![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 12, 8929-8935, March 24, 2000
,
,
¶
From the
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical
School, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts 02478 and the
§ Department of Genetics, Institute of Life Sciences, Hebrew
University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
APP-BP1 binds to the amyloid precursor protein
(APP) carboxyl-terminal domain. Recent work suggests that APP-BP1
participates in a novel ubiquitinylation-related pathway involving the
ubiquitin-like molecule NEDD8. We show here that, in vivo
in mammalian cells, APP-BP1 interacts with hUba3, its presumptive
partner in the NEDD8 activation pathway, and that the APP-BP1 binding
site for hUba3 is within amino acids 443-479. We also provide evidence
that the human APP-BP1 molecule can rescue the ts41 mutation in Chinese hamster cells. This mutation previously has been shown to lead to
successive S phases of the cell cycle without intervening
G2, M, and G1, suggesting that the product of
this gene negatively regulates entry into the S phase and positively
regulates entry into mitosis. We show that expression of APP-BP1 in
ts41 cells drives the cell cycle through the S-M checkpoint and that
this function requires both hUba3 and hUbc12. Overexpression of APP-BP1 in primary neurons causes apoptosis via the same pathway. A specific caspase-6 inhibitor blocks this apoptosis. These findings are discussed in the context of abnormalities in the cell cycle that have
been observed in Alzheimer's disease.
Amyloid precursor protein
(APP),1 a transmembrane
protein, is the source of the APP-BP1 was identified by its interaction with the intracellular
carboxyl terminus of APP (8), which places this molecule in a position
potentially to participate in the transduction of signals from the cell
surface into the cell. APP-BP1 initially was found to be homologous to
the Arabidopsis auxin resistance gene AXR1, and
to the amino terminus of the ubiquitin activating enzyme E1. It was
puzzling that APP-BP1 lacked a conserved cysteine required for E1
ubiquitin conjugation activity. However, it was subsequently discovered
that eukaryotes express a set of ubiquitin-like proteins that, like
ubiquitin, are ligated to other proteins (9, 10). In yeast, one of
these ubiquitin-like proteins, Rub1 (related to
ubiquitin 1), is activated by a heterodimer
consisting of the subunits Ula1 and Uba3. Ula1 and Uba3 are related to
the NH2- and COOH-terminal domains of the E1
ubiquitin-activating enzyme, respectively, and together fulfill E1-like
functions for Rub1 activation. Interestingly, Ula1 is homologous to
APP-BP1 (11). Rub1 conjugation also requires Ubc12, a protein related
to E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, which functions analogously to E2
enzymes in the Rub1-protein conjugate. The cellular reactions involving
these ubiquitin-like proteins appear to be quite similar to those
involving ubiquitin, but the ubiquitin-like proteins have novel
regulatory functions not necessarily linked to proteolysis (reviewed in
Ref. 12). For example, Rub1 has been shown to be conjugated to Cdc53, a
component of a large ubiquitin-protein ligase E3 complex (termed SCF,
comprising Cdc53, Skp1, and an F-box protein) that regulates
G1/S progression of the cell cycle (11, 13).
The homologous pathway in mammalian cells is the NEDD8 conjugation
pathway. NEDD8, the mammalian orthologue of Rub1, was first cloned as a
developmentally down-regulated gene expressed in neural precursor cells
(14). On the basis of in vitro studies, APP-BP1 has been
proposed to be a member of this pathway (15, 16). In vitro,
APP-BP1 together with hUba3 behaves like the ubiquitin activating
enzyme E1, with hUba3 containing the active cysteine and ATP binding
site. In vitro work has also shown that when NEDD8 is
activated, it forms a thiol ester bond with hUbc12, the human homologue
of Ubc12, which has a function parallel to that of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Cdc34. Subsequently, NEDD8 is covalently coupled to its target proteins.
The functions of the NEDD8 conjugation pathway are still unclear.
Recent studies have revealed that NEDD8 modifies cullins, a group of
proteins homologous to the yeast Cdc53. Interestingly, cullin-2 is
modified by NEDD8 and assembles with the von Hippel-Lindau tumor
suppressor protein pVHL into an SCF-like complex, linking the tumor
suppressor function of pVHL to NEDD8 conjugation with cullin-2 (17). A
recent study (18) showed that the NEDD8-modified form of cullin-1 is
localized to interphase and mitotic centrosomes as well as to the
cytoplasm, suggesting that NEDD8 modification of cullins may ensure
accurate chromosome segregation in mitosis. These observations hint
at a critical role in cell cycle control for the NEDD8 conjugation pathway.
In the present report, we show that APP-BP1 co-immunoprecipates with
hUba3 from mammalian cells, and we identify a 36-amino acid domain of
APP-BP1 to which hUba3 binds. We also show that wild type APP-BP1
rescues the cell cycle S-M checkpoint defect in ts41 hamster cells (19,
20), that this rescue is dependent on the binding of APP-BP1 to hUba3,
and that dominant negative mutants of hUba3 and Ubc12 prevent the
rescue. Finally, we show that overexpresion of APP-BP1 in primary
neurons causes apoptosis by a pathway that also involves hUba3 and hUbc12.
Antibodies and Immunoblots--
To generate anti-APP-BP1
antisera, the APP-BP1 cDNA was digested with NcoI and
the 371-base pair fragment encoding amino acids 90-213 was inserted
into the pGEX-KG vector (21) in frame. The resultant glutathione
S-transferase (GST) fusion protein was expressed in bacteria
and purified from inclusion bodies as described (22). Antibodies were
generated in rabbits, and the serum (BP339) was preadsorbed against a
GST column (Research Genetics, Inc.). The BP339 antibody was then
immunoaffininity-purified using full-length GST-APP-BP1 purified as a
soluble protein from bacteria (23). The anti-progesterone receptor
antibody (B-30, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used as a control for
BP339 specificity. The rabbit polyclonal antibody HA.11 (Alexis
Biochemicals) and the mouse monoclonal antibody 12CA5 (gift from Dr. E. Harlow) were used to detect hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged proteins, with
the monoclonal anti-myc antibody (ATCC) used as a negative control.
Plasmid Construction--
All plasmid constructs were made using
standard techniques and were sequenced to verify the correct reading
frame. Protein expression was confirmed by immunoblot analysis using
the appropriate antibodies. The sequences of the primers used for
constructions are written in 5' to 3' orientation. The cDNA clone
for hUBA3 was purchased from ATCC (expressed sequence tag 41156). The
hUba3 coding sequence was amplified from this plasmid by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the high fidelity Vent polymerase (New England Biolabs) using the forward primer
GGGGATCCAGATGGCTGTTGATGGTGGGTG and the reverse primer
GGGAATTCTTAAGAAGTAAAATGAAGTTTGAATA. The PCR product was digested with
BamHI/EcoRI for insertion into the expression
vectors pACT2, pcDNA3, and pHSVPrpUC. The hUba3 point mutation
C216S was made by trans-PCR (24). The hUbc12 cDNA was amplified
from human fetal brain RNA by reverse transcription-PCR using the
forward primer GGGAATGATCAAGCTGTTCTCGCTG and the reverse primer
GGTCGACTATTTCAGGCAGCGCTCAAAG. The PCR product was cloned into
pBluescript SKII+ (Stratagene), from which it was moved into the
expression vectors noted above. The hUbc12 point mutation C111S was
made with the QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene)
using the forward primer GGGCAACGTCAGCCTCAACATCC and the reverse primer
GGATGTTGAGGCTGACGTTGCCC. The QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis kit
was used to make the APP-BP1 point mutations T328A (forward primer
CCTGTTCGAGGCGCAATTCCTGATATG; reverse primer
CATATCAGGAATTGCGCCTCGAACAGG) and Y478F (forward primer GGTGAAAGATGATTTTGTCCACGAATTTT; reverse primer
AAAATTCGTGGACAAAATCATCTTTCACC). The 5' end of the APP-BP1 COOH-terminal
truncation mutant 443-554 (numbering refers to amino acids included in
the truncation fragment) was at the single EcoRV site in the
cDNA. The APP-BP1 deletion mutant (d401-479) was made by trans-PCR
using the forward primer GATGTCGATCCTTAGCTGAACACGAATTTTGCCGATATGG and
the reverse primer CCATATCGGCAAAATTCGTGTTCAGCTAAGGATCGACATC. The
APP-BP1 fragment 443-479 was amplified by PCR using the forward primer
GGGGATCCGGCCAGGAGTATCTAACTATCAAG and the reverse primer
GGGTCGACCTAGACATAATCATCTTTCACCATTAC. The APP-BP1 fragment
145-251, contained within two internal EcoRI sites in the
cDNA, was subcloned using EcoRI. Full-length APP-BP1, as
well as its mutants and subfragments, were cloned into the expression
vectors pBHA, pcDNA3, and pHSVPrpUC.
ts41 Cell Proliferation Assays--
ts41 cells were maintained
as described (20). Transfections of ts41 cells were done in triplicate
in six-well plates (3 × 105 cells/well) or 24-well
plates (4 × 104 cells/well) using the LipofectAMINE
Plus reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.). An equal amount of total DNA
was used for each transfection. Cells were shifted from 34 °C to the
nonpermissive temperature (40 °C) 7 h after transfection. To do
the cell counts at each time point, cells in a given well were
trypsinized and temporarily stored on ice while the total number of
cells in each well was counted using a hemocytometer.
Cell Cycle Analysis Using Fluorescence-activated Cell
Sorting--
Transfected ts41 cells were placed at 34 °C for 7 h and then maintained at 34 °C or shifted to 40 °C for another
37 h before being processed for flow cytometry analysis. Cells
were first trypsinized, washed three times with phosphate-buffered
saline in the presence of trypsin inhibitor (0.5 mg/ml), and
immediately labeled with propidium iodide for total DNA content. Data
were collected and analyzed using FACScalibur (Becton Dickinson).
Statistical Analyses--
Statistical analysis was done using
analysis of variance. When a significant p value
(p < 0.001) was found, Scheffe post hoc t
tests or t tests assuming unequal variance were performed to compare individual groups. All error bars represent standard deviation from the mean. Quantitation of one of at least two independent experiments is presented.
Coimmunoprecipitation--
ts41cells were transfected with the
designated plasmids when cells reached 70% confluence, using 2 µg of
DNA/well in six-well dishes. Forty-four hours after transfection, the
cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and scraped off the
dishes. Cell pellets were lysed in 0.1% Triton X-100 plus 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 µg/ml aprotinin, and
20 µg/ml leupeptin for 15 min on ice with mixing. After the lysate
was precleared with protein G for 30 min, the mouse anti-HA monoclonal
antibody 12CA5 or a control anti-myc antibody (9E10) was added and
incubated on ice for 1 h. Protein G was added for 1 h to
precipitate the immune complex. The pellet was washed three times with
the lysis buffer and the proteins were resolved on a 4-15% gel
(Bio-Rad). Immunoblot analysis was performed using the rabbit antibody
BP339. Blots were developed with ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and
exposed to Kodak film.
Yeast Two-hybrid Reporter Assay--
The assay utilized the L40
yeast strain, the bait vector pBHA5 that carries the TRP1 selection
marker (gifts from Dr. Morgan Sheng), and the activation domain vector
pACT2 (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.) carrying the
LEU selection marker. The yeast medium was prepared using reagents from
BIO101. Yeast transformations were performed using the alkali cation
yeast transformation kit (BIO101). The APP-BP1 Interacts with hUba3 in Vivo--
We initially used the
yeast two-hybrid reporter assay to test whether hUba3 interacts with
APP-BP1 in vivo (Fig. 1). The
hUba3 and APP-BP1 cDNAs were inserted into the pACT2 and pBHA
vectors, respectively, and transformed into yeast. The expression of
the transgenes was confirmed by immunoblot analysis with the anti-HA antibody 12CA5 (Fig. 1B). APP-BP1 interacted with hUba3 very
strongly (Fig. 1C), as indicated by activation of the
lacZ reporter gene; the color change occurred within 10 min
of addition of the 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl
We carried out coimmunoprecipitation studies in transiently transfected
cells to confirm the results obtained using the yeast two-hybrid
reporter assay. First, we performed a preadsorption assay to test the
specificity of the affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal antibody BP339,
made against APP-BP1 (Fig.
2A). Immunoprecipitations were
performed on HEK 293 cell lysates using BP339 (lane
1) or an irrelevant antibody against the progesterone
receptor (lane 2), after which immunoblots of the
precipitated proteins were probed with BP339. A band at the appropriate
molecular mass (~66 kDa) was detected only in the immunoprecipitate
from BP339 (lane 1). The immunoprecipitations
were repeated using BP339 that had been preadsorbed to GST
(lane 3) or to GST-APP-BP1 (lane
4) bound to glutathione-agarose beads; only in the former
case was a protein at ~66 kDa, presumably corresponding to APP-BP1,
detected by BP339 on the immunoblot.
We then used the BP339 antibody to confirm the expression of the
transgenes in the APP-BP1 vectors used for the coimmunoprecipitation experiments (Fig. 2B). hUba3 was co-expressed with wild type
APP-BP1 or with mutants of APP-BP1 in Chinese hamster cells, and cell lysates were incubated with anti-HA (12CA5; Fig. 2C) to
immunoprecipitate HA-tagged hUba3. Precipitations were also done with
an irrelevant antibody, anti-myc, as a negative control. The immune
complexes were then resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to a membrane, and blotted with the BP339 antibody. Wild
type APP-BP1 co-immunoprecipitated with hUba3 (BP1/Uba3), while the
deletion mutant d401-479 (d401-497/Uba3) did not. Two point mutants
of APP-BP1, Y478F (which alters a potential site of tyrosine
autophosphorylation) and T328A, were still able to interact with hUba3.
Thus, the yeast reporter assay and the coimmunoprecipitation experiments firmly established that APP-BP1 and hUba3 interact with
each other, presumably to form the heterodimeric NEDD8-activating enzyme.
Wild Type Human APP-BP1 Rescues the ts41 Cell Phenotype at the
Nonpermissive Temperature--
The ts41 mutation of Chinese hamster
cells disrupts their cell cycle. At nonpermissive temperature, the
cells go through successive S phases without progressing into
G2, M, and G1 (19, 20); and it has been
proposed (20) that the normal protein negatively regulates entry into
the S phase and positively regulates entry into mitosis. An informal
communication suggesting that the ts41 gene was the hamster orthologue
of the APP-BP1 gene (referred to in Ref. 25) led us to test whether
APP-BP1 could rescue the ts41 phenotype. We transfected ts41 cells with
a pcDNA3 vector expressing APP-BP1 at the permissive temperature;
7 h later, the cells were shifted to the nonpermissive
temperature. At selected time points thereafter, cells were trypsinized
and counted (Fig. 3A), to
measure cell proliferation. Cells transfected with a vector expressing
human wild type APP-BP1 maintained a rate of growth at 40 °C that
was similar (albeit slightly shifted to the right) to that of cells
transfected with the vector alone and maintained at 34 °C.
Vector-transfected cells that were shifted to the nonpermissive temperature showed a decreased mitotic index and eventually died, in
agreement with previous reports (19, 20).
We then performed the proliferation assay using ts41 cells transfected
with vectors expressing APP-BP1 mutants (Fig. 3B). The
d401-479 deletion mutant, which does not interact with hUba3, lost the
ability to rescue the ts41 phenotype at the nonpermissive temperature,
suggesting that interaction between APP-BP1 and hUba3 is necessary for
APP-BP1 function in this pathway. Interestingly, the T328A mutation
enhanced the ability of APP-BP1 to promote cell proliferation at the
nonpermissive temperature, while the Y478F mutation (which is located
within the putative hUba3 binding region of APP-BP1) impaired it.
We also transfected ts41 cells with a vector expressing the 37-amino
acid region of APP-BP1 (443-479) that is the putative binding site for
hUba3. The expression of this fragment, which was HA-tagged, was
confirmed by immunoblot analysis (data not shown, but see Fig.
5B). As shown in Fig. 3C, when APP-BP1 and the
443-479 fragment were co-expressed in ts41 cells, the function of
APP-BP1 was inhibited significantly at the nonpermissive temperature. These data suggest that the 443-479 fragment competes with APP-BP1 for
binding to hUba3, and that this competition interferes with the
function of APP-BP1.
As an independent measure of the ts41 phenotype, and of its rescue by
APP-BP1, we performed flow cytometry analysis (Fig. 3D).
Logarithmically growing ts41 cells transfected with vector alone or
with a recombinant vector expressing APP-BP1 were incubated for 37 h at either the permissive temperature, 34 °C, or the nonpermissive temperature, 40 °C, and then assayed for DNA content per cell by
flow cytometry. The results (Fig. 3D) show that at 40 °C,
ts41 cells transfected with vector alone show a greatly increased DNA content per cell. However, ts41 cells expressing APP-BP1 have a similar
profile of DNA content at 40 °C to vector-transfected cells grown at
the permissive temperature. In contrast, the d401-479 deletion mutant
was not able to rescue the ts41 phenotype at the nonpermissive temperature.
Mutations in the NEDD8 Conjugation Pathway Block APP-BP1 Function
in ts41 Cells--
We have established that APP-BP1 can rescue the
ts41 phenotype at 40 °C. Since APP-BP1 and hUba3 together act as a
heterodimeric activating enzyme in the NEDD8 conjugation pathway, we
hypothesized that the ts41 phenotype at 40 °C results from a defect
in this pathway. To test this hypothesis, we made dominant negative
mutants of hUba3 (Fig. 4) and the
NEDD8-conjugating enzyme hUbc12 by mutating the active cysteine to
serine in each protein (16, 26), and verified their expression in ts41
cells (Fig. 4C). We then tested their effects on APP-BP1
function in ts41 cells. The hUba3 active site mutant C216S inhibited
the ability of APP-BP1 to rescue the ts41 phenotype at the
nonpermissive temperature in cotransfected cells (Fig. 4, A
and B). The hUbc12 mutant C111S also showed a dominant
inhibitory effect on APP-BP1 function (Fig. 4D).
Overexpression of APP-BP1 in Neurons Causes Apoptosis--
The
experiments that we have described demonstrate that APP-BP1 has a
function in the cell cycle in Chinese hamster cells. However, APP-BP1
is also present in neurons in the brain, which are nonmitotic. We have
hypothesized (8) that a normal function of APP-BP1 in the brain might
go awry in Alzheimer's disease. As a first step toward illuminating
the function of APP-BP1 in neurons, we expressed APP-BP1 in rat primary
cortical neurons in culture using a replication-deficient herpes
simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1)-based vector (27). Expression of the
transgene was confirmed by immunoblot analysis (Fig.
5A). Because apoptosis, or
programmed cell death, is closely tied to the cell cycle, we quantified
the extent of apoptosis in neurons overexpressing APP-BP1. Embryonic
day 21 rat cortical cultures were infected with HSV-APP-BP1 at a
multiplicity of infection of 2 (which results in infection of
~70-80% of the cells; Ref. 27) or were mock-infected, and were
fixed 12 h after infection. The nuclear morphology of the cells
was assessed by staining with bisbenzimide, allowing fluorescent visualization of normal and condensed (apoptotic) chromatin.
Quantification of a representative experiment is shown in Fig.
5C. Cells infected with control HSV/lacZ showed only a few
apoptotic cells, and were not significantly different from
mock-infected cells (data not shown) in number of apoptotic nuclei.
However, cells infected with the HSV vector expressing APP-BP1 showed a
significant increase over control (~25% apoptotic nuclei) in the
number of apoptotic cells.
Primary neuronal cultures infected with HSV expressing
APP-BP1(d401-479), which lacks the hUba3 binding domain, did not
evince numbers of apoptotic nuclei greater than background. We also
infected neurons with a vector expressing the 37-amino acid region of
APP-BP1 (443-479) that is the putative binding site for hUba3. The
expression of this fragment, which was HA-tagged, was confirmed by
immunoblot analysis (Fig. 5B). As shown in Fig.
5C, when APP-BP1 and the 443-479 fragment were co-expressed
in primary cortical neurons, the apoptosis caused by APP-BP1 was
inhibited significantly. These data suggest that the 443-479 fragment
competes with APP-BP1 for binding to hUba3, and that this competition
disrupts the ability of APP-BP1 to cause neuronal apoptosis.
We then co-expressed HA-tagged dominant negative mutants of hUba3 and
hUbc12 with APP-BP1 in the cortical cultures (Fig.
6). Immunoblot analysis was performed to
confirm expression of the HSV transgenes (Fig. 6A). Both
dominant negative hUba3 (C216S) and hUbc12 (C111S) inhibited the
ability of APP-BP1 to cause apoptosis in the neurons (Fig. 6,
B and C), implicating the NEDD8 conjugation pathway in the apoptosis.
Activation of caspase-3 and caspase-6 occurs during neuronal
apoptosis (28, 29). Caspase-3 activation has been detected in
hippocampal neurons undergoing granulovacuolar degeneration in AD brain
(30), and APP is processed by caspases during apoptosis (31, 32). To
test whether these caspases are involved in APP-BP1-mediated apoptosis,
we treated HSV/APP-BP1-infected neurons with specific caspase
inhibitors. As shown in Fig. 6D, addition of the
cell-permeable broad spectrum caspase inhibitor Boc-D-FMK
or of the caspase-6 inhibitor VEID-CHO at the time of infection
decreased apoptosis to basal levels in cultures infected with
HSV/APP-BP1. Addition of the cell-permeable caspase-3 inhibitor
DEVD-CHO had no effect on apoptosis caused by overexpression of APP-BP1
(data not shown).
We have shown that APP-BP1 interacts with hUba3 in
vivo, using both the yeast two-hybrid report assay and also
coimmunoprecipitation, and we have identified a 36-amino acid domain of
APP-BP1 to which hUba3 binds. We have also demonstrated that wild type
APP-BP1 rescues the cell cycle S-M checkpoint defect in ts41 hamster
cells, that this rescue is dependent on the interaction of APP-BP1 and hUba3, and that the functional activity of both hUba3 and Ubc12 is
required for the rescue. Finally, we have shown that overexpresion of
APP-BP1 in primary neurons causes apoptosis by a pathway that also
involves hUba3 and hUbc12, and that is dependent on caspase-6 activity.
Our analysis has established the in vivo importance of
APP-BP1 in a pathway that leads to the activation of NEDD8. Our data suggest that, in Chinese hamster cells, this pathway is required for
cell cycle progression from S to M phases. APP-BP1 is an essential component of this pathway because without functional APP-BP1 the cell
cycle halts at the S phase. In vitro analysis of the NEDD8 conjugation pathway (33) has revealed that the ubiquitin-activating enzyme E2 adds NEDD8 to a polyubiquitin chain with an efficiency comparable to that of ubiquitin. This lack of an intrinsic block to
NEDD8 transfer to a polyubiquitin chain by E2 implies that the
selectivity of an E2 enzyme for ubiquitin versus NEDD8 is determined by upstream activating enzymes, rather than at the level of
the molecule (ubiquitin or NEDD8) being transferred. Either APP-BP1, or
hUba3, or both together, may be the determining factor for such
selectivity for NEDD8 conjugation. Although we have not proven directly
that the interaction of APP-BP1 and hUba3 leads to NEDD8 activation
in vivo, it is likely that it does. Our data indicate that
cellular functions mediated by APP-BP1 and hUba3 also require hUbc12.
hUbc12 is unable to form a thioester linkage with ubiquitin or with
another ubiquitin-like protein, SUMO-1, in vitro (15),
suggesting that it is specific for NEDD8. Moreover, while it has been
shown that ubiquitin is conjugated by multiple species of Ubc, the data
accumulated thus far indicate that NEDD8 uses uniquely the conjugating
enzyme hUbc12 (15).
We have identified the hUba3-binding site in APP-BP1 within amino acids
443-479. This region contains a DYV motif, identical to sequences that
are autophosphorylated in tyrosine kinases, with consequent
conformational changes leading to activation or inhibition of kinase
activity (34). The Y478F mutation significantly inhibited APP-BP1
function in the ts41 proliferation assay at the nonpermissive
temperature (although it did not affect APP-BP1 binding to hUba3),
suggesting that APP-BP1 may have an intrinsic kinase activity that is
important for its role in the cell cycle. The hUba3-binding domain of
APP-BP1 also includes a KXXS motif (amino acids 457-460),
which is a potential recognition site for cGMP-dependent
protein kinase or protein kinase C, and an EY motif (amino acids
467-468), another potential autophosphorylation site for tyrosine
kinases (34).
The involvement of APP-BP1 in the cell cycle is of interest in the
light of numerous findings of cell cycle abnormalities in AD. Evidence
has been accumulating (35, 36) that some neurons degenerate via
apoptotic pathways in Alzheimer's disease. Apoptosis and the cell
cycle are closely tied together, and the reexpression of cell cycle
markers has been linked with the occurrence of certain types of
neuronal cell death (37-39). The interpretation of these findings (40)
is that a neuron is committed to the permanent cessation of cell
division, so if for any reason it is forced to reenter the cell cycle
after this commitment, it dies. Notably, ectopic expression of cell
cycle proteins and their associated kinases in AD brain have been
reported (41-44). Most recently, Busser et al. (45) found
abnormal appearance of cell cycle markers in regions of AD brain where
cell death is extensive, and Chow et al. (46) found
increases in expression of genes encoding cell cycle proteins in single
neurons in late stage relative to early stage AD brain. The
phosphoepitope Ser-214 of the microtubule associated protein tau, that
appears in the neurofibrillary tangles in AD, is a prominent
phosphorylation site in metaphase but not in interphase of dividing
cells expressing tau (47), supporting the view that reactivation of the
cell cycle machinery may be involved in tau hyperphosphorylation in AD
brain. The possibility that phosphorylation-dependent events
occurring during the cell cycle affect the normal function of APP is
suggested by the finding that regulation of the phosphorylation and
metabolism of this protein occurs in a cell-cycle dependent manner (48,
49). We hypothesize that dysfunction of pathways mediated by APP may be
one cause of the reactivation of cell cycle proteins in AD brain. In
particular, APP interaction with APP-BP1 may be abnormal in the
disease. In this regard, it will be of interest to determine whether
NEDD8 activation is disrupted in AD.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-amyloid peptides that accumulate in
the brains of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The possibility
that APP may act as a signaling receptor was first proposed on the basis of its predicted amino acid sequence, which suggested that APP
was a type 1 intrinsic membrane protein consistent with the structure
of a cell surface receptor (1). It has now been demonstrated that a
percentage of APP is found on the cell surface in neurons (2-4).
Cell-surface APP possesses a neurite-promoting activity that is
distinct from that of the secreted APP (5), co-localizes with adhesion
plaque components (3, 6), and participates in synaptic vesicle
recycling (7), suggesting that a percentage of APP may function as a
cell surface receptor, transducing signals from the extracellular
matrix to the interior of the cell.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-galactosidase assay was
performed according to the CLONTECH yeast protocols handbook.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-D-galactopyranoside substrate. We then tested point and
deletion mutants of APP-BP1 for their ability to interact with hUba3.
The expression of each mutant was confirmed by immunoblot analysis (Fig. 1B). The APP-BP1 point mutation T328A was made because
RGT is a highly conserved sequence that is a potential recognition site
for serine/threonine kinases. This mutant showed a decreased interaction with hUba3, in that the color change occurred 30 min after
addition of the 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl
-D-galactopyranoside substrate. A carboxyl-terminal
fragment of APP-BP1, comprising amino acids 443-534, interacted with
hUba3, although the interaction was weaker. Deletion of amino acids
401-479 from APP-BP1 eliminated its ability to interact with hUba3,
suggesting that the hUba3-binding site in APP-BP1 lies within amino
acids 443-479. An NH2-terminal fragment of APP-BP1,
encompassing amino acids 1-209, did not show an interaction with
hUba3. This is consistent with our finding that the fragment consisting
of amino acids 145-251, to which APP binds (8), does not interact with
hUba3.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The yeast two-hybrid reporter assay reveals
that APP-BP1 interacts with hUba3. A, schematic diagram
showing the deletion and point mutants used for the assay.
B, immunoblots showing the expression in yeast of each of
the constructs used in the two-hybrid reporter assay. Exponentially
growing yeast were harvested and 1.0 OD600 unit of cells
was analyzed, using the anti-HA antibody 12CA5. The lane
labeled control is yeast cells only. Arrows
indicate the specific bands representing the transgene products.
C, table indicating the strength of each interaction, based
on length of time for the 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl
-D-galactopyranoside substrate to turn blue.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
APP-BP1 coimmunoprecipitates with hUba3
in vivo. A, demonstration of specificity of
anti-APP-BP1 antibody BP339. Immunoprecipitations were performed in HEK
293 cell lysates using BP339 (lane 1) or an
irrelevant antibody against the progesterone receptor (lane
2), after which immunoblots of the precipitated proteins
were probed with BP339. A band at the appropriate molecular weight was
detected only in the immunoprecipitate from BP339. The
immunoprecipitations were repeated using BP339 that had been
preadsorbed to GST (lane 3) or to GST-APP-BP1
(lane 4). Only in the former case was a protein
at the appropriate molecular weight detected by BP339. B,
immunoblots showing the expression of the transgenes in the pcDNA3
vectors used for the coimmunoprecipitation experiments. The
lane labeled pcDNA represents a vector-only
transfection. C, APP-BP1 or mutants of APP-BP1 were
co-expressed with hUba3 in Chinese hamster cells, and cell lysates were
incubated with anti-HA (12CA5) to immunoprecipitate HA-tagged hUba3.
Precipitations were also done with an irrelevant antibody, anti-myc, as
a negative control. The immune complexes were blotted with anti-APP-BP1
antibody BP339. Only the deletion mutant d401-479 did not
coimmunoprecipitate with hUba3.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
APP-BP1 rescues the ts41 cell phenotype at
the nonpermissive temperature. A, time course of
viability of ts41 cells transfected with the vector alone or with the
APP-BP1 construct at the nonpermissive temperature (40 °C). Data for
the vector-transfected cells at the permissive temperature (34 °C)
are shown for comparison. Counts were performed at 32, 64, and 80 h, except for the vector-transfected cells at the permissive
temperature, which were counted at 32 and 64 h only. Note that
cells transfected with a vector expressing human wild type APP-BP1
maintained a rate of growth at 40 °C that was similar (albeit
slightly shifted to the right) to that of cells transfected with the
vector alone and maintained at 34 °C. Vector-transfected cells that
were shifted to the nonpermissive temperature showed a decreased
mitotic index and eventually died. B, quantification of
viability of wild type and mutant APP-BP1-transfected ts41 cells grown
at 40 °C for 81 h. Note that the d401-479 deletion mutant of
APP-BP1, which does not interact with hUba3, is unable to rescue the
ts41 phenotype (Scheffe post hoc t tests; ## or ** indicates
p < 0.01, and * indicates p < 0.05;
#, comparison with pcDNA3; *, comparison with wild type APP-BP1).
C, quantification of viability of APP-BP1-transfected ts41
cells cotransfected with a vector expressing the hUba3-binding domain,
amino acids 443-479. The transfected cells were placed at 40 °C for
81 h. Co-expression of the hUba3-binding domain with APP-BP1
inhibits the ability of APP-BP1 to rescue the ts41 mutant phenotype
(p < 0.02, t test assuming unequal
variance). D, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis
of relative DNA content/cell of ts41 cells transfected with the vector
or with constructs expressing APP-BP1 or its deletion mutant d401-479.
At 40 °C, ts41 cells transfected with vector alone show a greatly
increased DNA content per cell. However, ts41 cells expressing APP-BP1
have a similar profile of DNA content at 40 °C to vector-transfected
cells grown at the permissive temperature. In contrast, the d401-479
deletion mutant was not able to rescue the ts41 phenotype at the
nonpermissive temperature.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Dominant negative mutants of hUba3 or hUbc12
inhibit the ability of APP-BP1 to rescue the ts41 mutant
phenotype. A, time course of viability of ts41 cells
transfected with APP-BP1 and wild type or dominant negative mutant
hUba3. Cells were counted at 64 and 81 h after the shift to the
nonpermissive temperature (40 °C). Co-expression of the dominant
negative mutant of hUba3 (C216S) inhibits the ability of APP-BP1 to
rescue the ts41 mutant phenotype. B, quantification of the
data shown in panel A at the 81-h time point. The
hUba3/APP-BP1 sample is significantly different from the C216S/APP-BP1
sample (p < 0.02; t test assuming unequal
variance). C, immunoblots demonstrating expression in ts41
cells of the constructs used in the experiments shown in this figure.
The lower band seen with 12CA5, that is present in the control
pcDNA lane, is nonspecific. D, quantification of the
viability of ts41 cells transfected with APP-BP1 and wild type or
dominant negative mutant hUbc12, at the 81-h time point. Co-expression
of the dominant negative mutant (C111S) of hUbc12 inhibits the ability
of APP-BP1 to rescue the ts41 mutant phenotype (hUbc12/APP-BP1
versus C111S/APP-BP1, p < 0.006 with
t test assuming unequal variance).

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Overexpression of APP-BP1 in neurons causes
apoptosis. A and B, immunoblots
demonstrating expression in neurons of the HSV vectors used in the
experiments shown in this figure. Note that the BP339 antibody detects
a relatively high level of endogenous expression of APP-BP1 in neurons,
in addition to the expression of the transgenes. The upper band
detected by the 12CA5 antibody in panel B is
nonspecific. HSV/lacZ, expressing E. coli
-galactosidase,
was used as the negative control in these experiments. C,
quantification of apoptotic nuclei in primary neuronal cultures
infected with HSV vectors expressing APP-BP1, the hUba3-binding
fragment of APP-BP1 (443-479), or the deletion mutant of APP-BP1,
d401-479. 12 h after infection, fixed cells were stained with
bisbenzimide to identify condensed nuclei. The d401-479 mutant of
APP-BP1, which does not bind to hUba3, does not cause significant
apoptosis (p < 0.01; Scheffe post hoc t
test). Co-expression of the hUba3-binding domain of APP-BP1 with
APP-BP1 inhibits the ability of APP-BP1 to cause neuronal apoptosis
(p < 0.01; Scheffe post hoc t test).

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Dominant negative mutants of hUba3 and
hUbc12, and a caspase-6 inhibitor, inhibit the ability of APP-BP1 to
cause neuronal apoptosis. A, immunoblots showing
expression in neurons of the hUba3 and hUbc12 HSV vectors used in the
experiments shown in this figure. B and C,
quantification of apoptotic nuclei in primary neuronal cultures
infected with HSV vectors expressing APP-BP1 and a dominant negative
mutant of hUba3 or hUbc12, respectively. Both dominant negative mutants
interfere with the ability of APP-BP1 to cause neuronal apoptosis
(HA-hUba3/APP-BP1 versus HA-C216S/APP-BP1, or
HA-hUbc12/APP-BP1 versus HA-C111S/APP-BP1, p < 0.01, Scheffe post hoc t test). D,
quantification of apoptotic nuclei in neurons infected with HSV vectors
in the presence of caspase inhibitors (50 µM). The broad
spectrum inhibitor Boc-D-FMK and the specific caspase-6
inhibitor VEID both inhibit the ability of APP-BP1 to cause neuronal
apoptosis. APP-BP1/Me2SO sample is significantly different
from all other samples (p < 0.01, Scheffe post
hoc t test).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. Nienwen Chow and Robert Coopersmith for helpful discussions and valuable assistance and Drs. David Thomas and Dina Gould for kind assistance with the FACScan analysis.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant AG12954 (to R. L. N).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: MRC 223, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill St., Belmont, MA 02478. Tel.: 617-855-2413; Fax: 617-855-3793; E-mail: neve@helix.mgh.harvard.edu.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: APP, amyloid precursor protein; AD, Alzheimer's disease; HSV, herpes simplex virus; HA, hemagglutinin; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; E1, ubiquitin-activating enzyme; E2, ubiquitin carrier protein; E3, ubiquitin-protein isopeptide ligase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Kang, J., Lemaire, H.-G., Unterbeck, A., Salbaum, J. M., Masters, C. L., Grzeschik, K.-H., Beyreuther, K., and Muller-Hill, B. (1987) Nature 325, 733-736[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Jung, S. S., Nalbantoglu, J., and Cashman, N. R. (1996) J. Neurosci. Res. 46, 336-348[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Storey, E., Spurck, T., Pickett-Heaps, J., Beyreuther, K., and Masters, C. L. (1996) Brain Res. 735, 59-66[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Perez, R. G.,
Zheng, H.,
Van der Ploeg, L. H. T.,
and Koo, E. H.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
9407-9414 |
| 5. | Qiu, W. Q., Ferreira, A., Miller, C., Koo, E. H., and Selkoe, D. J. (1995) J. Neurosci. 15, 2157-2167[Abstract] |
| 6. |
Yamazaki, T.,
Koo, E. H.,
and Selkoe, D. J.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
1004-1010 |
| 7. |
Marquez-Sterling, N. R.,
Lo, A. C. Y.,
Sisodia, S. S.,
and Koo, E. H.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
140-151 |
| 8. |
Chow, N.,
Korenberg, J. R.,
Chen, X.-N.,
and Neve, R. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
11339-11346 |
| 9. | Haas, A. L., and Siepmann, T. J. (1997) FASEB J. 11, 1257-1268[Abstract] |
| 10. | Johnson, P. R., and Hochstrasser, M. (1997) Trends Cell Biol. 7, 408-413[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Liakopoulos, D., Doenges, G., Matuschewski, K., and Jentsch, S. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2208-2214[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Hochstrasser, M.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
901-907 |
| 13. |
Lammer, D.,
Mathias, N.,
Laplaza, J. M.,
Jiang, W.,
Liu, Y.,
Callis, J.,
Goebl, M.,
and Estelle, M.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
914-926 |
| 14. | Kumar, S., Yoshida, Y., and Noda, M. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 195, 393-399[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Osaka, F.,
Kawasaki, H.,
Aida, N.,
Saeki, M.,
Chiba, T.,
Kawashima, S.,
Tanaka, K.,
and Kato, S.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2263-2268 |
| 16. |
Gong, L.,
and Yeh, E. T. H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
12036-12042 |
| 17. |
Liakopoulos, D.,
Busgen, T.,
Brychzy, A.,
Jentsch, S.,
and Pause, A.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
5510-5515 |
| 18. |
Freed, E.,
Lacey, K. R.,
Huie, P.,
Lyapina, S. A.,
Deshaies, R. J.,
Stearns, T.,
and Jackson, P. K.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
2242-2257 |
| 19. | Hirschberg, J., and Marcus, M. (1982) J. Cell. Phys. 113, 159-166[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Handeli, S., and Weintraub, H. (1992) Cell 71, 599-611[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Guan, K. L., and Dixon, J. E. (1991) Anal. Biochem. 192, 262-267[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Harlow, E., and Lane, D. (1988) Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 23. | Youssoufian, H. (1998) BioTechniques 24, 198-202[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Neve, R. L., and Neve, K. A. (1995) in Receptor Molecular Biology: Methods in Neurosciences (Sealfon, S. C., ed), Vol. 25 , pp. 163-174, Academic Press, San Diego |
| 25. | Cernac, A., Lincoln, C., Lammer, D., and Estelle, M. (1997) Development 124, 1583-1591[Abstract] |
| 26. |
Pagano, M.,
Tam, S. W.,
Theodoras, A. M.,
Beer-Romero, P.,
Del Sal,
Giannino,
Chau, V.,
Yew, P. R.,
Draetta, G. F.,
and Rolfe, M.
(1995)
Science
269,
682-685 |
| 27. |
Bursztajn, S.,
DeSouza, R.,
McPhie, D. L.,
Berman, S. A.,
Shioi, J.,
Robakis, N. K.,
and Neve, R. L.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
9790-9799 |
| 28. | Keane, R. W., Srinivasan, A., Foster, L. M., Testa, M. P., Örd, T., Nonner, D., Wang, H. G., Reed, J. C., Bredesen, D. E., and Kayalar, C. (1997) J. Neurosci. Res. 48, 168-180[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
LeBlanc, A.,
Liu, H.,
Goodyer, C.,
Bergeron, C.,
and Hammond, J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
23426-23436 |
| 30. | Selznick, L. A., Holtzman, D. M., Han, B. H., Gokden, M., Srinivasan, A. N., Johnson, E. M., Jr., and Roth, K. A. (1999) J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 58, 1020-1026[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Gervais, F. G., Xu, D., Robertson, G. S., Vaillancourt, J. P., Zhu, Y., Huang, J., LeBlanc, A., Smith, D., Rigby, M., Shearman, M. S., Clarke, E. E., Zheng, H., Van Der Ploeg, L. H., Ruffolo, S. C., Thornberry, N. A., Xanthoudakis, S., Zamboni, R. J., Roy, S., and Nicholson, D. W. (1999) Cell 97, 395-406[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Pellegrini, L.,
Passer, B. J.,
Tabaton, M.,
Ganjei, J. K.,
and D'Adamio, L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
21011-21016 |
| 33. |
Whitby, F. G.,
Xia, G.,
Pickart, C. M.,
and Hill, C. P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
34983-34991 |
| 34. | Pearson, R. B., and Kemp, B. E. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 200, 62-81[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Guo, W., Fu, W., Xie, J., Luo, H., Sells, S. F., Geddes, J. W., Bondada, V., Rangnekar, V. M., and Mattson, M. P. (1998) Nature 4, 957-962 |
| 36. | Cotman, C. W., and Anderson, A. J. (1995) Mol. Neurobiol. 10, 19-45[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. | Freeman, R., Estus, S., and Johnson, E. (1994) Neuron 12, 343-355[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. | Heintz, N. (1993) Trends Biochem Sci. 18, 157-159[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Herrup, K., and Busser, J. C. (1995) Development 121, 2385-2395[Abstract] |
| 40. | Lee, E.-H., Chang, C.-Y., Hu, N., Wang, Y.-C. J., Lai, C.-C.., Herrup, K., Lee, W.-H., and Bradley, A. (1992) Nature 359, 288-294[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. | Liu, W.-K., Williams, R., Hall, F., Dickson, D., and Yen, S.-H. (1995) Am. J. Pathol. 146, 228-238[Abstract] |
| 42. | Pope, W., Lambert, M., Leypole, B., Seupaul, R., Sletten, L., Krafft, G., and Klein, W. ( 1994) Exp. Neurol. 126, 185-194[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. |
Vincent, I.,
Rosado, M.,
and Davies, P.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
132,
413-425 |
| 44. |
Vincent, I.,
Jicha, G.,
Rosado, M.,
and Dickson, D.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
3588-3598 |
| 45. |
Busser, J.,
Geldmacher, D. S.,
and Herrup, K.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
2801-2807 |
| 46. |
Chow, N.,
Cox, C.,
Callahan, L. M.,
Weimer, J. M.,
Guo, L.,
and Coleman, P. D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9620-9625 |
| 47. |
Illenberger, S.,
Zheng-Fischhofer, Q.,
Preuss, U.,
Stamer, K.,
Baumann, K.,
Trinczek, B.,
Biernat, J.,
Godemann, R.,
Mandelkow, E. M.,
and Mandelkow, E.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
1495-1512 |
| 48. | Suzuki, T., Oishi, M., Marshak, D. R., Czernik, J., Nairn, A. C., and Greengard, P. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 1114-1222[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 49. | Oishi, M., Nairn, A. C., Czernik, A. J., Lim, G. S., Isohara, T., Gandy, S. E., Greengard, P., and Suzuki, T. (1997) Mol. Med 3, 111-123[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Laifenfeld, L. J. Patzek, D. L. McPhie, Y. Chen, Y. Levites, A. M. Cataldo, and R. L. Neve Rab5 Mediates an Amyloid Precursor Protein Signaling Pathway That Leads to Apoptosis J. Neurosci., July 4, 2007; 27(27): 7141 - 7153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nizzari, V. Venezia, E. Repetto, V. Caorsi, R. Magrassi, M. C. Gagliani, P. Carlo, T. Florio, G. Schettini, C. Tacchetti, et al. Amyloid Precursor Protein and Presenilin1 Interact with the Adaptor GRB2 and Modulate ERK 1,2 Signaling J. Biol. Chem., May 4, 2007; 282(18): 13833 - 13844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. H. J. Park, J. L. Hallows, P. Chakrabarty, P. Davies, and I. Vincent Conditional Neuronal Simian Virus 40 T Antigen Expression Induces Alzheimer-Like Tau and Amyloid Pathology in Mice J. Neurosci., March 14, 2007; 27(11): 2969 - 2978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bibeau-Poirier, S.-P. Gravel, J.-F. Clement, S. Rolland, G. Rodier, P. Coulombe, J. Hiscott, N. Grandvaux, S. Meloche, and M. J. Servant Involvement of the I{kappa}B Kinase (IKK)-Related Kinases Tank-Binding Kinase 1/IKKi and Cullin-Based Ubiquitin Ligases in IFN Regulatory Factor-3 Degradation J. Immunol., October 15, 2006; 177(8): 5059 - 5067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Oved, Y. Mosesson, Y. Zwang, E. Santonico, K. Shtiegman, M. D. Marmor, B. S. Kochupurakkal, M. Katz, S. Lavi, G. Cesareni, et al. Conjugation to Nedd8 Instigates Ubiquitylation and Down-regulation of Activated Receptor Tyrosine Kinases J. Biol. Chem., August 4, 2006; 281(31): 21640 - 21651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Baron, C. G. Tepper, S. Y. Liu, R. R. Davis, N. J. Wang, N. C. Schanen, and J. P. Gregg Genomic and functional profiling of duplicated chromosome 15 cell lines reveal regulatory alterations in UBE3A-associated ubiquitin-proteasome pathway processes Hum. Mol. Genet., March 15, 2006; 15(6): 853 - 869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-C. Lo and M. Hannink CAND1-Mediated Substrate Adaptor Recycling Is Required for Efficient Repression of Nrf2 by Keap1 Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2006; 26(4): 1235 - 1244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Herrup, R. Neve, S. L. Ackerman, and A. Copani Divide and Die: Cell Cycle Events as Triggers of Nerve Cell Death J. Neurosci., October 20, 2004; 24(42): 9232 - 9239. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nishitani, Z. Lygerou, and T. Nishimoto Proteolysis of DNA Replication Licensing Factor Cdt1 in S-phase Is Performed Independently of Geminin through Its N-terminal Region J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 2004; 279(29): 30807 - 30816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Li, S. Gazdoiu, Z.-Q. Pan, and S. Y. Fuchs Stability of Homologue of Slimb F-box Protein Is Reg |