JBC PeproTech; Our Business is Cytokines!

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gong, K.
Right arrow Articles by Herzberg, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gong, K.
Right arrow Articles by Herzberg, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 12, 8970-8974, March 24, 2000

ACCELERATED PUBLICATION
Salivary Film Expresses a Complex, Macromolecular Binding Site for Streptococcus sanguis*

Ke Gong, Lynn Mailloux, and Mark C. HerzbergDagger

From the Department of Preventive Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Teeth in the oral cavity are coated with a salivary film or pellicle, which lacks apparent intermolecular organization. This heterogeneous film facilitates binding of early commensal colonizing bacteria, including Streptococcus sanguis. To test the hypothesis that sufficient intermolecular organization exists in salivary films to form binding sites for S. sanguis, an in vitro model of saliva-coated teeth was probed with murine anti-idiotypical monoclonal antibodies (mAb2, anti-ids). The anti-ids were harvested from hybridomas that were developed in response to first generation murine hybridomas that produced anti-S. sanguis adhesin monoclonal antibodies (mAb1). The anti-ids (i) reacted with experimental salivary films and inhibited S. sanguis adhesion in a dose-dependent fashion. In Western blots, the anti-ids (ii) recognized a high molecular weight salivary antigen and (iii) secretory IgA (sIgA) light chain and alpha -amylase. After isolation by gel filtration from whole saliva or mixed secretory IgA and alpha -amylase, the high molecular weight component, containing amylase activity and sIgA, bound to hydroxyapatite to promote adhesion of S. sanguis. Therefore, a complex enriched in secretory immunoglobulin A and alpha -amylase forms a S. sanguis-binding site.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Naturally occurring biofilms generally develop when a conditioning film adsorbs to a surface, promoting the selective adhesion of microbes from the surrounding environment (1). Yet the mechanisms by which heterogeneous conditioning films promote selective microbial adhesion are ill defined (2). As the biofilm matures, certain of the attached microbes will colonize the surface. Depending in part on the specificity for adhesion to the conditioning film, microbial biofilms may be beneficial (e.g. the gastrointestinal commensal flora) or harmful (e.g. infected catheters and medical implants and dental plaque).

Dental plaque is an example of a complex microbial biofilm; Streptococcus sanguis are among the first or "pioneer" bacteria to adhere selectively and colonize the saliva-coated teeth (3). Representing a small proportion (~1%) of more than 300 species of bacteria in the oral cavity (4), S. sanguis first adheres to a conditioning film of heterogeneous salivary proteins and glycoproteins. The film includes alpha -amylase and secretory IgA (sIgA)1 (5, 6) and forms largely by adsorption from the surrounding salivary milieu in which it remains. Like most naturally occurring conditioning films, the salivary film on enamel (~98% hydroxyapatite, HA) has ill defined macromolecular organization and surface boundaries. Salivary macromolecules also change conformation upon adsorption to HA in in vitro models; interactions of the bacteria with salivary components in solution are not representative of adhesion to a salivary film (7-9). Actinomyces viscosus and certain other prominent dental plaque bacteria adhere to conformationally sensitive domains on purified salivary proline-rich proteins adsorbed to HA but not in solution (9), and Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa bind to a heterotypic complex of low molecular weight mucin and sIgA in solution but not in solid phase (10). In solution, sIgA may also complex with other salivary macromolecules to form binding receptors of different specificity for bacterial adhesins (11). When adsorbed on hydroxyapatite (saliva-coated hydroxyapatite (sHA)), kinetic data (7, 8, 12, 13) suggest that the salivary film promotes adhesion of S. sanguis by specific (14-16) and nonspecific (17) mechanisms. Because the salivary film lacks apparent intermolecular organization, we tested the hypothesis that conditioning film macromolecules form structures that serve as binding sites for S. sanguis.

To overcome the paucity of structural information about the salivary film, we developed a strategy to predict the molecular determinants that serve as binding sites for streptococci on sHA. First, murine anti-S. sanguis 133-79 adhesin monoclonal antibodies (mAb1s) were developed and characterized in a sHA adhesion assay (18, 19). S. sanguis 133-79 was selected to model adhesion, because it binds 3.6 times more effectively to sHA than HA. Anti-S. sanguis 133-79 mAb1.1 and mAb1.2 Fab fragments (or intact mAbs) each showed dose-dependent partial inhibition of adhesion. Together, these two mAbs inhibited adhesion of S. sanguis 133-79 to sHA by a maximum of 63%. Although additional adhesins are expressed, the mAb1s recognized 87- and 150-kDa antigens (19). The 150-kDa adhesin contained two different adhesive epitopes, each reacting with either mAb1.1 or -1.2.

To immunochemically simulate the specificity of the two respective adhesin epitopes, murine monoclonal anti-idiotype antibodies (mAb2s; anti-ids) were developed using the mAb1.1 and mAb1.2 as antigens (18). The antigen-combining site of anti-idiotype antibodies can express a surface substructure or internal image that is a molecular mimic of the original immunizing antigen (20, 21). Reacting with the probes, a complex containing secretory immunoglobulin A and alpha -amylase was identified as a S. sanguis-binding site.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

S. sanguis Strain and S. sanguis-sHA Adhesion Assay-- Strain 133-79 was stored and grown as described previously (19, 24). The in vitro adherence assay is a modification of that used by Liljemark et al. (22) and Tellefson and Germaine (23). Briefly, the assay was performed in 1.5-ml polypropylene microcentrifuge tubes with 1 mM KH2PO4, K2HPO4 buffer, pH 6.8, with 50 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM MgCl2 (Gibbons' buffer) at 20 °C (ambient temperature). Human whole saliva was collected from five adult volunteer donors (procedure reviewed and approved by the Committee on the Use of Human Subjects in Research of the University of Minnesota) into a chilled tube on ice, pooled, and clarified by centrifugation (1,972 × g for 20 min at 4 °C). Whole salivary supernatant (1 ml) was incubated for 60 min to coat 10 mg of HA that had been equilibrated for 60 min with Gibbons' buffer. The sHA was then washed 2 times and transferred into a new tube. Cells of S. sanguis 133-79 were labeled with 10 µCi/ml [methyl-3H]thymidine to a specific activity of 1.6 × 103 ± 280 bacteria/count/min (mean of five experiments, three determinations of each, ±S.E.). Radiolabeled cells (109) were added and mixed with sHA for 60 min by continuous inversion on a roto-torque at ambient temperature. Unattached bacteria were aspirated, and cells loosely associated with the sHA were removed by washing. The radioactivity associated with sHA was monitored by liquid scintillation counting.

Preparation of mAbs-- mAbs against S. sanguis adhesins (mAb1.1 and mAb1.2) were prepared as previously reported (18, 19). In brief, BALB/c mice were immunized with live cells of the adhesion positive strain 133-79. Hybridomas were screened for reaction with an adhesion positive strain (133-79) but not with an adhesion negative strain (ATCC 10556) and for the ability to react with strain 133-79 to inhibit adhesion to sHA. These selected mAb1 hybridomas were then injected intraperitoneally into BALB/c mice to produce anti-idiotypic mAb2s. The enlarged spleens were harvested, and mAb2 hybridomas were prepared and screened in indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for reaction with rabbit polyclonal IgG antibodies against the 87- and 150-kDa adhesin antigens. mAb2s from positive clones were then incubated with sHA and tested for inhibition of adhesion of strain 133-79.

Identification of Salivary Film Antigens That Bind S. sanguis-- To learn if mAb2s bind to specific adhesin receptors on salivary film, sHA was blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin, pretreated with increasing amounts of mAb2s, and then incubated for 1 h with S. sanguis in the adhesion assay (19, 24). To identify components in the salivary film that may have formed immunochemically unique adhesion receptors for cells of S. sanguis, freshly collected and clarified whole saliva was separated by SDS-PAGE in reduced or nonreduced conditions and reacted with the mAb2s in Western immunoblots (25, 26). In each experiment, nonspecific mouse IgG was used as the negative control. Based on their estimated sizes, isozymes of alpha -amylase (reduced 58-kDa and unreduced 56- and 58-kDa bands) and immunoglobulin light chain (reduced 25-kDa antigen) were suggested to react with mAb2s. To verify this, the whole saliva was then allowed to react with rabbit anti-alpha -amylase, anti-IgA (alpha -chain), or anti-kappa light chain in identical conditions or nonspecific rabbit IgG as a negative control. Purified sIgA (colostrum) and purified alpha -amylase were also allowed to react with mAb2s.

To test the possibility that sIgA (or its light chain) and alpha -amylase form a complex with unusual electrophoretic mobility, human colostral sIgA and alpha -amylase were mixed (1:16 ratio) for 30 min at 37 °C. The mixture was then separated by SDS-PAGE and allowed to react with mAb2s.

Collection and Fractionation of Saliva-- Whole human saliva from at least five healthy donors was collected into chilled tubes for each experiment. EDTA was added to a final concentration of 0.01%. Pooled human whole saliva was clarified by centrifugation and then dialyzed overnight at 4 °C against 0.1 M NH4HCO3 buffer, pH 8.0, with 0.05% sodium azide.

The mAb2-reactive component was isolated by gel filtration chromatography using a protocol modified from Kishimoto et al. (27). In brief, the freshly dialyzed saliva was applied to a column (2.5 × 70 cm) of Superose 6 prep grade (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), which was eluted at 12 ml/h. Pooled fractions were analyzed with SDS-PAGE, diluted serially with 0.1 M NH4HCO3 buffer, and used to coat HA beads, and then adhesion of S. sanguis 133-79 was determined. Adhesion was compared with experimental films formed from serially diluted whole saliva (positive control) or 0.1 M NH4HCO3 buffer (negative control).

mAb2.2 affinity column was also used to separate S. sanguis binding salivary component(s) from whole saliva. mAb2 was immobilized onto Affi-Gel Hz gel (Bio-Rad) by following the manufacturer's instructions. By sampling at each step, the coupling efficiency was determined to be about 1.4 mg of IgG1/ml of Affi-Gel. The column was washed with PBS, and clarified whole saliva was loaded and allowed to incubate for 2 h. After incubation, the column was washed with 2 bed volumes of 0.5 M NaCl and 2 bed volumes of PBS and then eluted with 2 N NaSCN. Eluted salivary proteins were analyzed by 6% SDS-PAGE.

Testing for Amylase Activity in Salivary Fractions-- Amylase activity was determined by hydrolysis of 1% starch in 1% agarose in PBS (pH 7) prepared in plastic plates. Wells were punched in the starch-agarose (35 µl), filled with an aliquot from each pooled salivary fraction, and incubated for 24 h at room temperature. Amylase activity (expressed in units) was determined from a standard curve (comparing the units of pure amylase with the diameter of the starch digestion zone).

Simulation of the Salivary Film Binding Site with alpha -Amylase-sIgA-- Human colostral sIgA (1.25 mg) and salivary alpha -amylase (10 mg) were mixed to model the 1:8 ratio of these proteins approximated in saliva (28) and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The 300-kDa antigen (P2) was isolated by gel filtration as described above. To learn if it functions on sHA as a preferred binding site for S. sanguis 133-79, 20 µg of the recovered 300-kDa antigen (P2) was used to coat 10 mg/ml HA. S. sanguis 133-79 adhesion was compared when HA films were formed from the 300-kDa antigen, 0.1 M NH4HCO3 buffer (negative control), 20 µg each of sIgA, amylase, or P3; sIgA/amylase mixture containing 10 or 20 µg of each; or 20 µg of total protein mixed at a ratio of 1:8 (2.22 µg of sIgA and 17.78 µg of alpha -amylase) or 1:16. To learn if mAb2s would inhibit adhesion of S. sanguis 133-79, 10 pmol each of mAb2.1 and -2.2 were mixed and then incubated with the experimental films for 1 h, and then cells of S. sanguis were added. Unrelated murine IgG1 mAbs and products of the IgG1 myeloma clones MOPC-21 and S1-68.1 (unknown specificities) were used as negative controls for the IgG1 mAb2s.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The anti-idiotype antibody mAb2.1 (66.7 pmol) bound to sHA, inhibited adhesion of S. sanguis by a maximum of 69%, and showed an ID50 (inhibitory dose, 50%) of 5 pmol/ml (Fig. 1). When its idiotype counterpart mAb1.1 was preincubated with sHA in the same conditions, adhesion of strain 133-79 was not significantly affected. In identical conditions, mAb2.2 inhibited adhesion maximally by 35%. Together, these two anti-idiotype antibodies (20 pmol each) inhibited adhesion by 86%.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Inhibition of adhesion of S. sanguis to sHA by mAb2s. The sHA was blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin, washed once, incubated with increasing amounts of mAb2s or mAb1.1 (control) for 1 h, and washed. S. sanguis cells were radiolabeled with [3H]thymidine and added at 109 cells/ml/10 mg of HA, and adhesion was allowed to proceed for 1 h. After washing, radioactivity associated with sHA was counted (n = 3).

As mimics of the adhesin macromolecules, mAb2.1 and mAb2.2 recognized salivary antigens of 300 and 365 kDa (estimated Mr; unreduced) in Western immunoblot (Fig. 2A, lanes 2 and 3, respectively). Nonspecific mouse IgG reacted only with macromolecules of 180 and 120 kDa as indicated by the asterisks. mAb2.2 also reacted weakly with bands of 56 and 58 kDa (lane 3). After reduction of disulfide bonds with 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME +), the mAb2s reacted only with salivary antigens of 25 and 58 kDa, and nonspecific mouse IgG did not appear to react. The unreduced 300-kDa band also reacted with rabbit anti-immunoglobulin kappa -chain (Fig. 2B, lane 1; 25 kDa after reduction), anti-immunoglobulin alpha -chain (lane 2; 60 kDa after reduction), and anti-alpha -amylase (lane 3; 58 kDa after reduction). Nonspecific rabbit IgG reacted only with an unreduced macromolecule of 180 kDa (asterisk). The specific salivary antigens probably complex with other proteins because unreduced antigens of other sizes were also detected. mAb2.2 also reacted with purified sIgA (colostrum) and light chain before and after reduction, respectively, and (in identical conditions) purified alpha -amylase (Fig. 2C). mAb2.1 reacted more weakly with amylase and light chain (data not shown). To test the possibility that the 300-kDa salivary macromolecule may be a complex with unusual electrophoretic mobility, human colostral sIgA and alpha -amylase were mixed (1:16 ratio) for 30 min at 37 °C. Both mAb2s reacted with the mixture of alpha -amylase and sIgA, including a fraction that migrated at 300 kDa, and reduced light chain and alpha -amylase (Fig. 2D). Nonspecific mouse IgG reacted weakly only with an unreduced macromolecule of 180 kDa (asterisk).


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Identification of salivary proteins that react with mAb2s by Western immunoblot. Whole freshly collected and clarified pooled human saliva was electrophoresed in the presence and absence of 2.5% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) on 5-10% gradient SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred to nitrocellulose for Western blotting. A, the reduced (2-ME +) and non-reduced salivary antigens (750 µg/ml, loaded 20 µl/well) were stained with AuroDye (lane 1) or reacted with 1:2 diluted culture supernatant containing mAb2.1 (lane 2) and mAb2.2 (lane 3). B, salivary antigens (reduced and unreduced) were reacted with 1:2000 diluted monospecific rabbit sera against kappa -chain (lane 1), alpha -chain of sIgA (lane 2), or alpha -amylase (lane 3). C, purified sIgA from colostrum (200 µg/ml, loaded 2 µl/well) and alpha -amylase (600 µg/ml, loaded 10 µl/well) were analyzed separately by SDS-PAGE with and without 2-mercaptoethanol, electrotransferred, and reacted with mAb2.2. D, colostral sIgA (200 µg/ml, loaded 3.75 µl/well) and alpha -amylase (600 µg/ml, loaded 20 µl/well) were incubated together for 30 min at 37 °C and analyzed by Western blotting (as in C). Shown are the AuroDye stained transfers (lane 1), and reactions with mAb2.1 (lane 2) and mAb2.2 (lane 3).

The mAb2-reactive component was then isolated from whole human saliva by gel filtration chromatography. A representative chromatogram from fractionation of a 12-ml sample of whole saliva shows the four peaks that typically resolved (Fig. 3). Serial dilutions of whole saliva or the four pooled fractions (P1-P4) were used to coat HA beads. A film formed by a 40% dilution of whole saliva, or pooled fraction 2 (P2) or 4 (P4), supported adhesion of S. sanguis maximally. All dilutions of P1 and P3 weakly promoted adhesion of S. sanguis (data not shown). Among 40% dilutions of the pooled fractions, P2 formed films with the greatest adhesion promotion activity per µg of soluble protein (Fig. 3). Fresh saliva and fractions were necessary for adhesion. After denaturation or dialysis and lyophilization, salivary fractions P1-P4 promoted similar low levels of adhesion, and no dilution effect was seen (data not shown).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Adhesion-promoting fractions isolated from whole saliva. In this representative chromatogram, Superose 6 prep grade gel filtration fractionation of a 12-ml sample of whole saliva shows the four peaks that typically resolved. Protein concentration (µg/ml) of the fractions was determined by the bicinchoninic acid assay. Tubes 36-41 were pooled as P1, tubes 59-63 pooled as P2, 74-78 as P3, and 87-91 as P4. A 600-µl sample of each pooled fraction was mixed with 400 µl of the NH4HCO3 buffer (40% dilution) and then tested for promotion of S. sanguis adhesion.

When visualized by SDS-PAGE, fraction P1 contained trace amounts of the putative 300-kDa component, P2 contained the 300-kDa component, and P3 contained trace amounts of a 56-kDa protein, whereas P4 was enriched in a 56-kDa protein (Fig. 4). The 300-kDa component in P2 reacted in Western blots with mAb2s, rabbit anti-human kappa -chain, Ig alpha -chain, and alpha -amylase, whereas the 56-kDa antigen reacted with anti-alpha -amylase (data not shown). Most amylase activity (2.75 units) eluted in P4 as expected (Table I). By comparison, P2 contained 0.045 unit of amylase activity, whereas P1 contained 0.001 unit and P3 contained no detectable activity.


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analysis of human whole saliva and pooled fractions from Superose 6 prep grade gel filtration. Indicated samples (30 µg/lane) were resolved by 6% SDS-PAGE and stained with metachromatic silver.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Amylase activity associated with fractions from whole saliva
Amylase activity was determined from a standard curve comparing the units of alpha -amylase with the diameter of the zone of starch digestion. Peak tubes (highest protein content) were sampled from each fraction as in Fig. 3.

After colostral sIgA and alpha -amylase were mixed and chromatographed, four fractions resolved (chromatogram not shown), each with an RF similar to eluted whole saliva. As noted in the fraction of whole saliva, P2 isolated from the mixture of sIgA and alpha -amylase also contained amylase activity (Table II). Separate experimental HA films formed from this P1 (sIgA) and P4 (amylase) promoted adhesion by only 7 and 5%, respectively. In contrast, when coated on HA, P2 from the sIgA and amylase mixture promoted S. sanguis adhesion by about 16%. Furthermore, adhesion of strain 133-79 to the HA film formed from P2 isolated from the mixture was inhibited in a dose-response manner by mAb2.1 (Fig. 5). The mAb2s also showed dose-dependent inhibition of binding of strain 133-79 to P2 from saliva (data not shown). In contrast, adhesion of S. sanguis to buffer-treated or P3-coated HA was unaffected by mAb2.1 (Table II).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Amylase activity and S. sanguis adhesion promotion activity associated with chromatographed fractions from a mixture of sIgA and alpha -amylase


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Dose-response inhibition of S. sanguis adhesion to experimental films formed from sIgA, alpha -amylase, or fraction P2 isolated from gel filtration chromatography of a 1:8 mixture. Experimental films on HA were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin, incubated for 1 h with increasing amounts of mAb2.1, and washed. Radiolabeled S. sanguis cells were then added and assayed for adhesion (data shown are the means ± S.E., n = 3).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The data from this study and previous reports suggest strongly that specific interactions between cells of S. sanguis and sHA predominate in this model of adhesion (24). As mimics of S. sanguis adhesins, the mAb2s react with specific epitope(s) to define an apparent binding receptor for S. sanguis formed on experimental salivary films. The mAb2.1 and mAb2.2 express similar but non-identical specificities (18). They appear to act independently to bind different epitopes on sHA for S. sanguis adhesins, inhibit adhesion additively, and differ in their ID50 values for adhesion of cells of S. sanguis, but they showed similar patterns of reaction on Western blots with salivary macromolecules.

Identified by mAb2s, the sHA binding receptor for S. sanguis is a heterotypic complex of the light chain of sIgA and alpha -amylase. Macroenzyme complexes of alpha -amylase and IgA or IgG form in serum and can be elevated in autoimmune and liver diseases (29). We now show that complexes of sIgA-light chain and amylase form in saliva or are reconstituted from purified individual proteins. Whether formed by purified macromolecules or isolated from saliva, the sIgA-amylase complexes are surrogates for a binding receptor expressed in the film formed on HA by whole saliva. The mAb2s do not bind the complex in saliva. A mAb2.2 affinity column failed to bind antigens from whole saliva (data not shown). The conformational dependence of the binding complex may enable S. sanguis to bind to salivary films formed on high energy surfaces such as HA or nitrocellulose but avoid anti-adhesion interactions with these proteins in the salivary fluid.

It is now clear that there is ample immunochemically defined structure in experimentally produced salivary films to serve as specific adhesion receptors. In the heterogeneous salivary biofilm, it would also be expected that interactions be promoted between multiple salivary proteins. The complexes that form may provide binding receptors of different specificities for the pioneer streptococci and other early colonizers. The structural characteristics of these binding receptors need to be further studied. To define space-fitting models of the receptors, we speculate that predictions could be made from structural characterization of the idiotopes of the mAb1s and new mAb3s, now in development. If proteinaceous complexes serve as a general adhesion mechanism for adhesion to conditioning films, binding sites and biofilm development may be modified for prevention and therapy by the development of novel antibiotic and biomimetic compounds.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Dr. Zhong-Shi Ji for helpful discussions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DE08590 and DE05501.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 612-625-8404; Fax: 612-626-2651; E-mail: mcherzb@tc.umn.edu.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: sIgA, secretory IgA; HA, hydroxyapatite; sHA, saliva-coated hydroxyapatite; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Dalton, H. M., and March, P. E. (1998) Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 9, 252-255[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Palmer, R. J., Jr., and White, D. C. (1997) Trends Microbiol. 5, 435-440[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Gibbons, R. J., and van Houte, J. (1980) in Bacterial Adherence. Receptors and Recognition, Series B (Beachey, E. H., ed), Vol. 6 , pp. 62-104, Chapman and Hall, London
4. Gibbons, R. J. (1996) J. Dent. Res. 75, 866-870[Free Full Text]
5. Al-Hashimi, I., and Levine, M. J. (1989) Arch. Oral Biol. 34, 289-295[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Lamkin, M. S., Arancillo, A. A., and Oppenheim, F. G. (1996) J. Dent. Res. 75, 803-808[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Gibbons, R. J. (1989) J. Dent. Res. 68, 750-760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Gibbons, R. J., Hay, D. I., Childs, W. C., III, and Davis, G. (1990) Arch. Oral Biol. 35 (suppl.), 107S-114S
9. Iontcheva, I., Oppenheim, F. G., and Troxler, R. F. (1997) J. Dent. Res. 76, 734-743[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Biesbrock, A. R., Reddy, M. S., and Levine, M. J. (1991) Infect. Immun. 59, 3492-3497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Oho, T., Yu, H., Yamashita, Y., and Koga, T. (1998) Infect. Immun. 66, 115-121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Nesbitt, W. E., Doyle, R. J., Taylor, K. G., Staat, R. H., and Arnold, R. R. (1982) Infect. Immun. 35, 157-165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Gibbons, R. J., Moreno, E. C., and Etherden, I. (1983) Infect. Immun. 39, 280-289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Liljemark, W. F., and Bloomquist, C. (1996) Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 7, 180-198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Bowden, G. H., and Hamilton, I. R. (1998) Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 9, 54-85[Abstract]
16. Ellen, R. P., Lepine, G., and Ngheim, P. M. (1997) Adv. Dent. Res. 11, 33-42[Abstract]
17. Busscher, H. J., Cowan, M. M., and van der Mei, H. C. (1992) FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 8, 199-209[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Gong, K., Wen, D. Y., Ouyang, T., Rao, A. T., and Herzberg, M. C. (1995) Infect. Immun. 63, 3628-3633[Abstract]
19. Gong, K., and Herzberg, M. C. (1997) Infect. Immun. 65, 3815-3821[Abstract]
20. Jerne, N. K. (1974) Ann. Immunol. 125C, 373-389
21. Nisonoff, A. (1991) J. Immunol. 147, 2429-2438[Free Full Text]
22. Liljemark, W. F., Bloomquist, C. G., and Germaine, G. R. (1981) Infect. Immun. 31, 935-941[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Tellefson, L. M., and Germaine, G. R. (1986) Infect. Immun. 51, 750-759[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Gong, K., Ouyang, T., and Herzberg, M. C. (1998) Infect. Immun. 66, 5388-5392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Towbin, H., Staehlein, T., and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4350-4354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Gershoni, J. M., and Palade, G. E. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 131, 1-15[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Kishimoto, E., Hay, D. I., and Gibbons, R. J. (1989) Infect. Immun. 57, 3702-3707[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Aguirre, A., Levine, M. J., Cohen, R. E., and Tabak, L. A. (1987) Arch. Oral Biol. 32, 297-301[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Remaley, A. T., and Wilding, P. (1989) Clin. Chem. 35, 2261-2270[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
A. H. Nobbs, Y. Zhang, A. Khammanivong, and M. C. Herzberg
Streptococcus gordonii Hsa Environmentally Constrains Competitive Binding by Streptococcus sanguinis to Saliva-Coated Hydroxyapatite
J. Bacteriol., April 15, 2007; 189(8): 3106 - 3114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
P. Xu, J. M. Alves, T. Kitten, A. Brown, Z. Chen, L. S. Ozaki, P. Manque, X. Ge, M. G. Serrano, D. Puiu, et al.
Genome of the Opportunistic Pathogen Streptococcus sanguinis
J. Bacteriol., April 15, 2007; 189(8): 3166 - 3175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
Y. Zhang, Y. Lei, A. Nobbs, A. Khammanivong, and M. C. Herzberg
Inactivation of Streptococcus gordonii SspAB Alters Expression of Multiple Adhesin Genes
Infect. Immun., June 1, 2005; 73(6): 3351 - 3357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
T. S. Walker, K. L. Tomlin, G. S. Worthen, K. R. Poch, J. G. Lieber, M. T. Saavedra, M. B. Fessler, K. C. Malcolm, M. L. Vasil, and J. A. Nick
Enhanced Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Development Mediated by Human Neutrophils
Infect. Immun., June 1, 2005; 73(6): 3693 - 3701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
A. O. Kilic, L. Tao, Y. Zhang, Y. Lei, A. Khammanivong, and M. C. Herzberg
Involvement of Streptococcus gordonii Beta-Glucoside Metabolism Systems in Adhesion, Biofilm Formation, and In Vivo Gene Expression
J. Bacteriol., July 1, 2004; 186(13): 4246 - 4253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
Y. Zhang, Y. Lei, A. Khammanivong, and M. C. Herzberg
Identification of a Novel Two-Component System in Streptococcus gordonii V288 Involved in Biofilm Formation
Infect. Immun., June 1, 2004; 72(6): 3489 - 3494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Mitoma, T. Oho, Y. Shimazaki, and T. Koga
Inhibitory Effect of Bovine Milk Lactoferrin on the Interaction between a Streptococcal Surface Protein Antigen and Human Salivary Agglutinin
J. Biol. Chem., May 18, 2001; 276(21): 18060 - 18065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gong, K.
Right arrow Articles by Herzberg, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gong, K.
Right arrow Articles by Herzberg, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.