JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mouillet-Richard, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kellermann, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mouillet-Richard, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kellermann, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 13, 9186-9192, March 31, 2000


Regulation by Neurotransmitter Receptors of Serotonergic or Catecholaminergic Neuronal Cell Differentiation*

Sophie Mouillet-RichardDagger §, Vincent Mutel, Sylvain LoricDagger , Claire TournoisDagger ||, Jean-Marie Launay||, and Odile KellermannDagger **

From the Dagger  Différenciation Cellulaire, CNRS URA 1960, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15 France,  Pharma Research Department, Hoffmann-La-Roche A.G., Basel 40002, Switzerland, and || CR Claude Bernard, Pathologie Expérimentale et Communications Cellulaires, IFR 6, Service de Biochimie, Hôpital Lariboisière, 75010 Paris, France

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The murine F9-derived 1C11 clone exhibits a stable epithelial morphology, expresses nestin, an early neuroectodermal marker, and expresses genes involved in neuroectodermal cell fate. Upon appropriate induction, 100% of 1C11 precursor cells develop neurite extensions and acquire neuronal markers (N-CAM, synaptophysin, gamma gamma -enolase, and neurofilament) as well as the general functions of either serotonergic (1C11*/5HT) (5HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine) or noradrenergic (1C11**/NE) (NE, norepinephrine) neurons. The two programs are shown to be mutually exclusive. 1C11 thus behaves as a neuroepithelial cell line with a dual bioaminergic fate. 1C11*/5HT cells implement a functional 5-HT transporter and thereby a complete serotonergic phenotype within 4 days, whereas 5-HT1B/D, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2A receptors are sequentially induced. The accurate time schedule of catecholaminergic differentiation was defined. Catecholamine synthesis, storage, and catabolism are acquired within 4 days; the noradrenergic phenotype is complete at day 12 and includes a functional norepinephrine transporter and an alpha 1D-adrenoreceptor (day 8). The time-dependent onset of neurotransmitter-associated functions proper to either program is similar to in vivo observations. Along each pathway, the selective induction of serotonergic or adrenergic receptors is shown to be an essential part of the differentiation program, since they promote an autoregulation of the corresponding phenotype.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Immortal cell lines expressing precursor properties and still capable of undergoing neuronal lineage transition may help identify the molecular and cellular events involved in neural differentiation and may help assess the relative contributions of the extrinsic and intrinsic factors involved in the fate of neuronal precursor cells (1). Several strategies have been devised to isolate neural cell lines, including cloning of tumors, targeted oncogenesis in transgenic mice, somatic cell fusion, growth factor-mediated expansion of progenitors of the central nervous system, as well as retroviral immortalization (2). Among these cell lines, of outstanding interest are those that retain pluripotent differentiative capacities, such as neuron-glia precursor cells (reviewed in Ref. 2). Although the processes underlying phenotypic choices may be studied with these precursor cells, the initial events of neurogenesis remain largely unknown because it is still impracticable to establish neuroepithelial stem cell lines immediately after gastrulation. Multipotential embryonic stem and embryonal carcinoma cells may be used to overcome this limitation and have already provided in vitro models for neuronal differentiation (3-5). For instance, the embryonal carcinoma-derived P19 cell line yields various types of neurons as well as astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia after treatment with retinoic acid (6). Such cell systems can be used to follow the differentiation pathway leading from the multipotential stem cell state to a terminally differentiated neural phenotype. However, molecular studies are hindered by the heterogeneity of differentiation, as no clear-cut switch from one phenotype to another can be triggered in response to extracellular signals.

In an attempt to isolate early committed progenitor cells able to homogeneously differentiate toward alternative fates after appropriate in vitro induction, we introduced the PK4 plasmid, which contains the early genes of the simian virus SV40 under the control of the adenovirus E1A promoter, into multipotential cells (7). Due to the low level constitutive expression of the SV40 T antigen, this construct promotes immortalization of neuroectodermal, endodermal, or mesodermal precursor cell lines while still allowing differentiation along multiple pathways to occur (8, 9).

The 1C11 murine cell line, which was selected upon differentiation of F9 multipotential embryonal carcinoma cells transfected with PK4 (7), behaves as a neuronal progenitor. It maintains an undifferentiated phenotype and responds to induction by producing a progeny with neuron-associated markers. 1C11 cells convert within 4 days into serotonergic cells able to metabolize, store, and take up serotonin (5-HT)1 (8, 10) and expressing 5-HT1B/D, 5-HT2A, and 5-HT2B receptors (11).

Additional experiments shown here establish that the selective induction of these three 5-HT receptors is an essential part of the serotonergic program. Indeed, the cells synthesis, storage, and transport of 5-HT respond to 5-HT concentration in the growth medium. The present study also introduces alternative culture conditions capable of triggering the 1C11 clone toward catecholaminergic differentiation. Similar to the serotonergic program, the catecholaminergic pathway recruits nearly 100% of the cells and follows a well defined schedule. Although the enzymes of catecholaminergic metabolism are fully acquired within 4 days, 12 days of induction are necessary for the cells to display a complete catecholaminergic phenotype, coincident with the induction of a functional norepinephrine (NE) uptake. Screening differentiating catecholaminergic cells to detect bioaminergic receptors revealed the onset of a single adrenergic receptor subtype, alpha 1D, at day 8 of differentiation. This receptor plays a pivotal role in the implementation of the catecholaminergic program, since its inhibition prevents the cells from acquiring a functional NE transport.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Dibutyryl cyclic AMP (Bt2cAMP), cyclohexane carboxylic acid (CCA), and dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) were from Sigma-Aldrich. Betaxolol and 2-[beta -(4-hydroxy-3-iodophenyl)ethylaminomethyl] tetralone (HEAT) were from Tocris Cookson. Paroxetine was a gift from Ferrosan. Yohimbine, SCH 23982, nisoxetine, and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine were from Sigma-Aldrich. Radioligands were obtained from NEN Life Science Products and Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. [3H]Betaxolol was synthesized by Dr. J. Wursch (Hoffmann-La Roche AG). Mouse alpha lA-, alpha 1B-, and alpha lD-adrenoreceptor cDNAs were cloned and transfected into COS-7 cells by Dr. P. Malherbe (Hoffmann-La Roche AG).

Cell Culture and Differentiation-- 1C11 cells were grown and induced to differentiate (a) along the serotonergic pathway by the addition of 1 mM Bt2cAMP and 0.05% CCA in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with fetal calf serum (10%) (8) or with 5-HT-depleted fetal calf serum (10%) (12), (b) along the catecholaminergic pathway by the addition of 1 mM Bt2cAMP, 0.05% CCA, and 2% Me2SO in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 5-HT-depleted fetal calf serum (10%). 1C11**/NE cells were seeded at 4 × 104 cells cm-2.

Determination of Cellular Content of Bioamines, Enzymatic Activities, Uptake Experiments-- Bioamine contents, metabolites, related enzymatic activities, and uptakes were measured as described (8). Mouse brain synaptosomes were obtained according to O'Reilly and Reith (13).

Radioligand Bindings and Related Experiments-- Binding experiments were performed on cell membranes as described (11). 1C11*/5HT cells were screened at days 2 and 4 of differentiation, 1C11**/NE cells were screened at days 4, 8, and 12. Specific radiolabeled ligands and their concentrations were chosen according to Alexander et al. (14) for adrenergic (alpha l, alpha 2, beta ), dopaminergic (D1 to D5), and serotonergic receptors. The specific binding was defined as the one inhibited by 1 µM homologous unlabeled ligands. We favored use of the cold form of the radioligand to detect as many binding sites as possible, including nonspecific ones, and thereafter to characterize them. The mean threshold for detection was 20 binding sites per cell. Determination of endogenous inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) was performed as described (11).

Data and Analysis-- Binding data were analyzed by the iterative nonlinear fitting software Prism (GraphPad) as described (11). p < 0.01 was selected as the significance criterion. All values are given as means ± S.E., or 95% confidence intervals.

Immunocytochemistry-- Indirect immunofluorescence experiments were made using rabbit polyclonal antibodies against L-CAM (a gift of Dr. N. Peyrieras), nestin (a gift of Dr. U. Lendhal), 5-HT (Eurodiagnostica), gamma gamma -enolase (a gift of Dr. L. Legault), and NE (Roche Molecular Biochemicals); goat polyclonal antibodies against Notch-1 and Jagged-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); mouse anti-NFL and rat anti-NCAM monoclonal antibodies (Valbiotech).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1C11 Behaves as a Neuroectodermal Progenitor Inducible toward a Serotonergic or a Catecholaminergic Differentiation Program-- Under long term standard culture conditions, the 1C11 clone maintained an immature phenotype with an epithelial morphology (Fig. 1A); it expressed L-CAM (Fig. 1B), a marker of epithelial cells, as well as nestin (Fig. 1C), a marker of embryonic neuroepithelial cells (15). 1C11 cells were also positively stained by specific antibodies against Notch-1 and its ligand Jagged-1 (Fig. 1, D and E), two key regulatory molecules involved in early neurogenesis (16). Conversely, the 1C11 progenitor lacked neuronal functions (Table I) and never spontaneously entered a differentiation program.


View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Immunocytochemical characterization of the 1C11 neuroepithelial precursor cell and its resulting 1C11*/HT serotonergic and 1C11**/NE catecholaminergic progeny. A-E, phase picture (A) and homogenous staining of 1C11 epithelial-like cells with antibodies to L-CAM (B), nestin (C), Notch-1 (D), and Jagged-1 (E). F-I, phase picture (F) and homogenous staining of 1C11*/5HT serotonergic cells at day 4 with antibodies against 5-HT (G), gamma gamma -enolase (H), and NFL (I). J-M, phase picture (J) and homogenous staining of 1C11**/NE catecholaminergic cells at day 4 with antibodies against NE (K), N-CAM (L), and NFL (M). Scale bar = 25 µm.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Serotonergic or catecholaminergic cell fate of 1C11 progenitor cells
Experiments were performed at day 0 (1C11) and at day 4 of serotonergic (1C11*/5HTd4) or catecholaminergic (1C11**/NEd4) differentiation. Measurements include (i) activities of biosynthetic enzymes for 5-HT (aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) and the key enzyme tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH)) and for NE (aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AADC), the key enzyme tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), and dopamine beta -hydroxylase (DBH)), (ii) activities of the catabolizing enzymes monoamine oxidase (MAO) A and B, and (iii) neurotransmitter content. The lack of phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PNMT) activity indicates that 1C11**/NE cells are not able to convert NE into epinephrine. 5-HTP, 5-hydroxytryptophan; 5-HIAA, 5-hydroxy indoleacetic acid; DBH, dopamine beta -hydroxylase.

The 1C11 cell line may be recruited toward neuronal differentiation by Bt2cAMP, which most likely mimics the signaling of an embryonic factor. After the addition of this inducer and CCA, cells adopted a neural-like morphology (Fig. 1F). They kept dividing, albeit at a slower rate than 1C11 precursor cells (generation time 30 h versus 20 h). Bipolar extensions were already visible after 24 h of treatment, and neuron-associated markers such as N-CAM, synaptophysin (8), gamma gamma -enolase (Fig. 1H), and neurofilament (Fig. 1I) were expressed. Four days after the addition of the inducers, nearly 100% of the cells could be positively stained by anti-5-HT antibodies (Fig. 1G). The serotonergic cells, now referred to as 1C11*/5HT cells, displayed a complete serotonergic metabolism with the ability to synthesize, store, and catabolize 5-HT, as inferred by the measurements of tryptophan hydroxylase activity, 5-HT content, and monoamine oxidase-B activity, respectively (Table I).

The addition of Me2SO, in combination with Bt2cAMP and CCA, inhibited the serotonergic program and instead promoted the catecholaminergic differentiation of 1C11 precursor cells. The addition of Me2SO alone (1 to 3%) in the culture medium induced neither a morphological change of 1C11 cells nor the expression of neuronal markers (data not shown). The effect of Me2SO concentration (in synergy with Bt2cAMP) on the onset of the catecholaminergic pathway is shown on Fig. 2A. A 2% concentration was selected to trigger the catecholaminergic differentiation of 1C11 cells under standard culture conditions, since a toxic effect was observed if the concentration exceeded 3%.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Characterization of the 1C11 catecholaminergic differentiation program. A, effect of Me2SO (DMSO) concentration on the onset of the 1C11**/NE catecholaminergic phenotype, deduced from measurements of DA and NE contents, as well as TH, dopamine beta -hydroxylase (DBH), and aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) enzymatic activities at day 4 of differentiation. dbcAMP, dibutyryl cyclic AMP; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. B, competition experiments for [3H]nisoxetine binding (pKi values) on 1C11**/NE day-12 cells are compared with the values measured on synaptosomes prepared from mouse brain. Values are the means of 3 independent experiments performed in triplicate. Ten different concentrations of each competing drug were used. Correlation analysis yields a Spearman rank of rs = 0.9643 (p < 0.002). C, comparison of competition experiments for [125I]HEAT binding (pKi values) on 1C11**/NE day-8 cells and on COS-7 cells stably transfected with mouse alpha 1D-adrenoreceptor cDNA (n = 8). Ten different concentrations of each competing drug were used. Correlation analysis yields a Spearman rank of rs = 0.9581 (p < 0.001). Estimated rs values were 0.5714 (p = 0.076) and 0.7381 (p = 0.023), respectively, for alpha 1A- and alpha 1B-adrenoreceptors expressed in COS cells. D, time-dependent stimulation of IP3 production in 1C11**/NE cells at day 8 (black-diamond ), day 10 (triangle ), and day 12 (black-triangle) by 100 nM NE.

Within 4 days, Bt2cAMP/CCA/Me2SO-treated 1C11 cells, now referred to as 1C11**/NE cells, acquired a morphology with short, widely branching neurites, markedly distinct from the morphology of 1C11*/5HT cells (Fig. 1J). However, similarly to 1C11*/5HT cells, 1C11**/NE cells expressed N-CAM (Fig. 1L), neurofilament (Fig. 1M), and synaptophysin (not shown). The growth rate of 1C11**/NE cells was comparable with that of 1C11*/5HT cells. Catecholaminergic differentiation occurred in a reproducible and synchronous manner, with almost 100% of the cells being positively stained by anti-NE antibodies at day 4 (Fig. 1K). Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) activity, the key enzyme of catecholamine biosynthesis, as well as DOPA, dopamine (DA), and NE contents became measurable (Table I). Like noradrenergic neurons (17), 1C11**/NE cells had a monoamine oxidase A activity (Table I) but no phenylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase activity (epinephrine synthesis) (Table I). Thus, we may conclude that the noradrenergic choice has been selective, with none of the serotonergic-related functions being expressed along the catecholaminergic pathway (Table I).

The Catecholaminergic Program Induces the Onset of a Complete Catecholaminergic Phenotype-- 1C11**/NE cells went through a series of distinct maturation stages during their differentiation kinetics. Two days after the inducers were added, 1C11**/NE cells acquired a weak TH activity (Table IIA). However, NE content could not be measured until day 4, when the cells had developed a complete catecholaminergic metabolism (Table IIA). At this stage, the cells are not fully differentiated, as reflected in particular by the absence of any detectable NE or DA uptake (<1.5 pmol/mg of protein/min).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Kinetics of acquisition of catecholaminergic functions by 1C11**/NE catecholaminergic cells and involvement of the alpha 1D-adrenoreceptor in the onset of the NET
A, NE-related functions were measured at various steps (days 2, 4, 8, and 12) of the 1C11**/NE catecholaminergic differentiation program. DBH, dopamine beta -hydroxylase. B, the parameters for NE metabolism and transport were measured at day 12 of differentiation: in 1C11**/NE cells grown in a dialyzed medium (1C11**/NE d12, column 1), after an activation of the alpha 1D-adrenoreceptor by 100 nM NE at day 8 (column 2), or after blockade of the receptor by 10 nM HEAT at day 8 (column 3) and day 10 (column 4). C, the basal level of IP3 production in 1C11**/NE cells grown under standard conditions was measured at days 8, 10, and 12 of the catecholaminergic differentiation program (column 1) or after inhibition of the alpha 1D-adrenoreceptor by addition of 10 nM antagonist HEAT at day 8 (column 2) or day 10 (column 3).

In vivo, during the differentiation of noradrenergic neurons, TH activity occurs before NE uptake (18). Therefore, we expected that the induction of the norepinephrine transporter (NET) may be part of the intrinsic catecholaminergic program of 1C11 cells. Accordingly, an active NE uptake could be measured 12 days after the inducers were added, provided that cells had been seeded at a lower density (104 cells/cm2) and left to grow without replating to preserve neuronal polarity. This NE transport was blocked at 4 °C and responded to ouabain, an inhibitor of the Na+,K+-ATPase energy source. It was stationary after 1 min at 37 °C, and the apparent Km of NE (430 ± 20 nM) was close to that reported for HeLa cells stably transfected with the human NET cDNA (19). The corresponding Vmax value was estimated at 12.5 ± 3.4 pmol/mg of protein/min. In parallel, [3H]nisoxetine, a selective inhibitor of NE uptake, bound intact cells with an apparent Kd of 15.4 ± 1.2 nM and an apparent Bmax of 7.4 ± 0.5 fmol/mg of protein (220 binding sites/single cell). Finally, we performed competition experiments for [3H]nisoxetine binding to the NET present at the surface of 1C11**/NE catecholaminergic cells and to the NET of mouse brain synaptosomes. As shown in Fig. 2B, a significant correlation was found between the two pharmacological profiles.

Interestingly, between day 4 and day 12 of the catecholaminergic program, the levels of DOPA, DA, and NE in 1C11**/NE cells did not vary significantly (Table IIA). Thus, we may conclude that although the catecholaminergic metabolism is fully acquired after only 4 days of induction, cell differentiation takes 8 more days before the expression of a functional NE transport and, thereby, of a complete catecholaminergic phenotype.

Binding experiments with [3H]GR12935 (<0.04 pmol/mg of protein/min from day 0 to day 12) excluded the presence of the DA transporter. Furthermore, 5-HT transporter molecules, assessed by [3H]-paroxetine binding (<0.03 pmol/mg prot/min), were never detectable during 1C11**/NE differentiation. Consequently, the choice between the serotonergic and the noradrenergic phenotypes was also reflected by the selective induction of the corresponding neurotransmitter transporter protein.

An alpha 1D-Adrenoreceptor Is Selectively Induced at Day 8 of the Catecholaminergic Differentiation Program-- The consistent, time-dependent acquisition of catecholaminergic functions along the catecholaminergic differentiation pathway prompted us to investigate into the presence of neurotransmitter receptors on 1C11**/NE cell membranes. With binding experiments, the presence of 5-HT or DA receptor subtypes at any time in the kinetics of 1C11**/NE differentiation could be excluded (see "Experimental Procedures"). To detect adrenergic binding sites, studies were first carried out with antagonists of the beta -, alpha 2-, and alpha 1-adrenoreceptors: 10 nM [3H]betaxolol, [3H]yohimbine, and [125I]HEAT, respectively. Yohimbine and betaxolol binding never could be detected. Nevertheless, from day 8, significant amounts of [125I]HEAT were bound by the cells, suggesting the presence of one or several alpha 1-adrenoreceptor(s). The magnitude of the binding constant of [125I]HEAT (Kd = 1.1 ± 0.1 nM) further favored the presence of an alpha 1D-adrenoreceptor. The Bmax value (73 ± 1 fmol/mg of protein) corresponds to nearly 2200 sites/cell.

The induction of an alpha 1D-adrenoreceptor as observed on day 8 of differentiation could be firmly established as follows. cDNAs encoding the mouse alpha 1A-, alpha 1B-, and alpha 1D-adrenoreceptors were cloned and stably transfected into COS cells. These COS cells were used to calibrate the pharmacologic response of each alpha -adrenoreceptor to various antagonists of [125I]HEAT binding. Highly significant correlations (p < 0.001) were obtained between the pKi values of the drugs measured on 1C11**/NE cells and on these COS cells that express the alpha 1D receptor (Fig. 2C). In contrast, no significant correlation was found with COS cells carrying the two other cloned alpha -adrenoreceptors. Moreover, as expected for an alpha 1 adrenoreceptor subtype, the alpha 1D receptor present on 1C11**/NE cells was coupled with phospholipase C beta ; at day 8, IP3 production was obtained in response to the addition of NE (Fig. 2D). At day 10, a constitutive level of IP3 was observed without addition of NE (Fig. 2D). However, upon stimulation of the receptor by NE, more IP3 production was obtained, reaching to the same plateau value as at day 8. We verified that the number of HEAT binding sites and the pharmacologic profile of the alpha 1D receptor did not change between day 8 and day 12.

These results emphasize (i) the onset at day 8 of a functional alpha 1D-adrenoreceptor along the catecholaminergic pathway and (ii) the induction of a constitutive activity for the coupling of this receptor to PLCbeta at day 10 of the differentiation program.

The alpha 1D-Adrenoreceptor Actively Participates to the Acquisition of a Functional NE Transport in 1C11**/NE Catecholaminergic Cells-- The onset of an alpha 1D-adrenoreceptor before the completion of the differentiation program prompted us to examine whether catecholaminergic functions could be regulated by NE. The experiments were performed with cells left to differentiate in a dialyzed culture medium, where the external concentrations of NE, DA, and 5-HT were less than 2 nM. First, the alpha 1D-adrenoreceptor was stimulated by the addition of 100 nM NE at day 8. As shown before, an increase in IP3 production was observed under these conditions. The parameters of NE metabolism and transport were measured 4 days later (day 12). They remained unchanged (Table IIB) as compared with the results obtained in standard culture conditions. The addition of NE at day 10 had no effect either on NE metabolism and transport, as measured at day 12.

In another experiment, the coupling of the receptor to PLCbeta was inactivated at day 8 by the addition of 10 nM full antagonist HEAT (Table IIB). Although the catecholaminergic metabolism was insensitive to this treatment (Table IIB), nisoxetine binding and NE transport, normally detected at day 12, became no more measurable (Table IIB). Strikingly, however, if HEAT was added at day 10, NE transport as well as NE metabolism remained intact at day 12 (Table IIB).

The above experiment suggested that an irreversible differentiation step had occurred between day 8 and day 10. Such a step may correspond to the acquisition of a constitutive activity for PLCbeta coupling by the alpha 1D-adrenoreceptor at day 10, as described in the previous paragraph. To assess this idea, we followed the PLCbeta coupling as a function of HEAT addition. As shown in Table IIC, the addition of 10 nM HEAT at day 8 abolished the basal level of IP3 production, which we normally observed from day 10. If HEAT was added at day 10 instead of day 8, the constitutive activity of the receptor was maintained (Table IIC). These experiments clearly indicate that day 10 constitutes a critical commitment step during implementation of the catecholaminergic program by which neither the constitutive activity of the adrenoreceptor nor the induction of NE transport may be impaired by antagonist treatment. We can therefore suggest that the onset of NE transport is related to the alpha 1D-adrenoreceptor basal signaling activity in 1C11**/NE cells.

External 5-HT Down-regulates All Serotonergic Functions Induced along the Serotonergic Differentiation Program-- The onset of serotonergic functions during the 1C11 serotonergic program follows a well defined kinetic pattern as well (Table III). Since 5-HT2B and 5-HT1B/D receptors were present on 1C11*/5HT cells as early as day 2 of the serotonergic differentiation program, we wondered whether these receptors could modulate the serotonergic functions, similarly to what we observed for the catecholaminergic pathway. Because standard 10% FCS-supplemented medium contains 0.5 to 1 µM 5-HT, the culture medium was dialyzed, and the 5-HT level was reduced to less than 1 nM. The parameters for serotonergic differentiation were assessed for 1C11*/5HT cells grown in 5-HT-depleted medium. Under these new culture conditions, the time sequence of acquisition of serotonergic functions remained unchanged. However, at day 4, 5-HT cellular content (×2.8), tryptophan hydroxylase activity (×9.3), and the apparent Vmax of 5-HT transport (×7.7) were higher than the values obtained with 1C11*/5HT cells grown in 10% FCS medium (Table III). These phenotypic changes specifically resulted from 5-HT starvation. Indeed, the values again became very close to those obtained under standard culture conditions if 5-HT concentration in the dialyzed medium was increased to 0.5 µM at day 0 of the serotonergic program (Table III). This experiment interestingly indicates a negative feedback of extracellular 5-HT on the extent of 5-HT synthesis and storage as well as on the 5-HT transport system itself.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Kinetics of acquisition of serotonergic functions by 1C11*/5HT cells and 5-HT-induced down-regulation of the serotonergic phenotype
The parameters for serotonergic differentiation were measured at day 2 (1C11*/5HTd2, column 1) and day 4 (1C11*/5HTd4, column 2) with cells left to differentiate in FCS-supplemented medium. For experiments regarding the down-regulation of the serotonergic phenotype, the serotonergic functions of 1C11*/5HTd4 cells were assessed after growth in FCS-supplemented medium (column 2), in 5-HT-depleted medium (column 3), or in 5-HT-depleted medium supplemented with 0.5 µM 5-HT at day 0 (column 4). TPH, tryptophan hydroxylase.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The 1C11 cell line was already shown to produce serotonergic cells upon differentiation (8). In the present study, we show that the 1C11 cell actually is a bipotential neuroectodermal progenitor able to also convert into fully functional catecholaminergic cells. This report also emphasizes that the receptors selectively induced along either differentiation pathway actively participate to the implementation of the corresponding phenotype.

1C11 Behaves as a Committed Neuroectodermal Progenitor-- As expected for a genuine progenitor, the 1C11 clone can give rise to differentiated progenies upon induction. The resulting daughter cells progressively acquire either a complete serotonergic or catecholaminergic phenotype. The sequential steps of the mutually exclusive differentiation programs of the 1C11 cell line are summarized on Fig. 3. The differentiation events concern almost 100% of the cells and are synchronous within the cell population, as monitored by the immunolabeling of neuronal- or neurotransmitter-specific markers.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   The differentiation steps of the 1C11 precursor cell line. db2cAMP, dibutyryl cyclic AMP

The 1C11 cell line initially resulted from the direct induction in vitro of F9-PK4 multipotential cells by retinoic acid and Bt2cAMP (7). Despite the lack of a proper embryonal environment, 1C11 cells appear to have been irreversibly committed toward a neural fate. Neuroectodermal cell fate decision is influenced by a variety of signals, either endogenous, such as developmentally expressed bioamines (20) and neurotrophins, or exogenous, originating from the somites and the notochord (21). Among the complex network of pathways that dictates the developmental choice of neural progenitors, the Notch signaling pathway is of critical importance (16). The combined expression of Notch-1 and Jagged-1 in 1C11 cells and the homogenous immunostaining of the cell nuclei with Notch-1 antibodies suggest that Notch-ligand interactions may take part in determining the fate of 1C11 cells. Finally, the expression of the early neuroectodermal marker nestin together with the lack of expression of neuronal functions indicate that the 1C11 clone may correspond to a neuroepithelial precursor.

1C11 Catecholaminergic Differentiation-- The PC12 cell line and the MAH sympathoadrenal progenitor (22) have already enabled the study of several features of the catecholaminergic differentiation. In particular, PC12 cells express a phenotype of transformed chromaffin cells and respond to nerve growth factor by adopting a neuron-like fate, with a switch from the adrenergic to a cholinergic phenotype (23). The 1C11 clone provides another, yet different, model for catecholaminergic differentiation. In contrast to the adrenergic cells of the peripheral nervous system or adrenal medulla, 1C11**/NE cells lack phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase enzymatic activity.

The 1C11 catecholaminergic program was triggered by the synergistic effect of Bt2cAMP and Me2SO, whereas the serotonergic program was obtained with Bt2cAMP alone. Me2SO therefore acts as a dominant epigenetic signal. Such an effect of Me2SO can be related to that described in the case of Friend erythroleukemia cells (24) and of NIE-115 neuroblastoma cells (25), where Me2SO confers a neuronal morphology.

The catecholaminergic program is restricted to the induction of (i) the catecholamine metabolism, (ii) an adrenoreceptor, and (iii) NE uptake. Several features of differentiation are reminiscent of the in vivo situation. Similarly to the noradrenergic neurons of the brainstem (26), 1C11**/NE cells have more robust but shorter neuritic processes than 1C11*/5HT cells. As in vivo (18), the synthesis of catecholamines occurs before NE uptake. Eventually, like noradrenergic neurons, 1C11**/NE cells express the NET but no DA transporter (27).

1C11**/NE noradrenergic cells selectively acquire a functional alpha 1D-adrenoreceptor at day 8 of differentiation. Although it appears not to be implied in the catecholaminergic metabolism, this receptor is involved in the completion of the phenotype. From our various observations, we may draw a link between the induction of a constitutive activity for the receptor at day 10 and the NET regulation. Indeed, inactivation of the receptor at day 8 impairs (i) NE transport and nisoxetine binding at day 12 and (ii) the onset of a constitutive PLC coupling to the receptor at day 10. None of these effects are observed if the antagonist treatment is applied at day 10.

Since these observations could be gained in culture medium deprived of exogenous catecholamines, we may propose that the acquisition by the receptor of its constitutive signaling activity is sustained by NE secreted by the cell itself. It is likely that 1C11**/NE cells produce NE as soon as day 4, when NE metabolism is implemented. A possible hypothesis is that small granular pulses of catecholamines, the existence of which we are currently testing by fast scan cyclic voltammetry, may account for NE release. Whatever the origin of the release, endogenous NE and the ensuing autocrine stimulation of the alpha 1D-adrenoreceptor appear sufficient to allow the onset of a functional NE transport. Indeed, the kinetics of induction and the parameters of NE transport at day 12 are not improved by prior addition of NE in the culture medium at day 8 or 10.

The role of alpha 1D receptors in vivo is unclear. The present discovery that an adrenoreceptor may act as an autoreceptor interfering with the onset of the NE transporter is unprecedented, yet NE binding to alpha -adrenoreceptors has already been suggested to be involved in the differentiation of amphibian embryonic neurons (28).

1C11 Cells and Serotonergic Differentiation-- The availability of cellular models exhibiting a complete serotonergic phenotype, i.e. 5-HT metabolism, storage, uptake, and receptors, is of general interest in view of the involvement of serotonergic neurons in many behavioral and homeostatic processes. The few cell lines meeting these criteria include the thyroid parafollicular cell system (29) and the embryonic raphe-derived RN46A cell line (30). Despite their ability to undergo differentiation after induction, these systems already display functional serotonergic properties in the undifferentiated state. In contrast, serotonergic-related functions cannot be detected in the 1C11 progenitor.

The time schedule enabling the acquisition of serotonergic functions by 1C11*/5HT cells is consistent with in vivo observations. The phenotype reaches completion within 4 days, and the expression of a functional 5-HT transport takes place only after the induction of tryptophan hydroxylase activity (Table III). In the rat, the ontogeny of central serotonergic neurons, originating in the raphe nuclei, also occurs within a window of 4 days, between day 11 and day 15 of embryogenesis. At day 13, neurotransmitter synthesis becomes measurable and monoamine transporters cannot be detected before day 15 (31).

In the present study, the intensities of 5-HT synthesis, storage, and uptake are shown to be down-regulated by 5-HT itself through the 5-HT2B and/or 5-HT1B/D receptors already present on the cells at day 2. The cells become responsive to external 5-HT at day 2 when the onset of 5-HT2B and 5-HT1B/D receptors occurs. This day therefore appears to be a critical commitment step within the 1C11 serotonergic program. The two receptors are still functional at day 4, when 5-HT2A receptors become expressed. Likely all these receptors can mediate the effect of 5-HT in the coordination of the serotonergic functions underlying a complete phenotype of the cells. In fact, 5-HT1B/D receptors have already been proposed to behave as autoreceptors capable of modulating serotonergic neurotransmission (32). Our unpublished data suggest that the 5-HT2B receptor may also act as an autoreceptor, as it controls the overall 5-HT transport system of 1C11*/5HT cells.

Concluding Remarks-- The 1C11-inducible cell line provides an example of how the autonomous genetic program of a precursor cell can lead to the progressive acquisition of neuronal- and neurotransmitter-related functions up to a complete and autoregulated phenotype. Although it has never been clearly established that serotonergic and noradrenergic cells may share a common precursor in the course of embryonic development, the dual bioaminergic fate of 1C11 cells is in line with two very recent reports (5, 33), which suggest that central dopaminergic and serotonergic neurons indeed arise from a common progenitor. The consistency of the 1C11 differentiation programs lies on (i) the 100% phenotypic conversion, (ii) the implementation of all functions specific to serotonergic or noradrenergic neurons, in a mutually exclusive manner, (iii) the temporal orders of onset of neurotransmitter-related features that are similar to those observed in vivo, (iv) the selective induction of bioaminergic receptors along either pathway, sustaining the autoregulation of the corresponding phenotype. Hopefully the 1C11 system may, in view of these key properties, help gain insight into the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the modulation of neuronal differentiation by neurotransmitters.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This article is dedicated to the memory of Dr. Mose Da Prada to whom we are greatly indebted for his constant support regarding the characterization of the 1C11 cell line. We gratefully acknowledge Prof. Sylvain Blanquet for critical reading of the manuscript and Dr. Patricia Malherbe for cloning alpha 1-adrenoreceptor cDNAs. We thank Dr. M. B. Foster for helpful comments on the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This study was supported by CNRS Grants URA 1960 and ARC 6668 and the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ This author is on leave of absence from the Ecole Nationale du Génie Rural des Eaux et des Forêts.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Dr. Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15 France. Tel.: 33145688465; Fax: 33140613194; E-mail: okellerm@pasteur.fr.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: 5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine; CCA, cyclohexane carboxylic acid; DA, dopamine; Bt2cAMP, dibutyryl cyclic AMP; HEAT, 2-[beta -(4-hydroxy-3-iodophenyl)ethylaminomethyl] tetralone; NE, norepinephrine; NET, NE transporter; TH, tyrosine hydroxylase; IP3, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate; PLC, phospholipase C; FCS, fetal calf serum.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Lendahl, U., and McKay, R. D. G. (1990) Trends Neurosci. 13, 132-137[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Whittemore, S. R., and Snyder, E. Y. (1996) Mol. Neurobiol. 12, 13-38[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Liesi, P., Rechardt, L., and Wartiovaara, J. (1983) Nature 306, 265-267[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Bain, G., Kitchens, D., Yao, M., Huettner, J. E., and Gottlieb, D. I. (1995) Dev. Biol. 168, 342-357[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Deacon, T., Dinsmore, J., Costantini, L. C., Ratliff, J., and Isacson, O. (1998) Exp. Neurol. 149, 28-41[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. McPherson, P. A., and McBurney, M. W. (1995) Methods: Comp. Methods Enzymol. 7, 238-252[CrossRef]
7. Kellermann, O., and Kelly, F. (1986) Differentiation 32, 74-81[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Buc-Caron, M. H., Launay, J. M., Lamblin, D., and Kellermann, O. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 1922-1926[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Poliard, A., Nifuji, A., Lamblin, D., Plee, E., Forest, C., and Kellermann, O. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 130, 1461-1472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Loric, S., Maroteaux, L., Kellermann, O., and Launay, J. M. (1995) Mol. Pharmacol. 47, 458-466[Abstract]
11. Kellermann, O., Loric, S., Maroteaux, L., and Launay, J. M. (1996) Br. J. Pharmacol. 118, 1161-1170[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Tournois, C., Mutel, V., Manivet, P., Launay, J. M., and Kellermann, O. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 17498-17503[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. O'Reilly, C. A., and Reith, M. E. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 6115-6121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Alexander, S., Mead, A., and Peters, J. (1998) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. (receptor and ion channel nomenclature suppl.) 1-98
15. Lendahl, U., Zimmerman, L. B., and McKay, R. D. G. (1990) Cell 60, 585-595[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Fleming, R. J., Purcell, K., and Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. (1997) Trends Cell Biol. 7, 437-441[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Westlund, K. N., Denney, R. M., Kochersperger, L. M., Rose, R. M., and Abell, C. W. (1985) Science 230, 181-183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Jonakait, G. M., Markey, K. A., Goldstein, M., Dreyfus, C. F., and Black, I. B. (1985) Dev. Biol. 108, 6-17[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Pacholczyk, T., Blakely, R. D., and Amara, S. G. (1991) Nature 350, 350-354[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Lauder, J. M. (1993) Trends Neurosci. 16, 233-239[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Bronner-Fraser, M., and Fraser, S. E. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 885-891[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Birren, S. J., and Anderson, D. J. (1990) Neuron 4, 189-201[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Green, S. H. (1995) Methods: Comp. Methods Enzymol. 7, 222-237[CrossRef]
24. Friend, C., Scher, W., Holland, J. G., and Sato, T. (1971) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 68, 378-382
25. Kihmi, Y., Palfrey, C., Spector, I., Barak, Y., and Littauer, U. Z. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 73, 462-466[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. McQueen, J. K. (1987) Basic Clin. Aspects Neurosci. 2, 7-16
27. Lorang, D., Amara, S. G., and Simerly, R. B. (1994) J. Neurosci. 14, 4903-4914[Abstract]
28. Rowe, S. J., Messenger, N. J., and Warner, A. E. (1993) Development 119, 1343-1357[Abstract]
29. Russo, A. F., Clark, M. S., and Durham, P. L. (1996) Mol. Neurobiol. 13, 257-276[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Rudge, J. S., Eaton, M. J., Mather, P., Lindsay, R. M., and Whittemore, S. R. (1996) Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 7, 604-621
31. Hyde, C. E., and Bennett, B. A. (1994) Brain Res. 646, 118-123[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Hoyer, D., Clarke, D. E., Fozard, J. R., Hartig, P. R., Martin, G. R., Mylecharane, E. J., Saxena, P. R., and Humphrey, P. P. (1994) Pharmacol. Rev. 46, 157-203[Abstract]
33. Ye, W., Shimamura, K., Rubenstein, J. L. R., Hynes, M. A., and Rosenthal, A. (1998) Cell 93, 755-766[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Mouillet-Richard, N. Nishida, E. Pradines, H. Laude, B. Schneider, C. Feraudet, J. Grassi, J.-M. Launay, S. Lehmann, and O. Kellermann
Prions Impair Bioaminergic Functions through Serotonin- or Catecholamine-derived Neurotoxins in Neuronal Cells
J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2008; 283(35): 23782 - 23790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
G. Tamguney, K. Giles, D. V. Glidden, P. Lessard, H. Wille, P. Tremblay, D. F. Groth, F. Yehiely, C. Korth, R. C. Moore, et al.
Genes contributing to prion pathogenesis
J. Gen. Virol., July 1, 2008; 89(7): 1777 - 1788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
T. Lau, S. Horschitz, S. Berger, D. Bartsch, and P. Schloss
Antidepressant-induced internalization of the serotonin transporter in serotonergic neurons
FASEB J, June 1, 2008; 22(6): 1702 - 1714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Pietri, A. Caprini, S. Mouillet-Richard, E. Pradines, M. Ermonval, J. Grassi, O. Kellermann, and B. Schneider
Overstimulation of PrPC Signaling Pathways by Prion Peptide 106-126 Causes Oxidative Injury of Bioaminergic Neuronal Cells
J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 2006; 281(38): 28470 - 28479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
J.-M. Launay, B. Schneider, S. Loric, M. Da Prada, and O. Kellermann
Serotonin transport and serotonin transporter-mediated antidepressant recognition are controlled by 5-HT2B receptor signaling in serotonergic neuronal cells
FASEB J, September 1, 2006; 20(11): 1843 - 1854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
M. Pietri, B. Schneider, S. Mouillet-Richard, M. Ermonval, V. Mutel, J.-M. Launay, and O. Kellermann
Reactive oxygen species-dependent TNF-{alpha} converting enzyme activation through stimulation of 5-HT2B and {alpha}1D autoreceptors in neuronal cells
FASEB J, July 1, 2005; 19(9): 1078 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
K. Arima, N. Nishida, S. Sakaguchi, K. Shigematsu, R. Atarashi, N. Yamaguchi, D. Yoshikawa, J. Yoon, K. Watanabe, N. Kobayashi, et al.
Biological and Biochemical Characteristics of Prion Strains Conserved in Persistently Infected Cell Cultures
J. Virol., June 1, 2005; 79(11): 7104 - 7112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Mouillet-Richard, M. Pietri, B. Schneider, C. Vidal, V. Mutel, J.-M. Launay, and O. Kellermann
Modulation of Serotonergic Receptor Signaling and Cross-talk by Prion Protein
J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2005; 280(6): 4592 - 4601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. Schneider, V. Mutel, M. Pietri, M. Ermonval, S. Mouillet-Richard, and O. Kellermann
NADPH oxidase and extracellular regulated kinases 1/2 are targets of prion protein signaling in neuronal and nonneuronal cells
PNAS, November 11, 2003; 100(23): 13326 - 13331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
S. Mouillet-Richard, M. Ermonval, C. Chebassier, J. L. Laplanche, S. Lehmann, J. M. Launay, and O. Kellermann
Signal Transduction Through Prion Protein
Science, September 15, 2000; 289(5486): 1925 - 1928.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow