![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 13, 9186-9192, March 31, 2000
From the The murine F9-derived 1C11 clone exhibits a
stable epithelial morphology, expresses nestin, an early
neuroectodermal marker, and expresses genes involved in neuroectodermal
cell fate. Upon appropriate induction, 100% of 1C11 precursor
cells develop neurite extensions and acquire neuronal markers (N-CAM,
synaptophysin, Immortal cell lines expressing precursor properties and still
capable of undergoing neuronal lineage transition may help identify the
molecular and cellular events involved in neural differentiation and
may help assess the relative contributions of the extrinsic and
intrinsic factors involved in the fate of neuronal precursor cells (1).
Several strategies have been devised to isolate neural cell lines,
including cloning of tumors, targeted oncogenesis in transgenic mice,
somatic cell fusion, growth factor-mediated expansion of progenitors of
the central nervous system, as well as retroviral immortalization (2).
Among these cell lines, of outstanding interest are those that retain
pluripotent differentiative capacities, such as neuron-glia precursor
cells (reviewed in Ref. 2). Although the processes underlying
phenotypic choices may be studied with these precursor cells, the
initial events of neurogenesis remain largely unknown because it is
still impracticable to establish neuroepithelial stem cell lines
immediately after gastrulation. Multipotential embryonic stem and
embryonal carcinoma cells may be used to overcome this limitation and
have already provided in vitro models for neuronal
differentiation (3-5). For instance, the embryonal carcinoma-derived
P19 cell line yields various types of neurons as well as astrocytes,
oligodendrocytes, and microglia after treatment with retinoic acid (6).
Such cell systems can be used to follow the differentiation pathway
leading from the multipotential stem cell state to a terminally
differentiated neural phenotype. However, molecular studies are
hindered by the heterogeneity of differentiation, as no clear-cut
switch from one phenotype to another can be triggered in response to
extracellular signals.
In an attempt to isolate early committed progenitor cells able to
homogeneously differentiate toward alternative fates after appropriate
in vitro induction, we introduced the PK4 plasmid, which
contains the early genes of the simian virus SV40 under the control of
the adenovirus E1A promoter, into multipotential cells (7). Due to the
low level constitutive expression of the SV40 T antigen, this construct
promotes immortalization of neuroectodermal, endodermal, or mesodermal
precursor cell lines while still allowing differentiation along
multiple pathways to occur (8, 9).
The 1C11 murine cell line, which was selected upon differentiation of
F9 multipotential embryonal carcinoma cells transfected with PK4 (7),
behaves as a neuronal progenitor. It maintains an undifferentiated
phenotype and responds to induction by producing a progeny with
neuron-associated markers. 1C11 cells convert within 4 days into
serotonergic cells able to metabolize, store, and take up serotonin
(5-HT)1 (8, 10)
and expressing 5-HT1B/D, 5-HT2A, and
5-HT2B receptors (11).
Additional experiments shown here establish that the selective
induction of these three 5-HT receptors is an essential part of the
serotonergic program. Indeed, the cells synthesis, storage, and
transport of 5-HT respond to 5-HT concentration in the growth medium.
The present study also introduces alternative culture conditions
capable of triggering the 1C11 clone toward catecholaminergic differentiation. Similar to the serotonergic program, the
catecholaminergic pathway recruits nearly 100% of the cells and
follows a well defined schedule. Although the enzymes of
catecholaminergic metabolism are fully acquired within 4 days, 12 days
of induction are necessary for the cells to display a complete
catecholaminergic phenotype, coincident with the induction of a
functional norepinephrine (NE) uptake. Screening differentiating
catecholaminergic cells to detect bioaminergic receptors revealed the
onset of a single adrenergic receptor subtype, Materials--
Dibutyryl cyclic AMP (Bt2cAMP),
cyclohexane carboxylic acid (CCA), and dimethyl sulfoxide
(Me2SO) were from Sigma-Aldrich. Betaxolol and
2-[ Cell Culture and Differentiation--
1C11 cells were grown and
induced to differentiate (a) along the serotonergic pathway
by the addition of 1 mM Bt2cAMP and 0.05% CCA
in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with fetal calf
serum (10%) (8) or with 5-HT-depleted fetal calf serum (10%) (12),
(b) along the catecholaminergic pathway by the addition of 1 mM Bt2cAMP, 0.05% CCA, and 2%
Me2SO in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented
with 5-HT-depleted fetal calf serum (10%). 1C11**/NE cells
were seeded at 4 × 104 cells cm Determination of Cellular Content of Bioamines, Enzymatic
Activities, Uptake Experiments--
Bioamine contents, metabolites,
related enzymatic activities, and uptakes were measured as described
(8). Mouse brain synaptosomes were obtained according to O'Reilly and
Reith (13).
Radioligand Bindings and Related Experiments--
Binding
experiments were performed on cell membranes as described (11).
1C11*/5HT cells were screened at days 2 and 4 of
differentiation, 1C11**/NE cells were screened at days 4, 8, and 12. Specific radiolabeled ligands and their concentrations were
chosen according to Alexander et al. (14) for adrenergic
( Data and Analysis--
Binding data were analyzed by the
iterative nonlinear fitting software Prism (GraphPad) as described
(11). p < 0.01 was selected as the significance
criterion. All values are given as means ± S.E., or 95%
confidence intervals.
Immunocytochemistry--
Indirect immunofluorescence experiments
were made using rabbit polyclonal antibodies against L-CAM (a gift of
Dr. N. Peyrieras), nestin (a gift of Dr. U. Lendhal), 5-HT
(Eurodiagnostica), 1C11 Behaves as a Neuroectodermal Progenitor Inducible toward a
Serotonergic or a Catecholaminergic Differentiation Program--
Under
long term standard culture conditions, the 1C11 clone maintained an
immature phenotype with an epithelial morphology (Fig.
1A); it expressed L-CAM (Fig.
1B), a marker of epithelial cells, as well as nestin (Fig.
1C), a marker of embryonic neuroepithelial cells (15). 1C11
cells were also positively stained by specific antibodies against
Notch-1 and its ligand Jagged-1 (Fig. 1, D and
E), two key regulatory molecules involved in early
neurogenesis (16). Conversely, the 1C11 progenitor lacked neuronal
functions (Table I) and never
spontaneously entered a differentiation program.
The 1C11 cell line may be recruited toward neuronal differentiation by
Bt2cAMP, which most likely mimics the signaling of an
embryonic factor. After the addition of this inducer and CCA, cells
adopted a neural-like morphology (Fig. 1F). They kept dividing, albeit
at a slower rate than 1C11 precursor cells (generation time 30 h
versus 20 h). Bipolar extensions were already visible after 24 h of treatment, and neuron-associated markers such as N-CAM, synaptophysin (8),
The addition of Me2SO, in combination with
Bt2cAMP and CCA, inhibited the serotonergic program and
instead promoted the catecholaminergic differentiation of 1C11
precursor cells. The addition of Me2SO alone (1 to 3%) in
the culture medium induced neither a morphological change of 1C11
cells nor the expression of neuronal markers (data not shown). The
effect of Me2SO concentration (in synergy with Bt2cAMP) on the onset of the catecholaminergic pathway is
shown on Fig. 2A. A 2%
concentration was selected to trigger the catecholaminergic differentiation of 1C11 cells under standard culture conditions, since
a toxic effect was observed if the concentration exceeded 3%.
Within 4 days, Bt2cAMP/CCA/Me2SO-treated 1C11
cells, now referred to as 1C11**/NE cells, acquired a
morphology with short, widely branching neurites, markedly distinct
from the morphology of 1C11*/5HT cells (Fig.
1J). However, similarly to 1C11*/5HT cells,
1C11**/NE cells expressed N-CAM (Fig. 1L),
neurofilament (Fig. 1M), and synaptophysin (not shown). The
growth rate of 1C11**/NE cells was comparable with that of
1C11*/5HT cells. Catecholaminergic differentiation occurred
in a reproducible and synchronous manner, with almost 100% of the
cells being positively stained by anti-NE antibodies at day 4 (Fig.
1K). Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) activity, the key enzyme of
catecholamine biosynthesis, as well as DOPA, dopamine (DA), and NE
contents became measurable (Table I). Like noradrenergic neurons (17),
1C11**/NE cells had a monoamine oxidase A activity (Table
I) but no phenylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase activity
(epinephrine synthesis) (Table I). Thus, we may conclude that the
noradrenergic choice has been selective, with none of the
serotonergic-related functions being expressed along the
catecholaminergic pathway (Table I).
The Catecholaminergic Program Induces the Onset of a Complete
Catecholaminergic Phenotype--
1C11**/NE cells went
through a series of distinct maturation stages during their
differentiation kinetics. Two days after the inducers were added,
1C11**/NE cells acquired a weak TH activity (Table
IIA). However, NE content could not be
measured until day 4, when the cells had developed a complete
catecholaminergic metabolism (Table IIA). At this stage, the cells are
not fully differentiated, as reflected in particular by the absence of
any detectable NE or DA uptake (<1.5 pmol/mg of protein/min).
In vivo, during the differentiation of noradrenergic
neurons, TH activity occurs before NE uptake (18). Therefore, we
expected that the induction of the norepinephrine transporter (NET) may be part of the intrinsic catecholaminergic program of 1C11 cells. Accordingly, an active NE uptake could be measured 12 days after the
inducers were added, provided that cells had been seeded at a lower
density (104 cells/cm2) and left to grow
without replating to preserve neuronal polarity. This NE transport was
blocked at 4 °C and responded to ouabain, an inhibitor of the
Na+,K+-ATPase energy source. It was stationary
after 1 min at 37 °C, and the apparent Km of NE
(430 ± 20 nM) was close to that reported for HeLa
cells stably transfected with the human NET cDNA (19). The
corresponding Vmax value was estimated at 12.5 ± 3.4 pmol/mg of protein/min. In parallel,
[3H]nisoxetine, a selective inhibitor of NE uptake, bound
intact cells with an apparent Kd of 15.4 ± 1.2 nM and an apparent Bmax of 7.4 ± 0.5 fmol/mg of protein (220 binding sites/single cell).
Finally, we performed competition experiments for
[3H]nisoxetine binding to the NET present at the surface
of 1C11**/NE catecholaminergic cells and to the NET of
mouse brain synaptosomes. As shown in Fig. 2B, a significant
correlation was found between the two pharmacological profiles.
Interestingly, between day 4 and day 12 of the catecholaminergic
program, the levels of DOPA, DA, and NE in 1C11**/NE cells
did not vary significantly (Table IIA). Thus, we may conclude that although the catecholaminergic metabolism is fully acquired after
only 4 days of induction, cell differentiation takes 8 more days before
the expression of a functional NE transport and, thereby, of a complete
catecholaminergic phenotype.
Binding experiments with [3H]GR12935 (<0.04 pmol/mg of
protein/min from day 0 to day 12) excluded the presence of the DA
transporter. Furthermore, 5-HT transporter molecules, assessed by
[3H]-paroxetine binding (<0.03 pmol/mg prot/min), were
never detectable during 1C11**/NE differentiation.
Consequently, the choice between the serotonergic and the noradrenergic
phenotypes was also reflected by the selective induction of the
corresponding neurotransmitter transporter protein.
An
The induction of an
These results emphasize (i) the onset at day 8 of a functional
The
In another experiment, the coupling of the receptor to PLC
The above experiment suggested that an irreversible differentiation
step had occurred between day 8 and day 10. Such a step may correspond
to the acquisition of a constitutive activity for PLC External 5-HT Down-regulates All Serotonergic Functions Induced
along the Serotonergic Differentiation Program--
The onset of
serotonergic functions during the 1C11 serotonergic program follows a
well defined kinetic pattern as well (Table III). Since 5-HT2B and
5-HT1B/D receptors were present on 1C11*/5HT
cells as early as day 2 of the serotonergic differentiation program, we
wondered whether these receptors could modulate the serotonergic functions, similarly to what we observed for the catecholaminergic pathway. Because standard 10% FCS-supplemented medium contains 0.5 to
1 µM 5-HT, the culture medium was dialyzed, and the 5-HT level was reduced to less than 1 nM. The parameters for
serotonergic differentiation were assessed for 1C11*/5HT
cells grown in 5-HT-depleted medium. Under these new culture conditions, the time sequence of acquisition of serotonergic functions remained unchanged. However, at day 4, 5-HT cellular content (×2.8), tryptophan hydroxylase activity (×9.3), and the apparent
Vmax of 5-HT transport (×7.7) were higher than
the values obtained with 1C11*/5HT cells grown in 10% FCS
medium (Table III). These phenotypic changes specifically resulted from
5-HT starvation. Indeed, the values again became very close to those
obtained under standard culture conditions if 5-HT concentration in the
dialyzed medium was increased to 0.5 µM at day 0 of the
serotonergic program (Table III). This experiment interestingly
indicates a negative feedback of extracellular 5-HT on the extent of
5-HT synthesis and storage as well as on the 5-HT transport system
itself.
The 1C11 cell line was already shown to produce serotonergic
cells upon differentiation (8). In the present study, we show that the
1C11 cell actually is a bipotential neuroectodermal progenitor able to
also convert into fully functional catecholaminergic cells. This report
also emphasizes that the receptors selectively induced along either
differentiation pathway actively participate to the implementation of
the corresponding phenotype.
1C11 Behaves as a Committed Neuroectodermal Progenitor--
As
expected for a genuine progenitor, the 1C11 clone can give rise to
differentiated progenies upon induction. The resulting daughter cells
progressively acquire either a complete serotonergic or
catecholaminergic phenotype. The sequential steps of the mutually exclusive differentiation programs of the 1C11 cell line are summarized on Fig. 3. The differentiation events
concern almost 100% of the cells and are synchronous within the cell
population, as monitored by the immunolabeling of neuronal- or
neurotransmitter-specific markers.
The 1C11 cell line initially resulted from the direct induction
in vitro of F9-PK4 multipotential cells by retinoic acid and Bt2cAMP (7). Despite the lack of a proper embryonal
environment, 1C11 cells appear to have been irreversibly committed
toward a neural fate. Neuroectodermal cell fate decision is influenced by a variety of signals, either endogenous, such as developmentally expressed bioamines (20) and neurotrophins, or exogenous, originating from the somites and the notochord (21). Among the complex network of
pathways that dictates the developmental choice of neural progenitors, the Notch signaling pathway is of critical importance (16). The
combined expression of Notch-1 and Jagged-1 in 1C11 cells and the
homogenous immunostaining of the cell nuclei with Notch-1 antibodies
suggest that Notch-ligand interactions may take part in determining the
fate of 1C11 cells. Finally, the expression of the early
neuroectodermal marker nestin together with the lack of expression of
neuronal functions indicate that the 1C11 clone may correspond to a
neuroepithelial precursor.
1C11 Catecholaminergic Differentiation--
The PC12 cell line and
the MAH sympathoadrenal progenitor (22) have already enabled the study
of several features of the catecholaminergic differentiation. In
particular, PC12 cells express a phenotype of transformed chromaffin
cells and respond to nerve growth factor by adopting a neuron-like
fate, with a switch from the adrenergic to a cholinergic phenotype
(23). The 1C11 clone provides another, yet different, model for
catecholaminergic differentiation. In contrast to the adrenergic cells
of the peripheral nervous system or adrenal medulla,
1C11**/NE cells lack phenylethanolamine
N-methyltransferase enzymatic activity.
The 1C11 catecholaminergic program was triggered by the synergistic
effect of Bt2cAMP and Me2SO, whereas the
serotonergic program was obtained with Bt2cAMP alone.
Me2SO therefore acts as a dominant epigenetic signal. Such
an effect of Me2SO can be related to that described in the
case of Friend erythroleukemia cells (24) and of NIE-115 neuroblastoma
cells (25), where Me2SO confers a neuronal morphology.
The catecholaminergic program is restricted to the induction of (i) the
catecholamine metabolism, (ii) an adrenoreceptor, and (iii) NE uptake.
Several features of differentiation are reminiscent of the in
vivo situation. Similarly to the noradrenergic neurons of the
brainstem (26), 1C11**/NE cells have more robust but
shorter neuritic processes than 1C11*/5HT cells. As
in vivo (18), the synthesis of catecholamines occurs before
NE uptake. Eventually, like noradrenergic neurons,
1C11**/NE cells express the NET but no DA transporter
(27).
1C11**/NE noradrenergic cells selectively acquire a
functional
Since these observations could be gained in culture medium deprived of
exogenous catecholamines, we may propose that the acquisition by the
receptor of its constitutive signaling activity is sustained by NE
secreted by the cell itself. It is likely that 1C11**/NE
cells produce NE as soon as day 4, when NE metabolism is implemented. A
possible hypothesis is that small granular pulses of catecholamines, the existence of which we are currently testing by fast scan cyclic voltammetry, may account for NE release. Whatever the origin of the
release, endogenous NE and the ensuing autocrine stimulation of the
The role of 1C11 Cells and Serotonergic Differentiation--
The availability
of cellular models exhibiting a complete serotonergic phenotype,
i.e. 5-HT metabolism, storage, uptake, and receptors, is of
general interest in view of the involvement of serotonergic neurons in
many behavioral and homeostatic processes. The few cell lines meeting
these criteria include the thyroid parafollicular cell system (29) and
the embryonic raphe-derived RN46A cell line (30). Despite their ability
to undergo differentiation after induction, these systems already
display functional serotonergic properties in the undifferentiated
state. In contrast, serotonergic-related functions cannot be detected
in the 1C11 progenitor.
The time schedule enabling the acquisition of serotonergic functions by
1C11*/5HT cells is consistent with in vivo
observations. The phenotype reaches completion within 4 days, and the
expression of a functional 5-HT transport takes place only after the
induction of tryptophan hydroxylase activity (Table III). In the rat,
the ontogeny of central serotonergic neurons, originating in the raphe
nuclei, also occurs within a window of 4 days, between day 11 and day
15 of embryogenesis. At day 13, neurotransmitter synthesis becomes
measurable and monoamine transporters cannot be detected before day 15 (31).
In the present study, the intensities of 5-HT synthesis, storage, and
uptake are shown to be down-regulated by 5-HT itself through the
5-HT2B and/or 5-HT1B/D receptors already
present on the cells at day 2. The cells become responsive to external
5-HT at day 2 when the onset of 5-HT2B and
5-HT1B/D receptors occurs. This day therefore appears to be
a critical commitment step within the 1C11 serotonergic program. The
two receptors are still functional at day 4, when 5-HT2A
receptors become expressed. Likely all these receptors can mediate the
effect of 5-HT in the coordination of the serotonergic functions
underlying a complete phenotype of the cells. In fact,
5-HT1B/D receptors have already been proposed to behave as
autoreceptors capable of modulating serotonergic neurotransmission
(32). Our unpublished data suggest that the 5-HT2B receptor
may also act as an autoreceptor, as it controls the overall 5-HT
transport system of 1C11*/5HT cells.
Concluding Remarks--
The 1C11-inducible cell line provides an
example of how the autonomous genetic program of a precursor cell can
lead to the progressive acquisition of neuronal- and
neurotransmitter-related functions up to a complete and autoregulated
phenotype. Although it has never been clearly established that
serotonergic and noradrenergic cells may share a common precursor in
the course of embryonic development, the dual bioaminergic fate of 1C11
cells is in line with two very recent reports (5, 33), which suggest
that central dopaminergic and serotonergic neurons indeed arise from a
common progenitor. The consistency of the 1C11 differentiation programs
lies on (i) the 100% phenotypic conversion, (ii) the implementation of
all functions specific to serotonergic or noradrenergic neurons, in
a mutually exclusive manner, (iii) the temporal orders of onset of
neurotransmitter-related features that are similar to those observed
in vivo, (iv) the selective induction of bioaminergic receptors along either pathway, sustaining the autoregulation of the
corresponding phenotype. Hopefully the 1C11 system may, in view of
these key properties, help gain insight into the cellular and molecular
mechanisms involved in the modulation of neuronal differentiation by neurotransmitters.
This article is dedicated to the memory of
Dr. Mose Da Prada to whom we are greatly indebted for his constant
support regarding the characterization of the 1C11 cell line. We
gratefully acknowledge Prof. Sylvain Blanquet for critical reading of
the manuscript and Dr. Patricia Malherbe for cloning
*
This study was supported by CNRS Grants URA 1960 and ARC
6668 and the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
This author is on leave of absence from the Ecole Nationale du
Génie Rural des Eaux et des Forêts.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Dr. Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15 France. Tel.: 33145688465; Fax:
33140613194; E-mail: okellerm@pasteur.fr.
The abbreviations used are:
5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine;
CCA, cyclohexane carboxylic acid;
DA, dopamine;
Bt2cAMP, dibutyryl cyclic AMP;
HEAT, 2-[
Regulation by Neurotransmitter Receptors of Serotonergic or
Catecholaminergic Neuronal Cell Differentiation*
§,
,
,
, and
**
Différenciation Cellulaire, CNRS URA
1960, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15 France, ¶ Pharma
Research Department, Hoffmann-La-Roche A.G., Basel 40002, Switzerland,
and
CR Claude Bernard, Pathologie Expérimentale et
Communications Cellulaires, IFR 6, Service de Biochimie, Hôpital
Lariboisière, 75010 Paris, France
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

-enolase, and neurofilament) as well as the
general functions of either serotonergic (1C11*/5HT)
(5HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine) or noradrenergic
(1C11**/NE) (NE, norepinephrine) neurons. The two programs
are shown to be mutually exclusive. 1C11 thus behaves as a
neuroepithelial cell line with a dual bioaminergic fate.
1C11*/5HT cells implement a functional 5-HT transporter and
thereby a complete serotonergic phenotype within 4 days, whereas
5-HT1B/D, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2A
receptors are sequentially induced. The accurate time schedule of
catecholaminergic differentiation was defined. Catecholamine synthesis,
storage, and catabolism are acquired within 4 days; the noradrenergic
phenotype is complete at day 12 and includes a functional
norepinephrine transporter and an
1D-adrenoreceptor (day
8). The time-dependent onset of neurotransmitter-associated functions proper to either program is similar to in vivo
observations. Along each pathway, the selective induction of
serotonergic or adrenergic receptors is shown to be an essential part
of the differentiation program, since they promote an autoregulation of
the corresponding phenotype.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1D, at
day 8 of differentiation. This receptor plays a pivotal role in the
implementation of the catecholaminergic program, since its inhibition
prevents the cells from acquiring a functional NE transport.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-(4-hydroxy-3-iodophenyl)ethylaminomethyl] tetralone (HEAT)
were from Tocris Cookson. Paroxetine was a gift from Ferrosan. Yohimbine, SCH 23982, nisoxetine, and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine were from Sigma-Aldrich. Radioligands were obtained from NEN Life Science Products and Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
[3H]Betaxolol was synthesized by Dr. J. Wursch
(Hoffmann-La Roche AG). Mouse
lA-,
1B-,
and
lD-adrenoreceptor cDNAs were cloned and
transfected into COS-7 cells by Dr. P. Malherbe (Hoffmann-La Roche AG).
2.
l,
2,
), dopaminergic (D1
to D5), and serotonergic receptors. The specific binding
was defined as the one inhibited by 1 µM homologous
unlabeled ligands. We favored use of the cold form of the radioligand
to detect as many binding sites as possible, including nonspecific
ones, and thereafter to characterize them. The mean threshold for
detection was 20 binding sites per cell. Determination of endogenous
inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) was performed as
described (11).

-enolase (a gift of Dr. L. Legault), and NE
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals); goat polyclonal antibodies against
Notch-1 and Jagged-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); mouse anti-NFL and rat
anti-NCAM monoclonal antibodies (Valbiotech).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (113K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Immunocytochemical characterization of the
1C11 neuroepithelial precursor cell and its resulting
1C11*/HT serotonergic and 1C11**/NE
catecholaminergic progeny. A-E, phase picture
(A) and homogenous staining of 1C11 epithelial-like cells
with antibodies to L-CAM (B), nestin (C), Notch-1
(D), and Jagged-1 (E). F-I, phase
picture (F) and homogenous staining of 1C11*/5HT
serotonergic cells at day 4 with antibodies against 5-HT
(G), 
-enolase (H), and NFL (I).
J-M, phase picture (J) and homogenous staining
of 1C11**/NE catecholaminergic cells at day 4 with
antibodies against NE (K), N-CAM (L), and NFL
(M). Scale bar = 25 µm.
Serotonergic or catecholaminergic cell fate of 1C11 progenitor cells
-hydroxylase (DBH)), (ii) activities of the catabolizing
enzymes monoamine oxidase (MAO) A and B, and (iii) neurotransmitter
content. The lack of phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase
(PNMT) activity indicates that 1C11**/NE cells are not able to
convert NE into epinephrine. 5-HTP, 5-hydroxytryptophan; 5-HIAA,
5-hydroxy indoleacetic acid; DBH, dopamine
-hydroxylase.

-enolase (Fig. 1H), and
neurofilament (Fig. 1I) were expressed. Four days after the addition of
the inducers, nearly 100% of the cells could be positively stained by
anti-5-HT antibodies (Fig. 1G). The serotonergic cells, now referred to as 1C11*/5HT cells, displayed a complete
serotonergic metabolism with the ability to synthesize, store, and
catabolize 5-HT, as inferred by the measurements of tryptophan
hydroxylase activity, 5-HT content, and monoamine oxidase-B activity,
respectively (Table I).

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Characterization of the 1C11
catecholaminergic differentiation program. A, effect of
Me2SO (DMSO) concentration on the onset of the
1C11**/NE catecholaminergic phenotype, deduced from
measurements of DA and NE contents, as well as TH, dopamine
-hydroxylase (DBH), and aromatic amino acid decarboxylase
(AADC) enzymatic activities at day 4 of differentiation.
dbcAMP, dibutyryl cyclic AMP; DMEM, Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium. B, competition experiments for
[3H]nisoxetine binding (pKi values) on
1C11**/NE day-12 cells are compared with the values
measured on synaptosomes prepared from mouse brain. Values are the
means of 3 independent experiments performed in triplicate. Ten
different concentrations of each competing drug were used. Correlation
analysis yields a Spearman rank of rs = 0.9643 (p < 0.002). C, comparison of competition
experiments for [125I]HEAT binding
(pKi values) on 1C11**/NE day-8 cells
and on COS-7 cells stably transfected with mouse
1D-adrenoreceptor cDNA (n = 8). Ten
different concentrations of each competing drug were used. Correlation
analysis yields a Spearman rank of rs = 0.9581 (p < 0.001). Estimated rs values
were 0.5714 (p = 0.076) and 0.7381 (p = 0.023), respectively, for
1A- and
1B-adrenoreceptors expressed in COS cells. D,
time-dependent stimulation of IP3 production in
1C11**/NE cells at day 8 (
), day 10 (
), and day 12 (
) by 100 nM NE.
Kinetics of acquisition of catecholaminergic functions by
1C11**/NE catecholaminergic cells and involvement of the
1D-adrenoreceptor in the onset of the NET
-hydroxylase. B, the parameters for NE
metabolism and transport were measured at day 12 of differentiation: in
1C11**/NE cells grown in a dialyzed medium (1C11**/NE
d12, column 1), after an activation of the
1D-adrenoreceptor
by 100 nM NE at day 8 (column 2), or after blockade of the
receptor by 10 nM HEAT at day 8 (column 3) and day 10 (column 4). C, the basal level of IP3 production in
1C11**/NE cells grown under standard conditions was measured at
days 8, 10, and 12 of the catecholaminergic differentiation program
(column 1) or after inhibition of the
1D-adrenoreceptor by
addition of 10 nM antagonist HEAT at day 8 (column 2) or
day 10 (column 3).
1D-Adrenoreceptor Is Selectively Induced at Day 8 of the Catecholaminergic Differentiation Program--
The consistent,
time-dependent acquisition of catecholaminergic functions along
the catecholaminergic differentiation pathway prompted us to
investigate into the presence of neurotransmitter receptors on
1C11**/NE cell membranes. With binding experiments, the
presence of 5-HT or DA receptor subtypes at any time in the kinetics of
1C11**/NE differentiation could be excluded (see
"Experimental Procedures"). To detect adrenergic binding
sites, studies were first carried out with antagonists of the
-,
2-, and
1-adrenoreceptors: 10 nM [3H]betaxolol,
[3H]yohimbine, and [125I]HEAT,
respectively. Yohimbine and betaxolol binding never could be detected.
Nevertheless, from day 8, significant amounts of [125I]HEAT were bound by the cells, suggesting the
presence of one or several
1-adrenoreceptor(s). The
magnitude of the binding constant of [125I]HEAT
(Kd = 1.1 ± 0.1 nM) further
favored the presence of an
1D-adrenoreceptor. The
Bmax value (73 ± 1 fmol/mg of protein) corresponds to nearly 2200 sites/cell.
1D-adrenoreceptor as observed on day
8 of differentiation could be firmly established as follows. cDNAs encoding the mouse
1A-,
1B-, and
1D-adrenoreceptors were cloned and stably transfected
into COS cells. These COS cells were used to calibrate the
pharmacologic response of each
-adrenoreceptor to various
antagonists of [125I]HEAT binding. Highly significant
correlations (p < 0.001) were obtained between the
pKi values of the drugs measured on
1C11**/NE cells and on these COS cells that express the
1D receptor (Fig. 2C). In contrast, no
significant correlation was found with COS cells carrying the two other
cloned
-adrenoreceptors. Moreover, as expected for an
1 adrenoreceptor subtype, the
1D receptor present on 1C11**/NE cells was coupled with phospholipase C
; at day 8, IP3 production was obtained in response to
the addition of NE (Fig. 2D). At day 10, a constitutive
level of IP3 was observed without addition of NE (Fig.
2D). However, upon stimulation of the receptor by NE, more
IP3 production was obtained, reaching to the same plateau value as at day 8. We verified that the number of HEAT binding sites
and the pharmacologic profile of the
1D receptor did not change between day 8 and day 12.
1D-adrenoreceptor along the catecholaminergic pathway
and (ii) the induction of a constitutive activity for the coupling of
this receptor to PLC
at day 10 of the differentiation program.
1D-Adrenoreceptor Actively Participates to the
Acquisition of a Functional NE Transport in 1C11**/NE
Catecholaminergic Cells--
The onset of an
1D-adrenoreceptor before the completion of the
differentiation program prompted us to examine whether
catecholaminergic functions could be regulated by NE. The experiments
were performed with cells left to differentiate in a dialyzed culture
medium, where the external concentrations of NE, DA, and 5-HT were less than 2 nM. First, the
1D-adrenoreceptor was
stimulated by the addition of 100 nM NE at day 8. As shown
before, an increase in IP3 production was observed under
these conditions. The parameters of NE metabolism and transport were
measured 4 days later (day 12). They remained unchanged (Table IIB) as
compared with the results obtained in standard culture conditions. The
addition of NE at day 10 had no effect either on NE metabolism and
transport, as measured at day 12.
was
inactivated at day 8 by the addition of 10 nM full
antagonist HEAT (Table IIB). Although the catecholaminergic metabolism
was insensitive to this treatment (Table IIB), nisoxetine binding and
NE transport, normally detected at day 12, became no more measurable
(Table IIB). Strikingly, however, if HEAT was added at day 10, NE
transport as well as NE metabolism remained intact at day 12 (Table
IIB).
coupling by
the
1D-adrenoreceptor at day 10, as described in the
previous paragraph. To assess this idea, we followed the PLC
coupling as a function of HEAT addition. As shown in Table IIC, the
addition of 10 nM HEAT at day 8 abolished the basal level of IP3 production, which we normally observed from day 10. If HEAT was added at day 10 instead of day 8, the constitutive activity of the receptor was maintained (Table IIC). These experiments clearly
indicate that day 10 constitutes a critical commitment step during
implementation of the catecholaminergic program by which neither
the constitutive activity of the adrenoreceptor nor the induction of NE
transport may be impaired by antagonist treatment. We can therefore
suggest that the onset of NE transport is related to the
1D-adrenoreceptor basal signaling activity in
1C11**/NE cells.
Kinetics of acquisition of serotonergic functions by 1C11*/5HT
cells and 5-HT-induced down-regulation of the serotonergic phenotype
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
The differentiation steps of the 1C11
precursor cell line. db2cAMP, dibutyryl
cyclic AMP
1D-adrenoreceptor at day 8 of
differentiation. Although it appears not to be implied in the
catecholaminergic metabolism, this receptor is involved in the
completion of the phenotype. From our various observations, we may draw
a link between the induction of a constitutive activity for the
receptor at day 10 and the NET regulation. Indeed, inactivation of the
receptor at day 8 impairs (i) NE transport and nisoxetine binding at
day 12 and (ii) the onset of a constitutive PLC coupling to the
receptor at day 10. None of these effects are observed if the
antagonist treatment is applied at day 10.
1D-adrenoreceptor appear sufficient to allow the onset of a functional NE transport. Indeed, the kinetics of induction and the
parameters of NE transport at day 12 are not improved by prior addition
of NE in the culture medium at day 8 or 10.
1D receptors in vivo is unclear.
The present discovery that an adrenoreceptor may act as an autoreceptor
interfering with the onset of the NE transporter is unprecedented, yet
NE binding to
-adrenoreceptors has already been suggested to be involved in the differentiation of amphibian embryonic neurons (28).
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
1-adrenoreceptor cDNAs. We thank Dr. M. B. Foster for helpful comments on the manuscript.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
-(4-hydroxy-3-iodophenyl)ethylaminomethyl] tetralone;
NE, norepinephrine;
NET, NE transporter;
TH, tyrosine hydroxylase;
IP3, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate;
PLC, phospholipase C;
FCS, fetal calf serum.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Lendahl, U.,
and McKay, R. D. G.
(1990)
Trends Neurosci.
13,
132-137[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Whittemore, S. R.,
and Snyder, E. Y.
(1996)
Mol. Neurobiol.
12,
13-38[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Liesi, P.,
Rechardt, L.,
and Wartiovaara, J.
(1983)
Nature
306,
265-267[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Bain, G.,
Kitchens, D.,
Yao, M.,
Huettner, J. E.,
and Gottlieb, D. I.
(1995)
Dev. Biol.
168,
342-357[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Deacon, T.,
Dinsmore, J.,
Costantini, L. C.,
Ratliff, J.,
and Isacson, O.
(1998)
Exp. Neurol.
149,
28-41[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
McPherson, P. A.,
and McBurney, M. W.
(1995)
Methods: Comp. Methods Enzymol.
7,
238-252[CrossRef]
7.
Kellermann, O.,
and Kelly, F.
(1986)
Differentiation
32,
74-81[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Buc-Caron, M. H.,
Launay, J. M.,
Lamblin, D.,
and Kellermann, O.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
1922-1926 9.
Poliard, A.,
Nifuji, A.,
Lamblin, D.,
Plee, E.,
Forest, C.,
and Kellermann, O.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
130,
1461-1472 10.
Loric, S.,
Maroteaux, L.,
Kellermann, O.,
and Launay, J. M.
(1995)
Mol. Pharmacol.
47,
458-466[Abstract]
11.
Kellermann, O.,
Loric, S.,
Maroteaux, L.,
and Launay, J. M.
(1996)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
118,
1161-1170[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Tournois, C.,
Mutel, V.,
Manivet, P.,
Launay, J. M.,
and Kellermann, O.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
17498-17503 13.
O'Reilly, C. A.,
and Reith, M. E.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
6115-6121 14.
Alexander, S., Mead, A., and Peters, J. (1998) Trends Pharmacol.
Sci. (receptor and ion channel nomenclature suppl.) 1-98
15.
Lendahl, U.,
Zimmerman, L. B.,
and McKay, R. D. G.
(1990)
Cell
60,
585-595[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Fleming, R. J.,
Purcell, K.,
and Artavanis-Tsakonas, S.
(1997)
Trends Cell Biol.
7,
437-441[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Westlund, K. N.,
Denney, R. M.,
Kochersperger, L. M.,
Rose, R. M.,
and Abell, C. W.
(1985)
Science
230,
181-183 18.
Jonakait, G. M.,
Markey, K. A.,
Goldstein, M.,
Dreyfus, C. F.,
and Black, I. B.
(1985)
Dev. Biol.
108,
6-17[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Pacholczyk, T.,
Blakely, R. D.,
and Amara, S. G.
(1991)
Nature
350,
350-354[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Lauder, J. M.
(1993)
Trends Neurosci.
16,
233-239[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Bronner-Fraser, M.,
and Fraser, S. E.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
885-891[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Birren, S. J.,
and Anderson, D. J.
(1990)
Neuron
4,
189-201[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Green, S. H.
(1995)
Methods: Comp. Methods Enzymol.
7,
222-237[CrossRef]
24.
Friend, C.,
Scher, W.,
Holland, J. G.,
and Sato, T.
(1971)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
68,
378-382
25.
Kihmi, Y.,
Palfrey, C.,
Spector, I.,
Barak, Y.,
and Littauer, U. Z.
(1976)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
73,
462-466 26.
McQueen, J. K.
(1987)
Basic Clin. Aspects Neurosci.
2,
7-16
27.
Lorang, D.,
Amara, S. G.,
and Simerly, R. B.
(1994)
J. Neurosci.
14,
4903-4914[Abstract]
28.
Rowe, S. J.,
Messenger, N. J.,
and Warner, A. E.
(1993)
Development
119,
1343-1357[Abstract]
29.
Russo, A. F.,
Clark, M. S.,
and Durham, P. L.
(1996)
Mol. Neurobiol.
13,
257-276[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Rudge, J. S.,
Eaton, M. J.,
Mather, P.,
Lindsay, R. M.,
and Whittemore, S. R.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Neurosci.
7,
604-621
31.
Hyde, C. E.,
and Bennett, B. A.
(1994)
Brain Res.
646,
118-123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Hoyer, D.,
Clarke, D. E.,
Fozard, J. R.,
Hartig, P. R.,
Martin, G. R.,
Mylecharane, E. J.,
Saxena, P. R.,
and Humphrey, P. P.
(1994)
Pharmacol. Rev.
46,
157-203[Abstract]
33.
Ye, W.,
Shimamura, K.,
Rubenstein, J. L. R.,
Hynes, M. A.,
and Rosenthal, A.
(1998)
Cell
93,
755-766[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Mouillet-Richard, N. Nishida, E. Pradines, H. Laude, B. Schneider, C. Feraudet, J. Grassi, J.-M. Launay, S. Lehmann, and O. Kellermann Prions Impair Bioaminergic Functions through Serotonin- or Catecholamine-derived Neurotoxins in Neuronal Cells J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2008; 283(35): 23782 - 23790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Tamguney, K. Giles, D. V. Glidden, P. Lessard, H. Wille, P. Tremblay, D. F. Groth, F. Yehiely, C. Korth, R. C. Moore, et al. Genes contributing to prion pathogenesis J. Gen. Virol., July 1, 2008; 89(7): 1777 - 1788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Lau, S. Horschitz, S. Berger, D. Bartsch, and P. Schloss Antidepressant-induced internalization of the serotonin transporter in serotonergic neurons FASEB J, June 1, 2008; 22(6): 1702 - 1714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pietri, A. Caprini, S. Mouillet-Richard, E. Pradines, M. Ermonval, J. Grassi, O. Kellermann, and B. Schneider Overstimulation of PrPC Signaling Pathways by Prion Peptide 106-126 Causes Oxidative Injury of Bioaminergic Neuronal Cells J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 2006; 281(38): 28470 - 28479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Launay, B. Schneider, S. Loric, M. Da Prada, and O. Kellermann Serotonin transport and serotonin transporter-mediated antidepressant recognition are controlled by 5-HT2B receptor signaling in serotonergic neuronal cells FASEB J, September 1, 2006; 20(11): 1843 - 1854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pietri, B. Schneider, S. Mouillet-Richard, M. Ermonval, V. Mutel, J.-M. Launay, and O. Kellermann Reactive oxygen species-dependent TNF-{alpha} converting enzyme activation through stimulation of 5-HT2B and {alpha}1D autoreceptors in neuronal cells FASEB J, July 1, 2005; 19(9): 1078 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Arima, N. Nishida, S. Sakaguchi, K. Shigematsu, R. Atarashi, N. Yamaguchi, D. Yoshikawa, J. Yoon, K. Watanabe, N. Kobayashi, et al. Biological and Biochemical Characteristics of Prion Strains Conserved in Persistently Infected Cell Cultures J. Virol., June 1, 2005; 79(11): 7104 - 7112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mouillet-Richard, M. Pietri, B. Schneider, C. Vidal, V. Mutel, J.-M. Launay, and O. Kellermann Modulation of Serotonergic Receptor Signaling and Cross-talk by Prion Protein J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2005; 280(6): 4592 - 4601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Schneider, V. Mutel, M. Pietri, M. Ermonval, S. Mouillet-Richard, and O. Kellermann NADPH oxidase and extracellular regulated kinases 1/2 are targets of prion protein signaling in neuronal and nonneuronal cells PNAS, November 11, 2003; 100(23): 13326 - 13331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mouillet-Richard, M. Ermonval, C. Chebassier, J. L. Laplanche, S. Lehmann, J. M. Launay, and O. Kellermann Signal Transduction Through Prion Protein Science, September 15, 2000; 289(5486): 1925 - 1928. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||