J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 13, 9447-9451, March 31, 2000
Thioredoxin Activation of Phosphoribulokinase in a Bi-enzyme
Complex from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Chloroplasts*
Luisana
Avilan
,
Sandrine
Lebreton§, and
Brigitte
Gontero§¶
From the § Institut Jacques MONOD (UMR 7592),
CNRS-Universités Paris VI
VII, 2 Place Jussieu,
75251 Paris Cedex 05, France
 |
ABSTRACT |
The activation of oxidized phosphoribulokinase
either "free" or as part of a bi-enzyme complex by reduced
thioredoxins during the enzyme reaction was studied. In the presence of
reduced thioredoxin, the product of the reaction catalyzed by
phosphoribulokinase within the bi-enzyme complex does not appear in a
linear fashion. It follows a mono-exponential pattern that suggests a
slow dissociation process of the bi-enzyme complex in the assay
cuvette. A plot of the steady state of product appearance against
thioredoxin concentration gave a sigmoid curve. On the basis of our
experimental results, we propose a minimum model of the activation of
phosphoribulokinase by reduced thioredoxin. Reduced thioredoxin may act
on the phosphoribulokinase, either within the complex or in the
dissociated metastable form. However, the time required to activate the
enzyme as part of the complex is shorter (about 20 s) than that
required to activate the dissociated form (about 10 min). This might be
of physiological relevance, and we discuss the role of the interactions
between phosphoribulokinase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase in the regulation of the Calvin cycle.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Phosphoribulokinase (EC 2.7.1.19) catalyzes the
ATP-dependent phosphorylation of ribulose 5-phosphate to
form ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate and belongs to the Calvin cycle. This
chloroplast enzyme is regulated by light through several mechanisms
(1-8). Thioredoxins are small (about 12 kDa) regulatory proteins that
mediate disulfide bridge reduction in specific target proteins (9-11).
Once reduced by the electron flux from the photosystem I, thioredoxin
activates various target enzymes. Reduction of these enzymes entails
the oxidation of thioredoxin. Recently, the molecular description of
the thiol-disulfide exchange pathway between spinach
phosphoribulokinase and thioredoxin has provided evidence that Cys-46
of thioredoxin and Cys-55 of spinach phosphoribulokinase participate in
the intermolecular mixed disulfide (12-14). The identities of the
pairing residues are thus well established.
There is now considerable evidence that phosphoribulokinase interacts
with other Calvin cycle enzymes leading to the formation of a
multienzyme complex (15-30). We have shown that chloroplast phosphoribulokinase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (EC
1.2.1.13) in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cells exist as a bi-enzyme complex made up of two molecules of dimeric
phosphoribulokinase and two molecules of tetrameric
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (24). A similar bi-enzyme
complex has recently been found to contain a so-called CP12, besides
the two enzymes (29).
Unlike the free stable enzyme, oxidized phosphoribulokinase may have a
quite significant activity when associated with
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (25). On dilution, the complex
may dissociate, and the released metastable phosphoribulokinase is also
active and slowly relapses into the free stable form (25). Therefore, the association of phosphoribulokinase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gives rise to conformation changes resulting in the
appearance of active oxidized phosphoribulokinase.
We have therefore studied the activation by thioredoxin
of algal phosphoribulokinase within a bi-enzyme complex
made up of this enzyme and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Strains and Culture Conditions--
The wild type
WM3
strain of C. reinhardtii was
heterotrophically grown in the dark at 25 °C on Tris
acetate/phosphate medium (31).
Materials--
Ribulose 5-phosphate was obtained from Sigma.
ATP, NAD(H), phosphoenolpyruvate, pyruvate kinase, and lactate
dehydrogenase were supplied by Roche Molecular Biochemicals.
Enzymes--
The phosphoribulokinase-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase complex was purified from C. reinhardtii
cells, essentially as described previously, but in the absence of
cysteine (24). Thioredoxin from a cyanobacterium, Spirulina
sp. (Sigma), was used because our efforts to purify thioredoxin from
Chlamydomonas have failed, probably because of the
instability of this protein in the alga (32). Free metastable enzyme
was obtained after dilution of the bi-enzyme complex (about 500-fold)
in the assay cuvette at pH 7.7 and 30 °C in the absence of
substrates. Under these conditions, the complex dissociates, and the
free metastable form of phosphoribulokinase appears. In most
experiments, the phosphoribulokinase activity of the bi-enzyme complex
or of the dissociated metastable form was followed, in the presence of
both substrates and thioredoxin, using the principle of Tian and Tsou (33).
Reaction Assay and Activity
Measurements--
Phosphoribulokinase was measured
spectrophotometrically using a coupled assay with pyruvate kinase and
lactate dehydrogenase at 30 °C (7). Thioredoxins were reduced by
incubation with 20 mM dithiothreitol for 15 min. For
thioredoxin activation experiments, thioredoxin was always present in a
large excess relative to the bi-enzyme complex and kept permanently
reduced in the assay cuvette using 0.5 or 1 mM
dithiothreitol. Protein concentrations were determined according to
Ref. 34.
Data Analysis--
The experimental data were fitted to the
equations generated by the model using Simplex (35) or Marquardt (36)
algorithms and a VAX computer.
 |
RESULTS |
Oxidized phosphoribulokinase can be reduced and activated by
reducing agents. Therefore, the activity of the bi-enzyme complex can
be followed while undergoing reduction by thioredoxin. Different thioredoxin concentrations were used with a fixed concentration of
dithiothreitol, and the activity of the phosphoribulokinase was
measured at saturating concentrations of both substrates (1 mM ribulose 5-phosphate and ATP). There was a latency
period, whatever the thioredoxin concentration used, and all progress curves were monophasic (Fig. 1). Indeed
in the presence of 1 µM reduced thioredoxin, the progress
curve was not a straight line or an exponential but could be fit using
a combination of these two functions. The lag phase was associated with
the slow depolymerization of the complex on dilution in the reaction
mixture at 30 °C. Exactly as in the case of oxidized form, a best
fit was obtained by assuming that the complex and the dissociated forms
were active (25). The lag therefore resulted from the conversion of a
less active form (phosphoribulokinase in the complex) into a more
active one (phosphoribulokinase released from the complex).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Progress curves of the reaction catalyzed by
reduced phosphoribulokinase within the bi-enzyme complex using
different thioredoxin concentrations. The product q of
the phosphoribulokinase activity is continuously measured in the
presence of 0 ( ), 0.08 µM (*), 0.16 µM
( ), 0.5 µM ( ), 0.8 µM ( ), 4 µM ( ) thioredoxin, and 0.5 mM
dithiothreitol. The final concentration of the bi-enzyme complex in the
assay cuvette is 2.3 nM. The data are fitted to Equation 4
in the main text.
|
|
If the bi-enzyme complex was allowed to dissociate (25) in the assay
cuvette for 10 min at 30 °C before the substrates and 1 µM reduced thioredoxins were added, no lag was detected
(curve 2, Fig. 2), contrary to
the curve obtained with the complex (curve 1, Fig. 2).
Therefore the metastable phosphoribulokinase released from the complex
on dilution did not exhibit a lag phase even upon reduction by
thioredoxin. These results indicate that the binding of reduced
thioredoxin was fast relative to the dissociation process. The
dissociation process was therefore the limiting step and was
responsible for the lag.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Progress curves of the reaction catalyzed by
phosphoribulokinase either in the bi-enzyme complex or in the
metastable form. The activity of the bi-enzyme complex is measured
in the presence of 1 µM reduced thioredoxin plus 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, at 1 mM ribulose 5-phosphate
and 1 mM ATP (curve 1). The bi-enzyme complex is
allowed to dissociate as described in the text, and the activity of the
released metastable form of phosphoribulokinase is measured in the same
experimental conditions described above for the bi-enzyme complex
(curve 2). In both cases, the concentration of the bi-enzyme
complex is 2.35 nM in the assay cuvette. The product
q of the phosphoribulokinase activity is continuously
measured. The experimental results are fitted to Equation 6 in the main
text describing a monoexponential law (curve 1) or to a
straight line (curve 2). The steady-state values are 416 s 1 when the target enzyme of the thioredoxin is the
complex (curve 1) and 333 s 1 when the target
enzyme is the metastable form of phosphoribulokinase (curve
2).
|
|
The apparent steady state (quasi-linear part of the curve) after
the lag, as observed with the bi-enzyme complex, was related to the
dissociated metastable form. When the steady-state rates pertaining to
the metastable phosphoribulokinase released from the complex were
plotted as a function of reduced thioredoxin, a sigmoid curve was
observed (Fig. 3). The simplest model
that can accommodate these results is shown in Fig.
4.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Variation of the steady-state rates of the
activation process of the bi-enzyme complex as a function of
thioredoxin concentration. By fitting the progress curves of Fig.
2 to Equation 4 in the main text, the values of the steady-state are
obtained. These results are fitted to Equation 6 that, indeed, can be
reduced to Equation 9 which is of the form
v/[E]0 = (a[T]2 + b)/(c[T]2 + d) with a = 517, b = 10, c = 1, and d = 0.2.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Theoretical model of oxidized
phosphoribulokinase activation induced by reduced thioredoxin.
C and D indicate phosphoribulokinase in the
bi-enzyme complex and the released metastable phosphoribulokinase,
respectively. The reduced and the oxidized states are labeled
r and o whatever the phosphoribulokinase forms
(free or in the complex). The constants Ki
correspond to apparent binding constants of thioredoxin (T)
to the different phosphoribulokinase forms. The constants
ki correspond to the apparent dissociation constants
of the complex forms into the dissociated (metastable (D))
forms. The constants ci and c i
correspond to the binding and desorption constants of the substrates
S (both ATP and ribulose 5-phosphate). The constants
µi correspond to the catalytic constants.
|
|
As mentioned above, reduced thioredoxins were rapidly bound to
phosphoribulokinase, and the corresponding steps can be considered to
be in rapid equilibrium. The rate of conversion of the enzyme-substrate forms into enzyme-product forms was slower and was therefore in a
steady state. One can therefore contract the kinetic scheme of Fig. 4
to the model of Fig. 5 by using Cha's
factors (37).

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Simplified model of the activation of
phosphoribulokinase by thioredoxin. The reduced (normalized)
steady-state concentrations of the various enzyme forms are (C,
CS, D, and DS). The forms C, CS, D, and
DS correspond to rapid equilibrium between oxidized and
reduced states of phosphoribulokinase either in the complex
(C and CS) or in the metastable form
(D and DS). The fi
coefficients correspond to Cha's factors.
|
|
The dissociation of the bi-enzyme complex, whether oxidized or reduced,
was the slowest process and occurred in one step. The simplified
kinetic Model 1 may thus be proposed,
where X and Y correspond to oxidoreduction
states of the phosphoribulokinase included in the bi-enzyme complex
(Co, CoS,
Cr, and CrS) and of
the recently metastable dissociated phosphoribulokinase
(Do, DoS, Dr, and DrS),
respectively.
* corresponds to the grouping of apparent dissociation
constants of the complex forms into the dissociated metastable
phosphoribulokinase forms and is equal to Equation 1,
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where the
parameters represent the normalized steady-state
concentrations of the various enzyme forms.
The time evolution of the overall process may be described through
Equation 2.
|
(Eq. 2)
|
Owing to the following conservation Equation 3,
|
(Eq. 3)
|
where Pt is the total protein concentration, it
can be demonstrated that the product q assumes the form
shown in Equation 4,
|
(Eq. 4)
|
and indeed, all experimental progress curves (Fig. 1) were fitted
to this equation. Moreover,
* is a complex function of the form
shown in Equation 5,
|
(Eq. 5)
|
and therefore
* should decrease as a function of thioredoxin
concentration. This is what was obtained experimentally (Fig. 6).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Variation of the apparent dissociation
constants of the phosphoribulokinase in the bi-enzyme complex as a
function of thioredoxin concentration. By fitting the progress
curves of Fig. 2 to Equation 4 in the main text, the values of * are
obtained. These data follow the Equation 5 in the main text.
|
|
By using Equation 4, values of the steady-state rates (A)
were plotted as a function of thioredoxin concentration, and a sigmoid was obtained (Fig. 3).
To test if the theoretical model depicted in Fig. 4 could also account
for this experimental result, the equations were written under
steady-state conditions, and the rate is as follows:
|
(Eq. 6)
|
Equation 6 therefore accounts for the sigmoidicity observed.
Moreover, if [T]= 0, Equation 6 reduces to Equation 7.
|
(Eq. 7)
|
If [T] is high, Equation 6 then reduces to Equation 8.
|
(Eq. 8)
|
Equations 7 and 8 follow the Michaelis-Menten law, and they
describe the behavior of the oxidized complex and of the fully reduced
dissociated metastable phosphoribulokinase, respectively, as described
previously (25, 28).
Fitting our experimental results to Equation 6 makes it possible to
simplify this to give Equation 9,
|
(Eq. 9)
|
in which the terms in [T], both in the numerator and
the denominator are negligible, with
(µ4c4K3K4[S])
close to 520, (µ2c2[S]) to 10, (c4[S]c
4 + µ4)K3K4
close to 1, and c2[S] + (c
2 + µ2) to 0.2 (Fig.
7, curve 1). By taking into
account these values, one can estimate the values of µ2
and µ4 to be approximately equal to 520 and 50 s
1, respectively. These values are in good agreement with
those previously reported (25, 28).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of the kinetic parameters associated
to the bi-enzyme complex and to the metastable form of
phosphoribulokinase on the sigmoidicity of the curves
v/[E]0
versus thioredoxin concentration. Curve
1 represents the theoretical curve that gives the best fit of
experimental data to v/[E]0 = (a[T]2 + b)/(c[T]2 + d) with a = 517, b = 10, c = 1, and d = 0.2. Curve 2 is obtained if all parameters are conserved but with a = 200. Curve 3 is obtained if all parameters are conserved
but with d = 10.
|
|
Different parameters were used to simulate Equation 9, and the results
are shown in Fig. 7. An increase in the parameter
c2[S] + (c
2 + µ2) associated with the bi-enzyme complex results in a marked
sigmoidicity (Fig. 7, curve 3). A decrease in the parameter
[S]µ4c4K3K4
associated with the metastable form of phosphoribulokinase results in a
decrease of the maximal steady-state rate, and at [T] = 0, the steady-state rate is null (Fig. 7, curve 2). The steady-state rate is related to the metastable form of
phosphoribulokinase and obviously depends on the kinetic parameters of
this form. These results also demonstrate that this rate depends on the
kinetic parameters of the bi-enzyme complex from which the metastable form originates.
From the model in Fig. 4, it can be seen that thioredoxin is able to
bind both to phosphoribulokinase within the bi-enzyme complex and to
metastable phosphoribulokinase. To measure the time required to
activate these two forms, they were separately mixed with reduced
thioredoxins. At different times of incubation, an aliquot was
withdrawn, and its activity was measured. In both case, an increase in
activity was observed. The rates increased exponentially with
incubation time before reaching a plateau value (Fig.
8). The amplitudes of these activation
processes were slightly different, whereas the time constant for the
activation of the enzyme inserted in the complex was higher (2 min
1) than that of the free enzyme (0.07 min
1).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Activation kinetics of the
phosphoribulokinase whether free or in the bi-enzyme complex in the
presence of reduced thioredoxins. The bi-enzyme is dissociated
first by dilution, and the released phosphoribulokinase is mixed with
thioredoxin for different times (curve 1). The bi-enzyme
complex is incubated with reduced thioredoxin (curve 2).
After increasing time period, the substrates are added, and the
activity was measured. The final enzyme concentration and thioredoxin
and dithiothreitol concentrations in both cases are 1.57 nM, 3.3 µM, and 1 mM,
respectively. The curves are fitted to the following equation
v/[E]0 = (A(1 e t) + A0),
where v is the velocity of the reaction, A and
stand for the amplitude and the time constant of the activation
process, respectively, [E]0 is the total
enzyme concentration, and A0, the initial
velocity of the reaction.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Modifications of the kinetic properties of multienzyme complexes
have been described (8, 38-42). The results presented here show that
activation of phosphoribulokinase by thioredoxins is altered when the
enzyme is embedded in a complex. Phosphoribulokinase in the complex
form is more easily activated by thioredoxin than is the dissociated
enzyme. It is likely that glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
dictates a conformation to phosphoribulokinase that is more amenable to
thioredoxin activation. The time required to activate this enzyme
within the complex is shorter (about 20 s) than that required to
activate its dissociated form (about 10 min). This time is comparable
to the induction time (about 30 s) of phosphoribulokinase activity
in crude extracts of C. reinhardtii following dark-light
transition (43).
It has been demonstrated that the reduction process of
phosphoribulokinase operates with the greatest efficiency via
hydrophobic interactions. This efficiency is the consequence of a
change of conformation that can be induced by chaotropic agents,
organic solvents, and high pressure (44-45). Protein-protein
interactions are good candidates for these effects in vivo.
However, most experiments on phosphoribulokinase activation by
thioredoxins have been performed with the stable, isolated enzyme (1,
12-14).
A new feature of the form embedded within the complex is the sigmoid
curve obtained for its steady-state rate as a function of thioredoxin
concentration. This curve can be explained by our proposed model, which
involves a slow dissociation of the complex in the reaction mixture,
and the binding of thioredoxin to the different forms of
phosphoribulokinase. Whether or not this sigmoidicity is of
physiological relevance, it results in a fine regulation of
phosphoribulokinase within the complex.
Although the organization of the Calvin cycle is widely accepted, the
regulation of these structures has been little studied. This paper
shows that heterologous interactions are responsible for kinetic
changes and that a physiological advantage might arise from these
interactions. It may be that the differences between in vivo
and in vitro activities result from interactions in the cell. As shown by Goodsell (46), macromolecular crowding in vivo favors interactions. The model presented here takes these interactions into account but is probably a simplified scheme because
it is likely that, in the cell, these interactions involve more than
two enzymes of the Calvin cycle.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are greatly indebted to Prof. J. Ricard
for helpful discussions and for advice in writing this manuscript. We
thank Dr. Owen Parkes for editing the English text.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
This paper is dedicated to the memories of Prof. P. A. Srere and Prof.
C. Costes.
Present address: Facultad de ciencis. Universidad de Los Andes,
Merida 5101, Venezuela.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: (33) 1 44 27 63 56; Fax: (33) 1 44 27 57 16; E-mail: meunier@ijm.jussieu.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Wolosiuk, R. A.,
and Buchanan, B. B.
(1978)
Arch. Bioch. Biophys.
189,
97-101[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Laing, A. W.,
Stitt, M.,
and Heldt, H. W.
(1981)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
637,
348-359[CrossRef]
|
| 3.
|
Wirtz, W.,
Stitt, M.,
and Heldt, H. W.
(1982)
FEBS Lett.
142,
223-226[CrossRef]
|
| 4.
|
Gardemann, A.,
Stitt, M.,
and Heldt, H. W.
(1982)
FEBS Lett.
137,
213-216[CrossRef]
|
| 5.
|
Gardemann, A.,
Stitt, M.,
and Heldt, H. W.
(1983)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
722,
51-60
|
| 6.
|
Porter, M. A.,
Stringer, C. D.,
and Hartman, F. C
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
123-129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Rault, M.,
Gontero, B.,
and Ricard, J.
(1993)
Eur. J. Biochem.
217,
1065-1073[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Gontero, B.,
Mulliert, G.,
Rault, M.,
Giudici-Orticoni, M. T.,
and Ricard, J.
(1993)
Eur. J. Biochem.
217,
1075-1082[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Buchanan, B. B.,
Schurmann, P.,
and Jacquot, J. P.
(1994)
Cell Biol.
5,
285-293
|
| 10.
|
Jacquot, J. P.,
Lancelin, J. M.,
and Meyer, Y.
(1997)
New Phytol.
136,
543-570[CrossRef]
|
| 11.
|
Eklund, H.,
Gleason, F. K.,
and Holmgren, A.
(1991)
Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet.
11,
13-28[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Milanez, S.,
Mural, R. J.,
and Hartman, F. C.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
10694-10699[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Brandes, H. K.,
Larimer, F. W.,
Geck, M. K.,
Stringer, C. D.,
Schurmann, P.,
and Hartman, F. C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
18411-18414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Brandes, H. K.,
Larimer, F. W.,
and Hartman, F. C.
(1996)
J. Biol Chem.
271,
3333-3335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Müller, B.
(1972)
Z. Naturforsch.
27,
925-932
|
| 16.
|
Gontero, B.,
Cardenas, M. L.,
and Ricard, J.
(1988)
Eur. J. Biochem.
173,
437-446[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Clasper, S.,
Easterby, J. S.,
and Powls, R.
(1991)
Eur. J. Biochem.
202,
1239-1246[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Rault, M.,
Giudici-Orticoni, M. T.,
Gontero, B.,
and Ricard, J.
(1993)
Eur. J. Biochem.
197,
791-797[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Hosur, M. V.,
Sainis, J. K.,
and Kannan, K. K.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
234,
1274-1278[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Ricard, J.,
Giudici-Orticoni, M. T.,
and Gontero, B.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
226,
993-998[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Gontero, B.,
Giudici-Orticoni, M. T.,
and Ricard, J.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
226,
999-1006[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Süss, K. H.,
Prokhorenko, I.,
and Adler, K.
(1995)
Plant Physiol. (Bethesda)
107,
1387-1397[Abstract]
|
| 23.
|
Anderson, L. E.,
Goldhaber-Gordon, I. M.,
Li, D.,
Tang, X.,
Xiang, M.,
and Prakash, N.
(1995)
Planta
196,
245-255[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Avilan, L.,
Gontero, B.,
Lebreton, S.,
and Ricard, J.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
246,
78-84[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Lebreton, S.,
Gontero, B.,
Avilan, L.,
and Ricard, J.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
246,
85-91[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Avilan, L.,
Gontero, B.,
Lebreton, S.,
and Ricard, J.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
250,
296-302[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Lebreton, S.,
Gontero, B.,
Avilan, L.,
and Ricard, J.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
250,
286-295[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Lebreton, S.,
and Gontero, B.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
20879-20884[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Wedel, N.,
and Soll, J.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9699-9704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Jebanathirajah, J. A.,
and Coleman, J. R.
(1998)
Planta
204,
177-182[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Harris, E. H.
(1989)
The Chlamydomonas Source Book: A Comprehensive Guide to Biology and Laboratory Use
, 1st Ed
, pp. 25-31, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego
|
| 32.
|
Huppe, H. C.,
De Lamotte-Guery, F.,
Jacquot, J. P.,
and Buchanan, B. B.
(1990)
Planta
180,
341-351[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Tian, W. X.,
and Tsou, C. L.
(1982)
Biochemistry
21,
1028-1032[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Nelder, J. A.,
and Mead, R.
(1965)
Computer J.
7,
308-313
|
| 36.
|
Marquardt, D. W.
(1963)
J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math.
11,
431-441[CrossRef]
|
| 37.
|
Cha, S.
(1968)
J. Biol. Chem.
243,
820-825[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Hensley, P.
(1988)
Curr. Top. Cell Regul.
29,
35-75[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Clarke, F. M.,
and Master, J. C.
(1974)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1209,
101-106
|
| 40.
|
Ovadi, J.,
and Keleti, T.
(1978)
Eur. J. Biochem.
85,
157-161[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Ovadi, J.,
Aragon, J. J.,
and Sols, A.
(1986)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
135,
852-856[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Srere, P. A.
(1987)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
56,
89-124[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Farr, T. J.,
Huppe, C. H.,
and Turpin, D. H.
(1994)
Plant Physiol. (Bethesda)
105,
1037-1042[Abstract]
|
| 44.
|
Wolosiuk, R. A.,
Corley, E.,
Crawford, N. A.,
and Buchanan, B. B.
(1985)
FEBS Lett.
189,
212-216[CrossRef]
|
| 45.
|
Prat-Gay, G.,
Paladini, A., Jr.,
Stein, M.,
and Wolosiuk, R. A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
20913-20921[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Goodsell, D. S.
(1991)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
16,
203-206[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. P. Howard, M. Metodiev, J. C. Lloyd, and C. A. Raines
Thioredoxin-mediated reversible dissociation of a stromal multiprotein complex in response to changes in light availability
PNAS,
March 11, 2008;
105(10):
4056 - 4061.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Lebreton, E. Graciet, and B. Gontero
Modulation, via Protein-Protein Interactions, of Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate Dehydrogenase Activity through Redox Phosphoribulokinase Regulation
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 28, 2003;
278(14):
12078 - 12084.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Mouche, B. Gontero, I. Callebaut, J.-P. Mornon, and N. Boisset
Striking Conformational Change Suspected within the Phosphoribulokinase Dimer Induced by Interaction with GAPDH
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 15, 2002;
277(8):
6743 - 6749.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.