J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 13, 9636-9644, March 31, 2000
The Bloom's Syndrome Gene Product Interacts with
Topoisomerase III*
Leonard
Wu
,
Sally L.
Davies
,
Phillip S.
North
,
Hélène
Goulaouic§,
Jean-François
Riou§,
Helen
Turley¶,
Kevin C.
Gatter¶, and
Ian D.
Hickson
From the
Imperial Cancer Research Fund Laboratories,
Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe
Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom,
§ Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Centre de Recherche de
Vitry-Alfortville, Vitry sur Seine Cedex, 94403 France, and the
¶ Department of Cellular Science, University of Oxford, John
Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
 |
ABSTRACT |
Bloom's syndrome is a rare genetic disorder
associated with loss of genomic integrity and a large increase in the
incidence of many types of cancer at an early age. The Bloom's
syndrome gene product, BLM, belongs to the RecQ family of DNA
helicases, which also includes the human Werner's and Rothmund-Thomson
syndrome gene products and the Sgs1 protein of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae. This family shows strong evolutionary conservation of
protein structure and function. Previous studies have shown that Sgs1p interacts both physically and genetically with topoisomerase III. Here,
we have investigated whether this interaction has been conserved in
human cells. We show that BLM and hTOPO III
, one of two human topoisomerase III homologues, co-localize in the nucleus of human cells
and can be co-immunoprecipitated from human cell extracts. Moreover,
the purified BLM and hTOPO III
proteins are able to bind
specifically to each other in vitro, indicating that the interaction is direct. We have mapped two independent domains on BLM
that are important for mediating the interaction with hTOPO III
.
Furthermore, through characterizing a genetic interaction between
BLM and TOP3 in S. cerevisiae, we
have identified a functional role for the hTOPO III
interaction
domains in BLM.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Bloom's syndrome is a genetic disorder characterized by retarded
growth, sun sensitivity, immunodeficiency, and a predisposition to a
wide variety of cancers (1). Cells from affected individuals show
genomic instability, the hallmark feature being hyperrecombination between sister chromatids. The gene mutated in Bloom's syndrome, BLM, encodes a member of the RecQ family of DEXH
box DNA helicases (2). This family of helicases has been conserved from
bacteria to humans, and all members share a central core domain
comprising seven highly conserved motifs found in all known DNA
helicases (3). In addition to BLM, there are at least four other human RecQ homologs. Defects in two of these, WRN and RECQL4, are also associated with disease conditions (4, 5). WRN is the gene mutated in the premature aging disorder Werner's syndrome, and RECQL4 is mutated in Rothmund-Thomson syndrome, a rare
condition associated with skin and skeletal abnormalities, as well as
some features of premature aging (6). Like Bloom's syndrome, both of these diseases also give rise to an elevated incidence of cancer, although to a lesser extent than is seen in Bloom's syndrome.
In eukaryotes, the RecQ helicase family can be divided into two
subfamilies: those that consist of essentially the helicase domain and
those in which the helicase domain is flanked by large, poorly
conserved N- and C-terminal domains (3). BLM falls into the latter
class, along with WRN and RECQL4, as well as the
Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rqh1 (7) and Saccharomyces
cerevisiae Sgs1 proteins (8, 9). In addition to structural
homology, there exists a certain degree of conservation of function
among the various eukaryotic RecQ helicases. For example, Sgs1p, BLM
and WRN display 3'-5' DNA helicase activity, suggesting that they
share a similar mechanism of action (10-12). Mutations in
BLM, WRN, SGS1, or
rqh1+ result in genomic instability (3), and
more specifically, BLM, sgs1, and rqh1
mutants display elevated levels of homologous recombination (7, 8,
13-15). Moreover, the hyperrecombination phenotype of sgs1
mutants can be partially suppressed by ectopic expression of either BLM
or WRN (16).
The torsional stress introduced into DNA when the complementary strands
are separated by helicases is relieved by a class of enzymes known as
topoisomerases. These enzymes catalyze the passage of intact DNA
strands across transient DNA breaks and fall into one of two classes,
designated type I and type II, depending upon their mechanism of
action. Type I topoisomerases generate single-stranded DNA nicks,
whereas type II topoisomerases make double-stranded DNA breaks (17,
18). There is increasing evidence to suggest that the RecQ helicases
act in concert with one member of the type I class, topoisomerase III.
S. cerevisiae expresses a single topoisomerase III enzyme
encoded by the TOP3 gene (19). top3
mutants
grow very slowly, display hyperrecombination between repetitive
sequences throughout the genome, and have defects in meiotic
recombination (8, 20). Mutations in SGS1 partially suppress
the pleiotropic effects of top3 mutations, suggesting that
Sgs1p and Top3p act in the same pathway (8). Moreover, Sgs1p and Top3p
interact physically and may, therefore, act in a coordinated manner as
a heterodimeric or larger complex (8). What role such a complex plays
in the cell is unclear. Harmon et al. (21) have shown that
E. coli RecQ and topo III together can catalyze the linking
and unlinking of covalently closed circular DNA molecules, and it has
been suggested that such an activity may function in suppressing recombination.
In mammals, two topoisomerase III homologues, TOPO III
and TOPO
III
, have been identified (22-24). Both of these enzymes can relax
negatively supercoiled DNA, and TOPO III
has been shown to be
essential for embryonic development in mice (22, 24, 25). Human TOPO
III
(hTOPO III
) is able to interact physically with Sgs1p when
expressed in S. cerevisiae (26), suggesting that the
interaction between RecQ helicases and topoisomerase III enzymes has
been conserved between eukaryotic species.
In this study, we have examined the possibility that BLM acts in
concert with one of the human TOPO III isozymes. Purified BLM and hTOPO
III
proteins were found to interact directly, and this association
was mediated by two regions located in the N- and C-terminal domains of
BLM that can independently bind hTOPO III
. BLM was also
found to genetically interact with yeast TOP3, and this
interaction was shown to require the presence of either one of the two
hTOPO III
interaction domains.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Lines--
The SV40-transformed normal human fibroblast
cell line, WI-38/VA-13, which was obtained from the ATCC, was used as a
representative of a human cell line from a normal individual. The
GM08505 cell line is an SV40-transformed fibroblast cell line from a
Bloom's syndrome patient (obtained from NIGMS, National Institutes of Health) and contains a BLM homozygous frameshift mutation
resulting in premature truncation of the protein at position 739 (2). PSNB2 cells were derived from a clone of GM08505 cells stably transfected with pcDNA3/BLM, an expression construct containing the
full-length BLM cDNA downstream of the CMV promoter. The
derivation and characterization of these cells will be described in
detail elsewhere.1 All three
cell lines were routinely cultured in
-minimum Eagle's medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. HeLa S3 cells were
maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum.
Escherichia coli and S. cerevisiae Strains--
The E. coli BL21(DE3) strain was obtained from NEB. Gene disruptions were
done in the S. cerevisiae YP-1 strain (his4-R leu2 MATa-URA3-MATa ura3-52 ade2-101 lys2). The SGS1 open
reading frame was replaced with LYS2 as described previously
(15). The TOP3 open reading frame was replaced with a
kanMX cassette using the method of Wach et al.
(27). Transformants were selected on plates containing G418, and the
disruption of TOP3 was confirmed using polymerase chain
reaction (PCR).2
Plasmids--
The entire BLM open reading frame was
cloned between the BamHI and XhoI sites of
pcDNA3 (Invitrogen) to generate pcDNA3/BLM. pMAL-C2 (New
England Biolabs) and pGEX-4T-1 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) plasmids
were used for the generation of maltose-binding protein (MBP) and
glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion peptides, respectively. Portions of the BLM cDNA that encoded
various N- and C-terminal regions of BLM were amplified by PCR. Sense
and antisense primers contained the seven terminal 5' sense and 3' antisense codons, respectively, of each desired fragment. The antisense
primer had an additional in-frame antisense stop codon. EcoRI and XhoI sites were also engineered into
the sense and antisense primers, respectively, to allow in-frame
cloning of the PCR fragments into pMAL-C2 and pGEX-4T-1. pBLM-N,
pBLM-C, and pBLM-NC contained residues 213-1417, 1-1265, and
213-1265 of BLM, respectively, and were generated by modification of
pJK1, which comprises the entire BLM open reading frame with
an additional 18 nucleotides encoding a C-terminal hexahistidine tag
cloned into pYES (12). To generate the N-terminal deletion, PCR was
used to amplify a 0.7-kb fragment from the BLM cDNA
using the 5' primer BLMN6
(5'-GAGAGGTACCTAACCATGTCTGAAAGCGAGCAAATAGA-3') and the 3' primer BLMN7 (5'-TTCATAGAATTCCCTGTAGG-3'). The BLMN6 primer
contains a unique KpnI site (underlined) and Kozak sequence in which the ATG is in-frame with Ser-213 of the BLM gene
(boldface). The 0.7-kb PCR fragment contains the unique
EcoRI site in pJK1 located at nucleotide position 1341 in
the BLM cDNA. The BLMN6/7 PCR fragment was digested with
KpnI and EcoRI and used to replace the single
1.4-kb KpnI/EcoRI fragment from pJK1 to generate
pBLM-N.
To generate the C-terminal deletion, PCR was used to amplify a 0.5-kb
fragment from the BLM cDNA using the 5' primer BLMC20 (5'-TGTAGGTCCTTCTGGAAGAT-3') and the 3' primer BLMC21
(5'-GAGATCTAGATCAGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGACCATCAA TTTGAAGCAAAA-3'). The BLMC21 primer contains a unique XbaI
site (underlined) and a stretch of 18 nucleotides (boldface) that
encodes a hexahistidine tag in-frame to Gly-1265 of BLM. The 0.5-kb PCR fragment contains the unique SalI site in pJK1 located at
nucleotide position 3343 of the BLM cDNA. The BLMC20/21
PCR fragments were each digested with SalI and
XbaI and used to replace the single 1-kb
SalI/XbaI fragment in pJK1 and pBLM-N, to
generate pBLM-C and pBLM-NC, respectively.
Antibodies--
For the production of the IHIC33 anti-BLM
antibody, rabbits were immunized with six 100-µg injections of an MBP
fusion peptide containing residues 1-449 of BLM. The serum was then
affinity-purified against the MBP/BLM (1-449) protein. Several mg of
the MBP fusion peptide was subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to
Hybond-ECL filters (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Filters were then
incubated with 2 ml of serum overnight at 4 °C before being washed
four times for 10 min each in TBS. Anti-BLM antibodies were eluted in 1 ml of 0.1 M glycine-HCl, pH 2.5, for 5 min at 20 °C and
neutralized by the addition of 675 µl of 1 M Tris-HCl, pH
8.0.
A monoclonal antibody specific for BLM recombinant BLM was raised in
Balb/C mice, following immunization with 10 µg of full-length recombinant BLM (28). Fusions were carried out using standard methods
(29). Supernatants were screened by antibody capture on multiwell
plates coated with recombinant BLM. An antiserum, designated BFL-103,
was chosen for study and will be described in detail
elsewhere.3
The D6 antibody specific for hTOPO III
was raised in New Zealand
White rabbits by subcutaneous injection of eight injections of 100 µg
each of purified recombinant hTOPO III
. The antiserum was used
without further purification.
In Vitro Transcription/Translation--
pcDNA3 containing
the entire open reading frame of either hTOPO III
or hTOPO III
was used in the TNT coupled reticulocyte system containing
[35S]methionine, following the manufacturer's
recommendations (Promega). Half of each reaction was then boiled and
separated by SDS-PAGE before being subjected to either autoradiography
or Western blotting.
Indirect Immunofluorescence Analysis--
Cells were grown on
coverslips and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in 250 mM
HEPES, pH 7.4, 0.1% Triton X-100 at 4 °C for 20 min. After 3-5
washes over 20 min in PBSA, cells were permeabalized in 0.5% Triton
X-100 for 20 min and then washed as before. Blocking in 5% fetal
bovine serum in PBSA was followed by 16 h incubation with the
primary antibodies BFL-103, IHIC33, or D6, which were used at a 1:50,
1:200, and 1:200 dilution, respectively. 3-5 PBSA washes over 20 min
were followed by incubating for a further 30 min with anti-mouse Cy3
(Sigma) or anti-rabbit fluorescein isothiocyanate (Dako) secondary
antibody diluted to 1/800 and 1/200 respectively. Cells were washed
five times in PBSA, and the DNA was stained using Hoechst 33258 at 50 ng/ml. Stained slides were mounted in 90% glycerol, 20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and 50 µg/ml paraphenylenediamine. Slides were
viewed at × 100 magnification on a Zeiss Axioskop microscope.
Image acquisition and analysis were performed using Kromascan (Kinetic
Imaging), and the images were pseudocolored and merged in Adobe Photoshop.
Whole Cell and Nuclear Extracts--
Nuclear extracts were
prepared from exponentially growing HeLa S3 cells. Approximately
108 cells were washed in PBSA and the pellet lysed in 5 ml
of lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40 and 1 mM PMSF) on ice for 45 min. The nuclei were then harvested at 5000 × g for 5 min, and the supernatant was
discarded. The pellet was then suspended in 0.15 ml of TKM buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 25 mM KCl, and 1 mM PMSF) to which 15 µl of 0.2 M EDTA, pH 8.0, and 2 volumes of Buffer D (80 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 2 mM EDTA, 0.53 M
NaCl, 20% glycerol supplemented with 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, and Complete protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), used at the manufacturer's recommended concentration), were added, and the mixture was incubated on ice for 30 min. The nuclear extract was then cleared by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm in a microcentrifuge at 4 °C, and the supernatant stored at
70 °C. Whole cell extracts were typically prepared from 2 liters
of exponentially growing HeLa S3 cultures. After rinsing of cells in
cold PBSA, the cell pellet was resuspended in 3 ml of lysis buffer (10 mM Pipes, pH 6.8, 100 mM NaCl, 300 mM sucrose, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA supplemented with 0.5% Triton X-100, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM
-glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM glucose
1-phosphate, 10 nM microcystin, 0.1 mM
para-nitrophenylphosphate, 1 mM PMSF, and
Complete protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), used at the manufacturer's recommended concentration), for 5 min at
4 °C. The lysate was then cleared by centrifugation at 5000 × g at 4 °C for 5 min and used on the day of preparation.
Immunoprecipitations and Western Blotting--
Typically, whole
cell extracts prepared from 300 ml of exponentially growing HeLa S3
cells were used for each immunoprecipitation. D6 or IHIC33 antibody was
added to the extract to give a 1:50 dilution and incubated for 30 min
at 4 °C. Antibody was captured by adding to each sample 100 µl of
a 50% slurry of protein A-Sepharose (Sigma) in whole cell extract
lysis buffer. Samples were then rotated end-over-end for 30 min at
4 °C. Immunoprecipitates were pelleted in a benchtop microcentrifuge
for 5 s at 14,000 rpm and washed in 1 ml of cold whole cell
extract lysis buffer. The pellet was washed a further four times before
being boiled in sample loading buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
6.8, 100 mM DTT, 2% SDS, 0.2% bromphenol blue, 20%
glycerol) for 5 min. Samples were separated on 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide
gels and transferred to Hybond-ECL filters (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
using a TE 70 semi-dry transfer unit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). BLM
and hTOPO III
were detected by conventional Western analysis using
1:500 dilutions of IHIC33 or D6 as primary antibody, respectively.
Anti-rabbit IgG/horse radish peroxidase conjugates (Sigma) were used as
secondary antibody at a 1:10,000 dilution and detected using ECL
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) following the manufacturer's instructions.
Expression and Purification of Recombinant
Proteins--
Recombinant BLM and hTOPOIII
were expressed and
purified as described previously (12, 28, 30). MBP and GST fusion
peptides were expressed and purified from BL21 (DE3) cells (New England Biolabs) transformed with the pMAL-C2 or pGEX-4T-1 expression plasmids
containing various portions of the BLM cDNA. Overnight cultures of transformants inoculated into 400 ml of LB at a 1:100 dilution were grown at 37 °C to an A600 of
0.5-0.6. Isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside was then
added to a final concentration of 0.4 mM, and the cultures were allowed to grow for a further 2-3 h before being chilled on ice
for 30 min. After centrifugation at 10,000 rpm in a Beckman JA10 rotor,
the cell pellet was resupended in 10 ml of PBSA supplemented with 1 mM PMSF and Complete protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) at the manufacturer's recommended
concentration. Cells were then lysed by sonication, and the lysate was
cleared by centrifugation at 42,000 rpm in a Beckman 70 TI rotor for 30 min at 4 °C. 1 ml of 50% slurries of amylose-agarose (NEB) or GSH-agarose resin (Sigma) were then added to the lysates to capture MBP
or GST fusion proteins, respectively, and rotated end-over-end for 30 min at 4 °C. The agarose resin was then pelleted in a benchtop microcentrifuge at 14,000 rpm for 5 s and washed with 1 ml of cold
PBSA. The resin was washed a further four times before being boiled in
sample loading buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 100 mM DTT, 2% SDS, 0.2% bromphenol blue, 20% glycerol) for
5 min.
Far Western Analysis--
Typically, 0.2-1.0 µg of each
polypeptide was subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to Hybond-ECL
filters (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using a TE 70 semidry transfer
unit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), after which all subsequent steps
were performed at 4 °C. Filters were immersed twice in denaturation
buffer (6 M guanidine-HCl in PBSA) for 10 min and then
incubated six times for 10 min each in serial dilutions (1:1) of
denaturation buffer supplemented with 1 mM DTT. Filters
were blocked in TBS containing 10% powdered milk, 0.3% Tween 20 for
30 min before being incubated in BLM or hTOPO III
(0.5 µg/ml) in
TBS supplemented with 0.25% powdered milk, 0.3% Tween 20, 1 mM DTT, and 1 mM PMSF for 60 min. Filters were
washed four times for 10 min each in TBS containing 0.3% Tween 20, 0.25% powdered milk. The second wash contained 0.0001% glutaraldehyde. Conventional Western analysis was then performed to
detect the presence of BLM or hTOPO III
using BFL-103 or D6, respectively, as primary antibody. Anti-rabbit IgG/horse radish peroxidase conjugate (Sigma) was used as secondary antibody at a
1/10,000 dilution and detected using ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
following the manufacturer's instructions.
Expression of Wild-type and Mutant BLM cDNAs in S. cerevisiae--
Plasmid transformation of yeast strains was carried
out by the modified protocol of Gietz et al. (31).
Transformants were selected for uracil prototrophy and maintained under
selection thereafter. Exponentially growing cultures in 2% glucose
were diluted to an A600 of 0.1, and 10 µl of
each culture was streaked onto agar plates containing 2% glucose or
1% raffinose/0.5% galactose to activate expression from the
GAL1 promoter. Plates were then incubated at 30 °C for
2-4 days to allow colony formation. For the preparation of whole cell
extracts, 50-ml cultures of transformants were grown in 1% raffinose
to an A600 of 0.4, at which point 0.5% galactose was added. Cells were then cultured for a further 20 h
and pelleted by centrifugation. After rinsing in 50 ml of lysis buffer
(50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl), the cell
pellet was resuspended in 1 volume of lysis buffer, and 1 volume of
glass beads was added. Cells were lysed by vortexing for 10 min at
4 °C, after which, 10× SDS loading buffer was added, and the sample was boiled for 5 min. Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to Hybond-ECL filters (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and then subjected to conventional Western analysis using mouse monoclonal anti-histidine antibody (Dianova) as the primary antibody.
 |
RESULTS |
Generation of Anti-BLM and Anti-hTOPO III
Antibodies--
Anti-BLM antibodies were raised in rabbits against a
chimeric protein consisting of MBP fused to residues 1-449 of BLM. The antiserum chosen for study, designated IHIC33, was affinity-purified using the MBP-BLM fusion protein, as described under "Experimental Procedures." Using Western blotting, IHIC33 recognized purified recombinant BLM (12, 28), and a single major protein in HeLa cell
nuclear extracts with a molecular mass of approximately 180 kDa that
co-migrated with the recombinant BLM protein (Fig.
1A). No such protein was
detected in cell extracts made from the fibroblast cell line, GM08505,
which was derived from a patient with Bloom's syndrome and has been
shown previously to lack expression of BLM (32) (Fig. 1A).
However, extracts from PSNB2 cells (GM08505 cells transfected with
pcDNA3/BLM, an expression construct carrying the BLM
cDNA) did contain an immunoreactive species of the predicted molecular mass (Fig. 1A), confirming that the IHIC33
antiserum is specific for the BLM protein.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Characterization of anti-BLM. A,
left panel, Western blot using the IHIC33 antibodies against
either purified recombinant BLM (rBLM) or a HeLa nuclear
extract, as indicated above the lanes. The sizes of
molecular mass standards (in kDa) run in parallel are shown on the
left. The position of BLM is indicated on the
right. Right panel, Western blot using the IHIC33
antibodies against a whole cell extract of GM08505 or PSNB2 cells, as
indicated above the lanes. B, Western blot with
the BFL-103 antibody against recombinant BLM and purified recombinant
proteins comprising MBP alone or MBP fused to the N-terminal (residues
1-447) or C-terminal (residues 966-1417) domains of BLM, as indicated
above the lanes.
|
|
A monoclonal antibody specific for BLM, designated BFL-103, was raised
in mice and detected recombinant BLM by Western blotting (Fig.
1B). Western blotting of different recombinant fragments of
BLM revealed that the epitope recognized by BFL-103 resides in the
nonconserved, N-terminal domain of BLM (Fig. 1B). Additional validation of this antiserum is described below, in Fig. 4.
Antibodies were also raised using purified recombinant hTOPO III
as
antigen. Serum from immunized rabbits, designated D6, contained
antibodies that recognized the purified recombinant hTOPO III
(30)
(Fig. 2A). Two degradation
products of the hTOPO III
protein present in the preparation were
also recognized by this antiserum. In HeLa cell extracts, D6 antibodies
detected two proteins of approximately 97 and 95 kDa (Fig.
2A). The same two proteins were also detectable in extracts
from WI-38/VA-13 cells, a normal human fibroblast cell line, and from
GM08505 cells (data not shown and see Fig. 4D, below).
Because hTOPO III
and hTOPO III
share 36% homology and the D6
antiserum was generated using full-length recombinant hTOPO III
, it
was possible that the reason for the presence of two immunoreactive
bands on the Western blot was that the D6 antiserum can cross-react
with hTOPO III
. To eliminate this possibility, expression vectors
containing the hTOPO III
and III
cDNAs were used to
synthesize the two human isozymes in an in vitro
transcription/translation system. Using this system, both proteins were
produced at comparable levels, as judged by
[35S]methionine incorporation, but only hTOPO III
was
recognized by D6 antiserum (Fig. 2B), confirming that the D6
antiserum is specific for hTOPO III
. It is possible, therefore, that
the two proteins recognized by the D6 antiserum in cell extracts
represent either the full-length and a proteolytically cleaved version
of hTOPO III
or different posttranslationally modified forms of the
protein that exist in human cells.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Characterization of anti-hTOPO
III antibodies. A, Western
blot using the D6 antibodies against purified recombinant hTOPO III
(left panel) or a HeLa whole cell extract (right
panel). The position of hTOPO III is indicated on the
right. B, in vitro
transcription/translation reactions containing no DNA (lane
1), pcDNA3-hTOPO III (lane 2), or
pcDNA3-hTOPO III (lane 3). Left panel,
autoradiograph of reaction products. Right panel, Western
blot using the D6 antiserum. The positions of the hTOPO III and
hTOPO III bands are indicated on the right.
|
|
BLM and hTOPO III
Exist as a Complex in Human Cells--
Given
that Sgs1p and Top3p interact physically in yeast (8), we tested the
possibility that BLM may form a complex with topoisomerase III in human
cells. Initially we sought evidence that BLM and hTOPO III
could be
co-immunoprecipitated from HeLa cell extracts. For this,
immunoprecipitates were prepared using either IHIC33 (anti-BLM) or D6
(anti-hTOPO III
) antibodies. These precipitates were then separated
by SDS-PAGE and Western blotted for the presence of hTOPO III
and
BLM. In D6 immunoprecipitates, two proteins of 97 and 95 kDa that
reacted with the D6 antiserum could be detected (Fig.
3, upper panel). The slower
migrating form could also be detected in IHIC33 immunoprecipitates,
indicating that BLM and at least one of the hTOPO III
forms is
tightly associated in HeLa cells. This interaction appeared to be
specific because the faster migrating D6-immunoreactive species was not
present in IHIC33 immunoprecipitates. As expected, Western blotting
with IHIC33 revealed BLM to be present in the IHIC33 immunoprecipitate (Fig. 3, lower panel). However, BLM was also detected in the
D6 immunoprecipitate (Fig. 3, lower panel), indicating that
the complex of BLM and hTOPO III
can be captured using either
antibody.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
BLM and hTOPO III
can be co-immunoprecipitated from HeLa cell extracts.
Immunoprecipitates were prepared using either anti-BLM (IHIC33) or
anti-hTOPO III (D6) antibodies as indicated above the
lanes. After separation by SDS-PAGE and transfer to nitrocellulose
filters, immunoprecipitates were probed for the presence of either
hTOPO III , using the D6 antibody (upper panel), or BLM,
using the IHIC33 antibody (lower panel).
|
|
The co-immunoprecipitation of BLM and hTOPO III
from human cell
extracts is consistent with these proteins forming a complex. To
provide additional evidence for this, we analyzed whether BLM and hTOPO
III
co-localize in the nucleus of intact human cells. In order for
co-staining studies to be undertaken without the requirement to
directly conjugate antibodies to fluorochromes, the BFL-103 mouse
monoclonal antibody to BLM and the D6 rabbit polyclonal antibody to
hTOPO III
were used for this part of the study. As a first step,
however, we wanted to confirm that the staining patterns obtained with
the IHIC33 and BFL-103 anti-BLM antibodies were the same. Indirect
immunofluorescence of exponentially growing WI-38/VA-13 cells using
either IHIC33 or BFL-103 revealed BLM to be localized to prominent
nuclear foci in many of the cells (Fig.
4A). This was in accordance
with the results of Neff et al. (32). Merging the
fluorescent signals for BLM obtained with the BFL-103 and IHIC33
antisera revealed a very strong concordance (Fig. 4A).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
A, BLM localizes to nuclear foci in
WI-38/VA-13 cells. The foci detected with the anti-BLM BFL-103
monoclonal (red) and IHIC33 polyclonal (green)
antisera co-localize, as revealed in the merged image. B,
co-localization of BLM (red) and hTOPO III
(green) in the nucleus of WI-38/VA-13 cells. C,
lack of staining for BLM and a reduced number of hTOPO III foci in
the nucleus of GM08505 cells (upper panel) compared with
PSNB2 cells (lower panel). Nuclear DNA was revealed by
staining with Hoechst 33258. D, upper panel, Western blot
using the D6 antibody against whole cell extracts of GM08505 and PSNB2
cells, as indicated above the lanes. The position of the
hTOPO III protein is indicated on the right. The
lower panel shows the same blot probed with anti- -tubulin
antibodies to ensure uniform loading.
|
|
Analysis of the subcellular localization of hTOPO III
also revealed
a punctate pattern of nuclear staining (Fig. 4B). Merging the signals for BLM and hTOPO III
proteins also indicated a strong concordance, indicating that BLM and hTOPO III
co-localize in human
cell nuclei. As expected from the Western blotting data described in
Fig. 1, BLM staining using the BFL-103 antiserum was absent from
Bloom's cell line, GM08505 (Fig. 4C), providing additional
evidence that BFL-103 is specific for BLM. In contrast, staining of
PSNB2 cells (GM08505 containing the BLM cDNA) revealed that BLM resides in nuclear foci that co-localized with hTOPO III
.
BLM was also found distributed in the nucleoli of PSNB2 cells, a
staining pattern that was also seen in nontransfected cells, albeit to
a quantitatively lesser extent than in PSNB2 cells. This striking
nucleolar staining in PSNB2 cells was presumably due to the
overexpression of BLM from the CMV promoter in this line.
Interestingly, although hTOPO III
staining was still evident in the
Bloom's syndrome mutant cell line, the number of nuclear foci detected
using the D6 antibody was consistently and substantially reduced
compared with that seen in PSNB2 cells (Fig. 4C). This could
have been due to one of two reasons: either hTOPO III
is mislocalized in GM08505 cells, or hTOPO III
is stabilized in PSNB2
cells, perhaps through its association with BLM. This latter possibility was excluded, however, because Western analysis using the
D6 antiserum on whole cell extracts from GM08505 and PSNB2 cells
revealed similar levels of hTOPO III
(Fig. 4D). This
suggests that the correct localization of hTOPO III
to nuclear foci
is at least partially dependent upon the presence of BLM. Together, these data strongly suggest that BLM and hTOPO III
exist as a complex in vivo.
BLM and hTOPO III
Interact Directly in Vitro--
We next
wanted to determine whether the interaction between BLM and hTOPO
III
was a direct one, because in vivo the interaction may
be mediated via an accessory protein. Far Western analysis was
therefore performed to determine whether purified recombinant BLM and
hTOPO III
could interact directly in vitro. Essentially, this procedure involves the immobilization of one of the proteins of
interest to a nitrocellulose filter, which is then incubated in buffer
containing the second protein. The filter is then washed to remove any
unbound material, and the presence of the second protein is detected by
conventional Western analysis. When BLM was used to probe hTOPO III
bound to nitrocellulose, a BFL-103-immunoreactive band could be
detected at the position where hTOPO III
would be expected to
migrate (Fig. 5). This was due to BLM
binding to hTOPO III
, as opposed to cross-reactivity of the BFL-103
antibody with hTOPO III
, because this band was absent on an
identical, control blot that had been incubated in TBS alone but had
otherwise been treated in the same way (Fig. 5). The interaction
between BLM and hTOPO III
appeared to be specific because BLM did
not bind to either of two control proteins, MBP and bovine serum
albumin (BSA), which were run in parallel on the same blot. To
eliminate the possibility that recombinant hTOPO III
was inherently
"sticky," the reciprocal experiment was carried out, wherein hTOPO
III
was used to probe nitrocellulose-bound BLM. A D6-immunoreactive band, which was absent on the control blot, was found migrating at the
position of BLM, confirming that BLM and hTOPO III
interact directly
(Fig. 5). Again, the interaction was specific because no signal was
detected with either of two control proteins, MBP and GST (Figs. 5 and
6B). A second
D6-immunoreactive band found migrating at the position of BSA was not
due to interaction between BSA and hTOPO III
(Fig. 5). Rather, this
latter band was due to low level cross-reactivity of the D6 antibodies
with BSA because the same band with equal intensity was also present on
the control blot that had been incubated with TBS alone and hence had
not been exposed to hTOPO III
(Fig. 5). We conclude that purified recombinant BLM and hTOPO III
interact directly in
vitro.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Purified recombinant BLM and hTOPO
III interact directly. Upper
panel, purified BLM, hTOPO III , MBP, and BSA were subjected to
SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie Blue. Lower panel, the
proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose filters and incubated with
either purified BLM or hTOPO III , as indicted above the
four images. Conventional Western analysis was then used to detect the
presence of either BLM, using the BFL-103 antibody, or hTOPO III ,
using the D6 antibody, as indicated above the images.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Mapping of the hTOPO III
interaction domains on BLM. A, schematic
representation of the 1417-amino acid BLM protein indicating the
position of the conserved helicase domain. Below this is
depicted a series of fusion proteins comprising either MBP or GST fused
to the indicated portions of BLM. The numbers represent the
amino acid positions in BLM that form the C-terminal residue (for the
MBP fusions) or either the C-terminal or the N-terminal residue (for
the GST fusions) of each BLM fragment. MBP is depicted as a black
box, and GST is depicted as a stippled box. The
right column indicates the ability of each peptide to bind
to hTOPO III as detected by far Western analysis. B, far
Western analysis showing the shortest BLM fusion proteins (with both
MBP and GST) that bind hTOPO III (lanes 1, 5, and
6), the longest MBP fusion peptide that is negative for
hTOPO III binding (lane 2), and the MBP and GST tags
alone as controls (lanes 3 and 4). Lanes
2 and 6 also contain some degradation products of the
respective fusion proteins. The left panels show Coomassie
Blue-stained gels of the various proteins, and the right
panels show the same proteins transferred to nitrocellulose and
subjected to far Western analysis using hTOPO III as a probe. Bound
hTOPO III was detected using the D6 antibody.
|
|
BLM Contains Two hTOPO III
Interaction Domains--
We next
investigated which region of the BLM protein was responsible for
mediating interactions with hTOPO III
. The BLM protein essentially
consists of three domains: a central conserved helicase domain found in
all RecQ helicases, flanked by divergent N- and C-terminal regions (2,
3). In yeast, Top3p has been shown to interact with the N-terminal
domain of Sgs1p (8). We therefore analyzed whether the N-terminal
domain of BLM was required for interaction with hTOPO III
.
Recombinant fusion peptides were generated that consisted of portions
of the N-terminal domain of BLM fused to the C terminus of MBP to aid
affinity purification. These fusion peptides were then transferred to
nitrocellulose and tested for their ability to bind hTOPO III
using
far Western analysis. hTOPO III
was found to bind to a peptide
containing residues 1-447 of BLM (Fig. 6A). Analysis of
further truncation derivatives of BLM revealed that residues 1-212
were sufficient to direct binding of hTOPO III
(Fig. 6, A
and B, upper panel). To eliminate the possibility of an
artifact caused by the binding of hTOPO III
to the junction where
MBP is fused to the BLM N-terminal domain, a second peptide was
generated consisting of GST fused to residues 1-212 of BLM. Switching
the tag to GST in this way had no effect on the extent of hTOPO III
binding, confirming that the hTOPO III
interaction domain resides
solely in those residues derived from the BLM protein (Fig. 6B,
lower panel). An MBP fusion peptide that contained residues 1-142
of BLM did not bind to hTOPO III
, indicating that residues 143-212
of BLM are important for the formation of the hTOPO III
binding site (Fig. 6B, upper panel).
To examine the possibility of additional sites of interaction between
BLM and hTOPO III
, far Western analysis was performed using the
C-terminal domain of BLM. A GST fusion peptide containing residues
966-1417 of BLM was found to interact with hTOPO III
(Fig.
6A). The location of this second site of interaction was further mapped by analysis of various truncated derivatives of the
C-terminal domain and was found to reside between residues 1266-1417
(Figs. 6, A and B, lower panel). Hence, two
independent interaction domains for hTOPO III
are present in the BLM protein.
BLM and Yeast TOP3 Genetically Interact--
Mutation of the
SGS1 gene, encoding the sole S. cerevisiae RecQ
homologue, suppresses the slow growth and hyperrecombination phenotype
of top3 mutants (8). This genetic interaction indicates that
Sgs1p and Top3p act in the same biochemical pathway and suggests that
Sgs1p generates a DNA structure that if not resolved by Top3p leads to
slow growth (8). We therefore analyzed whether BLM could
also genetically interact in this way with yeast TOP3. In an
sgs1
top3
double mutant, complementation of sgs1
by plasmid-encoded Sgs1p should result in the appearance of a slow
growth phenotype, reminiscent of a top3
mutant. This
effect has indeed been demonstrated previously by others following
ectopic expression of not only Sgs1p, but also BLM (16, 32, 33). In our
study, we also found that expression of the BLM protein from a
galactose-inducible promoter induced slow growth in sgs1
top3
cells (Fig. 7A).
However, expression of BLM in an sgs1
mutant (Fig.
6A) or in wild-type cells (Fig. 7B) had little
effect on growth, indicating that this BLM-induced effect was dependent
on the absence of functional Top3p.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Genetic interaction between BLM
and yeast TOP3. A,
galactose-inducible expression plasmids containing either
BLM or various BLM mutant cDNAs (see text for
details) were transformed into an sgs1 top3 strain
(upper square panels) or an sgs1 strain
(lower square panels). As a control, both strains were also
transformed with the empty vector. Shown is the growth of each
transformant on plates containing either 2% glucose, which represses
plasmid expression (left panels), or 0.5% galactose, which
induces GAL1 promoter expression (right panels).
B, wild-type yeast were transformed with galactose-inducible
expression plasmids containing either the BLM cDNA, the
mutant BLM-NC cDNA, or an empty vector. Composition of
plates was as in A. C, analysis of expression
levels for the BLM and BLM-NC proteins in an
sgs1 strain. The left panel shows
protein extracts stained with Coomassie Blue to indicate that the
protein loadings were equivalent. The right hand panel shows a Western
blot of the same extracts using an anti-His-tag antibody, because both
cDNAs encode a C-terminal hexahistidine tag. Lane 1, strain harboring the pYES2 vector alone; lane 2, strain
harboring the BLM cDNA; lane 3, strain
harboring the BLM-NC cDNA.
|
|
The hTOPO III
Interaction Domains Are Required for the Genetic
Interaction between BLM and Yeast TOP3--
We next tested the
possibility that the genetic interaction between BLM and
yeast TOP3 requires the hTOPO III
interaction domains on
BLM. Galactose-inducible expression constructs were generated
containing cDNAs encoding mutant BLM proteins that lack the
N-terminal (BLM-N), C-terminal (BLM-C), or both (BLM-NC) hTOPO III
interaction domains. Because these modifications to BLM involved truncations that could have global effects on protein folding, it was
important to confirm that the mutant proteins were still functionally
active. It has been shown previously that expression of BLM
cDNAs containing missense, helicase-inactivating mutations are not
functional when expressed in sgs1
top3
cells (32). Similarly, in our study, the ability to induce slow growth
in sgs1
top3
cells was used as an indicator of BLM
function. As with wild-type BLM, we found that all three of the
truncated BLM proteins induced slow growth when expressed in
sgs1
top3
cells (Fig. 7A), demonstrating
that loss of either or both of the hTOPO III
interaction domains on
BLM does not adversely affect BLM activity in yeast. However, although
expression of wild-type BLM was tolerated in wild-type and
sgs1
strains, expression of the BLM-NC mutant protein was
still able to induce slow growth in sgs1
cells, albeit to
a slightly lesser extent than it was in sgs1
top3
cells (Fig. 7A). Hence, the deleterious effect induced by
BLM-NC is largely independent of TOP3 status, indicating
that BLM-NC and TOP3 do not genetically interact.
In contrast, expression of the mutant BLM-N and BLM-C proteins, which
each lack only one of the hTOPO III
interaction domains, had little
effect in sgs1
cells (Fig. 7A). Therefore, as
with wild-type BLM, BLM-N and BLM-C induce slow growth that is
dependent upon the absence of Top3p, indicating that either interaction
domain is sufficient for establishing a genetic interaction between
BLM and yeast TOP3.
Taken together, these data suggest that the hTOPO III
interaction
domains target yeast Top3p to a BLM-induced DNA structure (which, if
not resolved, is detrimental to the cell), probably via a direct
interaction with BLM itself. However, there are two alternative
explanations for the results described above. First, the BLM-NC-induced
slow growth in sgs1
cells is not due to uncoupling of the
activities of BLM and Top3p; rather, the mutant BLM-NC protein has an
additional, dominant-negative effect that acts via a mechanism
independent of the pathway in which Sgs1p and Top3p act. Second, loss
of both hTOPO III
interaction domains has a stabilizing effect on
the protein, resulting in the accumulation of higher levels of active
BLM helicase and hence an increase in the number of BLM-generated
deleterious DNA structures. These two alternative explanations were
excluded, however, by the following observations: (i) expression of
BLM-NC had little effect in wild-type cells (Fig. 7B),
indicating that the BLM-NC protein only induces slow growth in the
absence of Sgs1p and is unlikely, therefore, to be acting through a
process independent of the pathway in which Sgs1p and Top3p act; and
(ii) BLM-NC was expressed at a comparable level to that of full-length
wild-type BLM (and possibly at an even lower level, given that
approximately 50% of the wild-type protein in the extracts was found
to be partially degraded) (Fig. 7C).
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have shown that the Bloom's syndrome gene product, BLM, forms
a direct physical association with the human topoisomerase III
isozyme, and we have identified two independent sites of interaction on
BLM. Deletion of both sites was found to severely compromise the
ability of BLM to functionally interact with topoisomerase III in
S. cerevisiae. Increasing evidence suggests that the
biochemical functions of RecQ helicases in different species are
intimately associated with those of topoisomerase III enzymes (3),
because the genetic interaction between Sgs1p and Top3p, first revealed in S. cerevisiae (8), has been shown to be conserved in the distantly related fission yeast S. pombe. We have described
elsewhere that mutations in the gene encoding the only known fission
yeast RecQ homologue, rqh1+, can
rescue the lethality caused by deletion of top3+
(34). Here, we have shown a similar genetic interaction exists between
one of the human RecQ homologs, BLM, and budding yeast TOP3. In common with Sgs1p and Top3p, which form a complex
in budding yeast (8), BLM also directly interacts with hTOPO III
, and a complex containing both proteins can be detected in
vivo.
The interaction between Top3p and Sgs1p is mediated by the N-terminal
domain of Sgs1p (8). Similarly, hTOPO III
was also found to interact
with the N-terminal domain of BLM, suggesting that the functional
domain organization of these two helicases may be similar, despite the
lack of extensive primary sequence conservation between their
respective N-terminal domains. A second hTOPO III
interaction domain
was also identified in the extreme C-terminal portion of BLM.
Interestingly, although both hTOPO III
interaction domains map to
the nonconserved regions of BLM, either one was sufficient for
BLM to genetically interact with S. cerevisiae
TOP3. There may, therefore, be conserved features of the secondary
and tertiary structure of the topoisomerase III interaction domains of
BLM and Sgs1p that are not evident by analysis of their amino acid
sequences. It is not known whether the C-terminal domain of Sgs1p is
also involved in binding to Top3p.
The ability of mutations in SGS1 to suppress the slow growth
phenotype of top3 mutants has been interpreted previously to suggest that the Sgs1 helicase generates a DNA structure that must be
acted upon by Top3p in order to prevent accumulation of an as yet
unidentified, toxic intermediate (8). The requirement for either of the
hTOPO III
interaction domains to be present on BLM in order for the
genetic interaction between BLM and yeast TOP3 to
be maintained suggests that Top3p is recruited to its sites of action
via a direct interaction with the BLM protein itself. The fact that
hTOPO III
appeared to be mislocalized in GM08505 cells is also
consistent with a role for BLM in targeting hTOPO III
to its correct
site of action.
The presence of two independent hTOPO III
interaction domains on BLM
raises the possibility that BLM and hTOPO III
interact with a 1:2
stoichiometry, which has mechanistic implications for how topoisomerase
III might resolve a RecQ helicase-generated DNA structure.
Topoisomerase III is a type I topoisomerase and therefore only makes
single-stranded DNA nicks. However, the recruitment of two
topoisomerase III molecules to a DNA structure by a RecQ helicase
could, in principle, be used to generate a double-stranded DNA break,
with each topoisomerase III molecule making a nick in close proximity
on opposite strands of the duplex. The possibility that topoisomerase
III can, under certain circumstances, act coordinately to cleave both
strands of a DNA duplex is consistent with the recent observations of
Harmon et al. (21). These authors showed that together, the
E. coli RecQ and Top3 proteins can catalyze the passage of
double-stranded DNA through a break in a second, covalently closed
double-stranded DNA molecule. It has been suggested that such an
activity could act either to decatenate newly replicated daughter DNA
molecules prior to cell division or to disrupt early recombination
intermediates between inappropriately paired DNA molecules (21, 35).
Bloom's, Werner's, and Rothmund-Thomson syndromes are clinically
distinct entities indicating that the human RecQ homologues perform at
least some nonoverlapping functions within the cell. sgs1
mutants are to a certain extent a phenocopy of both Bloom's and
Werner's syndromes. BLM mutants display hyperrecombination and have DNA replication abnormalities (1, 3). Similarly, sgs1 mutants also display hyperrecombination (8, 15) and are
sensitive to the ribonucleotide-reductase inhibitor hydroxyurea (16),
suggesting that they have some defect in replication. In common with
the phenotype of WRN mutants, sgs1 mutants have a
reduced replicative life span and display, prematurely, several markers
of aging, such as sterility and redistribution of Sir proteins from
telomeres to the nucleolus (36). The Sgs1p and WRN proteins also both
localize to the nucleolus (36-38), suggesting a conservation of
function in rDNA metabolism. Furthermore, expression of either BLM or
WRN can partially suppress the hyperrecombination phenotype of
sgs1 mutants (16). It is possible, therefore, that the
Sgs1/Top3 interaction has been conserved not only between BLM and hTOPO
III
but also between other RecQ family helicases in humans and one
of the topoisomerase III isozymes. It is likely that the evolutionarily
divergent N- and C-terminal domains play a key role in functionally
distinguishing the mammalian RecQ helicases through either directing
additional enzymatic functions or mediating specific protein-protein
interactions. For example, a DNA exonuclease function resides in the
N-terminal domain of WRN (39, 40), an activity that is apparently
absent from the other human RecQ homologs. The fact that the two hTOPO
III
interaction domains map to nonconserved regions in BLM might
suggest that the interaction between BLM and hTOPO III
is specific
for this pair of proteins. However, hTOPO III
has been shown to
interact with Sgs1p when expressed in yeast (26), suggesting that in
human cells hTOPO III
is also likely to interact with one or more of
the RecQ helicases. Therefore, it is possible that although the
ancestral recQ gene has undergone several duplication and
functional diversification events during evolution, the RecQ helicases
may all share a common mechanism of action in that they act in concert
with a topoisomerase III partner. Hence, the phenotype of RecQ helicase
mutants may be at least partially the consequence of a functional
impairment of topoisomerase III. The fact that mutations in at least
three of the known human RecQ helicases give rise to cancer-prone
disorders therefore raises the possibility that the gene encoding hTOPO III
may also be a tumor suppressor gene. Ongoing work is aimed at
addressing this possibility.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Julia Karow for the BLM protein, Guy
Debousker for hTOPO III
protein, Adele Goodwin and Jonathan Kearsey
for yeast strains, Connie Wilson for preparing the manuscript, and
members of the ICRF Genome Integrity Group for helpful discussions.
 |
Note Added in Proof |
Johnson et al. (Johnson, F. B., Lombard, D. B., Neff, N., Mastrangelo, M.-A., Dewolf, W., Ellis, N. A., Marciniak, R. A., Yin, Y., Jaenisch, R., and Guarente, L. (2000)
Cancer Res., in press) have also identified an interaction
between BLM and topoisomerase III
protein.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Imperial Cancer Research Fund
and Rhone-Poulenc Rorer.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
44-1865-222417; Fax: 44-1865-222431; E-mail:
hickson@icrf.icnet.uk.
1
P. S. North et al., manuscript in preparation.
3
H. Turley et al., manuscript in preparation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
kb, kilobase(s);
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
MBP, maltose-binding protein;
PBSA, phosphate buffered saline;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
Pipes, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid;
PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride;
TBS, Tris-buffered saline.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
German, J.
(1993)
Medicine
72,
393-406[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Ellis, N. A.,
Groden, J.,
Ye, T. Z.,
Straughen, J.,
Lennon, D. J.,
Ciocci, S.,
Proytcheva, M.,
and German, J.
(1995)
Cell
83,
655-666[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Chakraverty, R. K.,
and Hickson, I. D.
(1999)
BioEssays
21,
286-294[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Yu, C.,
Oshima, J.,
Fu, Y.,
Wijsman, E. M.,
Hisama, F.,
Alisch, R.,
Matthews, S.,
Najura, J.,
Miki, T.,
Ouais, S.,
Martin, G. M.,
Mulligan, J.,
and Schellenberg, G. D.
(1996)
Science
272,
258-262[Abstract]
|
| 5.
|
Kitao, S.,
Shimamoto, A.,
Goto, M.,
Miller, R. W.,
Smithson, W. A.,
Lindor, N. M.,
and Furuichi, Y.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
22,
82-84[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Vennos, E. M.,
and James, W. D.
(1995)
Dermatologic Clinics
13,
143-150[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Stewart, E.,
Chapman, C. R.,
Al-Khodairy, F.,
Carr, A. M.,
and Enoch, T.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
2682-2692[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Gangloff, S.,
McDonald, J. P.,
Bendixen, C.,
Arthur, L.,
and Rothstein, R.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
8391-8398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Watt, P. M.,
Louis, E. J.,
Borts, R. H.,
and Hickson, I. D.
(1995)
Cell
81,
253-260[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Bennett, R. J.,
Sharp, J. A.,
and Wang, J. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
9644-9650[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Gray, M. D.,
Shen, J. C.,
Kamath-Loeb, A. S.,
Blank, A.,
Sopher, B. L.,
Martin, G. M.,
Oshima, J.,
and Loeb, L. A.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
17,
100-103[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Karow, J. K.,
Chakraverty, R. K.,
and Hickson, I. D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30611-30614[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Fukuchi, K.,
Martin, G. M.,
and Monnat, R. J.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
5893-5897[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Salk, D.,
Au, K.,
Hoehn, H.,
Stenchever, M. R.,
and Martin, G. M.
(1981)
Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
30,
108-117[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Watt, P. M.,
Hickson, I. D.,
Borts, R. H.,
and Louis, E. J.
(1996)
Genetics
144,
935-945[Abstract]
|
| 16.
|
Yamagata, K.,
Kato, J.,
Shimamoto, A.,
Goto, M.,
Furuichi, Y.,
and Ikeda, H.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
8733-8738[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Wang, J. C.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
65,
635-692[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Watt, P. M.,
and Hickson, I. D.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
303,
681-695
|
| 19.
|
Wallis, J. W.,
Chrebet, G.,
Brodsky, G.,
Rolfe, M.,
and Rothstein, R.
(1989)
Cell
58,
409-419[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Gangloff, S.,
de Massy, B.,
Arthur, L.,
Rothstein, R.,
and Fabre, F.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1701-1711[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Harmon, F. G.,
DiGate, R. J.,
and Kowalczykowski, S. C.
(1999)
Mol. Cell
3,
1-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Hanai, R.,
Caron, P. R.,
and Wang, J. C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
3653-3657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Kawasaki, K.,
Minoshima, S.,
Nakato, E.,
Shibuya, K.,
Shintani, A.,
Schmeits, J. L.,
Wany, J.,
and Shimizu, N.
(1997)
Genome Res.
7,
250-261[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Seki, T.,
Seki, M.,
Onodera, R.,
Katada, T.,
and Enomoto, T.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
28553-28556[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Li, W.,
and Wang, J. C.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
1010-1013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Ng, S. W.,
Liu, Y.,
Hasselblatt, K. T.,
Mok, S. C.,
and Berkowitz, R. S.
(1999)
Nucleic Acids Res.
27,
993-1000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Wach, A.,
Brachat, A.,
Pohlmann, R.,
and Philippsen, P.
(1994)
Yeast
10,
1793-1808[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Karow, J. K.,
Newman, R. H.,
Freemont, P. S.,
and Hickson, I. D.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
597-600[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Harlow, E.,
and Lane, D.
(1988)
Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual
, pp. 139-244, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 30.
|
Goulaouic, H.,
Roulon, T.,
Flamand, O.,
Grondard, L.,
Lavelle, F.,
and Riou, J. F.
( |