J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 13, 9854-9862, March 31, 2000
The COOH-terminal Transactivation Domain Plays a Key Role in
Regulating the in Vitro and in Vivo Function
of Pax3 Homeodomain*
Yun
Cao and
Chiayeng
Wang
From the Center for Molecular Biology of Oral Diseases, University
of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612
 |
ABSTRACT |
Efficient transcription activation by Pax3
requires binding to a complex DNA sequence element containing binding
sites for both the paired domain and the Prd type homeodomain.
Previously, we have shown that this requirement is lost in PAX3-FKHR,
the product of a t(2;13) chromosomal translocation associated with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. In contrast to Pax3, the chimeric PAX3-FKHR, which acts as an oncogene, can efficiently activate a DNA sequence element containing only a homeodomain binding site
(TAATAN2-3ATTA), despite the presence of an intact
Pax3 paired domain. Here, we showed that this alteration in
sequence-specific transcription activity was determined in part by the
transactivation domain. First, we demonstrated that in intact Pax3,
substitution of the Pax3 transactivation domain with an unrelated viral
VP16 transactivation domain enabled Pax3 to transactivate
homeodomain-specific DNA sequence, as well as to transform fibroblasts.
Furthermore, we could abolish the homeodomain-dependent
transcription and transforming activities of PAX3-FKHR by replacing its
FKHR transactivation domain with Pax3 transactivation domain.
Collectively, these results suggested that the transactivation domain
influences the DNA binding specificity of Pax3. The translocation
process increased the oncogenic potential of Pax3 by removing the
inhibitory action of Pax3 transactivation domain on its homeodomain.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Pax3 is one of the nine-member Pax family of
developmentally regulated transcription factors. In murine
embryogenesis, Pax3 is first detected in the condensing somite of
8.5-day-old embryo, and later, the expression pattern becomes
restricted to primarily the neural crest cell lineage, lateral
dermamyotome, and limb bud mesenchyme (1-6). A loss of function in
Pax3 has been correlated with the mouse Splotch phenotype
(7-9) and the human Waardenburg's syndrome types I and III (10, 11).
Developmental defects in homozygous Splotch mutants include
exencephaly, spina bifida, and deficiency in neural crest derivatives
and limb muscle formation. In humans, Waardenburg's syndrome is
characterized by defects in pigmentation, craniofacial structure, and
limb musculature (specific for type III). In addition to the loss of
function mutations, gain of function mutation of Pax3 resulting from
chromosomal translocation is associated with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.
Rhabdomyosarcoma is a family of soft tissue tumors of skeletal muscle
lineage that occurs most frequently in children and young adolescent
(12-14). The alveolar subtype represents the most aggressive and
malignant form of rhabdomyosarcoma (15-18). A chromosomal translocation involving chromosomes 2 and 13 occurs in more than 90%
of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (12-14). The two genes involved in the
translocation breakpoints have been identified as the Pax3 gene (chromosome 2) and the FKHR gene (chromosome 13)
(19-21). Pax3 contains two DNA binding domains: a paired box domain
common to all members of the Pax family transcription
factors and a Prd-type homeodomain that is also found in Pax4 and Pax6
(22). The Pax3 transcription activation domain is localized within a
serine-, glycine-, and threonine-rich region at the COOH terminus. The FKHR gene is related to the developmentally regulated
HNF3/forkhead gene family (23-25). This family is
characterized by a conserved winged-helix DNA binding domain at the
NH2 terminus and a proline-rich acidic transcriptional
activation domain at its COOH terminus. The t(2;13) translocation leads
to the creation of a PAX3-FKHR chimeric gene that combines
the 5' sequence of the Pax3 gene coding both DNA binding
domains of Pax3 to the 3' sequence of the FKHR gene encoding
a partial (bisected) winged helix DNA binding domain and the proline-
and acid-rich transactivation domain (19-21).
Although in vivo target genes of Pax3 are currently unknown,
Pax3 can bind with high affinity in vitro to a complex e5
DNA response element derived from Drosophila even skipped
promoter for the Eve transcription factor (1). This sequence contains a
paired domain recognition site GTTCC (PRS-1) adjacent to a homeodomain recognition site (ATTA). The in vitro electrophoresis
mobility shift assay and in vivo transfection experiments
reveal that both the paired domain and the homeodomain binding sites
are required for Pax3 function, suggesting a synergistic interaction
between the two DNA domains with the ATTA and GTTCC DNA recognition
sites (11, 26). In addition to the DNA binding and transactivation domains, a putative repressor domain has recently been identified within the NH2-terminal 29 amino acid residues overlapping
the paired domain of the Pax3, and it functions to inhibit the basal promoter activity in a concentration-dependent manner (27,
28). Because both DNA binding domains of the Pax3 protein are intact whereas the FKHR winged helix DNA binding domain is disrupted in the
chimeric PAX3-FKHR protein, it is postulated that Pax3-responsive genes
would also be targets for the transcriptional activation of PAX3-FKHR.
Indeed, many Pax3-responsive sequences thus far identified also respond
to PAX3-FKHR (29). PAX3-FKHR is also a more potent transcription
activator than Pax3 (29), leading to the hypothesis that PAX3-FKHR
elicits its oncogenic activity by abnormally up-regulating
Pax3-dependent genes. Recently, our laboratory has
described a novel mechanism by which PAX3-FKHR gains the ability to
transcriptionally regulate DNA sequences that are not normally
responsive to Pax3, by recognizing a palindromic paired type
homeodomain site from the platelet-derived growth factor-
receptor
promoter referred to as P3 (30). Furthermore, mutation of the Pax3
paired domain in PAX3-FKHR has no effect on its transforming activity
in NIH3T3 cells, suggesting that homeodomain action alone is sufficient
for transforming activity of PAX3-FKHR (31). In the present study, we
have analyzed the structure-function requirements for the altered
homeodomain DNA recognition specificity between Pax3 and PAX3-FKHR. Our
results show that the Pax3 transactivation domain plays a central role in regulating the activity of the Prd type homeodomain.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
DNA Constructs--
pCMV expression vector containing the mouse
Pax3 and Pax3 mutant cDNAs has been described previously (32). The
pcDNA3 expression vector constructs containing the wild type and
mutant PAX3-FKHR cDNAs were obtained from J. Epstein (University of
Pennsylvania) and have been described previously (29, 33). In brief,
the plasmid encoding PAX3-FKHR is a mouse-human composed of murine Pax3
(GenBankTM accession number X59358, nucleotides 313-719)
encoding an amino acid sequence identical to that of human Pax3,
followed by human PAX3-FKHR (GenBankTM accession number
U02368, nucleotides 471-2556) and a sequence encoding a nine-residue
carboxyl-terminal hemagglutinin epitope tag (YDVPDYASL). The PAX3-FKHR
plasmid constructs that contain all three possible ATG translation
start codons are referred in this report as the full-length, whereas
the previously described PAX3-FKHR constructs that contain only the
second and third ATG codons from Pax3 are referred to as
NH2-terminally truncated PAX3-FKHR constructs
(GenBankTM accession number AF178854). The GAL4-VP16
construct was a generous gift from Dr. Michael Green (Massachusetts
Medical School). The plasmid construct encoding Pax3/VP16 or
Pax3mut/VP16 is composed of murine Pax3 or Pax3mut
(GenBankTM accession number X59358, nucleotides 298-1420),
followed by a linker sequence (GAATTCCCGGGGATCTGG) and ending with a
VP16 sequence (GenBankTM accession number U89963,
nucleotides 418-672). The plasmid construct encoding PAX3-FKHR, the
FKHR transactivation domain of which is replaced by the Pax3
transactivation domain, is constructed by first removing the FKHR
transactivation domain of PAX3-FKHR (GenBankTM accession
number U2368, nucleotides 1833-2559 and the nine amino acid residues
of hemagglutinin tag) and then cloning in its place the murine Pax3
transactivation domain (GenBankTM accession number X59358,
nucleotides 1334-1737). All expression constructs used in this study
were tested to confirm that they expressed correctly sized protein
products by a combination of in vitro translation and
Western blot analysis. The retroviral expression vector
(pBabe-puromycine) was described previously (34). Pax3, PAX3-FKHR, and
their derivatives were cloned into the pBabe retroviral expression
vector at the BamHI site. Retrovirus producing Phoenix cell
line was obtained from Dr. Gary Dolan (University of California).
PAX3-specific rabbit polyclonal antibody was a kind gift from Dr.
Jonathan Epstein (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA). The
reporter CAT1 gene constructs
have been described previously (30, 35).
Cell Culture--
Monolayer culture of P19 embryonic carcinoma
cells were maintained on tissue culture dishes that were pretreated
with 0.3% gelatin in the presence of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
high glucose medium supplemented with 200 units/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, 1 mM glutamine, 100 µg/ml sodium
pyruvate, and 10% (v/v) bovine calf serum. Murine NIH3T3 cells and
Phoenix cells were cultured in the same medium as for P19 but without
sodium pyruvate.
Retrovirus Production and Infection--
Retroviruses expressing
PAX3, PAX3-FKHR, or their variant genes were generated by first plating
2 × 106 Phoenix cells onto 60-mm tissue culture dish
24 h prior to transfection. A total of 10 µg of pBabe expression
vector (plus or minus the cDNA) was introduced into Phoenix cells
by CaPO4 method. After 17 h incubation with DNA, cells were
thoroughly rinsed with Tris-based saline and supplemented with fresh
growth medium. Cells were allowed to grow for 24 h before the
conditioned medium containing retrovirus was filtered and used for
infection. Fresh retroviral stocks were used for experiments whenever
possible. If stocks were not used within 1 week, they were aliquoted
and kept at -80 °C for long term storage.
Twenty-four hours prior to infection, NIH3T3 cells were plated at a
density of 2 × 105 cells/100-mm dish. Cells were
replenished with fresh medium 4 h before the addition of
retrovirus (in the presence of 4 µg/ml polybrene). Cells were allowed
to incubate in the presence of virus for a period of 17-24 h before
medium change. To establish clonal cell lines, cells were split 1:10
into 150-mm dishes, and single isolates were allowed to form for a
period of 14 days in the presence of 2 µg/ml puromycine. Five to 10 single clones were isolated, expanded, and characterized for protein
expression by Western blot analysis before they were used for
transformation assays. For each construct, we also expanded and
characterized pooled cell populations (>1000 clones) in parallel to
verify that results were not due to clonal variability.
Cell Transformation Assays--
Transformation of NIH3T3 cells
by Pax3, PAX3-FKHR, and their variants was tested using a colony
formation in soft agar culture assay (anchorage-independent growth). A
total of 1 × 104 cells in 0.3% Noble agar (in growth
medium) was laid over a solid support base containing 2% Noble agar
(in growth medium). The cells were allowed to grow in suspension for a
period of 21-30 days with fresh medium supplementation every 3 days
before colonies were counted and photographed.
Transient Transfection and CAT Assays--
Transient
transfection was carried out by plating P19 cells at a density of
2 × 105 cells/100-mm tissue culture dish 24 h
prior to transient transfection. Transient transfection was carried out
with a total of 20 µg of DNA that included 1-3 µg of
-galactosidase DNA (LacZ) driven by the
-actin promoter as an
internal standard for monitoring transfection efficiency. P19 cells
were exposed to DNA-CaPO4 precipitate for 17 h,
rinsed, and re-fed with growth medium for an additional 48 h
before harvest. Cell lysates for lacZ and CAT assays were prepared as
described previously (30). Deacetylase activity in the lysate was
inactivated by heating the lysates to 60 °C for 7 min (36). A
typical CAT assay reaction mixture consisted of 0.7 µg of acetyl-CoA,
0.2 µCi of [14C]chloramphenicol (1 Ci = 37 GBq),
and cell lysates in a final volume of 150 µl. The amount of cell
lysate used in each CAT reaction was standardized by its
-galactosidase activity. Unless stated otherwise, the routine CAT
assays were carried out at 37 °C for 1-3 h and terminated by
extraction with 1 ml of ice-cold ethyl acetate. Quantitative analysis
of CAT activity was carried out by measuring the radioactivity of each
radioactive spot in
-scintillation counter.
Western Blot Anlaysis--
To verify proper expression of the
different constructs that we made from the Pax3 and PAX3-FKHR
constructs, the cDNAs were subjected to in vitro
transcription/translation reaction using T7-TNT system (Promega).
Sample were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
later transferred to nitrocellulose membrane for Western blot analysis.
For detecting in vivo expression of Pax3, PAX3-FKHR, and
their derivatives, confluent cells were rinsed with cold
phosphate-buffered saline twice and lysed in the presence of
radioimmune precipitation buffer (137 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1% Nonidet P-40, 10% glycerol, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 500 µM orthovanadate, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Whole cell lysates were fractionated on
SDS-polyacrylamide gels and analyzed by Western blot. The expression of
PAX3, PAX3-FKHR, or their derivatives was detected by chemiluminescent
antibody detection kit (NEN Life Science Products) under the conditions
recommended by the manufacturer. The primary rabbit polyclonal PAX3
antibody was used at a dilution of 1:500. The secondary anti-rabbit IgG
antibody was used at a dilution of 1:3000.
 |
RESULTS |
Previously we have shown that the tumor-specific chimeric protein
PAX3-FKHR, but not its normal Pax3 counterpart, can transactivate the
P3 homeodomain-specific DNA sequence (TAATN3ATTA) (30). Because both Pax3 and PAX3-FKHR fusion protein contain the same DNA
binding domains, we seek to determine how other region(s) of the
proteins might influence the selective action on the homeodomain sequence by PAX3-FKHR but not by Pax3.
The NH2-terminal 10 Amino Acid Residues Are Not
Involved in Determining Sequence Specificity of the Prd Type
Homeodomain in Pax3 and PAX3-FKHR Proteins--
The full-length human
and mouse Pax3 cDNAs contain three in-frame ATG codons. It is
presently unknown which of the three ATG codons (any one or two or all
three) are used for in vivo expression of Pax3 and PAX3-FKHR
in development and in rhabdomyosarcoma formation. If all three codons
were used in vivo, polypeptides that differ by 10 or 11 amino acid residues at the NH2 terminus would be expressed. The clone of PAX3-FKHR used in our previous study began from the second
ATG codon (this NH2-terminally truncated PAX3-FKHR is
referred to here as tPF). We investigated whether the deletion of the
first 10 amino acids could account for the different homeodomain action detected in Pax3 or PAX3-FKHR. We addressed this question by two independent approaches. First, we determined the effect by deleting the
NH2-terminal 10 amino acid residues from the full-length
Pax3 cDNA (tPax3) on transactivation (Fig.
1A). The assay was performed by co-transfecting either the full-length Pax3 or tPax3 into P19 cells
with the CAT reporter gene construct that contained either the complex
e5 (6e5-ECCAT, Fig. 1B) or the simple homeodomain-specific P3 (P3-TKCAT, Fig. 1B) response element. The
homeodomain-specific P3 element contains a palindromic consensus
sequence (TAATN3ATTA) specific for the binding of Prd type
homeodomain-containing proteins as determined by in vitro
DNA-protein binding assay (37, 38). In our previous study (30), we have
shown that the tPF, like Pax3, can transactivate a reporter construct
containing the complex e5 sequence and that this transactivation
function requires intact paired domain and homeodomain. By contrast,
tPF, but not Pax3, can transactivate a reporter construct containing
the homeodomain-specific P3 sequence, and this transactivation function
requires only an intact homeodomain in tPF. As shown in Fig.
1C, both Pax3 and tPax3 were equally active in
transactivating the 6e5-ECCAT construct. Mutation of the Pax3 paired
domain (Pax3mut-Bu26, tPax3mut-Bu35, and
tPax3mut-Un1) abolished transactivation by both full-length Pax3 and tPax3. The Bu26 (P50L), Bu35 (R56L), and UN1 (G48S) mutations represent naturally occurring missense mutations found of the paired
domain of Pax3 (4), and all three mutations have previously been shown
to abrogate the DNA binding activity of Pax3 and PAX3-FKHR toward the
complex e5 DNA sequence. Under the same assay conditions, neither Pax3
nor tPax3 could transactivate the P3-TKCAT construct (Fig.
1D).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effect of the NH2-terminal 10 amino acid residues on Pax3 activity. A, schematic
illustration of the Pax3 expression constructs with or without the
NH2-terminal 10 amino acid residues. Met1
(M1) and Met11 (M11)
are methionine residues encoded by the first and second ATG codons in
the full-length Pax3 cDNA, respectively. Constructs that began from
the second ATG were referred to as truncated and are denoted with the
letter t. B, schematic illustration of the
components in the complex 6e5-ECCAT and simple P3-TKCAT reporter
constructs. The 6e5-ECCAT contains six tandem copies of the complex e5
sequence
(TCGGGCAGCACCGACGATTAGCACCGTTCCGCTCAGGCTCGG)
inserted upstream of the E1B-TATA basal promoter driving the CAT
reporter gene. The P3-TKCAT construct contains a single copy of the
palindromic Prd type homeodomain recognition sequence,
CAGTTTCCTAATCCCATTAAAGGATTAGCAACTAC, inserted upstream of
the thymidine kinase basal promoter driving the CAT reporter gene.
C, P19 cells were transiently transfected with a total of 20 µg of DNA (10 µg of the either ECCAT or 6e5-ECCAT reporter
construct, 0.1 µg of the pcDNA3 empty vector or vector containing
PAX3 cDNA, 3 µg of -galactosidase gene under the control of
-actin promoter, and nonspecific pGEM3 plasmid DNA) under the
conditions described under "Materials and Methods." Whole cell
lysates were prepared 48 h after transfection and assayed for both
-galactosidase activity and CAT activity. The amount of lysates used
for CAT assays were normalized to the -galactosidase activity.
D, P19 cells were transiently transfected with a total of 20 µg of DNA (2.5 µg of either TKCAT or P3-TKCAT, 1 µg of the
pcDNA3 empty vector or vector containing PAX3 cDNA, 3 µg of
-galactosidase gene under the control of -actin promoter, and
nonspecific pGEM3 plasmid DNA) under the conditions described under
"Materials and Methods." The mean fold induction was calculated
over the CAT activity measured in cells co-transfected with the empty
pcDNA3 expression vector, which was assigned an arbitrary value of
100%. Values shown represent means of a minimum of three experiments.
The S.D. is defined as the root mean square deviation of n
- 1 determinations.
|
|
In a second approach, we reintroduced the sequences encoding the
NH2-terminal 10 amino acids back into tPF (Fig.
2A) and examined whether these
residues could block the independent homeodomain specificity of the
full-length PAX3-FKHR (referred to here as PF). As could be predicted
from results in Fig. 1, both wild type PF and tPF transactivated the
6e5-ECCAT construct, whereas their corresponding paired domain mutants
(PF-Bu26 and tPF-Bu35) were inactive (Fig. 2B). Furthermore,
both PF and tPF, as well as their corresponding paired domain mutants,
remained transcriptionally active toward the P3-TKCAT construct (Fig.
2C). The observed transactivation was clearly mediated
through a specific interaction between the homeodomain region of the
proteins and the homeodomain-specific P3 sequence because mutation of
the homeodomain region in these proteins (PF-HD and tHD) or mutation of
the P3 consensus sequence (mP3) completely abolished the
transactivation activity of PF and tPF. It should be noted that
although there was no difference in the specificity of PF and tPF to
transactivate reporter construct containing either the complex e5 or
homeodomain-specific P3 response element, we did observe a significant
increase in background activity by the full-length PAX3-FKHR. This
increase in background activity was not observed with the Pax3
construct (see under "Discussion").

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of NH2-terminal 10 amino
acid residues on PAX3-FKHR fusion protein activity. A,
schematic illustration of the PAX3-FKHR expression constructs with or
without the NH2-terminal 10 amino acid residues.
Met1 (M1) and Met11
(M11) are methionine residues encoded by the first
and second ATG codon in the full-length PAX3-FKHR cDNA,
respectively. Constructs that began from the second ATG were referred
to as truncated and are denoted with the letter t.
B, transactivation of ECCAT or 6e5-ECCAT reporter gene by
wild type and mutant PAX3-FKHR with or without the
NH2-terminal 10 amino acid residues. C,
transactivation of TKCAT, P3-TKCAT, or mP3-TKCAT reporter gene by wild
type and mutant PAX3-FKHR with or without the NH2-terminal
10 amino acid residues. The mP3 was a mutant of P3, the
TAATCCCATTA sequence of which was changed to
GCCGCCCCGGC. Conditions used for
co-transfection for both B and C were the same as
those described in the Fig. 1 legend. The mean fold induction was
calculated over the CAT activity measured in cells co-transfected with
the empty pcDNA3 expression vector, which was assigned an arbitrary
value of 100%. Values shown represent means of a minimum of three
experiments. The S.D. is defined as the root mean square deviation of
n - 1 determinations.
|
|
Taken together, the data from Figs. 1 and 2 indicated that
NH2-terminal 10 amino acid residues of Pax3 did not play a
role in controlling the transcriptional potency or in the homeodomain specificity of both Pax3 and PAX3-FKHR proteins.
The Pax3 Transactivation Domain Negatively Regulates the Functional
Activity of the Homeodomain--
We next tested the possibility that
DNA sequences downstream of the Pax3 DNA binding domain may mediate the
difference between Pax3 and PAX3-FKHR in transactivation of the
P3-TKCAT construct. To begin addressing this question, we deleted
intervening sequences between the DNA binding domains and the
COOH-terminal transactivation domain from Pax3 and from
Pax3mut-Bu26, a paired domain mutant (Fig.
3A). In addition, we also
substituted the viral VP16 transactivation domain for the Pax3
transactivation domain in Pax3 and Pax3mut-Bu26 (Fig.
3A). Each of these constructs was co-transfected into P19 cells with either the 6e5-ECCAT (Fig. 3B) or P3-TKCAT (Fig.
3C) reporter gene constructs. As shown in Fig.
3B, neither the intervening sequence nor the Pax3
transactivation domain was required to transactivate the complex e5
containing reporter gene construct. As expected, none of the paired
domain mutant expression vectors could transactivate the complex e5
sequence. Strikingly, substitution of the VP16 transactivation domain
for the Pax3 transactivation domain enabled Pax3 to transactivate the
P3-TKCAT construct (Fig. 3C). This transactivation was
homeodomain-specific because mutation of the paired domain (Pax3mut/VP16) did not affect transactivation of the
P3-TKCAT construct. The internal deletion mutants of Pax3 (Pax3 del.8
and Pax3mutdel.8) remained unable to transactivate the
homeodomain-specific P3 DNA sequence. Collectively, these data led us
to hypothesize that the COOH-terminal Pax3 transactivation domain
played a decisive role in blocking Pax3 action toward homeodomain. If
so, substitution of the FKHR transactivation domain by Pax3
transactivation domain in PAX3-FKHR would relieve the negative
constraint imposed on the homeodomain by Pax3 transactivation domain,
allowing it to function as an independent DNA binding domain in the
fusion protein.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of VP16 transactivation domain
substitution on Pax3 activity. A, schematic
illustration of the internal deletion and transactivation domain
replacement constructs of full-length Pax3. B,
transactivation of the ECCAT or 6e5-ECCAT reporter gene by wild type or
paired domain mutant of full-length Pax3 (Pax3 and
Pax3mut), internal deletion of Pax3 (Pax3del 8 and
Pax3mutdel 8), and transactivation domain replacement
construct of Pax3 (Pax3/VP16 and Pax3mut/VP16).
C, transactivation of the TKCAT, P3-TKCAT, or mP3-TKCAT
reporter gene by wild type or paired domain mutant of full-length Pax3
(Pax3 and Pax3mut), internal deletion of Pax3 (Pax3 del 8 and Pax3mutdel 8), and transactivation domain replacement
construct of Pax3 (Pax3/VP16 and Pax3mut/VP16). Conditions
used for co-transfection for both B and C were
the same as those in the Fig. 1 legend. The mean fold induction was
calculated over the CAT activity measured in cells co-transfected with
the empty pcDNA3 expression vector, which was assigned an arbitrary
value of 100%. Values shown represent means of a minimum of three
experiments. The S.D. is defined as the root mean square deviation of
n - 1 determinations.
|
|
To test this hypothesis, we replaced the FKHR transactivation domain
with the Pax3 transactivation domain in wild type and paired domain
mutant of PF and tPF (Fig.
4A). When these constructs were co-transfected into cells with the 6e5ECCAT, they were able to
transactivate the complex e5 sequence (Fig. 4B). As
expected, these constructs containing the Pax3 transactivation domain
showed a lower fold induction than the constructs containing the FKHR transactivation domain. Most interestingly, replacement of the FKHR
transactivation domain with the Pax3 transactivation domain in PF and
tPF and their paired domain mutants (PF-Bu26/Pax3Td and tPD/Pax3Td,
respectively) rendered the proteins inactive toward the P3-TKCAT
construct (Fig. 4C). The paired domain deletion mutant of
PAX3-FKHR (tPDNH2) contains a deletion of the first three helices of
paired domain (Asn53 to Thr93) that is
important for DNA contact. As expected, the paired domain mutants were
also inactive.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of Pax3 transactivation domain
substitution on PAX3-FKHR activity. A, schematic
illustration of the internal deletion and transactivation domain
replacement constructs of truncated and full-length PAX3-FKHR cDNA
constructs. B, transactivation of ECCAT or 6e5-ECCAT
reporter gene by wild type and paired domain mutant PAX3-FKHR
containing either a FKHR transactivation domain (tPF, tPDNH2, PF, and
PF-Bu35) or a Pax3 transactivation domain (tPF/Pax3Td, tPD/Pax3Td,
PF/Pax3Td, and PF-Bu35/Pax3Td) at the COOH terminus. C,
transactivation of TKCAT, P3-TKCAT or mP3-TKCAT reporter gene by wild
type and paired domain mutant PAX3-FKHR containing either a FKHR
transactivation domain (tPF, tPDNH2, PF, and PF-Bu35) or a Pax3
transactivation domain (tPF/Pax3Td, tPD/Pax3Td, PF/Pax3Td, and
PF-Bu35/Pax3Td) at the COOH terminus. Conditions used for
co-transfection for both B and C were the same as
those in the Fig. 1 legend. The mean fold induction was calculated over
the CAT activity measured in cells co-transfected with the empty
pcDNA3 expression vector, which was assigned an arbitrary value of
100%. Values shown represent means of a minimum of three experiments.
The S.D. is defined as the root mean square deviation of the
n - 1 determinations.
|
|
The Pax3 Transactivation Domain Blocks the in Vivo Oncogenic
Property of PAX3-FKHR--
Thus far, we have presented evidence from
the transfection assay to suggest that the COOH-terminal
transactivation domain of Pax3 played a key role in the sequence
specificity of transactivation. Could our observation be correlated to
the biological activity of the PAX3-FKHR fusion protein? We examined
this issue by testing the effect of Pax3 transactivation domain
substitution on the ability of PAX3-FKHR to induce cell transformation
(Fig. 5). We used the retroviral
expression system to induce stable expression of PAX3-FKHR and its
derivatives in NIH-3T3 fibroblast cells (Fig. 5A) and tested
the anchorage-independent growth property of these cells in a soft agar
colony formation assay (Fig. 5B). In assaying anchorage-independent growth, we prepared and analyzed both pooled cell
populations and individual picked clones to eliminate potential problems due to clonal variability. As controls, we also prepared NIH3T3 cells that were infected by retrovirus that contained the empty
vector. Fig. 5B shows the representative results from clonal cell lines. NIH3T3 cells expressing vector alone or vector containing either Pax3 or Pax3mut-Bu26 cDNAs failed to form
colonies in soft agar, whereas NIH3T3 cells expressing wild type tPF
and paired domain mutant tPF-Bu35 were able to form large colonies in
soft agar. Mutation of the PAX3-FKHR homeodomain (tPF-HD) abolished the
transformation activity of the fusion protein. A similar result was
obtained when full-length PAX3-FKHR was tested (data not shown). These
results were in agreement with the previous findings by Lam et
al. (31). NIH3T3 cells expressing wild type (PF/Pax3Td and
tPF/Pax3Td) and paired domain mutant (PF-Bu26/Pax3Td and tPD/Pax3Td) PAX3-FKHR, the FKHR transactivation domains of which were replaced by
the Pax3 transactivation domains, were unable to grow in
anchorage-independent fashion. Thus replacement of the FKHR
transactivation domain in PAX3-FKHR with the Pax3 transactivation
domain abolished the transforming activity of PAX3-FKHR. This was not
due to a specific function missing from the FKHR transactivation domain
because substitution of the viral VP16 transactivation domain into Pax3
(Pax3/VP16 and Pax3mut/VP16) was sufficient to allow Pax3
to transform NIH3T3 cells. The result in Fig. 5 established a complete
correlation between the homeodomain-mediated transactivation activity
and the oncogenic property of PAX3-FKHR.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of Pax3 transactivation domain
substitution on the transforming activity of Pax3 and PAX3-FKHR in
NIH3T3 cells. A, Western blot analysis of in
vivo expressed Pax3, PAX3-FKHR, and their variants in NIH3T3
cells. A total of 20 µg of whole cell lysate was used for the
analysis under the conditions described under "Materials and
Methods." B, anchorage-independent growth assay was
carried out by overlaying 1 × 104 cells in 0.3%
Noble agar (in growth media), and over that, a solid support base
containing 2% Noble agar (in growth media). The cells were allowed to
grow in suspension for a period of 21 days. Cells were replenished with
fresh media in the presence of 2 µg/ml puromycine every 3 days before
photography.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The t(2;13) chromosomal translocation that joins the
NH2-terminal region of the Pax3 gene with the
COOH-terminal region of the FKHR gene is implicated in the
development of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. The resulting chimeric
transcription factor PAX3-FKHR has a gain of function phenotype in that
it can transform fibroblast cells in culture, i.e. it can
act as an oncogene. The mechanism underlying this gain of biological
function has not yet been elucidated. Previous studies have shown that
PAX3-FKHR demonstrates an increased transcription activity on
Pax3-responsive DNA sequences. The increased transcription potency in
PAX3-FKHR has been explained in part to result from the switch of
transactivation domains. It has been suggested that the increased
activity of the chimeric PAX3-FKHR results from the inability of the
FKHR transactivation domain to be inhibited by either a
NH2-terminal cis acting inhibitory domain (27, 28) or by a
trans-acting repressor Daxx protein (39). One mechanism for the
oncogenic activity of PAX3-FKHR may be mediated by this increased
transactivation activity that can abnormally regulate expression of
Pax3 target genes, causing disruption in process involving myoblast
cell proliferation, differentiation, or migration.
Recently, we have proposed an alternative mechanism for the
transforming activity of PAX3-FKHR that is based on the observation that PAX3-FKHR can increase transcription of genes that are not normally targets of Pax3 or FKHR action (30). Several studies have
shown that Pax3 protein contains two structurally distinct DNA binding
domains, a paired domain and a Prd type homeodomain. Both protein-DNA
binding and transcriptional assays have revealed that in Pax3, the two
DNA binding domains function interdependently. The homeodomain
functions to facilitate efficient paired domain DNA binding activity,
and the paired domain regulates the DNA binding specificity and
dimerization potential of the homeodomain. Thus, transcriptional
activation by Pax3 requires binding to a composite site containing both
a paired domain and a homeodomain-specific sequence. Consistent with
this notion, mutation of either DNA binding domain in Pax3 abolishes
its transcription activity. By contrast, we have demonstrated that in
addition to Pax3-dependent DNA sequences, the chimeric
PAX3-FKHR protein shows an altered sequence recognition specificity and
is able to bind and activate DNA sequences containing a palindromic Prd
type homeodomain element. Thus, we hypothesized that the
homeodomain-mediated PAX3-FKHR activity may be important for the
oncogenic potential of PAX3-FKHR. It is possible that the fusion
process induces a conformational change within PAX3-FKHR, enabling it
to regulate the expression and function of additional set of genes that
are not normally regulated by either Pax3 or FKHR. One prediction of
this hypothesis would be that only the homeodomain DNA binding motif of
PAX3-FKHR could be required for transformation. Recently, Lam et
al. (31) have shown that mutation of the paired domain of
PAX3-FKHR has no effect on the transforming activity of the fusion
protein. In this study, we carried out deletion mapping and domain
swapping experiments to determine the region(s) of PAX3-FKHR protein
responsible for the altered DNA recognition specificity.
One of the points that we focused on was the NH2-terminal
10 amino acid residues of the Pax3 protein. There are three in-frame ATG codons encoding methionine residues at amino acid positions 1, 10, and 11 of the full-length Pax3 protein. It is currently not known
whether all three codons are used by Pax3 or PAX3-FKHR during
development and in rhabdomyosarcoma formation. If all three codons are
used in vivo, they will generate protein species that differ
in 10 or 11 amino acid residues at the NH2 terminus. Our current data demonstrate that the full-length PAX3-FKHR cDNA
displays the same sequence-specific transcriptional activity (Fig. 2)
as does the NH2-terminally truncated PAX3-FKHR cDNA
that begins from the second ATG. These data indicate that the
NH2-terminal first 10 amino acid residues are not involved
in controlling the sequence-specific transcription of either Pax3 or
the fusion protein. It is worth noting that although the presence of
the NH2-terminal 10 amino acid residues does not affect the
sequence-specific transcription by the full-length versus
truncated PAX3-FKHR, we saw an increase in the activation of
promoter-only reporter constructs (E1B and TK) by the full-length
PAX3-FKHR. The observed increase in basal promoter activity appears to
be mediated through the paired domain because the paired domain mutant
(PF-Bu26), but not the homeodomain mutant (PF-HD), of full-length
PAX3-FKHR does not exhibit high background activity. We suspect that
the paired domain-mediated effect on the basal promoters is likely to
be sequence-nonspecific activation because we also detected high
background activity in promoterless CAT constructs in our transient
transfection assays (data not shown).
The other regions that we have focused on are the intervening sequences
between the DNA binding and transactivation domain and the
transactivation domain itself. Deletion of intervening sequences shows
no effect on either the transcriptional potency or binding specificity
of either Pax3 or PAX3-FKHR. By contrast, replacement of the Pax3
transactivation domain in the intact Pax3 protein with the viral VP16
transactivation domain is able to alter the specificity and biological
activity of Pax3 to that of PAX3-FKHR in terms of it ability to
transactivate homeodomain-specific P3-responsive element (Fig. 3) and
to transform fibroblast cells in culture (Fig. 5). Furthermore, we can
also revert the sequence-specific transcription and oncogenic potential
of PAX3-FKHR back to that of Pax3 by substituting the FKHR
transactivation domain with the Pax3 transactivation domain in the
chimeric PAX3-FKHR (Figs. 4 and 5). Taken together, these results
suggest that the COOH-terminal transactivation domain of Pax3 plays a
dominant role in determining the sequence specificity of Pax3 action
and in controlling its biological action. Thus, replacement of the Pax3
transactivation domain with two other transactivation domains (VP16 and
FKHR) allows the Pax3 homeodomain to function independently of the
paired domain. This alteration of specificity is a key mechanism in the oncogenic activity of PAX3-FKHR.
Although the activity of viral VP16 transactivation domain is known to
be much stronger than that of cellular transactivation domains, the
transactivation strength of the FKHR transactivation domain has been
determined to be comparable to that of Pax3 transactivation domain
(27). It has been suggested that the increased transcription potency in
PAX3-FKHR is due to a decreased sensitivity of FKHR transactivation
domain to regulation by the Pax3 repression domain (27). For this
reason, we do not favor the idea that the altered homeodomain
recognition specificity in Pax3 is simply due to switching a weaker
Pax3 transactivation domain for a stronger transactivation domain.
In vitro protein-DNA binding assays have shown that the homeodomain, when expressed as a separate entity, can bind and dimerize
on the homeodomain-specific P3 palindromic recognition motif. However,
it fails to dimerize on P3 sequence when the homeodomain is expressed
together with the paired domain in the same polypeptide (40). Although
the second helix of the paired domain has recently been shown to play a
major inhibitory role to the in vitro binding specificity of
homeodomain on P3 sequence (41), we show by functional analysis that
absence of the second helix (e.g. the tPD/Pax3Td construct)
is insufficient to uncouple regulation of homeodomain by the paired
domain (Fig. 4). It will be of interest to find out whether removal of
one or more of the remaining three helices of the paired domain would
be sufficient to uncouple regulation of homeodomain function by the
paired domain.
At present, it is possible to suggest that in intact Pax3 protein, the
Pax3 transactivation domain may interact directly either with both DNA
binding domains to bring them into their correct structural
configuration or primarily with the homeodomain, thus blocking it from
functioning alone. The introduction of FKHR transactivation domain as a
result of t(2;13) translocation could significantly disrupt
interactions within DNA binding domains and the transactivation domain,
allowing the homeodomain to function as an independent entity.
Alternatively, it is possible that Pax3 and FKHR transactivation domains interact differently with another protein factor(s) that in
turn directly interacts with and influences the homeodomain DNA binding
specificity. Recently, it has been reported that a repressor protein
named Daxx binds with equal efficiency to Pax3 and PAX3-FKHR, primarily
through their homeodomains; however, this interaction results in
different responses in the transcriptional potency of the two proteins
(39). It will be interesting to know whether Daxx or other unknown
protein factors participate in determining the DNA binding specificity
of the Pax3 homeodomain.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated in this study that the specificity
of Prd type homeodomain of Pax3 is tightly regulated by transactivation
domain present in the full-length protein. Further studies are needed
to better understand how the Pax3 and FKHR transactivation domains
communicate with the Pax3 DNA binding domains. Because
homeodomain-mediated activity is unique to the tumor-specific PAX3-FKHR
fusion protein, understanding the molecular basis for altered PAX3-FKHR
binding specificity may allow development of an effective drug therapy
to disrupt its oncogenic function with little or no effect on normal
gene function.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Reed Graves for help in the
proof reading of this manuscript. We also thank the late Dr. Gennady
Grechko for help in the soft agar analysis.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The present work was supported by National Institutes of
Health Grant CA-74907 and in part by National Institutes of Health Grant NS-36366 and American Institute for Cancer Research Grant 96A015
(to C. W.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Center for Molecular
Biology of Oral Diseases, University of Illinois at Chicago, 801 S. Paulina St., Chicago, IL 60612. Tel.: 312-996-4530; Fax: 312-413-1604;
E-mail: chiayeng@tigger.uic.edu.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviation used is:
CAT, chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Goulding, M. D.,
Chalepakis, G.,
Deutsch, U.,
Erselius, J. R.,
and Gruss, P.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
1135-1147[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Chalepakis, G.,
Stoykova, A.,
Wijnholds, J.,
Tremblay, P.,
and Gruss, P.
(1993)
J. Neurobiology
24,
1367-1384[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Daston, G.,
Lamar, E.,
Olivier, M.,
and Goulding, M.
(1996)
Development
122,
1017-1027[Abstract]
|
| 4.
|
Gruss, P.,
and Walther, C.
(1992)
Cell
69,
719-722[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Maroto, M.,
Reshef, R.,
Munsterberg, A. E.,
Koester, S.,
Goulding, M.,
and Lassar, A. B.
(1997)
Cell
89,
139-148[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Tajbakhsh, S.,
Rocancourt, D.,
Cossu, G.,
and Buckingham, M.
(1997)
Cell
89,
127-138[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Epstein, D. J.,
Vekemans, M.,
and Gros, P.
(1991)
Cell
67,
767-774[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Epstein, D. J.,
Vogan, K. L.,
Transler, D. G.,
and Gros, P.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
532-536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Vogan, K. G. E., D. J.,
Trasler, D. G.,
and Gros, P.
(1993)
Genomics
17,
364-369[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Tassabehji, M.,
Read, A. P.,
Newton, V. E.,
Harris, R.,
Balling, R.,
Gruss, P.,
and Strachan, T.
(1992)
Nature
355,
635-636[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Chalepakis, G.,
Goulding, M.,
Read, A.,
Strachan, R.,
and Gruss, P.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
3685-3689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Douglass, E. C.,
Valentine, M.,
Etcubanas, E.,
Parham, D.,
Webber, B. L.,
Houghton, P. J.,
and Green, A. A.
(1987)
Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
45,
148-155[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Turc-Carel, C.,
Lizard-Nacol, S.,
Justrabo, E.,
Favrot, M.,
Philip, T.,
and Tabone, E.
(1986)
Cancer Genet. Cytogenet.
19,
361-362[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Wang-Wuu, S.,
Soukup, S.,
Ballard, E.,
Gotwals, B.,
and Lampkin, B.
(1988)
Cancer Res.
48,
983-987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Enzinger, F. M.,
and Weiss, S.
(1983)
Soft Tissue Sarcomas
, pp. 363-370, C. V. Mosby Co., St. Louis
|
| 16.
|
Newton, W. A.,
Soule, E. H.,
Hammond, A. B.,
Reiman, H. M.,
Shimada, H.,
Beltangaty, M.,
and Mauren, H.
(1988)
J. Clin. Oncol.
6,
67-75[Abstract]
|
| 17.
|
Horn, R. C., Jr.,
and Enterline, H. T.
(1958)
Cancer
11,
181-191[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Harms, D.
(1995)
Curr. Top. Pathol.
89,
292-296
|
| 19.
|
Barr, F. G.,
Galili, N.,
Holick, J.m,
Biegel, J. A.,
Rovera, G.,
and Emanuel, B. S.
(1993)
Nat. Genet.
3,
113-117[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Galili, N.,
Davis, R.,
Fredericks, W. J.,
Mukhopadhyay, S.,
Rauscher, F. J., III,
and Emanuel, B. S.
(1993)
Nat. Genet.
5,
230-235[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Shapiro, D. N.,
Sublett, J. E.,
Li, B.,
Downing, J. R.,
and Naeve, C. W.
(1993)
Cancer Res.
53,
5108-5112[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Strachan, R.,
and Read, A. P.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
4,
427-438[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Anderson, M. J.,
Viars, C. S.,
Czekay, S.,
Cavenee, W. K.,
and Arden, K. C.
(1998)
Genomics
47,
187-199[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Borkhardt, A.,
Repp, R.,
Haas, O. A.,
Leis, T.,
Harbott, J.,
Kreuder, J.,
Hammermann, J.,
Henn, T.,
and Lampert, F.
(1997)
Oncogene
14,
195-202[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Hillion, J.,
Le Coniat, M.,
Jonveauz, P.,
Berger, R.,
and Bernard, O. A.
(1997)
Blood
90,
3714-3719[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Chalpeakis, G.,
Wijnholds, J.,
and Gruss, P.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
3131-3137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Bennicelli, J. L.,
Edwards, R. H.,
and Barr, F. G.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5455-5459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Chalepakis, G.,
Jones, F. S.,
Eelman, G. M.,
and Gruss, P.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
12745-12749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Fredericks, W. J.,
Galili, N.,
Mukhopadhyay, S.,
Rovera, G.,
Bennicelli, J.,
Barr, F. G.,
and Rauscher, F. J., III
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
1522-1535[Abstract]
|
| 30.
|
Epstein, J. A.,
Song, B.,
Lakki, M.,
and Wang, C.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
4118-4130[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Lam, P. Y. P.,
Sublett, J. E.,
Hollenbach, A. D.,
and Roussel, M. F.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
594-601[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Epstein, J. A.,
Lam, P.,
Jepeal, L.,
Maas, R. L.,
and Shapiro, D. N.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
11719-11722[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Scheidler, A.,
Fredericks, W. J.,
Rauscher, F. J.,
Barr, F. G.,
and Vogt, P. K.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
6. 93,
9805-9809
|
| 34.
|
Tontonoz, P.,
Hu, E.,
and Spiegelman, B. M.
(1994)
Cell.
79,
1147-1156[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Wang, C.,
and Song, B.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
712-723[Abstract]
|
| 36.
|
Mercola, M.,
Goverman, J.,
Mirell, C.,
and Calame, K.
(1985)
Science
227,
266-270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Wilson, D.,
Sheng, G.,
Lecuit, R.,
Dostatni, N.,
and Desplan, C.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
2120-2134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Wilson, D. S.,
Guenther, B.,
Desplan, C.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1995)
Cell
82,
709-720[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Hollenbach, A.,
Sublett, J. E.,
McPherson, C. J.,
and Grosveld, G.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
3702-3711[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Underhill, D. A.,
and Gros, P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem
272,
14175-14182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Fortin, A. S.,
Underhill, A.,
and Gros, P.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
4574-4581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Zhang and C. Wang
PAX3-FKHR Transformation Increases 26 S Proteasome-dependent Degradation of p27Kip1, a Potential Role for Elevated Skp2 Expression
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 3, 2003;
278(1):
27 - 36.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Lagutina, S. J. Conway, J. Sublett, and G. C. Grosveld
Pax3-FKHR Knock-In Mice Show Developmental Aberrations but Do Not Develop Tumors
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
October 15, 2002;
22(20):
7204 - 7216.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|