JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deterding, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tomer, K. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deterding, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tomer, K. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 14, 10463-10471, April 7, 2000


Mapping of the 5'-2-Deoxyribose-5-phosphate Lyase Active Site in DNA Polymerase beta  by Mass Spectrometry*

Leesa J. DeterdingDagger , Rajendra PrasadDagger , Gregory P. Mullen§, Samuel H. WilsonDagger , and Kenneth B. TomerDagger

From the Dagger  Laboratory of Structural Biology, NIEHS, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 and the § Department of Biochemistry, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06032

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The mechanism of the 5'-2-deoxyribose-5-phosphate lyase reaction catalyzed by mammalian DNA beta -polymerase (beta -pol) was investigated using a cross-linking methodology in combination with mass spectrometric analyses. The approach included proteolysis of the covalently cross-linked protein-DNA complex with trypsin, followed by isolation, peptide mapping, and mass spectrometric and tandem mass spectrometric analyses. The 8-kDa domain of beta -pol was covalently cross-linked to a 5'-2-deoxyribose-5-phosphate-containing DNA substrate by sodium borohydride reduction. Using tandem mass spectrometry, the location of the DNA adduct on the 8-kDa domain was unequivocally determined to be at the Lys72 residue. No additional amino acid residues were found as minor cross-linked species. These data allow assignment of Lys72 as the sole Schiff base nucleophile in the 8-kDa domain of beta -pol. These results provide the first direct evidence in support of a catalytic mechanism involving nucleophilic attack by Lys72 at the abasic site.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mammalian DNA polymerase beta  (beta -pol),1 a constitutively expressed "housekeeping" enzyme, has been implicated in DNA base excision repair (BER) (1-4). Base excision repair is thought to be the major repair pathway protecting cells against single base DNA damage. Recent evidence has indicated that BER in mammalian cells is mediated through at least two subpathways that are differentiated by the patch sizes and by the enzymes involved (5-8). These subpathways are designated as "single nucleotide" BER and long patch BER (two to several nucleotide repair patches). The single nucleotide BER subpathway is a sequential multistep process, where beta -pol is involved in two steps (9, 10). The overall scheme for the single nucleotide BER subpathway can be outlined as follows: (i) recognition and cleavage of an altered/damaged base by a specific monofunctional DNA glycosylase (a glycosylase lacking intrinsic apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) lyase activity) resulting in an AP site; (ii) class II AP endonuclease incision of the phosphodiester backbone 5' to the AP site, resulting in 3'-hydroxyl and 5'-2-deoxyribose-5-phosphate (dRP) containing termini; (iii) replacement of the missing base; (iv) removal of the 5'-sugar phosphate to provide a 5'-phosphate for DNA ligation by beta -pol; and (v) DNA ligase sealing of the nick (3, 9-13).

beta -Pol is a multifunctional enzyme consisting of an 8-kDa N-terminal domain with dRP lyase activity and a 31-kDa C-terminal domain with nucleotidyltransferase activity (9, 14-16). These two domains appear to be packed together in beta -pol in solution, as revealed by comparison of axial ratios of beta -pol (5.0) and the isolated 8- and 31-kDa domains (2.3 and 5.5, respectively) (17). Circular dichroism analysis has revealed that the 8-kDa domain is essentially alpha -helical in nature (16), and NMR solution and crystal structures (18, 19) have since confirmed the predominance of this secondary structure.

The 8-kDa domain of beta -pol (residues 1-87), originally characterized as a single-stranded DNA binding domain, is formed from four alpha -helices. These helices are packed as two antiparallel pairs with 60° crossing between the pairs. Connecting segments between helices 1 and 2 and between helices 3 and 4 each contribute to DNA binding. Helix 3-turn-helix 4, which forms a "helix-hairpin-helix" motif is similar to the helix-hairpin-helix motif that has been found in a number of DNA repair proteins (18, 20, 21), including several DNA glycosylases and AP lyases (20, 22). Residues of the helix-hairpin-helix motif have been proposed to contribute to recognition and excision of damaged nucleotides in DNA, as well as AP lyase chemistry (23, 24). Alignment of the helix-hairpin-helix motifs from beta -pol and endonuclease III suggested that Lys68 in beta -pol may be important in lyase chemistry, because mutation of the analogous lysine residue in endonuclease III, Lys120, resulted in a dramatic reduction in AP lyase activity, and Lys120 has been proposed to be the Schiff base nucleophile in this enzyme (25). In addition, the crystal structure of beta -pol bound to a gapped DNA molecule representing a product of the dRP lyase reaction suggested that lysine residues 35 and 68 coordinate the 5'-phosphate that exists in the gapped DNA/enzyme crystal structure (Ref. 26 and Fig. 1).

Matsumoto and Kim (9) suggested that beta -pol catalyzes removal of dRP from the AP endonuclease-incised AP site via beta -elimination, as opposed to hydrolysis, and that this dRP lyase activity resides in the N-terminal 8-kDa domain of beta -pol. In the beta -elimination, the dRP excision reaction would proceed via an imine or Schiff base intermediate. Fisher et al. (27) demonstrated in 1958 that an imine intermediate formed between a substrate and enzymatic amino group can be trapped by reduction with sodium borohydride (NaBH4). Since then this chemical technique has been widely used to elucidate reaction mechanisms, e.g. acetate decarboxylase (28) and aldolase (29). In both cases, the epsilon -NH2 group of a lysine was found to be involved in the formation of the imine intermediate. More recently, NaBH4 trapping was used for the identification of imine intermediates in several DNA enzymes: bacteriophage T4 endonuclease V-DNA (30), Escherichia coli endonuclease III-DNA (31), E. coli Fpg-DNA (31, 32), and Micrococcus luteus UV endonuclease-DNA covalent complexes (33). More direct evidence that the 8-kDa domain of beta -pol catalyzes removal of the dRP group via beta -elimination was also obtained by Piersen et al. (12). These investigators showed that a Schiff base intermediate is formed between the dRP-containing DNA substrate and the enzyme. The Schiff base nucleophile in the 8-kDa domain has been suggested to be Lys72 by site-directed mutagenesis (34, 35). This residue is in close proximity to the 5'-phosphate product group in the gapped DNA/enzyme crystal structure (26) and is part of the putative dRP lyase active site identified in NMR structures (23) of the 8-kDa domain (Fig. 1). Thus, based upon structural and site-directed mutagenesis data, it has been suggested that Lys72 is the preferred but not necessarily the obligatory residue in the dRP lyase active center of the 8-kDa domain of beta -pol (24, 35, 36). To understand the precise mechanism of the lyase reaction catalyzed by beta -pol and the lysine residue(s) involved in Schiff base chemistry, we utilized the NaBH4 trapping technique in combination with mass spectrometric (MS) analysis. The 8-kDa domain was first covalently cross-linked to a dRP-containing DNA substrate by NaBH4 reduction. We next identified the covalently modified lysine residue by MS sequencing. The approach included proteolysis of the covalently cross-linked protein-DNA complex with trypsin, followed by isolation, peptide mapping, and finally MS and MS/MS analyses of the adducted peptides. Our results, which unambiguously show that Lys72 in the 8-kDa domain of beta -pol is the sole Schiff base nucleophile, are discussed in the context of structure of the dRP lyase active site.


View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Surface image of a DNA polymerase-beta crystal structure showing the interaction between the N-terminal 8-kDa domain of beta -pol and the 5'-phosphate of a single nucleotide DNA gap (PDB code 1BPY). The molecular surface of only the 8-kDa domain of beta -pol, which possesses the dRP lyase activity, is illustrated. The DNA template is in red, and the DNA downstream of the gap is in green; the 5'-phosphate of this strand (green) is shown between Lys35 and Lys68. The 5'-phosphate binds near a lysine-rich pocket (blue) and the proposed lyase catalytic center of the 8-kDa domain. Structural and site-directed mutagenesis data suggest that Lys35 and Lys68 interact with this phosphate, and Lys72 has been proposed to be in the dRP lyase active site of the 8-kDa domain (34, 35). Nearby lysine residues Lys60 and Lys68 are also shown. Helices alpha 2, alpha 3, and alpha 4 are translucent and shown in white. This figure was generated using GRASP (44), Molscript (45), and Raster3D (46).


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- The acetonitrile and ammonium bicarbonate (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ), trifluoroacetic acid (Pierce), formic acid (Aldrich), and porcine trypsin (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) were used as delivered. All buffers were prepared using water with a conductivity of 18-MOmega (Hydro Service and Supplies, Research Triangle Park, NC).

Synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides purified by high pressure liquid chromatography were obtained from Oligos Etc, Inc. (Wilsonville, OR). [gamma -32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol), Mono S and Mono Q (HR 5/5) columns were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. The recombinant 8-kDa domain of beta -pol was overexpressed and purified as described previously (37). Human uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) with 84 amino acids deleted from the N terminus was purified as described (38).

5'-End Labeling-- Dephosphorylated 19-mer oligodeoxyribonucleotide (5'-UGTACGGATCCCCGGGTAC-3') containing a uracil residue at the 5'-end was phosphorylated with T4 polynucleotide kinase and [gamma -32P]ATP. The 34-mer (5'-GTACCCGGGGATCCGTACGGCGCATCAGCTGCAG-3') template was then annealed with 15-mer (5'-CTGCAGCTGATGCGC-3') and 19-mer 32P-labeled oligonucleotides by heating the solution at 90 °C for 3 min and allowing the solution to slowly cool to 25 °C. Unincorporated [gamma -32P]ATP was removed using a Nensorb-20 column according to the manufacturer's suggested protocol. The 32P-labeled duplex oligonucleotide, thus prepared, had a nick between positions 15 and 16. The radiolabeled oligonucleotide was lyophilized, resuspended in H2O, and stored at -30 °C.

UDG Treatment of DNA Substrate-- The 32P-labeled duplex oligonucleotide was treated with human UDG that resulted in the 32P-labeled deoxyribose sugar phosphate at the nick. Typically, 50 nM DNA substrate was pretreated with 10 nM UDG in 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 0.2 mM dithiothreitol. The reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Due to the labile nature of the UDG-treated DNA, the DNA substrate was prepared just before performing the NaBH4 trapping experiment.

Isolation and Purification of the 8-kDa Domain-DNA Complex-- To prepare the covalently cross-linked 8-kDa DNA complex, the NaBH4 trapping technique was used (12). Briefly, the reaction mixture (1 ml) contained 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 0.5 EDTA, 0.2 mM dithiothreitol, 25 µM 8-kDa domain of beta -pol, 5 µM duplex oligonucleotide substrate comprising 0.04 µM 32P-labeled DNA to monitor the cross-linked complex, and 25 mM NaBH4. The reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min on ice and then 30 min at room temperature. After incubation, the reaction mixture was precipitated with ice-cold 10% (v/v) trichloroacetic acid. Under these conditions, the free protein and protein-DNA complex precipitate leaving the majority of the free DNA in the supernatant. The protein was then pelleted by centrifugation, washed twice with ice-cold 100% acetone, and air-dried. The pellet was solubilized in 8 M urea and diluted with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, to give a final urea concentration of 1 M. Subsequently, the sample was loaded onto an FPLC Mono Q column (HR 5/5). The bound protein-DNA complex was eluted from the column using a NaCl gradient (0-1.0 M), and all fractions were counted for radioactivity. Fractions with peak radioactivity were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. At this stage, the fractions containing the protein-DNA complex were then pooled and digested with micrococcal nuclease (10 µg/ml). The covalently linked protein-DNA complex was precipitated with ice-cold trichloroacetic acid (10%), washed twice with ice-cold acetone (100%), and air-dried. The pellet was solubilized in 8 M urea and diluted with 50 mM (NH4)2CO3 (pH 8.5) to a final urea concentration of 1 M. The protein-DNA complex was further purified using an FPLC Mono S column (HR 5/5). All fractions were counted for radioactivity and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Fractions containing DNA-adducted protein were pooled and concentrated by trichloroacetic acid precipitation. Finally, the protein pellet was dissolved in 8 M urea and diluted with 50 mM (NH4)2CO3 (pH 8.5) to a final urea concentration of 1 M.

The high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) purification of the 8-kDa domain-DNA complex was performed by using a Hewlett-Packard Model 1100 HPLC system (Hewlett-Packard, Wilmington, DE) consisting of a Rheodyne 7125 sample injector (Rheodyne, Inc., Cotati, CA) with a 100-µl sample loop, a series 1100 binary pump, a series 1100 diode array detector, and a Bio-Rad Model 2110 fraction collector (Bio-Rad). The column used for the purification was a Vydac C4 reverse phase column (25 cm × 4.6 mm inner diameter). Separations were performed using a linear water:acetonitrile (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid) gradient of 10-60% acetonitrile over 50 min at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Fractions were collected at 1-min intervals and analyzed on a Beckman Model LS 6500 liquid scintillation counter (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA) to detect the 32P-containing fractions.

Tryptic Digestion Conditions-- The HPLC-purified 8-kDa domain protein-DNA complex was reconstituted in 10 µl of 90% acetonitrile and then diluted to 100 µl with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer (pH 8). Porcine trypsin (1 µg) (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) was added to an aliquot of the complex and to a sample of native 8-kDa protein alone (0.3 µg/µl in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.0). The reactions were carried out at 37 °C for 3 h. All tryptic fragment nomenclature refers to predicted fragments of the native 8-kDa domain protein.

Electrospray Mass Spectrometry-- A Micromass Q-Tof (Altrincham, UK) hybrid tandem mass spectrometer was used for the acquisition of the electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectra and tandem mass spectra (39). The instrument is equipped with a nanoflow electrospray source and consists of a quadrupole mass filter and an orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight mass spectrometer. The needle voltage was ~2800 V, the cone voltage was 25 eV, and the collision energy was 4.0 eV for the MS analyses. For the MS/MS experiments, a parent ion is selected with the first mass analyzer and transmitted into a collision cell where fragmentation is induced by collision with argon atoms. The collision energy used for these experiments was 30 eV. The resulting fragment ions were detected with the second mass analyzer. In this type of experiment, only ions resulting from fragmentation of the selected parent ion are observed. Data analysis was accomplished with a MassLynx data system and MaxEnt software supplied by the manufacturer.

Samples for flow injection analyses were infused into the mass spectrometer at ~200 nl/min using a pressure injection vessel (40). For the LC/MS and LC/MS/MS analyses, gradients were formed and delivered using a Gilson Gradient HPLC system and controller (Gilson, Inc., Middleton, WI). The HPLC system consisted of Gilson model 305 and 306 pumps, a model 811C manometric module, and a model 805 mixing chamber. Injections of 2.5 µl were made using a FAMOS automatic injector (LC Packings, San Francisco, CA). A 5-95% acetonitrile (0.1% formic acid) linear gradient over 30 min was used for the chromatographic separations. A flow rate of 0.35 ml/min was delivered from the Gilson HPLC system to an Acurate Splitter (LC Packings, San Francisco, CA), which reduced the flow rate through the column to approximately 200-300 nl/min. The column used was a 15 cm × 75 µm inner diameter Hypersil C18 ("pepmap") column (LC Packings, San Francisco, CA).

Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry-- The MALDI analyses were performed using a Voyager RP (PerSeptive Biosystems, Framingham, MA) time-of-flight dual-stage reflector mass spectrometer as has been previously described (41). A saturated MALDI matrix solution (0.5 µl) of alpha -cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 45:45:10 ethanol:water:formic acid and 0.5 µl of the sample solution were spotted onto the MALDI target. Co-crystallization of the sample and matrix was allowed to proceed at room temperature.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Optimization of Covalent 8-kDa DNA Complex Formation by NaBH4 Trapping-- To understand the mechanism of dRP lyase catalysis by the 8-kDa domain of beta -pol and to identify the lysine residue(s) directly involved in Schiff base chemistry, NaBH4 trapping (12) was used to isolate the imino complex formed between a DNA substrate and the 8-kDa domain. A duplex DNA (34 base pairs) that contained a solitary uracil at position 16 and a nick between positions 15 and 16 was chosen as a matter of convenience; the uracil-containing oligonucleotide was 5'-end-labeled prior to annealing. Next, the duplex DNA was treated with uracil-DNA glycosylase to create a dRP-containing single nucleotide-gapped DNA substrate. The DNA substrate, thus prepared (12), contained a 32P-labeled dRP flap at the nick (Fig. 2A).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Optimization of covalent 8-kDa protein-DNA complex formation by NaBH4 trapping. A 34-base pair oligonucleotide DNA containing [32P]dRP in the gap and the 8-kDa domain of beta -pol were incubated with NaBH4. Reaction conditions and product analysis are described under "Experimental Procedures." A illustrates the duplex DNA (34 base pairs) that contained a solitary uracil at position 16 and a nick between positions 15 and 16. Uracil-containing oligonucleotide was 5'-end labeled, annealed, and treated with uracil-DNA glycosylase. DNA substrate, thus prepared, contained a 32P-labeled dRP in the gap. B shows a photograph of an autoradiogram of the SDS-PAGE-resolved reaction mixtures; lanes 1-3, [32P]dRP-containing DNA (50 nM) mixed with varying ratios of an 8-kDa domain, as indicated. Covalent cross-linked 8-kDa domain-DNA intermediate was trapped by NaBH4 reduction for 30 min at room temperature; lanes 4-6, DNA (50 nM) mixed with the 8-kDa domain (50 nM) in a 1:1 ratio and incubated with NaBH4 at room temperature for various lengths of time, as indicated on the top of the photograph.

For preparation of large amounts of the covalent 8-kDa DNA complex, conditions for trapping the imino complex by NaBH4 reduction were evaluated. Results depicted in Fig. 2B (lanes 1-3) show that when the 8-kDa and 32P-labeled DNA were used in varying ratios and incubated with NaBH4 for 30 min at room temperature, little difference was detected in the amount of protein-DNA complex formed. Time course analysis of complex formation showed that a 30-min incubation of the 8-kDa protein and DNA with NaBH4 gave results similar to longer incubations (Fig. 2B, lanes 4-6). For subsequent large scale preparations, isolation, and purification of the complex, 8-kDa protein and DNA were used in a 5:1 ratio (protein:DNA) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature.

Purification of the 8-kDa DNA Complex-- The 8-kDa domain of beta -pol contains 15 lysine and 4 arginine residues and has an isoelectric point of 10.3. Hence at pH 8.8, below the isoelectric point, the protein should have a net positive charge, whereas, after cross-linking to the DNA substrate, it should have a net negative charge. This charge difference was used to separate the covalently linked protein from the free 8-kDa protein on an FPLC Mono Q column. Under the conditions used (pH 8.8), free protein does not bind to the Mono Q column and emerges in the flow-through, whereas the cross-linked protein-DNA complex remains bound to the column. The bound protein-DNA complex was eluted from the column using a NaCl gradient. A small portion of each fraction was analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Fractions containing radiolabeled protein-DNA complex were pooled (Fig. 3, lane 1) and subjected to micrococcal nuclease digestion. Micrococcal nuclease digested the entire length of the DNA except for the covalently cross-linked nucleotide. Because most of the DNA was digested, the remaining protein-DNA complex should have a net positive charge and, hence, should bind to the Mono S column. FPLC Mono S column chromatography, therefore, was used to purify the protein-DNA complex after micrococcal nuclease digestion. Based upon SDS-PAGE analysis, the fractions that contained the protein-DNA complex were pooled (Fig. 3, lane 2) and used for subsequent MS and peptide mapping analyses.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Purification of the covalent 8-kDa protein-DNA complex by Mono Q and Mono S columns. Photographs of autoradiograms of the purified 8-kDa protein-DNA complexes resolved by SDS-PAGE are shown. The 8-kDa protein (25 µM) and 32P-labeled DNA (5 µM) were incubated with NaBH4 for 30 min as described under "Experimental Procedures." The resulting covalent 8-kDa DNA (intact) complex was separated from the free protein and probe by Mono Q column chromatography. Fractions containing the cross-linked complex were pooled (Pool I, lane 1). Then, Pool I was digested with micrococcal nuclease and the 8-kDa DNA (micrococcal nuclease digested) complex was further purified using a Mono S column. Fractions containing the 8-kDa DNA complex were then pooled (Pool II, lane 2).

Mass Spectrometric Analyses of the 8-kDa DNA Complex-- Following micrococcal nuclease digestion and purification of the 8-kDa protein-DNA complex by FPLC using the Mono S column, the positive ion MALDI mass spectrum of the complex was acquired and is shown in Fig. 4A. The mass spectrum reveals ions corresponding to the protonated molecule of the protein-DNA complex at approximately 10,000 Da as well as ions that correspond in mass to protonated molecules of the micrococcal nuclease (ions labeled with an asterisk). Because the protein-DNA complex and the nuclease coelute from the Mono S column, the protein-DNA complex was further purified by reverse-phase HPLC using UV detection (Fig. 5A). As the DNA contains a 32P label, the fractions containing the 8-kDa protein-DNA complex were easily identified (Fig. 5B). The native 8-kDa domain protein, as well as the HPLC-purified protein-DNA complex, were then analyzed by both flow injection ESI/MS (Fig. 6) and MALDI/MS (Fig. 4B). The molecular mass of the 8-kDa protein-DNA covalent complex as determined by ESI/MS was 10,010 Da (Fig. 6B) in comparison to 9467 Da for the native 8-kDa protein (Fig. 6A). The mass accuracy of this instrument with external calibration is 0.01%, therefore, for molecular masses at 10,000 Da, the accuracy is ± 1 Da. These data suggest a molecular mass for the protein-DNA complex of 543 Da (±1 Da) greater than that of the molecular mass of the protein (or less if the protein had become oxidized). Similar results were obtained from the MALD/MS analysis (Fig. 4B).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   MALDI mass spectrum of the micrococcal nuclease-digested 8-kDa protein-DNA complex following purification by FPLC using a Mono S column. MALDI spectra were acquired prior to HPLC purification (A) and after HPLC purification (B). Ions corresponding to the singly and doubly charged protein-DNA complex were observed at approximately 10,000 and 5,000 Da, respectively. The mass spectrum was acquired as described under "Experimental Procedures." Ions labeled with an asterisk (*) correspond to background and/or micrococcal nuclease ions. The additional ion of m/z 9783 in B is most likely a decomposition ion due to loss of guanine.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Reverse phase HPLC purification of the 8-kDa protein-DNA complex with UV and radiometric detection. The separation was performed on a Vydac C4 column with a linear water:acetonitrile (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid) gradient as described under "Experimental Procedures." The UV chromatogram from the separation is shown in A. Fractions were collected at 1-min intervals, and the plot of radioactivity versus fraction number is shown in B. The protein-DNA complex eluted as one component at approximately 35 min.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Electrospray mass spectra of the native 8-kDa protein and 8-kDa protein-DNA complex. The ESI mass spectrum of the native 8-kDa protein (A) was acquired and compared with the ESI mass spectrum of the HPLC-purified 8-kDa protein-DNA complex (B). The molecular mass of the 8-kDa protein-DNA complex was observed to be 10,010 Da in comparison to 9467 Da for the native 8-kDa protein. These data suggest a molecular mass for the DNA adduct of 543 Da or less if the protein had become oxidized. The ion of m/z 10052 (B) corresponds in mass to the protein-DNA complex plus an acetonitrile. The mass spectra were acquired as described under "Experimental Procedures."

LC/MS Analyses of the Tryptic Digests-- To determine which amino acid(s) in beta -pol interacts with the DNA 5'-phosphate, the 8-kDa domain alone and the 8-kDa domain-DNA complex were subjected to tryptic digestion and analysis by LC/ESI/MS. The potential tryptic cleavage sites in the amino acid sequence of the 8-kDa domain of beta -pol and the resulting tryptic fragment numbers are shown in Fig. 7A. The mass chromatograms of the major tryptic fragments of the native 8-kDa protein were generated and compared with the mass chromatograms of these same tryptic fragments from the digest mixture of the protein-DNA complex. A notable difference observed between the mass chromatograms was that the relative abundance of tryptic fragment T15 (amino acids 73-81) was greatly reduced in the complex mixture in comparison to the native 8-kDa digestion mixture, indicating that the cross-linked DNA may be contained within these amino acid residues (data not shown). Note that the sample used for the tryptic digest of the 8-kDa protein-DNA also contained some residual native 8-kDa domain (Fig. 6B). It is, therefore, expected that tryptic fragments corresponding in mass to the native 8-kDa protein would be observed in the analysis of the digestion mixture of the 8-kDa protein-DNA complex. The most abundant new ion observed upon comparison of the LC/MS analysis of the digestion mixture of the complex (Fig. 7C) with that of the 8-kDa protein alone (Fig. 7B) was an ion [(M + 2H)2+ = 981.5] that eluted at 77.8 min and corresponds in mass to amino acid residues 69-81 (T14-15) plus 527 Da, in the protein-DNA complex digestion mixture, which was absent in the control digest mixture. The mass of this ion may correspond to the formation of the Schiff base intermediate followed by reduction. These data also indicate that 16 Da of the mass difference between the 8-kDa protein and the 8-kDa protein-DNA adduct are probably because of oxidation of one of the amino acid residues (i.e. mass increase of protein-DNA complex, 543 Da, less mass increase of adducted peptide, 527 Da, = oxygen, 16 Da). No signal was observed for the addition of 527 Da for any other predicted tryptic fragments above the baseline noise level (Table I). These data suggest that the DNA is cross-linked to one of the lysine residues in T14-15 (residues 69-81).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Potential tryptic cleavage sites in the 8-kDa protein and reconstructed mass chromatograms of T14-15 plus 527 Da. A illustrates the potential tryptic cleavage sites in the amino acid sequence of the 8-kDa domain of beta -polymerase as well as the resulting tryptic fragment number. The reconstructed mass chromatograms corresponding to the doubly charged ion of tryptic fragment T14-15 plus 527 Da (m/z 981.5) from the LC/MS analyses of the tryptic digest of the native 8-kDa protein as a control and the purified 8-kDa protein-DNA complex are shown in B and C, respectively. The LC/MS analyses are described under "Experimental Procedures."

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Summary of mass spectral ions for potential Schiff base intermediates observed in the LC/MS analyses of the tryptic digests

Determination of the Amino Acid in beta -Pol Cross-linked to DNA-- To determine whether the (M + 2H)2+ ion at m/z 981.5 (T14-15 plus 527 Da) contains the cross-linked DNA, an LC/MS/MS spectrum was acquired. The resulting MS/MS spectrum after transformation of all ions to the single charge state is shown in Fig. 8 and Table II. The major fragment ions are observed at m/z 1810.85, 1712.86, 1632.76, and 1534.79 (labeled as - G, - dG, - pdG, and - pdG - p) and correspond to the loss of guanine, deoxyguanosine, deoxyguanosine plus a phosphate, and deoxyguanosine plus two phosphate groups, respectively, from the peptide. These observed masses are within 0.05 Da of the calculated masses. These data confirm that the cross-linked DNA was contained within the T14-15 peptide. In addition, a series of both y and b ions (42, 43) are observed, which correspond to cleavages along the peptide backbone. The y series ions result from C-terminal peptide backbone cleavages and the b series ions result from N-terminal backbone cleavages. The y1 through y9 series ions correspond in mass to sequential loss of amino acids beginning at the C-terminal Lys81 and ending at Ile73. The b series ions (b4 - dG through b11 - dG) correspond in mass to cleavages of amino acids from the N terminus of the peptide backbone minus deoxyguanosine. The observation of the y10 - dG ion in addition to the observation of the y9 ion provides the necessary data to definitively assign the location of the DNA adduct. The observed mass difference between these two ions plus the mass of deoxyguanosine equals the mass of a lysine residue plus the mass of the DNA adduct. These structurally informative fragment ions allow the unequivocal assignment of the cross-linked DNA to the Lys72 residue of the 8-kDa domain of beta -pol. No additional amino acid residues were found as minor cross-linked species (Table I).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   LC/ESI tandem mass spectrum of the (M + 2H)2+ ion of m/z 981.5 from the tryptic digest of 8-kDa protein-DNA complex. The tandem mass spectrum was transformed using MaxEnt software so that all of the ions in the spectrum are in the single charge state. The major sites of fragmentation and their respective observed masses are shown on the structure in Table II. The most abundant fragment ions are labeled - G, - dG, - pdG, and - pdG - p and correspond to loss of guanine, deoxyguanosine, deoxyguanosine plus a phosphate, and deoxyguanosine plus two phosphate groups, respectively. The y and b series ions correspond to C-terminal and N-terminal cleavages, respectively, along the peptide backbone.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In the present study, the mechanism of the dRP lyase reaction of human DNA beta -polymerase has been investigated. To study the mechanism, the 8-kDa domain was covalently cross-linked to dRP-containing DNA by NaBH4 reduction, and the trapped intermediate was purified and then subjected to peptide mapping and MS sequencing analyses. Identification of the precise location of the DNA adduct on the 8-kDa protein has provided the first direct evidence in support of a catalytic mechanism involving nucleophilic attack by Lys72 at the abasic site. Based upon earlier site-directed mutagenesis studies (24, 34-36), Lys72 was shown to be involved at the dRP lyase active center of the 8-kDa domain of beta -pol, but the precise role of Lys72 could not be assigned. Other residues that potentially could be involved in Schiff base formation include Lys35, Lys60, Lys68, and Lys84 (Fig. 1). To determine precisely the amino acid residue(s) covalently cross-linked to the DNA, the 8-kDa protein-DNA complex was subjected to tryptic digestion followed by mass spectrometric sequencing. Because of the complexity of the digestion mixture, on-line LC was used in conjunction with the MS analyses. The results of the LC/MS analysis of the tryptic digest of the 8-kDa protein-DNA complex were compared with the LC/MS analysis of the tryptic digest of the native 8-kDa protein. For the LC/MS of the digest of the native 8-kDa domain, 91% of the protein sequence was detected. The tryptic digest ions corresponding to the remaining 9% of the protein had molecular masses that were below the effective mass range scanned for this particular experiment because of ions from chemical background at low mass.

LC/MS analysis of the tryptic digest of the 8-kDa protein-DNA complex showed the same tryptic digest ions that were observed in the LC/MS analysis of the native 8-kDa protein (data not shown). This observation is not surprising given the fact that some residual native 8-kDa protein was present in purified 8-kDa protein-DNA complex (Fig. 6B). In addition to the observation of the methionine-containing tryptic fragment ions T3-4 and T4, the oxidized form of these ions were also observed (data not shown). Based on ion counts, over 80% of tryptic fragment T4 appears to be oxidized. This indicates that the protein-DNA complex had become oxidized during the isolation and purification procedures. This confirms that the mass difference attributable to the DNA adduct is most likely 527 not 543 Da.

Mass chromatograms of ions corresponding to the addition of 527 Da to the tryptic fragments containing the suspected amino acid residues involved in dRP lyase activity based on mutagenesis studies were generated from the LC/MS data of the digests of both the protein-DNA complex and the native protein (Table I). The mass chromatogram corresponding to the doubly charged ion of tryptic fragment T14-15 (amino acid residues 69-81) plus 527 Da (m/z 981.5) was observed in the LC/MS analysis of the protein-DNA complex digestion mixture (Fig. 7C), and this ion was not observed in the LC/MS analysis of the digestion mixture of the native protein used as a control (Fig. 7B). The additional mass of 527 Da apparently results from the covalently bound abasic site and the attached 3'-deoxyguanylic acid. Because no signal was observed for the addition of 527 Da to any of the other potential amino acid residues, these data suggested that the DNA adduct is covalently cross-linked to one of the amino acid residues of 69-81.

To verify these results, the LC/MS/MS spectrum of the doubly charged ion of the T14-15 peptide was acquired. The tandem mass spectrum of the (M + 2H)2+ ion of m/z 981.5 in the tryptic digest mixture of the 8-kDa protein-DNA complex showed structurally informative fragment ions indicating the location of the DNA adduct on the tryptic peptide. After transformation of all ions to the single charge state, the resulting MS/MS spectrum showed abundant fragment ions corresponding to cleavages of the DNA that was adducted to the tryptic peptide (Fig. 8 and Table II). These ions included the loss of guanine (- G), loss of deoxyguanosine (- dG), loss of deoxyguanosine plus a phosphate (- pdG), and loss of deoxyguanosine plus two phosphates (- pdG - p). These data are consistent with the formation of a DNA adduct, which would contain an abasic site. In addition, a nearly complete series of C-terminal ions (i.e. y1 to y9) were observed, which correspond to the amino acid sequence IDEFLATGK. N-terminal ions minus the deoxyguanosine were also observed (i.e. b4 - dG to b11 - dG). The observation of these structurally informative fragment ions, most importantly y9 and y10 - dG, allows for definitive identification of Lys72 as the amino acid in the 8-kDa domain, which has been modified by covalent cross-linking to the DNA. Based upon the LC/MS and LC/MS/MS results, a proposed structure for the intermediate involved in dRP lyase activity is shown in Table II. The sole Schiff base intermediate in this enzyme is formed between the abasic site and the Lys72 residue of the 8-kDa domain.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Summary of mass spectral sequence ions observed in the LC/MS/MS MaxEnt transformed spectrum of (M + 2H)2+ = 981.45

In summary, using various purification and MS sequencing methodologies, the Schiff base intermediate trapped by reduction was identified. Tandem mass spectrometry provided structural information as to the location of the DNA adducted to the 8-kDa domain of beta -pol. The amino acid residue located at the center of the lyase activity was unequivocally determined to be Lys72 of the 8-kDa domain of beta -pol. Thus, peptide mapping in combination with mass spectrometry is an extremely powerful technique for investigating the structure of covalent intermediates in protein-DNA interactions.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Bill Beard for creating the surface image and Drs. Bill Copeland and Eric Finley for critical reading of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of Structural Biology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, P. O. Box 12233 MD F0-03, 111 T.W. Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Tel.: (919)541-1966; Fax: (919)541-0220; E-mail: tomer@niehs.nih.gov.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: beta -pol, polymerase beta ; BER, base excision repair; AP, apurinic/apyrimidinic; dRP, 5'-2-deoxyribose-5-phosphate; MS, mass spectrometry; UDG, uracil-DNA glycosylase; FPLC, fast protein liquid chromatography; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; ESI, electrospray ionization; LC, liquid chromatography; MALDI, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Wilson, S. H., Abbotts, J., and Widen, S. G. (1988) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 949, 149-157[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Wilson, S. H. (1991) in The Eukaryotic Nucleus (Stauss, P. R. , and Wilson, S. H., eds), Vol. 1 , pp. 199-234, The Telford Press, Inc., Caldwell, NJ
3. Singhal, R. K., Prasad, R., and Wilson, S. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 949-957[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Sobol, R. W., Horton, J. K., Kuhn, R., Gu, H., Singhal, R. K., Prasad, R., Rajewsky, K., and Wilson, S. H. (1996) Nature 379, 183-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Forsina, G., Fortini, P., Rossi, O., Carrozzino, F., Raspaglio, G., Cox, L. S., Lane, D. P., Abbondandodo, A., and Doglitti, E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 9573-9578[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Klungland, A., and Lindahl, T. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 3341-3348[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Fortini, P., Pascucci, B., Parlanti, E., Sobol, R. W., Wilson, S. H., and Doglitti, E. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 3575-3580[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Biade, S., Sobol, R. W., Wilson, S. H., and Matsumoto, Y. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 898-902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Matsumoto, Y., and Kim, K. (1995) Science 269, 699-702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Srivastava, D. K., Vande Berg, B. J., Prasad, R., Molina, J. T., Beard, W. A., Tomkinson, A. E., and Wilson, S. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 21203-21209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Dianov, G., and Lindahl, T. (1994) Curr. Biol. 4, 1069-1076[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Piersen, C. E., Prasad, R., Wilson, S. H., and Lloyd, R. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17811-17815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Prasad, R., Beard, W. A., Strauss, P. R., and Wilson, S. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15263-15270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Kumar, A., Abbotts, J., Karawya, E. M., and Wilson, S. H. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 7156-7159[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Kumar, A., Widen, S. G., Williams, K. R., Kedar, P., Karpel, R. J., and Wilson, S. H. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 2124-2131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Casas-Finet, J. R., Kumar, A., Morris, G., Wilson, S. H., and Karpel, R. L. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19618-19625[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Kim, S.-J., Lewis, M. S., Knutson, J. R., Porter, D., Kumar, A., and Wilson, S. H. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 244, 224-235[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Liu, D.-J., DeRose, E. F., Prasad, R., Wilson, S. H., and Mullen, G. P. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 9537-9545[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Pelletier, H., Sawaya, M. R., Kumar, A., Wilson, S. H., and Kraut, J. (1994) Science 264, 1891-1903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Seeberg, E., Edie, L, and Bjørås, M. (1995) Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 391-397[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Mullen, G. P., and Wilson, S. H. (1997) in Base Excision Repair of DNA Damage (Hickson, I. D., ed) , pp. 121-135, Landes Bioscience, Austin, TX
22. Doherty, A. J., Serpel, L. C., and Ponting, C. P. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 2488-2497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Liu, D.-J., Prasad, R., Wilson, S. H., DeRose, E. F., and Mullen, G. P. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 6188-6200[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Mullen, G. P., Antuch, W., Maciejewski, M. W., Prasad, R., and Wilson, S. H. (1997) Tetrahedron 35, 12057-12066[CrossRef]
25. Thayer, M. M., Ahern, H., Xing, D., Cunningham, R. P., and Tainer, J. A. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 4108-4120[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Sawaya, M. R., Prasad, R., Wilson, S. H., and Kraut, J. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 11205-11215[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Fisher, E. H., Kent, A. B., Snyder, E. R., and Krebs, E. G. (1958) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 2906-2907
28. Fridovich, I., and Westheimer, F. H. (1962) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84, 3208-3209[CrossRef]
29. Warren, S., Zerner, B., and Westheimer, F. H. (1966) Biochemistry 5, 817-823[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Dodson, M. L., Schrock, R. D., III, and Lloyd, R. S. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 8284-8290[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Sun, B., Latham, K. A., Dodson, M. L., and Lloyd, R. S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 19501-19508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Tchou, J., and Grollman, A. P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 11671-11677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Piersen, C. E., Prince, M. A., Augustine, M. L., Dodson, M. L., and Lloyd, R. S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 23475-23484[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Prasad, R., Beard, W. A., Chyan, J. Y., Maciejewski, M. W., Mullen, G. P., and Wilson, S. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 11121-11126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Matsumoto, Y., Kim, K., Katz, D. S., and Feng, J. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 6456-6464[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Feng, J., Crasto, C. J., and Matsumoto, Y. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 9605-9611[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Prasad, R., Kumar, A., Widen, S. G., Casas-Finet, J. R., and Wilson, S. H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 22746-22755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Slupphaug, G., Eftedal, I., Kavli, B., Bharti, S., Helle, N. M., Haug, T., Levine, D. W., and Krokan, H. E. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 128-138[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Borchers, C., Parker, C. E., Deterding, L. J., and Tomer, K. B. (1999) J. Chromatogr. A 854, 119-130[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Deterding, L. J., Moseley, M. A., Tomer, K. B., and Jorgenson, J. W. (1989) Anal. Chem. 61, 2504-2511[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Barr, D. P., Gunther, M. R., Deterding, L. J., Tomer, K. B., and Mason, R. P. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15498-15503[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Roepstorff, P., and Fohlman, J. (1984) Biomed. Environ. Mass Spectrom. 11, 601
43. Biemann, K. (1988) Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 16, 99-111
44. Nicholls, A., Sharp, K. A., and Honig, B. (1991) Proteins 11, 281-296[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Kraulis, P. (1991) J. Appl. Cryst. 24, 946-950
46. Merritt, E. A., and Bacon, D. J. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 277, 505-524[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. W. Duym, K. A. Fiala, N. Bhatt, and Z. Suo
Kinetic Effect of a Downstream Strand and Its 5'-Terminal Moieties on Single Nucleotide Gap-filling Synthesis Catalyzed by Human DNA Polymerase {lambda}
J. Biol. Chem., November 24, 2006; 281(47): 35649 - 35655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
L. Haracska, L. Prakash, and S. Prakash
A mechanism for the exclusion of low-fidelity human Y-family DNA polymerases from base excision repair
Genes & Dev., November 15, 2003; 17(22): 2777 - 2785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Prasad, K. Bebenek, E. Hou, D. D. Shock, W. A. Beard, R. Woodgate, T. A. Kunkel, and S. H. Wilson
Localization of the Deoxyribose Phosphate Lyase Active Site in Human DNA Polymerase {iota} by Controlled Proteolysis
J. Biol. Chem., August 8, 2003; 278(32): 29649 - 29654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-J. Kim, W. A. Beard, J. Harvey, D. D. Shock, J. R. Knutson, and S. H. Wilson
Rapid Segmental and Subdomain Motions of DNA Polymerase beta
J. Biol. Chem., February 7, 2003; 278(7): 5072 - 5081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. T. Saxowsky, Y. Matsumoto, and P. T. Englund
The Mitochondrial DNA Polymerase beta from Crithidia fasciculata Has 5'-Deoxyribose Phosphate (dRP) Lyase Activity but Is Deficient in the Release of dRP
J. Biol. Chem., September 27, 2002; 277(40): 37201 - 37206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. S. DeMott, E. Beyret, D. Wong, B. C. Bales, J.-T. Hwang, M. M. Greenberg, and B. Demple
Covalent Trapping of Human DNA Polymerase beta by the Oxidative DNA Lesion 2-Deoxyribonolactone
J. Biol. Chem., March 1, 2002; 277(10): 7637 - 7640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]