![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 14, 10597-10603, April 7, 2000
§,
,
, and
From the
Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia
Molecular, Facultat de Química, Universitat de Barcelona,
E08028 Barcelona, Spain, and the ¶ Department of Diabetes,
University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United
Kingdom
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Glucokinase has a very high flux control
coefficient (greater than unity) on glycogen synthesis from glucose in
hepatocytes (Agius et al., J. Biol. Chem.
271, 30479-30486, 1996). Hepatic glucokinase is inhibited by a 68-kDa
glucokinase regulatory protein (GKRP) that is expressed in molar
excess. To establish the relative control exerted by glucokinase and
GKRP, we applied metabolic control analysis to determine the flux
control coefficient of GKRP on glucose metabolism in hepatocytes.
Adenovirus-mediated overexpression of GKRP (by up to 2-fold above
endogenous levels) increased glucokinase binding and inhibited glucose
phosphorylation, glycolysis, and glycogen synthesis over a wide range
of concentrations of glucose and sorbitol. It decreased the affinity of
glucokinase translocation for glucose and increased the control
coefficient of glucokinase on glycogen synthesis. GKRP had a negative
control coefficient of glycogen synthesis that is slightly greater than unity ( Glucokinase (hexokinase IV) is the predominant glucose
phosphorylating enzyme in hepatocytes and insulin-secreting and
glucagon-secreting cells of the pancreas and has a major role in the
control of blood glucose homeostasis (1, 2). Its importance has been
confirmed by the finding that mutations in its gene cause a form of
diabetes known as maturity onset diabetes of the young type 2 (MODY-2),1 which is
characterized by mild hyperglycemia, decreased glucose-induced insulin
secretion, impaired hepatic glycogen storage, and dominant inheritance
(3), and by studies on hepatic glucokinase knockout mice (4). Hepatic
glucokinase is Regulated by a 68-kDa regulatory protein (GKRP) (5, 6).
Expression of GKRP during development precedes expression of
glucokinase (7), and no physiological situations are known in which
hepatic glucokinase is expressed in the absence of its regulatory
protein. GKRP is located mainly in the nucleus of hepatocytes, whereas
glucokinase translocates between the nucleus and the cytoplasm (8).
Glucokinase binds GKRP in the nucleus at low glucose
concentrations and translocates to the cytoplasm at elevated glucose or
fructose concentrations (8-10). This translocation can be
reconstituted in nonhepatic cells by co-expressing glucokinase and GKRP
(11). It is not yet known whether mutations in human GKRP contribute to
some forms of diabetes (12).
Loss of function mutations have been described for most enzymes
involved in glucose metabolism. In virtually all cases, with the
exception of glucokinase, effects on the phenotype are observed only in
the homozygous mutant (recessive inheritance) (13). Glucokinase thus
represents a very rare, if not unique, case of dominant inheritance
among metabolic enzymes. Kacser and Burns (13) provided a mechanistic
explanation for dominance and recessivity of loss of function mutations
of metabolic enzymes based on the flux control coefficient of the wild
type enzyme, which represents the fractional change in pathway flux
that results from a fractional change in enzyme concentration (14, 15).
Enzymes with flux control coefficients much smaller than unity are
predicted to show recessive inheritance because a 50% decrease in
activity is expected to have a negligible effect on metabolic flux and hence on the phenotype. The widespread occurrence of recessivity and
low control coefficients is consistent with this hypothesis. Likewise,
the very high control coefficient of glucokinase on hepatic glycogen
synthesis (16) is consistent with the dominant inheritance of
glucokinase mutations in MODY-2 and the impaired hepatic glycogen
synthesis in this condition (17). The control coefficient of an enzyme
or protein is thus indicative of whether loss of function mutations of
the protein are likely to affect the phenotype in the heterozygous
state (13). Therefore, the aims of this study were to determine the
control coefficient of GKRP on hepatic glycogen metabolism and to
determine the effects of changes in the ratio of expression of GKRP and
glucokinase on the control coefficients of the two proteins and thereby
evaluate the contribution of GKRP to the glucose sensory mechanism of
the hepatocyte. Our results show that the mechanism comprising
glucokinase and GKRP confers a markedly enhanced responsiveness and
sensitivity to glucose on the hepatocyte.
Materials--
DEAE-Sepharose, CH-Sepharose 4B,
1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide, sorbitol
6-phosphate, glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase from
Leuconostoc mestenteroides, and all other enzymes were from
Sigma. [U-14C]glucose, [2-3H]glucose, and
[3-3H]glucose were from New England Nuclear. Sources of
other reagents were as described in Ref. 18.
Preparation of Recombinant Adenoviruses--
The cDNA
encoding rat liver GKRP (a generous gift from Dr. E. Van Schaftingen,
University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium) was cloned into pACC vector
and co-transfected with pJM17 vector into 293 cells to achieve
homologous recombination and production of recombinant adenovirus
(AdCMV-GKRP) as described previously (19). Recombinant adenovirus
containing the cDNA for rat liver glucokinase (AdCMV-GKL) (20) was
a kind gift from Dr. C. Newgard (University of Texas, Dallas, TX). The
adenoviruses were amplified in 293 cells (19), and aliquots of medium
lysate were used. Viral titers were determined that resulted in protein
overexpression of between 30% and 2-fold above endogenous levels for
GKRP and between 30% and 4-fold above endogenous levels for
glucokinase at 18 h after treatment.
Hepatocyte Isolation and Culture--
Hepatocytes were isolated
by collagenase perfusion of the liver of male Wistar rats (body weight,
180-250 g) fed ad libitum (21). They were suspended in
minimal essential medium (MEM) containing 7% (v/v) neonatal calf serum
and seeded at a density of 4 × 104
cells/cm2 in 24-well plates for metabolic studies and
glucokinase determination, in 6-well plates for GKRP determination, or
on gelatin-coated coverslips for immunostaining. After cell attachment
(2-3 h), the medium was replaced by serum-free MEM containing the
adenoviruses or control medium. After an additional 2 h, the
medium was replaced by serum-free MEM containing 10 nM
dexamethasone, and the cells were cultured for 16-18 h before use for
metabolic studies. Unless stated otherwise, the MEM contained 5 mM glucose.
Immunostaining--
Cells cultured on 13-mm coverslips were
washed in PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (30 min), and
washed in PBS (11). They were incubated with NaBH4 (1 mg/ml, 10 min) and then permeabilized in 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100 in
PBS and blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin/0.02% Triton X-100/PBS.
They were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody against
GKRP (22) washed in PBS and incubated with a Texas Red-conjugated
antibody against rabbit IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch) in 0.1% Triton
X-100/1% bovine serum albumin for 1 h at room temperature. They
were then washed in PBS, water, and ethanol and mounted onto microscope
slides with Mowiol containing 2.5% diazabicyclo[2,2,2]octane
(Aldrich). Images of stained cells were obtained using a Bio-Rad-600
Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope equipped with a 15 mW krypton-argon
laser. The 568 nm line was used to excite the Texas Red fluorophore. For each field, a series of 1-µm optical sections were combined to
produce a single image.
Metabolic Studies--
For metabolic studies (Figs. 4 and 5) and
control coefficient determinations (Figs. 6-8), parallel incubations
were performed for determination of glucose metabolism and the
activities of glucokinase and GKRP. Incubations for determination of
glucose phosphorylation ([2-3H]glucose), glycolysis
([3-3H]glucose), or glycogen synthesis
([U-14C]glucose) were for 3 h in MEM containing the
substrates indicated and radiolabelled glucose (2 µCi/ml) and 2 µM cycloheximide to inhibit further protein
overexpression (16). On termination of the incubations, the medium from
experiments with [3H]glucose was collected into 0.1 M HCl for determination of 3H2O
(23). For determination of glycogen synthesis, hepatocyte monolayers
were washed three times with 150 mM NaCl and extracted in
0.1 M NaOH. Extracts were deproteinized with
trichloroacetic acid (10%, w/v) containing glycogen carrier, and the
radioactivity incorporated into glycogen was determined as described
previously (21). Glucose phosphorylation and glycolysis
(3H2O formation from
[2-3H]glucose and [3-3H]glucose,
respectively) and glycogen synthesis are expressed as nanomoles of
glucose metabolized/3 h per milligram of cell protein, which was
determined by an automated Lowry method (24).
Glucokinase Determination--
Glucokinase translocation was
determined from the distribution of activity between free and bound
fractions during permeabilization of the hepatocyte monolayers with
digitonin as described in Ref. 16. On termination of the incubations,
the hepatocyte monolayers were incubated in permeabilization medium
that contained 300 mM sucrose, 3 mM Hepes, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, and 0.04 mg/ml
digitonin, pH 7.2. After 8 min, this medium was collected for
determination of the free glucokinase activity. The residual (bound
fraction) was extracted in 150 mM KCl, 3 mM
Hepes, 2 mM DTT, and 0.04 mg/ml digitonin, pH 7.2. Glucokinase was assayed by the glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase
coupled assay (16), and the free glucokinase activity was expressed
either as milliunits/milligram of protein or as a percentage of total
(free + bound) activity.
GKRP Determination--
The assay based on the inhibition of
purified glucokinase was a modification of an assay described
previously (7). Hepatocyte monolayers in 6-well plates were washed
twice with 150 mM NaCl and extracted (1 ml/well) by brief
sonication in medium containing 25 mM KCl, 25 mM Hepes, 25 mM glucose, 2 mM DTT,
0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.04 mg/ml
digitonin. The extracts were sedimented (13,000 × g,
15 min), and the supernatants were fractionated on DEAE-Sepharose
mini-columns (2.5 cm) by elution with stepwise KCl concentrations (0, 50, 75, 100, 200, and 500 mM) as described in Ref. 7. This
fractionation separates GKRP from glucokinase and thus enables the
assay of GKRP in the absence of interference from endogenous
glucokinase (7). The assay mixture for determination of GKRP contained
25 mM KCl, 1 mM ATP-Mg2+, 5 mM glucose, 0.5 mM NAD, 1 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 0.05% bovine serum albumin,
25 mM Hepes, pH 7.1, 1.2 units/ml glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (Leuconostoc mesenteroides), and 6 milliunits/ml purified rat liver glucokinase. The assay was performed
in the absence or presence of 100 µM sorbitol
6-phosphate. The activity of GKRP (in Units) was determined from the
inhibition of glucokinase activity in the presence of sorbitol
6-phosphate, where 1 Unit represents the activity that causes 50%
inhibition of glucokinase activity in an assay volume of 1.0 ml under
the above-mentioned assay conditions. GKRP was also determined by
Western blotting as described previously (10).
The glucokinase used for assay of GKRP was prepared by overexpression
of rat liver glucokinase in hepatocytes using AdCMV-GKL followed by
purification by glucosamine affinity chromatography and DEAE-Sephadex.
Hepatocyte monolayers in 6-well plates were treated for 2 h with
high titers (>30 plaque-forming units/cell) of AdCMV-GKL. They were
then cultured in fresh MEM containing 10 nM dexamethasone
and 100 nM insulin for 3 days. This results in glucokinase
expression >100-fold above endogenous activity. Glucokinase was
extracted by permeabilizing the hepatocytes with digitonin (0.05 mg/ml)
in 80 mM KCl, 20 mM potassium phosphate, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol,
2 mM DTT, and 100 mM sucrose, pH 7.0. The
digitonin extract was pre-cleared (15,000 × g), and glucokinase was purified by affinity chromatography using
N-hexylglucosamine-Sepharose prepared by coupling
D-glucosamine to CH-Sepharose 4B in the presence of
1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide as described previously
(25) and diluted with unsubstituted Sepharose 4B (26). After elution
with 1 M glucose, the glucokinase was purified and
concentrated by DEAE-Sepharose chromatography. The preparation had a
specific activity of 150-200 units/mg protein (using bovine serum
albumin as standard).
Control Coefficients of GKRP and Glucokinase--
The control
coefficients (CEJ) of GKRP or
glucokinase were determined for glycogen synthesis or glycolysis. The
control coefficient is defined as the fractional change (+, increase;
Results are expressed as the means ± S.E. for the number of cell
preparations indicated. Statistical analysis was performed by using the
paired t test.
Treatment of Hepatocytes with AdCMV-GKRP Increases the Activity of
GKRP--
The activity of GKRP in hepatocyte extracts was determined
from the inhibition of purified glucokinase in the presence of sorbitol
6-phosphate, which enhances binding of GKRP to glucokinase (7) after
fractionation of the hepatocyte extracts on DEAE-Sepharose as described
previously (7). GKRP eluted at 75-100 mM KCl in fractions
7-10 (Fig. 1A), and
glucokinase activity eluted in fractions 12 and 13 (data not shown).
Treatment of hepatocytes with AdCMV-GKRP resulted in an increase in
GKRP activity of between 37% and 2-fold above endogenous activity
(Fig. 1B), an increase in immunostaining in the nucleus
(Fig. 2), and a more intense band by
Western blot analysis (data not shown). The endogenous GKRP content of
untreated hepatocytes in this study was 0.68 ± 0.15 Units/mg cell
protein, and the glucokinase activity was 19.8 ± 3.7 milliunits/mg. Assuming an activity of 0.2 Units/pmol for GKRP (27) and
10 milliunits/pmol for glucokinase, this corresponds to a
GKRP/glucokinase molar ratio of 1.8 ± 0.18 (means ± S.E.,
n = 7) in untreated hepatocytes.
GKRP Overexpression Increases the Binding of Glucokinase in
Hepatocytes--
In the experiments shown in Fig.
3, glucokinase and GKRP were
overexpressed simultaneously by treatment of hepatocytes with either varying titers of AdCMV-GK alone (open symbols) or in
the additional presence of 3 titers (50, 100, and 200 µl/ml) of
AdCMV-GKRP. Overexpression of GKRP by up to 2-fold above endogenous
activity decreased free (Fig. 3A) and increased bound (Fig.
3B) glucokinase, confirming that the overexpressed protein
binds glucokinase in the intact hepatocyte.
GKRP Overexpression Inhibits Glucose Phosphorylation, Glycolysis,
and Glycogen Synthesis--
Binding of glucokinase to GKRP in intact
hepatocytes is decreased by elevated glucose concentrations and by
precursors of fructose 1-phosphate such as sorbitol (9, 10, 28).
Control hepatocytes and cells treated with AdCMV-GKRP with
approximately 2-fold overexpression of GKRP (1.5 ± 0.16 versus 0.7 ± 0.1 units/mg) were incubated with varying
glucose concentration (Fig. 4). GKRP overexpression caused a decrease in free glucokinase activity, glucose
phosphorylation, glycolysis, and glycogen synthesis (Fig. 4,
A-D). The concentration of glucose that caused a
half-maximal effect on free glucokinase activity was 36 mM
in cells treated with AdCMV-GKRP compared with 25 mM for
untreated cells (Fig. 4A).
Increased glucokinase binding and inhibition of glucose
phosphorylation, glycolysis, and glycogen synthesis by GKRP
overexpression were also observed when hepatocytes were incubated with
7.5 mM glucose and varying concentrations of sorbitol (Fig.
5, A-D). Plots of rates of
glycolysis or glycogen synthesis against the corresponding free
glucokinase activity (Fig. 5, E and F) show that
the inhibition of glycolysis and glycogen synthesis can be explained by
increased binding of glucokinase.
GKRP Has a Greater Negative Control Coefficient on Glycogen
Synthesis than on Glycolysis--
The flux control coefficient of an
enzyme (or protein) with respect to a particular metabolic pathway is a
measure of the fractional response of pathway flux (J) to a
fractional change in the concentration of the protein. The control
coefficients of GKRP on glycolysis and glycogen synthesis were
determined from the slope of double logarithmic plots of rates of
metabolic flux against GKRP activity (Fig.
6). These plots were linear for glycogen synthesis but not for glycolysis (Fig. 6), indicating that the control
coefficient of GKRP on glycolysis decreases with GKRP overexpression
over the range of protein overexpression studied. GKRP had a greater
negative control coefficient on glycogen synthesis than on glycolysis
(Table I). The control coefficient on
glycogen synthesis was slightly greater than unity ( Effects of Glucokinase Overexpression on the Control Coefficient of
GKRP--
In another series of experiments, hepatocytes were treated
with combinations of both AdCMV-GK (4 titers to overexpress
glucokinase) and AdCMV-GKRP (3 titers to overexpress GKRP) to determine
the control coefficient of GKRP at basal glucokinase and at elevated glucokinase activity. The control coefficient of GKRP on glycogen at
7.5 and 35 mM glucose was determined at each glucokinase
level as shown in Fig. 6B. Although there was no difference
between 7.5 and 35 mM glucose in the control coefficient of
GKRP on glycogen synthesis in cells with endogenous glucokinase
activity (Fig. 7 and Table I), with
increasing glucokinase activity, the control coefficient of GKRP on
glycogen synthesis decreased at 35 mM glucose but not at
7.5 mM glucose (Fig. 7).
Effects of GKRP Overexpression on the Control Coefficient of
Glucokinase--
In the same series of experiments described in the
previous paragraph, the flux control coefficient of glucokinase was
determined at endogenous levels of GKRP and at overexpressed levels
from double logarithmic plots of glycogen synthesis (at 7.5 and 35 mM glucose) against total glucokinase activity. As shown in
Fig. 8, the control coefficient of
glucokinase was greater at 7.5 mM than at 35 mM
glucose, and overexpression of GKRP increased the control coefficient
of glucokinase at both 7.5 and 35 mM glucose.
The liver has a major role in the control of blood glucose
homeostasis. Glucokinase, the main glucose-phosphorylating enzyme in
hepatocytes, and its inhibitor, GKRP, together are key components of
the glucose sensory mechanism. The objective of this study was to gain
a deeper understanding of the advantages conferred on the cell by this
complex mechanism of regulation. To this end, we overexpressed GKRP by
up to 2-fold above endogenous activity using recombinant adenovirus.
This produced a functional protein that localized in the nucleus and
inhibited glucokinase activity both in vitro and in the
intact cell in vivo. Twofold overexpression of GKRP did not
block the translocation of glucokinase by either elevated glucose
concentration or sorbitol. However, it decreased the affinity of
glucokinase translocation and glucose phosphorylation for glucose. The
initial observation that the affinity of glucose phosphorylation for
glucose in hepatocytes is lower than can be explained by the sigmoidal
kinetics of glucokinase (S0.5, 20 versus 8 mM) was made by Bontemps et al. (29). The
discovery of GKRP by Van Schaftingen (30) provided an explanation for
the low affinity of glucose phosphorylation for glucose in intact
hepatocytes based on competitive inhibition of glucokinase by GKRP. The
present study demonstrates that in cells with 2-fold overexpression of GKRP, the concentration of glucose causing a half-maximal effect on
glucokinase translocation was increased by 44% (36 versus
25 mM). This clearly establishes that the affinity of the
hepatocyte for glucose depends on the ratio of GKRP:glucokinase and
decreases with increasing ratio. Overexpression of GKRP also inhibited
glycolysis and glycogen synthesis. This inhibition correlated with the
free glucokinase activity, confirming that it can be explained by
glucokinase binding to GKRP.
Metabolic control analysis is a very powerful analytical approach for
quantitative description and understanding of how control is
distributed among the component enzymes of a metabolic pathway in the
intact cell, and accordingly of the magnitude of the control exerted by
a particular enzyme (14, 15, 31). It defines the quantitative relation
between metabolic flux and the activities or concentrations of enzymes
that are components of the pathway or compete for substrate (32, 33).
In the case of glucokinase, the activity is a function of the total
glucokinase concentration and the proportion that is bound to GKRP. The
latter is determined by the concentration of GKRP and also by the
concentrations of glucose (9) and fructose 1-phosphate (34). It has
been proven by the summation theorem that the sum of the flux control
coefficients of all the component enzymes in relation to a metabolic
pathway must equal unity (33). We have shown previously that
glucokinase has a very high control coefficient (greater than unity) on
glycogen synthesis from glucose (16), and we suggested two possible
explanations for this high control coefficient. First, it could be due
to a substrate cycle between glucokinase and glucose 6-phosphatase. This would require a comparable and negative control coefficient of
glucose 6-phosphatase. This was found not to be the case because glucose 6-phosphatase has a low control coefficient ( Four findings emerged from the control analysis experiments: 1) the
negative control coefficient of GKRP on glycogen synthesis was greater
than unity, 2) GKRP overexpression increases the control coefficient of
glucokinase on glycogen synthesis, 3) a moderate increase in
glucokinase overexpression was associated with a decrease in control
coefficient of GKRP at high (35 mM) glucose concentration but not at low (7.5 mM) glucose concentration (taken
together, these results suggest that the control coefficients of both
glucokinase and GKRP on glycogen synthesis are a function of the ratio
of the two proteins), and 4) GKRP has a greater control coefficient on
glycogen synthesis than on glycolysis.
A key finding from this study is the high (negative) control
coefficient of GKRP on glycogen synthesis. This suggests that the
negative control coefficient of GKRP is the major determinant of the
high control coefficient of glucokinase in such a way that the high
positive control coefficient of glucokinase is counterbalanced by the
negative control coefficient of GKRP. There are no known physiological
situations in which hepatic glucokinase is expressed in the absence of
GKRP. In all physiological and experimental conditions studied to date,
GKRP is present in molar excess relative to glucokinase (7, 27). The
high control coefficient of GKRP suggests that the ratio of expression
of glucokinase and GKRP is finely balanced to maintain maximum or near
maximum control by both proteins. The increase in control coefficient
of glucokinase with increasing GKRP overexpression is consistent with
this hypothesis. Because the concentration of GKRP determines the free
glucokinase activity, a moderate increase in GKRP by about 2-fold
decreases the free glucokinase and thereby increases its control
coefficient and capacity for regulation. The greater decrease in the
flux control coefficient of GKRP with increasing glucokinase
overexpression at high glucose concentration (35 mM)
compared with 7.5 mM glucose is also consistent with the
hypothesis that there is an optimal ratio of GKRP:glucokinase that
ensures maximum control by the two proteins. Because elevated glucose
concentrations favor increased dissociation of glucokinase and GKRP,
the more rapid decline in flux control coefficient of GKRP at
increasing glucokinase can be explained by the lower affinity of GKRP
for glucokinase at high glucose concentrations. The lack of decrease in
the flux control coefficient of GKRP with increasing glucokinase
overexpression at 7.5 mM glucose can be explained by two
factors: 1) the lack of decrease in control coefficient of GKRP on
glycogen synthesis at 7.5 mM glucose at increasing GKRP
overexpression (linear response in Fig. 6B), and 2) the
lower affinity of glucokinase translocation for glucose at elevated
GKRP over expression.
The finding that GKRP has a greater control coefficient on glycogen
synthesis than on glycolysis was not surprising because both
glucokinase and glucose 6-phosphatase have higher control coefficients
on glycogen synthesis compared with glycolysis (18). This is most
likely due to differences in the glucose 6-phosphate dependence of the
two pathways. The linear inhibition of glycogen synthesis as compared
with the nonlinear inhibition of glycolysis with increasing GKRP
overexpression may be explained by the absolute dependence of
glycogen synthase activation on glucose 6-phosphate produced by
glucokinase (35, 36).
In metabolic pathways that are regulated by cooperative feedback
inhibition of enzymes, flux control is shifted downstream of the
inhibitory metabolite (37). The present study, combined with our
previous finding on the control coefficient of glucokinase (16),
suggests that a high degree of control of hepatic glycogen synthesis
resides before the formation of glucose 6-phosphate. This is consistent
with the role of this metabolite in feed-forward activation of glycogen
synthase (35, 36) and the lack of feedback inhibition of glucokinase by
hexose 6-phosphate (18).
Based on the above findings, three conclusions are drawn from this
study:
1. GKRP has a high control coefficient on glycogen synthesis and
glycolysis. Because we have shown that glucokinase also has a very high
control coefficient on hepatic glycogen synthesis (16), we conclude
that small changes in either protein will have a large metabolic
impact. This is the case for glucokinase because impaired hepatic
glycogen synthesis has been shown in diabetic MODY-2 subjects who are
heterozygous for glucokinase mutations. On the basis of our results, we
predict that mutations in GKRP that affect its binding to glucokinase
may have a significant impact on glucose utilization by the liver in
the heterozygote state, similar to those shown for MODY-2.
2. Another important conclusion from this study is that changes in the
molar ratio of GKRP:glucokinase within the physiological range will
affect the sensitivity (S0.5) of the liver cell to glucose.
Therefore, by changing the ratio between the components of the system,
the cell can adapt to different conditions. This seems to be the case
in vivo. Fasting and insulin deficiency are associated with
a more rapid decay of glucokinase relative to GKRP, with a consequent
increase in the GKRP:glucokinase ratio relative to the normal fed state
(7). Our results indicate that under these conditions, the affinity of
the hepatocyte for glucose is decreased. Conversely, the more rapid
increase in glucokinase compared with GKRP during refeeding (7) would
be associated with an increase in glycogen synthesis because of the
high control coefficient of glucokinase and the increased affinity for
glucose, resulting in a markedly amplified response.
3. Our results show in a quantitative way that the mechanism comprising
glucokinase and GKRP confers on the hepatocyte a versatile mechanism to
adjust glucose phosphorylation far beyond the sensitivity and
responsiveness possible by a single sigmoidal enzyme alone. This
mechanism represents a step forward in the design of enzymatic systems
with increased responsiveness and ability to respond to an extended
range of substrate concentrations.
1.2) and a control coefficient on glycolysis of
0.5. The
control coefficient of GKRP on glycogen synthesis decreased with
increasing glucokinase overexpression (4-fold) at elevated glucose
concentration (35 mM), which favors dissociation of
glucokinase from GKRP, but not at 7.5 mM glucose. Under the
latter conditions, glucokinase and GKRP have large and inverse control
coefficients on glycogen synthesis, suggesting that a large component
of the positive control coefficient of glucokinase is counterbalanced by the negative coefficient of GKRP. It is concluded that glucokinase and GKRP exert reciprocal control; therefore, mutations in GKRP affecting the expression or function of the protein may impact the
phenotype even in the heterozygote state, similar to glucokinase mutations in maturity onset diabetes of the young type 2. Our results
show that the mechanism comprising glucokinase and GKRP confers a
markedly extended responsiveness and sensitivity to changes in glucose
concentration on the hepatocyte.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, decrease) in metabolic flux (J) that results from a
fractional change in enzyme activity (e):
where J is the flux through the pathway, and
e is the total activity of GKRP or glucokinase (14, 15).
Control coefficients were determined from the slope of log J
(glycolysis or glycogen synthesis) against log e (total
activity of GKRP or glucokinase) as described previously (16, 18). For
determination of the control coefficient of GKRP, hepatocytes were
treated with either 3 or 5 titers of AdCMV-GKRP, and for determination
of the control coefficients of glucokinase, 4 titers of AdCMV-GK were
used. In experiments in which the control coefficients of both
glucokinase and GKRP were determined, hepatocytes were treated with 3 titers of AdCMV-GKRP, in each case without or with four titers
AdCMV-GK.
(Eq. 1)
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Activity of GKRP in hepatocytes treated with
AdCMV-GKRP. A, elution profile of GKRP in extracts from
untreated (open symbols) or AdCMV-GKRP-treated (closed
symbols) hepatocytes fractionated by DEAE-Sepharose with
increasing KCl concentration as described in Ref. 7 and assayed from
the inhibition of glucokinase activity in the presence of sorbitol
6-phosphate. B, GKRP activity in hepatocytes treated with 4 titers of AdCMV-GKRP at serial 2-fold dilution determined after 20 h of culture. Results are the means ± S.E. for seven experiments,
except for the 400 µl/ml titer, which represents four experiments.
The percentage increase in activity above endogenous activity is
shown.

View larger version (76K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Confocal images of untreated hepatocytes
(a) and hepatocytes treated with AdCMV-GKRP (b)
immunostained for GKRP. Scale bar, 50 µm.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Treatment of hepatocytes with AdCMV-GKRP
increases the binding of overexpressed glucokinase. Hepatocytes
were treated with different titers of AdCMV-GK in the absence (
) or
presence of AdCMV-GKRP (
, 50 µl;
, 100 µl;
, 200 µl/ml).
After 20 h of culture, the free glucokinase activity and bound
glucokinase activity were determined by permeabilization of hepatocytes
with digitonin. Free activity (A) and bound activity
(B) are plotted against total glucokinase activity. Results
are representative of five experiments.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
AdCMV-GKRP increases glucokinase binding and
inhibits glucose phosphorylation, glycolysis, and glycogen synthesis at
varying glucose concentrations. Hepatocytes were either untreated
(
) or treated with 200 µl/ml AdCMV-GKRP (
). After 18 h of
culture, they were incubated for 3 h in MEM containing the
concentrations of glucose indicated and either
[2-3H]glucose (glucose phosphorylation),
[3-3H]glucose (glycolysis), or
[U-14C]glucose (glycogen synthesis). Free glucokinase
activity and bound glucokinase activity were determined by
permeabilization of hepatocytes with digitonin, and free activity is
expressed as a percentage of total activity (A). Rates of
glucose phosphorylation (B), glycolysis (C), and
glycogen synthesis (D) are expressed as nanomoles of glucose
metabolized/3 h per milligram of cell protein. Results are the
means ± S.E. for three (B) or five (A, C,
and D) cultures. *, p < 0.05; **,
p < 0.005 AdCMV-GKRP-treated hepatocytes
versus respective controls.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
AdCMV-GKRP increases glucokinase binding and
inhibits glucose phosphorylation, glycolysis, and glycogen synthesis at
varying sorbitol concentrations. Hepatocyte incubations and
expression of results were as described in the legend to Fig. 4, except
that the medium contained 7.5 mM glucose and the
concentration of sorbitol indicated. E and F show
the rates of glycolysis and glycogen synthesis plotted against the
respective free glucokinase activity. Results are the means ± S.E. for three (B) or seven (A, C, and
D) cultures. *, p < 0.05; **,
p < 0.005 AdCMV-GKRP-treated hepatocytes
versus respective controls.
1.2). A control
coefficient of unity (negative) signifies that a fractional increase in
protein concentration is associated with a proportional decrease in
flux. The control coefficient on glycolysis was lower in the presence of sorbitol or elevated glucose (Table I).

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
The control coefficient of GKRP on glycolysis
and glycogen synthesis. Hepatocytes treated with varying titers of
AdCMV-GKRP were incubated in MEM containing 7.5 mM glucose
and either [3-3H]glucose (A) or [U-14C]glucose
(B) for determination of glycolysis and glycogen synthesis,
respectively. The control coefficient of GKRP was determined from the
initial slope of the double logarithmic plot (shown by the dotted
line). Results are a representative experiment of three
(A) or seven (B) experiments that are summarized
in Table I.
Control coefficients of GKRP on glycolysis and glycogen synthesis

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
The control coefficient of GKRP on glycogen
synthesis is dependent on the glucokinase activity and on the glucose
concentrations. Hepatocytes were either untreated or treated with
4 titers of AdCMV-GK in the absence or presence of 4 titers of
AdCMV-GKRP. After 18 h of culture, they were incubated for 3 h in MEM containing [U-14C]glucose with either 7.5 (
)
or 35 mM (
) glucose. The activities of glucokinase and
GKRP were determined from parallel incubations. The control coefficient
of GKRP on glycogen synthesis was determined from the slope of double
logarithmic plots of glycogen synthesis versus regulatory
protein activity. Results are the means ± S.E. of three to four
cultures. *, p < 0.05.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
The control coefficient of glucokinase on
glycogen synthesis is dependent on the expression of GKRP.
Experimental details were as described in the Fig. 7 legend. The
control coefficient of glucokinase on glycogen synthesis was determined
at either 7.5 (
) or 35 mM (
) glucose from the initial
slope of double logarithmic plots of glycogen synthesis
versus total glucokinase activity. Results are the
means ± S.E. of three to four cultures. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
0.3) on glycogen
synthesis (18). Second, it could be due to the compartmentation of
glucokinase in association with GKRP. In this study, we were able to
test the latter hypothesis directly by measuring the control coefficient of GKRP. The results provide direct support for this hypothesis.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Athel Cornish-Bowden, Mariluz Cárdenas, and Juan C. Ferrer for helpful discussions and Susanna Baqué for help in preparing the adenovirus.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by an award from The Royal Society under the European Science Exchange Program and by Grant PB96-0992 from Dirección General de Ensañanza Superior e Investigación Cientifica, Spain (to J. J. G.) and a British Diabetic Association grant (to L. A.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ Recipient of a doctoral fellowship from the Generalitat de Catalunya.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Diabetes,
The Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon
Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom. Tel.: 044-191-2227033; Fax: 044-191-2220723; E-mail: Loranne.Agius@ncl.ac.uk.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: MODY, maturity onset diabetes of the young; GKRP, glucokinase regulatory protein; MEM, minimal essential medium; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; DTT, dithiothreitol.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Iynedjian, P. B. (1993) Biochem. J. 293, 1-13 |
| 2. | Cardenas, M. L. (1995) Glucokinase: Its Regulation and Role in Liver Metabolism , pp. 21-40, R. G. Landes Publishers, Austin, TX |
| 3. | Hattersley, A. T. (1998) Diabetic Med. 15, 15-24[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Postic, C.,
Shiota, M.,
Niswender, K. D.,
Jetton, T. L.,
Chen, Y.,
Moates, J. M.,
Shelton, K. D.,
Linder, J.,
Cherrington, A. D.,
and Magnuson, M. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
305-315 |
| 5. | Van Schaftingen, E., Detheux, M., and Veiga-da-Cunha, M. (1994) FASEB J. 8, 414-419[Abstract] |
| 6. | Van Schaftingen, E., Veiga-da-Cunha, M., and Niculescu, L. (1997) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 25, 136-140[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Vandercammen, A., and Van Schaftingen, E. (1993) Biochem. J. 294, 551-556 |
| 8. | Brown, K. S., Kalinowski, S. S., Megill, J. R., Durham, S. K., and Mookhtiar, K. A. (1997) Diabetes 46, 179-186[Abstract] |
| 9. | Agius, L., and Peak, M. (1993) Biochem. J. 296, 785-796 |
| 10. | Agius, L., Peak, M., and Van Schaftingen, E. (1995) Biochem. J. 309, 711-713 |
| 11. | De la Iglesia, N., Veiga-da-Cunha, M., Van Schaftingen, E., Guinovart, J. J., and Ferrer, J. C. (1999) FEBS Lett. 456, 332-338[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Hayward, B. E., Warner, J. P., Dunlop, N., Fantes, J., Intody, S., Leek, J., Markham, A. F., and Bonthron, D. T. (1996) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 25, 140-145 |
| 13. |
Kacser, H.,
and Burns, J. A.
(1981)
Genetics
97,
639-666 |
| 14. | Kacser, H., and Burns, J. A. (1979) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 7, 1149-1160[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Fell, D. A. (1992) Biochem. J. 286, 313-330 |
| 16. |
Agius, L.,
Peak, M.,
Newgard, C. B.,
Gomez-Foix, A. M.,
and Guinovart, J. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
30479-30486 |
| 17. | Velho, G., Petersen, K. F., Perseghin, G., Huang, J-H., Rothman, D. L., Pueyo, M. E., Cline, G. W., Froguel, P., and Shulman, G. I. (1996) J. Clin. Investig. 98, 1755-1761[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Aiston, S.,
Trinh, K. Y.,
Lange, A. J.,
Newgard, C. B.,
and Agius, L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
24559-24566 |
| 19. | Becker, T. C., Noel, R. J., Coats, W. S., Gomez-Foix, A. M., Alam, T., Gerard, R. D., and Newgard, C. B. (1994) Methods Cell Biol. 43, 161-189 |
| 20. |
Becker, T. C.,
Noel, R. J.,
Johnson, J. H.,
Lynch, R. M.,
Hirose, H.,
Tokuyama, Y.,
Bell, G. I.,
and Newgard, C. B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
390-394 |
| 21. | Agius, L., Peak, M., and Alberti, K. G. M. M. (1990) Biochem. J. 266, 91-102[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Vandercammen, A., and Van Schaftingen, E. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 294, 551-556 |
| 23. | Agius, L. (1997) Biochem. J. 325, 667-673 |
| 24. | Clifton, P. M., Chang, K., and McKinnon, A. M. (1988) Anal. Biochem. 172, 165-168[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Miwa, I., Mitsuyama, S., Toyoda, Y., Murata, T., and Okuda, J. (1990) Prep. Biochem. 20, 163-178[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Holroyde, M. J., Chesher, J. M. E., Trayer, I. P., and Walker, D. G. (1976) Biochem. J. 153, 351-361[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Rosa, J. L., Perez, J. X., Detheux, M., Van Schaftingen, E., and Bartrons, R. (1997) Hepatology 25, 324-328[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Agius, L. (1994) Biochem. J. 298, 237-243 |
| 29. | Bontemps, F., Hue, L., and Hers, H.-G. (1978) Biochem. J. 174, 603-611[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Van Schaftingen, E. (1989) Eur. J. Biochem. 179, 179-184[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Cornish-Bowden, A. (1995) Fundamentals of Enzyme Kinetics , pp. 249-256, Portland Press, London and Miami, FL |
| 32. | Heinrich, R., and Rapaport, T. A. (1974) Eur. J. Biochem. 42, 89-95[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Kacser, H., and Burns, J. A. (1973) Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 27, 65-104[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Niculescu, L., Veiga-da-Cunha, M., and Van Schaftingen, E. (1997) Biochem. J. 321, 239-246 |
| 35. | Villar-Palasi, C., and Guinovart, J. J. (1997) FASEB J. 11, 544-558[Abstract] |
| 36. |
Seoane, J.,
Gomez-Foix, A. M.,
O'Doherty, R. M.,
Gomez-Ara, C.,
Newgard, C. B.,
and Guinovart, J. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
23756-23760 |
| 37. | Thomas, S., Mooney, P. J., Burrell, M. M., and Fell, D. A. (1997) Biochem. J. 322, 119-127 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. H. Mukhtar, V. A. Payne, C. Arden, A. Harbottle, S. Khan, A. J. Lange, and L. Agius Inhibition of glucokinase translocation by AMP-activated protein kinase is associated with phosphorylation of both GKRP and 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): R766 - R774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. A. Payne, C. Arden, A. J. Lange, and L. Agius Contributions of glucokinase and phosphofructokinase-2/fructose bisphosphatase-2 to the elevated glycolysis in hepatocytes from Zucker fa/fa rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): R618 - R625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Arden, A. Trainer, N. de la Iglesia, K. T. Scougall, A. L. Gloyn, A. J. Lange, J. A.M. Shaw, F. M. Matschinsky, and L. Agius Cell Biology Assessment of Glucokinase Mutations V62M and G72R in Pancreatic {beta}-Cells: Evidence for Cellular Instability of Catalytic Activity Diabetes, July 1, 2007; 56(7): 1773 - 1782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Futamura, H. Hosaka, A. Kadotani, H. Shimazaki, K. Sasaki, S. Ohyama, T. Nishimura, J.-i. Eiki, and Y. Nagata An Allosteric Activator of Glucokinase Impairs the Interaction of Glucokinase and Glucokinase Regulatory Protein and Regulates Glucose Metabolism J. Biol. Chem., December 8, 2006; 281(49): 37668 - 37674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Fujimoto, T. P. Torres, E. P. Donahue, and M. Shiota Glucose Toxicity Is Responsible for the Development of Impaired Regulation of Endogenous Glucose Production and Hepatic Glucokinase in Zucker Diabetic Fatty Rats Diabetes, September 1, 2006; 55(9): 2479 - 2490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Guigas, L. Bertrand, N. Taleux, M. Foretz, N. Wiernsperger, D. Vertommen, F. Andreelli, B. Viollet, and L. Hue 5-Aminoimidazole-4-Carboxamide-1-{beta}-D-Ribofuranoside and Metformin Inhibit Hepatic Glucose Phosphorylation by an AMP-Activated Protein Kinase-Independent Effect on Glucokinase Translocation. Diabetes, April 1, 2006; 55(4): 865 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Baltrusch, F. Francini, S. Lenzen, and M. Tiedge Interaction of Glucokinase With the Liver Regulatory Protein Is Conferred by Leucine-Asparagine Motifs of the Enzyme Diabetes, October 1, 2005; 54(10): 2829 - 2837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. A. Payne, C. Arden, C. Wu, A. J. Lange, and L. Agius Dual Role of Phosphofructokinase-2/Fructose Bisphosphatase-2 in Regulating the Compartmentation and Expression of Glucokinase in Hepatocytes Diabetes, July 1, 2005; 54(7): 1949 - 1957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Morifuji, K. Sakai, and K. Sugiura Dietary Whey Protein Modulates Liver Glycogen Level and Glycoregulatory Enzyme Activities in Exercise-Trained Rats Experimental Biology and Medicine, January 1, 2005; 230(1): 23 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Arden, A. Harbottle, S. Baltrusch, M. Tiedge, and L. Agius Glucokinase Is an Integral Component of the Insulin Granules in Glucose-Responsive Insulin Secretory Cells and Does Not Translocate During Glucose Stimulation Diabetes, September 1, 2004; 53(9): 2346 - 2352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Brocklehurst, V. A. Payne, R. A. Davies, D. Carroll, H. L. Vertigan, H. J. Wightman, S. Aiston, I. D. Waddell, B. Leighton, M. P. Coghlan, et al. Stimulation of Hepatocyte G |