JBC Transcription and Nuclear Factor Monoclonals

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de la Iglesia, N.
Right arrow Articles by Agius, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de la Iglesia, N.
Right arrow Articles by Agius, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 14, 10597-10603, April 7, 2000


The Role of the Regulatory Protein of Glucokinase in the Glucose Sensory Mechanism of the Hepatocyte*

Núria de la IglesiaDagger §, Mohammed Mukhtar, Joan SeoaneDagger , Joan J. GuinovartDagger , and Loranne Agius||

From the Dagger  Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Facultat de Química, Universitat de Barcelona, E08028 Barcelona, Spain, and the  Department of Diabetes, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Glucokinase has a very high flux control coefficient (greater than unity) on glycogen synthesis from glucose in hepatocytes (Agius et al., J. Biol. Chem. 271, 30479-30486, 1996). Hepatic glucokinase is inhibited by a 68-kDa glucokinase regulatory protein (GKRP) that is expressed in molar excess. To establish the relative control exerted by glucokinase and GKRP, we applied metabolic control analysis to determine the flux control coefficient of GKRP on glucose metabolism in hepatocytes. Adenovirus-mediated overexpression of GKRP (by up to 2-fold above endogenous levels) increased glucokinase binding and inhibited glucose phosphorylation, glycolysis, and glycogen synthesis over a wide range of concentrations of glucose and sorbitol. It decreased the affinity of glucokinase translocation for glucose and increased the control coefficient of glucokinase on glycogen synthesis. GKRP had a negative control coefficient of glycogen synthesis that is slightly greater than unity (-1.2) and a control coefficient on glycolysis of -0.5. The control coefficient of GKRP on glycogen synthesis decreased with increasing glucokinase overexpression (4-fold) at elevated glucose concentration (35 mM), which favors dissociation of glucokinase from GKRP, but not at 7.5 mM glucose. Under the latter conditions, glucokinase and GKRP have large and inverse control coefficients on glycogen synthesis, suggesting that a large component of the positive control coefficient of glucokinase is counterbalanced by the negative coefficient of GKRP. It is concluded that glucokinase and GKRP exert reciprocal control; therefore, mutations in GKRP affecting the expression or function of the protein may impact the phenotype even in the heterozygote state, similar to glucokinase mutations in maturity onset diabetes of the young type 2. Our results show that the mechanism comprising glucokinase and GKRP confers a markedly extended responsiveness and sensitivity to changes in glucose concentration on the hepatocyte.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Glucokinase (hexokinase IV) is the predominant glucose phosphorylating enzyme in hepatocytes and insulin-secreting and glucagon-secreting cells of the pancreas and has a major role in the control of blood glucose homeostasis (1, 2). Its importance has been confirmed by the finding that mutations in its gene cause a form of diabetes known as maturity onset diabetes of the young type 2 (MODY-2),1 which is characterized by mild hyperglycemia, decreased glucose-induced insulin secretion, impaired hepatic glycogen storage, and dominant inheritance (3), and by studies on hepatic glucokinase knockout mice (4). Hepatic glucokinase is Regulated by a 68-kDa regulatory protein (GKRP) (5, 6). Expression of GKRP during development precedes expression of glucokinase (7), and no physiological situations are known in which hepatic glucokinase is expressed in the absence of its regulatory protein. GKRP is located mainly in the nucleus of hepatocytes, whereas glucokinase translocates between the nucleus and the cytoplasm (8). Glucokinase binds GKRP in the nucleus at low glucose concentrations and translocates to the cytoplasm at elevated glucose or fructose concentrations (8-10). This translocation can be reconstituted in nonhepatic cells by co-expressing glucokinase and GKRP (11). It is not yet known whether mutations in human GKRP contribute to some forms of diabetes (12).

Loss of function mutations have been described for most enzymes involved in glucose metabolism. In virtually all cases, with the exception of glucokinase, effects on the phenotype are observed only in the homozygous mutant (recessive inheritance) (13). Glucokinase thus represents a very rare, if not unique, case of dominant inheritance among metabolic enzymes. Kacser and Burns (13) provided a mechanistic explanation for dominance and recessivity of loss of function mutations of metabolic enzymes based on the flux control coefficient of the wild type enzyme, which represents the fractional change in pathway flux that results from a fractional change in enzyme concentration (14, 15). Enzymes with flux control coefficients much smaller than unity are predicted to show recessive inheritance because a 50% decrease in activity is expected to have a negligible effect on metabolic flux and hence on the phenotype. The widespread occurrence of recessivity and low control coefficients is consistent with this hypothesis. Likewise, the very high control coefficient of glucokinase on hepatic glycogen synthesis (16) is consistent with the dominant inheritance of glucokinase mutations in MODY-2 and the impaired hepatic glycogen synthesis in this condition (17). The control coefficient of an enzyme or protein is thus indicative of whether loss of function mutations of the protein are likely to affect the phenotype in the heterozygous state (13). Therefore, the aims of this study were to determine the control coefficient of GKRP on hepatic glycogen metabolism and to determine the effects of changes in the ratio of expression of GKRP and glucokinase on the control coefficients of the two proteins and thereby evaluate the contribution of GKRP to the glucose sensory mechanism of the hepatocyte. Our results show that the mechanism comprising glucokinase and GKRP confers a markedly enhanced responsiveness and sensitivity to glucose on the hepatocyte.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- DEAE-Sepharose, CH-Sepharose 4B, 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide, sorbitol 6-phosphate, glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase from Leuconostoc mestenteroides, and all other enzymes were from Sigma. [U-14C]glucose, [2-3H]glucose, and [3-3H]glucose were from New England Nuclear. Sources of other reagents were as described in Ref. 18.

Preparation of Recombinant Adenoviruses-- The cDNA encoding rat liver GKRP (a generous gift from Dr. E. Van Schaftingen, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium) was cloned into pACC vector and co-transfected with pJM17 vector into 293 cells to achieve homologous recombination and production of recombinant adenovirus (AdCMV-GKRP) as described previously (19). Recombinant adenovirus containing the cDNA for rat liver glucokinase (AdCMV-GKL) (20) was a kind gift from Dr. C. Newgard (University of Texas, Dallas, TX). The adenoviruses were amplified in 293 cells (19), and aliquots of medium lysate were used. Viral titers were determined that resulted in protein overexpression of between 30% and 2-fold above endogenous levels for GKRP and between 30% and 4-fold above endogenous levels for glucokinase at 18 h after treatment.

Hepatocyte Isolation and Culture-- Hepatocytes were isolated by collagenase perfusion of the liver of male Wistar rats (body weight, 180-250 g) fed ad libitum (21). They were suspended in minimal essential medium (MEM) containing 7% (v/v) neonatal calf serum and seeded at a density of 4 × 104 cells/cm2 in 24-well plates for metabolic studies and glucokinase determination, in 6-well plates for GKRP determination, or on gelatin-coated coverslips for immunostaining. After cell attachment (2-3 h), the medium was replaced by serum-free MEM containing the adenoviruses or control medium. After an additional 2 h, the medium was replaced by serum-free MEM containing 10 nM dexamethasone, and the cells were cultured for 16-18 h before use for metabolic studies. Unless stated otherwise, the MEM contained 5 mM glucose.

Immunostaining-- Cells cultured on 13-mm coverslips were washed in PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (30 min), and washed in PBS (11). They were incubated with NaBH4 (1 mg/ml, 10 min) and then permeabilized in 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS and blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin/0.02% Triton X-100/PBS. They were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody against GKRP (22) washed in PBS and incubated with a Texas Red-conjugated antibody against rabbit IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch) in 0.1% Triton X-100/1% bovine serum albumin for 1 h at room temperature. They were then washed in PBS, water, and ethanol and mounted onto microscope slides with Mowiol containing 2.5% diazabicyclo[2,2,2]octane (Aldrich). Images of stained cells were obtained using a Bio-Rad-600 Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope equipped with a 15 mW krypton-argon laser. The 568 nm line was used to excite the Texas Red fluorophore. For each field, a series of 1-µm optical sections were combined to produce a single image.

Metabolic Studies-- For metabolic studies (Figs. 4 and 5) and control coefficient determinations (Figs. 6-8), parallel incubations were performed for determination of glucose metabolism and the activities of glucokinase and GKRP. Incubations for determination of glucose phosphorylation ([2-3H]glucose), glycolysis ([3-3H]glucose), or glycogen synthesis ([U-14C]glucose) were for 3 h in MEM containing the substrates indicated and radiolabelled glucose (2 µCi/ml) and 2 µM cycloheximide to inhibit further protein overexpression (16). On termination of the incubations, the medium from experiments with [3H]glucose was collected into 0.1 M HCl for determination of 3H2O (23). For determination of glycogen synthesis, hepatocyte monolayers were washed three times with 150 mM NaCl and extracted in 0.1 M NaOH. Extracts were deproteinized with trichloroacetic acid (10%, w/v) containing glycogen carrier, and the radioactivity incorporated into glycogen was determined as described previously (21). Glucose phosphorylation and glycolysis (3H2O formation from [2-3H]glucose and [3-3H]glucose, respectively) and glycogen synthesis are expressed as nanomoles of glucose metabolized/3 h per milligram of cell protein, which was determined by an automated Lowry method (24).

Glucokinase Determination-- Glucokinase translocation was determined from the distribution of activity between free and bound fractions during permeabilization of the hepatocyte monolayers with digitonin as described in Ref. 16. On termination of the incubations, the hepatocyte monolayers were incubated in permeabilization medium that contained 300 mM sucrose, 3 mM Hepes, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, and 0.04 mg/ml digitonin, pH 7.2. After 8 min, this medium was collected for determination of the free glucokinase activity. The residual (bound fraction) was extracted in 150 mM KCl, 3 mM Hepes, 2 mM DTT, and 0.04 mg/ml digitonin, pH 7.2. Glucokinase was assayed by the glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase coupled assay (16), and the free glucokinase activity was expressed either as milliunits/milligram of protein or as a percentage of total (free + bound) activity.

GKRP Determination-- The assay based on the inhibition of purified glucokinase was a modification of an assay described previously (7). Hepatocyte monolayers in 6-well plates were washed twice with 150 mM NaCl and extracted (1 ml/well) by brief sonication in medium containing 25 mM KCl, 25 mM Hepes, 25 mM glucose, 2 mM DTT, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.04 mg/ml digitonin. The extracts were sedimented (13,000 × g, 15 min), and the supernatants were fractionated on DEAE-Sepharose mini-columns (2.5 cm) by elution with stepwise KCl concentrations (0, 50, 75, 100, 200, and 500 mM) as described in Ref. 7. This fractionation separates GKRP from glucokinase and thus enables the assay of GKRP in the absence of interference from endogenous glucokinase (7). The assay mixture for determination of GKRP contained 25 mM KCl, 1 mM ATP-Mg2+, 5 mM glucose, 0.5 mM NAD, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 0.05% bovine serum albumin, 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.1, 1.2 units/ml glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (Leuconostoc mesenteroides), and 6 milliunits/ml purified rat liver glucokinase. The assay was performed in the absence or presence of 100 µM sorbitol 6-phosphate. The activity of GKRP (in Units) was determined from the inhibition of glucokinase activity in the presence of sorbitol 6-phosphate, where 1 Unit represents the activity that causes 50% inhibition of glucokinase activity in an assay volume of 1.0 ml under the above-mentioned assay conditions. GKRP was also determined by Western blotting as described previously (10).

The glucokinase used for assay of GKRP was prepared by overexpression of rat liver glucokinase in hepatocytes using AdCMV-GKL followed by purification by glucosamine affinity chromatography and DEAE-Sephadex. Hepatocyte monolayers in 6-well plates were treated for 2 h with high titers (>30 plaque-forming units/cell) of AdCMV-GKL. They were then cultured in fresh MEM containing 10 nM dexamethasone and 100 nM insulin for 3 days. This results in glucokinase expression >100-fold above endogenous activity. Glucokinase was extracted by permeabilizing the hepatocytes with digitonin (0.05 mg/ml) in 80 mM KCl, 20 mM potassium phosphate, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, 2 mM DTT, and 100 mM sucrose, pH 7.0. The digitonin extract was pre-cleared (15,000 × g), and glucokinase was purified by affinity chromatography using N-hexylglucosamine-Sepharose prepared by coupling D-glucosamine to CH-Sepharose 4B in the presence of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide as described previously (25) and diluted with unsubstituted Sepharose 4B (26). After elution with 1 M glucose, the glucokinase was purified and concentrated by DEAE-Sepharose chromatography. The preparation had a specific activity of 150-200 units/mg protein (using bovine serum albumin as standard).

Control Coefficients of GKRP and Glucokinase-- The control coefficients (CEJ) of GKRP or glucokinase were determined for glycogen synthesis or glycolysis. The control coefficient is defined as the fractional change (+, increase; -, decrease) in metabolic flux (J) that results from a fractional change in enzyme activity (e):
C<SUP><UP>J</UP></SUP><SUB><UP>E</UP></SUB>=<FR><NU>&dgr;J/J</NU><DE>&dgr;e/e</DE></FR> (Eq. 1)
where J is the flux through the pathway, and e is the total activity of GKRP or glucokinase (14, 15). Control coefficients were determined from the slope of log J (glycolysis or glycogen synthesis) against log e (total activity of GKRP or glucokinase) as described previously (16, 18). For determination of the control coefficient of GKRP, hepatocytes were treated with either 3 or 5 titers of AdCMV-GKRP, and for determination of the control coefficients of glucokinase, 4 titers of AdCMV-GK were used. In experiments in which the control coefficients of both glucokinase and GKRP were determined, hepatocytes were treated with 3 titers of AdCMV-GKRP, in each case without or with four titers AdCMV-GK.

Results are expressed as the means ± S.E. for the number of cell preparations indicated. Statistical analysis was performed by using the paired t test.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Treatment of Hepatocytes with AdCMV-GKRP Increases the Activity of GKRP-- The activity of GKRP in hepatocyte extracts was determined from the inhibition of purified glucokinase in the presence of sorbitol 6-phosphate, which enhances binding of GKRP to glucokinase (7) after fractionation of the hepatocyte extracts on DEAE-Sepharose as described previously (7). GKRP eluted at 75-100 mM KCl in fractions 7-10 (Fig. 1A), and glucokinase activity eluted in fractions 12 and 13 (data not shown). Treatment of hepatocytes with AdCMV-GKRP resulted in an increase in GKRP activity of between 37% and 2-fold above endogenous activity (Fig. 1B), an increase in immunostaining in the nucleus (Fig. 2), and a more intense band by Western blot analysis (data not shown). The endogenous GKRP content of untreated hepatocytes in this study was 0.68 ± 0.15 Units/mg cell protein, and the glucokinase activity was 19.8 ± 3.7 milliunits/mg. Assuming an activity of 0.2 Units/pmol for GKRP (27) and 10 milliunits/pmol for glucokinase, this corresponds to a GKRP/glucokinase molar ratio of 1.8 ± 0.18 (means ± S.E., n = 7) in untreated hepatocytes.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Activity of GKRP in hepatocytes treated with AdCMV-GKRP. A, elution profile of GKRP in extracts from untreated (open symbols) or AdCMV-GKRP-treated (closed symbols) hepatocytes fractionated by DEAE-Sepharose with increasing KCl concentration as described in Ref. 7 and assayed from the inhibition of glucokinase activity in the presence of sorbitol 6-phosphate. B, GKRP activity in hepatocytes treated with 4 titers of AdCMV-GKRP at serial 2-fold dilution determined after 20 h of culture. Results are the means ± S.E. for seven experiments, except for the 400 µl/ml titer, which represents four experiments. The percentage increase in activity above endogenous activity is shown.


View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Confocal images of untreated hepatocytes (a) and hepatocytes treated with AdCMV-GKRP (b) immunostained for GKRP. Scale bar, 50 µm.

GKRP Overexpression Increases the Binding of Glucokinase in Hepatocytes-- In the experiments shown in Fig. 3, glucokinase and GKRP were overexpressed simultaneously by treatment of hepatocytes with either varying titers of AdCMV-GK alone (open symbols) or in the additional presence of 3 titers (50, 100, and 200 µl/ml) of AdCMV-GKRP. Overexpression of GKRP by up to 2-fold above endogenous activity decreased free (Fig. 3A) and increased bound (Fig. 3B) glucokinase, confirming that the overexpressed protein binds glucokinase in the intact hepatocyte.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Treatment of hepatocytes with AdCMV-GKRP increases the binding of overexpressed glucokinase. Hepatocytes were treated with different titers of AdCMV-GK in the absence (open circle ) or presence of AdCMV-GKRP (black-square, 50 µl; black-triangle, 100 µl; black-down-triangle , 200 µl/ml). After 20 h of culture, the free glucokinase activity and bound glucokinase activity were determined by permeabilization of hepatocytes with digitonin. Free activity (A) and bound activity (B) are plotted against total glucokinase activity. Results are representative of five experiments.

GKRP Overexpression Inhibits Glucose Phosphorylation, Glycolysis, and Glycogen Synthesis-- Binding of glucokinase to GKRP in intact hepatocytes is decreased by elevated glucose concentrations and by precursors of fructose 1-phosphate such as sorbitol (9, 10, 28). Control hepatocytes and cells treated with AdCMV-GKRP with approximately 2-fold overexpression of GKRP (1.5 ± 0.16 versus 0.7 ± 0.1 units/mg) were incubated with varying glucose concentration (Fig. 4). GKRP overexpression caused a decrease in free glucokinase activity, glucose phosphorylation, glycolysis, and glycogen synthesis (Fig. 4, A-D). The concentration of glucose that caused a half-maximal effect on free glucokinase activity was 36 mM in cells treated with AdCMV-GKRP compared with 25 mM for untreated cells (Fig. 4A).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   AdCMV-GKRP increases glucokinase binding and inhibits glucose phosphorylation, glycolysis, and glycogen synthesis at varying glucose concentrations. Hepatocytes were either untreated (open circle ) or treated with 200 µl/ml AdCMV-GKRP (). After 18 h of culture, they were incubated for 3 h in MEM containing the concentrations of glucose indicated and either [2-3H]glucose (glucose phosphorylation), [3-3H]glucose (glycolysis), or [U-14C]glucose (glycogen synthesis). Free glucokinase activity and bound glucokinase activity were determined by permeabilization of hepatocytes with digitonin, and free activity is expressed as a percentage of total activity (A). Rates of glucose phosphorylation (B), glycolysis (C), and glycogen synthesis (D) are expressed as nanomoles of glucose metabolized/3 h per milligram of cell protein. Results are the means ± S.E. for three (B) or five (A, C, and D) cultures. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005 AdCMV-GKRP-treated hepatocytes versus respective controls.

Increased glucokinase binding and inhibition of glucose phosphorylation, glycolysis, and glycogen synthesis by GKRP overexpression were also observed when hepatocytes were incubated with 7.5 mM glucose and varying concentrations of sorbitol (Fig. 5, A-D). Plots of rates of glycolysis or glycogen synthesis against the corresponding free glucokinase activity (Fig. 5, E and F) show that the inhibition of glycolysis and glycogen synthesis can be explained by increased binding of glucokinase.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   AdCMV-GKRP increases glucokinase binding and inhibits glucose phosphorylation, glycolysis, and glycogen synthesis at varying sorbitol concentrations. Hepatocyte incubations and expression of results were as described in the legend to Fig. 4, except that the medium contained 7.5 mM glucose and the concentration of sorbitol indicated. E and F show the rates of glycolysis and glycogen synthesis plotted against the respective free glucokinase activity. Results are the means ± S.E. for three (B) or seven (A, C, and D) cultures. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005 AdCMV-GKRP-treated hepatocytes versus respective controls.

GKRP Has a Greater Negative Control Coefficient on Glycogen Synthesis than on Glycolysis-- The flux control coefficient of an enzyme (or protein) with respect to a particular metabolic pathway is a measure of the fractional response of pathway flux (J) to a fractional change in the concentration of the protein. The control coefficients of GKRP on glycolysis and glycogen synthesis were determined from the slope of double logarithmic plots of rates of metabolic flux against GKRP activity (Fig. 6). These plots were linear for glycogen synthesis but not for glycolysis (Fig. 6), indicating that the control coefficient of GKRP on glycolysis decreases with GKRP overexpression over the range of protein overexpression studied. GKRP had a greater negative control coefficient on glycogen synthesis than on glycolysis (Table I). The control coefficient on glycogen synthesis was slightly greater than unity (-1.2). A control coefficient of unity (negative) signifies that a fractional increase in protein concentration is associated with a proportional decrease in flux. The control coefficient on glycolysis was lower in the presence of sorbitol or elevated glucose (Table I).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   The control coefficient of GKRP on glycolysis and glycogen synthesis. Hepatocytes treated with varying titers of AdCMV-GKRP were incubated in MEM containing 7.5 mM glucose and either [3-3H]glucose (A) or [U-14C]glucose (B) for determination of glycolysis and glycogen synthesis, respectively. The control coefficient of GKRP was determined from the initial slope of the double logarithmic plot (shown by the dotted line). Results are a representative experiment of three (A) or seven (B) experiments that are summarized in Table I.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Control coefficients of GKRP on glycolysis and glycogen synthesis
Hepatocytes treated with different titers of AdCMV-GKRP were incubated for 3 h in medium with the substrates indicated and either [3-3H]glucose or [U-14C]glycogen for determination of glycolysis and glycogen synthesis, respectively. Control coefficients were determined from the slope (initial slope for glycolysis) of double logarithmic plots of rates of glycolysis or glycogen synthesis against GKRP activity. Results are the means ± S.E. for either three (glycolysis) or seven (glycogen synthesis) experiments.

Effects of Glucokinase Overexpression on the Control Coefficient of GKRP-- In another series of experiments, hepatocytes were treated with combinations of both AdCMV-GK (4 titers to overexpress glucokinase) and AdCMV-GKRP (3 titers to overexpress GKRP) to determine the control coefficient of GKRP at basal glucokinase and at elevated glucokinase activity. The control coefficient of GKRP on glycogen at 7.5 and 35 mM glucose was determined at each glucokinase level as shown in Fig. 6B. Although there was no difference between 7.5 and 35 mM glucose in the control coefficient of GKRP on glycogen synthesis in cells with endogenous glucokinase activity (Fig. 7 and Table I), with increasing glucokinase activity, the control coefficient of GKRP on glycogen synthesis decreased at 35 mM glucose but not at 7.5 mM glucose (Fig. 7).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   The control coefficient of GKRP on glycogen synthesis is dependent on the glucokinase activity and on the glucose concentrations. Hepatocytes were either untreated or treated with 4 titers of AdCMV-GK in the absence or presence of 4 titers of AdCMV-GKRP. After 18 h of culture, they were incubated for 3 h in MEM containing [U-14C]glucose with either 7.5 (open circle ) or 35 mM () glucose. The activities of glucokinase and GKRP were determined from parallel incubations. The control coefficient of GKRP on glycogen synthesis was determined from the slope of double logarithmic plots of glycogen synthesis versus regulatory protein activity. Results are the means ± S.E. of three to four cultures. *, p < 0.05.

Effects of GKRP Overexpression on the Control Coefficient of Glucokinase-- In the same series of experiments described in the previous paragraph, the flux control coefficient of glucokinase was determined at endogenous levels of GKRP and at overexpressed levels from double logarithmic plots of glycogen synthesis (at 7.5 and 35 mM glucose) against total glucokinase activity. As shown in Fig. 8, the control coefficient of glucokinase was greater at 7.5 mM than at 35 mM glucose, and overexpression of GKRP increased the control coefficient of glucokinase at both 7.5 and 35 mM glucose.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   The control coefficient of glucokinase on glycogen synthesis is dependent on the expression of GKRP. Experimental details were as described in the Fig. 7 legend. The control coefficient of glucokinase on glycogen synthesis was determined at either 7.5 (open circle ) or 35 mM () glucose from the initial slope of double logarithmic plots of glycogen synthesis versus total glucokinase activity. Results are the means ± S.E. of three to four cultures. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The liver has a major role in the control of blood glucose homeostasis. Glucokinase, the main glucose-phosphorylating enzyme in hepatocytes, and its inhibitor, GKRP, together are key components of the glucose sensory mechanism. The objective of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of the advantages conferred on the cell by this complex mechanism of regulation. To this end, we overexpressed GKRP by up to 2-fold above endogenous activity using recombinant adenovirus. This produced a functional protein that localized in the nucleus and inhibited glucokinase activity both in vitro and in the intact cell in vivo. Twofold overexpression of GKRP did not block the translocation of glucokinase by either elevated glucose concentration or sorbitol. However, it decreased the affinity of glucokinase translocation and glucose phosphorylation for glucose. The initial observation that the affinity of glucose phosphorylation for glucose in hepatocytes is lower than can be explained by the sigmoidal kinetics of glucokinase (S0.5, 20 versus 8 mM) was made by Bontemps et al. (29). The discovery of GKRP by Van Schaftingen (30) provided an explanation for the low affinity of glucose phosphorylation for glucose in intact hepatocytes based on competitive inhibition of glucokinase by GKRP. The present study demonstrates that in cells with 2-fold overexpression of GKRP, the concentration of glucose causing a half-maximal effect on glucokinase translocation was increased by 44% (36 versus 25 mM). This clearly establishes that the affinity of the hepatocyte for glucose depends on the ratio of GKRP:glucokinase and decreases with increasing ratio. Overexpression of GKRP also inhibited glycolysis and glycogen synthesis. This inhibition correlated with the free glucokinase activity, confirming that it can be explained by glucokinase binding to GKRP.

Metabolic control analysis is a very powerful analytical approach for quantitative description and understanding of how control is distributed among the component enzymes of a metabolic pathway in the intact cell, and accordingly of the magnitude of the control exerted by a particular enzyme (14, 15, 31). It defines the quantitative relation between metabolic flux and the activities or concentrations of enzymes that are components of the pathway or compete for substrate (32, 33). In the case of glucokinase, the activity is a function of the total glucokinase concentration and the proportion that is bound to GKRP. The latter is determined by the concentration of GKRP and also by the concentrations of glucose (9) and fructose 1-phosphate (34). It has been proven by the summation theorem that the sum of the flux control coefficients of all the component enzymes in relation to a metabolic pathway must equal unity (33). We have shown previously that glucokinase has a very high control coefficient (greater than unity) on glycogen synthesis from glucose (16), and we suggested two possible explanations for this high control coefficient. First, it could be due to a substrate cycle between glucokinase and glucose 6-phosphatase. This would require a comparable and negative control coefficient of glucose 6-phosphatase. This was found not to be the case because glucose 6-phosphatase has a low control coefficient (-0.3) on glycogen synthesis (18). Second, it could be due to the compartmentation of glucokinase in association with GKRP. In this study, we were able to test the latter hypothesis directly by measuring the control coefficient of GKRP. The results provide direct support for this hypothesis.

Four findings emerged from the control analysis experiments: 1) the negative control coefficient of GKRP on glycogen synthesis was greater than unity, 2) GKRP overexpression increases the control coefficient of glucokinase on glycogen synthesis, 3) a moderate increase in glucokinase overexpression was associated with a decrease in control coefficient of GKRP at high (35 mM) glucose concentration but not at low (7.5 mM) glucose concentration (taken together, these results suggest that the control coefficients of both glucokinase and GKRP on glycogen synthesis are a function of the ratio of the two proteins), and 4) GKRP has a greater control coefficient on glycogen synthesis than on glycolysis.

A key finding from this study is the high (negative) control coefficient of GKRP on glycogen synthesis. This suggests that the negative control coefficient of GKRP is the major determinant of the high control coefficient of glucokinase in such a way that the high positive control coefficient of glucokinase is counterbalanced by the negative control coefficient of GKRP. There are no known physiological situations in which hepatic glucokinase is expressed in the absence of GKRP. In all physiological and experimental conditions studied to date, GKRP is present in molar excess relative to glucokinase (7, 27). The high control coefficient of GKRP suggests that the ratio of expression of glucokinase and GKRP is finely balanced to maintain maximum or near maximum control by both proteins. The increase in control coefficient of glucokinase with increasing GKRP overexpression is consistent with this hypothesis. Because the concentration of GKRP determines the free glucokinase activity, a moderate increase in GKRP by about 2-fold decreases the free glucokinase and thereby increases its control coefficient and capacity for regulation. The greater decrease in the flux control coefficient of GKRP with increasing glucokinase overexpression at high glucose concentration (35 mM) compared with 7.5 mM glucose is also consistent with the hypothesis that there is an optimal ratio of GKRP:glucokinase that ensures maximum control by the two proteins. Because elevated glucose concentrations favor increased dissociation of glucokinase and GKRP, the more rapid decline in flux control coefficient of GKRP at increasing glucokinase can be explained by the lower affinity of GKRP for glucokinase at high glucose concentrations. The lack of decrease in the flux control coefficient of GKRP with increasing glucokinase overexpression at 7.5 mM glucose can be explained by two factors: 1) the lack of decrease in control coefficient of GKRP on glycogen synthesis at 7.5 mM glucose at increasing GKRP overexpression (linear response in Fig. 6B), and 2) the lower affinity of glucokinase translocation for glucose at elevated GKRP over expression.

The finding that GKRP has a greater control coefficient on glycogen synthesis than on glycolysis was not surprising because both glucokinase and glucose 6-phosphatase have higher control coefficients on glycogen synthesis compared with glycolysis (18). This is most likely due to differences in the glucose 6-phosphate dependence of the two pathways. The linear inhibition of glycogen synthesis as compared with the nonlinear inhibition of glycolysis with increasing GKRP overexpression may be explained by the absolute dependence of glycogen synthase activation on glucose 6-phosphate produced by glucokinase (35, 36).

In metabolic pathways that are regulated by cooperative feedback inhibition of enzymes, flux control is shifted downstream of the inhibitory metabolite (37). The present study, combined with our previous finding on the control coefficient of glucokinase (16), suggests that a high degree of control of hepatic glycogen synthesis resides before the formation of glucose 6-phosphate. This is consistent with the role of this metabolite in feed-forward activation of glycogen synthase (35, 36) and the lack of feedback inhibition of glucokinase by hexose 6-phosphate (18).

Based on the above findings, three conclusions are drawn from this study:

1. GKRP has a high control coefficient on glycogen synthesis and glycolysis. Because we have shown that glucokinase also has a very high control coefficient on hepatic glycogen synthesis (16), we conclude that small changes in either protein will have a large metabolic impact. This is the case for glucokinase because impaired hepatic glycogen synthesis has been shown in diabetic MODY-2 subjects who are heterozygous for glucokinase mutations. On the basis of our results, we predict that mutations in GKRP that affect its binding to glucokinase may have a significant impact on glucose utilization by the liver in the heterozygote state, similar to those shown for MODY-2.

2. Another important conclusion from this study is that changes in the molar ratio of GKRP:glucokinase within the physiological range will affect the sensitivity (S0.5) of the liver cell to glucose. Therefore, by changing the ratio between the components of the system, the cell can adapt to different conditions. This seems to be the case in vivo. Fasting and insulin deficiency are associated with a more rapid decay of glucokinase relative to GKRP, with a consequent increase in the GKRP:glucokinase ratio relative to the normal fed state (7). Our results indicate that under these conditions, the affinity of the hepatocyte for glucose is decreased. Conversely, the more rapid increase in glucokinase compared with GKRP during refeeding (7) would be associated with an increase in glycogen synthesis because of the high control coefficient of glucokinase and the increased affinity for glucose, resulting in a markedly amplified response.

3. Our results show in a quantitative way that the mechanism comprising glucokinase and GKRP confers on the hepatocyte a versatile mechanism to adjust glucose phosphorylation far beyond the sensitivity and responsiveness possible by a single sigmoidal enzyme alone. This mechanism represents a step forward in the design of enzymatic systems with increased responsiveness and ability to respond to an extended range of substrate concentrations.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Athel Cornish-Bowden, Mariluz Cárdenas, and Juan C. Ferrer for helpful discussions and Susanna Baqué for help in preparing the adenovirus.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by an award from The Royal Society under the European Science Exchange Program and by Grant PB96-0992 from Dirección General de Ensañanza Superior e Investigación Cientifica, Spain (to J. J. G.) and a British Diabetic Association grant (to L. A.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Recipient of a doctoral fellowship from the Generalitat de Catalunya.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Diabetes, The Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom. Tel.: 044-191-2227033; Fax: 044-191-2220723; E-mail: Loranne.Agius@ncl.ac.uk.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: MODY, maturity onset diabetes of the young; GKRP, glucokinase regulatory protein; MEM, minimal essential medium; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; DTT, dithiothreitol.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Iynedjian, P. B. (1993) Biochem. J. 293, 1-13
2. Cardenas, M. L. (1995) Glucokinase: Its Regulation and Role in Liver Metabolism , pp. 21-40, R. G. Landes Publishers, Austin, TX
3. Hattersley, A. T. (1998) Diabetic Med. 15, 15-24[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Postic, C., Shiota, M., Niswender, K. D., Jetton, T. L., Chen, Y., Moates, J. M., Shelton, K. D., Linder, J., Cherrington, A. D., and Magnuson, M. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 305-315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Van Schaftingen, E., Detheux, M., and Veiga-da-Cunha, M. (1994) FASEB J. 8, 414-419[Abstract]
6. Van Schaftingen, E., Veiga-da-Cunha, M., and Niculescu, L. (1997) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 25, 136-140[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Vandercammen, A., and Van Schaftingen, E. (1993) Biochem. J. 294, 551-556
8. Brown, K. S., Kalinowski, S. S., Megill, J. R., Durham, S. K., and Mookhtiar, K. A. (1997) Diabetes 46, 179-186[Abstract]
9. Agius, L., and Peak, M. (1993) Biochem. J. 296, 785-796
10. Agius, L., Peak, M., and Van Schaftingen, E. (1995) Biochem. J. 309, 711-713
11. De la Iglesia, N., Veiga-da-Cunha, M., Van Schaftingen, E., Guinovart, J. J., and Ferrer, J. C. (1999) FEBS Lett. 456, 332-338[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Hayward, B. E., Warner, J. P., Dunlop, N., Fantes, J., Intody, S., Leek, J., Markham, A. F., and Bonthron, D. T. (1996) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 25, 140-145
13. Kacser, H., and Burns, J. A. (1981) Genetics 97, 639-666[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Kacser, H., and Burns, J. A. (1979) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 7, 1149-1160[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Fell, D. A. (1992) Biochem. J. 286, 313-330
16. Agius, L., Peak, M., Newgard, C. B., Gomez-Foix, A. M., and Guinovart, J. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 30479-30486[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Velho, G., Petersen, K. F., Perseghin, G., Huang, J-H., Rothman, D. L., Pueyo, M. E., Cline, G. W., Froguel, P., and Shulman, G. I. (1996) J. Clin. Investig. 98, 1755-1761[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Aiston, S., Trinh, K. Y., Lange, A. J., Newgard, C. B., and Agius, L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 24559-24566[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Becker, T. C., Noel, R. J., Coats, W. S., Gomez-Foix, A. M., Alam, T., Gerard, R. D., and Newgard, C. B. (1994) Methods Cell Biol. 43, 161-189
20. Becker, T. C., Noel, R. J., Johnson, J. H., Lynch, R. M., Hirose, H., Tokuyama, Y., Bell, G. I., and Newgard, C. B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 390-394[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Agius, L., Peak, M., and Alberti, K. G. M. M. (1990) Biochem. J. 266, 91-102[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Vandercammen, A., and Van Schaftingen, E. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 294, 551-556
23. Agius, L. (1997) Biochem. J. 325, 667-673
24. Clifton, P. M., Chang, K., and McKinnon, A. M. (1988) Anal. Biochem. 172, 165-168[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Miwa, I., Mitsuyama, S., Toyoda, Y., Murata, T., and Okuda, J. (1990) Prep. Biochem. 20, 163-178[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Holroyde, M. J., Chesher, J. M. E., Trayer, I. P., and Walker, D. G. (1976) Biochem. J. 153, 351-361[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Rosa, J. L., Perez, J. X., Detheux, M., Van Schaftingen, E., and Bartrons, R. (1997) Hepatology 25, 324-328[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Agius, L. (1994) Biochem. J. 298, 237-243
29. Bontemps, F., Hue, L., and Hers, H.-G. (1978) Biochem. J. 174, 603-611[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Van Schaftingen, E. (1989) Eur. J. Biochem. 179, 179-184[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Cornish-Bowden, A. (1995) Fundamentals of Enzyme Kinetics , pp. 249-256, Portland Press, London and Miami, FL
32. Heinrich, R., and Rapaport, T. A. (1974) Eur. J. Biochem. 42, 89-95[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Kacser, H., and Burns, J. A. (1973) Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 27, 65-104[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Niculescu, L., Veiga-da-Cunha, M., and Van Schaftingen, E. (1997) Biochem. J. 321, 239-246
35. Villar-Palasi, C., and Guinovart, J. J. (1997) FASEB J. 11, 544-558[Abstract]
36. Seoane, J., Gomez-Foix, A. M., O'Doherty, R. M., Gomez-Ara, C., Newgard, C. B., and Guinovart, J. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 23756-23760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Thomas, S., Mooney, P. J., Burrell, M. M., and Fell, D. A. (1997) Biochem. J. 322, 119-127


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. H. Mukhtar, V. A. Payne, C. Arden, A. Harbottle, S. Khan, A. J. Lange, and L. Agius
Inhibition of glucokinase translocation by AMP-activated protein kinase is associated with phosphorylation of both GKRP and 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): R766 - R774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
V. A. Payne, C. Arden, A. J. Lange, and L. Agius
Contributions of glucokinase and phosphofructokinase-2/fructose bisphosphatase-2 to the elevated glycolysis in hepatocytes from Zucker fa/fa rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): R618 - R625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
C. Arden, A. Trainer, N. de la Iglesia, K. T. Scougall, A. L. Gloyn, A. J. Lange, J. A.M. Shaw, F. M. Matschinsky, and L. Agius
Cell Biology Assessment of Glucokinase Mutations V62M and G72R in Pancreatic {beta}-Cells: Evidence for Cellular Instability of Catalytic Activity
Diabetes, July 1, 2007; 56(7): 1773 - 1782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Futamura, H. Hosaka, A. Kadotani, H. Shimazaki, K. Sasaki, S. Ohyama, T. Nishimura, J.-i. Eiki, and Y. Nagata
An Allosteric Activator of Glucokinase Impairs the Interaction of Glucokinase and Glucokinase Regulatory Protein and Regulates Glucose Metabolism
J. Biol. Chem., December 8, 2006; 281(49): 37668 - 37674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
Y. Fujimoto, T. P. Torres, E. P. Donahue, and M. Shiota
Glucose Toxicity Is Responsible for the Development of Impaired Regulation of Endogenous Glucose Production and Hepatic Glucokinase in Zucker Diabetic Fatty Rats
Diabetes, September 1, 2006; 55(9): 2479 - 2490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
B. Guigas, L. Bertrand, N. Taleux, M. Foretz, N. Wiernsperger, D. Vertommen, F. Andreelli, B. Viollet, and L. Hue
5-Aminoimidazole-4-Carboxamide-1-{beta}-D-Ribofuranoside and Metformin Inhibit Hepatic Glucose Phosphorylation by an AMP-Activated Protein Kinase-Independent Effect on Glucokinase Translocation.
Diabetes, April 1, 2006; 55(4): 865 - 874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
S. Baltrusch, F. Francini, S. Lenzen, and M. Tiedge
Interaction of Glucokinase With the Liver Regulatory Protein Is Conferred by Leucine-Asparagine Motifs of the Enzyme
Diabetes, October 1, 2005; 54(10): 2829 - 2837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
V. A. Payne, C. Arden, C. Wu, A. J. Lange, and L. Agius
Dual Role of Phosphofructokinase-2/Fructose Bisphosphatase-2 in Regulating the Compartmentation and Expression of Glucokinase in Hepatocytes
Diabetes, July 1, 2005; 54(7): 1949 - 1957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
M. Morifuji, K. Sakai, and K. Sugiura
Dietary Whey Protein Modulates Liver Glycogen Level and Glycoregulatory Enzyme Activities in Exercise-Trained Rats
Experimental Biology and Medicine, January 1, 2005; 230(1): 23 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
C. Arden, A. Harbottle, S. Baltrusch, M. Tiedge, and L. Agius
Glucokinase Is an Integral Component of the Insulin Granules in Glucose-Responsive Insulin Secretory Cells and Does Not Translocate During Glucose Stimulation
Diabetes, September 1, 2004; 53(9): 2346 - 2352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
K. J. Brocklehurst, V. A. Payne, R. A. Davies, D. Carroll, H. L. Vertigan, H. J. Wightman, S. Aiston, I. D. Waddell, B. Leighton, M. P. Coghlan, et al.
Stimulation of Hepatocyte G