Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gambaletta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Falcioni, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gambaletta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Falcioni, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 14, 10604-10610, April 7, 2000


Cooperative Signaling between alpha 6beta 4 Integrin and ErbB-2 Receptor Is Required to Promote Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-dependent Invasion*

Daniela GambalettaDagger , Alessandra MarchettiDagger , Laura BenedettiDagger , Arthur M. Mercurio§, Ada SacchiDagger , and Rita FalcioniDagger

From the Dagger  Molecular Oncogenesis Laboratory, Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Via delle Messi d'Oro, 156-00158 Rome, Italy and the § Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We previously demonstrated that beta 4 integrin subunit overexpression increases in vitro invasiveness of NIH3T3 cells that have been transformed by ErbB-2 oncogene. We used this model to identify domains within the large beta 4 cytoplasmic domain that are involved in the interaction of alpha 6beta 4 with ErbB-2, invasion, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) activation. For this purpose, we expressed deletion mutants of beta 4 that lacked either all or portions of the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain in NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells. We also used an ecto-domain mutant in which most of the extracellular domain of beta 4 was replaced with a c-Myc tag. These transfectants were examined for their ability to invade Matrigel and their ability to activate PI3K, as well as for the ability of alpha 6beta 4 to co-immunoprecipitate with ErbB-2. The results obtained revealed that a region of the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain between amino acids 854 and 1183 is critical for the ability of alpha 6beta 4 integrin to increase invasion. Interestingly, the extracellular domain of beta 4 is not necessary for alpha 6beta 4 to stimulate invasion. The association of alpha 6beta 4 with ErbB-2 is dependent upon the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain and can occur in the absence of alpha 6beta 4 heterodimerization. Finally, we observed strong activation of PI3K with beta 4 wild type and with those beta 4 deletion mutants that were able to stimulate invasion upon the expression in NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells. In conclusion, our results establish that there is cooperation between alpha 6beta 4 and ErbB-2 in promoting PI3K-dependent invasion and implicate a specific region of the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain (amino acids 854-1183) in this event.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Integrins are the major family of cell surface receptors that mediate attachment to the extracellular matrix. The interaction between integrins and their ligands is involved in the regulation of many cellular functions, including embryonic development, cell proliferation, as well as tumor growth and metastasis. Integrins are composed of alpha  and beta  transmembrane subunits that heterodimerize to form different receptors. A single alpha  subunit (e.g. alpha v or alpha 6) can associate with different beta  subunits, (beta 1, beta 3, beta 5, or beta 1, beta 4, respectively), promoting different ligand binding specificity (1-3). The alpha 6beta 4 integrin is a receptor for various isoforms of the basement membrane component laminin (4-6), and its expression is restricted to epithelia, endothelia and peripheral nerves (7-9). In many epithelia, alpha 6beta 4 is found in hemidesmosomes where it plays an essential role in their organization (10, 11). This integrin can also interact with F-actin and promote the migration of invasive carcinoma cells (12, 13).

The intracellular portion of the beta 4 subunit is much larger (1,000 amino acids) than that of all the other known beta  subunits, and it does not exhibit apparent sequence homology with them (14-16). Increasing evidence indicates that the ability of alpha 6beta 4 to regulate cell proliferation, motility, and invasion is dependent upon signal transduction events that are mediated by the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain (17-19). Of particular relevance to cancer, alpha 6beta 4 has been implicated in carcinoma invasion (19-21) through its ability to activate PI3K (19). Moreover, the ability of alpha 6beta 4 to promote invasion is dependent upon the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain. The importance of alpha 6beta 4 in malignancy is also indicated by the finding that its expression correlates with the progression of squamous, ovarian, thyroid, gastric, and colorectal carcinomas (22-27).

Function and signaling properties of alpha 6beta 4 in carcinoma cells are influenced by its association with growth factor receptors. Specifically, we demonstrated that alpha 6beta 4 co-immunoprecipitates with ErbB-2 in human mammary and ovarian carcinoma cell lines and that ligation of this integrin increases ErbB-2 phosphorylation (28). Moreover, we also observed that overexpression of ErbB-2 and alpha 6beta 4 in NIH3T3 cells increased their invasive capacity (28). In the present study, we sought to identify the portion of beta 4 involved in the interaction with ErbB-2 and possibly involved in the development of a more aggressive phenotype. With this aim, we generated different NIH3T3 transfectants that concomitantly overexpress ErbB-2 oncogene and wild type or deletion mutants of beta 4 integrin. In vitro invasion assays demonstrated that the portion of beta 4 protein involved in the invasive capacity resides in 329 cytoplasmic residues between the amino acids 824 and 1183. Biochemical analysis indicated that ErbB-2/beta 4 interaction is abolished uniquely when the entire cytoplasmic domain of beta 4 is deleted. Thus, we were able to exclude that the interaction of ErbB-2 and beta 4 is responsible for increased malignancy of NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 cells. The study of the mechanisms by which beta 4 cooperates with ErbB-2 to promote increased malignancy showed that the alpha 6beta 4 integrin activates the PI3K pathway when both ErbB-2 and beta 4 are overexpressed.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Lines and cDNA Constructs-- NIH3T3 parental cell line and NIH3T3 cells stably transfected with the human ErbB-2 cDNA (29) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, penicillin, streptomycin, and glutamine (Life Technologies, Inc.). NIH3T3 cells and ErbB-2-transduced NIH3T3 cells were transfected, by electroporation, with the pRC/CMV expression vector carrying the wild type human beta 4 integrin subunit and truncated beta 4 cDNAs (10, 17). Filippo Giancotti (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York) kindly provided the cDNAs encoding the full-length and truncated beta 4 molecules. Selection of neomycin-positive clones was carried out using 500 µg/ml of G418 (Life Technologies, Inc.).

Antibodies-- The rat monoclonal antibody (mAb)1 439-9B and the mouse mAb 450-11A to the human beta 4 and the rat mAb 135-13C to alpha 6 integrin subunits, respectively, were purified as described previously (21, 30). Tom Carey (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) kindly donated the anti-human beta 4 integrin mAb A9 (31). The anti-mouse beta 4 integrin mAb 346-11A was prepared and purified from ascitic fluid and used as negative control (32). Purified anti-mouse IgG was from Cappel (Durham, NC). The mouse mAbs to the human ErbB-2 protein used in Western blotting experiments were from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KT) or from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG were from Bio-Rad. The anti-phosphotyrosine (anti-Tyr(P)) mouse mAb 4G10 was from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Upstate Biotechnology Inc., Lake Placid, NY).

Affinity Chromatography-- Anti-human and anti-mouse beta 4 integrin mAbs 439-9B and 346-11A were purified by high performance liquid chromatography and cross-linked to activated immune affinity supports Affi-Gel 10/15 (Bio-Rad). In brief, 4 mg of purified mAb was combined with 1 ml of Affi-Gel in 0.1 M buffer carbonate, pH 8.5, at 4 °C for 4 h. The beads were then washed with Tris-HCl 0.1 M, pH 8, and suspended in PBS containing 0.03% sodium azide (NaN3). NIH3T3 transfectants were lysed in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1% Nonidet P-40, 10% glycerol, 137 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, aprotinin (5 µg/ml), leupeptin (10 µg/ml), and pepstatin A (4 µg/ml). Repeated experiments were also performed in the presence of 10 mM CHAPS (Pierce), instead of 1% Nonidet P-40, to disrupt nonspecific protein-protein interactions. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation, and the immune complexes were purified by affinity chromatography using mAbs cross-linked to Affi-Gel (bead-conjugated antibodies).

Immunocomplexes and Total Cell Lysates-- Immunoprecipitations from cells labeled with lactoperoxidase and carrier-free 125I showed that the antibodies recognize the appropriate molecules (data not shown). In brief, as described previously (21), 2 × 106 cells were labeled with 1 mCi of 125I in the presence of 10 µl of lactoperoxidase (2 mg/ml in 50% of glycerol) (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) and 5 µl of a 1:1000 dilution of H2O2 (30%). After labeling, cells were washed with PBS and solubilized in lysis buffer containing 5 mg/ml BSA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM NaN3, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Sigma), 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin (Sigma), and 10 mM EDTA. The lysates were clarified by centrifugation (30,000 × g) for 3 h at 4 °C and solubilized proteins (1 × 107 cpm) were immunoprecipitated. The immunoprecipitates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and autoradiography was performed with X-Omat RP film (Kodak). Direct immunoprecipitations were performed using primary antibodies collected with 50 µl of Protein G-agarose beads (Pierce) suspended in lysis buffer (50% v/v). Total cell lysates were added to the bead-conjugated antibodies, and protein complexes were washed at 4 °C in lysis buffer, boiled, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.

Kinase Assay-- To assay PI3K activity, after serum starvation for 24 h the cells were washed and lysed in 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 0.15 M NaCl, 10% glycerol in the presence of protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Nuclei were removed by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. After lysis, aliquots of cell extracts containing equivalent amounts of protein were incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-Tyr(P) mAb 4G10 (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.) and protein G (Pierce). The beads were washed twice with lysis buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 0.15 M NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 1% Nonidet P-40); twice with 0.5 M LiCl; twice with 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 0.15 M NaCl, and 0.2% Nonidet P-40; and once with 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 0.15 M NaCl. After removal of the last wash, the beads were suspended in 30 µl of 30 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, and 30 µl of kinase buffer containing 10 µg (20 µl) of L-alpha -phosphatidylinositol from bovin liver (Sigma) sonicated in 10 mM Hepes and 1 mM EDTA, 80 µM ATP (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), 20 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP (6000 Ci/mmol), 10 mM MgCl2, and 400 µM adenosine (Sigma) and incubated for 25 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 100 µl of 1 M HCl, and 200 µl of 1:1 mixture of chloroform and methanol were added. The organic phase was then washed twice with 300 µl of 1:1 mixture of methanol and HCl. The lipid extracts (20 µl of each reaction) were then resolved by thin layer chromatography plates (TLC Silica gel) (Merck) in chloroform, methanol, and ammonium hydroxide. Dried TLC sheets were developed by autoradiography.

Western Blot Analysis-- Total cell lysates or immune complexes obtained by affinity chromatography or indirect immunoprecipitation were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad) or Immobilon-P transfer membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA). The blots were probed with the following antibodies: 2 µg/ml of anti-ErbB-2 mAb (Clone 3B5) or 2 µg/ml of purified mouse anti-human c-Myc mAb (Clone 9E10). Filters were washed and developed with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Autoradiographies were performed with Hyperfilm ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Flow Cytometry-- The expression levels of ErbB-2 and alpha 6beta 4 integrin receptors were detected by flow cytometric analysis of stained cells. Cells harvested using citrate saline buffer (0.134 M KCl, 0.015 M sodium citrate) were washed twice with cold PBS containing 0.002% EDTA and 10 mM NaN3 (washing buffer). Samples of 1 × 106 cells were incubated for 1 h at 4 °C with saturating concentrations of primary antibodies diluted in PBS containing 0.5% BSA. Control cells were incubated with unrelated antibodies. Cells were then washed three times with washing buffer (PBS containing 0.5% BSA) and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C with 50 µl of fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibodies (F(ab')2 (Cappel, West Chester, PA)) diluted 1:20 in PBS/BSA. After three washes, the cells were suspended in 1 ml of washing buffer. Cell suspensions were analyzed by a flow cytometer (Epics XL analyzer, Coulter Corporation, Miami, FL) after addition of 5 µl of propidium iodide (1 mg/ml stock solution) to exclude nonviable cells. At least 1 × 104 cells/sample were analyzed.

Chemoinvasion Assays-- Chemoinvasion assays were carried out in a Boyden chamber as described (33). In brief, 8-mm polycarbonate filters (Nucleopore, Concorezzo, Italy) were coated with Matrigel kindly provided by Dr. A. Albini (Genova, Italy). Optimal Matrigel concentration (12.5 µg/filter from a 250 µg/ml dilution of Matrigel in distilled, cold water) was accurately determined in preliminary experiments. The cells harvested by trypsin-EDTA treatment were washed with serum free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 0.1% BSA, and 5 × 105 cells were layered on the top well of a Boyden chamber. The chambers were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 8 h in the presence of Balb/3T3 conditioned medium (added as chemo-attractant) or in the presence of 0.1% BSA (added as negative control). In some assays, the cells were preincubated for 30 min before addition to the Matrigel-coated wells with wortmannin (Biomol, Plymouth Metting, PA). Cells migrated on the lower surface of the filters were fixed in ethanol and stained with Toluidine blue. Five independent fields were counted at 160× with a Zeiss microscope. Each assay was carried out in quadruplicate and repeated at least three times. The ability of the cells to adhere to the filters was verified by staining the upper side of the filters.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Cytoplasmic Domain of beta 4 Protein Influences the Metastatic Propensity of NIH3T3/ErbB-2-transformed Cells-- We previously demonstrated that the expression of the beta 4 integrin subunit in NIH3T3 cells, transformed by the ErbB-2 oncogene, stimulates their in vitro invasion (28). To identify specific domains in the beta 4 subunit that confer this invasive potential, we expressed deletion mutants of beta 4 in NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells (Fig. 1). These deletion mutants lacked either all (L) or portions (B, C, and D) of the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain. In addition, we used an ecto-domain mutant (F) in which most of the extracellular domain of beta 4 was replaced with a c-Myc tag. In agreement with data previously reported (10), all of these mutants were highly expressed on the cell surface of the transfected cells (data not shown). Clones of these transfectants expressing comparable surface expression of the beta 4 subunit were chosen for functional and biochemical analyses. The expression levels of beta 4 protein corresponding to F deletion mutant were assessed by Western blot analysis using a mouse anti-human c-Myc antibody (Fig. 2). Immunoprecipitation of surface-labeled proteins confirmed the expression of wild type and truncated beta 4 proteins on the cell surface of selected clones (data not shown).


View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic representation of wild type and mutated beta 4 cDNAs. black-square, transmembrane domain; amino acids 1-710, extracellular domain; amino acids 734-1752, cytoplasmic domain; Delta 70-660, extracellular domain deletion. Deletions in the cytoplasmic domain are indicated by the amino acids where the molecules were truncated.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Western blot analysis using a mouse anti-human c-Myc antibody of the clones obtained after selection of NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells transfected with deleted beta 4 F cDNA. The molecular size of beta 4 F transfectants (kilodaltons) is indicated by an arrow. W.B., Western blot.

To identify specific domains within the beta 4 subunit that are necessary for the ability of alpha 6beta 4 to promote invasion, the NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells that expressed the beta 4 deletion mutants were assayed for their ability to invade Matrigel in a standard chemoinvasion assay (Table I). At least two clones from each of the NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 transfectant were used for this purpose. In agreement with our previous finding (28), expression of the wild type beta 4 subunit increased invasion of NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells by 2.5-fold. Interestingly, expression of the beta 4 C, D, and F mutants resulted in a similar increase in invasion (Table I). However, expression of the beta 4 L and B mutants did not enhance the invasiveness of NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells. Two important conclusions can be drawn from these data. First, the extracellular domain of beta 4 does not appear to be necessary for alpha 6beta 4 to stimulate invasion based on the results obtained with the beta 4 F mutant. Second, a portion of the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain between amino acids 854 (the site of the beta 4 B deletion) and 1183 (the site of the beta 4 C deletion) is critical for the ability of the alpha 6beta 4 integrin to stimulate invasion. However, the beta 4 mutated proteins we used contain very large deletions, leaving open the possibility for the domains of the beta 4 protein, upstream of the 854 amino acid, to stimulate invasion but which at the same time require cooperation with the other downstream domains. We also cannot exclude that such deletions, causing conformational changes of the molecules, could prevent their interaction with intermediate signaling molecules responsible for stimulating invasion.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Chemoinvasive ability of the NIH3T3 transfectants
NIH3T3 transfectants were assayed for their ability to invade Matrigel in the absence or presence of the PI3K inhibitor wortmannin (100 nM. Fibroblast-conditioned serum-free medium was added in the lower compartment of the Boyden Chamber and used as chemoattractant. The data shown are from two individual clones of each transfectant and are the mean values ± S.D. of three experiments done in quadruplicate. Statistical significance (P*) was evaluated according to T-test comparing the median values of NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells/field versus themselves or NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 transfectants cells/field in absence or presence of wortmannin. ND, not determined.

Interaction of beta 4 with ErbB-2 Is Abrogated by the Lack of beta 4 Cytoplasmic Domain-- Given our previous demonstration of a physical association between alpha 6beta 4 and ErbB-2, we attempt to determine whether this association is necessary for the ability of alpha 6beta 4 and ErbB-2 to promote invasion. Specifically, we examined the ability of ErbB-2 to co-immunoprecipitate with alpha 6beta 4 heterodimers that contained specific deletions in the beta 4 subunit. To this purpose, these alpha 6beta 4 heterodimers were purified by affinity chromatography using either 439-9B mAb, which recognizes an epitope present in the extracellular domain of beta 4 or 450-11A mAb, which recognizes an epitope in the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain. As negative control, we used 346-11A mAb, which is specific for mouse beta 4. The presence of ErbB-2 in the beta 4 integrin immune complexes was determined by immunoblotting. Using this approach, we detected the 185-kDa ErbB-2 protein in the beta 4 immune complexes obtained from extracts of NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells that expressed the intact alpha 6beta 4 heterodimer (Fig. 3, lane 1), as expected (28). In addition, an ErbB-2/beta 4 complex was detected in extracts obtained from clones 19 and 21 of cells expressing the extracellular domain deletion of beta 4 (beta 4 F) (Fig. 3). In these immune complexes, purified by an anti-beta 4 mAb specific for the cytoplasmic domain of the molecule, the anti-ErbB-2 mAb was able to detect a 185-kDa protein (Fig. 3, lanes 2 and 3). Moreover, the co-immunoprecipitation of ErbB-2 and beta 4 F truncated protein was detected after reprobing the same blot with an anti-c-Myc mAb (Fig. 3, lanes 5 and 6). The same anti-c-Myc antibody did not recognize the beta 4 wild type protein (lane 4). Similar experiments performed using extracts from NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells expressing truncated proteins beta 4 C (clones 9 and 17) and D (clones 3 and 25) revealed that all these beta 4 truncated proteins co-immunoprecipitate with the ErbB-2 protein (Fig. 4, lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7, respectively). The mAb specific for the mouse beta 4 integrin (negative control) did not co-immunoprecipitate ErbB-2 from the same extracts (Fig. 4, lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8). Fig. 5 shows immune complexes from extracts of NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells transfected with truncated proteins beta 4 B (clones 11 and 14) and L (clones 5 and 4). The truncated beta 4 B protein still co-precipitated with ErbB-2 (Fig. 5, lanes 3 and 4), whereas beta 4 L protein, which was deleted from the entire cytoplasmic domain, did not co-precipitate with ErbB-2 (Fig. 5, lanes 6 and 7). As controls, the ErbB-2 protein was detected in immune complexes derived from lysates of NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells expressing wild type beta 4 protein (Fig. 5, lane 2) but not from lysates of NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells (Fig. 5, lane 1 and 5). These data show that only the deletion of the entire beta 4 cytoplasmic domain abrogates co-immunoprecipitation of ErbB-2 and beta 4. Moreover, the finding that the beta 4 F protein, which is unable to form alpha 6beta 4 heterodimers (10) but is still able to retain the ability to co-precipitate with ErbB-2 indicates that the alpha 6 subunit is not involved in the ErbB-2/beta 4 interaction.


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Association of beta 4 mutant F with ErbB-2. Total cell lysates from NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 wild type (lanes 1 and 4) and NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 mutant F cells (clones 19 and 21) (lanes 2, 3, 5, and 6) were incubated with bead-conjugated anti-human beta 4 mAb 439-9B. Immune complexes were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and probed as shown in the left panel with a mouse anti-human ErbB-2 mAb followed by chemiluminescence detection with an anti-mouse IgG peroxidase-conjugated antibody. The right panel shows the immunoblot on the same filter with a mouse anti-human c-Myc antibody. Molecular sizes (kilodaltons) are indicated. W.B., Western blot.


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Association of the beta 4 mutant C and D molecules with ErbB-2. Total cell lysates from NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 mutant C and D cells were incubated with bead-conjugated anti-human beta 4 antibody 439-9B (lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7) or, as negative control, anti-mouse beta 4 antibody 346-11A (lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8). Immune complexes were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and probed with a mouse anti-human ErbB-2 mAb followed by chemiluminescence detection with anti-mouse IgG peroxidase-conjugated antibody. Molecular sizes (kilodaltons) are indicated. W.B., Western blot.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Association of the beta 4 mutant B and L molecules with ErbB-2. Total cell lysates from NIH3T3/ErbB-2 (lanes 1 and 5), from NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 wild type (lane 2), from NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 mutant B (clone 11 and 14) (lanes 3 and 4), and from NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 mutant L (clones 5 and 4) (lanes 6 and 7) cells were incubated with bead-conjugated anti-human beta 4 439-9B antibody. Immune complexes were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and probed with a mouse anti-human ErbB-2 mAb followed by chemiluminescence detection with an anti-mouse IgG peroxidase-conjugated antibody. Molecular sizes (kilodaltons) are indicated. W. B., Western blot.

Cooperativity between alpha 6beta 4 and ErbB-2 Is Required to Activate PI3K-- The activation of PI3K by the alpha 6beta 4 integrin has been shown to promote the invasion of carcinoma cells (19). Based on our finding that the overexpression of alpha 6beta 4 increases the invasiveness of NIH3T3 cells transformed by ErbB-2, we examined the influence of these two surface receptors on PI3K activation. As a prelude to these experiments, we established the involvement of PI3K in the invasion of the NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 transfectants using wortmannin. In agreement with previous findings (19, 34), we found that wortmannin inhibited the invasion of NIH3T3 cells expressing either the intact alpha 6beta 4 heterodimer or the various beta 4 deletion mutants that are still able to increase invasiveness (Table I). Interestingly, we also found that wortmannin did not modify the invasive capacity of NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells (Table I), confirming the observation that PI3K pathway is involved in beta 4-dependent invasive capacity. The fact that wortmannin completely abolishes the invasiveness of NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 cells rather than reducing it to the level of parental cell line might be explained by the assumption that the activation of PI3K in NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells after beta 4 expression supersedes other signaling pathways responsible for the invasion of these cells. Based on this hypothesis, it is reasonable to think that wortmannin-mediated inhibition of PI3K activation should abolish the invasive capacity.

To assay PI3K activity, extracts obtained from NIH3T3/ErbB-2 transfectants were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Tyr(P) mAb to capture the activated population of PI3K, and the immunoprecipitates were assayed for their ability to phosphorylate L-alpha -phosphatidylinositol. Constitutive PI3K activity was undetectable in NIH3T3 parental cells and also in NIH3T3 cells overexpressing either the beta 4 or the ErbB-2 proteins alone (Fig. 6). However, PI3K activation was evident when beta 4 protein was co-expressed with ErbB-2 (Fig. 6). These results indicate that both alpha 6beta 4 and ErbB-2 expression are required for constitutive PI3K activation in NIH3T3 cells. Furthermore, these data indicate that in the NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cellular context a correlation exists between the beta 4-dependent invasive capacity and the beta 4-induced PI3K activity. Moreover, the availability of the beta 4 deletion mutants enabled us to identify specific domains within the beta 4 subunit that are required for PI3K activation and to compare these domains with those that are implicated in invasion based on our results. Cell extracts of the NIH3T3/ErbB-2 transfectants that expressed the beta 4 C, D, and F truncated proteins exhibited levels of PI3K activation comparable with that of wild type beta 4 (Fig. 7). In contrast, NIH3T3/ErbB-2 transfectants expressing the beta 4 L and B proteins that did not enhance the invasiveness of NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells (Table I) showed minimal activation of PI3K (Fig. 7). To establish a possible link between the formation of the receptor-integrin complex and PI3K activity, we checked the presence of PI3K in the complex. However, using different experimental conditions, we were never able to detect PI3K in ErbB-2/beta 4 complex (data not shown).


View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Analysis of PI3K activity on NIH3T3, NIH3T3/beta 4, NIH3T3/ErbB-2, and NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 clones. A, aliquots of cell extracts derived from the parental cell line NIH3T3 (lane 1) and NIH3T3 clones (lanes 2-4) containing equivalent amounts of protein were incubated with the anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10 and protein G-Sepharose overnight at 4 °C. After washing, the beads were resuspended in kinase buffer for 20 min at room temperature in presence of L-alpha -phosphatidylinositol. The phosphorylated lipids were resolved by thin layer chromatography. B, the amount of radiolabeled lipids was determined by densitometry. The data shown are the mean values ± S.D. from three separate experiments.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Analysis of PI3K activity on NIH3T3/ErbB-2, NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 wild type, and/or NIH3T3/ErbB-2 deleted beta 4 molecules C, D, L, B, and F. A, aliquots of cell extracts containing equivalent amounts of protein were incubated with the anti-Tyr(P) mAb and protein G-Sepharose overnight at 4 °C. After washing, the beads were resuspended in kinase buffer for 20 min at room temperature in the presence of L-alpha -phosphatidylinositol. The phosphorylated lipids were resolved by thin layer chromatography. B, the amount of radiolabeled lipids was determined by densitometry. The data shown are the mean values ± S.D. from three separate experiments.

We then questioned whether antibody-mediated ligation of alpha 6beta 4 could augment PI3K activation. To this purpose, we used a mAb specific for the alpha 6 integrin subunit because it allowed us to compare activation of PI3K by the alpha 6beta 1 and alpha 6beta 4 integrins. However, NIH3T3 cells express alpha 6beta 1 but not alpha 6beta 4. We observed that antibody-mediated ligation of the alpha 6 subunit (alpha 6beta 1) in the NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells did not stimulate PI3K activation (Fig. 8). However, ligation of the alpha 6 subunit in the NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 transfectants (primarily alpha 6beta 4) stimulated PI3K activity (Fig. 8). Finally, we asked whether wortmannin could affect PI3K activity on NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 cells. In agreement with previous findings (35), we found that treatment with wortmannin is able to reduce PI3K activity by 90% in these cells (Fig. 9), supporting the effect of the complete inhibition of invasiveness that was obtained after treatment of NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 with this inhibitor (Table I). These data further indicate that PI3K activation in NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells is strictly dependent upon beta 4 expression and that in these cells ligand activation of the alpha 6beta 1 receptors cannot substitute beta 4-dependent signals to generate PI3K activity.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Analysis of PI3K activity on NIH3T3/ErbB-2 and NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 wild type cells. A, NIH3T3/ErbB-2 and NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 cells were maintained in suspension (lanes 1 and 3) or plated on dishes coated with the anti-alpha 6 specific antibody 135-13C (lanes 2 and 4) and allowed to adhere. Aliquots of cell extracts that contained equivalent amounts of protein were incubated with the anti-Tyr(P) mAb and protein G-Sepharose overnight at 4 °C. After washing, the beads were resuspended in kinase buffer for 20 min at room temperature in the presence of L-alpha -phosphatidylinositol. The phosphorylated lipids were resolved by thin layer chromatography. B, densitrometric analysis show that the integrin clustering induces a 2-fold increase of PI3K activation in NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 cells (36.2 ± 6 versus 80.4 ± 7). The standard deviation of two separate experiments is indicated.


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Analysis of PI3K activity on NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 cells. A, NIH3T3/ErbB-2/beta 4 cells were maintained in adhesion (lane 1) or treated with wortmannin. Aliquots of cell extracts that contained equivalent amounts of protein were incubated with the anti-Tyr(P) mAb and protein G-Sepharose overnight at 4 °C. After washing, the beads were resuspended in kinase buffer for 20 min at room temperature in presence of L-alpha -phosphatidylinositol. The phosphorylated lipids were resolved by thin layer chromatography. B, the percentage of radiolabeled lipids inhibition was determined by densitometry.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Recent studies have implicated a key role of the alpha 6beta 4 integrin in carcinoma invasion and progression by a mechanism that involves its ability to activate PI3K (19). In addition, we have recently provided evidence that alpha 6beta 4 is able to associate with ErbB-2 (28), a growth factor receptor associated with aggressive breast carcinomas (36). In the current study, we defined the mechanism by which alpha 6beta 4 and ErbB-2 cooperate to promote invasion using NIH3T3 cells as a model system. We found that the expression of both alpha 6beta 4 and ErbB-2 in these cells is required to enhance their PI3K-dependent invasion through Matrigel. More importantly, expression of both alpha 6beta 4 and ErbB-2 is also required for the activation of PI3K, an observation that reinforces the importance of PI3K in invasion and has significant implications on how this lipid kinase is activated. The expression of beta 4 deletion mutants in NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cells enabled us to identify a specific region within the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain (329 amino acids) that is essential for the ability of alpha 6beta 4 to stimulate invasion. An important finding, in this context, is that neither the extracellular domain of the beta 4 subunit nor alpha 6beta 4 heterodimerization are needed for alpha 6beta 4 enhancement of invasion. Altogether, our results indicate that the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain cooperates with ErbB-2 to activate PI3K and stimulate invasion.

Our finding that the extracellular domain of the beta 4 subunit is not required for the stimulation of invasion and activation of PI3K in NIH3T3 cells is interesting in view of recent reports showing the ability of alpha 6beta 4 to promote invasion and chemotaxis, which can occur independently of alpha 6beta 4 ligation (19, 13). From these observations one can infer that the large beta 4 cytoplasmic domain can either initiate signaling events autonomously or influence the function of other receptors such as ErbB-2. This latter possibility is supported by our observation that the c-Myc/beta 4 cytoplasmic domain chimera is able to associate with ErbB-2 in the absence of the beta 4 extracellular domain. Although, the mechanisms by which the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain is able to enhance invasion and interact with ErbB-2 are not presently known, the recent findings that the beta 4 cytoplasmic is capable of self-association (37) suggest that clustering of this domain could initiate signaling events in the absence of extracellular domain ligation. The independence of the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain is also supported by the finding that this domain is sufficient for direct localization of beta 4 into adhesive sites (6).

Although the PI3K activation by alpha 6beta 4 has been shown to be relevant for invasion, the mechanism by which this or other integrins activate this lipid kinase is not known. In fact, the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain lacks the YMXM consensus motif for binding the regulatory p85 subunit of PI3K via SH2 domains. This motif is present in several growth factor receptors that activate PI3K (35, 38). It is clear from our data that both alpha 6beta 4 and ErbB-2 are required to induce activation of PI3K. Our finding that the expression of ErbB-2 alone is not sufficient to activate PI3K is in agreement with the report that ErbB-2, by itself, does not recruit PI3K but activates it only after heregulin stimulation and ErbB-2/ErbB-3 dimerization (39-41). Given the fact that heregulin was not present in our experiments, the conclusion can be drawn that the association of alpha 6beta 4 with ErbB-2 mimics the ErbB-2/ErbB-3 dimerization that is required for PI3K activation. The fact that ErbB-2 also lacks the consensus motif for p85 binding (42) suggests that the mechanism by which alpha 6beta 4 and ErbB-2 cooperate to activate PI3K involves their synergistic activation of signaling intermediates. The identification of the involvement of such signaling intermediates should increase our understanding of PI3K activation and invasion markedly.

Interestingly, expression of both alpha 6beta 4 and ErbB-2 in NIH3T3 resulted in the constitutive activation of PI3K in the absence of either alpha 6beta 4 ligation or heregulin stimulation. This result reinforces our hypothesis that alpha 6beta 4, the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain in particular, is able to initiate signaling events in the absence of receptor ligation and clustering. This hypothesis is supported by the recent finding that activation of a cAMP-dependent phosphodiesterase by alpha 6beta 4 is independent of alpha 6beta 4 ligation (13). Moreover, an increase in the constitutive activation of PI3K upon expression of alpha 6beta 4 in a breast carcinoma cell line has been observed (19). In agreement with our findings, constitutive activation of PI3K could be enhanced by antibody-mediated clustering of alpha 6beta 4 or by attachment to laminin. It is also apparent from our findings that a threshold of PI3K activation exists for the stimulation of invasion. Specifically, we observed significantly less PI3K activity upon expression of the beta 4 L and B mutants in comparison to the wild type and beta 4 C, D, and F mutants (Fig. 7), and this activity correlated with the ability of these mutants to stimulate invasion.

An important issue that had not been addressed prior to our study is the identification of a specific region of the large beta 4 cytoplasmic domain that is essential for its ability to stimulate invasion and activate PI3K. Indeed, the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain has been implicated in many cellular functions including not only invasion and PI3K activation but also hemidesmosome assembly (19, 43), dynamic interactions with F-actin (12), as well as cell proliferation (17) and apoptosis (44, 45). In addition, evidence has been presented for the binding of specific molecules to the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain including the adaptor protein Shc and the cytoskeletal-associated protein plectin or HD-1 (46, 47). To date, reasonably good evidence exists for specific sites within the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain involved in hemidesmosome assembly and plectin binding (36). However, the beta 4 domain involved in invasiveness, which we identified in our study, does not strictly correspond to the beta 4 domain able to interact with plectin in the stabilization of the hemidesmosomes.

In conclusion, we have identified a short portion of the beta 4 protein sufficient to generate invasive capacity and found that ErbB-2 oncogene and beta 4 protein cooperate to generate unexpected levels of PI3K activity, which is at least partially dependent upon signals generated from the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain. These findings are relevant not only for the comprehension of malignant phenotype in transformed cells but also for the potential development of specific drugs.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Filippo Giancotti for providing us with beta 4 deleted cDNAs, Adriana Albini for the Matrigel, and Tom Carey for the anti-beta 4 A9 antibody. We are also particularly grateful to Robin Bachelder, Kathleen O'Connor, Isaac Rabinovitz, Leslie Shaw, and Silvia Soddu for helpful discussions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 39-06-4985-2563; Fax: 39-06-4180-526; E-mail: falcioni@crs.ifo.it.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: mAb, monoclonal antibody; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid; BSA, bovine serum albumin; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Hemler, M. E. (1990) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 8, 365-400[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Sonnenberg, A. (1993) Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 184, 7-35[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Sonnenberg, A., Modderman, P. W., and Hogervorst, F. (1988) Nature 336, 487-489[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Lee, E. C., Lotz, M. M., Steele, G. D., and Mercurio, A. M. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 117, 671-678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Lotz, M. M., Corzelius, C. A., and Mercurio, A. M. (1990) Cell. Reg. 1, 249-257[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve],
6. Spinardi, L., Einheber, S., Cullen, T., Milner, T. A., and Giancotti, F. G. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 129, 473-487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Sonnenberg, A., Linders, C. J. T., Daams, J. H., and Kennel, S. J. (1990) J. Cell Sci. 96, 207-217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Kennel, S. J., Falcioni, R., and Wesley, J. W. (1991) Cancer Res. 51, 1529-1536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Quattrini, A., Previtali, S., Feltri, M. L., Canal, N., Nemni, R., and Wrabetz, L. (1996) Glia 17, 294-306[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Spinardi, L., Ren, Y. L., Sanders, R., and Giancotti, F. G. (1993) Mol. Biol. Cell 4, 871-884[Abstract]
11. Schaapveld, R. Q., Borradori, L., Geerts, D., van Leusden, M. R., Kuikman, I., Nievers, M. G., Niessen, C. M., Steenbergen, R. D., Snijders, P. J., and Sonnenberg, A. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 271-284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Rabinovitz, I., and Mercurio, A. M. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 1873-1884[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. O'Connor, K. L., Shaw, L. M., and Mercurio, A. M. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 143, 1749-1760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Suzuki, S., and Naitoh, Y. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 757-763[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Feltri, M. L., Arona, M., Scherer, S. S., and Wrabetz, L. (1997) Gene (Amst.) 186, 299-304[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Hogervorst, F., Kuikman, I., von dem Borne, A. E., and Sonnenberg, A. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 765-770[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Mainiero, F., Murgia, C., Wary, K. K., Curatola, A. M., Pepe, A., Blumemberg, M., Westwick, J. K., Der, C. J., and Giancotti, F. G. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 2365-2375[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Vivinus-Nebot, M., Ticchioni, M., Mary, F., Hofman, P., Quaranta, V., Rousselle, P., and Bernard, A. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 144, 563-574[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Shaw, L. M., Rabinovitz, I., Wang, H. F., Toker, A., and Mercurio, A. M. (1997) Cell 91, 949-960[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Chao, C., Lotz, M. M., Clarke, A. C., and Mercurio, A. M. (1996) Cancer Res. 56, 4811-4819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Falcioni, R., Sacchi, A., Resau, J., and Kennel, S. J. (1988) Cancer Res. 48, 816-821[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Kimmel, K. A., and Carey, T. E. (1986) Cancer Res. 46, 3614-3623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Bottini, C., Miotti, S., Fiorucci, S., Facheris, P., Menàrd, S., and Colnaghi, M. I. (1993) Int. J. Cancer 54, 261-267[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Serini, G., Trusolino, L., Saggiorato, E., Cremona, O., Derossi, M., Angeli, A., Orlandi, F., and Marchisio, P. C. (1996) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 88, 442-449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Tani, T., Karttunen, T., Kiviluoto, T., Kivilaakso, E., Burgeson, R. E., Sipponen, P., and Virtanen, I. (1996) Am. J. Pathol. 149, 781-793[Abstract]
26. Falcioni, R., Turci, V., Vitullo, P., Navarra, G., Ficari, F., Cavaliere, F., Sacchi, A., and Mariani-Costantini, R. (1994) Int. J. Oncol. 5, 573-578
27. Rabinovitz, I., and Mercurio, A. M. (1996) Biochem. Cell Biol. 74, 811-821[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Falcioni, R., Antonini, A., Nisticò, P., Di Stefano, S., Crescenzi, M., Natali, P. G., and Sacchi, A. (1997) Exp. Cell. Res. 236, 76-85[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Di Fiore, P. P., Pierce, J. H., Kraus, M. H., Segatto, O., King, C. R., and Aaronson, S. A. (1987) Science 237, 178-182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Kennel, S. J., Epler, R. G., Lankford, T. K., Foote, L. J., Dickas, V., Canamucio, M., Cavaliere, R., Cosimelli, M., Venturo, I., Falcioni, R., and Sacchi, A. (1990) Hybridoma 9, 243-255[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Van Vaes, C., Kozarsky, K. F., Warren, A. B., Kidd, L., Paugh, D., Liebert, M., and Carey, T. E. (1991) Cancer Res. 51, 2395-2402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Kennel, S. J., Foote, L. J., and Flynn, K. M. (1986) Cancer Res 46, 707-712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Albini, A., Iwamoto, Y., Kleinman, H. K., Martin, G. R., Aaronson, S. A., Kozlowsky, J. M., and Ewan, R. N. A (1987) Cancer Res. 47, 3239-3245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Ui, M., Okada, T., and Hazeki, O. (1995) Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 303-307[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Carraway, K. L., III, Soltoff, S. P., Diamonti, A. J., and Cantlet, L. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 13, 7111-7116
36. Hynes, N. E., and Stern, D. F. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1198, 165-184[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Gunther, A. R., de Pereda, J. M., Reipert, S., and Wiche, G. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 141, 290-225
38. Hu, P., Margolis, B., Skolnik, E. Y., Lammers, R., Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 981-990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Tan, M., Grijalva, R., and Yu, D. (1999) Cancer Res. 59, 1620-1625[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Alimandi, M., Romano, A., Curia, M. C., Muraro, R., Fedi, P., Aaronson, S. A., Di Fiore, P. P., and Kraus, M. H. (1995) Oncogene 10, 1813-1821[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Ram, T. G., and Ethier, S. P. (1996) Cell Growth Differ. 7, 551-561[Abstract]
42. Bargmann, C. I., Hung, M. C., and Weinberg, R. A. (1986) Nature 319, 226-230[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Schaapveld, R. Q. J., Borradori, L., Geerts, D., van Leusden, M. R., Kuikman, I., Nierves, M. G., Niessen, C. M., Steenbergen, R. D. M., Snijders, P. J. F., and Sonnenberg, A. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 271-284
44. Clarke, A. S., Lotz, M. M., Chao, C., and Mercurio, A. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22673-22676[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Bachelder, R. E., Marchetti, A., Falcioni, R., Soddu, S., and Mercurio, A. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20733-20737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Mainiero, F., Pepe, A., Yeon, M., Ren, Y., and Giancotti, F. G. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 134, 241-253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Niessen, C. M., Hulsman, E. H. M., Oomen, L. C. J., Kuikman, I., and Sonnenberg, A (1997) J. Cell Sci. 110, 1705-1716[Abstract]


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
G. Bon, S. E. Di Carlo, V. Folgiero, P. Avetrani, C. Lazzari, G. D'Orazi, M. F. Brizzi, A. Sacchi, S. Soddu, G. Blandino, et al.
Negative Regulation of {beta}4 Integrin Transcription by Homeodomain-Interacting Protein Kinase 2 and p53 Impairs Tumor Progression
Cancer Res., July 15, 2009; 69(14): 5978 - 5986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
V. Bhatia, R. V. Mula, N. L. Weigel, and M. Falzon
Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein Regulates Cell Survival Pathways via Integrin {alpha}6{beta}4-Mediated Activation of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Signaling
Mol. Cancer Res., July 1, 2009; 7(7): 1119 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Z. Gilcrease, S. K. Kilpatrick, W. A. Woodward, X. Zhou, M. M. Nicolas, L. J. Corley, G. N. Fuller, S. L. Tucker, L. K. Diaz, T. A. Buchholz, et al.
Coexpression of {alpha}6{beta}4 Integrin and Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Net1 Identifies Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients at High Risk for Distant Metastasis
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2009; 18(1): 80 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
U. Dutta and L. M. Shaw
A Key Tyrosine (Y1494) in the {beta}4 Integrin Regulates Multiple Signaling Pathways Important for Tumor Development and Progression
Cancer Res., November 1, 2008; 68(21): 8779 - 8787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Lu, K. Simin, A. Khan, and A. M. Mercurio
Analysis of Integrin {beta}4 Expression in Human Breast Cancer: Association with Basal-like Tumors and Prognostic Significance
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2008; 14(4): 1050 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. D. Merdek, X. Yang, C. A. Taglienti, L. M. Shaw, and A. M. Mercurio
Intrinsic Signaling Functions of the beta4 Integrin Intracellular Domain
J. Biol. Chem., October 12, 2007; 282(41): 30322 - 30330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Dentelli, A. Rosso, A. Zeoli, R. Gambino, L. Pegoraro, G. Pagano, R. Falcioni, and M. F. Brizzi
Oxidative Stress-mediated Mesangial Cell Proliferation Requires RAC-1/Reactive Oxygen Species Production and beta4 Integrin Expression
J. Biol. Chem., September 7, 2007; 282(36): 26101 - 26110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
V. Folgiero, R. E. Bachelder, G. Bon, A. Sacchi, R. Falcioni, and A. M. Mercurio
The {alpha}6{beta}4 Integrin Can Regulate ErbB-3 Expression: Implications for {alpha}6{beta}4 Signaling and Function
Cancer Res., February 15, 2007; 67(4): 1645 - 1652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T.-H. Lee, S. Seng, H. Li, S. J. Kennel, H. K. Avraham, and S. Avraham
Integrin Regulation by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells: ROLE OF {alpha}6beta1 INTEGRIN IN ANGIOGENESIS
J. Biol. Chem., December 29, 2006; 281(52): 40450 - 40460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
A. Bertotti, P. M. Comoglio, and L. Trusolino
{beta}4 integrin activates a Shp2-Src signaling pathway that sustains HGF-induced anchorage-independent growth
J. Cell Biol., December 18, 2006; 175(6): 993 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
C. E. Pullar, B. S. Baier, Y. Kariya, A. J. Russell, B. A.J. Horst, M. P. Marinkovich, and R. R. Isseroff
beta4 Integrin and Epidermal Growth Factor Coordinately Regulate Electric Field-mediated Directional Migration via Rac1
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2006; 17(11): 4925 - 4935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. Bon, V. Folgiero, G. Bossi, L. Felicioni, A. Marchetti, A. Sacchi, and R. Falcioni
Loss of {beta}4 Integrin Subunit Reduces the Tumorigenicity of MCF7 Mammary Cells and Causes Apoptosis upon Hormone Deprivation.
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 12(11): 3280 - 3287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
K. Wilhelmsen, S. H.M. Litjens, and A. Sonnenberg
Multiple Functions of the Integrin {alpha}6{beta}4 in Epidermal Homeostasis and Tumorigenesis
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2006; 26(8): 2877 - 2886.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S.-O. Yoon, S. Shin, and E. A. Lipscomb
A Novel Mechanism for Integrin-Mediated Ras Activation in Breast Carcinoma Cells: The {alpha}6{beta}4 Integrin Regulates ErbB2 Translation and Transactivates Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor/ErbB2 Signaling.
Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 66(5): 2732 - 2739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Fukumoto, J. H. Miner, H. Ida, E. Fukumoto, K. Yuasa, H. Miyazaki, M. P. Hoffman, and Y. Yamada
Laminin {alpha}5 Is Required for Dental Epithelium Growth and Polarity and the Development of Tooth Bud and Shape
J. Biol. Chem., February 24, 2006; 281(8): 5008 - 5016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
M. E. Loewen and G. W. Forsyth
Structure and Function of CLCA Proteins
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2005; 85(3): 1061 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
K. Raymond, M. Kreft, H. Janssen, J. Calafat, and A. Sonnenberg
Keratinocytes display normal proliferation, survival and differentiation in conditional {beta}4-integrin knockout mice
J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2005; 118(5): 1045 - 1060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
X. Yang, O. V. Kovalenko, W. Tang, C. Claas, C. S. Stipp, and M. E. Hemler
Palmitoylation supports assembly and function of integrin-tetraspanin complexes
J. Cell Biol., December 20, 2004; 167(6): 1231 - 1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
K.-P. Xu, A. Riggs, Y. Ding, and F.-S. X. Yu
Role of ErbB2 in Corneal Epithelial Wound Healing
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2004; 45(12): 4277 - 4283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Chung, S.-O. Yoon, E. A. Lipscomb, and A. M. Mercurio
The Met Receptor and {alpha}6{beta}4 Integrin Can Function Independently to Promote Carcinoma Invasion
J. Biol. Chem., July 30, 2004; 279(31): 32287 - 32293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
L. K. Diaz, X. Zhou, K. Welch, A. Sahin, and M. Z. Gilcrease
Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for {alpha}6{beta}4 Integrin in Breast Cancer: Correlation with Protein Expression
J. Mol. Diagn., February 1, 2004; 6(1): 10 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Abdel-Ghany, H.-C. Cheng, R. C. Elble, H. Lin, J. DiBiasio, and B. U. Pauli
The Interacting Binding Domains of the {beta}4 Integrin and Calcium-activated Chloride Channels (CLCAs) in Metastasis
J. Biol. Chem., December 5, 2003; 278(49): 49406 - 49416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. Herlevsen, D.-S. Schmidt, K. Miyazaki, and M. Zoller
The association of the tetraspanin D6.1A with the {alpha}6{beta}4 integrin supports cell motility and liver metastasis formation
J. Cell Sci., November 1, 2003; 116(21): 4373 - 4390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
T. S. Hiran, J. E. Mazurkiewicz, P. Kreienberg, F. L. Rice, and S. E. LaFlamme
Endothelial expression of the {alpha}6{beta}4 integrin is negatively regulated during angiogenesis
J. Cell Sci., September 15, 2003; 116(18): 3771 - 3781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
A. J. Russell, E. F. Fincher, L. Millman, R. Smith, V. Vela, E. A. Waterman, C. N. Dey, S. Guide, V. M. Weaver, and M. P. Marinkovich
{alpha}6{beta}4 integrin regulates keratinocyte chemotaxis through differential GTPase activation and antagonism of {alpha}3{beta}1 integrin
J. Cell Sci., September 1, 2003; 116(17): 3543 - 3556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
D. SHEPPARD
Functions of Pulmonary Epithelial Integrins: From Development to Disease
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2003; 83(3): 673 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. A. Ritch, S. L. Carroll, and H. Sontheimer
Neuregulin-1 Enhances Motility and Migration of Human Astrocytic Glioma Cells
J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2003; 278(23): 20971 - 20978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
T. Miralem and H. K. Avraham
Extracellular Matrix Enhances Heregulin-Dependent BRCA1 Phosphorylation and Suppresses BRCA1 Expression through Its C Terminus
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2003; 23(2): 579 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. Hernan, R. Fasheh, C. Calabrese, A. J. Frank, K. H. Maclean, D. Allard, R. Barraclough, and R. J. Gilbertson
ERBB2 Up-Regulates S100A4 and Several other Prometastatic Genes in Medulloblastoma
Cancer Res., January 1, 2003; 63(1): 140 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
C. A. W. Geuijen and A. Sonnenberg
Dynamics of the alpha 6beta 4 Integrin in Keratinocytes
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2002; 13(11): 3845 - 3858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Abdel-Ghany, H.-C. Cheng, R. C. Elble, and B. U. Pauli
Focal Adhesion Kinase Activated by beta 4 Integrin Ligation to mCLCA1 Mediates Early Metastatic Growth
J. Biol. Chem., September 6, 2002; 277(37): 34391 - 34400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
J. Chung, R. E. Bachelder, E. A. Lipscomb, L. M. Shaw, and A. M. Mercurio
Integrin ({alpha}6{beta}4) regulation of eIF-4E activity and VEGF translation: a survival mechanism for carcinoma cells
J. Cell Biol., July 8, 2002; 158(1): 165 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. Morena, S. Riccioni, A. Marchetti, A. T. Polcini, A. M. Mercurio, G. Blandino, A. Sacchi, and R. Falcioni
Expression of the beta 4 integrin subunit induces monocytic differentiation of 32D/v-Abl cells
Blood, June 17, 2002; 100(1): 96 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. G. Christensen, R. E. Schreck, E. Chan, X. Wang, C. Yang, L. Liu, J. Cui, L. Sun, J. Wei, J. M. Cherrington, et al.
High Levels of HER-2 Expression Alter the Ability of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Family Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors to Inhibit EGFR Phosphorylation in Vivo
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2001; 7(12): 4230 - 4238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
E. Hintermann, M. Bilban, A. Sharabi, and V. Quaranta
Inhibitory Role of {alpha}6{beta}4-associated erbB-2 and Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase in Keratinocyte Haptotactic Migration Dependent on {alpha}3{beta}1 Integrin
J. Cell Biol., April 24, 2001; 153(3): 465 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
G. Zanazzi, S. Einheber, R. Westreich, M.-J. Hannocks, D. Bedell-Hogan, M. A. Marchionni, and J. L. Salzer
Glial Growth Factor/Neuregulin Inhibits Schwann Cell Myelination and Induces Demyelination
J. Cell Biol., March 19, 2001; 152(6): 1289 - 1300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. F. Thorne, J. F. Marshall, D. R. Shafren, P. G. Gibson, I. R. Hart, and G. F. Burns
The Integrins alpha 3beta 1 and alpha 6beta 1 Physically and Functionally Associate with CD36 in Human Melanoma Cells. REQUIREMENT FOR THE EXTRACELLULAR DOMAIN OF CD36
J. Biol. Chem., November 3, 2000; 275(45): 35264 - 35275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Favre, L. Fontao, J. Koster, R. Shafaatian, F. Jaunin, J.-H. Saurat, A. Sonnenberg, and L. Borradori
The Hemidesmosomal Protein Bullous Pemphigoid Antigen 1 and the Integrin beta 4 Subunit Bind to ERBIN. MOLECULAR CLONING OF MULTIPLE ALTERNATIVE SPLICE VARIANTS OF ERBIN AND ANALYSIS OF THEIR TISSUE EXPRESSION
J. Biol. Chem., August 24, 2001; 276(35): 32427 - 32436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Abdel-Ghany, H.-C. Cheng, R. C. Elble, and B. U. Pauli
The Breast Cancer beta 4 Integrin and Endothelial Human CLCA2 Mediate Lung Metastasis
J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2001; 276(27): 25438 - 25446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gambaletta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Falcioni, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gambaletta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Falcioni, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement