Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hocking, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Langenbach, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hocking, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Langenbach, K. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 14, 10673-10682, April 7, 2000


Stimulation of Integrin-mediated Cell Contractility by Fibronectin Polymerization*

Denise C. HockingDagger §, Jane Sottile, and Kurt J. Langenbach||

From the Dagger  Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642 and the  Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York 12208

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Ligation of integrins with extracellular matrix molecules induces the clustering of actin and actin-binding proteins to focal adhesions, which serves to mechanically couple the matrix with the cytoskeleton. During wound healing and development, matrix deposition and remodeling may impart additional tensile forces that modulate integrin-mediated cell functions, including cell migration and proliferation. We have utilized the ability of cells to contract floating collagen gels to determine the effect of fibronectin polymerization on mechanical tension generation by cells. Our data indicate that fibronectin polymerization promotes cell spreading in collagen gels and stimulates cell contractility by a Rho-dependent mechanism. Fibronectin-stimulated contractility was dependent on integrin ligation; however, integrin ligation by fibronectin fragments was not sufficient to induce either tension generation or cell spreading. Furthermore, treatment of cells with polyvalent RGD peptides or pre-polymerized fibronectin did not stimulate cell contractility. Fibronectin-induced contractility was blocked by agents that inhibit fibronectin polymerization, suggesting that the process of fibronectin polymerization is critical in triggering cytoskeletal tension generation. These data indicate that Rho-mediated cell contractility is regulated by the process of fibronectin polymerization and suggest a novel mechanism by which extracellular matrix fibronectin regulates cytoskeletal organization and cell function.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Fibronectin is a high molecular mass, multidomain glycoprotein that circulates in a soluble form in the plasma and is also found in an insoluble, multimeric form within the extracellular matrix (1). The polymerization of soluble fibronectin into insoluble fibrils within the extracellular matrix is a dynamic, cell-dependent process that is mediated by a series of events involving the actin cytoskeleton and integrin receptors (2). The adhesion of cells to fibronectin via integrin receptors has been shown to be important in the regulation and coordination of such complex processes as cell growth, differentiation, and migration (1). Ligation of integrins with extracellular matrix molecules, including fibronectin, induces the clustering of actin and actin-binding proteins to focal adhesions, which serves to mechanically couple the extracellular matrix with the actin cytoskeleton (3). Recent studies suggest that the interaction of cells with the extracellular matrix form of fibronectin triggers changes in cell cycle progression (4-7), cell migration (8), and actin filament organization (6, 9) that are distinct from those generated by the interaction of cells with nonpolymerized fibronectin. The mechanism by which the matrix form of fibronectin gives rise to cellular phenotypes distinct from protomeric fibronectin is unknown.

Studies aimed at understanding the effect of extracellular matrix on cell function indicate that cells respond to fibronectin-coated beads with a local reinforcement of cytoskeletal links that are proportional to the strength of the force on the integrin (10). Similarly, cytoskeletal stiffness has been shown to increase in proportion to the stress applied to integrin receptors (11). Other studies suggest that cell spreading and migration (12) as well as cytoskeletal assembly (13) are regulated by the mechanical stiffness of the adhesive substrate. Taken together, these data suggest a model in which extracellular matrix fibronectin modulates cell function through local alterations in cytoskeletal organization that are mediated in part by changes in the rigidity of the insoluble fibronectin matrix. The cell-mediated polymerization of soluble fibronectin into an insoluble extracellular matrix is a tightly controlled process that can be rapidly up- or down-regulated (14-17). As such, the process of polymerizing an insoluble fibronectin matrix may serve as a distinct control mechanism by which the organization of the actin cytoskeleton remains tightly coupled to the organization of the extracellular environment.

The present study was undertaken to determine whether the polymerization of fibronectin into an insoluble extracellular matrix specifically influences the organization of the actin cytoskeleton by strengthening the linkage between the integrin and the cytoskeleton. Tension generation due to increases in cytoskeletal contractility may be determined directly by imbedding cells into three-dimensional, floating collagen gels and measuring the degree of gel contraction over time (18). In this well-characterized model of wound contraction, cells anchored in the collagen matrix organize and contract collagen fibrils (19-21) by an integrin-dependent mechanism (22-24). To determine the role of fibronectin deposition on actin organization and mechanical tension generation, fibronectin-null cells were imbedded into floating, native type I collagen matrices and the ability of fibronectin polymerization to stimulate cell spreading and integrin-mediated collagen gel contraction was assessed. Our data indicate that fibronectin polymerization stimulates cell spreading within collagen matrices and triggers a significant increase in cytoskeletal contractility. The increase in contractility induced by fibronectin was dependent on integrin ligation; however, integrin-binding fragments of fibronectin were not sufficient to induce either tension generation or cell spreading. Fibronectin-induced contractility was inhibited by agents that inhibit fibronectin polymerization, suggesting that the process of fibronectin polymerization is critical in triggering cytoskeletal tension generation. In addition, fibronectin-induced contractility was inhibited by pretreatment of cells with C3 exotransferase, suggesting a role for RhoA in the contractile response of cells to fibronectin polymerization. Taken together, these data suggest that the polymerization of a fibronectin matrix triggers integrin-mediated cytoskeletal reorganization and enhanced cell contractility through a mechanism involving the activation of RhoA.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Reagents-- Gel electrophoresis supplies were from Bio-Rad. Lipofectin, GRGDSP, and GRGESP peptides were obtained from Life Technologies Inc. Laminin (purified from Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm tumors) and type I rat tail collagen were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). Vitronectin was purified from fibronectin- and fibrinogen-depleted human plasma as described previously (25). Pertussis toxin was obtained from Calbiochem. C3 exoenzyme was obtained from List Biological Laboratories (Campbell, CA). Unless otherwise indicated, chemical reagents were obtained from Sigma.

Cell Culture-- Mouse embryo cells, derived from fibronectin-null embryos and adapted to grow under serum-free conditions (4), were cultured on collagen-coated dishes in a 1:1 mixture of Cellgro (Mediatech, Herndon, VA) and Aim V (Life Technologies). These media do not require serum supplementation. Thus, the fibronectin-null cells were cultured under conditions where no exogenous source of fibronectin or other extracellular matrix protein is present.

Purification of Fibronectin and Fibronectin Fragments-- Human plasma fibronectin was isolated from Cohn's fraction I and II (a gift of Dr. Kenneth Ingham, American Red Cross, Rockville, MD) essentially as described previously (26). Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the various fibronectin fragments used in this study. The 70-kDa amino-terminal fragment of fibronectin was generated by limited digestion with cathepsin D, followed by gelatin affinity chromatography, as described previously (27). To cleave the 70-kDa fragment into the 27-kDa heparin-binding and 40-kDa gelatin-binding fragments, the 70-kDa fragment was digested with trypsin, as described (28). The 40-kDa gelatin-binding fragment was isolated from the 27-kDa fragment by retention on gelatin affinity columns (28). The 60-kDa gelatin-binding fragment was prepared by limited digestion of fibronectin with human leukocyte elastase and purified by retention on gelatin-Sepharose followed by anion exchange on DEAE-Sephacel (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), as described (29). The 120-kDa cell-binding fragment was prepared by digestion of fibronectin with chymotrypsin and was isolated from the unbound fractions of sequential gelatin- and heparin-Sepharose affinity columns, as described (30). The 160/180-kDa cell- and gelatin-binding fragments were generated by limited digestion with trypsin and isolated by retention on gelatin-Sepharose, as described (27). Purity of fragments was assessed by SDS-PAGE1 and fragments were frozen at -80 °C until use.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Fibronectin fragments. Schematic representation of the fibronectin molecule illustrating relative positions of proteolytically derived fibronectin fragments. Shown are the 27-kDa (cathepsin-trypsin: amino-terminal), 40-kDa (cathepsin-trypsin: gelatin-binding), 60-kDa (elastase: gelatin-binding), 70-kDa (cathepsin: amino-terminal), 120-kDa (chymotrypsin: cell-binding), and 160/180-kDa (trypsin: gelatin- and cell-binding) fragments. Rectangles, type I modules; ovals, type II modules; squares, type III modules; stippled square, III-10.

Preparation of Recombinant Fibronectins-- A fragment from the first type III repeat of fibronectin, III-1C, was produced as a recombinant fusion protein containing six histidine residues at the carboxyl terminus, as described previously (8). Briefly, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (31) was used to amplify human fibronectin cDNA (a gift of Dr. Jean Thiery, Institut Curie, Paris, France) encoding amino acids 600-674. Amino acids were numbered from the amino-terminal pyroglutamic acid (32). The primers used for amplification have been described previously (8). The PCR product was cloned into the bacterial expression vector, pQE-12 (Qiagen, Santa Clarita, CA). PCR-amplified DNA was sequenced to ensure that no base changes had been introduced during amplification. III-1C was expressed in M15 bacteria and purified on Ni-NTA resin (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Full length rat fibronectin cDNA and a 3' cDNA clone in which the coding sequence for the RGD site was deleted (33) were generous gifts of Dr. Jean Schwarzbauer (Princeton University, Princeton, NJ). Full length fibronectin cDNA lacking the coding sequence for the RGD site was generated by ligating an RsrII-XbaI fragment from the Delta RGD fibronectin with wild type fibronectin cDNA from which the corresponding RsrII-XbaI fragment was removed. The resulting cDNA encodes for full length fibronectin lacking the RGD site. Recombinant wild type and Delta RGD fibronectin were expressed in insect cells using a baculovirus expression system essentially as described (34). Insect cells were infected with recombinant viruses, and conditioned medium was collected 44 h after infection. Insect cells do not produce detectable fibronectin and were maintained in defined media (SF-900-II, Life Technologies) lacking serum supplementation. Thus, recombinant fibronectins were produced under conditions where no nonrecombinant source of fibronectin was present. Purity of III1-C and recombinant fibronectins was assessed by SDS-PAGE, and aliquots were stored at -80 °C before use.

Antibodies-- 9D2 hybridoma cells were a gift from Dr. Deane Mosher (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI). The epitope recognized by 9D2 is found within the III-1 module of fibronectin (35). Ascites was generated by TSD Bioservices (Newark, DE). Immunoglobulins (IgGs) and Fab' fragments were purified as described previously (36). Nonimmune mouse F(ab')2 fragments (Cappel, Durham, NC) were similarly reduced, alkylated, and dialyzed against PBS to produce Fab' fragments. Purity was assessed by SDS-PAGE and aliquots were stored at -80 °C prior to use.

Anti-integrin beta 1 (Ha2/5), alpha 1 (Ha31/8), alpha 2 (Hma2), alpha 5 (5H10-27), and alpha v (H9.2B8) subunit antibodies were obtained from Pharmingen (San Diego, CA). Antibodies directed against the gelatin-binding domain (IST-10) and III-5 module (IST-5) of fibronectin were obtained from Chemicon International (Temecula, CA). The anti-fibronectin polycolonal antibody was purchased from Sigma. Purified hamster IgM, hamster IgG, and rat IgG2a were purchased from Pharmingen.

Collagen Gel Contraction Assays-- Fibronectin-null cells were harvested from monolayer culture by treatment with 0.08% trypsin (Life Technologies) and 0.5 mM EDTA. Trypsin activity was neutralized with an equal volume of 10 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor. Cells were washed one time with 1 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor in PBS and then resuspended in a 1:1 mixture of Cellgro/AimV.

Native type I collagen gels were prepared by mixing collagen, 0.1 N NaOH, 2× concentrated Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Life Technologies) and 1× DMEM on ice such that the final mixture contained 0.8 mg/ml collagen and 1× DMEM (37). Fibronectin-null cells were added to the neutralized type I collagen solutions at 2 × 105 cell/ml. Control wells (no cells) received an equal volume of media alone. Fibronectin and fragments were added to the collagen solutions prior to the addition of cells. To form prepolymerized fibronectin, 20 nM soluble fibronectin was incubated for 30 min at 20 °C with 62.5 µM III-1C (8) prior to its addition to the collagen solution. Control cells were incubated with either 20 nM fibronectin or 62.5 µM III-1C incubated under identical conditions. In some experiments, aliquots of cells were incubated with anti-integrin antibodies for 30 min prior to their addition to the collagen solution. To form floating gels, aliquots (0.1 ml/well) of the collagen/cell mixtures were added to wells of 96-well tissue culture plates (Corning/Costar, Corning, NY) precoated with 2% BSA. The collagen/cell mixtures were allowed to polymerize for 1 h at 37 °C in 8% CO2. Following this incubation,100 µl of Cellgro/Aim V was added to wells and the edges of the wells were scored to ensure that the gels were not attached to the wells. In experiments not shown, DMEM was substituted for Cellgro/AimV and similar levels of contraction were observed.

To determine the extent of contraction, gels were incubated for various periods of time at 37 °C in 8% CO2 and then removed from the wells and weighed. Collagen gel contraction was measured as a decrease in gel weight, using a Mettler AE260 balance with a sensitivity of 0.1 mg (37, 38). Data are reported as a percentage of the weight of polymerized gels not containing cells (original gel weight); the weight of polymerized collagen gels without cells was typically 50 mg. Each datum point was calculated as the mean ± S.E. of quadruplicate samples. All experiments were performed at least two or more times. Statistical comparison between experimental conditions was performed using the Student's t test for unpaired samples. Differences described as significant in the text are p < 0.01, unless otherwise indicated.

Fibronectin polymerization by fibronectin-null cells was determined by imbedding cells in collagen gels in the presence of 40 nM fibronectin, in the absence and presence of 50 µg/ml 9D2 IgG (35) or nonimmune mouse IgG. Following a 24-h incubation, gels were removed from the wells and added directly to 2× SDS-PAGE gel buffer (final concentration: 4% SDS and 20% glycerol in 0.05 M Tris, pH 6.8). Some samples were reduced with 2% beta -mercaptoethanol. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting, as described previously (39).

Pertussis Toxin and C3 Exotransferase Pretreatment-- To pretreat cells with pertussis toxin, monolayer cultures of fibronectin-null cells were washed 2× with DMEM and incubated overnight with 25 ng/ml pertussis toxin diluted in DMEM (40). Control cells were incubated with DMEM alone. Cells were then harvested as indicated above. To pretreat cells with C3 exotransferase, Lipofectin was used as a delivery vehicle (40, 41). C3 exotransferase and Lipofectin were diluted in DMEM, incubated for 1 h at 20 °C, and then diluted with additional DMEM to give a final concentration of 2 µg/ml C3 exotransferase and 10 µg/ml Lipofectin. Fibronectin-null cells that had grown to 70% confluence in a monolayer were washed 2× with DMEM and incubated overnight at 37 °C with either C3 exotransferase/Lipofectin, Lipofectin alone, or DMEM. Following this incubation, the media was removed and cells were incubated an additional 1 h with Cellgro/AimV. Cells were then harvested as indicated above.

Immunofluorescence Microscopy-- Fibronectin-null cells imbedded in collagen gels were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in Small's cytoskeletal buffer (42) for 1 h at 20 °C, rinsed several times with Small's buffer, and then permeabilized for 5 min at -20 °C with ice-cold acetone. Gels were washed 3× with Small's buffer, blocked with 10 mg/ml glycine and 1% BSA, and then stained for actin using FITC-phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Gels were mounted in o-phenylenediamine, examined using an Olympus BX60 microscope equipped with epifluorescence, and photographed using a digital camera (Spot, Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Fibronectin Induces Contraction of Floating Type I Collagen Gels-- To determine the effect of fibronectin on cytoskeletal tension generation, fibronectin-null cells were imbedded in floating collagen matrices in the absence and presence of increasing concentrations of intact fibronectin. Most adherent cells, including fibroblasts and endothelial cells, continually produce an extensive endogenous fibronectin matrix. Fibronectin-null cells do not produce any detectable fibronectin but are capable of assembling a fibronectin matrix when cultured in the presence of exogenously added fibronectin (4). Thus, in this system, the levels of extracellular matrix fibronectin can be precisely manipulated in order to determine the exact role of fibronectin polymerization on cytoskeletal organization. In the absence of fibronectin, fibronectin-null cells imbedded in collagen gels retained approximately 75-50% of the original gel weight. This corresponds to basal levels of contraction of between 25-50% (Figs. 2-4 and 6-11). Coincubation of fibronectin-null cells with plasma fibronectin triggered a further, dose-dependent decrease in gel weight (Fig. 2A); the addition of 80 nM of fibronectin (40 µg/ml) to collagen-imbedded cells resulted in an 83.9 ± 1.6% decrease in gel weight (Fig. 2A). The decrease in gel weight that occurs as a result of fluid extrusion has previously been shown to parallel the extent of collagen gel contraction (37, 38). Similar results were also obtained by measuring the diameter of contracted gels (data not shown). A similar, significant decrease in collagen gel weight was also observed following addition of fibronectin to human embryonic dermal fibroblasts (data not shown). These data indicate that the interaction of cells with fibronectin stimulates cell contraction.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effect of fibronectin on collagen gel contraction. Fibronectin-null cells (2 × 105 cell/ml) were mixed with neutralized type I collagen (0.8 mg/ml) on ice in the absence and presence of increasing concentrations of fibronectin (A) or a 40-nM concentration of either fibronectin (Fn), vitronectin (Vn), or laminin (Ln) or an equal volume of PBS (B). Cell/collagen mixtures were added to BSA-coated tissue culture wells and allowed to polymerize at 37 °C for 1 h after which time serum-free media was added. Gels were incubated an additional 20 h at 37 °C and then weighed. Data are presented as a percentage of the weight of gels not containing cells ± S.E.

To determine whether this stimulation of cell contractility is a property specific to fibronectin, the effect of other extracellular matrix molecules on cell-mediated collagen gel contraction was assessed. As demonstrated in Fig. 2B, coincubation of cells with equal molar concentrations of either vitronectin or laminin had no effect on collagen gel weight. These data suggest that stimulation of cell contractility is not a general property of extracellular matrix molecules.

Time Course of Fibronectin-induced Contraction-- Previous studies indicate that treatment of fibroblasts with either lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) or platelet-derived growth factor results in a steady increase in the contraction of floating collagen gels when measured over a period of 4 h (40). Others studies have demonstrated that cells imbedded in attached collagen gels undergo a rapid contraction within the first 10 min of release followed by a slower contraction that continues for 3-4 days (13). To determine the rate at which fibronectin stimulates collagen gel contraction, fibronectin-null cells were imbedded in collagen gels in the absence and presence of 40 nM plasma-derived or recombinant fibronectin. As demonstrated in Fig. 3, differences in collagen gel weight between the control and fibronectin-treated cells became apparent between 4 and 6 h after initial gel polymerization. Fibronectin-stimulated contraction continued to increase over a 20-h period (Fig. 3). In addition, plasma-derived or recombinant fibronectin stimulated contraction at similar rates (Fig. 3). Recombinant fibronectin was produced in insect cells grown in the absence of serum and, therefore, provides evidence that the fibronectin-induced collagen gel contraction is not due to the contamination of plasma-derived fibronectin with growth factors.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Time course of fibronectin-induced collagen gel contraction. Fibronectin-null cells were imbedded into collagen gels as indicated in the legend to Fig. 2, in the absence (-Fn, ) or presence of 40 nM plasma-derived (+pFn, ) or recombinant (+rFn, open circle ) fibronectin. Gels were allowed to polymerize at 37 °C for 1 h after which time serum-free media was added to the wells. At various times, separate gels were removed and weighed. Data are presented as a percentage of the weight of gels not containing cells ± S.E.

Effect of Fibronectin Fragments on Collagen Gel Contraction-- Fibronectin contains multiple binding sites, including those for sulfated glycosaminoglycans, collagen or gelatin, fibrin, cell surface integrin receptors, and fibronectin matrix assembly receptors (1). Ligation of integrin receptors by fragments of fibronectin has been shown to cause changes in both actin cytoskeleton organization and intracellular signaling (3, 43-45). Additional studies indicate that the interaction of cells with the carboxyl-terminal heparin-binding domain of fibronectin in conjunction with integrin receptor ligation enhances actin stress fiber formation (46, 47). To determine whether the contraction-promoting effect of fibronectin could be localized to either integrin- and/or heparin-binding regions of fibronectin, fibronectin-null cells were imbedded in collagen gels in the presence of various proteolytic fragments of fibronectin. The extent of collagen gel contraction in the presence of 40 nM intact fibronectin was compared with that observed when cells were incubated with equal molar concentrations of any of the 27-kDa (matrix assembly, heparin-binding), 40-kDa (gelatin-binding), 60-kDa (gelatin-binding), 70-kDa (matrix assembly, gelatin-binding),120-kDa (integrin-binding), or 160/180-kDa (integrin- and heparin-binding) fibronectin fragments (see Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 4, incubation of collagen-imbedded fibronectin-null cells with fibronectin fragments had no effect on collagen gel contraction. Moreover, simultaneous incubation of cells with two fibronectin fragments that together encompass the entire fibronectin molecule (160/180- and 27-kDa fragments) did not stimulate collagen gel contraction. These data suggest that the interaction of cells with either integrin- and/or heparin-binding fragments of fibronectin is not sufficient to stimulate contractility of cells imbedded in collagen matrices.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effect of fibronectin fragments on collagen gel contraction. Fibronectin-null cells were imbedded into collagen gels as indicated in the legend to Fig. 2. At the time of seeding, a 40-nM concentration of either intact fibronectin (+Fn) or various fibronectin fragments encompassing the entire fibronectin molecule were added to the collagen/cell mixture. Collagen gels were cast and processed as indicated in the legend to Fig. 2. Data are presented as a percentage of the weight of gels not containing cells ± S.E.

Fibronectin Polymerization Is Required for Fibronectin-mediated Contraction-- Upon binding to cells, fibronectin accumulates as high molecular mass multimers that do not penetrate the stacking gel when analyzed by SDS-PAGE. These multimers, which are thought to represent fibronectin in the extracellular matrix, can be dissociated to monomeric fibronectin with reducing agents (48). In addition, previous studies have demonstrated that polymerization of a fibronectin matrix by fibroblast (35) or fibronectin-null cell (4) monolayers is inhibited by the addition of the anti-fibronectin III-1 monoclonal antibody, 9D2. To characterize the ability of fibronectin-null cells to polymerize fibronectin within a collagen lattice, fibronectin-null cells were imbedded in floating collagen gels in the presence of 40 nM fibronectin, in the absence and presence of either 50 µg/ml 9D2 IgG or nonimmune mouse IgG. Following a 24-h incubation, the collagen gels were solubilized with gel buffer and analyzed by immunoblotting using a polyclonal anti-fibronectin antibody. As demonstrated in Fig. 5, addition of fibronectin to cells imbedded in collagen gels results in the formation of high molecular mass aggregates that do not penetrate the stacking gel. In the presence of a reducing agent, no high molecular mass aggregates were detected (Fig. 5). Furthermore, addition of the 9D2 mAb to fibronectin-treated cells inhibited the formation of these high molecular mass fibronectin aggregates. In contrast, addition of an equal concentration of nonimmune IgG to fibronectin-treated cells had no effect on fibronectin multimer formation (Fig. 5). These data indicate that fibronectin-null cells imbedded within a collagen lattice can polymerize fibronectin into high molecular mass multimers by a process that can be inhibited by the anti-fibronectin antibody, 9D2.


View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Fibronectin polymerization by collagen-imbedded cells. Fibronectin-null cells were imbedded into collagen gels as indicated in the legend to Fig. 2, in the presence of 40 nM intact fibronectin. At the time of seeding, cells were either left untreated (A) or incubated with 50 µg/ml 9D2 mAb (B) or nonimmune mouse IgG (C). Fibronectin was visualized by SDS-PAGE under nonreducing and reducing conditions followed by immunoblotting with a polyclonal anti-fibronectin antibody. The fibronectin starting material (SM) is shown. The positions of multimeric (HMW), dimeric (D), and monomeric (M) fibronectin are indicated.

The fibronectin fragments assayed for their ability to increase cell contractility (Fig. 4) contain binding sites for cell surface receptors (32, 49) but do not become incorporated into the high molecular mass multimers typically observed in the extracellular matrix (27). To determine whether the ability of fibronectin to stimulate cell contractility depends on its incorporation into insoluble fibrils, the effect of inhibitors of fibronectin polymerization on fibronectin-induced collagen gel contraction was assessed. Fibronectin-null cells were imbedded in collagen gels in the presence of 40 nM fibronectin, and in the absence and presence of either 9D2 Fab' fragments (Fig. 6A) or 70-kDa amino-terminal fibronectin fragments (27, 50) (Fig. 6B). Addition of either 9D2 Fab' fragments (Fig. 6A) or 70-kDa fibronectin fragments (Fig. 6B) to collagen-imbedded fibronectin-null cells resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of fibronectin-mediated collagen gel contraction. In contrast, addition of either nonimmune mouse Fab' (Fig. 6A) or the nonblocking 40-kDa fibronectin fragment (Fig. 6B) had no effect on the fibronectin-induced decrease in collagen gel weight. Taken together, these data suggest that fibronectin polymerization is essential for the development of fibronectin-mediated contraction.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Role of fibronectin polymerization in collagen gel contraction. Fibronectin-null cells were imbedded into collagen gels as indicated in the legend to Fig. 2, in the absence or presence of 40 nM intact fibronectin (Fn). In A, increasing concentrations of the anti-FnIII-1 antibody, 9D2, or 25 µg/ml nonimmune Fab' fragments (mFab') were added to the cell/collagen mixtures. In B, increasing concentrations of the 70-kDa fibronectin fragment or an equal molar concentration of the control 40-kDa fibronectin fragment were added to the cell/collagen mixtures. Collagen gels were cast and processed as indicated in the legend to Fig. 2. Data are presented as a percentage of the weight of gels not containing cells ± S.E.

Integrin Ligation Is Required but Not Sufficient for Fibronectin-mediated Collagen Gel Contraction-- Our data using integrin-binding fragments of fibronectin suggest that fibronectin-integrin ligation is not sufficient to trigger an increase in cell contractility. To determine whether Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD)-mediated integrin ligation is required for fibronectin-mediated tension generation, fibronectin-null cells were imbedded in collagen gels in the absence and presence of a recombinant fibronectin in which the RGD sequence had been deleted. As shown previously in Fig. 3, treatment of collagen-imbedded cells with either plasma-derived or recombinant, wild type fibronectin resulted in a significant decrease in collagen gel weight (Fig. 7). Deletion of the integrin-binding RGD repeat from fibronectin abolished the ability of fibronectin to induce collagen gel contraction (Fig. 7). Furthermore, addition of 850 µM RGD peptides to plasma fibronectin-treated cells completely inhibited the contractile response of cells to fibronectin (Fig. 7). Fibronectin-induced contraction was similarly inhibited by the addition of a 0.7-µM concentration of the larger, 120-kDa fibronectin fragment (data not shown). In contrast, addition of the inactive peptide, RGE (30), had no effect on fibronectin-induced contraction (Fig. 7). Cell adhesion to native collagen fibrils is RGD-independent (51, 52). Hence, the addition of RGD fragments to fibronectin-treated cells did not affect the 35% decrease in collagen gel weight that occurred independently of fibronectin (Fig. 7). Taken together, these data indicate that fibronectin-integrin ligation is required, but not sufficient, to induce increased cell contractility.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Role of fibronectin's integrin-binding RGD repeat in collagen gel contraction. Fibronectin-null cells were imbedded in collagen gels as indicated in the legend to Fig. 2, in the absence (+0) or presence of 40 nM plasma fibronectin (pFn), recombinant wild type fibronectin (rFn), or a recombinant fibronectin lacking the RGD sequence (rFnDelta RGD). In other wells, cells were incubated with 40 nM plasma fibronectin in the presence of 0.5 mg/ml (850 µM) GRGDSP (RGD) or GRGESP (RGE) peptides. Collagen gels were cast and processed as indicated in the legend to Fig. 2. Data are presented as a percentage of the weight of gels not containing cells ± S.E.

The adhesion of nonactivated lymphocytes is stimulated upon interaction with either a polymeric construct of RGD repeats or prepolymerized fibronectin, but it does not occur upon interaction with the 120-kDa integrin-binding fibronectin fragment (53). These data suggest that the number or spatial organization of integrin-binding sites may be critical in initiating a cellular response to fibronectin. To determine whether cell contractility can be stimulated by polyvalent integrin-binding fragments, fibronectin-null cells were imbedded into collagen gels in the absence and presence of either intact fibronectin, monomeric RGD peptides, or polymeric RGD peptides. Concentrations of proteins used were adjusted to reflect an equal molar concentration of RGD repeats. Treatment of cells with monomeric or polymeric RGD repeats, or with a 1000-fold excess of monomeric or polymeric RGD repeats versus 40 nM fibronectin, did not stimulate collagen gel contraction (Fig. 8A).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Effect of polyvalent fibronectin substrates on collagen gel contraction. Fibronectin-null cells were imbedded into collagen gels as indicated in the legend to Fig. 2. In A, either PBS, plasma fibronectin (+Fn; solid bar = 40 nM), monomeric RGD peptides (+RGD; solid bar = 80 nM, hatched bar = 80 µM), or polymeric RGD peptides (Poly-RGD; solid bar = 5.7 nM; hatched bar = 5.7 µM) were added to the cell/collagen mixture. Protein concentrations were adjusted to reflect either equal molar ratios of RGD repeats (solid bars) or a 1000-fold excess versus 40 nM fibronectin (hatched bars). In B, 20 nM of untreated fibronectin (; +Fn), fibronectin (20 nM) pretreated with 62.5 µM III-1C (black-square; +Fn/III-1C), III-1C (; +III-1C), or an equal volume of PBS (open circle ; -Fn) were added to cell/collagen mixtures. Collagen gels were cast and processed as indicated in the legend to Fig. 2. Data are presented as a percentage of the weight of gels not containing cells ± S.E. *, different from the +Fn group (p < 0.01); #, different from the +Fn group (p < 0.05).

Incubation of soluble fibronectin with a fragment of fibronectin's III-1 module (III-1C), has been shown to trigger the formation of high molecular mass multimers, termed superfibronectin (8). To determine whether the interaction of cells with this prepolymerized form of fibronectin could accelerate fibronectin-mediated collagen gel contraction, cells were incubated for various amounts of time with either soluble fibronectin or fibronectin that had been pretreated with III-1C (8). As shown in Fig. 8B, incubation of cells with prepolymerized fibronectin did not accelerate collagen gel contraction versus untreated fibronectin. Moreover, addition of prepolymerized fibronectin to collagen-imbedded cells decreased the extent of collagen gel contraction compared with cells incubated with untreated fibronectin (Fig. 8B). The ability of fibronectin polymerization inhibitors to block the contractile response of cells to fibronectin (Fig. 6), coupled with the inability of either monovalent fragments (Figs. 4 and 8A), polymeric RGD (Fig. 8A), or prepolymerized fibronectin (Fig. 8B) to stimulate cell contraction, suggests that the process of fibronectin polymerization may be critical in triggering cytoskeletal tension generation within collagen matrices.

Effect of Anti-integrin Antibodies on Fibronectin-mediated Collagen Gel Contraction-- Cell-mediated contraction of collagen gels has been shown to be dependent on alpha 1beta 1 (22) and/or alpha 2beta 1 integrin ligation (23, 24). Fibronectin polymerization by fibroblasts is mediated primarily by the alpha 5beta 1 integrin (44, 49). In the absence of alpha 5, other integrins, including alpha v-containing integrins, can promote fibronectin polymerization (44, 54, 55). In addition, recent studies suggest a role for alpha 5beta 1 integrin-fibronectin interactions in enhancing clot retraction (56). To determine the relative contributions of various integrin receptors to the fibronectin-mediated stimulation of cell contractility, adhesion-blocking anti-integrin antibodies were tested for their ability to inhibit fibronectin-induced collagen gel contraction. As expected, the addition of an anti-beta 1 integrin subunit antibody completely inhibited collagen gel contraction of fibronectin-treated cells (Fig. 9). Addition of 10 µg/ml anti-alpha 5 antibodies alone or in combination with anti-alpha v antibodies resulted in a small but significant reduction in fibronectin-induced contraction (Fig. 9). No further inhibition of the fibronectin contraction response was observed when the anti-alpha 5 and anti-alpha v antibody concentrations were increased to 25 µg/ml (data not shown). In the presence of fibronectin, addition of a combination of anti-alpha 1 and anti-alpha 2 antibodies had only a slight inhibitory effect on collagen gel contraction. Addition of anti-alpha 5 and anti-alpha v antibodies to alpha 1/alpha 2 integrin-blocked cells further reduced collagen gel contraction to levels similar to those observed in the absence of fibronectin (Fig. 9). Incubation of cells with isotype-matched IgM or IgG antibodies did not alter fibronectin-induced gel contraction (Fig. 9). These data indicate that collagen- and fibronectin-integrin receptors act synergistically to mediate fibronectin-induced collagen fibril contraction. Furthermore, these data suggest that, in the presence of collagen-integrin receptor blockade, fibronectin-integrin receptors can mediate fibronectin-stimulated collagen gel contraction.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Effect of anti-integrin antibodies on fibronectin-induced collagen gel contraction. Fibronectin-null cells were imbedded into collagen gels as indicated in the legend to Fig. 2 in the absence (+0) or presence of 40 nM plasma fibronectin (+Fn). 30 min prior to imbedding, some cells were incubated with 10 µg/ml each of various anti-integrin antibodies or isotype-matched controls. Collagen gels were cast and processed as indicated in the legend to Fig. 2. Data are presented as a percentage of the weight of gels not containing cells ± S.E. *, different from the +Fn group (p < 0.01).

Role of Fibronectin's Gelatin-binding Domain in Fibronectin-induced Collagen Gel Contraction-- Neither alpha 5beta 1 nor alpha vbeta 1 integrins bind directly to collagen (49). However, binding interactions between fibronectin and either individual collagen fibrils (types I, II, III, and IV) or denatured type I collagen have been demonstrated in vitro (57, 58). The binding site for gelatin has been localized to a 40-kDa domain in the amino-terminal region of fibronectin (Fig. 1) (59). To determine whether the gelatin-binding domain of fibronectin plays a role in fibronectin-mediated collagen gel contraction, fibronectin-null cells were imbedded in fibronectin-containing collagen gels in the absence and presence of various concentrations of either an anti-gelatin-binding domain monoclonal antibody or a control monoclonal antibody that recognizes an epitope within the III-5 module of fibronectin (IST-5) (60). As demonstrated in Fig. 10, addition of anti-gelatin-binding domain antibodies resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of fibronectin-induced collagen gel contraction. In contrast, addition of the anti-III-5 monoclonal antibody had no effect on fibronectin-induced contraction (Fig. 10). These data indicate that the gelatin-binding domain of fibronectin plays a role in mediating fibronectin-stimulated contraction. The anti-gelatin-binding domain antibody also inhibits fibronectin binding to gelatin, as assessed by enzyme-linked immunoassay (D.C. Hocking, unpublished observation). Thus, it is possible that fibronectin-binding integrins mediate collagen gel contraction through the formation of a tri-molecular complex in which integrin-bound fibronectin interacts with collagen via the gelatin-binding domain of fibronectin.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Role of fibronectin's gelatin-binding domain in collagen gel contraction. Fibronectin-null cells were imbedded in collagen gels as indicated in the legend to Fig. 2 in the absence (-) or presence (+) of 40 nM plasma fibronectin (Fn). At the time of imbedding, increasing concentrations of antibodies directed against either the gelatin binding domain (GBD) or the III-5 domain (IST-5; 50 µg/ml) of fibronectin were added to the gels. Collagen gels were cast and processed as indicated in the legend to Fig. 2. Data are presented as a percentage of the weight of gels not containing cells ± S.E.

Effect of Pertussis Toxin and C3 Exotransferase Treatment on Fibronectin-mediated Gel Contraction-- To begin characterizing the intracellular signals involved in fibronectin-mediated gel contraction, fibronectin-null cells were pretreated with either the Gi protein inhibitor, pertussis toxin (61) or with the Rho inhibitor, C3 exotransferase (62). The involvement of these pathways in the contraction of floating collagen gels by human dermal fibroblasts has been recently demonstrated (40). Pretreatment of fibronectin-null cells with pertussis toxin completely inhibited the LPA-induced contraction of floating collagen gels (Fig. 11A). In contrast, pertussis toxin pretreatment had no significant effect on fibronectin-mediated contraction (Fig. 11A), suggesting that the Gi class of heterotrimeric G proteins is not involved in the contractile response of cells to fibronectin. Inhibition of Rho activity by pretreatment of cells with C3 exotransferase completely blocked the fibronectin-mediated decrease in collagen gel weight (Fig. 11B); pretreatment of fibronectin-null cells with either DMEM or the Lipofectin vehicle alone had no effect on fibronectin-mediated contraction (Fig. 11B). These data suggest that activation of the small G protein, Rho, is required for the contraction of cells in response to fibronectin.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   Effect of pertussis toxin or C3 exotransferase on fibronectin-induced contraction. In A, fibronectin-null cell monolayers were incubated overnight with 25 ng/ml pertussis toxin (+PTx, hatched bars) or DMEM alone (-PTx, solid bars). Cells were harvested and imbedded into collagen gels as indicated in the legend to Fig. 2, in the absence (+0, +LPA) or presence of 40 nM fibronectin (+Fn). Gels were allowed to polymerize at 37 °C for 1 h after which time either serum-free media (+0, +Fn) or serum-free media containing 20 µg/ml LPA (+LPA) was added to the wells. Gels were incubated an additional 20 h at 37 °C and then removed and weighed. In B, cell monolayers were incubated overnight with either 2 µg/ml C3 exotransferase plus Lipofectin (hatched bars), Lipofectin alone (open bars), or DMEM (solid bars). Cells were harvested and imbedded into collagen gels, in the absence (+PBS) or presence of 40 nM fibronectin (+Fn). Gels were allowed to polymerize at 37 °C for 1 h after which time either serum-free media was added to wells. Gels were incubated an additional 6 h at 37 °C and then removed and weighed. Data are presented as a percentage of the weight of gels not containing cells ± S.E.

Fibronectin Polymerization Induces Actin Cytoskeleton Rearrangement-- During collagen gel contraction, fibroblasts imbedded in three-dimensional, floating collagen gels progress from a round to a spread phenotype (63). As cells spread, tractional forces generated from cellular extensions are thought to be the primary mechanism by which contraction of collagen fibrils occurs (64). To correlate fibronectin-induced changes in mechanical tension generation with changes in actin organization, cell spreading, and extension formation, fibronectin-null cells were imbedded in collagen gels in the absence and presence of 40 nM intact fibronectin or the integrin-binding 120-kDa fibronectin fragment. To assess the role of fibronectin polymerization on cell morphology and actin organization, the anti-fibronectin III-1 antibody, 9D2, or the control, nonimmune IgG was added to fibronectin-treated cells. Following a 20-h incubation, cells imbedded in collagen gels were fixed and permeabilized, and actin filaments were visualized with FITC-phalloidin. As demonstrated in Fig. 12, in the absence of fibronectin, collagen-imbedded fibronectin-null cells remained round (Fig. 12A). Similarly, treatment of cells with the 120-kDa integrin-binding fibronectin fragment did not promote cell spreading (Fig. 12B). In contrast, treatment of cells with fibronectin resulted in actin filament reorganization, cell spreading, and the formation of cell extensions (Fig. 12, C and D). These fibronectin-induced morphological changes were blocked by the addition of the 9D2 mAb, which inhibits fibronectin polymerization (35) (Fig. 12E). Addition of nonimmune mouse IgG had no effect on cell spreading or extension formation of fibronectin-treated cells (Fig. 12F). Similar results were observed following a 4-h incubation (not shown). Taken together, these data indicate that actin reorganization, cell spreading, and the formation of cellular extensions within a collagen lattice are stimulated by fibronectin polymerization.


View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12.   Effect of fibronectin polymerization on actin organization. Fibronectin-null cells were imbedded into collagen gels in the absence (A) or presence of the integrin-binding 120-kDa fibronectin fragment (B), intact fibronectin (C and D), intact fibronectin plus 25 µg/ml 9D2 Fab' (E), or intact fibronectin plus 25 µg/ml nonimmune mouse Fab' (F). Following a 20-h incubation, gels were fixed with paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with acetone. Actin was visualized by staining with FITC-phalloidin. Gels were mounted and examined using an Olympus BX60 microscope equipped with epifluorescence and photographed using a Spot digital camera. Data represent one of three experiments performed.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In the present study, we have demonstrated that fibronectin polymerization stimulates the spreading of fibronectin-null cells imbedded in collagen gels and triggers a significant increase in cell contractility, as measured by collagen gel contraction. The increase in cell contractility induced by fibronectin was dependent on integrin ligation; however, ligation of integrin receptors by fibronectin fragments was not sufficient to induce either tension generation or cell spreading. Cell contractility could not be stimulated by treatment of cells with either polyvalent RGD peptides or prepolymerized fibronectin. Moreover, fibronectin-induced contractility was blocked by agents that inhibit fibronectin polymerization, suggesting that the process of fibronectin polymerization is critical in triggering cytoskeletal tension generation. Fibronectin-induced contractility was inhibited by pretreatment of cells with C3 exotransferase but not by pretreatment with pertussis toxin, suggesting a role for RhoA in the contractile response of cells to fibronectin polymerization. These data are the first to demonstrate that Rho-mediated cell contractility may be regulated by the process of fibronectin polymerization and suggest a novel mechanism by which extracellular matrix fibronectin regulates cytoskeletal organization and cell function.

Our data suggest that fibronectin-binding integrins may mediate native collagen fibril reorganization through an interaction of the gelatin-binding domain of integrin-bound fibronectin with collagen fibrils. Competition binding assays indicate that the affinity of fibronectin for native collagen fibrils is approximately 10- to 100-fold lower than that of gelatin (57), prompting the suggestion that fibronectin may not bind to native collagen under physiological conditions (65). However, previous studies have demonstrated colocalization of fibronectin and collagen fibers in cultured fibroblasts (66-68). In addition, microscopic analyses of cutaneous wounds indicate that fibronectin fibrils are associated with type I (69) and type III (68) collagen fibrils. Furthermore, inhibition of fibronectin polymerization by anti-fibronectin antibodies inhibits collagen deposition by lung fibroblasts (70). These data, together with the data presented here, suggest that the interaction of fibronectin with the cell surface may increase the affinity of fibronectin for native collagen. Previous studies have identified conformation-dependent binding sites within fibronectin (36, 39) that may be exposed by changes in cell contractility (71). Further studies will be required to explore the possibility that fibronectin polymerization or cell contraction induces a conformational change within the gelatin-binding domain of fibronectin to enhance its collagen-binding activity.

The interaction of cells with fibronectin via cell surface integrin receptors generates a series of complex signaling events that serve to regulate many aspects of cell behavior, including growth, differentiation, adhesion, and motility (44, 49). Data presented in this study extend these observation by suggesting that the polymerization of an insoluble fibronectin matrix provides a distinct control mechanism to tightly couple the organization of the actin cytoskeleton to the organization of the extracellular environment. Fibronectin deposition may be rapidly up- and down-regulated by such factors as protein kinase C, cyclic AMP, and LPA (14-17). Activators of protein kinase C, which affect both stress fiber and focal contact formation (72), enhance fibronectin matrix assembly (17). Conversely, increasing intracellular cAMP levels, which disrupt actin stress fibers and cause cell retraction (73), inhibits matrix assembly (14). In addition, studies have demonstrated decreased fibronectin deposition upon disruption of the actin cytoskeleton with cytochalasin D (74). In the present study, cell contractility was inhibited by agents previously shown to inhibit fibronectin polymerization. Moreover, cell contractility could not be stimulated by treatment of cells with either monovalent fibronectin fragments, polyvalent RGD peptides, or prepolymerized fibronectin, suggesting that the process of fibronectin polymerization is critical in triggering cytoskeletal tension generation. Taken together, these studies suggest that a dynamic, reciprocal relationship exists between fibronectin polymerization, cytoskeletal organization, and the contractile state of the cell that may serve to regulate cell behavior.

Previous studies have defined a role for Rho-mediated contractility in fibronectin polymerization (16, 71, 75). Increasing Rho-stimulated contraction through treatment of cells with either LPA (16, 71) or nocodazole (75) or by microinjection of recombinant, constitutively active Rho (71) results in enhanced fibronectin deposition. In the present study, cell contractility induced by fibronectin polymerization was inhibited by pretreatment of cells with the Rho inhibitor, C3 exotransferase. In addition, spreading and extension formation by cells imbedded in collagen gels were dependent on fibronectin polymerization, and could not be stimulated by integrin-binding fragments of fibronectin. These data suggest that fibronectin polymerization triggers integrin-mediated cytoskeletal reorganization and enhances cell contractility through a mechanism involving the activation of RhoA. Recent studies have demonstrated that disruption of preformed extracellular matrices by treatment with the III-1C fragment of fibronectin blocks the ability of LPA to stimulate stress fiber formation (6). In addition, other studies suggest that actin stress fiber formation follows fibronectin matrix assembly (6) and is dependent on the three-dimensional structure of extracellular fibronectin (9). Taken together, these data suggest that fibronectin polymerization and deposition into the extracellular matrix stimulates Rho activation and subsequent actin cytoskeleton organization. Moreover, these data suggest that Rho activity may be sustained or potentiated by the continued deposition or remodeling of a fibronectin matrix.

One of the histological hallmarks of chronic inflammatory diseases, including interstitial pulmonary fibrosis and asthma, is an excessive and/or inappropriate deposition of extracellular matrix molecules that is thought to arise as a consequence of unresolved wound repair (76, 77). In the present study, we have used a well-characterized model of wound contraction (19-21, 40, 78, 79) to demonstrated that fibronectin stimulates the contraction of collagen matrices by a mechanism that requires both integrin ligation and fibronectin polymerization. These studies suggest that in normal wound healing, remodeling of the collagen matrix may be regulated in part, by the rate and extent of fibronectin polymerization into the extracellular matrix. In chronic inflammatory diseases, excessive fibronectin deposition into the extracellular matrix may contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease by triggering abnormal tissue remodeling through changes in the organization and contraction of collagen fibrils.

In summary, our data indicate that fibronectin enhances cell contractility and alters cytoskeletal organization by a mechanism that is dependent on fibronectin polymerization. Other studies have shown that cytoskeletal assembly and stiffness increase in proportion to the stress applied to integrin receptors (10, 11). In addition, cell spreading, migration (12), and cytoskeletal assembly (13) are regulated by the mechanical stiffness of the adhesive substrate. Therefore, it is possible that fibronectin polymerization promotes cell contractility through local alterations in cytoskeletal organization that are mediated in part by changes in the rigidity of the insoluble fibronectin matrix. Additionally, cell-mediated fibronectin polymerization may trigger conformational changes within the fibronectin molecule (71, 80) resulting in the exposure of neoepitopes that have unique affects on actin cytoskeletal organization. As such, future studies aimed at elucidating the precise mechanism by which fibronectin polymerization affects cell contractility will provide important insight into the extracellular factors that control cytoskeletal organization and, in addition, may suggest novel approaches for the development of therapeutic strategies aimed at preventing abnormal tissue remodeling following injury.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Deane Mosher for providing the 9D2 hybridoma cells, Dr. Jean Schwarzbauer for providing the fibronectin cDNAs, and Michelle Arquette for help with purifying the recombinant fibronectins.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grants HL60181 (to D. H.), HL 64074 (to D. H.), HL50549 (to J. S.), and HL03971 (to J. S.) of the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dagger Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Box 711, Rochester, NY 14642. Tel.: 716-273-1770; Fax: 716-244-9283; E-mail: denise_hocking@urmc.rochester.edu.

|| Supported by NIH Predoctoral Training Grant T32-HL07194.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's media; BSA, bovine serum albumin; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; LPA, 1-oleoyl lysophosphatidic acid; mAb, monoclonal antibody; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Hynes, R. O. (1990) Fibronectins , Springer-Verlag, New York
2. Magnusson, M., and Mosher, D. F. (1998) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 18, 1363-1370[Free Full Text]
3. Chicurel, M. E., Chen, C. S., and Ingber, D. E. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 232-239[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Sottile, J., Hocking, D. C., and Swiatek, P. J. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 2933-2943[Abstract]
5. Sechler, J. L., and Schwarzbauer, J. E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25533-25536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Bourdoulous, S., Orend, G., MacKenna, D. A., Pasqualini, R., and Ruoslahti, E. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 143, 267-276[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Mercurius, K. O., and Morla, A. O. (1998) Circ. Res. 82, 548-556[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Morla, A., Zhang, Z., and Ruoslahti, E. (1994) Nature 367, 193-196[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Sechler, J. L., and Schwarzbauer, J. E. (1997) Cell Adhes. Commun. 4, 413-424[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Choquet, D., Felsenfeld, D. P., and Sheetz, M. P. (1997) Cell 88, 39-48[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Wang, N., Butler, J. P., and Ingber, D. E. (1993) Science 260, 1124-1127[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Pelham, R. J., Jr., and Wang, Y.-L. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 13661-13665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Tomasek, J. J., Haaksma, C. J., Eddy, R. J., and Vaughan, M. B. (1992) Anat. Rec. 232, 359-368[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Allen-Hoffman, L. B., and Mosher, D. F. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 14361-14365[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Checovich, W., and Mosher, D. (1993) Arterioscler. Thromb. 13, 1662-1667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Zhang, Q., Checovich, W. J., Peters, D. M., Albrecht, R. M., and Mosher, D. F. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 127, 1447-1459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Somers, C., and Mosher, D. F. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 22277-22280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Lee, K.-M., Tsai, K. Y., Wang, N., and Ingber, D. E. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 274, H76-H82
19. Bell, E., Erhlich, H. P., Buttle, J., and Nakatsuji, T. (1981) Science 211, 1052-1054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Bellows, C. G., Melcher, A. H., and Aubin, J. E. (1982) J. Cell Sci. 58, 125-138[Abstract]
21. Stopak, D., and Harris, A. K. (1982) Dev. Biol. 90, 383-398[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Gotwals, P. J., Chi-Rosso, G., Lindner, V., Yang, J., Ling, L., Fawall, S. E., and Koteliansky, V. E. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 97, 2469-2477[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Schiro, J. A., Chan, B. M. C., Roswit, W. T., Kassner, P. D., Pentland, A. P., Hemler, M. E., Eisen, A. Z., and Kupper, T. S. (1991) Cell 67, 403-410[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Klein, C. E., Dressel, D., Steinmayer, T., Mauch, C., Eckes, B., Kreig, T., Bankert, R. B., and Weber, L. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 115, 1427-1436[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Yatohgo, T., Izumi, M., Kashiwagi, H., and Hayashi, M. (1988) Cell Struct. Funct. 13, 281-292[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Miekka, S. I., Ingham, K. C., and Menache, D. (1982) Thromb. Res. 27, 1-14[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. McKeown-Longo, P. J., and Mosher, D. F. (1985) J. Cell Biol. 100, 364-374[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Balian, G., Click, E. M., and Bornstein, P. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 3234-3236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. McDonald, J. A., and Kelley, D. G. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 8848-8858[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Pierschbacher, M. D., Hayman, E. G., and Ruoslahti, E. (1981) Cell 26, 259-267[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
32. Petersen, T. E., Skorstengaard, K., and Vibe-Pedersen, K. (1989) in Fibronectin (Mosher, D. F., ed) , pp. 1-24, Academic Press, New York
33. Schwarzbauer, J. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 113, 1463-1473[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Sottile, J., and Wiley, S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 17192-17198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Chernousov, M. A., Fogerty, F. J., Koteliansky, V. E., and Mosher, D. F. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 10851-10858[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Hocking, D. C., Smith, R. K., and McKeown-Longo, P. J. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 431-444[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Rodt, S. A., Reed, R. K., Ljungstrom, M., Gustafsson, T. O., and Rubin, K. (1994) Circ. Res. 75, 942-948[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Tingstrom, A., Heldin, C.-H., and Rubin, K. (1992) J. Cell Sci. 102, 315-322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Hocking, D. C., Sottile, J., and McKeown-Longo, P. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19183-19191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Grinnell, F., Ho, C.-H., Lin, Y.-C., and Skuta, G. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 918-923[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Kreisberg, J. I., Ghosh-Choudhury, N., Radnick, R. A., and Schwartz, M. A. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, F283-F288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Small, J. V., and Celis, J. E. (1978) Eur. J. Cell Biol. 16, 308-325
43. Miyamoto, S., Teramoto, H., Coso, O. A., Gutkind, J. S., Burbelo, P. D., Akiyama, S. K., and Yamada, K. M. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 131, 791-805[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Schwartz, M., Schaller, M. D., and Ginsberg, M. H. (1995) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 11, 549-599[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Burridge, K., and Chrzanowska-Wodnicka, M. (1996) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 12, 463-519[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Woods, A., Couchman, J. R., Johansson, S., and Hook, M. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 665-670[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Bloom, L., Ingham, K. C., and Hynes, R. O. (1999) Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 1521-1536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. McKeown-Longo, P. J., and Mosher, D. F. (1983) J. Cell Biol. 97, 466-472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Hynes, R. O. (1992) Cell 69, 11-25[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Quade, B. J., and McDonald, J. A. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 19602-19609[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Staatz, W. D., Fok, K. F., Zutter, M. M., Adams, S. P., Rodriguez, B. A., and Santoro, S. A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7363-7367[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Gullberg, D., Gehlsen, K. R., Turner, D. C., Ahlen, K., Zijenah, L. S., Barnes, M. J., and Rubin, K. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3865-3873[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Stupack, D. G., Li, E., Silletti, S. A., Kehler, J. A., Geahlen, R. L., Hahn, K., Nemerow, G. R., and Cherish, D. A. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 144, 777-787[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Yang, J. T., and Hynes, R. O. (1996) Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 1737-1748[Abstract]
55. Wu, C., Hughes, P. E., Ginsberg, M. H., and McDonald, J. A. (1996) Cell Adhes. Commun. 4, 149-158[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. Corbett, S. A., and Schwarzbauer, J. E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20943-20948[Abstract/Free Full Text]
57. Engvall, E., Ruoslahti, E., and Miller, E. J. (1978) J. Exp. Med. 147, 1584-1595[Abstract/Free Full Text]
58. Engvall, E., and Ruoslahti, E. (1977) Int. J. Cancer. 20, 1-5[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
59. Owens, R. J., and Baralle, F. E. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 2825-2830[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
60. Zardi, L., Carnemolla, B., Balza, E., Borsi, L., Castellani, P., Rocco, M., and Siri, A. (1985) Eur. J. Biochem. 146, 571-579[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
61. Suchard, S. J., and Mansfield, P. J. (1996) J. Cell. Physiol. 168, 217-227[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
62. Narumiya, S., Sekine, A., and Fujiwara, M. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 17255-17257[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63. Ehrlich, H. P., and Rajaratnam, J. B. (1990) Tissue Cell 22, 407-417[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
64. Harris, A. K., Stopak, D., and Wild, P. (1981) Nature 290, 249-251[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
65. Hynes, R. O. (1990) in Fibronectins (Hynes, R. O., ed) , pp. 84-93, Springer-Verlag, New York
66. Little, C. D., and Chen, W.-T. (1982) J. Cell Sci. 55, 35-50[Abstract]
67. Furcht, L. T., Smith, D., Wendelschafer-Crabb, G., Mosher, D. F., and Foidart, J. M. (1980) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 28, 1319-1333[Abstract]
68. Vaheri, A., Kurkinen, M., Lehto, V.-P., Linder, E., and Timpl, R. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 75, 4944-4948[Abstract/Free Full Text]
69. Welch, M. P., Odland, G. F., and Clark, R. A. F. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 110, 133-145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
70. McDonald, J. A., Kelley, D. G., and Broekelmann, T. J. (1982) J. Cell Biol. 92, 485-492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
71. Zhong, C., Chrzanowska-Wodnicka, M., Brown, J., Shaub, A., Belkin, A. M., and Burridge, K. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 141, 539-551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
72. Woods, A., and Couchman, J. R. (1992) J. Cell Sci. 101, 277-290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
73. Lamb, N. J. C., Fernandez, A., Conti, M. A., Adelstein, R., Glass, D. B., Welch, W. J., and Feramisco, J. R. (1988) J. Cell Biol. 106, 1955-1971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
74. Wu, C., Keivens, V. M., O'Toole, T. E., McDonald, J. A., and Ginsberg, M. H. (1995) Cell 83, 715-724[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
75. Zhang, Q., Magnusson, M. K., and Mosher, D. F. (1997) Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 1415-1425[Abstract]
76. Bousquet, J., Chanez, P., Lacoste, J. Y., White, R., Vic, P., Godard, P., and Michel, F. B. (1992) Allergy 47, 3-11[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
77. Clark, R. A. F. (1995) in The Molecular and Cellular Biology of Wound Repair (Clark, R. A. F., ed) , pp. 3-50, Plenum Press, New York
78. Guidry, C., and Grinnell, F. (1985) J. Cell Sci. 79, 67-81[Abstract]
79. Grinnel, F., and Lamke, C. (1984) J. Cell Sci. 66, 51-63[Abstract]
80. Peters, D. M. P, Chen, Y., Zardi, L., and Brummel, S. (1998) Microsc. Microanal. 4, 385-396[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
Z. Sun, L. A. Martinez-Lemus, M. A. Hill, and G. A. Meininger
Extracellular matrix-specific focal adhesions in vascular smooth muscle produce mechanically active adhesion sites
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): C268 - C278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
X. Zhou, R. G. Rowe, N. Hiraoka, J. P. George, D. Wirtz, D. F. Mosher, I. Virtanen, M. A. Chernousov, and S. J. Weiss
Fibronectin fibrillogenesis regulates three-dimensional neovessel formation
Genes & Dev., May 1, 2008; 22(9): 1231 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
D. C. Hocking, P. A. Titus, R. Sumagin, and I. H. Sarelius
Extracellular Matrix Fibronectin Mechanically Couples Skeletal Muscle Contraction With Local Vasodilation
Circ. Res., February 15, 2008; 102(3): 372 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
J. Sottile, F. Shi, I. Rublyevska, H.-Y. Chiang, J. Lust, and J. Chandler
Fibronectin-dependent collagen I deposition modulates the cell response to fibronectin
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): C1934 - C1946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Gui, K. Wojciechowski, C. D. Gildner, H. Nedelkovska, and D. C. Hocking
Identification of the Heparin-binding Determinants within Fibronectin Repeat III1: ROLE IN CELL SPREADING AND GROWTH
J. Biol. Chem., November 17, 2006; 281(46): 34816 - 34825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
J. Sottile and J. Chandler
Fibronectin Matrix Turnover Occurs through a Caveolin-1-dependent Process
Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2005; 16(2): 757 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. D. Gildner, A. L. Lerner, and D. C. Hocking
Fibronectin matrix polymerization increases tensile strength of model tissue
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2004; 287(1): H46 - H53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
T. R. Polte, G. S. Eichler, N. Wang, and D. E. Ingber
Extracellular matrix controls myosin light chain phosphorylation and cell contractility through modulation of cell shape and cytoskeletal prestress
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 2004; 286(3): C518 - C528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
A. S. Kazi, S. Lotfi, E. A. Goncharova, O. Tliba, Y. Amrani, V. P. Krymskaya, and A. L. Lazaar
Vascular endothelial growth factor-induced secretion of fibronectin is ERK dependent
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, March 1, 2004; 286(3): L539 - L545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
E. E. Robinson, R. A. Foty, and S. A. Corbett
Fibronectin Matrix Assembly Regulates {alpha}5{beta}1-mediated Cell Cohesion
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2004; 15(3): 973 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
H. Jarvelainen, R. B. Vernon, M. D. Gooden, A. Francki, S. Lara, P. Y. Johnson, M. G. Kinsella, E. H. Sage, and T. N. Wight
Overexpression of Decorin by Rat Arterial Smooth Muscle Cells Enhances Contraction of Type I Collagen In Vitro
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2004; 24(1): 67 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
R. M. Klein, M. Zheng, A. Ambesi, L. Van De Water, and P. J. McKeown-Longo
Stimulation of extracellular matrix remodeling by the first type III repeat in fibronectin
J. Cell Sci., November 15, 2003; 116(22): 4663 - 4674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. A. M. Verderio, D. Telci, A. Okoye, G. Melino, and M. Griffin
A Novel RGD-independent Cell Adhesion Pathway Mediated by Fibronectin-bound Tissue Transglutaminase Rescues Cells from Anoikis
J. Biol. Chem., October 24, 2003; 278(43): 42604 - 42614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
D. C. Hocking and C. H. Chang
Fibronectin matrix polymerization regulates small airway epithelial cell migration
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, July 1, 2003; 285(1): L169 - L179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Shiokawa, M. Iwashita, Y. Akimoto, S. Nagamatsu, K. Sakai, H. Hanashi, M. Kabir-Salmani, Y. Nakamura, M. Uehata, and Y. Yoshimura
Small Guanosine Triphospatase RhoA and Rho-Associated Kinase as Regulators of Trophoblast Migration
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2002; 87(12): 5808 - 5816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. C. Hocking
Fibronectin Matrix Deposition and Cell Contractility: Implications for Airway Remodeling in Asthma
Chest, December 1, 2002; 122(6_suppl): 275S - 278S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
E. Tamariz and F. Grinnell
Modulation of Fibroblast Morphology and Adhesion during Collagen Matrix Remodeling
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2002; 13(11): 3915 - 3929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
J. Sottile and D. C. Hocking
Fibronectin Polymerization Regulates the Composition and Stability of Extracellular Matrix Fibrils and Cell-Matrix Adhesions
Mol. Biol. Cell, October 1, 2002; 13(10): 3546 - 3559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
K. S. Midwood and J. E. Schwarzbauer
Tenascin-C Modulates Matrix Contraction via Focal Adhesion Kinase- and Rho-mediated Signaling Pathways
Mol. Biol. Cell, October 1, 2002; 13(10): 3601 - 3613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
D. C. Hocking and K. Kowalski
A cryptic fragment from fibronectin's III1 module localizes to lipid rafts and stimulates cell growth and contractility
J. Cell Biol., July 8, 2002; 158(1): 175 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Lim, I. Han, H. J. Kwon, and E.-S. Oh
Trichostatin A-induced Detransformation Correlates with Decreased Focal Adhesion Kinase Phosphorylation at Tyrosine 861 in ras-transformed Fibroblasts
J. Biol. Chem., April 5, 2002; 277(15): 12735 - 12740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. Pereira, B. J. Rybarczyk, T. M. Odrljin, D. C. Hocking, J. Sottile, and P. J. Simpson-Haidaris
The incorporation of fibrinogen into extracellular matrix is dependent on active assembly of a fibronectin matrix
J. Cell Sci., January 2, 2002; 115(3): 609 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. S. Filla, X. Liu, T. D. Nguyen, J. R. Polansky, C. R. Brandt, P. L. Kaufman, and D. M. Peters
In Vitro Localization of TIGR/MYOC in Trabecular Meshwork Extracellular Matrix and Binding to Fibronectin
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2002; 43(1): 151 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
D. G. Stupack, X. S. Puente, S. Boutsaboualoy, C. M. Storgard, and D. A. Cheresh
Apoptosis of adherent cells by recruitment of caspase-8 to unligated integrins
J. Cell Biol., October 29, 2001; 155(3): 459 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Burns, A. J. Thrasher, M. P. Blundell, L. Machesky, and G. E. Jones
Configuration of human dendritic cell cytoskeleton by Rho GTPases, the WAS protein, and differentiation
Blood, August 15, 2001; 98(4): 1142 - 1149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
J Sottile, D. Hocking, and K. Langenbach
Fibronectin polymerization stimulates cell growth by RGD-dependent and -independent mechanisms
J. Cell Sci., January 12, 2000; 113(23): 4287 - 4299.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hocking, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Langenbach, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hocking, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Langenbach, K. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement