![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 15, 10719-10722, April 14, 2000
From the Because the vitamin D
receptor interacting protein (DRIP)
coactivator complex shares components with the RNA polymerase II (Pol
II) holoenzyme complex, we tested whether the two protein complexes
associate in cellular extracts. On initial purification steps, the DRIP
complex copurified with the Pol II holoenzyme. Pol II was found to bind
to the vitamin D receptor in a ligand-dependent fashion
when either nuclear extracts or partially purified preparations were
used as sources of DRIP and Pol II holoenzyme. A subpopulation of
holoenzyme complexes bound to the receptor because BRCA1, which associates with the Pol II holoenzyme, did not associate with the
liganded receptor, and only in certain of the holoenzyme- and
DRIP-containing fractions did Pol II bind to the liganded receptor.
Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that the DRIP complex was not
pre-associated with the Pol II holoenzyme, but the interaction between
these two complexes was induced only in the presence of receptor and
ligand. These data support a model in which the activation of
transcription by hormone-bound receptor requires binding to the DRIP
coactivator, and this induced ternary complex can then bind to the Pol
II holoenzyme to activate transcription.
Current models of transcriptional regulation in mammalian cells
posit the RNA polymerase II (Pol
II)1 holoenzyme mediating the control of mRNA synthesis
from all protein-encoding genes (1, 2). Along with core Pol II, the Pol
II holoenzyme contains basal transcription factors, such as TFIIF,
TFIIE, and TFIIH, and multiple regulatory proteins, including CBP,
p300, BRCA1, SRB factors, and mediator polypeptides (3).
Nuclear receptors, such as the vitamin D receptor, transduce hormonal
signals by binding directly to DNA target sites in promoters, and when
in the presence of sufficiently high concentrations of a specific
ligand, the receptor directs the activation of gene transcription.
Receptor binding to ligand induces conformational changes in the
protein, creating a binding surface for cofactors that stimulate gene
expression (reviewed in Ref. 4). The vitamin D
receptor interacting proteins (DRIP)
complex was found to bind to the nuclear receptor in a
ligand-dependent fashion (5). This complex is classified as
a coactivator because its binding to the receptor promotes the
activation of transcription in reactions performed in vitro
(6).
Several groups (6-13) have reported the identification from mammalian
cells of coactivator complexes identical, or highly similar, to DRIP,
variously named SMCC, TRAP, ARC, CRSP, NAT, and the mouse and human
Mediators. The polypeptide compositions of these related coactivator
complexes contain 9-20 polypeptides. Thus, for the sake of simplicity
in the following text, the term "DRIP complex" will be used to
connote all of these coactivator complexes because the experiments
presented do not discriminate between the different complexes. Some of
the polypeptides found in the DRIP complex are a subset of the SRB and
mediator factors, such as Med7, previously thought to be exclusively
present in the Pol II holoenzyme. Although the DRIP complex contains
several mammalian SRB and mediator proteins, it lacks key components
found in the Pol II holoenzyme, including the core Pol II enzyme, basal transcription factors, CBP, BRCA1, and several specific SRB factors such as Cdk8 (6, 7, 9). Thus, it is unclear whether the DRIP complex
functions by binding to core Pol II to reconstitute a holoenzyme
complex or whether it functions as a separate coactivator that
interacts with the Pol II holoenzyme.
In the following experiments, we find that the DRIP complex is
separable from the Pol II holoenzyme complex, but, strikingly, we found
that the Pol II holoenzyme could be recruited to the vitamin D receptor
dependent upon the presence of the ligand and via the DRIP complex. In
addition, data are presented demonstrating that only a subset of the
Pol II holoenzyme complex associates with the receptor/ligand/DRIP,
suggesting that the DRIPs do not merely reconstitute holoenzyme but
also that they must function as a separable coactivator.
Biochemical Purification of Mammalian Holoenzyme--
HeLa cells
were passaged in suspension culture using standard procedures. The
purification from whole-cell extracts by chromatography on a Biorex70
ion exchange matrix and sucrose gradient sedimentation have been
described previously (14, 15).
GST-VDR-LBD Affinity Binding Assay--
The glutathione
S-transferase-vitamin D receptor-ligand binding domain
(amino acids 110-427) fusion protein (GST-VDR-LBD) was expressed in
bacteria. Expressed fusion protein was extracted using standard
procedures (5). 150-300 µl of this extract were bound to 20-40 µl
of glutathione-agarose by incubation for 2 h at 4 °C. Then,
this matrix was washed twice with 1.0 M KOAc in buffer H
(20 mM Tris-OAc, pH 7.9, 1 mM EDTA, 20%
glycerol) and once with binding buffer (buffer H, 120 mM
KCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2 mg/ml
BSA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Binding reactions
containing GST-VDR-LBD plus the protein fraction in a total volume of
400-800 µl were incubated with rotation 16 h at 4 °C in
binding buffer containing 0.18 M KCl, 20 mM
Tris-OAc, pH 7.9, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol,
and 0.2 mg/ml BSA in the presence or absence of 0.5 µM
1,25(OH)2D3 (BioMol). The amount of total
protein included in binding reactions was 560 µg when using nuclear
extract or 260 or 540 µg when using sucrose gradient fractions 10 or
18, respectively. In Fig. 2, the effect of binding on different
concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 was tested. After
binding, the supernatant was removed, and protein beads were then
washed three times using 400-800 µl of wash buffer (500 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris-OAc, pH 7.9, 0.1% Nonidet
P-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2 mg/ml BSA) in the presence
(0.5 µM) or absence of
1,25(OH)2D3. For Western blot analysis, samples
were subjected to electrophoresis in 5 or 6% SDS-polyacrylamide gels
and immunoblotted using the indicated antibodies.
Immunoprecipitation--
130 µg of protein from fraction 12 or
100 µg from fraction 2 of the sucrose gradient was immunoprecipitated
with anti-DRIP130 antibody. Pol II in this fraction binds to
GST-VDR-LBD in the presence of 1,25(OH)2D3 (not
shown). 400-800 µl of binding reactions were incubated with rotation
for overnight at 4 °C in buffer H supplemented with 0.1% Nonidet
P-40, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2 mg/ml BSA, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride in the presence of protein
extract, 3-4.5 µl of antibody, and 10-20 µl of protein A beads.
These steps were performed with and without 0.5 µM
1,25(OH)2D3 and 0.7-1.4 µg of purified
GST-VDR-LBD. The supernatant was removed, and protein beads were then
washed three times using 400-800 µl of wash buffer (120 mM KOAc/20 mM Tris-OAc, pH 7.9, 0.05% Nonidet P-40, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2 mg/ml BSA). For Western
blot analysis, samples were subjected to electrophoresis in 7%
SDS-polyacrylamide gels and immunoblotted using the indicated
antibodies. In the case of the polyclonal Cdk8 antiserum used in Fig.
3a, antibody molecules specific for the GST fusion partner
were adsorbed out using a GST protein matrix.
DRIP Complex Copurifies with Pol II Holoenzyme--
The DRIP
complex, and the many similar SRB and mediator-containing complexes,
were identified as key coactivator complexes for the regulation of
transcription by multiple factors (reviewed in Ref. 16). We have
developed a purification strategy for the Pol II holoenzyme (14, 15)
and have tested which of the protein fractions in our standard
purification contain DRIP polypeptides. HeLa whole-cell extracts were
chromatographed on a Biorex70 ion exchange matrix, and protein was
eluted in washes of increasing concentrations of potassium acetate.
Immunoblotting of eluted proteins revealed the presence of DRIP130 only
in the 0.6 M KOAc elution (Fig.
1, top). This protein
fraction, which also contains the Pol II holoenzyme (14), was then
subjected to sucrose gradient sedimentation in our standard
purification protocol. Analysis of the sucrose gradient sedimentation
fractions with available anti-DRIP antibodies revealed that DRIP130,
DRIP150, and DRIP205 sediment in a broad peak from fractions 10-24.
Although these proteins all cosediment, the fractions containing the
highest concentrations of each were different, with DRIP130 having its highest concentration in fraction 18, DRIP150 in fraction 14, and
DRIP205 in fraction 22 (Fig. 1, bottom). It is unknown
whether there is a single composition for a single DRIP complex or,
rather, a population of DRIP complexes with different compositions. The results of this sucrose sedimentation gradient support the latter possibility, because we observe different stoichiometries of DRIP factors among different fractions containing DRIP polypeptides. The
meaning of this observation is unclear at this time. The Pol II
holoenzyme peaked in fractions 10-18 in these same samples (Fig. 1,
bottom). The different Pol II holoenzyme components did not
perfectly cosediment in this gradient; this may reflect the multiple
complexes in which these factors are present. For example, Med7 is
present in the highest concentrations in fractions 10-14, consistent
with the usual position of the Pol II holoenzyme on these gradients,
but Med7 protein is present in low concentration in fractions up to
number 24, possibly consistent with its presence in the DRIP complex
(6). By comparison, Cdk8, which has not been detected in the DRIP or
activator-recruited (ARC) complexes (9), was present only in fractions
10-18, consistent with the Pol II holoenzyme. These results
demonstrate that on these initial purification steps, the DRIP complex
subunits copurify with Pol II holoenzyme components. Because the DRIP
complex and the Pol II holoenzyme share components such as Med7 and
human RGR1/DRIP150, it is possible that a subset of the DRIP complex
may interact directly with Pol II holoenzyme in a pre-formed complex.
This possibility was tested by receptor binding experiments and by immunoprecipitation.
Ligand-dependent Purification of Pol II Complexes by
Vitamin D Receptor--
We examined whether an RNA Pol II complex
associates with the VDR ligand binding domain using the GST-VDR-LBD
bound to glutathione-agarose as an affinity matrix. Crude nuclear
extract was incubated with GST-VDR-LBD in the presence of various
concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3, samples were
washed in 0.5 M KCl, and bound proteins were subjected to
SDS-PAGE and assayed by Western blotting. As shown previously for the
DRIP factors, the receptor plus ligand results in an association of the
DRIP130 and DRIP205 polypeptides. Interestingly, the DRIP130 antibody
detects three polypeptides, but the fastest migrating of these most
efficiently interacts with the receptor (Fig.
2a). The large subunit of Pol
II was purified on the GST-VDR-LBD matrix, and this was dependent upon
the presence of 1,25(OH)2D3 (Fig. 2a). By contrast, BRCA1, another Pol II holoenzyme component
(14), was not purified by the GST-VDR-LBD complex. This result suggests that the ligand bound GST-VDR-LBD interacts with the DRIP complex, which in turn interacts with Pol II, but if it is interacting with the
holoenzyme version of Pol II, then it is associating with a
subpopulation that does not contain BRCA1. As a control, liganded
GST-VDR-LBD did not bind to purified core Pol II (data not shown),
suggesting that the DRIP complex and/or Pol II holoenzyme components
are necessary to bind liganded receptor.
Differential Binding of Holoenzyme Complexes to the Vitamin D
Receptor--
To test whether all Pol II complexes interact with the
DRIP complex, we assayed binding to GST-VDR-LBD using different Pol II
holoenzyme- and DRIP-containing protein fractions sedimented by sucrose
gradient centrifugation. Vitamin D dependence for binding to the
receptor was tested by immunostaining for Pol II and DRIP150 (Fig.
2b). DRIP150 is homologous to yeast RGR1, a component of the
SRB/Med complex. The selected fractions were chosen to test the form of
Pol II associating with the DRIP complex. These fractions have high
concentrations of DRIP205, which is the key subunit for anchoring DRIP
to the vitamin D receptor in a ligand-dependent fashion
(6). Fraction 10 contained the fastest sedimenting form of Pol II
holoenzyme, which contains high concentrations of Med7 and Cdk8 (Fig.
1). Fraction 18 had lower concentrations of Med7 and Cdk8. Whether the
Pol II in this latter fraction is core Pol II or a differentially
sedimenting subpopulation of holoenzyme is unclear. In fraction 10, Pol
II was purified by the GST-VDR-LBD matrix in the presence of
1,25(OH)2D3, but in fraction 18, Pol II was not
purified. As a control for the affinity purification, DRIP150 was
purified in both fractions (Fig. 2b). These data suggest that there are subpopulations of Pol II complexes that differentially associate with the vitamin D receptor via the DRIP complex.
Interestingly, as was seen in Fig. 2a for DRIP130, two bands
were stained by the antibody specific for DRIP150, and only the lower
band bound to the receptor (lanes 3, 6). The affinity
purification by the receptor of the DRIP130 and DRIP150 polypeptides
that migrate rapidly on SDS-PAGE may be because of phosphorylation of
these subunits. Alternatively, other modifications such as acetylation, glycosylation, or even partial proteolysis could be responsible for
shifting the migration of these polypeptides. It is noteworthy that
DRIP205, which does not evidence a shift in migration (Fig. 2a), is the subunit that directly contacts the liganded VDR
(6); this would suggest that DRIP complex binding to the liganded VDR may either induce an allosteric change, which is possible only with the
rapidly migrating forms of DRIP130 and DRIP150, or that receptor
binding selects a subcomplex from among the DRIP complexes.
Interaction of DRIP Complex with Pol II Holoenzyme Is Dependent
upon Both 1,25(OH)2D3 and Vitamin D
Receptor--
The copurification of Pol II and DRIP complexes using
conventional and GST-VDR-LBD-affinity matrices suggests that the two are pre-associated in a stable complex. This was tested by
immunoprecipitation using anti-DRIP130 antisera from the partially
purified holoenzyme fractions (Fig. 3).
Surprisingly, when using fraction 12 (see Fig. 1), the DRIP complex was
not associated with the Pol II because Pol II was not immunopurified
using the DRIP130 specific antibody (Fig. 3a, lane
2). Because Pol II was purified from this sucrose gradient
fraction using GST-VDR-LBD matrix in the presence of the ligand, we
tested whether association of a Pol II complex with the DRIP complex
was dependent upon the presence of GST-VDR-LBD and ligand. Only when
the purified GST-VDR-LBD and 1,25(OH)2D3 were
included in binding reactions did the polymerase complex associate with
the DRIP complex (Fig. 3a, lane 5). In addition, the holoenzyme-specific Cdk8 polypeptide was purified under these conditions, demonstrating that it was the Pol II holoenzyme complex associating with the DRIP complex. Note that when in the presence of
1,25(OH)2D3, the Pol II and Cdk8 were present
in immunoprecipitates above background levels (Fig. 3a,
lane 4), probably because of low levels of contaminating VDR
in the protein fractions used for these assays.
Because DRIP205 directly contacts liganded receptor (6), we tested
whether DRIP205 was required for interaction with the Pol II
holoenzyme. The sucrose gradient purification resulted in a very
rapidly sedimenting complex containing Pol II and DRIP130 (fractions 2-4 in Fig. 1), and decreased DRIP205 and
DRIP150. Immunoprecipitation with anti-DRIP130 antibody from fraction 2 did not purify Pol II from this complex (Fig. 3b,
lanes 2 and 3). Upon prolonged exposure of this
Western blot, a very faint Pol II band is detected in lane 3 (data not shown) in the presence of ligand and receptor, consistent
with a low level of DRIP205 present in this protein fraction. This
result suggests that interaction of the vitamin D receptor with DRIP205
is required for the DRIP complex to bind to the Pol II holoenzyme.
In these experiments we found that the DRIP coactivator complex
and the Pol II holoenzyme copurify on initial purification steps.
Because the DRIP complex contains holoenzyme components such as Med7
and RGR1/DRIP150, we tested whether this copurification might suggest
association of the two complexes. Indeed, Pol II-containing complexes
bind to the vitamin D receptor in a ligand-dependent manner, but immunopurification using antisera specific for DRIP130 reveals that the Pol II holoenzyme complex is not associated with the
DRIP complex. Instead, Pol II holoenzyme only associated with the DRIP
complex when in the presence of the receptor and ligand. This
observation suggests that receptor plus ligand associate with the DRIP
complex and that the receptor-ligand-DRIP complex together creates a
binding surface for the Pol II holoenzyme. From these data we propose a
model (Fig. 4) by which gene expression is stimulated by the ligand-bound vitamin D receptor bound to the
promoter DNA. The DRIP complex will be recruited to the receptor, and
together these facilitate the recruitment of the Pol II holoenzyme. It
is known that the binding of the ligand to the receptor induces a
change in the ligand binding domain structure (indicated by the change
in shape and color of the receptor in Fig. 4; reviewed in Ref. 4). We
suggest that the liganded receptor then binds to the DRIP complex and
induces an allosteric change in DRIP structure (depicted as a change in
color and shape), allowing it to bind to the Pol II holoenzyme and
recruit the transcription machinery to the promoter. A formal
possibility, which cannot now be excluded, is that both receptor and
DRIP complex may independently contribute to binding to the Pol II
holoenzyme, creating a stable interaction only when receptor is bound
to the DRIP complex.
It has been suggested that the mediator complex associates with the
core Pol II to constitute the Pol II holoenzyme (17). Data presented
here argue against that model, at least as applies to the DRIP complex.
The DRIP complex does not bind to all Pol II complexes because it did
not bind to the Pol II in fraction 18 of the sucrose gradient (Fig.
2b), even though Pol II was quite abundant in the sample. A
direct test of this hypothesis was not possible with our protein
preparations because the DRIP complex was not separated from Pol II in
any of the protein fractions. We suggest that the DRIP complex
functions as a separable coactivator that interacts with the Pol II
holoenzyme to drive gene expression.
The DRIP complex functions as a coactivator for transcription (5, 6,
9). Other coactivators known to function with nuclear receptors are the
SRC/p160 class of factors. These different coactivators may have
complementary activities, because the SRC coactivators, in conjunction
with CBP/p300, appear to stimulate gene expression via the acetylation
of genomic DNA adjacent to promoters and enhancers containing nuclear
receptor binding sites (reviewed in Ref. 4). The data presented in this
paper support a model in which the DRIP complex functions via an
induced interaction with the Pol II holoenzyme. Thus, one coactivator
would prepare the chromatin template, and the second would recruit the
transcription machinery.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants GM53504 (to J. D. P.) and DK45460 (to L. P. F).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA
02115. Fax: 617-732-7449; E-mail: jparvin@rics.bwh. harvard.edu.
The abbreviations used are:
Pol II, RNA
polymerase II;
DRIP, vitamin D receptor interacting protein;
TF, transcription factor;
SRB, suppressor of RNA polymerase B mutations;
Med, mediator complex;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
VDR, vitamin D receptor;
LBD, ligand binding domain;
1, 25(OH)2D3, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin
D3;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
CBP, CREB-binding protein.
ACCELERATED PUBLICATION
Binding of Liganded Vitamin D Receptor to the Vitamin D Receptor
Interacting Protein Coactivator Complex Induces Interaction with RNA
Polymerase II Holoenzyme*
,
¶
Department of Pathology, Brigham and
Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
02115 and the § Cell Biology Program, Memorial
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
DRIP complex copurifies with Pol II
holoenzyme. HeLa whole-cell extracts were chromatographed on
Biorex70, and eluted proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting for
DRIP130 (top). The 0.6 M fraction was subjected
to sucrose gradient sedimentation, and fractions were immunoblotted for
DRIP130, DRIP150, and DRIP205 and the 210-kDa RPB1 subunit of Pol II,
Cdk8, and Med7 (bottom). The Cdk8-specific band is indicated
by the arrow. Fractions on the left (low
numbers) represent rapidly sedimenting complexes, and fractions on
the right (high numbers) represent low molecular
weight complexes. L, load; FT, load
flow-through.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Ligand-dependent purification of
Pol II complexes by vitamin D receptor. a, crude nuclear
extract was incubated with immobilized GST-VDR-LBD with
1,25(OH)2D3 present at 0, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 µM (lanes 2-5, respectively). Samples were
washed in 0.5 M KCl, and bound proteins were subjected to
5% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for Pol II, BRCA1, DRIP130, and DRIP205.
10% of the input sample was analyzed in lane 1. b, binding to GST-VDR-LBD was assayed using different
fractions containing Pol II and the DRIPs. Sucrose gradient fraction 10 (lanes 1-3) and fraction 18 (lanes 4-6) were
incubated with GST-VDR-LBD in 0.5 µM
1,25(OH)2D3 (lanes 3 and
6), and bound proteins were subjected to 6% SDS-PAGE and
immunoblotted for the large subunit of Pol II and for DRIP150. 10% of
the input sample was analyzed in each of lanes 1 and
4.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Binding of DRIP complex to holoenzyme complex
requires receptor plus ligand. a, immunopurification from
sucrose gradient fraction 12 of Fig. 1 was performed using anti-DRIP130
antisera (lane 2-5). Anti-DRIP130 antibody, protein A
beads, and the sucrose gradient fraction were present in every binding
reaction. Purified GST-VDR-LBD was included in lanes 3 and
5, and 1,25(OH)2D3 (0.5 µM) was included in lanes 4 and 5.
The bound proteins were immunoblotted for the Pol II large subunit,
Cdk8, and DRIP130. 5% of the input sample was analyzed in lane
1. In., input; IP, immunoprecipitation.
b, DRIP complex with low DRIP205 and DRIP150 content does
not associate with Pol II holoenzyme. Immunopurification from sucrose
gradient fraction 2 containing DRIP130 and Pol II but diminished
DRIP205 and DRIP150 (see Fig. 1) was performed using anti-DRIP130
antibody as in panel a (lanes 2 and
3). Purified GST-VDR-LBD and
1,25(OH)2D3 (0.5 µM) was included
in lane 3. 5% of the input sample was analyzed in
lane 1.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Model for function of the regulation of
transcription by the VDR. Ligand binding to the VDR induces a
structural change, exposing a binding surface for the DRIP205 subunit
of the DRIP coactivator complex. Data presented in Figs. 2 and 3
suggest that binding of the DRIP205 to the liganded receptor induces a
structural change in the DRIP complex that enables binding to the Pol
II holoenzyme (HOLO) complex. The changes in shape and color
for the VDR and the DRIP complex connote an allosteric change in the
complex. RXR, retinoid X receptor.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Thompson, C. M.,
and Young, R. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
4587-4590 2.
Myer, V. E.,
and Young, R. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27757-27760 3.
Parvin, J. D.,
and Young, R. A.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
8,
565-570[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Freedman, L. P.
(1999)
Cell
97,
5-8[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Rachez, C.,
Suldan, Z.,
Ward, J.,
Chang, C. P.,
Burakov, D.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Tempst, P.,
and Freedman, L. P.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1787-1800 6.
Rachez, C.,
Lemon, B. D.,
Suldan, Z.,
Bromleigh, V.,
Gamble, M.,
Naar, A. M.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Tempst, P.,
and Freedman, L. P.
(1999)
Nature
398,
824-828[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Gu, W.,
Malik, S.,
Ito, M.,
Yuan, C. X.,
Fondell, J. D.,
Zhang, X.,
Martinez, E.,
Qin, J.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(1999)
Mol. Cell
3,
97-108[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Fondell, J. D.,
Ge, H.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
8329-8233 9.
Naar, A. M.,
Beaurang, P. A.,
Zhou, S.,
Abraham, S.,
Solomon, W.,
and Tjian, R.
(1999)
Nature
398,
828-832[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Ryu, S.,
Zhou, S.,
Ladurner, A. G.,
and Tjian, R.
(1999)
Nature
397,
446-450[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Sun, X.,
Zhang, Y.,
Cho, H.,
Rickert, P.,
Lees, E.,
Lane, W.,
and Reinberg, D.
(1998)
Mol Cell
2,
213-222[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Myers, L. C.,
Gustafsson, C. M.,
Bushnell, D. A.,
Lui, M.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Tempst, P.,
and Kornberg, R. D.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
45-54 13.
Boyer, T. G.,
Martin, M. E.,
Lees, E.,
Ricciardi, R. P.,
and Berk, A. J.
(1999)
Nature
399,
276-279[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Scully, R.,
Anderson, S. F.,
Chao, D. M.,
Wei, W.,
Ye, L.,
Young, R. A.,
Livingston, D. M.,
and Parvin, J. D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
5605-5610 15.
Neish, A. S.,
Anderson, S. F.,
Schlegel, B. P.,
Wei, W.,
and Parvin, JD.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
847-853 16.
Lemon, B. D.,
and Freedman, L. P.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
9,
499-504[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Asturias, F. J.,
Jiang, Y. W.,
Myers, L. C.,
Gustafsson, C. M.,
and Kornberg, R. D.
(1999)
Science
283,
985-987
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. D. Nerenz, M. L. Martowicz, and J. W. Pike An Enhancer 20 Kilobases Upstream of the Human Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Ligand Gene Mediates Dominant Activation by 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2008; 22(5): 1044 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. I. Ellison, R. L. Eckert, and P. N. MacDonald Evidence for 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3-independent Transactivation by the Vitamin D Receptor: UNCOUPLING THE RECEPTOR AND LIGAND IN KERATINOCYTES J. Biol. Chem., April 13, 2007; 282(15): 10953 - 10962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. M. Sutton, X. Zhang, T. I. Ellison, and P. N. MacDonald The 1,25(OH)2D3-Regulated Transcription Factor MN1 Stimulates Vitamin D Receptor-Mediated Transcription and Inhibits Osteoblastic Cell Proliferation Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2005; 19(9): 2234 - 2244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Meng, Y. Zhao, A. Nag, M. Zeng, G. Dimri, Q. Gao, D. E. Wazer, R. Kumar, H. Band, and V. Band Human ADA3 Binds to Estrogen Receptor (ER) and Functions As a Coactivator for ER-mediated Transactivation J. Biol. Chem., December 24, 2004; 279(52): 54230 - 54240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Oda, C. Sihlbom, R. J. Chalkley, L. Huang, C. Rachez, C.-P. B. Chang, A. L. Burlingame, L. P. Freedman, and D. D. Bikle Two Distinct Coactivators, DRIP/Mediator and SRC/p160, Are Differentially Involved in Vitamin D Receptor Transactivation during Keratinocyte Differentiation Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2003; 17(11): 2329 - 2339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. De Bosscher, W. Vanden Berghe, and G. Haegeman The Interplay between the Glucocorticoid Receptor and Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B or Activator Protein-1: Molecular Mechanisms for Gene Repression Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2003; 24(4): 488 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. M. Sutton and P. N. MacDonald Vitamin D: More Than a "Bone-a-Fide" Hormone Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2003; 17(5): 777 - 791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Wang and A. J. Berk In Vivo Association of Adenovirus Large E1A Protein with the Human Mediator Complex in Adenovirus-Infected and -Transformed Cells J. Virol., August 12, 2002; 76(18): 9186 - 9193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Maeda, C. Rachez, L. Hawel III, C. V. Byus, L. P. Freedman, and F. M. Sladek Polyamines Modulate the Interaction between Nuclear Receptors and Vitamin D Receptor-Interacting Protein 205 Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2002; 16(7): 1502 - 1510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Naar, D. J. Taatjes, W. Zhai, E. Nogales, and R. Tjian Human CRSP interacts with RNA polymerase II CTD and adopts a specific CTD-bound conformation Genes & Dev., June 1, 2002; 16(11): 1339 - 1344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Burakov, L. A. Crofts, C.-P. B. Chang, and L. P. Freedman Reciprocal Recruitment of DRIP/Mediator and p160 Coactivator Complexes in Vivo by Estrogen Receptor J. Biol. Chem., April 19, 2002; 277(17): 14359 - 14362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Metivier, G. Penot, G. Flouriot, and F. Pakdel Synergism Between ER{alpha} Transactivation Function 1 (AF-1) and AF-2 Mediated by Steroid Receptor Coactivator Protein-1: Requirement for the AF-1 {alpha}-Helical Core and for a Direct Interaction Between the N- and C-Terminal Domains Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2001; 15(11): 1953 - 1970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Wang, G. T. Cantin, J. L. Stevens, and A. J. Berk Characterization of Mediator Complexes from HeLa Cell Nuclear Extract Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2001; 21(14): 4604 - 4613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Yang, C. Rachez, and L. P. Freedman Discrete Roles for Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor gamma and Retinoid X Receptor in Recruiting Nuclear Receptor Coactivators Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2000; 20(21): 8008 - 8017. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Nissen and K. R. Yamamoto The glucocorticoid receptor inhibits NFkappa B by interfering with serine-2 phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain Genes & Dev., September 15, 2000; 14(18): 2314 - 2329. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Warnmark, T. Almlof, J. Leers, J.-A. Gustafsson, and E. Treuter Differential Recruitment of the Mammalian Mediator Subunit TRAP220 by Estrogen Receptors ERalpha and ERbeta J. Biol. Chem., June 22, 2001; 276(26): 23397 - 23404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |