![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 15, 10864-10869, April 14, 2000
,
,
,
¶
From the
Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie
Structurale, CNRS, 205 Route de Narbonne, 31077 Toulouse
Cédex, France and § Department of Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology, University of Miami School of Medicine,
Miami, Florida 33101-6129
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have carried out solution equilibrium binding
studies of ICP8, the major single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein
of herpes simplex virus type I, in order to determine the thermodynamic parameters for its interaction with ssDNA. Fluorescence anisotropy measurements of a 5'-fluorescein-labeled 32-mer oligonucleotide revealed that ICP8 formed a nucleoprotein filament on ssDNA with a
binding site size of 10 nucleotides/ICP8 monomer, an association constant at 25° C, K = 0.55 ± 0.05 × 106 M ICP8 is 128-kDa zinc metalloprotein coded by the UL29
gene of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1).1 It is one of seven
virus-encoded proteins necessary for HSV-1 origin-dependent
DNA replication (1). ICP8 forms an extended nucleoprotein filament with
ssDNA in vitro; it binds more readily to ssDNA than to
double-stranded DNA (1-6), and DNA binding may involve contacts by
free sulfhydryl groups and surface lysine and tyrosine residues (6, 7).
In addition to its role as an ssDNA-binding protein, complexes of ICP8
with other proteins may act during viral replication. ICP8 physically
interacts via the UL8 protein with the HSV-1 helicase primase
heterotrimer thereby stimulating unwinding of intact and damaged duplex
DNA (8, 9); likewise a physical interaction between ICP8 and the herpes UL9 helicase has also been shown (10). Specific protein-protein interactions between ICP8, UL9 protein, and subunits of the DNA helicase primase are required for the assembly of these proteins into
prereplicative sites, and recruitment of the DNA polymerase into this
complex is mediated by the UL42 subunit (11, 12).
Cells infected with HSV-1 display a high frequency of homologous
recombination (13). In vitro experiments suggest that ICP8 may be responsible for homologous recombination in vivo.
ICP8 exhibits helix destabilizing and DNA renaturing activities (2, 14). The protein also catalyzes homologous pairing and strand exchange
activity in vitro (15) where it is able to transfer a DNA
strand from a linear duplex to a complementary single-stranded circular
DNA. The reaction requires MgCl2 but not (d)NTPs, and strand exchange is limited to a few 100 base pairs.
Understanding the role of ICP8 in the DNA replication and recombination
reactions of HSV-1 will require knowledge of the thermodynamics and
kinetics of the various macromolecular interactions involved. Currently, the thermodynamic characteristics of the simple reaction between ICP8 and ssDNA are largely unknown compared with other ssDNA-binding proteins such as gp32 from phage T4 (16, 17), Escherichia coli SSB (18), or eucaryote RPA (19, 20). In order to address this question, we have undertaken solution equilibrium binding studies of the reaction of ICP8 with ssDNA using fluorescence spectroscopy.
Chemicals and Reaction Conditions--
ICP8 was purified as
described (8). Spectroscopic Measurements--
Fluorescence measurements were
performed using a model MOS-400 spectrophotometer from Bio-Logic
(Claix, France). Samples were stirred continuously at 25 ± 1° C in a 1.0 × 0.4-cm thermostated cuvette with the short
path in the direction of incident light in order to reduce inner filter
effects. Results were corrected for dilution and inner filter effects
as described previously (21). pH was checked before and after the
reaction and did not change during the titration.
In experiments with
In experiments using 5'-fluorescein-labeled oligonucleotide, samples
were excited at 490 nm, and fluorescence intensity was measured through
a 550-nm cut-off filter. Vertically and horizontally polarized
fluorescence were measured simultaneously by a photoelastic modulator
PEM-90 (Hinds Instruments) and used to calculate fluorescence and
anisotropy (23).2
Fluorescence anisotropy is reported either as
Aobs or A = Aobs Binding of ICP8 to
The stability of the complex in high salt solution may be the result of
a kinetic trap such as the formation of a non-equilibrium complex (28).
To test this possibility, we carried out the reverse titration of ICP8
with Binding of ICP8 to Oligonucleotide--
In the previous
experiments ICP8 bound stoichiometrically to
The intrinsic anisotropy of the 5'-fluorescein-labeled 32-mer
oligonucleotide was 0.02 ± 0.007 (Fig.
2a) which is characteristic of
mobile fluorophore (23). Titration of oligonucleotide with ICP8
increased anisotropy to 0.16-0.18 reflecting lower mobility as a
result of protein binding. No fluorescence quenching occurred during
the titration (data not shown). The stoichiometry of the reaction was
10 ± 1 nt/ICP8 molecule.
The ICP8-oligonucleotide complex could be dissociated with NaCl (Fig.
2b). The anisotropy of the oligonucleotide alone increased with salt concentration (data not shown) and equaled the slightly elevated anisotropy values observed after dissociation of the complex.
This effect was taken into account in order to determine the salt
titration midpoint (STMP), the salt concentration necessary to decrease
anisotropy by 50%. Monovalent cations Na+ and
K+ destabilized the protein-DNA complex with equal
efficiency; the STMPs of NaCl and KCl were 0.35 ± 0.03 M and 0.31 ± 0.02 M, respectively. In
contrast the destabilizing efficiency was sensitive to anion, STMP
NaCH3COO
Unlike most spectroscopic measurements, fluorescence anisotropy is
independent of the concentration of fluorophore (23). Therefore, in
order to study ICP8 binding to ssDNA using this method, it was
important to experimentally determine the relationship between
anisotropy and the concentration of bound fluorescent oligonucleotide.
This can be accomplished using the macromolecular binding density
function method of Lohman and co-workers (29, 30). Briefly, several
concentrations of oligonucleotide are titrated by protein (Fig.
3). All titrations with a particular anisotropy, A, have the same binding density
On the basis of the salt-dependent stability of the
protein-DNA complex (Fig. 2b), we chose to study equilibrium
binding in the presence of 300 mM NaCl. Fluorescence
anisotropy of 5-25 µM oligonucleotide titrated with ICP8
in these conditions is shown in Fig. 3. Intrinsic oligonucleotide
anisotropy has been subtracted from these data. Plots of LT
versus MT for {LT, MT}
corresponding to anisotropies between 0.01 and 0.125 were linear (not
shown); nonlinear curves were observed at larger values that may
indicate aggregation at higher protein concentrations. The relationship
between A and
We fit the model-free binding isotherm (Fig. 4b) using the
method of Epstein (31) for a protein ligand binding to a 32-mer oligonucleotide macromolecule and n = 10. This approach
assumes that monomeric ICP8 binds to DNA; ICP8 sediments in a glycerol gradient as a monomer (32) which is consistent with this assumption. The best visual fit was found to be association constant
K = 0.55 ± 0.05 × 106
M
The salt dependence of the binding parameters was then determined. 5 µM oligonucleotide was titrated with ICP8 in 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, at 25° C in the presence of 200-400
mM NaCl. K and
We then investigated the effect of temperature on the reaction. We
first tried to determine K and
To test the effect of the 5'-fluorescein on the reaction, we performed
competitive binding experiments between labeled and unlabeled 32-mer in
stoichiometric reaction conditions (20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4, 25 °C). Fluorescence anisotropy was measured for complexes formed with 0.5 µM ICP8 and 10 µM of both labeled and unlabeled oligonucleotide.
Assuming a binding site size of 10 nt, ICP8 should bind 5 µM nucleotides in these conditions and, if the
fluorescent label has no effect, 25% of the fluorescent molecule would
be bound to protein. Anisotropy, corrected for the intrinsic signal of
unbound oligonucleotide, was 0.042 ± 0.005, independently of the
order of addition of labeled and unlabeled molecule. This value is in
good agreement with the anisotropy expected for fractional saturation
Binding site size for the oligonucleotide and for polynucleotide DNA-binding site sizes of 12-22 nt/ICP8 monomer have been
previously determined from electron microscope studies (36) or from
indirect measurements based on the concentration of ICP8 required to
optimize protein activity or nuclease protection (2, 14, 32, 37). Here
we report direct measurement of the DNA-binding site size of ICP8 in
solution using spectroscopic techniques, n = 10 ± 1 nt/ICP8 monomer (Table I). Identical results were observed for
binding to ss Binding of ICP8 to ssDNA stretched the DNA judging from enhanced
fluorescence of etheno-modified DNA (Fig. 1). These spectroscopic results are in agreement with electron microscopy experiments showing
that ICP8 interacts preferentially with ssDNA to form regular repeating
structures that hold DNA in an extended conformation (4, 36). The
induction of a stretched DNA conformation is found in nucleoprotein
filaments of ssDNA-binding proteins gp32 from phage T4 (17), SSB from
E. coli (38), and RPA from yeast (24). This extended
conformation is a property shared with protein-DNA filaments formed by
recombinases such as bacterial RecA (39), UvsX from phage T4 (25), and
eucaryote Rad51 (27). Although this fluorescence increase does not
depend in a quantitative fashion on DNA length, it is nevertheless a
useful qualitative manner to compare conformational changes brought
about by various ssDNA-binding proteins. The maximum fluorescence
enhancement factor at 25° C of ICP8 (2.9 ± 0.2) was larger
than the value reported for ssDNA-binding proteins gp32 (2.0 (17)),
yeast RPA (1.7 (24)), and for inactive RecA protein in the absence of
cofactor or in the presence of ADP (2.0 (26)). Larger fluorescence
enhancement values are reported for active recombinases in the presence
of ATP cofactor at 25° C: UvsX protein (2.0-2.5 (25)); RecA protein
(2.8 (21, 26)); and Rad51 at 30° C (5.0 (27)). There have been
reports that the fluorescence enhancement of The ICP8-
1, and a cooperativity
parameter,
= 15 ± 3. The equilibrium constant was
largely independent of salt,
log(K
)/
log([NaCl]) =
2.4 ± 0.4. Comparison of these parameters with other ssDNA-binding proteins showed
that ICP8 reacted with an unusual mechanism characterized by low
cooperativity and weak binding. In addition, the reaction product was
more stable at high salt concentrations, and fluorescence enhancement
of etheno-ssDNA by ICP8 was higher than for other ssDNA-binding
proteins. These last two characteristics are also found for protein-DNA
complexes formed by recombinases in their active conformation. Given
the proposed role of ICP8 in promoting strand transfer reactions, they
suggest that ICP8 and recombinase proteins may catalyze homologous
recombination by a similar mechanism.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
DNA was synthesized by published methods (21).
5'-Fluorescein (F)-labeled 32-mer F-CCATCCGCAAAAATGACCTCTTATCAAAAGGA
and the corresponding unlabeled oligonucleotide were synthesized by
Genosys. Concentration units of ICP8 and DNA are M protein and M
nucleotide, respectively.
DNA, samples were excited at 305 nm, and
fluorescence intensity was measured using a 345 nm cut-off filter. Fluorescence signals of
DNA and of protein were linear functions of
concentration in the concentration ranges used, which is consistent with the absence of aggregation. Fluorescence signal from protein alone was subtracted and data reported as fluorescence
enhancement, (Flcomplex
Fl
DNA)/Fl
DNA, where
Flcomplex is the fluorescence of the protein-DNA
complex and Fl
DNA is the fluorescence of
DNA alone.
A0, where
Aobs is the observed anisotropy, and
A0 is the signal of the oligonucleotide alone.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
DNA--
Etheno-DNA is a fluorescent
derivative of M13 ssDNA frequently used to measure protein binding to
ssDNA in nucleoprotein filaments (17, 21, 24-27); conformational
changes in the filament that stretch
DNA reduce collisional
quenching by adjacent nucleic acid bases and thereby increase
fluorescence signal. ICP8 binding enhanced the fluorescence of
DNA
by a factor of 2.9 ± 0.2 (Fig. 1
and Table I). Identical titration curves
were observed in the presence and absence of NaCl (10 mM
Tris acetate, 10% glycerol, pH 7.4, data not shown), indicating that
the reaction is stoichiometric in the experimental conditions of Fig.
1, and a binding site size of 10 nt per ICP8 monomer was determined
from the molar ratios of ICP8 and
DNA required to saturate
fluorescence enhancement. The resulting protein-DNA complex could not
be dissociated with 800 mM NaCl (Fig. 1b).

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
a, fluorescence enhancement of
DNA.
10 µM
DNA titrated with ICP8 25° C, 20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4; b,
titration of complex formed in a with NaCl.
Stoichiometry and fluorescence enhancement of complexes formed between
ICP8 and
DNA
DNA. The same stoichiometry and fluorescence enhancements were
observed as in the forward titration (Table I). To control further for
the possibility of irreversible complex formation, ICP8 was titrated
with
DNA at five NaCl concentrations from 150 to 700 mM
NaCl (not shown). Binding isotherms were similar in all experiments,
although at higher salt concentrations ([NaCl] >500 mM)
stoichiometry decreased slightly from 10 ± 1 to 8.5 ± 1 and
fluorescence enhancement decreased from 3.0 ± 0.1 to 2.6 ± 0.1 which may reflect the influence of high salt on the binding mode.
These results show that the complex formed between ICP8 and
DNA was
independent of the order of addition and insensitive to salt up to a
concentration of 500 mM NaCl.
DNA at high salt
concentrations, and we were unable to find solution conditions to
measure equilibrium binding. Therefore, we investigated the reaction of
ICP8 with a 32-mer oligonucleotide, reasoning that cooperative binding
which depends on protein-protein interactions should be less important
for an oligonucleotide than for a polynucleotide. The oligonucleotide
was labeled at the 5' extremity with fluorescein, and protein binding
was measured by fluorescence anisotropy.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
a, observed fluorescence anisotropy of 5 µM 5'-fluorescein-labeled 32-mer oligonucleotide titrated
with ICP8 at 25° C, 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl. Data points are the average of six titrations.
b, complexes in a titrated with indicated added
concentrations of NaCl (
), KCl (×), sodium acetate (
), or
MgCl2 (
).
= 0.76 ± 0.02 M,
and the divalent cation was more potent than monovalent cations, STMP
MgCl2 = 0.08 ± 0.01 M. It should be noted that data in Fig. 2b are salt titrations of complexes formed
in the presence of 150 mM NaCl which was required to
maintain the integrity of ICP8.
= Lb/MT which is determined by the chemical potential of
the free ligand, approximated by Lf; here Lb is bound
ligand concentration, Lf is free ligand concentration (M ICP8), and MT the total macromolecule concentration (M nt). The set of
{LT, MT} which gives a particular value of
A obeys conservation of mass, LT = Lb + Lf =
·MT + Lf, where LT is the
total ICP8 concentration (M protein). A plot of LT versus MT for the set of values {LT,
MT} corresponding to a particular anisotropy should be linear
with a slope of
and an intercept of Lf. Fractional
saturation,
, can be calculated from binding density by
= n·
where n is the binding site size
(nt/protein molecule). Since each value of
corresponds to a unique
value of the experimental signal, it is possible to determine the
relationship between anisotropy and density of protein on the
oligonucleotide (Fig. 4a).
Each value of
also corresponds to a particular free ligand
concentration (Lf) which allows one to construct a binding
isotherm (Fig. 4b) and to determine K and
independently of the relation between experimental signal and binding
density.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Fluorescence anisotropy of
5'-fluorescein-labeled oligonucleotide as a function of protein
concentration; the intrinsic anisotropy of the oligonucleotide has been
subtracted. 5 µM (
), 10 µM (
),
15 µM (
), 20 µM (
), or 25 µM (
) 32-mer oligonucleotide were titrated with
indicated concentrations of ICP8 at 25° C in 300 mM
NaCl, 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4. Theoretical curves were
calculated by the method of Epstein (31) using n = 10, K = 0.55 ± 0.05 × 106,
= 15 ± 5, and Amax = 0.165.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
a, fluorescence anisotropy as a function
of fractional saturation. b, model-free binding isotherm.
and Lf were calculated from the titration curves in Fig. 3
using the method of macromolecular binding density function analysis
(29, 30) (see text). Data in b are presented with
theoretical curves (31) n = 10; upper curve
K = 0.8 × 106
M
1,
= 10; lower curve
K = 0.4 × 106
M
1,
= 20; middle curve
K = 0.55 × 106
M
1,
= 15.
was determined from the slopes of these
plots and the binding site size n = 10 nt/protein (Fig. 4a). Small positive curvature was observed at low binding
density. The simplest explanation of this observation is that initial
bound protein inhibited mobility less than protein bound at high
density. Maximum anisotropy was extrapolated from data at high
fractional saturation, Amax = 0.165 ± 0.005.
1 and cooperativity parameter
= 15 ± 3. Visual fit was confirmed by examining the residuals
between experimental and theoretical points for K and
near these values. Identical results were found with two independent
titrations of 5-25 µM oligonucleotide with ICP8. The
effects of variations of K and
illustrated in Fig. 4b give an idea of the robustness of the fit. These
parameters were then used to fit experimental binding isotherms (Fig.
3). Theoretical curves were constructed assuming
Amax = 0.165 and a linear relationship between
anisotropy and fractional saturation. They agree well with experimental
data at anisotropy values in the range 0.06-0.125 which corresponds to
40-80% saturation. However, at lower anisotropy values the effect of
the nonlinear relation between anisotropy and fractional saturation
(Fig. 4a) becomes apparent. These differences between
experimental and theoretical curves can be corrected by taking into
account experimental relationship between A and
in Fig.
4a (not shown). However, it should be recalled that
K and
determined in Fig. 4b are independent
of this relationship.
were calculated from these
titration curves as above assuming n = 10 (Table
II). Values of the cooperativity constant
which gave best fits were in the range of
= 8-15 and did not
significantly depend on salt concentration. A plot of
log(K
) versus log([NaCl]) was linear (Fig.
5). The slope of this plot,
2.4 ± 0.4, is a function of the number of electrostatic interactions per
protein monomer contributing to the stability of the nucleoprotein
filament (33). These results, together with the dependence of the
reaction on the nature of the anion (Fig. 2b), show that
equilibrium binding of ICP8 with ssDNA is not simply entropically
driven displacement of cations from polynucleotide as reported for
simple peptide-DNA complexes (33-35).
Binding parameters for the reaction of ICP8 with 32-mer oligonucleotide

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Salt dependence of the binding constant.
5 µM oligonucleotide was titrated with ICP8 in the
presence of 200-400 mM NaCl, and equilibrium constants and
cooperativity parameters were calculated as in Fig. 3. The best
straight line fit was calculated by linear regression, slope =
2.4 ± 0.4, intercept = 5.5 ± 0.2.
at several temperatures between 20 and 40 °C. In this approach, the percent anisotropy increase during titration was assumed to be proportional to DNA binding
at all temperatures as is approximately the case at 25 °C (Fig.
4a). In order to determine this parameter, the maximum anisotropy, Amax which depends on temperature
according to the Perrin equation (23), must be evaluated at each
temperature. Preliminary experiments showed that plateau values of the
binding isotherm were not sufficiently precise to determine
Amax. We therefore measured binding parameters
at 37 °C using the macromolecular binding density function methods
as above (29-31). Four concentrations of oligonucleotide 10-25
µM were titrated with ICP8 at 37 ± 0.5 °C in 20 mM Tris acetate, 300 mM NaCl, pH 7.4. A
slightly non-linear relation between anisotropy and
was observed at
37 °C similar to results at 25 °C (Fig. 4a). The model
free binding isotherm was fit using n = 10 (Table II).
Enthalpy and entropy were assumed to be independent of temperature, and
these were estimated from a van't Hoff plot using K
at
the 25° C and 37° C,
H =
5.6 ± 1.3 kcal(M)
1,
S = 12.6 ± 4.4 cal(K·M)
1 (K is degrees Kelvin) where
the uncertainties are from the variations of K
which fit
the binding isotherms. These results indicate that entropy and enthalpy
contributed about equally to the free energy of ICP8 binding to ssDNA.
= 0.25 (Fig. 4a). Hence, these competition
experiments show that the fluorescent label did not interfere with DNA
binding. Likewise, the absence of fluorescence quenching during
titration suggests an absence of interaction between protein and the
fluorescein moiety.
DNA
were the same (Table I and Figs. 1 and 2) which suggests that the
product of the reaction between ICP8 and ssDNA is independent of the
length of DNA. The binding parameters determined using a 32-mer
oligonucleotide can probably be considered a good estimate for those of
the reaction with ssDNA. We have not investigated the effect of DNA
sequence which is known to influence the association constants of
ssDNA-binding proteins. Nevertheless, our results give a qualitative
description of the reaction between ICP8 and ssDNA which can be
compared with DNA binding studies reported for ICP8 and other proteins.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
DNA (Fig. 1) with NaCl concentrations from 150 to 500 mM or without NaCl in the presence of 10% glycerol as well
as for the reaction with a single-stranded 32-mer oligonucleotide (Fig.
2). ICP8 binding site size for the reaction with
DNA was independent
of salt concentration, 0-500 mM NaCl, indicating a single
DNA binding mode as a function of this salt, unlike the case of
E. coli SSB (18).
DNA varies with the
quantity and quality of etheno modification (25). We therefore compared the fluorescence enhancement of ICP8 and RecA using the same
DNA substrate. Fluorescence increase by ICP8 was indistinguishable from the
signal with RecA in the presence of ATP
S (not shown).
DNA complex was stable in the presence of high
concentrations of NaCl (Fig. 1). This stability was observed for complexes formed by both titration of protein with DNA and titration of
DNA with protein. Furthermore, titrations of
DNA with protein in the
presence of 200-500 mM NaCl gave similar binding isotherms as titration of DNA in 150 mM NaCl or in the presence of
10% glycerol without NaCl. We conclude that equilibrium binding occurs
in these reaction conditions, and the protein-ssDNA complex cannot be
dissociated by high NaCl concentrations. This stability likely reflects
a small contribution of electrostatic interactions to binding as observed with oligonucleotide,

log(K
)/
log([NaCl]) = 2.4 (Fig. 5 and Table
III). In contrast, the nucleoprotein
filaments of other ssDNA-binding proteins are readily dissociated by
NaCl; these form complexes with polynucleotides that exhibit values of

log(K
)/
log([NaCl]) in the range of 4-7 (Table
III). Recombination proficient nucleoprotein filaments formed by UvsX
(25), RecA (26), and Rad51 (27) are stable in the presence of NaCl,
whereas inactive recombinase filaments (such as RecA protein in the
presence of ADP) are readily disrupted by salts (39).
Nucleic acid binding parameters for single-stranded DNA-binding
proteins
Comparison of binding constants of ICP8 with those of other
single-stranded DNA-binding proteins shows that ICP8 forms an unusual
protein-DNA complex (Table III). The single-stranded binding protein
from phage T4, gp32, exhibits high cooperativity and tight binding (16,
17). As a consequence of high cooperativity, the binding isotherm is
sigmoidal which allows gp32 to associate and dissociate from ssDNA upon
small changes of protein concentration. High cooperativity and
preference for ssDNA rather than RNA provide the thermodynamic basis of
the autologous regulation of gp32 transcription. In contrast, the human
single-stranded DNA-binding protein, hRPA, displays low cooperativity
and tight binding (20). Consequently it has been suggested that a
concentration-dependent "switch" such as found for gp32
is not involved in regulation of hRPA; rather binding of the hRPA
heterotrimer to ssDNA may be regulated by other mechanisms that involve
phosphorylation and/or protein-protein interactions. The behavior of
E. coli SSB protein is more complex, with multiple DNA
binding modes and cooperativities depending on salt concentration (18).
The high salt form (
0.2 M NaCl), (SSB)65,
binds weakly to poly(dA) with intermediate cooperativity.
In comparison with these proteins, ICP8 binds weakly to ssDNA with low cooperativity (Table III). Early studies claimed that the reaction of ICP8 with ssDNA was highly cooperative. However, this conclusion was based on the observation of protein clusters on ssDNA by electron microscopy (4) and on the binding of partially purified ICP8-antibody complexes to ssDNA (3) which may not accurately measure equilibrium binding of the protein. A recent study (40) of the binding of ICP8 to oligo(dT) by gel mobility assay reported that the reaction was weakly cooperative. However, it is difficult to compare our results with this work since the reaction conditions, binding site size, and method for calculating binding parameters are not the same. The weak DNA binding of ICP8 may be compensated for by its high abundance during viral replication (41). Alternatively, strong cooperative binding to ssDNA may not be required for the functions of ICP8. For example, electron microscopy studies have shown that ICP8 and the HSV-1 origin binding protein UL9 unwind duplex DNA by a different mechanism than other DNA helicase/single-stranded DNA-binding proteins; DNA and the two proteins first condense and subsequently several kilobases of ssDNA covered with ICP8 are released (36). The selective advantage of the unusual ssDNA-binding properties of ICP8 are unknown. We speculate that they could be required for its putative recombinase activity.
Homologous recombination is carried out by recombinases in nucleoprotein filaments by a mechanism that has been found in all organisms from phage to man (42). Furthermore, recombinases are the only DNA repair proteins with a common domain arrangement in bacteria, archea, and eucaryotes (43). This conservation across evolution is likely the result of requirements of the homologous recombination reaction. If this argument is correct, ICP8 which catalyzes strand transfer in vitro (15), might likewise be expected to share some common properties with recombinases that are not found in other ssDNA-binding proteins.
We have observed that the ICP8-ssDNA nucleoprotein filament produces
higher fluorescence enhancement of
DNA, is more stable in the
presence of high concentrations of NaCl (Fig. 1), and exhibits smaller
values of
log(K
)/
log([NaCl]) than other well
studied ssDNA-binding proteins, gp32, ecSSB, and RPA (Table III). The
fluorescence enhancement of ICP8 resembles that reported for active
recombinases RecA and Rad51 and indicates that DNA may assume a similar
conformation in these filaments. Stability at high NaCl concentrations
is likewise a characteristic of both the ICP8 nucleoprotein filament
and recombinase filaments in their active conformation.
Of course bona fide recombinases also have general
characteristics that are not found for ICP8. They form long
nucleofilaments with well defined right-handed helical structures (42,
44), whereas ICP8 nucleoprotein filaments are left-handed and twice as
thick as RecA filaments, suggesting that more than one ICP8 molecule
may contribute to its width (32). Recombinases but not ICP8 have ATPase
activity (1, 42). However, despite these and other differences, the
protein-DNA complexes of ICP8 and recombinases appear to share some
structural and biochemical similarities. Further comparison of ICP8 and
recombinases should give important insights into the chemistry of
homologous recombination.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by Grants 9627 and 9584 from the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (to N. P. J. and G. V., respectively) and by Grant AI38335 from the National Institutes of Health (to P. E. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: (33) 5.61.17.59.60; Fax (33) 5.61.17.59.97; E-mail: neil@ipbs.fr.
2 Y. Dupont, Bio-Logic, personal communication.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
HSV-1, herpes
simplex virus type 1;
nt, nucleotide;
DNA, etheno-modified
single-stranded DNA from phage M13;
ss, single-stranded;
ecSSB, ssDNA-binding protein from E. coli;
hRPA, human
single-stranded binding protein RPA;
STMP, salt titration midpoint;
ATP
S, adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Boehmer, P. E., and Lehman, I. R. (1997) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66, 347-384[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Dutch, R. E.,
and Lehman, I. R.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
6945-6949 |
| 3. |
Lee, C. K.,
and Knipe, D. M.
(1985)
J. Virol.
54,
731-738 |
| 4. |
Ruyechan, W. T.
(1983)
J. Virol.
46,
661-666 |
| 5. | Ruyechan, W. T., and Wier, A. C. (1984) J. Virol. 59, 727-733 |
| 6. |
Ruyechan, W. T.
(1988)
J. Virol.
62,
810-817 |
| 7. |
Ruyechan, W. T.,
and Olson, J. W.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
6273-6279 |
| 8. |
Tanguy le Gac, N.,
Villani, G.,
Hoffmann, J. S.,
and Boehmer, P. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
21645-21651 |
| 9. |
Tanguy le Gac, N.,
Villani, G.,
and Boehmer, P. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
13801-13807 |
| 10. |
Boehmer, P. E.,
and Lehman, I. R.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
8444-8448 |
| 11. | Lukonis, C. J., and Weller, S. K. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 1751-1758[Abstract] |
| 12. |
Hamarsten, O.,
and Elias, P.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
1753-1760 |
| 13. | Dutch, R. E., Bianchi, V., and Lehman, I. R. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 3084-3089[Abstract] |
| 14. |
Boehmer, P. E.,
and Lehman, I. R.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
711-515 |
| 15. | Bortner, C., Hernandez, T. R., Lehman, I. R., and Griffith, J. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 231, 241-250[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Newport, J. W., Lonberg, N., Kowalczykowski, S. C., and von Hippel, P. H. (1981) J. Mol. Biol. 145, 105-121[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Kowalczykowski, S. C., Lonberg, N., Newport, J. W., and von Hippel, P. H. (1981) J. Mol. Biol. 145, 75-104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Lohman, T. M., and Ferrari, M. E. (1994) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63, 527-570[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Wold, M. S. (1997) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66, 61-92[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Kim, C., and Wold, M. S. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 2058-2064[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Cazaux, C., Blanchet, J. S., Dupuis, D., Villani, G., Defais, M., and Johnson, N. P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 44, 28799-28804 |
| 22. | Deleted in proof |
| 23. | Lakowicz, J. R. (1983) Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy , Plenum Publishing Corp., New York |
| 24. | Alani, E., Thresher, R., Griffith, J. D., and Kolodner, R. D. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 227, 54-71[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Ando, R. A., and Morrical, S. W. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 283, 785-796[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Menetski, J. P., and Kowalczykowski, S. C. (1985) J. Mol. Biol. 181, 281-295[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Namsaraev, E. A.,
and Berg, P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
6177-6182 |
| 28. |
Zlotnick, A.,
Mitchell, R. S.,
Steed, R. K.,
and Brenner, S. L.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
22525-22530 |
| 29. | Lohman, T. M., and Bujalowski, W. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 208, 258-290[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Bujalowski, W., and Lohman, T. M. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 3099-3106[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Epstein, I. R. (1978) Biophys. Chem. 8, 327-329[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
O'Donnell, M. E.,
Elias, P.,
Funnell, B. E.,
and Lehman, I. R.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
4260-4266 |
| 33. | Record, T. M., Jr., Lohman, T. M., and De Haseth, P. (1976) J. Mol. Biol. 107, 145-158[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. |
Johnson, N. P.,
Mazarguil, H.,
and Lopez, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19675-19679 |
| 35. |
Zhang, W.,
Bond, J. P.,
Anderson, C. F.,
Lohman, T. M.,
and Record, T. M. J.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
2511-2516 |
| 36. | Makhov, A. M., Boehmer, P. E., Lehman, I. R., and Griffith, J. D. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 258, 789-799[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Hernandez, T. R.,
and Lehman, I. R.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
11227-11232 |
| 38. | Kuil, M. E., Holmlund, K., Vlaanderen, C. A., and van Grondelle, R. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 8184-8189[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Kowalczykowski, S. C. (1991) Annu. Rev. Biochem. Biophys. Chem. 20, 539-575[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Dudas, K. C.,
and Ruyechan, W. T.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
257-265 |
| 41. | Bayliss, G. J., Marsden, H. S., and Hay, J. (1975) Virology 68, 124-134[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. | Roca, I. A., and Cox, M. M. (1997) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 56, 129-223[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. |
Aravind, L.,
Walker, D. R.,
and Koonin, E. V.
(1999)
Nucleic Acids Res.
27,
1223-1242 |
| 44. | Egelman, E. H., and Stasiak, A. (1993) Micron 24, 309-324 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. E. Boehmer RNA binding and R-loop formation by the herpes simplex virus type-1 single-stranded DNA-binding protein (ICP8) Nucleic Acids Res., August 25, 2004; 32(15): 4576 - 4584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Nimonkar and P. E. Boehmer Role of Protein-Protein Interactions during Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Recombination-dependent Replication J. Biol. Chem., May 21, 2004; 279(21): 21957 - 21965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-X. Dou, P.-Y. Wang, H. Q. Xu, and X. G. Xi The DNA Binding Properties of the Escherichia coli RecQ Helicase J. Biol. Chem., February 20, 2004; 279(8): 6354 - 6363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Nimonkar and P. E. Boehmer On the mechanism of strand assimilation by the herpes simplex virus type-1 single-strand DNA-binding protein (ICP8) Nucleic Acids Res., September 15, 2003; 31(18): 5275 - 5281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Nimonkar and P. E. Boehmer Reconstitution of recombination-dependent DNA synthesis in herpes simplex virus 1 PNAS, September 2, 2003; 100(18): 10201 - 10206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. B. Reuven, A. E. Staire, R. S. Myers, and S. K. Weller The Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Alkaline Nuclease and Single-Stranded DNA Binding Protein Mediate Strand Exchange In Vitro J. Virol., July 1, 2003; 77(13): 7425 - 7433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Nimonkar and P. E. Boehmer The Herpes Simplex Virus Type-1 Single-strand DNA-binding Protein (ICP8) Promotes Strand Invasion J. Biol. Chem., March 7, 2003; 278(11): 9678 - 9682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Nimonkar and P. E. Boehmer In Vitro Strand Exchange Promoted by the Herpes Simplex Virus Type-1 Single Strand DNA-binding Protein (ICP8) and DNA Helicase-Primase J. Biol. Chem., April 19, 2002; 277(17): 15182 - 15189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Spencer, M. J. Kruhlak, H. L. Jenkins, X. Sun, and D. P. Bazett-Jones Mitotic Transcription Repression In Vivo in the Absence of Nucleosomal Chromatin Condensation J. Cell Biol., July 11, 2000; 150(1): 13 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-S. Gourves, M. Defais, and N. P. Johnson Equilibrium Binding of Single-stranded DNA to the Secondary DNA Binding Site of the Bacterial Recombinase RecA J. Biol. Chem., March 23, 2001; 276(13): 9613 - 9619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |