JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gourves, A.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, N. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gourves, A.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, N. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 15, 10864-10869, April 14, 2000


Equilibrium Binding of Single-stranded DNA with Herpes Simplex Virus Type I-coded Single-stranded DNA-binding Protein, ICP8*

Anne-Sophie GourvesDagger , Nicolas Tanguy Le GacDagger , Giuseppe VillaniDagger , Paul E. Boehmer§, and Neil P. JohnsonDagger

From the Dagger  Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, CNRS, 205 Route de Narbonne, 31077 Toulouse Cédex, France and § Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33101-6129



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have carried out solution equilibrium binding studies of ICP8, the major single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein of herpes simplex virus type I, in order to determine the thermodynamic parameters for its interaction with ssDNA. Fluorescence anisotropy measurements of a 5'-fluorescein-labeled 32-mer oligonucleotide revealed that ICP8 formed a nucleoprotein filament on ssDNA with a binding site size of 10 nucleotides/ICP8 monomer, an association constant at 25° C, K = 0.55 ± 0.05 × 106 M-1, and a cooperativity parameter, omega  = 15 ± 3. The equilibrium constant was largely independent of salt, delta log(Komega )/delta log([NaCl]) = -2.4 ± 0.4. Comparison of these parameters with other ssDNA-binding proteins showed that ICP8 reacted with an unusual mechanism characterized by low cooperativity and weak binding. In addition, the reaction product was more stable at high salt concentrations, and fluorescence enhancement of etheno-ssDNA by ICP8 was higher than for other ssDNA-binding proteins. These last two characteristics are also found for protein-DNA complexes formed by recombinases in their active conformation. Given the proposed role of ICP8 in promoting strand transfer reactions, they suggest that ICP8 and recombinase proteins may catalyze homologous recombination by a similar mechanism.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

ICP8 is 128-kDa zinc metalloprotein coded by the UL29 gene of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1).1 It is one of seven virus-encoded proteins necessary for HSV-1 origin-dependent DNA replication (1). ICP8 forms an extended nucleoprotein filament with ssDNA in vitro; it binds more readily to ssDNA than to double-stranded DNA (1-6), and DNA binding may involve contacts by free sulfhydryl groups and surface lysine and tyrosine residues (6, 7). In addition to its role as an ssDNA-binding protein, complexes of ICP8 with other proteins may act during viral replication. ICP8 physically interacts via the UL8 protein with the HSV-1 helicase primase heterotrimer thereby stimulating unwinding of intact and damaged duplex DNA (8, 9); likewise a physical interaction between ICP8 and the herpes UL9 helicase has also been shown (10). Specific protein-protein interactions between ICP8, UL9 protein, and subunits of the DNA helicase primase are required for the assembly of these proteins into prereplicative sites, and recruitment of the DNA polymerase into this complex is mediated by the UL42 subunit (11, 12).

Cells infected with HSV-1 display a high frequency of homologous recombination (13). In vitro experiments suggest that ICP8 may be responsible for homologous recombination in vivo. ICP8 exhibits helix destabilizing and DNA renaturing activities (2, 14). The protein also catalyzes homologous pairing and strand exchange activity in vitro (15) where it is able to transfer a DNA strand from a linear duplex to a complementary single-stranded circular DNA. The reaction requires MgCl2 but not (d)NTPs, and strand exchange is limited to a few 100 base pairs.

Understanding the role of ICP8 in the DNA replication and recombination reactions of HSV-1 will require knowledge of the thermodynamics and kinetics of the various macromolecular interactions involved. Currently, the thermodynamic characteristics of the simple reaction between ICP8 and ssDNA are largely unknown compared with other ssDNA-binding proteins such as gp32 from phage T4 (16, 17), Escherichia coli SSB (18), or eucaryote RPA (19, 20). In order to address this question, we have undertaken solution equilibrium binding studies of the reaction of ICP8 with ssDNA using fluorescence spectroscopy.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Chemicals and Reaction Conditions-- ICP8 was purified as described (8). epsilon DNA was synthesized by published methods (21). 5'-Fluorescein (F)-labeled 32-mer F-CCATCCGCAAAAATGACCTCTTATCAAAAGGA and the corresponding unlabeled oligonucleotide were synthesized by Genosys. Concentration units of ICP8 and DNA are M protein and M nucleotide, respectively.

Spectroscopic Measurements-- Fluorescence measurements were performed using a model MOS-400 spectrophotometer from Bio-Logic (Claix, France). Samples were stirred continuously at 25 ± 1° C in a 1.0 × 0.4-cm thermostated cuvette with the short path in the direction of incident light in order to reduce inner filter effects. Results were corrected for dilution and inner filter effects as described previously (21). pH was checked before and after the reaction and did not change during the titration.

In experiments with epsilon DNA, samples were excited at 305 nm, and fluorescence intensity was measured using a 345 nm cut-off filter. Fluorescence signals of epsilon DNA and of protein were linear functions of concentration in the concentration ranges used, which is consistent with the absence of aggregation. Fluorescence signal from protein alone was subtracted and data reported as fluorescence enhancement, (Flcomplex - Flepsilon DNA)/Flepsilon DNA, where Flcomplex is the fluorescence of the protein-DNA complex and Flepsilon DNA is the fluorescence of epsilon DNA alone.

In experiments using 5'-fluorescein-labeled oligonucleotide, samples were excited at 490 nm, and fluorescence intensity was measured through a 550-nm cut-off filter. Vertically and horizontally polarized fluorescence were measured simultaneously by a photoelastic modulator PEM-90 (Hinds Instruments) and used to calculate fluorescence and anisotropy (23).2 Fluorescence anisotropy is reported either as Aobs or A = Aobs - A0, where Aobs is the observed anisotropy, and A0 is the signal of the oligonucleotide alone.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Binding of ICP8 to epsilon DNA-- Etheno-DNA is a fluorescent derivative of M13 ssDNA frequently used to measure protein binding to ssDNA in nucleoprotein filaments (17, 21, 24-27); conformational changes in the filament that stretch epsilon DNA reduce collisional quenching by adjacent nucleic acid bases and thereby increase fluorescence signal. ICP8 binding enhanced the fluorescence of epsilon DNA by a factor of 2.9 ± 0.2 (Fig. 1 and Table I). Identical titration curves were observed in the presence and absence of NaCl (10 mM Tris acetate, 10% glycerol, pH 7.4, data not shown), indicating that the reaction is stoichiometric in the experimental conditions of Fig. 1, and a binding site size of 10 nt per ICP8 monomer was determined from the molar ratios of ICP8 and epsilon DNA required to saturate fluorescence enhancement. The resulting protein-DNA complex could not be dissociated with 800 mM NaCl (Fig. 1b).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   a, fluorescence enhancement of epsilon DNA. 10 µM epsilon DNA titrated with ICP8 25° C, 20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4; b, titration of complex formed in a with NaCl.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Stoichiometry and fluorescence enhancement of complexes formed between ICP8 and epsilon DNA

The stability of the complex in high salt solution may be the result of a kinetic trap such as the formation of a non-equilibrium complex (28). To test this possibility, we carried out the reverse titration of ICP8 with epsilon DNA. The same stoichiometry and fluorescence enhancements were observed as in the forward titration (Table I). To control further for the possibility of irreversible complex formation, ICP8 was titrated with epsilon DNA at five NaCl concentrations from 150 to 700 mM NaCl (not shown). Binding isotherms were similar in all experiments, although at higher salt concentrations ([NaCl] >500 mM) stoichiometry decreased slightly from 10 ± 1 to 8.5 ± 1 and fluorescence enhancement decreased from 3.0 ± 0.1 to 2.6 ± 0.1 which may reflect the influence of high salt on the binding mode. These results show that the complex formed between ICP8 and epsilon DNA was independent of the order of addition and insensitive to salt up to a concentration of 500 mM NaCl.

Binding of ICP8 to Oligonucleotide-- In the previous experiments ICP8 bound stoichiometrically to epsilon DNA at high salt concentrations, and we were unable to find solution conditions to measure equilibrium binding. Therefore, we investigated the reaction of ICP8 with a 32-mer oligonucleotide, reasoning that cooperative binding which depends on protein-protein interactions should be less important for an oligonucleotide than for a polynucleotide. The oligonucleotide was labeled at the 5' extremity with fluorescein, and protein binding was measured by fluorescence anisotropy.

The intrinsic anisotropy of the 5'-fluorescein-labeled 32-mer oligonucleotide was 0.02 ± 0.007 (Fig. 2a) which is characteristic of mobile fluorophore (23). Titration of oligonucleotide with ICP8 increased anisotropy to 0.16-0.18 reflecting lower mobility as a result of protein binding. No fluorescence quenching occurred during the titration (data not shown). The stoichiometry of the reaction was 10 ± 1 nt/ICP8 molecule.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   a, observed fluorescence anisotropy of 5 µM 5'-fluorescein-labeled 32-mer oligonucleotide titrated with ICP8 at 25° C, 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl. Data points are the average of six titrations. b, complexes in a titrated with indicated added concentrations of NaCl (), KCl (×), sodium acetate (black-triangle), or MgCl2 (black-square).

The ICP8-oligonucleotide complex could be dissociated with NaCl (Fig. 2b). The anisotropy of the oligonucleotide alone increased with salt concentration (data not shown) and equaled the slightly elevated anisotropy values observed after dissociation of the complex. This effect was taken into account in order to determine the salt titration midpoint (STMP), the salt concentration necessary to decrease anisotropy by 50%. Monovalent cations Na+ and K+ destabilized the protein-DNA complex with equal efficiency; the STMPs of NaCl and KCl were 0.35 ± 0.03 M and 0.31 ± 0.02 M, respectively. In contrast the destabilizing efficiency was sensitive to anion, STMP NaCH3COO- = 0.76 ± 0.02 M, and the divalent cation was more potent than monovalent cations, STMP MgCl2 = 0.08 ± 0.01 M. It should be noted that data in Fig. 2b are salt titrations of complexes formed in the presence of 150 mM NaCl which was required to maintain the integrity of ICP8.

Unlike most spectroscopic measurements, fluorescence anisotropy is independent of the concentration of fluorophore (23). Therefore, in order to study ICP8 binding to ssDNA using this method, it was important to experimentally determine the relationship between anisotropy and the concentration of bound fluorescent oligonucleotide. This can be accomplished using the macromolecular binding density function method of Lohman and co-workers (29, 30). Briefly, several concentrations of oligonucleotide are titrated by protein (Fig. 3). All titrations with a particular anisotropy, A, have the same binding density nu  = Lb/MT which is determined by the chemical potential of the free ligand, approximated by Lf; here Lb is bound ligand concentration, Lf is free ligand concentration (M ICP8), and MT the total macromolecule concentration (M nt). The set of {LT, MT} which gives a particular value of A obeys conservation of mass, LT = Lb + Lf = nu ·MT + Lf, where LT is the total ICP8 concentration (M protein). A plot of LT versus MT for the set of values {LT, MT} corresponding to a particular anisotropy should be linear with a slope of nu  and an intercept of Lf. Fractional saturation, theta , can be calculated from binding density by theta  = n·nu where n is the binding site size (nt/protein molecule). Since each value of theta  corresponds to a unique value of the experimental signal, it is possible to determine the relationship between anisotropy and density of protein on the oligonucleotide (Fig. 4a). Each value of theta  also corresponds to a particular free ligand concentration (Lf) which allows one to construct a binding isotherm (Fig. 4b) and to determine K and omega  independently of the relation between experimental signal and binding density.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Fluorescence anisotropy of 5'-fluorescein-labeled oligonucleotide as a function of protein concentration; the intrinsic anisotropy of the oligonucleotide has been subtracted. 5 µM (), 10 µM (open circle ), 15 µM (black-square), 20 µM (), or 25 µM (black-triangle) 32-mer oligonucleotide were titrated with indicated concentrations of ICP8 at 25° C in 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4. Theoretical curves were calculated by the method of Epstein (31) using n = 10, K = 0.55 ± 0.05 × 106, omega  = 15 ± 5, and Amax = 0.165.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   a, fluorescence anisotropy as a function of fractional saturation. b, model-free binding isotherm. theta  and Lf were calculated from the titration curves in Fig. 3 using the method of macromolecular binding density function analysis (29, 30) (see text). Data in b are presented with theoretical curves (31) n = 10; upper curve K = 0.8 × 106 M-1, omega  = 10; lower curve K = 0.4 × 106 M-1, omega  = 20; middle curve K = 0.55 × 106 M-1, omega  = 15.

On the basis of the salt-dependent stability of the protein-DNA complex (Fig. 2b), we chose to study equilibrium binding in the presence of 300 mM NaCl. Fluorescence anisotropy of 5-25 µM oligonucleotide titrated with ICP8 in these conditions is shown in Fig. 3. Intrinsic oligonucleotide anisotropy has been subtracted from these data. Plots of LT versus MT for {LT, MT} corresponding to anisotropies between 0.01 and 0.125 were linear (not shown); nonlinear curves were observed at larger values that may indicate aggregation at higher protein concentrations. The relationship between A and theta  was determined from the slopes of these plots and the binding site size n = 10 nt/protein (Fig. 4a). Small positive curvature was observed at low binding density. The simplest explanation of this observation is that initial bound protein inhibited mobility less than protein bound at high density. Maximum anisotropy was extrapolated from data at high fractional saturation, Amax = 0.165 ± 0.005.

We fit the model-free binding isotherm (Fig. 4b) using the method of Epstein (31) for a protein ligand binding to a 32-mer oligonucleotide macromolecule and n = 10. This approach assumes that monomeric ICP8 binds to DNA; ICP8 sediments in a glycerol gradient as a monomer (32) which is consistent with this assumption. The best visual fit was found to be association constant K = 0.55 ± 0.05 × 106 M-1 and cooperativity parameter omega  = 15 ± 3. Visual fit was confirmed by examining the residuals between experimental and theoretical points for K and omega  near these values. Identical results were found with two independent titrations of 5-25 µM oligonucleotide with ICP8. The effects of variations of K and omega  illustrated in Fig. 4b give an idea of the robustness of the fit. These parameters were then used to fit experimental binding isotherms (Fig. 3). Theoretical curves were constructed assuming Amax = 0.165 and a linear relationship between anisotropy and fractional saturation. They agree well with experimental data at anisotropy values in the range 0.06-0.125 which corresponds to 40-80% saturation. However, at lower anisotropy values the effect of the nonlinear relation between anisotropy and fractional saturation (Fig. 4a) becomes apparent. These differences between experimental and theoretical curves can be corrected by taking into account experimental relationship between A and theta  in Fig. 4a (not shown). However, it should be recalled that K and omega  determined in Fig. 4b are independent of this relationship.

The salt dependence of the binding parameters was then determined. 5 µM oligonucleotide was titrated with ICP8 in 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, at 25° C in the presence of 200-400 mM NaCl. K and omega  were calculated from these titration curves as above assuming n = 10 (Table II). Values of the cooperativity constant which gave best fits were in the range of omega  = 8-15 and did not significantly depend on salt concentration. A plot of log(Komega ) versus log([NaCl]) was linear (Fig. 5). The slope of this plot, -2.4 ± 0.4, is a function of the number of electrostatic interactions per protein monomer contributing to the stability of the nucleoprotein filament (33). These results, together with the dependence of the reaction on the nature of the anion (Fig. 2b), show that equilibrium binding of ICP8 with ssDNA is not simply entropically driven displacement of cations from polynucleotide as reported for simple peptide-DNA complexes (33-35).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Binding parameters for the reaction of ICP8 with 32-mer oligonucleotide



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Salt dependence of the binding constant. 5 µM oligonucleotide was titrated with ICP8 in the presence of 200-400 mM NaCl, and equilibrium constants and cooperativity parameters were calculated as in Fig. 3. The best straight line fit was calculated by linear regression, slope = -2.4 ± 0.4, intercept = 5.5 ± 0.2.

We then investigated the effect of temperature on the reaction. We first tried to determine K and omega  at several temperatures between 20 and 40 °C. In this approach, the percent anisotropy increase during titration was assumed to be proportional to DNA binding at all temperatures as is approximately the case at 25 °C (Fig. 4a). In order to determine this parameter, the maximum anisotropy, Amax which depends on temperature according to the Perrin equation (23), must be evaluated at each temperature. Preliminary experiments showed that plateau values of the binding isotherm were not sufficiently precise to determine Amax. We therefore measured binding parameters at 37 °C using the macromolecular binding density function methods as above (29-31). Four concentrations of oligonucleotide 10-25 µM were titrated with ICP8 at 37 ± 0.5 °C in 20 mM Tris acetate, 300 mM NaCl, pH 7.4. A slightly non-linear relation between anisotropy and theta  was observed at 37 °C similar to results at 25 °C (Fig. 4a). The model free binding isotherm was fit using n = 10 (Table II). Enthalpy and entropy were assumed to be independent of temperature, and these were estimated from a van't Hoff plot using Komega at the 25° C and 37° C, Delta H = -5.6 ± 1.3 kcal(M)-1, Delta S = 12.6 ± 4.4 cal(K·M)-1 (K is degrees Kelvin) where the uncertainties are from the variations of Komega which fit the binding isotherms. These results indicate that entropy and enthalpy contributed about equally to the free energy of ICP8 binding to ssDNA.

To test the effect of the 5'-fluorescein on the reaction, we performed competitive binding experiments between labeled and unlabeled 32-mer in stoichiometric reaction conditions (20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4, 25 °C). Fluorescence anisotropy was measured for complexes formed with 0.5 µM ICP8 and 10 µM of both labeled and unlabeled oligonucleotide. Assuming a binding site size of 10 nt, ICP8 should bind 5 µM nucleotides in these conditions and, if the fluorescent label has no effect, 25% of the fluorescent molecule would be bound to protein. Anisotropy, corrected for the intrinsic signal of unbound oligonucleotide, was 0.042 ± 0.005, independently of the order of addition of labeled and unlabeled molecule. This value is in good agreement with the anisotropy expected for fractional saturation theta  = 0.25 (Fig. 4a). Hence, these competition experiments show that the fluorescent label did not interfere with DNA binding. Likewise, the absence of fluorescence quenching during titration suggests an absence of interaction between protein and the fluorescein moiety.

Binding site size for the oligonucleotide and for polynucleotide epsilon DNA were the same (Table I and Figs. 1 and 2) which suggests that the product of the reaction between ICP8 and ssDNA is independent of the length of DNA. The binding parameters determined using a 32-mer oligonucleotide can probably be considered a good estimate for those of the reaction with ssDNA. We have not investigated the effect of DNA sequence which is known to influence the association constants of ssDNA-binding proteins. Nevertheless, our results give a qualitative description of the reaction between ICP8 and ssDNA which can be compared with DNA binding studies reported for ICP8 and other proteins.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

DNA-binding site sizes of 12-22 nt/ICP8 monomer have been previously determined from electron microscope studies (36) or from indirect measurements based on the concentration of ICP8 required to optimize protein activity or nuclease protection (2, 14, 32, 37). Here we report direct measurement of the DNA-binding site size of ICP8 in solution using spectroscopic techniques, n = 10 ± 1 nt/ICP8 monomer (Table I). Identical results were observed for binding to ss epsilon DNA (Fig. 1) with NaCl concentrations from 150 to 500 mM or without NaCl in the presence of 10% glycerol as well as for the reaction with a single-stranded 32-mer oligonucleotide (Fig. 2). ICP8 binding site size for the reaction with epsilon DNA was independent of salt concentration, 0-500 mM NaCl, indicating a single DNA binding mode as a function of this salt, unlike the case of E. coli SSB (18).

Binding of ICP8 to ssDNA stretched the DNA judging from enhanced fluorescence of etheno-modified DNA (Fig. 1). These spectroscopic results are in agreement with electron microscopy experiments showing that ICP8 interacts preferentially with ssDNA to form regular repeating structures that hold DNA in an extended conformation (4, 36). The induction of a stretched DNA conformation is found in nucleoprotein filaments of ssDNA-binding proteins gp32 from phage T4 (17), SSB from E. coli (38), and RPA from yeast (24). This extended conformation is a property shared with protein-DNA filaments formed by recombinases such as bacterial RecA (39), UvsX from phage T4 (25), and eucaryote Rad51 (27). Although this fluorescence increase does not depend in a quantitative fashion on DNA length, it is nevertheless a useful qualitative manner to compare conformational changes brought about by various ssDNA-binding proteins. The maximum fluorescence enhancement factor at 25° C of ICP8 (2.9 ± 0.2) was larger than the value reported for ssDNA-binding proteins gp32 (2.0 (17)), yeast RPA (1.7 (24)), and for inactive RecA protein in the absence of cofactor or in the presence of ADP (2.0 (26)). Larger fluorescence enhancement values are reported for active recombinases in the presence of ATP cofactor at 25° C: UvsX protein (2.0-2.5 (25)); RecA protein (2.8 (21, 26)); and Rad51 at 30° C (5.0 (27)). There have been reports that the fluorescence enhancement of epsilon DNA varies with the quantity and quality of etheno modification (25). We therefore compared the fluorescence enhancement of ICP8 and RecA using the same epsilon DNA substrate. Fluorescence increase by ICP8 was indistinguishable from the signal with RecA in the presence of ATPgamma S (not shown).

The ICP8-epsilon DNA complex was stable in the presence of high concentrations of NaCl (Fig. 1). This stability was observed for complexes formed by both titration of protein with DNA and titration of DNA with protein. Furthermore, titrations of epsilon DNA with protein in the presence of 200-500 mM NaCl gave similar binding isotherms as titration of DNA in 150 mM NaCl or in the presence of 10% glycerol without NaCl. We conclude that equilibrium binding occurs in these reaction conditions, and the protein-ssDNA complex cannot be dissociated by high NaCl concentrations. This stability likely reflects a small contribution of electrostatic interactions to binding as observed with oligonucleotide, -delta log(Komega )/delta log([NaCl]) = 2.4 (Fig. 5 and Table III). In contrast, the nucleoprotein filaments of other ssDNA-binding proteins are readily dissociated by NaCl; these form complexes with polynucleotides that exhibit values of -delta log(Komega )/delta log([NaCl]) in the range of 4-7 (Table III). Recombination proficient nucleoprotein filaments formed by UvsX (25), RecA (26), and Rad51 (27) are stable in the presence of NaCl, whereas inactive recombinase filaments (such as RecA protein in the presence of ADP) are readily disrupted by salts (39).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Nucleic acid binding parameters for single-stranded DNA-binding proteins

Comparison of binding constants of ICP8 with those of other single-stranded DNA-binding proteins shows that ICP8 forms an unusual protein-DNA complex (Table III). The single-stranded binding protein from phage T4, gp32, exhibits high cooperativity and tight binding (16, 17). As a consequence of high cooperativity, the binding isotherm is sigmoidal which allows gp32 to associate and dissociate from ssDNA upon small changes of protein concentration. High cooperativity and preference for ssDNA rather than RNA provide the thermodynamic basis of the autologous regulation of gp32 transcription. In contrast, the human single-stranded DNA-binding protein, hRPA, displays low cooperativity and tight binding (20). Consequently it has been suggested that a concentration-dependent "switch" such as found for gp32 is not involved in regulation of hRPA; rather binding of the hRPA heterotrimer to ssDNA may be regulated by other mechanisms that involve phosphorylation and/or protein-protein interactions. The behavior of E. coli SSB protein is more complex, with multiple DNA binding modes and cooperativities depending on salt concentration (18). The high salt form (>= 0.2 M NaCl), (SSB)65, binds weakly to poly(dA) with intermediate cooperativity.

In comparison with these proteins, ICP8 binds weakly to ssDNA with low cooperativity (Table III). Early studies claimed that the reaction of ICP8 with ssDNA was highly cooperative. However, this conclusion was based on the observation of protein clusters on ssDNA by electron microscopy (4) and on the binding of partially purified ICP8-antibody complexes to ssDNA (3) which may not accurately measure equilibrium binding of the protein. A recent study (40) of the binding of ICP8 to oligo(dT) by gel mobility assay reported that the reaction was weakly cooperative. However, it is difficult to compare our results with this work since the reaction conditions, binding site size, and method for calculating binding parameters are not the same. The weak DNA binding of ICP8 may be compensated for by its high abundance during viral replication (41). Alternatively, strong cooperative binding to ssDNA may not be required for the functions of ICP8. For example, electron microscopy studies have shown that ICP8 and the HSV-1 origin binding protein UL9 unwind duplex DNA by a different mechanism than other DNA helicase/single-stranded DNA-binding proteins; DNA and the two proteins first condense and subsequently several kilobases of ssDNA covered with ICP8 are released (36). The selective advantage of the unusual ssDNA-binding properties of ICP8 are unknown. We speculate that they could be required for its putative recombinase activity.

Homologous recombination is carried out by recombinases in nucleoprotein filaments by a mechanism that has been found in all organisms from phage to man (42). Furthermore, recombinases are the only DNA repair proteins with a common domain arrangement in bacteria, archea, and eucaryotes (43). This conservation across evolution is likely the result of requirements of the homologous recombination reaction. If this argument is correct, ICP8 which catalyzes strand transfer in vitro (15), might likewise be expected to share some common properties with recombinases that are not found in other ssDNA-binding proteins.

We have observed that the ICP8-ssDNA nucleoprotein filament produces higher fluorescence enhancement of epsilon DNA, is more stable in the presence of high concentrations of NaCl (Fig. 1), and exhibits smaller values of delta log(Komega )/delta log([NaCl]) than other well studied ssDNA-binding proteins, gp32, ecSSB, and RPA (Table III). The fluorescence enhancement of ICP8 resembles that reported for active recombinases RecA and Rad51 and indicates that DNA may assume a similar conformation in these filaments. Stability at high NaCl concentrations is likewise a characteristic of both the ICP8 nucleoprotein filament and recombinase filaments in their active conformation.

Of course bona fide recombinases also have general characteristics that are not found for ICP8. They form long nucleofilaments with well defined right-handed helical structures (42, 44), whereas ICP8 nucleoprotein filaments are left-handed and twice as thick as RecA filaments, suggesting that more than one ICP8 molecule may contribute to its width (32). Recombinases but not ICP8 have ATPase activity (1, 42). However, despite these and other differences, the protein-DNA complexes of ICP8 and recombinases appear to share some structural and biochemical similarities. Further comparison of ICP8 and recombinases should give important insights into the chemistry of homologous recombination.


    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by Grants 9627 and 9584 from the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (to N. P. J. and G. V., respectively) and by Grant AI38335 from the National Institutes of Health (to P. E. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: (33) 5.61.17.59.60; Fax (33) 5.61.17.59.97; E-mail: neil@ipbs.fr.

2 Y. Dupont, Bio-Logic, personal communication.


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HSV-1, herpes simplex virus type 1; nt, nucleotide; epsilon DNA, etheno-modified single-stranded DNA from phage M13; ss, single-stranded; ecSSB, ssDNA-binding protein from E. coli; hRPA, human single-stranded binding protein RPA; STMP, salt titration midpoint; ATPgamma S, adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate).


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Boehmer, P. E., and Lehman, I. R. (1997) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66, 347-384[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Dutch, R. E., and Lehman, I. R. (1993) J. Virol. 67, 6945-6949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Lee, C. K., and Knipe, D. M. (1985) J. Virol. 54, 731-738[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Ruyechan, W. T. (1983) J. Virol. 46, 661-666[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Ruyechan, W. T., and Wier, A. C. (1984) J. Virol. 59, 727-733
6. Ruyechan, W. T. (1988) J. Virol. 62, 810-817[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Ruyechan, W. T., and Olson, J. W. (1992) J. Virol. 66, 6273-6279[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Tanguy le Gac, N., Villani, G., Hoffmann, J. S., and Boehmer, P. E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 21645-21651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Tanguy le Gac, N., Villani, G., and Boehmer, P. E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13801-13807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Boehmer, P. E., and Lehman, I. R. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 8444-8448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Lukonis, C. J., and Weller, S. K. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 1751-1758[Abstract]
12. Hamarsten, O., and Elias, P. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 1753-1760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Dutch, R. E., Bianchi, V., and Lehman, I. R. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 3084-3089[Abstract]
14. Boehmer, P. E., and Lehman, I. R. (1993) J. Virol. 67, 711-515[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Bortner, C., Hernandez, T. R., Lehman, I. R., and Griffith, J. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 231, 241-250[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Newport, J. W., Lonberg, N., Kowalczykowski, S. C., and von Hippel, P. H. (1981) J. Mol. Biol. 145, 105-121[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Kowalczykowski, S. C., Lonberg, N., Newport, J. W., and von Hippel, P. H. (1981) J. Mol. Biol. 145, 75-104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Lohman, T. M., and Ferrari, M. E. (1994) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63, 527-570[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Wold, M. S. (1997) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66, 61-92[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Kim, C., and Wold, M. S. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 2058-2064[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Cazaux, C., Blanchet, J. S., Dupuis, D., Villani, G., Defais, M., and Johnson, N. P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 44, 28799-28804
22. Deleted in proof
23. Lakowicz, J. R. (1983) Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy , Plenum Publishing Corp., New York
24. Alani, E., Thresher, R., Griffith, J. D., and Kolodner, R. D. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 227, 54-71[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Ando, R. A., and Morrical, S. W. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 283, 785-796[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Menetski, J. P., and Kowalczykowski, S. C. (1985) J. Mol. Biol. 181, 281-295[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Namsaraev, E. A., and Berg, P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 6177-6182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Zlotnick, A., Mitchell, R. S., Steed, R. K., and Brenner, S. L. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 22525-22530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Lohman, T. M., and Bujalowski, W. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 208, 258-290[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Bujalowski, W., and Lohman, T. M. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 3099-3106[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Epstein, I. R. (1978) Biophys. Chem. 8, 327-329[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. O'Donnell, M. E., Elias, P., Funnell, B. E., and Lehman, I. R. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 4260-4266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Record, T. M., Jr., Lohman, T. M., and De Haseth, P. (1976) J. Mol. Biol. 107, 145-158[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Johnson, N. P., Mazarguil, H., and Lopez, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 19675-19679[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Zhang, W., Bond, J. P., Anderson, C. F., Lohman, T. M., and Record, T. M. J. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 2511-2516[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Makhov, A. M., Boehmer, P. E., Lehman, I. R., and Griffith, J. D. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 258, 789-799[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Hernandez, T. R., and Lehman, I. R. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 11227-11232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Kuil, M. E., Holmlund, K., Vlaanderen, C. A., and van Grondelle, R. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 8184-8189[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Kowalczykowski, S. C. (1991) Annu. Rev. Biochem. Biophys. Chem. 20, 539-575[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Dudas, K. C., and Ruyechan, W. T. (1998) J. Virol. 72, 257-265[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Bayliss, G. J., Marsden, H. S., and Hay, J. (1975) Virology 68, 124-134[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Roca, I. A., and Cox, M. M. (1997) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 56, 129-223[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Aravind, L., Walker, D. R., and Koonin, E. V. (1999) Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 1223-1242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Egelman, E. H., and Stasiak, A. (1993) Micron 24, 309-324


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. E. Boehmer
RNA binding and R-loop formation by the herpes simplex virus type-1 single-stranded DNA-binding protein (ICP8)
Nucleic Acids Res., August 25, 2004; 32(15): 4576 - 4584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. V. Nimonkar and P. E. Boehmer
Role of Protein-Protein Interactions during Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Recombination-dependent Replication
J. Biol. Chem., May 21, 2004; 279(21): 21957 - 21965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-X. Dou, P.-Y. Wang, H. Q. Xu, and X. G. Xi
The DNA Binding Properties of the Escherichia coli RecQ Helicase
J. Biol. Chem., February 20, 2004; 279(8): 6354 - 6363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. V. Nimonkar and P. E. Boehmer
On the mechanism of strand assimilation by the herpes simplex virus type-1 single-strand DNA-binding protein (ICP8)
Nucleic Acids Res., September 15, 2003; 31(18): 5275 - 5281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. V. Nimonkar and P. E. Boehmer
Reconstitution of recombination-dependent DNA synthesis in herpes simplex virus 1
PNAS, September 2, 2003; 100(18): 10201 - 10206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
N. B. Reuven, A. E. Staire, R. S. Myers, and S. K. Weller
The Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Alkaline Nuclease and Single-Stranded DNA Binding Protein Mediate Strand Exchange In Vitro
J. Virol., July 1, 2003; 77(13): 7425 - 7433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. V. Nimonkar and P. E. Boehmer
The Herpes Simplex Virus Type-1 Single-strand DNA-binding Protein (ICP8) Promotes Strand Invasion
J. Biol. Chem., March 7, 2003; 278(11): 9678 - 9682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. V. Nimonkar and P. E. Boehmer
In Vitro Strand Exchange Promoted by the Herpes Simplex Virus Type-1 Single Strand DNA-binding Protein (ICP8) and DNA Helicase-Primase
J. Biol. Chem., April 19, 2002; 277(17): 15182 - 15189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
C. A. Spencer, M. J. Kruhlak, H. L. Jenkins, X. Sun, and D. P. Bazett-Jones
Mitotic Transcription Repression In Vivo in the Absence of Nucleosomal Chromatin Condensation
J. Cell Biol., July 11, 2000; 150(1): 13 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A.-S. Gourves, M. Defais, and N. P. Johnson
Equilibrium Binding of Single-stranded DNA to the Secondary DNA Binding Site of the Bacterial Recombinase RecA
J. Biol. Chem., March 23, 2001; 276(13): 9613 - 9619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page