![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 15, 11270-11277, April 14, 2000
,From the Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF2) is a potent
mitogen for medial smooth muscle cells and is necessary for their
proliferation after balloon catheter injury; however, intimal smooth
muscle cells do not require FGF2 for their proliferation, and they
respond only weakly to exogenous FGF2. The present study examined the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling as
well as the expression and activity of cell cycle proteins in
FGF2-stimulated intimal smooth muscle cells. FGF2 activates ERKs 1 and
2, and Western blot analysis showed that cyclin D, cyclin E, and
cyclin-dependent kinase (CDKs) 2 and 4 were expressed in
intimal smooth muscle cells after FGF2 infusion. FGF2 stimulation, however, did not lead to phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein
(Rb), CDK 2 activation, or expression of cyclin A. Western blot
analysis showed that intimal smooth muscle cells express elevated
levels of the cell cycle inhibitors p15INK4b and
p27Kip1, compared with medial smooth muscle cells, and that
FGF2 stimulation does not reduce the level of these inhibitors. These
studies suggest that despite activation of ERKs 1 and 2 and expression
of the cell cycle activators, cyclin D and cyclin E, high levels of
cell cycle inhibitors may inhibit cell cycle transit in FGF2-stimulated intimal smooth muscle cells.
Excessive growth of vascular smooth muscle cells is an important
component in the development of atherosclerotic lesion and in
restenosis. In order to study which factors control the growth of these
cells, we and many others have used a model of smooth muscle cell
proliferation induced by mechanical injury of the rat carotid artery
(1, 2). In this model, an inflated Fogarty balloon catheter is passed
into the lumen of the common carotid artery, denuding the artery of its
endothelial cell lining and damaging the underlying medial smooth
muscle cells. This injury results in a predictable response; within 2 days the medial smooth muscle cells begin proliferating, and after 4 days medial smooth muscle cells migrate into the intima, where they
continue to proliferate for up to 2 weeks. This leads to the formation
of a thickened neointima comprised primarily of smooth muscle cells and
extracellular matrix and results in luminal narrowing. In this model,
basic fibroblast factor
(FGF2)1 has been shown to be
a critical mitogen for the proliferation of medial smooth muscle cells.
The addition of FGF2 significantly increases medial smooth muscle cell
proliferation when administered after injury of the rat carotid artery
(3), and medial smooth muscle cell proliferation can be significantly
inhibited by neutralizing antibodies to FGF2 (4). Unlike medial smooth
muscle cells, FGF2 does not seem to be involved in regulating the
proliferation of the smooth muscle cells that have migrated into the
intima; neutralizing antibodies to FGF2 do not inhibit intimal smooth muscle cell proliferation (5) after balloon catheter injury, and the
addition of FGF2 to arteries with existing intimal lesions causes only
a small increase in proliferation (3). These data suggest that, in
contrast to medial smooth muscle cells, FGF2 is not necessary for
intimal smooth muscle cell proliferation, nor is it a potent mitogen
for those cells. The purpose of this study was to determine whether
differences in the activation of cytoplasmic signaling pathways and/or
cell cycle regulation could be responsible for this apparent
attenuation of FGF2-stimulated proliferation in intimal smooth muscle cells.
FGF2 signal transduction involves the activation of many different
cytoplasmic signaling molecules, including the extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERKs 1 and 2) (6-9). Activation of
the ERKs is required for FGF2-stimulated proliferation in several different cell types, and recently we have shown that the ERK signaling
pathway is activated following balloon catheter denudation of the rat
carotid artery and that ERK activity is required for smooth muscle cell
proliferation following this injury (10). FGF2 stimulation also
activates the PI 3-kinase pathway (11). Activation of this pathway is
required for FGF2-stimulated proliferation in a variety of cell types
including smooth muscle cells (12), and recent data suggest that this
pathway is also activated following balloon catheter injury (10).
Although FGF2 stimulation requires activation of cytoplasmic signaling
molecules such as the ERKs and PI 3-kinase to induce proliferation, the
resultant signaling must ultimately lead to activation of the
cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) in order for cells to
progress through the G1 phase of the cell cycle and into S
phase. The activity of the CDKs is regulated in part by the controlled
expression of the cyclins. The cyclins associate with and activate the
CDKs. Recently, it has been shown that both ERK and PI 3-kinase
signaling can regulate the expression of cyclin D (7, 13, 14), the
activating partner for CDK 4. Cyclin D-CDK 4 activation is required for
the phosphorylation and inactivation of Rb (15, 16). This frees the
transcription factor E2F, which stimulates the expression of factors
necessary for the initiation of S phase, including cyclin E (17-19).
Cylin E activates CDK 2, and this activity along with that of cyclin
D-CDK 4 leads to the increased expression of cyclin A (18, 20, 21),
which is necessary for entry into S phase (22). Thus, for FGF2 signal transduction to result in proliferation, there must be activation of
the ERK and/or PI 3-kinase signaling pathways, and this signaling must
result in increased expression of cyclin D as well as activation of the
cyclin D-CDK 4 complex.
Although the expression of the cyclins are necessary for activation of
the CDKs, they are not sufficient; there are specific CDK inhibitors
capable of inhibiting the CDKs even in the presence of the cyclins
(23-26). The CIP/KIP family of inhibitors can inhibit both the cyclin
D-CDK 4 and cyclin E-CDK 2 complexes (23), while the INK4 family of
inhibitors is more specific, only inhibiting CDK 4 activity (27, 28).
Overexpression of these inhibitors can attenuate the proliferative
response (20, 29), while a reduction in their expression increases
proliferation (30, 31). Therefore, the level of these proteins could be
critical in determining whether growth factor stimulation results in proliferation.
Our data show that FGF2 stimulation of smooth muscle cells in
established intimal lesions activates both the ERKs and PI 3-kinase and
increases cyclin D expression but does not lead to phosphorylation of
the retinoblastoma protein, activation of CDK 2, or increased expression of cyclin A. In these same arteries, high levels of the
cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p27Kip1 and
p15INK4b were noted, and we believe that their presence is
responsible for the attenuation of FGF2-induced proliferation.
Injury Models--
Male Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats (Tyler
Laboratories, Bellevue, Washington), age 3-3.5 months, were used
throughout these experiments. Rat carotid arteries were injured using
either the gentle injury technique previously described (32) or balloon
catheter denudation. The catheter was introduced into the left common
carotid through the left external branch and passed up and down the
common carotid three times to ensure complete denudation. To assess the
effects of FGF2 on medial smooth muscle cell proliferation, FGF2
(generous gift of Scios Nova) was infused (60 µg/rat) into the rats
via the tail vein immediately after gentle injury. To assess the
effects of FGF2 in intimal smooth muscle cell proliferation, FGF2 was infused (60 µg/rat) into the rats via the tail vein 6 weeks after balloon catheter injury.
Quantification of Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation--
Each
animal received intraperitoneal injections of tritiated thymidine
(specific activity 6.7 Ci/mmol; NEN Life Science Products) at 1, 9, and
17 h prior to being killed with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital (160 mg/kg of body weight; Anthony Products Co., Arcadia,
CA) and perfusion-fixed for 5 min with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.3). Segments of carotid artery were embedded in paraffin, and 6-µm sections were cut (four per animal). Sections were dipped in photographic emulsion (NTB2; Eastman Kodak Co.) and exposed for 2 weeks at 4 °C before being developed. Smooth muscle cell proliferation was measured by counting the number of labeled nuclei, and the [3H]thymidine index
((labeled nuclei/total nuclei) × 100%) was calculated. At least
four cross-sections per carotid were quantitated. Statistical analysis
was performed using Student's t test (two-tailed, unpaired).
Western Blot Analysis--
Carotid arteries were briefly flushed
with Ringer's lactate, excised, stripped of adventitia, and frozen in
liquid nitrogen. The frozen tissue was then ground with mortar and
pestle under liquid nitrogen until reduced to a fine powder, which was
suspended in a cell lysis solution containing 10 mM HEPES,
pH 7.4, 50 mM Na4P2O7,
50 mM NaF, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 2 mM Na3VO4, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
10 µg/ml leupeptin. Samples were sonicated for 5 s on ice, and
insoluble matter was removed by centrifugation. A small sample of the
resulting supernatant was reserved for protein determination; the rest
was diluted 1:1 in sample buffer containing 5% ERK Activity Assay--
Equal amounts of protein from carotid
arteries prepared for Western blot analysis were electrophoresed on a
10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel containing 0.4 mg/ml myelin basic protein.
SDS was removed from the gel by multiple washes with buffer A (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 5 mM CDK 2 Activity Assay--
150 µg of protein was normalized in
1.0 ml of CDK 2 lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 1 mM sodium fluoride, 150 mM sodium chloride,
10% glycerol, 2.5 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Response of Arterial Smooth Muscle Cell to Exogenous FGF2--
To
evaluate the response of medial smooth muscle cells to FGF2, 60 µg of
FGF2 was administered intravenously to rats immediately after their
carotid artery was subjected to a denuding injury using a nylon
filament loop. This procedure completely removes the endothelial cells
lining the carotid artery and yet causes only a small increase (1.5%)
in medial smooth muscle cell proliferation (32). Denudation is
necessary because endothelialized arteries do not respond to systemic
infusion of FGF2 (3). Intimal smooth muscle cells are not normally
found in rat carotid arteries, so in order to evaluate the response of
intimal smooth muscle cells to FGF2, it was necessary to induce the
formation of a neointima by balloon catheter injury. 6 weeks after this
injury, a well established intimal lesion composed primarily of intimal
smooth muscle cells and extracellular matrix is present (1, 2). At this
time, the lesion is not reendothelialized, and there is a low rate of
spontaneous proliferation (~1%) that is comparable with that induced
by the gentle injury. The smooth muscle cells in this established
intimal lesion will be referred to as "intimal smooth muscle
cells." This is in contrast to "medial smooth muscle cells,"
which refers to the smooth muscle cells in the media of a normal artery
after deendothelialization by gentle injury.
When FGF2 was administered acutely after the gentle injury, medial
smooth muscle cell proliferation was increased 20-fold (Fig.
1). In contrast, intimal smooth muscle
cells in arteries with established lesions showed a small increase in
proliferation after FGF2 stimulation (Fig. 1). These data show that
intimal smooth muscle cells are significantly less responsive to FGF2 than are medial smooth muscle cells. FGF2 did not cause any increase in
the proliferation of the medial smooth muscle cells in arteries with
established intimal lesions (data not shown).
FGF2 Stimulation of Cytoplasmic Signaling Pathways--
To verify
that the infused FGF2 is able to bind to and activate its receptor in
intimal smooth muscle cells, we measured the activation of the ERK
signaling pathway. The extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway is
activated, via Ras/Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular
signal-regulated kinase kinase, by many mitogenic stimuli, including
growth factors such as platelet-derived growth factor, epidermal growth
factor, and the FGFs (33-35). An in-gel kinase assay was used to
measure ERK activity in medial and intimal smooth muscle cells before
and after FGF2 stimulation. Low levels of activity were observed both
in uninjured carotid arteries and in arteries with established intimal
lesions in the absence of FGF2 stimulation. The administration of FGF2
significantly increased ERK activity, with maximal stimulation seen at
6 h after administration (Fig. 2) in
both acutely injured arteries and arteries with established intimal
lesions, demonstrating that FGF2 does bind to and activate its receptor
in intimal smooth muscle cells.
Since smooth muscle cell proliferation may require activation of
pathways other than the ERK pathway, we also examined activation of the
PI 3-kinase pathway by measuring phosphorylation of protein kinase B
(PKB), a downstream target of PI 3-kinase signaling (36). FGF2
administration also caused an increase in PKB phosphorylation in
acutely injured arteries and in arteries with established intimal lesions (Fig. 3), suggesting that FGF2
stimulation also activates PI 3-kinase in both cell types.
The Effects of FGF2 on the Cell Cycle--
The observation that
intimal smooth muscle cell proliferation is only weakly stimulated by
FGF2, despite significant activation of the ERKs and PI 3-kinase,
suggests that either this signaling was not sufficient to initiate
entry into the cell cycle or that a block in the cell cycle prevented
transit through G1 and into S phase in these cells. To
determine whether FGF2-stimulated intimal smooth muscle cells enter the
cell cycle, we examined the expression of cyclins D, E, and A, using
Western blot analysis. Cyclin D was detected neither in normal
uninjured vessels nor in established intimal lesions, but 24 h
after the administration of FGF2, cyclin D1 was elevated in arteries
subjected to the gentle injury as well as in arteries with established
intimal lesions (Fig. 4A). Cyclin E was present in both normal arteries and in arteries with established intimal lesions, and FGF stimulation had no effect on
cyclin E expression (Fig. 4B). Cyclin A was expressed
neither in normal uninjured arteries nor in arteries with established intimal lesions (Fig. 4C). FGF2 stimulation, however, did
cause a marked increase in cyclin A expression in medial smooth muscle cells in acutely injured arteries but not in intimal smooth muscle cells (Fig. 4C). Western blot analysis also showed that CDK
4 and CDK 2 were expressed in normal uninjured arteries and in
unstimulated arteries with intimal lesions and that FGF2 stimulation
had no effect on their expression (data not shown).
To determine whether the cyclin D-CDK 4 complex was active in
FGF2-stimulated intimal smooth muscle cells, we examined the phosphorylation state of Rb. Rb regulates cell cycle transit by binding
to and inactivating the E2F family of transcription factors. Phosphorylation of Rb by cyclin D-CDK 4 releases E2F, thus permitting the transcription of genes necessary for replication (15). Western blot
analysis showed that Rb is hyperphosphorylated in medial smooth muscle
cells 24 and 48 h after stimulation with FGF2 but not in intimal
smooth muscle cells stimulated with FGF2 (Fig. 5A). This finding suggests
that the signaling initiated by FGF2 stimulation in intimal smooth
muscle cells is sufficient to increase the expression of cyclin D, but
it is not sufficient to activate the cyclin D-CDK 4 complex.
We next asked whether CDK 2 was activated by FGF2 stimulation of smooth
muscle cells. Cyclin-CDK 2 complexes were immunoprecipitated with an
antibody specific for CDK 2. An in vitro kinase assay, using
histone H1 as a substrate, showed that the cyclin-CDK 2 complex was
strongly activated at 48 h after FGF2 stimulation of medial smooth
muscle cells, but only minimal activity was observed in FGF2-stimulated
intimal smooth muscle cells (Fig. 5B).
The observation that CDKs 4 and 2 were not activated despite the
expression of cyclin D and cyclin E prompted us to examine the
expression of Cdc25A and CDK inhibitors. The phosphatase Cdc25A is
required for the activation of CDK 4 and CDK 2, while CDK inhibitors inhibit the activity of CDKs 4 and 2 in the presence of the cyclins. Fig. 6 shows that Cdc25A is expressed in
normal carotid arteries and FGF stimulation of medial smooth muscle
cells increases its expression. Intimal smooth muscle cells express
lower levels of Cdc25A, and FGF2 stimulation did not increase the
expression of this protein.
We next examined the expression of the cell cycle inhibitors
p21Cip and p27Kip1. These inhibitors bind to
and inhibit the activity of the cyclin D-CDK 4 and the cyclin E-CDK 2 complexes. Western blot analysis showed that p27Kip1 was
expressed in both normal vessels and vessels with intimal lesions, with
the level of expression being higher in the intimal lesions than in
normal vessels (Fig. 7). FGF2 stimulation
did not decrease the expression of p27Kip1 in arteries with
established intimal lesions (Fig. 7). p21Cip was not
expressed in normal carotid arteries, but increased expression of
p21Cip was observed after FGF2 stimulation of medial smooth
muscle cells. Likewise, FGF2 stimulation caused a similar increase in
the expression of p21Cip in intimal smooth muscle
cells.
Another family of inhibitors, the INK4 family, bind to CDK 4 and
prevent its association with cyclin D. Examination of the expression of
p15INK4b showed that intimal smooth muscle cells express
higher levels of this inhibitor than do medial smooth muscle cells and
that this expression is increased after FGF2 stimulation (Fig. 7). Western blot analysis failed to detect expression of
p16INK4a (data not shown). Thus, our data show that
FGF2-stimulated intimal smooth muscle cells do express CDK 4, cyclin D,
CDK 2, and cyclin E, but the activity of the cyclin-CDK complexes is
very low. This lack of activity correlates with low levels of Cdc25A
and high levels of the CDK inhibitors p27Kip1 and
p15INK4b in smooth muscle cells in established intimal lesions.
FGF2 is a potent mitogen for medial smooth muscle cells and is
required for their proliferation following arterial injury. In
contrast, FGF2 does not seem to be required for intimal cell proliferation, since blocking antibodies to FGF2 do not inhibit intimal
smooth muscle cell proliferation after injury (5, 37). Further,
previous studies have shown that smooth muscle cells in intimal lesions
respond weakly to FGF2 stimulation (3). This study demonstrates that
there are dramatic differences in the ability of FGF2 to function as a
mitogen for smooth muscle cells in a normal artery as compared with
smooth muscle cells of an established intimal lesion. Although intimal
smooth muscle cells respond only weakly to FGF2, they have not lost
their ability to replicate, since if subjected to another balloon
injury, the resultant replication can exceed 25% (37). These
observations suggested that intimal smooth muscle cells suffer from a
specific defect in FGF2 responsiveness rather than a general inability to proliferate.
The observation that FGF2 stimulates ERK activation in intimal smooth
muscle cells to a similar degree as in medial smooth muscle cells
suggests that the ability of FGF2 to bind to its receptor and activate
cytoplasmic signaling pathways is not compromised in these cells. The
activation of ERK 1 and 2 is known to be an early event in the
stimulation of FGF receptors by FGF (35, 38, 39), and ERK activation is
required for many FGF2-mediated cellular responses including
proliferation (35). ERK activity increases after balloon catheter
injury of the rat carotid artery and is, in fact, required for medial
smooth muscle cell proliferation after balloon injury (10). Our data
demonstrate that FGF2 is able to activate a cytoplasmic signaling
pathway associated with smooth muscle cell proliferation in intimal
smooth muscle cells and that the magnitude and duration of the
activation is similar in intimal and medial smooth muscle cells. This
observation is important because, although ERK activation is associated
with proliferation, ERK activation does not necessarily lead to
proliferation, and in some cell types ERK activation is associated with
differentiation and inhibition of proliferation (40). How activation of
the ERK pathway can result in such diverse cellular responses is not entirely understood, but it has been suggested the duration of ERK
signaling can determine the outcome of ERK activation. An example of
this is that in CCL39 cells short term activation of ERKs is not
sufficient to stimulate proliferation (35). Sustained activation of ERK
for at least 6-8 h is necessary for stimulation of proliferation in
these cells. We found no significant difference in the duration of ERK
activation in intimal and medial smooth muscle cells after FGF2
stimulation, with ERK being activated for up to 24 h in both
cases. Despite this prolonged activation of the ERK signaling pathway,
FGF2 induced only a small increase in intimal smooth muscle cell
proliferation compared with medial smooth muscle cells.
FGF2 is capable of activating other signaling pathways that may be
necessary for cell proliferation, including the PI 3-kinase pathway
(11). To evaluate the effects of FGF2 on PI 3-kinase activity, we
measured the phosphorylation of PKB, a downstream target of PI 3-kinase
signaling and found that FGF2 stimulated an increase in PKB
phosphorylation in both medial and intimal smooth muscle cells. Thus, a
difference in PI 3-kinase signaling cannot explain differences in
responsiveness to FGF2 in intimal and medial smooth muscle cells.
Collectively, these data would therefore suggest that the block in the
mitogenic signal in FGF2-stimulated intimal smooth muscle cells is
downstream of ERK and PI 3-kinase signaling.
To try to identify this downstream inhibition, we examined the
expression of cyclin D. Cyclin D expression is regulated by growth
factors, increasing early in the G1 phase, and is critical for most proliferative signals (41-43). Recently, PI 3-kinase (14) and
the ERKs (7) have been found to regulate the expression of cyclin D,
thus providing a direct link between growth factor-mediated signaling
and initiation of the cell cycle. Our data show that cyclin D
expression increases following FGF2 stimulation of both intimal and
medial smooth muscle cells, suggesting that the FGF2-stimulated signaling is sufficient to increase the expression of cyclin D. This
observation also demonstrates that intimal smooth muscle cells enter
the cell cycle following FGF2 stimulation. We also noted that both cell
types express cyclin E, CDK 4, and CDK 2; however, this appears to be
constitutive, since FGF2 did not increase the expression of any of
these proteins. Although intimal smooth muscle cells express cyclin
D-CDK 4 and cyclin E-CDK 2 following FGF2 stimulation, the absence of
cyclin A expression, Rb phosphorylation, and CDK 2 activation suggests
that the cyclin-CDK complexes are not active in these cells. Active
cyclin D-CDK 4 phosphorylates Rb, freeing active E2F. This, along with
activation of cyclin E-CDK 2, leads to increased expression of cyclin
A. These events are necessary for cells to progress through the
G1 phase and into S phase. Intimal smooth muscle cells
showed neither Rb phosphorylation, CDK 2 activation, nor expression of
cyclin A following FGF2 stimulation. We believe that these data support
the hypothesis that intimal smooth muscle cells did enter the cell
cycle following FGF2 stimulation but that progression through the
G1 phase into S phase was blocked due to an inability to
activate CDK 4 and CDK 2.
In this report, we have identified several factors that could account
for the inhibition of cyclin D-CDK 4 and cyclin E-CDK 2 activity in the
smooth muscle cells from arteries with established intimal lesions. In
addition to association with the appropriate cyclin, CDKs require
dephosphorylation of inhibitory phosphorylation sites for activation
(44). The phosphatase Cdc25A is thought to be responsible for this
dephosphorylation, and its activity is necessary for proliferation
(45). Our results show that while the expression of Cdc25A increases
after FGF2 stimulation of medial smooth muscle cells, it does not
increase after stimulation of intimal smooth muscle cells. Further,
this increased expression of Cdc25A in the medial smooth muscle cells
correlates with increased activity of CDK 4 and CDK 2. One possibility,
therefore, is that the low level of Cdc25A expression in
FGF2-stimulated intimal smooth muscle cells contributed to the lack of
CDK 4 and CDK 2 activity in these cells and hence attenuated proliferation.
Specific inhibitors can also regulate the activity of CDK 4 and CDK 2. The p15INK4b family of inhibitors binds to CDK 4, preventing its association with cyclin D and thus inhibiting activation
of CDK 4 (27, 28). Interestingly, we found high levels of expression of
p15INK4b in intimal smooth muscle cells but not in medial
smooth muscle cells, which may explain the apparent lack of CDK 4 activity in intimal smooth muscle cells expressing a high level of
cyclin D expression. Another family of CDK inhibitors includes
p27Kip1, p21Cip, and p57Kip1.
Members of this family are more promiscuous and inhibit the activity of
cyclin D-CDK 4, cyclin E-CDK 2, and cyclin A-CDK 2 (23-26).
Surprisingly, the expression of p21Cip increased in intimal
smooth muscle cells as well as medial smooth muscle cells after FGF2
stimulation. This result is at first puzzling, since higher expression
of this cell cycle inhibitor correlates with higher CDK activity and
proliferation in medial smooth muscle cells. Although expression of
p21Cip can result in inhibition of proliferation, there is
now evidence that low level expression of p21Cip actually
promotes CDK 4 activity. We cannot say whether the level of
p21Cip expression in smooth muscle cells is inhibitory or
stimulatory, but what is clear is that the expression of
p21Cip in FGF2-stimulated medial smooth muscle cells
correlates with increased activity of CDK 4 and CDK 2 and increased
proliferation. In contrast, the level of expression of the inhibitor
p27Kip1 did correlate with reduced CDK activity, with
intimal smooth muscle cells expressing higher levels of
p27Kip1 than medial smooth muscle cells. The inhibitor
p27Kip1 is normally expressed in quiescent cells, and its
expression is down-regulated upon mitogenic stimulation (31, 41).
Overexpression of p27Kip1 has been shown to inhibit intimal
lesion formation (20), and blocking the expression of
p27Kip1 increased the sensitivity of cultured cells to
mitogenic stimulation, including FGF (31). Our finding that arteries
with established intimal lesions express high levels of two CDK
inhibitors, p15INK4b and p27Kip1, might well
explain the lack of CDK activity and the weak proliferative effects of
FGF2 in these cells.
Collectively, these data suggest that the cytoplasmic signaling
elicited by FGF2, while sufficient to up-regulate cyclin D expression
in intimal smooth muscle cells, is not sufficient to overcome the
elevated levels of CDK inhibitors. Pertinent to these findings are data
linking PI 3-kinase (46, 47) and ERK (48, 49) to p27Kip1
regulation in some cell types. Our data, however, show that elevated p27 levels are maintained despite activation of both ERK and PI 3-kinase in intimal smooth muscle cells, suggesting that neither PI
3-kinase nor ERK signaling regulates CDK inhibitor levels in smooth
muscle cells.
There are several possible explanations for the increased expression of
p27Kip1 in intimal smooth muscle cells. Interactions with
different extracellular matrices have been shown to affect the levels
of cell cycle inhibitors, and interestingly, Koyama et al.
found that cultured smooth muscle cells grown on polymerized type 1 collagen were less responsive to the mitogenic effects of
platelet-derived growth factor (50). This reduced responsiveness was
attributed to increased levels of cell cycle inhibitors in cells grown
on polymerized collagen (50). We cannot confirm that changes in
extracellular matrix are responsible for the increased expression of
p27Kip1, but increased expression of several extracellular
matrix components, including type 1 collagen, has been demonstrated
after arterial injury (51). Related to this observation are data
showing that integrins can also affect p27Kip1 expression;
Murgia et al. have found proliferation defects associated with increased expression of p27Kip1 in mice carrying a
targeted deletion of the Although the expression of p15INK4b, p27Kip1,
and Cdc25A in intimal smooth muscle cells may be regulated by different
factors, one factor, TGF- This work shows that FGF2 is weakly mitogenic for smooth muscle cells
in intimal lesions. Our data would support the conclusion that FGF2
stimulates prolonged activation of ERKs 1/2 as well as activation of PI
3-kinase and that this activation is similar to that seen in acutely
injured medial smooth muscle cell stimulated with FGF2. Additionally,
the signaling elicited by FGF2 in intimal smooth muscle cells is
sufficient to stimulate an increase in the expression of cyclin D,
indicating that these cells do enter the cell cycle. Further, intimal
smooth muscle cells also express cyclin E, CDK 4, and CDK 2. The
expression of cyclins D and E, however, was not sufficient to induce a
high level of proliferation, and we hypothesize that high levels of
p15INK4b and p27Kip1 inhibited the activity of
cyclin D-CDK 4 and cyclin E-CDK 2, thus attenuating the proliferation
of these intimal smooth muscle cells. Others have observed increased
expression of cell cycle inhibitors after arterial injury (20, 29, 60)
and suggested that this increased expression contributes to the
cessation of the proliferative response after injury. This study
supports those observations and provides evidence that the increased
expression of cell cycle inhibitors after injury inhibits the ability
of those cells to respond to subsequent mitogenic stimuli.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-mercaptoethanol and boiled for 5 min. The protein concentration of each sample was determined using a bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce) with BSA as a
standard. Equal amounts of total protein were loaded onto polyacrylamide gels, electrophoresed, and transferred to
nitrocellulose. The blot was then immunostained using antibodies
specific for either phospho-PKB (New England Biolabs), cyclin D
(Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY), cyclin E (Upstate
Biotechnology), cyclin A (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz,
CA), Rb (Pharmingen), Cdc25A (Santa Cruz Biotechnology),
p27Kip1 (Transduction Laboratories), p21Cip
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or p15INK4b (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology). Briefly, the blot was first incubated in 5% nonfat
dried milk in TBS-T (10 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 150 mM
NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20) for 1 h. The blot was then incubated
with primary antibody diluted in TBS-T buffer for 1 h. After
rinsing, the blot was exposed to a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
secondary antibody diluted in TBS-T. After rinsing, blots were
incubated in ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) reagent for 1 min,
blotted dry, and then exposed to Amersham Pharmacia Biotech ECL film
until a signal was detected.
-mercaptoethanol)
containing 20% isopropyl alcohol. Proteins were denatured with 6 M guanidine HCl in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol and then renatured with buffer A
containing 0.04% Tween 20. The gel was washed with buffer B (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 100 µM
Na3VO4, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol). The gels were then incubated with
buffer B containing 50 µCi of [
-32P]ATP for 1 h
at 37 °C. The reaction was stopped by washing the gel with 5.0%
trichloroacetic acid with 10 mM
Na4P2O7. After several washes, the
gel was dried and subjected to autoradiography. Autoradiographs were
then scanned using a flat bed scanner. The images were then analyzed
using NIH Image software.
-glycerophosphate, 0.1 mM sodium
orthovanadate, 0.1% Tween 20, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 2.5 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). 2 µg of anti-CDK 2-agarose conjugate (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was added to each sample and incubated overnight at 4 °C with constant rotation. Samples were washed three times with CDK 2 lysis buffer and
then twice with CDK 2 kinase buffer (40 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 20 mM MgCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol).
Washes were carried out at 4 °C with 1.0 ml of buffer, a gentle
agitation, and then a 5-min spin at 3000 × g. Samples
were then incubated with 30 µl of reaction buffer (40 mM
Tris, pH 7.6, 20 mM MgCl2, 2 mM
dithiothreitol, 67 µg/ml histone H1, 7 µM ATP with 167 µCi/ml
-ATP) for 30 min at 30 °C. The reaction was stopped with
the addition of 6× Laemmli sample buffer followed by a 5-min boil.
Samples were then run out on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The gel was
washed three times with gel fixative (5% trichloroacetic acid, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate), dried, and subjected to autoradiography.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Effects of FGF2 on medial and intimal smooth
muscle cell proliferation. FGF2 (60 µg, gray
bar) or saline (vehicle, black bar)
was given intravenously to rats with either acutely injured carotid
arteries (medial smooth muscle cells) or established intimal lesions
(intimal smooth muscle cells). Thymidine index was determined 48 h
after administration of FGF2 or saline.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
ERK activity after FGF2 stimulation.
Autoradiographs from in-gel kinase assays were scanned, and the
intensities of the bands representing ERK 1 and 2 activities were
quantitated using image analysis software. A, ERK activation
in arteries with established intimal lesions was measured at 5 min, 30 min, 1 h, 6 h, and 24 h after FGF2 stimulation. -Fold
stimulation is relative to unstimulated artery with established intimal
lesion (0 h). ERK activity data show that FGF2 stimulation increases
ERK 1 and 2 activity in arteries with established intimal lesions and
that this increase can be seen for up to 24 h after stimulation.
B, ERK activation in acutely injured arteries, measured 5 min, 1 h, 6 h, and 24 h after FGF2 stimulation. -Fold
stimulation is relative to normal uninjured artery (0 h). These data
show that ERK activity in acutely injured carotid arteries is increased
after FGF2 stimulation and that the level of ERK activity in these
medial smooth muscle cells is similar to that in seen in the intimal
smooth muscle cells of arteries with established intimal lesions.

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
PKB phosphorylation following FGF2
stimulation. Quantitation of Western blot for phospho-PKB shows
that FGF2 (black bars) stimulates an increase in
PKB phosphorylation compared with control vessels (open
bars) within 5 min. For medial SMC, the control is an
uninjured carotid artery. For medial SMC, the control is an
unstimulated artery with an established intimal lesion.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Expression of cyclins D, E, and A after FGF2
stimulation. A, Western blot analysis shows that cyclin
D expression is increased after FGF2 stimulation of both medial and
intimal smooth muscle cells. B, Western blot analysis shows
that medial and intimal smooth muscle cells express cyclin E. C, Western blot analysis shows that FGF2 stimulation does
not increase the expression of cyclin A in vessels with established
intimal lesions. Cyclin A expression is increased in FGF2-stimulated
medial smooth muscle cells.

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Rb phosphorylation and CDK 2 activity
following FGF stimulation. A, Western blot analysis
shows that FGF2 stimulation increases the phosphorylation of Rb in
medial smooth muscle cells but not in intimal smooth muscle cells.
B, FGF2 stimulation does not activate CDK 2 in intimal
smooth muscle cells. An in vitro kinase assay, using histone
H1 as a substrate, shows that CDK 2 activity is not significantly
increased in FGF2-stimulated intimal smooth muscle cells but is
stimulated in FGF2-stimulated medial smooth muscle cells.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Expression of Cdc25 after FGF2
stimulation. Medial smooth muscle cells express higher levels of
Cdc25A than do intimal smooth muscle cells. FGF2 stimulation increases
this expression in medial smooth muscle cells but has little effect on
the expression of Cdc25A in intimal smooth muscle cells.

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Expression of CDK inhibitors after FGF2
stimulation. Western blot analysis shows that intimal smooth
muscle cells express higher levels of p27Kip1 and
p15INK4b than do normal uninjured carotid arteries or
FGF-stimulated medial smooth muscle cells.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
4-integrin cytoplasmic domain
(52). Differences in the extracellular matrix and/or integrin
expression may be responsible for changes in the level of
p27Kip1 expression and thus may provide a mechanism by
which smooth muscle cells can modulate their response to growth factors.
, could be responsible for regulating the
expression of all of these proteins. TGF-
has been shown to increase
the expression of p27Kip1 (31, 53) and is well known as an
inhibitor of proliferation in many cell types, including smooth muscle
cells (54). In addition to p27Kip1, TGF-
has been shown
to also regulate the expression of p15INK4b and Cdc25A
(55-57). TGF-
increases the expression of p15INK4b in
many different cell types, and repression of Cdc25A expression has
recently been shown to be a part of TGF-
inhibition in a human
mammary epithelial cell line (57). It is tempting to speculate that
TGF-
1 may be responsible for decreased responsiveness to FGF2 found
in arteries with established intimal lesions, since these cells express
higher levels of TGF-
than do cells in normal uninjured arteries
(58, 59). Studies to examine this question are currently in progress.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants HL03174 and HL41103 and NIH Training Grant HL07312 (to N. E. O.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology,
Box 357335, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195. Tel.: 206-616-5948; Fax: 206-685-3662; E-mail:
olsonne@u.washington.edu.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: FGF, fibroblast growth factor; PI, phosphatidylinositol; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; Rb, retinoblastoma protein; PKB, protein kinase B; SMC, smooth muscle cell; INK4, inhibitor of CDK4.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Clowes, A. W., Reidy, M. A., and Clowes, M. M. (1983) Lab. Invest. 49, 327-333[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Clowes, A. W., Reidy, M. A., and Clowes, M. M. (1983) Lab. Invest. 49, 208-215[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Lindner, V.,
Lappi, D. A.,
Baird, A.,
Majack, R. A.,
and Reidy, M. A.
(1991)
Circ. Res.
68,
106-113 |
| 4. |
Lindner, V.,
and Reidy, M. A.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
3739-3743 |
| 5. | Olson, N. E., Chao, S., Lindner, V., and Reidy, M. A. (1992) Am. J. Pathol. 140, 1017-1023[Abstract] |
| 6. |
Pages, G.,
Lenormand, P.,
L'Allemain, G.,
Chambard, J. C.,
Meloche, S.,
and Pouyssegur, J.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
8319-8323 |
| 7. | Weber, J. D., Raben, D. M., Phillips, P. J., and Baldassare, J. J. (1997) Biochemistry 326, 61-68 |
| 8. | Lane, H. A., Fernandez, A., Lamb, N. J., and Thomas, G. (1993) Nature 363, 170-172[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Scott, P. H., Belham, C. M., al Hafidh, J., Chilvers, E. R., Peacock, A. J., Gould, G. W., and Plevin, R. (1996) Biochem. J. 318, 965-971 |
| 10. |
Koyama, H.,
Olson, N. E.,
Dastvan, F.,
and Reidy, M. A.
(1998)
Circ. Res.
82,
713-721 |
| 11. |
Jackson, T. R.,
Stephens, L. R.,
and Hawkins, P. T.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
16627-16636 |
| 12. |
Weiss, R. H.,
and Yabes, A. P.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
C619-C627 |
| 13. |
Lavoie, J. N.,
L'Allemain, G.,
Brunet, A.,
Muller, R.,
and Pouyssegur, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20608-20616 |
| 14. |
Gille, H.,
and Downward, J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22033-22040 |
| 15. | Peeper, D. S., and Bernards, R. (1997) FEBS Lett. 410, 11-16[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Planas-Silva, M. D., and Weinberg, R. A. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 768-772[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. |
Ohtani, K.,
DeGregori, J.,
and Nevins, J. R.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
12146-12150 |
| 18. |
Schulze, A.,
Zerfass, K.,
Spitkovsky, D.,
Middendorp, S.,
Berges, J.,
Helin, K.,
Jansen-Durr, P.,
and Henglein, B.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
11264-11268 |
| 19. | Ohtsubo, M., Theodoras, A. M., Schumacher, J., Roberts, J. M., and Pagano, M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2612-2624[Abstract] |
| 20. | Chen, D., Krasinski, K., Sylvester, A., Chen, J., Nisen, P. D., and Andrés, V. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 99, 2334-2341[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Zerfass-Thome, K., Schulze, A., Zwerschke, W., Vogt, B., Helin, K., Bartek, J., Henglein, B., and Jansen Durr, P. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 407-415[Abstract] |
| 22. | Girard, F., Strausfeld, U., Fernandez, A., and Lamb, N. J. (1991) Cell 67, 1169-1179[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Polyak, K., Lee, M. H., Erdjument Bromage, H., Koff, A., Roberts, J. M., Tempst, P., and Massagué, J. (1994) Cell 78, 59-66[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Toyoshima, H., and Hunter, T. (1994) Cell 78, 67-74[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Matsuoka, S.,
Edwards, M. C.,
Bai, C.,
Parker, S.,
Zhang, P.,
Baldini, A.,
Harper, J. W.,
and Elledge, S. J.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
650-662 |
| 26. | Harper, J. W., Elledge, S. J., Keyomarsi, K., Dynlacht, B., Tsai, L. H., Zhang, P., Dobrowolski, S., Bai, C., Connell-Crowley, L., and Swindell, E. (1995) Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 387-400[Abstract] |
| 27. | Serrano, M. (1997) Exp. Cell Res. 237, 7-13[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Carnero, A., and Hannon, G. J. (1998) Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 227, 43-55[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Yang, Z. Y.,
Simari, R. D.,
Perkins, N. D.,
San, H.,
Gordon, D.,
Nabel, G. J.,
and Nabel, E. G.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
7905-7910 |
| 30. |
Rivard, N.,
L'Allemain, G.,
Bartek, J.,
and Pouyssegur, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
18337-18341 |
| 31. | Shankland, S. J., Pippin, J., Flanagan, M., Coats, S. R., Nangaku, M., Gordon, K. L., Roberts, J. M., Couser, W. G., and Johnson, R. J. (1997) Kidney. Int. 51, 1088-1099[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Fingerle, J.,
Au, Y. P.,
Clowes, A. W.,
and Reidy, M. A.
(1990)
Arteriosclerosis
10,
1082-1087 |
| 33. |
Lubinus, M.,
Meier, K. E.,
Smith, E. A.,
Gause, K. C.,
LeRoy, E. C.,
and Trojanowska, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
9822-9825 |
| 34. | Marshall, C. J. (1995) Cell 80, 179-185[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Meloche, S., Seuwen, K., Pages, G., and Pouysségur, J. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 845-854[Abstract] |
| 36. | Coffer, P. J., Jin, J., and Woodgett, J. R. (1998) Biochem. J. 335, 1-13 |
| 37. | Koyama, H., and Reidy, M. A. (1997) Circ. Res. 80, 408-417 |
| 38. |
Wang, J. K.,
Gao, G.,
and Goldfarb, M.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
181-188 |
| 39. |
Huang, J.,
Mohammadi, M.,
Rodrigues, G. A.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
5065-5072 |
| 40. | Tombes, R. M., Auer, K. L., Mikkelsen, R., Valerie, K., Wymann, M. P., Marshall, C. J., McMahon, M., and Dent, P. (1998) Biochem. J. 330, 1451-1460 |
| 41. | Mann, D. J., Higgins, T., Jones, N. C., and Rozengurt, E. (1997) Oncogene 14, 1759-1766[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. |
Zhu, X.,
Ohtsubo, M.,
Bohmer, R. M.,
Roberts, J. M.,
and Assoian, R. K.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
133,
391-403 |
| 43. | Lukas, J., Bartkova, J., and Bartek, J. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6917-6925[Abstract] |
| 44. | Morgan, D. O. (1995) Nature 374, 131-134[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 45. | Jinno, S., Suto, K., Nagata, A., Igarashi, M., Kanaoka, Y., Nojima, H., and Okayama, H. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 1549-1556[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 46. | Takuwa, N., and Takuwa, Y. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 5348-5358[Abstract] |
| 47. |
Li, D. M.,
and Sun, H.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
15406-15411 |
| 48. | Kawada, M., Yamagoe, S., Murakami, Y., Suzuki, K., Mizuno, S., and Uehara, Y. (1997) Oncogene 15, 629-637[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 49. |
Greulich, H.,
and Erikson, R. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
13280-13288 |
| 50. | Koyama, H., Raines, E. W., Bornfeldt, K. E., Roberts, J. M., and Ross, R. (1996) Cell 87, 1069-1078[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 51. | Nikkari, S. T., Jarvelainen, H. T., Wight, T. N., Ferguson, M., and Clowes, A. W. (1994) Am. J. Pathol. 144, 1348-1356[Abstract] |
| 52. | Murgia, C., Blaikie, P., Kim, N., Dans, M., Petrie, H. T., and Giancotti, F. G. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 3940-3951[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 53. | Bouchard, C., Fridman, W. H., and Sautes, C. (1997) J. Immunol. 159, 4155-4164[Abstract] |
| 54. |
Owens, G. K.,
Geisterfer, A. A.,
Yang, Y. W.,
and Komoriya, A.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
107,
771-780 |
| 55. | Hannon, G. J., and Beach, D. (1994) Nature 371, 257-261[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 56. |
Reynisdóttir, I.,
Polyak, K.,
Iavarone, A.,
and Massagué, J.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
1831-1845 |
| 57. | Iavarone, A., and Massagué, J. (1997) Nature 387, 417-422[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 58. | Majesky, M. W., Lindner, V., Twardzik, D. R., Schwartz, S. M., and Reidy, M. A. (1991) J. Clin. Invest. 88, 904-910 |
| 59. | Wolf, Y. G., Rasmussen, L. M., and Ruoslahti, E. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 93, 1172-1178 |
| 60. |
Tanner, F. C.,
Yang, Z. Y.,
Duckers, E.,
Gordon, D.,
Nabel, G. J.,
and Nabel, E. G.
(1998)
Circ. Res.
82,
396-403 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Mantela, Z. Jiang, J. Ylikoski, B. Fritzsch, E. Zacksenhaus, and U. Pirvola The retinoblastoma gene pathway regulates the postmitotic state of hair cells of the mouse inner ear Development, May 15, 2005; 132(10): 2377 - 2388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Millette, B. H. Rauch, O. Defawe, R. D. Kenagy, G. Daum, and A. W. Clowes Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-BB-Induced Human Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation Depends on Basic FGF Release and FGFR-1 Activation Circ. Res., February 4, 2005; 96(2): 172 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Lindner, Q. Wang, B. A. Conley, R. E. Friesel, and C. P.H. Vary Vascular Injury Induces Expression of Periostin: Implications for Vascular Cell Differentiation and Migration Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2005; 25(1): 77 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Agrotis, P. Kanellakis, G. Kostolias, G. Di Vitto, C. Wei, R. Hannan, G. Jennings, and A. Bobik Proliferation of Neointimal Smooth Muscle Cells after Arterial Injury: DEPENDENCE ON INTERACTIONS BETWEEN FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR-2 AND FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR-9 J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 2004; 279(40): 42221 - 42229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |