JBC PeproTech; Our Business is Cytokines!

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paine, E.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paine, E.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 15, 11284-11290, April 14, 2000


Arachidonic Acid Activates Mitogen-activated Protein (MAP) Kinase-activated Protein Kinase 2 and Mediates Adhesion of a Human Breast Carcinoma Cell Line to Collagen Type IV through a p38 MAP Kinase-dependent Pathway*

Elizabeth Paine, Rèmi PalmantierDagger , Steven K. Akiyama, Kenneth Olden, and John D. Roberts§

From the Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, NIEHS, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709



    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Adhesion of metastatic human mammary carcinoma MDA-MB-435 cells to the basement membrane protein collagen type IV can be activated by treatment with arachidonic acid. We initially observed that this arachidonic acid-mediated adhesion was inhibited by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein. Therefore, we examined the role of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase family tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated pathways in arachidonic acid-stimulated cell adhesion. Arachidonic acid stimulated the phosphorylation of p38, the activation of MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 2 (MAPKAPK2, a downstream substrate of p38), and the phosphorylation of heat shock protein 27 (a downstream substrate of MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 2). Treatment with the p38 inhibitor PD169316 completely and specifically inhibited arachidonic acid-mediated cell adhesion to collagen type IV. p38 activity was specifically associated with arachidonic acid-stimulated adhesion; this was demonstrated by the observation that 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate-activated cell adhesion was not blocked by inhibiting p38 activity. Extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases (ERKs) 1 and 2 were also activated by arachidonic acid; however, cell adhesion to collagen type IV was not highly sensitive to PD98059, an inhibitor of MAP kinase kinase/ERK kinase 1 (MEK1) that blocks activation of the ERKs. c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase was not activated by arachidonic acid treatment of these cells. Together, these data suggest a novel role for p38 MAP kinase in regulating adhesion of breast cancer cells to collagen type IV.



    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell adhesion to extracellular matrix plays a major role in a variety of biological processes, such as embryonic development (1-3), wound healing (4, 5), cell proliferation (6-8), and disease pathogenesis (9, 10). Among these processes is tumor cell metastasis, during which neoplastic cells interact with other tumor cells, normal endothelial cells, and the extracellular matrix. These interactions are sensitive to regulation by the local microenvironment and are dependent upon cell surface adhesion molecules (11-16). We are interested in identifying factors that influence the adhesive properties of human tumor cells and that in doing so alter the metastatic potential of these cells.

There are several families of adhesion molecules, the function of which can affect metastasis, including cadherins, selectins, the CD44 group, the immunoglobulin superfamily, and integrins (16, 17). Integrins are heterodimeric, transmembrane cell surface glycoproteins that mediate adhesion to the extracellular matrix in a highly regulated manner and are linked to signal transduction pathways within the cell (18-20). Because of the profound effect that integrins and their interactions with the extracellular matrix have on the biology of the cell, the proteins and second messengers that regulate these signal transduction pathways play critical roles in the behavior of both normal and transformed cells (6, 8, 21-23).

The MAP1 kinase signaling pathways are ubiquitous cascades that regulate a number of cellular responses. The MAP kinase family consists of three different subfamilies: ERK1 and ERK2, the JNK kinases, and the p38 MAP kinases. The MAP kinase family proteins are activated by dual phosphorylation of tyrosine and threonine residues within recognized motifs. These motifs are different for each of the different subfamilies (24, 25). Proteins in the p38 subfamily contain a threonine-glycine-tyrosine motif (26) that is phosphorylated in response to several types of stimuli, including different forms of cellular stress (26-28), lipopolysaccaride (28-30), several cytokines (26, 31-33), and ceramide (34-36).

Arachidonic acid is a polyunsaturated fatty acid that is present in an esterified form in cell membranes and is released from the membrane by phospholipases, mainly phospholipase A2 (37-41). Direct addition of arachidonic acid or some of its metabolites can modulate cell-matrix interactions. Studies by Grossi et al. (42) and Timar et al. (43) have shown that 12(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (12(S)-HETE), a lipoxygenase metabolite of arachidonic acid, increases the ability of tumor cells to adhere to fibronectin and subendothelial matrix (42) and to spread on fibronectin (43). Other researchers have demonstrated a role for arachidonic acid in HeLa cell spreading on collagen type IV (44). We, and others, have demonstrated that arachidonic acid (45) and its metabolic precursor, linoleic acid (46), activate the adhesion of metastatic human breast carcinoma cells to type IV collagen. Our previous studies using the PKC inhibitor calphostin C demonstrated PKC signaling involvement in arachidonic acid-mediated cell adhesion to collagen type IV (45). However, the mechanism by which arachidonic acid stimulates cell adhesion to collagen type IV has not been completely described.

Thus, the goal of this study was to define additional signaling pathways that are involved in arachidonic acid-stimulated cell adhesion of MDA-MB-435 human breast carcinoma cells to collagen type IV. Specifically, we were interested in the role that MAP kinase proteins may play in arachidonic acid-stimulated adhesion. We demonstrated that p38, its downstream substrate MAPKAPK2, and HSP27 (a downstream substrate of MAPKAPK2), were all activated by arachidonic acid and that activation of p38 was necessary for arachidonic acid-mediated cell adhesion. ERK1 and ERK2 were also activated by arachidonic acid, but these proteins do not appear to play a role in mediating adhesion. Finally, JNK was not activated by arachidonic acid treatment of these cells; thus, p38 is the only MAP kinase of which the activation appears to be necessary for arachidonic acid-mediated cell adhesion.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture and Reagents-- The human breast carcinoma cell line MDA-MB-435 was obtained from Dr. Janet Price (M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) and was cultured as described (47). Cells were routinely tested for mycoplasma. Arachidonic acid (Cayman Chemical Co.) was purchased as a 328 mM stock in ethanol. The p38 inhibitor (PD169316) and a nonfunctional analogue of PD169316 (SB202474) were from Calbiochem. TPA and CHAPS (electrophoresis grade) were from Sigma. The MEK1 inhibitor (PD98059) was from New England Biolabs. Protease inhibitors were from Sigma or Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Collagen type IV and poly-D-lysine were from Becton Dickinson. BSA (fraction V) was from Life Technologies, Inc. (for adhesion studies) or ICN (for immunoblots). Primary antibodies were from Upstate Biotechnology (R2 and anti-p38), New England Biolabs (9101S, 9211S, and 9251S), Santa Cruz Biotechnology (sc-474), and Promega (anti-ACTIVETM p38). MAPKAPK2 polyclonal antibody and recombinant HSP27 protein were from Stressgen (Victoria, British Columbia, Canada). Control 293 cell lysates for the JNK blots were from New England Biolabs. Ampholines were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. [gamma -32P]ATP was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. 32P-Labeled orthophosphate was from ICN.

Cell Harvesting and Treatment-- Subconfluent cells were harvested with 5 mM EDTA, washed twice with serum-free medium preequilibrated at 37 °C in 7.5% CO2, resuspended at 5 × 105 cells/ml, and allowed to recover at 37 °C in 7.5% CO2 for 20 min before being treated with arachidonic acid. Inhibitors and their analogues were dissolved in Me2SO and added to the cells 30 min (PD169316 and SB202474) or 2 h (PD98059) prior to treatment with arachidonic acid. Arachidonic acid was prepared immediately prior to its addition to the cells by adding an equal volume of 328 mM KOH to the arachidonic acid stock and diluting the mixture to 6 mM arachidonic acid in 0.9% NaCl. An appropriate volume was added to the cells to yield a final concentration of 30 µM arachidonic acid. The maximum final concentration of ethanol was 0.009%.

Preparation of Cell Lysates-- Cells were harvested and treated as described above and were collected by centrifugation at 190 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Cell pellets were resuspended in lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1% Triton X-100, 1% deoxycholic acid, 0.1% SDS, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 0.5 mM sodium orthovanadate, 50 mM NaFl, 30 mM NaH2PO4, and 2 mg/ml 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride) at 4 °C and incubated on ice for 30 min. The cell lysate was then passed through a 23 gauge needle 10 times and centrifuged at 16,000 × g at 4 °C. Supernatants were saved and the protein concentrations determined using a BCA assay (Pierce).

Electrophoresis and Immunoblots-- Whole cell lysates were resolved by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (48) and were transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore) in Tris-glycine buffer containing 20% methanol and 0.2 mM sodium orthovanadate (49). Blots were probed with antibodies that recognized either ERK1 and ERK2 (R2, 1:5000); active, phosphorylated ERK1 and ERK2 (9101S, 1:2000); phosphorylated JNK (9251S, 1:1000); the 46-kDa isoforms of JNK1 and JNK3 (sc-474, 1:100); p38 (1 µg/ml); or active, phosphorylated p38 (anti-ACTIVETM p38 (1:1000) or 9211S (1:1000)). Immunoblots were performed as follows except where noted. Blots were blocked for a minimum of 1 h, incubated with primary antibody for 1-2 h, and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody (1:2000 or 1:3000) for 45 min. After incubations with primary or secondary antibody, blots were washed three times, 15 min each. TBST (10 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20) with 5% dry milk was used in all steps except during the washes, when the dry milk was omitted. All proteins were visualized using Supersignal chemiluminescent substrate according to the manufacturer's instructions (Pierce). BSA was used in place of milk for the anti-ACTIVETM p38 blot. Incubations with antibodies R2, 9101S, 9251S, and 9211S were done overnight at 4 °C, and washes for the 9101S, 9251S, and 9211S blots were 5 min in duration.

Kinase Assays-- Cells were treated with arachidonic acid and inhibitors as described above, and MAPKAPK2 assays were performed as described previously (50) with the following modifications. Protein A-agarose was used in place of protein G-Sepharose. The protein lysate used for each assay (0.5 mg of total protein per sample) was precleared for 1 h with protein A-agarose prior to immunoprecipitation. Leupeptin was added to the lysis buffer. E-64 and Brij were omitted from the procedure, and the proteins were resolved by electrophoresis on a 14% polyacrylamide gel. The specific activity of the [gamma -32P]ATP used was 6000 Ci/mmol.

Two-dimensional Gels-- Cells were harvested as described above and were labeled with 32P-phosphate (0.5 mCi/ml of cells) during a 30-min recovery period prior to arachidonic acid treatment and for an additional 30 min of arachidonic acid treatment. Cells were collected as described above and lysed in 9.5 M urea, 2% CHAPS, 2% ampholines (75% pH 5-7, 25% pH 3.5-10), 0.7 M beta -mercaptoethanol, 10 mM NaFl, 1 mM PMSF, and 1 mM EDTA (51). Lysates were passed through a 23 gauge needle 10 times, incubated for 40 min at 4 °C with 10 µl of a 50% slurry of protein G-agarose, and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 40 min at 4°. Supernatants were then analyzed by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis as described previously (52) except that CHAPS was used in place of Nonidet P-40. The first dimension was run using 75% pH 5-7 and 25% pH 3.5-10 ampholines. Proteins on the second dimension 12% Laemmli gel were transferred to PVDF membrane prior to exposure to audoradiographic film. In order to determine the pH gradient of first-dimension tube gels, two extra gels were run that were cut into 1-cm sections. The ampholytes in these sections were extracted in 2 ml of degassed H2O for at least 2 h, and the pH of the solutions measured with a standard pH electrode.

Adhesion Assays-- Cell attachment was assayed using a modification of the procedure described by Mould et al. (53). The wells of 96-well culture dishes (Costar) were coated with 100 µl/well of either 6.4 µg/ml collagen type IV, 32 µg/ml poly-D-lysine, or 20 mg/ml BSA for either 2 h at room temperature or overnight at 4 °C. Wells were then washed with calcium- and magnesium-free phosphate-buffered saline and blocked at room temperature for 2 h with 20 mg/ml heat-denatured BSA (Life Technologies, Inc., fraction V) (54). Cells were prepared and treated with TPA, arachidonic acid, or inhibitors as described above. Immediately after addition of arachidonic acid or TPA, 5 × 104 cells in 100 µl were added to each well. After a 45-min incubation at 37 °C, nonadherent cells were washed from the wells using serum-free medium and aspiration. Poly-D-lysine coated wells were not washed. The remaining cells were fixed with gluteraldehyde and stained with 0.5% crystal violet in 20% methanol. The stain was then resolubilized with 1% SDS, and the absorbance was measured at 595 nm using a SpectraMax 250 microplate reader (Molecular Devices). Values are presented as the percentage of total cells assuming that the cells fixed to poly-D-lysine without washing represent 100%. In these adhesion assays, we typically see increases in adhesion in response to arachidonic acid of 1.5-3-fold; however, increases as high as 10-fold have been observed.

Statistics-- Pairwise comparisons were made by Fisher's least significant difference test carried out at the p < 0.01 level of significance (55). Standard error for adhesion assays was calculated as the square root of the variance of the ratio of two means (56).


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

p38, MAPKAPK2, and HSP27 Are Targets of Arachidonic Acid-- In order to determine whether a tyrosine kinase-regulated signaling pathway was involved in arachidonic acid-activated adhesion of human breast carcinoma cells to collagen type IV, adhesion assays were performed in the presence of the phosphotyrosine inhibitor genistein or its nonfunctional analogue, genistin. Genistein was an effective inhibitor of arachidonic acid-activated cell adhesion, with half-maximal and maximal inhibition at concentrations of approximately 15 and 30 µM genistein, respectively. In contrast, 30 µM of the nonfunctional analogue, genistin, had no apparent inhibitory effect (data not shown).

Inasmuch as tyrosine phosphorylation is involved in the regulation of all three MAP kinase pathways, we examined whole cell extracts from arachidonic acid-treated human breast carcinoma cells for specific MAP kinase activity. Treatment of MDA-MB-435 cells with 30 µM arachidonic acid-activated p38 MAP kinase as detected by an antibody that specifically recognizes the active, dually phosphorylated form of the protein (Fig. 1A, lanes 1 and 2). The increase in activated, phosphorylated p38 was not a result of an increase in total p38 protein (Fig. 1B, lanes 1 and 2). That the protein being recognized is the active, dually phosphorylated form of p38 was further established by the observation that when cells were stimulated with arachidonic acid in the presence of the p38 inhibitor PD169316, active p38 was no longer detected (Fig. 1A, lane 2 versus lane 8). The total amount of p38 protein in these cells was unchanged as a result of treatment with PD169316 (Fig. 1B, lane 2 versus lane 8).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Arachidonic acid activates p38 in human breast carcinoma cells. MDA-MB-435 cells were pretreated for 30 min with the indicated concentrations of the p38 inhibitor PD169316, prior to a 5-min treatment with 30 µM arachidonic acid (lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8 (AA)) or its solvent (lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7 (C)). Cell lysates were analyzed by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (100 µg of protein/lane) and immunoblotting with antibodies to either active p38 (A) or total p38 (B). Results are representative of three separate experiments.

Kinase assays to measure MAPKAPK2 activity were performed to verify p38 activation and to determine whether downstream substrates of p38 were activated by arachidonic acid (50). MAPKAPK2 is a downstream substrate of p38 and phosphorylates HSP27 (27, 57); thus, MAPKAPK2 activation, as detected by in vitro phosphorylation of HSP27, is a frequent outcome of p38 activation. As demonstrated in Fig. 2, arachidonic acid treatment induced a significant increase in MAPKAPK2 activity (Fig. 2, compare lanes 1 and 4), which was inhibited by the p38 inhibitor PD169316 (Fig. 2, lane 5) but not by the nonfunctional analogue of this inhibitor, SB202474 (Fig. 2, lane 7). The specificity of this activity was demonstrated by the fact that when HSP27 was omitted from the reaction (Fig. 2, lane 2) or when the immunoprecipitation was performed with normal rabbit serum (Fig. 2, lane 3), phosphorylation of HSP27 was not detected. The ERK1 and ERK2 activator, MEK1, has also been observed to activate MAPKAPK2 (58). However, as indicated by the inability of the MEK1 inhibitor PD98059 to inhibit arachidonic acid activation of MAPKAPK2 (Fig. 2, lane 9), arachidonic acid activation of MAPKAPK2 occurred through p38 and not through a pathway involving MEK1. The observation that arachidonic acid activation of ERK1 and ERK2 does not occur until 15 min after arachidonic acid treatment of these cells (data not shown) also supports the conclusion that MAPKAPK2 activation, which occurs within 5 min of arachidonic acid treatment, does not occur through MEK1. These results demonstrate that the both p38 and its downstream substrate MAPKAPK2 are activated by arachidonic acid.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Arachidonic acid induces MAPKAPK2 activity. Cells were preincubated with Me2SO (DMSO) (lanes 1-4), the p38 inhibitor PD169316 (lanes 5 and 6), its nonfunctional analogue SB202474 (lanes 7 and 8), or the MEK1 inhibitor PD98059 (lanes 9 and 10) and subsequently treated with 30 µM arachidonic acid (lanes 1-3, 5, 7, and 9 (AA)) or its solvent (lanes 4, 6, 8, and 10 (C)) for 5 min. Cells were then lysed and assayed for MAPKAPK2 activity. In lane 2, the MAPKAPK2 substrate, HSP27, was omitted from the assay to demonstrate specificity. In lane 3, immunoprecipitation was performed using normal rabbit antisera. Similar results with arachidonic acid have been obtained from three separate experiments. Similar results using the inhibitors have been obtained from two separate experiments.

We next investigated whether arachidonic acid treatment induces the in vivo phosphorylation of HSP27. Human HSP27 can be phosphorylated at three different sites: serine 15, serine 78, and serine 82 (51, 59, 60). This phosphorylation results in the appearance of several different isoforms (61, 62). Treatment with arachidonic acid led to an increase in the amount of the dually phosphorylated c form of HSP27 (Fig. 3), demonstrating that HSP27 is activated in these cells in response to arachidonic acid. Immunoblotting with a monoclonal antibody to HSP27 verified the identity of the indicated spots as HSP27 (data not shown).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Arachidonic acid increases HSP27 phosphorylation. MDA-MB-435 cells were harvested and incubated in suspension with 32P-orthophosphate for 30 min prior to treatment with 30 µM arachidonic acid (AA) or its solvent (C) and for an additional 30 min after beginning treatment. Whole cell lysates (100 µg/gel) were analyzed on two-dimensional gels as described under "Experimental Procedures." Proteins were transferred to PVDF membrane, and 32P-labeled proteins were detected by audoradiography. The pH values of the indicated segments of the first-dimension gel are shown. Results are representative of two separate experiments. a, b, and c indicate the location of the unphosphorylated, singly phosphorylated, and dually phosphorylated forms of HSP27, respectively. The dotted lines outline the location of the unphosphorylated form of HSP27 as determined by immunoblotting.

Time and Dose Response of p38 Activation to Arachidonic Acid Treatment-- Arachidonic acid activated p38 at concentrations as low as 5 µM (Fig. 4, lane 3). Our previously published results demonstrated that the increase in arachidonic acid-mediated adhesion becomes apparent with 10 µM arachidonic acid treatment (45).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Dose response of p38 activation to arachidonic acid treatment. MDA-MB-435 cells were incubated for 5 min with varying concentrations of arachidonic acid (AA) (lanes 2-5) or its solvent (lane 1). Whole cell lysates (100 µg total protein/lane) were analyzed by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to PVDF membrane. The blot was probed with antibody to the active phosphorylated form of p38. The bottom panel depicts a blot prepared in parallel and probed with antibody to total p38. The migration positions of molecular size markers (Mr × 10-3) are shown on the left.

We performed kinetic studies of p38 activation to determine whether the time of arachidonic acid activation of p38 is consistent with its playing a role in arachidonic acid-stimulated cell adhesion. Arachidonic acid activation of p38 occurred rapidly, within 5 min of treatment (Fig. 5, lane 2), and was sustained for at least 60 min (Fig. 5, lane 5). These kinetics are consistent with the kinetics of activation of adhesion by arachidonic acid (data not shown).



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Kinetics of p38 activation by arachidonic acid. Cells were treated in suspension with 30 µM arachidonic acid (lanes 2-5 (AA)) or its solvent (lanes 7-10 (C)) and lysed at the indicated times. Control cells were lysed just prior to treatment with arachidonic acid (lane 1) or solvent (lane 6). Proteins from whole cell lysates (100 µg/lane) were resolved by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to PVDF membrane for immunoblotting with anti-ACTIVETM p38 antibody. The migration positions of molecular size markers (Mr × 10-3) are shown on the left. The experiment was done twice.

Activation of p38 Is Required for Arachidonic Acid-stimulated Cell Adhesion-- To determine whether activation of p38 is necessary for arachidonic acid-activated cell adhesion to collagen type IV, adhesion assays were performed using cells treated with the p38 inhibitor PD169316. As shown in Fig. 6A, 5 µM PD169316 was sufficient to completely block the activation of p38, as judged by immunoblotting with antibody to the active, phosphorylated form of p38 (Fig. 6A, lane 5). An equal molar concentration of the nonfunctional analogue SB202474 had no effect on the detection of active p38 (Fig. 6A, lane 6). Both 5 and 10 µM p38 inhibitor were tested for their ability to inhibit arachidonic acid-activated cell adhesion to collagen type IV (Fig. 6B and data not shown). As shown in Fig. 6B, 10 µM PD169316 inhibited the arachidonic acid-stimulated adhesion of MDA-MB-435 cells. In contrast, the same concentrations of the nonfunctional analogue had no effect on adhesion. Arachidonic acid-stimulated adhesion was also inhibited completely by 5 µM PD169316 (data not shown). As judged by propidium iodine staining and flow cytometry, neither PD169316 nor SB202474 had a significant effect on cell viability under the conditions used in the cell adhesion assay (data not shown). A second p38 inhibitor, SB203580, with a higher IC50, was also able to completely inhibit arachidonic acid-mediated adhesion when used at 20 µM under the same conditions (data not shown).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   The p38 inhibitor PD169316 blocks arachidonic acid-mediated adhesion of MDA-MB-435 cells to collagen type IV. A, cells were treated with a p38 inhibitor (PD169316) (lanes 3, 5, and 7) or a nonfunctional analogue (SB202474) (lanes 4, 6, and 8) for 15 min prior to a 5 min incubation with 30 µM arachidonic acid (lanes 2-8 (AA)) or its solvent (lane 1 (C)). Cell lysates (50 µg/lane) were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-ACTIVETM p38 antibody. The arrow indicates the location of the active form of the p38 protein. B, the indicated cells were preincubated with 10 µM p38 inhibitor (PD169316) or the nonfunctional analogue (SB202474) for 30 min prior to treatment with 30 µM arachidonic acid (AA), its solvent (C), Me2SO (DMSO), or 10 nM TPA immediately before being assayed for adhesion to collagen type IV (black-square) or BSA (). Data shown in B are the mean of three replicate wells ± S.E. Results with arachidonic acid treatment and the p38 inhibitor are representative of three similar experiments. *, values are significantly different from the control (C+DMSO) values (p < 0.01). **, values are significantly different from those marked with an asterisk (p < 0.01). black-diamond , values are significantly different from the control (DMSO) values (p < 0.01) but not significantly different from each other (p > 0.01).

The specificity of the role of p38 in arachidonic acid-activated cell adhesion was further demonstrated by examining the role of p38 activation in TPA-induced cell adhesion to collagen type IV. As shown Fig. 6B, 10 µM PD169316 had no significant effect on TPA-activated cell adhesion. In this same experiment, 10 µM PD169316 completely inhibited arachidonic acid-mediated adhesion.

Arachidonic acid-mediated cell adhesion to collagen type IV was not highly sensitive to the MEK1 inhibitor PD98059. When cells were preincubated with 10 µM PD98059 for 2 h, adhesion was not significantly inhibited (Fig. 7A), and activated ERK1 and ERK2 were not readily detected (Fig. 7B, lane 1), suggesting that high levels of activated ERK1 and ERK2 are not necessary for arachidonic acid-activated cell adhesion.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   The activation of ERK1 and ERK2 is not necessary for arachidonic acid-stimulated adhesion of MDA-MB-435 cells to collagen type IV. A, cells were preincubated with 10 µM MEK1 inhibitor (PD98059) for 2 h prior to being treated with 30 µM arachidonic acid (AA) or its solvent (C). Cells were then immediately assayed for adhesion to collagen type IV (black-square) or BSA (). Data are the mean of four replicate wells ± S.E. *, values are significantly different from the control (C+DMSO) (p < 0.01) but are not significantly different from each other (p > 0.01). Data are representative of two separate experiments. B, cells were treated with 10 µM of the MEK1 inhibitor (PD98059) for 2 h prior to a 20-min treatment with arachidonic acid (lanes 1 and 2 (AA)) or its solvent (lane 3 (C)). Cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblot analysis (100 µg/lane) with an antibody that recognizes only the phosphorylated, active forms of ERK1 and ERK2 (top) or with an antibody that recognizes all forms of ERK1 and ERK2 (bottom). Data are representative of four similar experiments.

We also examined arachidonic acid-treated cells for activation of JNK. There are three separate JNK genes; expression from any of the three genes can yield 45- or 54-kDa isoforms (63). Immunoblotting with an antibody that recognizes the phosphorylated 46- and 54-kDa isoforms of all three JNK gene products did not detect phosphorylated JNK in MDA-MB-435 cells after arachidonic acid treatment for various times up to an hour (Fig. 8A). As shown in Fig. 8B, these cells do express at least some isoforms of JNK1 and JNK3. These results demonstrate that activation of a JNK MAP kinase-mediated pathway is not necessary for arachidonic acid-induced cell adhesion.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   JNK proteins are not phosphorylated in response to arachidonic acid treatment of MDA-MB-435 cells. Cells were treated with 30 µM arachidonic acid (lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8 (AA)) or its solvent (lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7 (C)) for the indicated times. Cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblot analysis (100 µg of total protein/lane) with an antibody that recognizes the phosphorylated 46- and 54-kDa isoforms of the three different JNK gene products (A) or the 46-kDa isoforms of the JNK1 and JNK3 proteins (B). Extracts from transformed human kidney 293 cells that were untreated (lane 9) or treated with ultraviolet light (lane 10) were used as controls.



    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

These studies established that arachidonic acid activates the MAP kinase family protein p38, its downstream substrate MAPKAPK2, and the phosphorylation of the MAPKAPK2 substrate HSP27 in MDA-MB-435 human breast carcinoma cells. In addition, we showed that p38 activation is necessary for arachidonic acid-mediated adhesion of these cells to collagen type IV. Thus, we have defined an arachidonic acid-stimulated signal transduction pathway that includes at least p38, MAPKAPK2, and HSP27.

There are several possible mechanisms by which p38 may mediate arachidonic acid-stimulated adhesion to collagen type IV. First, p38 could alter the number of integrin receptors for collagen type IV present on the cell surface. This change could result from increased de novo expression of these integrins or from transport of such receptors from preexisting intracellular pools to the cell surface. The first mentioned mechanism is possible because multiple transcription factors, including cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB) (64, 65), activating transcription factor 1 (ATF-1) (64, 65), activating transcription factor 2 (ATF-2) (66, 67), C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) (36, 68), and myocyte-enhancer factor 2C (MEF2C) (69), can be activated by p38. In addition, p38 activates MAP kinase-interacting kinases 1 and 2 (MNK1 and -2) (70-72). MAP kinase-interacting kinase 1 is a kinase that can phosphorylate eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), a translation factor the phosphorylation of which is necessary for the initiation of mRNA translation (72-74). Thus, p38 could increase the expression of cell surface molecules through transcriptional or translational mechanisms. However, we have observed that the levels of collagen type IV receptor beta 1, alpha 1, and alpha 2 integrin subunits are not altered when examined after a 45-min incubation with arachidonic acid.2

Thus, it is more likely that p38 activates receptors already present at the cell surface. Activation of type IV collagen receptors could result from direct interaction of the adhesion receptors with signal transduction proteins or other cell surface adhesion molecules, from posttranslational modification of receptors, or from alterations in the cytoskeleton or cell membrane that could directly or indirectly affect adhesion receptor conformation. This activation could be achieved through downstream targets of p38, such as MAPKAPK2. Interestingly, activated MAPKAPK2 phosphorylates and activates heat shock protein 27 (57). The activation of HSP27 has been shown to stabilize and increase actin filament formation, a process that could result in cytoskeletal changes (75, 76). We have verified that arachidonic acid stimulation of MAPKAPK2 leads to the in vivo phosphorylation of HSP27. Therefore, we hypothesize that p38 may mediate cell adhesion through a pathway involving MAPKAPK2, HSP27, and subsequent alteration of the cytoskeleton.

The upstream mediators of arachidonic acid-induced p38 activation have not yet been identified. Previous studies have shown that activation of p38 can occur through a protein kinase cascade involving either MAP kinase kinase 3, 4, or 6 (66, 67, 77-80). All of these proteins are potential mediators of p38 activation by arachidonic acid.

The MAP kinase proteins ERK1 and ERK2 were also activated by arachidonic acid treatment of these cells; this observation is consistent with results in other cell types (81-83). However, arachidonic acid-mediated cell adhesion does not appear to be highly sensitive to the MEK1 inhibitor PD98059, suggesting that high levels of activated ERK1 and ERK2 have little effect on adhesion.

Arachidonic acid does not appear to activate JNK in this cell type, demonstrating that the activation of JNK is not necessary for arachidonic acid-mediated adhesion. Other studies have shown that arachidonic acid activates JNK in rabbit epithelial (84) and human leukemia (83) cells; therefore, it is likely that there is cell type specificity with respect to arachidonic acid activation of JNK pathways.

Recent work by others has shown that arachidonic acid activates p38 in HL60 cells, HeLa cells, and neutrophils (83) and that p38 plays a role in the adhesion of neutrophils to fibrinogen (85). However, to our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the involvement of p38 in arachidonic acid-mediated cell adhesion to collagen type IV and is the first to demonstrate that arachidonic acid activates MAPKAPK2 and causes the increased phosphorylation of HSP27. These observations are especially interesting because overexpression of HSP27 can alter the invasiveness of breast cancer cells in both tissue culture and animal models (86, 87). Thus, it is possible that p38 activation of MAPKAPK2 and the ensuing posttranslational modification of HSP27 could play a role in regulating metastasis of these cells through the modulation of cell adhesion.

It has also been shown that mice fed a diet high in the arachidonic acid precursor, linoleic acid, exhibit increased susceptibility to MDA-MB-435 (88) or 4526 (89) tumor metastasis in vivo. Collagen type IV is a major component of most basement membranes and a critical barrier through which metastasizing cells must pass (16, 90). Increased adhesion of cells to collagen type IV may facilitate their ability to invade through the basement membrane. Thus, our study suggests a possible mechanism by which increased linoleic acid in the diet of these mice could increase metastasis and suggests that p38 may be a useful target for antimetastatic drugs.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the Comparative Medicine Branch at NIEHS for testing the cell line for mycoplasma, Margaret D. George for technical assistance, and Dr. Francis M. Wolber for testing cell viability. We also thank Dr. Joseph K. Haseman of the Biostatistics Branch at NIEHS for help with statistical analyses and Drs. John P. O'Bryan and James C. Bonner, both of NIEHS, for critical review of the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Present address: SmithKline Beecham Biologicals, Bat 62, R&D, Rue de l'Institut, 89, B-1330 Rixensart, Belgium.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Mail Drop C2-14, NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Tel.: 919-541-5023; Fax: 919-541-7784; E-mail: Roberts1@niehs.nih.gov.

2 R. Palmantier, M. D. George, K. Olden, and J. D. Roberts, manuscript in preparation.


    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: MAP, mitogen-activated protein; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase; JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate; MEK1, MAP kinase kinase/ERK kinase 1; MAPKAPK2, MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 2; HSP27, heat shock protein 27; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate; PVDF, polyvinylidene fluoride; BSA, bovine serum albumin.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


1. Adams, J. C., and Watt, F. M. (1993) Development 117, 1183-1198[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. DeSimone, D. W. (1994) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 747-751[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Bronner-Fraser, M. (1985) J. Cell Biol. 101, 610-617[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Martin, P. (1997) Science 276, 75-81[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Gailit, J., and Clark, R. A. (1994) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 717-725[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Howe, A., Aplin, A. E., Alahari, S. K., and Juliano, R. L. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 220-231[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Giancotti, F. G., and Mainiero, F. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1198, 47-64[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Giancotti, F. G. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 691-700[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Zutter, M. M., and Santoro, S. A. (1998) Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 231, 167-185[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Weaver, V. M., Fischer, A. H., Peterson, O. W., and Bissell, M. J. (1996) Biochem. Cell Biol. 74, 833-851[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Stetler-Stevenson, W. G., Aznavoorian, S., and Liotta, L. A. (1993) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 9, 541-573[CrossRef]
12. Fidler, I. J. (1991) Br. Med. Bull. 47, 157-177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Lafrenie, R. M., Buchanan, M. R., and Orr, F. W. (1993) Cell Biophys. 23, 3-89[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Brodt, P. (1991) Cancer Metastasis Rev. 10, 23-32[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Price, J. E. (1990) Cancer 66, 1313-1320[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Price, J. T., Bonovich, M. T., and Kohn, E. C. (1997) Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 32, 175-253[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Albelda, S. M. (1993) Lab. Invest. 68, 4-17[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Schlaepfer, D. D., and Hunter, T. (1998) Trends Cell Biol. 8, 151-157[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Hynes, R. O. (1992) Cell 69, 11-25[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Clark, E. A., and Brugge, J. S. (1995) Science 268, 233-239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Guan, J. L., and Chen, H. C. (1996) Int. Rev. Cytol. 168, 81-121[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Danen, E. H., Lafrenie, R. M., Miyamoto, S., and Yamada, K. M. (1998) Cell. Adhes. Commun. 6, 217-224[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Akiyama, S. K., Olden, K., and Yamada, K. M. (1995) Cancer Metastasis Rev. 14, 173-189[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Davis, R. J. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 470-473[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Cano, E., and Mahadevan, L. C. (1995) Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 117-122[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Raingeaud, J., Gupta, S., Rogers, J. S., Dickens, M., Han, J., Ulevitch, R. J., and Davis, R. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 7420-7426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Rouse, J., Cohen, P., Trigon, S., Morange, M., Alonso-Llamazares, A., Zamanillo, D., Hunt, T., and Nebreda, A. R. (1994) Cell. 78, 1027-1037[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Han, J., Lee, J. D., Bibbs, L., and Ulevitch, R. J. (1994) Science. 265, 808-811[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Han, J., Lee, J. D., Tobias, P. S., and Ulevitch, R. J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 25009-25014[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Lee, J. C., Laydon, J. T., McDonnell, P. C., Gallagher, T. F., Kumar, S., Green, D., McNulty, D., Blumenthal, M. J., Heys, J. R., Landvatter, S. W., Strickler, J. E., McLaughlin, M. M., Siemens, I. R., Fisher, S. M., Livi, G. P., White, J. R., Adams, J. L., and Young, P. R. (1994) Nature 372, 739-746[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Freshney, N. W., Rawlinson, L., Guesdon, F., Jones, E., Cowley, S., Hsuan, J., and Saklatvala, J. (1994) Cell 78, 1039-1049[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Crawley, J. B., Rawlinson, L., Lali, F. V., Page, T. H., Saklatvala, J., and Foxwell, B. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15023-15027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Beyaert, R., Cuenda, A., Vanden Berghe, W., Plaisance, S., Lee, J. C., Haegeman, G., Cohen, P., and Fiers, W. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 1914-1923[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Reunanen, N., Westermarck, J., Hakkinen, L., Holmstrom, T. H., Elo, I., Eriksson, J. E., and Kahari, V. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5137-5145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Jarvis, W. D., Fornari, F. A., Jr., Auer, K. L., Freemerman, A. J., Szabo, E., Birrer, M. J., Johnson, C. R., Barbour, S. E., Dent, P., and Grant, S. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 52, 935-947[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Brenner, B., Koppenhoefer, U., Weinstock, C., Linderkamp, O., Lang, F., and Gulbins, E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 22173-22181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Glaser, K. B., Mobilio, D., Chang, J. Y., and Senko, N. (1993) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 14, 92-98[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Needleman, P., Turk, J., Jakschik, B. A., Morrison, A. R., and Lefkowith, J. B. (1986) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 55, 69-102[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Malmsten, C. L. (1986) Am. J. Med. 80, 11-17
40. Serhan, C. N. (1994) Curr. Opin. Hematol. 1, 69-77[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Moncada, S., and Higgs, E. A. (1988) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 522, 454-463[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Grossi, I. M., Fitzgerald, L. A., Umbarger, L. A., Nelson, K. K., Diglio, C. A., Taylor, J. D., and Honn, K. V. (1989) Cancer Res. 49, 1029-1037[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Timar, J., Chen, Y. Q., Liu, B., Bazaz, R., Taylor, J. D., and Honn, K. V. (1992) Int. J. Cancer. 52, 594-603[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Chun, J. S., and Jacobson, B. S. (1992) Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 481-492[Abstract]
45. Palmantier, R., Roberts, J. D., Glasgow, W. C., Eling, T., and Olden, K. (1996) Cancer Res. 56, 2206-2212[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Johanning, G. L., and Lin, T. Y. (1995) Nutr. Cancer 24, 57-66[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Price, J. E., Polyzos, A., Zhang, R. D., and Daniels, L. M. (1990) Cancer Res. 50, 717-721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Towbin, H., Staehelin, T., and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4350-4354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Dean, J. L., Brook, M., Clark, A. R., and Saklatvala, J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 264-269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Landry, J., Lambert, H., Zhou, M., Lavoie, J. N., Hickey, E., Weber, L. A., and Anderson, C. W. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 794-803[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. O'Farrell, P. H. (1975) J. Bio.. Chem. 250, 4007-4021[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Mould, A. P., Askari, J. A., Craig, S. E., Garratt, A. N., Clements, J., and Humphries, M. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27224-27230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Yamada, K. M., and Kennedy, D. W. (1984) J. Cell Biol. 99, 29-36[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Miller, R. G., Jr. (1966) Simultaneous Statistical Inference , pp. 90-94, McGraw Hill, New York
56. Finney, D. J. (1964) Statistical Methods in Biological Assay , p. 125, Hafner Publishing Co., New York
57. Stokoe, D., Engel, K., Campbell, D. G., Cohen, P., and Gaestel, M. (1992) FEBS Lett. 313, 307-313[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Stokoe, D., Campbell, D. G., Nakielny, S., Hidaka, H., Leevers, S. J., Marshall, C., and Cohen, P. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3985-3994[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
59. Gaestel, M., Schroder, W., Benndorf, R., Lippmann, C., Buchner, K., Hucho, F., Erdmann, V. A., and Bielka, H. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 14721-14724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
60. Lavoie, J. N., Lambert, H., Hickey, E., Weber, L. A., and Landry, J. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 505-516[Abstract]
61. Arrigo, A. P., and Welch, W. J. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 15359-15369[Abstract/Free Full Text]
62. Welch, W. J. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 3058-3062[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63. Gupta, S., Barrett, T., Whitmarsh, A. J., Cavanagh, J., Sluss, H. K., Derijard, B., and Davis, R. J. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 2760-2770[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
64. Iordanov, M., Bender, K., Ade, T., Schmid, W., Sachsenmaier, C., Engel, K., Gaestel, M., Rahmsdorf, H. J., and Herrlich, P. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 1009-1022[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
65. Tan, Y., Rouse, J., Zhang, A., Cariati, S., Cohen, P., and Comb, M. J. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 4629-4642[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
66. Raingeaud, J., Whitmarsh, A. J., Barrett, T., Derijard, B., and Davis, R. J. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1247-1255[Abstract]
67. Derijard, B., Raingeaud, J., Barrett, T., Wu, I. H., Han, J., Ulevitch, R. J., and Davis, R. J. (1995) Science 267, 682-685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
68. Wang, X. Z., and Ron, D. (1996) Science 272, 1347-1349[Abstract]
69. Han, J., Jiang, Y., Li, Z., Kravchenko, V. V., and Ulevitch, R. J. (1997) Nature 386, 296-299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
70. Waskiewicz, A. J., Flynn, A., Proud, C. G., and Cooper, J. A. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 1909-1920[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
71. Fukunaga, R., and Hunter, T. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 1921-1933[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
72. Wang, X., Flynn, A., Waskiewicz, A. J., Webb, B. L., Vries, R. G., Baines, I. A., Cooper, J. A., and Proud, C. G. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9373-9377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
73. Waskiewicz, A. J., Johnson, J. C., Penn, B., Mahalingam, M., Kimball, S. R., and Cooper, J. A. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 1871-1880[Abstract/Free Full Text]
74. Sonenberg, N., Rupprecht, K. M., Hecht, S. M., and Shatkin, A. J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4345-4349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
75. Lavoie, J. N., Hickey, E., Weber, L. A., and Landry, J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 24210-24214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
76. Lavoie, J. N., Gingras-Breton, G., Tanguay, R. M., and Landry, J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 3420-3429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
77. Lin, A., Minden, A., Martinetto, H., Claret, F. X., Lange-Carter, C., Mercurio, F., Johnson, G. L., and Karin, M. (1995) Science 268, 286-290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
78. Moriguchi, T., Kuroyanagi, N., Yamaguchi, K., Gotoh, Y., Irie, K., Kano, T., Shirakabe, K., Muro, Y., Shibuya, H., Matsumoto, K., Nishida, E., and Hagiwara, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13675-13679[Abstract/Free Full Text]
79. Han, J., Lee, J. D., Jiang, Y., Li, Z., Feng, L., and Ulevitch, R. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2886-2891[Abstract/Free Full Text]
80. Stein, B., Brady, H., Yang, M. X., Young, D. B., and Barbosa, M. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11427-11433[Abstract/Free Full Text]
81. Rao, G. N., Baas, A. S., Glasgow, W. C., Eling, T. E., Runge, M. S., and Alexander, R. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 32586-32591[Abstract/Free Full Text]
82. Hii, C. S., Ferrante, A., Edwards, Y. S., Huang, Z. H., Hartfield, P. J., Rathjen, D. A., Poulos, A., and Murray, A. W. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 4201-4204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
83. Hii, C. S., Huang, Z. H., Bilney, A., Costabile, M., Murray, A. W., Rathjen, D. A., Der, C. J., and Ferrante, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 19277-19282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
84. Cui, X. L., and Douglas, J. G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 3771-3776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
85. Detmers, P. A., Zhou, D., Polizzi, E., Thieringer, R., Hanlon, W. A., Vaidya, S., and Bansal, V. (1998) J. Immunol. 161, 1921-1929[Abstract/Free Full Text]
86. Lemieux, P., Oesterreich, S., Lawrence, J. A., Steeg, P. S., Hilsenbeck, S. G., Harvey, J. M., and Fuqua, S. A. (1997) Invasion Metastasis 17, 113-123[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
87. Lemieux, P., Harvey, J., Guise, T., Dallas, M., Oesterreich, S., Yin, J., Selander, K., and Fuqua, S. (1999) J. Bone Miner. Res. 14, 1570-1575[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
88. Rose, D. P., Hatala, M. A., Connolly, J. M., and Rayburn, J. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 4686-4690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
89. Hubbard, N. E., and Erickson, K. L. (1987) Cancer Res. 47, 6171-6175[Abstract/Free Full Text]
90. Liotta, L. A., Steeg, P. S., and Stetler-Stevenson, W. G. (1991) Cell 64, 327-336