![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 16, 11778-11783, April 21, 2000
,From the Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L6, Canada
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Replacement of amino acids 4187-4628 in the
skeletal muscle Ca2+ release channel (skeletal
ryanodine receptor (RyR1)), including nearly all of divergent region 1 (amino acids 4254-4631), with the corresponding cardiac ryanodine
receptor (RyR2) sequence leads to increased sensitivity of channel
activation by caffeine and Ca2+ and to decreased
sensitivity of channel inactivation by elevated Ca2+ (Du,
G. G., and MacLennan, D. H. (1999) J. Biol.
Chem. 274, 26120-26126). In further investigations, this region
was subdivided by the construction of new chimeras, and alterations in
channel function were detected by measurement of the caffeine
dependence of in vivo Ca2+ release and the
Ca2+ dependence of [3H]ryanodine binding.
Chimera RF10a (amino acids 4187-4381) had a lower EC50
value for activation by caffeine, and RF10c (4557-4628) had a higher
EC50 value, whereas the EC50 value for chimera
RF10b (4382-4556) was unchanged. Chimeras RF10b and RF10c were more sensitive to activation by Ca2+, whereas RF10a was less
sensitive to inactivation by Ca2+, implicating RF10b and
RF10c in Ca2+ activation and RF10a in Ca2+
inactivation. Deletion of much of divergent region 1 sequence to create
mutant The mechanism of excitation-contraction coupling differs in
cardiac and skeletal muscles: in cardiac muscle, contraction requires extracellular Ca2+ influx through the dihydropyridine
receptor to activate the Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine
receptor (RyR))1 in the
sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane and cause Ca2+-induced
Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum; in skeletal
muscle, contraction does not require extracellular Ca2+ and
appears to be induced through the dihydropyridine receptor via physical
interaction with the ryanodine receptor (1, 2). Despite these
physiological differences, Ca2+ is a basic modulator of
both RyR1 and RyR2. Both channels are also modulated by other
endogenous and exogenous modulators, such as ATP, calmodulin,
Mg2+, ruthenium red, and ryanodine, but the extent of
modulation by Ca2+, ATP, Mg2+, and ruthenium
red differs between RyR1 and RyR2 (3-5). The molecular mechanisms
underlying the interactions of these modulatory ligands with RyRs are
not yet known. The amino acid sequences of RyR1 and RyR2, deduced from
cDNA cloning (6-9), are 66% identical, with regions of high
sequence identity and regions of high diversity. If different
physiological functions and pharmacological properties could be
correlated with different sequences, binding sites for modulating
agents in RyR might be identified, leading to a better understanding of
structure/function relationships within the molecule.
Structure/function analysis of ryanodine receptors has identified
several important regions in the molecule. Malignant hyperthermia and
central core disease mutations, found in the sequences lying between
amino acids 35 and 614 and 2163 and 2458 (10), alter sensitivity of the
channel to caffeine and halothane (11, 12). Another central core
disease mutation has been found in the C terminus in predicted
transmembrane 9 (TM9) or its adjacent lumenal domain (13). Evidence
that the Ca2+ sensor lies in TM2 has been presented by Chen
et al. (14), who showed that mutation of Glu3987
in RyR3 (equivalent to Glu4032 in RyR1) caused a huge
decrease in Ca2+ sensitivity. Other mutations of acidic
amino acids in TM2, TM7, and TM10 have also been shown to block
caffeine and 4-chloro-m-cresol activation and high affinity ryanodine
binding, but single channel function was not analyzed (15). Evidence
that TM9 is a Ca2+ channel pore has been presented by Chen
and co-workers (16), showing that a single mutation, G4824A, reduced
single channel conductance from 798 pS for the wild type channel to 22 pS. The mutant channel was modulated by Ca2+,
Mg2+, ATP, caffeine, ruthenium red, and ryanodine.
Co-expression of wild type and G4824A mutant proteins yielded single
channels with intermediate unitary conductances. This is in line with
observations in the central core disease mutation (13). Deletion of the
N-terminal sequences of RyR1 revealed that one-fifth of the C-terminal
sequence contains structures sufficient to form a functional
Ca2+ release channel, but the N-terminal sequence also
regulates the release channel (17). Deletion of 3 amino acids at the C
terminus of RyR1 resulted in decreased activities, whereas deletion of 15 amino acids yielded an inactive RyR (18).
In earlier studies, we used chimeric molecules to exploit the
differences between Ca2+ inactivation profiles of RyR1 and
RyR2, allowing us to localize the low affinity Ca2+ binding
site(s) that inactivates the channel between amino acids 3726 and 5037 (19). These conclusions have been supported in recent studies by Nakai
et al. (20). We also found that RyR chimeras containing the
C-terminal sequence of RyR2 were more sensitive to Ca2+
activation than RyR1. This was unexpected, because Ca2+
activation in native or recombinant RyR1 and RyR2 is similar (3, 5,
21). RyR2 and RyR1/RyR2 chimeras containing the RyR2 C terminus were
also more sensitive to caffeine activation than RyR1 (3, 5, 19),
suggesting that the caffeine activation site might also be located in
this region. Caffeine appears to activate RyR by increasing
Ca2+ sensitivity (3, 5). Clearly, sequence changes in this
region affect the sensitivity of the channel to activation by
Ca2+ and caffeine and to inactivation by elevated
Ca2+.
Within the C-terminal sequence studied earlier (19), amino acids
4187-4628 are most closely associated with activation and inactivation
of RyR1. This sequence overlaps nearly all of divergent region 1 (D1)
(amino acids 4254-4631), one of the three most divergent regions
between RyR1 and RyR2. The other divergent regions in RyR1 are D2
(amino acids 1342-1403) and D3 (amino acids 1872-1923) (22). D2 and
D3 sequences have been related to excitation-contraction coupling (19,
23, 24). D3 is unlikely to be involved in Ca2+ inactivation
(19, 20). The role of D1 is unknown.
In an attempt to clarify the role of D1 in Ca2+ release
channel function, we have subdivided D1 into three small chimeras and constructed a deletion mutant in this region. We tested the
Ca2+ dependence of high affinity
[3H]ryanodine binding to these mutant proteins to look at
both Ca2+ activation and Ca2+ inactivation and
we measured in vivo Ca2+ release induced by
caffeine with Ca2+ photometry. Our results show that the
high affinity ryanodine binding site and caffeine and Ca2+
activation sites are not located in the sequence between 4274-4535 but
suggest that part of the Ca2+ inactivation site resides in
the sequence that includes amino acids 4187-4381.
Materials--
Pfu DNA polymerase, restriction
endonucleases, and other DNA modifying enzymes were from Stratagene,
Roche Molecular Biochemicals, New England Biolabs, Promega, and
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; Fura-2 acetoxymethyl ester (AM) was from
Molecular Probes; caffeine and protease inhibitors were from Sigma;
[3H]ryanodine was from NEN Life Science Products;
unlabeled ryanodine was from Calbiochem; CHAPS was from Bio-Rad; and
phosphatidylcholine was from Avanti Polar Lipids. The expression vector
pcDNA 3.1(-) was from Invitrogen. Monoclonal antibody 34C (mAb
34C) was a kind gift from Dr. Judith Airey (25). All other reagents
were of reagent grade or the highest grade available.
Construction of Full-length Chimeric and Deletion Mutant RyR
cDNAs for Expression--
The methods for expression of cDNAs
encoding rabbit skeletal muscle RyR1 and cardiac muscle RyR2 were
described previously (21, 26, 27). The boundaries used in construction
of chimeric RYR cDNAs from RYR1 and
RYR2 and of deletion-mutated RYR cDNAs are
outlined in Fig. 1. The three regions most divergent in amino acid
sequence between RyR1 and RyR2 are labeled as D1-D3 (22) in Fig. 1.
Part of cassette 10 (C10), lying between NheI and
XcaI in a modified RYR1 cDNA (11) and
encoding amino acids 4187-4628 encompassing the D1 region, is
designated F10. The construction of chimeric RyR involving F10 has been
described previously (19). F10a contains RyR1 amino acids 4187-4381,
F10b contains RyR1 amino acids 4382-4556, and F10c contains RyR1 amino
acids 4557-4628. RYR2 fragments were amplified using a
Pfu polymerase-based polymerase chain reaction in which
restriction endonuclease sites were introduced at each end
(NheI-SphI for F10a,
SphI-NruI for F10b, and
NruI-XcaI for F10c). The NruI site in
F10 was obtained by site-directed mutagenesis with polymerase chain
reaction. These fragments were inserted into their corresponding
locations in pBS-F10 to form pBS-F10a, pBS-F10b, and pBS-F10c. The F10
fragments in the last three constructs were further cleaved and
inserted into pBS-RyR1 to form pBS-RF10a, pBS-RF10b, and pBS-RF10c. The
full-length chimeric constructs were subcloned into pcDNA 3.1(
The construction of a deletion mutant involving the D1 region was
carried out in RYR1 cDNA cassette 10 (NheI-ClaI) (Fig. 1). In C10, there are five
NarI sites (12819, 12840, 12873, 13107, and 13605). To
obtain Cell Culture and DNA Transfection--
Culture of HEK-293 cells
and cDNA transfection by the calcium phosphate precipitation method
(28), were carried out as described previously (27).
Fluorescence Measurements--
A microfluorometry system (Photon
Technologies Inc.) was used to monitor the Fura-2 AM fluorescence
changes in transiently transfected or nontransfected HEK-293 cells, as
described previously (21).
Solubilization of Transfected HEK-293 Cells and Measurement of
[3H]Ryanodine Binding--
Transfected HEK-293 cells
grown in 100-mm Petri dishes were solubilized with 1% CHAPS and 5 mg/ml phosphatidylcholine and analyzed with the
[3H]ryanodine binding assay described previously (21). In
brief, 25-µl aliquots of solubilized total cellular protein were
diluted 10-fold in binding buffer composed of 0.5 M KCl, 1 mM ATP, 100 µM free Ca2+, 0.2 mM EGTA, 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.1, a protease
inhibitor mix (0.1 mM AEBSF, 1 mM benzamidine,
1 µg/ml of each of leupeptin, pepstatin, aprotinin, and E64), and
various concentrations of [3H]ryanodine. Nonspecific
binding was determined using a 1000-fold excess of unlabeled ryanodine.
After 2 h at 37 °C, the 0.25-ml samples were diluted with 1 ml
of ice-cold washing buffer composed of 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.1, and 0.25 M KCl and placed on Whatman GF/B membrane filters
presoaked with 1% polyethyleneimine in washing buffer. Filters were
washed three times with 6 ml of washing buffer. [3H]Ryanodine bound to the filter was quantified by
liquid scintillation counting. All binding assays were carried out in
duplicate. To assess the effects of Ca2+ on high affinity
ryanodine binding, protocols were modified by removal of ATP from the
binding buffer and addition of different concentrations of
Ca2+ with 2.5 nM [3H]ryanodine.
Free Ca2+ was calculated using the apparent binding
constants described by Fabiato (29).
SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis and
Immunoblotting--
About 50 µg of proteins from cells lysed with
CHAPS were separated by 5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(30). RyR proteins were detected by immunoblotting (31) as described
previously (26).
Protein Assay--
Protein concentration was determined by dye
binding using bovine serum albumin as a standard (32).
Data Analysis--
Data were analyzed with Microcal Origin
software (Microcal Software Ltd., Northampton, MA). Scatchard analysis
was used to determine the dissociation constant (Kd)
and maximal binding capacity (Bmax) from
equilibrium binding data. EC50 or IC50 values
were obtained by fitting the curves with an equation for logistic dose
response. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. An unpaired Student
t test was used for evaluation of the mean values between
groups. A value of p In earlier studies, we showed differences in the curves of
Ca2+ dependence for [3H]ryanodine binding to
recombinant RyR1 and RyR2 that could be equated with differences in
Ca2+ inactivation (21). We exploited this difference to
locate the Ca2+ inactivation sites of RyR1 in the COOH
terminus, in particular, in fragments between amino acids 3726-4186
(F9) and 4187-4628 (F10) (19). We also observed that chimeras
containing F9 and F10 were more sensitive to Ca2+ and
caffeine activation, implying that these two sequences might be
involved in Ca2+ and caffeine activation of RyR. Because
F10 encompasses the most divergent region (D1) between RyR1 and RyR2,
and because we were interested in the role of this region in
Ca2+ release channel function, we subdivided the D1 region
of RyR1 into three smaller chimeras by substitution with the
corresponding regions of RyR2 (Fig. 1).
We also constructed a deletion mutant in the D1 region of RyR1 (Fig.
1). These constructs were then transiently expressed in HEK-293 cells,
and the Ca2+ dependence of [3H]ryanodine
binding (21) was used as an indirect measurement of Ca2+
activation and inactivation. In addition, caffeine-induced
Ca2+ release was measured in vivo by
Ca2+ photometry using HEK-293 cells transfected with
chimeric or deletion-mutant RYR cDNA.
4274-4535 led to higher caffeine and Ca2+
sensitivity of channel activation and to lower Ca2+
sensitivity for inactivation. Thus, deletion results demonstrate that
caffeine, Ca2+, and ryanodine binding sites are not located
in amino acids 4274-4535. Nevertheless, the properties of the deletion
and chimeric mutants demonstrate that amino acids 4274-4535 and three
shorter sequences in this region (F10a, amino acids 4187-4381; F10b,
4382-4556; and F10c, 4557-4628) in RyR1 modulate Ca2+ and
caffeine sensitivity of the Ca2+ release channel.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
)
with XbaI and HindIII to obtain pcDNA-RF10a,
pcDNA-RF10b, and pcDNA-RF10c.
4274-4535-C10, C10 was digested with NarI to
delete DNA sequence 12819-13605 and self-ligated with T4 DNA ligase.
The deleted C10 was inserted into the corresponding region of pBS-RyR1,
and the resulting cDNA sequence was then excised and inserted into
pcDNA3.1(
) with XbaI and HindIII to form
4274-4535-R1. These chimeric inserts and the deletion mutant were
confirmed by DNA sequencing and restriction enzyme-digestion mapping.
0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Scheme of construction of RyR1/RyR2 chimeras
and a RyR1 deletion mutant. The top line represents RyR
amino acid sequences. The black bar represents RyR1, and the
white bar represents RyR2. D1, D2, and
D3 represent the three most divergent regions between RyR1
and RyR2 (22). F10 represents RyR1 amino acids 4187-4628;
F10a represents RyR1 amino acids 4187-4381; F10b
represents RyR1 amino acids 4382-4556; F10c represents RyR1
amino acids 4557-4628. Amino acid sequences are presented on the
right side, with RyR1 sequences unlabeled and RyR2 sequences
labeled R2. The construction of these RyR1/RyR2 chimeras and
a deletion mutant of RyR1 are described under "Experimental
Procedures."
Transient Expression of Chimeric and Deletion-mutant RyR
cDNAs--
Immunostaining of CHAPS-solubilized cell lysates, using
monoclonal antibody 34C against an epitope located in RyR1 amino acids 2756-2803 (11), was used to detect the expression of RyR proteins in
transfected HEK-293 cells. Fig. 2 shows
the absence of RyR immunostaining in pcDNA-transfected cells.
Because the chimeric and deletion-mutated proteins all retained the
RyR1 epitope, immunostaining with monoclonal antibody 34C was used as a
measure of RyR expression. Immunostaining demonstrated that the
chimeras RF10a, RF10b, RF10c, and the deletion mutant
4274-4535-R1
were expressed at levels comparable to wild type RyR1 and that RF10a
and
4274-4535-R1 were expressed at levels higher than that of RyR1.
It has been demonstrated that RyR1 and RyR2 are not expressed with
equal efficiency, and F10 and F11 from RyR2 have been shown to be the
key sequences conferring high levels of expression in HEK-293 cells
(19). In this study, a smaller fragment, F10a from RyR2, was also shown to confer high level expression.
|
We have observed that RyR2 and chimeras containing the F10
sequence have a higher mobility than RyR1 in SDS gels. When F10 was
subdivided, there was no obvious difference in mobility when compared
with RyR1. The mutant
4274-4535-R1 had a slightly higher mobility
due to deletion of 262 amino acids.
Fluorescence Measurements of Caffeine-induced Ca2+
Release in Vivo--
We used Fura-2 fluorescence to measure the
properties of caffeine-induced Ca2+ release in the chimeric
or deletion-mutant proteins expressed in HEK-293 cells (21). No
significant Ca2+ release occurred with caffeine up to 30 mM in pcDNA-transfected cells (21), but
caffeine-induced Ca2+ release was observed in cells
transfected with each of the constructs. The peak fluorescence
amplitude was measured during the course of incremental application of
0.03 to 30 mM caffeine and normalized to the peak amplitude
for maximal Ca2+ release induced by 30 mM
caffeine. EC50 values were then calculated by fitting the
caffeine dose-response curves with an equation for logistic dose
response. As described previously (21), EC50 values
measuring the caffeine sensitivity of Ca2+ release were
higher for recombinant RyR2 than for recombinant RyR1 (Fig.
3). Dose response curves for RyR1, RyR2,
RF10, and chimeric and deletion-mutant proteins are shown in Fig. 3.
EC50 values are summarized in the inset to Fig.
3.
|
Chimera RF10b had an EC50 value for caffeine that was
similar to RyR1. However, chimeras RF10, RF10a and mutant
4274-4535-R1 had lower caffeine EC50 values, and RF10c
had a higher caffeine EC50 value. Because caffeine
activation was retained after deletion of sequences in the D1 region,
caffeine activation sites are unlikely to be located in this region.
The higher caffeine sensitivity exhibited by the RF10 and RF10a
chimeras and the deletion mutant
4274-4535-R1 and the lower
sensitivity by the RF10c chimera might be explained by induced
conformations that modulate the Ca2+ release channel
function, either negatively or positively. The Hill coefficients for
chimeras RF10, RF10a, and RF10b resembled that for RyR2 (Fig. 3,
inset), and the Hill coefficients for other constructs were
similar to that of RyR1, indicating that the F10a (and possibly F10b)
sequence of RyR2 can partially suppress the co-operative interactions
that occur in RyR1.
High Affinity Equilibrium Binding of [3H]Ryanodine to
Chimeric and Deletion-mutated RyRs--
We measured the equilibrium
binding properties of [3H]ryanodine to the chimeric and
mutated RyR proteins to determine whether the high affinity ryanodine
binding site was preserved. We also used [3H]ryanodine
binding to determine expression levels, because 1 mol of a tetrameric
RyR molecule binds 1 mol of ryanodine with high affinity (21, 26, 33).
Scatchard analysis showed a single binding site in all of the chimeras
and the deletion mutant (Fig. 4),
effectively ruling out the possibility that the high affinity ryanodine
binding site is located between amino acids 4274 and 4535. Kd values for these mutants were similar to those
for wild type RyR2 and RyR1 (Ref. 21 and Fig. 4, inset), ranging from 1.6 nM for RF10 to 3.3 nM for
RF10a. These data indicate that the high affinity binding site for
ryanodine is unchanged in all of these mutants. The
Bmax values ranged from 0.22 to 1.42 pmol/mg of
protein in these chimeras and mutants (Fig. 4, inset), reflecting different expression levels. These results show that RF10a
expression, like RF10 expression, was increased 5-6-fold over RyR1
expression. The expression of
4274-4535-R1 was increased 3-fold,
confirming results from immunoblotting. As reported previously (21),
there was no significant binding in lysates isolated from pcDNA-transfected HEK-293 cells.
|
Ca2+ Activation and Inactivation of High Affinity
[3H]Ryanodine Binding to Chimeric and Deletion-mutant
RyRs--
Dose-response curves for Ca2+ activation and
inactivation of [3H]ryanodine binding to wild type RyR1
and RyR2 and RF10 were shown previously (19, 21). The dose-response
curves for Ca2+ activation and inactivation of
[3H]ryanodine binding to the mutants are shown in Fig.
5, where they are compared with those of
RF10. At Ca2+ concentrations below pCa 7, there was little
binding of [3H]ryanodine to the RyR proteins, except for
4274-4535-R1, which bound nearly 0.14 pmol of
[3H]ryanodine per mg of protein in the absence of
Ca2+. This level of activation was observed even in the
presence of 1 mM EGTA (data not shown). As with wild type
RyR1 and RyR2, [3H]ryanodine binding was activated by
increasing Ca2+ concentrations, with maximal binding
occurring between pCa 5.7 and pCa 4 for most of the constructs.
EC50 values, expressed in pCa units, were similar for wild
type RyR1 and RyR2, and the EC50 value for RF10a did not
differ from that of either RyR1 or RyR2 (Fig. 5 and Table
I). However, in chimeras RF10b and RF10c
and especially in the mutant
4274-4535-R1, activation of
[3H]ryanodine binding was observed with lower
Ca2+ concentrations, and EC50 values were
significantly higher than those for wild type RyR1 and RyR2 (Fig. 5 and
Table I). In addition, the slope for RF10b and
4274-4535-R1 was
decreased below 0.7, indicating that the co-operativity of
Ca2+ activation that is observed in wild type RyR1 and RyR2
is absent in these mutants and is lowered below 2 in mutants RF10 and
RF10c.
|
|
Ca2+ inactivation was studied indirectly through
measurement of the inhibition of [3H]ryanodine binding by
elevated Ca2+. IC50 values for the chimeric and
deletion mutant RyR proteins, expressed in pCa units, are also
presented in Table I and illustrated in Fig. 5, where they are compared
with values for wild type RyR1, RyR2, and RF10. The IC50
for chimeras RF10b and F10c did not differ from that of wild type RyR1.
IC50 values were significantly reduced, however, for
chimera RF10a (pCa 1.90), associating the RF10a sequence (amino acids
4187-4381) with the low affinity Ca2+ binding site. The
slopes for the curves of inactivation were not changed for chimeras and
mutant
4274-4535-R1, when compared with RyR1. Mutant
4274-4535-R1 also had a lower IC50 (pCa 2.01) when
compared with RyR1, suggesting some involvement of this sequence with
the low affinity Ca2+ binding site, perhaps in its region
of overlap with RF10a.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In an earlier study, we measured alterations in Ca2+
release channel function that resulted from exchange of RyR1 sequences with corresponding sequences in RyR2 (19). In this study, we substituted shorter sequences in RyR1 with corresponding sequences in
RyR2 and measured alterations in channel sensitivity to
Ca2+ and caffeine. This strategy allowed us to map part of
the Ca2+ inactivation site to the F10a sequence (amino
acids 4187-4381). Decreased sensitivity to inactivation by
Ca2+ in mutant
4274-4535-R1 may be due either to the
deletion of the Ca2+ inactivation site in the region of
overlap with RF10a or to conformational changes induced by the
deletion. Increased sensitivity to activation by Ca2+ or
caffeine was also observed in all chimeras. This is unlikely to involve
the activation sites for Ca2+ and caffeine, because the
deletion mutant
4274-4535-R1 exhibited increased sensitivity to
Ca2+ and caffeine. In fact, high affinity Ca2+
binding sites are suggested to be in hydrophobic sequences (14, 15,
34), which were not analyzed in this study. Chen et al. (14)
have presented evidence for a Ca2+ activation site
involving a residue in RyR3 that corresponds to Glu4032,
located in TM2 of RyR1. They showed that the mutant channel retained
normal conductance, but sensitivity to activating Ca2+ was
reduced by 10,000-fold, and heterotetrameric forms of wild type and
mutant channels, created by coexpression, had intermediate Ca2+ sensitivities. Therefore, it is most likely that the
increased sensitivity observed in the chimeras was due to
conformational changes that might have altered function through long
range effects.
The use of antibodies against several domains in the D1 region has been associated with Ca2+ activation of the Ca2+ release channel. Polyclonal antibodies against the junctional face membrane of skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum and purified ryanodine receptor from skeletal muscle blocked Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release and decreased single channel open probability and conductance (35, 36). Some of the epitopes recognized by these anti-RyR antibodies have been mapped to amino acids 4445-4586 and 4760-4877. Polyclonal antibodies raised against amino acids 4380-4621 and 4425-4621 in the C terminus of RyR1 decreased Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release and doxorubicin-induced Ca2+ release from isolated terminal cisternae (37). An antibody raised against amino acids 4478-4512 increased the Ca2+ sensitivity of the Ca2+ release channel (38). After the antibody was purified with a Pro-Glu repeat peptide sequence (amino acids 4490-4499), the purified antibody inhibited Ca2+- or caffeine-activated channel activity but did not inhibit ATP-activated channel activity (39). The major epitopes for the antibody made against amino acids 4478-4512 were shown not to be located in the Pro-Glu repeat region. From these results, it might be deduced that the domains involving Ca2+ activation are associated with or lie close to the cytoplasmic loop between proposed transmembrane sequences 2 and 5 in the Zorzato numbering scheme. These earlier results are, therefore, consistent with our current results. However, the Ca2+ activation site itself is not likely to be located between amino acids 4274 and 4535, as discussed above. Because deletion of amino acids 4274-4535 increased channel sensitivity to activation by Ca2+ and caffeine, this sequence in RyR1 could form a complex domain, which modulates RyR1 channel function, presumably by suppressing channel activation.
The sequences in RyR1 that were exchanged or deleted in this study, with the exception of RF10c, would be likely to form a cytoplasmic loop between M2 and M5 in the topological model of Zorzato et al. (7). Although M3 (amino acids 4277-4299), M4 (amino acids 4342-4362), and M5 (amino acids 4559-4580) were predicted to be transmembrane sequences (7), M3 and M4 are not highly conserved among RyR isoforms and are no longer considered to be transmembrane sequences (15). M5 is one of the most hydrophobic sequences in RyR1 and is almost certain to be a transmembrane sequence (6, 7). The fact that channel function was not destroyed after deletion of amino acids 4274-4535, which includes the sequences formerly designated M3 and M4, provides further reason to think that these sequences do not form any part of the channel pore.
Nothing is known of the structure of this probable cytoplasmic loop
region, although Gly-, Ala-, and Pro-rich sequences between amino acids
4274 and 4535 (6, 7) might limit the extent of helical structure. Most
of this sequence is hydrophilic, implying that at least part of the
sequence is surface-exposed and antigenic (39, 40). Binding domains for
several peptides have been mapped on RyR1 by cryoelectron microscopy
(41-43). Binding sites for calmodulin have been identified between
structural domains 3 and 7 in RyR1 (42, 43), and calmodulin binding
sites have been localized to amino acids 4303-4328 and 4534-4552 (44,
45), which lie in the D1 region. Thus, it is possible that the D1
region lies near structural domain 3 and 7. Deletion of more than 200 amino acids might be apparent in cryoelectron microscopy of this mutant form of RyR1, providing a means to localize it in RyR1. Knowledge of
the location of regulatory domains relative to the channel forming
domains could be helpful in understanding the regulation of the
Ca2+release channel.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Grant MT-3399 (to D. H. M.) from the Medical Research Council of Canada.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
A postdoctoral fellow of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto, Charles H. Best Institute, 112 College St., Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L6 Canada. Tel.: 416-978-5008; Fax: 416-978-8528; E-mail: david.maclennan@utoronto.ca.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: RyR, ryanodine receptor; RyR1, skeletal muscle RyR isoform; RyR2, cardiac muscle RyR isoform; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio-]-1-propanesulfonic acid; HEK-293, human embryonic kidney cell line 293; C10, cassette 10; D1, divergent region 1; pS, picosiemens.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Fleischer, S., and Inui, M. (1989) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 18, 333-364[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Franzini-Armstrong, C.,
and Protasi, F.
(1997)
Physiol. Rev.
77,
699-729 |
| 3. |
Coronado, R.,
Morrissette, J.,
Sukhareva, M.,
and Vaughan, D. M.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
266,
C1485-C1504 |
| 4. | Meissner, G. (1994) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 56, 485-508[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Zucchi, R.,
and Ronca-Testoni, S.
(1997)
Pharmacol. Rev.
49,
53-98 |
| 6. | Takeshima, H., Nishimura, S., Matsumoto, T., Ishida, H., Kangawa, K., Minamino, N., Matsuo, H., Ueda, M., Hanaoka, M., Hirose, T., and Numa, S. (1989) Nature 339, 439-445[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Zorzato, F.,
Fujii, J.,
Otsu, K.,
Phillips, M.,
Green, N. M.,
Lai, F. A.,
Meissner, G.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
2244-2256 |
| 8. |
Otsu, K.,
Willard, H. F.,
Khanna, V. K.,
Zorzato, F.,
Green, N. M.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
13472-13483 |
| 9. | Nakai, J., Imagawa, T., Hakamat, Y., Shigekawa, M., Takeshima, H., and Numa, S. (1990) FEBS Lett. 271, 169-177[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Loke, J., and MacLennan, D. H. (1998) Am. J. Med. 104, 470-486[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Tong, J.,
Oyamada, H.,
Demaurex, N.,
Grinstein, S.,
McCarthy, T. V.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
26332-26339 |
| 12. |
Tong, J.,
McCarthy, T. V.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
693-702 |
| 13. |
Lynch, P. J.,
Tong, J.,
Lehane, M.,
Mallet, A.,
Giblin, L.,
Heffron, J. J.,
Vaughan, P.,
Zafra, G.,
MacLennan, D. H.,
and McCarthy, T. V.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
4164-4169 |
| 14. |
Chen, S. R. W.,
Ebisawa, K.,
Li, X.,
and Zhang, L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
14675-14678 |
| 15. |
Du, G. G.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31867-31872 |
| 16. |
Zhao, M.,
Li, P.,
Li, X.,
Zhang, L.,
Winkfein, R. J.,
and Chen, S. R. W.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25971-25974 |
| 17. |
Bhat, M. B.,
Zhao, J.,
Takeshima, H.,
and Ma, J.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
73,
1329-1336 |
| 18. | Gao, L., Tripathy, A., Lu, X., and Meissner, G. (1997) FEBS Lett. 412, 223-226[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Du, G. G.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
26120-26126 |
| 20. | Nakai, J., Gao, L., Xu, L., Xin, C., Pasek, D. A., and Meissner, G. (1999) FEBS Lett. 459, 154-158[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Du, G. G.,
Imredy, J. P.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
33259-33266 |
| 22. | Sorrentino, V., and Volpe, P. (1993) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 14, 98-103[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Yamazawa, T.,
Takeshima, H.,
Shimuta, M.,
and Iino, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
8161-8164 |
| 24. |
Nakai, J.,
Sekiguchi, N.,
Rando, T. A.,
Allen, P. D.,
and Beam, K. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
13403-13406 |
| 25. |
Airey, J. A.,
Beck, C. F.,
Murakami, K.,
Tanksley, S. J.,
Deerinck, T. J.,
Ellisman, M. H.,
and Sutko, J. L.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
14187-14194 |
| 26. | Chen, S. R., Vaughan, D. M., Airey, J. A., Coronado, R., and MacLennan, D. H. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 3743-3753[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Chen, S. R.,
Leong, P.,
Imredy, J. P.,
Bartlett, C.,
Zhang, L.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
73,
1904-1912 |
| 28. |
Chen, C.,
and Okayama, H.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
2745-2752 |
| 29. | Fabiato, A. (1988) Methods Enzymol. 157, 378-417[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Towbin, H.,
Staehelin, T.,
and Gordon, J.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
4350-4354 |
| 32. |
Lowry, O. H.,
Rosebrough, N. J.,
Farr, A. L.,
and Randall, R. J.
(1951)
J. Biol. Chem.
193,
265-275 |
| 33. |
Inui, M.,
Saito, A.,
and Fleischer, S.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
1740-1747 |
| 34. | Feng, W., and Shoshan-Barmatz, V. (1996) Mol. Membr. Biol. 13, 85-93[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Zorzato, F., Chu, A., and Volpe, P. (1989) Biochem. J. 261, 863-870[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Fill, M., Mejia-Alvarez, R., Zorzato, F., Volpe, P., and Stefani, E. (1991) Biochem. J. 273, 449-457 |
| 37. | Treves, S., Chiozzi, P., and Zorzato, F. (1993) Biochem. J. 291, 757-763 |
| 38. |
Chen, S. R.,
Zhang, L.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
23318-23326 |
| 39. |
Chen, S. R.,
Zhang, L.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
13414-13421 |
| 40. |
Marks, A. R.,
Fleischer, S.,
and Tempst, P.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
13143-13149 |
| 41. |
Samso, M.,
Trujillo, R.,
Gurrola, G. B.,
Valdivia, H. H.,
and Wagenknecht, T.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
146,
493-499 |
| 42. |
Wagenknecht, T.,
Grassucci, R.,
Berkowitz, J.,
Wiederrecht, G. J.,
Xin, H. B.,
and Fleischer, S.
(1996)
Biophys. J.
70,
1709-1715 |
| 43. |
Wagenknecht, T.,
Radermacher, M.,
Grassucci, R.,
Berkowitz, J.,
Xin, H. B.,
and Fleischer, S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
32463-32471 |
| 44. |
Chen, S. R.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
22698-22704 |
| 45. | Menegazzi, P., Larini, F., Treves, S., Guerrini, R., Quadroni, M., and Zorzato, F. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 9078-9084[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. Tanskanen, J. L. Greenstein, A. Chen, S. X. Sun, and R. L. Winslow Protein Geometry and Placement in the Cardiac Dyad Influence Macroscopic Properties of Calcium-Induced Calcium Release Biophys. J., May 15, 2007; 92(10): 3379 - 3396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L WINSLOW, A. TANSKANEN, M. CHEN, and J. L GREENSTEIN Multiscale Modeling of Calcium Signaling in the Cardiac Dyad Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., October 1, 2006; 1080(1): 362 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Fessenden, W. Feng, I. N. Pessah, and P. D. Allen Amino Acid Residues Gln4020 and Lys4021 of the Ryanodine Receptor Type 1 Are Required for Activation by 4-Chloro-m-cresol J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 2006; 281(30): 21022 - 21031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Fessenden, W. Feng, I. N. Pessah, and P. D. Allen Mutational Analysis of Putative Calcium Binding Motifs within the Skeletal Ryanodine Receptor Isoform, RyR1 J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 2004; 279(51): 53028 - 53035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. G. Du, G. Avila, P. Sharma, V. K. Khanna, R. T. Dirksen, and D. H. MacLennan Role of the Sequence Surrounding Predicted Transmembrane Helix M4 in Membrane Association and Function of the Ca2+ Release Channel of Skeletal Muscle Sarcoplasmic Reticulum (Ryanodine Receptor Isoform 1) J. Biol. Chem., September 3, 2004; 279(36): 37566 - 37574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Zhang, M. Kohler, S.-N. Yang, F. Zhang, O. Larsson, and P.-O. Berggren Growth Hormone Promotes Ca2+-Induced Ca2+ Release in Insulin-Secreting Cells by Ryanodine Receptor Tyrosine Phosphorylation Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2004; 18(7): 1658 - 1669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. George, H. Jundi, N. L. Thomas, M. Scoote, N. Walters, A. J. Williams, and F. A. Lai Ryanodine Receptor Regulation by Intramolecular Interaction between Cytoplasmic and Transmembrane Domains Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2004; 15(6): 2627 - 2638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Wang, J. Bolstad, H. Kong, L. Zhang, C. Brown, and S. R. W. Chen The Predicted TM10 Transmembrane Sequence of the Cardiac Ca2+ Release Channel (Ryanodine Receptor) Is Crucial for Channel Activation and Gating J. Biol. Chem., January 30, 2004; 279(5): 3635 - 3642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhang, Z. Liu, H. Masumiya, R. Wang, D. Jiang, F. Li, T. Wagenknecht, and S. R. W. Chen Three-dimensional Localization of Divergent Region 3 of the Ryanodine Receptor to the Clamp-shaped Structures Adjacent to the FKBP Binding Sites J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2003; 278(16): 14211 - 14218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. G. Du, B. Sandhu, V. K. Khanna, X. H. Guo, and D. H. MacLennan Topology of the Ca2+ release channel of skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum (RyR1) PNAS, December 24, 2002; 99(26): 16725 - 16730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fill and J. A. Copello Ryanodine Receptor Calcium Release Channels Physiol Rev, October 1, 2002; 82(4): 893 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shigaki, N.-h. Cheng, J. K. Pittman, and K. Hirschi Structural Determinants of Ca2+ Transport in the Arabidopsis H+/Ca2+ Antiporter CAX1 J. Biol. Chem., November 9, 2001; 276(46): 43152 - 43159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Yamaguchi, C. Xin, and G. Meissner Identification of Apocalmodulin and Ca2+-Calmodulin Regulatory Domain in Skeletal Muscle Ca2+ Release Channel, Ryanodine Receptor |