J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 16, 11836-11845, April 21, 2000
Medial Golgi but Not Late Golgi Glycosyltransferases
Exist as High Molecular Weight Complexes
ROLE OF LUMINAL DOMAIN IN COMPLEX FORMATION AND
LOCALIZATION*
Andrew S.
Opat
,
Fiona
Houghton, and
Paul A.
Gleeson§
From the Department of Pathology and Immunology, Monash University
Medical School, Melbourne, Victoria 3181, Australia
 |
ABSTRACT |
To investigate the organization of Golgi
glycosyltransferases and their mechanism of localization, we have
compared the properties of a number of medial and late acting Golgi
enzymes. The medial Golgi enzymes,
N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I and II (GnTI and GnTII)
required high salt for solubilization and migrated as high molecular
weight complexes on sucrose density gradients. In contrast, the late
acting Golgi enzymes,
1,4-galactosyltransferase and
1,2-fucosyltransferase, were readily solubilized in low salt and
migrated as monomers/dimers by sucrose density gradient centrifugation. Analysis of membrane-bound GnTI chimeras indicates that the formation of high molecular weight complexes does not require the transmembrane domain and cytoplasmic tail sequences of GnTI. Furthermore, a soluble
form of GnTI, containing the stem region and catalytic domain,
accumulated in the Golgi prior to secretion, in contrast to
1,4-galactosyltransferase. Soluble GnTI, which also associated with
high molecular weight complexes, was comparable with membrane-bound GnTI in its ability to glycosylate newly synthesized glycoproteins in vivo. Mutation of charged residues within the stem
region of GnTI, known to be important for "kin recognition", had no
effect on the efficiency of Golgi localization, the inclusion into high molecular weight complexes, nor functional activity in
vivo. The differences in behavior between the medial
and late acting Golgi enzymes may contribute to their
differential localization and their ability to glycosylate efficiently
in the correct Golgi subcompartment.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The Golgi apparatus is a highly complex and dynamic organelle
consisting of a series of flattened cisternae associated with numerous
vesicles and membrane tubules. The Golgi is central to the secretory
pathway, since it plays important roles in the maturation and sorting
of newly synthesized secretory and membrane proteins and also in the
recycling of proteins and lipids to the endoplasmic reticulum (1, 2).
In addition, the Golgi has a fundamental role in the biosynthesis of
the glycan chains of glycoproteins, proteoglycans, and glycolipids in
eukaryotic cells. Glycosylation occurs in a highly regulated manner as
the newly synthesized molecules move from the cis to the
trans side of the Golgi stack (3). The synthesis of
carbohydrate chains of glycoconjugates in mammalian cells is likely to
require more than 200 different glycosyltransferase enzymes distributed
throughout the Golgi stack (4-6). To understand the control of glycan
biosynthesis in vivo requires an appreciation of the
organization of glycosyltransferases within the membranes of the
individual compartments.
All Golgi glycosyltransferases cloned to date are
Nin/Cout (type II) membrane proteins containing
a short N-terminal cytoplasmic domain, a single hydrophobic
membrane-spanning domain, and a large carboxyl-terminal catalytic
domain situated in the lumen of the Golgi apparatus (4-6). The
catalytic domain is linked to the transmembrane domain by a loosely
defined "stem" region that may play a role in positioning the
catalytic domain away from the lipid bilayer, facilitating access to
the substrates. A number of the enzymes involved in the synthesis of
complex N-glycans have been precisely localized and show
distinct but overlapping distributions that are consistent with their
order in the glycoprotein biosynthetic pathway (7).
The mechanisms that determine the steady state distribution of Golgi
glycosyltransferases are not well understood. Analysis of
glycosyltransferase chimeras from transfected eukaryotic cells has
demonstrated that the transmembrane domain of glycosyltransferases plays a critical role in Golgi localization; in addition, in a number
of cases contributions from the luminal domain and cytoplasmic tail
have also been detected, suggesting that there may be multiple signals
involved in the specific localization of these Golgi enzymes (for
reviews, see Refs. 8 and 9). Although these studies have been
informative, in most cases it remains unclear whether the
Golgi-localized glycosyltransferases chimeras are targeted correctly so
that they can function appropriately in vivo. A number of
models for the Golgi retention of glycosyltransferases have been
proposed including oligomerization, lipid-mediated sorting, and
intra-Golgi retrograde transport (10, 11). These models are not
mutually exclusive, although they need to be considered in the light of
the current evidence for cisternal maturation (12, 13) and the ability
of green fluorescent protein
(GFP)1-tagged resident Golgi
glycosyltransferases to diffuse rapidly and freely in Golgi membranes
(14), which indicates that Golgi targeting and retention is unlikely to
depend on protein immobilization.
The basis for the distribution of glycosyltransferases in the Golgi is
clearly complex. Further information is required concerning the
organization of Golgi glycosyltransferases within Golgi membranes and
the properties that may distinguish glycosyltransferases found in
different Golgi compartments. Glycosyltransferases may form large
hetero-oligomeric structures (15, 16); however, it is not known if this
is a property common to glycosyltransferases found in all regions of
the Golgi. In the present study, we have compared the behavior of two
medial Golgi enzymes with two late-acting Golgi enzymes and
demonstrate that the medial Golgi enzymes exist as large
molecular weight complexes, in contrast to late-acting Golgi enzymes
that are present as monomers and dimers. We have shown that inclusion
of the medial Golgi enzyme,
N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I (GnTI), in high molecular
weight complexes does not require the transmembrane domain of GnTI but
rather is dependent on the luminal domain. Indeed, a soluble form of
GnTI was retarded in the Golgi prior to secretion and was able to
glycosylate newly synthesized glycoproteins efficiently in
vivo. We propose that the inclusion of GnTI into high molecular
weight complexes defines the location of the soluble construct and is
critical for its ability to coordinate the synthesis of complex
N-glycans.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture and Antibodies
Cells were maintained at 37 °C as monolayers in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum
(FCS), 2 mM glutamine, 40 µg/ml proline, 100 units/ml
penicillin, and 0.1% (w/v) streptomycin. Transfected cells were
maintained in the above medium containing 400 µg/ml G418 (Life
Technologies, Inc.). Affinity-purified rabbit anti-(bovine Gal-T1)
antibodies were produced as described (17). myc epitope-tagged proteins were detected with the 9E10 monoclonal antibody (18). Anti-GFP monoclonal antibody was obtained from Roche Molecular Biochemicals.
Constructs
Unless stated otherwise, 50 µl of polymerase chain reactions
(PCRs) contained 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.3), 50 mM
KCl, 1 mM MgCl2 0.01% gelatin, a 0.05 mM concentration of each of the four nucleotide triphosphates, 2.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Life
Technologies), 0.016 units of cloned Pfu DNA polymerase
(Stratagene), and 10 pmol of each primer. All cloned PCR products were
verified by automated DNA sequencing (Applied Biosystems). The
constructs (see Fig. 1) were generated as
follows.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Glycosyltransferase constructs.
Membrane-bound (A) and soluble (B) GnTI
constructs. Human GnTI (black) was tagged with the myc
epitope. TfR/GnTImyc is a chimera, consisting of the human transferrin
receptor transmembrane domain and truncated cytoplasmic tail
(striped) and the human GnTImyc luminal domain. sGnTImyc
consists of the myc-tagged luminal domain of GnTI fused to the signal
peptide of hemaglutinin (hatched). NSS-TfR/GnTImyc and
NSS-sGnTImyc are mutated constructs of TfR/GnTImyc and sGnTImyc,
respectively, where Asp77, Arg83, and
Arg85 codons have been changed to Asn, Ser, and Ser,
respectively (amino acid numbers refer to the position in the native
GnTI sequence). The arrow indicates the signal peptide
cleavage site.
|
|
GnTImyc--
A full-length GnTI cDNA was amplified by PCR
from human GnTI genomic DNA (19), with primers incorporating a
c-myc epitope (18). The sense primer (5'-CCGAATTCAGGATGCTGAAGAAGCAG-3')
included a EcoRI restriction site, and the antisense primer
(5'-CTCGGATCCTTACAGGTCTTCTTCAGAGATCAGTTTCTGTTCCGGATTCCAGCTAGGATCATAGCC-3') included a BamHI restriction site and the c-myc
epitope (underlined). The 1391-bp PCR product was cloned into the
EcoRI/BamHI sites of pBluescript KS+
(Stratagene), and the EcoRI/XbaI fragment of this
construct was cloned into EcoRI/XbaI-digested
pCI-neo (Promega).
GnTIImyc--
Full-length GnTII cDNA was amplified by
PCR from human GnTII genomic DNA (20) with the sense primer
5'-TCTGAATTCACCATGAGGTTCCGCATCTACAA-3' and antisense primer
5'-CTCGGATCCTCACAGGTCTTCTTCAGAGATCAGTTTCTGTTCCGGCTGCAGTCTTCTATAACTTTT-3' (c-myc epitope underlined). The resulting 1398-bp PCR product was
cloned into the EcoRI/BamHI sites of pBluescript
KS+, and the EcoRI/XbaI fragment of this
construct cloned into EcoRI/XbaI-digested pCI-neo (Promega).
HTmyc--
A full-length HT cDNA was amplified by PCR
from human HT cDNA (21) using the sense primer
5'-CCGGAATTCACCATGTGGCTCCGGAGCCAT-3' and antisense primer
5'-CGCGAATCCTTACAGGTCTTCTTCAGAGATCAGTTTCTGTTCAGGCTTAGCCAATGTCCAGAG-3' (c-myc epitope underlined). The resulting 1149-bp PCR product was
cloned into the EcoRI/BamHI sites of pBluescript
KS+, and the EcoRI/XbaI fragment from this
plasmid was cloned into EcoRI/XbaI-digested pCI-neo (Promega).
TfR/GnTImyc--
The TfR/GnTI hybrid, TTG, was excised from
pSVTgpt-TTG (22) with EcoRI and cloned into
EcoRI-digested pCI-neo. A fragment, encoding the luminal
domain of the chimera, was excised from this vector using
AflIII and SmaI, and a 1296-bp PCR fragment
encoding the myc-tagged GnTI luminal domain was inserted in its place. The latter fragment was generated by PCR amplification of human GnTI
genomic DNA using the GnTImyc antisense primer described above and the
sense primer 5'-CCCACACGTCCAGCACCTGGCAGGCCA-3', which
incorporates an AflIII site (underlined) by conservative substitutions.
NSS-TfR/GnTmyc--
Three substitutions (Asp77
Asn, Arg83
Ser, Arg85
Ser) were
incorporated into TfR/GnTImyc using a megaprimer mutagenesis protocol adapted from that of Ke and Madison (23). The mutagenic primer, 5'-GGCGGGAGGGGCCGCAGTGGGCACGCTCCCCGACTGGCTCGACAGGGCATTCCCGATCTGCTG-3' is based on the sequence of human GnTI but incorporates the
mutations encoding the three amino acid substitutions (underlined) and
also eliminates a SacII site by conservative substitution.
The flanking sense primer was based on the signal/anchor sequence of
the human transferrin receptor (TfR) (5'-CCGAATTCACCATGGTC-3'), and the antisense flanking primer was the 3' GnTImyc primer described above.
The PCR was initiated asymetrically, with 10 pmol of mutagenic primer
and an annealing temperature of 55 °C. After five rounds of
synthesis, 100 pmol of the sense flanking primer was added, and
amplification continued for 25 cycles. Additional Taq and dNTPs were then added, and the annealing temperature increased to
72 °C (at this temperature, the sense primer cannot bind to the
template, and so the previous PCR product acts as the sense primer).
After five rounds of synthesis at this temperature, 100 pmol of
antisense flanking primer was added, and the PCR continued for 25 cycles. The PCR product was cloned into
EcoRI/BamHI sites of pBluescript KS+, and
then a 637-bp fragment was excised with EcoRI and
SacII and cloned into
EcoRI/SacII-digested pCIneo-TfR/GnTImyc.
TfR/GFP--
A chimera was constructed in which GFP was fused to
the carboxyl terminus of the TfR transmembrane domain and truncated
cytoplasmic tail. A fragment encoding the TfR transmembrane and
cytoplasmic tail was generated by PCR amplification of TfR/GnTI using
the sense and antisense primers 5'-CCGAATTCACCATGGTC-3' and
5'-CACTGGACGTGTACAATAGCCCAAGTAGC-3', respectively. The 128-bp PCR
product was cloned into pEGFP-C1 (CLONTECH, Palo
Alto, CA), which had been linearized by digestion with NheI,
and the 3' recessed ends were filled in with the Klenow fragment of DNA
polymerase I.
sGnTImyc--
A truncated GnTImyc cDNA, lacking the first 44 amino acids of GnTI, was amplified by PCR from human GnTI genomic DNA
using the sense primer 5'-GCCAGCCTCACCCGGGAA-3' and the antisense
primer used for full-length GnTImyc as above. The resulting 1239-bp
fragment was then blunt end-ligated into the SmaI site of
pSHT (24), which positions the GnTI luminal sequence immediately 3' of
the hemagglutinin signal peptide sequence. A similar approach was used
to construct mutated NSS-sGnTImyc using NSS-TfR/GnTImyc cDNA as template.
Gal-T1 constructs in pSVTgpt and pSHT were as described (17).
Transfections
CHO or CHO Lec1 cells (25) were transfected using Superfect
(Qiagen) or Fugene-6 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) in accordance with
the manufacturer's instructions. Constructs in pSVTgpt or pSHT were
co-transfected with pCI-neo. Constructs in pCI-neo were transfected
alone. Cells were selected in 800 µg/ml G418 and screened by indirect
immunofluorescence. Clonal cell lines were obtained from the
transfected populations by limiting dilution.
Immunofluorescence
Cells grown on 12-well glass microscope slides were rinsed in
PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, and free aldehyde
groups were quenched in PBS, 50 mM NH4Cl. Fixed
cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, PBS for 4 min and
then rinsed three times in PBS. Monolayers were incubated in primary antibodies as described (26), and bound antibodies were detected with
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated secondary antibodies. Images were acquired using a Bio-Rad MRC 1024 confocal imaging system.
Salt Extraction
Cells were harvested by scraping in PBS and then lysed in MNT
(50 mM MES (pH 6.5) containing 1% Triton X-100,
Complete® protease inhibitors (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals), and 0-250 mM NaCl for 1 h on ice, and
the extracts were centrifuged for 15 min at 15,000 × g. The supernatant was then further centrifuged for 1 h
at 100,000 × g. The low and high speed pellets and the final supernatant were made to the same volume in SDS sample buffer and
analyzed by immunoblotting as described below.
Glycosyltransferase Assays
Clonal CHO Lec1 cells transfected with GnTImyc were harvested by
scraping in Tris-buffered saline and extracted in MNT containing between 50 and 250 mM NaCl for 1 h at 4 °C.
Extracts were either left on ice or centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h at 4 °C. GnTI activity was assayed as
described by Vischer and Hughes (27) using 200 µg of extract protein
in 100-µl reactions, with ovalbumin as acceptor. GnTII was assayed as
described (28) using the synthetic acceptor
Man
1-6[GlcNAc
1,2Man
1-3]Man
-octyl (29).
Lectin Binding Assays
Subconfluent monolayers were harvested using PBS containing 1 mM EDTA. Cells were washed in PBS containing 2% FCS and
0.02% NaN3 (PBS/FCS/NaN3) and incubated with
10 µg/ml of FITC-conjugated L-PHA (Sigma), in
PBS/FCS/NaN3 for 45 min at 4 °C. Cells were washed twice
in PBS/FCS/NaN3 and analyzed by flow cytometry with a
FACScan (Becton Dickinson).
Sucrose Gradients
Cells were harvested by scraping in PBS, extracted in MNT
containing either 100 or 250 mM NaCl for 1 h on ice,
and then centrifuged for 15 min at 15,000 × g. The
supernatant was then layered on top of a 5-20% sucrose gradient
containing MNT with 100 or 250 mM NaCl. Gradients were
centifuged for 12 h at 125,000 × gmax in a SW55 rotor. Fractions (8), each 630 µl, were collected from the
bottom of the gradient. Proteins were precipitated from 150-µl
aliquots of each fraction with methanol/chloroform as described by
Wessel and Fleuge (30), and pellets were resuspended in 20 µl of SDS
sample buffer. The pellet from the ultracentrifuge tube was resuspended
in a comparative volume. Samples were boiled for 5 min and then
separated by SDS-PAGE and detected by immunoblotting as described below.
For analysis of secreted GnTI, subconfluent monolayers of CHO Lec1
cells expressing sGnTImyc were incubated for 9 h in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. Following incubation, the culture
medium was collected and centrifuged for 5 min at 1000 × g to remove cellular debris. An aliquot (600 µl) of
supernatant was layered on a 5-20% sucrose gradient containing 50 mM MES (pH 6.5), 1% Triton X-100, and 100 mM
NaCl. The gradient was centrifuged and analyzed as above.
Triton X-114 Phase Separation
Triton X-114 extraction was performed as described by Bordier
(31). Cells were extracted in 0.5% Triton X-114 containing 250 mM NaCl and Complete® protease inhibitors for
45 min on ice, and the extracts were centrifuged for 15 min at
15,000 × g. Bromphenol blue (0.05% (w/v)) was added
to the supernatant, and the sample was incubated for 3 min at 37 °C
and centrifuged for 2 min at 15,000 × g to separate aqueous and detergent phases. The volumes of the two phases were made
equal with PBS, and the samples were analyzed by immunoblotting.
Immunoprecipitation
Cells were radiolabeled with
L-[35S]methionine/cysteine
(Tran35S-label, ICN) as described (32), and extracted in 50 mM MES, pH 6.5, 1% Triton X-100 containing 100 mM NaCl and Complete® protease inhibitors for
45 min on ice. Lysates were centrifuged at 15,000 × g
for 15 min, and supernatants were incubated with 2 µg of purified
monoclonal antibody 9E10 for 1 h at 4 °C with rotation. Immune
complexes were collected by the incubation with Protein G-Sepharose,
and the Sepharose beads were washed as described (22).
Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by fluorography.
Immunoblotting
Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred
electrophoretically to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes as described (32). Myc-tagged proteins were detected with 9E10 hybridoma supernatant
and Gal-T1 with affinity-purified anti-Gal-T1 antibodies using enhanced
chemiluminescence (DuPont) as described (17, 32).
 |
RESULTS |
Stable CHO Cells Expressing Epitope-tagged
Glycosyltransferases--
More information about the characteristics
that may distinguish glycosyltransferases that reside in different
Golgi regions is needed in order to gain a better understanding of the
underlying mechanisms that regulate glycan biosynthesis and the
differential localization of glycosyltransferases throughout the Golgi
stack. Therefore, we have compared the physical states of
medial Golgi and late Golgi glycosyltransferases. The
enzymes examined include the two medial Golgi
glycosyltransferases, GnTI and GnTII (33, 34), which are responsible
for initiating the first two complex antennae of N-glycans,
and two late acting Golgi enzymes, namely
1,4-galactosyltransferase
(Gal-T1) and
1,2-fucosyltransferase (HT). Gal-T1 is a
trans/trans-Golgi network-localized enzyme
responsible for synthesis of the N-acetyllactosamine of
complex N-glycans (35, 36), and HT is responsible for the
synthesis of blood group H determinant (21, 37). For detection of
bovine Gal-T1 in transfected cells, a rabbit polyclonal antibody was
used (17). To be able to detect GnTI, GnTII, and HT in transfected
cells, we have tagged these three glycosyltransferases with a myc
epitope at the C terminus. All three myc-tagged enzymes were shown to be active in transfected cells (data not shown); therefore, the addition of the myc epitope does not appear to perturb the folding of
these enzymes.
Stable transfected CHO cell clones expressing each of the four
glycosyltransferases were obtained. For GnTI constructs throughout this
study, CHO Lec1 cells were transfected, since this Lec mutant is devoid
of GnTI activity (25, 38) and therefore provided an assay to assess the
in vivo function of the GnTI constructs. Staining of GnTI-,
GnTII-, or HT-transfected cells with the myc-specific monoclonal
antibody, 9E10, showed in each case a perinuclear staining pattern,
characteristic of the Golgi apparatus (Fig.
2). In each case, the staining pattern
remained unchanged after a 4-h treatment with cycloheximide.
Furthermore, treatment of transfected cells with brefeldin A resulted
in a diffuse cytoplasmic staining pattern typical of the ER (not
shown). Together, these results confirm that these three myc-tagged
enzymes are actively retained in the Golgi apparatus. Staining of
bovine Gal-T1 transfected CHO cells with affinity-purified anti-bovine
Gal-T1 antibodies also showed a perinuclear staining pattern similar to
the other enzymes (Fig. 2).

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Intracellular localization of
glycosyltransferases in stable CHO cell clones. CHO Lec1 cells
stably expressing GnTImyc and CHO cells stably expressing either
GnTIImyc, HTmyc, or Gal-T1 were fixed in paraformaldehyde,
permeabilized with Triton X-100, and stained with monoclonal antibody
9E10 or anti-Gal-T1 antibodies as described under "Experimental
Procedures," and confocal images were collected. Bar, 20 µm.
|
|
Medial Golgi glycosyltransferases form high molecular weight
complexes--
To determine if glycosyltransferases may be associated
with complexes in Golgi membranes of mammalian cells, Triton X-100 extracts containing a range of NaCl concentrations were analyzed by
immunoblotting. Extracts were centrifuged at 15,000 × g to remove any insoluble material, and then the supernatant
was collected and centrifuged at 100,000 × g to
determine if high molecular weight complexes were present. After
extraction in 50 mM NaCl/Triton X-100, the majority of
myc-tagged GnTI protein was found in the insoluble pellet of a low
speed centrifugation (15,000 × g) (Fig. 3A). The minor fraction of
GnTI found in the supernatant of a low speed centrifugation was
pelleted at high speed (100,000 × g), indicating that
this soluble protein existed as a high molecular weight complex.
Myc-tagged GnTI was detected as two components by immunoblotting with
molecular masses of 49.5 and 53 kDa. This heterogeneity is due to
glycosylation, since human GnTI has previously been shown to be
O-glycosylated (39), and treatment of cell extracts with
neuraminidase prior to immunoblotting resulted in collapse of the
higher molecular weight to a similar size as the lower species (not
shown). Extraction of myc-tagged GnTI-transfected CHO Lec1 cells with
Triton X-100 containing 100 mM NaCl resulted in greater
than 50% of GnTI protein remaining in the supernatant after a
15,000 × g centrifugation. At this salt concentration, approximately equivalent amounts of GnTI were found in the low speed
pellet, the high speed pellet, and in the final supernatant. The amount
of material remaining in the 100,000 × g supernatant increased with increasing salt concentration, and at 250 mM
NaCl the majority of GnTI protein was detected in the 100,000 × g supernatant (Fig. 3A). Slusarewicz et
al. (40) have reported that GnTI from rat liver Golgi membrane
preparations also requires 100 mM NaCl/Triton X-100 for
solubilization (i.e. 15,000 × g
supernatant), indicating that GnTI in transfected CHO cells behaves in
a similar fashion to endogenous GnTI.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Triton X-100 solubilization of medial Golgi
glycosyltransferases is dependent on salt concentration.
A, CHO Lec1 cells expressing GnTImyc and CHO cells
expressing GnTIImyc, Gal-T1, or HTmyc were extracted in 50 mM MES (pH 6.5) and 1% Triton X-100 containing between 50 and 250 mM NaCl. Extracts were centrifuged at 15,000 × g, and then the supernatant was spun at 100,000 × g. The low speed pellet (L), the high speed
pellet (H), and the final supernatant (S) were
adjusted to the same volume with SDS sample buffer and analyzed by
immunoblotting. Myc-tagged GnTI, GnTII, and HT were detected with
monoclonal antibody 9E10, and Gal-T1 was detected with
affinity-purified rabbit anti-bovine Gal-T1 antibodies. Sizes indicate
relative molecular mass compared with Bio-Rad low molecular weight
protein standards. B, CHO Lec1 cells expressing GnTImyc were
extracted in 1% Triton X-100/50 mM MES containing 50, 150, or 250 mM NaCl. GnTI assays of the total extract
(white bars) and the supernatants of a
100,000 × g centrifugation (black
bars) were carried out as described under "Experimental
Procedures." C, CHO Lec1 cells expressing GnTImyc were
pulse-labeled with [35S]Cys/Met for 15 min and then
chased for either 0 or 2 h, as indicated, and the cells were
extracted in 1% Triton X-100, 50 mM MES, 100 mM NaCl. Extracts were centrifuged at 15,000 × g. Half of the resulting total lysate (T) was
centrifuged at 100,000 × g, and the supernatant
(S) and total lysate were immunoprecipitated with the
monoclonal antibody 9E10 and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography.
D, CHO Lec1 cells expressing GnTImyc were incubated in the
presence and absence of 0.2% saponin for 30 min and then extracted in
1% Triton X-100, 50 mM MES, 100 mM NaCl. The
extracts were subjected to centrifugation and the fractions were
analyzed by immunoblotting as for A.
|
|
It is possible that the pelleted material in the low salt extractions
represented aggregated inactive enzyme. To investigate whether this was
the case, we assayed extracts for GnTI activity before and after
100,000 × g centrifugation. Triton X-100 extracts containing 50, 150, and 250 mM NaCl, prior to
centrifugation, all showed similar GnTI activity (Fig. 3B).
Centrifugation of the 50 mM NaCl extract at 100,000 × g resulted in the loss of the majority of GnTI activity from
the supernatant (Fig. 3B), demonstrating that the pelleted
GnTI represents active enzyme. In contrast, and consistent with the
immunoblotting data, only a small proportion of GnTI activity was
removed from Triton X-100 extracts containing 250 mM NaCl
after a 100,000 × g centrifugation.
Myc-tagged GnTII was detected as a single component of ~50 kDa by
immunoblotting with monoclonal antibody 9E10. GnTII behaved in a
similar manner to GnTI after extraction with Triton X-100 (Fig.
3A). At 50 mM NaCl, all the GnTII protein was
detected in the pellets of the 15,000 × g and
100,000 × g centrifugations. As for GnTI, with
increasing salt concentration an increasing percentage of the GnTII
protein was recovered in the final 100,000 × g supernatant.
In stark contrast to the behavior of the two medial Golgi
enzymes, the two late acting Golgi enzymes were detected almost exclusively in the 100,000 × g supernatant of low (50 mM) NaCl extractions. Increasing the salt concentrations
had little effect on the distribution of either Gal-T1 or HT proteins
in the fractions. By immunoblotting, myc-tagged HT was detected as two
components with molecular masses of 47 and 52 kDa. The difference in
size between the two components is due to heterogeneous
N-glycosylation, since treatment with N-glycanase
results in the collapse of both bands to a single smaller one of 40 kDa
(not shown), the expected size of the polypeptide chain.
In Fig. 3A, sialylated and nonsialylated myc-tagged GnTI
were both found in complexes, but a greater amount of sialylated GnTImyc was found in the supernatant compared with nonsialylated GnTImyc. However, the difference in solubility between the GnTImyc species is small compared with the stark difference between the medial and trans enzymes. Furthermore, extraction
of cell lines expressing rabbit GnTI (which does not bear O-
or N-glycans) (22) showed that rabbit GnTImyc exhibited a
similar distribution in the low speed pellet, high speed pellet, and
supernatant to that of human GnTImyc (not shown).
A pulse-chase study was carried out to determine the kinetics of high
molecular weight complex formation. CHO Lec1 cells expressing myc-tagged GnTI were pulse-labeled for 15 min with
[35S]Cys/Met and then chased for either 0 or 2 h.
Cell extracts in 100 mM NaCl/Triton X-100 were centrifuged
at 15,000 × g to remove insoluble material. Half the
supernatant (total soluble fraction) was then centrifuged at
100,000 × g. The total soluble fraction and the
100,000 × g supernatant were immunoprecipitated with
monoclonal antibody 9E10. After a 15-min pulse label, the yield of
GnTImyc from the total soluble fraction was considerably greater than from the 100,000 × g supernatant (Fig. 3C),
indicating that GnTImyc is extracted as a high molecular weight complex
within 15 min of synthesis. Similar results were obtained after a 2-h
chase period where the majority of GnTImyc was present as the 53-kDa sialylated species, confirming that the sialylated form of GnTImyc is
also a component of the high molecular weight complexes.
Overall, the above results indicate that both of the medial
Golgi enzymes, GnTI and GnTII, exist as high molecular weight complexes, whereas the late acting Golgi enzymes, Gal-T1 and HT, do not
display this characteristic under the conditions analyzed.
Analysis of Glycosyltransferase Complexes by Sucrose
Gradients--
To further investigate the size and heterogeneity of
the glycosyltransferase complexes, Triton X-100 extracts were analyzed on sucrose gradients. Cell extractions were performed using NaCl at 100 mM or higher, since the majority of the glycosyltransferase proteins were soluble under these conditions (i.e. remained
in the 15,000 × g supernatant). The 15,000 × g supernatants from Triton X-100 extractions were separated
on 5-20% sucrose gradients, and fractions were collected and
immunoblotted for glycosyltransferase protein with either 9E10
monoclonal antibody or anti-bovine Gal-T1 antibody. Myc-tagged GnTI was
detected in two distinct fractions throughout the sucrose gradient, one
migrating at the position expected for a monomer, while the remainder
was found at the bottom of the gradient (Fig.
4A). Under the same
conditions, myc-tagged GnTII was also resolved into two fractions, one
with a molecular mass of ~150 kDa and a second at the bottom of the
gradient. In contrast, both the late acting Golgi enzymes migrated as a
single peak in the sucrose gradient (Fig. 4A). Bovine Gal-T1
migrated as a single peak with a molecular mass of ~45 kDa, the
expected size of a monomer, and myc-tagged HT migrated in the gradient with a molecular mass of ~100 kDa, indicating that HT may form a
dimer. Indeed, analysis of HT on nonreducing SDS gels demonstrated that
HT exits predominantly as a disulfide-bonded dimer (not shown). For HT,
there were no detectable high molecular weight complexes. For Gal-T1, a
band was detected with a molecular mass of >700 kDa; however,
semiquantitative densitometric analysis indicated that this represented
only a very small percentage (<0.1%) of the total immunoblotted
Gal-T1.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Sucrose gradient analysis of extracts of
transfected CHO cells. CHO Lec1 cells expressing GnTImyc and CHO
cells expressing GnTIImyc, HTmyc, or Gal-T1 were extracted in 1%
Triton X-100, 50 mM MES (pH 6.5) containing either 100 mM (A) or 250 mM (B)
NaCl. Extracts were centrifuged at 15,000 × g, and the
supernatant was layered on a 5-20% sucrose gradient containing the
same buffer as the extract. Gradients were centrifuged at 125,000 × g for 12 h, and fractions were collected. The bottom
(B) of the tube was resuspended in extraction buffer to
dissolve pelleted material. Proteins were precipitated from each
fraction and analyzed by immunoblotting as described in the legend of
Fig. 3. The arrows indicate the position of standard
proteins, ovalbumin (43 kDa), immunoglobulin G (150 kDa), and
thyroglobulin (660 kDa).
|
|
Analysis of Triton X-100/250 mM NaCl extracts of either
GnTI- or GnTII-expressing CHO cells showed a marked reduction in the amount of high molecular weight material at the bottom of the gradient,
compared with 100 mM NaCl extracts, and a corresponding increase in the amount of material detected near the top of the gradient. The majority of the latter material migrated as a monomer with smaller amounts migrating up to ~200 kDa (Fig. 4B).
Therefore, the two medial Golgi enzymes exist as very high
molecular weight complexes that dissociate in the presence of high salt.
The GnTI Complexes Are Independent of Rafts--
One explanation
for the presence of GnTI and GnTII in high molecular weight complexes
could be that these medial Golgi enzymes are included in
cholesterol-rich membrane raft complexes. Membrane rafts are known to
be insoluble in Triton X-100. To explore this possibility,
GnTI-transfected CHO Lec1 cells were initially incubated in 0.2%
saponin for 30 min (saponin selectively extracts cholesterol from
membranes and thereby disrupts raft complexes (41)), followed by
extraction in Triton X-100/100 mM NaCl. Immunoblotting of
15,000 × g and 100,000 × g pellets
and the final supernantant showed that GnTI protein was distributed
throughout the fractions in similar proportions to extracts from cells
that had not been treated with saponin (Fig. 3D), indicating
that the GnTI complexes observed are independent of raft structures.
The Formation of High Molecular Weight Complexes Is
Independent of GnTI Transmembrane and Cytoplasmic
Sequences--
To determine whether the sequences of the transmembrane
domain and/or short cytoplasmic tail of GnTI were required for the inclusion of GnTI into high molecular weight complexes, a construct was
generated containing the myc-tagged luminal domain of GnTI fused with
the transmembrane domain and truncated cytoplasmic tail of the
transferrin receptor (TfR/GnTImyc) (Fig. 1). The truncated cytoplasmic
tail of this construct excludes the internalization motif of the native
transferrin receptor molecule. CHO Lec1 clones expressing myc-tagged
TfR/GnTI were obtained, and the chimeric GnTI protein was found to be
predominantly localized to the Golgi apparatus in transfected cells, as
assessed by indirect immunofluorescence (Fig.
5A). As for full-length GnTI,
TfR/GnTI was relocated to an ER-type staining pattern after treatment
with brefeldin A and remained in the Golgi region after a 4-h treatment
with cycloheximide (not shown), indicating that TfR/GnTI is efficiently
Golgi-localized. Analysis of TfR/GnTI-transfected CHO Lec1 cells by
flow cytometry revealed low levels of the myc-tagged chimeric protein
on the cell surface, whereas myc-tagged full-length GnTI was absent
from the cell surface of transfected Lec1 cells (not shown). The
presence of low levels of TfR/GnTI at the cell surface indicates that
the chimeric protein is not as efficiently Golgi-localized as
full-length GnTI, suggesting that both the transmembrane and luminal
domains play a role in Golgi retention, consistent with our previous
studies of the nontagged TfR/GnTI chimera (22). To determine whether the TfR/GnTI chimeric protein is functionally active within Golgi membranes of CHO Lec1 cells, the synthesis of complex
N-glycans was assessed by cell surface binding of the lectin
L-PHA, which binds to galactose-containing complex N-glycans
(42). Flow cytometric analysis showed that, whereas untransfected CHO
Lec1 cells did not bind FITC-L-PHA, TfR/GnTI transfected CHO Lec1 cells
bound FITC-L-PHA at a similar level to parental CHO cells (Fig.
5B). Therefore, the TfR/GnTI chimeric protein is
functionally active within Golgi membranes.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Intracellular localization and functional
activity of GnTI proteins in transfected CHO cells. A,
CHO Lec1 cells stably expressing TfR/GnTImyc, NSS-TfR/GnTImyc,
sGnTImyc, or NSS-sGnTImyc (as indicated) were fixed in
paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with Triton X-100, and stained with
monoclonal antibody 9E10; CHO cells stably expressing a soluble Gal-T1
protein (sGal-T1) were stained with anti-bovine Gal-T1 antibodies, as
described under "Experimental Procedures"; and confocal images were
collected. Bar, 20 µm. B, CHO, CHO Lec1, and
CHO Lec1 cells stably expressing GnTImyc, TfR/GnTImyc, NSS-TfR/GnTImyc,
or sGnTImyc (as indicated) were incubated with L-PHA-FITC for 30 min at
4 °C, washed, and then analyzed by flow cytometry.
|
|
Analysis of Triton X-100 extracts of TfR/GnTI-expressing CHO cells
demonstrated that myc-tagged TfR/GnTI behaved in a similar manner to
full-length GnTI (Fig. 7A). In the absence of NaCl or in the
presence of 50 mM NaCl, all of the TfR/GnTI protein was recovered in pellets from the 15,000 × g or
100,000 × g centrifugations, indicating that TfR/GnTI
was extracted as high molecular weight complexes. In extracts
containing 100 mM NaCl, all of the fusion protein
sedimented at 100,000 × g. However, in 250 mM NaCl extracts, a substantial proportion of the TfR/GnTI
protein was found in the final supernatant (Fig. 7A).
Results from sucrose gradients of Triton X-100 extracts of
TfR/GnTI-transfected cells were in agreement with these findings (Fig.
8). Almost all of the myc-tagged TfR/GnTI in 100 mM
extracts was recovered at the bottom of the gradient, whereas in 250 mM extracts TfR/GnTI was distributed throughout the
gradient as well as at the bottom of the gradient, indicative of
heterogeneous high molecular weight complexes (Fig. 8). Thus, formation
of complexes containing GnTI appears to be independent of the GnTI
transmembrane domain and cytoplasmic tail sequences.
It is unlikely that the TfR sequence of the TfR/GnTI protein is
influencing complex formation in the above analysis. However, to
directly ascertain the behavior of this TfR sequence on solubilization, a fusion protein was generated consisting of GFP attached to the C
terminus of the transmembrane domain and truncated cytoplasmic tail of
the transferrin receptor (TfR/GFP). As expected, TfR/GFP-transfected CHO cells showed high levels of the membrane-bound GFP fusion protein
at the cell surface (not shown). In contrast to TfR/GnTImyc, analysis
of Triton X-100 extracts of TfR/GFP-transfected CHO cells containing
either 50 or 100 mM NaCl demonstrated that the majority of
the GFP fusion protein was recovered in the supernatant after a
100,000 × g centrifugation (Fig. 7A). This
result demonstrates that the TfR sequences are not responsible for high
molecular complex formation of TfR/GnTI.
A Soluble Form of GnTI Is Retarded within the Golgi
Apparatus--
The above data indicates that the luminal domain of
GnTI may be involved in the formation of high molecular weight
complexes via protein-protein interactions. Such interactions may
facilitate the localization of chimeric molecules within the medial
Golgi. The question then arises whether soluble medial Golgi enzymes may behave in a different manner from soluble Gal-T1, which we have
previously demonstrated to be rapidly secreted from transfected cells
(17). Therefore, we decided to investigate whether the luminal domain
of GnTI, as a soluble protein, could be retained within the Golgi as a
result of interaction with other components.
The luminal domain of GnTI, containing both the stem region and
catalytic domain, was fused to the cleavable signal peptide derived
from hemagglutinin (Fig. 1). CHO Lec1 cells were transfected with this
construct, and clonal cell lines were established. Surprisingly, the
immunofluorescence staining of CHO cells expressing myc-tagged sGnTI
indicates that, at steady state, the majority of intracellular material
was Golgi-localized, since a strong perinuclear staining pattern was
observed (Fig. 5A). In contrast, CHO cells expressing a
soluble form of Gal-T1 showed only a reticular intracellular staining
pattern by immunofluorescence (Fig. 5A). Since soluble Gal-T1 is secreted from CHO cells (not shown), these results indicate that soluble Gal-T1 does not accumulate within the Golgi during secretion, consistent with our previous findings in transfected COS
cells (17).
To confirm that the GnTI product was a soluble protein, transfected CHO
cells were extracted in Triton X-114/250 mM NaCl, and the
aqueous and detergent phases were analyzed for the myc-tagged sGnTI
protein by immunoblotting (Fig.
6A). The majority of the sGnTI
protein was recovered in the aqueous phase with a molecular mass of
approximately ~45 kDa, consistent with the removal of the hydrophobic
signal peptide and the production of a soluble protein (Fig.
6A). As expected, membrane-bound full-length GnTI was
recovered in the detergent phase of a Triton X-114 extraction (Fig.
6A).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Analysis of soluble GnTI protein from
Lec1-transfected cells. A, clonal Lec1 cell lines
expressing either GnTImyc or sGnTImyc were extracted in 1% Triton
X-114, 50 mM MES (pH 6.5) containing 250 mM
NaCl, and after warming to 37 °C, the detergent (D) and
aqueous (Aq) phases were separated by centrifugation and
analyzed by immunoblotting using the monoclonal antibody 9E10.
B, pulse-chase analysis of sGnTI. Cells expressing sGnTImyc
were pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine/cysteine for 15 min and then chased for 0, 30, 60, or 120 min. The medium was
collected, and the cells were harvested and lysed. Both the culture
medium (M) and cell lysate (C) were
immunoprecipitated with 9E10, and the immunoprecipitates were analyzed
by SDS-PAGE and fluorography.
|
|
To determine whether the intracellular sGnTI was secreted, transfected
CHO Lec1 cells were treated with cycloheximide and analyzed over a 4-h
period by immunofluorescence. In contrast to membrane-bound full-length
GnTI, after a 4-h cycloheximide treatment, the majority of the
intracellular myc-tagged sGnTI had disappeared (not shown). Pulse-chase
studies were then carried out to determine the kinetics of secretion
(Fig. 6B). Two major bands were detected by
immunoprecipitation after a 30-min chase, a component of ~44 kDa and
a slightly higher molecular mass species, which is probably
O-glycosylated. After a 30-min chase period, the majority of
sGnTI protein was cell-associated. After a 60-min chase, >50% of the
sGnTI protein was found cell-associated, and the remainder was in the
medium. Whereas the secreted sGnTI protein was exclusively the higher
molecular weight component, very little of this higher molecular
component was cell-associated, indicating that once the sGnTI was fully
glycosylated it was rapidly transported out of the Golgi. By 2 h
of chase, almost all of the sGnTI was found in the medium, and very
little remained cell-associated (Fig. 6B). Collectively,
these results indicate that sGnTI may accumulate briefly within the
Golgi apparatus before subsequent transport to the cell surface and secretion.
Analysis of extracts of sGnTI-transfected CHO Lec1 cells showed that
the sGnTI protein was active in vitro. To determine if sGnTI
was functionally active in vivo within the Golgi apparatus, we investigated whether sGnTI could restore the ability of CHO Lec1
cells to synthesize branched complex N-glycans. Flow
cytometric analysis showed that sGnTI-transfected CHO Lec1 cells bound
FITC-L-PHA at a similar level to either parental CHO cells or Lec1
cells transfected with full-length GnTI (Fig. 5B). The GnTI
activity associated with sGnTI-transfected CHO Lec1 cells was about 7.3 nmol/mg protein/h compared with 11.1 nmol/mg protein/h from wild-type GnTI-transfected CHO Lec1 cells. The efficient production of branched complex N-glycans by the sGnTI-transfected cells suggests
that the soluble enzyme is able to act at the correct location within the glycosylation pathway.
Analysis of extracts of sGnTI-transfected CHO cells showed that
intracellular sGnTI was also associated with NaCl-dependent complexes. In Triton X-100 extracts containing 50 mM NaCl,
the majority of intracellular sGnTI sedimented at 100,000 × g, and at 100 mM NaCl the protein was equally
distributed between the 100,000 × g supernatant and
pellet (Fig. 7B). Sucrose
gradient analysis of 100 mM extracts showed that about 50%
of the material migrated as a monomer and the remainder as high
molecular weight complexes throughout the gradient including material
found at the bottom of the gradient (Fig.
8). Comparison of sGnTI with either
full-length GnTI or TfR/GnTI under these extraction conditions shows
that a greater proportion of sGnTI exits as a monomer, suggesting that
sGnTI is dissociated from the complexes more readily than membrane-bound GnTI. In Triton X-100 extracts containing 250 mM NaCl, sGnTI migrated as a broad peak with a molecular
mass range of approximately 43-660 kDa (not shown). In contrast to
intracellular sGnTI, soluble GnTI secreted into the medium migrated
exclusively as a monomer on sucrose gradients (Fig. 8).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Triton X-100 solubilization of Lec1 cells
expressing nonmutated and mutated TfR/GnTI and sGnTI proteins. CHO
Lec1 cells expressing the membrane-bound proteins TfR/GnTImyc or
NSS-TfR/GnTImyc and CHO cells expressing TfR/GFP (A) and CHO
Lec1 cells expressing the soluble proteins sGnTImyc and NSS-sGnTImyc
(B) were extracted in 50 mM MES (pH 6.5) and 1%
Triton X-100 containing either 0, 50, 100, or 250 mM NaCl.
Extracts were centrifuged at 15,000 × g, and then the
supernatant was spun at 100,000 × g. The low speed
pellet (L), the high speed pellet (H), and the
final supernatant (S) were adjusted to the same volume with
SDS sample buffer and analyzed by immunoblotting. GnTI proteins were
detected with monoclonal antibody 9E10, and TfR/GFP was detected with
anti-GFP antibodies.
|
|

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Sucrose gradient analysis of extracts of
transfected Lec1 cells expressing chimeric and soluble GnTI
proteins. CHO Lec1 cells expressing myc-tagged TfR/GnTI,
NSS-TfR/GnTI, sGnTI, or NSS-sGnTI were extracted in 1% Triton X-100,
50 mM MES (pH 6.5) containing either 100 mM or
250 mM NaCl, as indicated. Extracts were centrifuged at
15,000 × g, and the supernatant was layered on a
5-20% sucrose gradient containing the same buffer as the extract.
Gradients were centrifuged at 125,000 × g for 12 h, and fractions were collected. The bottom (B) of the tube
was resuspended in extraction buffer to dissolve pelleted material.
Proteins were precipitated from each fraction and analyzed by
immunoblotting as described in the legend to Fig. 3. The
arrows indicate the position of standard proteins, ovalbumin
(43 kDa), immunoglobulin G (150 kDa), and thyroglobulin (660 kDa).
|
|
Mutations in the Stem Region of GnTI, Which Are Required for Kin
Recognition, Do Not Affect Golgi Localization nor the Formation of High
Molecular Weight Complexes--
The Golgi localization of TfR/GnTI and
sGnTI and their inclusion in high molecular weight complexes suggests
that the luminal domain of GnTI is involved in protein-protein
interactions. Nilsson et al. (16) have previously suggested
that different Golgi enzymes of the same compartment may be able to
interact with each other to form hetero-oligomeric structures (kin
oligomers). This conclusion was based on a strategy involving the
attachment of an ER retention signal onto Golgi enyzmes; these
investigators showed that the ER relocation of one enzyme resulted in
the accumulation of other Golgi proteins in the ER. Using this kin
recognition assay, where interactions occur within the ER compartment,
Nilsson et al. (43) identified a region within the stem of
GnTI that was required for kin recognition. In particular, when three
charged residues within the stem sequence, namely Asp77,
Arg83, and Arg85 were mutated to the uncharged
residues Asn, Ser, and Ser, respectively, kin recognition was
essentially abolished.
To determine if Asp77, Arg83, and
Arg85 of the stem region of GnTI are also relevant to Golgi
localization of GnTI and to the formation of the GnTI-containing
complexes observed here, we have mutated these charged stem residues in
TfR/GnTImyc and sGnTImyc constructs (Fig. 1). Since the GnTI
transmembrane domain is absent in these constructs, if the charged stem
residues are critical for the ability of the luminal domain of GnTI to
contribute to Golgi retention, then these mutations should drastically
alter the intracellular steady state distribution of these proteins.
However, both myc-tagged NSS-TfR/GnTI and NSS-sGnTI were located
predominantly in the Golgi region of stably transfected CHO Lec1 cells
(Fig. 5A), and, moreover, the transfected Lec1 cells bound
FITC-L-PHA at a similar level to parental CHO cells, demonstrating that
these charged stem residues had little apparent effect on Golgi
localization (Fig. 5B). Furthermore, analysis of extracts of
transfected Lec1 cells showed that the mutated GnTI proteins behaved in
a similar manner to non-mutated proteins (Figs. 7 and 8). Sucrose
gradient analysis of 100 mM extracts showed that
NSS-TfR/GnTI displayed a similar distribution throughout the gradient
as TfR/GnTI. Likewise, NSS-sGnTI also showed a similar distribution
throughout the gradient as sGnTI, suggesting that regions of the
luminal domain other than the charged stem residues are responsible for
Golgi localization and the formation of high molecular weight complexes.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The synthesis of complex N-glycans requires the
sequential action of a number of membrane-bound glycosyltransferases in
a highly controlled fashion. To date, however, very little is known about the organization of these enzymes within Golgi membranes or the
underlying mechanisms responsible for the differential localization of
the various enzymes to different Golgi regions. Here we have compared
the characteristics of two medial Golgi enzymes with two
late acting Golgi enzymes and found the following differences. First,
the two medial Golgi glycosyltransferases are solubilized
only in high salt, in contrast to the late acting Golgi enzymes, which
are readily solubilized in low salt; second, analysis of detergent
extracts showed that the two medial Golgi glycosyltransferases exist as high molecular weight complexes, whereas
the late acting Golgi enzymes are present as monomers and dimers;
third, formation of GnTI high molecular weight complexes does not
require the transmembrane and cytoplasmic sequences of GnTI; and
fourth, in contrast to Gal-T1, soluble GnTI containing the catalytic
domain and stem region accumulates in the Golgi prior to secretion and
is included in high molecular weight complexes. These findings indicate
that the two medial Golgi enzymes exist as high molecular
weight complexes within Golgi membranes, whereas Gal-T1 and HT do not.
We propose that these observed differences between GnTI/GnTII and
Gal-T1/HT reflect different characteristics between enzymes found in
different Golgi compartments.
The extraction of both GnTI and GnTII from rat liver is known to be
salt-dependent (28, 40). In this report, we have
demonstrated that these enzymes behaved in a similar manner in
transfected cell lines, indicating that this is an inherent property of
these proteins. In low concentrations of salt, a large proportion of GnTI and GnTII from transfected CHO cells was insoluble. At higher salt
concentrations (100 mM), the enzymes were largely soluble; nonetheless, a significant proportion of both GnTI and GnTII was found
to exist in high molecular weight complexes that could be pelleted at
100,000 × g. These complexes are very large (>1000 kDa) and are independent of cholesterol-rich membrane rafts. These results contrast with both Gal-T1 and HT that were solubilized in low
salt and remained in the supernatant of a high speed spin. Slusarewicz
et al. (40) have previously shown that the medial Golgi
enzymes, GnTI and
-mannosidase II from rat liver membranes interact
with a detergent-insoluble intercisternal matrix in the absence of
NaCl; the interaction of GnTI with the insoluble matrix was fully
dissociated with 50-100 mM NaCl (40). We concur that GnTI
is extracted from Golgi membranes in a NaCl-dependent
manner but also observe that GnTI is solubilized as high molecular
weight complexes, which dissociate in a salt-dependent
manner, a behavior shared by GnTII. The extraction of the
medial Golgi glycosyltransferases as high molecular weight
complexes is consistent with reports on the purification of GnTII that
detected a high Mr form of GnTII (28).
Our data strongly suggest that the luminal domain of GnTI is important
for inclusion into the higher molecular weight complexes. First,
TfR/GnTI displayed very similar properties to full-length GnTI and was
present in high molecular weight complexes; second, intracellular
soluble GnTI containing the stem region and catalytic domain was
included in a high molecular weight complex, whereas the soluble GnTI
secreted into the medium exists as a monomer. Furthermore, soluble GnTI
accumulated in the Golgi region prior to secretion as demonstrated by
the intracellular localization of soluble GnTI in transfected CHO cells
and by pulse-chase experiments. myc-tagged sGnTI, which accumulates
within the Golgi at steady state, could be chased out by treatment with
cycloheximide, indicating that the Golgi-localized molecules are not
long term residents. It is possible therefore that the retardation of
soluble GnTI within the Golgi is due to the inclusion into high
molecular weight membrane complexes.
Soluble GnTI was able to glycosylate efficiently in vivo as
demonstrated by the ability of this soluble enzyme to rescue the glycosylation defect of CHO Lec1 cells. The ability of soluble intracellular GnTI to form high molecular complexes may be important in
its ability to coordinate the synthesis of complex N-glycans in Lec1 cells. The relative abilities of membrane-bound and soluble forms of other Golgi glycosyltransferases to glycosylate newly synthesized proteins have been compared, and differences between enzymes have been noted (44, 45). A possible reason for these differences could be that the enzymes that glycosylate efficiently in vivo have sequences in their luminal domains that lead to
the formation of protein complexes and retention of the soluble forms. Thus, the inclusion of the medial Golgi enzymes into high molecular weight complexes may be functionally relevant. Munro (15) has reported
the presence of multiprotein complexes with glycosyltransferase activity in the cis Golgi of yeast. It is possible that the
GnTI and GnTII complexes detected here may also represent multienzyme complexes. However, the nature of these complexes remains obscure at
this stage.
Warren and co-workers (16) have previously proposed that resident Golgi
enzymes may interact to form large hetero-oligomeric structures, termed
kin oligomers. This suggestion was based on the finding that the
addition of an ER retention motif to GnTI not only causes GnTI to
localize to the ER but also partially retains another medial Golgi
enzyme, namely
-mannosidase II, within the ER. The interaction
between GnTI and
-mannosidase within ER membranes has been shown to
be mediated by interaction through their luminal domains (43, 46).
However, since the interactions between these medial Golgi proteins
were detected within the ER, and not the Golgi compartment, the
biological relevance of these oligomers is not clear. The detection of
high molecular weight complexes of the two medial Golgi
enzymes, GnTI and GnTII, in this study is indeed consistent with these
earlier suggestions and, furthermore, directly demonstrates that
medial enzymes exist as complexes within Golgi membranes.
Nonetheless, whereas kin recognition required the presence of charged
residues in the stem region of GnTI (43), here we have shown that these
residues were not important for the ability of GnTI chimeric molecules to be either localized within the Golgi, included into high molecular weight complexes, or functionally active in vivo. Thus, the
interactions observed here do not depend on these charged residues.
What is the reason for this difference? The most likely explanation is that Nilsson et al. (43) assessed the importance of the
charged residues in chimeric molecules containing the stem of GnTI in the absence of the GnTI luminal catalytic domain; i.e. the
mutated chimeric molecules contained only the stem region of GnTI. The formation of high molecular weight complexes involving
medial Golgi enzymes may involve multiple contacts between
the protein molecules of the complex, and mutating the charged residues
of the GnTI stem should not interfere with contacts with other regions of the luminal domain. Details of the structure of the
medial Golgi enzymes will be most important in identifying
potential interactive surfaces. Using the kin recognition assay, Munro
(46) could not detect a specific interaction between the two
trans-Golgi enzymes
2,6-sialyltransferase and Gal-T1.
This finding is also consistent with our observations that the two
late-Golgi enzymes, HT and Gal-T1 exist as monomers or dimers within
the Golgi and strongly indicates that late Golgi enzymes exist in a
different physical state from medial Golgi enzymes.
What is the relationship between the high molecular weight complex
formation of the medial Golgi enzymes and Golgi localization? It is
likely that inclusion into the high molecular weight complexes accounts
for the Golgi localization of TfR/GnTI and sGnTI proteins. This
conclusion would also explain why luminal domains of
cis/medial enzymes can efficiently retain membrane-bound
chimeric molecules within the Golgi (22, 47), whereas the luminal
domains of late Golgi enzymes appear to be less efficient (17, 48). On the other hand, there is general agreement that the transmembrane domains of all medial Golgi and trans Golgi
enzymes so far examined contain Golgi targeting information (8, 9). The
transmembrane domain of medial Golgi enzymes is likely to be
acting as a signal independent of the luminal domain and may mediate
Golgi localization of these proteins by selective partitioning into
specific microdomains of Golgi lipid bilayers (10). The latter may also
include recruitment into retrograde transport vesicles (49). The
ability of medial Golgi enzymes to form complexes does raise
the further possibility that additional sorting information may be
present in other components of the complex and thereby influencing the
steady state distribution of these enzymes within the Golgi stack. The
basis of the localization of Golgi resident enzymes, however, cannot
really be resolved until the mechanisms of intra-Golgi transport, which
currently remain unresolved, are clarified. Nonetheless, it is unlikely that there will be a unifying model to explain the localization of all
Golgi enzymes, since this study clearly shows that the medial and late Golgi enzymes exist in different physical
states, suggesting that different mechanisms may contribute to the
localization of glycosyltransferases that reside in different regions
of the Golgi stack.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Hans Paulsen and Folkert Reck
for the generous gift of
Man
1-6[GlcNAc
1,2Man
1-3]Man
-octyl, Professor Mauro Sandrin for the HT cDNA, and Dr. Rohan Teasdale for helpful
comments on the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Australian National Health
and Medical Research Council.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Recipient of an Australian Postgraduate Award.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology and
Immunology, Monash University Medical School, Commercial Rd., Prahran,
Victoria 3181, Australia. Tel.: 61 3 9903 0714; Fax: 61 3 9903 0731;
E-mail: paul.gleeson@med.monash.edu.au.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GFP, green
fluorescent protein;
GnTI,
1,2-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I (EC 2.4.1.101);
sGnTI, soluble GnTI;
GnTII,
1,2-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase II (EC 2.4.1.143);
Gal-T1,
1,4-galactosyltransferase (EC 2.4.1.38);
HT, blood group H
1,2-fucosyltransferase (EC 2.4.1.69);
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
L-PHA, leuco-phytohemagglutinin;
TfR, transferrin receptor;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction;
ER, endoplasmic reticulum;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate;
bp, base pair;
MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Rothman, J. E.
(1994)
Nature
372,
55-63[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Farquhar, M.,
and Hauri, H.-P.
(1997)
in
The Golgi Apparatus
(Berger, E. G.
, and Roth, J., eds)
, pp. 63-129, Birhäuser Verlag, Basel
|
| 3.
|
Varki, A.
(1998)
Trends Cell Biol.
8,
34-40[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
van den Eijnden, D.,
and Joziasse, D. H.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
3,
711-721[CrossRef]
|
| 5.
|
Schachter, H.
(1994)
in
Molecular Glycobiology
(Fukuda, M.
, and Hindsgaul, O., eds)
, pp. 88-162, Oxford University Press, Oxford
|
| 6.
|
Field, M. C.,
and Wainwright, L. J.
(1995)
Glycobiology
5,
463-472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Rabouille, C.,
Hui, N.,
Hunte, F.,
Kieckbusch, R.,
Berger, E. G.,
Warren, G.,
and Nilsson, T.
(1995)
J. Cell Sci.
108,
1617-1627[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Colley, K. J.
(1997)
Glycobiology
7,
1-13[Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Gleeson, P. A.
(1998)
Histochem. Cell Biol.
109,
517-532[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Munro, S.
(1998)
Trends Cell Biol.
8,
11-15[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Füllekrug, J.,
and Nilsson, T.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1404,
77-84[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Bonfanti, L.,
Mironov, A. A., Jr.,
Martinez-Menarguez, J. A.,
Martella, O.,
Fusella, A.,
Baldassarre, M.,
Buccione, R.,
Geuze, H. J.,
Mironov, A. A.,
and Luini, A.
(1998)
Cell
95,
993-1003[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Nichols, B. J.,
and Pelham, H. R. B.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1404,
9-31[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Cole, N. B.,
Smith, C. L.,
Sciaky, N.,
Terasaki, M.,
Edidin, M.,
and Lippincott-Schwartz, J.
(1996)
Science
273,
797-801[Abstract]
|
| 15.
|
Jungmann, J.,
and Munro, S.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
423-34[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Nilsson, T.,
Hoe, M. H.,
Slusarewicz, P.,
Rabouille, C.,
Watson, R.,
Hunte, F.,
Watzele, G.,
Berger, E. G.,
and Warren, G.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
562-574[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Teasdale, R. D.,
D'Agostaro, G.,
and Gleeson, P. A.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
4084-4096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Evan, G. I.,
Lewis, G. K.,
Ramsay, G.,
and Bishop, J. M.
(1985)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5,
3610-3616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Hull, E.,
Sarkar, M.,
Spruijt, M. P. N.,
Höppener, J. W. M.,
Dunn, R.,
and Schachter, H.
(1991)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
176 |