![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 17, 12530-12536, April 28, 2000
-Hydroxylase Gene Promoters
Are Differentially Responsive to Regulation by Fatty Acids Mediated via
Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor
*
andFrom the Medical Research Council Group on Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids and the Department of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2S2, Canada
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We determined if fatty acids can regulate the
murine Cyp7a1 and human CYP7A1 gene promoters
via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors
(PPARs)1 belong to the
superfamily of ligand-activated nuclear hormone receptors and regulate
a wide spectrum of genes involved in lipid homeostasis (1-3). The
regulation of gene transcription by PPARs involves their
heterodimerization with 9-cis-retinoic acid receptor The liver plays an important role in maintaining whole body cholesterol
homeostasis by regulating the biosynthesis of cholesterol, its uptake
from plasma, storage, and catabolism to bile acids (16). The conversion
of cholesterol to bile acids in the liver represents an important route
by which cholesterol is eliminated from the body. Cholesterol
7 The proximal promoter region of the cyp7a gene contains sequences that
resemble nuclear hormone response elements. It was shown recently that
induction of the rat Cyp7a1 gene in response to oxysterols
involves the nuclear receptor LXR We previously demonstrated that dietary fats influence the response of
the murine Cyp7a1 gene to dietary cholesterol (35, 36). It
is well known that fatty acids regulate gene transcription via
PPAR Cloning and Construction of Recombinant Plasmids--
Genomic
clones containing the human CYP7A1 gene were isolated from a
human chromosome 8 library (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas,
VA). A genomic clone containing the entire murine Cyp7a1 gene was described previously (21). Gene chimeras containing the
proximal promoter region of the human CYP7A1 gene (nt
Mutant derivatives of the human CYP7A1 gene promoter were
constructed using mutagenic primers by in vitro DNA
amplification and the plasmid containing the wild-type gene chimera as
template. The 3'-half-site of the human CYP7A1 Site II
regulatory element was converted into an XhoI
site,2 and a point mutation
was introduced into the 3'-half-site of the human CYP7A1
Site I element. The primary structures of the mutagenized promoters
were verified by sequencing.
Cell Culture and Transfections--
McArdle RH-7777 rat hepatoma
cells (46) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum at 37 °C in a humidified
atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. Cells were plated
(60-mm culture dishes) at equal densities 16-18 h prior to
transfection and grown in medium containing 20% delipidated fetal calf
serum. The cells were transfected when cultures were at 50-60%
confluency using the calcium phosphate coprecipitation procedure (47)
with a mixture of plasmids that contained 2.5 µg of plasmid
pCMV- Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays--
The murine PPAR Fatty Acids Stimulate the Murine Cyp7a1 and Human CYP7A1 Gene
Promoters via PPAR
Interestingly, the response of the murine Cyp7a1 gene
promoter to fatty acids was consistently greater than that of the human CYP7A1 gene promoter. To verify the observed difference in
the response of the murine Cyp7a1 and human
CYP7A1 gene promoters to fatty acids, cells transfected with
the chimeric plasmids were treated with WY 14,643, a potent and well
characterized synthetic activator of PPAR The cyp7a Gene Promoter Contains a PPAR
Next, we evaluated the role of Site II in the regulation of the cyp7a
gene promoter by ligand-activated PPAR The Murine Cyp7a1 Gene Promoter Contains an Additional
PPAR
Comparison of the murine, human, rat, and hamster cyp7a gene promoters
revealed that the sequence of Site I is not conserved (Fig.
3A). Electrophoretic mobility shift assays using
oligonucleotides corresponding to the murine Site I element
demonstrated a strong interaction with PPAR Alteration of a Single Nucleotide in the Human CYP7A1 Site I
Regulatory Element Allows PPAR
To demonstrate the functional significance of the human
CYP7A1 Site I C-to-T mutation, a cyp7a-CAT gene chimera
containing mutagenized human CYP7A1 Site I was created and
analyzed for its response to WY 14,643-activated PPAR Both the murine Cyp7a1 and human CYP7A1 gene
promoters were induced when the culture medium of cells transfected
with gene chimeras containing these promoters was supplemented with
fatty acids. The stimulatory effect was observed even with stearic
acid, a fatty acid that interacts weakly with PPAR Although both fatty acids and WY 14,643 reproducibly stimulated the
human CYP7A1 gene promoter in our experimental system, the
magnitude of the stimulation was modest. Fibrates have generally been
shown to increase the concentration of cholesterol in human and rat
bile, and this effect appears to be correlated with the reduction of
cholesterol 7 Recently, it was discovered that human liver contains significantly
lower levels of PPAR In contrast, the murine Cyp7a1 gene promoter was highly
responsive to fatty acids and WY 14,643 in transfected cells. Since the
murine Cyp7a1 gene promoter did not contain other sequences that resemble the typical PPAR Previously, we demonstrated that the fat background of the diet had a
significant impact on the response of the murine Cyp7a1 gene
promoter to dietary cholesterol (35, 36). The stimulatory effect of
dietary cholesterol on the murine Cyp7a1 gene is likely mediated via LXR The inhibitory effect of bile acids on cyp7a gene expression is a well
documented phenomenon (17). The discovery that bile acids serve as
ligands for the farnesoid X receptor provides an explanation for the
repressive effect of bile acids on the transcription of bile
acid-responsive genes (40, 59, 60). A recent study demonstrated that
ligand-bound farnesoid X receptor is capable of antagonizing
transactivation by LXR In summary, we demonstrated that the murine Cyp7a1 and human
CYP7A1 gene promoters are differentially responsive to
regulation by fatty acids via PPAR
(PPAR
)/9-cis-retinoic acid receptor
(RXR
). In
transfected cells, the murine Cyp7a1 gene promoter
displayed markedly lower basal activity, but greater sensitivity to
fatty acid- or WY 14,643-activated PPAR
/RXR
when compared with
the human CYP7A1 gene promoter. PPAR
/RXR
can bind to
a site (Site II) located within the region at nucleotides
158 to
132 of both promoters. Mutagenesis of the human CYP7A1
Site II element abolished the response to activated PPAR
/RXR
. The
murine Cyp7a1 gene promoter contains an additional PPAR
/RXR
-binding site (Site I) located within nucleotides
72 to
57. Replacement of a single residue in human CYP7A1 Site
I with that found in the murine Cyp7a1 Site I sequence
enabled PPAR
/RXR
binding, and this mutation resulted in reduced
basal activity, but substantially improved the response to activated
PPAR
/RXR
in transfected cells. We conclude that fatty acids can
regulate the cyp7a gene promoter via PPAR
/RXR
. The differential
response of the murine Cyp7a1 and human CYP7A1
gene promoters to PPAR
activators is attributable to the additional
PPAR
/RXR
-binding site in the murine Cyp7a1 gene promoter.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(RXR
) and binding to specific sequences known as peroxisome
proliferator response elements (PPREs) in the proximal regions of
target genes (2, 4, 5). PPREs consist of a direct repeat of the nuclear receptor hexameric DNA recognition motif (5'-AGGTCA-3') separated by
one nucleotide, a configuration termed as DR1. Fatty acids and
fibrates, which are known ligands for PPAR
(6-11), have been shown
to regulate genes involved in cholesterol metabolism such as those
encoding apoA-I (12), apoA-II (13), apoC-III (14) and
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase (15).
-hydroxylase (cyp7a) is the rate-controlling enzyme of the major
pathway involved in this process (17). The gene encoding cyp7a has been
cloned from the rat (18, 19), mouse (20, 21), human (22, 23), and
hamster (24). Several studies have shown that cyp7a gene expression is
regulated by a variety of hormonal (25-28) and nutritional (29-36)
factors. Although phosphorylation has been suggested to regulate cyp7a
(30, 37, 38), the abundance of cyp7a mRNA remains the best
predictor of cyp7a enzyme activity.
(39), whereas repression of cyp7a
gene transcription by bile acids appears to be mediated via the
farnesoid X receptor (40). Other nuclear hormone receptors have also
been shown to interact with the cyp7a gene promoter (41-44). Given the
number of nuclear hormone receptor-binding sites in the cyp7a gene
promoter, it would seem that this class of transcription factors plays
a major role in regulating cyp7a gene expression.
/RXR
(2, 7). Here we evaluated the role of fatty acids in
regulating the cyp7a gene expression and whether PPAR
/RXR
is
involved in the process.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
372 to +61) or the murine Cyp7a1 gene (nt
412 to +77) were
generated from the cloned cyp7a genomic genes and linked to the
chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) structural gene sequence in
pCAT-Basic (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). The primary structures of the
in vitro amplified human CYP7A1 and murine
Cyp7a1 gene fragments were confirmed by sequencing. The
rabbit antiserum to PPAR
and plasmids encoding murine PPAR
and
RXR
were described previously (45).
-gal (encoding
-galactosidase) as a control for transfection
efficiency, cyp7a-CAT gene chimeras, and expression vectors encoding
PPAR
and RXR
. All samples were complemented with sonicated salmon
sperm DNA to equalize the mass of total DNA (20 µg) added to each
dish. One hour after the introduction of DNA, the transfected cells
were treated with either fatty acids (stearic acid (18:0), oleic acid
(18:1), and linoleic acid (18:2); Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, Ontario,
Canada) complexed to lipid-free bovine serum albumin (BSA) or WY 14,643 (BIOMOL Research Labs Inc., Plymouth Meeting, PA) dissolved in dimethyl
sulfoxide at a final concentration of 100 or 50 µM,
respectively. The control cells received either lipid-free BSA or
Me2SO alone. In initial experiments, we found that fatty
acids dissolved in ethanol were toxic when added to the culture medium
of transfected McArdle RH-7777 cells at concentrations
100
µM. However, the equivalent concentrations of fatty acids
were well tolerated when added to cell culture medium as a complex with
BSA and were therefore used in all subsequent experiments. Extracts of
transfected cells were prepared 36-48 h after the introduction of DNA
and assayed for both CAT and
-galactosidase activities by standard
methods. The CAT reaction products were separated by TLC, and
radioactivity of acetylated [14C]chloramphenicol was
quantitated using a Fuji BAS1000 phosphoimager. The CAT activity values
were normalized to the
-galactosidase activity, which was not
affected by the treatments.
and RXR
proteins were synthesized in vitro using a
coupled transcription/translation system (Promega Corp.) with a
standard scale of synthesis consisting of 25 µl of reaction mixture
and 0.5 µg of DNA template. Fragments produced by restriction enzyme
digestion of the human CYP7A1 gene promoter were first tested for binding to PPAR
/RXR
by electrophoretic mobility shift assays. The sequences of the promoter fragments that showed binding to
PPAR
/RXR
were analyzed, and regions that bore similarity to the
consensus PPRE sequence were further characterized. The following
synthetic double-stranded oligonucleotides bear natural sequences from
the cyp7a gene promoters and were used in electrophoretic mobility
shift assays: nt
150 to
123 of the human CYP7A1 gene (human Site II, 5'-TACCTGTGGACTTAGTTCAAGGCCAGTT-3'), nt
73 to
54 of
the human CYP7A1 gene (human Site I,
5'-CTTTGTCAACCAAGCTCAAG-3'), and nt
73 to
55 of the murine
Cyp7a1 gene (murine Site I, 5'-CTGGTCACCCAAGTTCAAG-3'). The
altered residues in the mutagenized derivatives of these sequences are
described in the figure legends. The oligonucleotides were synthesized
with a 4-nt 5'-extension (5'-AATT-3') to allow for radiolabeling of
annealed oligonucleotides by fill-in reaction catalyzed by the Klenow
fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. Radiolabeled
double-stranded oligonucleotides (0.1 pmol,
15,000 cpm) were
incubated in a total volume of 40 µl for 15 min at 25 °C with 4 µg of poly(dI·dC), 4 µg of BSA, and 1 µl of recombinant PPAR
and RXR
in binding buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 7% glycerol, 150 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mM
dithiothreitol). Double-stranded oligonucleotides containing the rat
acyl-CoA oxidase PPRE (45) and the rat tyrosine aminotransferase glucocorticoid response element (48) were used as competitors for
PPAR
/RXR
binding. In competition experiments, increasing amounts
(5-50-fold molar excess) of unlabeled acyl-CoA oxidase PPRE, murine
Cyp7a1 Site I, or human CYP7A1 Site I were added to reaction mixtures and incubated at room temperature for 10 min prior
to the addition of radiolabeled double-stranded oligonucleotides. After
an additional 15 min of incubation at room temperature, DNA-protein
complexes were separated by electrophoresis on a 4% polyacrylamide gel
in 0.5× Tris borate electrophoresis buffer at 4 °C and visualized
by autoradiography or phosphoimaging. In some experiments, 1-2 µl of
rabbit anti-PPAR
antiserum (45) was added after incubation of the
radiolabeled probes with the reticulocyte lysates. The reaction was
left on ice for an additional 30-60 min prior to electrophoresis.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/RXR
--
We observed that mice consuming a
semipurified high fat (20%) diet in the absence of exogenous bile
acids had a significantly higher (2-3-fold, p < 0.01)
abundance of Cyp7a1 mRNA compared with mice consuming a
chow diet (5% fat content). To investigate whether fatty acids
directly regulate cyp7a gene transcription through PPAR
/RXR
, gene
chimeras containing the murine Cyp7a1 or human
CYP7A1 proximal promoter regions linked to the CAT
structural gene were transfected into rat hepatoma cells in the absence
or presence of plasmids encoding PPAR
and RXR
. In the presence of
PPAR
/RXR
, the basal activity of the murine Cyp7a1 gene
promoter was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than that
of the human CYP7A1 gene promoter (Fig.
1A). Addition of stearic acid
(18:0), oleic acid (18:1), or linoleic acid (18:2) complexed to
lipid-free BSA to the culture medium at a concentration of 100 µM increased the activities of both the murine
Cyp7a1 and human CYP7A1 gene promoters as
reflected by the rise in CAT activity in lysates of treated cells (Fig.
1B). These results indicate that fatty acids stimulate the
cyp7a gene promoter of both species.

View larger version (8K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Human CYP7A1 and murine
Cyp7a1 gene promoters are stimulated by
PPAR
/RXR
activators. A, CAT activity in hepatoma cells
transfected with equal molar amounts of the human or murine cyp7a-CAT
gene chimera (white and black bars,
respectively). The CAT activity was normalized to
-galactosidase
activity encoded by a cotransfected
-galactosidase expression
vector. The results shown represent the means ± S.E. of three
independent experiments performed in triplicate. B, response
of the human CYP7A1 and murine Cyp7a1 gene
promoters (white and black bars, respectively) to
fatty acids in the presence of PPAR
/RXR
. The cyp7a-CAT gene
chimeras and plasmids encoding PPAR
, RXR
, and
-galactosidase
(internal reference standard) were cotransfected into hepatoma cells.
Fatty acids (stearic acid (18:0), oleic acid (18:1), and linoleic acid
(18:2)) complexed to lipid-free BSA were added to the cell culture
medium to a final concentration of 100 µM. Control cells received
lipid-free BSA (no FA). C, response of the human
CYP7A1 and murine Cyp7a1 gene promoters to WY
14,643 in the presence of PPAR
/RXR
. WY 14,643 was added to
culture medium to a final concentration of 50 µM
(black bars). Control cells received Me2SO
(carrier) alone (white bars). For both
B and C, the average normalized CAT activity
value in the absence of ligands was assigned a value of 1. The results
are the means ± S.E. of two independent experiments performed in
triplicate.
(6, 8, 10). As shown in
Fig. 1C, the response of the murine Cyp7a1 gene
promoter to WY 14,643 was significantly greater (11-fold activation)
compared with the human CYP7A1 gene promoter (1.5-fold
activation). These results show that although the human
CYP7A1 gene promoter has a higher basal activity compared with the murine Cyp7a1 gene promoter, the human
CYP7A1 gene is less responsive to regulation by activated
PPAR
/RXR
.
/RXR
-binding
Site--
Analysis of the human CYP7A1 and murine
Cyp7a1 gene promoter fragments produced by restriction
enzyme digestion revealed that PPAR
/RXR
can bind to the cyp7a
promoter somewhere in the region between nt
255 and
47 (data not
shown). Inspection of the sequence revealed that this region of the
cyp7a gene promoter contains a DR1 motif that resembles a
PPAR
/RXR
-binding site. This DR1 motif spans nt
144 to
132 and
nt
158 to
146 of the human CYP7A1 and murine
Cyp7a1 gene promoters, respectively. The sequence of this
site, which we have designated as Site II, is invariant among the
promoter regions of the human, murine, rat, and hamster cyp7a genes
(Fig. 2A). To determine if
Site II could function as a PPRE, we tested its ability to interact
with PPAR
/RXR
by electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
Double-stranded oligonucleotides containing the Site II sequence
displayed strong binding to PPAR
/RXR
heterodimers (Fig.
2B, left arrow). Interaction of the probe with
the recombinant transcription factors was not observed when either
PPAR
or RXR
was omitted from the binding reactions (data not
shown). Addition of anti-PPAR
antibodies to the binding reaction
containing PPAR
/RXR
resulted in the formation of a complex with
greatly reduced mobility (Fig. 2B, right arrow),
demonstrating that the complex contains PPAR
. The binding of Site II
to PPAR
/RXR
was competed efficiently by the well characterized
acyl-CoA oxidase PPRE (45), but not by a glucocorticoid response
element (48) (Fig. 2C, left panel). Mutagenesis
of the 3'-half-site of Site II drastically reduced binding to
PPAR
/RXR
(Fig. 2C, right panel). These data
demonstrate that PPAR
/RXR
can interact with the cyp7a gene
promoter.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The cyp7a gene promoter contains a conserved
PPAR
/RXR
-binding
site. A, shown is a schematic (top)
illustrating the approximate location of the Site II element of the
cyp7a gene promoter. The sequences of the Site II elements of the human
(GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank accession number L20569), murine
(this work and L20569), rat (J02926), and hamster (L04690) cyp7a gene
promoters and of the mutant human CYP7A1 Site II element
(mut Site II) are shown below. The coordinates shown are
based on a numbering system in which the most distal transcription
start site is assigned +1. The rat acyl-CoA oxidase (AOx)
PPRE and the consensus PPRE sequences are also shown for comparison.
The dots represent identical residues, and the
lowercase letters represent residues in the DR1 spacer
region. bp, base pairs. B, PPAR
/RXR
binding
to the cyp7a Site II element (left arrow) was demonstrated
by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Addition of anti-PPAR
antiserum (last lane) resulted in the formation of a complex
with greatly reduced mobility (right arrow). C,
the specificity of the binding was tested by adding a 5- or 50-fold
molar excess of competitor (glucocorticoid response element
(GRE) or acyl-CoA oxidase PPRE) relative to the radiolabeled
probe in the binding reactions. The binding of PPAR
/RXR
heterodimers to wild-type human CYP7A1 Site II
(arrows) relative to mutant Site II is shown in the
right panel. D, mutagenesis of the 3'-half-site
of the human CYP7A1 Site II element abolished responsiveness
to WY 14,643 (black bars). The wild-type and
mutant cyp7a-CAT gene chimeras were introduced into hepatoma cells
along with plasmids encoding PPAR
, RXR
, and
-galactosidase.
The normalized CAT activity values in the absence of PPAR
/RXR
ligands (white bars) were assigned a value of 1. Results
shown represent the means ± S.E. of three independent experiments
performed in triplicate.
/RXR
. The 3'-half-site of
Site II (a DR1 element) was mutagenized, and then CAT gene chimeras
containing the human CYP7A1 gene promoter with either the
wild-type or mutagenized Site II element were transfected into hepatoma
cells along with expression vectors encoding PPAR
and RXR
. The
activities of the wild-type and mutant Site II elements were compared
in the presence and absence of 50 µM WY 14,643. As shown
in Fig. 2D, the cells transfected with the gene chimera containing the wild-type human CYP7A1 Site II showed a small
but reproducible increase (1.5-fold, p < 0.05) in CAT
activity, whereas cells transfected with the CYP7A1 gene
chimera containing mutagenized Site II showed no response to WY 14,643. These results demonstrate that PPAR
/RXR
can regulate the cyp7a
gene promoter through Site II. As the sequence of Site II is identical
in both human CYP7A1 and murine Cyp7a1 gene
promoters, the basis for the more robust response of the murine
Cyp7a1 gene promoter to fatty acids was unclear.
/RXR
-binding Site--
The LXR
/RXR
heterodimers bind
to a tandem repeat of a nuclear hormone-binding sequence motif
separated by four unconserved residues (i.e. a DR4 element
termed the LXR response element) (49). Region
72 to
57 of the
murine Cyp7a1 gene promoter contains a DR4 element that is
similar to the LXR response element found in the rat Cyp7a1
gene promoter (39). Alignment of murine and rat DR4 elements shows a
single nucleotide difference in the spacer region, but the 5'- and
3'-half-sites are identical (Fig.
3A). Inspection of the murine
DR4 sequence (designated as Site I) suggests the existence of a
possible DR1 element embedded within DR4. The DR1 element is configured
in such a way that it shares a common 3'-half-site with the DR4.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
The murine Cyp7a1 gene
promoter contains an additional PPRE. A, shown is a
schematic (top) illustrating the approximate location of the
Site I element of the cyp7a gene promoter. The sequences of the Site I
elements of the cyp7a gene promoters from different species are shown
below. The dots represent identical residues, and the
lowercase letters represent residues in the spacer regions.
B, the PPAR
/RXR
heterodimers bound to murine
Cyp7a1 Site I (left arrow) were demonstrated by
electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Addition of anti-PPAR
antiserum (last lane) resulted in the formation of a complex
with greatly reduced mobility (right arrow). C, the
specificity of PPAR
/RXR
binding (left arrow) was
tested by adding a 5-50-fold molar excess of the rat acyl-CoA oxidase
(AOx) PPRE or the human Site I element relative to the
radiolabeled probe in the binding reactions.
/RXR
, whereas the
corresponding Site I element of the human CYP7A1 gene
promoter was unable to bind PPAR
/RXR
(Fig. 3B,
left arrow). Binding of PPAR
was confirmed by the
formation of a complex with greatly reduced mobility in the presence of anti-PPAR
antibodies (Fig. 3B, right arrow).
Consistent with these results, the binding of PPAR
/RXR
to murine
Cyp7a1 Site I could be competed with the acyl-CoA oxidase
PPRE, but not with the human CYP7A1 Site I element (Fig.
3C). These results indicate that the Site I element of the
murine Cyp7a1 gene promoter is configured to enable binding
of PPAR
/RXR
.
/RXR
Binding--
The human
CYP7A1 Site I differs from the murine Cyp7a1 Site
I by three nucleotide residues (Fig.
4A). We designed three
different double-stranded oligonucleotides containing the human
CYP7A1 Site I sequence in which each of the variant residues
was replaced with the corresponding residue in the murine
Cyp7a1 Site I sequence. Changes from T-to-G and from A-to-C
in the 5'-half-site of the DR4 element and in the spacer region,
respectively, did not promote binding of human CYP7A1 Site I
to PPAR
/RXR
(Fig. 4B, left panel). In
contrast, the C-to-T substitution in the 3'-half-site of human CYP7A1 Site I enabled binding to PPAR
/RXR
(Fig.
4B, left panel), and the binding was competed by
both the acyl-CoA oxidase PPRE and murine Cyp7a1 Site I
(Fig. 4B, right panel).

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Functional analysis of the human
CYP7A1 Site I regulatory element. A,
the murine Cyp7a1 and wild-type and mutant human
CYP7A1 Site I sequences are shown. The dots
represent residues identical to the human sequence, and the
lowercase letters represent substituted residues.
B, PPAR
/RXR
binding to wild-type and mutant
CYP7A1 Site I elements was evaluated by electrophoretic
mobility shift assay (left panel, arrow). The
specificity of PPAR
/RXR
binding to human CYP7A1 Site I
(C to T) (right panel, arrow) was tested by
adding a 5- or 50-fold molar excess of either the rat acyl-CoA oxidase
(AOx) PPRE or the murine Cyp7a1 Site I element
relative to the radiolabeled probe in the binding reaction.
C, the cyp7a-CAT gene chimeras with a wild-type or mutant
Site I element were introduced into hepatoma cells along with plasmids
encoding PPAR
, RXR
, and
-galactosidase. The left
panel shows the relative CAT activity normalized to
-galactosidase activity encoded by a cotransfected
-galactosidase
expression vector in the absence of PPAR
activators (white
bars). The right panel shows the response of the cyp7a
promoters to WY 14,643 (black bars). The normalized CAT
activity values in the absence of PPAR
/RXR
ligands (white bars) were assigned a
value of 1. Results shown represent the means ± S.E. of three
independent experiments performed in triplicate.
/RXR
in
hepatoma cells. Analysis of CAT activity in extracts of cells
transfected with the gene chimera carrying this mutation revealed a
marked reduction of the basal promoter activity as compared with cells
transfected with the wild-type version of the human CYP7A1
promoter (Fig. 4C, left panel). This result,
taken together with the results shown in Fig. 1A, suggests
that the low basal activity of the murine Cyp7a1 gene
promoter compared with the wild-type human CYP7A1 gene
promoter is attributable to the sequence of the Site I element. As
observed before, the wild-type human CYP7A1 gene promoter showed a small (1.5-fold) but consistent stimulation in
the presence of WY 14,643. In contrast, the human CYP7A1
gene promoter containing the Site I C-to-T mutation responded
significantly better (3.5-fold, p < 0.01) (Fig.
4C, right panel). These results illustrate that a
single nucleotide difference in the 3'-half-site of Site I can alter
the basal activity of the cyp7a promoter as well as determine the
ability of Site I to interact with PPAR
/RXR
.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(9, 11). This could be explained by the fact that metabolism of fatty acids in the
transfected cells can produce metabolites that are more potent
activators of PPAR
than the parental fatty acids. Inspection of the
proximal region of the cyp7a gene promoters from various mammalian
species revealed the existence of an invariant DR1 motif that is a
possible binding site for PPAR
/RXR
. Electrophoretic mobility
shift assays using recombinant PPAR
and RXR
revealed that this
sequence (termed Site II) was capable of binding PPAR
/RXR
in vitro. Since mutagenesis of the human Site II element
abolished the stimulatory effect of fatty acids on the human
CYP7A1 gene promoter, we surmised that this site is capable
of acting as a target for PPAR
-mediated signaling.
-hydroxylation activity in both species (50-53).
However, it should be noted that some fibrates have only minimal
effects on the lithogenic index of bile or cyp7a activity (50, 53).
Significant changes in the activities of other cholesterol-metabolizing enzymes have also been demonstrated (50, 51), and these effects likely
also contribute to changes in the lithogenic index of bile.
mRNA compared with murine liver (54).
Measurement of PPAR
/RXR
DNA-binding activity in liver extracts
suggested that human liver contains an order of magnitude less activity
compared with murine liver (54). These observations raise the
possibility that PPAR
may not play a significant role in regulating
human CYP7A1 gene expression. The conserved Site II element
of the cyp7a gene promoter is also capable of binding other
transcription factors (42-44) and thus may not be available for
PPAR
/RXR
interaction in vivo. The reduction of
cholesterol 7
-hydroxylation activity observed in humans and rats
after fibrate therapy may therefore be due to an indirect effect of
PPAR
-mediated signaling. A transgenic mouse strain bearing the human
CYP7A1 gene should aid in clarifying the significance of
PPAR
function in regulating human CYP7A1 gene expression.
/RXR
-binding site (a DR1 motif) (2,
5, 45), the basis for the enhanced response of the murine
Cyp7a1 gene promoter in transfected cells was not
immediately obvious. Mapping of the murine proximal gene promoter using
restriction fragments as probes in gel mobility shift assays
surprisingly revealed that the fragment containing the
LXR
/RXR
-binding site (LXR response element, a DR4 motif) (49)
could also bind PPAR
/RXR
in vitro. Unlike Site II, the
sequence that makes up the murine DR4 element (termed Site I) of the
Cyp7a1 gene promoter is not conserved among the different
mammalian species. The human and murine Site I sequences are
non-identical; and unlike murine Site I, the human variant is not
capable of binding PPAR
/RXR
. However, the substitution of a
single residue at the 3'-half-site of the human Site I sequence with
that found in the same position of the murine Site I element enabled
PPAR
/RXR
binding. In addition, this substitution substantially
improved the response of the human CYP7A1 gene promoter to
WY 14,643 in the presence of PPAR
/RXR
in transfected cells. The
magnitude of the response of the modified human CYP7A1 gene
promoter did not reach that observed for the murine Cyp7a1
gene promoter, but this may be due to other sequence differences
between the two promoters. Thus, we attribute the robust response of
the murine Cyp7a1 gene promoter to fatty acids and WY 14,643 to the existence of a second PPAR
/RXR
-binding site. Studies done
on mice that are homozygous for a disrupted Scp2 gene
(encodes sterol carrier protein 2 and sterol carrier protein X) (55)
provide additional support for the involvement of PPAR
in the
regulation of murine Cyp7a1 gene expression. The expression
of the Cyp7a1 gene in these mice is increased, coincident with the enhanced expression of hepatic genes known to be regulated by
PPAR
(55). This effect has been ascribed to the accumulation of
phytanic acid, a metabolite that can act as a ligand for and activator
of PPAR
(56).
, a nuclear hormone receptor that is activated by
oxysterols (39, 57), since inactivation of the LXR
gene in mice
abolishes the response (58). Based on the present study, it appears
that PPAR
/RXR
and LXR
/RXR
bind to overlapping sequences in
the murine Cyp7a1 gene promoter. The exclusive interaction of these transcription factors with the murine Site I element may
explain why fats have an apparent influence on the stimulatory effect
of dietary cholesterol. The exact requirements dictating the
preferential binding of either of these transcription factors to the
murine Site I element remain to be elucidated. In any case, the data
suggest that fats are important physiological regulators of murine
Cyp7a1 gene expression.
(60), although the precise mechanism by which
this effect is accomplished remains to be described. It will be of
interest to determine also if the stimulatory effect of
ligand-activated PPAR
on murine Cyp7a1 gene expression is influenced by the farnesoid X receptor.
/RXR
in transfected cells. The
basis for the differential sensitivity is apparently due to a variation in a critical residue in the Site I element of the cyp7a gene promoter.
The murine Site I variant enables PPAR
/RXR
binding and allows the
murine Cyp7a1 gene promoter to be more responsive to
regulation by fats. Mice may have either maintained or acquired more
sophisticated control of cyp7a gene expression through evolution to
allow greater flexibility in regulating bile acid synthesis.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. R. A. Rachubinski
(University of Alberta) for providing antiserum to PPAR
and plasmids
encoding recombinant PPAR
and RXR
. We also thank V. Drover for
assistance in some of the experiments.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Grant MT-14812 (to L. B. A.) from the Medical Research Council of Canada.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Dept. of Biochemistry, BT 3012, Memorial
University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NF A1B 3X9, Canada.
§ Senior Medical Scholar of the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. To whom correspondence should be addressed: 303 Heritage Medical Research Centre, Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada. Tel.: 780-492-5251; Fax: 780-492-3383; E-mail: luis.agellon@ualberta.ca.
2 V. Drover and L. B. Agellon, unpublished results.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
PPARs, peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptors;
RXR
, 9-cis-retinoic
acid receptor
;
PPRE, peroxisome proliferator response element;
cyp7a, cholesterol 7
-hydroxylase;
LXR, nuclear oxysterol receptor;
CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase;
nt, nucleotides;
BSA, bovine
serum albumin.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Issemann, I., and Green, S. (1990) Nature 347, 645-650[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Schoonjans, K., Staels, B., and Auwerx, J. (1996) J. Lipid Res. 37, 907-925[Abstract] |
| 3. | Kliewer, S. A., Lehmann, J. M., Milburn, M. V., and Willson, T. M. (1999) Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 54, 345-367 |
| 4. | Miyata, K. S., McCaw, S. E., Marcus, S. L., Rachubinski, R. A., and Capone, J. P. (1994) Gene (Amst.) 148, 327-330[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Kliewer, S. A., Umesono, K., Noonan, D. J., Heyman, R. A., and Evans, R. A. (1992) Nature 358, 771-774[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Issemann, I., Prince, R. A., Tugwood, J. D., and Green, S. (1993) J. Mol. Endocrinol. 11, 37-47[Abstract] |
| 7. |
Kliewer, S. A.,
Sundseth, S. C.,
Jones, S. A.,
Brown, P. J.,
Wisely, G. B.,
Koble, C. S.,
Devchand, P.,
Wahli, W.,
Willson, T. M.,
Lenhard, J. M.,
and Lehman, J. M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4318-4323 |
| 8. |
Forman, B. M.,
Chen, J.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4312-4317 |
| 9. | Xu, H. E., Lambert, M. H., Montana, V. G., Parks, D. J., Blanchard, S. G., Brown, P. J., Sternbach, D. D., Lehman, J. M., Wisely, G. B., Willson, T. M., Kliewer, S. A., and Milburn, M. V. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 397-403[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Krey, G.,
Braissant, O.,
L'Horset, F.,
Kalkhoven, E.,
Perroud, M.,
Parker, M. G.,
and Wahli, W.
(1997)
Mol. Endocrinol.
11,
779-791 |
| 11. | Lin, Q., Ruuska, S. E., Shaw, N. S., Dong, D., and Noy, N. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 185-190[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Vu-Dac, N.,
Schoonjans, K.,
Laine, B.,
Fruchart, J. C.,
Auwerx, J.,
and Staels, B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
31012-31018 |
| 13. | Vu-Dac, N., Schoonjans, K., Kosykh, V., Dallongeville, J., Fruchart, J. C., Staels, B., and Auwerx, J. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 96, 741-750 |
| 14. |
Hertz, R.,
Bishara-Shieban, J.,
and Bar-Tana, J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13470-13475 |
| 15. |
Rodriguez, J. C.,
Gil-Gomez, G.,
Hegardt, F. G.,
and Haro, D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18767-18772 |
| 16. | Dietschy, J. M., Turley, S. D., and Spady, D. K. (1993) J. Lipid Res. 34, 1637-1659[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Russell, D. W., and Setchell, K. D. R. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 4737-4749[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Jelinek, D. F., and Russell, D. W. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 7781-7785[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Nishimoto, M.,
Gotoh, O.,
Okuda, K.,
and Noshiro, M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
6467-6471 |
| 20. | Tzung, K. W., Ishimura-Oka, K., Kihara, S., Oka, K., and Chan, L. (1994) Genomics 21, 244-247[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Agellon, L. B., and Cheema, S. K. (1997) Biochem. J. 328, 393-399 |
| 22. | Cohen, J. C., Cali, J. J., Jelinek, D. F., Mehrabian, M., Sparkes, R. S., Lusis, A. J., Russell, D. W., and Hobbs, H. H. (1992) Genomics 14, 153-161[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Wang, D. P., and Chiang, J. Y. L. (1994) Genomics 20, 320-323[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Crestani, M., Galli, G., and Chiang, J. Y. L. (1993) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 306, 451-460[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Ness, G. C., Pendleton, L. C., Li, Y. C., and Chiang, J. Y. L. (1990) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 172, 1150-1156[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Hylemon, P. B.,
Gurley, E. C.,
Stravitz, R. T.,
Litz, J. S.,
Pandak, W. M.,
Chiang, J. Y. L.,
and Vlahcevic, Z. R.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
16866-16871 |
| 27. | Twisk, J., Hoekman, M. F. M., Lehmann, E. M., Meijer, P., Mager, W. H., and Princen, H. M. G. (1995) Hepatology 21, 501-510[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Crestani, M., Stroup, D., and Chiang, J. Y. L. (1995) J. Lipid Res. 36, 2419-2432[Abstract] |
| 29. |
Jelinek, D. F.,
Andersson, S.,
Slaughter, C. A.,
and Russell, D. W.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
8190-8197 |
| 30. |
Sundseth, S. S.,
and Waxman, D. J.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
15090-15095 |
| 31. | Rudel, L., Deckelman, C., Wilson, M., Scobey, M., and Anderson, R. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 93, 2463-2472 |
| 32. | Kirk, E. A., Moe, G. L., Caldwell, M. T., Lernmark, J. A., Wilson, D. L., and LeBoeuf, R. C. (1995) J. Lipid Res. 36, 1522-1532[Abstract] |
| 33. | Xu, G., Salen, G., Shefer, S., Ness, G. C., Nguyen, L. B., Parker, T. S., Chen, T. S., Zhao, Z., Donnelly, T. M., and Tint, G. S. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 95, 1497-1504 |
| 34. | Torchia, E. C., Cheema, S. K., and Agellon, L. B. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 255, 128-133 |
| 35. | Cheema, S. K., Cikaluk, D., and Agellon, L. B. (1997) J. Lipid Res. 38, 157-165 |
| 36. |
Cheema, S. K.,
and Agellon, L. B.
(1999)
J. Nutr.
129,
1718-1724 |
| 37. |
Goodwin, C. D.,
Cooper, B. W.,
and Margolis, S.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
4469-4472 |
| 38. | Nguyen, L. B., Shefer, S., Salen, G., Chiang, J. Y. L., and Patel, M. (1996) Hepatology 24, 1468-1474[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. |
Lehmann, J. M.,
Kliewer, S. A.,
Moore, L. B.,
Smith-Oliver, T. A.,
Oliver, B. B.,
Su, J.-L.,
Sundseth, S. S.,
Winegar, D. A.,
Blanchard, D. E.,
Spencer, T. A.,
and Willson, D. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
3137-3140 |
| 40. |
Makishima, M.,
Okamoto, A. Y.,
Repa, J. J.,
Tu, H.,
Learned, R. M.,
Luk, A.,
Hull, M. V.,
Lustig, K. D.,
Mangelsdorf, D. J.,
and Shan, B.
(1999)
Science
284,
1362-1365 |
| 41. |
Lee, Y. H.,
Alberta, J. A.,
Gonzalez, F. J.,
and Waxman, D. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
14681-14689 |
| 42. |
Stroup, D.,
Crestani, M.,
and Chiang, J. Y. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
9833-9839 |
| 43. |
Stroup, D.,
Crestani, M.,
and Chiang, J. Y. L.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
G508-G517 |
| 44. |
Cooper, A. D.,
Chen, J.,
Botelho-Yetkinler, M. J.,
Cao, Y.,
Taniguchi, T.,
and Levy-Wilson, B.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
3444-3452 |
| 45. |
Marcus, S. L.,
Miyata, K. S.,
Zhang, B.,
Subramani, S.,
Rachubinski, R. A.,
and Capone, J. P.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
5723-5727 |
| 46. | Becker, J. E., de Nechaud, B., and Potter, V. R. (1976) in Onco-developmental Gene Expression (Fishman, W. H. , and Sell, S., eds) , pp. 259-270, Academic Press, New York |
| 47. | Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , pp. 16.33-16.36, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 48. | Jantzen, J. M., Strahle, U., Gloss, B., Stewart, F., Schmid, W., Boshart, M., Miksicek, R., and Schutz, G. (1987) Cell 10, 29-38 |
| 49. |
Willy, P. J.,
Umesono, K.,
Ong, E. S.,
Evans, R. M.,
Heyman, R. A.,
and Mangelsdorf, D. J.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
1033-1045 |
| 50. | Stahlberg, D., Angelin, B., and Einarsson, K. (1989) J. Lipid Res. 30, 953-958[Abstract] |
| 51. | Stahlberg, D., Reihner, E., Rudling, M., Berglund, L., Einarsson, K., and Angelin, B. (1995) Hepatology 21, 1025-1030[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 52. |
Bertolotti, M.,
Concari, M.,
Loria, P.,
Abate, N.,
Pinetti, A.,
Guicciardi, M. E.,
and Carulli, N.
(1995)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
15,
1064-1069 |
| 53. | Raedsch, R., Plachky, J., Wolf, N., and Simonis, G. (1995) Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 20, 113-118[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 54. |
Palmer, C. N.,
Hsu, M. H.,
Griffin, K. J.,
Raucy, J. L.,
and Johnson, E. F.
(1998)
Mol. Pharmacol.
53,
14-22 |
| 55. |
Seedorf, U.,
Raabe, M.,
Ellinghaus, P.,
Kannenberg, F.,
Fobker, M.,
Engel, T.,
Denis, S.,
Wouters, F.,
Wirtz, K. W. A.,
Wanders, R. J. A.,
Maeda, N.,
and Assmann, G.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1189-1201 |
| 56. |
Ellinghaus, P.,
Wolfrum, C.,
Assmann, G.,
Spener, F.,
and Seedorf, U.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2766-2772 |
| 57. | Janowski, B. A., Willy, P. J., Devi, T. R., Falck, J. R., and Mangelsdorf, D. J. (1996) Nature 383, 728-731[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 58. | Peet, D. J., Turley, S. D., Ma, W., Janowski, B. A., Lobaccaro, J.-M. A., Hammer, R. E., and Mangelsdorf, D. J. (1998) Cell 93, 693-704[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 59. |
Parks, D. J.,
Blanchard, S. G.,
Bledsoe, R. K.,
Chandra, G.,
Consler, T. G.,
Kliewer, S. A.,
Stimmel, J. B.,
Willson, T. M.,
Zavacki, A. M.,
Moore, D. D.,
and Lehman, J. M.
(1999)
Science
284,
1365-1368 |
| 60. | Wang, H., Chen, J., Hollister, K., Sowers, L. C., and Forman, B. M. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 543-553[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Y. Ng, Y. Huang, L. M. Reddy, J. R. Falck, E. T. Lin, and D. L. Kroetz Cytochrome P450 Eicosanoids are Activators of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha} Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2007; 35(7): 1126 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |