![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 17, 12626-12632, April 28, 2000
Regulates Interferon-induced
Transcription through a Novel Element*
,
§,
¶,
From the Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have described previously a novel interferon
(IFN)-responsive cis-acting enhancer element called
Members of the interferon
(IFN)1 family of cytokines
regulate antiviral, antitumor, and immune responses in the vertebrates, inducing a number of cellular IFN-stimulated genes (1). IFN effects on
the cells are, in part, may also be due to the repression of certain
other genes (2). ISG induction has been largely due to activation of
the well established Janus tyrosine kinase (JAK)-signal-transducing
activators of transcription (STAT) pathway, wherein
tyrosine-phosphorylated dual function factors (i.e. STATs) directly regulate the expression of down-stream genes (3, 4). In the
IFN- Although IFN- Reagents--
Recombinant murine IFN- Cell Culture and Plasmids--
Murine macrophage cell line RAW
(RAW264.7) was grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine
serum (12). Mammalian expression vectors for C/EBP- Gene Expression Analyses--
Southern, Northern, and Western
blot analyses, transfection, cDNA Libraries--
Poly(A)+ mRNA from RAW
cells stimulated with murine IFN- Bacterial Expression--
Two different constructs, C/EBP- Isolation of GATE-binding Factors--
To identify the GATE
binding factors, we have screened (16) a Identification of GBF-2 as C/EBP-
To further prove that GBF-2 was C/EBP- C/EBP-
Because GATE was an IFN-
Since wild type C/EBP- C/EBP- C/EBP-
The formation of C/EBP-
To demonstrate that the C terminus of C/EBP- GBF-2 (C/EBP-
We next determined whether induction of C/EBP- Immunoregulatory cytokine IFN- We have shown previously that the induction of murine ISGF3 Although C/EBP- The specificity of C/EBP- In addition to being a regulator of IFN-response, C/EBP- To our knowledge, this is the first report that suggests a novel role
for C/EBP-
-IFN-activated transcriptional element (GATE). GATE is distinct from
the known IFN-stimulated elements and binds to novel transacting
factors. To identify the
-IFN-responsive transacting factors that
interact with GATE, we have screened a cDNA expression library
derived from IFN-
-stimulated murine macrophage cell line and
isolated three different cDNAs. Among these is a gene coding for
the pleiotropic transcription factor, CCAAT/enhancer-binding
protein-
(C/EBP-
). We report here that the gene for C/EBP-
binds to GATE and induces gene expression. A mutant C/EBP-
interferes with the IFN-
-stimulated transcription of the ISGF3
(p48) promoter. Other members of the C/EBP family do not cause these
effects. Interestingly, the expression of C/EBP-
, not the other
members of its family, is induced by IFN-
. These studies thus
identify a novel role for C/EBP-
in the IFN-signaling pathways.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
induced response, STAT1 and STAT2, after their activation
by JAK1 and TYK2, associate with ISGF3
(p48 or IRF-9), a member of
the IFN-gene regulatory factor (IRF) family (4, 5). The resultant
multimeric complex, ISGF3, migrates to nucleus prior to its binding to
the IFN-stimulated response element (ISRE) and stimulation of target
gene transcription (3-5). In a number of tumor- and viral
oncogene-expressing cell lines, down-regulation of the physical levels
or inactivation of the components of ISGF3 serves as a mechanism for
evading the action of IFNs (6, 7). Thus, ISGF3 is central to the
IFN response.
can alone induce ISGs, pretreatment with IFN-
causes a robust induction of these and consequent biological response
(8-10). This latter effect is achieved through an enhancement of the
levels of ISGF3
(9-11). ISGF3
is an IFN-regulated gene, like
certain other members of the IRF family (11). However, it is a slowly
induced gene and requires new protein synthesis, unlike other IRFs
(12). We have demonstrated earlier that GATE, a novel IFN-
response
element, and its cognate transacting factors regulate the murine p48
promoter (12). We have now identified the GATE binding factors (GBF)
from a cDNA library prepared from an IFN-
-stimulated macrophage
cell line. Here we show that one of the GBFs is transcription factor
C/EBP-
, a member of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein family (13).
It regulates GATE-dependent gene expression, in an
IFN-dependent manner. We also show that C/EBP-
(NF-IL6, LAP, NF-M, IL6-DBP) is an IFN-stimulated gene. This factor has been
previously shown to regulate the type I acute phase-responsive genes,
under the control of another cytokine, IL-6 (14, 15). Our studies for
the first time demonstrate a role for C/EBP-
in the IFN signal
transduction pathway and uncover a novel mechanism of IFN action.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(Roche Molecular
Biochemicals), IPTG and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl
-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal) (Life Technologies, Inc.),
cDNA synthesis kits (Stratagene), mouse liver cDNA library
(CLONTECH), restriction and modifying enzymes (New
England Biolabs), and nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell)
were used in these studies. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies specific for
C/EBP-
, C/EBP-
, and actin were purchased from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology. Murine ISGF3
promoter and its mutants were described
previously (12).
and C/EBP-
were provided by Richard Hanson (Case Western Reserve University,
Cleveland, OH) C/EBP-
expression vector was a gift from Peter
Johnson (National Cancer Institute, Frederick Cancer Research Facility,
Frederick, MD). Mutant C/EBP-
consisting of the DNA binding was
generated by subcloning the region corresponding to the C-terminal 139 amino acids in the pcDNA 3.1 vector. Wild type cDNA (open
reading frame) was also cloned into pcDNA3.1 and pCXN2 similarly.
Both these constructs gave a comparable induction of the reporter genes
in transient transfection (data not shown).
-galactosidase and luciferase assays,
electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA), SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis, and sequence analysis were performed as described in
our earlier publications (12). In vitro transcription and
translation were performed using commercially available RiboMax system
(Promega Inc.).
(400 units/ml) for 0, 4, 8, and
12 h was pooled and cDNA was prepared using a commercially
available kit. The cDNAs were cloned into
-ZAPII vector between
EcoRI and XhoI sites (Stratagene Inc.). The
resultant library was packed in vitro and was used to infect Escherichia coli to obtain the final library. This library,
consisting of more than 99% recombinants, was used for screening the
proteins that bind to GATE. Induction of protein encoded by the
cDNA is achieved by IPTG treatment. Three million plaques were
screened using a 32P-labeled, concatamerized GATE as
described previously (16). Positive clones identified in the first
round were subjected to two more rounds of screening with wild type
(5'-CCCGAGGAGAATTGAAACTTAGGG-3') and mutant GATE probes
(5'-CCCGAGGAGAATTGCTCGGCGAGGG-3'). The bases in
the GATE sequence were mutated (shown in italics and underlined),
primarily on the basis of our earlier observation that this sequence
exhibited a partial homology (12) to the IFN-stimulated response
element (16). In particular, AAACTT residues were altered. In each case
a corresponding complimentary oligonucleotide was synthesized and
annealed. These double-stranded oligonucleotides were concatamerized,
labeled with 32P, and used in the experiments. At the end,
13 independent phage clones expressing GATE-binding proteins were
isolated. These were grouped into three, based on Southern blot
analyses of the rescued inserts and partial sequence analysis. Among
these, five clones expressing various sizes of the same cDNA were
grouped as GBF-2. The others are being characterized currently. Inserts
in the phage were rescued by in vivo excision of the
inserts, which allowed the transfer of cDNA into pBluescript
phagemid. Inserts were sequenced and used for further analysis. A
commercially available mouse liver cDNA library
(CLONTECH) was screened further to obtain
full-length inserts.
S
and C/EBP-
L, each expressing different sized products, were
generated by polymerase chain reaction amplification (14 cycles) and
subcloned into bacterial expression vector pET32A. For amplifying
C/EBP-
L, the forward and reverse primers were:
5'-TAGAATTCTACGGTTACGTGAGCCTC-3' and
5'-TTAAGCTTCTAGCAGTGGC CCGCCGAG-3',
respectively. For amplifying C/EBP-
S, the forward primer is
5'-TAGAATTCTTCGCCCTGCGCGCCTAC-3' and the reverse
primer is same as described above. EcoRI and
HindIII restriction sites (italicized and underlined) were
included in these oligonucleotides to permit the cloning of the
amplified inserts. C/EBP-
S and C/EBP-
L contained the C-terminal
139 and 191 amino acids, respectively. Proteins were induced with IPTG treatment, purified on nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose (Novagen) and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Where indicated, Western blotting was performed to detect the recombinant proteins.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-ZAPII cDNA expression
library, prepared from an IFN-
-stimulated murine macrophage cell
line RAW, using labeled wild type GATE as a probe (see "Materials and
Methods"). Protein encoded by the cloned cDNA was induced by IPTG
treatment. Phage plaques were overlaid with nitrocellulose membranes
and the membranes were probed with a 32P-labeled,
concatamerized GATE. Clones identified, using the wild type GATE probe,
in the first round were subjected to additional rounds of screening.
Replica membranes from the same plate were probed with mutant or wild
type GATE, separately. GATE is partially homologous (12) to ISRE.
Mutant GATE was designed by altering residues that were homologous to
ISRE. In particular the AAACTT residues at the 3' end of the sequence
were changed to CTCGGC, because the AAA or TTT residues of ISREs are
essential for IFN response (3, 4). Plaques that lit with wild type GATE
were unable to interact with mutant GATE, indicating the specificity of
the binding (Fig. 1). Positive phage
clones were identified and purified. This approach yielded three
distinct groups of clones (as assessed by Southern analysis and partial
sequencing), which encoded proteins capable of binding to GATE. We
named these proteins GBFs to reflect their function as GATE binding
factors. From these, we have chosen GBF-2 for further characterization,
for reasons described below.

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Identification and isolation of a GBF-2.
A representative phage clone (clone 3) corresponding to GBF-2 was
plated on E. coli XL-1 blue MRF' host. Protein expression
was induced upon overlaying IPTG (10 mM) impregnated
nitrocellulose membranes. Duplicate membranes from the same plate were
incubated with a concatamerized double-stranded DNA corresponding to
mutant (Mut) or wild type GATE (see "Materials and
Methods") in a binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, and 5% nonfat dry milk powder) at 4 °C for 12 h. The probes were labeled with 32P using a nick
translation kit to a comparable specific activity (~109
cpm/µg). The filters were washed three times at room temperature with
the binding buffer containing 0.25% nonfat dry milk powder, dried, and
exposed to x-ray films to detect the clones expressing GATE-binding
protein (16). Phages were plated at ~250 and 100 plaque-forming units
in the second and third rounds, respectively. Note the enrichment of
GATE binding clones in the third round. Only half of the filter is
shown.
--
Five independent GBF-2
phage clones carrying different lengths of the same cDNA were
isolated from the screen, all of which were capable of encoding
GATE-binding proteins. A full-length cDNA was obtained by further
screening of a mouse liver cDNA library. Sequence analysis of GBF-2
revealed that it was identical to a known transcription factor,
C/EBP-
. No other member of C/EBP family was found in the other GBF
clones. The longest of these cDNAs was used as probe to isolate the
corresponding full-length cDNA from a mouse cDNA library.
In vitro translation of this cDNA yielded a protein with
an apparent molecular mass (~35 kDa) similar to that of C/EBP-
(Fig. 2A).

View larger version (52K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Expression and identification of GBF-2 as
C/EBP-
. A, in vitro
translation of full length GBF-2 and the cloning vector pGEM7zf.
Plasmid DNA (3 µg) linearized with XhoI was used as a
template to generate RNA using T7 RNA polymerase. The resultant RNA was
programmed into nuclease-treated rabbit reticulocyte lysates (Promega
Inc.), and translation was carried out for 2 h at 30 °C in the
presence of [35S]methionine (100 µCi, Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). Reaction components (20 µl) were separated on a
10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and visualized after fluorography.
Positions of the molecular mass standards (kDa) were indicated on the
right. B, translation reactions were conducted
with C/EBP RNA as described in panel A in the
presence of [35S]methionine. Subsequently, the reaction
products were immunoprecipitated with the indicated antibodies (3 µl)
at 4 °C for 4 h. Protein G-agarose (200 µl) was added and
incubated for additional 1 h at room temperature.
Immunoprecipitates were recovered by centrifugation, washed with thrice
with a buffer (0.5 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris, pH = 8.0, 0.1% Nonidet P-40) and separated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide
gel. Proteins were visualized by fluorography.
, the rabbit reticulocyte
translation reaction, programmed with in vitro transcribed RNA of GBF-2 cDNA, was subjected to immunoprecipitation using C/EBP-
- and C/EBP-
-specific antibodies. A C/EBP-
-specific
antibody specifically immunoprecipitated the protein encoded by GBF-2
(Fig. 2B). C/EBP-
-specific antibodies did not
immunoprecipitate the protein. These data show that GBF-2 is C/EBP-
.
Hereafter, the term C/EBP-
will be used to denote GBF-2.
Induces GATE-dependent Gene
Expression--
Since C/EBP-
cDNA has been isolated by virtue
of its interaction with GATE, it is necessary to determine whether it
is a transcriptional activator or repressor. Therefore, we have
subcloned the C/EBP-
cDNA under the control of a constitutive
enhancer in mammalian expression vector pCXN2, and determined if it
induces the luciferase reporter. A construct P4, driven by a 74-base
pair enhancer element consisting of GATE region of p48, was promoter placed upstream of a SV40 promoter used in these studies. C/EBP-
expression vector but not the control vector induced luciferase expression in a dose-dependent manner. Although at a higher
molar ratio C/EBP-
slightly inhibited the gene expression,
luciferase activity was significantly more than the vector alone at
that dose (Fig. 3A). This
inhibitory effect may be due to a competition for limited amounts of
general transcriptional co-activators such as histone acetylases
available in the cell. A similar construct that lacked the GATE did not
respond to C/EBP-
(Fig. 3B). The effect of GBF-2 was also
determined in the context of wild type promoter. Luciferase gene
expression in the wild type as well as a mutant that bore a
myc-stimulated element (MSE pm) was induced by GBF-2 (Fig.
3B). In contrast, the GATE mutant (GATE pm) was not induced
under these conditions. GBF-2 did not induce the transcription of other
mutant promoters that lacked GATE. Furthermore, luciferase expression
from a reporter plasmid, carrying a wild type GATE (GATE-W) but not a
mutant GATE (GATE-Mu), was induced by C/EBP-
.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Induction of gene expression by
C/EBP-
. Transfection was carried out
using LipofectAMINE reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.) and normalized to
an internal control, the
-actin-
-galactosidase reporter gene
(12). A, expression vector (pCXN2) or its derivative
expressing C/EBP-
were transfected along with the P4-luciferase
construct (0.4 µg) into RAW cells and expression of luciferase was
measured using 30 µg of total cell protein, 30 h after
transfection. Numbers on the x axis refer to
number of molecules of the expression vector or C/EBP-
vector
relative to that of P4 reporter. B,
GATE-dependent induction of gene expression by C/EBP-
.
Cells were transfected with the indicated reporter genes (0.4 µg) and
0.1 µg of C/EBP expression vector. -Fold induction of luciferase gene
was calculated, relative to that of vector (pCXN2) transfected in each
case. Data represent mean of triplicate measurements. Construction of
reporters was described elsewhere (12). A6, wild type p48
promoter; MSE pm, mutant of myc-stimulated
element; GATE pm, mutant of GATE; P4 and P3
contain the p48 promoter sequences (thick black
bar), placed upstream of a heterologous promoter (SV40).
GATE-W and GATE-Mu (see "Materials and Methods") contain wild type
and mutant GATE upstream of SV40 promoter. Cells were treated with
IFN-
(200 units/ml), where indicated. C, mutant C/EBP-
inhibits IFN-
-inducible expression. Cells were transfected with
expression vector (pcDNA3.1) or wild type C/EBP-
or mutant
C/EBP-
(expresses the C-terminal 139 amino acids), along with P4
reporter gene and luciferase activity was measured. Each bar
represents mean ± S.E. of triplicate measurements.
-inducible element and C/EBP-
induced
GATE-dependent gene expression, we next determined the
influence of IFN-
on GATE-dependent gene expression
(Fig. 3B). RAW cells were transfected with various reporter
genes along with C/EBP-
expression vector and were treated with
IFN-
. Although C/EBP-
alone was capable of inducing luciferase
expression, IFN-
treatment of cells further enhanced it strongly.
These data may indicate that IFN-
-induced post-translational
modifications such as phosphorylation play a role in the
transcriptional regulation. Only those reporters that possessed a wild
type GATE synergistically responded to IFN-
(Fig. 3B).
These results, combined with the binding data of Fig. 1, indicate that
C/EBP-
mediates both basal and inducible expression of ISGF3
promoter-dependent genes.
induced gene expression, a mutant C/EBP-
should fail to active GATE-dependent gene expression. To examine this, the P4 reporter was cotransfected with a mutant C/EBP-
that expressed only the C-terminal DNA binding domain (139 amino acids)
and luciferase activity was determined. Indeed, wild type C/EBP-
,
but not a mutant, induced gene expression (Fig. 3C). IFN-
highly stimulated the expression of p48 in the presence of wild type
C/EBP-
. The mutant suppressed the inducible expression in a dominant manner.
but Not Other Members of Its Family Induce
GATE-dependent Gene Expression--
To further demonstrate
the specificity of C/EBP-
in regulating GATE-dependent
gene expression, we have tested whether two other members of its
family, C/EBP-
and C/EBP-
also induced gene expression. In these
studies, the P4 reporter plasmid was co-transfected with C/EBP-
and
C/EBP-
expression vectors and measured the luciferase activity. Both
C/EBP-
and C/EBP-
did not significantly induce
GATE-dependent gene expression, compared with the
vector-transfected cells (Fig. 4).
C/EBP-
, as expected, caused the highest increase in luciferase gene
expression. IFN-
, as shown in Fig. 3, strongly induced the gene
expression. In contrast C/EBP-
suppressed the IFN-
-inducible
expression (compare it to vector-transfected samples). These data show
that C/EBP-
is a specifically induced GATE-driven gene
expression.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Effect of various members of the C/EBP family
on gene induction. Cells were transfected with pMSV expression
vector or the same vectors carrying C/EBP-
, C/EBP-
, and C/EBP-
cDNAs (0.25× molar concentration with respect to the reporter),
along with the P4 construct (0.4 µg) and luciferase activity was
measured as described above.
Binds to GATE--
Although C/EBP-
was isolated by
its ability to bind to GATE in a Southwestern type of screening, it was
important to determine whether full-length GBF bound to GATE. For
conducting these experiments, an in vitro translated
C/EBP-
protein was employed (Fig. 2A). A control reaction
programmed with vector-derived RNAs was also transcribed and translated
similarly. Protein translation was performed in the presence of
unlabeled methionine. The reaction components were then incubated with
32P-labeled GATE and EMSA was performed to detect DNA
binding. Reticulocyte lysates expressing C/EBP-
protein, but not the
controls, formed a band with GATE in EMSA (Fig.
5A). A similar experiment was
conducted with a labeled mutant GATE (see "Materials and Methods")
(Fig. 5B). Neither the lysates programmed with C/EBP-
RNA
nor those programmed with vector-derived RNA formed a complex with the
mutant GATE. These data thus indicate that C/EBP-
specifically binds to GATE.

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
C/EBP-
bonds to GATE. In vitro
translation was carried out essentially same as in Fig. 2, except that
unlabeled methionine was used. Binding of in vitro
translated full-length C/EBP-
to GATE. Ten µl of reticulocyte
lysate was incubated with 32P-labeled GATE (65,000 cpm),
and EMSA was performed (A). Vector indicates reticulocyte
lysates programmed with pGEM7Zf-derived RNA. C/EBP-
reticulocyte
lysate translated in the presence of C/EBP-
-specific mRNA
expressed from the same vector. B, an EMSA with a labeled
mutant GATE (80,000 cpm). None, no lysate. Other notations
are similar to panel A. C, C/EBP-
protein in complex with wild type GATE. EMSA was performed as in
panel A. C/EBP-
, reticulocyte
translation reaction (20 µl) programmed with C/EBP-
RNA;
None: probe alone; ab', antibody specific to
C/EBP-
; C/EBP-
+ ab', same as C/EBP-
lane, except C/EBP-
-specific antibody was included reaction.
Arrow indicates the supershifted complex. D,
comparison of wild type and mutant GATE sequences with the consensus
C/EBP-
binding site (C/EBP Cons). A
line between the nucleotides indicates homology.
N can be any base. Note the closer homology between wild
type GATE and the consensus C/EBP-
binding site.
·GATE complex was confirmed by using
antibodies specific to C/EBP-
(Fig. 5C). As expected, the
reticulocyte lysate containing C/EBP-
formed a complex with GATE.
Incubation of this complex with an antibody specific to C/EBP-
caused a "supershifting" of the complex (shown with an
arrow). Antibody alone did not form any detectable
complexes. Thus, full-length C/EBP-
was capable of binding to GATE.
The sequence relationships between C/EBP-
consensus site and wild
type GATE are shown in Fig. 5D. This sequence has only a
partial homology to the consensus C/EBP-
binding site. Mutant GATE
used in these studies lacks the residues necessary for C/EBP-
binding in the right half. Thus, the AAACTT nucleotides of the GATE are
necessary for C/EBP-
binding to GATE. Our preliminary DNase I
footprinting data are consistent with this observation (data not shown).
without the
transactivatng domain was sufficient to bind GATE, two different C/EBP-
inserts, C/EBP-
S (139 amino acids) and C/EBP-
L (191 amino acids), were expressed as histidine-tagged fusion proteins in
E. coli. The resultant recombinant proteins were purified
(Fig. 6A) and were analyzed by
Western blot using C/EBP-
-specific antibodies (Fig. 6B)
to confirm the expression of expected protein. A control sample
containing Tag alone was used in these experiments (lane 1). This antibody specifically detected both fusion
proteins, which contained various lengths of C/EBP-
(lanes 2 and 3), but not the Tag
protein (Fig. 6B). These proteins were then incubated with a
32P-labeled GATE in separate reactions and EMSA was
performed. Recombinant C/EBP-
S and C/EBP-
L protein, but not the
Tag, bound to GATE (Fig. 6C). Incubation of these reactions
with C/EBP-
-specific antibodies, but not a control antibody, caused
a supershifting of the complex (Fig. 6D).

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
The C terminus of C/EBP-
is sufficient for GATE binding. A, silver
staining of bacterially expressed C/EBP-
, separated on 12%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. C/EBP-
S (139 amino acids)
and C/EBP-
L (191 amino acids) represent two different His-tagged
fusion proteins representing the C terminus of the C/EBP-
cDNA.
Tag indicates the purified His tag protein from
pET32A-expressing cells. Protein concentrations are 500, 200, and 500 ng/lane in lanes 1, 2, and
3, respectively. B, Western blot of proteins
shown in panel A, using rabbit polyclonal
antibodies specific for C/EBP-
(1/5000 dilution). Open
and filled arrowheads indicate the positions of
C/EBP-
proteins. The C terminus of C/EBP-
is sufficient for GATE
binding. C, 200 ng of C/EBP-
S or C/EBP-
L or Tag
protein (Fig. 2B) was incubated with a
32P-labeled GATE (70,000 cpm) and EMSA was performed.
None, probe alone. B, super shifting of complexes
by C/EBP-
-specific antibodies. EMSA was conducted as in
panel A with GBF-2L protein. Where indicated, 2 µl of specific antibody was added to the reactions and incubated for
10 min, prior to EMSA. Minus (
) and plus (+)
indicate deletion addition of the reagent in the reaction. Control
antibody was normal rabbit serum.
) Is an IFN-stimulated Gene--
Given the
fact that C/EBP-
induced IFN-
stimulated gene expression and
GATE binding factors are synthesized in response to IFN-
(12), we
next determined whether IFN-
induced the expression of C/EBP-
.
RAW cells were treated with IFN-
, and the expression of C/EBP-
mRNA was monitored by Northern blotting. As shown in Fig.
6A, the mRNA of C/EBP-
was strongly induced by
IFN-
. Under these conditions, there was no change in the expression of
-actin mRNA. These blots were also probed with C/EBP-
probe to detect the changes in its expression. No change in the levels of C/EBP-
occurred with IFN-
treatment (data not shown and see below). To provide further evidence that GBF-2 (C/EBP-
) is an IFN-
-inducible gene, we have determined its induction in
vivo. BALB/c mice were injected with IFN-
(50,000 units) via
tail vein, and total RNA from various tissues was extracted. These RNAs
were Northern blotted and the blots probed with 32P-labeled
GBF-2 cDNA. As shown in Fig. 6B, GBF-2 mRNA was
readily induced by IFN-
treatment while a basal level of its
expression was seen in most tissues.
mRNA also caused
a corresponding increase in its protein levels. Western blot analysis
of IFN-
-stimulated RAW cell extracts was performed to detect changes
in C/EBP-
protein. Indeed, IFN-
caused a
time-dependent increase in the levels of C/EBP-
protein
(Fig. 7C). Presence of
comparable amount of protein in these lanes was ensured with probing of
these blots with an antibody raised against actin (Fig. 6C,
lower panel). A similar analysis of these samples
with C/EBP-
-specific antibodies did not suggest an evidence for its
induction (Fig. 7D). C/EBP-
protein was also induced in
the human fibrosarcoma cell line 2fTGH and mouse kidney and spleen and
tissues after IFN-
treatment (data not shown).

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
IFN-
-induced
expression of C/EBP-
. Panels
A and B, Northern blot analysis of total RNAs (30 µg) from RAW cells stimulated with IFN-
(200 units/ml)
(panel A) or the indicated mouse tissues, using
C/EBP-
probe. Numbers above panel A
indicate the length of IFN treatment. Panel B,
in vivo induction of C/EBP-
mRNA in BALB/c mice.
Where indicated with a plus (+) sign, mice were treated with
50,000 units/ml IFN-
for 12 h by tail vein injection. A
minus (
) sign indicates saline treatment. Each blot has
been reprobed with
-actin to ensure the presence of a comparable
amount of RNA in the lanes. Panels C and
D, Western blot analysis of IFN-
-treated RAW cell
extracts (150 µg) with indicated antibodies. Numbers above
the lanes indicate the hours after IFN-
treatment.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
is critical for mediating a wide
array of biological responses in the vertebrates, including antiviral
and antitumor functions (17, 18). A number of ISGs have been identified
using a variety of techniques (1, 2). The IFN-
-stimulated genes are
induced with variable kinetics unlike those stimulated by IFN-
/
(1). All IFN responses are attributed to the activation of JAK-STAT
signaling pathway, a rapidly activated and deactivated process (3, 4).
STAT activation often lasts for no longer than 1 h after the
ligand engagement with receptor, despite the presence of IFN in the
extracellular environment (3, 4). Although the activation of STATs and subsequent expression of certain ISGs is independent of de
novo RNA or protein synthesis, several IFN-
-regulated genes
require the synthesis of other protein factors (1, 2). Furthermore, the
induction of certain IFN-stimulated genes does not correspond to the
STAT activation and deactivation kinetics (1, 2). Thus, it appears that
transcription factors other than STATs regulate the expression of these
"late induced genes." Indeed a number of factors, such as hXBP1,
RF-X, interferon gene regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1), class II
transactivator, and IFN consensus sequence-binding protein represent
the secondary mediators of signals emanated from the initial burst of
STAT activation (19-22). However, these factors can only partially
account for the pleiotropic nature of IFN response, and additional
undefined IFN-induced regulators may exist. That said, IRFs
also regulate gene expression independent of STAT proteins (20).
(p48)
gene, an IFN-
induced component of the ISGF3 complex, occurs at a
slower rate compared with other ISGs (12). Our studies have also
identified a novel IFN-
response element, GATE, which is
preferentially regulated by IFN-
(12). To define the transacting factors that interact with GATE, we have screened a cDNA expression library derived from a mouse macrophage cell line, stimulated with
IFN-
(Fig. 1), and identified the candidate cDNAs. One of these
is a known transcription factor, C/EBP-
. In this study, we have
shown that transcription factor C/EBP-
acts as an IFN-regulated factor. The fact that five independent clones of C/EBP-
bind to
GATE, but not to a mutant GATE, indicates a specific interaction of
C/EBP-
with GATE (Figs. 1 and 5). Sequence and immunoprecipitation analyses (Fig. 2B) have established that GBF-2 is indeed
C/EBP-
. This library also included the cDNAs corresponding to
C/EBP-
(data not shown). However, they did not seem to bind to DNA.
Consistent with this, C/EBP-a did not cause significant gene induction
(Fig. 4). These observations indicate a specific binding of
C/EBP-
to GATE.
binding to wild type GATE, but not to mutant GATE,
can itself provide evidence for its binding specificity, it is
important to note that the protocol employs a concatamerized GATE, not
a monomeric GATE. It cannot distinguish whether C/EBP-
binds to GATE
or junctions of tandem GATE sequences. However, EMSA with monomeric
GATE provide a direct proof that full-length C/EBP-
binds to GATE
(Fig. 5). The C terminus of C/EBP-
contains a b-ZIP domain and is
sufficient for GATE binding (Fig. 6). Thus, interaction of C/EBP-
with GATE involves the previously identified DNA binding domain (23).
The antibody supershift experiments (Figs. 5C and
6D) proved that C/EBP-
indeed forms a complex with GATE.
C/EBP-
consensus sequence TTNNGNAAT (14, 15) has a partial homology
to GATE. Six of the nine nucleotides in this region of GATE match with
consensus C/EBP-
binding site. Mutation of the AAACTT nucleotides of
the wild type GATE resulted in the loss of C/EBP-
binding (Figs. 1
and 5). Thus, these nucleotides seem to be essential for C/EBP-
binding to GATE. Preliminary DNase I footprinting analysis suggests
that the GAAACTT region of the GATE is protected by C/EBP-
(data not presented).
in inducing GATE-driven gene expression
was demonstrated using multiple approaches. 1) Reporter genes that
contained a functional GATE were inducible by it (Fig. 3B).
2) A C/EBP-
mutant that possessed only the DNA binding domain failed
to induce gene expression (Fig. 5). 3) Other members of the C/EBP
family did not induce IFN-
-stimulated gene expression (Fig. 4).
C/EBP-
represses gene expression by possibly interfering with the
function of endogenous C/EBP-
(Fig. 4). Such repression may occur
via a heterodimerization between C/EBP-
and C/EBP-
(24).
Enhancement of C/EBP-
-inducible gene expression by IFN-
suggests
the participation of a protein kinase in this pathway. This observation
is consistent with our earlier studies, which showed that inhibitors of
protein kinases block IFN-
-induced expression from GATE (12). Our
recent studies show that inhibitors of the ERK pathway suppress
IFN-induced gene expression (data not presented). Consistent with our
original suggestion that GATE binding factors are distinct from
ISRE-binding proteins, we have now identified the C/EBP-
, a factor
that has not been implicated in IFN response previously.
is also an
IFN-inducible gene (Fig. 7). In RAW macrophage cell line, the mRNA
and the protein levels of C/EBP-
are induced in response to IFN-
.
Under these conditions C/EBP-
protein levels have not changed,
suggesting the specific effect of IFN-
. The induction of C/EBP-
gene is not a cell line-specific effect, because it is also induced in
various tissues by IFN-
, in vivo (Fig. 7B). IFN-
failed to induce C/EBP-
protein in mutant cell lines, which lacked STAT1 and JAK1 genes (data not presented). Analysis of the
C/EBP-
published promoter sequence reveals a putative GAS-like element, TTCCAGGGAA (25). The relevance of this sequence to IFN-
response needs to be established. Based on these results, we suggest
that IFN-
induces the expression of C/EBP-
gene, whose
transcriptional activity is enhanced further by the posttranscriptional modifications stimulated by IFN-
.
in the IFN signal transduction pathway. Our data are also
consistent with a previous report that identified C/EBP-
as an
IFN-inducible gene (2). We have now provided a direct evidence for
C/EBP-
in the IFN signaling pathway. Previously, this factor was
implicated in the regulation of gluconeogenesis, acute phase responses
induced by interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-
, and
lipopolysaccharide (14, 15). C/EBP-
also mediates its effects
through a cyclic AMP-responsive element and ATF binding sites (26-29).
It also interacts with other transcription factors such as the
retinoblastoma tumor suppressing protein and NF-
B (30). Although
C/EBP-
induces IL-6 gene expression, its activity is repressed in
the presence of wild type p53 (31). Indeed, IL-6 can cross-regulate p48
gene expression through C/EBP-
(data not shown). The participation
of C/EBP-
in disparate signaling pathways may be a testimony for its
versatility as opposed to the promiscuity. Such plasticity may be
necessary for C/EBP-
to mediate distinct biological outcomes.
Indeed, mice lacking C/EBP-
gene have defects in the
macrophage-dependent antibacterial and antitumor defenses
(32), glucose homeostasis (33), and develop lymphoproliferative
disorders (34, 35). C/EBP-
may be entailed by specific cues in each
of these processes. IFN-
signaling is critical for mediating
anti-infectious pathogen defenses (36, 37) and suppression of
neoplastic cell growth in vivo (18). The fact that C/EBP-
is regulated by IFN-
(this report) is consistent with a hypothesis
that C/EBP-
contributes partly to the in vivo effects of
IFN-
(32, 38). Furthermore, IFNs have also been implicated in the
cellular differentiation of certain hematopoietic cell lines (39, 40).
C/EBP-
, a known regulator of differentiation (41, 42), may now
provide a basis for such observations.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Richard Hanson and Peter Johnson for providing C/EBP expression plasmids.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health NCI Grants CA71401 and CA 78282 (to D. V. K.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
These authors contributed equally to this study and should be
considered as first authors.
§ Current address: Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD 21251.
¶ Current address: NCI-ABL Basic Research Program, Frederick, MD 21702.
To whom correspondence should be addressed.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
IFN, interferon;
C/EBP, CCAAT enhancer-binding protein;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility
shift assay;
GATE,
-interferon-activated transcriptional element;
GBF, GATE binding factor;
IRF, interferon gene regulatory factor;
ISG, interferon-stimulated gene;
ISGF, interferon-stimulated gene factor;
ISRE, interferon-stimulated response element;
JAK, Janus tyrosine
kinase;
STAT, signal transducing activator of transcription;
IL, interleukin;
IPTG, isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Sen, G. C., and Ransohoff, R. M. (1997) Transcriptional Regulation in the Interferon System , Chapman & Hall/Landes Bioscience, Austin, TX |
| 2. |
Der, S. D.,
Zhou, A.,
Williams, B. R. G.,
and Silverman, R. H.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
15623-15628 |
| 3. |
Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1997)
Science
277,
1630-1635 |
| 4. | Stark, G. R., Kerr, I. M., Williams, B. R. G., Silverman, R. H., and Schreiber, R. D. (1998) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 227-264[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Bluyssen, A. R., Durbin, J. E., and Levy, D. E. (1996) Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 7, 11-17[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Wong, L. H.,
Krauer, K. G.,
Hatzinisiriou, I.,
Estcourt, M. J.,
Hersey, P.,
Tam, N. D.,
Edmondson, S.,
Devenish, R. J.,
and Ralph, S. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28779-28785 |
| 7. | Kalvakolanu, D. V. (1999) Trends Microbiol. 7, 166-171[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Lewis, J. A.,
Huq, A.,
and Shan, B.
(1989)
J. Virol.
63,
4569-4578 |
| 9. | Levy, D. E., Lew, D. J., Decker, T., Kessler, D. S., and Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 1105-1111[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Bandyopadhyay, S. K.,
Kalvakolanu, D. V.,
and Sen, G. C.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
5055-5063 |
| 11. |
Veals, S. A.,
Schindler, C.,
Leonard, D.,
Fu, X. Y.,
Aebersold, R.,
Darnell, J. E., Jr.,
and Levy, D. E.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
3315-3324 |
| 12. |
Weihua, X.,
Kolla, V.,
and Kalvakolanu, D. V.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
103-108 |
| 13. |
Lekstrom-Himes, J.,
and Xanthopoulos, K. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
28545-28548 |
| 14. | Akira, S., and Kishimoto, T. (1997) Adv. Immunol. 65, 1-46[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Poli, V.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
29279-29282 |
| 16. |
Vinson, C. R.,
LaMarco, K. L.,
Johnson, P. F.,
Landschulz, W. H.,
and McKnight, S. L.
(1988)
Genes Dev.
2,
801-806 |
| 17. | Boehm, U., Klamp, T., Groot, M., and Howard, J. C. (1997) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15, 749-795[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Kaplan, D. H.,
Shankaran, V.,
Dighe, A. S.,
Stockert, E.,
Aguet, M.,
Old, L. J.,
and Schreiber, R. D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7556-7561 |
| 19. |
Kamijo, R.,
Harada, H.,
Matsuyama, T.,
Bosland, M.,
Gerecitano, J.,
Shapiro, D.,
Le, J.,
Koh, S. I.,
Kimura, T.,
Green, S. J.,
Mak, T. W.,
Taniguchi, T.,
and Vilcek, J.
(1994)
Science
263,
1612-1615 |
| 20. | Briken, V., Ruffner, H., Schultz, U., Schwarz, A., Reis, L. F., Strehlow, I., Decker, T., and Staeheli, P. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 975-982[Abstract] |
| 21. | Chin, K. C., Mao, C., Skinner, C., Riley, J. L., Wright, K. L., Moreno, C. S., Stark, G. R., Boss, J. M., and Ting, J. P. (1994) Immunity 1, 687-697[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Chang, C. H.,
Fontes, J. D.,
Peterlin, M.,
and Flavell, R. A.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
180,
1367-1374 |
| 23. |
Williams, S. C.,
Cantwell, C. A.,
and Johnson, P. F.
(1991)
Genes Dev.
5,
1553-1567 |
| 24. |
Cao, Z.,
Umek, R. M.,
and McKnight, S. L.
(1991)
Genes Dev.
5,
1538-1552 |
| 25. | Chang, C. J., Shen, B. J., and Lee, S. C. (1995) DNA Cell Biol. 14, 529-537[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Park, E. A.,
Song, S.,
Vinson, C.,
and Roesler, W. J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
211-217 |
| 27. |
Yamada, K.,
Duong, D. T.,
Scott, D. K.,
Wang, J. C.,
and Granner, D. K.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
5880-5887 |
| 28. | Fawcett, T. W., Martindale, J. L., Guyton, K. Z., Hai, T., and Holbrook, N. J. (1999) Biochem. J. 339, 135-141 |
| 29. |
Bakker, O.,
and Parker, M. G.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
1213-1217 |
| 30. |
Stein, B.,
Cogswell, P. C.,
and Baldwin, A. S., Jr.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
3964-3974 |
| 31. |
Margulies, L.,
and Sehgal, P. B.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
15096-15100 |
| 32. | Tanaka, T., Akira, S., Yoshida, K., Umemoto, M., Yoneda, Y., Shirafuji, N., Fujiwara, H., Suematsu, S., Yoshida, N., and Kishimoto, T. (1995) Cell 80, 353-361[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. |
Croniger, C.,
Trus, M.,
Lysek-Stupp, K.,
Cohen, H.,
Liu, Y.,
Darlington, G. J.,
Poli, V.,
Hanson, R. W.,
and Reshef, L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
26306-26312 |
| 34. | Screpanti, I., Romani, L., Musiani, P., Modesti, A., Fattori, E., Lazzaro, D., Sellitto, C., Scarpa, S., Bellavia, D., Lattanzio, G., Bistoni, F., Frati, L., Cortese, R., Gulino, A., Ciliberto, A., Constantini, F., and Poli, V. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 1932-1941[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
Chen, X.,
Liu, W.,
Ambrosino, C.,
Ruocco, M. R.,
Poli, V.,
Romani, L.,
Quinto, I.,
Barbieri, S.,
Holmes, K. L.,
Venuta, S.,
and Scala, G.
(1997)
Blood
90,
156-164 |
| 36. | Durbin, J. E., Hackenmiller, R., Simon, M. C., and Levy, D. E. (1996) Cell 84, 443-450[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. | Meraz, M. A., White, J. M., Sheehan, K. C., Bach, E. A., Rodig, S. J., Dighe, A. S., Kaplan, D. H., Riley, J. K., Greenlund, A. C., Campbell, D., Carver-Moore, K., DuBois, R. N., Clark, R., Aguet, M., and Schreiber, R. D. (1996) Cell 84, 431-442[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. |
Buchmeier, N. A.,
and Schreiber, R. D.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
7404-7408 |
| 39. | Resnitzky, D., Yarden, A., Zipori, D., and Kimchi, A. (1986) Cell 46, 31-40[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Briggs, R. C.,
Briggs, J. A.,
Ozer, J.,
Sealy, L.,
Dworkin, L. L.,
Kingsmore, S. F.,
Seldin, M. F.,
Kaur, G. P.,
Athwal, R. S.,
and Dessypris, E. N.
(1994)
Blood
83,
2153-2162 |
| 41. |
Seagroves, T. N.,
Krnacik, S.,
Raught, B.,
Gay, J.,
Burgess-Beusse, B.,
Darlington, G. J.,
and Rosen, J. M.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1917-1928 |
| 42. | Muller, C., Kowenz-Leutz, E., Grieser-Ade, S., Graf, T., and Leutz, A. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 6127-6135[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Li, P. Gade, S. C. Nallar, A. Raha, S. K. Roy, S. Karra, J. K. Reddy, S. P. Reddy, and D. V. Kalvakolanu The Med1 Subunit of Transcriptional Mediator Plays a Central Role in Regulating CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein-{beta}-driven Transcription in Response to Interferon-{gamma} J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2008; 283(19): 13077 - 13086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||