![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 17, 13098-13108, April 28, 2000
§¶,
,
,
,
,
§
, and
§**
From the
Cancer Research Laboratories and the
§ Department of Pathology, Queen's University,
Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Multidrug Resistance Protein 1 (MRP1) transports
diverse organic anionic conjugates and confers resistance to cytotoxic
xenobiotics. The protein contains two nucleotide binding domains (NBDs)
with features characteristic of members of the ATP-binding cassette superfamily and exhibits basal ATPase activity that can be stimulated by certain substrates. It is not known whether the two NBDs of MRP1 are
functionally equivalent. To investigate this question, we have used a
baculovirus dual expression vector encoding both halves of MRP1 to
reconstitute an active transporter and have compared the ability of
each NBD to be photoaffinity-labeled with 8-azido-[32P]ATP and to trap
8-azido-[32P]ADP in the presence of orthovanadate. We
found that NBD1 was preferentially labeled with
8-azido-[32P]ATP, while trapping of
8-azido-[32P]ADP occurred predominantly at NBD2. Although
trapping at NBD2 was dependent on co-expression of both halves of MRP1,
binding of 8-azido-ATP by NBD1 remained detectable when the
NH2-proximal half of MRP1 was expressed alone and when NBD1
was expressed as a soluble polypeptide. Mutation of the conserved
Walker A lysine 684 or creation of an insertion mutation between Walker
A and B motifs eliminated binding by NBD1 and all detectable trapping of 8-azido-ADP at NBD2. Both mutations decreased leukotriene
C4 (LTC4) transport by approximately 70%.
Mutation of the NBD2 Walker A lysine 1333 eliminated trapping of
8-azido-ADP by NBD2 but, in contrast to the mutations in NBD1,
essentially eliminated LTC4 transport activity without
affecting labeling of NBD1 with 8-azido-[32P]ATP.
Multidrug Resistance Protein 1 (MRP1)1 is a member of the
ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily of transmembrane transporters that has been shown to confer resistance to a variety of natural product type drugs (1-6). The drug resistance phenotype conferred by
MRP1 is similar to that resulting from overexpression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) (reviewed in Refs. 7-9) and is typically associated with an
ATP-dependent decrease in drug accumulation and an increase in drug efflux (4, 6). Although both ABC proteins can function as
energy-dependent efflux pumps for a range of natural
product type drugs, there is very limited primary structure similarity between them, and phylogenetic analyses suggest that they evolved from
different ancestral proteins. There is also considerable evidence that
the mechanisms by which MRP1 and P-gp transport drugs are different
(reviewed in Ref. 8).
In addition to its ability to confer multidrug resistance, MRP1, unlike
P-gp, has been shown by in vitro studies using inside-out membrane vesicles to transport a structurally diverse array of organic,
anionic conjugates (reviewed in Ref. 9). These include GSH-,
glucuronide-, and sulfate-conjugated aliphatic, prostanoid, and
heterocyclic compounds. The two highest affinity substrates identified
to date are the proinflammatory cysteinyl leukotriene C4
(LTC4) (10-12) and the GSH-conjugated epoxide of the
potent mutagen, aflatoxin B1 (13). In addition, MRP1 has
been shown to be capable of direct active transport of conjugated bile
salts (14) and nonpeptide hormones as well as in vitro
synthesized drug conjugates such as doxorubicin-SG (15) and
VP-16-glucuronide (14). MRP1 can also transport oxidized glutathione
with low affinity but relatively high capacity (16, 17). GSH alone is
not actively transported (12, 14, 18, 19). However, it is required for
the ATP-dependent transport of unmodified chemotherapeutic agents, such as vincristine and doxorubicin, and xenobiotics, such as
aflatoxin B1 (10, 12, 13, 19). Vincristine reciprocally stimulates ATP-dependent transport of GSH by MRP1, and
preliminary estimates of stoichiometry are consistent with the
possibility that the two compounds may be co-transported (19). The
stimulation of drug transport requires the complete GSH tripeptide but
is not dependent on a free thiol, since GS-methyl and, to a lesser extent, GS-ethyl will also stimulate the transport of vincristine (19).
Thus, in contrast to P-gp, in vitro transport studies with
the compounds tested to date indicate that MRP1 is not capable of
ATP-dependent transport of unmodified forms of the drugs to which it confers resistance unless drug transport is stimulated by the
presence of GSH. Whether other anions can stimulate drug efflux from
intact cells is presently not known.
The predicted topology of MRP1 differs from most other members of the
ABC superfamily, including P-gp. Rather than being composed of only two
nucleotide binding domains (NBDs) and two polytopic membrane-spanning
domains (MSDs), MRP1 has a third MSD that is formed by the first 200 amino acids of the protein. This domain consists of five putative
transmembrane helices with an extracellular NH2 terminus,
the location of which has been verified experimentally by
N-glycosylation site mutagenesis (20). Three recently
identified human MRP-related proteins (MRP2/cMOAT, MRP3, and MRP6) also
contain a third MSD and have been shown, or predicted, to have
extracellular NH2 termini (21-25). However, the amino acid
sequences of the MSDs are relatively poorly conserved when compared
with the remainder of the proteins. Two other MRP-related proteins have
been identified that contain only two MSDs (MRP4 and MRP5) (26, 27),
suggesting that the third MSD may have been acquired by fusion between
a gene specifying a more typical four-domain ancestral protein and genes encoding other integral or membrane-associated proteins.
In prokaryotic transporters such as the histidine permease of
Escherichia coli, the four domains of the active transporter are separate polypeptides. Both ATP-binding subunits are identical, and
inactivation of one results in a transporter that has 50% of the
ATPase and transport activities of a wild-type complex (28). In
eukaryotic transporters such as the P-gps, the two NBDs, although not
identical, are highly conserved, but in contrast to the histidine
permease, inactivation of either NBD completely abolishes ATPase and
transport activities of the protein (29-32). Compared with P-gp, the
two NBDs of the MRP-related proteins are considerably more divergent.
One of the major differences between the two NBDs of the MRP-related
proteins is a conserved "deletion" of 13 amino acids between the
Walker A and B motifs of NBD1 that is not present in the second NBDs of
the MRPs or either of the NBDs of P-gp (1, 7, 9). However, it does
occur in NBD1 of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance
regulator (CFTR), a member of the ABC superfamily that functions as an
ATP-gated chloride channel (33). In addition, NBD1 and NBD2 of the
MRP-related proteins are more similar to the corresponding NBD of CFTR
than they are to each other, consistent with the evolution of CFTR and
the MRP-related proteins from a common four-domain ancestor (34).
To investigate possible functional differences between the NBDs of
MRP1, we have directly examined binding of
8-azido-[32P]ATP and trapping of
8-azido-[32P]ADP by each NBD when they are expressed
individually or in combination. We have shown previously that it is
possible to reconstitute an active transporter by co-infecting
Spodoptera frugiperda Sf21 cells with viruses
encoding the two halves of MRP1 (35). However, the efficiency of
reconstitution is limited by the fact that all cells in the infected
population do not express equivalent amounts of both halves of the
molecule. We have circumvented this problem by using a virus with a
dual expression cassette encoding both halves of MRP1, and we show that
membrane vesicles prepared from such cells transport LTC4
with initial uptake rates comparable with those of vesicles containing
similar amounts of the intact protein. We have also examined binding of
8-azido-[32P]ATP by each of the NBDs expressed as soluble
proteins in Sf21 cells. These studies indicate that the two NBDs
of MRP1 differ markedly with respect to their ability to bind
8-azido-[32P]ATP and to trap
8-azido-[32P]ADP. The lack of functional equivalence
between the two NBDs is supported by studies in which we show that
inactivation of each of the NBDs in the reconstituted transporter has
different effects on LTC4 transport activity and the
ability to label the co-expressed wild-type NBD with 8-azido-ATP.
Generation of Constructs--
Recombinant donor plasmids
encoding full-length MRP1, as well as the NH2- and
COOH-proximal half-molecules of MRP1 have been described (35). A
two-step cloning strategy was used to introduce cDNA fragments
encoding the MRP1 half-molecules into the dual expression vector,
pFASTBAC Dual (Life Technologies Inc.). The DNA fragment encoding amino
acids 932-1531 was cloned first into pFASTBAC Dual. The previously
described pFB-
To express the first NBD of MRP1 as a soluble polypeptide in insect
Sf21 cells, pFB-
To generate a similar construct expressing the second NBD of MRP1, a
DNA fragment encoding amino acids 1294-1516 was amplified by PCR using
pBSMRP1-fc-ATG (35) as a template. The forward primer used was
5'-GAGGCTAGCGAATTCCGGAACTACTGCCTG-3', which includes a
NheI site (underline). The PCR fragment was digested with
NheI and ClaI, and the 180-bp
NheI-ClaI fragment was isolated. pFB-MRP1 was
digested with ClaI and KpnI, and the 600-bp
ClaI-KpnI fragment was also isolated. The
NheI-ClaI and the
ClaI-KpnI fragments were ligated together to a
prokaryotic expression vector pET-17b (Novagen), which had been
digested with NheI and KpnI to create
pET-MRP11294-1531. The fidelity of the PCR product was
confirmed by dideoxy sequencing. pET-MRP11294-1531 was
digested with NdeI, made blunt-ended using Klenow fragment,
and then digested with KpnI. The recovered gene fragment was
ligated to pFASTBAC1 as described for pFB-MRP1617-932. The
NBD2 construct was named pFB-MRP11294-1531, and three amino acids, methionine, alanine, and serine, were introduced before
codon 1294 of MRP1.
The Walker A lysine mutants were generated by site-directed mutagenesis
using the CLONTECH Transformer Kit. The coding
sequence for NBD1 was included in a BamHI-SphI
fragment of MRP1. The fragment was isolated from pBSMRP1-fc-ATG (35)
and cloned into pGEM-3Zf(+), which had been digested with the same
enzymes, to generate pGEM-NBD1. The coding sequence for NBD2 was
contained in an EcoRI-KpnI fragment of MRP1,
which was also isolated from pBSMRP1-fc-ATG and cloned into the same
vector with EcoRI and KpnI to give pGEM-NBD2. The primers with the mismatched bases (boldface type) for K684M and K1333M
were 5'-GGCTGCGGAATGTCGTCCCTG-3' and
5'-GGAGCTGGGATGTCGTCCCTG-3', respectively. The mutations
were selected by the selection primer provided in the kit, which
changed an NdeI restriction site to an NcoI site
in the vector backbone. The presence of the mutation and the fidelity
of the sequence of the MRP1 coding region were confirmed by dideoxy
sequencing. The Bsu36I-SphI fragment bearing the
K684M mutation was isolated from pGEM-NBD1 and used to replace the same
region in pFB-MRP1 (35) and pFBDual-halves to create pFB-MRP1/K684M and
pFBDual-halves/K684M, respectively. The
EcoRI-KpnI fragment with the K1333M mutation was
isolated from pGEM-NBD2 and used to replace the equivalent region in
pBSMRP1-fc-ATG to generate pBSMRP1-fc-ATG/K1333M. The
SphI-KpnI fragment was then isolated from the
resulting plasmid and used to replace the same region in pFB-MRP1 and
pFB-MRP1/K684M to give pFB-MRP1/K1333M and pFB-MRP1/Double
Km, respectively. To generate pFBDual-halves/Double KM, the NcoI-KpnI fragment of
pBSMRP1-fc-ATG/K1333M was isolated and used to replace the equivalent
region of pFBDual-MRP1932-1531. Then the
SalI-XbaI fragment of pFBDual-halves/K684M was
isolated and cloned into the resulting vector as described for
pFBDual-halves.
The missing 13 amino acids from human P-gp, DIRTINVRFLREI, were
introduced into MRP1 between amino acids 707 and 708 using a
recombinant PCR technique (36). Two PCR products were amplified from
MRP1 cDNA. The first contained MRP1 sequence (nucleotides 1924-2316 of MRP1 cDNA) and 27 bp at the 3'-end that encoded the first 9 of the inserted amino acids (DIRTINVRF). The primers for this PCR were as follows: primer 1, 5'-CCTGGATGCCCAGACAGCC-3' (forward
primer); primer 2, 5'-GAACCTGACGTTGATGGTCCTAATATCGGAGCCCTTGATAGCC- 3' (reverse primer). The underlined sequences are MRP1 sequences, while
the remainder of primer 2 encodes the inserted amino acids. The second
PCR product contained MRP1 sequence (nucleotides 2317-2979 of MRP1
cDNA) and 28 bp at the 5' end encoding the last 9 of the added
amino acids (INVRFLREI). Consequently, the two PCR products contain 16 bp of overlapping sequence (encoding INVRF of the inserted amino acid
sequence). The primers used for the second PCR were primer 3 (5'-CATCAACGTCAGGTTCCTACGGGAAATCGTGGCCTATGTGCCAC-3') (forward primer) and primer 4 (5'-GTGGTGCCTGCTGATGTCC-3') (reverse primer). Again the MRP1 sequence is underlined, and the remainder of
primer 3 encodes the inserted amino acids. The sequences that overlap
in primer 2 and primer 3 are double underlined.
Gel-purified PCR products were mixed, denatured, and slowly cooled to
allow annealing of the overlapping sequences and then made
double-stranded using Klenow fragment. Approximately 10% of the
product from the Klenow reaction was used as template for a third PCR
in which only primer 1 and primer 4 were used. The product contained
nucleotides 1924-2979 of MRP1 cDNA with a 39-bp insertion after
nucleotide 2316 encoding the 13 amino acids from human P-gp. Digestion
of the fragment with NcoI and SphI yielded a
940-bp product that was used to replace the region of MRP1 cDNA between nucleotides 1157 and 3066. After sequencing of this region, a
BglII fragment was excised and cloned into the equivalent
region of the MRP1 mammalian expression vector pCEBV7-MRP1 (4) to make
the construct pCEBV7-Ins708. A Bsu36I-SphI
fragment was isolated from pCEBV7-Ins708 and used to replace the
equivalent region in either pFB-MRP11-931 to produce
pFB-Ins7081-932 or pFBDual-halves to create
pFBDual-Ins708halves. A vector expressing the Ins708 NBD1 as a soluble
polypeptide was also generated from pFB-Ins7081-932 as
described for the wild-type form.
Viral Infection, Membrane Vesicle, and Crude Cytosol
Preparation--
Recombinant bacmids and baculoviruses were generated
as described (35, 37). The conditions used for viral infection were also similar to those described previously. For membrane vesicle preparation, cells were disrupted by nitrogen cavitation to generate membrane vesicles, which were subsequently purified by sucrose gradient
centrifugation as described (12, 38). Crude cytosolic fractions were
prepared from whole cell lysates produced by nitrogen cavitation, which
were centrifuged at 55,000 rpm at 4 °C for 20 min to remove cell
debris. The supernatant was used without further purification.
Immunoblotting and Quantification of MRP1
Polypeptides--
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) of
membrane vesicle proteins was performed essentially as described (3,
39, 40) using 5-15% gradient gels. Proteins were transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA) using 25 mM
Tris base, 192 mM glycine, and 20% methanol buffer, and
MRP1 polypeptides were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit
(ECL) and murine mAbs QCRL-1 and MRPm6, as described (40-43). The
relative amount of various MRP1 polypeptides was estimated by
comparison with Sf21 cell-expressed, full-length, wild-type MRP1
loaded on the same gel (35).
Vesicle Transport of LTC4--
Uptake of
[3H]LTC4 (50 nM, 132.0 Ci
mmol Photolabeling of NBD1 and NBD2 of MRP1 by
8-Azido- Orthovanadate-induced Trapping of
8-Azido- LTC4 Transport by MRP1 Half-molecules Expressed either
by Co-infection with Two Vectors or by Infection with a Dual Expression
Vector--
The vectors used for co-infection have been described
previously and encoded either amino acids 1-932 or 932-1531 of MRP1 (35). Construction of the dual expression vector and conditions used
for infection of Sf21 cells were as described under "Materials and Methods." Membrane vesicles were prepared from co-infected cells
and cells infected with the dual expression vector. The levels of
expression of NH2- and COOH-proximal halves of MRP1 were
then determined by immunoblotting with mAbs QCRL-1 (epitope amino acids
918-924) (41) and MRPm6 (epitope amino acids 1511-1520) (43),
respectively, as described (35). To provide an indication of the
relative levels of the NH2- and COOH-proximal
half-molecules, vesicles containing full-length MRP1 were also analyzed
on the same immunoblots.
Under the conditions used for infection, the levels of the
half-molecules were similar in membrane vesicles prepared from either
the co-infected cells or cells infected with the dual expression vector
(Fig. 1A). However, the rate
of ATP-dependent LTC4 transport by membranes
from cells infected with the dual expression vector was 2.5-3.0-fold
higher than obtained with vesicles from the co-infected cells and was
approximately 80% of the rate obtained with vesicles containing the
intact protein (Fig. 1B). Thus, reconstitution of a
functional transporter in cells infected with the dual expression vector is extremely efficient, supporting our previous suggestion that
population heterogeneity limited the extent of reconstitution obtained
in co-transfection experiments.
8-Azido-ATP Supports Active Transport by MRP1 as Efficiently as
ATP--
Radioactive photoactivatable analogues of ATP have been used
to study the characteristics of binding and/or hydrolysis of ABC
proteins, such as P-gp, CFTR, and SUR1 (31, 44-48). It has also been
shown that 8-azido- Photoaffinity Labeling of MRP1 by 8-Azido-ADP Occurs Primarily at
NBD2--
It has been shown previously that the photoaffinity labeling
of full-length MRP1 by 8-azido-
In the presence of 1 mM vanadate, labeling of an endogenous
protein (indicated by a star in Fig. 3B) that
migrates slightly below the predicted position of the
NH2-proximal half of MRP1 could be detected in membranes
from cells infected either with the dual expression vector or vectors
encoding each half-molecule, as well as membranes from cells infected
with a control vector (data not shown). No labeling of either NBD1 or
NBD2 could be detected with membranes from cells expressing one or the
other half-molecule. In contrast, photolabeling of NBD2 was readily detectable in membranes from cells infected with the dual expression vector, but very little labeling of NBD1 was observed. The extent of
labeling of both NBDs was also modestly increased in the presence of
the high affinity MRP1 substrate LTC4 (1 µM)
(Fig. 3B).
Photoaffinity Labeling with 8-Azido-ATP Occurs Preferentially at
NBD1 of MRP1--
The preferential photoaffinity labeling of MRP1 NBD2
following vanadate trapping prompted us to investigate whether a
similar labeling profile was observed under conditions designed to
minimize hydrolysis of the 8-azido-ATP. Membranes expressing either the NH2- or COOH-proximal half-molecules were incubated on ice,
rather than at 37 °C, for 5 min with 5 µM
8-azido-
To determine whether the extent of labeling was altered when both
halves of the protein were co-expressed, we carried out similar
analyses with membranes from cells infected with the dual expression
vector. Despite the fact that the levels of the half-molecules in
membranes prepared from these cells were similar to those obtained when
the half-molecules were expressed individually (Fig. 3A), the labeling of the NH2-proximal half of MRP1 was greatly
enhanced, and weak labeling of the COOH-proximal half of the protein
could also be detected (Fig. 4A). In addition, in membranes
containing both half-molecules, LTC4 stimulated the binding
of 8-azido-
A comparable series of experiments was carried out with
8-azido- Binding of Nucleotide by Soluble Forms of MRP1 NBD1 and NBD2
Expressed in SF21 Cells--
To determine whether the differences in
nucleotide binding characteristics of MRP1 NBD1 and NBD2 were
influenced by their interaction with the MSDs of MRP1 or by anchorage
to the membrane, both NBDs were expressed as soluble polypeptides in
Sf21 cells. NBD1 and NBD2 were included in fragments extending
from amino acid 617 to 932 and 1295 to 1531, respectively. Almost all
of the NBD expressed was recovered in a cytosolic, membrane-free protein fraction, which was used without further purification. Immunoblotting indicated that both NBDs accumulated to similar levels
(Fig. 5A). We have shown
previously that the NBDs expressed as soluble polypeptides in
Sf21 cells can be immunoprecipitated by MRP1 conformational mAbs
(51), thus providing supporting evidence that they are properly folded.
SDS-PAGE of total cytosolic proteins following incubation with
8-azido- Effect of Mutations of Walker A Lysine Residues in NBD1 and NBD2 on
LTC4 Transport and Vanadate Trapping by Full-length
MRP1--
To further characterize the roles of each NBD of MRP1 in ATP
binding and hydrolysis, mutations were introduced into the Walker A
lysine residues in both NBDs. Vectors encoding full-length MRP1 in
which the Walker A lysine was mutated to methionine in either or both
NBDs were generated, and membrane vesicles were prepared. Immunoblots
of these vesicles revealed that all three mutant proteins accumulate to
levels comparable with that of wild-type MRP1 (Fig. 6A). To determine the effect
of the mutations on transport activity, ATP-dependent
LTC4 uptake was measured using membrane vesicles containing
the three mutant proteins. The rate of ATP/MRP1-dependent LTC4 uptake by vesicles from cells expressing the NBD1
mutant, MRP1/K684M, was approximately 25% (at 1 min and in the
presence of 50 nM LTC4) of that obtained with
vesicles containing the wild-type protein (Fig. 6B). In
contrast, the rates of ATP-dependent LTC4 uptake by membranes containing either MRP1/K1333M or MRP1/Double KM
were less than 5% of that of the membranes expressing the wild-type protein.
Vanadate-induced trapping of ADP by these full-length mutant proteins
was also examined. Membranes from Sf21 cells expressing wild-type MRP1 or from cells infected with a control vector were included for comparison. In the presence of 1 mM vanadate,
weak labeling of an endogenous protein with a similar electrophoretic mobility to full-length MRP1 could be detected (indicated by a star in Fig. 6) in vesicles from cells infected with a
control vector (Fig. 6C). The intensity of labeling at this
position was greatly enhanced with proteins from vesicles containing
wild-type MRP1 and was further increased in the presence of 1 µM LTC4. However, no increase in labeling
above the background of the endogenous protein could be detected in
membranes containing any of the mutant proteins. Thus, despite the
transport activity observed with the K684M mutant, no trapping of
8-azido-ADP was detectable.
LTC4 Transport by Co-expressed Half-molecules of MRP1
Containing Walker A Lysine Mutations--
To further characterize the
effect of the Walker A K684M and K1333M substitutions on the ability to
photolabel each NBD with 8-azido- Effect of Walker A Lysine Mutations on Photolabeling with
8-Azido-ATP--
Membrane vesicles used in the transport assays
described above were also used for binding and photolabeling studies
with both 8-azido-
We also examined photolabeling of each NBD of the mutant half-molecules
with 8-azido- Effect of Increasing the Spacing between Walker A and B Motifs of
MRP1 NBD1 on LTC4 Transport--
As noted previously, the
spacing between the Walker A and B motifs in the
NH2-proximal NBDs of the MRP-related proteins and CFTR is
shorter than the spacing in their COOH-proximal NBDs and both NBDs of
the P-gps. This difference is primarily attributable to a relative
deletion of 13 amino acids at a conserved location in these proteins,
which in MRP1 is between amino acids 707 and 708. To investigate the
possible functional significance of the deletion, the corresponding
sequence from NBD1 of human P-gp was introduced into the
NH2-proximal half-molecule between amino acids 707 and 708 by recombinant PCR to generate an NH2-proximal Ins708 half-molecule, which was then expressed together with the wild-type COOH-proximal half-molecule using the dual expression vector. Immunoblotting of membranes prepared from cells expressing both halves
of the wild-type protein or the Ins708 mutation plus the wild-type
COOH-proximal half of the protein revealed very similar levels of
wild-type and mutant MRP1 polypeptides (Fig.
9A). The ATP-dependent uptake of LTC4 by membrane
vesicles prepared from both populations of cells was then compared. The
rate of ATP/MRP1-dependent LTC4 uptake by
vesicles containing the Ins708 mutation was approximately 30% (at 1 min and in the presence of 50 nM LTC4) of that
obtained with vesicles containing both halves of the wild-type protein (Fig. 9B). Thus, the results of LTC4 transport
studies were very similar to those obtained with K684M mutation.
Effect of the Ins708 Mutation on Labeling with 8-Azido-ATP and
-ADP--
To determine whether the nucleotide binding characteristics
of NBD1 were affected by the Ins708 mutation, membranes containing the
Ins708 half-molecule and the wild-type COOH-proximal half-molecule were
incubated with 5 µM 8-azido- Labeling of Ins708 NBD1 Expressed as a Soluble Polypeptide in
Sf21 Cells--
To determine whether the lack of 8-azido-ATP
binding observed with Ins708 NBD1 was attributable to altered
interactions with other domains in the protein, we expressed both the
mutant and wild-type binding domains as soluble polypeptides in
Sf21 cells. Immunoblotting indicated that both wild-type and
mutant NBD1s accumulated to similar levels (Fig. 10C).
SDS-PAGE of total cytosolic protein following incubation with
8-azido- Previous studies have shown that P-gp exhibits a high level of
constitutive ATPase activity that can be stimulated by many of its
substrates (52-54). The two NBDs of P-gp have also been reported to
bind Mg2+ATP and Mg2+-8-azido-ATP with similar
apparent affinities, and both can be readily photolabeled with
8-azido- Like P-gp, it has been demonstrated that vanadate-induced trapping of
8-azido- A strikingly different nucleotide labeling profile was observed when
experiments were carried out in the absence of vanadate at reduced
temperatures to minimize hydrolysis of the 8-azido-ATP. Under these
conditions, co-expression of the two MRP1 half-molecules revealed
strong labeling of NBD1 with relatively weak labeling of NBD2. This
difference was observed whether 8-azido- The effect of substrate on 8-azido-ATP binding by each of the NBDs
under nonhydrolysis conditions also differed from that observed under
vanadate trapping conditions. In the presence of LTC4,
trapping of 8-azido- The differences detected between the two NBDs of MRP1 with respect to
labeling with 8-azido-ATP and vanadate trapping of 8-azido-ADP prompted
us to examine the functional consequences of inactivating one or both
NBDs by mutation of the conserved lysine residue in the Walker A motifs
to methionine. In other ABC transporters, comparable mutations have
been shown to eliminate ATP binding and hydrolysis. In P-gp, such a
mutation in either NBD completely inactivates the protein (63-65),
while in CFTR, mutation of the conserved lysine in NBD1 impairs channel
opening and mutation of the comparable residue in NBD2 impairs channel
closing (66, 67). In full-length MRP1, mutation of lysine 684 in NBD1
decreased LTC4 transport activity by approximately 70%,
while the comparable mutation of lysine 1333 in NBD2 essentially
inactivated the protein. The K684M mutation had a similar effect on the
activity of the reconstituted transporter, and we confirmed that
binding of 8-azido-ATP by the mutated NBD1 had been abolished. However,
despite the retention of 30% of the wild-type level of
ATP-dependent transport activity, the K684M mutation also
eliminated detectable trapping of 8-azido-ADP by NBD2. Consequently, to
ensure that the transport activity detected in the K684M mutation was
indeed dependent on ATP hydrolysis, assays were carried out with the
nonhydrolyzable ATP analogue, ATP In addition to mutating the Walker A motif of NBD1, we also examined
the consequences of increasing the spacing between the Walker A and B
motifs by inserting 13 amino acids from NBD1 of human P-gp between
amino acids 707 and 708. This insertion creates an NBD with a spacing
between Walker motifs similar to that in NBD2 of MRP1 and both NBDs of
P-gp. The mutation eliminated the ability to label NBD1 with
8-azido-ATP, either when the NBD was expressed as part of a
reconstituted transporter or as a soluble polypeptide, in the presence
or absence of LTC4. The Ins708 mutation also failed to
enhance the ability to trap 8-azido-ADP at NBD1 and eliminated the
ability to detect trapping at NBD2. Furthermore, like the K684M
mutation, it reduced LTC4 transport by approximately 70%.
Thus, the Ins708 mutation behaved in a manner indistinguishable from
the K684M mutation with respect to nucleotide binding, vanadate-induced trapping, and transport activity.
No major differences could be detected between the ATP dependence of
the initial rates of transport of the K684M and Ins708 mutations when
compared with the wild-type protein. As observed with the wild-type
protein, initial rates of LTC4 transport of both the K684M
and Ins708 mutations reached a maximum between 0.5 and 1 mM
ATP (data not shown). This observation, coupled with the inability to
detect 8-azido-ATP binding by NBD1 following introduction of these two
quite different mutations, argues strongly that ATP hydrolysis at NBD2
is sufficient to support transport of LTC4, albeit with
decreased maximal efficiency relative to the wild-type protein. This
behavior is similar to that observed with histidine permease mutants in
which inactivation of either NBD reduces the activity of the protein by
approximately 50% rather than completely eliminating transport as it
does in P-glycoprotein (28). The inability to trap nucleotide at NBD2
in the K684M and the Ins708 mutant proteins suggests that in the
absence of ATP binding and possibly hydrolysis at NBD1, either
8-azido-ADP is released rapidly from NBD2 even in the presence of
vanadate or that the conformation in which NBD2 binds the 8-azido-ADP
vanadate complex cannot be efficiently photoaffinity-labeled. In
contrast, the K1333M mutation essentially eliminated transport and
abolished 8-azido-ADP trapping by NBD2 and the low level of trapping
detectable at NBD1. However, it had no effect on binding of 8-azido-ATP
at NBD1; nor did it affect the ability of LTC4 to enhance
the binding. The combined results of LTC4 transport and
photoaffinity labeling studies with the K684M, Ins708, and K1333M
mutants are consistent with a model in which ATP hydrolysis at NBD1 is
obligatorily coupled to hydrolysis at NBD2 but not vice
versa. This lack of reciprocity between the coupling of the two
NBDs could explain the relatively low level of trapping of 8-azido-ADP
observed at NBD1 despite the high level of photoaffinity labeling with
8-azido-ATP. Under these circumstances, trapping of 8-azido-ADP at NBD2
would be expected to prevent trapping at NBD1, while trapping at NBD1
would not necessarily eliminate trapping at NBD2.
The lack of reciprocal coupling between the two NBDs of MRP1 and the
different consequences of the K684M and K1333M mutations raise an
important question with respect to the role played by NBD1 in substrate
transport. In P-glycoprotein and histidine permease, there is
compelling evidence that both NBDs contribute directly to substrate
transport (28-32). However, it is not possible to determine with the
data presently available for MRP1 whether the decrease in
LTC4 transport efficiency seen with the K684M mutation is a
direct consequence of the inactivation of NBD1 or the result of a
decrease in the efficiency of ATP hydrolysis at NBD2. Several observations, including (i) the LTC4-dependent
stimulation of 8-azido-ATP binding by NBD1, (ii) the retention of
partial transport activity following inactivation of NBD1 but not NBD2
and, (iii) loss of the ability to trap and photolabel NBD2 in the K684M
and Ins708 mutants with 8-azido-ADP, are equally compatible with a mechanism in which the role of NBD1 is to regulate, in a
substrate-responsive manner, the efficiency of ATP binding and
hydrolysis at NBD2. It may be possible to distinguish between these two
possibilities by determining the molar stoichiometry between ATP
hydrolysis and substrate transport. However, this will require
establishment of a reconstituted MRP1 transport system with highly
purified wild-type and mutant proteins.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
N (MRP1932-1531) was linearized with
SalI, made blunt-ended using Klenow fragment and then
digested with KpnI. The recovered
SalI*-KpnI fragment was ligated into pFASTBAC
Dual, which had been digested with SmaI and KpnI
to give pFBDual-MRP1932-1531. The DNA fragment encoding
amino acids 1-932 was then cloned into
pFBDual-MRP1932-1531. To achieve this, a XbaI
site was introduced by PCR immediately 3' of the stop codon in the
sequence encoding the NH2-proximal half-molecule, and the
PCR fragment was cloned into pFASTBAC1 as a
SalI-XbaI fragment. The fidelity of the PCR
fragment was confirmed by dideoxy sequencing. The cDNA fragment
encoding the NH2-proximal half-molecule was then isolated
as a SalI-XbaI fragment and ligated to
pFBDual-MRP1932-1531, which had been digested with the
same enzymes to generate
pFBDual-MRP11-932/MRP1932-1531 (pFBDual-halves).
C (MRP11-932) was linearized
with Bsu36I, made blunt-ended using Klenow fragment, and
then digested with KpnI. The isolated DNA fragment was
ligated to pFASTBAC1 which had been digested with SalI, made
blunt-ended using Klenow fragment, and then digested with
KpnI. The construct was designated pFB-MRP1617-932, and the only amino acid introduced during the cloning was the initiator methionine.
1; NEN Life Science Products) into membrane vesicles
was measured at 23 °C in the presence of ATP, 8-azido-ATP, or AMP (4 mM) using a rapid filtration technique as described (12).
Initial rates of LTC4 uptake were determined at various
concentrations of ATP or 8-azido-ATP, and double reciprocal plots of
the data were used to determine Km values for both
ATP and 8-azido-ATP.
-[32P]ATP or
8-Azido-
-[32P]ATP--
Membrane vesicles (20 µg of
total protein) were dispersed in 20 µl of transport buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 250 mM sucrose, and 0.02%
Na3N) containing 5 mM MgCl2 and 5 µM 8-azido-
-[32P]ATP or
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP (ICN Biomedicals; specific activity
of 20 and 19.7 Ci mmol
1, respectively) in the presence or
absence of LTC4. After a 5-min incubation on ice, the
samples were exposed in an open, flexible 96-well plate to UV light at
302 nm on ice for 5 min at a distance of 8 cm. Membrane proteins were
then solubilized in Laemmli buffer and subjected to SDS-PAGE and
autoradiography in a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc.). For
8-azido-ATP binding studies with soluble NBDs expressed in Sf21
cells, a crude cytosolic fraction (15 µl) was used under comparable
conditions. For immunoprecipitation, 8-azido-ATP binding studies were
carried out using 40 µg of membrane proteins. After UV irradiation,
membrane proteins were solubilized in phosphate-buffered saline
containing 1% CHAPS at 4 °C for 1 h, and insoluble fraction
was removed by centrifugation. One µg of mAb QCRL-1 was then added to
the supernatant of solubilized membrane proteins and incubated at room
temperature for 30 min. After another 30-min incubation with GammaBind
Plus Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), the beads were collected
by centrifugation and washed four times with cold transport buffer.
Immunocomplexes were solubilized with Laemmli buffer and resolved by
10% SDS-PAGE.
-[32P]ADP by MRP1--
Membrane proteins (20 µg) were incubated in transport buffer (20 µl) containing 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM sodium
orthovanadate, and 5 µM
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP at 37 °C for 15 min in the
presence and absence of LTC4, as described in the legends
to Figs. 3, 6, 8, and 10B. The reactions were stopped by the
addition of 0.5 ml of ice-cold Tris-EGTA buffer (50 mM
Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 0.1 mM EGTA, 5 mM
MgCl2), and the membranes were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm
for 15 min at 4 °C. The pellets were washed again and resuspended in
20 µl of the same buffer. The samples were transferred to a 96-well
plate and treated as described in the binding procedure above. The
ImageQuaNT program (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) was used
to quantify the relative amounts of labeling of MRP1 and MRP1
polypeptides under various conditions.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Comparison of ATP-dependent
transport of LTC4 by MRP1 half-molecules expressed by
co-infection and infection with a dual expression vector.
A, membrane proteins were prepared from Sf21 cells
infected with baculovirus encoding full-length MRP1, co-infected with
baculoviruses encoding either half of MRP1 (Co-halves), and
infected with baculovirus encoding both halves of MRP1
(Dual-halves). Membrane proteins (4 µg) were subjected to
5-15% gradient SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-P membrane.
Left, detection of the NH2-proximal
half-molecule of MRP1 by MRP1-specific mAb QCRL-1; right,
detection of the COOH-proximal half-molecule of MRP1 by MRP1-specific
mAb MRPm6. Minor amounts of high molecular weight species present in
COOH-proximal half-molecule blot are oligomers of the half-molecules
(35). The sizes of protein standards are indicated in kilodaltons.
B, membrane vesicles containing full-length MRP1 (
),
co-halves (
), or dual halves (
) were assayed for
ATP-dependent LTC4 transport activity at
23 °C for up to 2 min in transport buffer containing
[3H]LTC4 (50 nM), as described
under "Materials and Methods." LTC4 uptake by vesicles
prepared from cells infected with a control vector (
-gus) is also
shown (
). Data points are the means ± S.E. of triplicate
determinations in a typical experiment.
-[32P]ATP in the absence or
presence of vanadate can be used to photolabel MRP1 (39, 49, 50).
However, the efficiency with which MRP1 is able to hydrolyze this ATP
analogue has not been reported. To examine the ability of 8-azido-ATP
to support active transport by MRP1, LTC4 uptake assays
were carried out in the presence of 4 mM ATP or 8-azido-ATP
using membrane vesicles from cells infected with the dual expression
vector. As shown in Fig. 2A,
the uptake of LTC4 by the co-expressed dual halves of MRP1
was almost identical with both ATP and 8-azido-ATP. Initial rates of
LTC4 uptake by the dual halves of MRP1 were also determined
at several ATP or 8-azido-ATP concentrations. Double-reciprocal plots
of the data yielded an apparent Km of 23 µM for ATP and an apparent Km of 13 µM for 8-azido-ATP (Fig. 2B). Comparable
Km values were also obtained when full-length MRP1
was used.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Comparison of
[3H]LTC4 uptake by membrane vesicles
expressing both halves of MRP1 in the presence of ATP or
8-azido-ATP. A, membrane vesicles from cells infected
with the MRP1 dual expression vector (
,
) or the control vector
(
,
) were incubated with 50 nM
[3H]LTC4 in transport buffer for the times
indicated. Open symbols represent uptake in the
presence of 4 mM ATP; closed symbols
represent uptake in the presence of 4 mM 8-azido-ATP.
B, [3H]LTC4 uptake by membrane
vesicles expressing both halves of MRP1 was measured at various ATP
concentrations (5-4000 µM) (
) or 8-azido-ATP
(5.8-4667 µM) (
) for 30 s. Km
values were determined from regression analysis of the Lineweaver-Burk
transformation of the data.
-[32P]ATP is enhanced
in the presence of orthovanadate, presumably as a result of the
trapping of 8-azido-
-[32P]ADP (49). To assess the
distribution of photolabeling between the two NBDs, membranes from
Sf21 cells expressing both half-molecules of MRP1 from the dual
expression vector or from cells infected with vectors expressing either
the NH2- or COOH-terminal half-molecules were prepared.
Immunoblotting of these membranes, together with membranes containing
full-length protein that served as a standard with which to compare the
levels of each half of the protein, revealed comparable levels of
expression of both half-molecules, either when expressed alone or
co-expressed from the dual vector (Fig.
3A). These membranes were
incubated with 1 mM sodium orthovanadate and 5 µM 8-azido-
-[32P]ATP at 37 °C for 15 min in the presence and absence of LTC4. Free and rapidly
exchangeable nucleotides were then removed by washing prior to
irradiation, and total membrane proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE.

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Vanadate-induced nucleotide trapping by MRP1
half-molecules expressed either individually or co-expressed by the
dual expression vector. A, immunoblots of membrane
proteins from Sf21 cells expressing either the
NH2-proximal half-molecule (N-half) or the
COOH-proximal half-molecule (C-half) of MRP1 or both halves
of MRP1 by the dual expression vector (Dual-halves).
Left, detection of the NH2-proximal
half-molecule of MRP1 by MRP1-specific mAb QCRL-1; right,
detection of the COOH-proximal half-molecule of MRP1 by MRP1-specific
mAb MRPm6. The sizes of protein standards are indicated in kilodaltons.
B, membrane proteins (20 µg) used in A were
incubated with 5 µM 8-azido-
-[32P]ATP, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate in the presence or absence of 1 µM LTC4 at 37 °C, following the trapping
procedure as described under "Materials and Methods." The position
of the labeled MRP1 N-half and C-half polypeptides are indicated, and
an endogenous protein labeled is indicated by a star.
-[32P]ATP in the presence and absence of
LTC4. The samples were then photocross-linked, and membrane
proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. As shown in Fig.
4A, weak labeling of the
NH2-proximal half was observed, but no labeling of the
COOH-proximal half could be detected when either total (Fig.
4A) or immunoprecipitated proteins (data not shown) were
analyzed. The addition of 1 µM LTC4 during
the 5-min incubation on ice had no effect on the labeling of either NBD.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Nucleotide binding in individually expressed
MRP1 half-molecules and dual expression vector-expressed MRP1
half-molecules. A, membrane proteins (20 µg) from
Sf21 cells expressing either the NH2-proximal
half-molecule (N-half) or the COOH-proximal half-molecule
(C-half) of MRP1 or both halves of MRP1
(Dual-halves) were incubated on ice with 5 µM
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP in the presence or absence of 1 µM LTC4 following the binding procedure as
described under "Materials and Methods." Membranes from Sf21
cells expressing
-gus were incubated in the presence of
LTC4 for comparison. An endogenous protein labeled is
indicated by a star. B, top,
experiments comparable with those described in A were
performed using 5 µM 8-azido-
-[32P]ATP
instead of 8-azido-
-[32P]ATP; bottom,
phosphor image of immunoprecipitates of
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP-labeled membrane proteins (40 µg)
from Sf21 cells infected with the control vector (
-gus), the
vector encoding the NH2-proximal half-molecule
(N-half), and the vector encoding both halves of MRP1
(Dual-halves).
-[32P]ATP at NBD1 severalfold without
affecting the level of binding at NBD2.
-[32P]ATP to confirm that the nucleotide bound
by each of the NBDs was being detected in its triphosphate form.
Labeling of the individually expressed NH2-proximal half of
the molecule (Fig. 4B) with
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP was less than that obtained with
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP (Fig. 4A) and was barely
detectable on total membranes (Fig. 4B, top
panel). However, it was detectable following immunoprecipitation (Fig. 4B, bottom panel). Again, no labeling of the
individually expressed COOH-proximal half of the protein could be
detected (Fig. 4B, top panel), even after
immunoprecipitation (data not shown). When the two halves were
co-expressed, labeling of the NH2-proximal half of the
protein was again readily detectable and strongly enhanced by 1 µM LTC4 (Fig. 4B, top
panel). In addition, very weak labeling of the COOH-proximal
half-molecule was also observed but was not stimulated by the presence
of LTC4 (Fig. 4B, top panel), and it
was confirmed by immunoprecipitation (Fig. 4B, bottom
panel).
-[32P]ATP (5 µM) at 0 °C for
5 min resulted in intense labeling of NBD1 but no detectable labeling
of NBD2 (Fig. 5B). We also attempted to enhance the labeling
of NBD1 and NBD2 by co-expressing them. Co-immunoprecipitation studies
confirmed that association of the two NBDs could be detected when they
were co-expressed, but no stimulation of labeling was observed (data
not shown). Repetition of these studies with
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP was precluded by the presence of
high levels of phosphatase and protein kinase activity in the crude
cytosol. However, a qualitatively similar profile of labeling was
obtained with 8-azido-
-[32P]ATP using bacterially
expressed, highly purified glutathione S-transferase fusion
proteins corresponding to NBD1 and NBD2 (data not shown). Thus, at
least qualitatively, the difference in ability to bind and be
photolabeled by 8-azido-ATP observed when the two halves of MRP1 were
expressed either individually or together, is retained when the NBDs
are produced as soluble polypeptides.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Nucleotide binding by individual MRP1 NBDs
expressed in Sf21 cells. A, crude cytosolic
fractions (5 µl) from Sf21 cells infected with baculoviruses
coding for the individual NBDs of MRP1 were loaded on a 5-15%
gradient gel and immunoblotted as described under "Materials and
Methods." Membranes (4 µg) from Sf21 cells expressing
full-length MRP1 were included for comparison. Left,
expression of MRP1NBD1 (amino acids 617-932) was detected by
MRP1-specific mAb QCRL-1; right, expression of MRP1NBD2
(amino acids 1295-1531) was detected with MRP1-specific mAb MRPm6. The
sizes of protein standards are indicated in kilodaltons. B,
crude cytosolic fractions (15 µl) from Sf21 cells expressing
either MRP1NBD1 or MRP1NBD2 were incubated with 5 µM
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP following the binding procedure as
described under "Materials and Methods."

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Comparison of LTC4 transport and
vanadate trapping by membrane vesicles containing wild-type MRP1 or
Walker A lysine mutant proteins. A, membrane proteins
from Sf21 cells expressing full-length MRP1 or Walker A lysine
mutant proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE through a 7.5% gel,
transferred to Immobilon-P membrane, and detected with MRP1-specific
mAb QCRL-1. B, membrane vesicles containing either MRP1 or
Walker A lysine mutant proteins were assayed for
ATP-dependent LTC4 transport activity at
23 °C for up to 2 min in transport buffer containing
[3H]LTC4 (50 nM), as described
under "Materials and Methods." Time and ATP-dependence of uptake is
shown for MRP1 (
), NBD1 mutant MRP1/K684M (
), NBD2 mutant
MRP1/K1333M (
), and the double mutant MRP1/Double KM (
).
ATP-dependent LTC4 uptake by vesicles prepared
from cells infected with a control vector is also shown (
). Data
points are the means ± S.E. of triplicate determinations in a
typical experiment. Where not visible, error bars are within the limits
of the symbol. C, membrane proteins (20 µg)
from Sf21 cells expressing wild-type MRP1 and Walker A lysine
mutant proteins were reacted with 5 µM
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP, 1 mM sodium
orthovanadate in the presence or absence of 1 µM
LTC4 at 37 °C for 15 min, washed, and irradiated as
described under "Materials and Methods." Membranes from Sf21
cells expressing
-gus were incubated in the presence of
LTC4 and sodium orthovanadate for comparison. An endogenous
protein with an electrophoretic mobility similar to that of MRP1 is
indicated by a star.
-[32P]ATP, these
mutations were introduced into each of the half-molecules, which were
then expressed either together, or with the appropriate wild-type
half-molecule, using dual expression vectors. Immunoblotting of
membranes prepared from cells infected with the dual expression vectors
revealed very similar levels of wild-type and mutant MRP1 half-molecules (Fig. 7A). The
ATP/MRP1-dependent uptake of LTC4 by membrane
vesicles prepared from the various populations of cells was then
compared. The rate of LTC4 uptake by vesicles containing the K684M mutation was approximately 35% (at 1 min and in the presence
of 50 nM LTC4) of that obtained with vesicles
containing both halves of the wild-type protein (Fig. 7B).
The rates of LTC4 uptake by both halves of MRP1/K1333M and
MRP1/Double KM were 8 and 5% that of the wild-type protein,
respectively. Thus, the results with the dual expression vectors were
in good agreement with those obtained with full-length mutant
proteins.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Comparison of LTC4 transport by
dual expression vector expressed wild-type MRP1 and Walker A lysine
mutant half-molecules. A, membrane proteins from
Sf21 cells expressing both halves of wild-type MRP1
(Dual-halves), NBD1 mutant (Dual-halves/K684M),
NBD2 mutant (Dual-halves/K1333M) and double mutant
(Dual-halves/Double KM) were separated by SDS-PAGE on a
5-15% gradient gel and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes.
Left, detection of the NH2-proximal
half-molecule by MRP1-specific mAb QCRL-1. Right, detection
of the COOH-proximal half-molecule by MRP1-specific mAb MRPm6. The
sizes of protein standards are indicated in kilodaltons. B,
membrane vesicles containing both halves of wild-type MRP1 or Walker A
lysine mutant proteins were assayed for ATP-dependent
LTC4 transport activity at 23 °C for up to 2 min in
transport buffer containing [3H]LTC4 (50 nM), as described under "Materials and Methods." Time
and ATP dependence of uptake is shown for Dual-halves (
),
Dual-halves/K684M (
), Dual-halves/K1333M (
), and
Dual-halves/Double KM (
). ATP-dependent LTC4
uptake by vesicles prepared from cells infected with a control vector
(
) is also shown. Data points are the means ± S.E. of
triplicate determinations in a typical experiment.
-[32P]ATP (Fig.
8A) and
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP (Fig. 8B). Despite
similar levels of the NH2-proximal half-molecules in the
membrane vesicles used (Fig. 7A), labeling of the
NH2-proximal half-molecule containing the K684M mutation
(for both Dual-halves/K684M and Dual-halves/Double KM) was not
detectable with either 8-azido-
- (Fig. 8B) or
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP (Fig. 8A), regardless of
whether it was expressed with a wild-type or mutant COOH-proximal
half-molecule. In addition, the K684M mutation eliminated any
LTC4 enhancement of the photolabeling of NBD1 and all
labeling of a co-expressed wild-type COOH-proximal half-molecule. Weak
labeling of a protein with a mobility similar to that of the COOH-half
molecule was detected, but this was present at the same level in all
membrane preparations used and thus is clearly an endogenous protein.
As expected, the K1333M mutation also eliminated all labeling of NBD2.
However, labeling of the NH2-proximal half-molecules with
either 8-azido-
-[32P]ATP or
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP was only slightly reduced and could
still be enhanced by LTC4 (Fig. 8, A and
B).

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Nucleotide binding and vanadate-induced
nucleotide trapping by reconstituted MRP1 containing Walker A lysine
mutant half-molecules. Membrane proteins (20 µg) from
Sf21 cells expressing both halves of wild-type MRP1 or Walker A
lysine mutant proteins were incubated with either 5 µM
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP (A) or 5 µM
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP (B) in the presence or
absence of 1 µM LTC4 following the binding
procedure as described under "Materials and Methods." The same
membranes were incubated with 5 µM
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP, 1 mM sodium
orthovanadate in the presence and absence of 1 µM
LTC4 following the trapping procedure (C).
-[32P]ATP under vanadate trapping
conditions, with and without the addition of 1 µM
LTC4 (Fig. 8C). As described above, when the dual expression vector was used to express both halves of the wild-type
protein as a positive control, NBD2 was preferentially labeled, and
labeling could be stimulated by LTC4 (Fig. 8C).
Weak labeling of NBD1 could also be detected. Consistent with the
results obtained with the full-length protein, no labeling of either
NBD was observed when either the K1333M or K684M mutant half-molecules were co-expressed with the appropriate wild-type half of the protein despite the demonstrable transport activity of the latter combination.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
LTC4 transport by reconstituted
MRP1 containing the Ins708 NH2-terminal half-molecule.
A, membrane proteins from Sf21 cells expressing both
halves of either MRP1 (Dual-halves) or Ins708
(Dual-Ins708halves) were separated by SDS-PAGE on a 5-15%
gradient gel and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes. Left,
detection of the NH2-proximal half-molecule by
MRP1-specific mAb QCRL-1. Right, detection of the
COOH-proximal half-molecule by MRP1-specific mAb MRPm6. The sizes of
protein standards are indicated in kilodaltons. B, membrane
vesicles containing both halves of either MRP1 or Ins708 were assayed
for ATP-dependent LTC4 transport activity at
23 °C for up to 2 min in transport buffer containing
[3H]LTC4 (50 nM), as described
under "Materials and Methods." Time and ATP dependence of uptake is
shown for Dual-halves (
) and Dual-Ins708halves (
).
ATP-dependent LTC4 uptake by vesicles prepared
from cells infected with full-length MRP1 (
) or a control vector
(
) is also shown. Data points are the means ± S.E. of
triplicate determinations in a typical experiment. Where not visible,
error bars are within the limits of the symbol.
-[32P]ATP on
ice for 5 min. Membranes containing both halves of the wild-type
protein were also included for comparison. Despite similar levels of
the two NH2-proximal half-molecules in the membrane vesicles used (Fig. 9A), labeling of the Ins708
half-molecule could not be detected even in the presence of
LTC4 (Fig. 10A). In addition, labeling of the COOH-proximal half of the protein with
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP when expressed with the Ins708
half-molecule was lost (Fig. 10A). As indicated above, the
faintly labeled band seen in the figure (indicated by a
star) is an endogenous protein detectable in membranes from
control Sf21 cells not expressing MRP1 polypeptides. We also
examined vanadate-induced trapping of 8-azido-ADP by NBD2 when
co-expressed with the Ins708 half-molecule, with and without the
addition of 1 µM LTC4 (Fig. 10B).
As described above, when the dual expression vector was used to express
both halves of the wild-type protein, NBD2 was preferentially labeled
in the presence of orthovanadate, and labeling could be stimulated by LTC4 (Fig. 10B). Under identical conditions,
labeling of NBD2 could not be detected when co-expressed with the
Ins708 half-molecule (Fig. 10B). Thus, the effect of the
Ins708 mutation was similar to that of the K684M mutation both with
respect to LTC4 transport activity and labeling by
8-azido-ATP and -ADP.

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 10.
Comparison of nucleotide binding and
vanadate-induced nucleotide trapping by wild-type NBD1 and Ins708 NBD1
expressed either as half-molecules or as soluble polypeptides.
A, membrane proteins (20 µg) from Sf21 cells
expressing both halves of either MRP1 (Dual-halves) or
Ins708 (Dual-Ins708halves) were incubated with 5 µM 8-azido-
-[32P]ATP in the presence or
absence of 1 µM LTC4 following the binding
procedure as described under "Materials and Methods." B,
the same membranes described in A were incubated with 5 µM 8-azido-
-[32P]ATP following trapping
procedure. C, crude cytosolic fractions (5 µl) from
Sf21 cells infected with baculoviruses encoding either the
wild-type NBD1 (MRP1NBD1) or the Ins708 NBD1
(Ins708NBD1) were loaded on a 5-15% gradient gel and
immunoblotted with MRP1-specific mAb QCRL-1. D, crude
cytosolic fractions (15 µl) from Sf21 cells expressing either
soluble MRP1NBD1 or soluble Ins708NBD1 were incubated with 5 µM 8-azido-
-[32P]ATP following the
binding procedure as described under "Materials and Methods."
-[32P]ATP (5 µM) at 0 °C for
5 min resulted in intense labeling of the wild-type NBD1 but no
detectable labeling of Ins708 NBD1 (Fig. 10D).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-[32P]ATP in vanadate trapping experiments
(29, 44, 55, 56). However, in the intact protein, inactivation of
either NBD completely blocks ATP hydrolysis despite the fact that each
NBD exhibits basal ATPase activity when expressed in NH2-
or COOH-proximal half-molecules (29, 30, 57). These and other studies
indicate that the two NBDs of P-gp act as alternating catalytic sites, in which drug transport is thought to be coupled to relaxation of a
high energy catalytic site conformation generated by the hydrolysis of
ATP (58). More recent studies of the pattern of fragments generated by
photoactivated cleavage of a Pgp·Mg2+ADP·Vi
complex support the alternating hydrolysis model (45). However, they
also suggest that in the absence of any previously bound nucleotides,
NBD1 is more accessible to ATP than NBD2, possibly because of
interactions either between the NBDs themselves or with other regions
of the protein.
-[32P]ADP by MRP1 can be stimulated by
substrate (49, 50). Our results indicate that in the presence or
absence of substrate the majority of the trapped, photo-cross-linked
nucleotide is bound to NBD2, with relatively little trapping at NBD1
being detectable. The low level trapping of 8-azido-ADP at NBD1 does
not appear to be attributable to inefficient binding or hydrolysis of
the 8-azido-ATP analogue, because LTC4 transport activity
with the analogue was comparable with that obtained with ATP itself,
and the Km values for both nucleotides were similar.
Furthermore, NBD1 is readily photoaffinity-labeled with
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP. In addition, when vesicles
containing only the COOH-proximal half of MRP1 were used, no trapping
of nucleotide could be detected in the presence of vanadate alone or
vanadate plus LTC4. Thus, the ability to detect both basal
and substrate-stimulated trapping of 8-azido-ADP by photoaffinity
labeling at NBD2 of MRP1 appears to be dependent on the presence of NBD1.
- or
8-azido-
-[32P]ATP was used, confirming the ability of
NBD1 to bind the triphosphate form of the nucleotide relatively
strongly. Furthermore, binding to NBD1 but not NBD2 could be detected
when these domains were expressed in individual half-MRP1 molecules or
as soluble polypeptides. However, it was also clear from these
experiments that binding of nucleotide by NBD1 was strongly enhanced by
the presence of NBD2. When the two NBDs were co-expressed as soluble
polypeptides, no increase in binding by NBD1 could be detected,
suggesting that the associated MSDs are required to stabilize, or
transduce the effects of, interactions between the NBDs. Overall, the
experiments with the dual expression vector support the existence of
cooperativity between the NBDs with respect to both nucleotide binding
and hydrolysis. They also indicate that this cooperativity is dependent
on the presence of the MSDs.
-[32P]ADP increased moderately at
NBD2, but the presence of substrate had little effect on trapping by
NBD1. In contrast, LTC4 increased the binding of
8-azido-ATP to NBD1 severalfold with little effect on binding of
nucleotide by NBD2. These data differ from those obtained previously
with P-gp, which suggest that substrate stimulates the hydrolysis of
ATP by the protein but does not enhance nucleotide binding (59-61).
One possible explanation for the observed differences between MRP1 and
P-gp may be the relative lipophilicity of their substrates. There is
considerable evidence that P-gp binds its hydrophobic substrates in the
lipid environment of the membrane (reviewed in Ref. 62). MRP1, on the
other hand, is likely to bind at least some of its comparatively
hydrophilic substrates from the cytoplasm, suggesting that cytoplasmic
regions of MRP1, possibly the NBDs themselves, may be important for
initial binding of some transported substrates. Consistent with this
possibility, we have shown previously that QCRL-3, an MRP1-specific mAb
that recognizes a conformational epitope in NBD1, inhibits
LTC4 transport and decreases LTC4 binding to
intact MRP1 (12, 40, 51). LTC4-dependent
stimulation of ATP binding by NBD1 did not occur when this domain was
expressed alone as part of the NH2-proximal half of MRP1,
indicating that interaction between both half-molecules is required.
Whether this is because of an obligatory interaction between the two
NBDs or because LTC4 binding requires elements in the
COOH-proximal half of the protein is presently not known.
S, and no transport activity could
be detected (data not shown).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank our colleagues Drs. D. R. Hipfner, Q. Mao, and W. Qiu for helpful discussion and advice. The excellent technical assistance from Monika Vasa and Libby Eastman is appreciated.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute of Canada with funds from the Terry Fox Run and the Medical Research Council of Canada (Grant MT-10519).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ Supported in part by a Queen's University graduate award.
A Senior Scientist of Cancer Care Ontario.
** Stauffer Research Professor of Queen's University. To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed: Cancer Research Laboratories, Rm. A315, Botterell Hall, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada. Tel.: 613-533-2981; Fax: 613-533-6830.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
MRP1, Multidrug Resistance Protein 1;
ABC, ATP-binding cassette;
P-gp, P-glycoprotein;
LTC4, leukotriene C4;
NBD, nucleotide binding domain;
MSD, membrane spanning domain;
CFTR, cystic
fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
mAb, monoclonal
antibody;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid;
ATP