![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 18, 13259-13265, May 5, 2000
§,
,
, and
From the
ESA CNRS 6161, Laboratoire de Physiologie et
Biochimie Végétales, University of Poitiers, UFR
Sciences, 40 Avenue du Recteur Pineau, 86022 Poitiers Cédex,
France and the ¶ Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39-A,
Chandigarh 160 036, India
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A high affinity glutathione transporter has been
identified, cloned, and characterized from the yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This transporter, Hgt1p,
represents the first high affinity glutathione transporter to be
described from any system so far. The strategy for the identification
involved investigating candidate glutathione transporters from the
yeast genome sequence project followed by genetic and physiological
investigations. This approach revealed HGT1 (open reading
frame YJL212c) as encoding a high affinity glutathione
transporter. Yeast strains deleted in HGT1 did not show any
detectable plasma membrane glutathione transport, and hgt1 Glutathione is the most abundant non-protein thiol compound
present in almost all prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. It plays numerous roles including control of redox potential, protection against
oxidative stress, detoxification of endogenous and exogenously derived
toxins, protein folding, storage, and transport of organic sulfur (1,
2). In humans, several diseases have been strongly correlated with
altered intracellular glutathione levels (3, 4). The biosynthesis of
glutathione is mediated by two cytoplasmic enzymes, GSH1
( In the present report we describe, for the first time, the
identification, cloning, and characterization of a high affinity plasma
membrane transporter mediating glutathione uptake in the yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This identification reveals a novel family of transport proteins that have homologues in other yeasts
and plants, but no homologues as yet discovered in either prokaryotes
or other higher eukaryotes.
Chemicals and Reagents--
All chemicals used were of
analytical reagent grade. Media components were either purchased from
Hi Media (India), from Sigma or from Difco. Bacteriological agar used
in France was from Biokar Diagnostics, Beauvais (France). Vent DNA
polymerase was from New England Biolabs while Taq Polymerase
was from Promega. Oligonucleotides were purchased from Ransom Hill
Biosciences and Gemini Biotech. Radioactivity was from NEN Life Science Products.
Yeast Strains and Growth--
The list of yeast strains used in
this study is shown in Table I. Yeasts were routinely maintained on YPD
medium. The minimal medium contained YNB, glucose, and ammonium sulfate
supplemented with the required amino acids and bases. Glutathione was
added wherever necessary at concentrations of 250 µM.
Sulfur-limited medium was made by substituting ammonium sulfate with
ammonium chloride. Sporulation plates were prepared as described by
Kaiser et al. (19).
Yeast DNA Isolation and Yeast Transformation--
Yeast
chromosomal DNA was isolated by the glass bead lysis method and yeast
transformations were carried out using the lithium acetate method
(19).
Cloning of HGT1--
HGT1 was cloned by
PCR.1 The following primers
were used for amplifying HGT1 from chromosomal DNA of a wild
type strain (YPH499); YJL-Bam,
5'-CCGCGAATTCATGATTACCACCATTTATCATAACC-3' and YJL-Eco, 5'-CACAGGATCCATGAGTACCATTTATAGGGAGAGC-3'. The 2.4-kilobase PCR product
obtained was digested with EcoRI and BamHI and
cloned into a single copy, URA3-based yeast expression
vector downstream of the TEF promoter (20).
Tetrad Analysis--
To check the viability of
gsh1
Diploids heterozygous for ptr2 Construction of Strains--
The genotypes of the strains used
in all the experiments are listed in Table
I and their construction is described
below.
YPH 499 was used as wild type strain in all these experiments.
Disruption of the different genes was carried out by one-step PCR-mediated gene disruption (21). Strains triply disrupted in the
different peptide and putative peptide transporters were constructed by
using the KanMX2 marker for PTR2 disruption, the URA3 marker for YPR194c disruption, and the
LEU2 marker for HGT1 disruption. These
disruptions were to be eventually constructed in YPH 499. However, as
this strain is not completely disrupted in either the URA3
allele or the LEU2 allele, PCR-mediated gene disruption
using the URA3/LEU2 alleles would not occur
efficiently. Therefore, YPR194c and HGT1 were
first disrupted through PCR-mediated gene disruption in the strain BY
4741 which carries null alleles of both URA3 and
LEU2 (22). The hgt1
The primers used for the disruption of YPR194c were:
194-URA-F,
5'-AGTCAAAGATAAAGTTATAATTGATGAGAAGGTATCCACAGCTTTTCAATTCAAT-3' and 194-URA-R,
5'-GGGCTCATATTAAGCATTCCACCTACAAATAACATTGGGTAATAACTGATATAATTA-3'.
The primers used to confirm YPR194c disruption were:
194-FOR, 5'-ATTAGAAATTATGAGTGAAAC-3' and 194-REV,
5'-GTTCTAGTCATGGATAGTGTC-3'.
The primers used to disrupt HGT1 were: 212-LEU-F,
5'-CCATTTATAGGGAGAGCGACTCGTTGGAGTCGGAGCCCTCGACTACGTC GTAAGGCCG-3,
and 212-LEU-R, 5'-CAAGCCTTGTCTCATGACAATAAATCCGTATAGCTTGAATGGAATCCCAACAATTACA-3'.
The primers used for the confirmation of HGT1 disruptions
were: 212-FOR, 5'-GATTACCACCATTTATCATAACC-3' and 212-REV,
5'-CGTCACAGAACACATGAGTACC-3'.
For the disruption of PTR2, the KanMX2 selection
marker was used and the transformants were selected on G418 containing
plates (23). The primers used for PTR2 disruption were:
PTR-DEL1,
5'-ATCCCAGCCAAGGCTCAGATGCTCAGGACGAAAAGCAGCTGAAGCTTCGTACGC-3' and
PTR-DEL2,
5'-CTGGTCGGCAATCAACACGGAAAGGTTAGCTTTAATCATAGGCCACTAGTGGATCTG-3'.
The primers used to confirm PTR2 disruption were:
PTR2-FOR, 5'-ATAAACGGATCCAATGCTCAACCATCCCAGCC-3' and PTR2-REV,
5'-ATGCACAAAAGCTTGCAGAACCAAAGGCGTCGTTAGTC-3'. Each of the disruptions
was made in an YPH 499 background. The double and triple disruptions
were carried out sequentially. Disruptions in GSH1 were constructed
using a GSH1::LEU2 plasmid (24).
Transport Experiments--
Cells were grown on minimal liquid
medium YNB complemented with ammonium sulfate and 2% glucose. When
several strains differing in auxotrophy were compared, the substances
required by the most deleted yeast were added to the growth medium of
all strains. Cells were incubated at 28 °C for growth for 12 h,
rotary shaken at 200 rpm. The cells were harvested at
A600 0.6, washed with a large volume of sterile
water (4 °C), and 20 mM MES/KOH, 5 mM CaCl2, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 2% glucose
(pH 5.5) (unless otherwise stated). They were finally resuspended in
the buffered medium (culture medium volume/25), aliquoted in 100-µl
samples, and kept on ice.
After a 10-min incubation of the cells at 28 °C,
[3H]GSH (1657.6 GBq mmol Synthesis of GS-NEM--
The N-ethylmaleimide
S-conjugate of glutathione was synthesized by mixing NEM
dissolved in 20 mM Tris-HCl with the same amount of GSH
dissolved in the same buffer. After 1 h a room temperature, dithiothreitol was added to neutralize NEM in excess (25). The purity
of the conjugate was checked by mass spectrometry.
Measurement of Protein--
Protein content was measured by the
method of Lowry et al. (26) using bovine serum albumin as a control.
The Yeast Plasma Membrane Peptide Transporter, Ptr2p, Is Unable to
Transport Glutathione--
S. cerevisiae has been reported
to have a single peptide transporter, Ptr2p, that can transport
dipeptides and tripeptides (27). Due to the wide substrate specificity
reported for this transporter, the possibility that Ptr2p might be the
transporter for the tripeptide glutathione was initially examined.
Yeast strains defective in glutathione biosynthesis
(gsh1 HGT1 Encodes a Yeast Plasma Membrane Glutathione
Transporter--
Studies with the yeast Candida albicans
earlier have revealed a new peptide transporter family that was able to
transport tetra- and pentapeptides (30). The gene OPT1 has
homologues in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Isp4+)
and S. cerevisiae (open reading frame YJL212c and YPR194c). Disruption of YPR194c in S. cerevisiae did not cause any
difference in sensitivity to toxic oligopeptides. Overexpression
revealed a very mild phenotype. However, no phenotype was found after
either disruption or overexpression of YJL212c (31). A possible role of
these proteins in glutathione transport was tested. Strains disrupted
in both YJL212c and YPR194c genes were
constructed. When the double disrupted strains were examined for
transport activity, virtually no GSH transport could be observed (Fig.
1). Examination of the transport capacity of single disruptants showed a total lack of transport in the yjl212 Functional Characterization of Hgt1p--
Transport activity of
HGT1 was further characterized with the wild type as well as
with the hgt1 Hgt1p Is the Primary Glutathione Transporter in the Plasma Membrane
of S. cerevisiae--
Although virtually no GSH transport was observed
in strains disrupted solely in HGT1, the gene has been
predicted to belong to an oligopeptide permease transporter family
(31). The presence of other glutathione transporters that would be
induced under some conditions, therefore, could not be ruled out. This
possibility was also suggested by an earlier report characterizing
glutathione transport in S. cerevisiae, which concerned
strains defective in sulfur metabolism (10). This report indicated the
existence of two saturable glutathione uptake systems with
Km values of 0.45 µM and 2 mM, respectively. The low affinity system was due to the
activity of a constitutive transporter, and the high affinity system
corresponded to a sulfur repressible transporter. The high affinity
transport activity was inducible and maximally induced by the absence
of sulfur in the medium. The transport activity of the wild type and of
hgt1
The possible existence of other glutathione transporters was also
examined by a genetic approach. A diploid heterozygous for hgt1 Homologues of Hgt1p in Other Organisms--
Data base searches for
Hgt1p homologues in other organisms using different BLAST/BLAST-PSI
programs (34, 35) yielded several homologues in yeasts and plants. The
proteins displayed between 38 and 51% identity and between 57 and 68%
similarity over the entire stretch to Hgt1p. The genome of the yeast
C. albicans contains a single homologue identified so far,
Opt1p, while three homologues were found in S. pombe (Isp4p
and accession numbers AL023590.1 and Z99164.1) (Fig.
8). The Isp4p and Opt1p proteins have
been putatively identified as oligopeptide permeases in these yeasts (31), but in the light of our findings and the close homology to
Hgt1p, it is possible that their primary function may be as glutathione transporters. The genome of S. cerevisiae also
contains an homologue to Hgt1p (Ypr194cp). Although the function of
Ypr194cp is unclear, studies with strains carrying a deletion in
YPR194c did not contribute in any way to plasma membrane
glutathione transport (Fig. 1). One possibility is that it might be
localized to a different organelle. Several homologues were also found
in plants (Arabidopsis thaliana) and ESTs in cotton and in
Neurospora crassa. Surprisingly, no homologue was found in
either E. coli or any other prokaryote or in any other
multicellular eukaryotes other than plants. A BLAST search using
different domains of this protein also failed to pick up any homologue
in systems apart from plants and yeasts.
The present paper describes the cloning and characterization of
Hgt1p, a high affinity plasma membrane glutathione transporter from the
yeast S. cerevisiae. Hgt1p is the first high affinity glutathione transporter described from any system so far. The strategy
employed involved the identification of candidate glutathione transporters from the yeast genome sequence, followed by a combination of genetic and physiological (growth properties, uptake studies) approaches. Evidence that HGT1 encodes a glutathione
transporter was obtained by loss of GSH transport activity upon gene
disruption, and by restoration of transport activity by complementation
of a hgt1 The 40% inhibition by CCCP was similar to the CCCP inhibition levels
seen in proton-coupled glutathione transport observed in plant
protoplasts (11). Inhibition by CCCP is never complete in
proton-coupled systems, because there is a residual passive electrical
component of the proton-motive force, even if the pH gradient would be
completely collapsed.
Hgt1p represents a novel class of transporter proteins. Sequence
analysis revealed virtually no homology of the Hgt1p with the
glutathione-conjugate pumps, YCF1 or MRP, that are able to mediate
transport of glutathione with low affinity (17, 18). Hgt1p also
appeared to be distinct from the yeast peptide transporters, Ptr2p, as
well as other amino acid, dicarboxylic acid, and tricarboxylic transporters.
Our attempts to identify other secondary plasma membrane glutathione
transporters in S. cerevisiae were unsuccessful. The hgt1 The S. cerevisiae genome contains a close homologue of
Hgt1p, Ypr194cp, but disruption of this gene did not affect glutathione uptake to any discernable extent. In addition, the lethality of the
hgt1 The S. pombe Isp4p gene is a close homologue of Hgt1p (38%
identity and 57% similarity over the entire stretch). This gene was
initially identified as a gene induced during sporulation (37) and its
product displays oligopeptide transport activity for tetra- and
pentapeptides (31). S. pombe diploids homozygous for defects
in glutathione biosynthesis fail to sporulate, indicating an increased
glutathione requirement during the sporulation process (28). A similar
observation has been made earlier with S. cerevisiae diploids homozygous for gsh1 It is surprising that HGT1 did not display any homologues in
eukaryotes other than yeasts and plants. This includes
Caenorhabditis elegans for which the complete genome
sequence is now available. However, extensive studies have been carried
out on glutathione transport in mammalian liver cells, where
glutathione plays a particularly important role. In these cells, the
transporters have a much lower affinity for glutathione
(Km = 0.3 mM; Ref. 8) than that measured
for Hgt1p. However, other studies with human small intestinal
epithelial cells (12) have indicated the presence of high affinity
glutathione transporters (Km = 90 µM),
an affinity comparable to that of Hgt1p. Therefore, high affinity
glutathione transporters for glutathione also probably exist in
mammalian systems, but they have yet to be identified. It is also
possible that there may be a second class of glutathione transporters
in these systems. If indeed glutathione uptake is mediated by different
proteins in plants and animals, then the plant protein, easily
accessible from the free space, and absent in animals would be a good
target for herbicides not toxic to animals. The description of
HGT1 and the existence of several yeast and plant homologues
should greatly facilitate the cloning, analysis, and our understanding
of these transporters.
disruptants were non-viable in a glutathione
biosynthetic mutant (gsh1
) background. The glutathione
repressible transport activity observed in wild type cells was also
absent in the hgt1
strains. The transporter was cloned
and kinetic studies indicated that Hgt1p had a high affinity for
glutathione (Km = 54 µM)) and was not
sensitive to competition by amino acids, dipeptides, or other
tripeptides. Significant inhibition was observed, however, with
oxidized glutathione and glutathione conjugates. The transporter reveals a novel class of transporters that has homologues in other yeasts and plants but with no apparent homologues in either
Escherichia coli or in higher eukaryotes other than plants.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-glutamylcysteine synthase) and GSH2 (glutathione synthetase). Glutathione may be either utilized in the cytosol or
transported by specific transporters to the endoplasmic reticulum (5,
6), the mitochondria (7), and the extracellular milieu (8). In addition
to endogenous biosynthesis, glutathione may also be taken up from the
extracellular environment. Biochemical evidence for specific
transporters mediating glutathione uptake has been obtained in bacteria
(9), yeasts (10), plants (11), and mammalian cells (12). Despite these
various reports describing glutathione transport into the cell and into
the different organelles, and the importance of this process in
maintaining glutathione homeostasis, no gene encoding a glutathione
transporter has been cloned so far from any organism. The initial
report of the cloning of the rat sinusoidal (13) and canalicular
glutathione hepatic transporters (14) now appears to be artifactual as
the nucleotide sequences of these genes are almost identical to
Escherichia coli open reading frames, and the results could
not be reproduced in other laboratories (15, 16). The mammalian
multidrug resistance associated protein (MRP1) and its yeast
homologue, YCF1, which belong to the ABC transporter family
are able to transport glutathione out of the cytoplasm. However, they
do so with very low affinity, having a Km for
glutathione in the range of about 15 mM (17, 18), and their
primary function is really in the efflux of glutathione conjugates.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and hgt1
double deletes, a diploid
heterozygous for both markers was constructed by crossing ABC869
(gsh1
::LEU2) with ABC822
(hgt1
::LEU2). The diploid was sporulated on
minimal sporulation plates (19) and tetrads were dissected. The spores
were dropped on either YPD or YPD supplemented with excess glutathione
(1 mM). After initial patching on YPD plates, spores were
replica plated on SD minus uracile, minus GSH, minus leucine, and minus
tryptophane plates.
and gsh1
,
and diploids heterozygous for ypr194
and
gsh1
were constructed in a similar way. The diploids were
sporulated and dissected as described above. The disruption at the
GSH1 locus was followed by glutathione auxotrophy, while
disruption at either the YPR194c locus or the
PTR2 locus was followed either by uracile prototrophy or
resistance to G418, respectively.
List of strains used in this study
::LEU2 and the
ypr194c
::URA3 disruptions in BY 4741 were then
PCR amplified to yield larger flanking regions and introduced into YPH
499. The disruptions were confirmed by PCR.
1) was added to the
buffered medium to a final concentration of 0.5 mM (final
specific activity 12.33 Mbq mmol
1). At selected times,
uptake was stopped by diluting the medium with a 20-fold volume of
water (4 °C) and filtering the cells through a glass fiber filter
(Sartorius AG, 37070 Goettingen, Germany). The cells trapped on the
filter were washed twice with the same volume of cold water. The filter
was dried and placed in a scintillation vial containing 4 ml of Ecolite
(ICN, Orsay, France). The radioactivity was counted after correction
for background and quenching (Packard Instruments, Les Ulis, France).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
) depend on exogenous glutathione for growth (28,
29). Should Ptr2p be the transporter mediating glutathione uptake, then
ptr2
gsh1
spores would not be viable. Tetrad
dissections of diploids heterozygous for ptr2
and
gsh1
were carried out. However, among the several tetrads that were dissected, all 4 spores were viable and several ptr2
gsh1
spores were isolated that did not appear to have any
visible growth defect. This suggested that even if Ptr2p mediated
glutathione transport, it was not the sole transporter. Potential
glutathione transport activity of Ptr2p was determined by comparing
glutathione uptake in a wild type and ptr2
strains. The
data clearly indicate that Ptr2p does not mediate GSH transport (data
not shown).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
GSH uptake in wild type YPH499 and various
yeast strains disrupted in different putative transporters. The
strains used were YPH499 (
), ptr2
ypr194
hgt1
(
), ypr194
hgt1
(
), ypr194
(
),
and hgt1
(+). The cells were incubated in 0.5 mM [3H]glutathione. Data are the mean ± S.E. of 8 samples from two independent experiments.
strain, whereas
the ypr194
strain took up GSH at the same rate as the
wild type (Fig. 1). The transport activity of the triple disruptant of
yjl212
ypr194
ptr2
was comparable to the transport
activity of yjl212
single disruptants (Fig. 1).
Altogether, the data strongly suggest that the protein encoded by
YJL212c (from now on referred to as HGT1, high affinity glutathione
transporter 1) is probably the glutathione transporter in the plasma
membrane of these cells. To further confirm the function of HGT1, the
transport activity of hgt1
disruptants complemented by
the HGT1 gene was studied. The HGT1 gene was
cloned and expressed in a single copy expression vector downstream of
the TEF promoter. Transformation of the hgt1
disruptants with this construct restored GSH transport (data not shown), which definitively established that Hgt1p is a glutathione transporter. The
deduced amino acid sequence indicates that HGT1 gene encodes a 799-amino acid polypeptide with a predicted molecular mass of 91627 Da and a pI of 9.00. Analysis of the hydropathy profile (32) suggests
the presence of 12-14 putative transmembrane domains (31), which is
typical for many transporter proteins. The N and C termini are
hydrophilic, and the N terminus is particularly long, with a stretch of
about 100 amino acids (Fig. 2).

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Hydropathy plot of Hgt1p. The peptide
sequence derived from HGT1 was plotted according to Kyte and
Doolittle with a window of 9 amino acids. Hydrophobic regions are given
a positive hydropathy index.
/TEF-HGT1 strain. pH dependence studies indicated that the initial rate of GSH uptake into the wild
type and hgt1
/TEF-HGT1 strain was maximal
between pH 5.0 and 5.5 (data not shown). Further studies were run at pH
5.5. Hardly any transport activity was detected at 4 °C, indicating that uptake was an active process (Fig.
3). The transport of GSH was also
significantly inhibited by the protonophore CCCP (Fig. 3), suggesting
that transport activity depended on the transmembrane pH gradient.
Kinetic studies yielded a Km of 53.9 ± 5.5 µM (mean of four measurements) and a
Vmax of 10.0 ± 0.6 nmol of GSH·mg
protein
1 min
1 (Fig.
4). Substrate specificity was studied by
measuring uptake of labeled GSH in the presence of a 100-fold excess of
various unlabeled potential competitors. A 100-fold excess of unlabeled GSH was used as a control to compare the different potential
competitors. Amino acids like L-Pro, Gly, and
L-Glu had little effect on GSH transport (Fig. 3). In
addition, the hgt1
strain was able to transport
L-Pro at rates similar to the wild type strain (data not
shown), which suggests that amino acid transport is not the primary
function of Hgt1p. Marginal inhibition was observed with both
L- and D-Cys, as well as with glutamine.
However, various di- or tripeptides such as Gly-Gly, Gly-Gly-Gly, and
Gly-Glu as well as the dipeptides
-Glu-Cys and Cys-Gly were poor
inhibitors (Fig. 3). In contrast, oxidized glutathione (GSSG) and the
glutathione conjugate GS-NEM were almost as inhibitory as GSH itself.
Because the synthesis of the GS-NEM conjugate requires the use of small amounts of DTT to neutralize excess NEM, additional controls were run
to test the effects of DTT on the uptake of GSH in the presence and
absence of GS-NEM. These controls showed that DTT does not affect the
results, and therefore that GS-NEM does indeed inhibit GSH uptake (Fig.
3). That glutathione S-conjugates may be transported by
Hgt1p was further checked by uptake studies with labeled GS-NEM (Fig.
5). Labeled GS-NEM could indeed be taken
up by the hgt1
/TEF-HGT1 strain, but not by the
hgt1
mutant, which clearly shows that Hgt1p transports
both GSH as well as GS conjugates.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Effect of low temperature and of various
compounds on GSH uptake in hgt1
,
TEF-HGT1 yeast. The initial rates of uptake from
a 0.5 mM GSH solution were determined at 4 °C, or in the
presence of various compounds as indicated. Data were plotted as % of
control (net initial rate of GSH uptake). The control initial rate of
GSH uptake was 12.3 ± 0.3 nmol mg protein
1
min
1. CCCP was used at 10 µM, amino acids,
dipeptides, tripeptides, GSH, GSSG, and GS-NEM were all present at 5 mM. When preparing the GS-NEM conjugate solution, excess
NEM was neutralized with DTT (final concentration 1.67 mM).
Corresponding controls were carried out in the same conditions. Results
are the mean ± S.E. of 8 to 12 samples from two or three
independent experiments.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Double reciprocal plots of GSH uptake
kinetics in in hgt1
strains transformed with
TEF-HGT1. Initial rates of uptake were measured
at GSH concentrations ranging from 10 µM to 1 mM, between 1 and 3 min. Data are representative from three
experiments (4 replicates per experiment).

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Hgt1p-mediated uptake of
[3H]glutathione-N-ethylmaleimide
conjugate (GS-NEM). hgt1
, (
), hgt1
,
TEF (
), and hgt1
, TEF-HGT1 (
) strains were
incubated in 0.1 mM [3H]GS-NEM for various
times. To ensure the total elimination of GSH in the GS-NEM solution,
NEM was added in excess before conjugation and afterward neutralized
with DTT (final concentration of 5 µM). Competitive
inhibition of GS-NEM uptake was carried out with added GSH at a final
concentration of 1 mM (
). For comparison, GSH uptake was
also measured in hgt1
, TEF-HGT1 (
) yeasts
from a 0.1 mM solution. Each point is the mean ± S.E.
of four samples.
strains cultivated in the presence or absence of
sulfur, as well as in the presence or absence of glutathione was
studied. The data (Fig. 6) clearly
indicated that the absence of glutathione was a strong inducer (or
derepressor) of GSH transport activity in the wild type strain, whereas
sulfur deficiency per se had no effect. The specific
repression of the transport activity by glutathione argues strongly for
Hgt1p being primarily a glutathione transporter.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Inductibility of GSH uptake. Various
yeasts (hgt1
; hgt1
, TEF;
hgt1
, TEF- HGT1; wild type YPH499) were grown
either in minimum medium YNB supplemented with amino acids/bases (+ sulfur), or in sulfur-limited medium (minimum medium YNB supplemented
with amino acids/bases where ammonium sulfate was replaced by ammonium
chloride;
sulfur) for 12 h. Each set was separately grown in
its respective medium supplemented (+ 250 µM GSH) or not
(
GSH) for about 12 h till A600 = 0.6. GSH uptake time course was run as described earlier. The initial rate
of GSH uptake was then calculated from the time course data. Results
are the mean ± S.E. of 8 samples from two independent
experiments.
and gsh1
was constructed. The
hgt1
/HGT1 gsh1
/GSH1 diploid was sporulated and
dissected. Among 15 analyzed tetrads, one was 4-spore, 8 were 3-spore,
and 6 were 2-spore. The presence of a wild type or of a disrupted
HGT1 gene was confirmed by PCR. All the gsh1
spores were subsequently analyzed to see if any of the gsh1
spores carried the hgt1
disrupted
gene. This analysis was done by PCR since both gsh1
and
the hgt1
deletions were marked by the LEU2
marker. All the gsh1
spores were analyzed and none of the
gsh1
spores were found to carry the hgt1
disrupted gene. Furthermore, the missing spores in the 2-spore and
3-spore tetrad corresponded to the gsh1
hgt1
double
deletes. No spore appeared even after prolonged incubation of the
plates. Tetrad dissections were also carried out by dropping the spores
on media containing higher (1 mM) concentrations of
glutathione to determine if there may still be a low affinity
transporter. Again, no gsh1
hgt1
spore could be
isolated under these conditions. The non-viability of the gsh1
hgt1
spores further confirmed that the HGT1 gene encoded the primary glutathione transporter in the plasma membrane of
this yeast. Yeast strains bearing a deletion in the MET15
(MET17) gene are unable to utilize inorganic sources of
sulfur for growth but can use organic sulfur sources such as
methionine, cysteine, and glutathione (10, 33). We therefore
constructed a met15
hgt1
double deletion and examined
its growth on different sources of organic sulfur. These strains could
grow on methionine as a source of organic sulfur but were specifically
unable to utilize glutathione as a source of organic sulfur (Fig.
7). The results are in agreement with the
function of Hgt1p being described as a glutathione transporter, and are
also in agreement with Hgt1p being the primary glutathione transporter
in the plasma membrane of this yeast.

View larger version (88K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Growth of met15
and
met15
hgt1
strains on minimal medium containing
either methionine (+ Met) or glutathione (+GSH) as a source of organic
sulfur.

View larger version (74K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Multiple sequence alignment of the different
yeast and plant homologues of Hgt1p. The alignment indicates the
more conserved regions and the amino acid residues that display
complete identity among all 10 proteins of the family. The alignment
was carried out using Clustal W with default parameters (39).
A.th-1, accession number AAC35527; A.th-2,
accession number AC000132; A.th-3, accession number S45495;
A.th-4, accession number, z97341; A.th-5,
accession number Al03062; S. pom-2, accession number
Al023590.1; S.pom-3, accession number Z99164.1.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
mutant with a plasmid bearing the
HGT1 gene. Several lines of evidence suggest that
glutathione uptake is the primary function of the protein encoded by
HGT1. The HGT1 product mediates a specific uptake
of GSH, GSSG, and GS-NEM. Neither an excess of L-amino acids nor various di- and tripeptides affects this uptake to any significant extent, and the hgt1
strain takes up amino
acids such as proline at a normal rate. Derepression of GSH transport activity by glutathione deficiency is a further indication that Hgt1p
is primarily a glutathione transporter and not a nonspecific oligopeptide permease as it was thought previously (31). Although Hgt1p
clearly functions at the plasma membrane, the possibility that it might
also be localized to a different membrane has not been examined.
strain did not display any detectable glutathione
uptake activity, and transport activity in this strain could not be
induced by deficiency of glutathione or other sulfur compounds.
Furthermore, double mutants in hgt1
and
gsh1
were non-viable and could not be rescued even in the
presence of high glutathione concentrations. Ptr2p which displays a
wide substrate specificity to number of di- and tripeptides was also
completely unable to mediate uptake of external glutathione. Even if a
second glutathione transporter exists, its contribution to glutathione
uptake must, for these reasons, be considered very minimal.
gsh1
spores and the inability of hgt1
met15
spores to grow on glutathione further suggest that
Ypr194cp makes no significant contribution to plasma membrane
glutathione uptake. Overexpression of Ypr194cp, but not Hgt1p, results
in mild toxicity of certain tetra- and pentapeptides (31). Therefore,
either YPR194c indeed encodes an oligopeptide transporter
protein that is very closely related to HGT1, or, more
likely, it encodes a glutathione transporter localized into a different organelle.
(38). It is possible,
therefore, that genes such as isp4+ are induced
during sporulation to meet the increased requirement for glutathione.
The strong homology to HGT1 does indeed suggest that the
primary function of the protein encoded by isp4+
is glutathione uptake, but this remains to be demonstrated. Two other
homologues of S. pombe as well as five homologues from the A. thaliana genome have been revealed. The functional
characterization of each of these putative glutathione transporters
needs further investigations.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We thank Dr. J. M.Berjault (University of Poitiers) for help in mass spectrometry analysis.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (India), and the Center National de la Recherche Scientifique (France).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ Contributed equally to the results of this article.
Junior Research Fellow of the Council of Scientific and
Industrial Research, India.
** Present address: MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
91-172-690908; Fax: 91-172-690585 or 91-172-690632; E-mail:
abachhawat@excite.com.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CCCP, carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone; GSH, reduced glutathione; GSSG, oxidized glutathione, GS-NEM, N-ethylmaleimide S-conjugate of GSH; NEM, N-ethylmaleimide; HGT, high affinity glutathione transporter; DTT, dithiothreitol; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Meister, A., and Anderson, M. E. (1983) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 52, 711-760[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
May, M. J.,
Vernoux, T.,
Leaver, T.,
Van Montagu, M.,
and Inze, D.
(1998)
J. Exp. Bot.
49,
649-667 |
| 3. | Smith, C. V., Jones, D. P., Guenthner, T. M., Lash, L. H., and Lauterburg, B. H. (1996) Toxicol. Pharmacol. 140, 1-12[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Herzenberg, L. A.,
De Rosa, S. C.,
Dubs, J. G.,
Roederer, M.,
Anderson, M. T.,
Ela, S. W.,
Deresinski, S. C.,
and Herzenberg, L. A.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
1967-1972 |
| 5. |
Hwang, C.,
Sinskey, A. J.,
and Lodish, H. F.
(1992)
Science
257,
1496-1502 |
| 6. |
Banhegyi, G.,
Lusini, L.,
Puskas, F.,
Rossi, R.,
Fulceri, R.,
Braun, L.,
Miles, V.,
di Simplicio, P.,
Mandl, J.,
and Benedetti, A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
12213-12216 |
| 7. |
Garcia-Ruiz, C.,
Morales, A.,
Colell, A.,
Rodes, J.,
Yi, J. R.,
Kaplowitz, N.,
and Fernandez-Checca, J. C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
15946-15949 |
| 8. |
Ballatori, N.,
and Dutczak, W. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
19731-19737 |
| 9. |
Sherrill, C.,
and Fahey, R. C.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
1454-1459 |
| 10. | Miyake, T., Hazu, T., Yoshida, S., Kanayama, M., Tomochika, K., Shinoda, S., and Ono, B. (1998) Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 62, 1858-1864[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Jamai, A., Tommasini, R., Martinoia, E., and Delrot, S. (1996) Plant Physiol. 111, 1145-1152[Abstract] |
| 12. | Iantomasi, T., Favilli, F., Marriani, P., Magaldi, T., Bruni, P., and Vincenzini, M. T. (1997) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1330, 274-283[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Yi, J-R.,
Lu, S.,
Fernandez-Checca, J.,
and Kaplowitz, N.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
1495-1499 |
| 14. | Lu, S. C., Sun, W.-M., Yi, J., Ookhtens, M., Sze, G., and Kaplowitz, N. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 97, 1488-1496[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Lee, T. K., Li, L., and Ballatori, N. (1997) Yale J. Biol. Med. 70, 287-300[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Li, L., Lee, T. K., and Ballatori, N. (1997) Yale J. Biol. Med. 70, 301-310[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. |
Rappa, G.,
Lorico, A.,
Flavell, R. A.,
and Sartorelli, A. C.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
5232-5237 |
| 18. |
Rebbeor, J. F.,
Connolly, G. C.,
Dumont, M. E.,
and Ballatori, N.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
33449-33454 |
| 19. | Kaiser, C., Michaelis, S., and Mitchell, A. (1994) Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Laboratory Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 20. | Mumberg, D., Muller, R., and Funk, M. (1995) Gene (Amst.) 156, 119-122[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Baudin, A.,
Ozier-Kalogeropoulos, O.,
Denouel, A.,
Lacroute, F.,
and Cullin, C.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
3329-3330 |
| 22. | Brachmann, C. B., Davies, A., Cost, G. C., Caputo, E., Li, J., Hieter, P., and Boeke, J. (1998) Yeast 14, 115-132[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Wach, A., Brachat, A., Pohlmann, R., and Philippsen, P. (1994) Yeast 10, 1793-1808[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Liskowsky, T. (1993) Curr. Gen. 23, 408-413[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Martinoia, E., Grill, E., Tommasini, R., Kreuz, K., and Amrhein, N. (1993) Nature 364, 247-249[CrossRef] |
| 26. |
Lowry, O. H.,
Rosebrough, N. J.,
Farr, A. L.,
and Randall, R. J.
(1951)
J. Biol. Chem.
193,
265-275 |
| 27. |
Perry, J. R.,
Basrai, M. A.,
Steiner, H-Y.,
Naider, F.,
and Becker, H. M.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
104-115 |
| 28. | Chaudhuri, B., Ingavale, S., and Bachhawat, A. K. (1997) Genetics 145, 75-83[Abstract] |
| 29. |
Wu, A. L.,
and Moye-Rowley, W. S.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
5832-5839 |
| 30. | Lubkowitz, M. A., Hauser, L., Breslav, M., Naider, F., and Becker, J. M. (1997) Microbiology 143, 387-396[Abstract] |
| 31. | Lubkowitz, M. A., Barnes, D., Breslav, M., Burchfield, A., Naider, F., and Becker, J. M. (1998) Mol. Microbiol. 28, 729-741[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Kyte, J., and Doolittle, R. F. (1982) J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105-132[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Thomas, D., Barbey, R., Henry, D., and Surdin-Kerjan, Y. (1992) J. Gen. Microbiol. 138, 2021-2028[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. J. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
Altschul, S. F.,
Madden, T. L.,
Schaffer, A. A.,
Zhang, J.,
Zhang, Z.,
Miller, W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3389-3402 |
| 36. | Deleted in proof |
| 37. | Sato, S., Suzuki, H., Widyastuti, U., Hotta, Y., and Tabata, S. (1994) Curr. Genet. 26, 31-37[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. | Ohtake, Y., Satou, A., and Yabuuchi, S. (1990) Agric. Biol. Chem. 54, 3145-3150 |
| 39. |
Thompson, J. D.,
Higgins, D. G.,
and Gibson, T. J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4673-4680 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. G. Stacey, A. Patel, W. E. McClain, M. Mathieu, M. Remley, E. E. Rogers, W. Gassmann, D. G. Blevins, and G. Stacey The Arabidopsis AtOPT3 Protein Functions in Metal Homeostasis and Movement of Iron to Developing Seeds Plant Physiology, February 1, 2008; 146(2): 589 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kaur and A. K. Bachhawat Yct1p, a Novel, High-Affinity, Cysteine-Specific Transporter From the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, June 1, 2007; 176(2): 877 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ganguli, C. Kumar, and A. K. Bachhawat The Alternative Pathway of Glutathione Degradation Is Mediated by a Novel Protein Complex Involving Three New Genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1137 - 1151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Wiles, H. Cai, F. Naider, and J. M. Becker Nutrient regulation of oligopeptide transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology, October 1, 2006; 152(Pt 10): 3133 - 3145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. WATERWORTH and C. M. BRAY Enigma Variations for Peptides and Their Transporters in Higher Plants Ann. Bot., July 1, 2006; 98(1): 1 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Daniel, B. Spanier, G. Kottra, and D. Weitz From Bacteria to Man: Archaic Proton-Dependent Peptide Transporters at Work Physiology, April 1, 2006; 21(2): 93 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Suzuki, T. Koyanagi, S. Izuka, A. Onishi, and H. Kumagai The yliA, -B, -C, and -D Genes of Escherichia coli K-12 Encode a Novel Glutathione Importer with an ATP-Binding Cassette J. Bacteriol., September 1, 2005; 187(17): 5861 - 5867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Murillo, G. Newport, C.-Y. Lan, S. Habelitz, J. Dungan, and N. M. Agabian Genome-Wide Transcription Profiling of the Early Phase of Biofilm Formation by Candida albicans Eukaryot. Cell, September 1, 2005; 4(9): 1562 - 1573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schaaf, A. Schikora, J. Haberle, G. Vert, U. Ludewig, J.-F. Briat, C. Curie, and N. von Wiren A Putative Function for the Arabidopsis Fe-Phytosiderophore Transporter Homolog AtYSL2 in Fe and Zn Homeostasis Plant Cell Physiol., May 1, 2005; 46(5): 762 - 774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||