Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexiev, U.
Right arrow Articles by Heyn, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alexiev, U.
Right arrow Articles by Heyn, M. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 18, 13431-13440, May 5, 2000


Evidence for Long Range Allosteric Interactions between the Extracellular and Cytoplasmic Parts of Bacteriorhodopsin from the Mutant R82A and Its Second Site Revertant R82A/G231C*

Ulrike AlexievDagger §, Ramin Mollaaghababa||, H. Gobind Khorana, and Maarten P. HeynDagger

From the Dagger  Biophysics Group, Department of Physics, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 14, D-14195 Berlin, Germany and the  Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Evidence is presented for long range interactions between the extracellular and cytoplasmic parts of the heptahelical membrane protein bacteriorhodopsin in the mutant R82A and its second site revertant R82A/G231C. (i) In the double mutants R82A/G72C and R82A/A160C, with the cysteine mutation on the extracellular or cytoplasmic surface, respectively, the photocycle is the same as in the single mutant R82A with an accelerated deprotonation of the Schiff base and a reversed order of proton release and uptake. Proton release and uptake kinetics were measured directly at either surface by using the unique cysteine residue as attachment site for the pH indicator fluorescein. Whereas in wild type proton uptake on the cytoplasmic surface occurs during the M-decay (tau  ~ 8 ms), in R82A it occurs already during the first phase of the M-rise (tau  < 1 µs). (ii) The introduction of a second mutation at the cytoplasmic surface in position 231 (helix G) restores wild type ground state absorption properties, kinetics of photocycle and of proton release, and uptake in the mutant R82A/G231C. In addition, kinetic H/D isotope effects provide evidence that the proton release mechanism in R82A/G231C and in wild type is similar. These results suggest the existence of long range interactions between the cytoplasmic and extracellular surface domains of bacteriorhodopsin mediated by salt bridges and hydrogen-bonded networks between helices C (Arg-82) and G (Asp-212 and Gly-231). Such long range interactions are expected to be of functional significance for activation and signal transduction in heptahelical G-protein-coupled receptors.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Allosteric interactions are well known and of great importance for water soluble enzymes, where ligand or substrate binding to a specific site alters the conformation and changes the affinity at a different site of the protein (for reviews see Refs. 1 and 2). For membrane-bound G-protein-coupled receptors analogous effects are expected to be of considerable functional significance. For this class of proteins ligand binding occurs mostly on the extracellular surface resulting in the active form of the receptor with binding and activation of the G-protein at the opposite cytoplasmic surface of the protein. The membrane protein bacteriorhodopsin (bR)1 shares the heptahelical bundle motif with G-protein-coupled receptors. In this report, we present evidence for long range interactions between the extracellular and cytoplasmic parts of bR based on evidence from the mutant R82A and its second site revertant R82A/G231C.

Bacteriorhodopsin acts as a light-driven proton pump in the plasma membrane of the archaebacterium Halobacterium salinarium. A retinylidene chromophore is bound via a protonated Schiff base linkage to Lys-216. Upon flash excitation bR undergoes a cyclic photoreaction with distinct spectroscopic intermediates and proton translocation from one side of the membrane to the other (for reviews see Refs. 3-5). In the first half of this photocycle, the Schiff base becomes deprotonated during the transition to the M-intermediate, and in the same time range a proton is released at the extracellular surface (6). During the second half of the photocycle, the Schiff base is reprotonated from Asp-96 (7), which is located in the cytoplasmic part of the protein, and a proton is taken up from the cytoplasm. In the proton release pathway, Asp-85 has been identified as the primary acceptor of the proton from the Schiff base by site-directed mutagenesis and Fourier transform infrared difference spectroscopy (8). Arg-82 is located one helix turn away from Asp-85, facing toward the proton channel (9, 10). Steady-state and time-resolved UV/Vis absorption (11-13) and Fourier transform infrared (14) spectroscopy results indicate that Asp-85, Glu-204, Glu-194, and Arg-82 interact via a direct or indirect coupling of their pK values. Proton release to the extracellular medium may be facilitated by a hydrogen-bonded network between these residues (10, 13, 15, 16). In the three-dimensional structure of the unphotolyzed bR, a defined density for the arginine 82 side chain, has recently been resolved by x-ray crystallography at a resolution of 2.5 (17) and 2.3 Å (10). The proposed movement of this side chain toward the extracellular surface upon formation of the M-intermediate, based on computer calculations (18), is not yet established. However, recent time-resolved electrical measurements support this proposal (19).

To further understand the mechanism of proton transport, we have studied the mutant R82A. In R82A an accelerated deprotonation of the Schiff base and a reversed order of proton release and uptake, detected with pH indicator dyes in the aqueous solution, were already observed (20, 21). Moreover, in R82A the pKa of Asp-85, which controls the purple to blue transition, is increased by about 5 pH units compared with wild type (wt) (22). These dramatic changes are because of the replacement of the positively charged arginine by the neutral alanine.

We have used time-resolved absorbance spectroscopy in combination with pH-sensitive dyes (pyranine in the aqueous bulk phase and fluorescein derivatives attached at specific sites on the protein surface) to detect the kinetics of the photocycle and of proton release and uptake. To detect proton concentration changes separately on each surface of the protein, the attachment site (single cysteine residue) for the pH indicator dye at the surface of the mutant protein R82A was varied. We have used the single cysteine residue in position 72 at the extracellular surface and in the positions 160 and 231 at the cytoplasmic surface as attachment sites. Fig. 1 shows a tertiary structural model of bR based on x-ray crystallographic data (23). The positions of the residues Gly-72, Arg-82, Ala-160, and Gly-231 are indicated. Unexpectedly, the cysteine mutation in position 231 at the end of helix G on the cytoplasmic surface leads to an almost complete restoration of the photocycle, pKa of Asp-85, and proton pumping in the double mutant R82A/G231C. The cysteine double mutant R82A/A160C, also with a cysteine mutation on the cytoplasmic surface (EF loop), has on the other hand still all the altered properties of the single mutant R82A. The reversion effect observed only at position Gly-231 suggests an interaction between helices C (Arg-82) and G (Gly-231). The second site revertant produced by the replacement of glycine by cysteine at the cytoplasmic surface of the protein far away from the location of the first mutation (R82A) can shed light on the molecular mechanisms that promote long range interactions in 7-helix transmembrane proteins. Such allosteric interactions are expected to be important for ligand binding and signal transduction in G-protein-coupled receptors (24).


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Tertiary structure of bacteriorhodopsin. The structure was obtained from x-ray crystallographic data (23), (1brr in WebLabViewer). The residues Gly-72, Ala-160, Gly-231, and Arg-82 are marked.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1,2-Dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (DMPC) and Tris-(hydroxy-methyl)-aminomethane (Tris) were obtained from Sigma. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and 1,4-dithio-DL-threitol were from Fluka. 8-Hydroxy-1,3,6-pyrene-trisulfonic acid trisodium salt (pyranine) was from Serva. Sephadex G-25 (fine) was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, 5-(iodoacetamido)fluorescein and 5-(bromomethyl)fluorescein (BMF) were from Molecular Probes.

The preparation and expression of the bR mutants A160C and G231C in H. salinarium, in which cysteine replaces Ala-160 and Gly-231, respectively, and the preparation of R82A, in which alanine is substituted for arginine in position 82, has been reported (25, 26). The bR double mutants R82A/A160C and R82A/G231C were prepared by following the described procedures (26) except that the synthetic restriction fragments BspHI-Psp14061 and SphI-NotI were used, respectively, to construct the mutant genes.

Solubilization of bR membrane fragments and regeneration of bR in DMPC/CHAPS micelles were performed as described (27). The regeneration procedure was modified according to Ref. 28. After regeneration the retinal band is shifted back completely to 550 nm, resulting in 96-100% regeneration, using an estimated extinction coefficent of epsilon 550 approx  56,000 M-1 cm-1. Labeling with 5-(iodoacetamido)- and 5-(bromomethyl)-fluorescein and the determination of the labeling stoichiometry were performed as described (25, 28).

Flash spectroscopy and data analysis with a sum of exponentials were performed as described elsewhere (7). The excitation was with 10-ns pulses of 3-6 mJ of energy at 590 or 500 nm. Under these conditions about 15% of bR are cycling. Typically 30-50 time traces were averaged for the kinetics of the M-intermediate and 70-100 for the dye kinetics.

Proton release and uptake were detected in the aqueous bulk medium of the purple membrane suspension, containing 4-15 µM bR in 150 mM KCl, by calculating the difference of the measured flash-induced absorbance changes at 450 nm between samples with and without 45 µM pyranine at pH 7.3 and 22 °C (25, 29). The light-induced proton concentration changes, detected in samples with fluorescein attached to cysteine residues in bR, were determined by calculating the measured flash-induced absorbance difference at 495 nm between samples with and without 10 mM Tris or MOPS buffer, pH 7.3, in 150 mM KCl at 22 °C (25, 29).

Titration experiments and analysis were performed as described in (30). To obtain the apparent pKa, the measured absorbance changes were fitted with the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation.
&Dgr;A=&Dgr;A<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB>/(1+10<SUP>n(<UP>p</UP>K<SUB>a</SUB>−<UP>pH</UP>)</SUP>) (Eq. 1)
Delta Amax is the maximal absorbance difference, n is the number of protons involved in the transitions and pKa is the midpoint of the titration.

The data plotted in Fig. 4 were fitted with the following equation described by Balashov et al. (21),
&Dgr;A=&agr;/(&agr;+&bgr;*&ggr;) (Eq. 2)
with alpha  = 1 + 10(pH - pK3), beta  = 1 + 10(pH - pK2), and gamma  = 10(pH - pK1).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Characterization of the Unphotolyzed Single and Double Mutants (Purple to Blue Transition)-- The position of the maximum of the visible absorbance spectrum of bacteriorhodopsin reflects the charge distribution in the vicinity of the retinylidene chromophore. Fig. 2 shows the absorption spectra of wt bR in the unphotolyzed state and that of the mutants R82A, G231C, and R82A/G231C in 150 mM KCl at pH 6. The chromophore absorbance maxima (lambda max) of wt, G231C, and R82A/G231C are nearly identical (568, 568, and 567 nm, respectively, in the light-adapted form). In the single mutant R82A lambda max is red shifted about 40 nm compared with wt to 602 nm. In the mutant R82A/G231C, the additional mutation G231C at the cytoplasmic surface (C terminus) restores the wt absorbance spectrum and, therefore, presumably the charge distribution in the vicinity of the chromophore.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Absorption spectra of the R82A and G231C single and double mutants. Wild type (---), and the mutants G231C (-·-·-), R82A (- - -), and R82A/G231C (dotted line) are measured in 150 mM KCl at pH 6.

The absorption spectrum of unphotolyzed bR is characterized by a purple form with a lambda max of 568 nm around neutral pH, as shown above, which changes to a blue form at acidic pH with a lambda max of about 602 nm. In wt the pKa of this so called purple to blue transition is about 2.6 (in 150 mM KCl). It has been shown that this transition reflects the protonation state of the primary proton acceptor Asp-85 (22, 31). The purple to blue transition is directly affected by the proton concentration at the protein surface, which depends on the surface charge (30, 32). Therefore, the apparent pKa of this transition is strongly dependent on ionic strength. We have compared the pKa values of the purple to blue transition in the various mutants at a given salt concentration. The pH titration curves of wt and the different mutants in 150 mM KCl are shown in Fig. 3. The absorbance changes at 628 nm are plotted as a function of pH. The data were fitted to Equation 1. In wild type the Hill coefficient of n approx  1.6 indicates a cooperative effect in the protonation/deprotonation reaction of the Asp-85 carboxyl group (33). In the bR mutant R82A, the pKa of the purple to blue transition is shifted from 2.6 to 7.3 (n = 0.8). In the double mutants R82A/G72C and R82A/A160C, the pKa values of the purple to blue transition are 7.2 and 7.3, respectively (data not shown), i.e. similar to that of the single mutant R82A. In the double mutant R82A/G231C, however, in which the second mutation is located at the cytoplasmic surface at the end of helix G, the pKa of the purple to blue transition is shifted completely back to the wild type value, even to a somewhat lower number (pKa = 2.1, n = 0.9). The single mutant G231C has a pKa of 2.7 (n = 1.1), similar to that of wild type. Note that for all mutants the n value is close to 1 (0.8-1.1) and clearly smaller than for wild type (1.6). The pKa and n values are summarized in Table I.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   pH titration of the blue to purple transition. pH titration of wild type (black-square) and the mutants G231C (open circle ), R82A (black-triangle), and R82A/G231C (), as measured by the absorbance change at 628 nm. The fraction of blue membrane in percent is plotted as a function of pH. The conditions are 150 mM KCl at room temperature (22 °C). The pH dependence was fitted with Equation 1. The resulting pKa values and Hill coefficients are collected in Table I.

For wt and the mutant R82A/G231C the pH titration was also performed in the regenerated form in CHAPS/DMPC micelles. Doing the titration with bR micelles has the advantage of having a higher fraction of the blue state at alkaline pH values than is the case with membranes. pH-dependent absorption spectra of wt and the mutant were recorded between pH 1 and 9.5. In Fig. 4 the fraction of the blue membrane of the double mutant is plotted versus the pH. The titration data were analyzed according to the model proposed by Balashov et al. (21) using Equation 2. The scheme in the inset of Fig. 4 describes the coupling between the pK values of residues Asp-85 and another group denoted X'H (probably Glu-204) and their dependence on the ionization state of each of the residues. The pKa values of wt and the double mutant R82A/G231C are presented in the scheme. The comparison of the pKa values clearly shows that in the double mutant R82A/G231C the pKa of Asp-85 in the presence of the protonated group X'H is shifted back from 6.9 in R82A (pK in micelles (30)) to 3.0, i.e. lower than the wild type value (pKa = 4.7). This should be compared with the Asp-85 pKa value of 2.6 and 2.1 in membranes for wt and R82A/G231C, respectively (Table I). These results indicate that the electrostatic environments for these residues (Asp-85 and X'H) differ in the double mutant and in wt. Also the pKa of Asp-85 in the presence of the deprotonated group X'- (like in the M-state), pKa = 5.8, differs slightly from the wild type value (pKa = 6.3). Similar shifts are observed for the pKa of X'H in the double mutant R82A/G231C, i.e. the pKa of X'H in the presence of the deprotonated Asp-85 is 7.5 for wild type and 6.7 for the double mutant. The corresponding numbers in the membrane fragments are 9.6 and 9.0, respectively.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   pH titration of the mutant R82A/G231C. Analysis of the pH titration data for the mutant R82A/G231C in 0.1% CHAPS/0.0025% DMPC and 150 mM KCl. The absorbance change at 628 nm, representing the fraction of blue membrane, was plotted as a function of pH. The pK values were analyzed with Equation 2 according to the model proposed in Ref. 21, which is presented in the inset.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
pKa values and Hill coefficients (n) of the blue to purple transition of bR wild type and various mutants
The purple to blue transition was measured as the absorbance increase at 628 nm in the dark in 150 mM KCl at room temperature (22 °C). The pKa was fitted using Equation 1. The errors in pKa and n are approximately 0.05.

The kinetics of light-dark adaptation of the chromophore in the unphotolyzed state of bR is also controlled by the protonation state of Asp-85 (12). In the light-adapted state the retinylidene chromophore is 100% in the all trans conformation. In the dark adapted state, the chromophore is in an equilibrium between the all trans (34%) and 13-cis (66%) configurations (34). In wt-bR the pH dependence of the dark adaptation rate and the fraction of molecules in the blue state were shown to be the same (12). We have measured the dark adaptation rate for wt, R82A, G231C, and R82A/G231C at selected pH values (data not shown). wt and the single mutant G231C have similar values of kDA approx  2.3-2.5 × 10-4 s-1 at pH 6. In the double mutant R82A/G231C a slightly higher value of 3.3 × 10-4 s-1 (pH 6) was observed. The fastest rate was observed for R82A with kDA approx  120 × 10-4 s-1 at pH 7.3. In wt the fastest rates are measured at acidic pH, where also the highest fraction of blue membrane was observed. Therefore, the faster rate for R82A, kDA approx  120 × 10-4 s-1, compared with wt, kDA approx  2.3 × 10-4 s-1, and the close values for wt, G231C, and R82A/G231C are in qualitative agreement with the results obtained from the blue to purple chromophore titration.

Photocycle Kinetics-- The formation and decay of the M-intermediate represent the deprotonation and reprotonation, respectively, of the Schiff base during the photocycle. We believe that a low pKa of the proton acceptor Asp-85 and a wild type-like dark isomerization rate are prerequisites for wild type like photocycling and proton pumping (for further details see "Discussion"). Because, as shown in the previous section, these two prerequisites are fulfilled in the double mutant R82A/G231C, one may expect a restoration of wild type kinetics of the photocycle and of proton release and uptake. In Fig. 5 the time courses of the M-intermediate (absorbance changes measured at 410 nm) are shown for wild type, R82A, and R82A/G231C measured at the same protein concentrations in 150 mM KCl at pH 7.3 and 22 °C. The amplitudes of the M-intermediates are normalized to the wild type value, which was set to 1. For R82A and R82A/G231C the amplitude scaling factors were 5 and 1.15, respectively. The apparent time constants and amplitudes for the kinetics of the M-rise and decay are given in Tables II and III. The transient absorption spectra of Fig. 5 show that in comparison to wild type the rise of M in R82A is accelerated by approximately a factor of 10, whereas the decay is faster by less than a factor of 2. In the double mutant R82A/G231C on the other hand, the kinetics of the rise of M are virtually identical to that of wild type, and the decay is delayed by about a factor of 2. The major effect in R82A, the greatly altered rise of M, is thus restored in the double mutant. Fig. 6 shows the photocycle kinetics at three selected wavelengths (410, 570, and 650 nm) of wild type and the mutants G231C and R82A/G231C. These three wavelengths were chosen because they are diagnostic for the kinetics of the M intermediate (410 nm) of the L intermediate and ground state depletion (570 nm) and of the K and O intermediates (650 nm). The data of Fig. 6 show that the photocycles of these three samples are closely similar until about 1 ms. Small differences are apparent in the second half of the cycle with a slow down of the later intermediates N and O in particular in G231C. A multiexponential global fit of the photocycle, measured at 17 different wavelengths between 370 and 690 nm with a sum of 7 exponentials, was applied for each mutant and wild type. The fit results in the following seven time constants for wild type, 1.2/40/138 µs and 0.71/2.11/6.18/15.2 ms; for G231C, 1.0/22/98 µs and 1.6/8.9/41/204 ms; and for R82A/G231C, 1/30/129 µs and 0.8/2.1/7.9/50 ms. These numbers confirm that in both mutants, G231C and R82A/G231C, the kinetics of the second half of the photocycle are somewhat slower than for wt (Fig. 6). The difference is smallest for the double mutant. The changed kinetics compared with wt may represent a different quasi-stationary equilibrium between M left-right-arrow N/O right-arrow bR. The equilibrium between M, N, and O is pH-dependent (7, 35). Therefore, the kinetics of the M-intermediate of wild type and R82A/G231C were measured in the pH range from 7 to 11. In Fig. 7, A and B, the time traces of the M-intermediate are shown at the different pH values for wild type and R82A/G231C, respectively. Both samples contain the same concentration of bR as estimated from the absorbance at lambda max = 568 nm in the light-adapted form at pH 6 (see Fig. 2). The total amplitude of the M-intermediates at pH 7 for a fixed flash intensity are different, 89 mOD for wild type and 70 mOD for R82A/G231C (amplitudes from a multiexponential fit; the apparent amplitudes in Fig. 7 are approximately 74 and 64 mOD, respectively). The overall conclusion, however, deduced from the multiexponential fits of the time traces shown in Fig. 7 is that the pH dependence of the M-decay kinetics in the double mutant and wild type is quite similar. The time constants of the fastest two components of the M-rise of R82A/G231C and wild type are identical in the observed pH range. Both the maximum amplitude and pKa of the slowest M-rise component of the double mutant, however, are different from wt. Fig. 8, inset, shows the amplitudes in mOD of the slowest M-rise component as a function of pH. Normalizing to the highest amplitude at pH 7, the data are replotted in the main part of Fig. 8. This last component in the M-rise represents the remaining fraction of the protonated Schiff base after the K left-right-arrow L left-right-arrow M equilibrium is established (13). The pH dependence was fitted with the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation (Equation 1). The amplitude of the pH-dependent transition of the slowest M-rise component is smaller by a factor of about 1.4 in the mutant R82A/G231C (Fig. 8, inset). This results in the overall smaller amplitude of the M-intermediate. The pKa values are 9.6 for wt and 9.1 for R82A/G231C. It was shown previously, that this pKa value represents the pKa of the terminal proton release group (X'H) in the unphotolyzed state (13). The lower pKa of the terminal proton release group in the double mutant compared with wt is in agreement with the results for the group X'H from the pH titration of the unphotolyzed protein (pKa = 9.6 and 9.0 for wt and R82A/G231C, respectively, in bR membrane fragments) described in the previous section.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Time course of the flash-induced M-intermediate of wild type bR and the mutants R82A and R82A/G231C. Kinetic absorbance changes were measured at 410 nm. The amplitude of the wt absorbance change was normalized to 1. The scaling factors for the mutants are given in the figure. Conditions: 150 mM KCl, pH 7.3, at 22 °C. The excitation was at 590 nm with flashes of about 6 mJ.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Kinetics of M formation and proton release
The M-formation is measured as the absorbance increase at 410 nm in 150 mM KCl, pH 7.3, at 22 °C. The relative contributions of the three rise components are given in percentages in parentheses following the rise times. When two components occur in the H+ release, the times are separated by a slash. Atotal gives the total amplitude as a percentage of the wild type amplitude of the M-intermediate. The proton release is detected with fluorescein bound to the cysteine at the indicated position at the protein surface and with pyranine in the aqueous bulk phase. A gives the amplitude of the proton signal as percent of the wild type amplitude of the proton signal.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Comparison of the photocycle kinetics at selected wavelength of wild type and the mutants G231C and R82A/G231C. Kinetic absorbance changes were measured at 410, 570, and 670 nm. The conditions are as in Fig. 5. The time traces are fitted globally. The fit data are given under "Results."


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   pH dependence of the M-intermediate. The time traces of the M-intermediate measured at 410 nm in the pH range from 7 to 11 in steps of 1 pH unit. Conditions as in Fig. 5. Upper panel, wild type; lower panel, R82A/G231C.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   pH dependence of the amplitude of the slowest component tau 3 in the M-rise. The data are from Fig. 7. The pH dependence was fitted with Equation 1. The inset shows the absorbance differences for this component as a function of pH. After normalizing at pH 7, the amplitudes are replotted as the fraction of protonated Schiff base remaining (see "Results"). black-square, wild type; open circle , R82A/G231.

Kinetic Isotope Effects in the Photocycle of Wild Type and R82A/G231C-- Kinetic isotope effects because of H/D exchange allow insight into the nature of proton transfer steps inside the protein (36). We have performed photocycle measurements of wt, R82A, and R82A/G231C in H2O and D2O at selected wavelengths. Fig. 9 shows the time traces at 410 nm for the two mutants (A and B) and wt (C) in 150 mM KCl and pH/pD 8. The measuring conditions were chosen such that the mutant R82A is more than 50% in the purple state. The isotope effects on the kinetics of the main M-rise components are smaller for R82A (A) than for R82A/G231C (B) and wt (C). For a better comparison of the multiexponential M-rise kinetics (see Table II) we have fitted the data with a Gaussian distribution of exponentials. This distribution of time constants obtained in H2O (tau H2O) is centered at 5.2, 145, and 121 µs for R82A, R82A/G231C, and wt, respectively; the corresponding values in D2O (tau D2O) were determined to be 12.5, 1041, and 835 µs. The values of tau D2O/tau H2O are 2.4 for R82A, and 6.9 and 7.2 for wt and R82A/G231C, respectively. The data thus indicate a similar proton release mechanism for wild type and the double mutant.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Kinetic H/D isotope effects. H/D isotope effects in the rise and decay kinetics of the M-intermediate as measured at 410 nm for (A) the mutant R82A, (B) the mutant R82A/G231C, and (C) wild type. Conditions: 150 mM KCl, pH/pD 8 at 22 °C.

Proton Release and Uptake Kinetics-- Proton concentration changes at the protein surface and in the aqueous bulk phase were detected with the surface bound dye fluorescein and the bulk pH indicator pyranine, respectively. Acetamido- or methylfluorescein was covalently bound to single cysteine residues introduced by site-directed mutagenesis at position Gly-72 (BC loop) on the extracellular side and at position Ala-160 (EF loop) and Gly-231 (C-terminal tail) on the cytoplasmic side of bacteriorhodopsin (Fig. 1) both in the single cysteine mutants and in the double mutants R82A/G72C, R82A/A160C, and R82A/G231C. Using the method described under "Experimental Procedures," on average 0.65-0.95 mol of BMF or 0.5-0.7 mol of 5-iodoacetamidofluorescein were normally incorporated/mol of mutant bR. In wild type bR, which lacks cysteine, less than 5 mol% fluorescein was bound under these conditions. A major change in the reactivity of the dye was observed for the cysteine residue in position 231. In the single cysteine mutant G231C, a labeling stoichiometry of only 0.15-0.2 mol 5-iodoacetamidofluorescein/mol bR was obtained, whereas in the double mutant R82A/G231C an approximately 3-fold higher stoichiometry (0.55-0.7) was observed under identical conditions.

In Fig. 10 the kinetics of the rise and decay of the M-intermediate (upper panel) are compared with the kinetics of proton release and uptake, detected in the aqueous bulk phase (lower panel) of R82A (Fig. 10A) and at the protein surface (Fig. 10, B-D, lower panel) of the three double mutants R82A/G72C, R82A/A160C, and R82A/G231C, respectively. All measurements were performed with membrane fragments under the same conditions (150 mM KCl, pH 7.3, and 22 °C). All proton release and uptake times as detected by fluorescein and pyranine for wt and the mutants are collected together with the time constants and amplitudes for the kinetics of M in Tables II and III. Note from Fig. 10 and Tables II and III that in contrast to the double mutant R82A/G231C, the photocycles and the proton signals, measured with pyranine, of R82A/G72C and R82A/A160C are similar to that of the single mutant R82A. Five exponentials are required to fit the time traces for M in R82A, R82A/G72C, and R82A/A160C. Seven exponentials are required for R82A/G231C. The main time constants are marked by vertical arrows in the figures. The main proton signal components are also marked by arrows, pointing down for proton release and pointing up for proton uptake. The two major M-rise time constants are similar in R82A, R82A/A160C (cysteine mutation on the cytoplasmic surface), and R82A/G72C (cysteine mutation on the extracellular surface) with tau 1 = 420 ns and tau 2 = 8.6 µs, tau 1 = 300ns and tau 2 = 5.4 µs, and tau 1 = 710ns and tau 2 = 9.7 µs, respectively. In R82A/G231C (cysteine mutation on the cytoplasmic surface) on the other hand, the M-rise time constants are tau 1 = 1.0 µs, tau 2 = 33 µs, and tau 3 = 136 µs and are virtually identical to those of wild type.


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Comparison of the rise and decay of the M-intermediate with the kinetics of proton release and uptake. The time trace of the M-intermediate was measured at 410 nm (top panels). The time-resolved proton concentration changes because of proton release and uptake (lower panels) were measured with the bulk pH indicator pyranine for the mutant R82A (A) or measured with the surface-bound fluorescein for the mutants R82A/G72C (B), R82A/A160C (C), and R82A/G231C (D). A negative Delta A for the dye signal indicates the release of protons. The solid lines represent multiexponential fits. The H+ release and uptake times obtained from the fits are marked with arrows pointing down for release and pointing up for proton uptake. Conditions are as in Fig. 5.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Kinetics of M-decay and proton uptake
The conditions are as given in Table I. The main decay components are listed. The relative contributions of the decay components are given in percentages in parentheses following the decay time constants. When two components occur in the H+ uptake, the times are separated by a slash.

The same pattern of results was obtained for the proton signal measured with pyranine in the aqueous bulk phase (Fig. 10A, lower panel, and Tables II and III). In all three mutants R82A, R82A/G72C, and R82A/A160C proton uptake precedes proton release. Proton uptake was measured with a time constant of about 7 ms and the release with a time constant of about 10 ms in R82A. For R82A/G72C and R82A/A160C the same results were obtained (Tables II and III). With R82A/G231C on the other hand, proton release occurred first (0.58 ms) followed by proton uptake (11.8 ms), and these values are virtually identical to those obtained with wild type (Tables II and III).

With the surface-bound dye fluorescein at position A160C at the cytoplasmic surface, two proton uptake components were detected for R82A/A160C with time constants <1 µs (approx 40%) and 150 ± 15 µs (approx 60%) (Fig. 10C, lower panel). The proton uptake with the two time constants was reproducible as verified in three independent experiments. The proton uptake measured with the dye bound at position G72C on the extracellular surface was fitted with two time constants of tau 1 = 84 ± 10 µs (approx 50%) and tau 2 = 185 ± 12 µs (approx 50%) (Fig. 10B, lower panel). For both double mutants, the proton uptake time constants detected at the protein surface are in the µs time range and thus at least 50 times faster than those detected in the bulk phase (milliseconds). Moreover, they clearly precede the normal H+ uptake time in wild type, detected at the protein surface (ms time range), also by more than one order of magnitude. The main proton release component at the surface of R82A is about 1 ms (tau  = 0.73 ms for R82A/G72C and tau 1 = 1.4 ms for R82A/A160C) or slower (tau 2 = 14 ms for R82A/A160C). Our experimental data thus clearly show that in the mutant R82A the release is slowed down, and the uptake is accelerated compared with wt (proton release tau  ~71 µs and proton uptake tau  ~8ms, as measured with the wt-like bR-mutant protein G72C-AF (25)).

In contrast to the double mutants R82A/G72C and R82A/A160C, which have photocycles similar to that of the single mutant R82A, the photocycle of R82A/G231C is similar to wt as described in the preceding two sections. It is thus not very surprising that the kinetics of the proton signals detected at the protein surface are also similar to wild type (Fig. 10D, lower panel, and Tables II and III). In particular the order is such that proton release (75 µs) precedes uptake (6 and 10.8 ms).

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Kinetics of Proton Release and Uptake Detected at the Surface of the bR Mutant R82A-- The reversed order of proton release and uptake in R82A and R82Q, as detected with the pH indicator dye pyranine in the aqueous bulk phase, was first reported by Otto et al. (20) using DMPC/CHAPS micelles. The effect of the arginine 82 to alanine mutation on dark adaptation, proton release, and photochemical cycle in membrane fragments was analyzed by Balashov et al. (21). These authors confirmed the reversed order of proton release and uptake observed in Ref. 20 using the same pH indicator dye, obtaining times of 8 ms (uptake) and 30 ms (release). Our measurements of the proton transfer kinetics in the aqueous bulk phase in the single mutant R82A also give proton uptake kinetics in the same time range of tau  approx  7 ms (Table III and Fig. 10A). The proton release kinetics is somewhat faster (10 ms compared with approx 30 ms) as described in Ref. 21, and this difference may be because of the different salt concentrations used in the experiments (150 mM and 2 M salt, respectively). The analysis of the kinetics of proton concentration change measured with pyranine in the aqueous bulk phase is complicated by the fact that it represents the kinetics of the H+ transfer between the protein surface and the bulk phase (6, 25, 28, 37, 38). Surface attached pH indicators dyes at both the extracellular and cytoplasmic protein surface overcome this limitation (25, 37, 39). We therefore constructed double mutants with the R82A substitution as well as another residue at either surface mutated to cysteine as an attachment site for the pH indicator dye. We chose G72C at the extracellular surface and A160C at the cytoplasmic surface. Both single cysteine mutants exhibit photocycle kinetics like wild type, with minor changes in the second half of the photocycle for A160C (25). The photocycles of R82A, R82A/G72C, and R82A/A160C are very similar. The M-rise was fitted with two time constants, tau 1 ~300-700 ns and tau 2 ~5-10 µs (Fig. 10). Two H+ uptake components were observed both at the cytoplasmic and extracellular surface, which precede the proton release. The very fast proton uptake time constant at the cytoplasmic surface of <1 µs seems to be correlated with the ns M-rise component. On the extracellular side (R82A/G72C) the fastest uptake component is about 85 µs. The proton uptake time of tau  <1 µs detected on the cytoplasmic surface at position 160, faster than the one detected on the extracellular surface, shows clearly that uptake occurs at this side as in wild type. On the other hand, when the uptake occurs on the same side as in wild type (i.e. cytoplasmic side) with a time constant faster (tau  < 1 µs as detected in position 160) than the equilibration time of about 70-80 µs for a proton around the bR membrane fragment (25) an uptake time of about 80 µs is anticipated to be detected at the extracellular surface. On both sides an additional proton uptake time was detected with about 150-200 µs. A similar time constant of about 150 µs was observed for a contribution from a 13-cis-photoproduct (21) in the R82A photocycle at pH 7.3 (data not shown). Proton release was observed with about 1.4 and 14 ms on the cytoplasmic surface with the dye in position 160 and about 1 ms at the extracellular surface in position 72. Comparison with time-resolved photovoltage measurements of R82A under the same conditions2 indicates there may be a transient protonation and deprotonation (without net transport) correlated with the H+ uptake time of 150 µs and the first H+ release time of about 1 ms, respectively, very likely attributed to the 13-cis-photocycle. Furthermore, net proton transfer is observed in the electrical measurements of the purple form of R82A.2 Together with our results that proton uptake in R82A clearly takes place at the cytoplasmic surface, we conclude that the direction of proton pumping is the same as in wild type, with proton release at the extracellular and uptake at the cytoplasmic surface.

From studies of the double mutant R82Q/D96N (40) it was concluded that proton release and uptake are independent processes. This interpretation was based on the fact that the proton uptake time in R82Q, monitored in the aqueous bulk phase, was virtually the same as in wild type. In the double mutant R82Q/D96N proton uptake was delayed as in the single mutant D96N. Our results, on the other hand, provide evidence that the mutation R82A, the substitution of a residue in the proton release channel close to the extracellular surface, affects not only the proton release, but in particular the proton uptake time at the opposite surface (<1 µs compared with ~8 ms in the wt-like mutant A160C), as monitored directly at the cytoplasmatic protein surface. This suggests long range interactions between the extracellular and cytoplasmic domains of the protein.

Comparison of Wild Type and the Second Site Revertant R82A/G231C, Implications for the Revertancy Mechanism-- Double mutants that restore the wild type phenotype in a single mutant with altered function are of particular interest because they allow the comparison of two proteins with different primary structures but identical phenotypes. For instance, the removal of a charged residue can often be compensated by a second mutation, which removes the opposite charge at a nearby position and therefore restores the electrostatic environment in this particular part of the protein. An example of such a short range electrostatic interaction in bR is the double mutant R82Q/D212N (41, 42). In this double mutant the complex counterion of the protonated Schiff base, which involves Asp-85, Arg-82, and Asp-212, is simplified by removing both the positive charge at position 82 and the nearby negative charge at position 212, resulting in a dipole instead of the original quadrupole. Even though the photochemical properties are only partially restored, a proton signal with the normal order of release and uptake and similar time constants as in wild type are observed in the aqueous bulk phase (41). Long range electrostatic interactions have been observed in second site suppressor mutants of the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter capsulatus (43). These second site mutations restore proton transfer, which is interrupted in the initial single-site mutant protein. It was suggested that the compensatory mutation propagates its effect over large distances by mutation-induced realignments of salt bridges within a network of ionizable residues.

The second site revertants of mutants containing single replacements at position 82 in bR (like R82A and R82Q) are of particular interest, because Arg-82 has been proposed to be involved in multiple types of interactions, as part of the counterion of the Schiff base proton (electrostatic interaction), in interactions with the primary and terminal proton release groups (electrostatic and structural-conformational interactions), and during folding (structural-electrostatic interaction). Though the second site revertant R82A/G231C displays in many respects wild type properties (pKa of Asp-85, rate of light-dark adaptation, kinetics of photocycle and of proton release and uptake, and kinetic isotope effects), small but distinct differences exist: (i) the pKa of Asp-85 is down shifted by 0.5 pH units compared with wt, (ii) the Hill coefficient is 0.9 in R82A/G231C but 1.6 in wt, (iii) the pKa of the terminal release group (X'H) was determined both in the unphotolyzed protein and from the pH dependence of the M-rise to be about 0.5 pH units lower than in wt, and (iv) the amplitude of the M-rise and of the proton signal are about 80% of the wt amplitude.

These differences may help to explain why the mutational change in position 231 at the cytoplasmic surface far away from position 82 (see Fig. 1) is able to revert many of the altered properties in R82A back to wild type. Based on our results and structural evidence from electron microscope and x-ray crystallographic data (9, 10), we present a hypothesis for the mechanism of the rescue in R82A/G231C. One possible explanation of the revertancy observed for R82A/G231C is a rearrangement of the native H-bonded network connected with Asp-212, leading to an equivalent hydrogen-bonded network as in wild type and facilitating proton release to the extracellular surface but without the participation of Asp-212 and Arg-82. The following arguments support this hypothesis.

In wild type, Asp-212 (helix G) presumably is directly hydrogen-bonded to Tyr-185 (helix F), Tyr-57 (helix B) and via water molecules (44) to Arg-82 and Asp-85 (helix C) forming a three-dimensional hydrogen-bonding network (9, 10, 23). Asp-85 and Asp-212, together with Arg-82 form the complex counterion to the protonated Schiff base in the retinal binding pocket (45). Note, that the neutral alanine residue in the mutant R82A is not capable of participating in a hydrogen-bonded network. We found that the most striking similarity between the mutants R82A, G231C, and R82A/G231C is the loss of cooperativity in the purple to blue transition (n = 1.6 in wild type to n = 0.8-1.1 in the mutants indicated). In addition, the pKa values of both Asp-85 and the terminal release group X'H in the unphotolyzed protein R82A/G231C are down shifted by about 0.5 pH units compared with wt. These results indicate a changed electrostatic environment of Asp-85 in the complex counterion and an altered interaction of ionizable residues in the proton release channel. This different electrostatic environment in the retinal binding pocket of R82A/G231C compensates for the removed positive charge of the arginine residue. A compensation of this positive charge might be realized by a removal of the negative charge of Asp-212 from the vicinity of Asp-85. This could occur by a structural change or by protonation. Conformational changes on the cytoplasmic surface close to helix G are suggested from the altered labeling stoichiometry with 5-iodoacetamidofluorescein observed between G231C and R82A/G231C. Asp-212 resides in the same helix (helix G) as Gly-231. A conformational change in helix G introduced by the mutation G231C can lead to a different interaction of the Asp-212 side chain with the neighboring residues in R82A/G231C in such a way that the side chain of Asp-212 no longer participates in the complex counterion. Recent time-resolved electrical measurements (19) provide evidence that the movement of the positively charged arginine 82 side chain makes a substantial contribution to the amplitude of the electrical signal in wt. This amplitude is clearly reduced in the mutants G231C and R82A/G231C.2 This result can be interpreted with the absence of the movement of Arg-82 already in the single mutant G231C. Note that the loss of cooperativity in the purple to blue transition was also observed in the single mutant G231C. Therefore, it might be that in the mutant protein G231C the arginine 82 side chain is already pointing outward to the extracellular surface and does not contribute to the proton release process. A replacement of Arg-82 with alanine is then not expected to alter substantially the properties of G231C. Furthermore, the results of the H/D isotope effect on the kinetics of the M-rise, on the other hand, indicate a reestablishing of a wt-like hydrogen-bonded network in the proton release channel in the mutant R82A/G231C.

Among the double mutants with R82A or R82Q previously described in the literature (30, 40-42), only one, R82Q/D212N (41, 42), with the second site mutation nearby at position 212 in helix G, is able to partially rescue the normal functional features, like normal kinetics of proton release and uptake and pKa of Asp-85 (41). Also the down shift of the pKa of Asp-85 compared with wt, similar to R82A/G231C, was reported in the double mutant R82Q/D212N. Interestingly, the compensatory mutation found in our study, G231C, is like Asp-212 also located in helix G. Whereas Arg-82 and Asp-212 are close together, Gly-231 is located at the end of helix G far away from Arg-82 (see Fig. 1). Therefore, in our case the effect of G231C on R82A in the double mutant R82A/G231C is clearly not a short range electrostatic compensation as in R82Q/D212N where a neutral charge pair was removed, but rather long range, and suggests a coupling of the two residues in the different parts of the protein. This coupling seems to mediated by an interaction of the helices C and G.

A final remaining question is concerned with the origin of the putative conformational changes in helix G leading to the altered electrostatic interaction in the counterion environment. It is known that arginines are stabilizing elements in proteins (46). In peptides, Lys right-arrow Arg substitutions increase the helix content of designed helical peptides. It was suggested that a single strategically placed arginine can exert long range control on helix structure (46). Two arginines, Arg-225 and Arg-227, are located at the cytoplasmic end of helix G, one helix turn below Gly-231. Arg-227 mutations affect the kinetics of M-decay (47) and proton uptake (48), indicating the interaction of the positively charged guanidinium group with a hydrogen-bonded network, which is proposed to be part of a proton uptake cluster (48). Exchange of the small unpolar and highly flexible glycine with the polar and ionizable cysteine in position 231 may lead to an alteration in the hydrogen-bonded network and/or water-filled cavities and to changes in the peptide backbone. On the other hand, the removal of all C-terminal amino acids in the mutant protein R82A by enzymatic digestion with papain, which cuts between residues 231 and 232 and leaves Gly-231 as the terminal residue, does not lead to the rescue as observed in the double mutant R82A/G231C but preserves the properties of R82A. The absorption maximum of the chromophore in the C terminus-less R82A mutant protein is 600 nm at pH 6 and the pK of the purple to blue transition is 7.2. These values are similar to the ones observed in the full-length R82A. This finding implies that all residues following Gly-231 in the C terminus (232-248) are not involved in the rescue mechanism, at least not by their absence. Further, it supports the idea that the residues involved in the revertancy mechanism are located in the helical region (helix G). Among the three double mutants involving R82A studied in this report, the five double or triple mutants involving R82A described in the literature (30, 40-42) and the double mutant R82A/T178V,3 only R82A/G231C reverts the properties of R82A(Q) back to wt. Except for the double mutants with the second mutation in the BC- (R82A/G72C) and EF-loop (R82A/A160C), the second or third mutation is located either in helix C, F, or G. Residues in these three helices are supposed to participate in the hydrogen-bonded network facilitating proton pumping (e.g. Asp-96, Asp-212, Asp-85, Tyr-185, and Glu-204). However, whether double mutants other than R82A/G231C are able to rescue R82A and which residues are involved in the revertancy mechanism is subject to further extensive mutagenesis studies.

In conclusion, we have shown that changes at the cytoplasmic surface can alter structural and functional interactions, which occur in the extracellular part of the protein and vice versa, probably because of a rearrangement of H-bonded networks mediated by conformational changes. We demonstrated with experiments on the mutants R82A, G231C, and R82A/G231C that allosteric interactions occur between the extracellular and cytoplasmic surfaces of bacteriorhodopsin. Such long range propagation of electrostatic and conformational changes is of potential importance for signal transduction in heptahelical G-protein-coupled receptors, where binding of ligands occurs mostly on the extracellular side resulting in the active form of the receptor and where binding and activation of the G-protein takes place at the cytoplasmic surface.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grant Sfb 312-B1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (to M. P. H.) and by Grant GM28289 from the National Institutes of Health (to H. G. K.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 49 30 83855157; Fax: 49 30 83856299.

|| Present address: Genetic Disease Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Inst., National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

2 S. Dickopf, U. Alexiev, and M. P. Heyn, unpublished results.

3 U. Alexiev, unpublished results.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: bR, bacteriorhodopsin; wt, wild type; DMPC, 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine; BMF, 5-(bromomethyl)fluorescein; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethyl-ammonio]-1-propanesulfonate; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid; A160C (G72C, G231C), mutant with alanine (glycine) in position 160 (72, 231) replaced by cysteine; R82A, mutant with arginine in position 82 replaced by alanine; A160C-MF(AF) (G72C-MF(AF) or G231C-MF(AF)), mutant A160C (G72C or G231C) with (methyl)- or (acetamido)fluorescein, respectively, bound to cysteine.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Fersht, A. (1985) Enzyme Structure and Mechanism , pp. 263-308, Freeman, New York
2. Kraut, J. (1988) Science 242, 533-540[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Lanyi, J. K. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1183, 241-261[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Ebrey, T. G. (1993) Thermodynamics of Membrane Receptors and Channels , pp. 353-387, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL
5. Rothschild, K. J. (1992) J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 24, 147-167[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Alexiev, U., Marti, T., Heyn, M. P., Khorana, H. G., and Scherrer, P. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 13693-13699[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Otto, H., Marti, T., Holz, M., Mogi, T., Lindau, M., Khorana, H. G., and Heyn, M. P. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 9228-9232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Braiman, M. S., Mogi, T., Marti, T., Stern, L. J., Khorana, H. G., and Rothschild, K. J. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 8516-8520[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Grigorieff, N., Ceska, T. A., Downing, K. H., Baldwin, J. M., and Henderson, R. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 25, 393-421
10. Luecke, H., Richter, H.-T., and Lanyi, J. K. (1998) Science 280, 1934-1937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Govindjee, R., Misra, S., Balashov, S. P., Ebrey, T. G., Crouch, R. K., and Menick, D. R. (1996) Biophys. J. 71, 1011-1023[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Balashov, S. P., Imasheva, E. S., Govindjee, R., and Ebrey, T. G. (1996) Biophys. J. 70, 473-481[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Richter, H.-T., Brown, L. S., Needleman, R., and Lanyi, J. K. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 4054-4062[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Hatanaka, M., Sasaki, J., Kandori, H., Ebrey, T. G., Needleman, R., Lanyi, J. K., and Maeda, A. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 6308-6312[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Balashov, S. P., Imasheva, E. S., Ebrey, T. G., Chen, N., Menick, D. R., and Crouch, R. K. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 8671-8676[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Dioumaev, A. K., Richter, H.-T., Brown, L. S., Tanio, M., Tuzi, S., Saito, H., Kimura, Y., Needleman, R., and Lanyi, J. K. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 2496-2506[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Pebay-Peyroula, E., Rummel, G., Rosenbusch, J. P., and Landau, E. M. (1997) Science 277, 1676-1681[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Scharnagl, C., and Fischer, S. F. (1996) Chem. Phys. 212, 231-246[CrossRef]
19. Dickopf, S., and Heyn, M. P. (1997) Biophys. J. 73, 3171-3181[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Otto, H., Marti, T., Holz, M., Mogi, T., Stern, L. J., Engel, F., Khorana, H. G., and Heyn, M. P. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 1018-1022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Balashov, S. P., Govindjee, R., Kono, M., Imasheva, E., Lukashev, E., Ebrey, T. G., Crouch, R. K., Menick, D. R., and Feng, Y. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 10331-10343[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Subramaniam, S., Marti, T., and Khorana, H. G. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 1013-1017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Essen, L.-O., Siegert, R., Lehmann, W. D., and Oesterhelt, D. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 11673-11678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Thomas, E. A., Carson, M. J., Neal, M. J., and Sutcliffe, G. J. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 14115-14119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Alexiev, U., Mollaaghababa, R., Scherrer, P., Khorana, H. G., and Heyn, M. P. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 372-376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Krebs, M. P., Mollaaghababa, R., and Khorana, H. G. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 1987-1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Liao, M.-J., London, E., and Khorana, H. G. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 9949-9955[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Scherrer, P., Alexiev, U., Marti, T., Khorana, H. G., and Heyn, M. P. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 13684-13692[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Moltke, S., Alexiev, U., and Heyn, M. P. (1995) Isr. J. Chem. 35, 401-414
30. Alexiev, U., Marti, T., Heyn, M. P., Khorana, H. G., and Scherrer, P. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 298-306[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Metz, G., Siebert, F., and Engelhard, M. (1992) FEBS Lett. 303, 237-241[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Szundi, I., and Stoeckenius, W. (1989) Biophys. J. 56, 369-383[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Mowery, P., Lozier, R., Chae, Q., Tseng, Y.-W., and Stoeckenius, W. (1979) J. Mol. Biol. 12, 88-118
34. Scherrer, P., Mathews, M. K., Sperling, W., and Stoeckenius, W. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 829-834[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Chizhov, I., Chernavskii, D. S., Engelhard, M., Mueller, K.-H., Zubov, B. V., and Hess, B. (1996) Biophys. J. 71, 2329-2345[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Le Coutre, J., and Gerwert, K. (1996) FEBS Lett. 398, 333-336[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Heberle, J., and Dencher, N. A. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 5996-6000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Gutman, M., and Nachliel, E. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1231, 123-138[CrossRef]
39. Scherrer, P., Alexiev, U., Otto, H., Heyn, M. P., Marti, T., and Khorana, H. G. (1992) Structures and Functions of Retinal Proteins (Rigaud, J. L., ed.) Vol. 221, pp. 205-211, London Colloque INSERM/John Libbey Eurotext Ltd
40. Brown, L. S., Yamazaki, Y., Maeda, A., Sun, L., Needleman, R., and Lanyi, J. K. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 239, 401-414[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Brown, L. S., Varo, G., Hatanaka, M., Sasaki, J., Kandori, H., Maeda, A., Friedman, N., Sheves, M., Needleman, R., and Lanyi, J. K. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 12903-12911[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Marti, T., Rösselet, S. J., Otto, H., Heyn, M. P., and Khorana, H. G. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 18674-18683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Sebban, P., Maróti, P., Schiffer, M., and Hanson, D. K. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 8390-8397[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Luecke, H., Schobert, B., Richter, H.-T., Cartailler, J.-P., and Lanyi, J. K. (1999) Science 286, 255-260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. De Groot, H. J. M., Harbison, G. S., Herzfeld, J., and Griffin, R. G. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 3346-3351[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Mrabet, N. T., Van den Broeck, A., Van, den brande, I., Stanssens, P., Laroche, Y., Lambeir, A.-M., Matthijssens, G., Jenkins, J., Chiadmi, M., van Tilbeurgh, H., Rey, F., Janin, J., Quax, W. J., Lasters, I., De Maeyer, M., and Wodak, S. J. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 2239-2253[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Stern, L., and Khorana, H. G. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 14202-14208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Zimányi, L., Cao, Y., Needleman, R., Ottolenghi, M., and Lanyi, J. K. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 7669-7678[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexiev, U.
Right arrow Articles by Heyn, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alexiev, U.
Right arrow Articles by Heyn, M. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement