|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 18, 13431-13440, May 5, 2000
Evidence for Long Range Allosteric Interactions between the
Extracellular and Cytoplasmic Parts of Bacteriorhodopsin from the
Mutant R82A and Its Second Site Revertant R82A/G231C*
Ulrike
Alexiev §,
Ramin
Mollaaghababa¶ ,
H. Gobind
Khorana¶, and
Maarten P.
Heyn
From the Biophysics Group, Department of Physics,
Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 14, D-14195 Berlin, Germany and the ¶ Department of Biology,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
 |
ABSTRACT |
Evidence is presented for long range interactions
between the extracellular and cytoplasmic parts of the heptahelical
membrane protein bacteriorhodopsin in the mutant R82A and its second
site revertant R82A/G231C. (i) In the double mutants R82A/G72C and R82A/A160C, with the cysteine mutation on the extracellular or cytoplasmic surface, respectively, the photocycle is the same as in the
single mutant R82A with an accelerated deprotonation of the Schiff base
and a reversed order of proton release and uptake. Proton release and
uptake kinetics were measured directly at either surface by using the
unique cysteine residue as attachment site for the pH indicator
fluorescein. Whereas in wild type proton uptake on the cytoplasmic
surface occurs during the M-decay ( ~ 8 ms), in R82A it
occurs already during the first phase of the M-rise ( < 1 µs). (ii) The introduction of a second mutation at the cytoplasmic
surface in position 231 (helix G) restores wild type ground state
absorption properties, kinetics of photocycle and of proton release,
and uptake in the mutant R82A/G231C. In addition, kinetic H/D isotope
effects provide evidence that the proton release mechanism in
R82A/G231C and in wild type is similar. These results suggest the
existence of long range interactions between the cytoplasmic and
extracellular surface domains of bacteriorhodopsin mediated by salt
bridges and hydrogen-bonded networks between helices C (Arg-82) and G
(Asp-212 and Gly-231). Such long range interactions are expected to be
of functional significance for activation and signal transduction in
heptahelical G-protein-coupled receptors.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Allosteric interactions are well known and of great importance for
water soluble enzymes, where ligand or substrate binding to a specific
site alters the conformation and changes the affinity at a different
site of the protein (for reviews see Refs. 1 and 2). For membrane-bound
G-protein-coupled receptors analogous effects are expected to be of
considerable functional significance. For this class of proteins ligand
binding occurs mostly on the extracellular surface resulting in the
active form of the receptor with binding and activation of the
G-protein at the opposite cytoplasmic surface of the protein. The
membrane protein bacteriorhodopsin (bR)1 shares the heptahelical
bundle motif with G-protein-coupled receptors. In this report, we
present evidence for long range interactions between the extracellular
and cytoplasmic parts of bR based on evidence from the mutant R82A and
its second site revertant R82A/G231C.
Bacteriorhodopsin acts as a light-driven proton pump in the plasma
membrane of the archaebacterium Halobacterium salinarium. A
retinylidene chromophore is bound via a protonated Schiff base linkage
to Lys-216. Upon flash excitation bR undergoes a cyclic photoreaction
with distinct spectroscopic intermediates and proton translocation from
one side of the membrane to the other (for reviews see Refs. 3-5). In
the first half of this photocycle, the Schiff base becomes deprotonated
during the transition to the M-intermediate, and in the same time range
a proton is released at the extracellular surface (6). During the
second half of the photocycle, the Schiff base is reprotonated from
Asp-96 (7), which is located in the cytoplasmic part of the protein,
and a proton is taken up from the cytoplasm. In the proton release
pathway, Asp-85 has been identified as the primary acceptor of the
proton from the Schiff base by site-directed mutagenesis and Fourier transform infrared difference spectroscopy (8). Arg-82 is located one
helix turn away from Asp-85, facing toward the proton channel (9, 10).
Steady-state and time-resolved UV/Vis absorption (11-13) and Fourier
transform infrared (14) spectroscopy results indicate that Asp-85,
Glu-204, Glu-194, and Arg-82 interact via a direct or indirect coupling
of their pK values. Proton release to the extracellular
medium may be facilitated by a hydrogen-bonded network between these
residues (10, 13, 15, 16). In the three-dimensional
structure of the unphotolyzed bR, a defined density for the arginine 82 side chain, has recently been resolved by x-ray crystallography at a
resolution of 2.5 (17) and 2.3 Å (10). The proposed movement of this
side chain toward the extracellular surface upon formation of the
M-intermediate, based on computer calculations (18), is not yet
established. However, recent time-resolved electrical measurements
support this proposal (19).
To further understand the mechanism of proton transport, we have
studied the mutant R82A. In R82A an accelerated deprotonation of the
Schiff base and a reversed order of proton release and uptake, detected
with pH indicator dyes in the aqueous solution, were already observed
(20, 21). Moreover, in R82A the pKa of Asp-85, which
controls the purple to blue transition, is increased by about 5 pH
units compared with wild type (wt) (22). These dramatic changes are
because of the replacement of the positively charged arginine by the
neutral alanine.
We have used time-resolved absorbance spectroscopy in combination with
pH-sensitive dyes (pyranine in the aqueous bulk phase and fluorescein
derivatives attached at specific sites on the protein surface) to
detect the kinetics of the photocycle and of proton release and uptake.
To detect proton concentration changes separately on each surface of
the protein, the attachment site (single cysteine residue) for the pH
indicator dye at the surface of the mutant protein R82A was varied. We
have used the single cysteine residue in position 72 at the
extracellular surface and in the positions 160 and 231 at the
cytoplasmic surface as attachment sites. Fig.
1 shows a tertiary structural model of bR
based on x-ray crystallographic data (23). The positions of the
residues Gly-72, Arg-82, Ala-160, and Gly-231 are indicated.
Unexpectedly, the cysteine mutation in position 231 at the end of helix
G on the cytoplasmic surface leads to an almost complete restoration of
the photocycle, pKa of Asp-85, and proton pumping in
the double mutant R82A/G231C. The cysteine double mutant R82A/A160C, also with a cysteine mutation on the cytoplasmic surface (EF loop), has
on the other hand still all the altered properties of the single mutant
R82A. The reversion effect observed only at position Gly-231 suggests
an interaction between helices C (Arg-82) and G (Gly-231). The second
site revertant produced by the replacement of glycine by cysteine at
the cytoplasmic surface of the protein far away from the location of
the first mutation (R82A) can shed light on the molecular mechanisms
that promote long range interactions in 7-helix transmembrane proteins.
Such allosteric interactions are expected to be important for ligand
binding and signal transduction in G-protein-coupled receptors
(24).

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Tertiary structure of bacteriorhodopsin.
The structure was obtained from x-ray crystallographic data (23), (1brr
in WebLabViewer). The residues Gly-72, Ala-160, Gly-231, and Arg-82 are
marked.
|
|
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
1,2-Dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine
(DMPC) and Tris-(hydroxy-methyl)-aminomethane (Tris) were obtained from
Sigma. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and
1,4-dithio-DL-threitol were from Fluka.
8-Hydroxy-1,3,6-pyrene-trisulfonic acid trisodium salt (pyranine) was
from Serva. Sephadex G-25 (fine) was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech,
5-(iodoacetamido)fluorescein and 5-(bromomethyl)fluorescein (BMF) were
from Molecular Probes.
The preparation and expression of the bR mutants A160C and G231C in
H. salinarium, in which cysteine replaces Ala-160 and Gly-231, respectively, and the preparation of R82A, in which alanine is
substituted for arginine in position 82, has been reported (25, 26).
The bR double mutants R82A/A160C and R82A/G231C were prepared by
following the described procedures (26) except that the synthetic
restriction fragments BspHI-Psp14061 and
SphI-NotI were used, respectively, to construct
the mutant genes.
Solubilization of bR membrane fragments and regeneration of bR in
DMPC/CHAPS micelles were performed as described (27). The regeneration
procedure was modified according to Ref. 28. After regeneration the
retinal band is shifted back completely to 550 nm, resulting in
96-100% regeneration, using an estimated extinction coefficent of
550 56,000 M 1
cm 1. Labeling with 5-(iodoacetamido)- and
5-(bromomethyl)-fluorescein and the determination of the labeling
stoichiometry were performed as described (25, 28).
Flash spectroscopy and data analysis with a sum of exponentials were
performed as described elsewhere (7). The excitation was with 10-ns
pulses of 3-6 mJ of energy at 590 or 500 nm. Under these
conditions about 15% of bR are cycling. Typically 30-50 time traces
were averaged for the kinetics of the M-intermediate and 70-100 for
the dye kinetics.
Proton release and uptake were detected in the aqueous bulk medium of
the purple membrane suspension, containing 4-15 µM bR in
150 mM KCl, by calculating the difference of the measured
flash-induced absorbance changes at 450 nm between samples with and
without 45 µM pyranine at pH 7.3 and 22 °C (25, 29).
The light-induced proton concentration changes, detected in samples
with fluorescein attached to cysteine residues in bR, were determined
by calculating the measured flash-induced absorbance difference at 495 nm between samples with and without 10 mM Tris or MOPS
buffer, pH 7.3, in 150 mM KCl at 22 °C (25, 29).
Titration experiments and analysis were performed as described in (30).
To obtain the apparent pKa, the measured absorbance
changes were fitted with the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation.
|
(Eq. 1)
|
Amax is the maximal absorbance
difference, n is the number of protons involved in the
transitions and pKa is the midpoint of the titration.
The data plotted in Fig. 4 were fitted with the following equation
described by Balashov et al. (21),
|
(Eq. 2)
|
with = 1 + 10(pH pK3), = 1 + 10(pH pK2), and = 10(pH pK1).
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of the Unphotolyzed Single and Double Mutants
(Purple to Blue Transition)--
The position of the maximum of the
visible absorbance spectrum of bacteriorhodopsin reflects the charge
distribution in the vicinity of the retinylidene chromophore. Fig.
2 shows the absorption spectra of wt bR
in the unphotolyzed state and that of the mutants R82A, G231C, and
R82A/G231C in 150 mM KCl at pH 6. The chromophore absorbance maxima ( max) of wt, G231C, and R82A/G231C are
nearly identical (568, 568, and 567 nm, respectively, in the
light-adapted form). In the single mutant R82A max is
red shifted about 40 nm compared with wt to 602 nm. In the mutant
R82A/G231C, the additional mutation G231C at the cytoplasmic surface (C
terminus) restores the wt absorbance spectrum and, therefore,
presumably the charge distribution in the vicinity of the
chromophore.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Absorption spectra of the R82A and G231C
single and double mutants. Wild type ( ), and the mutants G231C
(-·-·-), R82A (- - -), and R82A/G231C (dotted line) are
measured in 150 mM KCl at pH 6.
|
|
The absorption spectrum of unphotolyzed bR is characterized by a purple
form with a max of 568 nm around neutral pH, as shown above, which changes to a blue form at acidic pH with a
max of about 602 nm. In wt the pKa of
this so called purple to blue transition is about 2.6 (in 150 mM KCl). It has been shown that this transition reflects
the protonation state of the primary proton acceptor Asp-85 (22, 31).
The purple to blue transition is directly affected by the proton
concentration at the protein surface, which depends on the surface
charge (30, 32). Therefore, the apparent pKa of this
transition is strongly dependent on ionic strength. We have compared
the pKa values of the purple to blue transition in
the various mutants at a given salt concentration. The pH titration
curves of wt and the different mutants in 150 mM KCl are
shown in Fig. 3. The absorbance changes at 628 nm are plotted as a function of pH. The data were fitted to
Equation 1. In wild type the Hill coefficient of n 1.6 indicates a cooperative effect in the protonation/deprotonation
reaction of the Asp-85 carboxyl group (33). In the bR mutant R82A, the pKa of the purple to blue transition is shifted from 2.6 to 7.3 (n = 0.8). In the double mutants R82A/G72C
and R82A/A160C, the pKa values of the purple to blue
transition are 7.2 and 7.3, respectively (data not shown),
i.e. similar to that of the single mutant R82A. In the
double mutant R82A/G231C, however, in which the second mutation is
located at the cytoplasmic surface at the end of helix G, the
pKa of the purple to blue transition is shifted
completely back to the wild type value, even to a somewhat lower number
(pKa = 2.1, n = 0.9). The single
mutant G231C has a pKa of 2.7 (n = 1.1), similar to that of wild type. Note that for all mutants the
n value is close to 1 (0.8-1.1) and clearly smaller than
for wild type (1.6). The pKa and n values
are summarized in Table I.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
pH titration of the blue to purple
transition. pH titration of wild type ( ) and the mutants G231C
( ), R82A ( ), and R82A/G231C ( ), as measured by the absorbance
change at 628 nm. The fraction of blue membrane in percent is plotted
as a function of pH. The conditions are 150 mM KCl at room
temperature (22 °C). The pH dependence was fitted with Equation 1.
The resulting pKa values and Hill coefficients are
collected in Table I.
|
|
For wt and the mutant R82A/G231C the pH titration was also performed in
the regenerated form in CHAPS/DMPC micelles. Doing the titration with
bR micelles has the advantage of having a higher fraction of the blue
state at alkaline pH values than is the case with membranes.
pH-dependent absorption spectra of wt and the mutant were
recorded between pH 1 and 9.5. In Fig. 4
the fraction of the blue membrane of the double mutant is plotted
versus the pH. The titration data were analyzed according to
the model proposed by Balashov et al. (21) using Equation 2.
The scheme in the inset of Fig. 4 describes the coupling
between the pK values of residues Asp-85 and another group
denoted X'H (probably Glu-204) and their dependence on the ionization
state of each of the residues. The pKa values of wt
and the double mutant R82A/G231C are presented in the scheme. The
comparison of the pKa values clearly shows that in
the double mutant R82A/G231C the pKa of Asp-85 in
the presence of the protonated group X'H is shifted back from 6.9 in
R82A (pK in micelles (30)) to 3.0, i.e. lower
than the wild type value (pKa = 4.7). This should be
compared with the Asp-85 pKa value of 2.6 and 2.1 in
membranes for wt and R82A/G231C, respectively (Table I). These results indicate that the
electrostatic environments for these residues (Asp-85 and X'H) differ
in the double mutant and in wt. Also the pKa of
Asp-85 in the presence of the deprotonated group X'
(like in the M-state), pKa = 5.8, differs slightly
from the wild type value (pKa = 6.3). Similar shifts
are observed for the pKa of X'H in the double
mutant R82A/G231C, i.e. the pKa of X'H
in the presence of the deprotonated Asp-85 is 7.5 for wild type and 6.7 for the double mutant. The corresponding numbers in the membrane
fragments are 9.6 and 9.0, respectively.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
pH titration of the mutant R82A/G231C.
Analysis of the pH titration data for the mutant R82A/G231C in 0.1%
CHAPS/0.0025% DMPC and 150 mM KCl. The absorbance change
at 628 nm, representing the fraction of blue membrane, was plotted as a
function of pH. The pK values were analyzed with Equation 2
according to the model proposed in Ref. 21, which is presented in the
inset.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
pKa values and Hill coefficients (n) of the blue to purple
transition of bR wild type and various mutants
The purple to blue transition was measured as the absorbance increase
at 628 nm in the dark in 150 mM KCl at room temperature
(22 °C). The pKa was fitted using Equation 1. The
errors in pKa and n are approximately
0.05.
|
|
The kinetics of light-dark adaptation of the chromophore in the
unphotolyzed state of bR is also controlled by the protonation state of
Asp-85 (12). In the light-adapted state the retinylidene chromophore is
100% in the all trans conformation. In the dark adapted
state, the chromophore is in an equilibrium between the all
trans (34%) and 13-cis (66%) configurations
(34). In wt-bR the pH dependence of the dark adaptation rate and the
fraction of molecules in the blue state were shown to be the same (12). We have measured the dark adaptation rate for wt, R82A, G231C, and
R82A/G231C at selected pH values (data not shown). wt and the single
mutant G231C have similar values of kDA 2.3-2.5 × 10 4 s 1 at pH 6. In the
double mutant R82A/G231C a slightly higher value of 3.3 × 10 4 s 1 (pH 6) was observed. The fastest
rate was observed for R82A with kDA 120 × 10 4 s 1 at pH 7.3. In wt the fastest rates
are measured at acidic pH, where also the highest fraction of blue
membrane was observed. Therefore, the faster rate for R82A,
kDA 120 × 10 4
s 1, compared with wt, kDA 2.3 × 10 4 s 1, and the close values
for wt, G231C, and R82A/G231C are in qualitative agreement with the
results obtained from the blue to purple chromophore titration.
Photocycle Kinetics--
The formation and decay of the
M-intermediate represent the deprotonation and reprotonation,
respectively, of the Schiff base during the photocycle. We believe that
a low pKa of the proton acceptor Asp-85 and a wild
type-like dark isomerization rate are prerequisites for wild type like
photocycling and proton pumping (for further details see
"Discussion"). Because, as shown in the previous section, these two
prerequisites are fulfilled in the double mutant R82A/G231C, one may
expect a restoration of wild type kinetics of the photocycle and of
proton release and uptake. In Fig. 5 the
time courses of the M-intermediate (absorbance changes measured at 410 nm) are shown for wild type, R82A, and R82A/G231C measured at the same
protein concentrations in 150 mM KCl at pH 7.3 and
22 °C. The amplitudes of the M-intermediates are normalized to the
wild type value, which was set to 1. For R82A and R82A/G231C the
amplitude scaling factors were 5 and 1.15, respectively. The apparent
time constants and amplitudes for the kinetics of the M-rise and decay
are given in Tables II and III. The
transient absorption spectra of Fig. 5 show that in comparison to wild
type the rise of M in R82A is accelerated by approximately a factor of
10, whereas the decay is faster by less than a factor of 2. In the
double mutant R82A/G231C on the other hand, the kinetics of the rise of
M are virtually identical to that of wild type, and the decay is
delayed by about a factor of 2. The major effect in R82A, the greatly
altered rise of M, is thus restored in the double mutant. Fig.
6 shows the photocycle kinetics at three
selected wavelengths (410, 570, and 650 nm) of wild type and the
mutants G231C and R82A/G231C. These three wavelengths were chosen
because they are diagnostic for the kinetics of the M intermediate (410 nm) of the L intermediate and ground state depletion (570 nm) and of
the K and O intermediates (650 nm). The data of Fig. 6 show that the
photocycles of these three samples are closely similar until about 1 ms. Small differences are apparent in the second half of the cycle with
a slow down of the later intermediates N and O in particular in G231C.
A multiexponential global fit of the photocycle, measured at 17 different wavelengths between 370 and 690 nm with a sum of 7 exponentials, was applied for each mutant and wild type. The fit
results in the following seven time constants for wild type, 1.2/40/138
µs and 0.71/2.11/6.18/15.2 ms; for G231C, 1.0/22/98 µs and
1.6/8.9/41/204 ms; and for R82A/G231C, 1/30/129 µs and 0.8/2.1/7.9/50
ms. These numbers confirm that in both mutants, G231C and R82A/G231C,
the kinetics of the second half of the photocycle are somewhat slower
than for wt (Fig. 6). The difference is smallest for the double mutant.
The changed kinetics compared with wt may represent a different
quasi-stationary equilibrium between M N/O bR. The equilibrium
between M, N, and O is pH-dependent (7, 35). Therefore, the
kinetics of the M-intermediate of wild type and R82A/G231C were
measured in the pH range from 7 to 11. In Fig.
7, A and B, the
time traces of the M-intermediate are shown at the different pH values
for wild type and R82A/G231C, respectively. Both samples contain the same concentration of bR as estimated from the absorbance at
max = 568 nm in the light-adapted form at pH 6 (see
Fig. 2). The total amplitude of the M-intermediates at pH 7 for a fixed
flash intensity are different, 89 mOD for wild type and 70 mOD for
R82A/G231C (amplitudes from a multiexponential fit; the apparent
amplitudes in Fig. 7 are approximately 74 and 64 mOD, respectively).
The overall conclusion, however, deduced from the multiexponential fits
of the time traces shown in Fig. 7 is that the pH dependence of the
M-decay kinetics in the double mutant and wild type is quite similar.
The time constants of the fastest two components of the M-rise of
R82A/G231C and wild type are identical in the observed pH range. Both
the maximum amplitude and pKa of the slowest M-rise
component of the double mutant, however, are different from wt. Fig.
8, inset, shows the amplitudes
in mOD of the slowest M-rise component as a function of pH. Normalizing to the highest amplitude at pH 7, the data are replotted in the main
part of Fig. 8. This last component in the M-rise represents the
remaining fraction of the protonated Schiff base after the K L M equilibrium is established (13). The pH dependence was fitted with
the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation (Equation 1). The amplitude of the
pH-dependent transition of the slowest M-rise component is
smaller by a factor of about 1.4 in the mutant R82A/G231C (Fig. 8,
inset). This results in the overall smaller amplitude of the
M-intermediate. The pKa values are 9.6 for wt and
9.1 for R82A/G231C. It was shown previously, that this
pKa value represents the pKa of
the terminal proton release group (X'H) in the unphotolyzed state
(13). The lower pKa of the terminal proton release
group in the double mutant compared with wt is in agreement with the
results for the group X'H from the pH titration of the unphotolyzed
protein (pKa = 9.6 and 9.0 for wt and R82A/G231C,
respectively, in bR membrane fragments) described in the previous
section.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Time course of the flash-induced
M-intermediate of wild type bR and the mutants R82A and
R82A/G231C. Kinetic absorbance changes were measured at 410 nm.
The amplitude of the wt absorbance change was normalized to 1. The
scaling factors for the mutants are given in the figure. Conditions:
150 mM KCl, pH 7.3, at 22 °C. The excitation was at 590 nm with flashes of about 6 mJ.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Kinetics of M formation and proton release
The M-formation is measured as the absorbance increase at 410 nm in 150 mM KCl, pH 7.3, at 22 °C. The relative contributions of
the three rise components are given in percentages in parentheses
following the rise times. When two components occur in the H+
release, the times are separated by a slash. Atotal
gives the total amplitude as a percentage of the wild type amplitude of
the M-intermediate. The proton release is detected with fluorescein
bound to the cysteine at the indicated position at the protein surface
and with pyranine in the aqueous bulk phase. A gives the
amplitude of the proton signal as percent of the wild type amplitude of
the proton signal.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Comparison of the photocycle kinetics at
selected wavelength of wild type and the mutants G231C and
R82A/G231C. Kinetic absorbance changes were measured at 410, 570, and 670 nm. The conditions are as in Fig. 5. The time traces are fitted
globally. The fit data are given under "Results."
|
|

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
pH dependence of the M-intermediate. The
time traces of the M-intermediate measured at 410 nm in the pH range
from 7 to 11 in steps of 1 pH unit. Conditions as in Fig. 5.
Upper panel, wild type; lower panel,
R82A/G231C.
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
pH dependence of the amplitude of the slowest
component 3 in the M-rise.
The data are from Fig. 7. The pH dependence was fitted with Equation 1.
The inset shows the absorbance differences for this
component as a function of pH. After normalizing at pH 7, the
amplitudes are replotted as the fraction of protonated Schiff base
remaining (see "Results"). , wild type; , R82A/G231.
|
|
Kinetic Isotope Effects in the Photocycle of Wild Type and
R82A/G231C--
Kinetic isotope effects because of H/D exchange allow
insight into the nature of proton transfer steps inside the protein (36). We have performed photocycle measurements of wt, R82A, and
R82A/G231C in H2O and D2O at selected
wavelengths. Fig. 9 shows the time traces
at 410 nm for the two mutants (A and B) and wt
(C) in 150 mM KCl and pH/pD 8. The measuring
conditions were chosen such that the mutant R82A is more than 50% in
the purple state. The isotope effects on the kinetics of the main M-rise components are smaller for R82A (A) than for
R82A/G231C (B) and wt (C). For a better
comparison of the multiexponential M-rise kinetics (see Table II) we
have fitted the data with a Gaussian distribution of
exponentials. This distribution of time constants obtained in
H2O ( H2O) is
centered at 5.2, 145, and 121 µs for R82A, R82A/G231C, and wt,
respectively; the corresponding values in D2O
( D2O) were determined to be 12.5, 1041, and 835 µs. The values of
D2O/ H2O
are 2.4 for R82A, and 6.9 and 7.2 for wt and R82A/G231C, respectively.
The data thus indicate a similar proton release mechanism for wild type
and the double mutant.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Kinetic H/D isotope effects. H/D isotope
effects in the rise and decay kinetics of the M-intermediate as
measured at 410 nm for (A) the mutant R82A, (B)
the mutant R82A/G231C, and (C) wild type. Conditions: 150 mM KCl, pH/pD 8 at 22 °C.
|
|
Proton Release and Uptake Kinetics--
Proton concentration
changes at the protein surface and in the aqueous bulk phase were
detected with the surface bound dye fluorescein and the bulk pH
indicator pyranine, respectively. Acetamido- or methylfluorescein was
covalently bound to single cysteine residues introduced by
site-directed mutagenesis at position Gly-72 (BC loop) on the
extracellular side and at position Ala-160 (EF loop) and Gly-231
(C-terminal tail) on the cytoplasmic side of bacteriorhodopsin (Fig. 1)
both in the single cysteine mutants and in the double mutants
R82A/G72C, R82A/A160C, and R82A/G231C. Using the method described under
"Experimental Procedures," on average 0.65-0.95 mol of BMF or
0.5-0.7 mol of 5-iodoacetamidofluorescein were normally
incorporated/mol of mutant bR. In wild type bR, which lacks cysteine,
less than 5 mol% fluorescein was bound under these conditions. A major
change in the reactivity of the dye was observed for the cysteine
residue in position 231. In the single cysteine mutant G231C, a
labeling stoichiometry of only 0.15-0.2 mol
5-iodoacetamidofluorescein/mol bR was obtained, whereas in the
double mutant R82A/G231C an approximately 3-fold higher stoichiometry
(0.55-0.7) was observed under identical conditions.
In Fig. 10 the kinetics of the rise and
decay of the M-intermediate (upper panel) are compared with
the kinetics of proton release and uptake, detected in the aqueous bulk
phase (lower panel) of R82A (Fig. 10A) and at the
protein surface (Fig. 10, B-D, lower panel) of the three
double mutants R82A/G72C, R82A/A160C, and R82A/G231C, respectively. All
measurements were performed with membrane fragments under the same
conditions (150 mM KCl, pH 7.3, and 22 °C). All proton
release and uptake times as detected by fluorescein and pyranine for wt
and the mutants are collected together with the time constants and
amplitudes for the kinetics of M in Tables II and
III. Note from Fig. 10 and Tables II and
III that in contrast to the double mutant R82A/G231C, the photocycles and the proton signals, measured with pyranine, of R82A/G72C and R82A/A160C are similar to that of the single mutant R82A. Five exponentials are required to fit the time traces for M in R82A, R82A/G72C, and R82A/A160C. Seven exponentials are required for R82A/G231C. The main time constants are marked by vertical arrows in the figures. The main proton signal components are also marked by arrows, pointing down for proton release and pointing up
for proton uptake. The two major M-rise time constants are similar in
R82A, R82A/A160C (cysteine mutation on the cytoplasmic surface), and
R82A/G72C (cysteine mutation on the extracellular surface) with
1 = 420 ns and 2 = 8.6 µs,
1 = 300ns and 2 = 5.4 µs, and
1 = 710ns and 2 = 9.7 µs,
respectively. In R82A/G231C (cysteine mutation on the cytoplasmic
surface) on the other hand, the M-rise time constants are
1 = 1.0 µs, 2 = 33 µs, and
3 = 136 µs and are virtually identical to those
of wild type.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Comparison of the rise and decay of the
M-intermediate with the kinetics of proton release and uptake. The
time trace of the M-intermediate was measured at 410 nm (top
panels). The time-resolved proton concentration changes because of
proton release and uptake (lower panels) were measured with
the bulk pH indicator pyranine for the mutant R82A (A) or
measured with the surface-bound fluorescein for the mutants R82A/G72C
(B), R82A/A160C (C), and R82A/G231C
(D). A negative A for the dye signal indicates the
release of protons. The solid lines represent
multiexponential fits. The H+ release and uptake times
obtained from the fits are marked with arrows pointing down
for release and pointing up for proton uptake. Conditions are as in
Fig. 5.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Kinetics of M-decay and proton uptake
The conditions are as given in Table I. The main decay components are
listed. The relative contributions of the decay components are given in
percentages in parentheses following the decay time constants. When two
components occur in the H+ uptake, the times are separated by a
slash.
|
|
The same pattern of results was obtained for the proton signal measured
with pyranine in the aqueous bulk phase (Fig. 10A, lower panel, and Tables II and III). In all three mutants
R82A, R82A/G72C, and R82A/A160C proton uptake precedes proton release. Proton uptake was measured with a time constant of about 7 ms and the
release with a time constant of about 10 ms in R82A. For R82A/G72C and
R82A/A160C the same results were obtained (Tables II and III). With
R82A/G231C on the other hand, proton release occurred first (0.58 ms)
followed by proton uptake (11.8 ms), and these values are virtually
identical to those obtained with wild type (Tables II and III).
With the surface-bound dye fluorescein at position A160C at the
cytoplasmic surface, two proton uptake components were detected for
R82A/A160C with time constants <1 µs ( 40%) and 150 ± 15 µs ( 60%) (Fig. 10C, lower panel). The
proton uptake with the two time constants was reproducible as verified
in three independent experiments. The proton uptake measured with the
dye bound at position G72C on the extracellular surface was fitted with
two time constants of 1 = 84 ± 10 µs
( 50%) and 2 = 185 ± 12 µs ( 50%)
(Fig. 10B, lower panel). For both double mutants,
the proton uptake time constants detected at the protein surface are in
the µs time range and thus at least 50 times faster than those
detected in the bulk phase (milliseconds). Moreover, they clearly
precede the normal H+ uptake time in wild type, detected at
the protein surface (ms time range), also by more than one order of
magnitude. The main proton release component at the surface of R82A is
about 1 ms ( = 0.73 ms for R82A/G72C and 1 = 1.4 ms for R82A/A160C) or slower ( 2 = 14 ms for
R82A/A160C). Our experimental data thus clearly show that in the mutant
R82A the release is slowed down, and the uptake is accelerated compared
with wt (proton release ~71 µs and proton uptake ~8ms, as
measured with the wt-like bR-mutant protein G72C-AF (25)).
In contrast to the double mutants R82A/G72C and R82A/A160C, which have
photocycles similar to that of the single mutant R82A, the photocycle
of R82A/G231C is similar to wt as described in the preceding two
sections. It is thus not very surprising that the kinetics of the
proton signals detected at the protein surface are also similar to wild
type (Fig. 10D, lower panel, and Tables II and
III). In particular the order is such that proton release (75 µs)
precedes uptake (6 and 10.8 ms).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Kinetics of Proton Release and Uptake Detected at the Surface of
the bR Mutant R82A--
The reversed order of proton release and
uptake in R82A and R82Q, as detected with the pH indicator dye pyranine
in the aqueous bulk phase, was first reported by Otto et al.
(20) using DMPC/CHAPS micelles. The effect of the arginine 82 to
alanine mutation on dark adaptation, proton release, and photochemical
cycle in membrane fragments was analyzed by Balashov et al.
(21). These authors confirmed the reversed order of proton release and
uptake observed in Ref. 20 using the same pH indicator dye, obtaining
times of 8 ms (uptake) and 30 ms (release). Our measurements of the proton transfer kinetics in the aqueous bulk phase in the single mutant
R82A also give proton uptake kinetics in the same time range of
7 ms (Table III and Fig. 10A). The proton
release kinetics is somewhat faster (10 ms compared with 30 ms) as
described in Ref. 21, and this difference may be because of the
different salt concentrations used in the experiments (150 mM and 2 M salt, respectively). The analysis of
the kinetics of proton concentration change measured with pyranine in
the aqueous bulk phase is complicated by the fact that it represents
the kinetics of the H+ transfer between the protein surface
and the bulk phase (6, 25, 28, 37, 38). Surface attached pH indicators
dyes at both the extracellular and cytoplasmic protein surface overcome this limitation (25, 37, 39). We therefore constructed double mutants
with the R82A substitution as well as another residue at either surface
mutated to cysteine as an attachment site for the pH indicator dye. We
chose G72C at the extracellular surface and A160C at the cytoplasmic
surface. Both single cysteine mutants exhibit photocycle kinetics like
wild type, with minor changes in the second half of the photocycle for
A160C (25). The photocycles of R82A, R82A/G72C, and R82A/A160C are very
similar. The M-rise was fitted with two time constants,
1 ~300-700 ns and 2 ~5-10 µs
(Fig. 10). Two H+ uptake components were observed both at
the cytoplasmic and extracellular surface, which precede the proton
release. The very fast proton uptake time constant at the cytoplasmic
surface of <1 µs seems to be correlated with the ns M-rise
component. On the extracellular side (R82A/G72C) the fastest uptake
component is about 85 µs. The proton uptake time of <1 µs
detected on the cytoplasmic surface at position 160, faster than the
one detected on the extracellular surface, shows clearly that uptake
occurs at this side as in wild type. On the other hand, when the uptake
occurs on the same side as in wild type (i.e. cytoplasmic
side) with a time constant faster ( < 1 µs as detected in
position 160) than the equilibration time of about 70-80 µs for a
proton around the bR membrane fragment (25) an uptake time of about 80 µs is anticipated to be detected at the extracellular surface. On
both sides an additional proton uptake time was detected with about
150-200 µs. A similar time constant of about 150 µs was observed
for a contribution from a 13-cis-photoproduct (21) in the
R82A photocycle at pH 7.3 (data not shown). Proton release was observed
with about 1.4 and 14 ms on the cytoplasmic surface with the dye in
position 160 and about 1 ms at the extracellular surface in position
72. Comparison with time-resolved photovoltage measurements of R82A
under the same conditions2
indicates there may be a transient protonation and deprotonation (without net transport) correlated with the H+ uptake time
of 150 µs and the first H+ release time of about 1 ms,
respectively, very likely attributed to the
13-cis-photocycle. Furthermore, net proton transfer is observed in the electrical measurements of the purple form of R82A.2 Together with our results that proton uptake in R82A
clearly takes place at the cytoplasmic surface, we conclude that the
direction of proton pumping is the same as in wild type, with proton
release at the extracellular and uptake at the cytoplasmic surface.
From studies of the double mutant R82Q/D96N (40) it was concluded that
proton release and uptake are independent processes. This
interpretation was based on the fact that the proton uptake time in
R82Q, monitored in the aqueous bulk phase, was virtually the same as in
wild type. In the double mutant R82Q/D96N proton uptake was delayed as
in the single mutant D96N. Our results, on the other hand, provide
evidence that the mutation R82A, the substitution of a residue in the
proton release channel close to the extracellular surface, affects not
only the proton release, but in particular the proton uptake time at
the opposite surface (<1 µs compared with ~8 ms in the wt-like
mutant A160C), as monitored directly at the cytoplasmatic protein
surface. This suggests long range interactions between the
extracellular and cytoplasmic domains of the protein.
Comparison of Wild Type and the Second Site Revertant R82A/G231C,
Implications for the Revertancy Mechanism--
Double mutants that
restore the wild type phenotype in a single mutant with altered
function are of particular interest because they allow the comparison
of two proteins with different primary structures but identical
phenotypes. For instance, the removal of a charged residue can often be
compensated by a second mutation, which removes the opposite charge at
a nearby position and therefore restores the electrostatic environment
in this particular part of the protein. An example of such a short
range electrostatic interaction in bR is the double mutant R82Q/D212N
(41, 42). In this double mutant the complex counterion of the
protonated Schiff base, which involves Asp-85, Arg-82, and Asp-212, is
simplified by removing both the positive charge at position 82 and the
nearby negative charge at position 212, resulting in a dipole instead of the original quadrupole. Even though the photochemical properties are only partially restored, a proton signal with the normal order of
release and uptake and similar time constants as in wild type are
observed in the aqueous bulk phase (41). Long range electrostatic interactions have been observed in second site suppressor mutants of
the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter capsulatus (43). These second site mutations restore proton transfer, which is
interrupted in the initial single-site mutant protein. It was suggested
that the compensatory mutation propagates its effect over large
distances by mutation-induced realignments of salt bridges within a
network of ionizable residues.
The second site revertants of mutants containing single replacements at
position 82 in bR (like R82A and R82Q) are of particular interest,
because Arg-82 has been proposed to be involved in multiple types of
interactions, as part of the counterion of the Schiff base proton
(electrostatic interaction), in interactions with the primary and
terminal proton release groups (electrostatic and
structural-conformational interactions), and during folding (structural-electrostatic interaction). Though the second site revertant R82A/G231C displays in many respects wild type properties (pKa of Asp-85, rate of light-dark adaptation,
kinetics of photocycle and of proton release and uptake, and kinetic
isotope effects), small but distinct differences exist: (i) the
pKa of Asp-85 is down shifted by 0.5 pH units
compared with wt, (ii) the Hill coefficient is 0.9 in R82A/G231C but
1.6 in wt, (iii) the pKa of the terminal release
group (X'H) was determined both in the unphotolyzed protein and from
the pH dependence of the M-rise to be about 0.5 pH units lower than in
wt, and (iv) the amplitude of the M-rise and of the proton signal are
about 80% of the wt amplitude.
These differences may help to explain why the mutational change in
position 231 at the cytoplasmic surface far away from position 82 (see
Fig. 1) is able to revert many of the altered properties in R82A back
to wild type. Based on our results and structural evidence from
electron microscope and x-ray crystallographic data (9, 10), we present
a hypothesis for the mechanism of the rescue in R82A/G231C. One
possible explanation of the revertancy observed for R82A/G231C is a
rearrangement of the native H-bonded network connected with Asp-212,
leading to an equivalent hydrogen-bonded network as in wild type and
facilitating proton release to the extracellular surface but without
the participation of Asp-212 and Arg-82. The following arguments
support this hypothesis.
In wild type, Asp-212 (helix G) presumably is directly hydrogen-bonded
to Tyr-185 (helix F), Tyr-57 (helix B) and via water molecules (44) to
Arg-82 and Asp-85 (helix C) forming a three-dimensional hydrogen-bonding network (9, 10, 23). Asp-85 and Asp-212, together with
Arg-82 form the complex counterion to the protonated Schiff base in the
retinal binding pocket (45). Note, that the neutral alanine residue in
the mutant R82A is not capable of participating in a hydrogen-bonded
network. We found that the most striking similarity between the mutants
R82A, G231C, and R82A/G231C is the loss of cooperativity in the purple
to blue transition (n = 1.6 in wild type to
n = 0.8-1.1 in the mutants indicated). In addition,
the pKa values of both Asp-85 and the terminal release group X'H in the unphotolyzed protein R82A/G231C are down shifted by about 0.5 pH units compared with wt. These results indicate
a changed electrostatic environment of Asp-85 in the complex counterion
and an altered interaction of ionizable residues in the proton release
channel. This different electrostatic environment in the retinal
binding pocket of R82A/G231C compensates for the removed positive
charge of the arginine residue. A compensation of this positive charge
might be realized by a removal of the negative charge of Asp-212 from
the vicinity of Asp-85. This could occur by a structural change or by
protonation. Conformational changes on the cytoplasmic surface close to
helix G are suggested from the altered labeling stoichiometry with
5-iodoacetamidofluorescein observed between G231C and R82A/G231C.
Asp-212 resides in the same helix (helix G) as Gly-231. A
conformational change in helix G introduced by the mutation G231C can
lead to a different interaction of the Asp-212 side chain with the
neighboring residues in R82A/G231C in such a way that the side chain of
Asp-212 no longer participates in the complex counterion. Recent
time-resolved electrical measurements (19) provide evidence that the
movement of the positively charged arginine 82 side chain makes a
substantial contribution to the amplitude of the electrical signal in
wt. This amplitude is clearly reduced in the mutants G231C and
R82A/G231C.2 This result can be interpreted with the
absence of the movement of Arg-82 already in the single mutant G231C.
Note that the loss of cooperativity in the purple to blue transition
was also observed in the single mutant G231C. Therefore, it might be
that in the mutant protein G231C the arginine 82 side chain is already
pointing outward to the extracellular surface and does not contribute
to the proton release process. A replacement of Arg-82 with alanine is
then not expected to alter substantially the properties of G231C.
Furthermore, the results of the H/D isotope effect on the kinetics of
the M-rise, on the other hand, indicate a reestablishing of a wt-like
hydrogen-bonded network in the proton release channel in the mutant
R82A/G231C.
Among the double mutants with R82A or R82Q previously described in the
literature (30, 40-42), only one, R82Q/D212N (41, 42), with the second
site mutation nearby at position 212 in helix G, is able to partially
rescue the normal functional features, like normal kinetics of proton
release and uptake and pKa of Asp-85 (41). Also the
down shift of the pKa of Asp-85 compared with wt,
similar to R82A/G231C, was reported in the double mutant R82Q/D212N.
Interestingly, the compensatory mutation found in our study, G231C, is
like Asp-212 also located in helix G. Whereas Arg-82 and Asp-212 are
close together, Gly-231 is located at the end of helix G far away from
Arg-82 (see Fig. 1). Therefore, in our case the effect of G231C on R82A
in the double mutant R82A/G231C is clearly not a short range
electrostatic compensation as in R82Q/D212N where a neutral charge pair
was removed, but rather long range, and suggests a coupling of the two
residues in the different parts of the protein. This coupling seems to
mediated by an interaction of the helices C and G.
A final remaining question is concerned with the origin of the putative
conformational changes in helix G leading to the altered electrostatic
interaction in the counterion environment. It is known that arginines
are stabilizing elements in proteins (46). In peptides, Lys Arg
substitutions increase the helix content of designed helical peptides.
It was suggested that a single strategically placed arginine can exert
long range control on helix structure (46). Two arginines, Arg-225 and
Arg-227, are located at the cytoplasmic end of helix G, one helix turn
below Gly-231. Arg-227 mutations affect the kinetics of M-decay (47)
and proton uptake (48), indicating the interaction of the positively
charged guanidinium group with a hydrogen-bonded network, which is
proposed to be part of a proton uptake cluster (48). Exchange of the
small unpolar and highly flexible glycine with the polar and ionizable cysteine in position 231 may lead to an alteration in the
hydrogen-bonded network and/or water-filled cavities and to changes in
the peptide backbone. On the other hand, the removal of all C-terminal
amino acids in the mutant protein R82A by enzymatic digestion with
papain, which cuts between residues 231 and 232 and leaves Gly-231 as the terminal residue, does not lead to the rescue as observed in the
double mutant R82A/G231C but preserves the properties of R82A. The
absorption maximum of the chromophore in the C terminus-less R82A
mutant protein is 600 nm at pH 6 and the pK of the purple to
blue transition is 7.2. These values are similar to the ones observed
in the full-length R82A. This finding implies that all residues
following Gly-231 in the C terminus (232-248) are not involved in the
rescue mechanism, at least not by their absence. Further, it supports
the idea that the residues involved in the revertancy mechanism are
located in the helical region (helix G). Among the three double mutants
involving R82A studied in this report, the five double or triple
mutants involving R82A described in the literature (30, 40-42) and the
double mutant R82A/T178V,3
only R82A/G231C reverts the properties of R82A(Q) back to wt. Except
for the double mutants with the second mutation in the BC- (R82A/G72C)
and EF-loop (R82A/A160C), the second or third mutation is located
either in helix C, F, or G. Residues in these three helices are
supposed to participate in the hydrogen-bonded network facilitating
proton pumping (e.g. Asp-96, Asp-212, Asp-85, Tyr-185, and
Glu-204). However, whether double mutants other than R82A/G231C are
able to rescue R82A and which residues are involved in the revertancy
mechanism is subject to further extensive mutagenesis studies.
In conclusion, we have shown that changes at the cytoplasmic surface
can alter structural and functional interactions, which occur in the
extracellular part of the protein and vice versa, probably
because of a rearrangement of H-bonded networks mediated by
conformational changes. We demonstrated with experiments on the mutants
R82A, G231C, and R82A/G231C that allosteric interactions occur between
the extracellular and cytoplasmic surfaces of bacteriorhodopsin. Such
long range propagation of electrostatic and conformational changes is
of potential importance for signal transduction in heptahelical
G-protein-coupled receptors, where binding of ligands occurs mostly on
the extracellular side resulting in the active form of the receptor and
where binding and activation of the G-protein takes place at the
cytoplasmic surface.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grant Sfb 312-B1 from the
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (to M. P. H.) and by Grant
GM28289 from the National Institutes of Health (to H. G. K.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 49 30 83855157;
Fax: 49 30 83856299.
Present address: Genetic Disease Research Branch, National
Human Genome Research Inst., National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
2
S. Dickopf, U. Alexiev, and M. P. Heyn,
unpublished results.
3
U. Alexiev, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
bR, bacteriorhodopsin;
wt, wild type;
DMPC, 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine;
BMF, 5-(bromomethyl)fluorescein;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethyl-ammonio]-1-propanesulfonate;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid;
A160C (G72C, G231C), mutant with
alanine (glycine) in position 160 (72, 231) replaced by cysteine;
R82A, mutant with arginine in position 82 replaced by alanine;
A160C-MF(AF)
(G72C-MF(AF) or G231C-MF(AF)), mutant A160C (G72C or G231C) with
(methyl)- or (acetamido)fluorescein, respectively, bound to
cysteine.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Fersht, A.
(1985)
Enzyme Structure and Mechanism
, pp. 263-308, Freeman, New York
|
| 2.
|
Kraut, J.
(1988)
Science
242,
533-540[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Lanyi, J. K.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1183,
241-261[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Ebrey, T. G.
(1993)
Thermodynamics of Membrane Receptors and Channels
, pp. 353-387, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL
|
| 5.
|
Rothschild, K. J.
(1992)
J. Bioenerg. Biomembr.
24,
147-167[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Alexiev, U.,
Marti, T.,
Heyn, M. P.,
Khorana, H. G.,
and Scherrer, P.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
13693-13699[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Otto, H.,
Marti, T.,
Holz, M.,
Mogi, T.,
Lindau, M.,
Khorana, H. G.,
and Heyn, M. P.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
9228-9232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Braiman, M. S.,
Mogi, T.,
Marti, T.,
Stern, L. J.,
Khorana, H. G.,
and Rothschild, K. J.
(1988)
Biochemistry
27,
8516-8520[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Grigorieff, N.,
Ceska, T. A.,
Downing, K. H.,
Baldwin, J. M.,
and Henderson, R.
(1996)
J. Mol. Biol.
25,
393-421
|
| 10.
|
Luecke, H.,
Richter, H.-T.,
and Lanyi, J. K.
(1998)
Science
280,
1934-1937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Govindjee, R.,
Misra, S.,
Balashov, S. P.,
Ebrey, T. G.,
Crouch, R. K.,
and Menick, D. R.
(1996)
Biophys. J.
71,
1011-1023[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Balashov, S. P.,
Imasheva, E. S.,
Govindjee, R.,
and Ebrey, T. G.
(1996)
Biophys. J.
70,
473-481[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Richter, H.-T.,
Brown, L. S.,
Needleman, R.,
and Lanyi, J. K.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
4054-4062[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Hatanaka, M.,
Sasaki, J.,
Kandori, H.,
Ebrey, T. G.,
Needleman, R.,
Lanyi, J. K.,
and Maeda, A.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
6308-6312[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Balashov, S. P.,
Imasheva, E. S.,
Ebrey, T. G.,
Chen, N.,
Menick, D. R.,
and Crouch, R. K.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
8671-8676[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Dioumaev, A. K.,
Richter, H.-T.,
Brown, L. S.,
Tanio, M.,
Tuzi, S.,
Saito, H.,
Kimura, Y.,
Needleman, R.,
and Lanyi, J. K.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
2496-2506[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Pebay-Peyroula, E.,
Rummel, G.,
Rosenbusch, J. P.,
and Landau, E. M.
(1997)
Science
277,
1676-1681[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Scharnagl, C.,
and Fischer, S. F.
(1996)
Chem. Phys.
212,
231-246[CrossRef]
|
| 19.
|
Dickopf, S.,
and Heyn, M. P.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
73,
3171-3181[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Otto, H.,
Marti, T.,
Holz, M.,
Mogi, T.,
Stern, L. J.,
Engel, F.,
Khorana, H. G.,
and Heyn, M. P.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
1018-1022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Balashov, S. P.,
Govindjee, R.,
Kono, M.,
Imasheva, E.,
Lukashev, E.,
Ebrey, T. G.,
Crouch, R. K.,
Menick, D. R.,
and Feng, Y.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
10331-10343[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Subramaniam, S.,
Marti, T.,
and Khorana, H. G.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
1013-1017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Essen, L.-O.,
Siegert, R.,
Lehmann, W. D.,
and Oesterhelt, D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
11673-11678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Thomas, E. A.,
Carson, M. J.,
Neal, M. J.,
and Sutcliffe, G. J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
14115-14119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Alexiev, U.,
Mollaaghababa, R.,
Scherrer, P.,
Khorana, H. G.,
and Heyn, M. P.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
372-376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Krebs, M. P.,
Mollaaghababa, R.,
and Khorana, H. G.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
1987-1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Liao, M.-J.,
London, E.,
and Khorana, H. G.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
9949-9955[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Scherrer, P.,
Alexiev, U.,
Marti, T.,
Khorana, H. G.,
and Heyn, M. P.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
13684-13692[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Moltke, S.,
Alexiev, U.,
and Heyn, M. P.
(1995)
Isr. J. Chem.
35,
401-414
|
| 30.
|
Alexiev, U.,
Marti, T.,
Heyn, M. P.,
Khorana, H. G.,
and Scherrer, P.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
298-306[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Metz, G.,
Siebert, F.,
and Engelhard, M.
(1992)
FEBS Lett.
303,
237-241[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Szundi, I.,
and Stoeckenius, W.
(1989)
Biophys. J.
56,
369-383[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Mowery, P.,
Lozier, R.,
Chae, Q.,
Tseng, Y.-W.,
and Stoeckenius, W.
(1979)
J. Mol. Biol.
12,
88-118
|
| 34.
|
Scherrer, P.,
Mathews, M. K.,
Sperling, W.,
and Stoeckenius, W.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
829-834[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Chizhov, I.,
Chernavskii, D. S.,
Engelhard, M.,
Mueller, K.-H.,
Zubov, B. V.,
and Hess, B.
(1996)
Biophys. J.
71,
2329-2345[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Le Coutre, J.,
and Gerwert, K.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
398,
333-336[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Heberle, J.,
and Dencher, N. A.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
5996-6000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Gutman, M.,
and Nachliel, E.
(1995)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1231,
123-138[CrossRef]
|
| 39.
| Scherrer, P., Alexiev, U., Otto, H., Heyn, M. P., Marti, T., and
Khorana, H. G. (1992) Structures and Functions of Retinal
Proteins (Rigaud, J. L., ed.) Vol. 221, pp. 205-211, London
Colloque INSERM/John Libbey Eurotext Ltd
|
| 40.
|
Brown, L. S.,
Yamazaki, Y.,
Maeda, A.,
Sun, L.,
Needleman, R.,
and Lanyi, J. K.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
239,
401-414[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Brown, L. S.,
Varo, G.,
Hatanaka, M.,
Sasaki, J.,
Kandori, H.,
Maeda, A.,
Friedman, N.,
Sheves, M.,
Needleman, R.,
and Lanyi, J. K.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
12903-12911[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Marti, T.,
Rösselet, S. J.,
Otto, H.,
Heyn, M. P.,
and Khorana, H. G.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
18674-18683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Sebban, P.,
Maróti, P.,
Schiffer, M.,
and Hanson, D. K.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
8390-8397[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Luecke, H.,
Schobert, B.,
Richter, H.-T.,
Cartailler, J.-P.,
and Lanyi, J. K.
(1999)
Science
286,
255-260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
De Groot, H. J. M.,
Harbison, G. S.,
Herzfeld, J.,
and Griffin, R. G.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
3346-3351[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Mrabet, N. T.,
Van den Broeck, A.,
Van,
den brande, I.,
Stanssens, P.,
Laroche, Y.,
Lambeir, A.-M.,
Matthijssens, G.,
Jenkins, J.,
Chiadmi, M.,
van Tilbeurgh, H.,
Rey, F.,
Janin, J.,
Quax, W. J.,
Lasters, I.,
De Maeyer, M.,
and Wodak, S. J.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
2239-2253[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Stern, L.,
and Khorana, H. G.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
14202-14208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Zimányi, L.,
Cao, Y.,
Needleman, R.,
Ottolenghi, M.,
and Lanyi, J. K.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
7669-7678[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|