JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fajloun, Z.
Right arrow Articles by De Waard, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fajloun, Z.
Right arrow Articles by De Waard, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 18, 13605-13612, May 5, 2000


Synthesis, 1H NMR Structure, and Activity of a Three-disulfide-bridged Maurotoxin Analog Designed to Restore the Consensus Motif of Scorpion Toxins*

Ziad FajlounDagger §, Gilles Ferrat, Edmond Carlier||, Mohamed FathallahDagger , Catherine LecomteDagger , Guillaume Sandoz||, Eric di LuccioDagger , Kamel MabroukDagger , Christian LegrosDagger , Herve Darbon, Herve RochatDagger , Jean-Marc SabatierDagger , and Michel De Waard||**

From the Dagger  Laboratoire de Biochimie, CNRS Unité Mixte de Recherche 6560, IFR Jean Roche, Faculté de Médecine Nord, Boulevard Pierre Dramard, 13916, Marseille Cédex 20,  Architecture et Function des Macromolécules Biologiques, CNRS Unité Propre de Recherche 9039, IFR1, 31, Chemin Joseph-Aiguier, 13402 Marseille Cédex 20, and || Laboratoire de Neurobiologie des Canaux Ioniques, INSERM Unité 464, IFR Jean Roche, Faculté de Médecine Nord, Boulevard Pierre Dramard, 13916, Marseille Cédex 20, France

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Maurotoxin (MTX) is a 34-residue toxin that has been isolated from the venom of the chactidae scorpion Scorpio maurus palmatus. The toxin displays an exceptionally wide range of pharmacological activity since it binds onto small conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels and also blocks Kv channels (Shaker, Kv1.2 and Kv1.3). MTX possesses 53-68% sequence identity with HsTx1 and Pi1, two other K+ channel short chain scorpion toxins cross-linked by four disulfide bridges. These three toxins differ from other K+/Cl-/Na+ channel scorpion toxins cross-linked by either three or four disulfide bridges by the presence of an extra half-cystine residue in the middle of a consensus sequence generally associated with the formation of an alpha /beta scaffold (an alpha -helix connected to an antiparallel beta -sheet by two disulfide bridges). Because MTX exhibits an uncommon disulfide bridge organization among known scorpion toxins (C1-C5, C2-C6, C3-C4, and C7-C8 instead of C1-C4, C2-C5, and C3-C6 for three-disulfide-bridged toxins or C1-C5, C2-C6, C3-C7, and C4-C8 for four-disulfide-bridged toxins), we designed and chemically synthesized an MTX analog with three instead of four disulfide bridges ([Abu19,Abu34]MTX) and in which the entire consensus motif of scorpion toxins was restored by the substitution of the two half-cystines in positions 19 and 34 (corresponding to C4 and C8) by two isosteric alpha -aminobutyrate (Abu) derivatives. The three-dimensional structure of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX in solution was solved by 1H NMR. This analog adopts the alpha /beta scaffold with now conventional half-cystine pairings connecting C1-C5, C2-C6, and C3-C7 (with C4 and C8 replaced by Abu derivatives). This novel arrangement in half-cystine pairings that concerns the last disulfide bridge results mainly in a reorientation of the alpha -helix regarding the beta -sheet structure. In vivo, [Abu19,Abu34]MTX remains lethal in mice as assessed by intracerebroventricular injection of the peptide (LD50 value of 0.25 µg/mouse). The structural variations are also accompanied by changes in the pharmacological selectivity of the peptide, suggesting that the organization pattern of disulfide bridges should affect the three-dimensional presentation of certain key residues critical to the blockage of K+ channel subtypes.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

MTX1 is a toxin isolated from the venom of the chactidae scorpion Scorpio maurus palmatus (1). It is a basic, C-terminal amidated 34-mer peptide cross-linked by four disulfide bridges. The solid phase technique has been used to obtain synthetic maurotoxin (sMTX) and it was found that both the natural and synthetic MTXs are equally lethal to mice by intracerebroventricular inoculation (LD50 of 80 ng/mouse). sMTX has been shown to be active in the nanomolar range on both voltage-gated K+ channels (Shaker B, Kv1.1, Kv1.2, and Kv1.3) and onto rat brain apamin-sensitive small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels (SK) (1). The solution structure of sMTX has been solved by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance technique (2). The three-dimensional structure shows that the toxin contains a bent helix from residues 6 to 16 connected by a loop to a two-stranded antiparallel beta -sheet (residues 23-26 and 28-31), a conformation grossly similar to those of other scorpion toxins.

The half-cystine pairings of sMTX were identified by enzyme proteolysis and found to be Cys3-Cys24, Cys9-Cys29, Cys13-Cys19, and Cys31-Cys34, consistent with experimental data obtained by Edman sequencing of the natural MTX (3). The structural and pharmacological features of MTX (less than 40 residues, 4 disulfide bridges, and binding onto K+ channels) suggest that MTX belongs to a new class of natural K+ channel blockers structurally intermediate between the Na+ (60-70 residues and 4 disulfide bridges) and K+ channel scorpion toxin families (less than 40 residues and 3 disulfide bridges) (4). This class also includes Pi1 and HsTx1 from the venoms of the scorpions Pandinus imperator (5) and Heterometrus spinnifer (6), respectively. These K+ channel-acting toxins share from 53 to 68% sequence identity with MTX but display slightly different pharmacological selectivities. For instance, Pi1 is inactive on rat Kv1.1 and Kv1.3 channels, whereas HsTx1 is inactive on apamin-sensitive SK channels in contrast to MTX (6). One interesting feature of MTX is that it has a unique disulfide bridge pattern among known scorpion toxins, including toxins from its own class such as Pi1 and HsTx1. In particular, it differs, first, from the classical three-disulfide-bridged toxins active on K+ channels by the presence of an extra disulfide bridge and, second, from all three- or four-disulfide-bridged toxins by a loss of the half-cystine pairings observed in classical three- or four-disulfide-bridged toxins (C1-C4, C2-C5, and C3-C6 pairings, or C1-C5, C2-C6, C3-C7, and C4-C8 pairings, respectively). The change concerns the two last disulfide bridges, and the pairings observed in MTX are of the type C1-C5, C2-C6, C3-C4, and C7-C8 instead.

It has been proposed that the alpha /beta scaffold of scorpion toxins is determined by a consensus sequence of the type [...]C[...]CXXXC[...](G/A/S)XC[...]CXC[...] for either three- or four-disulfide-bridged toxins, with two additional half-cystines located outside the motif in the latter case (2, 7, 8). From the alpha /beta scaffold arises a great functional diversity of these scorpion toxins. The detailed structural basis for this variability is still poorly apprehended. We noticed that this consensus sequence is, however, altered in the case of MTX since the first half-cystine residue located at the N terminus is absent, whereas a new one is inserted in the central part of the motif (position Cys19, Fig. 1). Despite this change in the proposed consensus sequence, it was unexpectedly found that MTX still adopts the alpha /beta scaffold (2). However, interesting differences result from this new disulfide bridge organization. In particular, it was found that, in this novel disulfide bridge pattern, the alpha -helix is connected by two disulfide bridges (Cys9-Cys29 and Cys13-Cys19) to two different strands of the beta -sheet instead of connecting the alpha -helix to the same strand. These novel half-cystine pairings may nevertheless result in discrete conformational changes and/or positioning of certain residues of the toxin that could impact the pharmacological selectivity of MTX. To test this hypothesis, a three-disulfide-bridged structural analog of MTX was designed to fully restore the consensus sequence of the scorpion toxins. Accordingly, Cys19 and Cys34 that do not belong to the consensus sequence were replaced by isosteric alpha -aminobutyrate derivatives. Here, we report the chemical synthesis of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX, its half-cystine pairings, its three-dimensional structure in solution, and its biological and pharmacological activities. Our data indicate that there is indeed a rearrangement of the disulfide bridges in the MTX analog without a drastic alteration of the alpha /beta scaffold, but with a marked reorientation of the alpha -helix regarding the beta -sheet (angle of 50°) that may be sufficient to affect the pharmacological activity of the peptide.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Nalpha -Fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl (Fmoc)-L-amino acids, Fmoc-amide resin, and reagents used for peptide synthesis were obtained from Perkin-Elmer. Solvents were analytical grade products from SDS. Enzymes (trypsin and chymotrypsin) were obtained from Roche Molecular Biochemicals.

Chemical Synthesis and Physicochemical Characterization of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX-- The [Abu19,Abu34]MTX was obtained by the solid phase technique (9) using a peptide synthesizer (model 433A, Applied Biosystems Inc.). Peptide chains were assembled stepwise on 0.25 meq of Fmoc-amide resin (0.65 meq of amino group/g) using 1 mmol of (Fmoc) amino acid derivatives (10). The side chain-protecting groups used for trifunctional residues were: trityl for Cys, Asn, and Gln; tert-butyl for Ser, Thr, Tyr, and Asp; pentamethylchroman for Arg, and tert-butyloxycarbonyl for Lys. The Fmoc-amino acid derivatives were coupled (20 min) as their hydroxybenzotriazole active esters in N-methylpyrrolidone (4-fold excess). The peptide resin (about 2.2 g) was treated for 2.5 h at room temperature with a mixture of trifluoroacetic acid/H2O/thioanisole/ethanedithiol (88:5:5:2, v/v) in the presence of crystalline phenol (2.25 g). After filtration of the mixture, the peptide was precipitated and washed by adding cold diethyloxide. The crude peptide was pelleted by centrifugation (3,000 × g; 10 min) and the supernatant was discarded. The reduced peptide was then dissolved at 2 mM in 0.2 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.3, and stirred under air to allow folding (48 h, room temperature). The target product, [Abu19,Abu34]MTX, was purified by reversed phase high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Perkin-Elmer, C18 Aquapore ODS 20 µm, 250 × 10 mm) by means of a 60-min linear gradient of 0.08% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid and 0-35% acetonitrile in 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid/H2O at a flow rate of 5 ml/min (lambda  = 230 nm). The homogeneity and identity of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX was assessed by: (i) analytical C18 reversed phase HPLC, (ii) amino acid analysis after acidolysis, and (iii) mass determination by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.

Assignment of Half-cystine Pairings of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX by Enzyme-based Cleavage and Edman Sequencing Analysis-- The [Abu19,Abu34]MTX (800 µg) was incubated with a mixture of trypsin and chymotrypsin at 10% (w/w) in 0.2 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, for 12 h at 37 °C. The peptide fragments were then purified by reversed phase HPLC (Vydac, C18 5-µm column, 4 × 150 mm) with a 60-min linear gradient of 0.08% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid, 0-60% acetonitrile in 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid/H2O at a flow rate of 1 ml/min (lambda  = 230 nm), and freeze-dried prior to their analyses. The peptide fragments were hydrolyzed by acidolysis (6 N HCl/phenol), and their amino acid content was analyzed (Beckman, System 6300 amino acid analyzer). The peptides were further characterized by mass spectrometry analysis (RP-DE Voyager, Perseptive Biosystems), and Edman sequencing using a gas phase microsequencer (Applied Biosystems 470A). In standard HPLC conditions for analyzing phenylthiohydantoin-amino acid derivatives, diphenylthiohydantoin-cystine elutes at a retention time of 9.8 min.

Three-dimensional Structure Determination of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX in Solution by Bidimensional 1H NMR-- 4.0 mg of [Abu13,Abu34]MTX was dissolved in 0.5 ml of H2O/D2O (90/10 v/v), pH = 3 uncorrected for isotope effects. Proton two-dimensional NMR spectra was first routinely recorded at 300 K. All the data were collected on a Bruker DRX 500. Clean total correlation spectra (TOCSY) (11, 12) were acquired with a spin lock of 80 ms. Phase sensitive two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) spectra (NOESY) (13, 14) with watergate (15) composite were acquired using the time proportional phase increment method with mixing time of 100 ms. The solvent-OH resonance was suppressed either by low power irradiation during the relaxation delay and, for NOESY spectra, during the mixing time, or using a watergate 3-9-19 pulse train (15) using a gradient at the magic angle obtained by applying simultaneously x, y, and z gradients prior to detection.

For determination of amide proton exchange rates, the peptide was lyophilized twice and solubilized in 100% D2O. Immediately after solubilization, a series of NOESY spectra with a mixing time of 80 ms were recorded at 283 K, the first one during a time period of 1 h (1024 complex points with 256 experiments), followed by spectra of 10 h (1024 complex points with 512 experiments).

All the data were processed using the Bruker software XWINNMR, running on a Silicon Graphic INDY R4000 workstation. The matrices were transformed with a zero filling to the next power of two in the acquisition dimension, and to 1024 points in the other. The signal was multiplied by a shifted sine-bell window, in both dimensions prior to Fourier transform, and a fifth-order polynomial base-line correction was applied. Spectra had finally a 12 ppm width with a digital resolution of 2.93 Hz/point in the omega 2 dimension and 5.85 Hz/point in the omega 1 dimension. The spectral analysis and structure calculation were performed as described previously (2).

Molecular Mechanics Calculations-- Steric energy calculations were aimed at determining the most energetically favored half-cystine pairings of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX. These calculations were based on the three-dimensional structure of MTX obtained from the Protein Data Bank (2). Half-cystines in positions 19 and 34 were substituted by Abu derivatives, and full minimization was performed for each sterically possible half-cystine pairing arrangements (12 found possible out of 15, the disulfide bridge 29-31 being excluded from the calculations because of steric impossibility; see Table II for the various combinations used). Minimizations were achieved using the molecular modeling program Insight II (Molecular Simulations Inc.), the Discover-based minimization, and the CVFF force field. The mathematical method used for minimizations was the gradient conjugate.

Neurotoxic Activity of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX in Mice-- The peptide was tested in vivo for toxicity by determining the LD50 after intracerebroventricular injection into 20-g C57/BL6 mice. Groups of six mice per dose were injected with 5 µl of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX solution containing 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin and 0.9% (w/v) sodium chloride.

Binding Assay of 125I-Apamin and Competition by [Abu19,Abu34]MTX onto Rat Brain Synaptosomes-- Rat brain synaptosomes (P2 fraction) were prepared as described by Gray and Whittaker (16). The protein content was determined by a modified Lowry method. 125I-Apamin (2,000 Ci/mmol) was obtained according to Seagar et al. (17). Aliquots of 50 µl of 0.1 nM 125I-apamin were added to 400 µl of synaptosome suspension (0.4 mg of protein/ml). Samples were incubated for 1 h at 4 °C with 50 µl of one of a series of concentrations of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX (10-5 to 10-13 M) in 500 µl final volume. The incubation buffer was 25 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM KCl, pH 7.2. The samples were centrifuged, and the resulting pellets were washed three times in 1 ml of the same buffer. Bound radioactivity was determined by counting (Packard Crystal II). The values expressed are the means of triplicate experiments ± S.D. Nonspecific binding, less than 10% of the total binding, was determined in the presence of an excess (10 nM) of unlabeled apamin.

Oocyte Preparation and Electrophysiological Recordings-- Stages V and VI Xenopus laevis oocytes were prepared for cRNA injection and electrophysiological recordings as described (18). Briefly, oocytes were prepared by removing the follicular cell layer by enzymatic treatment with 2 mg/ml collagenase IA (Sigma) in classical Barth's medium (in mM: 88 NaCl, 1 KCl, 0.82 MgSO4, 0.33 Ca(NO3)2, 0.41 CaCl2, 2.4 NaHCO3, 15 HEPES, pH 7.4 with NaOH). The plasmids were cut with SmaI (Shaker B), NotI (rat Kv1.1), XbaI (rat Kv1.2), and EcoRI (rat Kv1.3). The linearized plasmids were transcribed by means of a T7 or SP6 (mMessage mMachine kit, Ambion). The cRNA were stored frozen in H2O at -80 °C at 1 µg/µl. The cells were micro-injected 2 days latter with 50 nl of cRNA (0.2 µg/µl Shaker B, rat Kv1.1, rat Kv1.2, or rat Kv1.3 channels). To favor channel expression, cells were incubated at 16 °C into a defined nutrient oocyte medium (19) 2-6 days before current recordings. Standard two-microelectrode techniques were used at room temperature (18-23 °C) to record oocyte currents. Both current and voltage electrodes were filled with 140 mM KCl and had resistances comprising between 0.5 and 1 megaohm. The bath solution was clamped to 0 mV, which served as reference potential. Currents were recorded using a voltage-clamp amplifier (GeneClamp 500, Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) interfaced with a 16-bit AD/DA converter (Digidata 1200A, Axon Instruments) for acquisition and voltage protocol application. Voltage pulses were delivered every 15 s from a holding potential of -80 mV. Current records were sampled at 10 kHz and low pass-filtered at 2 kHz using an eight-pole Bessel filter and stored on computer for subsequent analysis. The extracellular recording solution contained (in mM): 88 NaCl, 10 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 0.5 CaCl2, 0.5 niflumic acid, 5 HEPES, pH 7.4 (NaOH). Leak and capacitative currents were subtracted on-line by a P/4 protocol. Residual capacitative artifacts were blanked for display purposes. Toxin solutions were perfused in the recording chamber at a flow rate of 2 ml/min using a ValveBank4 apparatus (Automate Scientific Inc.). 0.1% bovine serum albumin was added to the recording and perfusion solutions to prevent [Abu19,Abu34]MTX loss to the plastic chamber and tubules and nonspecific binding onto the cell. Data analysis was performed using pCLAMP 6.0.3 software (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). The results are presented as mean ± S.E.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Fig. 1 illustrates the consensus sequence of the scorpion toxins independent of their length, primary structure, and pharmacological selectivity (7, 8). In three-disulfide-bridged toxins, the half-cystine pairings are so far of the type C1-C4, C2-C5, and C3-C6. In short chain four-disulfide-bridged toxins active on K+ channels, one of the two additional half-cystine residues is located inside the consensus motif, between C3 and C4, whereas the other one is placed after the C-terminal end of the motif (after C6). Of note, the two additional half-cystine residues found in long-chain four-disulfide-bridged scorpion toxins active on Na+ channels are located differently, i.e. at N- and C-terminal regions, outside the motif. In the K+ channel toxins, the addition of two cysteines affects the disulfide bridge organization of the toxin. Two possibilities are observed so far in this toxin family: (i) toxins such as Pi1 and HsTx1 keep the general overlapping type of half-cystine pairings (see Fig. 1), whereas (ii) MTX presents partially rearranged half-cystine pairings. In particular, the two last bridges are not of an overlapping type in MTX but instead C3 is connected with the extra central half-cystine residue (Cys in position 19 in MTX amino acid sequence) and C6 with the outer C-terminal half-cystine residue (Cys in position 34). To assess the effect of the disulfide bridge rearrangement induced by the presence of these two extra half-cystine residues regarding toxin three-dimensional structure and pharmacological activity, we designed and chemically synthesized an analog of MTX in which Cys19 and Cys34 were replaced by isosteric alpha -aminobutyrate derivatives (Abu19 and Abu34, which are unable to associate covalently). In this analog, the two half-cystine residues were not engaged in the formation of the same disulfide bridge, and it can therefore be expected that there will be (i) a reduction in the number of disulfide bridges from four to three and (ii) a concomitant rearrangement in pairings of the remaining six half-cystine residues. These mutations aim to restore the entire consensus sequence and half-cystine pairings of three-disulfide-bridged scorpion toxins.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Consensus motif and half-cystine pairings of three- and four-disulfide-bridged scorpion toxins. Top, consensus structural motif of short chain three-disulfide-bridged toxins active on K+ channels and long chain four-disulfide-bridged toxins active on Na+ channels. Corresponding half-cystine pairings are given in right panel for three-disulfide-bridged toxins. The half-cystines are numbered by order of appearance from the N to C termini. Middle, variant of the consensus motif for short chain four-disulfide-bridged toxins active on K+ channels. The additional half-cystines (not numbered) are given in bold type. The case of MTX is illustrated showing complete primary structure. The two possible half-cystine pairings arising from this modified consensus motif are given in the right panel; top, for Pi1 and HsTx1; bottom, for MTX. Bottom, structural motif of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX after substituting the two additional half-cystines found in amino acid positions 19 and 34 by alpha -aminobutyrate derivatives (Abu). Of note, the resulting motif resembles the structural motif for short chain three-disulfide-bridged or long chain four-disulfide-bridged toxins as shown on top figure. The half-cystine pairings (right) are defined in Fig. 2. Asterisks denote a C-terminal carboxylamide.

Stepwise assembly of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX was achieved by means of Fmoc/t-butyl chemistry (10). The yield of assembly was 80%. The profiles of elution by C18 reversed phase HPLC of the crude reduced peptide after final acidolysis are shown in Fig. 2A (left panel). The crude peptide was folded/oxidized by 48 h exposure to air (Fig. 2A, middle panel), and purified to homogeneity by C18 reversed phase HPLC (Fig. 2A, right panel). The amino acid ratios of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX were in agreement with the deduced values (see Table I). Additionally, the mass spectrometry analysis by the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight technique gave an experimental Mr (M + H)+ of 3579.3 for [Abu19,Abu34]MTX, which is close to the deduced Mr (M + H)+ of 3579.2. 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Analytical C18 reversed phase HPLC profiles of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX at various stages of its chemical synthesis. A, the crude reduced peptide after trifluoroacetic acid cleavage (left), the crude peptide after 48 h of folding/oxidation (middle), and the purified folded [Abu19,Abu34]MTX (right). For conditions, see "Experimental Procedures." B, assignment of the half-cystine pairings by analysis of the peptide fragments obtained by trypsin/chymotrypsin proteolysis of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX. After enzyme-based cleavage, the peptide fragments were purified by analytical C18 reversed phase HPLC and characterized by amino acid analysis, Edman sequencing and mass spectrometry. The peptide sequences deduced from these analyses are shown. Retention times in HPLC, experimental and deduced Mr values of the proteolytic fragments, and established half-cystine pairings are indicated. C, complete disulfide bridge pattern of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX as experimentally determined by enzyme-based cleavage. The positions of half-cystines are indicated in bold. The disulfide bridges are shown in lines. The novel pairing between Cys13 and Cys31 is shown in bold line.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Amino acid content (uncorrected values) of [Abu19, Abu34] MTX after hydrolysis (118 °C, 20 h, N2 atmosphere) with 6 N HCl in the presence of 2% (w/v) phenol
The deduced amino acid composition is given in brackets. Deduced and experimental Mr values are indicated. ND, not determined.

Next, we attempted to determine by computer-assisted molecular modeling which disulfide bridge organization among the 15 theoretically possible combinations was the most energetically favored for [Abu19,Abu34]MTX. Three of these combinations, all based on the Cys29-Cys31 pairing, were deliberately eliminated from the calculations because of the impossibility of this pairing to occur (the minimal pairing that can occur being the 14-membered disulfide ring requiring two residues between the two half-cystines). The most stable conformation (lowest steric energy) obtained was the one that can be found in scorpion toxins cross-linked by three disulfide bridges characterized so far, i.e. C1-C4, C2-C5, and C3-C6 (Table II).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Steric energies of the 12 possible half-cystine pairing combinations of the three-disulfide-bridged [Abu19, Abu34]MTX as determined by molecular mechanics calculations
The most favored combination is shown in bold and corresponds to the experimentally determined disulfide bridge organization. The conformation of molecules involving a half-cystine pairing 24-29 are strongly disfavored.

To now formerly establish the half-cystine pairings of oxidized [Abu19,Abu34]MTX, the analog was proteolyzed by a mixture of trypsin and chymotrypsin and the resulting peptide fragments were purified by HPLC. Amino acid analysis, mass spectrometry, and Edman sequencing techniques were used to identify the sequence of the peptides connected to each other by a disulfide bond. The results of the enzyme treatment are summarized in Fig. 2B. The half-cystine pairings were thereby mapped as Cys3-Cys24, Cys9-Cys29, and Cys13-Cys31 (Fig. 2C). These findings demonstrate that, as expected by introducing the two point mutations in positions 19 and 34 of MTX, the standard overlapping disulfide bridge pattern found in natural three-disulfide-bridged scorpion toxins was restored. In the [Abu19,Abu34]MTX analog, the two first disulfide bridges (Cys3-Cys24 and Cys9-Cys29) are identical to those found in MTX, whereas the last one is a recombination between Cys13 and Cys31 that initially belonged to two different disulfide bridges. Interestingly, all three disulfide bridges formed in [Abu19,Abu34]MTX are in an identical pattern to the three first disulfide bridges of both Pi1 and HsTx1, confirming that the disulfide bridge pattern adopted by [Abu19,Abu34]MTX was indeed energetically favored as suggested by the molecular mechanics calculations. The formation of a disulfide bridge between Cys13 and Cys31 may appear as a surprising result since, in the solution structure of MTX, the sulfurs of Cys13 and Cys31 are distant by 5.4 Å. The fact that, in the [Abu19,Abu34]MTX variant, these sulfurs approach within disulfide bonding distance (2 Å) may be due to the substitutions of the half-cystines 19 and 34 by the isosteric Abu derivatives themselves. Indeed, the potential differences in properties (hydrophobicity) between the side chains of Abu and Cys residues are likely to be the real cause of this structural rearrangement. Alternatively, it cannot be ruled out that disulfide bridges may not just simply stabilize pre-folded structures, as generally admitted, but could also affect the final three-dimensional structure of the molecule to a small extent, a possibility that is, however, difficult to address experimentally.

Next, we determined by 1H NMR whether the disulfide bridge rearrangement observed in [Abu19,Abu34]MTX induces significant changes in the three-dimensional structure of the peptide. Spin system assignment was carried out according to the 2-steps method. First, the spin systems were identified by their scalar connectivities. Cross-peaks between HN and Halpha were identified by examination of the DQF-COSY spectrum (Fig. 3A). Spin systems were identified on the basis of DQF-COSY, and the TOCSY spectrum was used to correlate these side-chain spin systems with the HN-Halpha cross-peaks. In a second assignment step, the spin systems were connected in sequence by the virtue of Halpha /HN, HN/HN, and Hbeta /HN connectivities. These together with medium range connectivities are summarized in Fig. 3B. The calculated structures of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX converged into a single solution. The root mean square deviation value (1.1 Å for backbone atoms and 2.2 Å for all heavy atoms) of the 25 structures demonstrates the presence of the conventional alpha /beta scaffold: a two-stranded beta -sheet connected to an alpha -helix by two disulfide bridges (Fig. 4). The precise location of these secondary structures has been obtained by PROCHECK-NMR, which indicates the presence of an alpha -helix running from residues 9 to 17 (two turns and a half-helix) and a beta -sheet made of two stretches from residues 22 to 25 and 28 to 31. The second and the third strands are connected by an undefined beta -turn formed by the residues at positions 26 and 27. The main difference of the three-disulfide-bridged [Abu19,Abu34]MTX as compared with the four-disulfide-bridged MTX is the angle between the axis of the alpha -helix and the axis of the beta -sheet. This angle is 50° in MTX, whereas it is close to 0° in [Abu19,Abu34]MTX. This structural difference could be explained by the fact that in MTX, the alpha -helix is connected by two disulfide bridges (Cys9-Cys29 and Cys13-Cys19) to each strand of the beta -sheet, which forces the alpha -helix to orient with an angle of 50° as compared with the beta -sheet. In contrast, in [Abu19,Abu34]MTX, the two disulfide bridges (conserved Cys9-Cys29 and novel Cys13-Cys31) connect the alpha -helix to the same strand (running from residues 28 to 31) of the beta -sheet. This novel pattern of bridging now constrains the two secondary structures to the same axis orientation (Fig. 4). The relative orientation of the alpha -helix with regard to the main axis of the beta -sheet measured on all available three-disulfide-bridged scorpion toxins from the Protein Data Bank files ranges from 0 to 70° independently of the pharmacological selectivity and sensitivity of these toxins. Therefore, this structural characteristic cannot be used to anticipate the pharmacological profile of any given toxin.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Fingerprint region of a DQF-COSY spectrum and sequential NOE data of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX. A, fingerprint region of a DQF-COSY spectrum. The alpha N cross-peaks are labeled according to the results of the sequential assignment. B, summary of sequential and medium range assignments. The sequential assignments are indicated by boxes, the sizes of which are related to the intensity of the corresponding sequential NOE.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Comparison of the three-dimensional solution structures of sMTX and [Abu19,Abu34]MTX by 1H NMR. Molscript representation of sMTX (left) and [Abu19,Abu34]MTX (right). The marked difference in the relative orientation of the two secondary structures (alpha -helix versus beta -sheet) is highlighted by looking at the two molecules from the beta -sheet side.

We next tested whether the structural rearrangement induced by the novel disulfide bridge pattern could result in changes in the pharmacological activity of the synthetic peptide. Intracerebroventricular injections of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX still produced a lethal effect in mice with an LD50 value of 0.25 µg/mouse. This effect is thus 3 times less potent than the one observed with the four-disulfide-bridged MTX (1). However, the symptoms induced by the injection of the toxin analog closely resemble those of MTX itself (and other K+ channel scorpion toxins), suggesting that K+ channels are still likely the molecular targets of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX. Because of the high relatedness of MTX and [Abu19,Abu34]MTX primary structures, we compared their effects on the binding of 125I-apamin onto rat brain synaptosomes and on the K+ currents induced by the expression of Shaker B, rat Kv1.1, Kv1.2, and Kv1.3 into Xenopus oocytes. We first tested the ability of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX to compete with 125I-apamin for binding onto rat brain synaptosomes. Fig. 5 shows an [Abu19,Abu34]MTX-induced, concentration-dependent, inhibition of 125I-apamin binding with a half-effect of 100 nM. In comparison, unlabeled apamin produced a complete inhibition (IC100) of 125I-apamin binding at a much lower concentration (100 pM). The disulfide bridge rearrangement produced by the Cys19 and Cys34 substitutions decreased the affinity of the peptide for SK-type channels by approximately 9-fold since an IC50 of 11 nM was found for sMTX, in agreement with previous data (1). Next, we examined the activity of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX on Shaker B, rat Kv1.1, Kv1.2, and Kv1.3 expressed in Xenopus oocytes. We compared the dose-dependent inhibition of the currents associated to these channels by sMTX and [Abu19,Abu34]MTX applications. Fig. 6A shows that 1 nM [Abu19,Abu34]MTX potently inhibited rat Kv1.2 currents. The extent of inhibition was identical at various test depolarizations, suggesting that the toxin action was only slightly or not voltage-dependent. The reversibility of the inhibition is illustrated in Fig. 6B. 5 nM [Abu19,Abu34]MTX induced a 95% inhibition after a 3-min application of the peptide, which was partially (up to 65%) reversed by washout of the toxin. Similar observations were made with Shaker B and Kv1.3 under similar experimental conditions (data not shown). We performed the dose-response experiments for Shaker B, rat Kv1.1, Kv1.2, and Kv1.3 current inhibitions by [Abu19,Abu34]MTX and compared the results to the dose-response data obtained using sMTX under identical experimental conditions (Fig. 6C). The IC50 values measured for [Abu19,Abu34]MTX were 1.2 ± 0.9 nM (Shaker B, n = 26), 1.7 ± 2 (Kv1.2, n = 36), and 432 ± 23 nM (Kv1.3, n = 22). The toxin had no effect on Kv1.1 at concentrations up to 10 µM (n = 10). In comparison, we found IC50 values of 3.4 ± 2.2 nM (Shaker B, n = 26), 0.06 ± 0.1 (Kv1.2, n = 20), and 320 ± 51 nM (Kv1.3, n = 17) for sMTX. These data suggest that the substitution of Cys19 and Cys34 by Abu derivatives produces no significant change in peptide affinity for Shaker B and Kv1.3, but a 20-fold decrease in affinity for rat Kv1.2. Notably, there was also a greater fraction of Kv1.3 current that could be blocked by the MTX analog, i.e. 53.2% for [Abu19,Abu34]MTX versus 19.6% for sMTX. The IC50 values obtained with [Abu19,Abu34]MTX for either the binding assay with 125I-apamin or the various K+ channel current blocks are within the concentration range observed for natural three-disulfide-bridged scorpion toxins. For instance, SK channel-acting toxins compete with 125I-apamin for binding onto rat brain synaptosomes at concentrations ranging from 20 pM (P05) to over 1 µM (P01). Similarly, for Shaker B current inhibition, IC50 values reported for other toxins range from 0.16 nM (agitoxin) to 160 nM (noxiustoxin) (20). The only exception to the rule appears to be Kv1.3, which is much less sensitive to [Abu19,Abu34]MTX than to other three-disulfide-bridged toxins. The IC50 values so far reported range from 4 pM (agitoxin 2) to 1.7 nM (agitoxin 1), which is at least 2 orders of magnitude less than [Abu19,Abu34]MTX. The wide range of toxin IC50s reported for any given channel and the difference in affinity observed between three-disulfide-bridged toxins and [Abu19,Abu34]MTX for Kv1.3 suggest that the toxin primary structure is crucial to channel sensitivity and does not solely rely on the disulfide bridge framework.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Competitive effect of MTX and [Abu19,Abu34]MTX on the binding of radiolabeled 125I-apamin onto rat brain synaptosomes. Complete inhibition of binding of 125I-apamin onto rat brain synaptosomes by 100 pM unlabeled apamin (filled square), and dose-dependent inhibition of 125I-apamin binding by sMTX (filled circles) and [Abu19,Abu34]MTX (open circles). B0 is the binding of 125I-apamin in the absence of ligand, and B is the binding in the presence of the indicated concentrations of competitors. Nonspecific binding, less than 10% binding, was subtracted for the calculation of the ratios. The data were fitted by the equation y = yo + a/[1 + exp(-(x - IC50)/b)] with IC50 values of 11 ± 18 nM (sMTX) and 100 ± 27 nM ([Abu19,Abu34]MTX).


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   [Abu19,Abu34]MTX is a high affinity blocker of various voltage-gated K+ channels. A, oocytes expressing rat Kv1.2 were recorded under two-electrode voltage clamp. K+ currents were obtained by depolarization from a holding potential of -90 mV to various potentials (from -40 to 70 mV in 10-mV steps). Upper panel, control currents; lower panel, currents during superfusion of [Abu19,Abu34]MTX at 1 nM. In this cell, currents were inhibited by 77-83% depending on the voltage tested. B, transient perfusion with 5 nM [Abu19,Abu34]MTX caused a 94.6% transient decrease in K+ currents. C, dose-dependent inhibition curves of Shaker B, rat Kv1.1, Kv1.2, and Kv1.3 currents by sMTX (filled circles) and [Abu19,Abu34]MTX (open circles). Data points are the mean ± S.E. The solid lines through the data are from the equation y = yo + a/[1 + exp(-(x - IC50)/b)] with IC50 values of 3.4 ± 2.2 nM (Shaker B, n = 26), 0.06 ± 0.1 nM (Kv1.2, n = 20), and 320 ± 51 nM (Kv1.3, n = 17) for MTX applications, or 1.2 ± 0.9 nM (Shaker B, n = 31), 1.7 ± 2 nM (Kv1.2, n = 36), and 443 ± 23 nM (Kv1.3, n = 22) for [Abu19,Abu34]MTX. No detectable inhibition was observed on Kv1.1 for both peptides at concentrations up to 10 µM (n = 10 for MTX and n = 10 for [Abu19,Abu34]MTX). In B and C, currents were measured by depolarizing the membrane to 70 mV. When absent, error bars are within symbol size.

Overall, it can be concluded that changes in the disulfide bridge organization do not significantly alter the pharmacological targets of the ligand but can be employed as an unique mean to change its selectivity. Unexpectedly, the conformational alterations in toxin structure that accompany the disulfide bridge reorganization do not systematically translate into decreased affinities of the peptide for its K+ channel target(s). These data suggest that the disulfide bridge reorganization can be used as a novel approach to tentatively improve the interaction surface of the ligand for its receptor site. For the channels in which reductions in ligand affinities were observed (i.e. Kv1.2), there must be a three-dimensional repositioning of key residues critical to the blockage of current. This could be associated with the novel orientation observed between the alpha -helix and the beta -sheet structures, suggesting that residues belonging to both the secondary structures could be involved in the recognition of the binding site. In contrast, for channels in which no or little change in affinity was observed (i.e. Shaker B), the key residues implicated in current blockade may exclusively involve amino acid residues of the beta -sheet structure, shown to be involved in Kv-type recognition (21). These conclusions should be reinforced by a structure-activity relationship study based on an alanine-scanning approach that ultimately will reveal the intimate differences in the binding surface of MTX for interaction with Shaker B and rat Kv1.2 and Kv1.3 channels. A combination of amino acid substitution and disulfide bridge reorganization used in parallel may reveal itself a powerful approach to the specific increase in toxin selectivity.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. P. Mansuelle, S. Canarelli, and R. Oughideni for running the protein sequencer and amino acid analyzer. We also thank Dr. M. Martin-Eauclaire for providing rat brain synaptosomes. We are indebted to C. Raymond for the preparation of Xenopus oocytes and to Drs. T. Hoshi and O. Pongs for providing the rat Kv1.1, Kv1.2, and Kv1.3, and Shaker B cDNAs.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by grants from INSERM and CNRS.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Recipient of a fellowship from the CNRS and the region Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-491-69-88-60; Fax: 33-491-09-05-06; E-mail: dewaard.m@jean-roche.univ-mrs.fr.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: MTX, maurotoxin from the scorpion S. maurus palmatus; [Abu19, Abu34]MTX, a synthetic maurotoxin analog with alpha -aminobutyrate derivatives in positions 19 and 34; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; HsTx1, toxin 1 from the scorpion H. spinnifer; sMTX, synthetic maurotoxin; Pi1, toxin 1 from the scorpion P. imperator; NOE, nuclear Overhauser effect; NOESY, nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy; DQF-COSY, double quantum-filtered correlation spectroscopy; TOCSY, total correlation spectroscopy; Fmoc, Nalpha -fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl; SK, small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Kharrat, R., Mabrouk, K., Crest, M., Darbon, H., Oughideni, R., Martin-Eauclaire, M. F., Jacquet, G., El Ayeb, M., Van Rietschoten, J., Rochat, H., and Sabatier, J. M. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 242, 491-498[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Blanc, E., Sabatier, J.-M., Kharrat, R., Meunier, S., El Ayeb, M., Van Rietschoten, J., and Darbon, H. (1997) Proteins 29, 321-333[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Kharrat, R., Mansuelle, P., Sampieri, F., Crest, M., Oughideni, R., Van Rietschoten, J., Martin-Eauclaire, M.-F., Rochat, H., and El Ayeb, M. (1997) FEBS Lett. 406, 284-290[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Darbon, H., Blanc, E., and Sabatier, J. M. (1999) in Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design: Animal Toxins and Potassium Channels (Darbon, H. , and Sabatier, J. M., eds), Vol. 15/16 , pp. 40-60, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
5. Olamendi-Portugal, T., Gomez-Lagunas, F., Gurrola, G. B., and Possani, L. D. (1996) Biochem. J. 315, 977-981
6. Lebrun, B., Romi-Lebrun, R., Martin-Eauclaire, M.-F., Yasuda, A., Ishiguro, M., Oyama, Y., Pongs, O., and Nakajima, T. (1997) Biochem. J. 328, 321-327
7. Bonmatin, J. M., Bonnat, J. L., Gallet, X., Vovelle, F., Ptak, M., Reichart, J. M., Hoffmann, J., Keppi, E., Legrain, M., and Achstetter, T. (1992) J. Biomol. NMR 2, 235-256[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Bontems, F., Roumestand, C., Gilquin, B., Ménez, A., and Toma, F. (1991) Science 254, 1521-1523[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Merrifield, R. B. (1986) Science 232, 341-347[Free Full Text]
10. Sabatier, J. M. (1999) in Handbook of Toxinology, Animal Toxins: Tools in Cell Biology (Rochat, H. , and Martin-Eauclaire, M. F., eds) , pp. 198-218, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland
11. Bax, A., and Davis, D. G. (1987) J. Magn. Reson. 65, 355-360
12. Griesinger, C., Otting, G., Wüthrich, K., and Ernst, R. R. (1988) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 7870-7872[CrossRef]
13. Jeener, J., Meier, B. H., Bachman, P., and Ernst, R. R. (1979) J. Chem. Phys. 71, 4546-4553[CrossRef]
14. Kumar, A., Ernst, R. R., and Wüthrich, K. (1981) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 95, 1-6
15. Piotto, M., Saudek, V., and Sklenar, V. (1992) J. Biomol. NMR 2, 661-665[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Gray, E. G., and Whittaker, V. P. (1962) J. Anat. 96, 79-88[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Seagar, M. J., Granier, C., and Couraud, F. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 1491-1495[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. De Waard, M., and Campbell, K. P. (1995) J. Physiol. 485, 619-634[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Eppig, J. J., and Dumont, J. N. (1976) In Vitro 12, 418-427[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Possani, L. D., Selisko, B., and Gurrola, G. B. (1999) in Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design: Animal Toxins and Potassium Channels (Darbon, H. , and Sabatier, J. M., eds), Vol. 15/16 , pp. 15-40, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
21. Miller, C. (1995) Neuron 15, 5-10[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Ram, N. Weiss, I. Texier-Nogues, S. Aroui, N. Andreotti, F. Pirollet, M. Ronjat, J.-M. Sabatier, H. Darbon, V. Jacquemond, et al.
Design of a Disulfide-less, Pharmacologically Inert, and Chemically Competent Analog of Maurocalcine for the Efficient Transport of Impermeant Compounds into Cells
J. Biol. Chem., October 3, 2008; 283(40): 27048 - 27056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
C. Pimentel, S. M'Barek, V. Visan, S. Grissmer, F. Sampieri, J.-M. Sabatier, H. Darbon, and Z. Fajloun
Chemical synthesis and 1H-NMR 3D structure determination of AgTx2-MTX chimera, a new potential blocker for Kv1.2 channel, derived from MTX and AgTx2 scorpion toxins
Protein Sci., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 107 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. Regaya, C. Beeton, G. Ferrat, N. Andreotti, H. Darbon, M. De Waard, and J.-M. Sabatier
Evidence for Domain-specific Recognition of SK and Kv Channels by MTX and HsTx1 Scorpion Toxins
J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 2004; 279(53): 55690 - 55696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
K. Yu, W. Fu, H. Liu, X. Luo, K. X. Chen, J. Ding, J. Shen, and H. Jiang
Computational Simulations of Interactions of Scorpion Toxins with the Voltage-Gated Potassium Ion Channel
Biophys. J., June 1, 2004; 86(6): 3542 - 3555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
J. I. Guijarro, S. M'Barek, F. Gomez-Lagunas, D. Garnier, H. Rochat, J.-M. Sabatier, L. D. Possani, and M. Delepierre
Solution structure of Pi4, a short four-disulfide-bridged scorpion toxin specific of potassium channels
Protein Sci., September 1, 2003; 12(9): 1844 - 1854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. M'Barek, I. Lopez-Gonzalez, N. Andreotti, E. di Luccio, V. Visan, S. Grissmer, S. Judge, M. El Ayeb, H. Darbon, H. Rochat, et al.
A Maurotoxin with Constrained Standard Disulfide Bridging: INNOVATIVE STRATEGY OF CHEMICAL SYNTHESIS, PHARMACOLOGY, AND DOCKING ON K+ CHANNELS
J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 31095 - 31104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
N. A. Castle, D. O. London, C. Creech, Z. Fajloun, J. W. Stocker, and J.-M. Sabatier
Maurotoxin: A Potent Inhibitor of Intermediate Conductance Ca2+-Activated Potassium Channels
Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2003; 63(2): 409 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
W. Fu, M. Cui, J. M. Briggs, X. Huang, B. Xiong, Y. Zhang, X. Luo, J. Shen, R. Ji, H. Jiang, et al.
Brownian Dynamics Simulations of the Recognition of the Scorpion Toxin Maurotoxin with the Voltage-Gated Potassium Ion Channels
Biophys. J., November 1, 2002; 83(5): 2370 - 2385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z. Fajloun, A. Mosbah, E. Carlier, P. Mansuelle, G. Sandoz, M. Fathallah, E. di Luccio, C. Devaux, H. Rochat, H. Darbon, et al.
Maurotoxin Versus Pi1/HsTx1 Scorpion Toxins. TOWARD NEW INSIGHTS IN THE UNDERSTANDING OF THEIR DISTINCT DISULFIDE BRIDGE PATTERNS
J. Biol. Chem., December 8, 2000; 275(50): 39394 - 39402.