J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 18, 13737-13745, May 5, 2000
Interaction of a Kinesin-like Calmodulin-binding Protein with a
Protein Kinase*
Irene S.
Day,
Cindy
Miller,
Maxim
Golovkin, and
A. S. N.
Reddy
From the Department of Biology and Program in Cell and Molecular
Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523
 |
ABSTRACT |
Kinesin-like calmodulin-binding protein (KCBP) is
a novel member of the kinesin superfamily that is involved in cell
division and trichome morphogenesis. KCBP is unique among all known
kinesins in having a myosin tail homology-4 region in the N-terminal
tail and a calmodulin-binding region following the motor domain.
Calcium, through calmodulin, has been shown to negatively regulate the interaction of KCBP with microtubules. Here we have used the yeast two-hybrid system to identify the proteins that interact with the tail
region of KCBP. A protein kinase (KCBP-interacting protein kinase
(KIPK)) was found to interact specifically with the tail region of
KCBP. KIPK is related to a group of protein kinases specific to plants
that has an additional sequence between subdomains VII and VIII of the
conserved C-terminal catalytic domain and an extensive N-terminal
region. The catalytic domain alone of KIPK interacted weakly with the
N-terminal KCBP protein but strongly with full-length KCBP, whereas the
noncatalytic region did not interact with either protein. The
interaction of KCBP with KIPK was confirmed using coprecipitation
assays. Using bacterially expressed full-length and truncated proteins,
we have shown that the catalytic domain is capable of phosphorylating
itself. The association of KIPK with KCBP suggests regulation of KCBP
or KCBP-associated proteins by phosphorylation and/or that KCBP is
involved in targeting KIPK to its proper cellular location.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Kinesin and kinesin-like proteins
(KLPs)1 are microtubule-based
transport motor proteins that perform a variety of important cellular
and developmental functions such as controlling steady-state structural
organization of cytoplasm; moving and positioning of intracellular
macromolecules and organelles; and driving cell movement, cell
division, and flagellar movement (1-3). The first kinesin was
identified as a protein likely to be responsible for fast anterograde
axonal transport (4). Kinesin is a tetramer consisting of two heavy
chains (KHCs) and two light chains (KLCs) with the motor activity being
in the heavy chains (5, 6) The heavy chain consists of three domains: a
motor domain that contains conserved ATP and microtubule binding sites,
a stalk domain that forms an
-helical coiled-coil, and a globular
tail that binds the light chains. KLPs show sequence similarity to the
conserved motor domain of the KHC, which consists of 320-340 amino
acids (7). In kinesin, the motor domain is in the amino-terminal region
of the heavy chain, whereas in KLPs the motor domain is found in the
amino-terminal, carboxyl-terminal, or middle region (3, 4). Outside the
motor domain there is little homology between KLPs, but many contain an
-helical region predicted to form a coiled-coil. The tail regions
are not conserved with respect to kinesin heavy chain or among members
of the same KLP subfamilies. It is widely believed that the tail
regions of the KLPs may associate with accessory proteins important for
function (7). The unique tail domains of the KLPs are thought to be
responsible for the varied microtubule-based functions of the conserved
motor domain (6). About 193 sequences containing the kinesin motor
domain have been deposited into the data bases. Multiple KLPs have been identified in several organisms (Caenorhabditis elegans (19 KLPs), Drosophila melanogaster (14 KLPs), Homo
sapiens (20 KLPs), Mus musculus (36 KLPs), and
Arabidopsis thaliana (21 KLPs)). The challenge facing
researchers now is to elucidate the function of these multiple microtubule motor proteins and their regulation.
Although it is widely believed that the tail region of KLPs performs
its function(s) by interacting with other proteins, in most cases the
proteins that interact with the tail region have not been identified.
In the case of KHC, the tail region has been shown to interact with
KLCs (8-10). Another protein called kinectin also interacts with KHC
(11). Kinectin was isolated from chick embryo brain microsomes and was
localized to the cytoplasmic face of the microsomes. A cDNA clone
for kinectin was isolated from a chick embryo cDNA library by
immunoscreening with mAbs to kinectin (12). Studies using antibodies to
kinectin inhibited plus-end-directed vesicle motility by approximately
90% and reduced kinesin binding to vesicles (13). Using yeast
two-hybrid methods, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinases
MLK2 and MLK3 were found to interact with the kinesin, KIF3 (14).
Another yeast two-hybrid interaction study showed an interaction
between an actin-based vesicle-transport motor, MyoVA, and a
microtubule-based motor, KhcU (15).
Microtubule-based motility is known to be precisely regulated. This
regulation could be due to the regulation of the motor protein, the
microtubules or both components of the system (16). Studies on the
regulation of kinesin and KLPs have focused mainly on phosphorylation
of KHC, KLC, and kinesin-interacting proteins (7, 16-18).
Phosphorylation of these proteins can affect their motor activity or
their ability to interact with organelles or other proteins.
Phosphorylation has been shown to be involved in cell cycle regulation
of kinesin and KLPs (18, 19). The protein kinase or family of kinases
responsible for phosphorylation has not been established in all cases.
Two kinases have been shown to phosphorylate specific KLPs. A human
KLP, HsEg5, has been shown to be phosphorylated by the
cyclin-dependent protein kinase, p34cdc2,
specifically during mitosis (20). Phosphorylation controls the
association of HsEg5 with the spindle apparatus. A murine protein
kinase, PLK, which reaches its maximum activity at the onset of
mitosis, appears to interact with and phosphorylate CHO1/mitotic kinesin-like protein 1 (21).
Recently a KLP, kinesin-like calmodulin-binding protein (KCBP), was
isolated from Arabidopsis and other flowering plants using a
protein-protein interaction-based screening with calmodulin as a probe
(22-24). KCBP has two unique domains: a calmodulin-binding domain at
the C terminus following the motor domain and a myosin tail homology
domain in the tail (22, 23, 25-27). KCBP binds calmodulin in a
calcium-dependent manner at physiological calcium concentration (22), and the binding of calmodulin inhibits KCBP from
binding microtubules or dissociates the preformed KCBP-microtubule complex (28-30). Until recently, no other KLP had been known to bind
calmodulin, and a KCBP homologue had not been found in animals including C. elegans whose genome has been completely
sequenced. Using a PCR screen for kinesins in sea urchin, Rogers
et al. (31) isolated a kinesin (kinesin-C) with a
calmodulin-binding domain. Although it has sequence similarity in the
motor and calmodulin-binding domains with KCBP, it does not contain the
myosin tail homology-4 and talin-like regions present in the N-terminal
portion of KCBP.
Many KLPs are involved in chromosome distribution and spindle function.
Some of the functions include separation of microtubule organizing
centers for spindle formation, spindle assembly, spindle elongation,
and maintenance of spindle bipolarity and spindle pole integrity (1, 7,
32). Vernos and Karsenti (32, 33) proposed that kinetochore KLPs may
tether the ends of growing and shrinking microtubules to kinetochores
during chromosome movements. Immunolocalization studies indicated the
involvement of KCBP in cell division (34, 35). It was also shown that
KCBP is differentially active during the various phases of cell
division in Tradescantia stamen hair cells (36). KCBP was
found to be capable of bundling microtubules, suggesting the
involvement of KCBP in establishing mitotic microtubule arrays during
different stages of the cell cycle (37). Genetic studies have shown
that KCBP is essential for trichome morphogenesis (38, 39). KCBP
mutants (zwichel) had shorter and less branched trichomes (38). Three
extragenic suppressors ("suppressor of zwichel-3"; suz1,
suz2, and suz3) that rescued trichome branch
number defect were isolated (39). Genetic studies have shown that SUZ2
may interact with not only ZWI (KCBP) but also with FURCAI, a protein
involved in trichome branching. These suppressor studies suggest that
KCBP interacts with several other proteins in the cell (27, 40).
Because the tail region of KLPs is implicated in interacting with other
proteins as either cargo or regulator and because the genetic evidence
suggests that KCBP interacts with other proteins (39), we used the
yeast two-hybrid screen to isolate proteins that interact with KCBP.
Here we report that the N-terminal region of KCBP interacts with a
protein kinase, termed KCBP-interacting protein kinase (KIPK). It has
homology to a group of protein kinases that appears to be unique to
plants. We have confirmed the interaction in vitro and have
demonstrated autophosphorylation of KIPK.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plant Materials--
A. thaliana L. Heynh. ecotype
Columbia was grown at 22 °C on a mixture of peat/perlite/vermiculite
(1:1:1) under continuous light. Leaves, stems, and flowers were
collected from 5-6-week-old plants. Roots were grown in liquid
cultures as described earlier (41). Suspension-cultured cells from the
same ecotype were grown in Murashige and Skogg salts supplemented with
vitamins, 3% sucrose, and 0.5 µg/ml 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid.
Plasmid Construction--
The pAS1CYH2/N-terminal KCBP plasmid
was constructed by cloning a SacI/NotI fragment
(amino acids 12-1261) of Arabidopsis KCBP into pET32b (30).
This plasmid was then cut with NcoI, releasing a
2.8-kilobase fragment (amino acids 12-924), which was ligated into
pAS1CYH2 digested with NcoI. Full-length
Arabidopsis KCBP/pAS1CYH2 was made by cutting the
pAS1CYH2/N-terminal KCBP with AvrII and SalI and
dropping the fragment. Full-length Arabidopsis KCBP in pET28
(29) was also cut with AvrII and SalI. The
fragment was isolated and ligated into the pAS1CYH2
AvrII/SalI-cut plasmid.
The expression plasmid for KIPK was constructed by excising KIPK from
pACT-KIPK with XhoI and ligating it into pET32a (Novagen) also cut with XhoI. Preparation of KCBP N-terminal construct
in pET28 and its expression was described previously (29).
Subclones of KIPK were made using PCR-generated fragments. Primers were
designed to amplify an N-terminal fragment from amino acids 1-347 and
a C-terminal fragment from amino acids 323-744. A BamHI
site was included in the 5' primers, and a XhoI site was included in the 3' primers. Primers used were KIPK1S
(5'-CGGGATCCGATGCCTGTAAACGATAAACC-3'), KIPK1A
(5'-CCGCTCGAGAGTGTCGTAAACCCAAAGAGCC-3'), KIPK2S
(5'-CGGGATCCCATGTCGATGGATGTAGATGGG-3'), and KIPK2A
(5'-CCGCTCGAGACTCAAGATGATCGCCTATGGC-3'). pET32b and the
PCR-generated fragments were cut with BamHI and
XhoI, ligated, and used to transform Escherichia
coli BL21 (DE3). Subclones were cut from pET32b using
NcoI and XhoI and ligated into
NcoI/XhoI-cut pACT2. All clones were sequenced to
confirm the accuracy of the PCR product and in-frame ligation.
A motor domain subclone of KCBP was constructed by PCR amplification of
a C-terminal fragment coding for amino acids 860-1261, including the
motor domain, calmodulin binding domain, and a small portion of the
coiled-coil region (23). The primers included a site for
BspHI, which when cut has ends compatible with
NcoI. pAS1CYH2 was digested with NcoI, and the
fragment was digested with BspHI; they were ligated and used
to transform E. coli (DH5
)
Yeast Transformation and
-Galactosidase Filter
Assays--
Competent cells were prepared by inoculating several
colonies of yeast strain Y190 into YPD (12 g/liter peptone, 10 g/liter yeast extract, 2% dextrose) plus cycloheximide (10 µg/ml) or
colonies of transformed Y190 in appropriate SD (6.7 g/liter yeast
nitrogen base without amino acids (Difco), 2% dextrose, and 1×
dropout solution minus Trp or minus Leu
(CLONTECH)), vortexing vigorously, and incubating
at 30 °C with shaking overnight. Cultures were then transferred to
50 ml of YPD/cycloheximide or SD lacking Trp or Leu and incubated at
30 °C overnight with shaking. Cultures were diluted with 250 ml of
YPD and incubated at 30 °C with shaking at 250 rpm for 3 h.
Cells were centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 5 min at room
temperature, and the pellet was resuspended in 50 ml of sterile water
and centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 5 min at room
temperature. The pellet was then resuspended in 1.5 ml of freshly
prepared, sterile 1× TE/LiAc (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM lithium acetate, pH 7.5).
For library transformation of Y190-KCBP, 5 µg of an
Arabidopsis cDNA library, 0.1 mg of salmon sperm carrier
DNA, and 0.1 ml of Y190-KCBP-competent cells were added to 16 separate
tubes; the contents were mixed well. For transformation with plasmid DNA from constructs, 0.1 µg of plasmid DNA was mixed with 0.1 mg of
salmon sperm carrier DNA, and 0.1 ml of competent cells was added to
each tube. For double transformations, 0.1 µg of each construct was
added to 0.1 mg of salmon sperm carrier DNA, and 0.1 ml of competent
cells was added and transformed as described (CLONTECH manual). Approximately 100 µl of
transformed cells was spread on SD plates containing 20 g/liter agar
and
Trp dropout for pAS1CYH2 transformations,
Leu dropout for pACT
transformations, and
Trp,
Leu,
His dropout plus 25 mM
3-aminotriazole for transformations with the library or both pACT and
pAS1CYH2 plasmids. Plates were incubated 3-8 days at 30 °C.
Colonies were either patched to new plates or used as grown for assays.
Sterile filters (Whatman number 5) were soaked in Z
buffer/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside
solution (prepared according to the CLONTECH
manual) and placed over the surface of the plates containing
transformants. Filters were carefully lifted, transferred (colonies
facing up) into liquid nitrogen, completely submerged for 10 s,
and then allowed to thaw at room temperature. Filters were then placed
on top of filters freshly soaked in Z
buffer/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside solution and incubated at room temperature until blue color appeared.
Plasmid and Protein Isolation from Yeast--
Yeast
transformants were grown in 5 ml of the appropriate SD, and plasmids
were isolated using a kit from Zymo Research according to the
instructions provided by the manufacturer. The culture was incubated at
30 °C with shaking until saturated. For protein isolation, overnight
cultures of transformant yeast colonies were used to inoculate 100 ml
of appropriate SD, which were grown overnight at 30 °C. Cells were
spun at 5,000 rpm for 5 min and resuspended in a small portion of the
medium. The cells were transferred to flat-bottom, O-ring screw cap
microcentrifuge tubes and spun. After aspiration of the medium, the
cells were resuspended in 40 µl of Laemmli buffer and 400 µl of
acid-washed beads and vortexed two times for 1 min each. An additional
460 µl of Laemmli buffer was added, and tubes were transferred to
boiling water for 3 min. Following chilling on ice, the tubes were spun
at high speed for 5 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was transferred
to a clean tube and stored at
20 °C.
Sequencing--
Sequences on either side of the multiple cloning
site of pACT were used to design primers for sequencing. Primers were
5'-TACCACTACAATGGATGATG-3' (pACT5') and
5'-GTTGAAGTGAACTTGCGGGG-3', (pACT3'). The clone was sequenced by
the dideoxynucleotide chain termination method using double-stranded
plasmid DNA as a template. Sequence data from the initial sequencing
was used to construct subsequent primers to sequence the clone from end
to end in both directions. Subclones were sequenced to verify in frame
insertion of sequence.
DNA Hybridization and Reverse Transcription PCR--
An
Arabidopsis genomic DNA blot was prepared and probed with
KIPK as described earlier (42). Total RNA from different organs and
tissues was isolated and purified on a CsCl cushion (43). Poly(A)+ mRNA was isolated by an oligo(dT)-cellulose
column. First strand cDNA was synthesized using Promega's Reverse
Transcription System (44). The first strand cDNA was used in a PCR
using primers specific to the C-terminal half of KIPK (KIPK2S and
KIPK2A). The PCR product was separated electrophoretically on an 0.8%
gel, transferred to a nylon membrane, and probed with
32P-labeled KIPK sequence.
Protein Induction, Isolation, and Detection--
BL21(DE3) cells
transformed with either pET28b-Arabidopsis KCBP or
pET32a-Arabidopsis KIPK were cultured to an
A600 of approximately 0.6. Expression of protein
was induced by the addition of
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside to a concentration
of 0.2 mM. Induced cells were grown overnight at room
temperature with constant shaking. Bacteria were harvested and
resuspended in ice-cold 1× T7 tag bind/wash buffer (10× T7 buffer:
42.9 mM Na2HPO4, 14.7 mM KH2PO4, 27 mM KCl,
1.37M NaCl, 1% Tween 20, 0.02% sodium azide, pH 7.3) for KCBP protein
or ice-cold 1× S tag bind/wash buffer (10× S tag buffer: 200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1.5 mM NaCl, 1% Triton
X-100) for KIPK protein. Lysozyme (200 µg/ml) and Complete Protease
Inhibitor (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) were added to each sample, and
samples were placed on ice for 1 h and sonicated on ice five times
for 15 s. Lysate was centrifuged at 18,000 rpm for 30 min. Protein
was stored at 4 °C.
In Vitro Interaction of KCBP and KIPK--
Crude extract (2 ml)
of KCBP protein was added to 150 µl of T7 tag antibody-agarose
(Novagen) and incubated with shaking at room temperature for 30 min.
The agarose beads were washed three times with 1× T7 tag bind/wash
buffer, and 2 ml of KIPK crude protein was added to the agarose beads
and incubated as above. KIPK crude protein alone was also added to T7
tag antibody-agarose beads that were not incubated with KCBP. Both sets
of agarose beads were washed three times. Following the final wash, 75 µl of 1× sample loading buffer was added to the beads. Twenty-five µl was loaded on each of three polyacrylamide gels and
electrophoresed. One gel was stained, and two were blotted and probed
with either T7 tag antibody or S tag protein.
Phosphorylation--
KIPK (full-length and subclone 2-catalytic
domain) and amino-terminal KCBP proteins were expressed and isolated as
above. The proteins were bound by S tag-agarose beads or T7 tag-agarose beads, respectively (Novagen). For one set of phosphorylation experiments, full-length KIPK protein bound to S tag beads was mixed
with amino-terminal KCBP bound to T7 tag beads, subclone 1 (noncatalytic domain) protein bound to S tag beads, or water. Phosphorylation assays were performed in a buffer (20 mM
Tris, pH 7.5, 6 mM MgCl2) containing 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 0.1 mM ATP, and [
-32P]ATP
at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction was stopped by adding
protein sample buffer, and reaction mixtures were electrophoresed on
acrylamide gels, blotted to a membrane, and exposed to a phosphor imaging screen. A second set of phosphorylation reactions was performed
essentially as above except that the catalytic domain of KIPK bound to
S tag beads was used.
 |
RESULTS |
Screening of an Arabidopsis Two-hybrid Library for KCBP-interacting
Proteins--
To identify KCBP-interacting proteins, we employed the
yeast two-hybrid system (45, 46). Previous studies have shown that the
C-terminal region of KCBP interacts with microtubules, tubulin subunits, and calmodulin (22, 25, 28-30, 47). To avoid isolation of
tubulin and calmodulin, the N-terminal end of Arabidopsis
KCBP comprising the "tail" and the coiled-coil region but not the
motor or calmodulin binding domain was used as the "bait" in the
screen. An A. thaliana cDNA library consisting of clones
in pACT as fusions to the activation domain of Gal4 was screened using
the amino-terminal domain (amino acids 12-806) of KCBP in pAS1CYH2 as
a fusion to the DNA binding domain of Gal4.
Approximately 106 transformants were plated on selection
plates (synthetic complete minus His, Leu, and Trp). Transformants growing on these plates were screened for
-galactosidase activity using a filter assay (48). Colonies that were His+ and blue
were selected for further analysis. Possible interacting clones were
sequenced at the 5'- and 3'-ends and compared with the NCBI data base.
One of the clones showed homology to a type of protein kinase found, to
date, only in plants (see below). Because of the sequence similarities
between the isolated clone and protein kinases, we designated this
protein as KIPK. The pACT-KIPK plasmid was isolated and used to
transform Y190 by itself. Yeast colonies expressing both the pAS1CYH2
amino-terminal KCBP and the pACT-KIPK plasmid grew on selection medium
and showed positive
-galactosidase activity, while Y190 colonies
with neither plasmid or with either just the amino-terminal KCBP or
KIPK plasmid did not (Fig.
1A).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Interaction of KCBP with KIPK.
A, yeast containing no plasmids (Y190), the
pAS1CYH2/N-terminal KCBP plasmid (Y190 + KCBP), the
pACT-KIPK plasmid (Y190 + KIPK), or both plasmids
(Y190 + KCBP + KIPK) were replica-plated on YPD; SC minus
tryptophan ( W); SC minus leucine ( L); and SC
minus tryptophan, leucine, and histidine ( 3). A
-galactosidase assay (A) was carried out using a YPD
plate replicate. B, the noncatalytic domain (subclone 1) and
catalytic domain (subclone 2) were cloned into pACT2 and used in a
two-hybrid interaction with pAS1CYH2/N-terminal KCBP. Yeast (Y190)
cells containing the N-terminal region of KCBP and either the
noncatalytic domain (Sub 1) or the catalytic domain
(Sub 2) were grown on SC minus leucine and tryptophan
( L, W) and assayed for -galactosidase
activity (A). C, Y190 yeast containing
pAS1CYH2/full-length KCBP were transformed with the noncatalytic region
(Sub 1), the catalytic domain (Sub 2) or the
full-length KIPK (Kipk) clone. Transformed yeast grew on SC
minus leucine, minus tryptophan ( L, W). A
-galactosidase assay (A) was carried out using duplicate
plates.
|
|
Interaction of Different Regions of KCPB and KIPK--
KIPK was
isolated as a clone that interacted with an amino-terminal subclone of
KCBP. The KIPK clone contained the kinase catalytic domain at the C
terminus and an extensive noncatalytic N-terminal region (see below).
To determine if certain regions of KIPK were responsible for the
interaction, we constructed two subclones of KIPK (one containing the
noncatalytic amino-terminal region and the second one with the
catalytic carboxyl-terminal region) and tested their interaction with
the N-terminal region of KCBP using the yeast two-hybrid assay. The
N-terminal region of KIPK (subclone 1) showed no interaction with KCBP,
whereas the catalytic domain (subclone 2) showed weak interaction (Fig. 1B). The blue color from the galactosidase assay took
greater than 24 h to develop. To determine if KIPK interacts with
the motor domain of KCBP, we constructed a motor domain subclone in pAS1CYH2 and used it to transform Y190 containing the pACT-KIPK full-length clone. No interaction was observed between KIPK and the
motor domain of KCBP (data not shown). A full-length KCPB clone was
constructed in pAS1CYH2 and used in an interaction assay with
full-length KIPK and both subdomains. Both full-length KIPK and the
catalytic domain showed strong interaction with full-length KCPB, but
the N-terminal region showed no interaction (Fig. 1C). The
presence of the plasmids in the transformants was confirmed by PCR
using the primers specific to KCBP and KIPK. All transformants showed
the presence of both plasmids (data not shown).
KIPK Belongs to a Group of Protein Kinases That Are Specific to
Plants--
The KIPK sequence contains an open reading frame that
encodes a protein of 744 amino acids with a calculated molecular mass of 86 kDa (Fig. 2). The putative start
site is the first methionine in the clone. The size of the predicted
protein is larger than the protein kinases of this type. Hence, it is
unlikely that the native protein is larger than 744 amino acids. The
KIPK protein contains all conserved domains and amino acids found in
other protein kinases (9, 49-51). The catalytic domain starts at amino acid 348 (Fig. 2) and contains the 11 conserved subdomains typical of
protein kinases. Highly conserved features include the glycine-rich stretch GCGDIG355, which forms the nucleotide binding site
along with Lys377 and Glu396; the catalytic
loop, which contains Asp473, Lys475, and
Asn478 and which also participates in ATP binding; and the
substrate binding site comprising APE597,
Gly616, and Arg673. Two sequences diagnostic of
serine/threonine kinases, RDLKPEN472 and
GTHEYLAPE591, are also present in KIPK.

View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence of
KIPK. The putative initiation codon is in boldface
type. The 11 protein kinase domains (49) are enclosed in
brackets and are in italic type. Highly conserved
amino acids are in boldface type. The catalytic
domain that is diagnostic of serine/threonine kinases is
underlined. Nucleotides are numbered on the left,
and amino acids are numbered on the right.
|
|
Two features of the KIPK sequence are found in several other plant
protein kinases. One is a change of the highly conserved tripeptide DFG
to DFD491. The other is the presence of an additional
sequence between subdomains VII and VIII, and this insertion is found
only in plant protein kinases (51-54). Fig.
3 shows an alignment of KIPK with two
other protein kinases: PVPK-1, a protein kinase from Phaseolus vulgaris L., and STPK1, a protein kinase from Solanum
tuberosum, that showed very high sequence similarity. The unique
sequence between subdomains VII and VIII contains repeats of the motif CXX(X)P (where "XX(X)"
indicates any 2 or 3 amino acids). In KIPK, there is one repeat at the
beginning of the insertion sequence, and later in the insertion
sequence three other copies in tandem are interrupted by a repeat
lacking the proline. In STPK1 and PVPK-1, there are six repeats, one at
the beginning and five in tandem later in the sequence (51). A BLAST
search using the insertion sequence identified 18 different plant
protein kinases with significant homology to that region: four other
protein kinases in Arabidopsis; five in rice; three in
tomato; and one each in bean, ice plant, maize, potato, pea, and
soybean. The amino-terminal portion of the kinase shows more limited
homology than the catalytic domain (Fig. 3).

View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Comparison of KIPK with two other plant
kinases. The protein kinase domains are overlined, and
the unique sequence between domains VII and VIII is double
overlined. Identical amino acids between two or more
sequences are indicated by reverse lettering (white letters
on black background). The numbers on the
left are the amino acid residue numbers for each protein.
PVPK-1 is a protein kinase from P. vulgaris L. (GenBankTM accession no. J04555). STPK1 is a protein kinase
from S. tuberosum (GenBankTM accession no.
X90990).
|
|
Gene Copy Number and Expression of KIPK--
The gene copy number
was determined using DNA gel blot analysis. As shown in Fig.
4A, a single hybridizing band
was detected with HindIII and EcoRI, indicating
that it is coded by a single gene. To study the expression of KIPK in
various organs and tissues, RNA was isolated from fruits, leaves,
roots, flowers, and cell suspension cultures. Reverse transcription
followed by PCR using primers specific to the carboxyl-terminal portion
of KIPK was used to amplify the message. An expected fragment of
approximately 1.2 kilobases was amplified from the first strand
cDNA (Fig. 4B). KIPK was expressed in all tissue
examined but was more highly expressed in fruit, roots, and flowers. As
a control, genomic DNA was also used for PCR. The fragment from the
genomic DNA was slightly larger, indicating the presence of at least
one intron. 32P-Labeled KIPK hybridized to the
PCR-generated fragments, verifying the KIPK product. As an internal
control, primers were also included for the constitutively expressed
cyclophilin gene (55).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Gene copy number and expression of KIPK.
A, DNA gel blot. Arabidopsis genomic DNA was
digested with HindIII or EcoRI, separated
electrophoretically, and transferred to a nylon membrane. The blot was
hybridized with 32P-labeled KIPK and exposed to x-ray film.
B, expression of KIPK. First strand cDNA was made from
poly(A)+ mRNA and used in PCR using primers specific to
the C-terminal half of KIPK. As an internal control, primers to the
constitutively expressed cyclophilin gene were included in the
reaction. The PCR product was separated electrophoretically,
transferred to a nylon membrane, and probed with
32P-labeled KIPK sequence. An arrow points to
the expected KIPK fragment. An arrowhead points to the
cyclophilin fragment. P, plasmid; G, genomic DNA;
F, fruit, L, leaves; R, root;
Fl, flower; S, cell suspension. Size markers are
indicated on the left in kilobases.
|
|
Expression of KCBP and KIPK Protein in Yeast and Bacteria and in
Vitro Interaction of KCBP and KIPK--
To demonstrate the presence
of KCBP and KIPK protein in transformed yeast, protein was isolated
from yeast containing the pAS1CYH2-KCBP and pACT-KIPK plasmids.
Proteins blots were probed with GAL4 AD monoclonal antibody (pACT) or
GAL4 DNA-BD monoclonal antibody (pAS1CYH2)
(CLONTECH). The gene fusion product from
amino-terminal KCBP was expected be approximately 109 kDa (87 kDa + 22 kDa from the binding domain). The gene fusion product from KIPK was
expected to be 105 kDa (86 kDa + 19 kDa from the activation domain).
Proteins of the expected molecular masses were detected for both
proteins (Fig. 5A). These
results further confirm the interaction data obtained with the
two-hybrid interaction assay.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Expression of KCBP and KIPK in yeast and
bacteria. A, protein was isolated from yeast strain
Y190 harboring the pAS1CYH2-KCBP and pACT-KIPK plasmids and Y190 with
no plasmids. The blot on the left was probed with GAL4
binding domain antibody, and the blot on the right was
probed with GAL4 activation domain antibody. B, protein was
isolated from bacteria containing pET28-KCBP or pET32-KIPK. The blot on
the left was probed with S tag protein, which binds to the S
tag expressed as a fusion with KIPK in pET32. The blot on the
right was probed with T7 tag antibody, which binds to the T7
tag expressed as a fusion to KCBP in pET28. The two lower bands are
degraded forms of KCBP. Numbers on the left
indicate the size of molecular mass markers in kDa. A thin
arrow points to KIPK protein; a thick
arrow points to KCBP protein.
|
|
Both amino-terminal KCBP and KIPK were cloned into bacterial expression
vectors. KCBP was expressed using pET28a (Novagen) as a fusion to T7
tag, and KIPK was expressed using pET32a (Novagen) as a fusion to S
tag. Protein blots containing the induced proteins were probed with T7
tag antibody for KCBP or S tag protein for KIPK. The gene fusion
product from amino-terminal KCBP was expected be approximately 92 kDa
(87 kDa + 5 kDa from the T7 tag). The gene fusion product from KIPK was
expected to be 105 kDa (86 kDa + 19 kDa from the S tag). Both proteins
of expected molecular mass were detected in the supernatant fraction
(Fig. 5B).
To demonstrate the interaction of KIPK and KCBP proteins in
vitro, a co-precipitation experiment was performed. T7 tag
antibody-agarose beads (Novagen) were incubated with proteins isolated
from bacteria expressing KCBP as a T7 tag fusion. The beads were washed
and then incubated with protein isolated from bacteria expressing KIPK
as a fusion to S tag. The beads were washed again, and protein was
released using protein sample loading buffer. Proteins were separated
on a gel and blotted to membranes and probed with either T7 tag
antibody to identify KCBP or S tag protein to identify KIPK. As shown
in Fig. 6, KIPK coprecipitated with
N-terminal KCBP bound to the beads. As a control, crude extract
containing KIPK protein was incubated with T7 tag antibody-agarose
beads. No KIPK protein was precipitated by the beads alone (Fig.
6).

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
In vitro interaction of KCBP and
KIPK. Agarose beads conjugated to T7 tag antibody were used to
precipitate KCBP expressed as a T7 tag fusion. KIPK expressed as a
fusion to S tag was precipitated from crude bacterial extract by
incubation with the KCBP-bound T7 tag antibody beads. As a control, an
equal amount of T7 tag antibody beads with no KCBP was also incubated
with the crude extract containing the KIPK protein. The beads were
washed, and equal portions were loaded on three gels. One gel was
stained, and the other two were blotted to nitrocellulose membranes.
One blot was probed with T7 tag antibody to detect KCBP, and one was
probed with S tag protein to detect KIPK. Lane 1 in each case is from beads incubated with KCBP followed by KIPK crude
extract. Lane 2 in each case is from beads
incubated in KIPK crude extract alone. An arrow points to
the band corresponding to the expected molecular weight of KIPK. The
band in T7 tag, lane 2, and the corresponding
band in lane 1 are from recognition of the T7 tag
antibody from the beads by the secondary antibody. Numbers
on the left indicate the size of molecular mass markers in
kDa.
|
|
KIPK Undergoes Autophosphorylation--
Bacterially expressed KIPK
protein was used in a series of phosphorylation experiments to
determine if it could autophosphorylate and to determine if it
phophorylates KCBP protein. The KIPK protein sequence contains several
potential phosphorylation sites, one of which (Ser588) has
been characterized in other protein kinases (51). The KCBP protein
sequence also has a number of possible phosphorylation sites.
Full-length KIPK protein and the catalytic domain (subclone 2) protein
either bound to beads or free in solution were used in phosphorylation
experiments. Both KIPK full-length protein and the catalytic domain
alone autophosphorylated (Fig. 7,
A, lanes 1 and 3;
B, lanes 1 and 3).
Duplicate phosphorylation experiments carried out with no magnesium
were negative (data not shown). KCBP N-terminal protein bound to T7 tag
beads was incubated with the full-length KIPK protein (Fig.
7A, lane 4) or the catalytic domain of
KIPK protein (Fig. 7B, lane 4).
Neither the full-length KIPK nor catalytic domain of KIPK
phosphorylated KCBP under the conditions used (Fig. 7A,
lane 4; B, lane
4). The N-terminal region of KIPK bound to S tag beads was
also incubated with full-length KIPK (Fig. 7A,
lane 5) or catalytic domain of KIPK (Fig.
7B, lane 5) bound to S tag beads to
test if KIPK phosphorylates the N-terminal noncatalytic region. As
shown in Fig. 7, phosphorylation of the N-terminal region was not
observed under these conditions (Fig. 7A, lane
5; B lane 5). The presence
of KCBP and different regions of KIPK proteins in the assay was
verified using the appropriate protein probes (Fig. 7,
middle panels).

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Autophosphorylation of KIPK. Full-length
KIPK protein or the KIPK catalytic domain protein (subclone 2) was
incubated in phosphorylation buffer containing
[ -32P]ATP electrophoresed, blotted, and exposed to a
phosphor imaging screen. The blot was then probed with anti-T7 tag
and/or S tag protein conjugated to alkaline phosphatase to show the
presence of protein in the phosphorylation reaction. The
thin arrows point to the full-length KIPK. The
arrowhead points to KCBP protein. The thick
arrow points to the noncatalytic domain (subclone 1)
protein, and asterisks denote catalytic domain protein
(subclone 2). A, lane 1, crude KIPK
protein; lane 2, crude BL21 protein;
lane 3, KIPK protein bound to S tag beads alone;
lane 4, KIPK protein bound to S tag beads
incubated with KCBP amino-terminal protein bound to T7 tag beads;
lane 5, KIPK protein bound to S tag beads
incubated with subclone 1 bound to S tag beads. B, subclone
2 protein. Lane 1, crude subclone 2 protein;
lane 2, crude BL21 protein; lane
3, subclone 2 protein bound to S tag beads alone;
lane 4, subclone 2 protein bound to S tag beads
incubated with KCBP amino-terminal protein bound to T7 tag beads;
lane 5, subclone 2 protein bound to S tag beads
incubated with subclone 1 bound to S tag beads. The numbers
on the left represent kDa.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A clone (KIPK) was isolated from a yeast two-hybrid screen using
the amino-terminal region of the kinesin KCBP. Based on sequence similarities and the presence of specific diagnostic features, the
protein product of the isolated clone was identified as a serine/threonine protein kinase. It contains the 11 subdomains (12 if
domain VI is split into VIa and VIb) (49) characteristic of protein
kinases. Protein kinases are a superfamily of proteins that have been
divided into five main groups by Hanks and Hunter (56). A
classification of plant protein kinases done by Stone and Walker (57)
groups plant kinases also into these five families. Of these five
groups, the "AGC" group consists of the cyclic
nucleotide-dependent family (protein kinase A
and protein kinase G), the protein kinase C
family, and the ribosomal S6 kinase family. A common theme of the AGC
group is regulation by second messenger (i.e. cAMP, cGMP, diacylglycerol, and Ca2+). Although protein kinases with
properties similar to protein kinase C have been isolated (58-61)
there is a lack of evidence for any of the major AGC kinases in plants.
However, a group of plant protein kinases including the first plant
protein kinase cloned, PVPK-1 (54), showed some similarity to protein
kinase A (57). However, PVPK-1 and other related protein kinases,
unlike other members of the AGC group, are characterized by a
70-90-amino acid insert between subdomains VII and VIII of the
catalytic domain. This insert may be involved in regulation of the
kinases. It is thought that the CXX(X)P repeats
in this insertion may contribute to protein folding and thus to binding
specificity of the insert (51). Also, the insertion is in the
activation region of protein kinases, which is defined as the region
spanning DFG (DFD491 in KIPK) in subdomain VII and
APE597 of subdomain VIII. This segment contains a residue
(or residues) that are phosphorylated, and the phosphorylation plays a
crucial role in the regulation of some protein kinases (9). KIPK showed highest similarity to five of the protein kinases in this group, a
maize protein kinase (52), potato STPK1 (51), rice Gl1A and bean PVPK-1
(54), and another Arabidopsis protein kinase, ATPK5 (53). In
a recent review of plant serine/threonine kinases, Hardie (62), using
89 A. thaliana protein kinases in a phylogenetic study,
classified plant protein kinases into 12 groups. One of these groups
included kinases homologous to KIPK. In discussing the functions of the
different protein kinases, he makes the point that no function has been
established for any kinase in this group. Knowing that KIPK interacts
with KCBP should lead to the function of this kinase, which may then
give insight to the functions of similar kinases.
The amino-terminal regions show less homology to other similar proteins
and are thought to have some regulatory or protein interaction role (4,
63). The amino-terminal region of KIPK is highly rich in Ser and Thr
(23%) over 347 amino acids. Other protein kinases in this
plant-specific group are similarly rich in Ser and Thr, 20-30%. It is
thought that like animal protein kinases C these upstream regions could
represent regulatory domains (53).
Protein kinases are involved in many aspects of cellular regulation and
metabolism. Protein phosphorylation has been implicated in response to
many signals, including light, pathogen invasion, hormones, temperature
stress, and nutrient deprivation (57). STPK1 expression is increased
after infection with Phytophthora infestans, which indicates
that STPK1 may participate in the signal transduction pathway triggered
by the pathogen (51). The maize protein kinase isolated by Bierman
et al. (52) was shown to be phylogenetically related to
protein kinases involved in transduction of extracellular signals via
regulation of their activity by second messengers (cAMP, cGMP, calcium,
and diacylglycerol). A group of protein kinases in pea that show
homology to these AGC group VIII kinases have the DFG modification and
a small insert between subdomains VII and VIII (64, 65). Two of the
genes, PsPK3 and PsPK5, were shown to be
photoregulated. G11A and PVPK-1 are also most like protein kinases that
transduce extracellular signals, but their noncatalytic sequences
exhibit no homology to regulatory domains of other protein kinases
(54). Since KIPK is most closely related to these plant kinases and the
AGC animal protein kinases, it too may be involved in transduction of
extracellular messages.
In this study, we have demonstrated that KIPK interacts with the
kinesin KCBP. This conclusion is supported first by the yeast two-hybrid interaction results. Full-length KIPK interacted with the
amino-terminal portion and full-length KCBP but did not interact with
the motor domain of KCBP. The interaction of KCBP and KIPK is further
supported by the results of the in vitro co-precipitation results. KCBP protein, bacterially expressed as a fusion to T7 tag, was
purified on T7 tag antibody-agarose beads and used to co-precipitate
bacterially expressed KIPK. KIPK was selectively precipitated from
crude protein extract in the presence of KCBP. T7 tag antibody-agarose
beads on the other hand did not bind to KIPK when incubated with crude
protein extract from bacteria expressing KIPK.
Regulation of kinesin and KLPs by phosphorylation may be by direct
phosphorylation of the KLP or by phosphorylation of a protein that
interacts with the KLP. Evidence of both types of phosphorylation has
been found (66, 67). Phosphorylation has been correlated with vesicle
transport in several systems (21, 68, 69), and phosphorylation of KLPs
during the cell cycle has also been shown (20, 21, 70-73). Both the
full-length KIPK and the catalytic domain of KIPK show
autophosphorylation. The N-terminal region of KCBP, on the other hand,
was not phosphorylated by either full-length or catalytic domain KIPK
protein under the conditions tested in our study. KIPK may need to be
phosphorylated by another protein kinase or need some other form of
post-translational modification in order to phosphorylate KCBP. The
other possibility is that KIPK phosphorylates the full-length or native
KCBP. We could not use the full-length KCBP in phosphorylation studies,
since the expression of full-length cDNA always yielded proteolyzed
N-terminal and C-terminal fragments.
Alternatively, KCBP may not be a target for the kinase itself but may
be involved in the targeting of the kinase to a specific location or to
a KCBP-associated protein that may be the substrate for the kinase. A
calmodulin-binding class III myosin called NinaC is thought to
transport calmodulin and control the subcellular distribution of
calmodulin (40, 74, 75). Phosphorylation of kinesin-associated proteins
with concomitant stimulation of kinesin activity has been shown (76).
Three proteins that co-purified with kinesin were hyperphosphorylated
under conditions of enhanced activity. Later, one of the proteins was
identified as KLC (77). A 100-kDa kinase and a 150-kDa type 1 phosphatase regulated the phosphorylation of this KLC. The kinase and
phosphatase both co-purify with the KHC, suggesting that kinesin exists
in a large complex capable of self-regulation. MLK Ser/Thr kinase
related to the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase family
used in a yeast two-hybrid screen interacted with a KLP related to KIF3 and with a KIF3-interacting protein, KAP3A, the putative targeting component of KIF3 (78). KIF3 localized to structures along microtubules at the same location as MLK2 and phosphorylation-activated c-Jun N-terminal kinase, a stress-regulated protein kinase (14). Another complex of proteins containing a KLP and a protein kinase was isolated
in Drosophila (79). Co-immunopreciptation experiments revealed a complex containing a protein-serine/threonine kinase (FU), a
transcription factor (cubitus interruptus), and a KLP (COS2). A
signaling protein HH (hedgehog gene) stimulated phosphorylation of COS2
and FU, but the phosphorylation of neither FU nor COS2 was by FU. Even
when the catalytic domain of FU was mutated, both proteins were
phosphorylated (79).
This study, together with previous biochemical (22, 25, 28-30) and
genetic studies (38, 39), strongly suggests that KCBP interacts with
several proteins and may function as a multiprotein complex. It is
interesting that KLPs seem to be present in complexes of proteins that
often contain protein kinases. Work in the future to elucidate the
substrate(s) for KIPK will help to answer some of the questions raised
by the presence of these complexes in cells.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant
MCB-9630782 (to A. S. N. R.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF236104.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 970-491-5773;
Fax: 970-491-0649; E-mail: reddy@lamar.colostate.edu.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
KLP, kinesin-like
protein;
KHC, kinesin heavy chain;
KCBP, kinesin-like
calmodulin-binding protein;
KIPK, KCBP-interacting protein kinase;
KLC, kinesin light chain;
YPD, yeast extract-peptone-dextrose medium;
SD, synthetic dropout medium;
SC, synthetic complete medium.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hoyt, M. A.
(1994)
Curr. Biol.
6,
63-68
|
| 2.
|
Shroer, T. A.,
and Sheetz, M. P.
(1991)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
53,
629-652[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Vale, R. D.,
and Fletterick, R. J.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol.
13,
745-777[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Moore, J. D.,
and Endow, S. A.
(1995)
BioEssays
18,
207-219
|
| 5.
|
Goodson, H. V.,
Kang, S. J.,
and Endow, S. A.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
1875-1884[Abstract]
|
| 6.
|
Vale, R. D.,
and Goldstein, L. S.
(1990)
Cell
60,
883-885[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Bloom, G. S.,
and Endow, S. A.
(1994)
Protein Profile
1,
1059-1116[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Gauger, A. K.,
and Goldstein, L. S. B.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
13657-13666[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Johnson, C. S.,
Buster, D.,
and Scholey, J. M.
(1990)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
16,
204-213[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Stearns, M. E.,
and Piazza, G. A.
(1990)
Biochem. Cell Biol.
68,
436-440[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Toyoshima, I., Yu, H.,
Steuer, E. R.,
and Sheetz, M. P.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
118,
1121-1131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Yu, H.,
Nicchitta, C. V.,
Kumar, J.,
Becker, M.,
Toyoshima, I.,
and Sheetz, M. P.
(1995)
Mol. Biol. Cell
6,
171-183[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Kumar, J., Yu, H.,
and Sheetz, M. P.
(1995)
Science
267,
1834-1837[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Nagata, K.,
Puls, A.,
Futter, C.,
Aspenstrom, P.,
Schaefer, E.,
Nakata, T.,
Hirokawa, N.,
and Hall, A
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
149-158[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Huang, J. D.,
Brady, S. T.,
Richards, B. W.,
Stenolen, D.,
Resau, J. H.,
Copeland, N. G.,
and Jenkins, N. A.
(1999)
Nature
397,
267-270[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Thaler, C. D.,
and Haimo, L. T.
(1996)
Int. Rev. Cytol.
164,
269-327[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Haimo, L. T.
(1996)
Trends Cell Biol.
5,
165-168
|
| 18.
|
Robertson, A. M.,
and Allan, V. J.
(1997)
Prog. Cell Cycle Res.
3,
59-75[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Nigg, E. A.,
Blangy, A.,
and Lane, H. A.
(1996)
Exp. Cell Res.
229,
174-180[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Blangy, A.,
Lane, H. A.,
d'Herin, P.,
Harper, M.,
Kress, M.,
and Nigg, E. A.
(1995)
Cell
83,
1159-1169[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Lee, K. D.,
and Hollenbeck, P. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
5600-5605[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Reddy, A. S.,
Safadi, F.,
Narasimhulu, S. B.,
Golovkin, M.,
and Hu, X.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
7052-7060[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Reddy, A. S.,
Narasimhulu, S. B.,
Safadi, F.,
and Golovkin, M.
(1996)
Plant J.
10,
9-21[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Wang, W.,
Takezawa, D.,
Narasimhulu, S. B.,
Reddy, A. S.,
and Poovaiah, B. W.
(1996)
Plant Mol. Biol
31,
87-100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Reddy, V. S.,
Safadi, F.,
Zielinski, R. E.,
and Reddy, A. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
31727-31733[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Reddy, V. S.,
and Reddy, A. S. N.
(1999)
Bioinformatics
15,
1055-1057[Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Reddy, A. S.
(2000)
in
Signal Transduction in Plants: Current Advances
(Sopory, S. K.
, Oelmuller, R.
, and Maheshwari, S. C., eds)
, Kluher Academic Publishers, New York, in press
|
| 28.
|
Deavours, B. E.,
Reddy, A. S.,
and Walker, R. A.
(1998)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
40,
408-416[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Narasimhulu, S. B.,
Kao, Y. L.,
and Reddy, A. S.
(1997)
Plant J.
12,
1139-1149[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Narasimhulu, S. B.,
and Reddy, A. S.
(1998)
Plant Cell
10,
957-965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Rogers, G. C.,
Hart, C. L.,
Wedaman, K. P.,
and Scholey, J. M.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
294,
1-8[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Vernos, I.,
and Karsenti, E.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
4-9[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Vernos, I.,
and Karsenti, E.
(1995)
Trends Cell Biol.
5,
297-301[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Smirnova, E. A.,
Reddy, A. S.,
Bowser, J.,
and Bajer, A. S.
(1998)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
41,
271-280[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Bowser, J.,
and Reddy, A. S.
(1997)
Plant J.
12,
1429-1437[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Voss, J. W.,
Safadi, F.,
Reddy, A. S. N.,
and Hepler, P. K.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
373a
|
| 37.
|
Kao, Y. L.,
Deavours, B. E.,
Phelps, K. K.,
Walker, R. A.,
and Reddy, A. S.
(2000)
Biochem Biophys. Res. Commun.
267,
201-207[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Oppenheimer, D.,
Pollock, M.,
Vacik, J.,
Szymanski, D.,
Ericson, B.,
Feldmann, K.,
and Marks, M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
6261-6266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Krishnakumar, S.,
and Oppenheimer, D. G.
(1999)
Development
126,
3079-3088[Abstract]
|
| 40.
| Reddy, A. S. (2000) Int. Rev. Cytol., in press
|
| 41.
|
Reddy, A. S. N.,
Safadi, F.,
Beyette, J.,
and Mykles, D. L.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun
199,
1089-1095[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Golovkin, M.,
and Reddy, A. S. N.
(1998)
Plant Cell
10,
1637-1647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, F. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 44.
|
Day, I. S.,
and Reddy, A. S.
(1998)
Plant Mol. Biol.
36,
451-461[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Durfee, T.,
Becherer, K.,
Chen, P. L.,
Yeh, S. H.,
Yang, Y.,
Kilburn, A. E.,
Lee, W. H.,
and Elledge, S. J.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
555-569[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Fields, S.,
and Song, O.
(1989)
Nature
340,
245-246[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Song, H.,
Golovkin, M.,
Reddy, A. S.,
and Endow, S. A.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
322-327[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Schneider, S.,
Buchert, M.,
and Hovens, C. M.
(1996)
BioTechniques
20,
960-962[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Hanks, S. K.,
and Quinn, A. M.
(1991)
Methods Enzymol.
200,
38-62[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Hunter, T.
(1991)
Methods Enzymol.
200,
3-37[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Meyer, R. C.
(1996)
Plant Sci.
118,
71-80[CrossRef]
|
| 52.
|
Biermann, B.,
Johnson, E. M.,
and Feldman, L. J.
(1990)
Plant Physiol.
94,
1609-1615[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Hayashida, N.,
Mizoguchi, T.,
and Shinozaki, K.
(1993)
Gene (Amst.)
124,
251-255[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Lawton, M. A.,
Yamamoto, R. T.,
Hanks, S. K.,
and Lamb, C. J.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
3140-3144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Lippuner, V.,
Chou, I. T.,
Scott, S. V.,
Ettinger, W. F.,
Theg, S. M.,
and Gasser, C. S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem
269,
7863-7868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Hanks, S. K.,
and Hunter, T.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
576-596[Abstract]
|
| 57.
|
Stone, J. M.,
and Walker, J. C.
(1995)
Plant Physiol.
108,
451-457[Abstract]
|
| 58.
|
Chandok, M. R.,
and Sopory, S. K.
(1996)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
251,
599-608[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Kuo, W. N.,
Ku, T. W.,
Jones, D. L.,
Jn-Baptiste, J. B.,
and Bradshaw, C. J.
(1995)
Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int
37,
423-430[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
van der Hoeven, P. C.,
Siderius, M.,
Korthout, H. A.,
Drabkin, A. V.,
and de Boer, A. H.
(1996)
Plant Physiol
111,
857-865[Abstract]
|
| 61.
|
Sokolova, M.,
Prufer, D.,
Tacke, E.,
and Rohde, W.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
400,
201-205[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 62.
|
Hardie, D. G.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
50,
97-131[CrossRef]
|
| 63.
|
Hanks, S. K.,
Quinn, A. M.,
and Hunter, T.
(1988)
Science
241,
42-52[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 64.
|
Khanna, R.,
Lin, X.,
and Watson, J. C.
(1999)
Plant Mol. Biol.
39,
231-242[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 65.
|
Lin, X. L.,
Feng, X.-H.,
and Watson, J. C.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
6951-6955[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 66.
|
Matthies, H. J.,
Miller, R. J.,
and Palfrey, H. C.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
11176-11187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 67.
|
Hollenbeck, P. J.
(1993)
J. Neurochem
60,
2265-2275[CrossRef][Me |