|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 18, 13879-13887, May 5, 2000
Interaction of p55 Reverse Transcriptase from the
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Retrotransposon Ty3
with Conformationally Distinct Nucleic Acid Duplexes*
Jason W.
Rausch §,
Marion K. Bona-Le
Grice§¶,
M.
Henrietta,
Nymark-McMahon ,
Jennifer T.
Miller , and
Stuart
F. J.
Le Grice **
From the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Drug Resistance
Program, Division of Basic Sciences, NCI-Frederick Cancer Research and
Development Center, Frederick, Maryland 21702, ¶ Science
Applications International Corporation, Frederick, Maryland 21702, and
the Department of Biological Chemistry, College of Medicine,
University of California, Irvine, California 92697-1700
 |
ABSTRACT |
The 55-kDa reverse transcriptase (RT) domain of
the Ty3 POL3 open reading frame was purified and evaluated
on conformationally distinct nucleic acid duplexes. Purified enzyme
migrated as a monomer by size exclusion chromatography. Enzymatic
footprinting indicate Ty3 RT protects template nucleotides +7 through
21 and primer nucleotides 1 through 24. Contrary to previous data
with retroviral enzymes, a 4-base pair region of the template-primer duplex remained nuclease accessible. The C-terminal portion of Ty3 RT
encodes a functional RNase H domain, although the hydrolysis profile
suggests an increased spatial separation between the catalytic centers.
Despite conservation of catalytically important residues in the RNase H
domain, Fe2+ fails to replace Mg2+ in the RNase
H catalytic center for localized generation of hydroxyl radicals, again
suggesting this domain may be structurally distinct from its retroviral
counterparts. RNase H specificity was investigated using a model system
challenging the enzyme to select the polypurine tract primer from
within an RNA/DNA hybrid, extend this into (+) DNA, and excise the
primer from nascent DNA. Purified RT catalyzed each of these three
steps but was almost inactive on a non-polypurine tract RNA primer. Our
studies provide the first detailed characterization of the enzymatic
activities of a retrotransposon reverse transcriptase.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Following infection, retroviruses initiate their DNA synthesis
program from a host-derived tRNA hybridized to a specific region at the
5' end of their (+) strand RNA genome, designated the primer binding
site or PBS.1 However, tRNA
use is somewhat heterogeneous, i.e. while avian viruses
exploit tRNATrp, Moloney murine leukemia virus uses
tRNAPro and D-type and human spumaretroviruses
tRNALys1,2 (1). In the case of HIV and related lentiviruses
of simian, feline, and equine origin, tRNALys3 is selected
as the replication primer. Early experimentation suggested
complementarity between the PBS and sequences at the 3' terminus of the
replication primer as the sole specificity determinant during
initiation of ( ) strand synthesis (2). However, extensive analyses
with Rous sarcoma virus (3-5) and HIV-1 (6-14) have provided a
convincing argument that additional intermolecular base pairing between
the replication primer and sequences of the viral genome 5' to the PBS
play a major role in controlling initiation. In the latter case,
chemical footprinting data (11, 15) and kinetic analysis (12, 14)
indicate a two-step initiation program. The first of these is
characterized by slow addition of the first 5 dNTPs, during which DNA
synthesis is highly distributive; subsequently, the replication
machinery moves into a rapid and processive elongation mode. Avian
viruses display a similar control mechanism, although the
intermolecular interactions underlying this are subtly different,
i.e. while the anticodon loop of tRNALys,3 is in
intimate contact with U5-IR loop bases of the HIV genome, this occurs
between the T C arm of tRNATrp and U5-IR stem bases in
Rous sarcoma virus (3-5).
Although restricted to an intracellular life cycle in the absence of an
envelope gene, LTR-containing retrotransposons of the budding yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, representatives of which include
Ty1 and Ty3, share many features of the reverse transcription cycle
with their retroviral counterparts (16). Both are LTR-containing
elements requiring a host-derived tRNA primer, in this case
tRNAiMet, to initiate ( ) strand
synthesis. In contrast, a distinguishing feature of these
retrotransposons is the limited complementarity between PBS sequences
at the 5' end of the genome and the tRNA primer, which in Ty3 is
reduced from 18 to 8 nt. However, Keeney et al. (17)
demonstrated that features of the T C arm are critical to
transposition, and more recently Gabus et al. (18) provided experimental evidence that Ty3 compensates for this by exploiting a
bipartite PBS. According to this model, a region with extensive complementarity (12 nucleotides) to the T C arm of the tRNA primer is
located at the 3' end of the genome. Although speculative, these
authors have also suggested an initiation complex of two genomic RNAs
could be stabilized through a short autocomplementary sequence in
tRNAiMet, which induces dimerization. A
similar scenario prevails with Ty1, where reduced complementarity to
the 3' end of the tRNA primer (10 nt) is compensated by extended
interactions with the D arm (19). This notion of co-operativity between
distal cis-acting sequences on the genome may be not be
unique to retrotransposons. Brule et al. (20) have found
that ( ) strand transfer in HIV can benefit from complementary
sequences in the tRNA anticodon stem and bases in the U3 region at the
3' end of the genome. A better understanding of cis-acting
sequences cooperating in ( ) strand DNA synthesis in retrotransposons
would therefore be beneficial.
As in retroviruses, (+) strand synthesis in retrotransposons initiates
from an RNase H-resistant, purine-rich sequence immediately adjacent to
the U3 region at the 3' end of the genome and designated the polypurine
tract or PPT. This sequence must be (i) selected from the (+) RNA/( )
DNA replication intermediate, (ii) extended at its 3' terminus into (+)
strand DNA, and (iii) excised from the nascent (+) strand to generate
the appropriate 5' LTR sequences for recognition by the integration
machinery. Since imprecise removal of the PPT from (+) DNA may have
consequences for integration, PPT selection and removal must by
necessity be a highly accurate process. In this respect, Kirchner and
Sandmeyer (21) and Wilhelm et al. (22) indicated that
several ribonucleotides at the 3' terminus of the Ty3 and Ty1 PPT could
serve as (+) strand initiation sites. These studies have relied
exclusively on analysis of DNA isolated from virus-like particles
since, until recently, purified Ty3 RT and a reconstituted system
recapitulating in vivo events have been unavailable. The
goal of the present study was to prepare recombinant Ty3 RT and analyze
both the nucleoprotein complexes and enzymatic activities (DNA
polymerase and RNase H) mediating these events. DNase I footprinting of
binary polymerization complexes indicates an organization unlike that
demonstrated for several retroviral enzymes (23-25). A system of
"PPT scanning" was also exploited to evaluate the precision with
which Ty3 (+) strand synthesis is initiated. Surprisingly, this system
indicated that the specificity of primer selection and removal was
dependent on the nature of the PPT-containing RNA primer. Finally,
alignment of amino acid sequences from the RNase H domains of several
LTR-containing retrotransposons and plant caulimoviruses suggests an
alternative distribution of catalytic residues.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cloning, Expression, and Purification of Ty3 RT
The 55-kDa RT open reading frame was amplified from the Ty3
POL3 gene (26) by the polymerase chain reaction as a
BamHI/HindIII fragment and inserted between the
equivalent sites of plasmid p6HRT (27). This procedure generated
plasmid p6HTy3RT, which allows IPTG-inducible expression of a
polyhistidine extended enzyme. RT was purified from logarithmically
grown and IPTG-induced cultures by a combination of metal chelate
(nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid-Sepharose) and ion exchange
chromatography (S-Sepharose). Purified enzyme was demonstrated to be
free of contaminating nucleases and stored at 20 °C in a 50%
glycerol-containing buffer (28) at a concentration of 0.25 mg/ml. Under
these conditions, we observed minimal loss of DNA polymerase or RNase H
activity over several months.
For comparative purposes, the p66/p51 form of either FIV or HIV-1 RT
was included in several experiments. Methods for preparation and
purification of these enzymes have been provided elsewhere (28).
Immunological analysis of Ty3 RT expressed in Escherichia coli was performed using rabbit polyclonal antibodies against the
purified protein.
Determination of Ty3 RT Subunit Composition
The molecular weight and quaternary structure of Ty3 RT was
evaluated by size exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 200 HR
10/30 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) connected to a DuoFlow (Bio-Rad) chromatography system. For Calibration purposes, 50-250 µg
of several proteins of known molecular weight were applied to the
column in a buffer of 50 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.0), 25 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. These include human IgG (150,000 Da), HIV RT p66/p51 (117,000 Da), bovine serum albumin (67,000 Da), HIV RT p51 (52,000 Da),
-lactoglobulin (35,000 Da), and cytochrome c (12,000 Da).
62 µg of Ty3 RT was likewise applied. Elution of proteins was
detected spectrophotemetrically (E280), and
migration times plotted against log molecular weight to create a
molecular weight standard curve. The best fit dependence of mass on
migration time was determined using the logarithmic curve-fitting function of Delta Graph graphing software (Design Sciences, Inc.).
DNA Polymerase Activity
DNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity was evaluated
on a 71-nt template hybridized to a 5' end-labeled 36-nt primer, the
former of which contains a short stem-loop in the single stranded
template (29). Twenty nM template-primer (annealed by
incubation at 95 °C in 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 25 mM MgCl2 and slow cooling to room temperature)
was incubated with 40 nM RT on ice for 5 min, in a buffer
comprising 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM
MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, and 5 mM
dithiothreitol. DNA synthesis was initiated at 30 °C by addition of
dATP, dGTP, dCTP, and TTP to a final concentration of 100 µM. Aliquots were removed at times indicated in the text and mixed with an equal volume of 7 M urea containing 0.1%
bromphenol blue and xylene cyanol. Polymerization products were
resolved by high voltage denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and evaluated by autoradiography.
RNase H Activity
RNase H activity was initially evaluated on a 5' end-labeled
90-nt RNA template (prepared by in vitro transcription)
hybridized to the 36-nt DNA primer used to evaluate polymerase function
(30). 10 nM enzyme was incubated with 20 nM
template-primer in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH
7.5, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM dithiothreitol. Hydrolysis
was initiated by addition of MgCl2 to a final concentration of 10 mM and allowed to continue at 30 °C. Aliquots were
again removed at times indicated in the text and processed as described above. In a minor modification to this technique, RNase H activity was
also examined on the same substrate whose 3' terminus was end-labeled
with [32P]Cp and RNA ligase (New England Biolabs) under
conditions recommended by the manufacturer.
Enzymatic Footprinting of Replication Complexes
DNase I--
DNase I footprinting (24) was conducted on the
71-nt template/36-nt primer described above and whose template or
primer was end-labeled with -32P and polynucleotide
kinase. End-labeling followed protocols specified by the manufacturer
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals). 50 mM end-labeled template-primer was incubated with 85 nM Ty3 RT in 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 6 mM MgCl2, 80 mM NaCl for 10 min at room temperature. Two units of DNase
I were added, and digestion allowed to proceed for 30 s.
Hydrolysis was terminated by addition of an equal volume of
phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1). Nucleic acids in the
aqueous phase were recovered by ethanol precipitation; dried;
resuspended in a solution of 8 M urea, 0.1% bromphenol blue, and 0.1% xylene cyanol; and fractionated by high voltage denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Hydrolysis products were
visualized by autoradiography.
S1 Nuclease--
S1 footprinting (24) required modification of
the DNase I protection protocol. Following preparation of
protein/nucleic acid complexes, the sample was supplemented with 40 units of S1 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) in a concentrated S1 buffer,
such that the final composition of the reaction mixture was 33 mM sodium acetate, pH 4.5, 50 mM NaCl, and 30 µM ZnSO4. Following 30 s of S1
treatment, hydrolysis was terminated and nucleic acids processed as
described above. Under these conditions, the replication complex remains stable over the digestion period. Control S1 digests of extended substrates in the absence of RT were also prepared.
Polypurine Tract Utilization
Experiments evaluating Ty3 PPT utilization required a
combination of both DNA polymerase and RNase H activities (31). A 65-nt, chemically synthesized ( ) strand DNA template (Integrated DNA
Technologies) containing the PPT complement was hybridized to synthetic
(+) strand RNA primers (Dharmacon Research) spanning the PPT by heating
to 90 °C and slow cooling in 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 25 mM MgCl2. The final concentration of all
template-primer combinations following hybridization was 20 µM.
These substrates were incubated at room temperature for 45 min with Ty3
RT in buffer containing (final concentration) 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0; 80 mM NaCl; 6 mM
MgCl2; 5 mM dithiothreitol; 1 µM
template-primer; 340 nM RT; 100 µM each dATP,
dGTP, dCTP, and TTP; 85 nM [ -32P]dATP.
After 45 min, the reactions were terminated by heating to 90 °C for
2 min, after which unincorporated radioactivity was removed by
spin-column Sephadex G25 gel filtration (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
The eluate was divided into equal portions to visualize nascent (+) DNA
containing or lacking the RNA primer. One portion was treated with 0.3 volumes of 1 N NaOH at 65 °C to hydrolyze all RNA
primers, then neutralized by adding an equivalent volume of 1 N HCl. Nucleic acids were precipitated with ethanol;
precipitated; dried; and resuspended in 7 M urea, 0.1%
bromphenol blue, and 0.1% xylene cyanol. The remaining portion
(i.e. containing RNA primers) was precipitated as described
above and resuspended in the same gel loading buffer. DNA synthesis
products were fractionated by high voltage denaturing polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis and visualized by autoradiography.
Fe2+-mediated Cleavage of Duplex DNA by the RNase H
Domain
Replacement of Mg2+ in the RNase H domain with
Fe2+ and hydroxyl radical-mediated cleavage of duplex DNA
followed the protocol of Goette et al. (32). Substrate was
the 71-nt template/36-nt primer used to evaluate
DNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity, the template of
which was 5' end-labeled with [ -32P]ATP and
polynucleotide kinase according to standard protocols. Enzyme (1 µM) and template primer (50 nM) were
incubated 5 min at room temperature in a buffer of 80 mM
HEPES, pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl. The following reactants were
subsequently pipetted onto the wall of the reaction tube: 1 µl of 50 mM dithiothreitol, 1 µl of freshly prepared
H2O2, 2 µl of 2 mM
Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2·6H2O. Reaction vessels were carefully closed and centrifuged to initiate of
Fe2+-mediated hydroxyl radical cleavage. After 5 min, the
reaction was terminated by adding 40 µl of stop solution (0.1 M thiourea, 10.0 mM EDTA, 0.6 M
NaOAc, pH 6.2), and 1 µl of glycogen. Nucleic acids were precipitated
with ethanol, collected by centrifugation, dried, and resuspended in
urea-based gel loading buffer. Hydrolysis products were fractionated by
high voltage denaturing gel electrophoresis and visualized by autoradiography.
 |
RESULTS |
Purified p55 Ty3 RT Sediments as a Monomer--
Although most
lentiviral RTs studied to date exhibit a dimeric structure of
asymmetrically organized subunits, the purified MLV enzyme is a
monomer. Although surprising, the possibility of a monomeric RT
organization is supported by recent data with recombinant enzyme from
bovine leukemia virus (33), which was shown by rate sedimentation
analysis to migrate as a monomer in both the absence and presence of
duplex DNA. Following expression and purification of Ty3 RT (Fig.
1, A and B), its
quaternary structure was evaluated by size exclusion chromatography. As
indicated in Fig. 1B, the Ty3 enzyme migrated slightly
faster than the monomeric polyhistidine-tagged p51 subunit of HIV-1 RT
(mass 52 kDa) but behind bovine serum albumin (mass 67 kDa), which is
consistent with a monomeric organization. However, these results do not
rule out the possibility of other RT forms are required during Ty3 replication.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A, immunological evaluation of Ty3 RT
expression in recombinant E. coli.
M15:pDM1.I::p6HTy3RT was grown to mid-log phase and induced
with IPTG as outlined under "Experimental Procedures." Samples were
withdrawn after for 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min (lanes
1-5, respectively) and analyzed with antiserum against Ty3
RT. Lane 0, pre-IPTG induction sample.
B, evaluation of Ty3 RT expression and purification by
Coomassie Blue staining. Lane , pre-IPTG induction;
lane +, 45 min post-IPTG induction; lane
T, purified Ty3 RT; lane M, molecular
weight markers. C, determination of Ty3 RT subunit
stoichiometry by size exclusion chromatography. Molecular weights of
standard proteins have been indicated on the calibration curve.
|
|
DNA-dependent DNA Polymerase Activity of Ty3
RT--
The ability of Ty3 RT to support processive DNA synthesis in
the absence of accessory factors such as the nucleocapsid protein was
initially assessed. At the same time, we also wished to determine the
extent to which processivity might be influenced by temperature, since
yeast strains harboring Ty elements are maintained at 30 °C and RT
activity in VLPs is temperature-sensitive (34). DNA synthesis was
evaluated on a 71-nt DNA template/36-nt DNA primer used to characterize
many of the retroviral RTs in our collection (24). A fortuitous feature
of this substrate is the intramolecular duplex adopted by the
single-stranded template immediately ahead of the primer 3' terminus
(Fig. 2A). This structure has
been exploited to evaluate the processivity of wild type and mutant
variants of HIV-1 and EIAV RT. As an example, Wöhrl et
al. demonstrated that the p51 subunit of EIAV RT efficiently
initiates DNA synthesis on this substrate, but fails to polymerize into
the hairpin (29). A similar phenotype was obtained with HIV-1 enzymes
harboring mutations within the p66 primer grip motif (35). Thus, as a preliminary characterization, the response of the Ty3 enzyme to this
structure was investigated, the results of which are presented in Fig.
2 (B and C).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
DNA-dependent DNA polymerase
activity of purified Ty3 reverse transcriptase. A,
schematic representation of the heteropolymeric substrate, comprising a
71-nt template to which a 5' labeled 36-nt primer is hybridized. Note
that a region near the 5' end of the single-stranded template has the
capacity for intramolecular base pairing. Stalling of RT in this region
is characterized by accumulation of P + 10 to P + 15 products.
B, temperature sensitivity of DNA polymerase activity
catalyzed by HIV-1 and Ty3 RT. For each temperature indicated,
duplicate 10 min DNA synthesis profiles (a and b)
are presented. C, time course of Ty3 and HIV-1 RT-catalyzed
DNA synthesis at 30 °C. Lanes C, radiolabeled
primer (36 nt). In both cases, DNA synthesis was evaluated after 1 min
(lanes 1), 2 min (lanes 2),
5 min (lanes 3), 10 min (lanes
4), 20 min (lanes 5), and 45 min
(lanes 6). Note that, whileTy3 RT is less active
than the HIV-1 enzyme, stalled products in the range P + 10 to P + 15 are absent.
|
|
DNA polymerase activity of Ty3 RT was affected by both the template
hairpin and temperature at which the assay was performed (Fig.
2B). At 37 °C, i.e. where the HIV-1 enzyme was
most active, DNA-dependent DNA synthesis catalyzed by Ty3
RT stopped predominantly between positions P + 10 and P + 15, which
define the base of the template hairpin (Fig. 2A). Since
DNase I and S1 footprinting experiments have verified the presence of
the stem-loop (24), it appears that Ty3 RT inefficiently resolves this
structure at 37 °C. Lowering the incubation temperature to 30 °C
conferred on Ty3 RT the capacity to polymerize through the hairpin,
although the overall level of polymerase activity was lower than that
obtained with the HIV-1 enzyme. In Fig. 2C, a time course of
DNA-dependent DNA synthesis was performed with both the
HIV-1 and Ty3 enzymes at 30 °C. Although it is again clear that Ty3
RT is less active than its HIV-1 counterpart, pausing between template
nucleotides +10 and +15 is only observed with the latter, suggesting
the Ty3 enzyme may have a more robust strand displacement activity.
Enzymatic Footprinting of Ty3 Replication Complexes--
Enzymatic
footprinting of HIV (24), EIAV (25), and MLV replication complexes (23)
indicates that the retroviral polymerase is in close contact with DNA
from template nucleotide +7 to 24/ 27 of the template-primer duplex.
Since the size of the Ty3 enzyme is considerably different from those
we have previously evaluated, it was of interest to determine if this
resulted in an altered enzymatic footprint on the same template-primer
duplex. A complete picture of the nucleoprotein complex can only be
achieved by independent evaluation of resistance to the nucleases S1
and DNase I, which hydrolyze single-stranded and double-stranded DNA,
respectively (Fig. 3A). For
comparison, replication complexes containing p66/p51 HIV-1 RT were
evaluated in parallel.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Enzymatic footprinting of Ty3 RT. The
substrate depicted in panel A is that used to
evaluate DNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity. The
presence of an 11-bp stem-loop near the 5' terminus of the template
generates a substrate that is resistant to nuclease S1 and sensitive to
DNase I. Panel B, S1 footprinting of contacts
made to the single-stranded template ahead to the DNA polymerase
catalytic center. C, no enzyme; H, p66/p51 HIV-1
RT; T, Ty3 RT. As indicated above, intramolecular template
base pairing has the consequence that only template bases between
positions +1 and +10 are revealed. Panel C, interaction of
HIV-1 (lane H) and Ty3 RTs (lane T)
with the template strand of the template-primer duplex.
Lanes C, no enzyme. Template nucleotides within
each footprint that retain DNase I sensitivity or display
hyper-reactivity have been boxed. The positions of the single-stranded
template and intramolecular hairpin have been indicated at the
side of the panel. Panel D, interaction of HIV-1
and Ty3 RTs with primer nucleotides of the template-primer duplex.
Template nucleotides that are hyper-reactive in the presence of the
HIV-1 and Ty3 enzyme have been indicated by the arrow and
closed box, respectively. Lane designations are
as in panel C.
|
|
The results of S1 probing are illustrated in Fig. 3B. Since
the single-stranded template of our substrate assumes an intramolecular base paired structure (Fig. 3A), only template nucleotides
between positions +1 and +10 are revealed in Fig. 3B
(hydrolysis products in the immediate vicinity of the 5' terminus lie
outside the resolving capacity on the gel). Incubation of
template-primer with the heterodimeric HIV-1 enzyme results in
protection of template nucleotides between positions +1 and +7 from
hydrolysis, which is in keeping with our previous findings (23, 24). A
similar S1 hydrolysis profile was obtained with the Ty3 enzyme,
suggesting that the finger subdomains of each polymerase make
equivalent contact with nucleotides ahead of the DNA polymerase
catalytic center. In contrast, the manner in which the HIV-1 and Ty3
enzymes contact the template-primer duplex is significantly different
(Fig. 3C). The protection pattern derived from the HIV-1
enzyme extends as far as template nucleotide 22, within which
positions 19/ 20 remain nuclease-accessible. In the presence of Ty3
RT, the protection pattern extends to position 24, while template
nucleotides between positions 16 and 19 remain nuclease-accessible.
A similar pattern emerges when contact to primer nucleotides of the
template-primer duplex is investigated (Fig. 3D). In this
case, HIV-1 RT protects primer nucleotides between positions 1 and
25, within which positions 19/ 20 remain accessible. With the Ty3
enzyme, the protection pattern also extends as far as primer nucleotide
25, but within this footprint positions 16 to 18 are rendered
nuclease-susceptible. Combining the Ty3 RT-derived template and primer
hydrolysis profiles suggests duplex DNA between positions 16 and 19
remains freely accessible to DNase I. Such data may indicate that the
N-terminal DNA polymerase and C-terminal RNase H domains of Ty3 RT form
independent domains separated by a small linker, as has been proposed
for the murine enzyme (36). Alternatively, an interaction of Ty3 RT
with the template-primer duplex may alter its structure sufficiently to render it locally hypersensitive to DNase I digestion.
RNase H Hydrolysis Profiles Suggest an Altered Spatial Separation
between the DNA Polymerase and RNase H Domains of TY3
RT--
Currently available crystallographic (37-39), enzymatic (31,
40), and chemical probing data (41) suggest that the DNA polymerase and
RNase H domains of the retroviral polymerase are separated by 17-18
bp. In order to determine whether the same holds for the Ty3 enzyme,
its interaction with an RNA/DNA hybrid related to the DNA duplex of the
previous section was evaluated. This substrate is depicted in Fig.
4A, comprising a 90-nt RNA template to which the identical 36-nt DNA primer is hybridized. The
temporal sequence of RNase H-mediated hydrolysis is indicated in Fig.
4A and involves initial endonucleolytic cleavage at position 17,
followed by a directional processing activity extending to position
8. Using the system illustrated in Fig. 4A, these activities are
diagnosed by the accumulation of 71- and 62-nt hydrolysis fragments,
respectively.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
RNase H activity of purified Ty3 RT.
A, schematic representation of the substrates used for
analysis. The major HIV-1-derived cleavage sites on the 90-nt RNA
template have been indicated, designating the first base pair of the
RNA-DNA hybrid in the DNA polymerase catalytic center " 1."
B, HIV-1 and Ty3 hydrolysis profiles derived from substrate
whose RNA 5' terminus is 32P-labeled. For both enzymes,
hydrolysis was evaluated after 30 s (lanes
1), 1 min (lanes 2), 2 min
(lanes 3), 5 min (lanes 4),
10 min (lanes 5), 20 min (lanes
6), and 40 min (lanes 7). The major
sites of hydrolysis and corresponding fragment sizes are indicated at
the side of each panel. C, hydrolysis profiles
generated from substrate whose RNA 3' terminus is
32P-labeled. Time points 1-7 are similar to
those in B, while C represents the uncleaved RNA
template.
|
|
RNase H-mediated hydrolysis catalyzed by HIV-1 RT is illustrated in
Fig. 4B. Initially, hydrolysis products of 71, 74, and, to a
lesser extent, 76 nt accumulate, and are gradually replaced by
fragments in the range 64-62 nt. A similar pattern emerges when Ty3
RNase H-mediated hydrolysis is evaluated, but differs significantly in
the size of the hydrolysis products. Accumulation of a 75-nt fragment
at early stages represents hydrolysis at template nucleotide 21.
Subsequent to this, the final product of directional processing is a
65-nt fragment, indicating cleavage at template nucleotide 11. While
we have previously provided evidence that different lentiviral RTs may
have a more stringent separation between their catalytic centers
(37-39), Ty3 is the first RT shown to terminate directional processing
at this position. In the experiment of Fig. 3C, hydrolysis
was evaluated on the same substrate but whose RNA template was labeled
at the 3' terminus. Since RT binding is initially controlled by the DNA
primer 3' terminus, the combination of synthesis-dependent
and -independent RNase H activities will have the effect of producing a
"gapped" template. In doing so, this directs re-binding of RT for
cleavage further downstream, i.e. toward the radiolabel,
thereby generating short hydrolysis products (31). This bimodal
hydrolysis is evident for both the HIV-1 and Ty3 enzymes, but, as was
demonstrated with the 5' labeled substrate, the distribution of
hydrolysis products is significantly different.
Ty3 RT Fails to Support Fe-mediated Cleavage of Duplex
DNA--
Goette et al. (32, 42) have elegantly demonstrated
that Fe2+ can be substituted for Mg2+ in the
RNase H catalytic center of HIV-1 RT. As a consequence, Fe2+-mediated hydroxyl radicals can be generated, which
cleave duplex DNA at position 17 through an oxidative
scission process. Although not demonstrated directly, this approach
assumes that metal coordination occurs through the highly conserved
acidic residues of the RNase H domain, namely Asp443,
Glu478, Asp498, and Asp549. Since
the DNase I footprinting data of Fig. 3 and RNase H activity of Fig. 4
suggest a greater separation of the RNase H and DNA polymerase
catalytic centers of the Ty enzyme, we investigated whether this
induced an altered patter of hydroxyl radical cleavage by
Fe2+-substituted Ty3 RT. The 71-nt DNA template/36-nt DNA
primer depicted in Fig. 1 was employed for these studies. As predicted
from studies with HIV-1 RT (32), cleavage of the template at position
17 is diagnosed by release of a 54-nt fragment (Fig.
5A).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Ty3 RT fails to support
Fe2+-mediated cleavage of duplex DNA. Panel
A provides a schematic representation of the methodology.
Substrate is the 71-nt template/36-nt primer used to evaluate
DNA-dependent DNA polymerase. Template and primer
nucleotides contacted by RT are indicated by the bars. Replacement of
Mg2+ within the RNase H catalytic center with
Fe2+ permits localized release of hydroxyl radicals and
chemical scission at template nucleotide 17. When the template is
radiolabeled at its 5' terminus, Fe2+-mediated hydroxyl
radical cleavage generates a 54-nt hydrolysis product. Panel
B, reactivity of HIV, FIV, and Ty3 RTs. The arrow
indicates the position of the 54-nt cleavage product.
|
|
Hydroxyl radical cleavage by Fe2+-seeded p66/p51 HIV-1 RT,
FIV RT, and the Ty3 enzyme was evaluated in parallel. As can be seen from the data of Fig. 5B, we were successful with both
retroviral enzymes in Fe2+ substitution and hydroxyl
radical cleavage at template nucleotide 17. In contrast, however, we
failed to detect hydroxyl radical cleavage in the presence of Ty3 RT.
The trivial possibility that Ty3 RT had lost activity during storage
was eliminated in a parallel experiment in which RNase H activity was
evaluated on an RNA/DNA hybrid in the presence of Mg2+.
Under these conditions, full activity for each enzyme was achieved (data not shown). In light of this, we hypothesized that residues important for Mg2+ coordination in HIV-1 and E. coli RT are less strictly conserved or are positioned differently
in the Ty3 enzyme, thus affecting coordination geometry. The amino acid
alignment presented in Fig. 7 indicates the counterparts of
Asp443, Glu478, Asp498, and
Asp549 in the HIV-1 enzyme are preserved, so the absence of
these conserved carboxylates can be ruled out. However, according to
the revised model of Kashiwagi et al. (43),
Asn474 and Gly444 of HIV-1 RT also participate
in Mg2+ coordination at the RNase H domain, the
counterparts of which are absent in the Ty3 enzyme. In addition, the
monomeric nature of Ty3 RT may also influence the avidity with which
Fe2+ is retained. Although these explanations are presently
speculative, they indicate another significant difference between the
retroviral and retrotransposon enzymes.
Initiation of Ty3 (+) Strand Synthesis--
To determine whether
the recombinant enzyme catalyzed more specialized activities required
for accurate fulfillment of reverse transcription, we evaluated the
capacity of Ty3 RNase H to excise the PPT primer from an RNA/DNA hybrid
for extension into, and subsequent removal from, (+) strand DNA.
Previous data from our laboratory (31, 44) have indicated that related
retroviral enzymes will support each of these events in a single
reaction. Our PPT "scanning" strategy is depicted in Fig.
6A, and investigates the
recognition of both PPT- and non-PPT-containing RNA primers by the Ty3
enzyme. Primer P3 is complementary to ( ) strand DNA sequences
immediately 5' to the sequence proposed to prime Ty3 (+) strand
synthesis (20, 21). P3 thus evaluates the efficiency of non-PPT
RNA-primed synthesis. P2 contains additional sequences 5' to the PPT,
and terminates within sites predicted to be most frequently used.
Finally, P1 contains the Ty3 PPT and additional 3' sequences, and must
therefore be processed by Ty3 RNase H to reveal the authentic (+)
strand primer. All experiments were performed in the presence of a dNTP
mixture to reveal the steps of primer selection and extension. As an
additional control, these primers were extended by DNA polymerase I
Klenow fragment, which efficiently recognizes their 3' OH. The results
of our investigation are presented in Fig. 6B.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Selection and utilization of the Ty3
polypurine tract by purified Ty3 RT. A, schematic
representation of the model PPT selection/extension system. RNA
oligonucleotides, 25 nt in length and designated P1, P2, and P3, were
hybridized to a 65-nt DNA oligonucleotide. Within P1 and P2,
italicized, lowercase ribonucleotides represent those of the
PPT. P3 lies outside the PPT and thus serves as a control for RNase H
and (+) strand initiation specificity. B, results of PPT
selection/extension experiments. Left panels
represent DNA synthesis profiles obtained with the Klenow fragment of
DNA polymerase I, which efficiently recognizes RNA primers.
Right panels represent the equivalent reactions
catalyzed by Ty3 RT. In both panels denoted
+NaOH, the RNA component of each DNA-RNA chimera was
removed. C, summary of PPT selection and extension data with
primers P1 and P2. Note that, while both (+) strand products generated
by RT-associated RNase H activity are the same length, the 5' terminal
base is a ribonucleotide when P2 is used as primer. This ribonucleotide
is subsequently removed following alkaline treatment. The PPT sequence
most frequently used is located within the shaded
area.
|
|
While P1 and P2 were recognized by Ty3 RT, the data of Fig.
6B clearly indicate that the non-PPT RNA primer P3 does not
support efficient (+) strand DNA synthesis, which is in keeping with
reports on related systems (45-47). At this stage, we cannot determine whether this represents reduced affinity for the RNA-DNA hybrid or an
inability of bound enzyme to catalyze DNA synthesis. (+) strand
products of 40 and 27/26 nt accumulate when P1 is used as primer, the
former of which is eliminated and the latter of which remains unchanged
following NaOH treatment (to remove all ribonucleotides). Thus, the
40-nt species represents a (+) RNA/(+) DNA chimera, while the latter
reflects RNase H-mediated primer removal following (+) strand DNA
synthesis. That the "mature" DNA is a mixture of 27-nt and 26-nt
species, rather than the predicted 25-nt species, indicates
(a) that (+) strand synthesis initiation is slightly
heterogeneous, and (b) the 3' residue of primer P2 does not
belong to the PPT.
(+) strand products of 50, 40, and 26/27 nt accumulate when P2 is used
as primer. The largest corresponds to the intact primer (25 nt)
covalently attached to (+) strand DNA, while the 40-nt product
represents (+) strand DNA containing exclusively the PPT RNA primer.
The shortest and principal products are 26/27 nt, resembling the
"mature" DNA previously observed upon removal of primer derived
from P1. In this case, however, these are shortened by a single
nucleotide to 25/26 nt following alkaline hydrolysis. Hence, while
initiation of (+) strand synthesis by Ty3 RT occurs without 3'
processing of primer P2, the resulting chimera is not cleaved by the
enzyme at the RNA-DNA junction as observed in experiments using primer
P1, but rather at an inter-ribonucleotide bond. This suggests that the
recognition signal for primer removal is not the RNA-DNA junction, but
an intrinsic feature of the polypurine tract structure.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Despite many similarities between retroviruses and LTR-containing
retrotransposons, several recent reports underscore a need for an
in-depth study of retrotransposon RTs and accessory proteins with which
they might interact. First, documentation of a bipartite PBS in Ty3
(18) suggests that sequences at both ends of the (+) strand Ty3 RNA
genome constitute the PBS and contribute to efficient initiation of
( ) strand synthesis. This situation effectively places a
discontinuous A-form duplex in the nucleic acid binding site, which is
unlike any retroviral system. Second, Kirchner and Sandmeyer (21) and
Wilhelm et al. (22) have found additional bases at the 3'
ends of the Ty3 upstream LTR, implying that RNase H-mediated selection
and release of the PPT primer is less precise than demonstrated for
retroviruses. Finally, Nymark-McMahon and Sandmeyer (48) have noted
that mutations in the integrase (IN) component of he Ty3
POL3 open reading frame have severe consequences for reverse
transcription, implying an interaction between RT and IN, either as
individual proteins or as the RT-IN polyprotein. In order to study
reverse transcription in LTR-containing retrotransposons at the
biochemical level, we have purified a 55-kDa protein representing the
RT open reading frame of Ty3 and evaluated its interaction with nucleic
acid duplexes encountered during replication, extending a recent
in vitro evaluation of NC-mediated initiation of Ty3 reverse
transcription (49) from the bipartite PBS.
The finding that purified enzyme migrated as a monomer by size
exclusion chromatography, although surprising, is not unprecedented, since the same has been demonstrated for RT purified from bovine leukemia virus (33), MLV (36), and an active HIV-1/MLV chimera (50). In
the case of MLV RT, it has been proposed that substrate binding induces
dimerization, a feature we have not determined here. This was not the
case for the bovine leukemia virus enzyme, which migrated to almost the
same position in glycerol gradients in the absence and presence of
substrate. Interestingly, the degree of similarity between the
Ty3-gypsy family and certain retroviruses, in particular
MLV, is sufficiently high that they have been speculated to comprise
one large superfamily (16).
An unusual feature of our DNase I footprinting experiments is the
3-4-bp region of duplex DNA remaining accessible, and in some cases
rendered hypersensitive, to nuclease digestion (Fig. 2, C
and D). This region is substantially removed from the
"window" of hydroxyl radical accessibility between positions 7
and 11 noted for the HIV-1 enzyme (41). This could reflect either an altered DNA structure or that the retrotransposon enzyme has
independent nucleic acid binding domains separated by a flexible
linker, as suggested for the MLV RT (36). Such spatial separation of
functional domains may leave the intervening nucleic acid susceptible
to nucleolytic cleavage. Furthermore, although the increased size of
the footprint relative to HIV-1 and EIAV RT was unexpected, it is in
keeping with the RNase H hydrolysis profiles of Fig. 4, supporting the
notion that the spatial separation of the catalytic centers of Ty3 RT
exceeds the 18 bp observed with most retroviral enzymes (37-39).
Although speculative, it is worth noting in retroviruses that
(a) the length of the tRNA:PBS duplex is 18 bp and
(b) 18 bases of the tRNA primer are copied before (+) strand
synthesis is interrupted and second strand transfer initiates (51).
Thus, retroviral enzymes may have evolved to accommodate 18 bp of
duplex between their catalytic centers to efficiently mediate two
critical tRNA-mediated events in replication. In contrast, the
equivalent events occur through entirely different mechanisms in Ty3.
As indicated earlier, the Ty3 PBS is bipartite and is contributed from
both ends of the genome. Moreover, nucleotides of
tRNAiMet constituting the PBS complement
are not inherited by the element from the primer prior to second strand
transfer in Ty1, as is the case in retroviruses (52). Although this has
not been demonstrated for Ty3, it is possible that events normally
requiring recognition or copying of 3' nucleotides of the tRNA primer
are more relaxed in retrotransposons and reflected in altered spatial
coupling of the catalytic centers of their polymerases.
Data from both a heteropolymeric RNA/DNA hybrid (Fig. 4B)
and substrates recapitulating selection, extension and release of the
PPT primer (Fig. 5B) confirms a bona fide Ty3
RNase H activity capable of performing highly specialized RNA
processing events required during reverse transcription. An intriguing
observation from the latter analysis is that the Ty3 enzyme initiates
(+) strand synthesis from P1 and P2 with different specificity. Just as
the recombinant enzyme was incapable of extending primer P3, extension
of intact P1 was also inefficient, since the 3' terminus is 10 nt
removed from the PPT. Hence, the enzyme here must select its own
initiation site via RNase H cleavage at the position indicated in Fig.
6C. Furthermore, since the smallest products generated from
P1 are unchanged following sodium hydroxide treatment, the primer must
be removed by RNase H-mediated cleavage at the RNA-DNA junction. This
indicates that primer selection and removal occur at precisely the same
site, i.e. within the -G-A- dinucleotide at the PPT 3'
terminus. In contrast, no RNase H processing seems to be required for
initiation from primer P2. This would explain why it is utilized more
efficiently than P1, which must be cleaved before DNA synthesis can
occur. However, because the cleavage site for primer removal does not
appear to vary between reactions, sites for initiation from and removal
of P2-derived primers are separated by a single nucleotide. This is
reflected in the difference between cleavage profiles for primer P2
following alkali treatment (Fig. 6B).
It is unclear why the primer selected by recombinant Ty3 RT differs by
a single nucleotide from the principle site observed by Wilhelm
et al. (21) in vivo. It is possible that
sequences flanking the polypurine tract, and in part absent in primers
P1 and P2, bias the cleavage specificity of the recombinant enzyme. Since multiple primers are selected in vivo, there is apparently some
flexibility in the structural determinants for primer selection. Experiments designed to evaluate these determinants are currently under way.
Our data may also have implications for the general mechanism of RNase
H-mediated hydrolysis, which has remained in doubt. Highly conserved
residues of the HIV-1 RNase H domain include Asp443,
Glu478, Asp498, His539, and
Asp549. According to Kashiwagi et al. (43),
His539 serves as a general base (precedents for which are
the enzymes DNase I and ExoIII), while Asp549 is involved
in appropriately positioning a water molecule activated by
His539 for electrophilic attack. This mechanism assumes
participation of a single metal ion, which is clearly defined in the
crystal structure of the bacterial enzyme (53, 54), and a role for the
highly conserved His539. The sequence compilation of Fig.
7 indicates good conservation of
appropriately spaced acidic residues constituting the -D-E-D-D- motif
within the RNase H domains of gypsy group of
retrotransposons and plant caulimoviruses (55). However, two intriguing
features in the former group, including Ty3 are: (a)
substitution of this conserved histidine with an invariant tyrosine and
(b) the emergence of a highly conserved histidine immediately adjacent
to the counterpart of Asp498. Conversely, plant
caulimovirus RNases H and the retroviral and bacterial enzymes restore
histidine at the equivalent of position 539, but now lack this residue
immediately adjacent to Asp498. One possibility we have
considered from this compilation is that the cluster of catalytically
conserved residues of gypsy group of retrotransposons is not
-D-E-D-H-D-, but in fact -D-E-DH-D-, i.e. His of the
adjacent Asp/His pair serves to activate a water molecule in the same
manner that has been suggested for His539 and
His124 of the HIV-1 and E. coli RNases H,
respectively. The high degree of conservation of tyrosine in the "His
box" suggests this serves a more structural role, possibly through a
direct contact with the nucleic acid substrate. Current efforts are
aimed at evaluating this proposal by in vitro site-directed
mutagenesis, as well as to determine whether the His/Tyr pair in Ty3 RT
can be interchanged.

View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Alignment of catalytic residues in the RNase
H domains of the gypsy group of retrotransposons and
plant caulimoviruses. The -D-D-D-H-E- preceding the compilation is
derived from a comparison of the retroviral and bacterial enzymes,
while numbering above and below HIV-1
RT and E. coli RNase H represents the amino acid positions.
Within each column, the conserved residue is represented in
bold. 17.6, 297, 412,
gypsy, micropia, and Ulysses are from
Drosophila; TED, is from the cabbage looper;
SURL elements are from echinoids; mag is from the
silk moth Bombyx mori; IFG7 is from Pinus
radiata; Del is from the lily, Lilium
henryi; Tf1 is from the fission yeast
Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Ty3 is from S. cerevisiae; Cft1 is from Cladosporium
fulvum. Plant caulimoviruses are abbreviated as follows:
COYMV, Commelina yellow mottle virus; CERV,
carnation etched ring virus; FIGWORT, figwort mosiac virus;
CMV, cauliflower mosiac virus. The sequences presented have
been modified from the phylogenetic relationships of Springer and
Britten (55).
|
|
Finally, although we can accurately recapitulate events mimicking
initiation of ( ) (49) and (+) strand synthesis (this work),
interactions between RT and IN should not be overlooked, since several
IN mutations result in reverse transcription defects in Ty3 virus-like
particles (48). Such data imply an interaction between these
polypeptides, either individually or as the RT/IN polyprotein. Efforts
to prepare the 115-kDa Ty3 RT/IN polyprotein are presently under way.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Kathryn J. Howard (Case Western
Reserve University) for assistance in the preliminary purification of
Ty3 RT, Suzanne B. Sandmeyer for critical reading of the manuscript,
and John M. Coffin for insightful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants GM 52263 (to S. F. J. L. G.) and GM33281
(H. M. N.-M.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
These authors contributed equally to this work.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: HIV Drug Resistance
Program, Div. of Basic Sciences, NCI-FCRDC, Bldg. 535, Frederick, MD
21702. Tel.: 301-846-5256; Fax: 301-846-6013; E-mail:
slegrice@mail.ncifcrf.gov.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
FIV, feline immunodeficiency virus;
RT, reverse transcriptase;
HIV, human immunodeficiency virus;
IPTG, isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside;
PPT, polypurine
tract;
LTR, long terminal repeat;
nt, nucleotide(s);
bp, base pair(s);
IN, integrase;
EIAV, equine infectious anemia virus;
MLV, Moloney
murine leukemia virus.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Leis, J.,
Aiyar, A.,
and Cobrinik, D.
(1993)
in
Reverse Transcriptase
(Skalka, A. M.
, and Goff, S. P., eds)
, pp. 33-47, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 2.
|
Taylor, J. M.,
and Illmensee, R.
(1975)
J. Virol.
16,
553-558[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Cobrinik, D.,
Aiyar, A,
Ge, Z.,
Katzman, M.,
Huang, H.,
and Leis, J.
(1991)
J. Virol.
65,
3864-3872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Aiyar, A.,
Ge, Z.,
and Leis, J.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
611-618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Miller, J. T.,
Ge, Z.,
Morris, S.,
Das, K.,
and Leis, J.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
7648-7655[Abstract]
|
| 6.
|
Wakefield, J. K.,
Wolf, A. G.,
and Morrow, C. D.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
6021-6029[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Li, Y.,
Zhang, Z.,
Kang, S.-M.,
Buescher, J. L.,
and Morrow, C. D.
(1997)
Virology
238,
273-282[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Zhang, Z.,
Kang, S.-M.,
Li, Y.,
and Morrow, C. D.
(1998)
RNA
4,
394-406[Abstract]
|
| 9.
|
Liang, C.,
Li, X.,
Rong, L.,
Inouye, P.,
Quan, Y.,
Kleiman, L.,
and Wainberg, M. S.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
5750-5757[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Isel, C.,
Ehresmann, C.,
Keith, G.,
Ehresmann, B.,
and Marquet, R.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
247,
236-250[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Isel, C.,
Lanchy, J.-M.,
Le Grice, S. F. J.,
Ehresmann, C.,
Ehresmann, B.,
and Marquet, R.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
917-924[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Arts, E. J.,
Ghosh, M.,
Ehresmann, B.,
and Le Grice, S. F. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
9054-9061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Arts, E. J.,
Stetor, S.,
Li, X.,
Rausch, J. W.,
Howard, K. J.,
Ehresmann, B.,
North, T. W.,
Goody, R. S.,
Wainberg, M. A.,
and Le Grice, S. F. J.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
10063-10068[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Lanchy, J. M.,
Keith, G.,
Le Grice, S. F. J.,
Ehresmann, B.,
Ehresmann, C.,
and Marquet, R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24425-24432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Isel, C.,
Westhof, E.,
Massire, C.,
Le Grice, S. F. J.,
Ehresmann, B.,
Ehresmann, C,
and Marquet, R.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1036-1046
|
| 16.
|
Boeke, J.,
and Stoye, J. P.
(1998)
in
Retroviruses
(Coffin, J. M.
, Hughes, S. H.
, and Varmus, H. E., eds)
, pp. 343-432, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 17.
|
Keeney, J. B.,
Champan, K. B.,
Lauermann, V.,
Voytas, D. F.,
Astrom, S. U.,
von Pawel-Rammingen, U.,
Byström, A.,
and Boeke, J. D.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
217-226[Abstract]
|
| 18.
|
Gabus, C.,
Ficheux, D.,
Rau, M.,
Kieth, G.,
Sandmeyer, S.,
and Darlix, J. L.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
4873-4880[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Friant, S.,
Heyman, T.,
Wilhelm, M. L.,
and Wilhelm, F. X.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
441-449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Brulé, F.,
Bec, G.,
Keith, G.,
Le Grice, S. F. J.,
Roques, B. P.,
Ehresmann, B.,
Ehresmann, C.,
and Marquet, R.
(2000)
Nucleic Acids Res.
28,
634-640[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Kirchner, J.,
and Sandmeyer, S. B.
(1996)
J. Virol.
70,
4737-4747[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Wilhelm, M.,
Heyman, T.,
Friant, S.,
and Wilhelm, F. X.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
2161-2166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Wohrl, B. M.,
Georgiadis, M.,
Telesnitsky, A.,
Hendrickson, W.,
and Le Grice, S. F. J.
(1995)
Science
267,
96-99[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Wohrl, B. M.,
Tantillo, C.,
Arnold, E.,
and Le Grice, S. F. J.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
5343-5350[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Rausch, J. R.,
Wohrl, B. M.,
and Le Grice, S. F. J.
(1996)
J. Mol. Biol.
257,
500-511[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Kirchner, J.,
and Sandmeyer, S. B.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
19-28[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Le Grice, S. F. J.,
and Grüninger-Leitch, F.
(1990)
Eur. J. Biochem.
178,
307-314
|
| 28.
|
Le Grice, S. F. J.,
Cameron, C. E.,
and Benkovic, S. J.
(1995)
in
DNA Replication: Methods in Enzymology
(Campbell, J. L., ed)
, pp. 130-147, Academic Press, New York
|
| 29.
|
Wohrl, B. M.,
Howard, K. J.,
Jacques, P. S.,
and Le Grice, S. F. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
8541-8548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Ghosh, M.,
Cameron, C. E.,
Hughes, S. H.,
Benkovic, S. J.,
and Le Grice, S. F. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7068-7076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Rausch, J. W.,
and Le Grice, S. F. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
8602-8610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Gotte, M.,
Maier, G.,
Gross, H. J.,
and Heumann, H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10139-10146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Perach, M.,
and Hizi, A.
(1999)
Virology
259,
176-189[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Hansen, L. J.,
Chalker, D. L.,
Orlinsky, K. J.,
and Sandmeyer, S. B.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
1414-1424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Ghosh, M.,
Jacques, P. S.,
Rodgers, D.,
Ottmann, M.,
Darlix, J.-L.,
and Le Grice, S. F. J.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
8553-8562[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Telesnitsky, A.,
and Goff, S. P.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
1276-1280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Kohlstaedt, L. A.,
Wang, J.,
Friedman, M.,
Rice, P. A.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1992)
Science
256,
1783-1790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Jacobo-Molina, A.,
Ding, J.,
Nanni, R. G.,
Clark, A. D.,
Lu, X.,
Tantillo, C.,
Williams, R. L.,
Kamer, G.,
Ferris, A. L.,
Clark, P.,
Hizi, A.,
Hughes, S. H.,
and Arnold, E. A.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
6320-6324[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Huang, H.,
Chopra, R.,
Verdine, G. L.,
and Harrison, S. C.
(1998)
Science
282,
1669-1675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Arts, E. J.,
and Le Grice, S. F. J.
(1998)
Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol.
58,
339-393[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Metzger, W.,
Hermann, T.,
Schatz, O.,
Le Grice, S. F. J.,
and Heumann, H.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
5909-5913[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Gotte, M.,
Maier, G.,
Onori, A. M.,
Cellai, L.,
Wainberg, M. A.,
and Heumann, H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
11159-11169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Kashiwagi, T.,
Jeanteur, D.,
Haruki, M.,
Katayanagi, K.,
Kanaya, S.,
and Morikawa, K.
(1996)
Protein Eng.
9,
857-867[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Stetor, S. R.,
Rausch, J. W.,
Boone, L. R.,
and Le Grice, S. F. J.
(1999)
Biochemistry
23,
3656-3667
|
| 45.
|
Randolph, C. A.,
and Champoux, J. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
19207-19215[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Fuentes, G. M.,
Rodriguez-Rodriguez, L.,
Fay, P. J.,
and Bambara, R. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
28169-28176[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Powell, M. D.,
and Levin, J. G.
(1996)
J. Virol.
70,
5288-5296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Nymark-McMahon, M. H.,
and Sandmeyer, S. B.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
453-465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Cristofari, G.,
Gabus, C.,
Ficheux, D.,
Bona, M.,
Le Grice, S. F. J.,
and Darlix, J. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
36643-36648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Misra, H. S.,
Pandey, P. K.,
and Pandey, V. N.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
9785-9789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Burnett, B. P.,
and McHenry, C. S.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
7210-7215[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Lauermann, V.,
and Boeke, J. D.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
6603-6612[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Katayanagi, K.,
Miyagawa, M.,
Matsushima, M.,
Ishikawa, M.,
Kanaya, S.,
Nakamura, H.,
Ikehara, M.,
Matsuzaki, T.,
and Morikawa, K.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
223,
1029-1052[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Katayanagi, K.,
Ishikawa, M.,
Okumura, M.,
Ariyoshi, M.,
Kanaya, S.,
Kawano, Y.,
Suzuki, M.,
Tanaka, I.,
and Morikawa, K.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
22092-22099[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Springer, M. S.,
and Britten, R. J.
(1993)
Mol. Biol. Evol.
10,
1370-1379[Abstract]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. B. Turner, H. Y. Yi-Brunozzi, R. G. Brinson, J. P. Marino, D. Fabris, and S. F.J. Le Grice
SHAMS: Combining chemical modification of RNA with mass spectrometry to examine polypurine tract-containing RNA/DNA hybrids
RNA,
August 1, 2009;
15(8):
1605 - 1613.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Hizi
The Reverse Transcriptase of the Tf1 Retrotransposon Has a Specific Novel Activity for Generating the RNA Self-Primer That Is Functional in cDNA Synthesis
J. Virol.,
November 1, 2008;
82(21):
10906 - 10910.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Dash, J. P. Marino, and S. F. J. Le Grice
Examining Ty3 Polypurine Tract Structure and Function by Nucleoside Analog Interference
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 3, 2006;
281(5):
2773 - 2783.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Bibillo, D. Lener, A. Tewari, and S. F. J. Le Grice
Interaction of the Ty3 Reverse Transcriptase Thumb Subdomain with Template-Primer
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 26, 2005;
280(34):
30282 - 30290.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Christensen and T. H. Eickbush
R2 Target-Primed Reverse Transcription: Ordered Cleavage and Polymerization Steps by Protein Subunits Asymmetrically Bound to the Target DNA
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
August 1, 2005;
25(15):
6617 - 6628.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. G. Kuznetsov, M. Zhang, T. M. Menees, A. McPherson, and S. Sandmeyer
Investigation by Atomic Force Microscopy of the Structure of Ty3 Retrotransposon Particles
J. Virol.,
July 1, 2005;
79(13):
8032 - 8045.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Bibillo, D. Lener, G. J. Klarmann, and S. F. J. Le Grice
Functional roles of carboxylate residues comprising the DNA polymerase active site triad of Ty3 reverse transcriptase
Nucleic Acids Res.,
January 12, 2005;
33(1):
171 - 181.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Smith, D. J. Anderson, and B. D. Preston
Purifying Selection Masks the Mutational Flexibility of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 18, 2004;
279(25):
26726 - 26734.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Dash, J. W. Rausch, and S. F. J. Le Grice
Using pyrrolo-deoxycytosine to probe RNA/DNA hybrids containing the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 3' polypurine tract
Nucleic Acids Res.,
March 5, 2004;
32(4):
1539 - 1547.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F.-X. Wilhelm, M. Wilhelm, and A. Gabriel
Extension and Cleavage of the Polypurine Tract Plus-strand Primer by Ty1 Reverse Transcriptase
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 28, 2003;
278(48):
47678 - 47684.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Lener, M. Kvaratskhelia, and S. F. J. Le Grice
Nonpolar Thymine Isosteres in the Ty3 Polypurine Tract DNA Template Modulate Processing and Provide a Model for Its Recognition by Ty3 Reverse Transcriptase
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 11, 2003;
278(29):
26526 - 26532.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Lener, S. R. Budihas, and S. F. J. Le Grice
Mutating Conserved Residues in the Ribonuclease H Domain of Ty3 Reverse Transcriptase Affects Specialized Cleavage Events
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 12, 2002;
277(29):
26486 - 26495.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kvaratskhelia, S. R. Budihas, and S. F. J. Le Grice
Pre-existing Distortions in Nucleic Acid Structure Aid Polypurine Tract Selection by HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 3, 2002;
277(19):
16689 - 16696.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Nymark-McMahon, N. S. Beliakova-Bethell, J.-L. Darlix, S. F. J. Le Grice, and S. B. Sandmeyer
Ty3 Integrase Is Required for Initiation of Reverse Transcription
J. Virol.,
February 22, 2002;
76(6):
2804 - 2816.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Wilhelm, O. Uzun, E. H. Mules, A. Gabriel, and F.-X. Wilhelm
Polypurine Tract Formation by Ty1 RNase H
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 7, 2001;
276(50):
47695 - 47701.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|