Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurz, E. U.
Right arrow Articles by Gieseler, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurz, E. U.
Right arrow Articles by Gieseler, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 18, 13948-13954, May 5, 2000


Modulation of Human DNA Topoisomerase IIalpha Function by Interaction with 14-3-3epsilon *

Ebba U. KurzDagger , Kelly B. LeaderDagger , David J. KrollDagger §, Michael Clark||, and Frank Gieseler||

From the Dagger  Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center and § University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, Colorado 80262 and the || University Hospital, Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Christian Albrechts University, 24105 Kiel, Germany

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Human DNA topoisomerase IIalpha (topo II), a ubiquitous nuclear enzyme, is essential for normal and neoplastic cellular proliferation and survival. Several common anticancer drugs exert their cytotoxic effects through interaction with topo II. In experimental systems, altered topo II expression has been associated with the appearance of drug resistance. This mechanism, however, does not adequately account for clinical cases of resistance to topo II-directed drugs. Modulation by protein-protein interactions represents one mechanism of topo II regulation that has not been extensively defined. Our laboratory has identified 14-3-3epsilon as a topo II-interacting protein. In this study, glutathione S-transferase co-precipitation, affinity column chromatography, and immunoprecipitations confirm the authenticity of these interactions. Three assays evaluate the impact of 14-3-3epsilon on distinct topo II functional properties. Using both a modified alkaline comet assay and a DNA cleavage assay, we demonstrate that 14-3-3epsilon negatively affects the ability of the chemotherapeutic, etoposide, to trap topo II in cleavable complexes with DNA, thereby preventing DNA strand breaks. By electrophoretic mobility shift assay, this appears to be due to reduced DNA binding activity. The association of topo II with 14-3-3 proteins does not extend to all 14-3-3 isoforms. No protein interaction or disruption of topo II function was observed with 14-3-3sigma .

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Human DNA topoisomerase IIalpha (topo II),1 a ubiquitous nuclear enzyme that alters DNA topology and separates intertwined DNA helices during the processes of replication, recombination, and chromosome segregation, is essential for normal and neoplastic cellular proliferation and survival (reviewed in Ref. 1). It is through interactions, in part, with topo II that several widely used cancer chemotherapeutic agents (e.g. doxorubicin, etoposide) exert their cytotoxic effects (2, 3). Unlike simple competitive inhibitors, these agents trap topo II in covalent complexes with DNA, transforming the enzyme into a required co-factor for cytotoxicity. In experimental model systems, changes in the expression of topo II have been associated with the appearance of antitumor drug resistance (4-6). This mechanism, however, is unable to account for clinical cases of resistance to topo II-directed drugs, implying that alternative topo II regulatory mechanisms require consideration (7, 8).

Modulation by protein-protein interactions represents one mechanism of topo II regulation that has been largely underappreciated. Interaction of the transcription factors CREB, ATF-2, and c-Jun with topo II stimulates topo II DNA decatenation activity in vitro (9), while association of wild-type retinoblastoma protein with topo II decreases this DNA decatenation activity (10). Yeast topo II, in addition to associating with nuclear scaffold proteins and proteins involved in chromosomal segregation (11-13), has been demonstrated to interact functionally with the Sgs1 helicase (14). Cells lacking the Sgs1 protein (Sgs1p) exhibit a slow growth phenotype due to the inability to completely decatenate DNA. The finding that Sgs1p is required in concert with topo II for completely faithful chromosomal segregation now appears to be significant in human neoplasia. A defect in the human homolog of Sgs1p, BLM, appears to be the genetic basis of Bloom's syndrome, a human disease of genetic instability (15). Clearly, continued characterization of topo II protein-protein interactions will yield new and important roles for the enzyme and may reveal implications for these interactions in cellular sensitivity to topo II-directed chemotherapeutics.

Previous work in the laboratory led to the isolation of several topo II-interacting proteins (TIPs) (16). We have now identified one of these as the epsilon isoform of the human 14-3-3 protein (14-3-3epsilon ) and independently isolated a 14-3-3epsilon cDNA from screening a human HeLa cell cDNA expression library with a radiolabeled, 80-kDa C-terminal fragment of human topo II protein. The 14-3-3 proteins belong to a well conserved family of seven isoforms (17). In addition to binding cruciform DNA structures (18), 14-3-3 proteins have been characterized as preferentially binding serine phosphorylated proteins and are implicated in the regulation of signal transduction pathways and cell cycle-associated proteins (reviewed in Refs. 17 and 19). Among their reported functions, 14-3-3 proteins have been demonstrated to: (a) bind the protein kinases Raf1 (20-22), protein kinase C (23, 24), and BCR (25, 26) modulating their activities; (b) serve an apoptosis checkpoint function by binding to the apoptotic agonist BAD, thereby preventing the association of BAD with Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL (27, 28); (c) interact with p53, thereby enhancing p53 DNA binding activity (29) and modulating G2/M progression (30, 31); and (d) modulate the intracellular localization of cdc25 (32-35) and protein kinase Ualpha (36) during phases of the cell cycle and in response to DNA damage. This present study characterizes the interaction between topo II and 14-3-3epsilon and presents evidence suggesting that this association modulates topo II-DNA interactions and drug-stabilized cleavable complex formation.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mammalian Cell Culture-- HeLa human cervical carcinoma cells, HL-60 human promyelocytic leukemia cells, and CCRF/CEM human acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). HeLa cells were maintained as monolayer cultures in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies, Inc.), and HL-60 and CCRF/CEM cells were maintained as suspension cultures in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, Inc.). Both media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 50 units/ml penicillin G, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate. All cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

cDNA Expression Library Screening for TIPs-- To identify unknown protein interactive partners of topo II, approximately 1 × 106 plaques of a HeLa cDNA library in lambda gt11 (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) were plated at a density of 20,000 plaque-forming units/150-mm plate. Protein induction was accomplished by overlaying plates with 132-mm nitrocellulose filters soaked in 10 mM isopropylthio-beta -galactoside. Filter lifts were subjected to a protein denaturing/renaturing protocol (37), blocked and probed as described previously (9), but using 125I-human topo II (amino acids 857-1448) as the interaction probe. Expression and purification of this recombinant protein have been detailed elsewhere (9). Filters were washed extensively prior to autoradiography. Putative positive clones were plated for two additional cycles of screening until plaque purification was achieved. Selected cDNA clones were obtained by polymerase chain reaction using lambda gt11 primers and the PCR products directly cloned in the T-tailed sequencing vector, pCRII (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). One TIP clone was identical to the DNA sequence corresponding to amino acids 126-255 (terminus) of the epsilon form of human 14-3-3 protein. Full-length 14-3-3epsilon cDNA was obtained by polymerase chain reaction using a dilution of HeLa cDNA library as the template and was subcloned in frame with glutathione S-transferase (GST) in pGEX-2TK (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) to enable prokaryotic expression and affinity purification of the resulting chimeric protein (GST14-3-3epsilon ).

GST Co-precipitation Assays-- The co-precipitation method of Conklin et al. (38) was employed. Briefly, 10-200 µg of purified GST14-3-3epsilon peptides or GST alone was incubated with 20 µg of topo II peptide (amino acids 857-1448) in PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 and 0.1% BSA for 16 h at 4 °C. In experiments where interactions of full-length proteins were investigated, CCRF/CEM nuclear extract was used as the topo II source. Portions of the nuclear extract were treated with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (Life Technologies, Inc.) (1 unit/6 µg of extract) prior to incubation with GST fusion proteins in a buffer containing 40 mM Hepes, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, and 0.05% Nonidet P-40. Complexes were subsequently precipitated by the addition of 10 µl of a 50% slurry of glutathione-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and incubated on ice on a rotating shaker. Beads were allowed to settle, washed three times in binding buffer, then heated to 95 °C in 2× Laemmli SDS sample buffer. Following SDS-PAGE and electrotransfer, blots were probed with a polyclonal antiserum to human topo IIalpha .

Co-immunoprecipitation and Affinity Chromatography-- CCRF-CEM extracts were prepared by sonication in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (RIPA: PBS + 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS with CompleteTM protease inhibitor (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM benzamidine, and the phosphatase inhibitors 10 mM NaF and 10 mM Na3VO4). Extracts (25-500 µg of total protein) were brought up to 500 µl of RIPA and pre-cleared with 20 µl of a 50% slurry of Protein A/Protein G-agarose beads with rocking for 1 h on ice. Cleared extracts were then incubated with 5 µl of polyclonal antiserum (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) to 14-3-3epsilon (T-16), a broad spectrum 14-3-3 antiserum that recognizes all mammalian isoforms (K-19), or a c-Myb monoclonal antibody as a control. Following a 2-h incubation on ice, complexes were precipitated by a 30-min incubation with another 20 µl of Protein A/Protein G-agarose. Complexes were washed three times with 500 µl of RIPA, then released by boiling for 5 min in 2× Laemmli SDS sample buffer, followed by immunoblotting for topo IIalpha .

For affinity chromatography, the large C-terminal fragment of topo II (amino acids 857-1448) was expressed in Escherichia coli as a polyhistidine fusion protein as described previously (9) and purified by nickel-agarose affinity chromatography. One aliquot of purified protein (250 µg) was phosphorylated with 100 units of recombinant, human casein kinase II (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) in 7 ml of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM ATP for 30 min at 30 °C. Control topo II protein was incubated under similar conditions but without the addition of kinase. Separate 400-µl bed volumes of fresh nickel-agarose (Probond) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) were loaded into individual minicolumns and bound with 250 µg of BSA, control topo II protein, or casein kinase II-phosphorylated topo II protein. Columns were then washed with 10 bed volumes of 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.8, 500 mM NaCl. A RIPA extract of CCRF-CEM cells (5 mg total protein) was then applied to the column, diluted 1:7 in PBS, and reapplied to the column three more times. The columns were washed extensively with 40 bed volumes of PBS, and bound proteins were eluted with multiple 500-µl aliquots of 0.5% SDS in 12.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8. Aliquots of each fraction were supplemented with 2-mercaptoethanol, boiled, and resolved on a 12% SDS-PAGE prior to immunoblotting with a broad spectrum 14-3-3 antiserum (K-19).

Alkaline Naked Comet Assay-- A modified alkaline comet assay using isolated HL-60 nuclei was performed to assess the effect of 14-3-3epsilon on etoposide-mediated DNA damage (39). HL-60 nuclei were prepared from logarithmically growing cultures by standard techniques and incubated in PBS in the presence or absence of 30 µM etoposide and GST, GST14-3-3epsilon , or GST14-3-3sigma protein (0.16-20 µg/ml). Nuclei were incubated on ice for 90 min and then subjected to a standard electrophoretic comet protocol (40). After staining with ethidium bromide (20 µg/ml), nuclei were quantified by fluorescence microscopy for total nuclear and tail length.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)-- Oligonucleotides corresponding to residues 87-126 of pBR322, a strong topo II binding site (41), were annealed and end-labeled with [alpha -32P]dCTP. Nuclear protein extracts (500 mM NaCl extraction) were prepared from logarithmically growing HeLa cells as described previously (16) and using CompleteTM protease inhibitor (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Incubations of the binding site with nuclear protein extract were carried out on ice in a 25-µl reaction volume containing 50 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris (pH 7.6), 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 2.5 µg of BSA, and 0.1 µg of poly(dI-dC)·(dI-dC) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Free and bound oligonucleotide were separated by electrophoresis through a 4% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel in 0.25× Tris borate-EDTA buffer. For competition EMSA, molar excesses of unlabeled competitor oligonucleotide were premixed with the 32P-labeled binding site oligonucleotide before the addition of reaction buffer and nuclear protein extract. For supershift EMSA, antiserum was added 30 min after the initiation of the binding reaction and the mixture was incubated on ice for an additional 30 min prior to electrophoresis.

DNA Cleavage Assay-- DNA cleavage assays were carried out essentially as described in Ref. 42. Typically, reactions contained 300 ng of pBR322 and were initiated by the addition of 6 units of purified human topo IIalpha (Topogen, Columbus, OH) and incubated at 37 °C for 8 min. Reactions were terminated by the addition of SDS (0.5% final concentration) and incubated with proteinase K (200 µg/ml) at 56 °C for 1 h. Reaction components were resolved at 20 V for 16 h on a 1.3% agarose gel containing 0.7 µg/ml ethidium bromide to allow the relaxed closed-circular plasmid to run with greater mobility than supercoiled DNA so as to distinguish it from open, nicked-circular DNA (42).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

14-3-3epsilon is a Topo II-interacting Protein-- To clone and identify TIPs, a lambda gt11-HeLa cell cDNA library was screened with radioiodinated topo IIalpha -(857-1448). Four open reading frames were identified that survived three rounds of screening and plaque purification. Three clones corresponded to amino acids 280-623 of XPR1/X3, a membrane-bound receptor for xenotropic and polytropic murine leukemia viruses (43, 44), and are not considered further here. The fourth open reading frame clone was 100% identical to the DNA sequence encoding amino acids 126-255 of the epsilon isoform of human 14-3-3 protein.

14-3-3epsilon Interacts with Topo II in Solution-- To verify the authenticity of the 14-3-3epsilon /topo II interaction, expression vectors encoding GST in frame with the N terminus of 14-3-3epsilon (or fragment thereof) were generated and tested for the ability to co-precipitate topo II from solution (Fig. 1). Both the full-length GST14-3-3epsilon and a C-terminal fragment (amino acids 126-255) interacted with topo II-(857-1448), while GST alone did not precipitate any of the recombinant topo II peptide (Fig. 1A). Conversely, the topo II-(857-1448) fragment, containing a polyhistidine tag, was immobilized on a nickel-chelating column and was tested for the ability to adsorb endogenous 14-3-3 proteins using CCRF-CEM RIPA extract as the source. When compared with a BSA control column, the topo II column selectively co-purified a protein of 30-32 kDa that reacted with a broad spectrum antiserum to all isoforms (Fig. 1B). Phosphorylation of the topo II-(857-1448) fragment with casein kinase II prior to immobilization on the nickel-chelating column greatly enhanced the co-purification of the 14-3-3-immunoreactive 30-32-kDa protein (Fig. 1B), relative to either BSA or unphosphorylated topo II-(857-1448).


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Human topo II interacts in solution with human 14-3-3epsilon . Panel A, interaction between immobilized GST14-3-3epsilon proteins and purified C-terminal topo II peptide. Increasing amount of GST, GST14-3-3epsilon FL (full-length human 14-3-3epsilon ), or GST14-3-3epsilon CT (14-3-3epsilon C terminus, amino acids 126-255) were combined with 20 µg of topo II-(857-1448) prior to incubation with GSH-Sepharose beads. Proteins liberated from the beads by boiling were resolved by SDS-PAGE (9% acrylamide) and processed for immunoblotting with anti-topo IIalpha antiserum. Panel B, affinity column. A 400-µl bed volume of nickel-chelating resin (Probond, Invitrogen) was used to bind BSA, polyhistidine-tagged topo II-(857-1448), or casein kinase II-phosphorylated topo II-(857-1448). CCRF-CEM RIPA extracts corresponding to 5 mg of total protein were applied four times to each column, then washed with 40 bed volumes of PBS. Specifically bound proteins were eluted with multiple 500-µl aliquots of 0.5% SDS in 12.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8 and the fractions concentrated 10-fold under vacuum prior to electrophoresis on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel and immunoblotting with a pan-14-3-3 antiserum. The arrow denotes the primary, topo II-specific band of 14-3-3 reactivity migrating at 30-32 kDa. Panel C, interaction between immobilized GST14-3-3epsilon and full-length topo IIalpha from CCRF/CEM nuclear extract. Approximate molar equivalents of GST (50 µg), GST14-3-3epsilon (100 µg), or GST14-3-3sigma (100 µg) were incubated with a nuclear extract of log phase CCRF/CEM cells (125 or 250 µg of protein) prior to incubation with GSH-Sepharose beads. Where indicated, the nuclear extract was treated with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (1 unit/6 µg of extract) prior to co-precipitation. Samples were boiled, electrophoresed, and processed for topo II detection as in panel A. Panel D, co-immunoprecipitation of topo II with 14-3-3 antisera. The indicated amounts of CCRF-CEM RIPA cell extracts were incubated for 2 h on ice with 5 µl of antisera raised to recognize either all 14-3-3 isoforms (K-19) or the epsilon  form only (T-16). Following immobilization on Protein A/Protein G-agarose, complexes were washed under high stringency with RIPA and immunoprecipitated complexes were liberated by the addition of 2× Laemmli SDS-PAGE sample buffer and boiling. Complexes were resolved on a 7.5% polyacrylamide-SDS gel and immunoblotted as in panel A.

As the above experiments were carried out using a recombinant topo II peptide, we examined whether GST14-3-3epsilon was able to interact with full-length 170-kDa topo II from nuclear protein extracts. Using nuclear protein extracts from CCRF/CEM cells as a source of 170-kDa topo II, we determined that GST14-3-3epsilon , but not GST, could interact with full-length topo II (Fig. 1C). This association of topo II with 14-3-3 proteins does not extend to all isoforms, as no interaction was observed with a GST14-3-3sigma fusion protein even though comparable amounts of protein were used (Fig. 1C). Using an alkaline phosphatase treatment previously demonstrated to remove more than 80% of the phospholinkages on topo II (45), we demonstrated that, while the GST14-3-3epsilon fusion protein preferentially interacts with a phosphorylated form of topo II (Fig. 1C), dephosphorylation abrogates the interaction.

Finally, we investigated the ability of 14-3-3 antisera to co-immunoprecipitate 170-kDa topo II from CCRF-CEM cell extracts, using standard methods but with the addition of high stringency washing conditions with RIPA (instead of the low salt, detergent-lacking washes used commonly) (Fig. 1D). Using antisera recognizing either all 14-3-3 isoforms or only the epsilon  isoform, a topo II immunoreactive band in immunoprecipitates migrating at 170 kDa was observed when using 500 µg of cell extract. The authenticity of this interaction is emphasized by the fact that this experiment was performed without overexpression of either protein, but rather using the endogenous levels of each protein normally present in CCRF-CEM cells. Despite the fact that 14-3-3 is capable of binding several other proteins in mammalian cells, the interaction with topo II was of enough abundance to be detected in this assay.

14-3-3epsilon Reduces Etoposide-mediated DNA Damage-- To investigate the effect of 14-3-3epsilon on topo II in the intact nucleus, we modified the alkaline comet assay using purified HL-60 nuclei (39). Co-incubation of nuclei with GST14-3-3epsilon significantly protected the nuclei from etoposide-mediated DNA damage (Fig. 2A), while addition of GST or GST14-3-3sigma provided no protection from DNA strand breakage. In the absence of etoposide-induced DNA damage, co-incubation of HL-60 nuclei with GST, GST14-3-3epsilon , or GST14-3-3sigma had no effect on observed nuclear length (Fig. 2A). The protection from etoposide-mediated DNA damage by GST14-3-3epsilon was dose-dependent with significant protection from DNA strand breaks in the presence of 0.8 µg/ml protein (Fig. 2B).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   GST14-3-3epsilon protects HL-60 nuclei from etoposide-mediated DNA strand breaks. Panel A, isolated HL-60 nuclei were incubated in the absence (hatched bars) or presence (open bars) of 30 µM etoposide and GST, GST14-3-3epsilon , or GST14-3-3sigma (10 µg/ml), embedded in agarose, and electrophoresed. After staining with ethidium bromide (20 µg/ml), nuclei were quantified by fluorescence microscopy for comet (nuclear plus tail) length. Comet lengths are expressed relative to untreated HL-60 controls. The means (± S.D.) of 30 comets are shown for each data point. The relative length of comets in the presence of 10 µg/ml GST14-3-3epsilon and 30 µM etoposide differed significantly from other etoposide-exposed nuclei (*, p < 0.005 one-way analysis of variance with a Bonferroni multiple comparison post hoc test) but did not differ significantly from untreated controls. Panel B, relative comet length of untreated (closed symbols, hatched region) or etoposide-treated (30 µM) (open symbols) HL-60 nuclei in the presence of GST (10 µg/ml) or increasing concentrations of GST14-3-3epsilon (0.16, 0.8, 4.0, and 20.0 µg/ml). The means of 30 comets are shown for each data point. Nuclear lengths differing significantly from untreated controls are indicated (*, p < 0.005).

14-3-3epsilon Abrogates Topo II DNA Binding Activity-- To evaluate the effect of 14-3-3epsilon on topo II DNA binding activity, EMSAs were carried out using a radiolabeled double-stranded oligonucleotide containing a strong topo II binding site. Competition EMSA, using increasing molar excesses of unlabeled oligonucleotide representing the topo II binding site and an oligonucleotide of unrelated sequence, demonstrated that the predominant observed DNA-protein interaction is sequence-specific (Fig. 3A). Addition of an anti-topo IIalpha antiserum produced a supershifted complex, indicating the involvement of topo II in the protein-DNA complex (Fig. 3B). Incubation of the nuclear extract with a nonspecific antiserum produced neither a supershifted complex nor a reduction in the intensity of the specific DNA-protein complex (Fig. 3B). GST14-3-3epsilon was added to the binding reaction to evaluate its effect on topo II DNA binding activity. Addition of increasing amounts of GST14-3-3epsilon abrogated topo II DNA binding activity (Fig. 3C). This effect was specific for 14-3-3epsilon , as the addition of increasing amounts of GST alone or GST14-3-3sigma had no effect on the topo II-DNA interaction (Fig. 3C).


View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   EMSA using a topo II binding site: effects of 14-3-3epsilon . Oligonucleotides, containing a topo II binding site from positions 87 to 126 of pBR322, were annealed and end-labeled with [alpha -32P]dCTP. Panel A, nuclear extract (1 µg of protein) from HeLa cells was assayed for binding activity to the 32P-labeled topo II binding site in the presence of 0.1 µg of poly(dI-dC)·(dI-dC). The DNA-protein complex (bound) was separated from free probe (free) by electrophoresis through a non-denaturing, 4% polyacrylamide gel. The specificity of the DNA-protein interaction was determined by competition EMSA. HeLa nuclear extract (1 µg of protein) was incubated with 32P-labeled binding site and increasing molar excesses (20-, 100-, and 250-fold) of unlabeled competitor oligonucleotide (self) or an unlabeled competitor oligonucleotide of unrelated sequence (nonspecific). Panel B, HeLa nuclear extract (1 µg of protein) was incubated with 32P-labeled topo II binding site and increasing amounts of a topo IIalpha antiserum (topo IIalpha Ab) or a nonspecific antiserum (nonspecific Ab). The supershifted complex produced with the addition of antiserum is indicated (supershift). Panel C, the effect of 14-3-3epsilon protein on modulating specific topo II binding activity was evaluated by including in each incubation the indicated amounts of GST14-3-3epsilon fusion protein, GST14-3-3sigma fusion protein, or GST protein alone.

14-3-3epsilon Decreases Etoposide-stabilized Cleavable Complex Formation-- To examine whether 14-3-3epsilon would alter the ability of etoposide to trap topo II in cleavable complexes, a plasmid DNA cleavage assay was performed (Fig. 4). This assay, designed to evaluate the catalytic activity of topo II, demonstrates that 14-3-3epsilon negatively affects the ability of etoposide to stabilize topo II in covalent complexes with DNA, as demonstrated by the reduction in intensity of the linear DNA band (Fig. 4). The inhibitory effect observed was specific for GST14-3-3epsilon , as neither GST alone nor GST14-3-3sigma had an effect on the cleavage-religation equilibrium.


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effect of 14-3-3epsilon on etoposide-stabilized, cleavable complex formation. The plasmid pBR322 (300 ng) was incubated in topo II cleavage buffer with the indicated amounts of GST, GST14-3-3epsilon , or GST14-3-3sigma proteins and in the presence or absence of 20 µM etoposide. Reactions were initiated by the addition of 6 units of purified human topo IIalpha and incubated at 37 °C for 8 min. Equilibrium reactions were terminated by the addition of SDS (0.5%) and incubated with proteinase K (200 µg/ml) at 56 °C for 1 h. Reaction components were resolved at 20 V for 16 h on a 1.3% agarose gel containing 0.7 µg/ml ethidium bromide (42) to allow the relaxed closed-circular plasmid to run with greater mobility than open, nicked-circular DNA. Stabilized cleavable complexes are indicated by the intensity of the linear DNA band.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Through a HeLa cDNA expression library screen, we identified 14-3-3epsilon as a topo II-interacting protein. We have verified the authenticity of this interaction by demonstrating that (a) recombinant GST14-3-3epsilon is able to interact in solution with either a recombinant topo II peptide (857-1448) or full-length topo II in nuclear protein extracts, (b) recombinant topo II-(857-1448) immobilized on a column interacts with 14-3-3 proteins in a whole cell extract, and (c) two antisera recognizing 14-3-3 proteins are able to precipitate full length topo II from cellular extract without the need for overexpression of either protein. Consistent with reports of the preferential binding of 14-3-3 to phosphorylated proteins, the interaction between 14-3-3epsilon and topo II is significantly enhanced by prior phosphorylation of a recombinant topo II fragment and attenuated by phosphatase pretreatment of the nuclear protein extract.

It is well established that topo II, both in vitro and in vivo, is associated with and phosphorylated by casein kinase II (46-48), although the precise residues phosphorylated in vivo remain to be defined. In addition to phosphorylating topo II, casein kinase II has been demonstrated to stabilize topo II decatenation activity in a phosphorylation-independent manner (49). Topo II appears to be phosphorylated in a cell cycle phase-specific manner, with the highest levels present at G2/M. It has been suggested that phosphorylation of topo II may regulate the activity of this enzyme, although this remains a subject of continued scrutiny. While phosphorylation of topo II by casein kinase II has been shown to increase the intrinsic ATPase activity of the enzyme (47), this has not been a consistent finding (50). The interpretation of these studies is complicated by the use of topo II from different species and whether or not cell cycle variations in the level of site-specific phosphorylation are taken into consideration.

Although phosphorylation of its protein partner is not an absolute requirement (51), the interaction of 14-3-3 with its targets is most often mediated by the recognition of a phosphoserine motif. Two consensus sequences for 14-3-3 binding have been identified (52, 53). Examination of the topo II sequence reveals a single potential 14-3-3 binding site (1080RGYDSDP1088) that also contains within it a casein kinase II consensus phosphorylation site (54). Whether this site is phosphorylated by casein kinase II or contributes to the interaction with 14-3-3epsilon is under investigation.

To establish the functional consequences of these interactions, we have used three independent assays to evaluate the impact of 14-3-3epsilon on distinct topo II activities. Using both a modified alkaline comet assay with isolated HL-60 nuclei and a plasmid DNA cleavage assay, we demonstrated that 14-3-3epsilon negatively affects the ability of etoposide to trap topo II in cleavable complexes, thereby preventing the induction of DNA strand breaks. By EMSA, it is demonstrated that this appears to be due to reduced DNA binding activity. Whether 14-3-3epsilon induces a change in the preferred DNA binding sequence for topo II remains to be tested. Taken together, these findings suggest that the effect of 14-3-3epsilon on topo II activity be evaluated in intact cells, since the consequence of this interaction is reminiscent of topo II inhibition as a result of physical association with the tumor suppressor gene product, Rb (10).

Although an extensive range of studies investigating 14-3-3 proteins have been published, few papers characterize more than one isoform, while even fewer reports experimentally exclude specific isoforms as candidate interacting proteins. While the amino acid sequences of the seven identified 14-3-3 isoforms are highly conserved (55), the retention of multiple isoforms throughout evolution suggests that they may have evolved distinct, non-redundant functions. Although some proteins, such as Raf1, may be promiscuous in their association with multiple 14-3-3 isoforms (20, 22, 56), other 14-3-3 protein partners demonstrate a degree of selectivity (31, 57). This report demonstrates that 14-3-3epsilon , but not 14-3-3sigma , interacts with topo II, thereby modulating several in vitro measures of topo II function. 14-3-3epsilon is an atypical isoform, being more closely related to yeast and plant 14-3-3 proteins than to other mammalian isoforms (55, 58). This early divergence may have given rise to distinct roles for 14-3-3epsilon . It should be considered that the limited distribution of 14-3-3sigma to cells of epithelial origin, in contrast with the ubiquitous distribution of 14-3-3epsilon , may also play a role in influencing their functions (19, 59). Although it is clear that topo II interacts with 14-3-3epsilon (and 14-3-3tau ),2 but not with 14-3-3sigma , it is not currently known whether topo II interacts with other 14-3-3 isoforms.

There are several hypotheses as to the mechanism of 14-3-3epsilon -mediated disruption of topo II function. First, dimerization is essential for topo II DNA-binding and function. Recently, two sequences in human topo II (spanning amino acids 1053-1069 and 1124-1143) were identified to be crucial for this dimerization, with disruption of either sequence leading to a loss of capacity to dimerize (60). It is of note that the candidate 14-3-3epsilon binding site falls between these two sequences. Second, numerous 14-3-3 isoforms, including 14-3-3epsilon , have been recently described as mediating subcellular localization of their protein partners, including protein kinase Ualpha (36), and, in response to DNA damage, the cell cycle regulatory protein cdc25, thereby inducing cell cycle arrest (32-35). Hypothetically, the interaction between 14-3-3epsilon and topo II could modulate the subcellular localization of topo II, either during phases of the cell cycle, or in response to DNA damage thereby modulating cellular sensitivity to topo II poisons. Whether the binding of 14-3-3epsilon disrupts topo II homodimerization, modulates topo II localization, or functions through a mechanism yet to be considered remains the focus of our ongoing investigation.

In summary, we have identified 14-3-3epsilon as a topo II-interacting protein. Our finding that this interaction with topo II does not extend to all 14-3-3 isoforms, as demonstrated by the lack of interaction with 14-3-3sigma , is one of a small, but growing, number of reports that hint at functional specificity within this well conserved protein family. This observation suggests that evolutionary retention of multiple isoforms may be attributable to hereto unappreciated distinct and non-redundant functions for individual isoforms or subsets thereof. The demonstration that 14-3-3epsilon disrupts topo II/DNA interaction and reduces etoposide-mediated cleavable complex formation and DNA strand breaks has significant implications for the cellular sensitivity to topo II-directed chemotherapeutics.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Dr. Jack C. Yalowich (University of Pittsburgh) and Dr. Daniel M. Sullivan (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center) for topo II antisera and thoughtful experimental advice. We acknowledge the able technical assistance of Diane Wegman, Pegge M. Halandras, Brante P. Sampey, and Dr. Hannah C. Anchordoquy.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant CA-76201 (to D. J. K.) and a grant from the Cancer League of Colorado (to E. U. K.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Box C238, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 E. Ninth Ave., Denver, CO 80262-0238. Fax: 303-315-6281; E-mail: david.kroll@uchsc.edu.

2 E. U. Kurz and D. J. Kroll, unpublished observation.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: topo II, topoisomerase IIalpha ; TIP, topo II-interacting protein; Sgs1p, Sgs1 protein; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; RIPA, radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; BSA, bovine serum albumin.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Nitiss, J. L. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1400, 63-81[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Burden, D. A., and Osheroff, N. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1400, 139-154[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Hande, K. R. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1400, 173-184[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Mirski, S. E., and Cole, S. P. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 2129-2134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Danks, M. K., Warmoth, M. R., Friche, E., Granzen, B., Bugg, B. Y., Harker, W. G., Zwelling, L. A., Futscher, B. W., Suttle, D. P., and Beck, W. T. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 1373-1379[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Hinds, M., Deisseroth, K., Mayes, J., Altschuler, E., Jansen, R., Ledley, F. D., and Zwelling, L. A. (1991) Cancer Res. 51, 4729-4731[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Kaufmann, S. H., Karp, J. E., Jones, R. J., Miller, C. B., Schneider, E., Zwelling, L. A., Cowan, K., Wendel, K., and Burke, P. J. (1994) Blood 83, 517-530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Nitiss, J. L., and Beck, W. T. (1996) Eur. J. Cancer 32A, 958-966
9. Kroll, D. J., Sullivan, D. M., Gutierrez-Hartmann, A., and Hoeffler, J. P. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 305-318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Bhat, U. G., Raychaudhuri, P., and Beck, W. T. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 7859-7864[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Gasser, S. M., Laroche, T., Falquet, J., Boy de la Tour, and Laemmli, U. K. (1986) J. Mol. Biol. 188, 613-629[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Bhat, M. A., Philp, A. V., Glover, D. M., and Bellen, H. J. (1996) Cell 87, 1103-1114[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Wang, X., Watt, P. M., Louis, E. J., Borts, R. H., and Hickson, I. D. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 4791-4797[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Watt, P. M., Louis, E. J., Borts, R. H., and Hickson, I. D. (1995) Cell 81, 253-260[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Ellis, N. A., Groden, J., Ye, T. Z., Straughen, J., Lennon, D. J., Ciocci, S., Proytcheva, M., and German, J. (1995) Cell 83, 655-666[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Kroll, D. J. (1997) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 345, 175-184[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Reuther, G. W., and Pendergast, A. M. (1996) Vitam. Horm. 52, 149-75[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve], 149-175
18. Todd, A., Cossons, N., Aitken, A., Price, G. B., and Zannis-Hadjopoulos, M. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 14317-14325[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Aitken, A. (1996) Trends Cell Biol. 6, 341-347[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Freed, E., Symons, M., Macdonald, S. G., McCormick, F., and Ruggieri, R. (1994) Science 265, 1713-1716[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Fu, H., Xia, K., Pallas, D. C., Cui, C., Conroy, K., Narsimhan, R. P., Mamon, H., Collier, R. J., and Roberts, T. M. (1994) Science 266, 126-129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Fantl, W. J., Muslin, A. J., Kikuchi, A., Martin, J. A., MacNicol, A. M., Gross, R. W., and Williams, L. T. (1994) Nature 371, 612-614[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Toker, A., Ellis, C. A., Sellers, L. A., and Aitken, A. (1990) Eur. J. Biochem. 191, 421-429[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Toker, A., Sellers, L. A., Amess, B., Patel, Y., Harris, A., and Aitken, A. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 206, 453-461[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Reuther, G. W., Fu, H., Cripe, L. D., Collier, R. J., and Pendergast, A. M. (1994) Science 266, 129-133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Braselmann, S., and McCormick, F. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 4839-4848[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Zha, J., Harada, H., Yang, E., Jockel, J., and Korsmeyer, S. J. (1996) Cell 87, 619-628[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Hsu, S. Y., Kaipia, A., Zhu, L., and Hsueh, A. J. (1997) Mol. Endocrinol. 11, 1858-1867[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Waterman, M. J., Stavridi, E. S., Waterman, J. L., and Halazonetis, T. D. (1998) Nat. Genet. 19, 175-178[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Hermeking, H., Lengauer, C., Polyak, K., He, T. C., Zhang, L., Thiagalingam, S., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1997) Mol. Cell 1, 3-11[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Chan, T. A., Hermeking, H., Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1999) Nature 401, 616-620[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Lopez-Girona, A., Furnari, B., Mondesert, O., and Russell, P. (1999) Nature 397, 172-175[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Yang, J., Winkler, K., Yoshida, M., and Kornbluth, S. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 2174-2183[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Kumagai, A., and Dunphy, W. G. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 1067-1072[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Dalal, S. N., Schweitzer, C. M., Gan, J., and DeCaprio, J. A. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 4465-4479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Zhang, S., Xing, H., and Muslin, A. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 24865-24872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Blanar, M. A., and Rutter, W. J. (1992) Science 256, 1014-1018[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Conklin, D. S., Galaktionov, K., and Beach, D. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7892-7896[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Gieseler, F., Bauer, E., Nussler, V., Clark, M., and Valsamas, S. (1999) Leukemia 13, 1859-1863[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. McKelvey-Martin, V. J., Green, M. H., Schmezer, P., Pool-Zobel, B. L., De, M. M., and Collins, A. (1993) Mutat. Res. 288, 47-63[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Thomsen, B., Bendixen, C., Lund, K., Andersen, A. H., Sorensen, B. S., and Westergaard, O. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215, 237-244[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Gantchev, T. G., and Hunting, D. J. (1998) Mol. Pharmacol. 53, 422-428[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Battini, J. L., Rasko, J. E., and Miller, A. D. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 1385-1390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Tailor, C. S., Nouri, A., Lee, C. G., Kozak, C., and Kabat, D. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 927-932[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Kroll, D. J., and Rowe, T. C. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7957-7961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Dang, Q., Alghisi, G. C., and Gasser, S. M. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 243, 10-24[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Corbett, A. H., DeVore, R. F., and Osheroff, N. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20513-20518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Bojanowski, K., Filhol, O., Cochet, C., Chambaz, E. M., and Larsen, A. K. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 22920-22926[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Redwood, C., Davies, S. L., Wells, N. J., Fry, A. M., and Hickson, I. D. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 3635-3642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Kimura, K., Nozaki, N., Enomoto, T., Tanaka, M., and Kikuchi, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 21439-21445[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Masters, S. C., Pederson, K. J., Zhang, L., Barbieri, J. T., and Fu, H. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 5216-5221[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Muslin, A. J., Tanner, J. W., Allen, P. M., and Shaw, A. S. (1996) Cell 84, 889-897[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Yaffe, M. B., Rittinger, K., Volinia, S., Caron, P. R., Aitken, A., Leffers, H., Gamblin, S. J., Smerdon, S. J., and Cantley, L. C. (1997) Cell 91, 961-971[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Kennelly, P. J., and Krebs, E. G. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 15555-15558[Free Full Text]
55. Aitken, A., Collinge, D. B., van, H., B., Isobe, T., Roseboom, P. H., Rosenfeld, G., and Soll, J. (1992) Trends Biochem. Sci. 17, 498-501[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. Ichimura, T., Ito, M., Itagaki, C., Takahashi, M., Horigome, T., Omata, S., Ohno, S., and Isobe, T. (1997) FEBS Lett. 413, 273-276[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Vincenz, C., and Dixit, V. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20029-20034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
58. Skoulakis, E. M., and Davis, R. L. (1998) Mol. Neurobiol. 16, 269-284[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
59. Roseboom, P. H., Weller, J. L., Babila, T., Aitken, A., Sellers, L. A., Moffett, J. R., Namboodiri, M. A., and Klein, D. C. (1994) DNA Cell Biol. 13, 629-640[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
60. Bjergbæk, L., Jensen, S., Westergaard, O., and Andersen, A. H. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26529-26536[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. P. Wyles, Z. Wu, S. E.L. Mirski, and S. P.C. Cole
Nuclear interactions of topoisomerase II {alpha} and {beta} with phospholipid scramblase 1
Nucleic Acids Res., June 12, 2007; (2007) gkm434v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. Skladanowski, M.-G. Come, M. Sabisz, A. E. Escargueil, and A. K. Larsen
Down-Regulation of DNA Topoisomerase II{alpha} Leads to Prolonged Cell Cycle Transit in G2 and Early M Phases and Increased Survival to Microtubule-Interacting Agents
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2005; 68(3): 625 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sci SignalHome page
D. Bridges and G. B. G. Moorhead
14-3-3 Proteins: A Number of Functions for a Numbered Protein
Sci. Signal., August 9, 2005; 2005(296): re10 - re10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sci SignalHome page
D. Bridges and G. B. G. Moorhead
14-3-3 Proteins: A Number of Functions for a Numbered Protein
Sci. Signal., July 20, 2004; 2004(242): re10 - re10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. J. van Hemert, M. Niemantsverdriet, T. Schmidt, C. Backendorf, and H. P. Spaink
Isoform-specific differences in rapid nucleocytoplasmic shuttling cause distinct subcellular distributions of 14-3-3{sigma} and 14-3-3{zeta}
J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2004; 117(8): 1411 - 1420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. L. Lyu and J. C. Wang
Aberrant lamination in the cerebral cortex of mouse embryos lacking DNA topoisomerase II{beta}
PNAS, June 10, 2003; 100(12): 7123 - 7128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
R. K. Baker, E. U. Kurz, D. W. Pyatt, R. D. Irons, and D. J. Kroll
Benzene metabolites antagonize etoposide-stabilized cleavable complexes of DNA topoisomerase II{alpha}
Blood, August 1, 2001; 98(3): 830 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurz, E. U.
Right arrow Articles by Gieseler, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurz, E. U.
Right arrow Articles by Gieseler, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement