|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 19, 14273-14280, May 12, 2000
Characterization of the Heparin-binding Site of the Mycobacterial
Heparin-binding Hemagglutinin Adhesin*
Kevin
Pethe §,
Marc
Aumercier¶,
Emmanuelle
Fort ,
Christophe
Gatot ,
Camille
Locht **, and
Franco D.
Menozzi
From the INSERM U447, Mécanismes
Moléculaires de la Pathogénie Microbienne, Institut Pasteur
de Lille, Institut de Biologie de Lille, 1 rue A. Calmette,
59019 Lille Cedex, France, ¶ CNRS, Mécanismes du
Développement et de la Cancérisation, UMR 8526, Institut de Biologie de Lille, 59019 Lille Cedex, France, and the
Computer Cell Culture Center s.a., 14 rue de la Marlette,
7140 Seneffe, Belgium
 |
ABSTRACT |
The mycobacterial adhesin heparin-binding
hemagglutinin (HBHA) contains several lysine-rich repeats at its
carboxyl-terminal end. Using truncated recombinant HBHA forms and
hybrid proteins containing HBHA repeats grafted onto the
Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein (MBP), we found
that these repeats are responsible for heparin binding.
Immunofluorescence microscopy studies revealed that their deletion
abrogates binding of HBHA to human pneumocytes. Conversely, when fused
to MBP, the HBHA repeats confer pneumocyte adherence properties to the
hybrid protein. Treatment of pneumocytes with
glycosaminoglycan-degrading enzymes showed that HBHA binding depends on
the presence of heparan sulfate chains on the cell surface. The epitope
of a monoclonal antibody that inhibits mycobacterial adherence to
epithelial cells was mapped within the lysine-rich repeats, confirming
their involvement in mycobacterial adherence to epithelial cells.
Surface plasmon resonance analyses showed that recombinant HBHA binds
to immobilized heparin with fast association kinetics
(ka = 5.62 (± 0.10) × 105
M 1 s 1), whereas the
dissociation kinetics were slower (kd = 0.015 (± 0.002) s 1), yielding a KD
value of 26 nM. Similar analyses with grafted MBP indicated
similar kinetic constants, indicating that the carboxyl-terminal repeats contain the entire heparin-binding site of HBHA. The molecular characterization of the interactions of HBHA with epithelial
glycosaminoglycans should help to better understand mycobacterial
adherence within the lungs and may ultimately lead to new approaches
for therapy or immunoprophylaxis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Mycobacteria are among the most successful pathogenic
microorganisms for humans. Mycobacterium tuberculosis
infects over one-third of the population in the world, causing annually
10 million new cases of active tuberculosis and 3 million deaths (1,
2). Leprosy, caused by Mycobacterium leprae, remains a major
health problem in developing countries (3), whereas members of the Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex are among the
most frequent opportunistic pathogens infecting patients suffering from
acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (4).
Despite the importance of mycobacterial diseases, their molecular
mechanisms are still poorly understood. One of the initial and crucial
events in any infectious process is the adherence of the microorganism
to its target tissues (5). Mycobacteria exhibit a tropism for the
lungs, and interactions of the tubercle bacillus with alveolar
macrophages have been extensively documented (6-8). However,
mycobacterial adhesins interacting with respiratory epithelial cells or
extracellular matrix may also play a role in the infection, because
these are the first host tissues encountered by mycobacteria when they
are transmitted by aerosol. As described for other pathogenic bacteria
(9, 10), viruses (11, 12), and parasites (13, 14), M. tuberculosis produces on its surface a heparin-binding protein
involved in adherence to epithelial cells (15). Because of its
capability to agglutinate rabbit erythrocytes, this adhesin was called
heparin-binding hemagglutinin (HBHA).1 HBHA is a
199-residue glycoprotein that also induces bacterial autoaggregation
(15-17). Recombinant HBHA (rHBHA) produced by Escherichia coli is not glycosylated and, in contrast to the native protein, is highly sensitive to proteolytic degradation affecting essentially its carboxyl-terminal end. This part of the protein contains two different lysine-rich repeated motifs (16), named R1 and R2. R1
(KKAAPA) is directly repeated thrice between residues 160 and 177, whereas R2 (KKAAAKK) is repeated twice between amino acids 178 and 194. In this report, we show that these repeats constitute the high affinity
heparin-binding site of HBHA and that they are responsible for the
binding of HBHA to heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) present on
the surface of human pneumocytes.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Bacterial Strains, Growth Conditions, and DNA
Manipulations--
Growth conditions for Mycobacterium
bovis BCG (strain 1173P2; World Health Organization, Stockholm,
Sweden) have been previously described (15). E. coli
XL1-Blue (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), E. coli
BL21(DE3) (Novagen, Madison, WI), and E. coli B834 (18) were
grown in LB medium (19) supplemented with 100 µg/ml ampicillin or 30 µg/ml kanamycin when appropriate. Restriction enzymes, T4 DNA ligase,
and other molecular biology reagents were purchased from New England
Biolabs, Roche Molecular Biochemicals, or Promega (Madison, WI).
Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were performed using a Perkin-Elmer
thermal cycler model 480 (Perkin-Elmer) with 100 ng of purified plasmid
DNA and 1 µg of each primer (Table I). All the PCR fragments were
sequenced using an ABI PRISM Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit and an
ABI PRISM 377 sequencer (Perkin-Elmer). Plasmids were purified on
Nucleobond AX 100 cartridges (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany)
according to the instructions of the manufacturer.
Plasmid Construction--
To produce rHBHA under the control of
the T7 promoter, the 643-base pair NcoI-HindIII
fragment of pKK-HBHA (16) was introduced into
NcoI/HindIII-restricted pET-24d(+) (Novagen), and
the resulting plasmid, pET-HBHA, was used to transform E. coli BL21(DE3). The gene coding for a truncated HBHA (rHBHA C)
lacking amino acids 161-199 was generated by PCR using pKK-HBHA as
template and the oligonucleotides HBHA (5') and HBHA C as primers
(Table I). The 492-base pair PCR fragment
was digested with NcoI and SacI and ligated into
NcoI/SacI-restricted pKK388-1
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) and pET24d(+) to generate
pKK-HBHA C and pET-HBHA C, respectively. pKK-HBHA C was used to
transform E. coli XL1-Blue, and pET-HBHA C was
introduced into E. coli BL21(DE3).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Sequences of the oligonucleotides used to generate PCR fragments
Sequences corresponding to the restriction sites used to clone the PCR
products are underlined. The corresponding restriction enzymes are
indicated in parentheses.
|
|
Genes coding for HBHA with one (rHBHA C+1R1), two
(rHBHA C+2R1), or three (rHBHA C+3R1) R1 motifs were
generated by PCR using pKK-HBHA as template and oligonucleotides HBHA
(5') with HBHA C+1R1 or HBHA C+2/3R1 as primers. After purification
and restriction by NcoI and SacI, the PCR
fragments were inserted into NcoI/SacI-restricted pET-24d(+), generating pET-HBHA C+1R1, pET-HBHA C+2R1, and
pET-HBHA C+3R1, respectively. These plasmids were used to transform
E. coli BL21(DE3). Genes encoding maltose-binding protein
(MBP) containing various combinations of HBHA repeats (MBP+3R1+2R2 and
MBP+1R1+2R2) were generated as follows. First, the 3'-region of the
HBHA gene coding for the repeats was amplified by PCR using pKK-HBHA
and oligonucleotides E4 (5') and E4 (3'). Oligonucleotide E4 (5') has
three hybridization sites on the template DNA. However, the PCR
generated only two products of 222 base pairs and 186 base pairs that
correspond to amino acids 161-199 (3R1+2R2) and amino acids 173-199
(1R1+2R2), respectively. After digestion with EcoRI and
PstI, the PCR fragments were ligated into
EcoRI/PstI-digested pMAL-c (New England Biolabs) to generate pMAL+3R1+2R2 and pMAL+1R1+2R2. These plasmids were then
used to transform E. coli B834 and E. coli
XL1-Blue.
Production of Recombinant Proteins in E. coli--
Recombinant
HBHA with or without the carboxyl-terminal truncations, as well as MBP,
MBP+3R1+2R2, and MBP+1R1+2R2 (Table II) were produced in E. coli. After transformation with the
appropriate recombinant plasmid, E. coli cells were grown at
37 °C in 250 ml of LB broth supplemented with ampicillin or
kanamycin. At an A600 of 0.5, isopropylthiogalactoside was added to a final concentration of 1 mM, and incubations were continued for 4 h. The
cultures were then centrifuged for 15 min at 4 °C and 7000 × g. The supernatants were discarded, and the cells were
resuspended into 20 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 20 mM
Na2HPO4, 3.5 mM
KH2PO4). Cell suspensions were stored at
20 °C until further use.
Protein Purification--
To purify the rHBHA, frozen
recombinant E. coli cell suspensions were thawed and
sonicated twice for 5 min at 4 °C using a Branson Sonifier at an
output of 5 delivered to a microtip. The bacterial lysates were then
centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The
supernatants were diluted to 100 ml with PBS and then applied onto a
heparin-Sepharose CL-6B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) column (1 × 4 cm) previously equilibrated with 100 ml of PBS. The bound material
was eluted with a 0-500 mM NaCl linear gradient prepared
in 80 ml of PBS. The column was regenerated by washing the gel with 30 ml of PBS containing 3 M NaCl. All chromatographic steps
were carried out at room temperature using a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min.
Native M. bovis BCG HBHA was purified by heparin-Sepharose
chromatography as described previously (15).
To purify rHBHA C, cells from a 250-ml culture of E. coli
BL21(DE3)(pET-HBHA C) were resuspended into 50 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and sonicated twice for 5 min at
4 °C. The soluble fraction obtained after centrifugation (7000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C) was loaded at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min onto a DEAE-cellulose (DE 52, Whatman, Maidstone, United
Kingdom) column (1 × 8 cm) equilibrated with 150 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). rHBHA C was eluted using a linear
0-1 M NaCl gradient in 100 ml of 50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). The material eluted between 150 and 200 mM NaCl was collected, diluted twice with 50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 4 M NaCl, and finally loaded at a flow
rate of 0.5 ml/min onto a Phenyl Sepharose CL-4B (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) column (1 × 5 cm) equilibrated with 100 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 2 M NaCl. rHBHA C was
eluted with a negative linear 2-0 M NaCl gradient in 100 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). The fractions eluted between
0.8 and 0.6 M NaCl contained purified rHBHA C, as
determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE) performed according to Laemmli (20) by using a 4% stacking
and 12 or 15% separating gels. After electrophoresis, gels were
stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (Merck). Protein
concentrations were determined according to the method of Bradford
(21), using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard.
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Analysis--
The BIAcore 2000 apparatus (BIAcore AB, Uppsala, Sweden) was used for real time analysis
of molecular interactions between rHBHA, rHBHA C, MBP, or MBP+3R1+2R2
and heparin. Biotinylated heparin with an average molecular mass of 5 kDa (Biotinylated-Ardeparin, Celsus Laboratories, Cincinnati, OH) was
immobilized onto a streptavidin-coated sensor chip (CM5 Sensor Chip,
BIAcore AB). Briefly, the streptavidin was covalently bound to the
sensor chip after activation of the chip with a mixture of
N-hydroxysuccinimide and
N-ethyl-N'-dimethylaminopropyl carbodiimide
according to the manufacturer's instructions. 10 µl of biotinylated
heparin solution at 5 µg/ml in PBS were injected onto the
streptavidin-coated chip, generating an immobilization signal of 250 resonance units. The protein solutions in PBS were then injected at a
flow rate of 10 µl/min for 3 min at 25 °C, and binding of soluble
proteins to immobilized heparin was measured in resonance units.
Concentrations of purified proteins used in the SPR analyses were
determined after acid hydrolysis (24 h at 110 °C in 6 N HCl) by
total amino acid quantitation performed with a Beckman 6300 amino acid
analyzer coupled to a high pressure liquid chromatography detection
system (Beckman Gold System). The association
(ka) and the dissociation rate constants
(kd) were calculated according to the
BIAevaluation software 3.0. The affinity constants were calculated from
the equation KD = kd/ka. rHBHA, rHBHA C,
MBP, or MBP+3R1+2R2 did not bind directly to streptavidin bound to the
sensor chip.
Protein Binding to Pneumocytes--
The human lung pneumocyte
A549 cell line (CCL185) was obtained from the American Type Culture
Collection and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, Inc.)
supplemented with 10% decomplemented fetal bovine serum (Life
Technologies, Inc.). 18 h before use, the cells were seeded on
glass coverslips at ~105 cells/12-mm diameter coverslip.
After two washes with 1 ml of PBS, the coverslips were incubated with
400 µl of 1 µM rHBHA, rHBHA C, MBP, or MBP+3R1+2R2
solution in PBS. After 1 h at 37 °C, the cells were washed
three times with 1 ml of PBS containing 0.01% Tween 80, fixed for 10 min with 400 µl of 2% paraformaldehyde, and washed again three times
with PBS containing 0.01% Tween 80. The cells were then incubated for
30 min with 400 µl of rabbit anti-rHBHA serum (diluted 500-fold) or
rabbit anti-MBP serum (diluted 10,000-fold). After three washes with
PBS containing 0.01% Tween 80, 400 µl of 1000-fold-diluted
rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes, Eugene,
OR) were added for 30 min. The cells were washed again three times with
PBS containing 0.01% Tween 80 and analyzed using a Zeiss Axioplan 2 fluorescence microscope. Cells incubated with rhodamine-conjugated
secondary antibodies alone served as a negative control.
HBHA Binding to Pneumocytes Treated with GAG-degrading
Enzymes--
A549 pneumocytes were propagated in suspension using 293 SFM growth medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 4 mM L-glutamine. After 48 h of culture,
5 × 105 cells were collected by low speed
centrifugation, washed once with PBS, and resuspended in 1 ml of PBS
supplemented with 0.1% BSA (PBS/BSA). Following the addition of 1 unit
of chondroitinase ABC (Sigma) or heparinase III (Sigma), the cells were
incubated for 2 h at 37 °C, washed twice with PBS/BSA, and
resuspended in 1 ml of PBS containing 1 µM rHBHA. After
30 min of incubation at 4 °C followed by 3 washes with PBS/BSA, the
cells were incubated for 1 h at 4 °C with 1 ml of rabbit
anti-rHBHA serum diluted 500-fold. The cells were then washed thrice
with PBS/BSA and incubated for 20 min at room temperature in 1 ml of
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson
ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) diluted 500-fold. After 3 final washes with PBS/BSA, the cells were fixed with 500 µl of 4%
paraformaldehyde, and cell-associated fluorescence (percentage of
fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled pneumocytes) was quantified by flow
cytometry using an EPICS Elite cytometer (Coulter, Hialeah, FL).
Fluorescence associated with pneumocytes that were not incubated with
rHBHA was used to determine nonspecific signals.
Immunoblot Analyses--
After SDS-PAGE, proteins were
transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (BA 85; Schleicher & Schuell)
as described by Towbin et al. (22). Immobilized native HBHA,
rHBHA, and truncated versions of rHBHA, MBP, or MBP-HBHA hybrid
proteins were then probed with purified anti-HBHA monoclonal antibody
(mAb) 4057D2 or 3921E4 (23), 500-fold diluted anti-HBHA rat serum (15),
or 10,000-fold diluted rabbit anti-MBP serum (New England Biolabs). mAb
4057D2 was purified by cryoprecipitation (24), and mAb 3921E4 as
purified by protein A-Sepharose Fast Flow (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) chromatography. Immune complexes were developed with alkaline phosphatase-linked goat anti-mouse, anti-rat, or anti-rabbit IgG (ProtoBlot System; Promega, Madison, WI). To investigate the influence of dextran (500 kDa, Sigma), dextran sulfate (500 kDa, Sigma), and
heparin (3 kDa, Sigma) on the immunoreactivities, nitrocellulose membranes bearing immobilized antigens were incubated at room temperature for 1 h in PBS containing 500 µg/ml of the
polysaccharide to be tested. After two washes with PBS, the membranes
were probed with mAb 3921E4 or anti-MBP serum and developed as
described above.
 |
RESULTS |
Dextran Sulfate Protects rHBHA from Proteolytic
Degradation--
Unglycosylated rHBHA produced in E. coli
undergoes rapid proteolytic degradation affecting its carboxyl-terminal
lysine-rich repeats (16). This degradation correlates with a reduction
of affinity for heparin, raising the possibility that these repeats are
involved in heparin binding by HBHA. To test this hypothesis, dextran
sulfate (500 kDa) or dextran (500 kDa) was added at 500 µg/ml to an
E. coli XL1-Blue(pKK-HBHA). As shown in Fig.
1, dextran sulfate but not dextran
partially protected rHBHA from proteolysis during incubation at
37 °C. A decrease in dextran sulfate concentration correlated with a
reduction of the protective effect (data not shown). These observations
suggest that the sulfated polysaccharide masked proteolytic cleavage
sites through its binding to the carboxyl terminus of rHBHA. Low
molecular mass heparin (3 kDa) did not protect rHBHA, even at
concentrations up to 2 mg/ml, indicating that the length of the
sulfated polysaccharide may be important to protect rHBHA from
proteolytic degradation.

View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Inhibition by dextran sulfate of proteolysis
of rHBHA produced in E. coli XL1-Blue. Cell
extracts obtained by sonication of a 250-ml culture of E. coli XL1-Blue(pKK-HBHA) were incubated at 37 °C with dextran
(500 kDa, left) or dextran sulfate (500 kDa,
right) at a final concentration of 500 µg/ml. After 1 min
(lanes A), 15 min (lanes B), 30 min (lanes
C), 1 h (lanes D), and 3 h of incubation
(lanes E), the proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and
Coomassie Blue staining. The position of rHBHA is shown by a
star, and molecular mass markers expressed in kDa are
indicated in the left margin.
|
|
High Level Production of rHBHA by a Protease-deficient E. coli
Strain--
To circumvent the degradation of rHBHA, the protein was
produced under the control of the T7 promoter in E. coli
BL21(DE3), a protease-deficient strain. No significant rHBHA
degradation was observed during the first 4 h in an E. coli BL21(DE3)(pET-HBHA) lysate incubated at 37 °C, whereas
under the same conditions all rHBHA expressed in E. coli
XL1-Blue was cleaved into a 19-kDa polypeptide (16). After 24 h of
incubation, less than 50% of the rHBHA was cleaved into a 25-kDa
polypeptide in the E. coli BL21(DE3)(pET-HBHA) lysate (data
not shown). These results show that a protease-deficient E. coli strain allows for stable production of rHBHA. Moreover, the
use of the T7 promoter instead of the trc promoter permitted
a ~10-fold increase in rHBHA production, as determined by
densitometric analysis of the Coomassie-stained electrophoresis gels.
rHBHA C Does Not Bind to Heparin and Is Not Recognized by mAb
3921E4--
The production of rHBHA C in E. coli
XL1-Blue(pKK-HBHA C) and in E. coli
BL21(DE3)(pET-HBHA C) was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.
Similar to full-length rHBHA, the production of rHBHA C was strongly
enhanced when the recombinant gene was under the control of the T7
promoter (Fig. 2, compare lanes
E and G). In both expression systems, the apparent
molecular mass of rHBHA C was ~25.4 kDa, whereas its calculated
molecular mass is 17.4 kDa. This difference is similar to that observed
for full-length rHBHA (16), indicating that the deletion of the
repeated motifs does not abolish the aberrant electrophoretic
migration. Incubation of E. coli XL1-Blue(pKK-HBHA C)
lysates for 1 day at 37 °C revealed that rHBHA C does not undergo
degradation (data not shown), consistent with the notion that the
proteolytic susceptibility of full-length rHBHA concerns the
lysine-rich repeats. mAb 3921E4, which blocks the heparin-inhibitable
binding of M. tuberculosis to epithelial cells (15, 16),
failed to recognize rHBHA C (Fig. 2, lanes E), indicating
that at least part of its epitope is located within the HBHA repeats.
To determine whether these repeats are involved in the interaction of
HBHA with heparin, an E. coli BL21(DE3)(pET-HBHA C) lysate
was applied onto a heparin-Sepharose column. All the rHBHA C was
recovered in the flow-through fraction, whereas under the same
conditions, full-length rHBHA produced by E. coli
BL21(DE3)(pET-HBHA) remained bound to the column. These observations
indicate that the lysine-rich motifs of HBHA are involved in the
interaction with heparin.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analyses of rHBHA and
rHBHA C produced in E. coli XL1-Blue and E. coli BL21(DE3). E. coli XL1-Blue(pKK-HBHA)
(lanes B and C), E. coli
XL1-Blue(pKK-HBHA C) (lanes D and E), and
E. coli BL21(DE3)(pET-HBHA C) (lanes F and
G) lysates were analyzed before (lanes B, D, and
F) and after induction by isopropylthiogalactoside
(lanes C, E, and G). Lanes A contain
200 ng of purified HBHA from M. bovis BCG. After
electrophoresis, the proteins were stained with Coomassie Blue R-250
(left and right panels) or transferred onto
nitrocellulose membranes and probed with mAb 3921E4 (middle
panel). The arrowheads indicate the positions of rHBHA
(lane C) and rHBHA C (lane E). Molecular mass
markers expressed in kDa are given in the left margin.
|
|
Deletions within the rHBHA Repeats Weaken the Interaction with
Heparin--
To assess the contribution of the R1 repeats to the
HBHA-heparin-binding activity and to further map the epitope of mAb
3921E4, rHBHA C+1R1, rHBHA C+2R1, and rHBHA C+3R1 were produced
in E. coli BL21(DE3). Recombinant protein production was
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using mAb 3921E4 (Fig.
3). This antibody failed to recognize
rHBHA C+1R1 and reacted only faintly with rHBHA C+2R1, whereas its
reactivity with rHBHA C+3R1 was comparable to that observed with
rHBHA, suggesting that the mAb 3921E4 epitope overlaps two successive
R1 motifs. Interestingly, compared with rHBHA, the rHBHA C with 1-3
R1 motifs was less stable in E. coli BL21(DE3), suggesting
that the missing carboxyl-terminal amino acids, perhaps the terminal
VTQK sequence, may shield from proteolysis (Fig. 3, lanes
C-E).

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analyses of rHBHA
containing truncations within the carboxyl-terminal repeats.
E. coli BL21(DE3)(pET24d(+)) (lanes A), E. coli BL21(DE3)(pET-HBHA) (lanes B), E. coli
BL21(DE3)(pET-HBHA C+3R1) (lanes C), E. coli
BL21(DE3)(pET-HBHA C+2R1) (lanes D), E. coli
BL21(DE3)(pET-HBHA C+1R1) (lanes E), and E. coli BL21(DE3)(pET-HBHA C) (lanes F) lysates were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining (left
panel) and immunoblotting using mAb 3921E4 (right
panel). Molecular mass markers expressed in kDa are shown in the
left margin.
|
|
When tested for their ability to interact with heparin, rHBHA C+1R1
was found unable to bind to heparin-Sepharose, and rHBHA C+2R1 bound
weakly because it could be eluted with 20 mM NaCl. The
presence of the third R1 motif strengthened the interaction with
heparin because elution of rHBHA C+3R1 required 100 mM
NaCl. These results indicate that the R1 motifs are involved in heparin
binding, but they are not sufficient for the high affinity binding
observed for full-length rHBHA, suggesting that the missing 21 residues, perhaps the R2 motifs, also play a role in the interaction
with heparin.
Grafting of the HBHA Repeats onto MBP Confers Heparin Binding and
mAb 3921E4 Recognition to the Hybrid Protein--
To investigate
whether the carboxyl-terminal repeats are sufficient for heparin
binding, amino acids 161-199 (3R1+2R2) or 173-199 (1R1+2R2) of HBHA
were fused to the carboxyl end of MBP. Production of the hybrid
proteins MBP+3R1+2R2 and MBP+1R1+2R2 was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and
immunoblotting. Both proteins were equally well recognized by mAb
3921E4, confirming that its epitope is located within the repeats. When
produced in E. coli XL1-Blue, MBP+3R1+2R2 and MBP+1R1+2R2
were rapidly degraded into polypeptides of 41.5 and 40 kDa,
respectively, which were resistant to further degradation and no longer
recognized by mAb 3921E4 (data not shown).
The capacity of the MBP hybrid proteins to bind to sulfated
polysaccharides was investigated by immunoblotting and
heparin-Sepharose chromatography. As shown in Fig.
4, pretreatment of nitrocellulose membranes bearing MBP+3R1+2R2 with dextran sulfate but not with unsulfated dextran impeded the subsequent recognition by mAb 3921E4 but
not that of anti-MBP antibodies, suggesting that the sulfated polysaccharide bound to the hybrid protein and masked the 3921E4 epitope. The size of the sulfated polysaccharide appeared to be important as low molecular weight heparin did not inhibit 3921E4 reactivity (data not shown). To determine whether the fusion
of the HBHA repeats to MBP induces its binding to heparin,
E. coli B834(pMAL-c), E. coli
B834(pMAL+3R1+2R2), and E. coli B834(pMAL+1R1+2R2) lysates were subjected to heparin-Sepharose chromatography. Whereas MBP
was unable to bind to heparin, MBP+3R1+2R2 bound to the column and was
eluted with 300 mM NaCl (Fig.
5), a condition similar to that required
for the elution of rHBHA. MBP+1R1+2R2 also bound to heparin-Sepharose
but less strongly because it was eluted with 100 mM NaCl.
These results indicate that the molecular determinants required for the
heparin-binding activity of HBHA are all located within the
carboxyl-terminal repeats and that the heparin-binding activity of HBHA
can be transferred to an heterologous protein by tagging with the HBHA
repeats.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Influence of dextran and dextran sulfate on
reactivity of MBP and MBP+3R1+2R2 with anti-MBP antiserum or mAb
3921E4. E. coli B834(pMAL-c) (lanes A) and
E. coli B834(pMAL+3R1+2R2) (lanes B) lysates were
submitted to SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining (left
panel) and analyzed by immunoblotting using a rabbit anti-MBP
antiserum ( -MBP) or mAb 3921E4 after incubation of the membranes
with dextran or dextran sulfate at 1 mg/ml in PBS. Molecular mass
markers expressed in kDa are shown in the left margin.
|
|

View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Heparin-Sepharose chromatography of an
E. coli B834(pMAL+3R1+2R2) lysate. Bacterial
cells of a 250-ml culture of E. coli B834(pMAL+3R1+2R2) were
sonicated in PBS. The soluble material was subjected to
heparin-Sepharose chromatography and eluted using a 0-500
mM NaCl gradient. 50 µg of starting material (lane
A), flow-through material (lane B), eluting material
(lanes C), and material released during the regeneration
step of the column using PBS containing 3 M NaCl
(lanes D and E) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and
Coomassie Blue staining. Molecular mass markers expressed in kDa are
shown in the left margin.
|
|
SPR Analysis of the HBHA-Heparin Interactions--
SPR was used to
more precisely analyze the interaction of rHBHA and MBP+3R1+2R2 with
heparin. As shown in Fig. 6, rHBHA C and MBP were unable to interact with the heparin sensor chip, whereas
rHBHA and MBP+3R1+2R2 displayed comparable interaction profiles. The
affinity constants calculated using protein concentrations of 200 nM were 26 (±2) and 23 (± 1) nM for rHBHA and
MBP+3R1+2R2, respectively, confirming that the high affinity binding of
HBHA to heparin is entirely mediated by its lysine-rich repeats. For both proteins, the interaction with heparin was characterized by fast
association kinetics. However, the association rate constant for the
interaction of MBP+3R1+2R2 with heparin (ka = 6.65 (± 0.15) × 105 M 1
s 1) was slightly higher than that calculated for the
rHBHA-heparin interaction (ka = 5.62 (± 0.10) × 105 M 1
s 1), suggesting perhaps a slightly faster binding for the
hybrid protein. No difference was observed for the dissociation rate constants between the two proteins.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
SPR analysis of the interactions of rHBHA and
MPB+3R1+2R2 with immobilized heparin. Biotinylated heparin was
immobilized onto the surface of sensor chips, and 30 µl of
rHBHA, rHBHAC, MBP, or MBP+3R1+ 2R2 at a concentration of
200 nM was used to monitor the protein interactions with
immobilized heparin in real time (A). No interaction was
observed with rHBHAC and MBP. Data are expressed as relative responses
in resonance units (RU) after subtraction of the background
signal recorded on streptavidin-coated sensor chips. The kinetic
parameters of the interactions observed with rHBHA and MBP+3R1+2R2 are
summarized in B. Standard deviations were calculated from
three independent experiments.
|
|
Binding of HBHA to Human Pneumocytes Is Mediated by the
Carboxyl-terminal Repeats--
To test whether the HBHA repeats are
involved in HBHA adherence to human pneumocytes, purified rHBHA and
rHBHA C were incubated with A549 cells, and protein binding was
monitored by immunofluorescence microscopy. As shown in Fig.
7, rHBHA bound to the cell surface, whereas rHBHA C did not, indicating that the repeats are required for
interaction of HBHA with human pneumocytes. In this binding assay, MBP
did not bind to A549 cells, whereas MBP+3R1+2R2 bound to the
pneumocytes (Fig. 7), indicating that the repeats are sufficient for
binding of HBHA to respiratory epithelial cells.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Immunofluorescence microscopy analysis of
rHBHA and MBP+3R1+2R2 binding to human pneumocytes. A549 cells
seeded onto glass coverslips were incubated with 400 µl of 1 mM rHBHA (A), rHBHA C (B),
MBP+3R1+2R2 (C), or MBP (D). After washing and
fixing with paraformaldehyde, the bound proteins were detected using a
rabbit anti-rHBHA antiserum (A and B) or a rabbit
anti-MBP antiserum (C and D) followed by
incubation with rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG.
|
|
Pneumocyte Heparan Sulfate Chains Act as Receptors for
HBHA--
To investigate the involvement of GAGs in HBHA binding to
human pneumocytes, A549 cells were treated with chondroitinase ABC or
heparinase III, which cleaves chondroitin sulfate A, B, and C or
heparan sulfate, respectively. Untreated cells as well as lyase-treated
cells were then incubated with rHBHA, and the adhesin binding was
monitored by flow cytometry. Whereas the chondroitinase ABC treatment
did not significantly reduce the interaction of rHBHA with pneumocytes,
the heparinase III treatment led to a reduction of 68% of rHBHA
binding (Fig. 8), indicating that
proteoglycans containing heparan sulfate chains serve as receptors for
HBHA on the surface of human pneumocytes.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Flow cytometry analysis of rHBHA binding to
human pneumocytes treated with GAG-degrading enzymes. Untreated
A549 cells and A549 cells treated with chondroitinase ABC or heparinase
III were incubated with rHBHA, and protein binding was assessed by flow
cytometry using a rabbit anti-rHBHA antiserum. Nonspecific antibody
binding corresponding to fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled cells
observed in absence of rHBHA was 10.4% (± 0.3). Standard deviations
were calculated from three independent experiments. FITC,
fluorescein isothiocyanate.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
To mediate adherence during the early steps of infection,
pathogenic microorganisms commonly interact with cell surface receptors that are normally recognized by eukaryotic ligands to mediate signal
transduction, as well as cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix
interactions (25). These molecules are generally glycoproteins, and an
increasing number of bacterial adhesins are now being shown to express
specific lectin activity for the carbohydrate moieties of these
receptors (26). Among those carbohydrates, heparan sulfate and related
sulfated polysaccharides such as chondroitin sulfate are of special
interest, because they are present on the surface of virtually all
animal cells in the form of sulfated proteoglycans (27). Indeed, the
GAG chains of proteoglycans constitute a family of receptors for
various bacterial adhesins (28), including HBHA, a surface-exposed
glycosylated heparin-binding adhesin produced by M. tuberculosis (15, 16).
For most adhesins, the molecular details of their interaction with GAG
chains are not known. Here, we show that the carboxyl terminus of HBHA,
which comprises five lysine-rich repeats (3 R1 and 2 R2), is
responsible for heparin interaction. Consistent with the notion that
basic amino acids are most often involved in sulfated polysaccharide
binding via electrostatic interactions (29), a recombinant HBHA variant
from which all the repeats were deleted was unable to bind to heparin.
Progressive truncations within the HBHA repeats correlated with a
reduction of affinity for heparin, and both the R1 and the R2 repeats
were found to contribute to binding to the sulfated polysaccharide.
When the repeats were grafted onto MBP, which by itself does not bind
to heparin (30), the hybrid protein displayed the same affinity for
heparin as full-length HBHA, indicating that all the molecular determinants responsible for heparin binding are located within the
repeats. Because the hybrid protein bound to heparin-Sepharose, the
HBHA repeats may constitute a new type of molecular tag for the
production of recombinant proteins easy to be purified by heparin-Sepharose chromatography. This application may have an advantage over other tags, such as histidine or protein A tags, in that
the hybrid proteins can be easily eluted under mild, nondenaturing conditions, such as increased NaCl concentrations, whereas the elution
of recombinant proteins tagged by other means usually requires urea or
low pH (31, 32). Furthermore, the lysine-rich repeats are highly
susceptible to proteolytic degradation (16), which should facilitate
the removal of the heparin-binding tag after purification of the
recombinant hybrid protein. However, the presence of other
heparin-binding proteins in the recombinant cell extracts may require
additional steps to purify the tagged protein.
SPR analysis of rHBHA-heparin interactions revealed high affinity
binding, with affinity constants in the range of values that have been
reported for the GAG-binding activities of eukaryotic proteins such as
fibronectin (33), antithrombin III (34), or HARP, a heparin-binding
growth factor (35). The affinity of HBHA for sulfated polysaccharides
is thus sufficient to mediate adherence to the surface of
physiologically relevant tissues, such as the pulmonary alveolus. By
comparing different heparin-binding domains of various eukaryotic
proteins, Cardin and Weintraub (36) proposed two heparin-binding
motifs, XBBXBX and
XBBBXXBX, where B represent basic
amino acids and X any other amino acids. The heparin-binding
site of HBHA does not totally fit the consensus sequence of Cardin and
Weintraub (36). However, the high density of lysine residues within
these repeats is consistent with their role as basic amino acids
interacting with the negatively charged sulfate groups on the
carbohydrate receptors (29). It is striking to notice that the HBHA
heparin-binding domain is composed of only three amino acids (alanine,
lysine, and proline) and consists on seven di-lysine motifs separated
by the tetrapetide AAPA or the tripeptides AAA or APA, which probably
serve as spacers of the positive charges borne by the lysines.
The presence of proline-rich regions and repeats is known to induce
aberrant electrophoretic mobility during SDS-PAGE. We have previously
noticed that rHBHA displays such aberrant electrophoretic mobility
(16). However, rHBHA C still migrates slower than expected, indicating that the HBHA repeats are not responsible for its aberrant electrophoretic mobility.
The epitope recognized by mAb 3921E4 mapped within the lysine-rich
repeats. This mAb has been reported to inhibit adherence of BCG to
Chinese hamster ovary cells (15). We show here that this epitope
comprises the sequence AAPAKKAA. Deletion of this octapeptide from the
HBHA protein abolished mAb 3921E4 recognition, and grafting of a
peptide containing this octapeptide onto MBP resulted in the
recognition of the recombinant hybrid protein by the mAb.
Antibody-mediated blocking of mycobacterial binding to target cells may
perhaps constitute the basis of a novel vaccine design against
tuberculosis, although antibody-mediated immune responses have not been
considered protective yet (37). Therefore, repeated motifs of HBHA may
represent an entirely new target for vaccine development. In this
respect it is important to realize that the HBHA repeats are involved
in binding to human A549 pneumocytes, a more relevant target for
infections by M. tuberculosis than Chinese hamster ovary cells.
In addition to mAb 3921E4, a second mAb has also been shown to inhibit
BCG adherence to Chinese hamster ovary cells. This mAb, named 4057D2,
only recognizes glycosylated HBHA (16). Here, we show that the
glycosylation of HBHA is not important for heparin binding. Previous
studies have indicated that the glycosylation protects HBHA from
proteolytic degradation at the carboxyl-terminal end (16) and thus
protects the heparin-binding domain from proteolytic removal. Although
the glycosylation site of HBHA has not been identified yet, it is
tempting to hypothesize that it is located in the vicinity of the
lysine-rich repeats, and that mAb 4057D2 binding causes a steric
hindrance that impedes recognition of GAGs. However, the possibility
that such a steric hindrance may be caused by binding of the mAb to
distal sites cannot be ruled out and certainly warrants further
investigation, because the identification of the glycosylation site of
HBHA will increase the molecular understanding of the
structure-function relationship of this mycobacterial adhesin.
Experiments using various GAG lyases indicated that heparan sulfate
chains, but not chondroitin sulfate chains, play a crucial role in HBHA
binding to A549 pneumocytes. Specific recognition of GAGs by bacterial
adhesins has already been described for Chlamydia trachomatis (38) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (39).
Similar to this study, N. gonorrhoeae has been shown to
adhere to heparan sulfate chains on epithelial cells, whereas
chondroitin sulfate chains did not appear to be involved in gonococcal
adherence (39). The purification and characterization of the HBHA
receptor on the surface of pneumocytes will generate new valuable
information on the mycobacteria-host interactions. Given the high yield
of rHBHA and the possibility to graft the heparin-binding site onto MBP, as reported in this study, such investigations are now feasible.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Eve Willery for excellent
assistance in DNA sequencing, Alex Veithen for the immunofluorescence
microscopy, Nathalie Spruyt for help in SPR analyses, Hervé
Drobecq for total amino acid analyses, Gwenola Kervoaze for the
suspension cultures of A549 cells, Brigitte Quatannens for the flow
cytometry analyses, Elizabeth Pradel for critically reading the
manuscript, and Dominique Stéhelin for the free access to the
BIAcore apparatus.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Institut Pasteur de Lille,
the Région Nord-Pas de Calais, and INSERM.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Holds a fellowship from the Ministère de la Recherche et de
la Technologie.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-3-20871151;
Fax: 33-3-20871158; E-mail: camille.locht@pasteur-lille.fr.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HBHA, heparin-binding hemagglutinin;
r, recombinant;
GAG, glycosaminoglycan;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
MBP, maltose-binding protein;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
BCG, Bacille de Calmette et Guérin;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
SPR, surface plasmon resonance;
mAb, monoclonal antibody.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bloom, B. R.,
and Murray, C. L.
(1992)
Science
257,
1055-1064[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Raviglione, M. C.,
Snider, D. E.,
and Kochi, A.
(1995)
J. Am. Med. Assoc.
273,
220-226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Noordeen, S. K.,
Bravo, L. L.,
and Sundaresan, T. K.
(1992)
Bull. W. H. O.
70,
7-10[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Horsburgh, C. R.
(1991)
N. Engl. J. Med.
324,
1332-1338[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Finlay, B. B.,
and Falkow, S.
(1997)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
61,
136-169[Abstract]
|
| 6.
|
Schlesinger, L. S.,
Bellinger-Kawahara, C. G.,
Payne, N. R.,
and Horwitz, M. A.
(1990)
J. Immunol.
144,
2771-2780[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Stokes, R. W.,
Haidl, I. D.,
Jefferies, W. A.,
and Speert, D. P.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
151,
7067-7076[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Schlesinger, L. S.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
150,
2920-2930[Abstract]
|
| 9.
|
van Putten, J. P. M.,
and Paul, S. M.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
2144-2154[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Menozzi, F. D.,
Mutombo, R.,
Renauld, G.,
Gantiez, C.,
Hannah, J. H.,
Leininger, E.,
Brennan, M. J.,
and Locht, C.
(1994)
Infect. Immun.
62,
769-778[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Zhu, Z.,
Gershon, M. D.,
Ambron, R.,
Gabel, C.,
and Gershon, A. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
3546-3550[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Compton, T.,
Nowlin, D. M.,
and Cooper, N. R.
(1993)
Virology
193,
834-841[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Herrera, E. M.,
Ming, M.,
Ortega-Barria, E.,
and Pereira, M. E. A.
(1994)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol
65,
73-83[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Maubert, B.,
Guilbert, L. J.,
and Deloron, P.
(1997)
Infect. Immun.
65,
1251-1257[Abstract]
|
| 15.
|
Menozzi, F. D.,
Rouse, J. H.,
Alavi, M.,
Laude-Sharp, M.,
Muller, J.,
Bischoff, R.,
Brennan, M. J.,
and Locht, C.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
184,
993-1001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Menozzi, F. D.,
Bischoff, R.,
Fort, E.,
Brennan, M. J.,
and Locht, C.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
12625-12630[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
| Pethe, K., Locht, C., and Menozzi, F. D. (1999) American
Society for Microbiology General Meeting, May 30 to June 3, Chicago, Abstr. U-106, American Society for
Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
|
| 18.
|
Wood, W. B.
(1966)
J. Mol. Biol.
16,
118-133[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 20.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Towbin, H.,
Staehelin, T.,
and Gordon, J.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
4350-4354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Rouse, D. A.,
Morris, S. L.,
Karpas, A. B.,
Mackall, J. C.,
Probst, P. G.,
and Chaparas, S. D.
(1991)
Infect. Immun.
59,
2595-2600[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Gagnon, P.
(1996)
Purification Tools For Monoclonal Antibodies,
, Validated Biosystems Edition, Tucson, AZ
|
| 25.
|
Isberg, R. R.,
and Tran Van Nhieu, G.
(1994)
Trends Microbiol.
2,
10-14[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Ofek, I.,
Goldhar, J.,
Keisari, Y.,
and Sharon, N.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
49,
239-276[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Yanagishita, M.,
and Hascall, V. C.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
9451-9454[Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Rostand, K. S.,
and Esko, J. D.
(1997)
Infect. Immun.
65,
1-8[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Margalit, H.,
Fischer, N.,
and Ben-Sasson, S. A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
19228-19231[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Hannah, J. H.,
Menozzi, F. D.,
Renauld, G.,
Locht, C.,
and Brennan, M. J.
(1994)
Infect. Immun
62,
5010-5019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Schmitt, J.,
Hess, H.,
and Stunneberg, H. G.
(1993)
Mol. Biol. Rep.
18,
223-230[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Nilsson, B.,
Abrahmsén, L.,
and Uhlén, M.
(1985)
EMBO J.
4,
1075-1080[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Lee, M. K.,
and Lander, A. D.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
2768-2772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Bjork, I.,
and Lindahl, U.
(1982)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
48,
161-182[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Vacherot, F.,
Delbé, J.,
Heroult, M.,
Barritault, D.,
Fernig, D. G.,
and Courty, J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem
274,
7741-7747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Cardin, A. D.,
and Weintraub, H. J. R.
(1989)
Arteriosclerosis
9,
21-32[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Wizemann, T. M.,
Adamou, J. E.,
and Langermann, S.
(1999)
Emerg. Infect. Dis.
5,
395-403[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Su, H.,
Raymond, L.,
Rockey, D. D.,
Fischer, E.,
Hackstadt, T.,
and Caldwell, H. D.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
11143-1148[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Chen, T.,
Belland, R. J.,
Wilson, J.,
and Swanson, J.
(1995)
J. Exp. Med.
182,
511-517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Verbelen, V. Dupres, D. Raze, C. Bompard, C. Locht, and Y. F. Dufrene
Interaction of the Mycobacterial Heparin-Binding Hemagglutinin with Actin, as Evidenced by Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy
J. Bacteriol.,
December 1, 2008;
190(23):
7614 - 7620.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Esposito, M. V. Pethoukov, D. I. Svergun, A. Ruggiero, C. Pedone, E. Pedone, and R. Berisio
Evidence for an Elongated Dimeric Structure of Heparin-Binding Hemagglutinin from Mycobacterium tuberculosis
J. Bacteriol.,
July 1, 2008;
190(13):
4749 - 4753.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Verbelen, D. Raze, F. Dewitte, C. Locht, and Y. F. Dufrene
Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy of Mycobacterial Adhesin-Adhesin Interactions
J. Bacteriol.,
December 15, 2007;
189(24):
8801 - 8806.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Jenkins, S. J. Geary, M. Gladd, and S. P. Djordjevic
The Mycoplasma gallisepticum OsmC-like protein MG1142 resides on the cell surface and binds heparin
Microbiology,
May 1, 2007;
153(5):
1455 - 1463.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A-R. Shin, K.-S. Lee, J.-S. Lee, S.-Y. Kim, C.-H. Song, S.-B. Jung, C.-S. Yang, E.-K. Jo, J.-K. Park, T.-H. Paik, et al.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis HBHA Protein Reacts Strongly with the Serum Immunoglobulin M of Tuberculosis Patients.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol.,
August 1, 2006;
13(8):
869 - 875.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Jenkins, J. L. Wilton, F. C. Minion, L. Falconer, M. J. Walker, and S. P. Djordjevic
Two Domains within the Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Cilium Adhesin Bind Heparin
Infect. Immun.,
January 1, 2006;
74(1):
481 - 487.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Hayman, T. R. Southern, and T. E. Nash
Role of Sulfated Glycans in Adherence of the Microsporidian Encephalitozoon intestinalis to Host Cells In Vitro
Infect. Immun.,
February 1, 2005;
73(2):
841 - 848.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. R. Henderson, F. Navarro-Garcia, M. Desvaux, R. C. Fernandez, and D. Ala'Aldeen
Type V Protein Secretion Pathway: the Autotransporter Story
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
December 1, 2004;
68(4):
692 - 744.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Aoki, S. Matsumoto, Y. Hirayama, T. Wada, Y. Ozeki, M. Niki, P. Domenech, K. Umemori, S. Yamamoto, A. Mineda, et al.
Extracellular Mycobacterial DNA-binding Protein 1 Participates in Mycobacterium-Lung Epithelial Cell Interaction through Hyaluronic Acid
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 17, 2004;
279(38):
39798 - 39806.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Bannantine, J. F. J. Huntley, E. Miltner, J. R. Stabel, and L. E. Bermudez
The Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis 35 kDa protein plays a role in invasion of bovine epithelial cells
Microbiology,
August 1, 2003;
149(8):
2061 - 2069.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Mueller-Ortiz, E. Sepulveda, M. R. Olsen, C. Jagannath, A. R. Wanger, and S. J. Norris
Decreased Infectivity despite Unaltered C3 Binding by a {Delta}hbhA Mutant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Infect. Immun.,
December 1, 2002;
70(12):
6751 - 6760.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Pethe, P. Bifani, H. Drobecq, C. Sergheraert, A.-S. Debrie, C. Locht, and F. D. Menozzi
Mycobacterial heparin-binding hemagglutinin and laminin-binding protein share antigenic methyllysines that confer resistance to proteolysis
PNAS,
August 6, 2002;
99(16):
10759 - 10764.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Mueller-Ortiz, A. R. Wanger, and S. J. Norris
Mycobacterial Protein HbhA Binds Human Complement Component C3
Infect. Immun.,
December 1, 2001;
69(12):
7501 - 7511.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. K. Singh, X. Zhang, A. S. Patibandla, P. Chien Jr., and S. Laal
Antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Expressed during Preclinical Tuberculosis: Serological Immunodominance of Proteins with Repetitive Amino Acid Sequences
Infect. Immun.,
June 1, 2001;
69(6):
4185 - 4191.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|