![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 19, 14509-14516, May 12, 2000
,
§,From the Département de Microbiologie et d'Infectiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec J1H 5N4, Canada
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1
protein and a shortened derivative (UP1) promote telomere elongation in
mammalian cells. To gain insights into the function of A1/UP1 in
telomere biogenesis, we have investigated the binding properties of
recombinant A1/UP1 and derivatives to single-stranded DNA
oligonucleotides. Our results indicate that UP1 prefers to bind to DNA
carrying single-stranded telomeric extensions at the 3' terminus. The
RNA recognition motif 1 is sufficient for strong and specific binding to oligomers carrying vertebrate telomeric repeats. We find that the
binding of A1/UP1 protects telomeric sequences against degradation by
endo- and exonucleases. Moreover, A1/UP1 binding prevents extension by
telomerase and terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase and inhibits rNTP-dependent DNA synthesis in vitro. These
observations are consistent with the hypothesis that A1/UP1 is a
telomere end-binding protein that plays a role in the maintenance of
long 3' overhangs.
Telomeres are the specialized structures at the end of linear
chromosomes and are essential for normal cellular function. Telomeres
prevent degradation and aberrant recombination of chromosome termini
and facilitate the complete replication of chromosome ends (for
reviews, see Refs. 1-3). Vertebrate telomeres contain variable numbers
of TAGGGT repeats in double-stranded form and terminate with a
single-stranded overhang of the G-rich strand, the strand making the
3'-end of the chromosome (4-6). The ribonucleoprotein enzyme
telomerase directs the synthesis of telomeric repeat units onto this
G-rich strand, thereby counteracting the loss of sequence that occurs
at each cell division (3). It is thought that the G-rich strand will
then serve as substrate for the synthesis of the complementary strand
by DNA primase followed by conventional DNA polymerases (7, 8).
The presence of a 3' overhang of the G-rich strand suggests that
single-stranded DNA binding activities will play an important role in
telomere function. Proteins that can bind to single-stranded telomeric
repeats include protein In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Est1p and Est4p/Cdc13p have
properties of terminus-binding proteins, and their association with G-rich extensions may mediate recognition by telomerase. Mutant strains
engineered not to express Est1p, or expressing mutated forms of Cdc13p,
undergo telomere attrition despite having wild-type levels of
telomerase (19, 20). While Est1p interacts with telomerase RNA in
vitro and in vivo, its presence is not essential in
some telomerase activity assays in vitro (20-22).
In vertebrates, several proteins can interact with single-stranded
G-rich extensions in vitro. For example, the chicken MF3 protein and the Xenopus XTEF protein share this property
(23, 24). However, there has been no demonstration that these proteins bind to telomeres in vivo or that their expression
influences the structure of telomeres. Mammalian
hnRNP1 proteins have been
reported to associate with RNA and DNA oligonucleotides carrying
telomeric repeats (25-29). The only mammalian hnRNP protein for which
genetic evidence of a function in telomere biogenesis has been obtained
is the hnRNP A1 protein. Ectopic expression of A1 promotes telomere
elongation in mammalian cells (29). Although hnRNP A1 is a well known
modulator of alternative pre-mRNA splicing (30-32), several
observations are consistent with the notion that the function of A1 in
telomere control may be direct and therefore independent of its role in
alternative splicing. First, a shortened derivative of A1 (UP1) that
has no intrinsic activity in alternative splicing (31), but which can
antagonize the modulatory activity of A1 in splicing extracts (30),
also promotes telomere elongation (29). Second, UP1 and A1 can interact specifically with single-stranded telomeric repeats in vitro
(29). Third, UP1 may interact with telomerase, as judged by its ability to recover telomerase activity from a cell lysate (29). Although we do
not yet know whether A1 binds to single-stranded telomeric extensions
in vivo, here we present further evidence consistent with a
direct role for A1 in telomere biogenesis. We show that the binding of
A1 and UP1 to a long single-stranded oligonucleotide protects DNA from
endonuclease and exonuclease attack. Moreover, A1/UP1 binding to
telomeric repeats represses telomerase extension and
rNTP-dependent DNA synthesis. Thus, our results suggest
that A1/UP1 can contribute to telomere protection and can modulate telomere replication in vitro.
Oligonucleotides--
DNA oligonucleotides (see Table
I) were purified on acrylamide/urea gels.
For binding assays, oligonucleotides were 5'-end-labeled by incubation
with T4 polynucleotide kinase (Promega) and purified using MicroSpinTM
G-25 columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Plasmids--
pGEX-A1 was constructed by inserting the mouse A1
cDNA (33) into the EcoRI site of pGEX-2T. The UP1
fragment was produced as described by LaBranche et al. (29)
and was inserted into the EcoRI site of pGEX-2T.
pGEX-UP1 Production of Recombinant Proteins--
Recombinant A1, UP1, and
protein derivatives were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21
or DH5
To obtain proteins devoid of the GST moiety, bound proteins were
treated with thrombin, and the released proteins were collected. The
concentration of proteins was determined by Bradford staining or by
staining gels containing bovine serum albumin standards.
Binding and Protection Assays--
5'-Radiolabeled
oligonucleotides were incubated 30 min at 30 °C with various amounts
of proteins in a 10-µl final volume of 10 mM Hepes (pH
7.6), 0.1 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 75 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 µg of
poly(dI-dC)·(dI-dC) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Samples were loaded
onto a 5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel (115 V), and complexes were
visualized by autoradiography. DNase I (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech),
exonuclease I (U.S. Biochemical Corp.), and Bal31 (Promega)
protection assays were set up with 5'-labeled oligonucleotides
incubated with recombinant proteins in the binding buffer described
above. Following a 30-min incubation at 30 °C, each sample was split
into two sets. One set was tested for binding in a native gel, as
above. Nuclease was added to the other set (5 units of DNase I, 1 unit
of exonuclease I, or 1 unit of Bal31), and the mixtures were
incubated for 10 min at room temperature (DNase I), 1 min at 37 °C
(exonuclease I), or 10 min at 30 °C (Bal31).
Telomerase Assay--
Ten pmol of oligonucleotides was added to
proteins (G-UP1, G-A1, UP1, G-UP1 TdT Assay--
The assay was performed essentially as described
by Froelich-Ammon et al. (13). 0.83 pmol of oligonucleotides
(TS10 or TS) was added to UP1 or gp32 protein in 1× TdT buffer (Life
Technologies, Inc.). The mixture was incubated overnight at 4 °C or
1 h at 30 °C. TdT (5 units; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and 0.5 µl of dTTP (400 Ci/mmol; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) were added to a
final volume of 40 µl and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. The
reaction was stopped by incubation for 2 h at 45 °C in 200 µl
of stop solution (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 15 mM EDTA, 0.6% SDS, and 0.1 mg/ml proteinase K). Labeled
extension products were purified by two extractions with
phenol-chloroform and ethanol precipitation and were fractionated onto
a 8% polyacrylamide, 7 M urea gel.
Lagging Strand Synthesis Assay--
The procedure described by
Reveal et al. (38) was used. HeLa nuclear extract, HeLa
S100, and CB3 nuclear extract were prepared according to the procedure
of Dignam et al. (34) and dialyzed in 10 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM MgCl2, 7.5 mM DTT. Essentially, 5 pmol of TS10 oligonucleotide was
incubated in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM
MgCl2, 7.5 mM DTT with a 1 mM
concentration each of rATP, rCTP, rUTP, dATP, and dTTP; 10 µM dCTP; 100 nM [ A1 and UP1 Binding to Telomeric Repeats--
We reported that
recombinant forms of the A1 and UP1 proteins (GST-A1 and GST-UP1) can
bind directly and specifically to short single-stranded
oligonucleotides carrying 2-4 contiguous vertebrate TAGGGT telomeric
repeats (29). As monitored by gel shift assays, A1 and UP1 did not bind
to a 22-nucleotide yeast telomeric sequence (data not shown). Because
mammalian chromosomes end with G-rich single-stranded overhangs, we
tested the influence of nontelomeric sequences flanking the telomeric
repeats. Binding assays using UP1 and oligonucleotides carrying
nontelomeric sequences upstream or downstream of the telomeric cassette
indicated a slight preference for telomeric repeats located at the
3'-end (Fig. 1A, compare lanes 1-3 with lanes
9-11). Likewise, UP1 bound slightly more efficiently to
oligonucleotides carrying a double-stranded portion at the 5'-end
rather than at the 3'-end (Fig. 1A, compare lanes 5-7 with lanes 13-15). Binding
assays performed in the presence of an excess of unlabeled competitor
oligomers confirmed that UP1 interacts slightly better with an oligomer
that contains telomeric sequences at the 3' terminus (Fig.
1B).
Because the length of single-stranded G-rich overhangs in human and
mouse telomeres ranges from 50 to 150 nucleotides (4-6), we examined
the binding of A1/UP1 to a more natural substrate (TS10) containing 10 contiguous telomeric TTAGGG repeats and, hence, nine complete A1
binding sites (TAGGGT). A mobility shift assay performed with GST-UP1
revealed the assembly of three complexes with TS10 (Fig.
2, lanes 1-6). A
similar result was obtained with GST-A1, and no complex was formed when
GST-A1 or GST-UP1 was incubated with a control oligonucleotide of
similar length (data not shown). The profile of complex formation on
TS10 was different when a preparation of UP1 lacking the GST moiety was
used (Fig. 2, lanes 8-10). In this case, a small
complex appeared at a low concentration of UP1, several complexes of
intermediate mobility appeared as the concentration of UP1 was
increased, and a single highly retarded complex was detected at the
highest concentration of UP1. Thus, although the presence of a bulky
GST domain does not dramatically affect the affinity of UP1 to TS10, it
influences the architecture of the complex.
RRM1 Is Sufficient for Strong and Specific Binding to Telomeric
Sequences--
To determine whether the binding of UP1 to telomeric
sequences requires both nucleic acid binding domains, we tested the
binding activity of UP1 molecules deprived of either RRM2 or part of
RRM1 (Fig. 3, A and
B). The UP1 derivative lacking the C-terminal RRM2 domain
(UP1 A1 and UP1 Can Protect Telomeric Sequences from Nuclease
Digestion--
We next examined whether UP1 binding could protect
telomeric sequences against nucleolytic activities. Incubation of naked TS10 with DNase I yielded a profile indicative of preferential cleavage
after each G in every repeat (Fig.
4A, lane 7;
B, lane 6; and C,
lane 9). The sites of cleavage were confirmed by
comparison with a profile obtained by DMS treatment, which generates
cuts at all G nucleotides (data not shown). At the lowest
concentrations of GST-A1, DNase I cleavage occurred preferentially at
the T
Protection assays were also performed with the E. coli 3'
exonuclease I, which carries out nucleotide removal on naked TS10 or C6
to yield a ladder of products (Fig. 4E, lanes
3 and 6). It is unclear why no products shorter
than 35 nucleotides are detected with TS10. The highest concentration
of UP1 decreased the level of TS10 ExoI products by 2-fold
while providing no protection to the C6 oligonucleotide
(lanes 2 and 5, respectively). A
similar experiment performed with Bal31 exonuclease showed
that the addition of increasing amounts of UP1 protects oligonucleotide
TS10 but not C6 against Bal31 activity (data not shown). The
efficiency of UP1 binding to the oligonucleotides correlated well with
the level of protection from Bal31 (Fig. 4F). Our
results clearly indicate that UP1 binding to a long telomeric substrate
provides protection against the activity of endo- and exonucleases.
A1 and UP1 Inhibit Telomerase-mediated Extension--
We next
investigated whether A1 or UP1 could affect the ability of telomerase
to extend telomeric DNA in vitro. Recombinant UP1 lacking
the GST moiety was prebound to TS10, and the complex was incubated in a
HeLa S100 extract. In this conventional telomerase assay, the extension
products are monitored directly following fractionation in a denaturing
gel. In the absence of UP1, telomerase added multiple repeats to TS10,
indicative of high processivity (Fig.
5A, lane
1). No activity was detected when the S100 extract was
treated with RNase A (lane 2). Preincubation with
increasing amounts of UP1 led to a gradual reduction in telomerase
activity (lanes 3-5) such that few products were
made at concentrations of UP1 that shifted TS10 into low mobility
complexes (Fig. 5B, lanes 1-4). A
similar result was obtained with GST-A1 (Fig. 5A, lanes 6-8). Inhibition appeared A1/UP1
protein-specific, since preincubation with the single-stranded
DNA-binding gp32 was less efficient at inhibiting telomerase (Fig.
5A, lanes 9-11) despite the fact that
gp32 assembled TS10 into low mobility complexes as efficiently as UP1
(Fig. 5B, lanes 5-7).
Inhibition of telomerase activity by UP1 was less apparent when a short
substrate was used. The appearance of the shorter extension products
derived from oligonucleotide TS was not compromised by large amounts of
UP1 (Fig. 5C, lane 2). However, UP1
promoted a small but reproducible decrease in the appearance of the
largest (+20) extension product (lane 3). While
oligonucleotide TS is a common substrate in telomerase (TRAP) assays
(35), it does not contain a complete telomeric repeat and is not bound
by UP1 (not shown). Because the largest TS extension product carries three complete A1 binding sites (TAGGGT), the product carrying two
sites is the first substrate sensitive to the addition of UP1. This is
consistent with our observation that at least two TAGGGT units are
required for stable UP1 binding (29). We also tested a derivative
carrying one complete telomeric repeat (TS1). While TS1 can be extended
in a S100 extract, the addition of UP1 compromised the appearance of a
shorter (+14) extension product (Fig. 5C, lane
4), again consistent with the notion that at least two
TAGGGT units are required for UP1 binding.
To confirm that UP1 binding to the telomerase substrate was responsible
for the inhibition, we preincubated UP1 with a molar excess of an
oligonucleotide bound by UP1 (TS8A) or an oligonucleotide not bound by
UP1 (MS2). TS8A and MS2 are not efficiently extended by telomerase
(data not shown). Preincubating UP1 with TS8A stimulated extension of
TS10 (Fig. 5D, lanes 3 and
4), while preincubation with MS2 had little effect
(lanes 5 and 6). Overall, these
results show that inhibition of telomerase activity by UP1 is specific to substrates carrying high affinity A1 binding sites.
The inhibitory activity of UP1 derivatives lacking either RRM1 or RRM2
was also tested. Although UP1 UP1 Inhibits the Activity of Other DNA Polymerases--
To
determine whether UP1 could affect the activity of other DNA
polymerases, we first tested the activity of calf thymus terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase (TdT), which like telomerase carries out
extension on a 3'-end. Unlabeled TS10 oligomer was incubated with TdT
in the presence of UP1 and radiolabeled TTP. Nucleotide addition was
monitored on a denaturing polyacrylamide gel. As shown in Fig.
6, UP1 strongly inhibited extension of
TS10 (lanes 2-4). UP1
Purified UP1 was reported to stimulate the activity of DNA polymerase
Notably, the addition of increasing amounts of GST-UP1 inhibited
rNTP-dependent synthesis in the HeLa nuclear extract (Fig. 7A, lanes 5-8) but did not affect
rNTP-independent synthesis (Fig. 7B, lanes
4-7). Inhibition was also seen with UP1, GST-A1, and commercial preparations of SSB and gp32 proteins (data not shown).
It is unlikely that our protein preparations contain a nonspecific
inhibitor of DNA polymerase
Inhibition of lagging strand synthesis could also be obtained with
UP1 We have shown previously that hnRNP A1 and its shortened
derivative UP1 can promote telomere elongation in mammalian cells (29).
The ability of A1 and UP1 to bind specifically to single-stranded telomeric repeats suggests that A1 may interact with telomeric extensions at the ends of mammalian chromosomes. In addition, recombinant UP1 but not recombinant A1 protein can recover telomerase activity from a cell extract (29). Because a proteolytic activity that
produces UP1 from A1 has been reported, this conversion may represent
an important step in the production of a factor that can interact with
telomerase. Alternatively, post-translational modifications occurring
at the C-terminal glycine-rich domain of A1 may modulate the
interaction with telomerase. These possibilities are currently being
investigated. In this study, we have addressed the effect of
recombinant A1 and UP1 on a variety of processes that are relevant to
telomere biogenesis. We find that the binding of A1 or UP1 protects a
single-stranded telomeric substrate against the activity of endo- and
exonucleases. Moreover, recombinant A1 and UP1 proteins prevent
telomerase extension and telomere replication by DNA polymerase
Interaction of A1/UP1 with Telomeric Repeats--
A UP1 derivative
lacking RRM2 binds to a telomeric oligonucleotide with an affinity and
specificity that are nearly equivalent to the complete UP1 protein. In
contrast, deleting part of RRM1 severely compromises binding. Thus,
while the RRM1 domain is essential for binding, the RRM2 domain appears
dispensable. This conclusion contrasts with a previous observation
indicating that both RRM1 and RRM2 are required to recover molecules
carrying RNA versions of telomeric repeats from a pool of random
sequence (39). Because these experiments were performed with
derivatives carrying the C-terminal glycine-rich domain, it is possible
that this domain affects the binding properties of the preceding RRM.
The deletion of RRM2 in A1 would position the glycine-rich domain next
to RRM1 and could alter its binding specificity. Because the
glycine-rich domain is absent from UP1, the deletion of RRM2 would
maintain the binding specificity of RRM1 in our assays. Thus, while
cooperativity between RRMs has been assumed to be a general property of
proteins with multiple RRMs, our results clearly show that RRM2 is not required for strong and specific binding to telomeric oligonucleotides. Because at least two TAGGGT repeats are required for the assembly of a
stable complex with A1 or UP1, our results suggest that a minimal
complex involves two A1 or two UP1 molecules, each protein using only
RRM1 to bind to one repeat unit. The recent x-ray structure of UP1
bound to 12 nucleotides of telomeric DNA indicates that UP1 binds as a
dimer to two strands of telomeric DNA, the RRM1 and RRM2 of one UP1
monomer binding to separate strands (40). Whereas each telomeric repeat
is contacted by only one RRM, RRM1 and the adjacent linker region make
more contacts with the bases of a telomeric repeat than RRM2 (40),
suggesting that the N-terminal half of UP1 plays a dominant role in the
affinity and/or specificity of binding. In contrast to the work of Ding
et al. (40), our results suggest that UP1 does not
simultaneously interact with different strands, since the incubation of
UP1 with two small telomeric oligonucleotides of different lengths does
not lead to the assembly of complexes containing both
oligonucleotides.2
A Role for A1/UP1 in the Maintenance of a Telomeric 3'
Overhang--
Maintaining the integrity of telomeric 3' overhangs is
paramount to telomere function. In mammals, this conclusion is
supported by recent studies performed with TRF2, a protein that binds
to double-stranded telomeric repeats. Overexpression of a dominant negative variant of TRF2 promotes the loss of 3' overhangs, an event
associated with chromosome fusions and apoptosis (41, 42). Consistent
with the properties expected for a protein that binds to 3' overhangs,
A1/UP1 displays specific binding to mammalian telomeric repeats and
prefers binding to telomeric sequences that are located at the 3'
terminus of an oligonucleotide. While specific binding is also a
property of the telomere single-stranded binding proteins of
Oxytricha and Euplotes, the yeast Cdc13p/Est4p
and Est1p proteins can interact, albeit with reduced affinity, to vertebrate and ciliate telomeric sequences (9, 19, 20, 43). The
Oxytricha and Euplotes proteins that bind to
single-stranded telomeric repeats protect telomeric DNA from nuclease
digestion (9, 44). Likewise, the interaction of A1/UP1 with vertebrate telomeric single-stranded DNA confers resistance against the activity of both endo- and exonucleases. Thus, the ability of A1/UP1 to protect
telomeric repeats from nuclease attack suggests that A1/UP1 may be an
important component of the protective cap associated with telomere
function. Although a recent study suggests that mammalian telomeric 3'
overhangs may be sequestered in duplex loops (45), the internal G-rich
single-stranded regions created by the formation of such structures may
also require protection from nucleases. Since A1/UP1 binding also
prevents access to telomerase and to TdT and inhibits
rNTP-dependent DNA synthesis, the binding of A1/UP1 may
help shield the ends of chromosomes from surveillance mechanisms that
detect DNA damage and double-stranded breaks.
In addition to functioning as protective caps, telomeres also
facilitate the complete replication of chromosomes. The enzyme telomerase plays a crucial role in this process by extending the 3' end
of the G-rich strand. Our results show that the binding of A1/UP1 to
single-stranded telomeric repeats prevents telomerase extension
in vitro. The Oxytricha telomere DNA-binding
proteins also attenuate telomerase extension in vitro (13).
The ability of A1/UP1 to promote telomere elongation despite causing
telomerase repression in vitro may indicate that A1/UP1
functions predominantly by favoring the assembly of a protective cap at
the ends of chromosomes. Thus, the repression of synthetic activities
would be an indication of the insulating property of A1/UP1. We have
shown previously that UP1 can interact with telomerase in
vitro (29). Given that A1/UP1 binding prevents extension by
telomerase, this interaction may reflect the ability of UP1 to recruit
telomerase as part of the assembly of a protective cap. In support of
this model, the stable interaction of yeast telomerase with
single-stranded telomeric repeats was taken to suggest that telomerase
might be a component of the telomere cap (46). While the binding of
A1/UP1 to single-stranded telomeric repeats prevents access to a
variety of replication enzymes, it is likely that telomerase must gain
access to a 3' overhang at some point during the replication cycle. We
propose that following conventional DNA replication and the activity of specific nucleases (Fig. 8), the newly
formed 3' overhang may remain free of A1/UP1 for a long enough period
of time to allow extension by telomerase and partial filling by DNA
polymerase
In conclusion, our study indicates that the binding of A1/UP1 to
single-stranded telomeric sequences provides protection against nucleolytic activities. A1/UP1 binding also renders the 3'-end of a
telomeric substrate inaccessible to a variety of polymerases. We can
now begin to envision how the protective and replication-modulating activities associated with the binding of A1/UP1 contribute to telomere
biogenesis in mammalian cells.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
of Oxytricha,
Stylonychia, and Euplotes. The 56-kDa protein
of Oxytricha exists as an heterodimer with the 41-kDa
protein
(9-11). These proteins protect single-stranded overhangs
from nuclease digestion and chemical modification (for a review, see
Ref. 12). Moreover, the binding of an
/
homodimer or an
/
heterodimer to telomeric DNA renders the end inaccessible to telomerase
(13). The Chlamydomonas protein Gbp1p binds to single-stranded G-rich telomeric DNA (14, 15), but its role in telomere
function in vivo remains to be shown. While telomerase RNA
makes direct contacts with single-stranded extensions during repeat
synthesis, protein components of Tetrahymena and
Euplotes telomerases can also interact with telomeric
single-stranded DNA substrates by protein-DNA interactions
(16-18).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
List of oligonucleotides
RRM1 was produced by deleting the
PvuII-NdeI fragment. pGEX-UP1
RRM2 was
produced by cutting pGEX-UP1 with BglII, filling with Klenow
before religation.
. Cells were grown 2-3 h at 37 °C until reaching an OD
between 0.5-2.0 at 600 nm. Induction with 100 µM
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside was performed for 4 h. Cells were washed with PBS and resuspended in 5 ml of PBS per
100 ml of culture, to which was added 10 µl of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (0.5 M) and 25 µl of DTT (1 M).
Cells were sonicated 30 s and left on ice for 30 s. This
cycle was repeated another three times. Triton X-100 was added to a
final concentration of 1%, and the mixture was incubated for 30 min at
room temperature on a nutator. Following centrifugation for 10 min at
10,000 rpm at 4 °C, 250 µl of glutathione-Sephadex (from a 50%
slurry in phosphate-buffered saline) was added to the supernatant. The
mixture was incubated 30 min at 4 °C, spun, and washed five times
with phosphate-buffered saline. GST-A1 was eluted with 500 µl of 20 mM glutathione-reduced, 200 mM Tris-HCl (pH
9.5) and 120 mM NaCl. GST-UP1 was eluted with 500 µl of
20 mM glutathione-reduced, 200 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, and 120 mM NaCl.
1, G-UP1
2, and gene 32 protein
(gp32)), 1 µl of [
-32P]dGTP (3000 Ci/mmol; Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech), and 5 µl of Telomix B (200 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 8.2), 20 mM dATP, 20 mM dTTP, 4 µM dGTP, 4 mM MgCl2, 8 mM EGTA, 8 mM DTT, 1 µl of RNAguard (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), 4 mM spermidine, 0.4 mM
spermine) to a final volume of 10 µl. Ten µl of HeLa S100 extract
was added, and the mixture was incubated for 1 h at 30 °C. The
reaction was stopped by the addition of 25 µl of RNase mix (20 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.1 mg/ml
RNase A) and incubation for 15 min at 37 °C. After treatment with
proteinase K (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.5% SDS, 0.3 mg/ml
proteinase K (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 25 µl per reaction),
extension products were purified by two phenol-chloroform extractions
and ethanol precipitation. Products were fractionated onto 8%
polyacrylamide, 7 M urea gel. To test whether the effect of
UP1 can be observed after telomerase loading onto the template, the
reaction was incubated in telomix B lacking dNTPs for 10 min at
30 °C without UP1. dNTPs were then added to start elongation by
telomerase with or without the addition of UP1, and the mixture was
incubated at 30 °C for an additional 1 h. In competition
experiments, TS8A or MS2 oligonucleotides were incubated with UP1 for
15 min at 25 °C. S100 extract was then added and incubated for
another 15 min at room temperature. Last, template oligonucleotides,
[
-32P]dGTP, and Telomix B were added to the mixture.
To test RNA-dependent elongation, RNase A (final
concentration: 0.25 mg/ml) was added to the S100 extract before
incubation with TS10.
-32P]dCTP
(3 µCi; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech); and 1 µl of HeLa nuclear extract for 1 h at 37 °C. The reaction was stopped by the
addition of 100 mM EDTA, and the products were purified by
phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Reaction
products were loaded onto a 20% polyacrylamide, 7 M urea
gel and revealed by autoradiography. When exogenous proteins were added
to the assay, they were incubated with TS10, dNTPs, and
[
-32P]dCTP for 30 min at 30 °C before the addition
of rNTPs and the nuclear extract. CB3 nuclear extract and HeLa
postcytoplasmic S100 extract were also used but without pre-dialysis of
the extracts. For competition experiments, the TS10/protein mixture was
co-incubated with the indicated amounts of Tel2, Ne4, or TS10 oligonucleotides.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Binding of UP1 to single-stranded telomeric
extensions. Gel shift assays were performed using single-stranded
or partially double-stranded duplex substrates. A, the
concentrations of G-UP1 used for each set of DNA substrate were 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 0 µM. Duplex formation was accomplished by
incubating an equimolar amount of unlabeled Tb with labeled b' (or
unlabeled aT with labeled a'). The partial duplex substrates migrate
slightly above the position of labeled Tb and aT. G-UP1 did not bind to
a' and b' alone (not shown). B, gel shift assays were
accomplished in the presence of an excess of cold oligonucleotides as
competitor. Labeled Tb or aT (0.1 µM) was used in
combination with cold Tb or aT (0, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, and 5.0 µM) and G-UP1 (0.3 µM). Open
bar, vertebrate telomeric repeats; solid
bar, nontelomeric DNA. Asterisks indicate which
oligonucleotide were 32P-labeled at the 5'-end. Complexes
were fractionated on 5% nondenaturating polyacrylamide gels. The
positions of the free and complexed oligonucleotides are shown.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Binding of UP1 to a long telomeric
extension. G-UP1 at concentrations of 0, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and
4.0 µM or UP1 at concentrations of 0, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 µM was incubated with TS10 (0.5 µM).
Complexes were fractionated on 5% nondenaturating polyacrylamide gels.
The positions of complexes and free TS10 are shown.
2) was almost as efficient as the complete UP1 protein at
binding to TS10 (Fig. 3C). The binding of UP1
2 remained
specific, since short oligonucleotides carrying mutated telomeric
repeats were bound less efficiently by UP1
2 (Fig. 3D). A
UP1 derivative lacking most of RRM1 (UP1
1) was considerably less
efficient than UP1 and UP1
2 at binding to TS10 (Fig. 3C).
These results indicate that the N-terminal portion of UP1 that contains
RRM1 is sufficient for stable and specific binding. Since stable UP1
binding requires a minimum of two TAGGGT units (29), each unit may be
bound by the RRM1 domain of one UP1 molecule.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Binding of UP1 and UP1 derivatives lacking
RRM1 or RRM2. A, structure of the recombinant GST-UP1,
GST-UP1
1, and GST-UP1
2 proteins. B, proteins were
purified on glutathione-Sepharose, fractionated on SDS-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis, and stained with Coomassie Blue. M,
molecular weight markers. C, TS10 (0.3 nM) was
incubated with the indicated concentrations (in µM) of
G-UP1, G-UP1
1, and G-UP1
2. Binding was measured by a gel shift
assay and is expressed as a percentage of the input labeled material
that formed complexes. D, binding of UP1
2 (1 µM) to different small oligomers (0.02 µM).
The identities of the oligonucleotides are shown above each
lane.
T of each repeat (Fig. 4A, lanes
1-3). Complete protection of TS10 was observed at higher
concentrations of GST-A1 (lanes 4-6). An assay
performed with GST-UP1 and a higher level of DNase I yielded similar
results (Fig. 4B). Likewise, a preparation of UP1 lacking the GST moiety offered a level of protection that was equivalent to the
level obtained with GST derivatives (Fig. 4C,
lanes 1-8). In contrast, incubation of GST-A1 or
UP1 with an oligonucleotide (C6) not bound by these proteins offered
little or no protection against DNase I (Fig. 4A,
lanes 8-14; C, lanes
10-18). Thus, low concentrations of A1 or UP1 changed the
cleavage profile obtained with DNase I, consistent with the notion that
TAGGGT is the unit bound by A1 and UP1. At high concentrations of A1 or
UP1, complete protection was observed. The binding of A1 and UP1 to
single-stranded telomeric sequences can therefore promote the assembly
of a complex that is highly resistant to endonuclease attack. The
derivative UP1
1, which binds weakly to TS10, did not offer
significant protection against DNase I (Fig. 4D,
lanes 8-10). Although UP1
2 binds to TS10
nearly as efficiently as UP1, it was less efficient at protecting TS10
against DNase I (Fig. 4D, lanes 5-7).
Thus, strong binding is not sufficient to confer full protection,
suggesting that portions of UP1 help prevent access of the endonuclease
to DNA.

View larger version (58K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
A1 and UP1 protect telomeric sequences from
nuclease attack in vitro. DNase I protection
assays were performed with 0.03, 0.08, 0.16, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.9 µM GST-A1 (A); 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 1.2 µM GST-UP1 (B); or 0.2, 0.45, 0.7, 0.9, 2.25, 3.4, 4.5, and 5.6 µM UP1 (C). 0.1 µM TS10 or C6 was used in each assay. The amount of DNase
I used in B was higher than in A and
C. D, DNase I protection assays were performed on
TS10 with 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 µM UP1, UP1
1, and UP1
2
(GST derivatives). E, UP1 protects telomeric sequences from
exonuclease I attack. The protection assay was performed with 0.1 µM of TS10 or C6 oligonucleotide at UP1 concentrations of
0.2 and 0.45 µM. F, UP1 binding protects
telomeric sequences from Bal31 digestion. The graph
represents the extent of protection from Bal31
(abscissa) relative to the percentage of input telomeric
oligonucleotide bound by UP1 (ordinate).

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
A1/UP1 inhibits extension by telomerase
in vitro. A, A1 and UP1 inhibit
telomerase activity. Telomerase extension assays were performed in a
HeLa S100 extract using TS10 as substrate (0.5 µM). UP1,
G-A1, and gp32 at concentrations of 1.25, 2.5, and 8 µM
were added to TS10 before incubation in the S100 mixture. B,
gel shift assay with UP1 and gp32. UP1 and gp32 at concentrations of
0.45, 0.9, and 1.8 µM were incubated with TS10 (0.5 µM). Complexes were fractionated on 5% nondenaturating
polyacrylamide gels. The position of complexes and free TS10 is shown.
C, UP1 inhibits the extension of shorter substrates. TS or
TS1 (0.5 µM) was added to UP1 (8 µM) before
incubation in the S100 mixture. The length of the extension products is
indicated on the left. The sequence at the 3'-end of each
oligonucleotide is shown below in uppercase, and
the nucleotides added by telomerase are in lowercase.
D, an excess of oligonucleotide bound by UP1 can rescue
telomere extension on TS10. TS8A or the control oligonucleotide MS2 (1 or 2 µM) were incubated with UP1 (3 µM)
before addition to a mixture containing the S100 extract, TS10 (0.5 µM) and dNTPs. E, a UP1 derivative lacking the
second RRM (G-UP1
2) does not prevent telomerase extension. UP1 and
G-UP1
2 proteins were used at concentrations of 2.25 and 7 µM.
2 binds to TS10 as efficiently as the
complete UP1 protein, it did not inhibit telomerase extension of TS10
(Fig. 5E). UP1
1, which does not bind efficiently to TS10, also did not affect telomerase extension (data not shown).
2 also efficiently
repressed TdT activity (lanes 5-7), while
UP1
1 had little effect (lanes 8-10). The
inhibitory effect of UP1 was specific, since an oligonucleotide lacking
an A1 binding site (TS oligo) was efficiently extended by TdT in the
presence of a high concentration of UP1 (data not shown). Notably, the addition of gp32 also prevented extension of TS10 by TdT
(lanes 11-14). Thus, although UP1
2 and gp32
were poor inhibitors of telomerase, both could prevent TdT access to
the substrate. These results suggest that the mechanism by which UP1
inhibits telomerase is different from the mechanism that inhibits
TdT.

View larger version (65K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
UP1 represses TdT activity. UP1,
GST-UP1
2, GST-UP1
1, and gp32 were prebound to TS10 (20 nM) followed by the addition of TdT. The concentrations of
proteins used are indicated in µM above each
lane.
when poly(dA/dT) or a template DNA partially degraded with E. coli exonuclease III is used as substrate (36, 37). To determine
whether UP1 displays a similar activity on a telomeric substrate, we
used an in vitro assay to monitor the synthesis of the
mammalian telomere lagging strand. Using TS10 as DNA template, DNA
polymerase
/primase was shown to catalyze synthesis of the complementary strand, a process that required both dNTPs and rNTPs (38). In agreement with this report, we observed that incubation of
unlabeled TS10 in a HeLa nuclear extract leads to the synthesis of
products shorter than 60 nucleotides (Fig.
7A, lane
3). Synthesis required rNTPs and dNTPs, but omission of GTP
and/or rGTP did not affect the appearance of labeled products
(lane 2, and data not shown). The rNTP dependence of the
assay is indicative of DNA polymerase
/primase activity. When the
complementary oligonucleotide C5 was preincubated with TS10, lagging
strand synthesis occurred in the absence of rNTPs, suggesting DNA
polymerase
and/or
activity (Fig. 7B, lane
2). To confirm that the rNTP-dependent activity
was mediated by DNA polymerase
/primase, we tested the inhibitory
effect of a monoclonal antibody specific for DNA polymerase
/primase
(38). The SJK 132-20 antibody completely inhibited rNTP-dependent DNA synthesis but did not affect
rNTP-independent DNA synthesis (data not shown).

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
UP1 inhibits rNTP-dependent
lagging strand synthesis. A, the lagging strand
synthesis assay was performed with TS10 (0.5 µM) in the
absence of dGTPs and rGTP. rNTPs are UTP, rCTP, and rATP. The band
identified as X (also seen in B and C)
is of unknown origin but was always seen when TS10 was incubated in the
absence of rNTPs. B, UP1 does not inhibit rNTP-independent
lagging strand synthesis. In addition to TS10 (0.5 µM),
the mixture contained an oligonucleotide complementary to TS10 (C5, 1 µM) and dNTPs (dCTP, dATP, and dTTP). In this experiment,
the highest amount of GST-UP1 used completely inhibited
rNTP-dependent lagging strand synthesis (data not shown).
C, rescue of rNTP-dependent lagging strand
synthesis by oligonucleotides. In the assay shown in lanes
1-7, the amount of TS10 was increased while keeping the
concentration of UP1 constant. In the assay shown in lanes
8-14, oligonucleotides Tel2 and Ne4 were co-incubated with
TS10 in the HeLa extract without exogenous UP1. Tel2, but not Ne4, is
bound by UP1 in gel shift assays (not shown). The assay depicted in
lanes 15-20 monitors the effect of co-incubating
oligonucleotide Tel2 in a HeLa nuclear extract (HeLa), a
HeLa S100 extract (S100), and a nuclear extract prepared
from mouse erythroleukemic CB3 cells that is severely deficient in
hnRNP A1 protein (CB3; Ref. 29). Endogenous levels of A1 are
high in the HeLa nuclear extract and low in the S100 extract.
/primase activity, since increasing the
amounts of TS10 in mixtures containing UP1 stimulated lagging strand
synthesis (Fig. 7C, lanes 5-7).
Consistent with this observation, the addition of a shorter telomeric
oligonucleotide (Tel2) to a HeLa mixture containing TS10 but not
recombinant UP1 also stimulated rNTP-dependent lagging
strand synthesis (Fig. 7C, compare lane 12 with lane 13). In contrast, the
addition of a control oligonucleotide lacking telomeric sequences did
not stimulate lagging strand synthesis (lane 14).
These results suggest that Tel2 can specifically suppress the
inhibition caused by nuclear factor that binds to TS10. Given that
recombinant A1 protein also inhibits lagging strand synthesis, endogenous A1 proteins are probably repressing lagging strand activity
in the HeLa extract. This conclusion is supported by the following
experiment in which rNTP-dependent activity was monitored
in a HeLa nuclear extract, a HeLa postnuclear S100 extract, which
contains residual levels of hnRNP A1, and a nuclear extract prepared
from a mouse cell line (CB3), which is severely deficient in hnRNP A1
(29, 32, 33). Compared with the strong stimulation obtained when Tel2
is added to the HeLa nuclear extract (Fig. 7C, compare
lane 15 with lane 18), Tel2
only had a modest stimulatory effect when added to the HeLa S100
(compare lane 17 with lane 20) and no effect when added to the CB3 extract (compare
lane 16 with lane 19).
These results indicate that endogenous A1 proteins repress lagging
strand synthesis in the HeLa nuclear extract, and that sequestration of
A1 by Tel2 considerably improves rNTP-dependent synthesis
on TS10.
2 but not with UP1
1 (data not shown). Thus, the mechanism by
which UP1 inhibits lagging strand synthesis and TdT activity may be
similar but distinct from the mechanism by which UP1 prevents telomerase extension.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/primase in vitro.
/primase (Fig. 8). The subsequent binding of A1/UP1 to
newly made telomeric tails would help maintain long 3' overhangs
throughout the rest of the cell cycle.

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Model for the role of A1/UP1 in telomere
biogenesis. At the top, several A1/UP1 molecules are
shown to interact with a single-stranded telomeric extension. A1/UP1
binding would prevent access of enzymes to the 3' overhang, thereby
protecting the structure and preventing its recognition as DNA damage.
Following telomere replication by conventional DNA polymerases, a
putative exonuclease (47) or endonuclease/helicase complex would
produce a 3' overhang from the newly synthesized DNA strand
(black bar). This overhang may serve as substrate
for telomerase and lagging strand synthesis until the nascent extension
becomes bound by A1/UP1.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We thank Raymund Wellinger for many helpful comments on the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Recipient of a studentship from the Fonds pour la Formation de
Chercheurs et l'Aide à la Recherche.
§ Present address: Dept. of Pediatrics, Division of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, One Children's Place, Box 8116, St. Louis, MO 63110.
¶ Supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute of Canada with funds from the Canadian Cancer Society. A Research Scholar from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec. To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 819-564-5295; Fax: 819-564-5392; E-mail: b.chabot@courrier.usherb.ca.
2 F. Dallaire and B. Chabot, unpublished results.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: hnRNP, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein; DTT, dithiothreitol; TdT, terminal nucleotidyltransferase; RRM, RNA recognition motif; GST, glutathione S-transferase; gp32, gene 32 protein; G-UP1, GST-UP1; G-A1, GST-A1.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Blackburn, E. H., and Greider, C. W. (eds) (1995) Telomeres , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 2. |
Zakian, V. A.
(1995)
Science
270,
1601-1607 |
| 3. | Greider, C. W. (1996) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 337-365[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Makarov, V. L., Hirose, Y., and Langmore, J. P. (1997) Cell 88, 657-666[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | McElligott, R., and Wellinger, R. J. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 3705-3714[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Wright, W. E.,
Tesmer, V. M.,
Huffman, K. E.,
Levene, S. D.,
and Shay, J. W.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2801-2809 |
| 7. | Greider, C. W., and Blackburn, E. H. (1989) Nature 337, 331-337[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Nugent, C. I.,
and Lundblad, V.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1073-1085 |
| 9. | Gottschling, D. E., and Zakian, V. A. (1986) Cell 47, 195-205[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Price, C. M.,
and Cech, T. R.
(1987)
Genes Dev.
1,
783-793 |
| 11. | Gray, J. T., Celander, D. W., Price, C. M., and Cech, T. R. (1991) Cell 67, 807-814[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Fang, G., and Cech, T. R. (1995) in Telomeres (Blackburn, E. H. , and Greider, C. W., eds) , pp. 69-105, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 13. |
Froelich-Ammon, S. J.,
Dickinson, B. A.,
Bevilacqua, J. M.,
Schultz, S. C.,
and Cech, T. R.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1504-1514 |
| 14. | Petracek, M. E., Konkel, L. M., Kable, M. L., and Berman, J. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 3648-3658[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Johnston, S. D.,
Lew, J. E.,
and Berman, J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
923-933 |
| 16. | Collins, K., and Greider, C. W. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 5422-5432[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Hammond, P. W., Lively, T. N., and Cech, T. R. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 296-308[Abstract] |
| 18. |
Gandhi, L.,
and Collins, K.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
721-733 |
| 19. |
Nugent, C. I.,
Hughes, T. R.,
Lue, N. F.,
and Lundblad, V.
(1996)
Science
274,
249-252 |
| 20. |
Virta-Pearlman, V.,
Morris, D. K.,
and Lundblad, V.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
3094-3104 |
| 21. |
Cohn, M.,
and Blackburn, E. H.
(1995)
Science
269,
396-400 |
| 22. |
Steiner, B. R.,
Hidaka, K.,
and Futcher, B.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
2817-2821 |
| 23. |
Gualberto, A.,
Lowry, J.,
Santoro, I. M.,
and Walsh, K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
4509-4517 |
| 24. |
Cardenas, M. E.,
Bianchi, A.,
and de Lange, T.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
883-894 |
| 25. |
McKay, S. J.,
and Cooke, H.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
6461-6464 |
| 26. |
Ishikawa, F.,
Matunis, M. J.,
Dreyfuss, G.,
and Cech, T. R.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
4301-4310 |
| 27. |
Abdul-Manan, N.,
and Williams, K. R.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
4063-4070 |
| 28. |
Sarig, G.,
Weisman-Shomer, P.,
Erlitzki, R.,
and Fry, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4474-4482 |
| 29. | LaBranche, H., Dupuis, S., Ben-David, Y., Bani, M. R., Wellinger, R. J., and Chabot, B. (1998) Nat. Genet. 19, 199-202[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Blanchette, M., and Chabot, B. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1939-1952[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Mayeda, A., Munroe, S. H., Caceres, J. F., and Krainer, A. R. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 5483-5495[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Yang, X.,
Bani, M. R.,
Lu, S. J.,
Rowan, S.,
Ben-David, Y.,
and Chabot, B.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
6924-6928 |
| 33. |
Ben-David, Y.,
Bani, M. R.,
Chabot, B.,
De Koven, A.,
and Bernstein, A.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
4449-4455 |
| 34. |
Dignam, J. D.,
Lebovitz, R. M.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(1983)
Nucleic Acids Res.
11,
1475-1489 |
| 35. |
Kim, N. W.,
Piatyszek, M. A.,
Prowse, K. R.,
Harley, C. B.,
West, M. D.,
Ho, P. L.,
Coviello, G. M.,
Wright, W. E.,
Weinrich, S. L.,
and Shay, J. W.
(1994)
Science
266,
2011-2015 |
| 36. |
Herrick, G.,
Delius, H.,
and Alberts, B.
(1976)
J. Biol. Chem.
251,
2142-2146 |
| 37. | Riva, S., Morandi, C., Tsoulfas, P., Pandolfo, M., Biamonti, G., Merrill, B., Williams, K. R., Multhaup, G., Beyreuther, K., Werr, H., Henrich, B., and Schäfer, K. P. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 2267-2273[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. |
Reveal, P. M.,
Henkels, K. M.,
and Turchi, J. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11678-11681 |
| 39. | Burd, C. G., and Dreyfuss, G. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 1197-1204[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Ding, J.,
Hayashi, M. K.,
Zhang, Y.,
Manche, L.,
Krainer, A. R.,
and Xu, R. M.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
1102-1115 |
| 41. | van Steensel, B., Smogorzewska, A., and de Lange, T. (1998) Cell 92, 401-413[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. |
Karlseder, J.,
Broccoli, D.,
Dai, Y.,
Hardy, S.,
and de Lange, T.
(1999)
Science
283,
1321-1325 |
| 43. | Price, C. M., Skopp, R., Krueger, J., and Williams, D. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 10835-10843[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. |
Price, C. M.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
3421-3431 |
| 45. | Griffith, J. D., Comeau, L., Rosenfield, S., Stansel, R. M., Bianchi, A., Moss, H., and de Lange, T. (1999) Cell 97, 503-514[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 46. |
Prescott, J.,
and Blackburn, E. H.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2790-2800 |
| 47. | Wellinger, R. J., Ethier, K., Labrecque, P., and Zakian, V. A. (1996) Cell 85, 423-433[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Q.-S. Zhang, L. Manche, R.-M. Xu, and A. R. Krainer hnRNP A1 associates with telomere ends and stimulates telomerase activity RNA, June 1, 2006; 12(6): 1116 - 1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zielinski, K. Kilk, T. Peritz, T. Kannanayakal, K. Y. Miyashiro, E. Eiriksdottir, J. Jochems, U. Langel, and J. Eberwine In vivo identification of ribonucleoprotein-RNA interactions PNAS, January 31, 2006; 103(5): 1557 - 1562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |