 |
INTRODUCTION |
The monomeric
and dimeric 
subunits of the
heterotrimeric (

) G
proteins1 reversibly bind to
one another at the cytoplasmic face of the plasma membrane where they
interact with heptahelical receptors (1, 2). Upon receptor activation,
the heterotrimer dissociates into a GTP-bound
subunit and a 
subunit, both of which can regulate effector proteins. The correct
targeting of G proteins to the plasma membrane, and likely
micro-domains of the plasma membrane, is required for the proper
functioning of this signaling system (3). For example,
subunits
defective in membrane binding are unable to couple receptor stimulation
to effector activation (4-6). Although the importance of membrane
localization for proper signaling has been established, the basic
signals that direct the different
subunits to the plasma membrane
and retain them there are not well defined.
A recent model proposes that G protein
subunits, and other
peripheral membrane proteins, utilize two signals to bind tightly and
stably to plasma membranes (7-10). These two signals are thought to
act synergistically to promote a stable interaction between the
membrane and G protein
subunit. According to the model, at least
one of these signals must be involved in specifically targeting the
subunit to the plasma membrane rather than other intracellular
membranes. The signals involved in targeting and binding to the
membrane could be covalent lipid modifications, polybasic stretches of
amino acids, or protein-protein interactions with other
membrane-binding proteins (7-10).
Lipid modifications clearly function as membrane binding signals
for G protein
subunits (11, 12).
i,
o, and
z contain two lipid modifications,
myristoylation and palmitoylation, at their N terminus that are
involved in membrane binding. Myristate, a 14-carbon fatty acid, is
attached co-translationally via a stable amide bond to the N-terminal
glycine residue after removal of the initiating methionine, while
palmitate, a 16-carbon fatty acid, is attached post-translationally via
a reversible thioester bond to a cysteine residue immediately
C-terminal to the myristoylated glycine. Mutation of the N-terminal
glycine abolishes myristoylation and inhibits palmitoylation, leading
to a shift in localization from membrane to cytosol (13-17). Mutation
of the palmitoylated cysteine results in a myristoylated but
non-palmitoylated subunit that partially shifts to the cytosol and
binds to intracellular membranes as well as the plasma membrane (4, 13,
18-21). These results support a two-signal model of membrane binding
in which myristoylation and palmitoylation cooperate in targeting
subunits of the
i family to the plasma membrane.
Furthermore, myristoylation is required for subsequent palmitoylation.
Many G protein
subunits (e.g.
s,
q,
12,
13), however, are
not myristoylated, but are palmitoylated at N-terminal cysteines. The
location of the cysteines and the surrounding sequences show little or
no similarity among the different non-myristoylated
subunits.
Although mutation of the palmitoylated cysteines inhibits membrane
binding (5, 6), additional signals that contribute to membrane
attachment and allow palmitoylation have not been identified for the
non-myristoylated
subunits. 
(4, 12, 22), through its
protein-protein interaction with
, or unknown hydrophobic
modifications of
(23) have been proposed, although not yet tested,
to function as membrane binding signals for the non-myristoylated
subunits. The importance of 
subunits in helping to anchor
subunits to cellular (plasma) membranes is controversial. An early
study showed that purified 
was required to attach purified
i and
o to phospholipid vesicles in
vitro (24), and co-expression of 
enhances membrane
association of G2A myristoylation site mutants of
i or
z (4, 21). On the other hand, short N-terminal sequences
of 10 amino acids or less from Gpa1 (a G protein
subunit from
Saccharomyces cerevisiae) (25),
i2,
2 or Src-like tyrosine
kinases (26, 27) are sufficient to target heterologous proteins to
plasma membranes in the absence of interactions with 
. Another
recent report suggested that dissociation of
s from

combined with depalmitoylation of
s was not
sufficient to release
s from isolated membranes,
implying that neither palmitoylation nor 
interactions were
important for stable membrane association (28).
The goal of the studies presented here was to test the importance of

binding for two different non-myristoylated G protein
subunits. A series of mutations designed to disrupt 
binding were
introduced into
s and
q, and the
localization of these subunits was determined by cell fractionation and
immunofluorescence microscopy after transient transfection. In
addition, palmitoylation of mutant
s and
q subunits was assayed by metabolic labeling. To test
the possibility that myristoylation could substitute for 
binding, an additional series of
q mutants containing an
N-terminal site for myristoylation were created and assayed. The
results of these experiments provide the first evidence that
interactions with 
are crucial for the proper membrane
localization and palmitoylation of
s and
q.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
HEK293 cells were obtained from the American Type
Culture Collection (CRL-1573). [2-3H]Inositol and
[2-3H]adenine were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
[9,10-3H]Palmitic acid and
[9,10-3H]myristic acid were from NEN Life Science
Products. Dowex resin was from Bio-Rad. Tissue culture reagents were
from Life Technologies, Inc. Other reagents were from Fisher Scientific
and Sigma.
Plasmid Construction--
The HA epitope (DVPDYA)-tagged
HA-
s-pcDNAI and HA-
q-pcDNAI
were constructed and analyzed previously and described in detail (5,
29). The coding region was transferred from these pcDNAI plasmids
to pcDNA3 plasmids by restriction and ligation and the subsequent
constructs are hereafter referred to as
s or
q. The Stratagene QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis
kit was used to replace residues thought to contact 
with
alanines. The primers used for mutagenesis varied from 42 to 53 bases
in length and the sense and antisense primers had 3' overhangs of 3 to
7 bases.
qAG was created in the same manner using sense
(5'-ctcggatccatcgatctggagtccatcatgggatgctgcctg-3') and antisense
(5'-gcagcatcccatgatggactccagatcgatggatccgagctc-3') oligonucleotides,
which replaced Ala with Gly after the second N-terminal methionine and
prevented initiation from the first methionine by replacing the first
putative methionine codon six residues upstream of the second with an
isoleucine codon. To create all the
qAG 
binding
mutants, the 889-base pair EcoNI and EcoRI fragment from each of the 
binding mutants of
q was ligated into
qAG plasmid cut with
EcoNI and EcoRI. The resulting cDNAs were
verified by DNA sequencing (Kimmel Cancer Center Nucleic Acids
Facility) to contain no mutations other than those desired. The R201C
and R183C mutants were created by excising
Eco47III-XhoI and
Eco47III-NotI fragments from
HA-
s-R201C-pcDNAI and
HA-
q-R183C-pcDNAI (5), respectively, and ligating
them into appropriately digested
s- or
q-pcDNA3 plasmids.
Cell Culture and Transfection--
HEK293 cells were propagated
in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium containing 10% fetal bovine
serum and Gentamicin. Unless otherwise noted, cells were plated in
six-well plates at 7.0 × 105 cells/well and grown for
24 h prior to transfection. 1 µg of each expression plasmid was
transfected into the cells using LipofectAMINE from Life Technologies,
Inc. according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Cell Fractionation--
HEK293 cells were plated at 2 × 106 cells in 6-cm plates, grown for 24 h, and
transfected with 3 µg of expression plasmid. 24 h after
transfection, the cells were transferred to 10-cm plates and grown for
48 h. Cells were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline and
then dislodged from the plate by washing and pelleted at low speed. The
cell pellet was suspended in 0.5 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml aprotinin), and cells were lysed by 10 passages through a 27-gauge needle. Lysed cells were centrifuged at 400 × g for 5 min to remove nuclei and intact cells. The supernatant was centrifuged
at 150,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C in a TL-100
tabletop ultracentrifuge (Beckman Instruments). The supernatant
(soluble fraction) was removed and the pellet (particulate fraction)
was suspended in an equal volume of lysis buffer. Fractions were frozen
at
20 °C and later analyzed by Western blotting. Samples were
fractionated by 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF-Plus (Micron
Separations Inc.) using a Trans-Blot SD semi-dry electrophoretic
transfer cell (Bio-Rad), and probed with 12CA5 monoclonal antibody.
Bands were visualized by chemiluminescence and quantitated using a
Kodak DC40 imaging system.
Immunofluorescence Localization--
24 h after transfection in
six-well plates, HEK293 cells were replated on glass coverslips and
grown for 48 h. Cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 15 min and permeabilized by
incubation in blocking buffer (2.5% nonfat milk and 1% Triton X-100
in PBS) for 30 min. Cells were then incubated with 12CA5 mouse
monoclonal antibody (3 µg/ml) in blocking buffer for 1 h. The
cells were washed with blocking buffer and incubated in a 1:100
dilution of donkey anti-mouse Texas Red conjugate (Jackson
Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) for 30 min. The coverslips
were washed with 1% Triton X-100 in PBS, rinsed in distilled water,
and mounted on glass slides with 10 µl of Prolong Antifade reagent
(Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Microscopy was performed with an
Olympus BX60 microscope equipped with a 60×/NA1.4 objective and a
Texas Red filter cube. Images were recorded with a Sony DKC-5000
digital camera and transferred to Adobe Photoshop for digital processing.
cAMP and Inositol Phosphate Assays--
24 h after transfection
in six-well plates, each well was reseeded into six wells of a 24-well
plate with [2-3H]adenine or [2-3H]inositol
(2 µCi/ml) and grown for 24 h. The cells were then assayed for
their ability to induce production of cAMP or IP as described
previously (5). The 
binding competition assay was performed in
the same manner as the cAMP assay except that cells were
stimulated with 10 µM quinpirole rather than UK-14304, as
described (30).
Metabolic Labeling and Immunoprecipitation--
Radiolabeling of
s and
q with fatty acids was performed
essentially as described (31). 48 h after transfection, HEK293 cells in a 6-cm dish were incubated with 1 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 5 mM
sodium pyruvate, and [9,10-3H]palmitic acid (1 mCi/ml) or
[9,10-3H]myristate (0.25 mCi/ml) for 2 h. Cells were
washed once with PBS and lysed in 1 ml of radioimmune precipitation
buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5%
sodium deoxycholate, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml aprotinin). Cell extracts were
tumbled for 1 h at 4 °C, and nuclei and insoluble material were
removed by microcentrifugation at 16,000 × g for 3 min. Samples containing HA-tagged
q or its mutants were
adjusted to 0.1% SDS. 1 µg of 12CA5 antibody was added, and the
samples were tumbled for 2 h at 4 °C. Next, 20 µl of Protein
A/G Plus agarose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) was added,
and the sample was tumbled overnight at 4 °C. The sample was
centrifuged for 30 s at 200 × g to pellet the
beads. The supernatant was discarded, and the beads were washed three
times with 1 ml of radioimmune precipitation buffer. SDS-PAGE sample
buffer containing 10 mM dithiothreitol was added to the washed beads, and the samples were heated at 65 °C for 1 min. An
aliquot was analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE. Gels were incubated for 20 min
in an aqueous solution of 50% methanol and 10% acetic acid, followed
by 10% ethanol and 10% acetic acid for 20 min, and, finally, Amplify
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 20 min. Gels were dried and subjected
to fluorography at
80 °C using Hyperfilm MP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Trypsin Protection Assay--
HEK293 cells were transiently
transfected with expression constructs, and soluble and particulate
fractions were isolated as already described. The particulate
(membrane) fractions were centrifuged at 20,000 rpm for 35 min at
4 °C in a TL-100 tabletop ultracentrifuge (Beckman Instruments). The
pellet was resuspended in 100 µl of solubilization buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol, 1%
C12E10 (polyoxyethylene 10-lauryl ether), 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and incubated on ice for
30 min followed by centrifugation at 150,000 × g for
20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was divided into separate tubes and
incubated for 30 min at 30 °C with 10 µM GDP or
AlF4
mix (30 mM NaF, 150 µM AlCl3, 10 µM GDP) (32).
Samples were then treated with a 1:500 dilution of trypsin mix (100 µM GDP, 0.6 mg/ml trypsin, 1%
C12E10) and further incubated for 30 min at
30 °C. Reactions were terminated by adding soybean trypsin inhibitor
to a final concentration of 3 mg/ml. Trypsin-resistant fragments of
q were visualized by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis using 12CA5 antibody as described previously.
 |
RESULTS |
Mutation of a Conserved 
Contact Region in
s
and
q--
Examination of the extreme N terminus of
several G protein
subunits reveals two conserved regions with a
(I/L)(E/D)(K/R) triplet within the second region (Fig.
1). X-ray crystallography of the


complex for Gt and Gi1 has shown that
this second region contains residues that directly contact 
(33,
34). All of the conserved residues in this region, with the exception
of (K/R), were shown to contact 
. In order to assess the
importance of 
binding for proper localization and
palmitoylation, we substituted alanine residues for these potentially
important amino acids in
s and
q.3 Although
(K/R) does not seem to contact 
, this highly conserved residue
was also mutated in some constructs to examine its role in localization
and palmitoylation of
s and
q.
Interestingly, mutation of the lysine at this position in
o caused a reduction in 
binding, as measured by
pertussis toxin-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation (35). Constructs with
progressively greater mutations were made beginning within the
conserved triplet and working outward as shown in Fig. 1.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Alignment of subunit N termini showing mutations introduced into a
putative  binding region.
The N termini of several subunits have been aligned and conserved
residues are shaded, showing two conserved regions. Amino
acids modified by myristoylation or palmitoylation are in
drop shadow font. Residues that were
found to directly contact  in crystal structures of
t and i heterotrimers have
been marked by asterisks. The descriptive suffixes for each
of the s and q mutants are
above the aligned sequences and the amino acids which were
substituted with alanines in each mutant are shown by an
"A" over each original residue shown in bold.
The sequence encoded by the cDNA for the modified q
subunit ( qAG) is shown at the bottom with the starting
methionine and new myristoylated glycine residue.
|
|
Although a second surface of the
subunit forms an even larger area
of interaction with 
(33, 34), our studies concentrated on the
N-terminal region for two important reasons. First, previous work by
others showed that disruption of this region by deletion (36, 37),
proteolysis (38), or antibody binding (39, 40) is sufficient to prevent
from interacting with 
. Second, mutations in the N-terminal
region are unlikely to disrupt the overall three-dimensional structure
of the
subunit. Crystal structures indicate that this region does
not interact with other regions of
, whereas the second 
contact surface is located within the switch I and II region where
activation-dependent rearrangements occur (33, 34). In
addition,
s lacking the N terminus is still capable of
normal GTP binding and hydrolysis and normal effector activation in vitro (41), but the second 
contact region overlaps
with an effector interacting surface (42-44). To facilitate
immunodetection and immunoprecipitation of the
subunits, we
utilized well characterized HA-tagged variants of
s and
q.
Mutation of the 
Contact Region Disrupts Membrane
Attachment--
To determine whether this putative 
binding
region of
s and
q is critical for
membrane attachment, we transiently transfected the various
subunit
constructs into HEK293 cells and determined their subcellular
distributions. The transfected cells were lysed in hypotonic buffer,
soluble (S) and particulate (P) fractions were separated by
centrifugation and the distribution of
subunits was assessed by
Western blot analysis. In these experiments the distribution of
wild-type HA-tagged
s is reproducibly 60:40 P:S. As the
putative 
binding region of
s is subjected to
increasing numbers of mutations, the membrane-bound fraction
progressively decreases until construct
sIEK+ partitions
20:80 P:S (Fig. 2). Inclusion of the
arginine 201 to cysteine (RC) (45) activating mutation further
increases the soluble fraction to give a 10:90 P:S ratio for
sRC IEK+. The same mutations were also assayed in the
q subunit which showed the same trend toward greater
solubility.
q without mutations was almost entirely
membrane associated (85:15 P:S) while
qIER+ was found
almost exclusively in the soluble fraction (15:85 P:S) (Fig. 2). The
subcellular distribution of these two subunits varied only slightly
between experiments. In agreement with the
s data, the
other
q mutants were always found in the soluble
fractions to a greater degree than was wild type
q;
however, they displayed greater variability between experiments (data
not shown).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Localization of
 binding region mutants of
s and
q by cell fractionation. Each of
the putative  binding mutants of s and
q was transiently expressed in HEK293 cells and the
subunits were separated into soluble and particulate fractions as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The quantitated protein
in each fraction is represented as a percentage of total detected
soluble plus particulate s or q protein
for each subunit. The variability in distribution of s
subunits between experiments was not significantly more than the
variability within a single experiment. The results shown are the
means ± S.D. for n = 3-9 experiments, except for
sRC and sRC IEK+ which represent 1 and 2 experiments, respectively.
|
|
Immunofluorescence Microscopy of
s and
q 
Contact Region Mutants--
To examine further
the effect of 
binding region mutations on
s and
q localization, immunofluorescence microscopy was utilized to examine the subcellular distribution of the HA
epitope-tagged
s and
q subunits in
transiently transfected HEK293 cells. Wild-type
s
displayed pronounced plasma membrane staining, as evidenced by the
sharp signal at the cell periphery, with some diffuse staining of the
cytoplasm (Fig. 3A). Mutations
in the 
binding region caused a decrease in plasma membrane
staining and a concomitant increase in cytoplasmic staining (Fig. 3,
B-F). Complete loss of plasma membrane staining was only
observed for
sIEK+. All other mutant subunits displayed
an intermediate level of plasma membrane and cytoplasmic staining in
which the level of cytoplasmic staining increased as the number of
mutations increased. The
q subunit was much more
sensitive to loss of plasma membrane staining in visualized cells.
Although wild-type
q and
qR localized to the plasma membrane (Fig. 3, G and H), all other
subunits displayed no detectable plasma membrane staining (Fig. 3,
I-L). The
q subunits deficient in membrane
staining appeared to be distributed diffusely throughout the cytoplasm
and within the nucleus. A similar pattern of cytoplasmic and nuclear
staining was noted previously for fatty acylation-deficient mutants of
z (4).

View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Subcellular localization of
 binding region mutants of
s and
q by immunofluorescence. HEK293
cells were transiently transfected with HA epitope-tagged
s constructs: s (A) and 
binding mutants sK (B), sIE
(C), sIE+ (D), sIEK
(E), and sIEK+ (F), and
q constructs: q (G) and 
binding mutants qR (H), qIE
(I), qIE+ (J), qIER
(K), and qIER+ (L). The cells were
fixed and visualized as described under "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|
Mutation of the 
Contact Region Disrupts
s and
q Signaling--
If mutation of the putative 
binding region in
s and
q subunits
inhibits 
binding, then functional heterotrimer capable of being
activated by receptor will not be formed. Additionally, if
subunits
cannot associate with the plasma membrane, they will not be activated
by receptor. When
s or
q subunits are cotransfected in HEK293 cells with
2-AR, both G proteins
can be activated by
2-AR agonists (5, 46). This system
provides a useful assay to test the various subunits for their ability to couple receptor to downstream effector. Exposure of cells expressing wild-type
s and
2-AR to the
2-AR agonist UK-14304 caused a 7-fold increase in cAMP
accumulation (Fig. 4A).
Co-expression of
2-AR and pcDNA3 displayed a small
increase in cAMP accumulation upon agonist stimulation, but it was not
considered significant because these levels are barely above
background. The K28A substitution (
sK) had almost no
effect on
s signaling in this assay, but other mutations
showed pronounced inhibitory effects.
sIE was capable of
less than a 3-fold induction in cAMP, and
sIE+ and
sIEK stimulated cAMP less than 2-fold over basal levels.
However, complete disruption of signaling required that all six
residues be substituted with alanines. To ensure that substitution of
this many residues does not disrupt the structure of
s
to such an extent that it is incapable of stimulating adenylyl cyclase,
we incorporated the R201C activating mutation to create
sRC IEK+. This mutation in
s resulted in
constitutively elevated receptor-independent cAMP synthesis (45) (Fig.
4A, inset). The ability of the putative 
binding-deficient subunit,
sRC IEK+, to stimulate
adenylyl cyclase was reduced by about 50% compared with
sRC, despite the fact that it is not localized at the
plasma membrane where adenylyl cyclase resides (Fig. 4A,
inset). This demonstrates that the fully mutated
sIEK+ is still capable of functionally coupling to
effector. A cytoplasmic, non-palmitoylated
sRC C3S
mutant shows a similar reduction in its ability to constitutively
increase cAMP in transfected cells (5).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Ability of G protein
 binding region mutants to stimulate
effectors. HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with 500 ng
of 2-AR-pCMV4 plus 500 ng of pcDNA3 or pcDNA3
containing cDNA encoding each of the subunits. A,
cells expressing s subunits were treated with 10 µM UK-14304 and 1 mM isobutylmethylxanthine
(shaded bars) or isobutylmethylxanthine alone
(open bars). The inset shows the
results of constitutively active subunits of s
containing the R201C mutation. The y axis scale of the
inset corresponds to the scale of the larger graph. The
level of cAMP was determined as described under "Experimental
Procedures." B, cells expressing q subunits
were treated with 10 µM UK-14304 (shaded
bars) or carrier (open bars). The
level of inositol phosphate was determined as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Background counts were subtracted from
the raw counts, and the level of stimulated wild-type subunit was
arbitrarily set at 100. The results shown are the means ± S.D.
for one experiment assayed in triplicate. Duplicate experiments
exhibited similar results.
|
|

binding region mutants of
q also lost the ability
to couple an activated receptor to effector stimulation. However, the defect was more severe with
q mutants compared with
s mutants. The only
q subunits capable of
coupling receptor to effector were wild-type
q and
qR (Fig. 4B). All other putative 
binding mutants were completely unable to stimulate IP production
following agonist activation. In contrast to
s, the
addition of a constitutively activating R183C mutation (46) to all
q mutants, with the exception of
qR,
failed to increase IP levels (data not shown). Previously, a lack of
constitutive activity was also observed with a cytoplasmic, non-palmitoylated
qC9S,C10S mutant (5).
The Ability of
Subunits to Localize at the Plasma Membrane
Determines Their Palmitoylation State--
To determine whether loss
of plasma membrane localization and signaling correlates with decreased
palmitoylation of the
subunits, we compared the ability of the
different 
binding mutants of
s and
q to incorporate radiolabeled palmitate. Cells transiently transfected with the HA epitope-tagged
subunits were
metabolically labeled with [3H]palmitic acid and
immunoprecipitated with the 12CA5 monoclonal antibody. Because
extremely low levels of palmitate were incorporated into wild type
s after expression in HEK293 cells in these studies, COS
cells were used to assay
s palmitoylation (Fig.
5A). Palmitoylation of
q was performed using transfection of either COS (data
not shown) or HEK293 cells (Fig. 5B), and the two cell lines
gave similar results. Palmitoylation levels were visualized by
fluorography of immunoprecipitated proteins after SDS-PAGE
fractionation. The amount of radiolabeled palmitate incorporated in
s increased in the
sK and
sIE mutants, fell to wild-type levels in
sIE+ and
sIEK, and was greatly reduced in
sIEK+ (Fig. 5A). Palmitoylation of the 
binding-deficient mutants of the
q subunits correlated strongly with membrane localization (Figs. 2 and 3, G-L)
and functional activity (Fig. 4B).
q and
qR incorporated equal levels of radiolabeled palmitate
(Fig. 5B). Palmitate incorporation into
qIE
was dramatically reduced, while palmitoylation of
qIE+,
qIER, and
qIER+ was reduced even further
when corrected for expression levels (Fig. 5B). Thus,
despite the fact that cysteine sites of palmitoylation are retained in
all mutants, the loss of critical side chains in the N-terminal 
binding regions of
s and
q can adversely affect palmitoylation.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Palmitoylation of
 binding region mutants of
s and
q. The palmitoylation state of
each of the  binding mutant subunits was measured by
transiently transfecting COS7 cells with s subunit
expression constructs (A) and HEK293 cells with
q subunit expression constructs (B) and
metabolically labeling the subunits with [3H]palmitic
acid as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
upper panel shows the radiolabeled palmitate
incorporated by each subunit and visualized by fluorography
(A, 21-day exposure; B, 50-day exposure).
Aliquots of each radiolabeled subunit were analyzed by Western blotting
(lower panel) as described. Similar results were
obtained in two separate experiments with the q subunits
in HEK293 and COS7 cells.
|
|
Myristoylation Restores Plasma Membrane Localization and
Palmitoylation of Mutant
q--
To investigate whether
membrane binding could be recovered through the use of another membrane
anchor, a variant
q (
qAG), was engineered
with a site for myristoylation (Fig. 1). The various 
binding
region mutations (Fig. 1) were introduced into the
qAG
background. The amino acid sequence of the extreme N terminus of
qAG is consistent with a consensus site for
myristoylation (47, 48), and, indeed, directs myristoylation of
qAG and
qAG containing 
binding
region mutations (Fig. 7, lower panel), as
described below.
qAG was found exclusively in the membrane fraction for
all 
binding region mutants including
qAG IE and
qAG IER+ (Fig. 6A). To determine if these
myristoylated and potentially 
binding-defective subunits are
correctly targeted to the plasma membrane, they were visualized by
immunofluorescence microscopy. We detected no discernible difference in
localization between
q and
qAG within
intact cells (Fig. 3G versus Fig. 6B).
Therefore, neither removal of residues 1-6, mutation of alanine to
glycine nor myristoylation itself alters membrane targeting of
q. Visualization of
qAG IE and
qAG IER+ (Fig. 6, C and D) showed
that they too are correctly localized at the plasma membrane and not at
internal membranes. Thus, myristoylation does indeed seem capable of
substituting for the loss of putative 
binding ability in
targeting the subunits to the plasma membrane.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Localization of
 binding region mutants of
myristoylated qAG by cell
fractionation and immunofluorescence. Each of the putative 
binding mutants of HA epitope-tagged qAG was transiently
expressed in HEK293 cells. A, S and P extracts were prepared
as described, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and visualized by Western blotting
with 12CA5 antibody. The results shown with qAG,
qAG IE, and qAG IER+ are representative
of all the other myristoylated subunits and similar results were
obtained in two different experiments, although the level of expression
did vary slightly between experiments. The asterisk marks
the position of the 42-kDa subunit bands. The subcellular
localization of three different subunits, qAG
(B), qAG IE (C), and
qAG IER+ (D) was visualized by
immunofluorescence as described under "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|
Our previous experiments demonstrated a correlation between membrane
binding and the palmitoylation state of the subunit, and mutant
q or
s subunits containing a
myristoylation sequence from
t but lacking
palmitoylatable cysteines (5) fail to properly localize to plasma
membranes.4 This suggests
that the myristoylated
qAG subunits would be fully palmitoylated since they are all associated with the plasma membrane. The myristoylated
qAG variants were assayed to determine
their palmitoylation state and all of them were found to be
palmitoylated to the same degree regardless of mutations in the 
binding region (Fig. 7, upper
panel). This suggests that membrane binding is sufficient
for palmitoylation of
subunits.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Palmitoylation and myristoylation
of  binding region mutants
of q and
qAG. The myristoylation and
palmitoylation state of each of the  binding mutant
qAG subunits was measured by transiently transfecting
HEK293 cells with qAG subunit expression constructs and
metabolically labeling the subunits with [3H]palmitic
acid or [3H]myristic acid as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The amount of radiolabeled palmitate
(upper panel) and myristate (lower
panel) incorporated by each subunit was visualized by
fluorography after a 30-day exposure. Identical gels were treated with
hydroxylamine (data not shown). The myristate signal was unaffected by
hydroxylamine treatment, while the palmitate signal was greatly
decreased in all samples. [3H]palmitate-labeled
q, qAG, and qAG containing
N-terminal mutations displayed identical sensitivities to
hydroxylamine.
|
|
Although myristoylation restored plasma membrane localization and
palmitoylation to 
binding region mutants of
q
(Fig. 7),
qAG subunits containing 
binding region
mutations were unable to couple activated
2-AR to
increased inositol phosphate production (data not shown). This defect
was not due to the alanine to glycine mutation since
qAG
worked as well as
q in this signaling assay (data not
shown). Instead, this likely reflects the inability of these mutants to
bind 
and form a functional 

-receptor complex. To verify
that the
qAG mutants are properly folded, capable of
binding GTP, and attaining their activated conformation, the mutant
with the most mutations,
qAG IER+, was tested in a trypsin protection assay. This widely used assay takes advantage of the
fact that activated (GTP- or
GDP·AlF4
-bound) G protein
subunits acquire resistance to trypsin digestion due to an
activation-dependent conformational change (38, 49). In
this assay, trypsin treatment removes only a small portion of the N
terminus from activated
subunits, whereas unactivated (GDP-bound)
subunits are degraded to smaller fragments. In the assay described
here, binding of GDP·AlF4
was much
more efficient than GTP
S (data not shown) at promoting protection
from trypsin cleavage, probably due to the slow rate of
q guanine nucleotide exchange (50). The results show
that both
qAG and
qAG IER+ were protected
from proteolysis by trypsin after incubation with
GDP·AlF4
(Fig.
8), indicating that multiple mutations in
the N terminus of
q do not affect the ability of the
protein to bind guanine nucleotides and undergo an
activation-dependent conformational change.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Trypsin protection of myristoylated
qAG constructs. qAG
and qAG IER+ were transiently expressed in HEK293 cells,
and the subunits were separated into soluble and particulate fractions
as already described. The particulate fraction was utilized in a
trypsin protection assay as described under "Experimental
Procedures" to verify that these subunits could still attain an
activated conformation upon binding a GTP analog. The left
and right panels show the results of incubating
qAG and qAG IER+, respectively, with GDP
and AlF4 and digesting them with
trypsin. The size markers correspond to molecular masses of 44 and 33 kDa.
|
|
Mutations Lead to Loss of 
Binding in Myristoylated
qAG--
Our experimental results so far have suggested
that mutation of the residues in the N-terminal 
binding region
of
s and
q interfere with the binding of

to
subunits. However, the changes seen in localization and
signaling could be caused by something other than a loss of 
binding. To demonstrate that mutant
q subunits are
indeed defective in interacting with 
, we employed an indirect
assay by testing their ability to sequester 
and thus inhibit

-mediated signaling. This assay takes advantage of the ability of

subunits, released from Gi by agonist activation of
a Gi-coupled receptor, to enhance stimulation of
s-stimulated adenylyl cyclase II (ACII) in transfected
HEK293 cells. As demonstrated previously with
t (30),
q can inhibit 
stimulation of ACII-mediated cAMP
production (Fig. 9, compare
GFP control versus
q bar), most likely by binding to and
sequestering free 
. In contrast,
qIER+ had no
effect on the 
-dependent stimulation of cAMP in this model assay. Because
qIER+ is not found at the plasma
membrane, its lack of inhibition may simply be due to its inability to
co-localize with free 
. To address this, we turned to
qAG since 
binding region mutations in the
qAG background did not compromise localization to plasma
membranes (Fig. 6).
qAG is able to compete for binding of 
, and this results in a 70% reduction in cAMP production (Fig. 9).
qAG subunits with mutations in the 
binding region are unable to fully compete with ACII for 
binding, and the introduction of multiple mutations results in
subunit with no more affinity for 
than GFP protein, transfected
as a control. Thus, these results provide evidence that the mutations
inhibit interaction of
with 
as predicted from the crystal
structures.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Inhibition of
 signaling by
qAG mutants. HEK293 cells were
transiently co-transfected with 200 ng of ACII-pcDNAI, 200 ng of
dopamine type 2 receptor-pcDNAI, 50 ng of
sQL-pcDNAI, and 500 ng of pcDNA3 containing
cDNA encoding the competitor protein. The competitor protein
consisted of various q and qAG subunits
or GFP, which served as a negative control. The results are represented
as the percentage of increase in cAMP upon agonist treatment. The
results shown are the means ± S.D. for two or three experiments
assayed in triplicate.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The experiments presented here demonstrate that mutation of
several residues in the N-terminal 
binding region of
s and
q disrupts the membrane
localization and palmitoylation of these non-myristoylated G protein
subunits. The potency of this effect was shown to increase as more
residues were mutated in
s and
q. The
extent of disruption in plasma membrane localization was determined
both by cell fractionation and by immunofluorescence localization of
each subunit transiently expressed in HEK293 cells. In addition, our
results show that introduction of a site for myristoylation in
q can restore plasma membrane localization and
palmitoylation to 
binding region mutants. The residues mutated
in this study are highly conserved throughout the family of
heterotrimeric G protein
subunits and are located at identical positions to residues in
t and
i1
previously shown to contact 
in the crystal structures of
heterotrimers (Fig. 1) (33, 34). In addition,
q 
binding region mutants failed to inhibit 
-mediated signaling in
an in vivo assay designed to measure the ability of these
subunits to bind and sequester 
, consistent with the proposal
that these mutations are affecting the interaction of
with 
.
Finally, the ability of
s 
binding region mutants containing an activating mutation to retain stimulation of cAMP production and the ability of
q mutants to be protected
from trypsin digestion in an aluminum fluoride-dependent
manner argue that the 
binding region mutations did not disrupt
the overall structure of the
subunits.
It is informative to consider these results in terms of the two-signal
model for membrane binding. This recently proposed model for membrane
targeting of lipid-modified proteins proposes that two membrane
attachment signals are required for stable membrane binding of the
modified protein (7-12). Further, one of these signals should direct
the protein to the correct cellular membrane, in this case, the plasma
membrane. For G protein
subunits of the
i family
(
i,
o, and
z), it appears
that these two signals are myristoylation and palmitoylation. The model
states that co-translationally added myristate functions as the first
signal and provides a general membrane targeting signal for the
i subunits. When the myristoylated proteins contact the
plasma membrane, a palmitoyl transferase proposed to reside there (51,
52) adds a palmitate molecule, which acts synergistically with
myristate to give a thermodynamically strong and kinetically long-lived
association with the membrane (8, 51). However, members of the
s,
q, and
12 families are
not myristoylated; thus, according to the two-signal model, something
else must function as the first signal to get these subunits to their
correct place at the plasma membrane. Our results provide compelling
evidence that interaction of
s and
q with 
, which is prenylated and capable of stably binding to the plasma membrane, provides this signal. Mutants of
s and
q deficient in 
binding ability failed to
associate with the plasma membrane or incorporate radiolabeled
palmitate. It appears that the
subunits must associate with 
that is already membrane-bound or being transported to the plasma
membrane before they can undergo palmitoylation and stably associate
with the plasma membrane. Although the relative levels of 