|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M909875199 on March 24, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 21, 15917-15925, May 26, 2000
Newly Synthesized Canalicular ABC Transporters Are Directly
Targeted from the Golgi to the Hepatocyte Apical Domain in Rat
Liver*
Helmut
Kipp and
Irwin M.
Arias
From the Department of Physiology, Tufts University School of
Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111
Received for publication, December 9, 1999, and in revised form, March 1, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Newly synthesized canalicular ectoenzymes and a
cell adhesion molecule (cCAM105) have been shown to traffic from the
Golgi to the basolateral plasma membrane, from where they transcytose to the apical bile canalicular domain. It has been proposed that all
canalicular proteins are targeted via this indirect route in
hepatocytes. We studied the membrane targeting of rat canalicular proteins by in vivo [35S]methionine metabolic
labeling followed by preparation of highly purified Golgi membranes and
canalicular (CMVs) and sinusoidal/basolateral (SMVs) membrane vesicles
and subsequent immunoprecipitation. In particular, we compared membrane
targeting of newly synthesized canalicular ABC
(ATP-binding cassette) transporters
MDR1, MDR2, and SPGP (sister of
P-glycoprotein) with that of
cCAM105. Significant differences were observed in metabolic pulse-chase
labeling experiments with regard to membrane targeting of these apical
proteins. After a chase time of 15 min, cCAM105 appeared exclusively in
SMVs, peaked at 1 h, and progressively declined thereafter. In
CMVs, cCAM105 was first detected after 1 h and subsequently
increased for 3 h. This findings confirm the transcytotic
targeting of cCAM105 reported in earlier studies. In contrast, at no
time point investigated were MDR1, MDR2, and SPGP detected in SMVs. In
CMVs, MDR1 and MDR2 appeared after 30 min, whereas SPGP appeared after
2 h of labeling. In Golgi membranes, each of the ABC transporters
peaked at 30 min and was virtually absent thereafter. These data
suggest rapid, direct targeting of newly synthesized MDR1 and MDR2 from the Golgi to the bile canaliculus and transient sequestering of SPGP in
an intracellular pool en route from the Golgi to the apical plasma
membrane. This study provides biochemical evidence for direct targeting
of newly synthesized apical ABC transporters from the Golgi to the bile
canaliculus in vivo.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The bile canalicular membrane of the mammalian hepatocyte contains
several primary active transporters that couple ATP hydrolysis to the
transport of specific substrates into the bile canaliculus (1-4).
These transporters are members of the superfamily of ABC (ATP-binding cassette) membrane
transport proteins (5) and currently include P-glycoprotein or MDR1
(multidrug resistance protein;
organic cations) (6), MDR2 (phosphatidylcholine) (7, 8), SPGP
(sister of
P-glycoprotein; bile acids) (9),
and MRP2 (multidrug resistance-associated
protein; non-bile acid organic anions) (10).
The amount of each ABC transporter in the canalicular membrane is
regulated by the physiological demand to excrete bile acids. Intravenous administration of rats with taurocholate or dibutyryl cAMP
rapidly and selectively increased the functional activity and amount of
ABC transporters in the canalicular membrane. This increase was
inhibited by prior administration of colchicine, which disrupts
microtubules (11), and wortmannin, which inhibits phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase (12). These observations indicate that an intracellular
microtubule-dependent transport mechanism that is sensitive to
active phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is required to traffic ABC
transporters to the canalicular membrane. In addition, lipid products
of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase directly regulate the
ATP-dependent substrate transport activity of SPGP and MRP2 in the canalicular membrane (13). These studies indicate that bile
secretion requires intrahepatic trafficking and regulation of the
canalicular ABC transporters.
Membrane targeting of the newly synthesized canalicular ectoenzymes
dipeptidyl peptidase IV, aminopeptidase N, and 5'-nucleotidase and the
canalicular cell adhesion molecule cCAM105 (also known as HA4) has been
studied in rat liver by in vivo metabolic pulse-chase labeling. After biosynthesis, these canalicular proteins are
transferred from the Golgi to the basolateral membrane and subsequently
reach the bile canaliculus only by transcytosis (14, 15). Based on
these results, it was proposed that all newly synthesized canalicular proteins, including canalicular ABC-type transporters, are targeted via
this indirect route (16, 17). Although the membrane targeting of newly
synthesized canalicular ectoenzymes and cell adhesion molecule cCAM105
has been thoroughly studied, comparable investigations of canalicular
ABC transporters have not been performed.
In this study, we used metabolic pulse-chase labeling followed by
subcellular fractionation of rat liver and immunoprecipitation to
investigate the intracellular trafficking of newly synthesized canalicular proteins. In particular, we focused on membrane targeting of newly synthesized transporters of the MDR family, including SPGP,
and compared their trafficking with that of cCAM105 and with the
basolateral membrane resident asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGP-R).1
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials
Radiochemicals were supplied by NEN Life Science Products. All
other chemicals were of the highest purity available and were purchased
from Sigma. Monoclonal antibody C219 (anti-MDR1/MDR2) was from Centocor
(Malvern, PA), and polyclonal anti- -COP antibody was from Sigma.
Other antibodies were kind donations: EAG15 (polyclonal, anti-MRP2), D. Keppler (10); Ab669 (polyclonal, anti-cCAM105), S. H. Lin, (18);
HA301 (monoclonal, anti-dipeptidyl peptidase IV), A. L. Hubbard
(19); and anti-ASGP-R, R. J. Stockert (20).
Generation of Anti-SPGP Antibody LVT90
A glutathione S-transferase fusion protein containing
a 90-amino acid fragment of the SPGP linker region (amino acids
653-742, starting with LVT) was used as antigen to raise antibody
LVT90. The corresponding coding DNA fragment was amplified from
full-length SPGP cDNA (provided by P. Meier, (9) by polymerase
chain reaction using the oligonucleotides 5'-AAT GAA TCC TGC TTG TGA
CCC TGC AAA G-3' (containing a BamHI site) and 5'-ATT GTC
GAC TAC CTA ACT GGG GCA GGT TC-3' (containing a SalI site).
The polymerase chain reaction product was digested by BamHI
and SalI and ligated into the
BamHI/SalI sites of the pGEX-5X-3 vector
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). In-frame cloning was confirmed by DNA
sequencing. Expression of the glutathione S-transferase
fusion protein in Escherichia coli BL21 cells and
purification using glutathione-Sepharose beads were performed according
to protocols provided by Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. A commercial
service was employed to raise antibodies in rabbits (Covance, Denver,
PA) using a standard protocol for immunization and bleeding.
Metabolic Labeling
Groups of five male Sprague-Dawley rats (300-350 g) kept on a
standard diet were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg,
injected intraperitoneally) and were injected in the tail vein with 3.5 mCi of [35S]methionine/cysteine (1175 Ci/mmol;
Expre35S35S protein label, NEN Life Science
Products) in 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline. 15 min later, 50 mg of
unlabeled methionine and 5 mg of unlabeled cysteine in 2.5 ml of
phosphate-buffered saline were injected intraperitoneally. For
investigation of membrane targeting, livers were removed after 15 min,
30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h and used for subcellular
fractionation. Data presented are typical results observed in at least
three sets of five rats.
Subcellular Fractionation of Rat Liver
Previously published methods were combined, modified, and
optimized for a high yield of canalicular, sinusoidal/basolateral, and
Golgi membranes from a single rat liver (Fig.
1). After gentle homogenation of rat
liver, bile canaliculi remain attached to tight junctions and sediment
with the low speed nuclear pellet. Canalicular membrane vesicles were
prepared from the low speed pellet by nitrogen cavitation followed by
calcium precipitation (21). The low speed supernatant was split and
used for purification of basolateral membranes on a sucrose/Ficoll
gradient (22) and for preparation of Golgi membranes by floating a
microsomal fraction on a discontinuous sucrose gradient (23). Details
are as follows.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Schematic presentation of the protocol used
to isolate CMVs, SMVs, and Golgi membranes from rat liver.
HOM, homogenate.
|
|
Excised rat liver (10-15 g, wet weight) was rapidly perfused with
ice-cold SHCa buffer (0.25 M sucrose, 10 mM
HEPES/Tris, pH 7.4, and 0.2 mM CaCl2
supplemented with protease inhibitors (2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml
pepstatin A, 20 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml
benzamidine, and 2 µg/ml aprotinin)) and homogenized in 50 ml of SHCa
buffer with four strokes in a loose-fitting Dounce homogenizer. The
suspension was filtered through a double layer of cheesecloth;
homogenized again with 15 strokes; diluted with SH buffer (SHCa buffer
without CaCl2) to 140 ml; supplemented with 0.1 M EGTA stock solution, pH 7.4, to a final concentration of
1 mM; and centrifuged for 10 min at 1880 × g (Beckman JA-14, 3500 rpm). The pellet and fluffy layer
were collected and used for preparation of CMVs. The supernatant
(~130 ml) was split 1:1 and used for preparation of SMVs and Golgi
membranes, respectively.
CMVs--
The pellet was resuspended in 50 ml of SHCa buffer and
centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 × g (Beckman JA-14,
4500 rpm). The resulting pellet was suspended in 50 ml of SHCa buffer,
placed in a high pressure chamber (Parr Instrument Model 4635), and
equilibrated with nitrogen at 850 p.s.i. for 15 min with shaking
at 4 °C. Pressure was released within 3 min; and the contents of the
chamber were homogenized with six strokes in a tight-fitting Dounce
homogenizer, diluted with SHCa buffer to 120 ml, and supplemented with
1 M CaCl2 stock solution to a final
concentration of 10 mM. After incubation for 10 min on ice,
the suspension was centrifuged for 20 min at 7600 × g
(Beckman JA-14, 7000 rpm). The supernatant was filtered through fine
weave cloth and centrifuged for 30 min at 47,000 × g
(Beckman Ti-45, 27,000 rpm). The pellet was homogenized in 30 ml of
SHCa buffer with six strokes in a tight-fitting Dounce homogenizer and
centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 × g (Beckman JA-17, 4500 rpm). The supernatant was collected and centrifuged for 30 min at
47,000 × g (Beckman Ti-45, 27,000 rpm). The resulting
pellet was homogenized in SHCa buffer at 3-4 mg/ml protein with a
syringe and 24-gauge needle and stored at 80 °C until used.
SMVs--
65 ml of the first supernatant was centrifuged for 10 min at 5500 × g (Beckman JA-14, 7500 rpm). The
resulting supernatant and fluffy layer were collected and centrifuged
for 30 min at 22,000 × g (Beckman JA-14, 12,000 rpm).
The pellet was resuspended in SH buffer containing 1 mM
EGTA (total volume of 12 ml) and layered on two discontinuous gradients
consisting of 1 ml of 60% sucrose, 23 ml of 23% sucrose and 4%
Ficoll 400, and 7 ml of 20% sucrose. After centrifugation for 90 min
at 130,000 × g in a swinging bucket rotor (Beckman SW
27, 27,000 rpm), the interphase between 20% sucrose and 23% sucrose
and 4% Ficoll was collected, diluted six times with SHCa buffer, and
centrifuged for 30 min at 47,000 × g (Beckman Ti-45,
27,000 rpm). The resulting pellet was homogenized in SHCa buffer at
~10 mg/ml protein with a syringe and 24-gauge needle and stored at
80 °C until used.
Golgi--
65 ml of the first supernatant was homogenized with
10 strokes in a tight-fitting Dounce homogenizer, supplemented with
MgCl2 to a final concentration of 5 mM, and
centrifuged for 10 min at 15,000 × g (Beckman JA-14,
10,000 rpm). The supernatant was saved, and the pellet was resuspended
in 50 ml of SH buffer containing 5 mM MgCl2 and
centrifuged again for 10 min at 15,000 × g. The two
supernatants from the 15,000 × g spins were combined
and centrifuged for 60 min at 140,000 × g (Beckman
Ti-45, 35,000 rpm). The pellet was resuspended in 12 ml of 1.25 M sucrose and overlaid with 12 ml of 1.1 M
sucrose and 12 ml of 0.25 M sucrose in a 36-ml tube for
gradient centrifugation. After centrifugation for 90 min at 130,000 × g (Beckman SW 27, 27,000 rpm), the
interphase between 0.25 M sucrose and 1.1 M
sucrose was collected, diluted six times with SHCa buffer, and
centrifuged for 30 min at 47,000 × g (Beckman Ti-45,
27,000 rpm). The resulting pellet was homogenized in SHCa buffer at
3-4 mg/ml protein with a syringe and 24-gauge needle and stored at
80 °C until used. Typical yields were 1.0-1.3 mg of membrane
protein for CMV and Golgi preparations and 5-6 mg of protein for SMV preparations.
Immunoprecipitation
1 mg of protein of CMV, SMV, and Golgi preparations was
solubilized for 1 h at 4 °C in 1 ml of buffer containing 20 mM octyl -D-glucopyranoside, 0.5% Triton
X-100, 0.3 M NaCl, and 0.025 M
NaPi, pH 7.4, containing 0.02% NaN3 and
protease inhibitors (2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml pepstatin A, 20 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml benzamidine, and 2 µg/ml aprotinin). The homogenate (40 mg of protein) was solubilized
in 10 ml of the same buffer. The mixtures were centrifuged at
150,000 × g for 60 min at 4 °C. The supernatants
were precleared by adding 40 µl of protein A-Sepharose beads, shaken
for 30 min at 4 °C, and centrifuged for 5 min at 16,000 × g. The precleared supernatants were used for
immunoprecipitation with monoclonal antibody C219 (10 µg of IgG) and
antisera from polyclonal anti-ASGP-R (20 µl) and anti-cCAM105 (20 µl) antibodies and LVT90 (20 µl). By repeated immunoprecipitation
followed by immunoblotting, it was established that these conditions
are sufficient to precipitate completely the respective antigen. The
lysates were employed for precipitation with each antibody in a
sequential fashion. The order in which the proteins were
immunoprecipitated proved to be uncritical. The detergent extracts were
supplemented with bovine serum albumin to 0.5% and incubated with the
respective antibody for 1 h at 4 °C with shaking. 40 µl of
protein A-Sepharose beads was added, and incubation with shaking at
4 °C was continued for 1 h. The beads were sedimented for 1 min
at 16,000 × g, washed four times by repeated
suspension in 1 ml of the lysis buffer (without octyl glucoside and
protease inhibitors), and centrifuged for 1 min at 16,000 × g. 30 µl of gel loading buffer (10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 6.5, 3% SDS, 10% glycerol, 5% -mercaptoethanol, 8 M urea, and 0.025% bromphenol blue) was added to the
washed beads and heated to 95 °C for 5 min. To remove the Sepharose
beads, the suspension was applied to a microcentrifuge column (Bio-Rad)
and centrifuged for 2 min at 16,000 × g. The
flow-through fraction was subjected to SDS-PAGE on an 8% gel (24). The
gel was fixed with 1-propanol/water/acetic acid (25:65:10), stained
with 0.25% Coomassie Blue in methanol/water/acetic acid (45:45:10),
destained with methanol/water/acetic acid (20:75:5), and dried on
filter paper (80 °C, 2 h, vacuum). The dried gel was exposed in
a PhosphorImager cassette and read after 1 week with a Molecular
Dynamics PhosphorImager.
Miscellaneous Methods
For Western blotting, polypeptides were electrotransferred (25)
onto nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schüll). Antibodies were detected by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody, followed by detection with an enhanced
chemiluminescence system (NEN Life Science Products). The method of
Lowry et al. (26) was used for protein measurements with
bovine serum albumin as the standard. The activities of marker enzymes
were determined according to the following protocols: -glutamyl
transpeptidase (27), alkaline phosphatase (28), Na,K-ATPase (29), and
galactosyltransferase (30).
 |
RESULTS |
Properties of Subcellular Fractionations--
The quality of the
membrane preparations was determined by measuring the enrichment of
marker enzymes (Table I). Marker enzymes for the canalicular membrane -glutamyl transpeptidase and alkaline phosphatase were highly enriched only in CMVs (~45-fold) as compared with the homogenate. A marker for the basolateral membrane Na,K-ATPase was slightly increased in Golgi fractions, below the detection limit in
CMVs, and enriched 16-fold in SMVs. The enrichment of marker enzymes
was comparable to that reported previously (21, 22).
Galactosyltransferase, a marker for Golgi membranes, was slightly
enriched in SMVs, below the detection limit in CMVs, and 24-fold
enriched in Golgi preparations. The yields of specific marker enzyme
activities in CMVs and SMVs are consistent with data reported earlier
(21, 22).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Specific activities of marker enzymes
Values represent means ± S.E. from four to seven determinations.
The fold enrichment of marker enzymes compared with the homogenate
(HOM) given in parentheses, and the yield of a specific activity is
given in brackets. ND, not detected.
|
|
The quality of membrane preparations was further established by
immunochemical methods. Monoclonal anti- -COP antibody recognizes an
epitope shared by the Golgi -COP protein (110 kDa). Immunoblots probed with anti- -COP antibody showed significant enrichment in
Golgi membranes as compared with the homogenate, whereas -COP was
absent from canalicular and basolateral membranes (Fig.
2). CMV and SMV preparations were further
characterized by probing with antibodies against apical and basolateral
membrane resident proteins in immunoblots. As shown in Fig. 4,
basolateral ASGP-R was detected only in SMVs and was absent from CMVs,
whereas antibodies against the canalicular transporters MDR1 and MDR2
and SPGP and MRP2 reacted exclusively with antigens in CMVs.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
-COP is highly enriched in
Golgi membranes. Rat liver homogenate (H), CMVs
(C), SMVs (S), and Golgi membranes (G)
were separated by SDS-PAGE (10 µg of protein of each fraction),
blotted onto nitrocellulose, and probed with the Golgi-specific
anti- -COP antibody. The arrowhead indicates the position
of the antigen.
|
|
Generation and Specificity of Anti-SPGP Antibody LVT90--
We
were interested in antibodies directed against canalicular ABC-type
transporters that were suitable for immunoprecipitation. Among
available antibodies, only monoclonal antibody C219 (anti-MDR1/MDR2) met this property. Therefore, we generated a polyclonal antibody against the recently cloned canalicular bile acid transporter SPGP.
Alignments of amino acid sequences revealed high similarity/homology among rat MDR1 (31), MDR2 (32), and SPGP (9): MDR1 versus SPGP, 48/68%; MDR1 versus MDR2, 69/82%; and MDR1
versus SPGP, 46/66%. A 90-amino acid peptide from the SPGP
"linker" region that showed the lowest similarity/homology to the
other MDR transporters was chosen as immunogen for the generation of
anti-SPGP antibody LVT90.
Monoclonal antibody C219 was raised against MDR1 constitutively
overexpressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells and is directed against
two hexapeptides located close to the ATP-binding sites in CHO-MDR1,
VQAALD and VQEALD (33). Both recognition motifs are present in rat MDR1
and MDR2 at the same position. In rat SPGP, the corresponding sites are
altered to VQEALN and VQTALD. In the first recognition sequence,
aspartic acid, which is critical for antigen recognition (33), was
replaced by asparagine. In the second recognition sequence, glutamic
acid was replaced by threonine.
In immunoblots, the polyclonal anti-SPGP antibody LVT90 showed strong
reaction with a 170-kDa protein in CMVs that was absent from SMVs (see
Fig. 4). Preimmune serum did not show reactions with CMVs or SMVs.
Reaction of LVT90 with CMVs was competed by addition of the glutathione
S-transferase fusion protein (data not shown). To test for
possible cross-reactivity between C219 and LVT90, we performed
immunoprecipitations followed by immunoblotting (Fig.
3). A lysate of rat liver CMVs (500 µg)
was immunoprecipitated first with anti-SPGP antibody LVT90 (lanes
A) followed by anti-MDR1/MDR2 antibody C219 (lanes B).
In a similar experiment, CMV lysate was first immunoprecipitated with
C219 (lanes C) followed by LVT90 (lanes D).
Immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred onto
nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with either LVT90 or C219. Reaction
of LVT90 in immunoblots was observed only when LVT90 was used for
immunoprecipitation. Whether LVT90 immunoprecipitation was before or
after precipitation with C219 was uncritical. Furthermore, C219
immunoprecipitates showed no reaction with LVT90 in immunoblots. The
same applied for C219 immunoblots. Positive reactions were observed
only when C219 was used for the initial precipitation, and no reaction
was observed with LVT90 precipitates. The sequence in which antibodies
were employed for precipitation was not critical. These
immunoprecipitation/blotting experiments indicate that there is no
cross-reactivity between the C219 and LVT90 antibodies with regard to
immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting. Thus, C219 is specific for rat
MDR1 and MDR2, and LVT90 is specific for rat SPGP.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Antibodies C219 and LVT90 do not
cross-react. Rat liver CMVs (500 µg) were immunoprecipitated
first with anti-SPGP antibody LVT90 (lanes A) followed by
anti-MDR1/MDR2 antibody C219 (lanes B). In a second similar
experiment, CMVs were first immunoprecipitated with C219 (lanes
C) followed by LVT90 (lanes D). Immunoprecipitates were
separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane, and
probed with either LVT90 or C219. Arrowheads indicate the
positions of the antigens.
|
|
CMV/SMV Distribution of Canalicular Proteins in
Immunoblots--
Western blots of purified CMVs and SMVs that were
probed with antibodies against canalicular proteins are shown in Fig.
4. Anti-dipeptidyl peptidase IV and
anti-cCAM105 antibodies predominantly reacted with CMVs, and a small
amount was regularly observed in SMVs. We explain the presence of these
"canalicular" proteins in SMVs by the fact that these membrane
proteins are initially transferred to the basolateral membrane after
biosynthesis and subsequently reach the apical pole by transcytosis
(14). This scenario is in good accordance with detectable steady-state
levels in SMVs. Under the same conditions, antibodies against the
canalicular ABC-type transporters, C219 (anti-MDR1/MDR2), LVT90
(anti-SPGP), and EAG15 (anti-MRP2), exclusively recognized antigens in
CMVs, which suggests that newly synthesized canalicular ABC
transporters may not be initially trafficked to the basolateral plasma
membrane.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
CMV/SMV distribution of hepatic membrane
proteins. Rat liver CMVs (C) and SMVs (S),
10 mg each, were separated by SDS-PAGE; blotted onto nitrocellulose
membrane; and probed with antibodies against the basolateral membrane
resident ASGP-R and the bile canaliculus resident proteins MDR1 and
MDR2 (detected with the C219 antibody (anti-MDR1/MDR2)), SPGP, the
organic anion transporter MRP2, the ectoenzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV
(DPP IV), and the canalicular cell adhesion molecule
cCAM105. Arrowheads indicate the positions of
antigens.
|
|
Metabolic Pulse-Chase Labeling--
To test the hypothesis of
direct apical targeting of canalicular ABC transporters in rat
hepatocytes, we performed metabolic pulse-chase labeling experiments.
Rats were injected with [35S]methionine, and labeling of
newly synthesized proteins was terminated 15 min later by injection of
an excess of unlabeled methionine. Livers from individual rats were
excised after chase times of 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and
3 h, and CMVs, SMVs, and Golgi membranes were prepared. Each
fraction was immunoprecipitated with anti-ASGP-R, anti-cCAM105, C219
(anti-MDR1/MDR2), and LVT90 (anti-SPGP) antibodies; immunoprecipitates
were separated by SDS-PAGE; and radioactive bands were detected and
quantified with a PhosphorImager. The results are presented in Fig.
5.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Metabolic pulse-chase labeling. Rats
were pulse-labeled for 15 min with [35S]methionine and
then chased with unlabeled methionine for 15 min, 30 min, 1 h,
2 h, and 3 h. ASGP-R (A), cCAM105 (C),
MDR1/MDR2 (E), and SPGP (G) were then
immunoprecipitated (IP) from liver homogenates
(HOM), Golgi membranes, CMVs, and SMVs. 35S in
immunoprecipitates from CMVs and SMVs separated by SDS-PAGE was
detected and quantified with a PhosphorImager and plotted
versus the chase time to illustrate the membrane targeting
of each membrane protein (B, D, F, and
H). Arrowheads indicate the positions of mature
antigens. Experiments shown are representative and show typical results
observed in at least three sets of five rats. arb. units,
arbitrary units.
|
|
Membrane targeting of ASGP-R was investigated as a control experiment
to validate our experimental procedures using a sinusoidal membrane
resident protein. ASGP-R consists of three subunits (43, 54, and 64 kDa) (34) and is a well established sinusoidal membrane protein that is
involved in receptor-mediated endocytosis (35). ASGP-R in the
basolateral membrane binds to ligands with terminal N-acetylglucosamine residues, and the ligand-receptor
complex is internalized into endosomes, where the complex is split;
ASGP-R is recycled to the basolateral membrane, and the ligand is
targeted to lysosomes. After immunoprecipitation and a chase time of 15 min, the three subunits of ASGP-R were detected exclusively in SMVs,
peaked at 1 h, and declined thereafter. The decline after 1 h
results from internalization of receptor from the sinusoidal membrane
into endosomes. More important, this experiment shows that in
immunoblots and by immunoprecipitation from CMVs and SMVs, ASGP-R is
exclusively detected in SMVs, which further validates the quality of
the plasma membrane preparations.
Radiolabeled MDR1, MDR2, and SPGP peaked in Golgi membranes after a
chase time of 30 min and were virtually absent from the Golgi at later
time points, indicating that processing and passage through the Golgi
of these ABC transporters are complete after 30-60 min. This is also
supported by the fact that immature forms of SPGP disappeared from
homogenates at chase times later than 30 min. Under the same
conditions, MDR1 and MDR2 could not be immunoprecipitated from the
homogenate with C219 antibody, probably due to a much lower abundance
of MDR1 and MDR2 compared with SPGP. Compared with ABC transporters,
the passage of cCAM105 through the Golgi was slower. In Golgi
membranes, cCAM105 was detected up to 2 h, which was paralleled by
the presence of immature proteins in the homogenate for the same time
period. The slower passage of cCAM105 through the Golgi may result from
its greater extent of glycosylation compared with that of ABC transporters.
Beside passage through the Golgi, major differences were also observed
among the canalicular membrane proteins with regard to membrane
targeting. After a chase time of 15 min, newly synthesized cCAM105
appeared exclusively in SMVs, peaked at 1 h, and progressively declined thereafter. In CMVs, cCAM105 was first detected after 1 h
and subsequently increased for 3 h. These observations are in
accordance with transcytotic targeting of cCAM105 and confirm results
from earlier studies (14). This experiment also demonstrates that our
experimental procedure efficiently detects transcytotic targeting.
After a chase time of 30 min, MDR1 and MDR2 appeared exclusively in
CMVs and increased thereafter for the remaining time investigated. At
no time was MDR1 or MDR2 detected in SMVs. The absence of MDR1 and MDR2
from SMVs at all investigated time points and the time course of their
appearance in CMVs strongly suggest direct targeting from the Golgi to
the canalicular membrane. A transcytotic pathway can also be excluded
for the plasma membrane targeting of SPGP. At no time was SPGP detected
in SMVs, but compared with MDR1 and MDR2, appeared in CMVs only after
2 h. Particular interesting are results after 1 h of
labeling: the homogenate contained only mature SPGP, indicating that
SPGP had already trafficked through the Golgi, but had not reached the
cell surface. A likely explanation is that SPGP is transiently
sequestered in an intracellular pool before it is delivered to the
canalicular membrane.
Efficiency of Immunoprecipitation with C219 and LVT90
Antibodies--
Critical to our hypothesis (that in contrast to other
canalicular proteins, ABC transporters do not undergo transcytosis
after biosynthesis, but are directly delivered from the Golgi to the apical membrane) is the absence of ABC transporters from SMVs in the
metabolic labeling studies. Therefore, we investigated the efficiency
of antibodies against canalicular ABC transporters for
immunoprecipitation and quantified the detection limit of ABC
transporters in SMVs.
To estimate the efficiency of immunoprecipitation, lysates of 1 mg of
CMVs that had been immunoprecipitated with C219 or LVT90 under the same
conditions used for metabolic labeling studies were probed with the
same antibodies in immunoblots to detect remaining antigen. These
results were compared with control experiments in which lysates of 1 mg
of CMVs were "immunoprecipitated" under the same conditions with an
equal volume of phosphate-buffered saline (control for monoclonal
antibody C219) or an equal volume of preimmune serum (control for
LVT90) (Fig. 6). Quantitation by a laser
densitometer revealed that after immunoprecipitation with C219, 3% of
MDR1/MDR2 remained in the lysate and 2% of SPGP remained after
immunoprecipitation with LVT90. To determine whether any SPGP or
MDR1/MDR2 remained after immunoprecipitation, we used a sufficiently
high amount of lysate that saturated the gray scale of the bands in the
control experiments (Fig. 6). Therefore, the amount of remaining
antigen after immunoprecipitation with C219 and LVT90 was even
<2-3%. It is therefore reasonable to conclude that the amount of
MDR1, MDR2, and SPGP remaining after immunoprecipitation is not
significant and that the efficiency of antibodies C219 and LVT90 for
immunoprecipitation is ~100%.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Antibodies C219 and LVT90 efficiently
precipitate their antigens. CMVs were immunoprecipitated with C219
(control (contr) immunoprecipitation (IP) with
phosphate-buffered saline) and LVT90 (control immunoprecipitation with
preimmune serum) as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Aliquots of the remaining lysates were precipitated with
trichloroacetic acid. The pellets were dissolved in sample buffer and
subjected to SDS-PAGE and electroblotting. The blots were then reprobed
with C219 and LVT90, respectively. Arrowheads indicate the
positions of the antigens. The amount of antigen was quantified by
laser densitometry (lower panels). arb. units,
arbitrary units.
|
|
The lower detection limit for putative ABC transporters in SMVs was
determined using SMV/CMV mixing experiments. Rats were pulse-chase-labeled with [35S]methionine for 2 h
since only at this chase time is SPGP present in CMVs (Fig.
5G). From the metabolically labeled rats, samples of SMVs (1 mg each) were supplemented with increasing amounts of CMVs (0, 25, 50, 100, 250, and 500 µg). The mixtures were immunoprecipitated with the
C219 and LVT90 antibodies; immunoprecipitates were separated by
SDS-PAGE; and radioactive bands were detected in a PhosphorImager (Fig.
7). Immunoprecipitation with C219
detected MDR1/MDR2 in a supplement of 50 µg of CMVs in 1 mg of SMVs,
and immunoprecipitation with LVT90 detected SPGP in a supplement of 25 µg of CMVs in 1 mg of SMVs. For the metabolic labeling studies (Fig.
5), 1 mg of SMVs and CMVs, respectively, was used for
immunoprecipitation. Therefore, in SMVs, <5% of C219 antigen and
<2.5% of LVT90 antigen could be detected. Furthermore, this
experiment demonstrates that there are no components in SMVs that
prevent immunoprecipitation of ABC transporters with either C219 or
LVT90.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Low levels of 35S-labeled SPGP,
MDR1, and MDR2 can be detected in SMVs when supplemented with
CMVs. Rats were pulse-chase-labeled with
[35S]methionine for 2 h, and CMVs and SMVs were
prepared from the livers. SMVs were supplemented with various amounts
of CMVs and immunoprecipitated (IP) with C219
(anti-MDR1/MDR2) and LVT90 (anti-SPGP) antibodies as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The immunoprecipitates were separated by
SDS-PAGE, and 35S-labeled antigens were detected in a
PhosphorImager.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Hepatocytes and other epithelial cells exhibit two morphologically
distinguishable plasma membrane domains (apical and basolateral) that
contain different membrane resident proteins that fulfill the
physiological task of each pole of the cell. Maintenance of polarity
requires mechanisms for targeting newly synthesized membrane proteins
to their appropriate plasma membrane domains. After biosynthesis, basolateral membrane resident proteins are targeted directly from the
Golgi to the basolateral plasma membrane. In contrast, alternative routes exist for newly synthesized proteins of the apical membrane. In
various cell lines, they are either directly delivered from the Golgi
to the apical pole or initially transferred to the basolateral domain
and subsequently access the apical pole by transcytosis (for reviews,
see Refs. 36 and 37). In polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney cells,
newly synthesized endogenous apical proteins are predominantly
delivered by a direct route (38-40); however, the transcytotic route
can also participate as demonstrated for the polymeric immunoglobulin A
receptor (41, 42) and for endogenous apical glycoproteins (43). Both
mechanisms for apical targeting are operative in Caco-2 cells, an
epithelial cell line derived from human intestine (44, 45). In
contrast, hepatocytes are assumed to lack the direct pathway for
delivery of apical proteins (16) based on the investigations of
dipeptidyl peptidase IV, aminopeptidase N, 5'-nucleotidase, and the
canalicular cell adhesion molecule cCAM105 (14, 15). These canalicular
proteins are selectively targeted by transcytosis in metabolic labeling
studies in vivo.
Stable cell lines in culture are invaluable for investigating targeting
of membrane proteins in polarized cells. However, similar targeting
studies of endogenous membrane proteins in vivo are
infrequent due to the difficulty in separating apical and basolateral
membranes from native tissue for detailed investigation. Bartles and
Hubbard (46) overcame these obstacles and developed a method to study
targeting of newly synthesized membrane proteins in polarized rat
hepatocytes in vivo. Livers from rats metabolically labeled
with [35S]methionine were used to prepare sheets of total
plasma membranes, which were vesiculated by ultrasonification and
resolved into apical and basolateral domains by centrifugation on a
continuous sucrose gradient. Fractions of this gradient were
immunoprecipitated with antibodies against apical proteins to document
the distribution of newly synthesized proteins in either apical or
basolateral membrane domains at a defined time after biosynthesis. In
the present study, we used a similar approach to study membrane
targeting of newly synthesized canalicular ABC-type transporters
in vivo. We resolved apical and basolateral membrane domains
by preparing highly purified CMVs and SMVs according to well
established, reproducible methods (21, 22), which we have combined and
optimized for high yield from a single rat liver. In addition, we
prepared Golgi membranes from the same metabolically labeled rat to
simultaneously study the trafficking of canalicular proteins
through this intracellular compartment.
The metabolic pulse-chase labeling approach depends on availability of
precipitating antibodies against canalicular ABC transporters. Since
only the commercial C219 antibody met this requirement, a precipitating
antibody (LVT90) was raised against a fusion protein containing a
90-amino acid sequence from the rat SPGP linker region. In sequence
alignments, this region showed few matches with the homolog sequences
of rat MDR1 and MDR2. As demonstrated in immunoprecipitation/blotting experiments, the C219 and LVT90 antibodies do not cross-react. Therefore, LVT90 is specific for SPGP, and C219 is specific for MDR1
and MDR2.
This study confirms the transcytotic pathway for apical targeting of
newly synthesized canalicular cell adhesion molecule cCAM105 (HA4),
which was described in an earlier study (14). In contrast, at no time
between passage through the Golgi and arrival at the bile canaliculus
were apical ABC transporters MDR1, MDR2, and SPGP detected in SMVs,
indicating a direct Golgi-to-bile canaliculus pathway for their
membrane targeting. These results are supported by the steady-state
levels of apical proteins in isolated CMVs and SMVs as detected in
immunoblots. Most of cCAM105 and dipeptidyl peptidase IV are present in
CMVs, but a considerable amount is also present in SMVs. Their presence
in SMVs is due to the fact that after biosynthesis, these molecules are
targeted by transcytosis and are initially transferred to the
basolateral membrane. Consistent with a direct Golgi-to-bile
canaliculus targeting, the ABC transporters MDR1, MDR2, and SPGP were
not detected in SMV immunoblots, but were exclusively found in CMVs, as
was the canalicular ABC transporter MRP2. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that all apical ABC transporters known so far are targeted directly from the Golgi to the bile canaliculus after biosynthesis.
Although newly synthesized MDR1, MDR2, and SPGP were not initially
transferred to the basolateral membrane, their post-Golgi trafficking
differed. After passage through the Golgi, MDR1 and MDR2 were rapidly
delivered directly to the bile canaliculus, whereas Golgi-to-bile
canaliculus trafficking of SPGP involved additional intermediate steps.
At 1 h after metabolic labeling, only the mature form of SPGP was
detected in the homogenate, indicating that processing and passage
through the Golgi were complete at this point. This is also supported
by decreased radioactivity to background levels in immunoprecipitates
from Golgi membranes after 1 h. At this time point, SPGP was not
detected in SMVs and CMVs and therefore had not reached the cell
surface. The most likely explanation is that SPGP is sequestered in an
intracellular pool prior to delivery to the canalicular membrane (Fig.
8). Interestingly, immunogold electron
microscopic detection of SPGP in rat hepatocytes revealed that the
distribution of SPGP in the rat hepatocyte is not restricted only to
the bile canaliculus, but labeling of SPGP was also detected in
electron translucent vacuoles close to the apical membrane (9).
Pericanalicular distribution of SPGP was also demonstrated by
immunofluorescent staining of isolated rat hepatocyte couplets (47).
These subapical structures containing SPGP may represent the transient
intracellular pool in which newly synthesized SPGP is transiently
sequestered prior to its targeting to the bile canaliculus.
In metabolic pulse-chase experiments, ABC transporters peaked in Golgi
membranes only 30 min after labeling; thus, it is unlikely that the
labeled cohort of ABC transporters is not detected in SMVs due to very
rapid transcytosis. But we cannot completely exclude the possibility
that a very small portion of ABC transporters, which is below the
detection limit, may be trafficked to the basolateral membrane and
undergo transcytosis. SMV/CMV mixing experiments demonstrated that
<5% of the labeled cohort of MDR1 and MDR2 (C219 antibody) and
<2.5% of the labeled SPGP cohort (LVT90 antibody) can be
theoretically detected in SMVs with our procedure. If a transcytotic
pathway for the ABC transporters exists in rat hepatocytes, it is
utilized by <2.5-5% of the canalicular ABC transporters that were
studied. It is therefore reasonable to assume that transcytosis is not
a significant pathway for membrane targeting of newly synthesized ABC
transporters. In contrast, newly synthesized canalicular ABC transporters are predominantly if not exclusively targeted directly from the Golgi to the bile canaliculus with or without intermediate intracellular sequestering.
There is additional evidence from earlier studies for a direct
Golgi-to-bile canaliculus pathway after biosynthesis of ABC transporters. Disturbance of transhepatic trafficking by either colchicine, which disrupts microtubules, or wortmannin, which inhibits
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, results in accumulation of the
transcytosing molecule cCAM105 in the basolateral membrane, but does
not result in detectable levels of ABC transporters in the basolateral
membrane (12). These results indicate non-transcytotic trafficking for
canalicular ABC transporters.
WIF-B cells are a hybrid of rat hepatoma cells and human fibroblasts,
have functional bile canaliculi, and serve as a useful model for
hepatocytes (48, 49). Membrane targeting of an MDR1-green fluorescent
protein chimera stably transfected into WIF-B cells was recently
studied by Sai et al. (50). Fluorescence of the MDR1-green
fluorescent protein chimera was exclusively detected in Golgi and bile
canalicular membranes; no labeling of basolateral plasma membranes was
observed. Time-lapse video imaging revealed that MDR1-green fluorescent
protein traveled directly from the Golgi to the bile canaliculus.
Trafficking from the Golgi to the apical membrane occurred in tubular
vesicular structures at 0.02-0.6 µm/s. These observations strongly
support the rapid and direct pathway detected with the C219 antibody
(anti-MDR1/MDR2) in the present in vivo study.
Direct Golgi-to-apical membrane targeting of newly synthesized ABC
transporters is in contrast to earlier work in which transcytotic targeting was proposed for these canalicular transporters (17, 47). The
assumption was based on immunofluorescence detection of canalicular ABC
transporters in the basolateral membrane of isolated rat hepatocyte
couplets. However, the "basolateral membrane" of rat hepatocyte
couplets also originates from parts of other hepatocytes that are
ripped from the bile canaliculi of adjacent hepatocytes. Consequently,
the basolateral membrane of rat hepatocyte couplets represents a
mixture of basolateral membrane and the remainder of former bile
canaliculi, which likely explains detectable ABC transporter levels in
the rat hepatocyte couplet periphery.
Soroka et al. (47) demonstrated, by immunogold electron
microscopy, colocalization of the transcytosis marker polymeric immunoglobulin A receptor and SPGP (there called bile salt export pump)
in the same vesicles from a population of tubulin-bound vesicles in rat
liver and proposed transcytotic targeting of both newly synthesized
proteins. In contrast, our study does not reveal evidence for newly
synthesized SPGP to be initially targeted to the basolateral membrane.
SPGP was transiently sequestered in an intracellular pool. Probably,
this pool is a subapical compartment involved in sorting and/or apical
recycling similar to that observed in other epithelial cells
(i.e. WIF-B cells (51), Madin-Darby canine kidney cells
(52), and Caco-2 cells (53)). Furthermore, in Madin-Darby canine kidney
cells, a subapical compartment is an intermediate station for the
polymeric immunoglobulin A receptor transcytotic basolateral-to-apical
trafficking (54, 55). The observed intracellular SPGP pool is therefore
most likely the site at which directly targeted biosynthesized
canalicular ABC transporters and proteins undergoing transcytosis merge.
This study prompts revision of current views regarding the trafficking
of newly synthesized canalicular proteins in hepatocytes. Direct
Golgi-to-apical membrane trafficking of ABC transporters with or
without subapical accumulation probably provides specific physiological
regulation of transporter recruitment and function and may provide
targets for drugs that impair bile acid secretion, resulting in
cholestasis. We are currently investigating these mechanisms.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We are grateful to Nipaporn Pichetshote for
skillful technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Research Grant Ki 640 (to H. K.) and by NIDDK Grants DK35652 and 30DK34928 (Digestive Disease Center) from the National Institutes of
Health (to I. M. A.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology,
Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Ave., Boston, MA
02111. Tel.: 617-636-6739; Fax: 617-636-0445; E-mail:
Irwin.Arias@Tufts.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 24, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M909875199
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ASGP-R, asialoglycoprotein receptor;
CMV, canalicular membrane vesicle;
SMV, sinusoidal membrane vesicle;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Nishida, T.,
Gatmaitan, Z.,
Che, M.,
and Arias, I. M.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
6590-6594
|
| 2.
|
Nishida, T.,
Hardenbrook, C.,
Gatmaitan, Z.,
and Arias, I. M.
(1992)
Am. J. Physiol.
262,
G629-G635
|
| 3.
|
Stieger, B.,
O'Neill, B.,
and Meier, P. J.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
284,
67-74
|
| 4.
|
Gatmaitan, Z. C.,
and Arias, I. M.
(1995)
Physiol. Rev.
75,
261-275
|
| 5.
|
Higgins, C. F.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
8,
67-113
|
| 6.
|
Kamimoto, Y.,
Gatmaitan, Z.,
Hsu, J.,
and Arias, I. M.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
11693-11698
|
| 7.
|
Ruetz, S.,
and Gros, P.
(1994)
Cell
77,
1071-1081
|
| 8.
|
Nies, A. T.,
Gatmaitan, Z.,
and Arias, I. M.
(1996)
J. Lipid Res.
37,
1125-1136
|
| 9.
|
Gerloff, T.,
Stieger, B.,
Hagenbuch, B.,
Madon, J.,
Landmann, L.,
Roth, J.,
Hofmann, A. F.,
and Meier, P. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10046-10050
|
| 10.
|
Büchler, M.,
König, J.,
Brom, M.,
Kartenbeck, J.,
Spring, H.,
Horie, T.,
and Keppler, D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15091-15098
|
| 11.
|
Gatmaitan, Z. C.,
Nies, A. T.,
and Arias, I. M.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
272,
G1041-G1049
|
| 12.
|
Misra, S.,
Ujhazy, P.,
Gatmaitan, Z.,
Varticovski, L.,
and Arias, I. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
26638-26644
|
| 13.
|
Misra, S.,
Ujhazy, P.,
Varticovski, L.,
and Arias, I. M.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
5814-5819
|
| 14.
|
Bartles, J. R.,
Feracci, H. M.,
Stieger, B.,
and Hubbard, A. L.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
105,
1241-1251
|
| 15.
|
Schell, M. J.,
Maurice, M.,
Stieger, B.,
and Hubbard, A. L.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
119,
1173-1182
|
| 16.
|
Bartles, J. R.,
and Hubbard, A. L.
(1988)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
13,
181-184
|
| 17.
|
Roelofsen, H.,
Soroka, C. J.,
Keppler, D.,
and Boyer, J. L.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
1137-1145
|
| 18.
|
Lin, S. H.,
Culic, O.,
Flanagan, D.,
and Hixson, D. C.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
278,
155-161
|
| 19.
|
Bartles, J. R.,
Braiterman, L. T.,
and Hubbard, A. L.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
12792-12802
|
| 20.
|
Stockert, R. J.,
and Morell, A. G.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
1841-1846
|
| 21.
|
Inoue, M.,
Kinne, R.,
Tran, T.,
Biempica, L.,
and Arias, I. M.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
5183-5188
|
| 22.
|
Inoue, M.,
Kinne, R.,
Tran, T.,
and Arias, I. M.
(1982)
Hepatology
2,
572-579
|
| 23.
|
Subramaniam, V. N.,
bin Mohd Yusoff, A. R.,
Wong, S. H.,
Lim, G. B.,
Chew, M.,
and Hong, W.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
12016-12021
|
| 24.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
|
| 25.
|
Towbin, H.,
Staehelin, T.,
and Gordon, J.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
4350-4354
|
| 26.
|
Lowry, O. H.,
Rosebrough, N. J.,
Farr, A. L.,
and Randall, R. J.
(1951)
J. Biol. Chem.
193,
265-275
|
| 27.
|
Orlowski, M.,
and Meister, A.
(1963)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
73,
679-681
|
| 28.
|
Walter, K.,
and Schütt, C.
(1974)
in
Methods of Enzymatic Analysis
(Bergmeyer, H. U., ed), Vol. II
, pp. 856-864, Academic Press, New York
|
| 29.
|
Heidrich, H. G.,
Kinne, R.,
Kinne-Saffran, E.,
and Hannig, K.
(1972)
J. Cell Biol.
54,
232-245
|
| 30.
|
Sztul, E.,
Kaplin, A.,
Saucan, L.,
and Palade, G.
(1991)
Cell
64,
81-89
|
| 31.
|
Silverman, J. A.,
Raunio, H.,
Gant, T. W.,
and Thorreirsson, S. S.
(1991)
Gene (Amst.)
106,
229-236
|
| 32.
|
Brown, P. C.,
Thorgeirsson, S. S.,
Snorri, S.,
and Silverman, J. A.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
3885-3891
|
| 33.
|
Georges, E.,
Bradley, G.,
Gariepy, J.,
and Ling, V.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
152-156
|
| 34.
|
Nakada, H.,
Sawamura, T.,
Okumura, T.,
and Tashiro, Y.
(1986)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
99,
867-876
|
| 35.
|
Wall, D. A.,
and Hubbard, A. L.
(1985)
J. Cell Biol.
101,
2104-2112
|
| 36.
|
Mostov, K.,
Apodaca, G.,
Aroeti, B.,
and Okamoto, C.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
116,
577-583
|
| 37.
|
Keller, P.,
and Simons, K.
(1997)
J. Cell Sci.
110,
3001-3009
|
| 38.
|
Lisanti, M. P.,
LeBivic, A.,
Sargiacomo, M.,
and Rodriguez-Boulan, E.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
2117-2127
|
| 39.
|
LeBivic, A.,
Sambuy, Y.,
Mostov, K.,
and Rodriguez-Boulan, E.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
110,
1533-1539
|
| 40.
|
Schleiffle, P.,
Peranen, J.,
and Simons, K.
(1995)
Nature
378,
96-98
|
| 41.
|
Mostov, K. E.,
and Deitcher, D. L.
(1986)
Cell
46,
613-621
|
| 42.
|
Gibson, A.,
Futter, C. E.,
Maxwell, S.,
Allchin, E. H.,
Shipman, M.,
Kraehenbuhl, J. P.,
Domingo, D.,
Odorizzi, G.,
Trowbridge, I. S.,
and Hopkins, C. R.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
81-94
|
| 43.
|
Brändli, A. W.,
Parton, R. G.,
and Simons, K.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
2902-2921
|
| 44.
|
Matter, K.,
Brauchbar, M.,
Bucher, K.,
and Hauri, H. P.
(1990)
Cell
60,
429-437
|
| 45.
|
LeBivic, A.,
Quaroni, A.,
Nichols, B.,
and Rodriguez-Boulan, E.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
1351-1361
|
| 46.
|
Bartles, J. R.,
and Hubbard, A. L.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
191,
825-841
|
| 47.
|
Soroka, C. J.,
Pate, M. K.,
and Boyer, J. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
26416-26424
|
| 48.
|
Ihrke, G.,
Neufeld, E. B.,
Meads, T.,
Shanks, M. R.,
Cassio, D.,
Laurent, M.,
Schroer, T. A.,
Pagano, R. E.,
and Hubbard, A. L.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
1761-1775
|
| 49.
|
Shanks, M. R.,
Cassio, D.,
Lecoq, O.,
and Hubbard, A. L.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
813-825
|
| 50.
|
Sai, Y.,
Nies, A. T.,
and Arias, I. M.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
4535-4545
|
| 51.
|
Ihrke, G.,
Martin, G. V.,
Shanks, M. R.,
Schrader, M.,
Schroer, T. A.,
and Hubbard, A. L.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
115-133
|
| 52.
|
Bomsel, M.,
Prydz, K.,
Parton, R. G.,
Gruenberg, J.,
and Simons, K.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
3243-3258
|
| 53.
|
Hughson, E. J.,
and Hopkins, C. R.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
110,
337-348
|
| 54.
|
Apodaca, G.,
Katz, L. A.,
and Mostov, K. E.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
125,
67-86
|
| 55.
|
Barroso, M.,
and Sztul, E. S.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
124,
83-100
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Miller, B. Bauer, and A. M. S. Hartz
Modulation of P-Glycoprotein at the Blood-Brain Barrier: Opportunities to Improve Central Nervous System Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacol. Rev.,
June 1, 2008;
60(2):
196 - 209.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kagawa, N. Watanabe, K. Mochizuki, A. Numari, Y. Ikeno, J. Itoh, H. Tanaka, I. M. Arias, and T. Mine
Phenotypic differences in PFIC2 and BRIC2 correlate with protein stability of mutant Bsep and impaired taurocholate secretion in MDCK II cells
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
January 1, 2008;
294(1):
G58 - G67.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Theard, M. Steiner, D. Kalicharan, D. Hoekstra, and S. C.D. van IJzendoorn
Cell Polarity Development and Protein Trafficking in Hepatocytes Lacking E-Cadherin/beta-Catenin-based Adherens Junctions
Mol. Biol. Cell,
June 1, 2007;
18(6):
2313 - 2321.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Fu and B. D. Roufogalis
Actin disruption inhibits endosomal traffic of P-glycoprotein-EGFP and resistance to daunorubicin accumulation
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
April 1, 2007;
292(4):
C1543 - C1552.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Mochizuki, T. Kagawa, A. Numari, M. J. Harris, J. Itoh, N. Watanabe, T. Mine, and I. M. Arias
Two N-linked glycans are required to maintain the transport activity of the bile salt export pump (ABCB11) in MDCK II cells
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
March 1, 2007;
292(3):
G818 - G828.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Fausther, J. Lecka, F. Kukulski, S. A. Levesque, J. Pelletier, H. Zimmermann, J. A. Dranoff, and J. Sevigny
Cloning, purification, and identification of the liver canalicular ecto-ATPase as NTPDase8
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
March 1, 2007;
292(3):
G785 - G795.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Sarkadi, L. Homolya, G. Szakacs, and A. Varadi
Human Multidrug Resistance ABCB and ABCG Transporters: Participation in a Chemoimmunity Defense System.
Physiol Rev,
October 1, 2006;
86(4):
1179 - 1236.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Wang, F. Sun, D.-w. Zhang, Y. Ma, F. Xu, J. D. Belani, J. C. Cohen, H. H. Hobbs, and X.-S. Xie
Sterol Transfer by ABCG5 and ABCG8: IN VITRO ASSAY AND RECONSTITUTION
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 22, 2006;
281(38):
27894 - 27904.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Wojtal, E. de Vries, D. Hoekstra, and S. C.D. van IJzendoorn
Efficient Trafficking of MDR1/P-Glycoprotein to Apical Canalicular Plasma Membranes in HepG2 Cells Requires PKA-RII{alpha} Anchoring and Glucosylceramide
Mol. Biol. Cell,
August 1, 2006;
17(8):
3638 - 3650.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. R. Simon, M. Iwahashi, L.-J. Hu, I. Qadri, I. M. Arias, D. Ortiz, R. Dahl, and E. Sutherland
Hormonal regulation of hepatic multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Abcc2) primarily involves the pattern of growth hormone secretion
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
April 1, 2006;
290(4):
G595 - G608.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.-N. Lian, T.-W. Wu, R.-L. Dao, Y.-J. Chen, and C.-H. Lin
Deglycosylation of Na+/K+-ATPase causes the basolateral protein to undergo apical targeting in polarized hepatic cells
J. Cell Sci.,
January 1, 2006;
119(1):
11 - 22.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Wakabayashi, P. Dutt, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, and I. M. Arias
Rab11a and myosin Vb are required for bile canalicular formation in WIF-B9 cells
PNAS,
October 18, 2005;
102(42):
15087 - 15092.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Chan, G. Calderon, A. L. Swift, J. Moseley, S. Li, H. Hosoya, I. M. Arias, and D. F. Ortiz
Myosin II Regulatory Light Chain Is Required for Trafficking of Bile Salt Export Protein to the Apical Membrane in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 24, 2005;
280(25):
23741 - 23747.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Wustner
Mathematical Analysis of Hepatic High Density Lipoprotein Transport Based on Quantitative Imaging Data
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 25, 2005;
280(8):
6766 - 6779.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Mottino, F. A. Crocenzi, E. J. S. Pozzi, L. M. Veggi, M. G. Roma, and M. Vore
Role of microtubules in estradiol-17{beta}-D-glucuronide-induced alteration of canalicular Mrp2 localization and activity
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
February 1, 2005;
288(2):
G327 - G336.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Schuck and K. Simons
Polarized sorting in epithelial cells: raft clustering and the biogenesis of the apical membrane
J. Cell Sci.,
December 1, 2004;
117(25):
5955 - 5964.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. R. Simon, J. Fortune, M. Iwahashi, I. Qadri, and E. Sutherland
Multihormonal regulation of hepatic sinusoidal Ntcp gene expression
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
October 1, 2004;
287(4):
G782 - G794.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Shoda, Y. Inada, A. Tsuji, H. Kusama, T. Ueda, T. Ikegami, H. Suzuki, Y. Sugiyama, D. E. Cohen, and N. Tanaka
Bezafibrate stimulates canalicular localization of NBD-labeled PC in HepG2 cells by PPAR{alpha}-mediated redistribution of ABCB4
J. Lipid Res.,
October 1, 2004;
45(10):
1813 - 1825.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Cohen, E. Rodriguez-Boulan, and A. Musch
Par-1 promotes a hepatic mode of apical protein trafficking in MDCK cells
PNAS,
September 21, 2004;
101(38):
13792 - 13797.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. F. Ortiz, J. Moseley, G. Calderon, A. L. Swift, S. Li, and I. M. Arias
Identification of HAX-1 as a Protein That Binds Bile Salt Export Protein and Regulates Its Abundance in the Apical Membrane of Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 30, 2004;
279(31):
32761 - 32770.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Wakabayashi, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, and I. M. Arias
Intracellular Trafficking of Bile Salt Export Pump (ABCB11) in Polarized Hepatic Cells: Constitutive Cycling between the Canalicular Membrane and rab11-positive Endosomes
Mol. Biol. Cell,
July 1, 2004;
15(7):
3485 - 3496.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Hoekstra, D. Tyteca, and S. C. D. van IJzendoorn
The subapical compartment: a traffic center in membrane polarity development
J. Cell Sci.,
May 1, 2004;
117(11):
2183 - 2192.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kipp, S. Khoursandi, D. Scharlau, and R. K. H. Kinne
More than apical: distribution of SGLT1 in Caco-2 cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
October 1, 2003;
285(4):
C737 - C749.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Sehayek, R. Wang, J. G. Ono, V. S. Zinchuk, E. M. Duncan, S. Shefer, D. E. Vance, M. Ananthanarayanan, B. T. Chait, and J. L. Breslow
Localization of the PE methylation pathway and SR-BI to the canalicular membrane: evidence for apical PC biosynthesis that may promote biliary excretion of phospholipid and cholesterol
J. Lipid Res.,
September 1, 2003;
44(9):
1605 - 1613.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Misra, L. Varticovski, and I. M. Arias
Mechanisms by which cAMP increases bile acid secretion in rat liver and canalicular membrane vesicles
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
July 7, 2003;
285(2):
G316 - G324.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Slimane, G. Trugnan, S. C.D. van IJzendoorn, and D. Hoekstra
Raft-mediated Trafficking of Apical Resident Proteins Occurs in Both Direct and Transcytotic Pathways in Polarized Hepatic Cells: Role of Distinct Lipid Microdomains
Mol. Biol. Cell,
February 1, 2003;
14(2):
611 - 624.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Maier and D. Hoekstra
Trans-Golgi Network and Subapical Compartment of HepG2 Cells Display Different Properties in Sorting and Exiting of Sphingolipids
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 3, 2003;
278(1):
164 - 173.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Swiatecka-Urban, M. Duhaime, B. Coutermarsh, K. H. Karlson, J. Collawn, M. Milewski, G. R. Cutting, W. B. Guggino, G. Langford, and B. A. Stanton
PDZ Domain Interaction Controls the Endocytic Recycling of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 11, 2002;
277(42):
40099 - 40105.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bastaki, L. T. Braiterman, D. C. Johns, Y.-H. Chen, and A. L. Hubbard
Absence of Direct Delivery for Single Transmembrane Apical Proteins or Their ""Secretory"" Forms in Polarized Hepatic Cells
Mol. Biol. Cell,
January 1, 2002;
13(1):
225 - 237.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. D. Luker, J. L. Dahlheimer, R. E. Ostlund Jr., and D. Piwnica-Worms
Decreased hepatic accumulation and enhanced esterification of cholesterol in mice deficient in mdr1a and mdr1b P-glycoproteins
J. Lipid Res.,
September 1, 2001;
42(9):
1389 - 1394.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kipp, N. Pichetshote, and I. M. Arias
Transporters on Demand. INTRAHEPATIC POOLS OF CANALICULAR ATP BINDING CASSETTE TRANSPORTERS IN RAT LIVER
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 2, 2001;
276(10):
7218 - 7224.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ananthanarayanan, N. Balasubramanian, M. Makishima, D. J. Mangelsdorf, and F. J. Suchy
Human Bile Salt Export Pump Promoter Is Transactivated by the Farnesoid X Receptor/Bile Acid Receptor
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 27, 2001;
276(31):
28857 - 28865.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|