Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M909875199 on March 24, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 21, 15917-15925, May 26, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/21/15917    most recent
M909875199v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kipp, H.
Right arrow Articles by Arias, I. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kipp, H.
Right arrow Articles by Arias, I. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Newly Synthesized Canalicular ABC Transporters Are Directly Targeted from the Golgi to the Hepatocyte Apical Domain in Rat Liver*

Helmut Kipp and Irwin M. AriasDagger

From the Department of Physiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111

Received for publication, December 9, 1999, and in revised form, March 1, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Newly synthesized canalicular ectoenzymes and a cell adhesion molecule (cCAM105) have been shown to traffic from the Golgi to the basolateral plasma membrane, from where they transcytose to the apical bile canalicular domain. It has been proposed that all canalicular proteins are targeted via this indirect route in hepatocytes. We studied the membrane targeting of rat canalicular proteins by in vivo [35S]methionine metabolic labeling followed by preparation of highly purified Golgi membranes and canalicular (CMVs) and sinusoidal/basolateral (SMVs) membrane vesicles and subsequent immunoprecipitation. In particular, we compared membrane targeting of newly synthesized canalicular ABC (ATP-binding cassette) transporters MDR1, MDR2, and SPGP (sister of P-glycoprotein) with that of cCAM105. Significant differences were observed in metabolic pulse-chase labeling experiments with regard to membrane targeting of these apical proteins. After a chase time of 15 min, cCAM105 appeared exclusively in SMVs, peaked at 1 h, and progressively declined thereafter. In CMVs, cCAM105 was first detected after 1 h and subsequently increased for 3 h. This findings confirm the transcytotic targeting of cCAM105 reported in earlier studies. In contrast, at no time point investigated were MDR1, MDR2, and SPGP detected in SMVs. In CMVs, MDR1 and MDR2 appeared after 30 min, whereas SPGP appeared after 2 h of labeling. In Golgi membranes, each of the ABC transporters peaked at 30 min and was virtually absent thereafter. These data suggest rapid, direct targeting of newly synthesized MDR1 and MDR2 from the Golgi to the bile canaliculus and transient sequestering of SPGP in an intracellular pool en route from the Golgi to the apical plasma membrane. This study provides biochemical evidence for direct targeting of newly synthesized apical ABC transporters from the Golgi to the bile canaliculus in vivo.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The bile canalicular membrane of the mammalian hepatocyte contains several primary active transporters that couple ATP hydrolysis to the transport of specific substrates into the bile canaliculus (1-4). These transporters are members of the superfamily of ABC (ATP-binding cassette) membrane transport proteins (5) and currently include P-glycoprotein or MDR1 (multidrug resistance protein; organic cations) (6), MDR2 (phosphatidylcholine) (7, 8), SPGP (sister of P-glycoprotein; bile acids) (9), and MRP2 (multidrug resistance-associated protein; non-bile acid organic anions) (10).

The amount of each ABC transporter in the canalicular membrane is regulated by the physiological demand to excrete bile acids. Intravenous administration of rats with taurocholate or dibutyryl cAMP rapidly and selectively increased the functional activity and amount of ABC transporters in the canalicular membrane. This increase was inhibited by prior administration of colchicine, which disrupts microtubules (11), and wortmannin, which inhibits phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (12). These observations indicate that an intracellular microtubule-dependent transport mechanism that is sensitive to active phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is required to traffic ABC transporters to the canalicular membrane. In addition, lipid products of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase directly regulate the ATP-dependent substrate transport activity of SPGP and MRP2 in the canalicular membrane (13). These studies indicate that bile secretion requires intrahepatic trafficking and regulation of the canalicular ABC transporters.

Membrane targeting of the newly synthesized canalicular ectoenzymes dipeptidyl peptidase IV, aminopeptidase N, and 5'-nucleotidase and the canalicular cell adhesion molecule cCAM105 (also known as HA4) has been studied in rat liver by in vivo metabolic pulse-chase labeling. After biosynthesis, these canalicular proteins are transferred from the Golgi to the basolateral membrane and subsequently reach the bile canaliculus only by transcytosis (14, 15). Based on these results, it was proposed that all newly synthesized canalicular proteins, including canalicular ABC-type transporters, are targeted via this indirect route (16, 17). Although the membrane targeting of newly synthesized canalicular ectoenzymes and cell adhesion molecule cCAM105 has been thoroughly studied, comparable investigations of canalicular ABC transporters have not been performed.

In this study, we used metabolic pulse-chase labeling followed by subcellular fractionation of rat liver and immunoprecipitation to investigate the intracellular trafficking of newly synthesized canalicular proteins. In particular, we focused on membrane targeting of newly synthesized transporters of the MDR family, including SPGP, and compared their trafficking with that of cCAM105 and with the basolateral membrane resident asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGP-R).1

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials

Radiochemicals were supplied by NEN Life Science Products. All other chemicals were of the highest purity available and were purchased from Sigma. Monoclonal antibody C219 (anti-MDR1/MDR2) was from Centocor (Malvern, PA), and polyclonal anti-beta -COP antibody was from Sigma. Other antibodies were kind donations: EAG15 (polyclonal, anti-MRP2), D. Keppler (10); Ab669 (polyclonal, anti-cCAM105), S. H. Lin, (18); HA301 (monoclonal, anti-dipeptidyl peptidase IV), A. L. Hubbard (19); and anti-ASGP-R, R. J. Stockert (20).

Generation of Anti-SPGP Antibody LVT90

A glutathione S-transferase fusion protein containing a 90-amino acid fragment of the SPGP linker region (amino acids 653-742, starting with LVT) was used as antigen to raise antibody LVT90. The corresponding coding DNA fragment was amplified from full-length SPGP cDNA (provided by P. Meier, (9) by polymerase chain reaction using the oligonucleotides 5'-AAT GAA TCC TGC TTG TGA CCC TGC AAA G-3' (containing a BamHI site) and 5'-ATT GTC GAC TAC CTA ACT GGG GCA GGT TC-3' (containing a SalI site). The polymerase chain reaction product was digested by BamHI and SalI and ligated into the BamHI/SalI sites of the pGEX-5X-3 vector (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). In-frame cloning was confirmed by DNA sequencing. Expression of the glutathione S-transferase fusion protein in Escherichia coli BL21 cells and purification using glutathione-Sepharose beads were performed according to protocols provided by Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. A commercial service was employed to raise antibodies in rabbits (Covance, Denver, PA) using a standard protocol for immunization and bleeding.

Metabolic Labeling

Groups of five male Sprague-Dawley rats (300-350 g) kept on a standard diet were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg, injected intraperitoneally) and were injected in the tail vein with 3.5 mCi of [35S]methionine/cysteine (1175 Ci/mmol; Expre35S35S protein label, NEN Life Science Products) in 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline. 15 min later, 50 mg of unlabeled methionine and 5 mg of unlabeled cysteine in 2.5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline were injected intraperitoneally. For investigation of membrane targeting, livers were removed after 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h and used for subcellular fractionation. Data presented are typical results observed in at least three sets of five rats.

Subcellular Fractionation of Rat Liver

Previously published methods were combined, modified, and optimized for a high yield of canalicular, sinusoidal/basolateral, and Golgi membranes from a single rat liver (Fig. 1). After gentle homogenation of rat liver, bile canaliculi remain attached to tight junctions and sediment with the low speed nuclear pellet. Canalicular membrane vesicles were prepared from the low speed pellet by nitrogen cavitation followed by calcium precipitation (21). The low speed supernatant was split and used for purification of basolateral membranes on a sucrose/Ficoll gradient (22) and for preparation of Golgi membranes by floating a microsomal fraction on a discontinuous sucrose gradient (23). Details are as follows.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic presentation of the protocol used to isolate CMVs, SMVs, and Golgi membranes from rat liver. HOM, homogenate.

Excised rat liver (10-15 g, wet weight) was rapidly perfused with ice-cold SHCa buffer (0.25 M sucrose, 10 mM HEPES/Tris, pH 7.4, and 0.2 mM CaCl2 supplemented with protease inhibitors (2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml pepstatin A, 20 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml benzamidine, and 2 µg/ml aprotinin)) and homogenized in 50 ml of SHCa buffer with four strokes in a loose-fitting Dounce homogenizer. The suspension was filtered through a double layer of cheesecloth; homogenized again with 15 strokes; diluted with SH buffer (SHCa buffer without CaCl2) to 140 ml; supplemented with 0.1 M EGTA stock solution, pH 7.4, to a final concentration of 1 mM; and centrifuged for 10 min at 1880 × g (Beckman JA-14, 3500 rpm). The pellet and fluffy layer were collected and used for preparation of CMVs. The supernatant (~130 ml) was split 1:1 and used for preparation of SMVs and Golgi membranes, respectively.

CMVs-- The pellet was resuspended in 50 ml of SHCa buffer and centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 × g (Beckman JA-14, 4500 rpm). The resulting pellet was suspended in 50 ml of SHCa buffer, placed in a high pressure chamber (Parr Instrument Model 4635), and equilibrated with nitrogen at 850 p.s.i. for 15 min with shaking at 4 °C. Pressure was released within 3 min; and the contents of the chamber were homogenized with six strokes in a tight-fitting Dounce homogenizer, diluted with SHCa buffer to 120 ml, and supplemented with 1 M CaCl2 stock solution to a final concentration of 10 mM. After incubation for 10 min on ice, the suspension was centrifuged for 20 min at 7600 × g (Beckman JA-14, 7000 rpm). The supernatant was filtered through fine weave cloth and centrifuged for 30 min at 47,000 × g (Beckman Ti-45, 27,000 rpm). The pellet was homogenized in 30 ml of SHCa buffer with six strokes in a tight-fitting Dounce homogenizer and centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 × g (Beckman JA-17, 4500 rpm). The supernatant was collected and centrifuged for 30 min at 47,000 × g (Beckman Ti-45, 27,000 rpm). The resulting pellet was homogenized in SHCa buffer at 3-4 mg/ml protein with a syringe and 24-gauge needle and stored at -80 °C until used.

SMVs-- 65 ml of the first supernatant was centrifuged for 10 min at 5500 × g (Beckman JA-14, 7500 rpm). The resulting supernatant and fluffy layer were collected and centrifuged for 30 min at 22,000 × g (Beckman JA-14, 12,000 rpm). The pellet was resuspended in SH buffer containing 1 mM EGTA (total volume of 12 ml) and layered on two discontinuous gradients consisting of 1 ml of 60% sucrose, 23 ml of 23% sucrose and 4% Ficoll 400, and 7 ml of 20% sucrose. After centrifugation for 90 min at 130,000 × g in a swinging bucket rotor (Beckman SW 27, 27,000 rpm), the interphase between 20% sucrose and 23% sucrose and 4% Ficoll was collected, diluted six times with SHCa buffer, and centrifuged for 30 min at 47,000 × g (Beckman Ti-45, 27,000 rpm). The resulting pellet was homogenized in SHCa buffer at ~10 mg/ml protein with a syringe and 24-gauge needle and stored at -80 °C until used.

Golgi-- 65 ml of the first supernatant was homogenized with 10 strokes in a tight-fitting Dounce homogenizer, supplemented with MgCl2 to a final concentration of 5 mM, and centrifuged for 10 min at 15,000 × g (Beckman JA-14, 10,000 rpm). The supernatant was saved, and the pellet was resuspended in 50 ml of SH buffer containing 5 mM MgCl2 and centrifuged again for 10 min at 15,000 × g. The two supernatants from the 15,000 × g spins were combined and centrifuged for 60 min at 140,000 × g (Beckman Ti-45, 35,000 rpm). The pellet was resuspended in 12 ml of 1.25 M sucrose and overlaid with 12 ml of 1.1 M sucrose and 12 ml of 0.25 M sucrose in a 36-ml tube for gradient centrifugation. After centrifugation for 90 min at 130,000 × g (Beckman SW 27, 27,000 rpm), the interphase between 0.25 M sucrose and 1.1 M sucrose was collected, diluted six times with SHCa buffer, and centrifuged for 30 min at 47,000 × g (Beckman Ti-45, 27,000 rpm). The resulting pellet was homogenized in SHCa buffer at 3-4 mg/ml protein with a syringe and 24-gauge needle and stored at -80 °C until used. Typical yields were 1.0-1.3 mg of membrane protein for CMV and Golgi preparations and 5-6 mg of protein for SMV preparations.

Immunoprecipitation

1 mg of protein of CMV, SMV, and Golgi preparations was solubilized for 1 h at 4 °C in 1 ml of buffer containing 20 mM octyl beta -D-glucopyranoside, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.3 M NaCl, and 0.025 M NaPi, pH 7.4, containing 0.02% NaN3 and protease inhibitors (2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml pepstatin A, 20 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml benzamidine, and 2 µg/ml aprotinin). The homogenate (40 mg of protein) was solubilized in 10 ml of the same buffer. The mixtures were centrifuged at 150,000 × g for 60 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were precleared by adding 40 µl of protein A-Sepharose beads, shaken for 30 min at 4 °C, and centrifuged for 5 min at 16,000 × g. The precleared supernatants were used for immunoprecipitation with monoclonal antibody C219 (10 µg of IgG) and antisera from polyclonal anti-ASGP-R (20 µl) and anti-cCAM105 (20 µl) antibodies and LVT90 (20 µl). By repeated immunoprecipitation followed by immunoblotting, it was established that these conditions are sufficient to precipitate completely the respective antigen. The lysates were employed for precipitation with each antibody in a sequential fashion. The order in which the proteins were immunoprecipitated proved to be uncritical. The detergent extracts were supplemented with bovine serum albumin to 0.5% and incubated with the respective antibody for 1 h at 4 °C with shaking. 40 µl of protein A-Sepharose beads was added, and incubation with shaking at 4 °C was continued for 1 h. The beads were sedimented for 1 min at 16,000 × g, washed four times by repeated suspension in 1 ml of the lysis buffer (without octyl glucoside and protease inhibitors), and centrifuged for 1 min at 16,000 × g. 30 µl of gel loading buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.5, 3% SDS, 10% glycerol, 5% beta -mercaptoethanol, 8 M urea, and 0.025% bromphenol blue) was added to the washed beads and heated to 95 °C for 5 min. To remove the Sepharose beads, the suspension was applied to a microcentrifuge column (Bio-Rad) and centrifuged for 2 min at 16,000 × g. The flow-through fraction was subjected to SDS-PAGE on an 8% gel (24). The gel was fixed with 1-propanol/water/acetic acid (25:65:10), stained with 0.25% Coomassie Blue in methanol/water/acetic acid (45:45:10), destained with methanol/water/acetic acid (20:75:5), and dried on filter paper (80 °C, 2 h, vacuum). The dried gel was exposed in a PhosphorImager cassette and read after 1 week with a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager.

Miscellaneous Methods

For Western blotting, polypeptides were electrotransferred (25) onto nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schüll). Antibodies were detected by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody, followed by detection with an enhanced chemiluminescence system (NEN Life Science Products). The method of Lowry et al. (26) was used for protein measurements with bovine serum albumin as the standard. The activities of marker enzymes were determined according to the following protocols: gamma -glutamyl transpeptidase (27), alkaline phosphatase (28), Na,K-ATPase (29), and galactosyltransferase (30).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Properties of Subcellular Fractionations-- The quality of the membrane preparations was determined by measuring the enrichment of marker enzymes (Table I). Marker enzymes for the canalicular membrane gamma -glutamyl transpeptidase and alkaline phosphatase were highly enriched only in CMVs (~45-fold) as compared with the homogenate. A marker for the basolateral membrane Na,K-ATPase was slightly increased in Golgi fractions, below the detection limit in CMVs, and enriched 16-fold in SMVs. The enrichment of marker enzymes was comparable to that reported previously (21, 22). Galactosyltransferase, a marker for Golgi membranes, was slightly enriched in SMVs, below the detection limit in CMVs, and 24-fold enriched in Golgi preparations. The yields of specific marker enzyme activities in CMVs and SMVs are consistent with data reported earlier (21, 22).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Specific activities of marker enzymes
Values represent means ± S.E. from four to seven determinations. The fold enrichment of marker enzymes compared with the homogenate (HOM) given in parentheses, and the yield of a specific activity is given in brackets. ND, not detected.

The quality of membrane preparations was further established by immunochemical methods. Monoclonal anti-beta -COP antibody recognizes an epitope shared by the Golgi beta -COP protein (110 kDa). Immunoblots probed with anti-beta -COP antibody showed significant enrichment in Golgi membranes as compared with the homogenate, whereas beta -COP was absent from canalicular and basolateral membranes (Fig. 2). CMV and SMV preparations were further characterized by probing with antibodies against apical and basolateral membrane resident proteins in immunoblots. As shown in Fig. 4, basolateral ASGP-R was detected only in SMVs and was absent from CMVs, whereas antibodies against the canalicular transporters MDR1 and MDR2 and SPGP and MRP2 reacted exclusively with antigens in CMVs.


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   beta -COP is highly enriched in Golgi membranes. Rat liver homogenate (H), CMVs (C), SMVs (S), and Golgi membranes (G) were separated by SDS-PAGE (10 µg of protein of each fraction), blotted onto nitrocellulose, and probed with the Golgi-specific anti-beta -COP antibody. The arrowhead indicates the position of the antigen.

Generation and Specificity of Anti-SPGP Antibody LVT90-- We were interested in antibodies directed against canalicular ABC-type transporters that were suitable for immunoprecipitation. Among available antibodies, only monoclonal antibody C219 (anti-MDR1/MDR2) met this property. Therefore, we generated a polyclonal antibody against the recently cloned canalicular bile acid transporter SPGP. Alignments of amino acid sequences revealed high similarity/homology among rat MDR1 (31), MDR2 (32), and SPGP (9): MDR1 versus SPGP, 48/68%; MDR1 versus MDR2, 69/82%; and MDR1 versus SPGP, 46/66%. A 90-amino acid peptide from the SPGP "linker" region that showed the lowest similarity/homology to the other MDR transporters was chosen as immunogen for the generation of anti-SPGP antibody LVT90.

Monoclonal antibody C219 was raised against MDR1 constitutively overexpressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells and is directed against two hexapeptides located close to the ATP-binding sites in CHO-MDR1, VQAALD and VQEALD (33). Both recognition motifs are present in rat MDR1 and MDR2 at the same position. In rat SPGP, the corresponding sites are altered to VQEALN and VQTALD. In the first recognition sequence, aspartic acid, which is critical for antigen recognition (33), was replaced by asparagine. In the second recognition sequence, glutamic acid was replaced by threonine.

In immunoblots, the polyclonal anti-SPGP antibody LVT90 showed strong reaction with a 170-kDa protein in CMVs that was absent from SMVs (see Fig. 4). Preimmune serum did not show reactions with CMVs or SMVs. Reaction of LVT90 with CMVs was competed by addition of the glutathione S-transferase fusion protein (data not shown). To test for possible cross-reactivity between C219 and LVT90, we performed immunoprecipitations followed by immunoblotting (Fig. 3). A lysate of rat liver CMVs (500 µg) was immunoprecipitated first with anti-SPGP antibody LVT90 (lanes A) followed by anti-MDR1/MDR2 antibody C219 (lanes B). In a similar experiment, CMV lysate was first immunoprecipitated with C219 (lanes C) followed by LVT90 (lanes D). Immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with either LVT90 or C219. Reaction of LVT90 in immunoblots was observed only when LVT90 was used for immunoprecipitation. Whether LVT90 immunoprecipitation was before or after precipitation with C219 was uncritical. Furthermore, C219 immunoprecipitates showed no reaction with LVT90 in immunoblots. The same applied for C219 immunoblots. Positive reactions were observed only when C219 was used for the initial precipitation, and no reaction was observed with LVT90 precipitates. The sequence in which antibodies were employed for precipitation was not critical. These immunoprecipitation/blotting experiments indicate that there is no cross-reactivity between the C219 and LVT90 antibodies with regard to immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting. Thus, C219 is specific for rat MDR1 and MDR2, and LVT90 is specific for rat SPGP.


View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Antibodies C219 and LVT90 do not cross-react. Rat liver CMVs (500 µg) were immunoprecipitated first with anti-SPGP antibody LVT90 (lanes A) followed by anti-MDR1/MDR2 antibody C219 (lanes B). In a second similar experiment, CMVs were first immunoprecipitated with C219 (lanes C) followed by LVT90 (lanes D). Immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with either LVT90 or C219. Arrowheads indicate the positions of the antigens.

CMV/SMV Distribution of Canalicular Proteins in Immunoblots-- Western blots of purified CMVs and SMVs that were probed with antibodies against canalicular proteins are shown in Fig. 4. Anti-dipeptidyl peptidase IV and anti-cCAM105 antibodies predominantly reacted with CMVs, and a small amount was regularly observed in SMVs. We explain the presence of these "canalicular" proteins in SMVs by the fact that these membrane proteins are initially transferred to the basolateral membrane after biosynthesis and subsequently reach the apical pole by transcytosis (14). This scenario is in good accordance with detectable steady-state levels in SMVs. Under the same conditions, antibodies against the canalicular ABC-type transporters, C219 (anti-MDR1/MDR2), LVT90 (anti-SPGP), and EAG15 (anti-MRP2), exclusively recognized antigens in CMVs, which suggests that newly synthesized canalicular ABC transporters may not be initially trafficked to the basolateral plasma membrane.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   CMV/SMV distribution of hepatic membrane proteins. Rat liver CMVs (C) and SMVs (S), 10 mg each, were separated by SDS-PAGE; blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane; and probed with antibodies against the basolateral membrane resident ASGP-R and the bile canaliculus resident proteins MDR1 and MDR2 (detected with the C219 antibody (anti-MDR1/MDR2)), SPGP, the organic anion transporter MRP2, the ectoenzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV), and the canalicular cell adhesion molecule cCAM105. Arrowheads indicate the positions of antigens.

Metabolic Pulse-Chase Labeling-- To test the hypothesis of direct apical targeting of canalicular ABC transporters in rat hepatocytes, we performed metabolic pulse-chase labeling experiments. Rats were injected with [35S]methionine, and labeling of newly synthesized proteins was terminated 15 min later by injection of an excess of unlabeled methionine. Livers from individual rats were excised after chase times of 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h, and CMVs, SMVs, and Golgi membranes were prepared. Each fraction was immunoprecipitated with anti-ASGP-R, anti-cCAM105, C219 (anti-MDR1/MDR2), and LVT90 (anti-SPGP) antibodies; immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE; and radioactive bands were detected and quantified with a PhosphorImager. The results are presented in Fig. 5.


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Metabolic pulse-chase labeling. Rats were pulse-labeled for 15 min with [35S]methionine and then chased with unlabeled methionine for 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h. ASGP-R (A), cCAM105 (C), MDR1/MDR2 (E), and SPGP (G) were then immunoprecipitated (IP) from liver homogenates (HOM), Golgi membranes, CMVs, and SMVs. 35S in immunoprecipitates from CMVs and SMVs separated by SDS-PAGE was detected and quantified with a PhosphorImager and plotted versus the chase time to illustrate the membrane targeting of each membrane protein (B, D, F, and H). Arrowheads indicate the positions of mature antigens. Experiments shown are representative and show typical results observed in at least three sets of five rats. arb. units, arbitrary units.

Membrane targeting of ASGP-R was investigated as a control experiment to validate our experimental procedures using a sinusoidal membrane resident protein. ASGP-R consists of three subunits (43, 54, and 64 kDa) (34) and is a well established sinusoidal membrane protein that is involved in receptor-mediated endocytosis (35). ASGP-R in the basolateral membrane binds to ligands with terminal N-acetylglucosamine residues, and the ligand-receptor complex is internalized into endosomes, where the complex is split; ASGP-R is recycled to the basolateral membrane, and the ligand is targeted to lysosomes. After immunoprecipitation and a chase time of 15 min, the three subunits of ASGP-R were detected exclusively in SMVs, peaked at 1 h, and declined thereafter. The decline after 1 h results from internalization of receptor from the sinusoidal membrane into endosomes. More important, this experiment shows that in immunoblots and by immunoprecipitation from CMVs and SMVs, ASGP-R is exclusively detected in SMVs, which further validates the quality of the plasma membrane preparations.

Radiolabeled MDR1, MDR2, and SPGP peaked in Golgi membranes after a chase time of 30 min and were virtually absent from the Golgi at later time points, indicating that processing and passage through the Golgi of these ABC transporters are complete after 30-60 min. This is also supported by the fact that immature forms of SPGP disappeared from homogenates at chase times later than 30 min. Under the same conditions, MDR1 and MDR2 could not be immunoprecipitated from the homogenate with C219 antibody, probably due to a much lower abundance of MDR1 and MDR2 compared with SPGP. Compared with ABC transporters, the passage of cCAM105 through the Golgi was slower. In Golgi membranes, cCAM105 was detected up to 2 h, which was paralleled by the presence of immature proteins in the homogenate for the same time period. The slower passage of cCAM105 through the Golgi may result from its greater extent of glycosylation compared with that of ABC transporters.

Beside passage through the Golgi, major differences were also observed among the canalicular membrane proteins with regard to membrane targeting. After a chase time of 15 min, newly synthesized cCAM105 appeared exclusively in SMVs, peaked at 1 h, and progressively declined thereafter. In CMVs, cCAM105 was first detected after 1 h and subsequently increased for 3 h. These observations are in accordance with transcytotic targeting of cCAM105 and confirm results from earlier studies (14). This experiment also demonstrates that our experimental procedure efficiently detects transcytotic targeting. After a chase time of 30 min, MDR1 and MDR2 appeared exclusively in CMVs and increased thereafter for the remaining time investigated. At no time was MDR1 or MDR2 detected in SMVs. The absence of MDR1 and MDR2 from SMVs at all investigated time points and the time course of their appearance in CMVs strongly suggest direct targeting from the Golgi to the canalicular membrane. A transcytotic pathway can also be excluded for the plasma membrane targeting of SPGP. At no time was SPGP detected in SMVs, but compared with MDR1 and MDR2, appeared in CMVs only after 2 h. Particular interesting are results after 1 h of labeling: the homogenate contained only mature SPGP, indicating that SPGP had already trafficked through the Golgi, but had not reached the cell surface. A likely explanation is that SPGP is transiently sequestered in an intracellular pool before it is delivered to the canalicular membrane.

Efficiency of Immunoprecipitation with C219 and LVT90 Antibodies-- Critical to our hypothesis (that in contrast to other canalicular proteins, ABC transporters do not undergo transcytosis after biosynthesis, but are directly delivered from the Golgi to the apical membrane) is the absence of ABC transporters from SMVs in the metabolic labeling studies. Therefore, we investigated the efficiency of antibodies against canalicular ABC transporters for immunoprecipitation and quantified the detection limit of ABC transporters in SMVs.

To estimate the efficiency of immunoprecipitation, lysates of 1 mg of CMVs that had been immunoprecipitated with C219 or LVT90 under the same conditions used for metabolic labeling studies were probed with the same antibodies in immunoblots to detect remaining antigen. These results were compared with control experiments in which lysates of 1 mg of CMVs were "immunoprecipitated" under the same conditions with an equal volume of phosphate-buffered saline (control for monoclonal antibody C219) or an equal volume of preimmune serum (control for LVT90) (Fig. 6). Quantitation by a laser densitometer revealed that after immunoprecipitation with C219, 3% of MDR1/MDR2 remained in the lysate and 2% of SPGP remained after immunoprecipitation with LVT90. To determine whether any SPGP or MDR1/MDR2 remained after immunoprecipitation, we used a sufficiently high amount of lysate that saturated the gray scale of the bands in the control experiments (Fig. 6). Therefore, the amount of remaining antigen after immunoprecipitation with C219 and LVT90 was even <2-3%. It is therefore reasonable to conclude that the amount of MDR1, MDR2, and SPGP remaining after immunoprecipitation is not significant and that the efficiency of antibodies C219 and LVT90 for immunoprecipitation is ~100%.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Antibodies C219 and LVT90 efficiently precipitate their antigens. CMVs were immunoprecipitated with C219 (control (contr) immunoprecipitation (IP) with phosphate-buffered saline) and LVT90 (control immunoprecipitation with preimmune serum) as described under "Experimental Procedures." Aliquots of the remaining lysates were precipitated with trichloroacetic acid. The pellets were dissolved in sample buffer and subjected to SDS-PAGE and electroblotting. The blots were then reprobed with C219 and LVT90, respectively. Arrowheads indicate the positions of the antigens. The amount of antigen was quantified by laser densitometry (lower panels). arb. units, arbitrary units.

The lower detection limit for putative ABC transporters in SMVs was determined using SMV/CMV mixing experiments. Rats were pulse-chase-labeled with [35S]methionine for 2 h since only at this chase time is SPGP present in CMVs (Fig. 5G). From the metabolically labeled rats, samples of SMVs (1 mg each) were supplemented with increasing amounts of CMVs (0, 25, 50, 100, 250, and 500 µg). The mixtures were immunoprecipitated with the C219 and LVT90 antibodies; immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE; and radioactive bands were detected in a PhosphorImager (Fig. 7). Immunoprecipitation with C219 detected MDR1/MDR2 in a supplement of 50 µg of CMVs in 1 mg of SMVs, and immunoprecipitation with LVT90 detected SPGP in a supplement of 25 µg of CMVs in 1 mg of SMVs. For the metabolic labeling studies (Fig. 5), 1 mg of SMVs and CMVs, respectively, was used for immunoprecipitation. Therefore, in SMVs, <5% of C219 antigen and <2.5% of LVT90 antigen could be detected. Furthermore, this experiment demonstrates that there are no components in SMVs that prevent immunoprecipitation of ABC transporters with either C219 or LVT90.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Low levels of 35S-labeled SPGP, MDR1, and MDR2 can be detected in SMVs when supplemented with CMVs. Rats were pulse-chase-labeled with [35S]methionine for 2 h, and CMVs and SMVs were prepared from the livers. SMVs were supplemented with various amounts of CMVs and immunoprecipitated (IP) with C219 (anti-MDR1/MDR2) and LVT90 (anti-SPGP) antibodies as described under "Experimental Procedures." The immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE, and 35S-labeled antigens were detected in a PhosphorImager.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Hepatocytes and other epithelial cells exhibit two morphologically distinguishable plasma membrane domains (apical and basolateral) that contain different membrane resident proteins that fulfill the physiological task of each pole of the cell. Maintenance of polarity requires mechanisms for targeting newly synthesized membrane proteins to their appropriate plasma membrane domains. After biosynthesis, basolateral membrane resident proteins are targeted directly from the Golgi to the basolateral plasma membrane. In contrast, alternative routes exist for newly synthesized proteins of the apical membrane. In various cell lines, they are either directly delivered from the Golgi to the apical pole or initially transferred to the basolateral domain and subsequently access the apical pole by transcytosis (for reviews, see Refs. 36 and 37). In polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney cells, newly synthesized endogenous apical proteins are predominantly delivered by a direct route (38-40); however, the transcytotic route can also participate as demonstrated for the polymeric immunoglobulin A receptor (41, 42) and for endogenous apical glycoproteins (43). Both mechanisms for apical targeting are operative in Caco-2 cells, an epithelial cell line derived from human intestine (44, 45). In contrast, hepatocytes are assumed to lack the direct pathway for delivery of apical proteins (16) based on the investigations of dipeptidyl peptidase IV, aminopeptidase N, 5'-nucleotidase, and the canalicular cell adhesion molecule cCAM105 (14, 15). These canalicular proteins are selectively targeted by transcytosis in metabolic labeling studies in vivo.

Stable cell lines in culture are invaluable for investigating targeting of membrane proteins in polarized cells. However, similar targeting studies of endogenous membrane proteins in vivo are infrequent due to the difficulty in separating apical and basolateral membranes from native tissue for detailed investigation. Bartles and Hubbard (46) overcame these obstacles and developed a method to study targeting of newly synthesized membrane proteins in polarized rat hepatocytes in vivo. Livers from rats metabolically labeled with [35S]methionine were used to prepare sheets of total plasma membranes, which were vesiculated by ultrasonification and resolved into apical and basolateral domains by centrifugation on a continuous sucrose gradient. Fractions of this gradient were immunoprecipitated with antibodies against apical proteins to document the distribution of newly synthesized proteins in either apical or basolateral membrane domains at a defined time after biosynthesis. In the present study, we used a similar approach to study membrane targeting of newly synthesized canalicular ABC-type transporters in vivo. We resolved apical and basolateral membrane domains by preparing highly purified CMVs and SMVs according to well established, reproducible methods (21, 22), which we have combined and optimized for high yield from a single rat liver. In addition, we prepared Golgi membranes from the same metabolically labeled rat to simultaneously study the trafficking of canalicular proteins through this intracellular compartment.

The metabolic pulse-chase labeling approach depends on availability of precipitating antibodies against canalicular ABC transporters. Since only the commercial C219 antibody met this requirement, a precipitating antibody (LVT90) was raised against a fusion protein containing a 90-amino acid sequence from the rat SPGP linker region. In sequence alignments, this region showed few matches with the homolog sequences of rat MDR1 and MDR2. As demonstrated in immunoprecipitation/blotting experiments, the C219 and LVT90 antibodies do not cross-react. Therefore, LVT90 is specific for SPGP, and C219 is specific for MDR1 and MDR2.

This study confirms the transcytotic pathway for apical targeting of newly synthesized canalicular cell adhesion molecule cCAM105 (HA4), which was described in an earlier study (14). In contrast, at no time between passage through the Golgi and arrival at the bile canaliculus were apical ABC transporters MDR1, MDR2, and SPGP detected in SMVs, indicating a direct Golgi-to-bile canaliculus pathway for their membrane targeting. These results are supported by the steady-state levels of apical proteins in isolated CMVs and SMVs as detected in immunoblots. Most of cCAM105 and dipeptidyl peptidase IV are present in CMVs, but a considerable amount is also present in SMVs. Their presence in SMVs is due to the fact that after biosynthesis, these molecules are targeted by transcytosis and are initially transferred to the basolateral membrane. Consistent with a direct Golgi-to-bile canaliculus targeting, the ABC transporters MDR1, MDR2, and SPGP were not detected in SMV immunoblots, but were exclusively found in CMVs, as was the canalicular ABC transporter MRP2. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that all apical ABC transporters known so far are targeted directly from the Golgi to the bile canaliculus after biosynthesis.

Although newly synthesized MDR1, MDR2, and SPGP were not initially transferred to the basolateral membrane, their post-Golgi trafficking differed. After passage through the Golgi, MDR1 and MDR2 were rapidly delivered directly to the bile canaliculus, whereas Golgi-to-bile canaliculus trafficking of SPGP involved additional intermediate steps. At 1 h after metabolic labeling, only the mature form of SPGP was detected in the homogenate, indicating that processing and passage through the Golgi were complete at this point. This is also supported by decreased radioactivity to background levels in immunoprecipitates from Golgi membranes after 1 h. At this time point, SPGP was not detected in SMVs and CMVs and therefore had not reached the cell surface. The most likely explanation is that SPGP is sequestered in an intracellular pool prior to delivery to the canalicular membrane (Fig. 8). Interestingly, immunogold electron microscopic detection of SPGP in rat hepatocytes revealed that the distribution of SPGP in the rat hepatocyte is not restricted only to the bile canaliculus, but labeling of SPGP was also detected in electron translucent vacuoles close to the apical membrane (9). Pericanalicular distribution of SPGP was also demonstrated by immunofluorescent staining of isolated rat hepatocyte couplets (47). These subapical structures containing SPGP may represent the transient intracellular pool in which newly synthesized SPGP is transiently sequestered prior to its targeting to the bile canaliculus.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Membrane targeting of newly synthesized canalicular proteins in rat hepatocytes.

In metabolic pulse-chase experiments, ABC transporters peaked in Golgi membranes only 30 min after labeling; thus, it is unlikely that the labeled cohort of ABC transporters is not detected in SMVs due to very rapid transcytosis. But we cannot completely exclude the possibility that a very small portion of ABC transporters, which is below the detection limit, may be trafficked to the basolateral membrane and undergo transcytosis. SMV/CMV mixing experiments demonstrated that <5% of the labeled cohort of MDR1 and MDR2 (C219 antibody) and <2.5% of the labeled SPGP cohort (LVT90 antibody) can be theoretically detected in SMVs with our procedure. If a transcytotic pathway for the ABC transporters exists in rat hepatocytes, it is utilized by <2.5-5% of the canalicular ABC transporters that were studied. It is therefore reasonable to assume that transcytosis is not a significant pathway for membrane targeting of newly synthesized ABC transporters. In contrast, newly synthesized canalicular ABC transporters are predominantly if not exclusively targeted directly from the Golgi to the bile canaliculus with or without intermediate intracellular sequestering.

There is additional evidence from earlier studies for a direct Golgi-to-bile canaliculus pathway after biosynthesis of ABC transporters. Disturbance of transhepatic trafficking by either colchicine, which disrupts microtubules, or wortmannin, which inhibits phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, results in accumulation of the transcytosing molecule cCAM105 in the basolateral membrane, but does not result in detectable levels of ABC transporters in the basolateral membrane (12). These results indicate non-transcytotic trafficking for canalicular ABC transporters.

WIF-B cells are a hybrid of rat hepatoma cells and human fibroblasts, have functional bile canaliculi, and serve as a useful model for hepatocytes (48, 49). Membrane targeting of an MDR1-green fluorescent protein chimera stably transfected into WIF-B cells was recently studied by Sai et al. (50). Fluorescence of the MDR1-green fluorescent protein chimera was exclusively detected in Golgi and bile canalicular membranes; no labeling of basolateral plasma membranes was observed. Time-lapse video imaging revealed that MDR1-green fluorescent protein traveled directly from the Golgi to the bile canaliculus. Trafficking from the Golgi to the apical membrane occurred in tubular vesicular structures at 0.02-0.6 µm/s. These observations strongly support the rapid and direct pathway detected with the C219 antibody (anti-MDR1/MDR2) in the present in vivo study.

Direct Golgi-to-apical membrane targeting of newly synthesized ABC transporters is in contrast to earlier work in which transcytotic targeting was proposed for these canalicular transporters (17, 47). The assumption was based on immunofluorescence detection of canalicular ABC transporters in the basolateral membrane of isolated rat hepatocyte couplets. However, the "basolateral membrane" of rat hepatocyte couplets also originates from parts of other hepatocytes that are ripped from the bile canaliculi of adjacent hepatocytes. Consequently, the basolateral membrane of rat hepatocyte couplets represents a mixture of basolateral membrane and the remainder of former bile canaliculi, which likely explains detectable ABC transporter levels in the rat hepatocyte couplet periphery.

Soroka et al. (47) demonstrated, by immunogold electron microscopy, colocalization of the transcytosis marker polymeric immunoglobulin A receptor and SPGP (there called bile salt export pump) in the same vesicles from a population of tubulin-bound vesicles in rat liver and proposed transcytotic targeting of both newly synthesized proteins. In contrast, our study does not reveal evidence for newly synthesized SPGP to be initially targeted to the basolateral membrane. SPGP was transiently sequestered in an intracellular pool. Probably, this pool is a subapical compartment involved in sorting and/or apical recycling similar to that observed in other epithelial cells (i.e. WIF-B cells (51), Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (52), and Caco-2 cells (53)). Furthermore, in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells, a subapical compartment is an intermediate station for the polymeric immunoglobulin A receptor transcytotic basolateral-to-apical trafficking (54, 55). The observed intracellular SPGP pool is therefore most likely the site at which directly targeted biosynthesized canalicular ABC transporters and proteins undergoing transcytosis merge.

This study prompts revision of current views regarding the trafficking of newly synthesized canalicular proteins in hepatocytes. Direct Golgi-to-apical membrane trafficking of ABC transporters with or without subapical accumulation probably provides specific physiological regulation of transporter recruitment and function and may provide targets for drugs that impair bile acid secretion, resulting in cholestasis. We are currently investigating these mechanisms.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We are grateful to Nipaporn Pichetshote for skillful technical assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Research Grant Ki 640 (to H. K.) and by NIDDK Grants DK35652 and 30DK34928 (Digestive Disease Center) from the National Institutes of Health (to I. M. A.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Ave., Boston, MA 02111. Tel.: 617-636-6739; Fax: 617-636-0445; E-mail: Irwin.Arias@Tufts.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 24, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M909875199

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ASGP-R, asialoglycoprotein receptor; CMV, canalicular membrane vesicle; SMV, sinusoidal membrane vesicle; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Nishida, T., Gatmaitan, Z., Che, M., and Arias, I. M. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 6590-6594
2. Nishida, T., Hardenbrook, C., Gatmaitan, Z., and Arias, I. M. (1992) Am. J. Physiol. 262, G629-G635
3. Stieger, B., O'Neill, B., and Meier, P. J. (1992) Biochem. J. 284, 67-74
4. Gatmaitan, Z. C., and Arias, I. M. (1995) Physiol. Rev. 75, 261-275
5. Higgins, C. F. (1992) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 8, 67-113
6. Kamimoto, Y., Gatmaitan, Z., Hsu, J., and Arias, I. M. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 11693-11698
7. Ruetz, S., and Gros, P. (1994) Cell 77, 1071-1081
8. Nies, A. T., Gatmaitan, Z., and Arias, I. M. (1996) J. Lipid Res. 37, 1125-1136
9. Gerloff, T., Stieger, B., Hagenbuch, B., Madon, J., Landmann, L., Roth, J., Hofmann, A. F., and Meier, P. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 10046-10050
10. Büchler, M., König, J., Brom, M., Kartenbeck, J., Spring, H., Horie, T., and Keppler, D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15091-15098
11. Gatmaitan, Z. C., Nies, A. T., and Arias, I. M. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, G1041-G1049
12. Misra, S., Ujhazy, P., Gatmaitan, Z., Varticovski, L., and Arias, I. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 26638-26644
13. Misra, S., Ujhazy, P., Varticovski, L., and Arias, I. M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 5814-5819
14. Bartles, J. R., Feracci, H. M., Stieger, B., and Hubbard, A. L. (1987) J. Cell Biol. 105, 1241-1251
15. Schell, M. J., Maurice, M., Stieger, B., and Hubbard, A. L. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 119, 1173-1182
16. Bartles, J. R., and Hubbard, A. L. (1988) Trends Biochem. Sci. 13, 181-184
17. Roelofsen, H., Soroka, C. J., Keppler, D., and Boyer, J. L. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 1137-1145
18. Lin, S. H., Culic, O., Flanagan, D., and Hixson, D. C. (1991) Biochem. J. 278, 155-161
19. Bartles, J. R., Braiterman, L. T., and Hubbard, A. L. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 12792-12802
20. Stockert, R. J., and Morell, A. G. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 1841-1846
21. Inoue, M., Kinne, R., Tran, T., Biempica, L., and Arias, I. M. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 5183-5188
22. Inoue, M., Kinne, R., Tran, T., and Arias, I. M. (1982) Hepatology 2, 572-579
23. Subramaniam, V. N., bin Mohd Yusoff, A. R., Wong, S. H., Lim, G. B., Chew, M., and Hong, W. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 12016-12021
24. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685
25. Towbin, H., Staehelin, T., and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4350-4354
26. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275
27. Orlowski, M., and Meister, A. (1963) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 73, 679-681
28. Walter, K., and Schütt, C. (1974) in Methods of Enzymatic Analysis (Bergmeyer, H. U., ed), Vol. II , pp. 856-864, Academic Press, New York
29. Heidrich, H. G., Kinne, R., Kinne-Saffran, E., and Hannig, K. (1972) J. Cell Biol. 54, 232-245
30. Sztul, E., Kaplin, A., Saucan, L., and Palade, G. (1991) Cell 64, 81-89
31. Silverman, J. A., Raunio, H., Gant, T. W., and Thorreirsson, S. S. (1991) Gene (Amst.) 106, 229-236
32. Brown, P. C., Thorgeirsson, S. S., Snorri, S., and Silverman, J. A. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 3885-3891
33. Georges, E., Bradley, G., Gariepy, J., and Ling, V. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 152-156
34. Nakada, H., Sawamura, T., Okumura, T., and Tashiro, Y. (1986) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 99, 867-876
35. Wall, D. A., and Hubbard, A. L. (1985) J. Cell Biol. 101, 2104-2112
36. Mostov, K., Apodaca, G., Aroeti, B., and Okamoto, C. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 116, 577-583
37. Keller, P., and Simons, K. (1997) J. Cell Sci. 110, 3001-3009
38. Lisanti, M. P., LeBivic, A., Sargiacomo, M., and Rodriguez-Boulan, E. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 109, 2117-2127
39. LeBivic, A., Sambuy, Y., Mostov, K., and Rodriguez-Boulan, E. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 110, 1533-1539
40. Schleiffle, P., Peranen, J., and Simons, K. (1995) Nature 378, 96-98
41. Mostov, K. E., and Deitcher, D. L. (1986) Cell 46, 613-621
42. Gibson, A., Futter, C. E., Maxwell, S., Allchin, E. H., Shipman, M., Kraehenbuhl, J. P., Domingo, D., Odorizzi, G., Trowbridge, I. S., and Hopkins, C. R. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 143, 81-94
43. Brändli, A. W., Parton, R. G., and Simons, K. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 111, 2902-2921
44. Matter, K., Brauchbar, M., Bucher, K., and Hauri, H. P. (1990) Cell 60, 429-437
45. LeBivic, A., Quaroni, A., Nichols, B., and Rodriguez-Boulan, E. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 111, 1351-1361
46. Bartles, J. R., and Hubbard, A. L. (1990) Methods Enzymol. 191, 825-841
47. Soroka, C. J., Pate, M. K., and Boyer, J. L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26416-26424
48. Ihrke, G., Neufeld, E. B., Meads, T., Shanks, M. R., Cassio, D., Laurent, M., Schroer, T. A., Pagano, R. E., and Hubbard, A. L. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 123, 1761-1775
49. Shanks, M. R., Cassio, D., Lecoq, O., and Hubbard, A. L. (1994) J. Cell Sci. 107, 813-825
50. Sai, Y., Nies, A. T., and Arias, I. M. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 4535-4545
51. Ihrke, G., Martin, G. V., Shanks, M. R., Schrader, M., Schroer, T. A., and Hubbard, A. L. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 141, 115-133
52. Bomsel, M., Prydz, K., Parton, R. G., Gruenberg, J., and Simons, K. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 109, 3243-3258
53. Hughson, E. J., and Hopkins, C. R. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 110, 337-348
54. Apodaca, G., Katz, L. A., and Mostov, K. E. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 125, 67-86
55. Barroso, M., and Sztul, E. S. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 124, 83-100


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
D. S. Miller, B. Bauer, and A. M. S. Hartz
Modulation of P-Glycoprotein at the Blood-Brain Barrier: Opportunities to Improve Central Nervous System Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2008; 60(2): 196 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
T. Kagawa, N. Watanabe, K. Mochizuki, A. Numari, Y. Ikeno, J. Itoh, H. Tanaka, I. M. Arias, and T. Mine
Phenotypic differences in PFIC2 and BRIC2 correlate with protein stability of mutant Bsep and impaired taurocholate secretion in MDCK II cells
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): G58 - G67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
D. Theard, M. Steiner, D. Kalicharan, D. Hoekstra, and S. C.D. van IJzendoorn
Cell Polarity Development and Protein Trafficking in Hepatocytes Lacking E-Cadherin/beta-Catenin-based Adherens Junctions
Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2007; 18(6): 2313 - 2321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
D. Fu and B. D. Roufogalis
Actin disruption inhibits endosomal traffic of P-glycoprotein-EGFP and resistance to daunorubicin accumulation
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): C1543 - C1552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
K. Mochizuki, T. Kagawa, A. Numari, M. J. Harris, J. Itoh, N. Watanabe, T. Mine, and I. M. Arias
Two N-linked glycans are required to maintain the transport activity of the bile salt export pump (ABCB11) in MDCK II cells
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): G818 - G828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
M. Fausther, J. Lecka, F. Kukulski, S. A. Levesque, J. Pelletier, H. Zimmermann, J. A. Dranoff, and J. Sevigny
Cloning, purification, and identification of the liver canalicular ecto-ATPase as NTPDase8
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): G785 - G795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
B. Sarkadi, L. Homolya, G. Szakacs, and A. Varadi
Human Multidrug Resistance ABCB and ABCG Transporters: Participation in a Chemoimmunity Defense System.
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2006; 86(4): 1179 - 1236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Wang, F. Sun, D.-w. Zhang, Y. Ma, F. Xu, J. D. Belani, J. C. Cohen, H. H. Hobbs, and X.-S. Xie
Sterol Transfer by ABCG5 and ABCG8: IN VITRO ASSAY AND RECONSTITUTION
J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 2006; 281(38): 27894 - 27904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
K. A. Wojtal, E. de Vries, D. Hoekstra, and S. C.D. van IJzendoorn
Efficient Trafficking of MDR1/P-Glycoprotein to Apical Canalicular Plasma Membranes in HepG2 Cells Requires PKA-RII{alpha} Anchoring and Glucosylceramide
Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2006; 17(8): 3638 - 3650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
F. R. Simon, M. Iwahashi, L.-J. Hu, I. Qadri, I. M. Arias, D. Ortiz, R. Dahl, and E. Sutherland
Hormonal regulation of hepatic multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Abcc2) primarily involves the pattern of growth hormone secretion
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, April 1, 2006; 290(4): G595 - G608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
W.-N. Lian, T.-W. Wu, R.-L. Dao, Y.-J. Chen, and C.-H. Lin
Deglycosylation of Na+/K+-ATPase causes the basolateral protein to undergo apical targeting in polarized hepatic cells
J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2006; 119(1): 11 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Wakabayashi, P. Dutt, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, and I. M. Arias
Rab11a and myosin Vb are required for bile canalicular formation in WIF-B9 cells
PNAS, October 18, 2005; 102(42): 15087 - 15092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. Chan, G. Calderon, A. L. Swift, J. Moseley, S. Li, H. Hosoya, I. M. Arias, and D. F. Ortiz
Myosin II Regulatory Light Chain Is Required for Trafficking of Bile Salt Export Protein to the Apical Membrane in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells
J. Biol. Chem., June 24, 2005; 280(25): 23741 - 23747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Wustner
Mathematical Analysis of Hepatic High Density Lipoprotein Transport Based on Quantitative Imaging Data
J. Biol. Chem., February 25, 2005; 280(8): 6766 - 6779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
A. D. Mottino, F. A. Crocenzi, E. J. S. Pozzi, L. M. Veggi, M. G. Roma, and M. Vore
Role of microtubules in estradiol-17{beta}-D-glucuronide-induced alteration of canalicular Mrp2 localization and activity
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): G327 - G336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
S. Schuck and K. Simons
Polarized sorting in epithelial cells: raft clustering and the biogenesis of the apical membrane
J. Cell Sci., December 1, 2004; 117(25): 5955 - 5964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
F. R. Simon, J. Fortune, M. Iwahashi, I. Qadri, and E. Sutherland
Multihormonal regulation of hepatic sinusoidal Ntcp gene expression
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): G782 - G794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
J. Shoda, Y. Inada, A. Tsuji, H. Kusama, T. Ueda, T. Ikegami, H. Suzuki, Y. Sugiyama, D. E. Cohen, and N. Tanaka
Bezafibrate stimulates canalicular localization of NBD-labeled PC in HepG2 cells by PPAR{alpha}-mediated redistribution of ABCB4
J. Lipid Res., October 1, 2004; 45(10): 1813 - 1825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Cohen, E. Rodriguez-Boulan, and A. Musch
Par-1 promotes a hepatic mode of apical protein trafficking in MDCK cells
PNAS, September 21, 2004; 101(38): 13792 - 13797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. F. Ortiz, J. Moseley, G. Calderon, A. L. Swift, S. Li, and I. M. Arias
Identification of HAX-1 as a Protein That Binds Bile Salt Export Protein and Regulates Its Abundance in the Apical Membrane of Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells
J. Biol. Chem., July 30, 2004; 279(31): 32761 - 32770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
Y. Wakabayashi, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, and I. M. Arias
Intracellular Trafficking of Bile Salt Export Pump (ABCB11) in Polarized Hepatic Cells: Constitutive Cycling between the Canalicular Membrane and rab11-positive Endosomes
Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 2004; 15(7): 3485 - 3496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
D. Hoekstra, D. Tyteca, and S. C. D. van IJzendoorn
The subapical compartment: a traffic center in membrane polarity development
J. Cell Sci., May 1, 2004; 117(11): 2183 - 2192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
H. Kipp, S. Khoursandi, D. Scharlau, and R. K. H. Kinne
More than apical: distribution of SGLT1 in Caco-2 cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): C737 - C749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
E. Sehayek, R. Wang, J. G. Ono, V. S. Zinchuk, E. M. Duncan, S. Shefer, D. E. Vance, M. Ananthanarayanan, B. T. Chait, and J. L. Breslow
Localization of the PE methylation pathway and SR-BI to the canalicular membrane: evidence for apical PC biosynthesis that may promote biliary excretion of phospholipid and cholesterol
J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 1605 - 1613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
S. Misra, L. Varticovski, and I. M. Arias
Mechanisms by which cAMP increases bile acid secretion in rat liver and canalicular membrane vesicles
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, July 7, 2003; 285(2): G316 - G324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
T. A. Slimane, G. Trugnan, S. C.D. van IJzendoorn, and D. Hoekstra
Raft-mediated Trafficking of Apical Resident Proteins Occurs in Both Direct and Transcytotic Pathways in Polarized Hepatic Cells: Role of Distinct Lipid Microdomains
Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2003; 14(2): 611 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
O. Maier and D. Hoekstra
Trans-Golgi Network and Subapical Compartment of HepG2 Cells Display Different Properties in Sorting and Exiting of Sphingolipids
J. Biol. Chem., January 3, 2003; 278(1): 164 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Swiatecka-Urban, M. Duhaime, B. Coutermarsh, K. H. Karlson, J. Collawn, M. Milewski, G. R. Cutting, W. B. Guggino, G. Langford, and B. A. Stanton
PDZ Domain Interaction Controls the Endocytic Recycling of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator
J. Biol. Chem., October 11, 2002; 277(42): 40099 - 40105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. Bastaki, L. T. Braiterman, D. C. Johns, Y.-H. Chen, and A. L. Hubbard
Absence of Direct Delivery for Single Transmembrane Apical Proteins or Their ""Secretory"" Forms in Polarized Hepatic Cells
Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2002; 13(1): 225 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
G. D. Luker, J. L. Dahlheimer, R. E. Ostlund Jr., and D. Piwnica-Worms
Decreased hepatic accumulation and enhanced esterification of cholesterol in mice deficient in mdr1a and mdr1b P-glycoproteins
J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2001; 42(9): 1389 - 1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Kipp, N. Pichetshote, and I. M. Arias
Transporters on Demand. INTRAHEPATIC POOLS OF CANALICULAR ATP BINDING CASSETTE TRANSPORTERS IN RAT LIVER
J. Biol. Chem., March 2, 2001; 276(10): 7218 - 7224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Ananthanarayanan, N. Balasubramanian, M. Makishima, D. J. Mangelsdorf, and F. J. Suchy
Human Bile Salt Export Pump Promoter Is Transactivated by the Farnesoid X Receptor/Bile Acid Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., July 27, 2001; 276(31): 28857 - 28865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/21/15917    most recent
M909875199v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kipp, H.
Right arrow Articles by Arias, I. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kipp, H.
Right arrow Articles by Arias, I. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement