|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M000509200 on March 13, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 21, 16139-16145, May 26, 2000
Compulsory Order of Substrate Binding to Herpes Simplex Virus
Type 1 Thymidine Kinase
A CALORIMETRIC STUDY*
Remo
Perozzo ,
Ilian
Jelesarov§,
Hans Rudolf
Bosshard§,
Gerd
Folkers , and
Leonardo
Scapozza ¶
From the Department of Applied Biosciences, Swiss
Federal Institute of Technology, Winterthurerstr. 190, CH-8057 Zurich,
Switzerland and the § Department of Biochemistry, University
of Zurich, Winterthurerstr. 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
Received for publication, January 24, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Isothermal titration calorimetry has been used to
investigate the thermodynamic parameters of the binding of thymidine
(dT) and ATP to herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase (HSV1 TK).
Binding follows a sequential pathway in which dT binds first and ATP
second. The free enzyme does not bind ATP, whose binding site becomes
only accessible in the HSV1 TK·dT complex. At pH 7.5 and 25 °C,
the binding constants are 1.9 × 105
M 1 for dT and 3.9 × 106
M 1 for ATP binding to the binary HSV1 TK·dT
complex. Binding of both substrates is enthalpy-driven and opposed by a
large negative entropy change. The heat capacity change
( Cp) obtained from H in the range of
10-25 °C is 360 cal K 1 mol 1 for dT
binding and 140 cal K 1 mol 1 for ATP
binding. These large Cp values are incompatible with a
rigid body binding model in which the dT and ATP binding sites pre-exist in the free enzyme. Values of Cp and
T S strongly indicate large scale
conformational adaptation of the active site in sequential substrate
binding. The conformational changes seem to be more pronounced in dT
binding than in the subsequent ATP binding. Considering the crystal
structure of the ternary HSV1 TK·dT·ATP complex, a large
movement in the dT binding domain and a smaller but substantial movement in the LID domain are proposed to take place when the enzyme
changes from the substrate-free, presumably more open and less
ordered conformation to the closed and compact conformation of
the ternary enzyme-substrate complex.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Molecular recognition phenomena are at the heart of biological
reactions. Key to the understanding of molecular recognition is a
comprehensive analysis of the thermodynamics of binding and a
meaningful correlation of thermodynamics with structure. A close insight into the thermodynamics of a binding process provides guide
marks for structure-based molecular design strategies. The forces that
govern a binding reaction are the free energy change ( G),
the enthalpy change ( H), the entropy change
( S), and the heat capacity change ( Cp).
Cp is an approximate measure of the surface area buried
in an association reaction and can be used to predict conformational
rearrangements in associating protein molecules. An example of high
medicinal interest where such information is essential is thymidine
kinase from herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV1
TK).1 The structure of this
enzyme is known at high resolution in complex with a series of ligands,
including various substrates (natural and non-natural) and inhibitors
(1-5).
Thymidine kinases (EC 2.7.1.21) catalyze the phosphorylation of
thymidine (dT) to dTMP in the presence of magnesium ions by
transferring the -phosphate group of ATP to the 5'-OH group of dT.
Herpesviruses encode their own thymidine kinases, which differ
considerably from the enzyme of the human cellular host (human cellular
thymidine kinase). While the human enzyme is highly specific, HSV1 TK
is a multifunctional enzyme of broad substrate specificity. It shows
deoxycytidine kinase and thymidylate kinase activity (6) and
phosphorylates a broad spectrum of pyrimidine as well as purine analogs
(7-12). Moreover, HSV1 TK displays low stereochemical specificity. The
enzyme accepts modified ribose moieties, acyclic side chains, and the
L-stereoisomer of the deoxyribose of dT (13). The preferred
phosphate donor is ATP, yet HSV1 TK also shows high affinity for
cytidine triphosphate, uridine triphosphate, and guanosine triphosphate
and their deoxy analogs.
Therapeutic applications involving HSV1 TK make use of the broad
substrate diversity of the viral enzyme in the background of strict
substrate selectivity of the host cell enzyme. Therefore, a detailed
thermodynamic analysis of substrate binding to the viral kinase is a
prerequisite for the successful design of new therapeutically useful compounds.
HSV1 TK is a homodimer with 376 residues per subunit (Fig.
1). The constituent subunits display the
general / folding pattern. A central five-stranded parallel
-sheet is flanked on either side by helices. HSV1 TK is a member of
the family of NMP kinases and contains the classical mononucleotide
(NMP) binding fold (14). In this enzyme family, three-dimensional
structures are known for adenylate kinase (15, 16), guanylate kinase
(17), uridylate kinase (18), bacteriophage T4 deoxynucleotide kinase
(19), and thymidylate kinase (20). The central five- -strand domain is referred to as the CORE domain. Other domains are the LID domain and
the NMPbind domain (21). Main chain superposition of HSV1 TK and adenylate kinase reveals substantial similarity in the CORE
domain. Major differences exist in the NMPbind domain,
where HSV1 TK has extensive insertions. The LID domain of HSV1 TK
consists of only eight residues, reminiscent of other small variants of NMP kinases. Further differences from adenylate kinase arise from the
following unique structural features of HSV1 TK: a 45-residue-long amino-terminal segment, which is not resolved in the crystal structure and is not necessary for catalytic activity (22) but plays a role in
migration within the cell (23); a partially mobile segment of 72 residues between residues 250 and 322; and an additional 29 C-terminal
residues (2). Interestingly, many of these differences appear to be
located close to the dimer interface.

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Ribbon diagram of the
symmetric HSV1 TK dimer with bound ADP and dTMP (Protein Data Bank
entry 1VTK; Ref. 2). The domains are defined as for other NMP
kinases (21). The CORE domain is depicted in blue, the
NMPbind domain in red, and the LID domain in
yellow. The additional residues (250-322) are shown in
green. Substrate and cofactor are depicted as
cyan ball and stick
models. The image was generated with the program MOLSCRIPT
(53).
|
|
Adenylate kinases undergo large conformational changes upon substrate
binding as shown by crystallography (24). The substrate-free enzyme has
a more open conformation, and substrate binding leads to a closed
conformation. The NMPbind domain and the LID domain rearrange upon binding of AMP and ATP, whereas the conformation of the
CORE domain remains unchanged (21, 24). The three-dimensional structures of HSV1 TK known to date have been solved for ternary complexes with natural and non-natural substrates, inhibitors, cofactors, or sulfate ions mimicking the -phosphate of ATP (1-5) and correspond to the closed conformation of NMP kinases. The structure
of the free apoenzyme is not known. Since structural similarities in
the CORE domain and substrate binding pockets are substantial in the
NMP kinase family, one may assume that substrate-free HSV1 TK also
exists in an open conformation and that conformational changes take
place when HSV1 TK is converted to the closed conformation during
substrate binding.
Here we present a comprehensive thermodynamic analysis of nucleoside
(dT) and cofactor (ATP) binding to HSV1 TK. Substrate binding, which
was followed by ITC, is shown to be strictly sequential, with dT
binding first and ATP second. Combining the thermodynamic parameters
with the three-dimensional structure of the ternary HSV1 TK·dT·ATP
complex demonstrates that the sequential binding pathway is accompanied
by significant structural rearrangements of the enzyme.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
All chemicals were of analytical grade and were
used without further purification. Thymidine, ATP, glutathione, buffer
reagents, and glutathione-agarose (SH-coupled via 12 C-spacer) were
from Sigma; dithiothreitol and EDTA were from Fluka.
Expression and Purification--
The bacterial expression vector
pGEX2T-TK was constructed as described previously (25, 26). HSV1 TK was
expressed as glutathione S-transferase fusion protein
(GST-TK) in Escherichia coli strain BL21 and purified by
glutathione affinity chromatography (25). After isolation of the fusion
protein from the crude extract by glutathione-affinity chromatography,
the protein was directly (on column) exchanged into the experimental
buffer by thoroughly rinsing the column with an excess of buffer. The
protein was eluted by the addition of 5 mM glutathione and
used for titration experiments. The total protein concentration was
determined using a dye-binding assay (27). The concentration of active
enzyme present in the protein samples used for ITC was determined by
ATP affinity chromatography in the presence of dT (25). Inactive enzyme
does not bind to this column. The amount of inactive enzyme was
20-30% of the total protein concentration and was corrected for in
the calculation of the binding constants (KB) and
enthalpy of binding ( H) from ITC raw data.
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry--
ITC experiments were
carried out using an OMEGA titration microcalorimeter (Microcal Inc.,
Northampton, MA) equipped with a nanovolt preamplifier to reduce
electrical noise (28). The reference cell was filled with water
containing 0.01% sodium azide, and the calorimeter was calibrated
using standard electrical pulses as recommended by the manufacturer.
All solutions were degassed for 10 min with gentle stirring under
vacuum. Solutions of the fusion protein were filled in the sample cell
(1.34-ml volume) and titrated with dT or ATP. Substrate solutions were
prepared in the buffer from the final step of protein purification. The substrate concentration in the injection syringe was usually 25 times
higher than the concentration of protein binding sites. A typical
experiment consisted of a first control injection of 1 µl followed by
19 injections, each of 4 µl and 15 s duration, with a 4-min
interval in between.
ITC measurements were routinely performed in 50 mM Tris, pH
7.5, 4 mM EDTA (to suppress enzymatic activity), 5 mM glutathione, 1 mM dithiothreitol. Heat
contributions due to coupled protonation events upon binding were
evaluated by calorimetric experiments in various buffers of different
ionization enthalpies under otherwise identical conditions. The buffers
and their ionization enthalpies (in kcal mol 1 at
25 °C) were as follows: PIPES (2.7), MOPS (4.9), TES (7.7), and Tris
(11.34) (29). The pH of the buffer was adjusted at the experimental
temperature. Buffer concentrations were 50 mM, and the
ionic strength was similar for all buffers. In control experiments, the
ligand was injected into buffer. The observed heat effects were
concentration-independent and were identical to the heat signals
detected after complete saturation of the protein. Therefore, the
nonspecific background was usually estimated by averaging the small
heats at the end of the titration. Raw data were collected, corrected
for ligand heats of dilution, and integrated using the Microcal Origin
software supplied with the instrument. Since protein concentration was
expressed on a subunit basis, a single-site binding model was fit to
the data by a nonlinear regression analysis to yield binding constants
(KB), enthalpies of binding ( H), and
stoichiometry of binding.
HPLC Assay--
High performance liquid chromatography was used
for concentration determination of thymidine and ATP in the final
ligand solutions and to monitor potential phosphorylation products
during calorimetric experiments using a modified protocol of a
previously published method (30). Nucleotides were determined by
reverse-phase ion-paired chromatography using a C18 column
(LiChrospher 100 RP-18, 5 µm, 250 × 4 mm; Merck) in 0.2 M NaH2PO4, 25 mM
tetrabutylammonium, 3% (v/v) methanol at 1.0 ml/min and detection at
254 nm. Ligand concentrations were calculated by means of calibration
curves from standard solutions showing linearity in the range of <0.04 to at least 2 mM. The detection limit for dT, dTMP, and ATP
was <20 nmol (31).
Calculation of Solvent-accessible Surface Area--
The program
NACCESS (32), an implementation of the Lee and Richards solvent
accessibility algorithm (33), was used with a probe radius of 1.4 Å and a slice width of 0.25 Å. ASAap and ASApol were calculated using the coordinates
of the ternary complex TK·dT·ATP (1) and removing either dT or ATP
or both.
 |
RESULTS |
Experimental Setup--
The GST fusion protein of HSV1 TK was used
in this study to facilitate protein purification and to improve
stability during storage. To rule out artifacts caused by the presence
of GST in the construct, control experiments were performed with the
HSV1 TK obtained after on-column cleavage of the affinity tag.
Thermodynamic parameters determined by ITC were identical within error
for cleaved HSV1 TK and for the GST fusion protein (data not shown).
The influence of glutathione in concentrations up to 5 mM
on HSV1 TK kinetics was investigated as previously described (25, 34).
Glutathione in concentrations up to 5 mM does not change
Km (data not shown). Since Mg2+ is
strictly required for the phosphorylation reaction catalyzed by HSV1
TK, all measurements were performed in the presence of 4 mM
EDTA to suppress any enzymatic activity in ITC experiments. Since
Mg2+ could influence the equilibrium binding parameters by
either direct participation in the bonding network of the binding
pocket or by indirect structural effects, control titrations with the noncleavable ATP derivative , -methyleneadenosine 5'-triphosphate were performed in the presence and absence of Mg2+. No
differences were seen (data not shown).
Determination of the Thermodynamic Parameters of dT and ATP Binding
by ITC--
In the ternary complex TK·dT·ATP, the substrate dT and
the cofactor ATP are located in separate and well defined binding
pockets of the enzyme. Formation of the ternary enzyme-substrate
complex may either proceed through an obligatory sequential pathway or by a random mechanism. Two sequential pathways are possible: TK TK·dT TK·dT·ATP (reactions i and ii shown in Fig.
2) or TK TK·ATP TK·dT·ATP
(reactions iii and iv in Fig. 2). In a random mechanism, binding of one
substrate is not a prerequisite for binding of the other, and all four
reactions of Fig. 2 can take place.

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Formation of the ternary enzyme-substrate
complex TK·dT·ATP. The two ordered sequential pathways are i
plus ii and iii plus iv, respectively. In a random binding mechanism,
all four reactions take place.
|
|
To distinguish between ordered and random binding, HSV1 TK was titrated
with dT and with ATP, respectively. Fig.
3 shows representative titrations of the
substrate-free enzyme with dT (A and B) and with
ATP (C and D). The titration with dT was
characterized by a significant exothermic heat effect. In Fig.
3B, the integrated heat of each injection (filled
squares) is plotted against the molar ratio of dT to enzyme
binding sites, and the solid line is a nonlinear
least squares fit for a single-site binding model. The mean values of
the thermodynamic parameters at 25 °C and pH 7.5 for the titration
of the substrate-free enzyme with dT, resulting from three independent
measurements, are KB = 1.9 ×105
M 1 and Hbind = 19.1 kcal mol 1 (Table
I).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Representative isothermal titration
calorimetry measurements. A and B, titration
of HSV1 TK with dT, corresponding to reaction i of Fig. 2. C
and D, titration of TK with ATP, corresponding to reaction
iii in Fig. 2. E and F, titration of TK with ATP
in the presence of excess dT, corresponding to reaction ii of Fig. 2.
G and H, titration of HSV1 TK with a 1:1 mixture
of dT and ATP. Raw data are shown as differential power signals in
A, C, E, and G. Binding
isotherms obtained by integration and normalization of the raw data and
by correction for the heat of ligand dilution are shown in
B, D, F, and H. The
solid lines represent nonlinear best fits for a
single-site binding model. Titrations were performed in 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 25 °C. A and
B, 60.6 µM enzyme was titrated with 2.2 mM dT. C and D, 51 µM
enzyme was titrated with 1.3 mM ATP. E and
F, 37.3 µM enzyme in the presence of 1 mM dT was titrated with 1.4 mM ATP. Under these
conditions, >99% of the enzyme was present as TK·dT complex.
G and H, 51.5 µM enzyme was
titrated with a 1:1 mixture of 1.6 mM dT and ATP. For the
purpose of clarity, only one representative result of triplicate
measurements is shown. Values on the y axis
(kcal/mol of injectant) are raw data and are not yet corrected for
protonation effect (Equation 1).
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Thermodynamic parameters for the binding of dT and ATP to HSV1 TK at pH
7.5
Values of H are corrected for protonation effect by
Equation 1. Values of G, H, and
T S are in kcal mol 1.
Cp is in kcal K 1 mol 1. Values are the
mean of triplicates. G was calculated from
G = RT × ln
KB, where KB is the binding
constant determined by ITC. Uncertainty of G is within
±0.35 kcal mol 1 of the mean. Errors of H are
about ±5% and mainly reflect the error in ligand concentration.
Maximal possible errors of T S are 1.5 kcal
mol 1. Errors of Cp were estimated by reduction
of the data set by one data point at a time and were, on average,
±0.02 kcal K 1 mol 1, i.e. within 5-15%
of the reported mean.
|
|
Titration with ATP showed a very different behavior (C and
D). Only very small heat signals corresponding to
nonspecific heat effects were detected. Titrations were repeated at
15 °C and at varying concentration ratios of ATP to enzyme. No heat
effect typical of a binding reaction was observed (data not shown).
This indicates that empty HSV1 TK does not bind ATP. Binding driven by
entropy without heat change could be excluded (see below). In agreement
with the inability of the apoenzyme to bind ATP is the fact that
thymidine-depleted HSV1 TK did not bind to ATP affinity columns, even
at very high protein concentrations (25).
To confirm an ordered binding mechanism in which TK·dT precedes the
formation of TK·dT·ATP, the experiment shown in Fig. 3, E and F, was performed. The preformed TK·dT
binary complex (1 mM dT) was titrated with ATP (reaction ii
in Fig. 2). The reaction was again exothermic and yielded values of
KB = 3.9 × 106
M 1 and Hbind = 13.8 kcal mol 1 (Table I; corrected for protonation
effect; see below).
In the cell, HSV1 TK is exposed to both substrates at the same time,
which in the scheme of Fig. 2 corresponds to a move on the diagonal
from TK to TK·dT·ATP. If the binding reaction is indeed sequential
as expected from the above experiments, titration of TK with a 1:1
mixture of dT and ATP should yield a heat change corresponding to the
sum of the heat changes for reactions i and ii of Fig. 2. A
representative titration is shown in Fig. 3, G and
H. The titration isotherm yielded
Hbind = 33.1 kcal mol 1 (Table
I, corrected for heat of protonation), identical within error to the
sum of the enthalpy changes of reactions i and ii.
The ITC experiment provides the binding constant KB
for a single-site reaction, and G values of reactions i
and ii were calculated from G = RT × ln KB. S was obtained from
G = H T S. Reactions i and ii were driven by
favorable negative changes in binding enthalpy and strongly opposed by
unfavorable entropic contributions. Although the reaction with the 1:1
mixture of dT and ATP was more complex, it could still be treated as a single-site reaction if one considered dT plus ATP as one ligand. In
this case, KB obtained from ITC equaled
(Ki × Kii)1/2 where
Ki and Kii were the
binding constants for reactions i and ii, respectively. Hence, the
apparent binding constant for the coupled reactions i and ii was
KB2, and G equaled
RT × ln KB2.
Change of Protonation State--
Substrate binding may cause
the enzyme to take up or release protons, for example through
pKa changes of side chains accompanying the binding
reaction. This will contribute to the overall heat change,
Hobs, measured in the ITC experiment. If ionizable groups undergo pKa changes on complex
formation, protons will be exchanged with the buffer. The heat of
protonation/deprotonation depends on the ionization enthalpy of the
buffer, Hion, according to the equation,
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where nH+ designates the number of protons
that are released (nH+ >0) or taken up
(nH+ < 0) by the buffer (35). To study such
protonation effects, titration experiments were repeated in various
buffers of different Hion. The intrinsic enthalpy of binding, Hbind, was obtained from
the intercept ( Hion = 0) of a plot according
to Equation 1. The results are shown in Fig.
4. Protonation/deprotonation was
negligible in the case of dT binding to the free enzyme (Fig. 4,
line B). Hence, Hobs = Hbind for reaction i. An uptake of 0.31 protons was observed with ATP binding to the TK·dT complex in
reaction ii (Fig. 4, line A). Titration with the
1:1 mixture of dT and ATP leads to the uptake of 0.35 protons (Fig. 4,
line C). It follows that proton uptake occurred
with ATP binding but not with dT binding. Heat changes from ITC
experiments were corrected accordingly (Table I).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Protonation effect. Experimentally
observed enthalpy change, Hobs, is plotted
versus the ionization enthalpy of the buffer,
Hion, at 25 °C to evaluate the protonation
effect. ITC experiments were performed at pH 7.5 in PIPES, MOPS, TES,
and Tris buffers. A, titration of enzyme with ATP in the
presence of excess dT (reaction ii in Fig. 2). B, titration
of enzyme with dT (reaction i in Fig. 2). C, titration of
enzyme with a 1:1 mixture of dT and ATP. Continuous lines are linear
least-squares fits according to Equation 1.
|
|
Phosphate buffer behaved anomalously and influenced the thermodynamic
parameters significantly. Therefore, data collected in phosphate buffer
were not included in the analysis because of obvious differences in the
interaction mechanism.
Temperature Dependence of Thermodynamic Parameters--
ITC
measurements were performed at 10, 15, 20, and 25 °C. The results
are presented in Fig. 5 and are
summarized in Table I. H and T S
depended strongly on temperature, while G was almost
insensitive to temperature due to enthalpy-entropy compensation. Values
of Cp were calculated from the slopes of the regression lines of Hbind versus temperature
(Fig. 5). Binding of dT to the free enzyme (reaction i) was
characterized by Cp = 360 cal K 1
mol 1. Cp = 140 cal
K 1mol 1 was measured for ATP binding to the
TK·dT complex (reaction ii), and Cp = 510 cal
K 1 mol 1 for the titration of the enzyme
with a 1:1 mixture of dT and ATP (Table I). The latter value was very
close to the sum of the Cp values of reactions i and ii,
in agreement with a thermodynamic cycle described by the three
reactions.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Temperature dependence of
H, T S,
and G. ITC experiments were
performed in Tris/HCl, pH 7.5. A, binding of dT to the free
enzyme (reaction i). B, binding of ATP to the enzyme
presaturated with dT (reaction ii). C, binding of a 1:1
mixture of dT and ATP to the free enzyme. Cp was obtained
from the slope of a linear least-squares fit to H data.
H values are displayed as triangles, while
G and T S values are shown as
squares and diamonds, respectively. Reported data
are corrected for protonation effect by Equation 1.
|
|
Correlation between Cp and Surface Area Buried on Substrate
Binding--
In protein folding, the changes in enthalpy, entropy, and
heat capacity can be accounted for in terms of changes in
solvent-accessible polar and apolar surface area (36-43). Since
changes in the atomic interactions are similar in protein folding and
in binding reactions involving proteins (44), thermodynamic parameters
of protein-protein, peptide-protein, and small ligand-protein
interactions can be related to changes in solvent-accessible surface in
the same way (45, 46). Cp scales with the amount and type
of surface buried in the complex according to the equation,
|
(Eq. 2)
|
where ASA represents the apolar (ap) and polar (pol)
surface buried in the complex, and C represents the
elementary contributions per Å2 of apolar and polar
surface to the heat capacity and enthalpy changes (45).
Since there are no structural data available for HSV1 TK in the
ligand-free state, to estimate ASA, one may remove dT and ATP from the crystal structure of the ternary complex to obtain ASA. The buried surface area calculated in this way
corresponds to a rigid body binding model in which no conformational
changes take place when dT and ATP bind. As seen in Table
II, ASAtot calculated for the rigid body model was on the order of 600 to 800
Å2 for both dT binding and ATP binding. However, values of
Cp calculated by Equation 2 using the rigid body values
of ASA were much smaller than Cp determined
by experiment ( Cpcalc and
Cpexp in Table II).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Analysis of the changes of solvent-accessible surface area
Calculated changes of solvent-accessible surface area
( ASA) caused by substrate binding to HSV1 TK under the
assumption of a rigid body binding model are shown. Based on this
assumption, ASA have been calculated by removing dT, ATP,
or both from the crystal structure of the TK·dT·ATP complex (1).
ASA is in Å2 and Cp in cal
K 1 mol 1. Cpcalc values have
been calculated from Equation 2 with ASA calculated from
the crystal structure of TK·dT·ATP (rigid body assumption).
Cpexp values are from Table I.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Ordered Binding of Thymidine and ATP to HSV1 TK--
The
calorimetric titrations presented here provide a comprehensive
description of the energetics of substrate binding to HSV1 TK.
Substrate binding is strictly ordered. ATP could bind only after the
TK·dT complex had been formed. No ATP binding to the apoenzyme was
observed. One might argue that ATP binding was entropy-driven and that
H for ATP binding was so small that it escaped detection by ITC. This possibility could be ruled out because the entire set of
thermodynamic parameters satisfied the cycle shown in Fig. 6. Fig. 6 summarizes the energetics of
binding of dT and ATP at 25 °C and pH 7.5. Summation of the
parameters for reactions i and ii equaled almost exactly the parameters
determined independently for the single reaction of the apoenzyme with
dT and ATP together. The free energy change for dT binding was smaller
than for ATP binding, 7.2 versus 9.0 kcal
mol 1, but the enthalpy, entropy, and heat capacity
changes were significantly larger for the initial dT binding. Comparing
absolute values, one notes that H was 1.4 times larger,
and T S and Cp were 2.5 times
larger for dT binding than for the subsequent ATP binding. This means
that dT binding, which induced the formation of a tight ATP binding
site, was driven by a large enthalpy change but at a high cost in
entropy.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Thermodynamic cycle for sequential binding of
dT and ATP to HSV1 TK. The parameters at 25 °C and pH 7.5 are
indicated ( G, H, and
T S in kcal mol 1; data from Table
I).
|
|
Substrate-induced Conformational Changes Deduced from Large Cp
Values--
In the relatively narrow temperature range studied,
H became more favorable and T S
more unfavorable with increasing temperature. As a result,
G remained remarkably insensitive to temperature through
entropy/enthalpy compensation. This is a ubiquitous phenomenon seen in
many association reactions and is thought to be directly related to the
role of solvent water molecules in the association process (47).
According to the laws of thermodynamics, the temperature dependence of
H and S results from substantial changes in
heat capacity. In almost all association processes with proteins,
Cp has a negative sign if the free components are the
reference state (45). In the present case, Cp of the
overall reaction was 510 cal K 1 mol 1.
Binding of dT contributed 70%, and ATP binding contributed 30% to
this large negative heat capacity change. Recently, it has been shown
that the enthalpy slope observed in ITC experiments may include
contributions arising from temperature-induced changes in the heat
capacities of all participants of the association reaction over the
considered temperature range (48). The quantitative information that is
needed to correct the experimental Cp for such effects
could be obtained by DSC, given that the individual components undergo
a reversible thermal unfolding. Unfortunately, the thermal unfolding of
HSV1 TK was fully irreversible, with an apparent midpoint at 43 °C.
However, the far and near CD spectra remained unchanged, and the enzyme
retained full enzymatic activity over the relatively narrow temperature
interval of this study. We believe, therefore, that the measured
H and Cp values genuinely reflect the
formation of the specific ligand-protein complex, including the
structural rearrangements of the enzyme to accommodate the ligands and
do not contain significant contributions from preexisting
temperature-dependent conformational equilibria.
Since, in general, Cp correlates well with the amount of
surface area buried at the complex interface (49-52), we have tried to
calculate Cp from the surface area of HSV1 TK buried by
dT and ATP, respectively, and by both substrates together. The
calculation (Equation 2) is based on a large body of structural and
thermodynamic data for protein folding, protein-protein association,
and protein-ligand binding.
Since the three-dimensional structure of substrate-free HSV1 TK is not
known, we could not relate the calculated surface changes with actual
structural data. However, from the crystal structure of the
TK·dT·ATP complex, one can calculate the buried area for the case
of a rigid body binding model in which the dT and ATP binding sites
preexist and no conformational changes take place. Obviously, this
assumption was unjustified in view of the ordered sequential binding
mechanism. Indeed, the heat capacity changes calculated from
ASA for the rigid body binding model were accordingly much smaller than the experimentally determined ones (Table II).
One has to remember that surface burial calculated according to
Equation 2 takes into account mainly hydration effects, which are not
the only contributions to Cp. Changes in molecular
vibration modi are influenced by ligand binding in a deep hydrophobic
binding pocket, as seen in the crystal structure of the TK·dT·ATP
complex, in which the binding sites are close to the interface between the tightly associated monomers of the functional dimer. Hence, vibrational effects may have contributed to the large negative Cp values in addition to hydration effects, but they were
not considered in the semiempirical analysis. Nevertheless, the
significant discrepancy from a rigid binding model is an indisputable
sign of significant conformational rearrangements accompanying
substrate binding to HSV1 TK. Indeed, in the crystal structure of the
ternary enzyme-substrate complex, dT is deeply buried and completely
caved due to closing of the LID domain (Fig. 1). The ATP binding site is more surface-exposed, with ATP located like a plug just in front of
dT (1). Thus, a large contribution by conformational rearrangements
would seem to be justified. Reorganization of the dimer interface
concomitant to substrate binding would also seem to be feasible. The dT
binding site in the ternary complex of HSV1 TK is localized in a large
pocket of the NMPbind domain that is lined up by helices
3, 4, and 5. These
elements also belong to the dimer interface, and one might assume that
the association of dT and the subsequent formation of the ATP binding
site could be communicated to the dimer interface. In addition, parts
of the CORE domain and of the mobile segment between residues 250 and
322 contribute to the NMPbind domain. While these
considerations remain speculative before the structure of
substrate-free HSV1 TK is known, recent crystallographic studies of
adenylate kinases, to which the viral thymidine kinase is homologous,
have indeed demonstrated major changes induced by substrate binding in
the NMPbind domains and the LID domains as well as small
changes in the CORE domains (21, 24).
 |
CONCLUSION |
This is the first report providing a comprehensive thermodynamic
description of substrate and cofactor binding to HSV1 TK, a
representative of the large family of nucleotide and nucleoside kinases. The results obtained by titration microcalorimetry reveal an
extreme case of positive heterotropic interaction. Formation of a
binary complex of thymidine with HSV1 TK is a stringent prerequisite for ATP binding. Since the ATP binding site is in fact generated by
thymidine binding, one would expect the enzyme to undergo considerable conformational rearrangements. This has been supported by the analysis
of the observed heat capacity changes, which were large and negative
and indicated burial of molecular surface to an extent much larger than
expected if the substrate binding sites preexisted on the apoenzyme and
no rearrangement would occur (rigid body binding model). The findings
support the view that substrate binding to HSV1 TK leads to a
conformational closing of the substrate binding sites to bring
thymidine and ATP into an orientation appropriate for catalysis. The
details of the predicted rearrangements must await a firm structural
foundation. Work is in progress in this laboratory to solve the crystal
structure of the substrate-free apo form of HSV1 TK.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by grant from the Swiss
National Science Foundation and the Canton of Zurich.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
41-1-635-6036; Fax: 41-1-635-6884; E-mail:
scapozza@pharma.ethz.ch.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 13, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000509200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HSV1, herpes
simplex virus type 1;
TK, thymidine kinase;
dT, thymidine;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
HPLC, high performance liquid
chromatography;
ITC, isothermal titration calorimetry;
PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid;
TES, 2-{[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]amino}ethanesulfonic
acid;
NMP, nucleoside monophosphate.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Wild, K.,
Bohner, T.,
Aubry, A.,
Folkers, G.,
and Schulz, G. E.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
368,
289-292
|
| 2.
|
Wild, K.,
Bohner, T.,
Folkers, G.,
and Schulz, G. E.
(1997)
Protein Sci.
6,
2097-2106
|
| 3.
|
Champness, J. N.,
Bennett, M. S.,
Wien, F.,
Visse, R.,
Summers, W. C.,
Herdewijn, P.,
de Clerq, E.,
Ostrowski, T.,
Jarvest, R. L.,
and Sanderson, M. R.
(1998)
Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet.
32,
350-361
|
| 4.
|
Brown, D. G.,
Visse, R.,
Sandhu, G.,
Davies, A.,
Rizkallah, P. J.,
Melitz, C.,
Summers, W. C.,
and Sanderson, M. R.
(1995)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
2,
876-881
|
| 5.
|
Bennett, M. S.,
Wien, F.,
Champness, J. N.,
Batuwangala, T.,
Rutherford, T.,
Summers, W. C.,
Sun, H.,
Wright, G.,
and Sanderson, M. R.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
443,
121-125
|
| 6.
|
Chen, M. S.,
and Prusoff, W. H.
(1978)
J. Biol. Chem.
253,
1325-1327
|
| 7.
|
Smee, D. F.,
Martin, J. C.,
Verheyden, J. P.,
and Matthews, T. R.
(1983)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
23,
676-682
|
| 8.
|
Waldman, A. S.,
Haeusslein, E.,
and Milman, G.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
11571-11575
|
| 9.
|
Chen, M. S.,
Walker, J.,
and Prusoff, W. H.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
10747-10753
|
| 10.
|
Keller, P. M.,
Fyfe, J. A.,
Beauchamp, L.,
Lubbers, C. M.,
Furman, P. A.,
Schaeffer, H. J.,
and Elion, G. B.
(1981)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
30,
3071-3077
|
| 11.
|
Larder, B. A.,
and Darby, G.
(1982)
J. Virol.
42,
649-658
|
| 12.
|
Larder, B. A.,
Cheng, Y. C.,
and Darby, G.
(1983)
J. Gen. Virol.
64,
523-532
|
| 13.
|
Spadari, S.,
Maga, G.,
Focher, F.,
Ciarrocchi, G.,
Manservigi, R.,
Arcamone, F.,
Capobianco, M.,
Carcuro, A.,
Colonna, F.,
and Iotti, S.
(1992)
J. Med. Chem.
35,
4214-4220
|
| 14.
|
Schulz, G. E.
(1992)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
2,
61-67
|
| 15.
|
Dreusicke, D.,
Karplus, P. A.,
and Schulz, G. E.
(1988)
J. Mol. Biol.
199,
359-371
|
| 16.
|
Schlauderer, G. J.,
and Schulz, G. E.
(1996)
Protein Sci.
5,
434-441
|
| 17.
|
Stehle, T.,
and Schulz, G. E.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
211,
249-254
|
| 18.
|
Muller-Dieckmann, H. J.,
and Schulz, G. E.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
236,
361-367
|
| 19.
|
Teplyakov, A.,
Sebastiao, P.,
Obmolova, G.,
Perrakis, A.,
Brush, G. S.,
Bessman, M. J.,
and Wilson, K. S.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
3487-3497
|
| 20.
|
Lavie, A.,
Vetter, I. R.,
Konrad, M.,
Goody, R. S.,
Reinstein, J.,
and Schlichting, I.
(1997)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
4,
601-604
|
| 21.
|
Vonrhein, C.,
Schlauderer, G. J.,
and Schulz, G. E.
(1995)
Structure
3,
483-490
|
| 22.
|
Halpern, M. E.,
and Smiley, J. R.
(1984)
J. Virol.
50,
733-738
|
| 23.
|
Degreve, B.,
Johansson, M.,
De Clercq, E.,
Karlsson, A.,
and Balzarini, J.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
9535-9543
|
| 24.
|
Muller, C. W.,
Schlauderer, G. J.,
Reinstein, J.,
and Schulz, G. E.
(1996)
Structure
4,
147-156
|
| 25.
|
Fetzer, J.,
Michael, M.,
Bohner, T.,
Hofbauer, R.,
and Folkers, G.
(1994)
Protein Expression Purif.
5,
432-441
|
| 26.
|
Michael, M.,
Gerber, S.,
Fetzer, J.,
and Folkers, G.
(1997)
Pharmacol Acta Helv.
72,
139-143
|
| 27.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254
|
| 28.
|
Wiseman, T.,
Williston, S.,
Brandts, J. F.,
and Lin, L. N.
(1989)
Anal. Biochem.
179,
131-137
|
| 29.
|
Cooper, A.,
and Johnson, C. M.
(1994)
Methods Mol. Biol.
22,
137-150
|
| 30.
|
Masson, S.,
Desmoulin, F.,
Sciaky, M.,
and Cozzone, P. J.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
1025-1031
|
| 31.
|
Pilger, B. D.,
Perozzo, R.,
Alber, F.,
Folkers, G.,
and Scapozza, L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
31967-31973
|
| 32.
|
Hubbard, S. J.,
and Thornton, J. M.
(1996)
NACCESS, Version 2.1.1
, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College, London
|
| 33.
|
Lee, B.,
and Richards, F. M.
(1971)
J. Mol. Biol.
55,
379-400
|
| 34.
|
Gerber, S.,
and Folkers, G.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
225,
263-267
|
| 35.
|
Cooper, A.,
and Johnson, C. M.
(1994)
Methods Mol. Biol.
22,
109-124
|
| 36.
|
Xie, D.,
and Freire, E.
(1994)
Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet.
19,
291-301
|
| 37.
|
Privalov, P. L.,
and Makhatadze, G. I.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
232,
660-679
|
| 38.
|
Makhatadze, G. I.,
and Privalov, P. L.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
232,
639-659
|
| 39.
|
Murphy, K. P.,
Bhakuni, V.,
Xie, D.,
and Freire, E.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
227,
293-306
|
| 40.
|
Murphy, K. P.,
and Freire, E.
(1992)
Adv. Protein Chem.
43,
313-361
|
| 41.
|
Spolar, R. S.,
Ha, J. H.,
and Record, M. T., Jr.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
8382-8385
|
| 42.
|
Spolar, R. S.,
Livingstone, J. R.,
and Record, M. T., Jr.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
3947-3955
|
| 43.
|
Privalov, P. L.,
and Gill, S. J.
(1988)
Adv. Protein Chem.
39,
191-234
|
| 44.
|
Janin, J.,
and Chothia, C.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
16027-16030
|
| 45.
|
Baker, B. M.,
and Murphy, K. P.
(1998)
Methods Enzymol.
295,
294-315
|
| 46.
|
Luque, I.,
and Freire, E.
(1998)
Methods Enzymol.
295,
100-127
|
| 47.
|
Lumry, R.,
and Rajender, S.
(1970)
Biopolymers
9,
1125-227
|
| 48.
|
Privalov, P. L.,
Jelesarov, I.,
Read, C. M.,
Dragan, A. I.,
and Crane-Robinson, C.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
294,
997-1013
|
| 49.
|
Connelly, P. R.,
and Thomson, J. A.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
4781-4785
|
| 50.
|
Murphy, K. P.,
Xie, D.,
Garcia, K. C.,
Amzel, L. M.,
and Freire, E.
(1993)
Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet.
15,
113-120
|
| 51.
|
Baker, B. M.,
and Murphy, K. P.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
268,
557-569
|
| 52.
|
McNemar, C.,
Snow, M. E.,
Windsor, W. T.,
Prongay, A.,
Mui, P.,
Zhang, R.,
Durkin, J.,
Le, H. V.,
and Weber, P. C.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
10006-10014
|
| 53.
|
Kraulis, P. J.
(1991)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
24,
946-950
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Frago, A. Velazquez-Campoy, and M. Medina
The Puzzle of Ligand Binding to Corynebacterium ammoniagenes FAD Synthetase
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 13, 2009;
284(11):
6610 - 6619.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Schelling, M. T. Claus, R. Johner, V. E. Marquez, G. E. Schulz, and L. Scapozza
Biochemical and Structural Characterization of (South)-Methanocarbathymidine That Specifically Inhibits Growth of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Thymidine Kinase-transduced Osteosarcoma Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 30, 2004;
279(31):
32832 - 32838.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Sekulic, L. Shuvalova, O. Spangenberg, M. Konrad, and A. Lavie
Structural Characterization of the Closed Conformation of Mouse Guanylate Kinase
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 9, 2002;
277(33):
30236 - 30243.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Sulpizi, P. Schelling, G. Folkers, P. Carloni, and L. Scapozza
The Rational of Catalytic Activity of Herpes Simplex Virus Thymidine Kinase. A COMBINED BIOCHEMICAL AND QUANTUM CHEMICAL STUDY
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 8, 2001;
276(24):
21692 - 21697.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Shiroishi, A. Yokota, K. Tsumoto, H. Kondo, Y. Nishimiya, K. Horii, M. Matsushima, K. Ogasahara, K. Yutani, and I. Kumagai
Structural Evidence for Entropic Contribution of Salt Bridge Formation to a Protein Antigen-Antibody Interaction. THE CASE OF HEN LYSOZYME-HyHEL-10 Fv COMPLEX
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 15, 2001;
276(25):
23042 - 23050.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|