![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 21, 16289-16295, May 26, 2000
From the Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
Received for publication, December 23, 1999, and in revised form, February 18, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous work showed a transient but dramatic
arrest in the synthesis of Rubisco large subunit (LSU) upon transfer of
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cells from low light (LL) to high
light (HL). Using dichlorofluorescin, a short-term increase in reactive
oxygen species (ROS) was demonstrated, suggesting that their excessive
formation could signal LSU down-regulation. A decrease in LSU synthesis occurred at LL in the presence of methyl viologen and was prevented at
HL by ascorbate. Interfering with D1 function by mutations or by
incubation with DCMU prevented the increase in ROS formation at HL and
the concomitant down-regulation of LSU synthesis. If the electron
transport was blocked further downstream, by mutation in the cytochrome
b6/f or by incubation with
2,5-dibromo-3-methyl-6-isopropyl-p-benzoquinone, ROS
formation increased, and LSU synthesis ceased. The elevation of ROS
occurred concurrently with a change in the redox state of the
glutathione pool, which shifted toward its oxidized form immediately
after the transfer to HL and returned to its original value after
6 h. The decrease in the reduced/oxidized glutathione ratio at HL
was prevented by ascorbate and could be induced at LL by methyl
viologen. We suggest that excess ROS mediate a decrease in the
reduced/oxidized glutathione ratio that in turn signals the
translational arrest of the rbcL transcript.
Exposure of photosynthetic organisms to light intensities that
exceed the limits of photosynthesis saturation can cause severe damage
to the photosynthetic machinery, referred to as photoinhibition (1-3).
Most plants and algae have the capacity to recover from light stress
through photoacclimation, which normally involves a reduction in either
the number or size of the light harvesting complexes and increased
synthesis of the photodamaged D1, the core protein of photosystem II
(PSII) (4, 5). Excess light energy generates reactive oxygen species
(ROS),1 which in turn lead to
the induction of antioxidant photoprotective mechanisms enabling the
plant to combat the danger posed by the presence of ROS.
Ribulose biphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (Rubisco) is the key enzyme
in carbon assimilation during photosynthesis. In Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and in land plants the enzyme is composed of eight large subunits (LSU) encoded by the chloroplast rbcL gene
and eight small subunits encoded by the nuclear rbcS gene
family (6, 7). Assembly of the Rubisco holoenzyme is driven by the
chloroplast Cpn60 and Cpn10, encoded by groEL and
groES, respectively. Previously we observed unique and
opposite patterns for translational regulation of the chloroplast LSU
and D1 polypeptides in response to changes in light intensity. Within
minutes of shifting cells of C. reinhardtii from low light
to higher light intensities, LSU synthesis was down-regulated
dramatically for a period that did not exceed 4-6 h, whereas that of
D1 was gradually up-regulated. Translation of other genes was hardly
affected, including photosynthesis-related genes such as the
chloroplast encoded ATPase This study attempts to decipher the mechanism that controls translation
of LSU and signals the immediate and short-term down-regulation observed upon transferring low light grown C. reinhardtii
cells to higher light intensities. We propose that modulation of the glutathione redox potential by changes in the level of ROS regulate the
synthesis of Rubisco LSU in the chloroplast.
Strains and Growth Conditions--
C. reinhardtii
wild type strain CC-125 was used in all experiments. Cultures in High
Salt Reduced Sulfate (HSRS) (300 ml) (9) were grown with 5%
CO2 bubbling and constant rotary shaking at 22 °C.
Cultures were illuminated with low light (LL; 70 µmol m In Vivo Pulse Labeling of Chloroplast Proteins--
In
vivo labeling of plastid and nuclear encoded proteins with
[35S]H2SO4 was performed
essentially as described (12), with the following modifications. Cells
were grown under LL in HSRS (13), until their biomass
A750 reached 0.2-0.3. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation for 5 min (4500 × g,
20 °C) and resuspended at 0.4 A750 in minimal
medium lacking sulfate (HS-S; Ref. 13) and containing 10 mM
bicarbonate to ensure carbon availability for photosynthesis. The cells
were equilibrated for 1 h under LL in HS-S. Aliquots (4 ml) of the
HS-S cell suspension were placed in 30-ml Corex tubes containing
magnetic stirring bars and illuminated at LL or at high light (HL; 700 µmol m Labeling of Wild Type CC-125 Cells in the Presence of Herbicides
or Ascorbic Acid--
Wild type cells were grown photoautotrophically
and processed for labeling as described above. Following transfer to
HS-S for 1 h, the cells were incubated at LL or at HL in the
presence of DCMU (10 In Vivo Pulse Labeling of Nonphotosynthetic Mutants--
The
nonphotosynthetic mutant strains CC-741 (FUD7), CC-3376 (A251R*), and
CC-2910 (F2D8) were grown heterotrophically in TAP medium (9) under LL
conditions to early log phase. Acetate was depleted by transfer of the
cells to minimal growth conditions (HSRS/5% CO2) 16 h
before transfer to HL. The cells were then resuspended in HS-S for
1 h and transferred to LL and HL for 2.5 h. Labeling and
SDS-PAGE analysis were performed as described for wild type cells.
Labeling of Wild Type CC-125 Cells in the Presence of
MeV--
Early log cells grown photoautotrophically at LL on HSRS with
bubbling of 5% CO2. Aliquots (4 ml) were transferred to
HS-S medium for 1 h at LL in presence of MeV (10 DCF Fluorescence at LL and after the Shift to HL--
Early log
cells grown photoautotrophically on minimal medium with 5%
CO2 at LL were transferred to HS-S for 1 h. A sample of the cell suspension (10 ml) was placed in 30-ml Corex tubes containing magnetic stirring bars and illuminated with LL or HL irradiance. Samples (2 ml) from LL and HL were removed after 0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 h and added to 8 ml of loading buffer (10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 50 mM KCl) containing 0.05 mM
DCFH (5 µl from a 100 mM stock solution in
Me2SO; Ref. 15). The samples were maintained for 20 min in
the dark, and relative fluorescence was monitored in a Perkin-Elmer
LS50B Spectrofluorometer, set at an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and
emission wavelength of 525 nm with a slit width of 7.5 nm. DCF
fluorescence at LL and after the shift to HL was performed in wild type
CC-125 and in the nonphotosynthetic mutants (CC-741, CC-3376, and
CC-2910) as well as in wild type cells in the presence of DCMU
(10 Measurement of GSH/GSSG Ratio--
GSH and GSSG were measured
using a modified method for glutathione measurement in microtiter
plates (16, 17). Cells were grown under LL in HSRS up to a density of
0.2-0.3 A750, harvested by centrifugation for 5 min (4500 × g, 20 °C), and resuspended at a density
of 0.4 A750 in HS-S. Cultures were then
illuminated at LL and at HL for different time periods, and cell
samples (12 ml) were removed, washed once in phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.0), and centrifuged. The wet weight of the washed
cell pellet was measured, and 5% sulfosalicylic acid (Sigma) was
added, 150 µl/50 mg pellet. The mixture was agitated on a Vortex
mixer and stored at Effect of Disrupting the Photosynthetic Electron Transport Chain on
the Synthesis of Rubisco LSU Following Transfer from LL to HL--
To
test whether the redox state of specific components along the electron
transport chain affected the down-regulation of LSU, labeling
experiments of wild type cells at LL and after transfer to HL were
performed in the presence of herbicides that inhibit the electron
transfer at different sites along the electron transfer chain. DCMU
inhibits the oxidation of the plastoquinone pool, and DBMIB reduces its
oxidation by competitively binding to cytochrome b6/f complex. Wild type C. reinhardtii cells were labeled at LL and after transfer to HL (2 h) in the presence of DCMU (10
To complement the experiments using herbicides, C. reinhardtii mutants in which D1 was completely absent (FUD-7) or
inactivated by a point mutation (A251R*), and a mutant defective in
cytochrome b6/f (F2D8) were labeled
at LL and after shifting to HL (2 h). The FUD-7 mutant does not
synthesize any D1 and is thus deficient of functional PSII. In the D1
mutant A251R*, Ala at position 251 was substituted with Arg.
Ala251 is located in the quinone binding loop connecting
the IV-V helices of D1 (10). This mutation does not alter the size (32 kDa) or amount of the D1 protein. The mutant synthesizes D1 up to 80% of its level in wild type when grown under HL but has a
nonphotosynthetic phenotype because electron transfer between QA and QB
is completely blocked (10). Labeling experiments of both D1 mutants
indicate that in the absence of a functional D1, synthesis of LSU is
unaffected by shifting the cells from LL to HL (Fig.
2, B and C).
However, inactivation of cytochrome
b6/f in the mutant strain F2D8 did not prevent the down-regulation of LSU synthesis (Fig.
2D).
The effect of mutations in the photosynthetic electron carriers that
prevent oxidation or reduction of the plastoquinone (Fig. 2)
corroborated with that of the herbicides (Fig. 1). In the presence of
DCMU or in mutants defective in D1, the plastoquinone pool remained
oxidized in wild type cells, despite transfer to HL. Thus LL conditions
are mimicked, and LSU down-regulation was not observed. Preventing
oxidation of the plastoquinone pool by incubation with DBMIB or by
mutagenesis of the cytochrome b6/f
complex did not alter the pattern of LSU down-regulation. Although
these results could indicate that the redox state of the PQ has a
regulatory role in LSU synthesis during LL to HL shifts, previous
fluorimetric measurements ruled out this possibility. The plastoquinone
was reduced immediately after transfer from LL to HL and was maintained in a reduced state in HL (8), whereas LSU synthesis initially declined
and then recovered.
The labeling pattern of D1 indicated that in control cells synthesis of
this protein increased 9-fold upon transfer from LL to HL, in line with
previous observations (18). This increase was inhibited by DCMU, DBMIB,
and a mutation in cytochrome b6/f. These data are in line with the redox control of D1 synthesis in the
chloroplast (19). However, it was difficult to explain why D1 synthesis
increased (by 5.5-fold) in A251R*, because electron transport is
blocked in this nonphotosynthetic mutant. Different forms of D1 that
vary in their half lives were shown to coexist in the thylakoids of
this mutant, and these could be reflected in the pattern of labeling
(10).
Effects of Ascorbic Acid on Synthesis of LSU and on ROS Levels
during LL to HL Shifts--
Excess energy not trapped by the
photosynthetic electron transport chain can increase the formation of
ROS at specific sites of the PSII and PSI reaction centers. In PSII,
singlet oxygen is formed by the reaction of the triplet state of P680
with oxygen. Hydrogen peroxide is generated both in PSI and in PSII,
and can be converted to hydroxyradicals by interaction with non-heme
iron (20, 21). As photoprotective mechanisms come into play (4, 5), the
free radical density should decline, and LSU synthesis would normalize
once again. We therefore hypothesized that the increase in ROS could
signal the down-regulation of LSU synthesis, either directly or
indirectly. To test this possibility, ascorbic acid, which acts as an
antioxidant by removing hydrogen peroxide (22) was added to cells
labeled at HL. Synthesis of LSU was not interrupted if the cells were
transferred to HL in the presence of ascorbic acid (5 and 10 mM), whereas in its absence, LSU translation decreased at
HL (2 h). Addition of ascorbic acid increased the synthesis of D1
already at LL, thus reducing the difference between incorporation of
radiolabel into D1 at LL and at HL (Fig.
3A).
To examine whether accumulation of excess ROS indeed signaled the
translational arrest of LSU, their level was measured using the
oxidatively sensitive DCFH (15). DCFH enters the cells in its diacetate
form (DCFH-DA), becomes hydrolyzed and remains trapped intracellularly.
Oxidation of DCFH by H2O2 generates DCF, a
highly fluorescent compound. Although DCFH reacts mainly with
H2O2, it is useful for monitoring other ROS
species, because singlet oxygen is converted to superoxide anion
resulting in the formation of H2O2 by
superoxide dismutase activity (20, 23).
The results of DCF fluorescence indicate that the level of ROS
increased by almost 2-fold at 0.5 and 1.5 h after transfer from LL
to HL and decreased after 2.5 h back to the level measured at LL
(Fig. 3B). Addition of ascorbic acid (5 and 10 mM) to wild type cells prevented the ROS increase at HL, in
line with its antioxidant activity.
Monitoring ROS Levels with DCF in the Presence of Herbicides and in
Mutant Cells--
To establish the correlation between down-regulation
in LSU synthesis and the increase in ROS levels, DCF fluorescence was measured at LL and after transfer to HL in the presence of DCMU (10 The Effect of MeV on ROS Formation and LSU Synthesis--
To
establish the direct involvement of ROS in signaling the
down-regulation of LSU synthesis, cells were incubated at LL with MeV.
MeV accepts an electron from ferredoxin and reacts with molecular O2, forming a superoxide radical anion that is transformed
in subsequent reactions to ROS such as hydrogen peroxide and hydroxy radicals (24). The free radical pool can therefore be increased by MeV,
similar to what occurs when cells are transferred from LL to HL. Cells
were labeled at LL in the presence of MeV,
(10
DCF fluorescence at LL in the presence of MeV
(10 Monitoring GSH/GSSG Ratios at LL and after Transfer to
HL--
Glutathione is a low molecular mass thiol that has a key
regulatory role in plants and algae. Most of it is present in the reduced form (GSH), and only a minor fraction is oxidized and exists as
two molecules of GSH linked by a disulfide bond (GSSG). An increase in
ROS during stress could affect the GSH/GSSG ratio, shifting the balance
toward oxidation. As shown in our DCF based fluorescence assay, a
"light shock" causes a rapid increase in the level of ROS that
subsequently returns to the original value measured at LL. We therefore
examined whether the transient increase in ROS after the LL to HL shift
is coupled to parallel changes in the GSH/GSSG ratio. Transfer of
C. reinhardtii cells from LL to HL resulted in a transient
decrease in the GSH/GSSG ratio (Fig. 6A) which dropped 2-fold after
1.5 h and recovered its original LL level within 6 h. The
accumulation of excess ROS thus changed the redox state of glutathione,
increasing its relative oxidized fraction. The changes in the GSH/GSSG
ratio paralleled the down-regulation and the subsequent recovery of LSU
synthesis. The translational arrest of LSU was maximal at 2 h and
recovered after 4-6 h (8). The GSH/GSSG ratio returned to its original
value also after 6 h, only after the level of ROS decreased.
Modulation of the GSH/GSSG ratio by changes in the ROS level is further
supported by the opposite effects observed for ascorbate and MeV.
Addition of ascorbic acid to cells transferred to HL prevented the
transient decrease in the GSH/GSSG ratio (Fig. 6B), and
addition of MeV to cells grown at LL increased the relative fraction of
oxidized glutathione decreasing the GSH/GSSG ratio, mimicking the
transfer to HL (Fig. 6C).
Changes in light intensities play a key role in regulation of
photosynthetic genes. Recent studies assigned a regulatory role for the
redox state of components in the photosynthetic electron pathway in
controlling expression of chloroplastic proteins (19, 25). Regulation
of the nuclear encoded cab genes, and the chloroplast encoded psbA is thought to be controlled directly by the
redox potential of specific components in the electron transport chain. Expression of cab genes is reversibly repressed by a
phosphorylatable factor coupled to the redox status of PQ through a
chloroplast protein kinase (25). Translation of D1 is subject to
regulation by the redox state of thioredoxin and ferredoxin (19) by
affecting the thiol groups on proteins that bind to the 5'-untranslated region (26). Unlike D1, whose synthesis gradually increases in response
to elevation of light intensities, LSU synthesis follows a unique
regulatory pattern, displayed by its transient arrest in cells
transferred from LL to HL and a subsequent recovery upon photoacclimation (8). The mechanism that regulates the synthesis of
these two proteins should therefore differ.
In this study we propose that translational arrest of rbcL
is signaled by the increased generation of ROS that can modulate the
redox potential of the glutathione pool and thus inhibit the translation of this protein. The labeling pattern of LSU in the presence of DCMU and DBMIB or in mutants defective at different sites
of the electron transport chain could imply that the redox state of
plastoquinone is involved in signaling the down-regulation in LSU
synthesis. However, because the measured value of 1-qP (the index of
QA reduction state) was high and remained unaltered during the
first hours after transfer to HL, whereas LSU translation initially
declined and then recovered (8), changes in the redox state of PQ were
not likely to be the direct cause for the down-regulation of LSU,
although indirect effects of the chloroplast redox state could be
involved. Alternatively, these results could be explained on the basis
of ROS formation upon transfer to HL. The down-regulation of the
rbcL gene encoding LSU could occur in response to a signal generated by the imbalance that takes place when cells grown in LL,
with their extensive chlorophyll antenna complexes, are shifted to HL.
These antennae would trap more light quanta than can be processed by
the photosynthetic electron transport system, resulting in the rapid
elevation of ROS. As the antenna size is adjusted downward the
imbalance would be dissipated, the level of ROS would decrease, and LSU
synthesis would increase once again. Quantitative estimation of ROS
correlates with this hypothesis, with their level transiently
increasing upon transfer from LL to HL and then returning to the basal
level. Incubation with ascorbic acid prevented the increase in ROS at
HL and prevented the translational arrest of LSU. In accordance with
these data, incubation of cells at LL in the presence of MeV, an
inducer of ROS in the chloroplast, led to the increase of ROS and the
down-regulation of LSU synthesis, whereas translation of other proteins
was unaffected.
The results of labeling wild type cells in the presence of herbicides
or labeling of mutants defective at different sites of the electron
transport chain could also be interpreted by ROS formation. DCMU
protects cells from the oxidative stress experienced during high
intensity illumination by preventing the increase in ROS and the light
induced breakdown of D1 (27, 28). The DCF-based measurements of ROS in
the presence of DCMU confirmed this observation, which correlated with
the continued synthesis of LSU at HL in the presence of DCMU. Likewise,
ROS levels in nonphotosynthetic D1 mutants did not show a marked
increase at HL. DBMIB or mutations in the cytochrome
b6/f complex did not prevent the
elevation of ROS levels nor the translational arrest of LSU. The
increase in ROS in the presence of DBMIB is relatively short-term for
reasons not completely clear to us; however, the basal level of ROS is
high already at LL, possibly because of the block in the electron pathway.
Previous reports indicated that ROS can function as second messengers
in mediating stress responses in plants. Plants attacked by pathogens
respond by elevating ROS levels, leading to the induction of pathogen
response genes (29, 30). Transcriptional activation of pathogen
response genes can also be obtained by elicitors of ROS (31), by direct
application of H2O2 (32), or by suppression of
catalase activity resulting in increased levels of
H2O2 (33, 34).
Modulation of gene expression by ROS can be mediated by changes in the
redox state of the glutathione pool (23, 35). Elevation of reduced
glutathione in transformed plants overexpressing glutathione reductase
increased resistance to oxidative stress (36), and changes in the redox
status of glutathione regulated the expression of copper,
zinc-superoxide dismutase and of ascorbate peroxidase (37).
Here we show that transfer of cells from LL to HL causes a transient
increase in ROS that correlates with the reduction in the GSH/GSSG
ratio. Addition of ascorbic acid prevented the increase in ROS, and
thus the GSH/GSSG ratio remained unaltered at HL, whereas addition of
MeV at LL increased the formation of ROS and decreased the GSH/GSSG
ratio. Concomitantly, ascorbic acid prevented the down-regulation of
LSU translation at HL and MeV induced it at LL. Thus the decrease in
the GSH/GSSG ratio in the chloroplast could serve as a signal for the
translational arrest of LSU. We hypothesize that translational arrest
of the rbcL transcript could occur because of oxidation of
sulfhydryl groups in one or more of the components of the translational
initiation complex that assembles on the rbcL
5'-untranslated region. During photoacclimation the intrachloroplastic
glutathione pool shifts to its reduced form, oxidation of the
sulfhydryl groups on the target protein is reversed, and translation of
LSU can proceed. At this stage the nature of the putative protein that
modulates translation of the rbcL transcript possibly by
oxidation of its sulfhydryl groups is yet unclear. In addition to its
role in translational control, redox changes induced during
photoinhibitory stress and senescence have been implicated in Rubisco
breakdown (38, 39), and oxidation of sulfhydryl groups in critical Cys
residues has been demonstrated to play a key role in LSU degradation
(40).
The time period required for recovery of the GSH/GSSG ratio is
similar to that observed for restoration of LSU translation (4-6 h),
suggesting that the two processes are associated. However, the level of
ROS returned to its original level already within 2.5 h. This
difference can be explained by a lag period that is required for the
cell to overcome the oxidative damage induced by the transfer to HL.
The delay in restoring the GSH/GSSG ratio could be due to a requirement
for synthesis of new proteins.
The synthesis of subunits that compose organellar multimeric protein
complexes is coordinated, even when they are encoded by the different
genomes of the cell (41, 42). Translation of the chloroplast-encoded
Rubisco LSU was inhibited when the two genes encoding the small
subunits in C. reinhardtii were deleted (43) or if their
synthesis was inhibited by the antisense approach (44). Unlike
these effects, the transient arrest in LSU translation that we observe
during a light shock in C. reinhardtii did not lead to a
coordinated down-regulation of small subunit synthesis, possibly
because the down-regulation of LSU was short-term and not long enough
to affect the steady state of this protein (8). Uncoordinated synthesis
of Rubisco subunits has been previously reported, but only during a
short term (45).
Although the current study reveals a novel signaling mechanism that
controls translation of Rubisco LSU, the physiological significance of
its down-regulation during a light shock remains to be elucidated. We
suggest that the arrest in LSU synthesis ceases Rubisco assembly, thus
releasing the Cpn60/10 chaperonins from mediating assembly of this
highly abundant complex and transiently recruiting them for overcoming
the damaging effects of oxidative stress.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-subunit, the nuclear encoded small
subunit of Rubisco (small subunits), or nonphotosynthetic genes, such
as tubulin. The observed changes in D1 and LSU synthesis could not be
correlated with changes in the steady state levels of their
corresponding mRNAs, implying that translational regulation was
involved. Primer extension analysis of rbcL mRNA
revealed two transcripts that differed in their 5' ends and in their
abundance at LL and after transfer to HL. The appearance of the longer
transcript correlated with the down-regulation in LSU synthesis, but
its involvement in arresting LSU translation was unresolved. These several distinct effects of temporary light stress were correlated with
a rapid, sustained increase in the reduction state of QA, a
transient decline in the photosynthetic efficiency, a less rapid drop
in total chlorophyll content, and a delay in cell division (8).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2 s
1) using cool white fluorescent lamps.
LL grown cells were adapted for low irradiance and were not permitted
to attain densities greater that 0.2-0.3 A750.
The D1 mutant strains were CC-741 (FUD7), a D1 deletion mutant, and
CC-3376 (A251R*), which carries a point mutation in D1 (10). The
cytochrome b6/f-deficient mutant was CC-2910 (F2D8) (11).
2 s
1) for the designated time
periods. Anisomycin (Sigma) was then added to a concentration of 250 µg ml
1 for 15 min to reduce labeling of cytoplasmic
proteins (14). [35S]H2SO4 (125 µCi; carrier free; NEN Life Science Products) was then added to each
aliquot of cells for additional 15 min. To terminate labeling, 3 ml of
the cell aliquot were added rapidly to 10 ml of ice-cold acetone
incubated on ice for 1-2 h and centrifuged for 10 min, and the protein
pellets were dried. Samples were resuspended in 100 µl of
H2O and 100 µl of denaturing solution (4% SDS, 5 mM EDTA, 40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4), briefly
vortexed, and boiled for 5 min. Incorporation of the radiolabel was
measured by trichloroacetic acid precipitation, and the protein content
was determined with the BCA reagent (Pierce). Samples containing equal
protein quantities were loaded and verified by Coomassie staining. The
gels were dried, exposed to XAR5 film (Kodak), and also analyzed by a
Fuji phosphorimager.
7 M), DBMIB
(10
6 M), or ascorbic acid (5 and 10 mM) for 2 h and then labeled as described for wild
type cells. Following cell harvest, proteins were extracted and
analyzed as described above. Labeling of LSU and D1 was evaluated by phosphorimaging.
6,
6 × 10
6, and 10
5 M) for
45 min and radiolabeled.
7 M), DBMIB (10
6
M), and ascorbic acid (10 mM). Measurement of
DCF fluorescence at LL in the presence of MeV
(10
4-10
6 M) was performed with
samples that were collected after 0.5 and 1.5 h. Fluorometry
measurements were performed in triplicate and expressed as relative
fluorescence units.
70 °C until their analysis, at which time the
cells were thawed, and the insoluble debris was removed by
centrifugation (13,000 × g, 4 °C, 20 min). The
supernatant was collected, and samples of 100 µl were diluted 1:1
with distilled water and distributed into two aliquots, for
individually measuring GSSG and total glutathione. To conjugate GSH,
2-vinylpyridine (Fluka) was added to one of the aliquots to a final
concentration of 0.35 M. The mixture was neutralized to pH
6.7-7 with triethanolamine (diluted 1:2 with double distilled
H2O). GSSG concentrations in these extracts were determined
using the enzymatic recycling assay (16, 17) involving the color
development at 412 nm of 0.15 mM 5,5-dithiobis
2-nitro-benzoic acid (Sigma) in the presence of 0.2 mM
NADPH and 1 unit ml
1 of GSH reductase (Fluka). Total
glutathione (GSH and GSSG) concentrations were determined in the second
aliquot using the same assay without adding 2-vinylpyridine. GSSG
standards (Calbiochem) were used for calibration, and all measurements
were performed in triplicate. GSH and GSSG were measured also in cells
incubated with ascorbic acid at LL and at HL and in cells incubated
with MeV at LL.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
7 M) and DBMIB
(10
6 M), which were added when the cells were
transferred to HL. Although synthesis of LSU decreased 2-fold in
control cells shifted to HL, it was almost unaffected in the presence
of DCMU (Fig. 1A). However,
addition of DBMIB did not prevent the down-regulation of LSU synthesis
after transfer from LL to HL (Fig. 1B). In addition, LSU
synthesis decreased already at LL in the presence of DBMIB (10
6 M).

View larger version (66K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Labeling of wild type cells in the presence
of DCMU and DBMIB. Early log cells grown photoautotrophically at
LL on minimal medium with 5% CO2 were transferred to LL or
HL (2 h) with or without DCMU (10
7 M)
(A) and DBMIB (10
6 M)
(B) and metabolically labeled in the presence of anisomycin.
Labeled proteins were subjected to 11% SDS-PAGE, autoradiography, and
phosphorimaging. The HL/LL ratio of radiolabel incorporation into LSU
and D1 is shown below each autoradiogram.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Labeling of nonphotosynthetic mutants at LL
and after the shift to HL. Mutant strains were grown
heterotrophically in TAP medium to early log phase under LL conditions.
Acetate was depleted by transfer of the cells to minimal growth
conditions (HSRS/5%CO2) 16 h before transfer to HL.
The cells were then resuspended in HS-S for 1 h and transferred to
LL and HL for 2 h. Labeling of wild type cells and SDS-PAGE were
performed as described in the legend of Fig. 1. A, wild type
cells; B, A251R*; C, FUD7; D,
F2D8.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Labeling and DCF fluorescence measurements in
the presence of ascorbic acid at LL and after the shift to HL.
A, early log cells grown photoautotrophically at LL on
minimal medium (HS) with 5% CO2 were transferred to LL or
HL for 2 h with or without ascorbic acid (5 and 10 mM). Labeling and SDS-PAGE were performed as described for
Fig. 1. The HL/LL ratio of LSU and D1 labeling is depicted at the
bottom. B, DCF fluorescence. Wild type cells
grown photoautotrophically at LL were transferred to LL or HL for
different time periods (0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 h) in the absence
(a) or in the presence of 5 mM (b) or
10 mM (c) ascorbic acid. Samples were removed for
fluorescence measurements. Each column represents the mean of three
independent measurements ± S.E. DCF fluorescence data are
presented as relative units.
7 M) and DBMIB (10
6
M) and in mutants defective in D1 and in cytochrome
b6/f. DCF fluorescence in cells
transferred from LL to HL hardly changed in the presence of DCMU and in
mutants deficient or defective in D1 (Fig.
4, A-C), indicating that the
level of ROS at HL did not increase. However, addition of DBMIB or
inactivation of the cytochrome b6/f
complex did not prevent the increase in ROS at HL (Fig. 4, D
and E). With DBMIB (10
6 M) the
basal level of ROS was higher already at LL than that measured in the
absence of this herbicide (Fig. 4D). This result was in
correlation to the already reduced synthesis of LSU observed with DBMIB
at LL (10
6 M, Fig. 1).

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
DCF fluorescence measurements in the presence
of herbicides and in mutant strains. Wild type cells were grown
photoautotrophically at LL in HSRS, and mutants were grown on TAP
medium and transferred to HSRS for 16 h to deplete the
intrastrains cellular acetate. The cells were transferred to LL or to
HL for different time periods (0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 h), and samples
were removed for fluorescence measurements. A, wild type
cells in the presence of DCMU (10
7 M);
B, FUD-7; C, A251R*; D, wild type
cells in the presence of DBMIB (10
6 M);
E, F2D8 cells. Each column represents the mean of three
independent measurements ± S.E. DCF fluorescence is presented as
relative units.
6-10
5 M). Labeling was
performed in the absence of anisomycin to maintain the synthesis of
cytoplasmic proteins and to ensure that MeV did not cause a general
decrease in protein synthesis, which could be masked in the presence of
anisomycin. Increasing concentrations of MeV exclusively reduced the
synthesis of LSU at LL (by 79% after 1 h), whereas synthesis of
other proteins was unaffected.
6-10
4 M) shows an increase
in the level of ROS in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5B). Although the highest ROS
level was measured with 10
4 M, this
concentration was too high for labeling, because it inhibited protein
synthesis nonspecifically (data not shown). These results in
combination with the labeling data indicate the role of ROS in
controlling the translation of Rubisco LSU.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effects of MeV on protein synthesis and on
DCF fluorescence. A, wild type early log cells were
grown as described in the legend to Fig. 1. Different concentrations of
MeV were added for 1 h, and the cells were metabolically labeled.
B, DCF fluorescence was measured in wild type cells in the
presence of different concentrations of MeV, added for 0.5 and 1.0 h. Fluorescence is depicted as relative units.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Reduced to oxidized glutathione ratios at LL
and HL. A, wild type cells were grown at LL and shifted
to HL for different time periods (0.5, 1, 2.5, and 6 h). The
glutathione content (total and oxidized) was determined, and the
GSH/GSSG ratios were calculated. Each point represents the mean of
three independent measurements ± S.E. B, GSH/GSSG
ratio was measured at LL and at HL in the presence of ascorbic acid 10 mM. C, GSH/GSSG ratio was measured at LL in the
absence or presence of MeV (10
5 M).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Prof. Boynton and Prof. Gillham from Duke University for support and for valuable discussions, Dr. E. Harris from the Chlamydomonas Duke Center for the various algal strains, and Dr. Irit Dahan for technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by the Doris and Bertie Black Center for Bioenergetics in Life Sciences at the Ben-Gurion University.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. Life Sciences,
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105 Israel. Tel.:
972-7-6472663; Fax: 972-7-6472890; E-mail:
shapiram@bgumail.bgu.ac.il.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: ROS, reactive oxygen species; Rubisco, 1,5-ribulose biphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase; LSU, large subunit(s); LL, low light; HL, high light; HS-S, minimal medium lacking sulfate; DCMU, [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethyl urea; DBMIB, 2,5-dibromo-3-methyl-6-isopropyl-p-benzoquinone; MeV, methyl viologen; DCF, dichlorofluorescin; DCFH, dichlorofluorescin hydrolyzed; GSH, reduced glutathione; GSSG, oxidized glutathione; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Barber, J., and Andersson, B. (1992) Trends Biochem. Sci. 17, 61-66[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Osmond, C. B. (1994) What is photoinhibition: Some Insights from Comparisons of Shade and Sun Plants , pp. 1-24, Bios Scientific Publishers, Oxford, UK |
| 3. | Prásil, O., Adir, N., and Ohad, I. (1992) in The Photosystems: Structure, Function and Molecular Biology (Barber, J., ed) , pp. 295-348, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam |
| 4. | Anderson, J. M., and Osmond, C. B. (1987) Shade-Sun Responses: Compromises between Acclimation and Photoinhibition , pp. 1-38, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam |
| 5. | Falkowski, P., and Laroche, J. (1991) J. Phycol. 27, 8-14[CrossRef] |
| 6. | Spreitzer, R. J. (1993) Annu. Rev. Plant. Phusiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 44, 1-49[CrossRef] |
| 7. | Gutteridge, S., and Gatenby, A. A. (1995) Plant Cell 7, 809-819[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Shapira, M., Lers, A., Heifetz, P., Irihimoritch, V., Osmond, B. C., Gillham, N. W., and Boynton, J. E. (1997) Plant Mol. Biol. 33, 1001-1011[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Harris, E. H.,
Burkhart, B. D.,
Gillham, N. W.,
and Boynton, J. C.
(1989)
Genetics
123,
281-292 |
| 10. |
Lardans, A.,
Gillham, N. W.,
and Boynton, J. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
210-216 |
| 11. | Howe, G., and Merchant, S. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 2789-2801[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Lers, A.,
Heifetz, P. B.,
Boynton, J. E.,
Gillham, N. W.,
and Osmond, C. B.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
17494-17497 |
| 13. |
Schmidt, R. J.,
Gillham, N. W.,
and Boynton, J. E.
(1985)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5,
1093-1099 |
| 14. |
Chua, N.-H.,
and Gillham, N. W.
(1977)
J. Cell Biol.
74,
441-452 |
| 15. | Cathcart, R., Schwiers, E., and Ames, B. N. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 134, 111-116[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Anderson, M. E. (1985) Methods Enzymol. 113, 548-555[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Baker, M. A., Cerniglia, G. J., and Zaman, A. (1990) Anal. Biochem. 190, 360-365[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Schuster, G., Timberg, R., and Ohad, I. (1988) Eur. J. Biochem. 177, 403-410[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Danon, A.,
and Mayfield, S. P.
(1994)
Science
266,
1717-1719 |
| 20. | Bowler, C., Montagu, V., and Inze, D. (1992) Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 43, 83-116[CrossRef] |
| 21. | Okada, K., Ikeuchi, M., Yamamoto, N., Ono, T. A., and Miyao, M. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1274, 73-79[CrossRef] |
| 22. | Alcher, R. G., Donahue, J. L., and Cramer, C. L. (1997) Physiol. Plant. 100, 224-233[CrossRef] |
| 23. | Foyer, C. H., Lelandais, M., and Kuner, K. J. (1994) Physiol. Plant. 92, 696-717[CrossRef] |
| 24. | Härtel, H., Haseloff, R. F., Ebert, B., and Rank, B. (1992) J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biology 12, 375-387[CrossRef] |
| 25. |
Escoubas, J.-M.,
Lomas, M.,
LaRoche, J.,
and Falkowski, P. G.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
10237-10241 |
| 26. |
Kim, J.,
and Mayfield, S. P.
(1997)
Science
278,
1954-191957 |
| 27. | Jegerschöld, C., Virgin, I., and Styring, S. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 6179-6186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Gong, H., and Ohad, I. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1228, 181-188[CrossRef] |
| 29. |
Chen, Z.,
Silva, H.,
and Klessig, D. F.
(1993)
Science
262,
1883-1886 |
| 30. | Green, R., and Fluhr, R. (1995) Plant Cell 7, 203-212[Abstract] |
| 31. | Allan, A., and Fluhr, R. (1997) Plant Cell 9, 1559-1572[Abstract] |
| 32. | Bei, Y. M., Kenton, P., Mur, L., Darby, R., and Draper, J. (1995) Plant J. 8, 235-245[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Chamnongpol, S., Willekens, H., Langebartels, C., Van, M. M., Inze, D., and Van, C. W. (1996) Plant J. 10, 491-503[CrossRef] |
| 34. |
Chen, Z.,
Malamy, J.,
Henning, J.,
Conrath, U.,
Sanchez, C. P.,
Silva, H.,
Ricigliano, J.,
and Klessig, D. F.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
4134-4137 |
| 35. |
Wingate, V. P. M.,
Lawton, M. A.,
and Lamb, C. J.
(1988)
Plant Physiol.
87,
206-210 |
| 36. | Foyer, C. H., Souriau, N., Perret, S., Lelandais-M, Kunert, K. J., Pruvost, C., and Jouanin, L. (1995) Plant Physiol. 109, 1047-1057[Abstract] |
| 37. | Karpinski, S., Escobar, C., Karpinska, B., Creissen, G., and Mullineaux, P. M. (1997) Plant Cell 9, 627-640[Abstract] |
| 38. | Moreno, J., Penarrubia, L., and Garcia-Ferris, C. (1995) Plant Physiol. Biochem. 33, 121-127 |
| 39. |
Ishida, H.,
Nishimori, Y.,
Sugisawa, M.,
Makino, A.,
and Mae, T.
(1997)
Plant Cell Physiol.
38,
471-479 |
| 40. |
Moreno, J.,
and J., S. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
26789-26793 |
| 41. |
Schmidt, G. W.,
and Mishkind, M. L.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
2632-2636 |
| 42. |
Choquet, Y.,
Stern, D. B.,
Wostrikoff-K,
Kuras, R.,
Girard-Bascou, J.,
and F. A., W.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
4380-4385 |
| 43. |
Khrebtukova, I.,
and Spreitzer, R. J.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13689-13693 |
| 44. |
Rodermel, S.,
Haley, J.,
Jiang, C. Z.,
Tsai, C. H.,
and Bogorad, L.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
3881-3885 |
| 45. | Barraclough, R., and Ellis, J. (1979) Eur. J. Biochem. 94, 165-177[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. J. Parry, A. J. Keys, P. J. Madgwick, A. E. Carmo-Silva, and P. J. Andralojc Rubisco regulation: a role for inhibitors J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1569 - 1580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Martin, P. H. Saladores, E. Lambert, A. O. Hudson, and T. Leustek Localization of Members of the {gamma}-Glutamyl Transpeptidase Family Identifies Sites of Glutathione and Glutathione S-Conjugate Hydrolysis Plant Physiology, August 1, 2007; 144(4): 1715 - 1732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Lefebvre-Legendre, F. Rappaport, G. Finazzi, M. Ceol, C. Grivet, G. Hopfgartner, and J.-D. Rochaix Loss of Phylloquinone in Chlamydomonas Affects Plastoquinone Pool Size and Photosystem II Synthesis J. Biol. Chem., May 4, 2007; 282(18): 13250 - 13263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wostrikoff and D. Stern Rubisco large-subunit translation is autoregulated in response to its assembly state in tobacco chloroplasts PNAS, April 10, 2007; 104(15): 6466 - 6471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhou, H. M. Lam, and J. Zhang Inhibition of photosynthesis and energy dissipation induced by water and high light stresses in rice J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2007; 58(5): 1207 - 1217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-H. Zhou, J.-Q. Yu, W.-H. Mao, L.-F. Huang, X.-S. Song, and S. Nogues Genotypic Variation of Rubisco Expression, Photosynthetic Electron Flow and Antioxidant Metabolism in the Chloroplasts of Chill-exposed Cucumber Plants Plant Cell Physiol., February 1, 2006; 47(2): 192 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Cohen, J. A. Knopf, V. Irihimovitch, and M. Shapira A Proposed Mechanism for the Inhibitory Effects of Oxidative Stress on Rubisco Assembly and Its Subunit Expression Plant Physiology, February 1, 2005; 137(2): 738 - 746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ball, G.-P. Accotto, U. Bechtold, G. Creissen, D. Funck, A. Jimenez, B. Kular, N. Leyland, J. Mejia-Carranza, H. Reynolds, et al. Evidence for a Direct Link between Glutathione Biosynthesis and Stress Defense Gene Expression in Arabidopsis PLANT CELL, September 1, 2004; 16(9): 2448 - 2462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Yosef, V. Irihimovitch, J. A. Knopf, I. Cohen, I. Orr-Dahan, E. Nahum, C. Keasar, and M. Shapira RNA Binding Activity of the Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase Large Subunit from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii J. Biol. Chem., March 12, 2004; 279(11): 10148 - 10156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Tang, S. Bhat, and M. E. Petracek Light Control of Nuclear Gene mRNA Abundance and Translation in Tobacco Plant Physiology, December 1, 2003; 133(4): 1979 - 1990. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Matsuo and J. Obokata Dual Roles of Photosynthetic Electron Transport in Photosystem I Biogenesis: Light Induction of mRNAs and Chromatic Regulation at Post-mRNA Level Plant Cell Physiol., October 15, 2002; 43(10): 1189 - 1197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||