![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 22, 16404-16407, June 2, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§,
,
From the
University Laboratory of Physiology, Parks
Road, Oxford OX1 3PT, United Kingdom and the Departments of
¶ Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology and ** Molecular Pharmacology
and Pathology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri,"
Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, 66030 Santa Maria Imbaro (Chieti), Italy
Received for publication, February 28, 2000, and in revised form, March 27, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The physiological role of the inwardly rectifying
potassium channel, Kir5.1, is poorly understood, as is the molecular
identity of many renal potassium channels. In this study we have used
Kir5.1-specific antibodies to reveal abundant expression of Kir5.1 in
renal tubular epithelial cells, where Kir4.1 is also expressed.
Moreover, we also show that Kir5.1/Kir4.1 heteromeric channel activity
is extremely sensitive to inhibition by intracellular acidification and
that this novel property is conferred predominantly by the Kir5.1
subunit. These findings suggest that Kir5.1/Kir4.1 heteromeric channels are likely to exist in vivo and implicate an important and
novel functional role for the Kir5.1 subunit.
The ability of a cell to maintain an electrochemical imbalance
across its plasma membrane is one of the most fundamental and essential
biological processes. A large variety of integral membrane proteins
exist to facilitate transport across membranes. One such example is the
family of inwardly rectifying potassium (Kir) channels that are found
in almost every cell type, where they play key roles in controlling
membrane potential, cellular excitability, and K+ fluxes
(1, 2).
Kir channel subunits possess two transmembrane domains separated by the
signature K+-selective pore sequence and can assemble as
both homotetramers and heterotetramers. Since the initial isolation of
Kir1.1 by Ho et al. (3) in 1993, approximately fifteen
distinct clones have been identified that can be divided into seven
major subfamilies, Kir1.0-Kir7.0 (1, 2). Physiological roles have been
either established or proposed for nearly all of these major
subfamilies. However, the Kir5.0 family remains a notable exception. To
date, only one member of this family (Kir5.1) has been identified
(4).
We have previously reported the production of specific polyclonal
antibodies against Kir5.1 and shown it to be highly expressed in
spermatozoa and spermatogenic tissue (5). Kir5.1 mRNA has also been
shown to be present in kidney, spleen, adrenal glands, liver, and in
several brain regions (4). However, almost nothing is known about the
specific cell types involved or the function of Kir5.1 in these
tissues. This is primarily because of the inability of Kir5.1 to
produce functional K+ channel activity when heterologously
expressed by itself, and even though it can form functional heteromeric
K+ channels with Kir4.1 (6) and Kir4.2 (7), its functional relevance is not yet clear.
Renal potassium channels play a critical role in several key tubular
transport functions (8, 9). Tubular basolateral K+ channels
are principally responsible for the maintenance of the membrane
potential, thus generating the driving force for electrogenic solute
translocation across the apical membrane. K+ secretion by
the apical membrane is also an important source of K+
excretion. Regulatory mechanisms for the cross-talk between the K+ channels of the apical and basolateral membranes are
therefore essential. Although some of the potassium channels
responsible have been cloned, the molecular identity of many renal
K+ channels remains to be established. Given the high
levels of expression of rat Kir5.1 mRNA in the kidney (4) we have
further investigated the localization of Kir5.1 in rat renal tissues
and the potential role of this subunit.
In this study we show that Kir5.1 subunits are highly expressed in the
epithelial cells of the convoluted tubules of rat kidney, the same
cells in which Kir4.1 is expressed (10). More importantly, we also show
that mild intracellular acidification markedly inhibits heteromeric
Kir5.1/Kir4.1 channel activity and that this property is conferred
primarily by the Kir5.1 subunit. These findings suggest that
pH-sensitive, heteromeric Kir5.1/Kir4.1 channels are likely to exist
in vivo and identify Kir5.1 as a potentially important regulator of renal function.
Molecular Biology
Gene-specific primers based upon rat Kir5.1
(5'-CGCAAGGCAGTGGCCAAAG-3' and 5'-CATCTGGGATTCCATGGAGAT-3') were used
to amplify the correct 3' end of the gene from rat genomic DNA by
PCR.1 The amplified fragment
was used to reconstruct the correct full-length rat Kir5.1. Sequences
were confirmed on both strands by automated sequencing. The full and
corrected sequence of this clone has been deposited in the
GenBankTM data base (AF249676). NCBI-BLAST searches and
sequence alignments were performed using the Omiga 2.0 program (Oxford
Molecular, Oxford, UK). The C-terminal truncation of Kir5.1
(Kir5.1 Electrophysiology
Two-electrode Voltage Clamp Recording--
Xenopus
laevis care and handling were in accordance with the highest
standards of institutional guidelines. Frogs underwent no more than two
surgeries, separated by at least three weeks. Frogs were anesthetized
with an aerated solution of 3-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester. Standard
recording solution contained 90 mM KCl, 3 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) unless otherwise
stated. Intracellular acidification was achieved using a potassium
acetate buffering system (11). Microelectrodes were filled with
3M KCl and had resistances of 0.1-0.5 megohms. Recordings
were performed at 22 °C 18-48 h after injection with a GeneClamp
500 amplifier (Axon Instruments) interfaced to a Power Macintosh
7200/90 computer with an ITC-16 computer interface (InstruTECH Corp.,
Port Washington, NY). Currents were evoked by voltage commands from a
holding potential of Patch Clamp Recording--
Patch clamp recordings were performed
as described previously (6) using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon
Instruments). Oocytes were bathed in a cytoplasmic solution containing
120 mM KCl, 10 mM EGTA, 5 mM HEPES,
0.1 mM dithiothreitol, pH 7.2. Recording electrodes were
pulled from borosilicate glass, dipped in sticky wax (Kerr, Emoryville,
CA) prior to polishing, and had resistances of 3-5 megohm. The pipette
solution contained 120 mM KCl, 5 mM HEPES, 200 µM CaCl2, pH 7.2. Patch records were obtained
in the cell-attached and inside-out configuration by stepping the
holding potential to various test potentials for 20-60 s. Current
traces at each holding potential were filtered at 500 Hz and digitized at 5 kHz.
Immunohistochemistry
The production and specificity of the anti-Kir5.1 antibody has
previously been described in detail (5). Sections of kidney from
60-day-old Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats were prepared, fixed, and stained
as described previously (5). Antibody staining was visualized using
3,5'-diaminobenzidine (DAB), and tissues were counterstained with
methylene blue. To confirm the specificity of these Kir5.1 antibodies,
kidney sections were stained with antibodies preabsorbed to the
immunogenic peptide (5) and with the secondary antibody alone. In both
cases no DAB staining could be visualized (not shown).
We have previously generated and purified highly specific
polyclonal antibodies for Kir5.1. Using these antibodies we
immunostained rat kidney sections. Fig. 1
shows intense ABC immunoperoxidase staining in the cortex and inner and
outer zones of the medulla. In particular, Kir5.1 appears to be
abundantly expressed in the epithelial tissues of the proximal and
distal convoluted tubules. Positive staining was also observed in the
endothelial cells surrounding glomerular capillaries, in the flattened
parietal layer of Bowman's capsule, in the thin segment of the loop of
Henle, and in the collecting tubule epithelial cells.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
C49) was created by PCR truncation. All channel subunits were
subcloned into the oocyte expression vector pBF, which provides 5' and
3' untranslated regions from the Xenopus
-globin gene
flanking a polylinker containing multiple restriction sites. In
vitro mRNAs were generated using SP6 polymerase. Kir subunits
were joined in tandem as described previously (6).
10 mV, delivered in
10-mV increments from 50 to
120 mV, unless otherwise stated. Unless otherwise stated oocytes
were injected with Kir4.1 and Kir5.1 (or Kir5.1
C49) mRNAs in a
1:5 ratio as described previously (6).
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (122K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Immunolocalization of Kir5.1 in the
kidney. A, positive ABC immunoperoxidase staining shows
the presence of the Kir5.1 subunit in proximal convoluted tubules
(open arrowhead) and in distal convoluted tubules
(closed arrow). The glomeruli (*) are poorly stained.
B, localization of Kir5.1 at a higher magnification showing
that labeling is present in the endothelial cells surrounding
glomerular capillaries (open arrows) and in the flattened
parietal layer of Bowman's capsule (closed arrow). The
epithelial cells of both proximal (open arrowhead) and
distal (closed arrowhead) convoluted tubules are also
positively stained. C, more transverse sections at high
magnification showing abundant expression of Kir5.1 in tubular
epithelia (closed arrow). D, longitudinal
sections through the outer medullary zone confirmed the presence of
Kir5.1 in the epithelium of proximal and distal tubules and show
positive immunostaining along the thin segment of the loop of Henle
(closed arrow) and in the epithelium of collecting tubules
(open arrowhead). Scale Bar = 50 µm (A and
D), 10 µm (B), and 25 µm
(C).
Although Kir5.1 does not appear to form functional homomeric channels, coexpression with Kir4.1 (6) generates novel heteromeric channels. However, the functional relevance of these channels is unclear. Kir4.1 has been shown to be expressed in renal distal tubular epithelial cells, where it is confined to the basolateral membrane (10). Therefore, because Kir5.1 is also expressed in these cells and can form a functional heteromeric channel with Kir4.1, it is not unreasonable to assume that these heteromeric channels exist in vivo.
The inability of Kir5.1 to produce functional K+ channel activity when expressed alone could mean that the channel is present, but inactive, in the plasma membrane, or it could mean that the protein fails to reach the plasma membrane. Kir6.2 is also incapable of independent functional expression because of the presence of an endoplasmic reticulum retention sequence in the C terminus that prevents the subunit from reaching the plasma membrane (12, 13). We therefore examined the role of the C terminus of Kir5.1. Alignment of the rat sequence with the mouse sequence of Kir5.1 (14) revealed significant differences in the C-terminal sequences. A BLAST search of the sequence data base with the rat Kir5.1 sequence identified a novel human homolog of Kir5.1 in a large chromosome 17 clone (GenBankTM accession number AC005298; 107283-108341 base pairs). Identification of this human homolog confirms the chromosomal localization proposed by Mouri et al. (14), who localized mouse Kir5.1 to the murine chromosome 11, which shares extensive homology with human chromosome 17.
Closer examination of these three Kir5.1 sequences revealed that the original rat clone contained an error at position 1079 that introduces a frameshift and results in premature truncation. Using gene-specific primers we PCR-amplified the 3' end of the rat Kir5.1 gene from rat genomic DNA and reconstructed the correct sequence. The corrected amino acid sequence of the C terminus of rat Kir5.1 then aligned correctly with the murine and human homologs (not shown) and demonstrates that the C-terminal sequence of Kir5.1 is highly conserved between the species.
Fig. 2, A-C shows that
expression of the correct rat Kir5.1 clone in Xenopus
oocytes still fails to elicit functional K+ currents but
that Kir5.1 is still capable of forming novel heteromeric channels when
coexpressed with Kir4.1. These novel channels are characterized by an
instantaneous component that is followed by a
time-dependent increase in the current and appears
identical to those channels we have previously reported for Kir4.1 and
Kir5.1 coexpression (6). It is therefore unlikely that the distal C
terminus of Kir5.1 has any effect on the ability of the subunit to form
heteromeric channels with Kir4.1. In our previous study (6) we also
reported that the most accurate way to record currents from these
heteromeric channels is in a fixed 2:2 stoichiometry by expression of
tandemly linked Kir4.1-Kir5.1 dimers. This ensures that the currents
recorded are not only from channels of a fixed stoichiometry but also
that there are no contaminating currents from Kir4.1 homotetramers. We
therefore linked the correct rat Kir5.1 sequence in tandem with Kir4.1
and expressed this dimeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1 construct in
Xenopus oocytes. Expressing the full-length Kir4.1-Kir5.1
dimer generated currents almost identical to those formed by expression
of individual mRNAs, and Fig. 2D shows that the
rectification properties of these Kir4.1-Kir5.1 currents do not differ
from those previously reported (6). In addition, the
time-dependent component was well fitted by a single
exponential function that yielded time constants not different from the
previously reported truncated dimer (Fig. 2E) (6).
Therefore, the biophysical properties of these channels appear
identical to those we have previously reported and indicate that the
distal C terminus of this subunit does not affect the ability of Kir5.1
to form novel heteromeric channels with Kir4.1.
|
Intriguingly, the newly revealed distal C terminus of Kir5.1 possesses
a sequence (RRRSFSAVA) with partial homology to the region containing
the arginine-rich endoplasmic reticulum retention sequence found in
Kir6.2 (13). We therefore examined whether this motif prevents
independent functional expression of Kir5.1. We created a C-terminal
truncation of Kir5.1 that deleted amino acids 371-419 (Kir5.1
C49)
and therefore removed this motif. However, injection of Kir5.1
C49
mRNA into Xenopus oocytes did not produce K+
channel activity (Fig. 2F). By contrast, coexpression of
Kir5.1
C49 with Kir4.1 clearly demonstrates that this truncation has
no effect on the ability of the subunit to form heteromeric channels
with Kir4.1 (Fig. 2F). This suggests that either Kir5.1 is
only able to form functional channels as a heteromer or that it is
lacking an accessory regulatory subunit or agonist.
One of the most important renal functions is the homeostatic regulation of extracellular fluid (ECF) volume, pH, and osmolality (8, 9). These processes are primarily dependent on the regulation of Na+ balance, which itself is dependent on the relative K+ concentrations. K+ balance is also critical because of the impact of ECF K+ concentrations on the resting membrane potential of tubular epithelia. Mechanisms for the regulation of K+ secretion and recycling in renal epithelia are therefore vitally important. One such example is thought to be the pH-dependent regulation of the renal secretory K+ channel, Kir1.1. This channel is found in the apical membrane of the tubular epithelia (15), where it is inhibited by intracellular, but not extracellular, acidification with a pK of 6.8 (16). Mutations in Kir1.1 that alter its pH sensitivity are responsible for inherited forms of antenatal Bartter's syndrome (17). We therefore tested whether extracellular and intracellular pH changes were able to regulate Kir4.1/Kir5.1 heteromeric channel activity.
Extracellular acidification of oocytes was unable to modify the
whole-cell amplitude of Kir4.1/Kir5.1 currents recorded by two-electrode voltage clamp (not shown). To assess the effects of
intracellular acidification we used a well established potassium acetate buffering system that has been shown to modify the
intracellular pH of oocytes (11). Fig.
3A shows that perfusion of
oocytes with a potassium acetate buffer, which has been shown to reduce the pHi to 6.4 (11), causes almost complete
inhibition of Kir4.1/Kir5.1 currents. However, Fig. 3B shows
that only a small inhibition of Kir4.1 currents is observed at this
predicted pHi. To assess the effects of
pHi on Kir4.1/Kir5.1 heteromeric channels we
made use of the Kir4.1-Kir5.1 tandemly linked dimer. As well as
ensuring a fixed stoichiometry this also excludes contaminating
currents from Kir4.1 homotetramers (6). Fig. 3C shows the
current inhibition/pHi relationship for the
Kir4.1 + Kir5.1 currents, as well as for the Kir4.1-Kir5.1 dimer and
Kir4.1. The heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channels generated by this
dimeric construct exhibited the same sensitivity to intracellular acidification as the Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels formed by individual subunit expression. The pKa values calculated from
these data were 6.9 ± 0.02 for Kir4.1 + Kir5.1, and 6.8 ± 0.02 for the Kir4.1-Kir5.1 dimer, as opposed to 6.1 ± 0.04 for
Kir4.1. The latter value is in agreement with those previously
calculated for Kir4.1 (17, 18). These results clearly demonstrate that Kir4.1-Kir5.1 heteromeric channels are very sensitive to changes in
pHi within the physiological range and that this
dimeric construct is a valid tool for assessing the effects of pH on
these heteromeric channels. These results also demonstrate that this extreme pHi sensitivity is primarily conferred
by the Kir5.1 subunit, because at pHi 6.6, Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels are almost completely inhibited, whereas Kir4.1
currents are almost fully active at this pH. Indeed, one report
suggests that Kir4.1 exhibits maximal activity at pH 6.6 (18) and is
therefore unlikely to contribute significantly to the
pH-dependent regulation of Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels within
the physiological range.
|
To confirm the effect of intracellular acidification on these channels
we recorded currents in excised membrane patches from oocytes
expressing the Kir4.1-Kir5.1 dimer. Fig.
4 shows that exposure of the
intracellular surface of the patch to a solution at pH 6.5 rapidly
reduced the activity of these channels by approximately 80%. This
reduction in pHi did not appear to modify the single channel amplitude and is clearly reversible upon return to
control solution (Fig. 4C). Taken together these results
clearly demonstrate that intracellular acidification directly inhibits these heteromeric channels.
|
In conclusion, our immunolocalization studies show Kir5.1 to be
abundantly expressed in the epithelial cells of the proximal and distal
convoluted tubules. The identification of Kir5.1 in the same cells in
which Kir4.1 is also expressed suggests that heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1
channels exist in vivo. Furthermore, the extreme sensitivity
of these heteromeric channels to intracellular acidification implicates
a novel role for the Kir5.1 subunit in pH-dependent
regulation of renal K+ buffering and recycling.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by the Wellcome Trust (UK), the Italian National Research Council (Convenzione Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche-Mario Negri Sud), and Grant 1083 from the Telethon-Italy.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF249676.
§ Wellcome Trust career development fellow. To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: stephen.tucker@physiol.ox.ac.uk.
Recipient of a fellowship from M.U.R.S.T. (Corso Biennale per
Esperto in Biotecnologie Applicate alla Ricerca Scientifica Biomedica).
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 7, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000127200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PCR, polymerase chain reaction; DAB, 3,5'-diaminobenzidine; ECF, extracellular fluid.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Nichols, C. G., and Lopatin, A. N. (1997) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 59, 171-191 |
| 2. | Reimann, F., and Ashcroft, F. M. (1999) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 503-508 |
| 3. | Ho, K., Nichols, C. G., Lederer, W. J., Lytton, J., Vassilev, P. M., Kanazirska, M. V., and Hebert, S. C. (1993) Nature 362, 31-38 |
| 4. | Bond, C. T., Pessia, M., Xia, X-M., Lagrutta, A., Kavanaugh, M. P., and Adelman, J. P. (1994) Receptors Channels 2, 183-191 |
| 5. | Salvatore, L., D'Adamo, M. C., Polishchuk, R., Salmona, M., and Pessia, M. (1999) FEBS Lett. 449, 146-152 |
| 6. | Pessia, M., Tucker, S. J., Lee, K., Bond, C. T., and Adelman, J. P. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 2980-2987 |
| 7. | Pearson, W. L., Dourado, M., Schreiber, M., Salkoff, L., and Nichols, C. G. (1999) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 514, 639-653 |
| 8. | Kawahara, K., and Anzai, N. (1997) Jpn. J. Physiol. 47, 1-10 |
| 9. | Wang, W., Hebert, S. C., and Giebisch, G. (1997) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 59, 413-436 |
| 10. | Ito, M., Inanobe, A., Horio, Y., Hibino, H., Isomoto, S., Ito, H., Mori, K., Tonosaki, A., Tomoike, H., and Kurachi, Y. (1996) FEBS Lett. 388, 11-15 |
| 11. | Choe, H., Zhou, H., Palmer, G., and Sackin, H. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, F516-F529 |
| 12. | Tucker, S. J., Gribble, F. M., Zhao, C., Trapp, S., and Ashcroft, F. M. (1997) Nature 387, 179-183 |
| 13. | Zerangue, N., Schwappach, B., Jan, Y. N., and Jan, L. Y. (1999) Neuron 22, 537-548 |
| 14. | Mouri, T., Kittaka, N., Horio, Y., Copeland, N. G., Gilbert, D. G., Jenkins, N. A., and Kurachi, Y. (1998) Genomics 54, 181-182 |
| 15. | Xu, J. Z., Hall, A. E., Peterson, L. N., Bienkowski, M. J., Eessalu, T. E., and Hebert, S. C. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, F739-F748 |
| 16. | Fakler, B., Schultz, J. H., Yang, J., Sculte, U., Brandle, U., Zenner, H. P., Jan, L. Y., and Ruppersberg, J. P. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 4093-4099 |
| 17. | Schulte, U., Hahn, H., Konrad, M., Jeck, N., Derst, C., Wild, K., Weidemann, S., Ruppersberg, J. P., Fakler, B., and Ludwig, J. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 15298-15303 |
| 18. | Yang, Z., and Jiang, C. (1999) J. Physiol. 520, 921-927 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Lachheb, F. Cluzeaud, M. Bens, M. Genete, H. Hibino, S. Lourdel, Y. Kurachi, A. Vandewalle, J. Teulon, and M. Paulais Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channel forms the major K+ channel in the basolateral membrane of mouse renal collecting duct principal cells Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): F1398 - F1407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Nie, W. Feng, R. Diaz, M. A. Gratton, K. J. Doyle, and E. N. Yamoah Functional Consequences of Polyamine Synthesis Inhibition by L-{alpha}-Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO): CELLULAR MECHANISMS FOR DFMO-MEDIATED OTOTOXICITY J. Biol. Chem., April 15, 2005; 280(15): 15097 - 15102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Gray, G. Frindt, Y.-Y. Zhang, and L. G. Palmer Basolateral K+ conductance in principal cells of rat CCD Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): F493 - F504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Hebert, G. Desir, G. Giebisch, and W. Wang Molecular Diversity and Regulation of Renal Potassium Channels Physiol Rev, January 1, 2005; 85(1): 319 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Putnam, J. A. Filosa, and N. A. Ritucci Cellular mechanisms involved in CO2 and acid signaling in chemosensitive neurons Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): C1493 - C1526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tanemoto, T. Abe, T. Onogawa, and S. Ito PDZ binding motif-dependent localization of K+ channel on the basolateral side in distal tubules Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): F1148 - F1153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hibino, A. Fujita, K. Iwai, M. Yamada, and Y. Kurachi Differential Assembly of Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channel Subunits, Kir4.1 and Kir5.1, in Brain Astrocytes J. Biol. Chem., October 15, 2004; 279(42): 44065 - 44073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Casamassima, M. C. D'Adamo, M. Pessia, and S. J. Tucker Identification of a Heteromeric Interaction That Influences the Rectification, Gating, and pH Sensitivity of Kir4.1/Kir5.1 Potassium Channels J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 2003; 278(44): 43533 - 43540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ishii, A. Fujita, K. Iwai, S. Kusaka, K. Higashi, A. Inanobe, H. Hibino, and Y. Kurachi Differential expression and distribution of Kir5.1 and Kir4.1 inwardly rectifying K+ channels in retina Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2003; 285(2): C260 - C267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-A. Konstas, C. Korbmacher, and S. J. Tucker Identification of domains that control the heteromeric assembly of Kir5.1/Kir4.0 potassium channels Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2003; 284(4): C910 - C917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Schulze, T. Krauter, H. Fritzenschaft, M. Soom, and T. Baukrowitz Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate (PIP2) Modulation of ATP and pH Sensitivity in Kir Channels. A TALE OF AN ACTIVE AND A SILENT PIP2 SITE IN THE N TERMINUS J. Biol. Chem., March 14, 2003; 278(12): 10500 - 10505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Hill, M. M. Briggs, J. Liu, and L. Magtanong Cloning, expression, and localization of a rat hepatocyte inwardly rectifying potassium channel Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282(2): G233 - G240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Fujita, Y. Horio, K. Higashi, T. Mouri, F. Hata, N. Takeguchi, and Y. Kurachi Specific localization of an inwardly rectifying K+ channel, Kir4.1, at the apical membrane of rat gastric parietal cells; its possible involvement in K+ recycling for the H+-K+-pump J. Physiol., April 1, 2002; 540(1): 85 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |