|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M909877199 on March 19, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 22, 16490-16496, June 2, 2000
Novel Mechanism of -Lactam Resistance Due to Bypass of
DD-Transpeptidation in Enterococcus faecium*
Jean-Luc
Mainardi §,
Raymond
Legrand¶,
Michel
Arthur ,
Bernard
Schoot¶,
Jean
van Heijenoort , and
Laurent
Gutmann
From the L.R.M.A., UFR Broussais-Hôtel
Dieu, Université Paris VI, 75270 Paris, France, the
¶ Physics Department, Hoechst Marion Roussel,
Romainville, 93235 France, and the Biochimie Moléculaire
et Cellulaire, CNRS, Orsay, 91405 France
Received for publication, December 6, 1999, and in revised form, March 10, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The peptidoglycan structure of in
vitro selected ampicillin-resistant mutant Enterococcus
faecium D344M512 and of the susceptible parental strain D344S was
determined by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography and
mass spectrometry. The muropeptide monomers were almost identical in
the two strains. The substantial majority (99.3%) of the oligomers
from the susceptible strain D344S contained the usual
D-alanyl D-asparaginyl (or
D-aspartyl)-L-lysyl cross-link (D-Ala D-Asx-L-Lys) generated
by -lactam-sensitive DD-transpeptidation. The remaining oligomers
(0.7%) were produced by -lactam-insensitive LD-transpeptidation,
because they contained L-Lys D-Asx-L-Lys cross-links. The muropeptide
oligomers of the ampicillin-resistant mutant D344M512 contained only
these L-Lys D-Asx-L-Lys
cross-links indicating that resistance was due to the bypass of the
-lactam-sensitive DD-transpeptidation reaction. The discovery of
this novel resistance mechanism indicates that DD-transpeptidases
cannot be considered anymore as the sole essential transpeptidase enzymes.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The peptidoglycan of Escherichia coli is generated by
polymerization of a precursor composed of
N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc)1 and
N-acetylmuramic acid (MurNAc)
substituted by a
L-alanyl-D-isoglutamyl-meso-diaminopimelyl-D-alanyl-D-alanine pentapeptide stem
(L-Ala1-D-iGlu2-meso-A2
pm3-D-Ala4-D-Ala5)
(1). The final steps of peptidoglycan synthesis involve polymerization of the glycan strands by glycosyltransferases and cross-linking of the
peptide stems by DD-transpeptidases. The latter enzymes catalyze
formation of a peptide bond between the -carboxyl of D-Ala at the fourth position of a donor stem and the amino group of meso-A2 pm at the third position of an
acceptor stem generating a D-Ala4 meso-A2 pm3 cross-link (2).
The first step of the transpeptidation reaction leads to the release of
the C-terminal D-Ala5 of the donor peptide stem
and to the formation of a covalent adduct between the penultimate residue (D-Ala4) and a conserved catalytic
serine residue of the DD-transpeptidases (2, 3). Antibiotics of the
-lactam class, such as penicillin and ampicillin, are structural
analogs of the C-terminal
D-Ala4-D-Ala5 end of
peptidoglycan precursors and act as suicide substrates in a similar
acylation reaction (4). The second step of the transpeptidation
reaction results in a cross-linking and release of the
DD-transpeptidases. In contrast, acylation of the DD-transpeptidases by
-lactams is nearly irreversible. The DD-transpeptidases are the
killing target of the -lactams, because transpeptidation is
essential to maintain the integrity of the cell wall (2).
The D-Ala meso-A2 pm3
cross-links generated by the DD-transpeptidases are prevalent in the
peptidoglycan of E. coli although minor meso-A2
pm3 meso-A2 pm3 cross-links have
been detected in the exponential (~2%) and stationary (~4%)
phases of growth (5-7). The enzymes generating the minor
meso-A2 pm3 meso-A2 pm3 cross-links have not been identified. By analogy with
DD-transpeptidases, these putative LD-transpeptidases are thought to
cleave the C-terminal D-Ala4 of a donor
tetrapeptide stem peptide before linking the -carboxyl of
meso-A2 pm3 to the -amino group of
meso-A2 pm3 of an acceptor stem peptide (8, 9).
The -lactam ring does not contain any LD-peptide bond indicating
that LD-transpeptidases do not belong to the family of
penicillin-binding proteins (4, 10). In agreement with this notion,
LD-carboxypeptidases, which cleave the C-terminal
D-Ala4 residue of tetrapeptide stems, are not
acylated by -lactams (11).
The overall structure and mode of synthesis of peptidoglycan is
conserved in eubacteria, although variations have been detected, in
particular in the sequence of the peptide stem. In the Gram-positive bacteria Enterococcus faecium and Lactobacillus
casei, D-iGlu at the second position is amidated,
meso-A2 pm at the third position is replaced by
L-Lys, and the -amino group of the latter amino acid is
substituted by D-Asn or D-Asp (12-14).
Consequently, the DD-transpeptidases of E. faecium and
L. casei catalyze formation of
D-Ala4 D-Asx-L-Lys3 cross-links.
Several lines of evidence indicate that the DD-transpeptidase targets
of -lactam antibiotics are ubiquitous in eubacteria that produce
peptidoglycan. First, penicillin-binding proteins have been
reproducibly detected based on acylation with radiolabeled penicillin
(15, 16). More importantly, analyzes of peptidoglycan precursors and of
the corresponding biosynthetic enzymes have shown that the C-terminal
DD-configuration of residues at the C-terminal positions 4 and 5 of the
peptide stem is uniformly conserved (12, 17). This implies conservation
of the structural analogy between -lactams and the donor substrate
of the DD-transpeptidases. Finally, analyses of peptidoglycan structure
in a wide range of bacteria have invariably revealed that cross-linking
was mainly or exclusively generated by DD-transpeptidase activities
that catalyzed peptide bond formation between D-Ala at the
fourth position of a donor stem and the amino group of the acceptor
(12). In this report, we showed that emergence of high level ampicillin resistance in an in vitro selected mutant of E. faecium was associated with replacement of
D-Ala4 D-Asx-L-Lys3 by
L-Lys3 D-Asx-L-Lys3 cross-links
establishing for the first time that bacteria can bypass the
requirement for -lactam-sensitive DD-transpeptidase activity.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Strains and Growth Conditions--
E. faecium D344S
is highly susceptible to ampicillin and derives from E. faecium D344 (18) by a spontaneous deletion of pbp5
encoding the low-affinity penicillin-binding protein
5.2 This strain was chosen to
avoid selection of ampicillin resistance because of penicillin-binding
protein 5 alterations (19). E. faecium D344M512 is a
spontaneous mutant of D344S obtained by five serial selection steps on
agar containing increasing concentrations of ampicillin. All cultures
were performed at 37 °C in brain heart infusion (Difco Laboratories,
Detroit, MI) agar or broth without shaking. Minimal inhibitory
concentrations of ampicillin (Bristol-Myers, Paris, France) were
determined by the agar dilution method (20).
Peptidoglycan Structure Analysis--
Peptidoglycan was obtained
after 4% sodium dodecyl sulfate treatment at 100 °C. The pellet was
treated with Pronase (200 µg/ml) for 16 h at 37 °C in 10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, and then after centrifugation (40,000 × g, 4 °C), the pellet was treated with
trypsin (200 µg/ml) for 16 h at 37 °C in 20 mM
potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) to remove the contaminating
proteins from the protease-resistant proteoglycan. The pellet was
washed twice with water and treated with lysozyme (200 µg/ml) and
mutanolysin (250 µg/ml) for 16 h at 37 °C in 1 ml of 25 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5), 10 mM
MgCl2 (14, 21). Muropeptides were separated by
reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and
identified by mass spectrometry (MS) as described (21, 22).
Fragmentation Analysis of Selected Muropeptides--
The
structure of muropeptides B and E of D344M512 was determined by MS/MS
performed on singly and doubly charged molecules with argon as
collision gas (21) using a Waters 600 MS-HPLC pump system and a Waters
PD1991 liquid chromatograph with a diode array detector system coupled
to a Finningam TSQ7000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (San Jose,
CA). Muropeptides 11 and 13 of D344S and muropeptides 8, C, D, G, and H
of D344M512 were purified by reverse-phase high pressure liquid
chromatography and analyzed by MS/MS using the nanoelectrospray source
kit for the Finnigam TSQ 7000 Protonona A/S (San Jose, CA). Samples
were resuspended in 5 µl of H2O, 30% acetonitrile,
0.045% trifluoroacetic acid and sprayed at 0.6-0.7 kV. Under these
conditions, MS/MS was done on the doubly charged protonated molecules
using argon (2.5 millitorr) as collision gas at 28-38 eV. Scan
accumulation was done with ~150 five-min scans.
 |
RESULTS |
Characteristics of D344S and D344M512--
The minimal
inhibitory concentration of ampicillin for the parental strain
D344S was 0.06 µg/ml. Growth of the ampicillin-resistant mutant
D344M512 was not inhibited at the highest drug concentration tested
(minimal inhibitory concentrations > 2000 µg/ml).
Muropeptide Composition of Peptidoglycan from D344S and
D344M512--
The peaks in the HPLC muropeptide profiles of
peptidoglycan from D344S (Fig.
1A) and D344M512 (Fig.
1B) were identified, and their relative amounts were
determined (Table I). Monomers were eluted first between 49 and 69 min followed by oligomers (68-84 min).
The monomers accounted for the same proportion of all muropeptides in
the two strains (37-38%), and the monomer profiles were almost identical (peaks 1-10). The molecular mass and deduced structure of
these monomers were in accordance with previous analyses of different
strains of E. faecium (13, 14). The oligomer profile of the
parental strain D344S was also in agreement with previous studies (13,
14). In contrast, the peptidoglycan of D344M512 contained a novel
oligomer muropeptide species (peaks A-M). The muropeptide profiles of
D344M512 grown in the absence of antibiotic (Fig. 1B) or in
the presence of 32 µg/ml ampicillin (data not shown) were very
similar indicating that cross-linking of these novel oligomers was not
inhibited by the drug. We focused on the determination of the structure
of the most abundant peaks of D344M512 and comparison with the
oligomers of D344S. This required a definitive assignment of the
structure of the main D344S dimer by MS/MS (peak 13) and MS analysis of
peaks 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, and 22 that have not been resolved in
previous analyses.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
HPLC muropeptide profiles of D344S
(A) and ampicillin-resistant mutant D344M512
(B). Purified peptidoglycan was digested with
lysozyme and mutanolysin, and muropeptides were resolved by
reverse-phase high pressure liquid chromatography. Numbers
and letters correspond to peaks identified in Table I.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Molecular mass and structure of muropeptides from E. faecium D344S and
D344M512
The molecular composition was determined by reverse-phase HPLC, mass
spectrometry, and MS/MS. The relative amounts of the compounds are
expressed as percentages calculated from the UV absorbance of peaks in
HPLC elution profiles of D344S (Fig. 1A) and D344M512 (Fig.
1B).
|
|
Structure of the Main Oligomers of Parental Strain D344S--
The
main dimer of D344S, peak 13, accounted for 21.7% of all peaks and had
a molecular mass of 1932.5 (Table I). Nanoelectrospray MS/MS analysis
(Fig. 2) indicated that muropeptide 13 was a dimer containing a donor tetrapeptide stem and an acceptor
tripeptide stem with a D-asparagine branched on the
-amino group of both lysine residues (Asn-tetra-Asn-tri) (Fig.
3). The cross-link was of the expected
D-Ala4 D-Asn-L-Lys3 type. The structure of
dimers 11, 12, 14, and 16 and of trimer 20 (Table I and Fig. 3) has been reported in E. faecium (13, 14). The structures of the other previously unidentified peaks (15, 17, 18, 19, 21, and 22) were
deduced from their retention times and molecular masses (Fig. 1A and Table I). Muropeptides differing by an increase of 42 or 84 mass units from other dimers were considered to harbor one or two
O-acetylated N-acetyl muramyl residues (21). Four
dimers (15, 17, 19, and 21) that contained an O-acetylated
N-acetylmuramyl residue have been previously identified in
L. casei (21). The cross-link in all these oligomers
(11-22) was that expected to be found after DD-transpeptidation
involving the cleavage of C-terminal D-Ala5 of
the donor pentapeptide and formation of a cross-link between the
penultimate D-Ala4 and the
D-asparagine branched to the -amino group of the
acceptor L-Lys3. From this work and previous
studies (13, 14), it can be estimated that at least 98% of all the
oligomer muropeptides present in D344S harbored the
D-Ala4 D-Asx-L-Lys3 cross-link
generated by DD-transpeptidation.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
MS/MS spectrum and schematic representation
of muropeptide 13 with an [M + H]+ ion at m/z
1933.5. The loss of one GlcNAc residue gave an ion at
m/z 1730.2; the loss of an additional asparagine residue
gave an ion at m/z 1616.1. The loss of both GlcNAc residues
gave ion an at m/z 1527.4; the loss of an additional
asparagine residue gave an ion at m/z 1412.9. The loss of
GlcNAc-MurNAc and of an alanine residue gave an ion at m/z
1382.0; the loss of an additional GlucNAc residue gave an ion at
m/z 1179.0; the loss of an additional isoglutamine residue
gave an ion at m/z 1050.7; the loss of additional
lysine, asparagine, and alanine residues gave an ion at
m/z 720.0; the loss of additional asparagine, lysine, and
isoglutamine residues gave an ion at m/z 349.4. The ion at
m/z 331.4 corresponds to the tripeptide
alanyl-asparaginyl-lysine.
|
|

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Proposed structures of the main muropeptide
dimers of D344S and D344M512. Muropeptide designations refer to
peaks of the chromatogram in Fig. 1. a, % of total
muropeptides; b, Rt, retention time (min);
c, assignment of Asp to either stem peptide is
arbitrary.
|
|
Structure of Dimers E, C, B, and A of Mutant D344M512--
The
most prevalent dimer of D344M512, muropeptide E (retention time 73.6 min, Fig. 1B), accounted for 17.6% of all peaks and had a molecular mass of 1861.8 (Table I). The molecular mass was
consistent with a single dimer structure (Asn-tri-Asn-tri) containing a
novel cross-link of the L-Lys3 D-Asx-L-Lys3 type (Fig. 3). This
structure was confirmed by MS/MS (Fig.
4).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
MS/MS spectrum and schematic representation
of muropeptide E with an [M + H]+ ion at m/z
1862.8. Major fragmentation was because of the loss of one
GlcNAc residue (peaks at m/z 1862.8 gave an ion at
m/z 1659.9) or the loss of both GlcNAc residues (peaks at
m/z 1862.8 gave an ion at m/z 1456.5). The loss
of both GlcNAc residues, one MurNAc residue, one alanine residue, and
NH3 gave an ion at m/z 1090.5; the loss of
additional isoglutamine and lysine residues gave an ion at
m/z 832.6; the loss of an additional asparagine residue gave
an ion at m/z 720.1; the loss of an additional asparagine
residue gave an ion at m/z 605.5; the loss of additional
lysine and isoglutamine residues gave an ion at m/z
349.1.
|
|
Muropeptide C (Mr 1862.7) eluted 1.5 min
before muropeptide E (Mr 1861.8). MS/MS analysis
(data not shown) indicated that the difference of one mass unit
resulted from the presence of an aspartate instead of an asparagine
residue on the -amino group of the L-lys3 of
the donor peptide stem (Asp-tri-Asn-tri) (Fig. 3). This observation and
previous analyses of E. faecium and L. casei
peptidoglycans indicated that aspartate-branched muropeptides eluted
before the asparagine-containing analogs (14, 21).
Muropeptide B (Mr 1747.8) was the second most
abundant dimer (8%). MS/MS (Fig. 5)
indicated that this muropeptide was a tri-Asn-tri dimer containing the
unusual L-Lys3 D-Asn-L-Lys3 cross-link and
an unsubstituted L-Lys3 in the donor stem
peptide (Fig. 3). Dimer A (Mr 1748.7) was most
probably the D-aspartate-containing analog of dimer B
because it eluted 1.2 min before dimer B and differed by one mass unit
from dimer B.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
MS/MS spectrum and schematic representation
of muropeptide B with an [M + H]+ ion at m/z
1748.8. Major fragmentation was because of the loss of one
GlcNAc residue (peak at m/z 1748.8 gave an ion at
m/z 1545.8) or the loss of both GlcNAc residues (peaks at
m/z 1748.8 gave an ion at m/z 1343.7). The loss
of both GlcNAc residues, one MurNAc residue, and NH3 led to
an ion at m/z 1048.2; the loss of an additional alanine and
isoglutamine residues gave an ion at m/z 847.3. The loss of
both GlcNAc, one MurNAc, one alanine, one isoglutamine, and one lysine
gave an ion at m/z 737.5; the loss of an additional
asparagine residue gave an ion at m/z 625.2. The peak at
m/z 261.3 corresponds to dipeptide asparaginyl-lysine. The
peak at m/z 328.5 corresponds to the tripeptide
alanyl-isoglutaminyl-lysine.
|
|
Structure of Dimers D and G of D344M512 Compared with That of
Dimers 11 and 13 of D344S--
Comparison of the muropeptides from
D344S and D344M512 revealed the presence of dimers that had similar
molecular masses but did not elute exactly with the same retention
times. For example, muropeptides 13 (see above) and G present in D344S
and D344M512, respectively, had a molecular mass of 1932.5 and 1932.0 and a retention time of 75.4 and 76.4 min (Table I, Fig. 1). For this pair of muropeptides, that contained two D-asparagine
residues (Table I), the molecular mass was compatible with two
alternative structures containing either a donor tetrapeptide stem and
an acceptor tripeptide stem with a D-Ala4 D-Asn-L-Lys3 cross-link or a donor
tripeptide stem and an acceptor tetrapeptide stem with a
L-Lys3 D-Asn-L-Lys3 cross-link (Fig. 3).
The two structures were differentiated on the basis of the presence or
absence of a C-terminal alanine residue. The complete analyses of the
MS/MS fragmentation pattern of muropeptides 13 of D344S and G of
D344M512 are presented in Figs. 2 and 6,
respectively, whereas Fig. 7 provides a
comparison of the relevant portions of the two patterns. Muropeptide G
of D344M512 contained an alanine residue that was not engaged in the
cross-bridge (Figs. 6 and 7). In particular, the peak at m/z
1641.6 resulted from the loss of one alanine residue at the C-terminal
end of the acceptor tetrapeptide stem after the loss of one
N-acetylglucosamine residue (m/z 1730.5).
Similarly, the peak at m/z 1437.9 was because of the loss of
one alanine residue at the C-terminal end of the tetrapeptide stem
after the loss of both N-acetylglucosamine residues
(m/z 1527.3). The loss of the alanine residue was also found
from another major fragmentation product (m/z 1178.7)
yielding ions at m/z 1089.6 (Fig. 6). Thus, muropeptide G
had a cross-link through an asparagine between two lysine residues
(Fig. 3). In contrast, the fragmentation profile of muropeptide 13 of
D344M512 did not reveal the presence of any structure generated by the
cleavage of a C-terminal alanine residue confirming that the C-terminal
D-alanine of the donor tetrapeptide stem was participating
in the formation of a D-Ala4 D-Asn-L-Lys3 cross-link. Using the
same approach, muropeptides 11 of D344S (Mr
1818.7) and D of D344M512 (Mr 1818.0) were found
to correspond to a tetra-Asn-tri dimer with a
D-Ala4 D-Asn-L-Lys3 cross-link and to a
tri-Asn-tetra dimer with a L-Lys3 D-Asn-L-Lys3 cross link,
respectively (data not shown).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
MS/MS spectrum and schematic representation
of muropeptide G with an [M + H]+ ion at m/z
1933.1. Major fragmentation products are because of the loss
of one GlcNAc residue (the peak at m/z 1933.1 gave an ion at
m/z 1730.5) or the loss of both GlcNAc residues (the peak at
m/z 1933.1 gave an ion at m/z 1527.3). The loss
of GlcNAc-MurNAc and of one alanine residue gave an ion at
m/z 1382.2; the loss of an additional GlcNAc residue gave an
ion at m/z 1178.7; the loss of an additional isoglutamine
residue gave an ion at m/z 1050.7; the loss of additional
lysine, alanine, and asparagine residues gave an ion at m/z
719.6; the loss of an additional asparagine, lysine, and isoglutamine
residues gave an ion at m/z 349.5. The peaks at
m/z 1641.6, 1437.9, and 1089.6, issued from ions at
m/z 1730.5, 1527.3, and 1178.6, respectively, correspond to
the loss of the C-terminal alanine of the acceptor tetrapeptide stem
peptide.
|
|

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Comparison of the MS/MS fragmentation
patterns of muropeptide G ([M + H]+ ion at m/z
1933.1) of D344M512 and muropeptide 13 ([M + H]+
ion at m/z 1933.5) of D344S. For both
muropeptides, loss of one or both GlcNAc residues gave ions at
m/z 1730.5 and 1527.4, respectively. From the latter peak,
loss of one MurNAc residue and the N-terminal alanine residue gave
peaks at m/z 1178.6 (D344M512) or 1179.3 (D344S). Loss of
the C-terminal alanine from the acceptor tetrapeptide stem peptide of
muropeptide G produced peaks at m/z 1641.6, 1437.9, and
1089.6 that were issued from ions at m/z 1730.5, 1527.4, and
1178.6, respectively. These peaks were absent from the fragmentation
pattern of muropeptide 13.
|
|
Analogs of Dimer G--
Dimer F eluted slightly before dimer G
(retention time 74.8 versus 76.4 min, respectively) and
differed from dimer G by one molecular mass unit
(Mr 1933.0 versus 1932.1). Based on a
previous comparison of dimers E and C (see above), most likely dimers F and G differed only by the presence of a D-asparagine or a
D-aspartate residue. Finally, MS/MS analysis of muropeptide
H revealed an Asn-tri-Asn-penta dimer containing the
L-Lys3 D-Asn-L-Lys3 cross-link-present in
the other dimers of D344M512 (data not shown).
Overview of the Oligomers from D344S and D344M512--
All the
oligomers of mutant D344M512 that were analyzed contained the unusual
L-Lys3 D-Asx-L-Lys3 cross-link instead of the D-Ala4 D-Asx-L-Lys3 cross-link present in
the parental susceptible strain. Despite this major difference, the
cross-linked peptidoglycan generated by DD-transpeptidation in D344S or
by LD-transpeptidation in D344M512 displayed striking similarities. In
particular, tripeptide stems were detected at the acceptor position in
the majority of the oligomer muropeptides from both strains (Table I
and Fig. 3). Moreover, L-Lys3 in the
muropeptides of both strains was more frequently substituted by
D-Asn than by D-Asp. Finally, as mentioned above, the extent of the cross-link was similar in D344S and D344M512 because oligomers, mainly dimers, represented 62-63% of the
muropeptides (Table I).
Further Attempts to Find Common Muropeptides Oligomers in D344S and
D344M512--
As shown in Fig. 1 and Table I, all the major
muropeptide oligomers of D344M512 that were produced in sufficient
amount for structural analysis contained the unusual
L-Lys3 D-Asx-L-Lys3 cross-link. Further
analysis of very minor peaks did not provide any evidence for the
presence of muropeptide containing the usual D-Ala4 D-Asx-L-Lys3 cross-link present in
D344S (data not shown). In contrast, further analysis of minor peaks of
D344S revealed two dimers (A and B) that contained the unusual
L-Lys3 D-Asx-L-Lys3 cross-link. These
peaks were very minor components of the peptidoglycan of D344S
accounting for only 0.7% of the total muropeptides (Table I and Fig.
1A). Thus, the unusual L-Lys3 D-Asx-L-Lys3 cross-links preexisted
in the parental strain.
Further Characterization of Monomer Muropeptides--
Five
monomers (peaks 4, 5, 9, and 10) present in the muropeptide profiles of
D344S and D344M512 had not been fully characterized in previous studies
of the E. faecium peptidoglycan. MS/MS analysis indicated
that muropeptide 5 was a monomer containing a tripeptide stem with a
D-asparagine branched on L-Lys3,
whereas muropeptide 4, which eluted 1.2 min before muropeptide 5 and
differed by one mass unit, was the D-aspartate-containing
analog of muropeptide 5. Based on the 42 mass unit difference,
muropeptide 10 differed from muropeptide 5 by O-acetylation
of the MurNAc residue. In agreement, peak 10 had the same retention
time and molecular mass as the O-acetylated tripeptide
monomer characterized by MS/MS in L. casei (21). According
to the same criteria, muropeptide 9 was the D-aspartate-
and O-acetyl-containing analogue of muropeptide 5. Finally,
MS/MS analysis indicated that muropeptide 8, only present in a small
amount, contained a D-asparagine-substituted pentapeptide
stem (data not shown).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Analysis of the peptidoglycan of the ampicillin-resistant mutant
D344M512 revealed the presence of a novel type of cross-link that
connected two lysine residues (L-Lys3 D-Asx-L-Lys3) instead of the usual
cross-link generated by the DD-transpeptidases
(D-Ala4 D-Asx-L-Lys3) in susceptible
strains. Qualitatively, this finding is not entirely novel, because
replacement D-Ala4 meso-A2
pm3 by meso-A2 pm3 meso-A2 pm3 has been previously reported in
E. coli for a minority (<4%) of the cross-links in the
stationary phase of growth (1, 5-7). Quantitatively, the results
obtained for D344M512 were unprecedented because the
L-Lys3 D-Asx-L-Lys3 cross-link was present
in 100% of the muropeptide oligomers that were analyzed (Table I and
Fig. 1). As detailed under "Results" extensive analysis was
performed to rule out the presence of the D-Ala4 D-Asx-L-Lys3 cross-links even in
minor muropeptide oligomer species of D344M512. The absence of this
type of structure indicates that DD-transpeptidase activity was playing
no role in peptidoglycan cross-linking. In agreement, the increase in
the proportion of L-Lys3 D-Asx-L-Lys3 cross-links from 0.7%
in D344S to 100% in D344M512 was associated with a >3 × 104-fold increase in the minimal inhibitory concentration
of ampicillin, and the resistant mutant was not inhibited by the
highest drug concentration tested (2000 µg/ml). Moreover, the
muropeptide profile of resistant mutant D344M512 was unaffected
by ampicillin (data not shown) indicating that synthesis of the novel
cross-link was unaffected by the drug. Taken together, these results
indicate that the requirement for the essential -lactam-sensitive
DD-transpeptidase activity was bypassed by a -lactam-insensitive
LD-transpeptidase activity that preexisted to a low extent in the
susceptible parental strain.
The bypass of the essential DD-transpeptidases is a novel resistance
mechanism to -lactam antibiotics. Previously described bacterial
strategies for acquisition of -lactam resistance include decreased
outer membrane permeability in Gram-negative bacteria (23),
production of -lactamases that inactivate the drugs (24), and
production of DD-transpeptidases with reduced affinity for -lactams
(16, 19, 25). Despite the wide distribution of these resistant
mechanisms in pathogenic bacteria, -lactams are still the most
broadly used antibiotic class because several strategies have been
successfully developed to overcome resistance, including modification
of -lactam structure to prevent hydrolysis by -lactamase, association of -lactams with -lactamase inhibitors, and design of
new drugs that display increased affinity for DD-transpeptidases from
resistant bacteria. The emergence of resistance by LD-transpeptidation bypass mechanism described in this study is worrisome because it is
expected to confer cross-resistance to all -lactams.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank C. Harcour for secretarial assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grants CRI 950601 and EHI 0004.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: L.R.M.A.,
Université Paris VI, 15, rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France. Tel.: 33-1-42-34-68-63; Fax: 33-1-43-25-68-12;
E-mail: jlmainar@bhdc.jussieu.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 19, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M909877199
2
J.-L. Mainardi, M. Arthur, and L. Gutmann,
unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GlcNAc, N-acetylglucosamine;
MurNAc, N-acetylmuramic
acid;
MS, mass spectometry;
HPLC, high pressure liquid
chromatography.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Höltje, J. V.
(1998)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62,
181-203
|
| 2.
|
Ghuysen, J. M.,
and Shockman, G. D.
(1973)
in
Bacterial Membranes and Wall
(Lieve, L., ed)
, pp. 37-130, Marcel Dekker, New York
|
| 3.
|
Rasmussen, J. R.,
and Strominger, J. L.
(1978)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
75,
84-88
|
| 4.
|
Ghuysen, J. M.
(1994)
Trends Microbiol.
2,
372-380
|
| 5.
|
Pisabarro, A. G.,
De Pedro, M. A.,
and Vazquez, D.
(1985)
J. Bacteriol.
161,
238-242
|
| 6.
|
Driehuis, F.,
and Wouters, J. T. M.
(1987)
J. Bacteriol.
169,
97-101
|
| 7.
|
Blasco, B.,
Pisabarro, A. G.,
and de Pedro, M. A.
(1988)
J. Bacteriol.
170,
5224-5228
|
| 8.
|
Glauner, B.,
Höltje, J. V.,
and Schwarz, U.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
10088-10095
|
| 9.
|
Höltje, J. V.,
and Glauner, B.
(1990)
Res. Microbiol.
141,
75-89
|
| 10.
|
Coyette, J.,
Perkins, H. R.,
Polacheck, I.,
Schockman, G. D.,
and Ghuysen, J. M.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
44,
459-468
|
| 11.
|
Templin, M. F.,
Ursinus, A.,
and Höltje, J. V.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
4108-4117
|
| 12.
|
Schleifer, K. H.,
and Kandler, O.
(1972)
Bacteriol. Rev.
36,
407-477
|
| 13.
|
de Jonge, B. L. M,
Gage, D.,
and Handwerger, S.
(1996)
Microb. Drug Resist.
2,
225-229
|
| 14.
|
Billot-Klein, D.,
Shlaes, D.,
Bryant, D.,
Bell, D.,
van Heijenoort, J.,
and Gutmann, L.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
313,
711-715
|
| 15.
|
Spratt, B. G.
(1975)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
72,
2999-3003
|
| 16.
|
Georgopapadakou, N. H.
(1993)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37,
2045-2053
|
| 17.
|
van Heijenoort, J.
(1998)
Cell Mol. Life Sci.
54,
300-304
|
| 18.
|
Williamson, R.,
Le Bouguénec, C.,
Gutmann, L.,
and Horaud, T.
(1985)
J. Gen. Microbiol.
131,
1933-1940
|
| 19.
|
Zorzi, W.,
Zhou, X. Y.,
Dardenne, O.,
Lamotte, J.,
Raze, D.,
Pierre, J.,
Gutmann, L.,
and Coyette, J.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
4948-4957
|
| 20.
|
Rybkine, T.,
Mainardi, J. L.,
Sougakoff, W.,
Collatz, E.,
and Gutmann, L.
(1998)
J. Infect. Dis.
178,
159-163
|
| 21.
|
Billot-Klein, D.,
Legrand, R.,
Schott, B.,
van Heijenoort, J.,
and Gutmann, L.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
6208-6212
|
| 22.
|
Mainardi, J. L,
Billot-Klein, D.,
Coutrot, A.,
Legrand, R.,
Schoot, B.,
and Gutmann, L.
(1998)
Microbiology
144,
2679-2685
|
| 23.
|
Nikaido, H.
(1989)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
33,
1831-1836
|
| 24.
|
Bush, K.,
Jacoby, G. A.,
and Meideros, A. A.
(1995)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39,
1211-1233
|
| 25.
|
Hartman, B. J.,
and Tomasz, A.
(1986)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
29,
85-92
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Magnet, L. Dubost, A. Marie, M. Arthur, and L. Gutmann
Identification of the L,D-Transpeptidases for Peptidoglycan Cross-Linking in Escherichia coli
J. Bacteriol.,
July 1, 2008;
190(13):
4782 - 4785.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Lavollay, M. Arthur, M. Fourgeaud, L. Dubost, A. Marie, N. Veziris, D. Blanot, L. Gutmann, and J.-L. Mainardi
The Peptidoglycan of Stationary-Phase Mycobacterium tuberculosis Predominantly Contains Cross-Links Generated by L,D-Transpeptidation
J. Bacteriol.,
June 15, 2008;
190(12):
4360 - 4366.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. van Heijenoort
Lipid Intermediates in the Biosynthesis of Bacterial Peptidoglycan
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
December 1, 2007;
71(4):
620 - 635.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-L. Mainardi, J.-E. Hugonnet, F. Rusconi, M. Fourgeaud, L. Dubost, A. N. Moumi, V. Delfosse, C. Mayer, L. Gutmann, L. B. Rice, et al.
Unexpected Inhibition of Peptidoglycan LD-Transpeptidase from Enterococcus faecium by the beta-Lactam Imipenem
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 19, 2007;
282(42):
30414 - 30422.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Magnet, A. Arbeloa, J.-L. Mainardi, J.-E. Hugonnet, M. Fourgeaud, L. Dubost, A. Marie, V. Delfosse, C. Mayer, L. B. Rice, et al.
Specificity of L,D-Transpeptidases from Gram-positive Bacteria Producing Different Peptidoglycan Chemotypes
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 4, 2007;
282(18):
13151 - 13159.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Cremniter, J.-L. Mainardi, N. Josseaume, J.-C. Quincampoix, L. Dubost, J.-E. Hugonnet, A. Marie, L. Gutmann, L. B. Rice, and M. Arthur
Novel Mechanism of Resistance to Glycopeptide Antibiotics in Enterococcus faecium
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 27, 2006;
281(43):
32254 - 32262.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Bellais, M. Arthur, L. Dubost, J.-E. Hugonnet, L. Gutmann, J. van Heijenoort, R. Legrand, J.-P. Brouard, L. Rice, and J.-L. Mainardi
Aslfm, the D-Aspartate Ligase Responsible for the Addition of D-Aspartic Acid onto the Peptidoglycan Precursor of Enterococcus faecium
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 28, 2006;
281(17):
11586 - 11594.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-L. Mainardi, M. Fourgeaud, J.-E. Hugonnet, L. Dubost, J.-P. Brouard, J. Ouazzani, L. B. Rice, L. Gutmann, and M. Arthur
A Novel Peptidoglycan Cross-linking Enzyme for a {beta}-Lactam-resistant Transpeptidation Pathway
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 18, 2005;
280(46):
38146 - 38152.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. R. Flores, L. M. Parsons, and M. S. Pavelka Jr.
Characterization of Novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium smegmatis Mutants Hypersusceptible to {beta}-Lactam Antibiotics
J. Bacteriol.,
March 15, 2005;
187(6):
1892 - 1900.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Arbeloa, J.-E. Hugonnet, A.-C. Sentilhes, N. Josseaume, L. Dubost, C. Monsempes, D. Blanot, J.-P. Brouard, and M. Arthur
Synthesis of Mosaic Peptidoglycan Cross-bridges by Hybrid Peptidoglycan Assembly Pathways in Gram-positive Bacteria
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 1, 2004;
279(40):
41546 - 41556.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. David, B. Bozdogan, J.-L. Mainardi, R. Legrand, L. Gutmann, and R. Leclercq
Mechanism of Intrinsic Resistance to Vancomycin in Clostridium innocuum NCIB 10674
J. Bacteriol.,
June 1, 2004;
186(11):
3415 - 3422.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Arbeloa, H. Segal, J.-E. Hugonnet, N. Josseaume, L. Dubost, J.-P. Brouard, L. Gutmann, D. Mengin-Lecreulx, and M. Arthur
Role of Class A Penicillin-Binding Proteins in PBP5-Mediated {beta}-Lactam Resistance in Enterococcus faecalis
J. Bacteriol.,
March 1, 2004;
186(5):
1221 - 1228.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Antignac, J.-C. Rousselle, A. Namane, A. Labigne, M.-K. Taha, and I. G. Boneca
Detailed Structural Analysis of the Peptidoglycan of the Human Pathogen Neisseria meningitidis
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 22, 2003;
278(34):
31521 - 31528.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Antignac, I. G. Boneca, J.-C. Rousselle, A. Namane, J.-P. Carlier, J. A. Vazquez, A. Fox, J.-M. Alonso, and M.-K. Taha
Correlation between Alterations of the Penicillin-binding Protein 2 and Modifications of the Peptidoglycan Structure in Neisseria meningitidis with Reduced Susceptibility to Penicillin G
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 22, 2003;
278(34):
31529 - 31535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Huard, G. Miranda, F. Wessner, A. Bolotin, J. Hansen, S. J. Foster, and M.-P. Chapot-Chartier
Characterization of AcmB, an N-acetylglucosaminidase autolysin from Lactococcus lactis
Microbiology,
March 1, 2003;
149(3):
695 - 705.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Goffin and J.-M. Ghuysen
Biochemistry and Comparative Genomics of SxxK Superfamily Acyltransferases Offer a Clue to the Mycobacterial Paradox: Presence of Penicillin-Susceptible Target Proteins versus Lack of Efficiency of Penicillin as Therapeutic Agent
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
December 1, 2002;
66(4):
702 - 738.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Bouhss, N. Josseaume, A. Severin, K. Tabei, J.-E. Hugonnet, D. Shlaes, D. Mengin-Lecreulx, J. van Heijenoort, and M. Arthur
Synthesis of the L-Alanyl-L-alanine Cross-bridge of Enterococcus faecalis Peptidoglycan
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 22, 2002;
277(48):
45935 - 45941.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-L. Mainardi, V. Morel, M. Fourgeaud, J. Cremniter, D. Blanot, R. Legrand, C. Frehel, M. Arthur, J. van Heijenoort, and L. Gutmann
Balance between Two Transpeptidation Mechanisms Determines the Expression of beta -Lactam Resistance in Enterococcus faecium
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 20, 2002;
277(39):
35801 - 35807.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Sifaoui, M. Arthur, L. Rice, and L. Gutmann
Role of Penicillin-Binding Protein 5 in Expression of Ampicillin Resistance and Peptidoglycan Structure in Enterococcus faecium
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,
September 1, 2001;
45(9):
2594 - 2597.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. B. Rice, L. L. Carias, R. Hutton-Thomas, F. Sifaoui, L. Gutmann, and S. D. Rudin
Penicillin-Binding Protein 5 and Expression of Ampicillin Resistance in Enterococcus faecium
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,
May 1, 2001;
45(5):
1480 - 1486.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Grohs, L. Gutmann, R. Legrand, B. Schoot, and J. L. Mainardi
Vancomycin Resistance Is Associated with Serine-Containing Peptidoglycan in Enterococcus gallinarum
J. Bacteriol.,
November 1, 2000;
182(21):
6228 - 6232.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|