|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M000954200 on March 27, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 22, 16550-16559, June 2, 2000
Methylation Increases the Open Probability of the Epithelial
Sodium Channel in A6 Epithelia*
Andrea
Becchetti ,
Alexandra E.
Kemendy §,
James D.
Stockand ¶,
Sarah
Sariban-Sohraby , and
Douglas C.
Eaton ¶**
From the Department of Physiology and the
¶ Center for Cell & Molecular Signaling, Emory University School
of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322 and the Université
Libre de Bruxelles, Laboratoire de Physiologie et Physiopatologie,
Bruxelles 1070, Belgium
Received for publication, February 6, 2000, and in revised form, March 23, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
We used single channel methods on A6 renal cells
to study the regulation by methylation reactions of epithelial sodium
channels. 3-Deazaadenosine (3-DZA), a methyltransferase blocker,
produced a 5-fold decrease in sodium transport and a 6-fold decrease in apical sodium channel activity by decreasing channel open probability (Po). 3-Deazaadenosine also blocked the
increase in channel open probability associated with addition of
aldosterone. Sodium channel activity in excised "inside-out"
patches usually decreased within 1-2 min; in the presence of
S-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet), activity
persisted for 5-8 min. Sodium channel mean time open (topen) before and after patch excision was
higher in the presence of AdoMet than in untreated excised patches but
less than topen in cell-attached patches.
Sodium channel activity in excised patches exposed to both AdoMet and
GTP usually remained stable for more than 10 min, and
Po and the number of active channels per patch were close to values in cell-attached patches from untreated cells. These findings suggest that a methylation reaction contributes to the
activity of epithelial sodium channels in A6 cells and is directed to
some regulatory element closely connected with the channel, whose
activity also depends on the presence of intracellular GTP.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The amiloride-blockable, highly selective, epithelial sodium
channel (ENaC)1 present on
the apical surface of principal cells in mammalian renal cortical
collecting tubules is the primary site for the regulation of total body
sodium balance and blood pressure. The cell line, A6, derived from
distal tubules of Xenopus laevis nephrons, is a good
experimental model for the study of these sodium channels. When grown
on permeable supports in the presence of aldosterone, A6 cells express
an apical sodium channel with properties identical to those of channels
in mammalian tissues (1).
Despite many studies, the mechanism by which aldosterone stimulates
apical sodium transport is still poorly understood. It is known that
the complex between aldosterone and its intracellular receptor
activates gene expression and induces the synthesis of proteins (2-9);
however, little is known about the cellular functions of the induced
proteins except that the final result is an increase in sodium
transport (2, 9-11). Originally, because of the observation that
protein synthesis was required for aldosterone to increase sodium
transport, it was postulated that aldosterone induced sodium channel
synthesis and insertion. However, earlier studies in A6 cells showed
that aldosterone increases Na+ entry at the apical membrane
by changing the activity of channels that are already present in the
apical membrane and not by increasing the number of channels (13).
Although interpretation of other electrophysiological data remains
controversial (14-16), biochemical methods support the original
observation that ENaC mRNA and ENaC protein in the apical membrane
does not increase in the presence of aldosterone (at least in the first
2-4 h when the increase in sodium transport is most dramatic) (10,
17-19).
Since the action of aldosterone appears to involve a mechanism that
increases the Po of sodium channels, an
examination of post-translational mechanisms that alter
Po may offer some insight into the mechanism of
aldosterone action, but identifying signal transduction pathways that
can increase sodium channel Po in A6 cells has
been difficult. There have been many suggestions about potential
aldosterone-induced post-translational modifications, but in the
context of our previous results (20-22), one is particularly interesting. Sariban-Sohraby et al. (23) demonstrated that
the amount of sodium transport that could be measured in apical
membrane vesicles obtained from A6 cells, a sodium-transporting,
distal-nephron cell line, was markedly enhanced by prior application of
agents that methylate membrane proteins. There was no additional effect of AdoMet in the presence of aldosterone, and the effect was blocked by
two methylation blockers, S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy)
and 3-deazaadenosine (3-DZA). 3-DZA is a membrane-permeable drug that blocks transmethylation reactions by specifically inhibiting the S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase, thereby promoting the
accumulation of S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy) and
deaza-D-adenosylhomocysteine that produces end
product inhibition of AdoMet-dependent
methyltransferases (24). Since they also demonstrated that application
of aldosterone leads to the methylation of membrane protein and lipid,
their suggestion was that intracellular methyltransferases induced by aldosterone could be responsible for the methylation and, therefore, modulate the sodium channel protein. As a post-translational
modification, methylation is analogous to phosphorylation (for reviews
see Refs. 25-28). Highly specific methyltransferases promote the
methylation of proteins at specific consensus sites, and much
less specific esterases promote demethylation of the proteins. The
difference between phosphorylation and methylation is that methylation
is in general more stable and, therefore, can be used to alter the activity of proteins for a much longer period than is typical for phosphorylation.
The previous work on methylation implies an involvement of
transmethylation in controlling sodium transport; however, the studies
all involved measuring changes in total sodium transport and therefore
do not distinguish between the relative contribution of channel
density, single-channel open probability, and conductance. In
principle, any of these factors could contribute to a modification of
transepithelial transport. These considerations led us to study the
effects of carboxymethylation reactions on the activity of single-sodium channels of A6 cells using patch clamp methods. In this
way, we hoped to clarify what aspect of channel function is altered and
to confirm whether the methylation effect is indeed membrane-directed.
We found that methylation inhibitors reduce ENaC activity by decreasing
Po. Also, addition of the methyl donor, AdoMet,
to the cytosolic surface of ENaC in excised inside-out patches
significantly increased channel activity with respect to controls. The
presence of AdoMet seems to maintain the single channel mean open time even after excision. Addition of partially purified methyltransferase produced little additional effect, suggesting that the endogenous methyltransferase is probably membrane-associated and close to the
channel. Addition of GTP along with AdoMet increased channel activity
more than AdoMet alone. The present work has been previously reported
in several brief communications (13, 22).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
A6 Cell Culture Preparation--
For single channel experiments,
we used A6 cells from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA)
in the 68th passage. Experiments were carried out on passages 70-80,
with no discernible variation between cells from different passages.
Cells were maintained in plastic tissue culture flasks (Corning, NY) at
26 °C in a humidified incubator with 4% CO2 in air. The
culture medium was a mixture of Coon's medium F-12 (3 parts) and
Leibovitz's medium L-15 (7 parts) modified for amphibian
cells with 104 mM NaCl, 25 mM
NaHCO3, pH 7.4, with a final osmolarity of 240 mosmol/kg
H2O. Besides these components, 10% (v/v) fetal bovine
serum (Irvine Scientific, CA), 1% streptomycin, and 0.6% penicillin
(Hazleton Biologics, KA) and, in most experiments, 1 µM
aldosterone were added. Cells grown on plastic tissue culture dishes
were detached when confluent by exposing them to divalent-free
(Ca2+ and Mg2+) medium containing 0.05%
trypsin and 0.6 mM EDTA (Irvine Scientific, CA). The cells
were then rinsed, centrifuged, resuspended, and finally replated. When
used for patch clamp experiments, A6 cells were replated at confluent
density on collagen-coated, permeable CM® filters (Millipore)
attached to the bottom of small Lucite disks with the disks suspended
in 35-mm Petri plates as described previously (29). This sided
preparation forms a polarized monolayer with the apical surface
oriented upward and net sodium transport moving from the apical to
basolateral surface. The cells were fed with fresh medium every 2 days
and sampled when fully differentiated (7-14 days after replating). For
experiments in which the aldosterone levels were reduced, after the
cells reached confluent density, the cells were incubated in medium
free of both aldosterone and serum for 2 days. Then half of the cells
were washed with A6 saline and re-fed with serum-free medium containing
1.5 µM aldosterone. The remaining cells (aldosterone-free
controls) were washed with A6 saline followed by re-addition of
aldosterone-free and serum-free medium. Cells were incubated for 4 h followed by current or patch clamp measurements.
Protein Carboxymethyltransferase Isolation--
Protein
carboxymethyltransferase was partially purified from the membrane
fraction of A6 cells as one of us has described previously (30). Medium
was removed, and cells were washed twice in a Ringer's solution (85 mM NaCl, 18 mM NaHCO3, 4 mM KCI, 1 mM KH2PO4, pH
7.4), scraped, and Dounce-homogenized. Crude membrane and cytosolic
fractions were separated by centrifugation at 50,000 × g for 1 h. Stripped membranes were prepared by a
modification of the method of Yamane and Fung (31). The membrane pellet
was resuspended in Buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol) along with 1%
sodium cholate and allowed to sit on ice for 1 h. The membranes
were collected by centrifugation as above, washed twice, and
resuspended in Buffer A without sodium cholate.
The enzyme activity assay was similar to that described previously (32,
33). In brief, 50 µg of protein of the enzyme preparation was
incubated with the incubation mixture (50 µl) containing 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8, 720 nM
[3H]adenosylmethionine (15 Ci/mmol), 100 µM
of the methyltransferase substrate,
N-acetyl-S-farnesyl-L-cysteine, and a
blocking concentration of a methyltransferase inhibitor when
appropriate (S-trans,trans-farnesylthiosalicylic acid,
3-deazadenosine, or S-adenosylhomocysteine). After
incubation for 1 h at 37 °C, the reaction was stopped by the
addition of 50 µl of 20% trichloroacetic acid and the reaction mix
vortexed for 10 s. The isoprenyl cysteine methyl esters were
separated by the addition of 400 µl of heptane to the reaction mix. A
fraction (200 µl) of the organic top layer containing the methyl
esters was transferred to a small top-free Eppendorf tube and dried
under vacuum. 200 µl of 1 M NaOH was added, and the tube
was placed upright in a vial containing a small volume of scintillation
fluid. The vials were sealed and incubated at 37 °C overnight. The
strong base hydrolyzes the methyl esters releasing methanol vapor that partitions into the hydrophobic scintillant. The methyl esters in the
vials were counted by liquid scintillation counting. The specific
activity of the enzyme is defined as picomoles of methyl-3H
group transferred per mg/min of enzyme protein. The preparation catalyzed the incorporation of base-labile isotope into
N-acetyl-S-farnesyl-L-cysteine, which
was 70-90% inhibited by AdoHcy or FTS. The specific activity of
methyl groups transformed by the enzyme was 0.12 pmol/mg
protein/min.
Transepithelial Current Recording--
A6 cells were grown for
14 days on permeable supports with a surface area of approximately 9 cm2, at which time transepithelial potential differences
(PD) and resistances (R) were measured using dual flexible electrodes, containing Ag/AgCl pellets (Millicell-ERS, Millipore, Bedford MA). The
resistance of the insert was obtained by passing an alternating current
of ± 20 µA at 12.5 Hz. Transepithelial current
(Itr) was calculated from the PD and R values,
and in this system, the predominant component of the current is carried
by Na+ through amiloride-sensitive Na+ channels
at the apical membrane (34). Because measurements were made under
sterile conditions, we were able to make several measurements over time
on the same cells.
Single Channel Recordings--
We used either the cell-attached
or the inside-out configuration of the Hamill patch clamp technique.
Before sampling, the apical cell surface was carefully washed several
times with our standard extracellular solution, containing (in
mM): 95 NaCl, 3.4 KCl, 0.8 CaCl2, 0.8 MgCl2, 10 HEPES (Sigma); pH was adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH.
Patch pipettes contained the same solution. For inside-out experiments,
the apical solution was substituted immediately before patch excision
with a cytosol-mimicking solution (in mM: 85 KCl, 3 NaCl, 4 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 5 EGTA, potassium salt (Sigma),
1 mM adenosine trisphosphate (ATP, sodium salt, Sigma), and
10 HEPES, pH 7.4, adjusted with KOH). Only one inside-out experiment
was performed per dish to avoid any possibility of examining cells
whose properties might have been altered by extended exposure to high
potassium solution. In some of the inside-out experiments, 300 µM S-adenosyl-L-methionine
(AdoMet, Sigma) or GTP was added to the "intracellular" solution.
Solutions containing AdoMet, GTP, or ATP were prepared fresh every day
to prevent possible degradation. All experiments were performed at room
temperature (22-24 °C, very close to the physiological temperature
for amphibian cells) within 45-60 min of removing the A6 cells from
the incubator. Patch pipettes with a tip diameter 1 µM
were fabricated from WPI TW 150 glass (New Haven, CT) and
fire-polished. Since the voltage dependence of apical sodium channels
in A6 cells is relatively small (35), we have not corrected all our
data for the small (a few mV) junction potential present after patch
excision in a high potassium solution.
Data Acquisition and Analysis--
Single channel currents from
cell-attached patches were measured with an Axopatch 1-B
current-voltage clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments, Inc. Burlingame,
CA), low pass-filtered at 5 kHz, and recorded on a digital video
recorder (Sony, Japan), and then the recorded signal was refiltered and
digitized at twice the corner frequency (usually 1 kHz) using a
Scientific Solutions A/D converter and an IBM PC computer equipped with
Axotape software (Axon Instruments, CA). The data were subsequently
transferred to a Micro Vax II computer (Digital Equipment) for single
channel analysis. Data records from cells grown in the presence of
aldosterone were low pass-filtered at 100 Hz, whereas those from
aldosterone-depleted cells were filtered at 300 or 500 Hz using a
software Gaussian filter. Events were detected by setting the threshold
level at 50% of the estimated single channel current amplitude.
Because of the necessity for analyzing long continuous records,
programs that closely follow the strategy of Colquhoun and Sigworth
(36) were written for use on the VAX family of computers. These
programs produce tables of event durations and amplitudes based on a
50% threshold crossing algorithm and allowed the analysis of long continuous records, necessary for the interpretation of single channel
experiments on renal epithelial tissue.
One method for calculating NPo from single
channel records without making any assumptions about the total number
of channels in a patch or the Po of a single
channel is given by Equation 1,
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where T is the total recording time;
NA is the observable number of current levels
(corresponding to the apparent number of channels) within the patch
determined as the highest observable current level; i is the
number of channels open; and ti is the time during
which i channels are open. If channels open independently of
one another and the exact number of channels in a patch is known, then
the Po of a single channel can be calculated by
dividing NPo by the number of channels in a
patch. The total number of functional channels (N) in the
patch was determined by observing the number of peaks detected in all
points amplitude histograms constructed, when possible, from event
records of long enough duration to provide 95% confidence of
determining the correct N according to methods we have
previously described (37, 38). However, especially in some of the
untreated excised patches, we could not record long enough to reach a
95% confidence level, and the values for N in these patches
may be an underestimate. The mean open time (to)
of N channels can be calculated as shown in Equation 2,
|
(Eq. 2)
|
where n is the total number of transitions between
states during the total recording period, T, and the other
parameters are the same as in Equation 1. This value represents the
average time the channel spends open (in any open state) and should not
be confused with the mean residency time of the channel in a specific state (sometimes called the mean open time for the state). Nonetheless, this measure provides an easy way to distinguish whether experimental manipulations (e.g. AdoMet or 3-DZA) modify
Po by affecting the open states or closed states
of the channel.
Statistics--
Unless otherwise stated, data are presented as
the means ± S.E. Unpaired or paired Student's t tests
as appropriate were used to test for significance between two
treatments. Analysis of variance with Student-Neumann-Keuls post test
was used for multiple comparisons. Probability <0.05 was
considered significant.
 |
RESULTS |
Sodium Channel Properties--
In this work, we have studied the
highly selective, amiloride-blockable, aldosterone-inducible, 4-pS
sodium channels previously observed in recordings from the apical
surfaces of both A6 cells and isolated rat and rabbit cortical
collecting tubule cells (1, 39-42). An example of a typical recording
from a patch containing three such channels is shown in Fig.
1A. In this case, the open probability measured from about 6 min of continuous recording at 0-mV
pipette potential was close to 0.5 (see the amplitude histogram on the
bottom). This is by far the most common type of channel found on the
apical surface of A6 cells grown on permeable supports so that it can
be studied in physiological solutions, i.e. without the need
of any kind of ion channel blocker. Its biophysical properties have
been extensively described by us and others (43).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
3-DZA reduces the open probability of ENaC
channels. A6 cells monolayers were pretreated for 2.5-5 h with
300 µM methylation inhibitor, 3-DZA (right
panel), for comparison with untreated cells (left
panel). The patch activity was then recorded at 0-mV pipette
potential (Vp) for at least 4-5 min. Inward
currents are downward deflection; c = closed level. The
records were filtered at 100 Hz. A comparison of the amplitude
histograms from A and B shows a dramatic
difference in the open probability of sodium channels under the two
conditions. The estimated Po of channels in the
3-DZA pretreated patch was less than 0.004, barely discernible in the
amplitude histogram (for clarity, the portion of the histogram
containing open amplitude points has been magnified in the
inset) compared to about 0.5 in the untreated patch.
|
|
A Methylation Inhibitor, 3-DZA, Inhibits ENaC NPo and
Po--
If methylation is important for ENaC activity,
inhibitors of methylation should reduce activity. A6 cells monolayers
previously treated with aldosterone were pretreated for 2.5-5 h with
300 µM methylation inhibitor, 3-DZA for comparison with
untreated cells. The patch activity was then recorded at 0 mV pipette
potential (Vp) for at least 4-5 min. Usually, this
time was sufficiently long to estimate confidently the number of active
channels (N) in a control patch in A6 cells (provided that
N 4-5 channels (38, 44)). If N is known with
confidence, Po can also be calculated. A
representative example of a single channel record from a cell pretreated with 3-DZA for 3 h is shown in Fig. 1B. A
comparison of the amplitude histograms from Fig. 1, A and
B, shows a dramatic difference in the open probability of
sodium channels under the two conditions. The estimated
Po of channels in the 3-DZA-pretreated patch was
less than 0.004, barely discernible in the amplitude histogram (for
clarity, the bottom portion of the histogram has been magnified in the
inset). This estimate of Po is an
upper limit since it depends upon accurately determining the number of
channels, N, in a patch. If we have underestimated
N, then we will overestimate Po.
Therefore, Po may actually be significantly lower than 0.004.
3-DZA Blocks the Effect of Aldosterone--
Our goals in this
study were 2-fold as follows: first, to examine the regulation of
sodium channel activity by methylation; and second, to determine if the
action of aldosterone involved a methylation event as suggested by
others (23, 23, 45, 46). We had previously shown that one effect of
aldosterone addition to aldosterone-depleted cells was to increase the
Po of individual sodium channels from a very low
level (less than 0.01) to a much higher level (about 0.4) (37)
primarily by increasing the mean open time of channels. To investigate
further the relationship between methylation and the effects of
aldosterone, we examined the effect of 3-DZA on single sodium channels
in patches formed on aldosterone-depleted cells. First, paired dishes
of A6 cells were serum- and aldosterone-depleted (see "Materials and
Methods") for 48 h before one dish was treated with 300 µM 3-DZA for 4 h. Then 1.5 µM
aldosterone was added to both dishes, and sodium channel activity was
sampled from both dishes by repeatedly forming patches on cells
selected at random from the dishes. The results of a large number of
experiments in which the patch activity was observed with or without
3-DZA incubation in the presence or absence of aldosterone are
summarized in Fig. 2. A 3-4-h
pretreatment with 3-DZA of aldosterone-treated cells dramatically
decreased NPo from 2.88 ± 0.731 (mean ± S.D., n = 37) to 0.297 ± 0.185 (n = 49). These values contrast with the
NPo determined in cells treated with
aldosterone-free medium for 24 h of 0.117 ± 0.134 (n = 43). By dividing every NPo
value by the maximum number of current levels detected during the whole
recording period, we calculated that the sodium channel
Po was significantly reduced by the action of
3-DZA (right) from 0.408 ± 0.0619 (n = 37) to
0.0808 ± 0.0314 (n = 49). The
Po after 3-DZA treatment was not significantly
different than the Po in the absence of
aldosterone (0.0902 ± 0.0289). The Po
after treatment with 3-DZA or aldosterone-free medium is an upper limit
for the value of Po since, with low channel
activity, it is possible that we underestimated the value for
N, and thus we could have overestimated
Po. Nonetheless, even the upper limit for
Po after 3-DZA treatment is significantly less
than the Po of control channels.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
3-DZA blocks the action of aldosterone on
single channel activity. This figure summarizes the effect of
aldosterone and 3-DZA on the NPo of EnaC. The
effect of aldosterone addition to aldosterone-depleted cells was to
increase the NPo of individual sodium channels
from a very low level to a much higher level, and 3-DZA blocks the
effect of aldosterone. Paired dishes of A6 cells were serum- and
aldosterone-depleted (see "Materials and Methods") for 48 h
before one dish was treated with 300 µM 3-DZA for 4 h. Then 1.5 µM aldosterone was added to both dishes, and
sodium channel activity was sampled from both dishes by repeatedly
forming patches on cells selected at random from the dishes.
Pretreatment with 3-DZA of aldosterone-treated cells dramatically
decreased NPo from 2.88 ± 0.731 (mean ± S.D., n = 37) to 0.297 ± 0.185 (n = 49). These values contrast with the
NPo determined in cells treated with
aldosterone-free medium for 24 h of 0.117 ± 0.134 (n = 43).
|
|
3-DZA Probably Produces Little, If Any, Change in
N--
Unfortunately, although these data clearly suggest that 3-DZA
decreases sodium channel Po, a concomitant
effect on the channel density could not be completely ruled out. In
controls, the mean number of channels (N) in patches showing
detectable channel activity (37 patches) was 7.13 ± 1.70, with
Po = 0.408 ± 0.0619. On the other hand, as
mentioned above, the large decrease in mean Po we frequently observed after incubation with 3-DZA or in
aldosterone-free medium made the detection of temporally overlapping
openings difficult, thus reducing the accuracy of our determination of
N. In fact, only 23 out of 43 experiments performed after
removal of aldosterone and 36 out of 49 after 3-DZA treatment had
channel activity with a Po large enough to
determine N accurately for the recording period available
(see Kemendy et al. (37) for a discussion). Thus, although
there may be an apparent decrease in N after 3-DZA treatment
or aldosterone removal, we cannot state with any significant statistical confidence (p > 0.1 for all conditions)
that there is actually any change in N. Therefore, there
might have been a small decrease in the mean N per patch
after 3-DZA treatment or aldosterone removal (with a corresponding
decrease in the mean Po) but one that we cannot
verify statistically.
3-DZA Does Not Alter the Current-Voltage Relationship--
Fig.
3 shows the current-voltage (I-V)
relationship for sodium channels from cell-attached patches, obtained
by measuring the single channel current amplitudes at various applied
pipette potentials. We assumed that Vp values from
70 to +70 mV should cover the physiological range of membrane
potentials. The potentials shown in the figure are the displacement of
the cellular potential from the resting potential with respect to the
potential of the patch pipette (or Vp,
i.e. a positive potential is a cell depolarization). The
shapes of the I-V curves obtained from untreated (circles)
and 3-DZA-pretreated cells (3-5 h, squares) were
statistically indistinguishable. They were also consistent with I-V
curves previously obtained for highly selective sodium channels in A6
and mammalian distal nephron cells (1, 38, 41, 47). Examination of the
single channel current amplitudes shows a small increase in unit
current in the presence of 3-DZA (from 0.35 to 0.40 pA, at
V = 0 mV). This is consistent with a small (about 15 mV) hyperpolarization of the apical membrane, expected if the apical
sodium permeability is decreased by 3-DZA. The single channel
conductance with no applied potential (i.e. the resting
potential) is 4 pS under both conditions. 3-DZA does not
significantly alter the rectification properties, ion selectivity, or
unit conductance of apical sodium channels.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Comparison of current-voltage relationships
in control or 3-DZA treated cell-attached patches.
Circles and squares, untreated and 3-DZA-treated
cells, respectively. Values are means from three experiments.
Potentials are the deviations of the cellular potential from the
resting potential with respect to the potential of the patch pipette
(i.e. a positive potential is a cell depolarization from the
resting potential).
|
|
Methyltransferase Inhibitors Reduce Transepithelial Sodium Current
and Block Aldosterone-induced Increases in Transepithelial Sodium
Current--
If 3-DZA reduces the NPo of
individual ENaC channels, then total transepithelial sodium current
should also be reduced. Fig. 4C shows that 3-DZA at all
concentrations tested reduces transepithelial current. Since 3-DZA does
not reduce NPo to zero it is not surprising that
it also does not reduce current at any concentration as much as 10 µM amiloride. Fig. 4, A and B,
shows that a general inhibitor of methyltransferases, 300 µM 3-DZA, and a more specific inhibitor of
isoprenylcysteine methyltransferases, 100 µM FTS, both
inhibit the aldosterone-induced increases in sodium current with little or no effect on basal current in the absence of aldosterone.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Methyltransferase inhibitors block
aldosterone-induced increases in transepithelial current. The
isoprenylcysteine methyltransferase-specific inhibitor FTS and the more
general methyltransferase inhibitor 3-DZA both inhibit
aldosterone-induced increases in transepithelial current but produce
little if any change in basal current (A and B).
In each panel, four groups of cells in three separate experiments were
used as follows: one group treated with aldosterone-free medium
( aldosterone); a second treated with aldosterone-free
media containing 100 µM FTS or 300 µM 3-DZA
( aldosterone + FTS or aldosterone + DZA); a
third treated with 0.1 µM aldosterone medium
(+aldosterone); and a fourth treated with FTS or DZA plus
0.1 µM aldosterone (+aldosterone + FTS or
+aldosterone + DZA). Only application of aldosterone
produces a significant change in current. Current in treated monolayers
are not significantly different from levels of untreated basal
currents. C, 3-DZA inhibits transepithelial current relative
to control. 3-DZA at all concentrations tested reduced transepithelial
current. 3-DZA does not reduce current as much as 10 µM
amiloride.
|
|
The Methyl Donor, S-Adenosyl-L-methionine, Activates
ENaC in Excised Patches--
Results obtained after 3-DZA incubation
demonstrate that inhibition of the cellular methylation reactions
reduces ENaC activity in A6 cells. However, based only on these
"cell-attached" experiments performed after long incubation times,
it is impossible to decide whether the crucial methylation step
involves the channel protein itself or other cellular components
unrelated to the apical membrane such as histone methylation that might
affect protein transcription. This point can be clarified by examining
ENaC activity in excised patches whose internal surface has been
exposed to the methyl donor, AdoMet, provided that the putative
methyltransferase responsible for the channel methylation is
membrane-associated. In both controls and AdoMet-treated patches, 1 mM ATP was always present, on the assumption that some of
the processes necessary to maintain sodium channel activity might
require an energy source. After obtaining a high resistance seal on an
A6 cell, the recording chamber was rapidly filled with a high potassium
and low calcium solution (see "Materials and Methods"). The patch
was then excised, moved well away from the cell surface, and its
behavior observed for at least 10 min, at Vp = 0 mV.
The entire excision process never took more than 1 min.
A rapid spontaneous decrease in ENaC activity is very common in excised
patches from a variety of epithelial cells including A6 cells (47),
strongly suggesting that some diffusible intracellular factor must be
present to maintain channel activity. Indeed, in 73% of our controls
we could not observe any channel opening more than 2 min after
excision. Fig. 5A shows an
example of channel activity typical of patches shortly after excision
before activity decreases. In this case, it was possible to observe
channel activity after excision for only about 5 min. This is in very
good agreement with previous work, in which less than 25% of the
control excised patches showed long lasting activity (47).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
AdoMet increases the activity of ENaC
channels. A shows an example of channel activity
typical of patches shortly after excision before activity decreases. In
contrast, B shows an example of typical channel activity
after excision in 100 µM AdoMet with the amplitude
histogram for channel activity after excision. In this particular case
the calculated channel Po was 0.12. Inward
currents are downward deflections. Records are filtered at 100 Hz and
held at a constant Vp = 0 mV. The high potassium
bath solution contained 1 mM ATP in addition to the
AdoMet.
|
|
In contrast, when excised in the presence of AdoMet, patch activity
lasted at least 5 min and in 8 out of 10 experiments activity lasted at
least 8 min. An example of typical channel activity after excision in
AdoMet is shown in Fig. 5B with the amplitude histogram for
channel activity after excision. In this particular case the channel
activity remained stable for about 10 min, with no modification of
current amplitude; the calculated Po was
0.12.
The small decrease in the single channel current amplitude after
excision is consistent with the change in transmembrane potential across the patch (about 40 mV before excision, the intracellular apical potential, versus 0 mV after excision, closer to the
sodium equilibrium potential). As in the case of 3-DZA experiments, the single channel conductance is also about 4 pS, consistent with the
properties of typical apical sodium channels in A6 cells.
Activity of untreated and AdoMet-treated excised patches with time
after excision are summarized in Fig. 6.
Ten consecutive 1-min windows in which Po was
calculated for every excised AdoMet-treated patch and the values for
each window were averaged (10 experiments) and plotted for comparison
with the control values of Po measured and
averaged in the same way (11 experiments). It is clear that the
presence of AdoMet significantly prolonged the sodium channel activity,
which remained fairly stable for at least 3-4 min. With AdoMet, the
mean Po during the first 4 min after excision
was 0.202 ± 0.06, comparable to the value of
Po between 0.25 and 0.5 which we routinely
measure in cell-attached patches from cells in the presence of
aldosterone but otherwise untreated (37). After the initial stable
period, the channel activity progressively decreased until
Po for AdoMet-treated patches was
indistinguishable from control values about 7-10 min after excision.
In AdoMet-treated cells, the mean Po measured
2-4 min after excision was 0.167 ± 0.056, significantly
different from the corresponding control value (0.049 ± 0.0097).
The low level of activity remaining, in both AdoMet and control
patches, even after 6-7 min of recording is due to a small number of
patches (about 20-25% of the total) whose activity did not decrease
(47).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Summary of changes in ENaC
NPo with time after patch excision into
different media. Ten consecutive 1-min windows in which
Po was calculated for each excised patch treated
with different substances (11 untreated patches, 10 in AdoMet
(SAM), 5 in AdoMet plus methyltransferase
(Mtase), and 12 in AdoMet plus GTP) and the values for each
window are averaged and plotted for comparison with the control values
of Po measured and averaged in the same way.
AdoMet maintained sodium channel activity longer than untreated excised
patches. In AdoMet-treated cells, the mean Po
measured 2-4 min after excision was 0.167 ± 0.056, significantly
different from the corresponding control value (0.049 ± 0.0097).
The low level of activity remaining, in both AdoMet and control
patches, even after 6-7 min of recording is due to a small number of
patches (about 20-25% of the total) whose activity did not decrease.
Exogenous methyltransferase does not increase the effects of AdoMet on
excised patches. We performed excised patch experiments in the presence
of both 300 µM AdoMet and 2 µg of partially purified A6
methyltransferase in a volume of about 400 µl. The addition of the
enzyme did not affect the decrease in channel activity in a
statistically significant way. In contrast, guanosine trisphosphate
substantially increases ENaC activity in the presence of AdoMet. We
examined the activity of single sodium channels in excised patches in
the presence of 1 mM ATP, 200 µM GTP, and 300 µM AdoMet. In the presence of GTP, channel activity was
significantly increased with respect to controls even 8-10 min after
excision when the mean Po was 0.546 ± 0.0199 in the presence of GTP and significantly different
(p < 0.01) from the corresponding values for control
(0.0705 ± 0.00478) and AdoMet-treated (0.0980 ± 0.0169)
patches.
|
|
Exogenous Methyltransferase Does Not Increase the Effects of AdoMet
on Excised Patches--
If A6 cell sodium channels are activated by a
methyl donor like AdoMet, some methyltransferase must be present and
tonically active to allow this reaction. It is actually known that at
least one cellular methyltransferases is membrane-associated (27, 48),
so it seems possible that some methyltransferase might still be present
in our patches even after excision. We nonetheless wondered whether
under our conditions the membrane concentration of the enzyme was
sufficient to obtain a maximum effect on channels and whether the
decrease in channel activity could be further delayed by a saturating
presence of exogenous methyltransferase enzyme. We thus performed
excised patch experiments in the presence of both 300 µM
AdoMet and 2 µg of partially purified methyltransferase (30, 48) in a
volume of about 400 µl. As shown in Fig. 6, the addition of the
enzyme did not affect the loss of channel activity in a statistically
significant way.
Guanosine Trisphosphate Substantially Increases ENaC Activity in
the Presence of AdoMet--
If the G-protein-like 95-kDa subunit of
the A6 cell sodium channel complex is really the target for
transmethylation reactions (46, 49, 50) and remembering that many
methylation reactions are GTP-stimulated (27), we would expect GTP
analogues to influence the activity of sodium channels in the presence
of AdoMet. We therefore examined the activity of single sodium channels
in excised patches in the presence of 1 mM ATP, 200 µM GTP, and 300 µM AdoMet. Fig. 6 shows the
time course of this activity compared with activity in controls and
AdoMet-treated patches. In contrast to the results obtained with AdoMet
alone, in the presence of GTP, channel activity was significantly
increased with respect to controls even 8-10 min after excision when
the mean Po was 0.546 ± 0.0199 in the presence of GTP and significantly different (p < 0.01)
from the corresponding values for control (0.0705 ± 0.00478) and
AdoMet-treated (0.0980 ± 0.0169) patches. Furthermore, the number
of channels per patch and Po were close to those
normally found in cell-attached patches from A6 cells grown in the
presence of aldosterone. In particular, by considering the period with
maximum activity in the presence of GTP (2nd to 5th min), N
was 3.0 ± 0.60 and Po was 0.720 ± 0.0111. These values are comparable to values previously reported by us
for typical channels in untreated cell-attached patches where
N = 2.2 ± 0.80 and Po = 0.41 ± 0.08 (40). Thus, the addition of GTP with AdoMet and ATP
maintains typical physiological activity of sodium channels in
inside-out patches for relatively long periods.
S-Adenosyl-L-methionine and GTP Reduce the Rate of
Decrease of ENaC Activity in Excised Patches--
In the channels we
examined, the onset of a decrease in activity was clearly delayed in
the presence of AdoMet or AdoMet plus GTP. We wondered whether the
effect of these agents was due to a direct effect on the process that
produces a loss of activity, i.e. changing the rate of
decrease, or whether AdoMet affected some other process and did not
effect the rate of decrease once it had started. The exponential time
course of the decrease in ENaC activity in excised patches as seen in
Fig. 6 can be expressed by Equation 3,
|
(Eq. 3)
|
where A is a constant corresponding to the
Po value at some defined beginning time;
t is the time after the beginning time, and is the time
constant of the exponential decrease. We fit Eq. 3 to the data in Fig.
6 to obtain time constants for the decrease in sodium transport. The
time constants for untreated and AdoMet-treated patches are similar
( = 2.28 ± 0.336 min in controls and 3.16 ± 0.283 min in AdoMet); however, the time constant in AdoMet plus GTP is, as
expected, much larger (18.5 ± 4.80 min). The implication appears
to be that AdoMet and, especially, AdoMet plus GTP reduce the rate at
which ENaC loses activity in excised patches.
S-Adenosylmethionine Increases ENaC Mean Open Time--
It seemed
clear from Fig. 5 that one effect of AdoMet was to increase the mean
open time above that observed in excised patches. To examine this
question more carefully, we combined event information from at least
five patches (more than a thousand events for each condition) with a
single channel (no evidence for a second current level) for each
condition, plotted interval histograms with logarithmic bin sizes, and
determined mean open and closed times from the interval histograms.
Such histograms are shown in Fig. 7. The interval histograms were fit with a single exponential function (although in cell-attached patches there was some evidence of a small
contribution of a second class of short duration open and closed
events). The mean open and closed times and calculated Po are given in Table
I and are summarized in Fig.
8. Patch excision appears to strongly
destabilize the open state and nominally stabilize the closed state of
the channel, and AdoMet and AdoMet plus GTP appear to return the
channel to a state similar to cell-attached patches.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
S-Adenosylmethionine increases
ENaC mean open time. Event information from at least five patches
(more than a thousand events for each condition) with a single channel
(no evidence for a second current level) for each condition was pooled,
and interval histograms with logarithmic bin sizes were generated. On
the right are typical single channel records under each
condition, and on the left are the interval histograms. The
single channel records are from patches containing one active channel
held at Vp = 0 mV and filtered at 100 Hz. The
interval histograms were fit with a single exponential function
(although in cell-attached patches there was some evidence of a small
contribution of a second class of short duration open and closed
events). The mean open and closed times and calculated
Po are given in Table I and summarized in Fig.
8.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Mean durations and calculated Po for sodium channels under
various conditions
Mean open times for all treatments were significantly different from
one another (p < 0.05) except for patches excised into
intracellular saline for aldosterone-treated and aldosterone-depleted
cells (rows 2 and 5). Mean closed times for all other treatments
were significantly different (p < 0.05) from the
closed times in patches excised into saline alone (aldosterone-treated
or aldosterone-depleted). The open probabilities of all treatments were
significantly different except that the open probabilities of
aldosterone-depleted cells (rows 5 and 6) were not different
from the open probability of patches from aldosterone-treated cells
excised into saline (row 2).
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
AdoMet plus GTP increases the open
probability of sodium channels from aldosterone-depleted cells but not
as much as aldosterone-replete cells. Patches were formed and
channels recorded from cells depleted of aldosterone for 48 h and
from cells treated with 1.5 µM aldosterone. Channels from
aldosterone-free cells have a very short mean open time that is not
significantly different than that of channels in untreated excised
patches. When patches from the same cells were excised into 0.1 mM AdoMet (SAM) and 0.2 mM GTP on
the cytosolic surface, the open probability and mean open time of the
channel of the channel increased but to a value significantly less than
that of channels in patches on aldosterone-treated cells. AdoMet + GTP
appeared to restore the mean closed time regardless of whether the
cells had been treated with aldosterone. Asterisks and
brackets indicate a significant difference between
treatments (p < 0.05).
|
|
AdoMet Plus GTP Increases the Open Probability of Sodium Channels
from Aldosterone-depleted Cells but Not as Much as Aldosterone-replete
Cells--
If aldosterone stimulation of channel activity only
involves an essential transmethylation of the sodium channel, itself, or a closely associated membrane regulatory component, then addition of
AdoMet plus GTP to the inner surface of excised patches should mimic
the action of aldosterone (albeit more quickly since there is no
required gene expression). Fig. 8 and Table I show that this is only
partially true. Excised patches from cells depleted of aldosterone for
48 h have a very short mean open time as we have previously
described, and the mean open time is not much different than that of
channels in untreated excised patches. However, when the same patch was
treated with 0.1 mM AdoMet and 0.2 mM GTP on
the cytosolic surface, the open probability and mean open time of the
channel increased but to a value less than that of channels in
patches on aldosterone-replete cells. The implication is that there
must be some aldosterone-induced elements that are critical to maintain
channel activity, and therefore, methylation is not the only required
event in the activation of channels by aldosterone.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Apical Sodium Channels Are Activated When Methylation Is Stimulated
in A6 Cells--
Sariban-Sohraby et al. (23) showed that
methylation increases sodium uptake into membrane vesicles isolated
from the apical surface of cultured A6 cells. Furthermore, Wiesmann
et al. (45) demonstrated that aldosterone stimulates
phospholipid methylation and protein carboxymethylation in cultured
epithelial cell line TB-6c. In this case, 3-DZA inhibition of
methyltransferases was correlated with inhibition of short circuit
current response to aldosterone. We have shown (51) and Blazer-Yost
et al. (52) have also shown that Na+ transport
is attenuated by inhibitors of the protein methyltransferase that
modifies C-terminal isoprenylcysteine. These observations pointed to a
membrane effect of methylating agents linked to renal sodium transport.
We thus tried to verify whether the putative methylation effect on
sodium transport was accompanied by a modification of the properties of
individual apical sodium channels. We observed that 3-DZA did reduce
Po and mean open time in a manner reminiscent of
aldosterone removal (but faster). We also showed that AdoMet applied to
the cytosolic surface of excised patches prolongs the lifetime of
apical sodium channels. This information and data obtained from apical
vesicles (23) imply that the methylation reaction stimulating sodium
transport involves some membrane or membrane-associated target protein,
possibly sodium channel proteins themselves, rather than some
intracellular protein. Furthermore, data from excised patches indicate
that the methylation reaction affects the channel open probability,
even though a small effect on channel density cannot be completely
ruled out (since the Po after DZA treatment is
so low that the number of sodium channels per patch cannot be
accurately determined). Since, in the absence of AdoMet, channel
activity in excised patches is generally unstable, the methylation
reaction in A6 cells is probably easily reversible, in keeping with the
reversibility of methylation of other membrane proteins (48, 53, 54).
In addition, for ENaC expressed in lipid bilayers, methylation is
capable of activating sodium channels (30). This makes methylation a
credible candidate as a regulation mechanism controlling sodium
absorption in renal cells.
However, the sodium channels of all epithelial cells do not appear to
respond to AdoMet and GTP in the same way. Frindt and Palmer (55)
examined sodium channels in principal cells of rat cortical collecting
duct and could not stimulate sodium channel activity in whole cell
recordings in which AdoMet and GTP were included in the pipette
solution. We presume this means that there is little methyltransferase
associated with the apical membrane or that something about the whole
cell recording conditions alters methyltransferase activity, but it
could also mean that methylation is not a critical step in the
activation of channels by aldosterone. It would be interesting to
examine the effects of 3-DZA or FTS on the activity of single sodium
channels in this preparation.
Action of Exogenous Methyltransferase--
It is clear from Fig. 6
that the presence of supplementary methyltransferase does not slow the
decrease in activity compared with patches treated with AdoMet alone,
so that this decrease in activity does not seem to depend on
inactivation of methyltransferase in "inside-out" excised patches.
The small effect of methyltransferase addition in excised patches was
not too surprising to us, since some methyltransferases are
membrane-associated (56). It seems likely that, under our experimental
conditions (i.e. in the presence of aldosterone), there
already would be membrane-associated methyltransferases in the vicinity
of the channels in an excised patch. The AdoMet results imply that the
endogenous enzyme is usually sufficient to methylate either channels,
themselves, or other closely associated regulatory proteins in the
presence of the substrate. This observation is consistent with the
observation that no addition of enzyme is necessary to obtain in
vitro methylation of apical membrane vesicles (23). On the other
hand, our observations do contrast with those of Frindt and Palmer (55)
who, as mentioned above, could not see channel activation by methyl
donors in excised patches. It would be interesting to test if addition
of exogenous methyltransferase would activate sodium channels in rat
principal cells.
GTP Stimulation of Sodium Channel Activity in the Presence of
S-Adenosylmethionine--
Sariban-Sohraby et al. (46)
showed that aldosterone-induced membrane methylation targets a
90-95-kDa protein that has previously been suggested as a subunit of
the amiloride-sensitive Na+ channel complex. In those
experiments, methylation of the 95-kDa protein was stimulated by GTP
analogues. Consistent with that observation, we found that addition of
GTP increases the ability of AdoMet to stimulate channel activity in
excised patches. There are two interpretations of these data that are
not mutually exclusive. The first possibility is that the
methyltransferase associated with the apical membrane of A6 cells is
directly stimulated by GTP as other methyltransferases are (28,
56-63). The second possibility is that some ENaC regulatory protein
requires both methylation and GTP to be active (for example a small
G protein).
In previous work on membranes prepared from aldosterone-depleted A6
cells, GTP S was very effective in stimulating methylation whereas,
in membranes prepared from aldosterone-replete cells, GTP S
stimulated methylation poorly, if at all (46). The comparison with our
results has interesting implications. In aldosterone-depleted cells,
AdoMet does increase channel activity as expected from the results
observed in vesicles; on the other hand AdoMet does not increase the
activity to the level seen in aldosterone-treated cells. Moreover, in
aldosterone-treated cells, neither AdoMet alone nor AdoMet plus GTP
applied to the cytosolic surface of excised patches significantly
increased the open probability of sodium channels beyond that observed
in cell-attached patches. However, both treatments maintained the
activity of channels in excised patches. These results seem to imply
that the aldosterone-induced methyl ester that increases sodium channel
activity is stable in a normal cellular (or vesicular) environment but
that, in excised patches, the ester rapidly breaks down leaving
inactive channels in the patch. In the presence of substrates (GTP and
AdoMet) that promote formation of new methyl esters, channel lifetime
is significantly prolonged.
The Protein Target for Methylation--
To understand the role of
methylation in altering sodium channel activity, it is useful to
identify the protein targets for methylation. As mentioned above,
Sariban-Sohraby et al. (46) demonstrated that a 95-kDa
protein was methylated in the presence of aldosterone. Since this size
is consistent with the size of a glycosylated sodium channel subunit,
some investigators (49) have suggested that the target for methylation
is one of the sodium channel subunits. Indeed, in recent work, Rokaw
et al. (64) demonstrated methylation of the subunit of
sodium channels in A6 cells. In addition, ENaC appears to be
activated in lipid bilayers by methylation donors (like AdoMet) to
increase the open probability of sodium channels (at least ones treated
with dithiothreitol) (30). The difficulty with these experiments is
that the channels are reconstituted from oocyte proteins (which may
contain other proteins that are targets for methylation but which must
necessarily associate with ENaC), and methylation enzymes are found
in a total cell cytosolic lysate. Therefore, the oocyte lysate may contain many methyltransferases other than isoprenylcysteine
methyltransferase that could methylate ENaC or associated regulatory proteins.
However, methylation of proteins that controls activity of the protein
almost always occurs only at a very restrictive consensus sequence, the
so-called "CAAX" box (a cysteine residue followed by two
aliphatic residues, followed by any residue at the C-terminal end of
the protein). None of the ENaC sequences contain any cysteine residues
that meet the criteria for methylation. However, there are other
possible cellular targets for aldosterone-induced methylation of
proteins that regulate sodium channels, but based on the present work, the target for methylation, if it is not a channel subunit itself, must be a membrane-associated protein in close proximity to the channels.
Methylation and the Mechanism of Aldosterone Action--
The
experiments we report here paint an interesting picture of some of the
steps that lead from the induction of aldosterone-induced proteins to
an increase in sodium channel open probability. We have demonstrated at
a single channel level that methylation is essential for significant
channel activity and that aldosterone promotes methylation in A6 cells.
We have also demonstrated that the enzyme responsible for
aldosterone-induced methylation is membrane-associated and that it is
present both in the presence and absence of aldosterone.
Therefore, the methyltransferase is essential for the action of
aldosterone but is not an aldosterone-induced protein. In other recent
work (65), we have also demonstrated by direct biochemical
experiments that O-carboxymethyltransferase is not an
aldosterone-induced protein. However, methylation reactions are
required for normal sodium channel activity; therefore, methylation is
necessary but not sufficient to account for aldosterone-induced increases in ENaC activity.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Elizabeth E. Seal for maintaining the
cells in culture.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Department of Health and Human
Services Grant R01 DK37963 (to D. C. E.) and the Egelston Hospital Children's Research Center.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Performed a portion of this work to partially fulfill doctoral requirements.
**
To whom reprint requests should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology,
Emory University School of Medicine, 1648 Pierce Dr., N.E., Atlanta, GA 30322.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 27, 2000, DOI 10.1074.jbc.M000954200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ENaC, epithelial
sodium channel;
AdoMet, S-adenosyl-L-methionine;
AdoHcy, S-adenosylhomocysteine;
3-DZA, 3-deazaadenosine;
FTS, S-trans,trans-farnesylthiosalicylic acid;
GTP S, guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Palmer, L. G.,
and Frindt, G.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
2767-2770
|
| 2.
|
Blazer-Yost, B.,
Geheb, M.,
Preston, A.,
Handler, J.,
and Cox, M.
(1982)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
719,
158-161
|
| 3.
|
Chu, L. L. H.,
and Edelman, I. S.
(1972)
J. Membr. Biol.
10,
291-310
|
| 4.
|
Funder, J. W.,
Pearce, P. T.,
Smith, R.,
and Smith, A. I.
(1988)
Science
242,
583-585
|
| 5.
|
Geheb, M.,
Alvis, R.,
Owen, A.,
Hercker, E.,
and Cox, M.
(1984)
Biochemical J.
218,
221-228
|
| 6.
|
Horisberger, J.-D.,
and Rossier, B. C.
(1992)
Hypertension
19,
221-227
|
| 7.
|
Lahav, M.,
Dietz, T.,
and Edelman, I. S.
(1973)
Endocrinology
92,
1685-1699
|
| 8.
|
Lien, E. L.,
Goodman, D. B.,
and Rasmussen, H.
(1976)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
421,
210-217
|
| 9.
|
Szerlip, H.,
Palevsky, P.,
Cox, M.,
and Blazer-Yost, B. L.
(1991)
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.
2,
1108-1114
|
| 10.
|
Garty, H.,
and Edelman, I. S.
(1983)
J. Gen. Physiol.
81,
785-803
|
| 11.
|
Mintz, E.,
Thomas, S. R.,
and Mikulecky, D. C.
(1986)
J. Theor. Biol.
123,
21-34
|
| 12.
|
Stockand, J. D.,
Edinger, R. S.,
Al-Baldawi, N. F.,
Sariban-Sohraby, S.,
Al-Khalili, O. K.,
Eaton, D. C.,
and Johnson, J. P.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
26912-26916
|
| 13.
|
Kemendy, A. E.,
Kleyman, T. R.,
and Eaton, D. C.
(1992)
Am. J. Physiol.
263,
C825-C837
|
| 14.
|
Pacha, J.,
Frindt, G.,
Antonian, L.,
Silver, R. B.,
and Palmer, L. G.
(1993)
J. Gen. Physiol.
102,
25-42
|
| 15.
|
Baxendale, L. M.,
Duncan, R. L.,
and Helman, S. I.
(1987)
Fed. Proc.
46,
495
|
| 16.
|
Palmer, L. G.,
Li, J. H.,
Lindemann, B.,
and Edelman, I. S.
(1982)
J. Membr. Biol.
64,
91-102
|
| 17.
|
Middleton, P.,
Al-Khalili, O. K.,
Zuckerman, J. B.,
Rokaw, M. D.,
Johnson, J. P.,
and Eaton, D. C.
(1998)
FASEB J.
12,
982 (abstr.)
|
| 18.
|
Kleyman, T. R.,
Ernst, S. A.,
and Coupaye Gerard, B.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
266,
F506-F511
|
| 19.
|
Asher, C.,
Eren, R.,
Kahn, L.,
Yeger, O.,
and Garty, H.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
16061-16065
|
| 20.
|
Stockand, J. D.,
Edinger, R. S.,
Al-Baldawi, N. F.,
Wang, J. M.,
Johnson, J. P.,
and Eaton, D. C.
(1999)
FASEB J.
13,
A67-A67
|
| 21.
|
Stockand, J. D.,
Spier, B. J.,
Worrell, R. T.,
Yue, G.,
Al-Baldawi, N.,
and Eaton, D. C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
35449-35454
|
| 22.
|
Becchetti, A.,
Sariban-Sohraby, S.,
and Eaton, D. C.
(1994)
FASEB J.
8,
339
|
| 23.
|
Sariban-Sohraby, S.,
Burg, M.,
Wiesmann, W. P.,
Chiang, P. K.,
and Johnson, J. P.
(1984)
Science
225,
745-746
|
| 24.
|
Zimmerman, T. P.,
Wolberg, G.,
Duncan, G. S.,
and Elion, G. B.
(1980)
Biochemistry
19,
2252-2259
|
| 25.
|
Chiang, P. K.,
Gordon, R. K.,
Tal, J.,
Zeng, G. C.,
Doctor, B. P.,
Pardhasaradhi, K.,
and McCann, P. P.
(1996)
FASEB J.
10,
471-480
|
| 26.
|
Aswad, D. W.
(1989)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
1,
1182-1187
|
| 27.
|
Rando, R. R.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1300,
5-16
|
| 28.
|
Volker, C.,
and Stock, J. B.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
255,
65-82
|
| 29.
|
Marunaka, Y.,
and Eaton, D. C.
(1991)
Am. J. Physiol.
260,
C1071-C1084
|
| 30.
|
Ismailov, I. I.,
McDuffie, J. H.,
Sariban-Sohraby, S.,
Johnson, J. P.,
and Benos, D. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
22193-22197
|
| 31.
|
Yamane, H. K.,
and Fung, B. K.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
20100-20105
|
| 32.
|
Ghosh, S. K.,
Paik, W. K.,
and Kim, S.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
19024-19033
|
| 33.
|
Lobet, Y.,
Lhoest, J.,
and Colson, C.
(1989)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
997,
224-231
|
| 34.
|
Baxendale-Cox, L. M.,
Duncan, R. L.,
Liu, X.,
Baldwin, K.,
Els, W. J.,
and Helman, S. I.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
C1650-C1656
|
| 35.
|
Palmer, L. G.,
and Frindt, G.
(1988)
J. Gen. Physiol.
92,
121-138
|
| 36.
|
Colquhoun, D.,
and Sigworth, F. J.
(1983)
in
Fitting and Statistical Analysis of Single Channel Records
(Sakmann, B.
, and Neher, E., eds)
, pp. 191-263, Plenum Press, New York
|
| 37.
|
Kemendy, A. E.,
Kleyman, T. R.,
and Eaton, D. C.
(1992)
Am. J. Physiol.
263,
C825-C837
|
| 38.
|
Marunaka, Y.,
and Eaton, D. C.
(1991)
Am. J. Physiol.
260,
C1071-C1084
|
| 39.
|
Hamilton, K. L.,
and Eaton, D. C.
(1986)
Membr. Biochem.
6,
149-171
|
| 40.
|
Ling, B. N.,
Zuckerman, J. B.,
Lin, C.,
Harte, B. J.,
Mcnulty, K. A.,
Smith, P. R.,
Gomez, L. M.,
Worrell, R. T.,
Eaton, D. C.,
and Kleyman, T. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
594-600
|
| 41.
|
Ling, B. N.,
Hinton, C. F.,
and Eaton, D. C.
(1991)
Am. J. Physiol.
261,
F933-F944
|
| 42.
|
Eaton, D. C.,
Marunaka, Y.,
and Ling, B. N.
(1991)
in
Membrane Transport in Biology
(Schafer, J.
, and Giebisch, G. H., eds)
, pp. 73-165, Springer-Verlag, New York
|
| 43.
|
Garty, H.,
and Palmer, L. G.
(1997)
Physiol. Rev.
77,
359-396
|
| 44.
|
Kemendy, A. E.,
and Eaton, D. C.
(1989)
FASEB J.
3,
861 (abstr.)
|
| 45.
|
Wiesmann, W. P.,
Johnson, J. P.,
Miura, G. A.,
and Chaing, P. K.
(1985)
Am. J. Physiol.
248,
F43-F47
|
| 46.
|
Sariban-Sohraby, S.,
Fisher, R. S.,
and Abramow, M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
26613-26617
|
| 47.
|
Ohara, A.,
and Eaton, D. C.
(1991)
Biophys. J.
59,
648
|
| 48.
|
Xie, H.,
and Clarke, S.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
203,
1710-1715
|
| 49.
|
Sariban-Sohraby, S.,
and Fisher, R. S.
(1995)
Kidney Int.
48,
965-969
|
| 50.
|
Sariban-Sohraby, S.,
Mies, F.,
Abramow, M.,
and Fisher, R. S.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
268,
C557-C562
|
| 51.
|
Al-Baldawi, N. F.,
Stockand, J. D.,
and Eaton, D. C.
(1998)
FASEB J.
12,
421 (abstr.)
|
| 52.
|
Blazer-Yost, B. L.,
Hughes, C. L.,
and Nolan, P. L.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
272,
C1928-C1935
|
| 53.
|
Xie, H.,
and Clarke, S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1981-1984
|
| 54.
|
Chelsky, D.,
Ruskin, B.,
and Koshland, D. E., Jr.
(1985)
Biochemistry
24,
6651-6658
|
| 55.
|
Frindt, G.,
and Palmer, L. G.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
F1086-F1092
|
| 56.
|
Pillinger, M. H.,
Volker, C.,
Stock, J. B.,
Weissmann, G.,
and Philips, M. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1486-1492
|
| 57.
|
Backlund, P. S., Jr.,
and Aksamit, R. R.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
15864-15867
|
| 58.
|
Bilodeau, D.,
and Beliveau, R.
(1999)
Cell Signal.
11,
45-52
|
| 59.
|
Desrosiers, R. R.,
and Beliveau, R.
(1999)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
367,
333-340
|
| 60.
|
Gingras, D.,
and Beliveau, R.
(1992)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1136,
150-154
|
| 61.
|
Yoo, B. C.,
Kang, M. S.,
Kim, S.,
Lee, Y. S.,
Choi, S. Y.,
Ryu, C. K.,
Park, G. H.,
and Han, J. S.
(1998)
Exp. Mol. Med.
30,
227-234
|
| 62.
|
Clarke, S.,
Vogel, J. P.,
Deschenes, R. J.,
and Stock, J.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
4643-4647
|
| 63.
|
Philips, M. R.,
Pillinger, M. H.,
Staud, R.,
Volker, C.,
Rosenfeld, M. G.,
Weissmann, G.,
and Stock, J. B.
(1993)
Science
259,
977-980
|
| 64.
|
Rokaw, M. D.,
Wang, J.-M.,
Edinger, R. S.,
Weisz, O. A.,
Hui, D.,
Middleton, P.,
Shlyonsky, V.,
Berdiev, B. K.,
Ismailov, I. I.,
Eaton, D. C.,
Benos, D. J.,
and Johnson, J. P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
28746-28784
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Yu, M. N. Helms, Q. Yue, and D. C. Eaton
Single-channel analysis of functional epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) stability at the apical membrane of A6 distal kidney cells
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
November 1, 2008;
295(5):
F1519 - F1527.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. F. Bao, L. Liu, J. Self, B. J. Duke, R. Ueno, and D. C. Eaton
A synthetic prostone activates apical chloride channels in A6 epithelial cells
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
August 1, 2008;
295(2):
G234 - G251.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Maher, H. Ao, T. Banke, N. Nasser, N.-T. Wu, J. G. Breitenbucher, S. R. Chaplan, and A. D. Wickenden
Activation of TRPA1 by Farnesyl Thiosalicylic Acid
Mol. Pharmacol.,
April 1, 2008;
73(4):
1225 - 1234.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Yu, D. C. Eaton, and M. N. Helms
Effect of divalent heavy metals on epithelial Na+ channels in A6 cells
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
July 1, 2007;
293(1):
F236 - F244.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Edinger, J. Yospin, C. Perry, T. R. Kleyman, and J. P. Johnson
Regulation of Epithelial Na+ Channels (ENaC) by Methylation: A NOVEL METHYLTRANSFERASE STIMULATES ENaC ACTIVITY
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 7, 2006;
281(14):
9110 - 9117.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Mies, V. Shlyonsky, A. Goolaerts, and S. Sariban-Sohraby
Modulation of epithelial Na+ channel activity by long-chain n-3 fatty acids
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
October 1, 2004;
287(4):
F850 - F855.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Staruschenko, P. Patel, Q. Tong, J. L. Medina, and J. D. Stockand
Ras Activates the Epithelial Na+ Channel through Phosphoinositide 3-OH Kinase Signaling
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 3, 2004;
279(36):
37771 - 37778.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Becchetti, B. Malik, G. Yue, P. Duchatelle, O. Al-Khalili, T. R. Kleyman, and D. C. Eaton
Phosphatase inhibitors increase the open probability of ENaC in A6 cells
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
November 1, 2002;
283(5):
F1030 - F1045.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Stockand
New ideas about aldosterone signaling in epithelia
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
April 1, 2002;
282(4):
F559 - F576.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Stockand, S. Zeltwanger, H.-F. Bao, A. Becchetti, R. T. Worrell, and D. C. Eaton
S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase is necessary for aldosterone-induced activity of epithelial Na+ channels
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
September 1, 2001;
281(3):
C773 - C785.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. R. Kleyman, J. B. Zuckerman, P. Middleton, K. A. McNulty, B. Hu, X. Su, B. An, D. C. Eaton, and P. R. Smith
Cell surface expression and turnover of the alpha -subunit of the epithelial sodium channel
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
August 1, 2001;
281(2):
F213 - F221.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. F. Al-Baldawi, J. D. Stockand, O. K. Al-Khalili, G. Yue, and D. C. Eaton
Aldosterone induces Ras methylation in A6 epithelia
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
August 1, 2000;
279(2):
C429 - C439.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|