![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 22, 16574-16578, June 2, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
andFrom the Department of Immunology, The Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Received for publication, December 21, 1999, and in revised form, February 16, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Stat1 transcription factor plays a pivotal
role in both, the antiviral and antigrowth actions of interferons.
Stat1 acquires the ability to bind DNA by becoming phosphorylated on
Tyr701. However, to effectively stimulate gene
transcription, it must also be phosphorylated on Ser727. We
show that engagement of T cell antigen receptor (TCR)/CD3 complex in
either Jurkat cells or peripheral blood lymphocytes stimulates
phosphorylation of Ser727 but not Tyr701 of
Stat1. This process does not require the expression of tyrosine kinases
Lck and Zap-70. Interestingly, pretreatment of T cells with the Src
kinase inhibitor PP1 completely abrogated CD3-mediated serine
phosphorylation of Stat1, whereas inhibitors to MEK1 and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase had no effect. Phosphorylation of Ser727 of Stat1 in T cells is not restricted to TCR/CD3 but
also results when cells are stimulated via the costimulatory molecule
CD28. The combination of CD3 and CD28 did not augment phosphorylation of Stat1 Ser727. Surprisingly, Stat1-mediated
transcriptional activity in response to IFN- Engagement of the T cell receptor
(TCR)/CD31 activates
signaling pathways critical for T cell development and function (1, 2).
One of the earliest detectable events in this process is the rapid
activation of several protein-tyrosine kinases (PTKs) including Fyn,
Lck, and Zap-70 and protein-tyrosine phosphatase, CD45. Ultimately,
transcription factors become activated and initiate gene expression
critical for T cell activation and survival (1, 2).
Lck and Fyn are two critical cytoplasmic PTKs of the Src family
involved in T cell maturation. Both PTKs can partially substitute for
the activity of each other. Mice deficient in Lck show a profound block
in T cell development at the early double positive
CD4+/CD8+ stage (3), whereas mice deficient in
Fyn display minor aberration in T cell differentiation, yet their
single positive T cells show reduced proliferation in response to
mitogens (4). Interestingly, mice lacking both Lck and Fyn display a
complete block in T cell maturation at two stages:
CD4 Another key player in T cell maturation is Zap-70, a member of the
Syk/Zap-70 family of cytoplasmic PTKs (6). Disruption of the Zap-70
gene in mice leads to a block in T cell differentiation similar to
those detected in Lck-deficient mice (7). A subgroup of patients with
severe combined immunodeficiency lack expression of Zap-70, and their T
cells are refractory to T cell stimulation (8, 9).
Signal transducers and activators of transcription (Stat) become
activated in response to cytokines, growth factors, and osmotic stress
(10, 11). Upon stimulation, Janus family PTKs (Jaks) become activated
and tyrosine phosphorylate Stats. This allows Stats to dimerize through
Src homology 2 phosphotyrosine and translocate to the nucleus where
they are able to bind DNA and regulate gene transcription (10).
Ser727 is conserved in the transactivation domains of
Stat1, Stat3, and Stat4. This site contains a mitogen-activated protein
kinase (MAPK) recognition motif, PXn(S/T)P
(n = 1 or 2) that must be phosphorylated for Stats to
gain maximal transcriptional activity (12). Cytokine-induced tyrosine
phosphorylation of Stats can occur independently of serine
phosphorylation (13). The identity of the Stat serine kinase has
remained elusive. Both ERK2 and p38 MAPK have been shown to be
activated in response to IFNs, and dominant negative forms of these
proteins can inhibit transcriptional reporter activity of Stat1 (14,
15).
Stats also play a pivotal role in T cell function (16). T cells in mice
deficient in Stat4 and Stat6 are impaired in the development of Th1 and
Th2 responses, respectively (17, 18). Stimulation of T lymphoblasts via
their TCR receptor has been shown to induce serine but not tyrosine
phosphorylation of Stat3 (19). This process is mediated by MEK/ERK1/2
signaling pathways (19). In contrast, a different study showed that
stimulation of an allogen-specific CD4+ human T cell line
with anti-CD3 antibody or bacterial superantigen triggered both serine
and tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat3 with similar kinetics (20).
Furthermore, CD3 stimulation of murine T cells triggers tyrosine
phosphorylation of Stat5, a process mediated by the Src kinase Lck, and
this stimulation induces transient association of Stat5 with the TCR
(21). Here we show that signaling through the TCR/CD3 and CD28
costimulation induces serine but not tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat1
in Jurkat cells, a human T cell leukemia line. This observation can be
seen in nontransformed naive, primary human T cells. Phosphorylation of
Ser727 of Stat1 can be effectively blocked by the Src
kinase inhibitor PP1 in response to TCR/CD3 stimulation and occurs
independently of Lck and Zap-70 tyrosine kinases. Moreover, CD3
stimulation augments Stat1-dependent gene transcription in
response to IFN- Cells and Cell Culture--
The human leukemic T cell line
Jurkat, subclone E6, mutant lines derived from this clone,
Lck-deficient (J.Cam.1.6), (a gift from A. Weiss, UCSF, San Francisco,
CA) and Zap-70-deficient (P116) (a gift from R. Abraham, Duke
University, Durham, NC), were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented
with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Life Technologies, Inc.),
2 mM L-glutamine, penicillin (10 units/ml) and
streptomycin (10 µg/ml) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) were isolated from whole blood by
density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll-Hypaque (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) followed by removal of monocytes by plastic adherence at 37 °C.
Antibodies and Chemical Reagents--
Antiserum that
specifically recognizes the phosphorylated form of serine 727 of Stat1
was used at 1:10000 dilution (a generous gift of D. Frank, Dana-Farber
Cancer Institute, Boston, MA). Phosphospecific antibodies against
tyrosine 701 of Stat1 and active ERK1/2 were purchased from New England
Biolabs Inc. (Beverly, MA) and used at 1:2000 dilution. Monoclonal
antibodies to Stat1 and pan-ERK were obtained from Transduction
Laboratories (Lexington, KY) and used at 1:1000 dilution. Anti-CD3
monoclonal antibody OKT3 was from Ortho Biotech, Inc. (Raritan, NJ).
Anti-CD28 was purchased from Pharmingen (Palo Alto, CA). The inhibitors
H7, PD98059, U0126, PP1, SB203580, wortmannin, and LY294002 were
purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA).
Stimulation of Cells--
For TCR/CD3 stimulation, cells were
left untreated or incubated with 5 µg/ml anti-CD3 OKT3 antibody. For
CD28 stimulation, a final dilution of 1:200 dilution of CD28 antibody
was used. Cells were incubated for 10 min at 37 °C followed by
addition of 10 µg/ml of anti-mouse IgG (Sigma) at 37 °C for the
indicated times. In some experiments, cells were treated for 30 min at
37 °C prior to CD3 stimulation with MEK1-specific inhibitor PD98059 (50 µM), p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (10 µM), MEK1 inhibitor U0126 (10 µM),
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors LY294002 (10 µM), wortmannin (100 nM), serine/threonine
kinase inhibitor H7 (50 µM), or Src kinase inhibitor PPI
(10 µM). Cells were then washed once with cold
phosphate-buffered saline and lysed in a buffer containing 1% Triton
X-100, 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 mM
Immunoblot Analysis--
Proteins (30 µg of whole cell
extract) were separated on 8% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Membranes
were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies using concentrations
and conditions recommended by manufacturers. Immunoblots were developed
using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies
(Zymed Laboratories Inc., San Francisco, CA) and ECL
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Luciferase Assay--
Jurkat cells were transiently transfected
using Superfect Reagent (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA) with 2 µg of
3 × IRF-GAS luciferase reporter plasmid. To normalize for
luciferase activity and control for transfection efficiency, 0.5 µg
of pRL-TK (Promega, Madison, WI) was also included. After overnight
incubation at 37 °C, cells were left untreated or stimulated with
anti-CD3 OKT3 antibody as described above, IFN- Phosphorylation of Serine 727 of Stat1 Is Induced by TCR/CD3
Stimulation--
The participation of Stat transcription factors in
TCR signaling was unknown until it was discovered that Stat3 and Stat5 become activated in response to TCR/CD3 stimulation (19, 21). We set
out to examine whether TCR/CD3 stimulation may also lead to activation
of Stat1 in T cells because this transcription factor is critical in
the generation of antiviral and antibacterial responses as demonstrated
in mice deficient in Stat1 gene, suggesting a defect in T cell-mediated
immunity (22, 23). To address this, Jurkat cells were stimulated by
cross-linking with an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (OKT3), which mimics
TCR activation. Total cell extracts were prepared and proteins were
separated by SDS-PAGE. The serine phosphorylation status of Stat1 was
monitored by Western blot analysis using an antibody that specifically
recognizes Stat1 phosphorylated on Ser727. As shown in Fig.
1A, serine phosphorylated
Stat1 was detected as early as 15 min after CD3 stimulation of Jurkat
cells, and this form of Stat1 continued to be activated up to 1 h.
Reprobing the blots for Stat1 demonstrates that equal amounts of the
protein are present in all the samples (Fig. 1A, lower
panel). Despite the extensive use of Jurkat cells as a model to
study TCR signaling pathways, these cells are transformed and grow in
the absence of exogenous growth factors. We wanted to extend our
observations to a more physiological relevant T cell; therefore we
assayed PBLs from normal volunteers to determine whether Stat1 was
serine phosphorylated in response to CD3 stimulation. PBLs were
incubated for various times with anti-CD3, and whole cell extracts were analyzed for phosphorylation of Ser727 of Stat1 (Fig.
1B). Detection of phosphorylated Stat1 on Ser727
with similar kinetics as seen with Jurkat cells was observed as early
as 15 min, and the signal was sustained up to 1 h
post-stimulation. IFNs activate serine and tyrosine phosphorylation of
Stat1. We decided to examine whether the level of activation of serine
phosphorylation of Stat1 induced after CD3 stimulation was similar to
that of IFN stimulation. PBLs were stimulated with either CD3 antibody or IFN- CD3 Stimulation of T Cells Does Not Induce Tyrosine Phosphorylation
of Stat1--
Previous studies have shown that Stat3 becomes
phosphorylated on Ser727 after TCR stimulation. However,
there are conflicting data about whether tyrosine phosphorylation of
Stat3 occurs in T cells (19, 20). In light of this observation, we
decided to examine whether CD3 stimulation leads to tyrosine
phosphorylation of Stat1 in Jurkat cells by immunoblot analysis using
phosphospecific antibodies that recognize only the tyrosine
phosphorylated form of these proteins. As shown in Fig. 1D,
CD3-mediated T cell activation failed to induce tyrosine
phosphorylation of Stat1 over a course of 1 h. The lack of Stat1
tyrosine phosphorylation was not due to a defect in Stat activation in
these cells because treatment of Jurkat cells with IFN- CD28 Costimulation Triggers Stat1 Ser727
Phosphorylation--
CD28 is a molecule expressed on T cells that
provides a second signal to T cell activation when bound to its ligand,
B7/CD80 (24). B7/CD28 interactions lead to cytokine gene expression and
rescues T cells from entering an unresponsive state or anergy (25).
Because CD28 plays a pivotal role in T cell activation and is
intimately linked with activation through the TCR, we set out to
explore the possibility that stimulation through CD28 may also result
in the activation of Stat1. Stimulation of Jurkat cells with anti-CD28
antibody induced the phosphorylation of Ser727 Stat1 (Fig.
2A). The levels of phosphorylated Stat1 Ser727
were similar to those observed with CD3 stimulation. No increase in the
level of serine phosphorylation of Stat1 was observed by the
combination of CD3+CD28 stimulation (lanes 2 and
3 versus lane 4). The kinetics of
activation of Stat1 Ser727 phosphorylation were the same as
with CD3 stimulation (data not shown). This suggested that the
signaling machinery that leads to Stat1 activation in T cells through
TCR/CD3 or CD28 receptor stimulation may be shared. To show that
CD28-mediated Stat1 activation could also occur in primary T cells,
PBLs were activated by CD3, by CD28 stimulation, or by the combination
of both activators. Fig. 2B demonstrates that like Jurkat
cells, these activators also stimulate phosphorylation of Stat1
Ser727 in normal peripheral T cells. Again, signaling via
both CD3 and CD28 did not enhance phosphorylation of Ser727
of Stat1. Similar to the CD3 response, CD28 or the combination of CD3
and CD28 stimulation does not trigger tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat1
in Jurkat or in primary T cells (Fig. 2). Serine phosphorylation of
Stat3 was observed in response to CD28 costimulation with similar kinetics as those seen with Stat1 (data not shown).
Lck and Zap-70 Tyrosine Kinases Are Not Required in CD3-mediated
Phosphorylation of Stat1 Ser727--
Signaling cascades
regulated via the TCR require the expression and activation of Lck and
Zap-70 tyrosine kinases, which are critical in T cell differentiation
and function (3, 9). Recently, Lck has been shown to be required for
TCR-mediated activation of Stat5 (21). To examine further whether these
signaling molecules were required for TCR induced serine
phosphorylation of Stat1, we made use of variant Jurkat cell lines,
which lack expression of either Lck or Zap-70 (26, 27). Treatment of
either Lck- or Zap-70-deficient Jurkat cells with anti-CD3 antibody
stimulated phosphorylation of Stat1 Ser727 with similar
kinetics to those observed in parental cells (Fig. 3). These findings indicate that
phosphorylation of Stat1 Ser727 in response to CD3
stimulation occurs independently of Lck and Zap-70 kinases.
CD3-mediated Phosphorylation of Stat1 Ser727 Is
inhibited by Src Kinase Inhibitor PP1 and Is Independent from the
MEK/MAPK Pathway--
The fact that neither Lck nor Zap-70 are
required for TCR stimulated serine phosphorylation of Stat1 was
surprising. We therefore decided to explore what other kinases might be
implicated for this event. Pretreatment of either Jurkat cells or PBLs
with MEK inhibitors PD98059 and U0126 did not block the induction of
serine phosphorylation of Stat1 but effectively inhibited the
activation of ERK1/2 MAPK (Fig. 4). The
H7 serine/threonine kinase inhibitor used at 50 µM, a
concentration reported to effectively block serine phosphorylation of
Stats (28), did not affect TCR/CD3-mediated phosphorylation of Stat1
Ser727. The p38 MAPK-specific inhibitor SB203580 had no
effect in blocking activation of Stat1 Ser727 in Jurkat
cells and PBLs. Because phosphatidylinositol 3 (PI-3)-kinase is
important in T cell activation, we also evaluated the role of this
kinase in Stat1 serine phosphorylation. Again, both LY294002 and
wortmannin, potent inhibitors of PI-3 kinase, did not alter Stat1
serine phosphorylation in Jurkat cells (Fig. 4A). Similar responses were detected when primary T cells were evaluated or when
rapamycin, an inhibitor of p70S6K kinase was used (data not
shown). Surprisingly, the Src kinase inhibitor PP1, completely blocked
CD3-induced serine phosphorylation of Stat1 in both Jurkat and primary
T cells (Fig. 4). This was also accompanied by inhibition of ERK1/2
MAPK activation (Fig. 4, lower panels in both A
and B).
CD3 Stimulation of T cells Augments Stat1-dependent
Transcriptional Activity to IFN- In this study, we report that triggering of the antigen receptor
complex in T cells results in the phosphorylation of serine 727 but not
tyrosine 701 of Stat1. This activation differs in B cells, where
engagement of the B cell receptor induces both serine and tyrosine
phosphorylation of Stat1 (29). This finding indicates that the
transcription factor Stat1 is a component in TCR signal transduction.
The role that phosphorylated Ser727 Stat1 and Stat3 play in
T cell biology remains to be elucidated. It is widely accepted that
tyrosine phosphorylation of Stats allows these proteins to dimerize,
translocate to the nucleus, and bind DNA sequences found in promoters
of Stat target genes. Serine phosphorylation is required to augment the
transcriptional activity of Stats (12). A variety of activators such as
ultraviolet light irradiation, TNF The identity of the Stat1 serine kinase that mediates CD3/CD28
triggered phosphorylation of Stat1 is not clear. Pharmacological inhibitors PD98059 and SB203580, which block the activation of MEK1 and
p38 MAPK, respectively, fail to inhibit CD3-stimulated serine
phosphorylation of Stat1. In addition, the broad spectrum serine/threonine kinase inhibitor, H7, that has been reported to
inhibit serine phosphorylation of Stats is also without effect on
CD3-mediated phosphorylation of this protein. This is in contrast to
Stat3 phosphorylation on Ser727 in response to CD3
stimulation, which can be blocked by the MEK1 inhibitor, PD98059 (19).
The inability of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and p70S6K
kinase inhibitors (data not shown) to affect Stat1 phosphorylation of
Ser727 indicated that these proteins also were not involved
in Stat1 activation. All TCR-mediated signaling cascades require the
activity of one or several tyrosine kinases, including Lck and Zap-70. To address whether these PTKs were needed for the serine
phosphorylation of Stat1, we examined Jurkat cell variants that lack
expression of Lck or Zap-70. Triggering the TCR complex in these cells
did not alter the induction of Stat1 serine phosphorylation. By
contrast, the Src kinase inhibitor PP1 could effectively block
phosphorylation of Stat1 Ser727 and ERK1/2 activation. This
result demonstrates that neither Lck nor Zap-70 may be involved in
Stat1 activation. However, the fact that the Src kinase inhibitor PP1
did prevent serine phosphorylation of Stat1 suggests that another
tyrosine kinase in this family is involved in mediating this process.
One kinase that is well known to be required for TCR function is Fyn.
It is interesting that TCR activation of the tyrosine kinase Pyk2
requires Fyn but neither Lck nor Zap-70 (33). Pyk2 has also been
reported to be required for IFN-
was enhanced with CD3
stimulation, whereas CD3 alone had little effect. These findings
suggest that Stat1 is a signaling molecule in TCR signaling and may
play a role in T cell function.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/CD8
to
CD4+/CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+
to CD4+ and CD8+ (5).
. These results suggest that Stat1 is another
component in T cell signal transduction pathways.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-glycerophosphate. Lysates were vortexed and incubated on ice for 10 min, and insoluble material was cleared by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm
for 10 min at 4 °C.
or the combination
of anti-CD3 plus IFN-
for 6 h. Cell lysates were prepared, and
luciferase activity was measured with a Luminometer (Dynatech
Laboratories, Chantilly, VA) using the dual luciferase reporter system
according to the manufacturer (Promega).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
for 30 min. Serine phosphorylation of Stat1 in whole cell
extracts prepared from these cells was analyzed by immunoblot analysis.
As shown in Fig. 1C, CD3 stimulation induced phosphorylation of Ser727 of Stat1 with similar levels to those detected
with IFN-
treatment.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
CD3/TCR stimulation induces phosphorylation
of serine 727 in Stat1. Jurkat cells (A) and PBLs
(B) were left untreated or stimulated with 5 µg/ml of
anti-CD3 (OKT3) antibody and then incubated with 10 µg/ml of rabbit
anti-mouse IgG for the indicated times. Proteins were separated by
SDS-PAGE and probed with anti-phosphoserine Stat1 antibody (upper
panels). C, same as in B except PBLs were
stimulated with 1000 units/ml of IFN-
. D, same as in
A except the membrane was probed with anti-phosphotyrosine
Stat1 antibody. Immunoblots were reprobed with anti-Stat1 antibody to
verify for equal loading of protein (lower panels).
induced
tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat1 (Fig. 1D). Similar results
were obtained when normal PBLs were analyzed (Fig.
2B). This suggests that
activation of the TCR complex only stimulates serine phosphorylation of
Stat1.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
CD28 costimulation induces serine
phosphorylation of Stat1. Jurkat cells (A) and PBLs
(B) were left untreated or stimulated with anti-CD3,
anti-CD28, or anti-CD3 + anti-CD28 antibodies followed by cross-linking
with anti-mouse IgG for 30 min, and cell lysates were prepared.
Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with
anti-phosphoserine Ser727 or anti-phosphotyrosine
Tyr701 Stat1 antibodies. Membranes were reprobed with
anti-Stat1 antibody to verify for equal loading of protein (lower
panels).

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Lck and Zap-70 tyrosine kinases are not
required for TCR-mediated serine phosphorylation of Stat1.
Lck-deficient Jurkat (A) and Zap-70-deficient Jurkat cells
(B) were left untreated or stimulated with anti-CD3 (OKT3)
antibody followed by incubation with rabbit anti-mouse IgG for the
indicated times, and cell lysates were prepared. Proteins were
separated by SDS-PAGE and probed with anti-phosphoserine Stat1 antibody
(upper panels). Immunoblots were reprobed with anti-Stat1
antibody to verify for equal loading of protein (lower
panels).

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
The Src kinase inhibitor PP1 abrogates
TCR-mediated serine phosphorylation of Stat1. A, Jurkat
cells were pretreated for 30 min with PD98059 (50 µM),
U0126 (10 µM), H7 (50 µM), PP1 (10 µM), SB203580 (10 µM), Ly294002 (10 µM), or wortmannin (100 nM) followed by CD3
stimulation for 30 min. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and
immunoblot analysis was performed with anti-phosphoserine Stat1
antibody. Membranes were then reprobed with anti-Stat1 antibody to
verify for equal loading of proteins (middle panel).
Activation of MAPK was also analyzed in the same samples by using a
phospho-specific antibody that recognizes ERK1/ERK2 when dually
phosphorylated (lower panels). B, the same as
A except primary PBLs were used for the analysis.
DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.
--
To understand the possible
significance of CD3-mediated phosphorylation of Ser727 of
Stat1 in T cells, we wanted to determine whether CD3 stimulation of T
cells would have an effect on Stat1-dependent
transcriptional responses induced by IFN-
. To address this
possibility, Jurkat cells were transiently transfected with an IRF-GAS
luciferase reporter, and cell lysates were prepared after 6 h of
stimulation with anti-CD3 antibody, IFN-
, or the combination of
anti-CD3 plus IFN-
(Fig. 5).
Incubation of cells with anti-CD3 induced a 2 ± 0.5-fold increase
in reporter activity compared with untreated cells. IFN-
treatment
of cells stimulated the IRF-GAS luciferase reporter 11.8 ± 0.3-fold using 100 units/ml of cytokine or 20.9 ± 2-fold in cells
incubated with 1000 units/ml. Interestingly, CD3 stimulation of these
cells in the presence of IFN-
significantly enhanced the level of
transcriptional activity. For instance, compare 20.9 ± 2-fold
induction, with IFN-
(1000 units/ml) alone versus
50.7 ± 2.3 with IFN-
plus anti-CD3. These findings indicate that IFN-
and CD3 signals synergize to augment
Stat-dependent gene transcription.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
CD3 stimulation synergizes with
IFN-
to augment Stat1-mediated gene
transcription. Jurkat cells were transiently transfected with the
Stat-dependent 3× IRF-GAS luciferase reporter. Cells were
left untreated or stimulated with anti-CD3, different doses of IFN-
,
or a combination of anti-CD3 and IFN-
for 6 h and harvested for
determination of firefly luciferase activity in cell extracts. Values
were normalized against Renilla luciferase activity and
shown as fold induction with respect to untreated samples. This is a
representative experiment of two that were performed. Results are shown
as means ± S.D. of duplicate samples.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, and LPS can trigger Stat1
phosphorylation on Ser727 in the absence of tyrosine
phosphorylation (30, 31). Serine 727 of Stat1 also appears to play a
critical role in the constitutive expression of Stat1 target genes such
as members of the caspase family of proteins as well as in the
protection of TNF
-mediated induction of apoptosis (32). Our data
indicate that TCR signals can synergize with IFN-
to increase
Stat-dependent transcriptional response. A similar
observation has been made in monocytes where pretreatment with LPS
resulted in an enhanced transcriptional activity in response to IFN-
(30). In such a study, it was postulated that tyrosine phosphorylated
Stat1 may be a better substrate for a Stat1 serine kinase. We can
speculate that a similar mechanism may also occur with signals derived
from IFN-
and CD3 stimulation in T cells. It is thus likely that
CD3-mediated serine phosphorylation of Stat1 might modulate one or
several of the biological outcomes in T cells.
-stimulated serine phosphorylation
of Stat1 (34). One might speculate that TCR-stimulated Fyn activity
allows for the activation of Pyk2 followed by activation of a MAPK
member responsible for serine phosphorylation of Stat1. Experiments are in progress to test this hypothesis. The fact that Stat1 can be selectively serine phosphorylated through engagement of the TCR provides another potential physiological role for this transcription factor. Relating this event to T cell-mediated responses and/or clonal
selection will allow for further understanding of the pleotropic actions of Stat1 through a variety of tyrosine kinase-regulated signaling events.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants CA77741 and CA77736 (to A. C. L.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Recipient of a National Research Service Award from the National
Institutes of Health.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Immunology, Lerner Research Inst., NB-30, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195. Tel.: 216-445-9045; Fax: 216-444-8372; E-mail: larnera@ccf.org.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 23, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M910149199
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: TCR, T cell receptor; Stat, signal transducers and activators of transcription; PBL, peripheral blood lymphocyte; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK, MAPK/Erk kinase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; IFN, interferon; PTK, protein-tyrosine kinase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Weiss, A., and Littman, D. R. (1994) Cell 76, 263-274 |
| 2. | van Leeuwen, J. E. M., and Samelson, L. (1999) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11, 242-248 |
| 3. | Molina, T. J., Kishihara, K., Siderovski, D. P., van Ewijk, W., Narendran, A., Timms, E., Wakeman, A., Paige, C. J., Hartmann, K.-U., Veillette, A., Davidson, D., and Mak, T. W. (1992) Nature 357, 161-164 |
| 4. | Stein, P. L., Lee, H.-M., Rich, S., and Soriano, P. (1992) Cell 70, 741-750 |
| 5. | van Oers, N. S., Lowin-Kropf, B., Finlay, D., Connolly, K., and Weiss, A. (1996) Immunity 5, 429-436 |
| 6. | Chan, A. C., van Oers, N. S., Tran, A., Turka, L., Law, C. L., Ryan, J. C., Clark, E. A., and Weiss, A. (1994) J. Immunol. 152, 4758-4766 |
| 7. | Negishi, I., Motoyama, N., Nakayama, K.-I., Nakayama, K., Senju, S., Hatakeyama, S., Zhang, Q., Chan, A. C., and Loh, D. Y. (1995) Nature 376, 435-438 |
| 8. | Arpaia, E., Shahar, M., Dadi, H., Cohen, A., and Roifman, C. M. (1994) Cell 76, 947-958 |
| 9. | Elder, M. E., Lin, D., Clever, J., Chan, A. C., Hope, T. J., Weiss, A., and Parslow, T. G. (1994) Science 264, 1596-1599 |
| 10. | Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1997) Science 277, 1630-1635 |
| 11. | Gatsios, P., Terstegen, L., Schliess, F., Haussinger, D., Kerr, I. M., Heinrich, P. C., and Graeve, L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22962-22968 |
| 12. | Wen, Z., Zhong, Z., and Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1995) Cell 82, 241-250 |
| 13. | Zhu, X., Wen, Z., Xu, L. Z., and Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 6618-6623 |
| 14. | David, M., Petricoin, E. F., III, Benjamin, C., Pine, R., Weber, M. J., and Larner, A. C. (1995) Science 269, 1721-1723 |
| 15. | Goh, K. C., Haque, S. J., and Williams, B. R. G. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 5601-5608 |
| 16. | O'Shea, J. J. (1997) Immunity 7, 1-11 |
| 17. | Thierfelder, W. E., van Deursen, J. M., Yamamoto, K., Tripp, R. A., Sarawar, S. R., Carson, R. T., Sangster, M. Y., Vignali, D. A. A., Doherty, P. C., Grosveld, G. C., and Ihle, J. N. (1996) Nature 382, 171-174 |
| 18. | Kaplan, M. H., Sun, Y.-L., Hoey, T., and Grusby, M. J. (1996) Nature 32, 174-177 |
| 19. | Ng, J., and Cantrell, D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24542-24549 |
| 20. | Gerwien, J., Nielsen, M., Labuda, T., Nissen, M. H., Svejgaard, A., Geisler, C., Ropke, C., and Odum, N. (1999) J. Immunol. 163, 1742-1745 |
| 21. | Welte, T., Leitenberg, D., Dittel, B. N., al-Ramadi, B. K., Xie, B., Chin, Y. E., Janeway, C. A., Jr., Bothwell, A. L. M., Bottomly, K., and Fu, X.-Y. (1999) Science 283, 222-225 |
| 22. | Durbin, J. E., Hackenmiller, R., Simon, M. C., and Levy, D. E. (1996) Cell 84, 443-450 |
| 23. | Rodig, S. J., Meraz, M. A., White, J. M., Lampe, P. A., Riley, J. K., Arthur, C. D., King, K. L., Sheehan, K. C. F., Yin, L., Pennica, D., Johnson, E. M., Jr., and Schreiber, R. D. (1998) Cell 93, 373-383 |
| 24. | Thompson, C. B., Lindsten, T., Ledbetter, H. A., Kunkel, S. L., Young, H. A., Emerson, S. G., Leiden, J. M., and June, C. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U. S. A. 86, 1333-1337 |
| 25. | Greenfield, E. A., Nguyen, K. A., and Kuchroo, V. K. (1998) Crit. Rev. Immunol. 18, 389-418 |
| 26. | Straus, D. B., and Weiss, A. (1992) Cell 70, 585-593 |
| 27. | Williams, B. L., Schreiber, K. L., Zhang, W., Wange, R., Samelson, L. E., and Abraham, R. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 1388-1399 |
| 28. | Frank, D. A., Mahajan, S., and Ritz, J. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 100, 3140-3148 |
| 29. | Su, L., Rickert, R. C., and David, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 31770-31774 |
| 30. | Kovarik, P., Stoiber, D., Novy, M., and Decker, T. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 3660-3668 |
| 31. | Kovarik, P., Stoiber, D., Eyers, P. A., Menghini, R., Neininger, A., Gaestel, M., Cohen, P., and Decker, T. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 13956-13961 |
| 32. | Kumar, A., Commane, M., Flickinger, T. W., Horvath, C. M., and Stark, G. R. (1997) Science 278, 1630-1632 |
| 33. | Qian, D., Lev, S., van Oers, N. S. C., Dikic, I., Schlessinger, J., and Weiss, A. (1997) J. Exp. Med. 185, 1253-1259 |
| 34. | Takaoka, A., Tanaka, N., Mitani, Y., Miyazaki, T., Fujii, H., Sato, M., Kovarik, P., Decker, T., Schlessinger, J., and Taniguchi, T. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 2480-2488 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Gamero, R. Potla, J. Wegrzyn, M. Szelag, A. E. Edling, K. Shimoda, D. C. Link, J. Dulak, D. P. Baker, Y. Tanabe, et al. Activation of Tyk2 and Stat3 Is Required for the Apoptotic Actions of Interferon-beta in Primary Pro-B Cells J. Biol. Chem., June 16, 2006; 281(24): 16238 - 16244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, Y.-Y. Cho, B. L. Petersen, F. Zhu, and Z. Dong Evidence of STAT1 phosphorylation modulated by MAPKs, MEK1 and MSK1 Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2004; 25(7): 1165 - 1175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang, M. G. Malabarba, Z. S. Nagy, and R. A. Kirken Interleukin 4 Regulates Phosphorylation of Serine 756 in the Transactivation Domain of Stat6: ROLES FOR MULTIPLE PHOSPHORYLATION SITES AND Stat6 FUNCTION J. Biol. Chem., June 11, 2004; 279(24): 25196 - 25203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kunigal, A. Kusch, N. Tkachuk, S. Tkachuk, U. Jerke, H. Haller, and I. Dumler Monocyte-expressed urokinase inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell growth by activating Stat1 Blood, December 15, 2003; 102(13): 4377 - 4383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Mazzarella, T. T. MacDonald, V. M Salvati, P. Mulligan, L. Pasquale, R. Stefanile, P. Lionetti, S. Auricchio, F. Pallone, R. Troncone, et al. Constitutive Activation of the Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription Pathway in Celiac Disease Lesions Am. J. Pathol., June 1, 2003; 162(6): 1845 - 1855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. S. Nagy, Y. Wang, R. A. Erwin-Cohen, J. Aradi, B. Monia, L. H. Wang, S. M. Stepkowski, H. Rui, and R. A. Kirken Interleukin-2 family cytokines stimulate phosphorylation of the Pro-Ser-Pro motif of Stat5 transcription factors in human T cells: resistance to suppression of multiple serine kinase pathways J. Leukoc. Biol., October 1, 2002; 72(4): 819 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Uddin, A. Sassano, D. K. Deb, A. Verma, B. Majchrzak, A. Rahman, A. B. Malik, E. N. Fish, and L. C. Platanias Protein Kinase C-delta (PKC-delta ) Is Activated by Type I Interferons and Mediates Phosphorylation of Stat1 on Serine 727 J. Biol. Chem., April 19, 2002; 277(17): 14408 - 14416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nguyen, C. V. Ramana, J. Bayes, and G. R. Stark Roles of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase in Interferon-gamma -dependent Phosphorylation of STAT1 on Serine 727 and Activation of Gene Expression J. Biol. Chem., August 31, 2001; 276(36): 33361 - 33368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |