|
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 22, 16879-16884, June 2, 2000
Regulation of Neuronal Cell Adhesion Molecule Expression by
NF- B*
Carol S.
Simpson and
Brian J.
Morris
From the Division of Neuroscience and Biomedical Systems, Institute
of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow,
Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom
Received for publication, July 14, 1999, and in revised form, February 9, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The neuronal cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) is a
key mediator of structural plasticity in the central nervous system,
but the mechanisms that control its expression are unknown. Equally,
although the transcription factor NF- B is present in the brain, few
NF- B-regulated genes relevant for central nervous system function
have been identified. We have previously demonstrated that NF- B is
activated in neuronal cultures treated with kainic acid or nitric
oxide. We show here that kainic acid or nitric oxide also increase the
levels of NCAM mRNA and protein in neurons and that this induction
of NCAM expression is sensitive to dexamethasone and to antisense, but
not missense, oligonucleotides designed to suppress NF- B synthesis.
Nitric oxide also stimulates protein binding to an NF- B site in the promoter of the NCAM gene. This indicates that NF- B, which has recently been implicated in synaptic plasticity and also in the etiology of neurodegenerative disease, plays a crucial role in the
activity-dependent regulation of NCAM gene expression. In addition, since both NCAM and NF- B are present in the post-synaptic density, this represents a route allowing direct communication between
the synapse and the nucleus.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In all models of long-lasting synaptic plasticity, the later
phases are dependent on the synthesis of new proteins. This may at
least partially reflect the requirement for durable structural rearrangement of the synapses. Sprouting of new synaptic contacts is
associated with long term facilitation in Aplysia (1),
whereas an increase in dendritic spine density (2, 3) or alterations in
synaptic clustering (4) or spine architecture (5, 6) are observed in
the mammalian hippocampus during long term potentiation (LTP)1 or memory formation.
The effects on the dendritic spine reflect actions either on the spine
itself or on the post-synaptic density (psd), a specialized structure
within the dendritic spine that receives and transduces the
neurotransmitter signals from the presynaptic terminal. Although it is
likely that these structural changes are necessary to sustain long term
functional plasticity, there are few indications as to the cellular and
molecular mechanisms involved. One possibility is that nitric oxide
(NO) plays a central role. In many situations, NO release appears to be
necessary for the generation of LTP (7-10), whereas recent evidence
has suggested that NO can specifically modulate cytoarchitecture (11,
12).
The psd is composed of a functionally connected network of receptors,
channels, enzymes, and scaffolding proteins (13-15). One of the major
psd constituents, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent
protein kinase II (CamKII) (16), is known to play a major role in the
induction and maintenance of synaptic plasticity (17-22). The level of
expression of the subunit of CamKII is increased a few hours after
the induction of hippocampal LTP (23, 24), presumably to maintain the
heightened sensitivity. We have reported that exposure to NO increases
dendritic CamKII mRNA levels (25), an effect likely to be
mediated by post-transcriptional mechanisms acting on CamKII mRNA
present in the neuronal dendrites (26, 27). Thus glutamate receptors
and NO can enhance the synthesis of psd CamKII by acting locally in the dendrite.
The neuronal cell adhesion molecule NCAM is also present in the psd
(28, 29, 30). Recent evidence suggests that NCAM also plays an
important role in plasticity (31, 32). The maintenance of LTP (33, 34)
and learning behavior in the rat (35) and chicken (36) are reduced by
antibodies to NCAM. Similarly, inactivation of the NCAM gene in mice
results in deficits in spatial learning (37) and in attenuation of
hippocampal LTP (38). It has recently been discovered that, in an
analagous manner to CamKII, the levels of NCAM in dendritic spines and
psds are increased after LTP induction (29), suggesting that NCAM may
also be important for the sustained functional change. This hypothesis
is supported, in other models by evidence that NCAM levels are
increased after learning behaviors (39) by genetic evidence that the
Drosophila homologue of NCAM is involved in the regulation
of synaptic structure and function at the neuromuscular junction (40)
and by the modulation of the Aplysia homologue of NCAM
during synaptic plasticity (41).
The mechanisms involved in elevating NCAM expression are likely to be
different from the post-transcriptional regulation of CamKII
expression, since NCAM mRNA is not found in neuronal
dendrites.2 Increased
transcription of the NCAM gene is probably involved, since enhanced
activation of AMPA/kainate receptors, which facilitate the induction of
LTP and enhance learning, elevates the activity of the NCAM promoter
(42).
The molecular link between AMPA/kainate receptors and increased NCAM
gene transcription therefore becomes of major interest in understanding
how the properties of synapses and of the psd, in particular, can be
modulated by patterns of afferent activity. In the immune and vascular
systems, two nonneuronal homologues of NCAM, the intracellular adhesion
molecule (ICAM-1) and the vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1),
show increased expression when cells are exposed to cytokines or
lipopolysaccharide (LPS). In both the ICAM-1 gene and the VCAM-1 gene,
the promoter region contains an NF- B site upstream of the
transcription start site, and NF- B activation appears to be required
for gene induction (43-47). Inspection of the NCAM promoter reveals a
potential NF- B site in a similar position (48). There is evidence
linking activation of NF- B to neuronal plasticity (49), and
interestingly, NF- B has been detected in the psd in cortical and
hippocampal neurons (50), where the inactive form may be tethered to
the PDZ domains of the psd structural network (51). This location in
the psd would place NF- B in a unique position to carry
transcriptional signals from the synapses to the cell nucleus.
We have recently shown that kainic acid and also NO, which is released
in striatal cultures in response to AMPA/kainate receptor stimulation,
activate NF- B in striatal neurons (52). We therefore tested the
hypothesis that neuronal NF- B might be involved in NCAM induction
following kainate receptor stimulation or release of NO. If correct,
this would identify a novel pathway that links the psd to the nucleus
and acts to couple synaptic stimulation to morphological plasticity.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Primary Neuronal Culture and Drug Treatment--
Neuronal
cultures were prepared as described (53) and maintained in supplemented
serum-free medium. On day 12 drugs were added, and after 24 h the
cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 10 min.
Dexamethasone was added 3 h before drug treatment. When wells were
treated with antisense oligonucleotide or control (missense)
oligonucleotide, these agents were added 2 days before drug treatments.
Cells were plated at equal densities, and samples were treated
identically in every experiment. In addition, different treatments were
always performed in parallel so that relative staining intensities
could be monitored both between groups and also relative to
vehicle-treated wells.
Antisense Treatment--
Antisense oligonucleotides and controls
directed to NF- B p50 have been designed and manufactured by
Biognostik, Germany. The sequences were: antisense, atc ctg aaa ccc
cac; randomized mismatch control with same AT/GC ratio (missense), gtc
cct ata cga acg. Oligonucleotides were introduced into neurons
essentially according to published procedures (54).
Immunocytochemistry--
Immunocytochemistry was performed as
described previously (27) with antibodies against p50 and p65 (1:2000,
1:2000 dilution, respectively, Santa Cruz), neurofilament-200 (1:1000
dilution, Sigma), NCAM, integrin V, or Elk-1 (1:2000, 1:1000, 1:4000
dilutions, respectively, Santa Cruz). Staining was visualized using an
ABC peroxidase system (Vector Laboratories).
To check for linearity of staining intensity relative to protein
concentration, varying concentrations of NCAM antigen peptide (Santa
Cruz) were immobilized on polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and
detected as above. The staining intensity was found to be proportional
to the amount of peptide present over a range of 2 orders of magnitude,
spanning the staining intensities observed in cultured neurons in these
experiments (not shown).
In Situ Hybridization--
In situ hybridization was
performed at high stringency as described (27, 53) using an
35S-labeled oligonucleotide probe complementary to the
region of NCAM mRNA encoding amino acids 334-347.
Data Analysis--
Computerized image analysis was used either
to measure the intensity of immunocytochemical staining over individual
neurons (mean number of pixels/unit area) or the intensity of
autoradiographic signal following in situ hybridization
(pixel area occupied by silver grains/neuron) using Image NIH 1.52 software (W. Rasband, National Institutes of Health). For each drug
treatment, five measurements were taken from different fields of view,
and no less than four animals were used per treatment group. Each field of view represented between 50 and 100 neurons, but this small variation in number did not affect the measurements, which are assessed
over individual neurons. Pooled data were analyzed for significance
using ANOVA with post hoc Fisher's test for multiple pairwise comparisons (>2 groups) or Wilcoxon/Mann-Whitney
U test (2 groups).
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Analysis--
Male Harlan
Sprague-Dawley rats (200-250 g) received intraperitoneal injections of
2 mg/kg NOR3 (Calbiochem) or 1 ml/kg vehicle (saline). After 30 min,
the rats were killed by anesthetic overdose, and the striatum was
dissected out and homogenized. Similarly, cultured neurons were scraped
from the culture wells and homogenized. Nuclear extracts were prepared
according to standard procedures and incubated for 30 min with
radiolabeled NF- B binding site oligonucleotide (Promega) or an
oligonucleotide corresponding to bases 905-926 of the NCAM promoter
region. DNA-protein complexes were then resolved on 6% polyacrylamide
gels. To control for specificity of shifted bands, a 20-fold excess of
NF- B competitor oligonucleotide (Life Technologies, Inc.) was added
to the incubation in some cases.
Western Blotting--
Cultured neurons were scraped from the
culture wells, homogenized in radioimmune precipitation buffer (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals), and centrifuged. After a second centrifugation
step, proteins in the supernatant were denatured and run on 3-8%
polyacrylamide-Tris acetate gels with size markers (Santa Cruz). After
blotting onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, the proteins
under investigation were visualized using primary antisera as above and
alkaline phosphatase-conjugated 2nd antibodies, according to standard procedures.
 |
RESULTS |
Exposure of cultures of rat striatal neurons to the NO-releasing
agent S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP)
increased the levels of NCAM mRNA (Fig.
1, a and b). The NO
scavenger hemoglobin prevented SNAP from increasing NCAM mRNA
levels (Fig. 1, a and b). Similarly, increases in
immunoreactive NCAM (NCAM-ir) were detected after treatment with SNAP
(Fig. 1, c and d). In addition, exposure of
striatal neurons to LPS, which activates NF- B in cultured cells, and
kainic acid produced increases in NCAM-ir (Fig. 1, c and
d). These results demonstrate that the neuronal expression
of the NCAM gene is subject to regulation by neurohumoral factors.

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effect of SNAP, LPS, and kainate on NCAM
expression in cultured neurons. a, neurons were treated for
1 h with either vehicle (left panel), 200 µM SNAP (center panel), or 200 µM SNAP in the presence of 20 µM hemoglobin
(right panel) and processed for detection of NCAM mRNA.
Note the incresased density of autoradiographic silver grains over
counterstained cell bodies after SNAP treatment (center
panel), which is prevented by exposure to hemoglobin. Scale
bar represents 25 µm. b, neurons were treated for
1 h with vehicle, 200 µM SNAP, or 200 µM SNAP in the presence of 20 µM hemoglobin
(Hb) and processed for detection of NCAM mRNA. Results
are expressed as a percentage of the signal in vehicle-treated wells.
*p < 0.05 versus vehicle treatment. #,
p < 0.05 versus SNAP alone (Wilcoxon test
and Mann-Whitney U test). c, neurons were treated
for 24 h with either vehicle (Veh), 200 µM SNAP, 10 µg/ml LPS, or 50 µM kainate
(kain) and processed for detection of NCAM-ir. *,
p < 0.05 versus vehicle treatment (ANOVA
with post-hoc Fisher's test). d, neurons were treated for
24 h with either vehicle (left panel), 200 µM SNAP (center panel), or 50 µM
kainate (right panel) and processed for detection of
NCAM-ir. Note the increased cellular staining relative to vehicle
treatment in both cell bodies and dendrites after exposure to SNAP or
kainate. Scale bar represents 25 µm.
|
|
Compounds widely used to suppress NF- B activation in cell lines,
(dithiocarbamate, caffeic acid phenethyl ester, and curcumin), were
found to be neurotoxic on the neuronal cultures (not shown). However,
dexamethasone prevents the activation of the transcription factor
NF- B (55), and we observed that in the absence of any neurotoxic
effects, the increases in NCAM-ir protein levels caused by SNAP, LPS,
and kainic acid were blocked by pretreatment with dexamethasone, (Fig.
2, a and b).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
a, neurons were treated for 3 h
with vehicle or dexamethasone (Dex, 15 µM) and
then for a further 24 h with either vehicle (Veh), 200 µM SNAP, 10 µg/ml LPS, or 50 µM kainate
(Kain) and processed for detection of NCAM-ir. *,
p < 0.05 versus vehicle treatment. #,
p < 0.05 versus corresponding drug in the
absence of dexamethasone (ANOVA with post-hoc Fisher's test).
b, Western blot for detection of NCAM-ir. Cultured neurons
were treated for 24 h with either vehicle, 50 µM
kainate (K), or 50 µM kainate + 15 µM dexamethasone (K + dex). c,
electrophoretic mobility shift analysis showing protein binding to
potential NF- B site in the NCAM promoter. The oligonucleotide used
corresponds exactly to bases 905-926 of the NCAM promoter region.
Lane 1, no extract; lane 2, activated HeLa cells
(positive control); lane 3, in vivo vehicle (1 ml/kg intraperitoneal) treatment; lane 4, in vivo
NOR3 (2 mg/kg); lane 5, in vivo NOR3 + competitor; lane 6, in vitro NOR3 (300 nM antisense oligonucleotide pretreatment); lane
7, in vitro NOR3 (300 nM missense
oligonucleotide pretreatment). The arrow indicates the
position of the shifted band.
|
|
If NO release elevates NCAM expression via the transcription factor
NF- B, then it should be possible to detect protein binding to the
NF- B site in the NCAM promoter following exposure to NO. Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis demonstrated that the NO-releasing agent NOR3 increased protein binding both to a consensus NF- B site (52) and to the potential NF- B site in the NCAM promoter (48) (Fig. 2c).
To provide a direct test of the hypothesis that NO enhances NCAM
expression via NF- B, we utilized an antisense oligonucleotide designed to suppress the synthesis of the p50 subunit of rat NF- B. The utility of antisense oligonucleotides in primary neuronal cultures
is usually limited by problems with neurotoxicity due to the
oligonucleotides. However, we employed a polyethyleneimine carrier (54)
to aid cell penetration and reduce the concentrations required for
translational inhibition. Although, in our hands higher concentrations
of oligonucleotide (>500 nM) showed neurotoxic effects
(not shown), no toxic effects were observed at concentrations of 300 nM or below.
The uptake of oligonucleotide was assessed using a fluorescein-labeled
NF- B p50 oligonucleotide. A very high proportion of cultured
striatal neurons showed fluorescent labeling under the conditions used
(Fig. 3a). Pretreatment of
cultures for 2 days with an antisense oligonucleotide directed against
the mRNA encoding NF- B p50 resulted in a decrease in p50-ir of
more than 60% (Fig. 3, b-d). A missense oligonucleotide
with the same base composition had no significant effect on p50-ir
(Fig. 3. b-d). A smaller decrease in immunoreactivity for
the p65 subunit of NF- B (p65-ir) was detected using the p50
antisense oligonucleotide, although the missense oligonucleotide had no
effect (Fig. 3c).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
a, uptake of fluorescent antisense
oligonucelotide into cultured neurons. Cells were incubated with 300 nM oligonucleotide for 48 h. The scale bar
represents 30 µm. b, Western blot for detection of NF- B
p50-ir. Cultured neurons were treated for 48 h with either vehicle
(Veh), 300 nM missense oligonucleotide
(Mis), or 300 nM antisense oligonucleotide
(Anti). c and d, effect of antisense or missense
oligonucleotides on NF- B p50-ir or NF- B p65-ir in cultured
neurons. c, neurons were pretreated with oligonucleotides
(300 nM) for 48 h, as in b, and processed
for immunocytochemistry followed by quantitation of staining intensity.
*, p < 0.05 versus vehicle treatment. #,
p < 0.05 versus antisense treatment (ANOVA
with post-hoc Fisher's test). d, neurons were stained for
NF B p50-ir after 48 h of treatment with vehicle (left
panel), 300 nM antisense oligonucleotide (center
panel), or 300 nM missense olignucleotide (right
panel).
|
|
The gene encoding high molecular weight neurofilament (NF-H) is
apparently not regulated in association with synaptic plasticity, and
the promoter region of the NF-H gene does not contain any potential
NF- B sites (48). Therefore, to ensure that there were no nonspecific
effects on protein synthesis occurring, we studied the effect of
antisense or missense oligonucleotide treatment on the levels of
NF-H-ir. No significant changes in NF-H-ir could be detected with
either the antisense or missense oligonucleotides or with any of the
drugs used (Fig. 4b). We also
monitored the expression of the cell adhesion molecule integin V and
the transcription factor Elk1 to provide additional information of any
nonspecific effects of antisense oligonucleotide treatment. No changes
in the levels of integin V-ir or Elk1-ir were observed after
antisense oligonucleotide treatment (Fig. 4c).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of antisense (Anti)
or missense (Mis) oligonucleotides on iNOS-ir
(a), neurofilament H-ir (b), or
Elk1-ir and integrin V-ir, in cultured neurons
(c). Neurons were pretreated with vehicle or
oligonucleotides (300 nM) for 48 h before the addition
of either vehicle (Veh), 200 µM SNAP, 10 µg/ml LPS, or 50 µM kainate (Kain). *,
p < 0.05 versus corresponding vehicle
treatment. #, p < 0.05 versus corresponding
drug with vehicle pretreatment (ANOVA with post-hoc Fisher's
test).
|
|
To determine whether the degree of suppression of NF- B activity
following antisense oligonucleotide treartment is sufficient for a
functional blockade of NF- B activity, we studied the induction of
the inducible form of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Induction of the
iNOS gene by cytokine or LPS treatment occurs via activation of NF- B
binding to the promoter region (55, 56). When iNOS protein levels were
assessed using a specific iNOS antiserum, both kainate and LPS
treatment increased iNOS-ir (Fig. 4a). The increased iNOS-ir
protein levels were prevented by pretreatment with the NF- B p50
antisense oligonucleotide but not by pretreatment with the missense
oligonucleotide (Fig. 4a). Similar effects were observed
when NOS activity in the striatal cultures was monitored by
NADPH-diaphorase histochemistry (not shown).
The induction of NCAM-ir by SNAP, LPS, and kainate was completely
blocked by pretreatment with the NF- B p50 antisense oligonucleotide (Fig. 5, a and b)
but not affected by the missense oligonucleotide under identical
conditions.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of antisense or missense
oligonucleotides on NCAM-ir in cultured neurons. a,
neurons were pretreated with oligonucleotides (300 nM) for
48 h before the addition of either vehicle (Veh), 200 µM SNAP, 10 µg/ml LPS, or 50 µM kainate
(Kain) and then processed for immunocytochemistry, followed
by quantitation of the staining intensity. *, p < 0.05 versus corresponding vehicle treatment. #, p < 0.05 versus corresponding drug with vehicle pretreatment
(ANOVA with post-hoc Fishers test). b, Western blot for
detection of NCAM-ir. Cultured neurons were pretreated for 48 h
with either vehicle or with missense (Mis) or antisense
(Anti) oligonucleotides (300 nM) and for 24 h with vehicle or 50 µM kainate (K).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We demonstrate here that kainate, SNAP, and LPS are all able to
increase NCAM expression in striatal neurons. In each case the doses of
agents used were substantially below the doses that result in
neurotoxicity, suggesting that the effect on the NCAM gene is part of
the normal repertoire of plasticity-related responses. The lack of
toxicity is confirmed by the absence of any effect of SNAP, kainate, or
LPS on NF-H expression. In addition, this illustrates the specificity
of the actions of these agents for the NCAM gene, emphasizing that
there is not a generalized elevation in the expression of all cellular genes.
The level of immunocytochemical signal is unlikely to be directly
proportional to the amount of antigen in the tissue, considering the
various amplification steps involved in the detection procedure, and so
it is not possible to relate the magnitude of the change in NCAM-ir
detected to the magnitude of the increase in NCAM protein. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that even a small increase in NCAM
expression is thought to produce a dramatic functional change in cell
adhesion properties (57).
Dexamethasone attenuated the increased NCAM expression due to kainate
and SNAP treatment. Among other actions, dexamethasone acts to suppress
the transactivating potential of NF- B (55, 58, 59). This inhibition
of NCAM induction by dexamethasone is therefore consistent with the
hypothesis that NF- B is involved in the regulation of neuronal NCAM
expression. This also provides a likely explanation for the observation
that hippocampal NCAM levels and dendritic arborization are enhanced by
removal of endogenous glucocorticoids (60), where their absence would
remove any inhibition of NCAM expression mediated by this mechanism
in vivo. Furthermore, in view of the importance of NCAM
expression for learning and memory processes, our results provide a
framework to explain the well known suppressive effects of
glucocorticoids on acquisition and retrieval of memories (61, 62).
The antisense oligonucleotide directed against NF- B p50 decreased
immunostaining for p50 by more than 50%, whereas no significant suppression of staining was observed with an equivalent missense oligonucelotide. These results suggest that a sequence-specific suppression of neuronal NF- B p50 levels has been achieved via this
approach. The lack of any effect of the oligonucleotide treatments on
NF-H immunostaining provides evidence that there is no toxic effect of
the treatment and, equally, that there is no generalized, nonselective
suppression of protein synthesis within the neurons. Furthermore, the
lack of any effect of antisense treatment on the levels of integin
V-ir suggests that there are no generalized nonspecific effects on
cell adhesion molecule synthesis, whereas the lack of any effect of
antisense treatment on the levels of Elk1-ir confirms that there is no
generalized suppression of transcription factor synthesis and, hence,
that the treatment is likely to be selectively inhibiting translation
of NF- B p50.
Interestingly the levels of NF- B p65-ir were decreased by the p50
antisense treatment but not by the missense treatment. This is probably
a reflection of the fact that NF- B p50 homodimers or p50/p65
heterodimers participate in maintaining the basal levels of neuronal
expression of the p65 gene, since the p65 promoter contains a NF- B
site, and dexamethasone shows a greater inhibition of p65 activity
relative to p50 activity (52). In consequence, it can be concluded that
the antisense oligonucleotide produces a suppression of NF- B
activity by inhibiting the synthesis of both p50 and p65 subunits of
NF- B.
The major influence on expression of the iNOS gene in a variety of cell
types is known to be NF- B (55, 56, 63). We observe that in striatal
neurons, kainate and LPS both produced a clear induction of iNOS,
providing further evidence that these agents activate NF- B. This
induction of iNOS was not observed after antisense oligonucleotide
treatment, confirming that the antisense pretreatment produces a
functional blockade of NF- B activity.
The induction of NCAM-ir by SNAP, LPS, and kainate was completely
blocked by pretreatment with the NF- B p50 antisense oligonucleotide (Fig. 4b) but not affected by the missense oligonucleotide
under identical conditions. This confirms that the induction of NCAM expression is critically dependent on the activation of NF- B.
In occasional experiments the basal levels of NCAM-ir were reduced by
antisense treatment (Fig. 5b), perhaps reflecting a higher
level of endogenous synaptic activity in these cultures. Overall there
was no significant effect of antisense treatment on the basal levels of
NCAM-ir (Fig. 5a), implying that basal levels are not
maintained by the constitutive NF- B activity in neurons (64) but
rather that NF- B participates in activity-dependent regulation of NCAM expression. Basal levels of NCAM expression are
likely to be mainly sustained by other transcription factors. For
example, the homeobox-binding proteins have been shown to be important
for the developmental regulation of NCAM expression (65).
Activation and nuclear translocation of NF- B has been detected
following the induction of LTP in the hippocampus (49) during neuronal
development (66) and as part of the response to neuronal injury (67).
Whereas the activation of NF- B during injury is relatively easy to
reconcile with known NF- B target genes such as cyclooxygenase 2, until now it has not been clear what role NF- B might play in
physiological as opposed to pathological plasticity. Our results
suggest that one of the consequences of NF- B activation will be
increased expression of NCAM, which in turn is expected to lead to
plasticity in synaptic architecture and, particularly, to sprouting of
nerve terminals or dendritic processes (31, 32). The presence of NCAM
in the psd suggests that activity-associated rearrangement of the psd
(5) may involve this pathway. Interestingly, recent evidence suggests
that extracellular binding of NCAM will itself activate NF- B (69).
Since NF- B can be present presynaptically as well as
post-synaptically, this provides an elegant mechanism whereby
activity-stimulated NCAM induction (via NF- B) in the psd could then
activate presynaptic NF- B and, hence, cause a complementary increase
in presynaptic NCAM expression. Over a few hours, this would then
produce a reciprocal stabilization of the new synaptic structure.
It is worth noting that activated neuronal NF- B has been detected in
the immediate vicinity of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease
tissue (70), where there is also extensive aberrant axon terminal
sprouting. Furthermore, the cholinergic neurons of the basal forebrain,
which show particularly pronounced terminal sprouting during the course
of Alzheimer's disease (71, 72), are also prominent in terms of their
high levels of activated NF- B (73). In the light of a recent report
showing increased NCAM expression in the regions of abberant sprouting
(68), our results suggest that the novel NF- B-NCAM link reported
here contributes to the inappropriate terminal hypertrophy that is a
feature of the neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Dr. J. Quinn (University of
Edinburgh) for helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Wellcome Trust Grant 045837.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of
Neuroscience and Biomedical Systems, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, West Medical Bldg., University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ,
UK. Tel.: 44-141-330-5361; Fax: 44-141-330-5659; E-mail: B.Morris@biomed.gla.ac.uk.
2
B. J. Morris, unpublished information.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
LTP, long term
potentiation;
psd, post-synaptic density;
CamKII, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II;
NCAM, neuronal cell adhesion molecule;
LPS, lipopolysaccharide;
ANOVA, analysis of variance;
SNAP.
S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine, -ir,
immunoreactive;
NF-H, high molecular weight neurofilament;
iNOS, inducible form of nitric oxide synthase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bailey, C. H.,
Chen, M.,
Keller, F.,
and Kandel, E. R.
(1992)
Science
256,
645-649[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Desmond, N.,
and Levy, W.
(1986)
J. Comp. Neurol.
253,
476-482[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Moser, M.-B.,
Trommald, M.,
and Andersen, P.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
12673-12675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Rusakov, D. A.,
Davies, H. A.,
Harrison, E.,
Diana, G.,
Richter-Levin, G.,
Bliss, T. V. P.,
and Stewart, M. G.
(1997)
Neuroscience
80,
69-77[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Geinisman, Y.,
de Toledo-Morrell, L.,
and Morrell, F.
(1991)
Brain Res.
566,
77-88[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Buchs, P.-A.,
and Muller, D.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
8040-8045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Böhme, G. A.,
Bon, C.,
Stutzmann, J.-M.,
Doble, A.,
and Blanchard, J.-C.
(1991)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
199,
379-381[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
O'Dell, T. J.,
Hawkins, R. D.,
Kandel, E. R.,
and Arancio, O.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
11285-11289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Boulton, C. L.,
Southam, E.,
and Garthwaite, J.
(1995)
Neuroscience
69,
699-703[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Doyle, C.,
Hölscher, C.,
Rowan, M. J.,
and Anwyl, R.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
418-426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Greenstreet, E. H.,
and Djamgoz, M. B. A.
(1994)
Neuroreport
6,
109-112[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Inglis, F. M.,
Furia, F.,
Zuckerman, K. E.,
Strittmatter, S. M.,
and Kalb, R. G.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
10493-10501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Kornau, H. C.,
Schenker, L. T.,
Kennedy, M. B.,
and Seeburg, P. H.
(1995)
Science
269,
1737-1740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Kennedy, M. B.
(1997)
Trends Neurosci.
20,
264-267[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
O'Brien, R. J.,
Lau, L. F.,
and Huganir, R. L.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
8,
364-369[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
McNeill, R. B.,
and Colbran, R. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
10043-10049[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Lledo, P.-M.,
Hjelmstad, G. O.,
Mukherji, S.,
Soderling, T. R.,
Malenka, R. C.,
and Nicoll, R. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
11175-11179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Glazewski, S.,
Chen, C. M.,
Silva, A.,
and Fox, K.
(1996)
Science
272,
421-423[Abstract]
|
| 19.
|
Mayford, M.,
Bach, M. E.,
Huang, Y.-Y.,
Wang, L.,
Hawkins, R. D.,
and Kandel, E. R.
(1996)
Science
274,
1678-1683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Pettit, D. L.,
Perlman, S.,
and Malinow, R.
(1994)
Science
266,
1881-1885[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Strack, S.,
Barban, M. A.,
Wadzinski, B. E.,
and Colbran, R. J.
(1997)
J. Neurochem.
68,
2119-2128[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Strack, S.,
Choi, S.,
Lovinger, D. M.,
and Colbran, R. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13467-13470[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Roberts, L. A.,
Higgins, M. J.,
O'Shaughnessy, C. T.,
Stone, T. W.,
and Morris, B. J.
(1996)
Mol. Brain Res.
42,
123-127[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Thomas, K. L.,
Laroche, S.,
Errington, M. L.,
Bliss, T. V. P.,
and Hunt, S. P.
(1994)
Neuron
13,
737-745[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Johnston, H. M.,
and Morris, B. J.
(1995)
Mol. Brain Res.
31,
141-150[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Roberts, L. A.,
Large, C. H.,
Higgins, M. H.,
Stone, T. W.,
O'Shaughnessy, C. T.,
and Morris, B. J.
(1997)
Mol. Brain Res.
56,
38-44[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Morris, B. J.
(1997)
Eur. J. Neurosci.
9,
2334-2339[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Persohn, E.,
Pollerberg, G. E.,
and Schachner, M.
(1989)
J. Comp. Neurol.
288,
92-100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Schuster, T.,
Krug, M.,
Hassan, H.,
and Schachner, M.
(1998)
J. Neurobiol.
37,
359-372[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Difiglia, M.,
Marshall, P.,
Covault, J.,
and Yamamoto, M.
(1989)
J. Neurosci.
9,
4158-4168[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Schachner, M.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
627-634[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Fields, R. R.,
and Itoh, K.
(1996)
Trends Neurosci.
19,
473-480[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Luthi, A.,
Laurent, J. P.,
Figurov, A.,
Muller, D.,
and Schachner, M.
(1994)
Nature
372,
777-779[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Muller, D.,
Wang, C.,
Skibo, G.,
Toni, N.,
Cremer, H.,
Calaora, V.,
Rougon, G.,
and Kiss, J. Z.
(1996)
Neuron
17,
413-422[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Arami, S.,
Jucker, M.,
Schachner, M.,
and Welzl, H.
(1996)
Behav. Brain Sci.
81,
81-87
|
| 36.
|
Rose, S. P. R.
(1995)
Behav. Brain Sci.
66,
73-78
|
| 37.
|
Cremer, H.,
Lange, R.,
Christoph, A.,
Plomann, M.,
Vopper, G.,
Roes, J.,
Brown, R.,
Baldwin, S.,
Kraemer, P.,
Scheff, S.,
Barthels, D.,
Rajewsky, K.,
and Wille, W.
(1994)
Nature
367,
455-459[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Cremer, H.,
Chazal, G.,
Carleton, A.,
Goridis, C.,
Vincent, J.-D.,
and Lledo, P.-M.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
13242-13247[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Skibo, G. G.,
Davies, H. A.,
Rusakov, D. A.,
Stewart, M. G.,
and Schachner, M.
(1998)
Neuroscience
82,
1-5[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Schuster, C. M.,
Davis, G. W.,
Fetter, R. D.,
and Goodman, C. S.
(1996)
Neuron
17,
655-667[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Mayford, M.,
Barzilai, A.,
Keller, F.,
Schacher, S.,
and Kandel, E. R.
(1992)
Science
256,
638-644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Holst, B. D.,
Vanderklish, P. W.,
Krushel, L. A.,
Zhou, W.,
Langdon, R. B.,
McWhirter, J. R.,
Edelman, G. M.,
and Crossin, K. L.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
2597-2602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Autieri, M. V.,
Yue, T. L.,
Ferstein, G. Z.,
and Ohlstein, E.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
213,
827-836[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Khachigian, L. M.,
Collins, T.,
and Fries, J. W. U.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
206,
462-467[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Neish, A. S.,
Williams, A. J.,
Palmer, H. J.,
Whitley, M. Z.,
and Collins, T.
(1992)
J. Exp. Med.
176,
1583-1593[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Shu, H. B.,
Agranoff, A. B.,
Nabel, E. G.,
Leung, K.,
Duckett, C. S.,
Neish, A. S.,
Collins, T.,
and Nabel, G. J.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
6283-6289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Collins, T.,
Read, M. A.,
Neish, A. S.,
Whitley, M. Z.,
Thanos, D.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
899-909[Abstract]
|
| 48.
|
Quandt, K.,
Frech, K.,
Karas, H.,
Wingender, E.,
and Werner, T.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
4878-4884[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Meberg, P. J.,
Kinney, W. R.,
Valcourt, E. G.,
and Routtenberg, A.
(1996)
Mol. Brain Res.
38,
179-190[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Suzuki, T.,
Mitake, S.,
Okumura-Noji, K.,
Yang, J.-P.,
Fujii, T.,
and Okamoto, T.
(1997)
Neuroreport
8,
2931-2935[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Maekawa, K.,
Imagawa, N.,
Naito, A.,
Harada, S.,
Yoshie, O.,
and Takagi, S.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
337,
179-184
|
| 52.
|
Simpson, C. S.,
and Morris, B. J.
(1999)
J. Neurochem.
73,
353-361[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Morris, B. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24740-24744[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Boussif, O.,
Lezoualch, F.,
Zanta, M. A.,
Mergny, M. D.,
Scherman, D.,
Demeneix, B.,
and Behr, J. P.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
7297-7301[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Kleinert, H.,
Euchenhofer, C.,
IhrigBiedert, I.,
and Forstermann, U.
(1996)
Mol. Pharmacol.
49,
15-21[Abstract]
|
| 56.
|
Xie, Q.-W.,
Kashiwabara, Y.,
and Nathan, C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
4705-4708[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Kadmon, G.,
Kowitz, A.,
Altevogt, P.,
and Schachner, M.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
110,
209-218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
DeBosscher, K.,
Schmitz, M. L.,
VandenBerghe, W.,
Plaisance, S.,
Fiers, W.,
and Haegeman, G.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13504-13509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Wissink, S.,
vanHeerde, E. C.,
vanderBurg, B.,
and vanderSaag, P. T.
(1998)
Mol. Endocrinol.
12,
355-363[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 60.
|
Rodriguez, J. J.,
Montaron, M. F.,
Petry, K. G.,
Aurousseau, C.,
Marinelli, M.,
Premier, S.,
Rougon, G.,
Le Moal, M.,
and Abrous, D. N.
(1998)
Eur. J. Neurosci.
10,
2994-3006[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 61.
|
de Quervain, D.,
Roozendaal, B.,
and McGaugh, J. L.
(1998)
Nature
394,
787-790[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 62.
|
Kirschbaum, C.,
Wolf, O. T.,
May, M.,
Wippich, W.,
and Hellhammer, D. H.
(1996)
Life Sci.
58,
1475-1483[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 63.
|
Griscavage, J. M.,
Wilk, S.,
and Ignarro, L. J.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
3308-3312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 64.
|
Kaltschmidt, C.,
Kaltschmidt, B.,
Neumann, H.,
Wekerle, H.,
and Baeuerle, P. A.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
3981-3992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 65.
|
Holst, B. D.,
Jones, F. S.,
and Edelman, G. M.
(1995)
Mol. Biol. Cell
6,
573-573
|
| 66.
|
Guerrini, L.,
Molteni, A.,
Wirth, T.,
Kistler, B.,
and Blasi, F.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
6057-6063[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 67.
|
Perezotano, I.,
McMillian, N. K.,
Chen, J.,
Bing, G. Y.,
Hong, J. S.,
and Pennypacker, K. R.
(1996)
Glia
16,
306-315[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 68.
|
Mikkonen, M.,
Soininen, H.,
Tapiola, T.,
Alafuzoff, I.,
and Miettinen, R.
(1999)
Eur. J. Neurosci.
11,
1754-1764[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 69.
|
Krushel, L. A.,
Cunningham, B., A.,
Edelman, G. M.,
and Crossin, K. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2432-2439[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 70.
|
Kaltschmidt, B.,
Uherek, M.,
Volk, B.,
Baeuerle, P. A.,
and Kaltschmidt, C.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2642-2647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 71.
|
Gertz, H. J.,
Cervos-Navarro, J.,
and Ewald, V.
(1987)
Neurosci. Lett.
76,
228-232[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 72.
|
Geddes, J. W.,
Monaghan, D. T.,
Cotman, C. W.,
et al..
(1985)
Science
230,
1179-1181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 73.
|
Boissiere, F.,
Hunot, S.,
Faucheux, B.,
Duyckaerts, C.,
Hauw, J. J.,
Agid, Y.,
and Hirsch, E. C.
(1997)
Neuroreport
8,
2849-2852[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sarada, P. Himadri, C. Mishra, P. Geetali, M. S. Ram, and G. Ilavazhagan
Role of Oxidative Stress and NFkB in Hypoxia-Induced Pulmonary Edema
Experimental Biology and Medicine,
September 1, 2008;
233(9):
1088 - 1098.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Gutierrez, G. W. O'Keeffe, N. Gavalda, D. Gallagher, and A. M. Davies
Nuclear Factor {kappa}B Signaling Either Stimulates or Inhibits Neurite Growth Depending on the Phosphorylation Status of p65/RelA
J. Neurosci.,
August 13, 2008;
28(33):
8246 - 8256.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. J. Edenberg, X. Xuei, L. F. Wetherill, L. Bierut, K. Bucholz, D. M. Dick, V. Hesselbrock, S. Kuperman, B. Porjesz, M. A. Schuckit, et al.
Association of NFKB1, which encodes a subunit of the transcription factor NF-{kappa}B, with alcohol dependence
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
April 1, 2008;
17(7):
963 - 970.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. B. James, A.-M. Conway, and B. J. Morris
Regulation of the Neuronal Proteasome by Zif268 (Egr1)
J. Neurosci.,
February 1, 2006;
26(5):
1624 - 1634.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Gutierrez, V. A. Hale, X. Dolcet, and A. Davies
NF-{kappa}B signalling regulates the growth of neural processes in the developing PNS and CNS
Development,
April 1, 2005;
132(7):
1713 - 1726.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Rakhit, C. J. Clark, C. T. O'Shaughnessy, and B. J. Morris
N-Methyl-D-aspartate and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Induce Distinct Profiles of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase, Mitogen- and Stress-Activated Kinase, and Ribosomal S6 Kinase Phosphorylation in Cortical Neurons
Mol. Pharmacol.,
April 1, 2005;
67(4):
1158 - 1165.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. E. Ayala, H. Dai, M. Ittmann, R. Li, M. Powell, A. Frolov, T. M. Wheeler, T. C. Thompson, and D. Rowley
Growth and Survival Mechanisms Associated with Perineural Invasion in Prostate Cancer
Cancer Res.,
September 1, 2004;
64(17):
6082 - 6090.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|