|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M910303199 on March 23, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 22, 17086-17093, June 2, 2000
Purification of the Novel Endonuclease, Hpy188I, and
Cloning of Its Restriction-Modification Genes Reveal Evidence of Its
Horizontal Transfer to the Helicobacter pylori Genome*
Qing
Xu ,
Shawn
Stickel§,
Richard J.
Roberts§,
Martin J.
Blaser ¶, and
Richard D.
Morgan§
From the Department of Microbiology and Immunology,
¶ Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine,
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232 and § New England Biolabs, Inc.,
Beverly, Massachusetts 01915
Received for publication, December 22, 1999, and in revised form, February 25, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have isolated a novel restriction
endonuclease, Hpy188I, from Helicobacter pylori
strain J188. Hpy188I recognizes the unique sequence, TCNGA,
and cleaves the DNA between nucleotides N and G in its recognition
sequence to generate a one-base 3' overhang. Cloning and sequence
analysis of the Hpy188I modification gene in strain J188
reveal that hpy188IM has a 1299-base pair (bp) open reading
frame (ORF) encoding a 432-amino acid product. The predicted protein
sequence of M.Hpy188I contains conserved motifs typical of
aminomethyltransferases, and Western blotting indicates that it is
an N-6 adenine methyltransferase. Downstream of hpy188IM is
a 513-bp ORF encoding a 170-amino acid product, that has a 41-bp
overlap with hpy188IM. The predicted protein sequence from this ORF matches the amino acid sequence obtained from purified Hpy188I, indicating that it encodes the endonuclease. The
Hpy188I R-M genes are not present in either strain of
H. pylori that has been completely sequenced but are found
in two of 11 H. pylori strains tested. The significantly
lower G + C content of the Hpy188I R-M genes implies that
they have been introduced relatively recently during the evolution of
the H. pylori genome.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Restriction-modification systems were first recognized in
Escherichia coli more than four decades ago (1, 2) because of their role as enzymatic barriers against genomic invasion by phages.
The restriction endonuclease recognizes a specific sequence in DNA, and
cleaves the DNA, whereas the cognate methyltransferase modifies DNA at
the same recognition sequence, preventing cleavage by the endonuclease.
Based on subunit composition, co-factor requirements, DNA specificity
characteristics, and reaction products, R-M systems may be classified
as type I, type II, or type III (3). Type II R-M systems have the
simplest architecture, usually consisting of two separate enzymes, a
restriction endonuclease and a methyltransferase (3). They play an
indispensable role in the manipulation of recombinant DNA, and serve as
models for study of protein structures (4, 5), catalytic mechanisms (6,
7), and DNA-protein interactions (7-9).
Helicobacter pylori is one of few bacteria that can colonize
the human stomach (10, 11). The colonization increases the risk of
developing ulcer disease and gastric adenocarcinoma (12). Analysis of
the entire genomic sequence of H. pylori strain 26695 and
J99 predicted that these strains have 14 or 15 potential type II R-M
systems (13, 14). Comparison of the two strains demonstrated that the
genomes are quite similar, with only 6-7% strain-specific genes (14).
Diverse R-M systems comprise a large portion of the strain-specific
genes. Despite their potential importance in H. pylori, few
of these R-M systems have been described in detail. In this study, we
purified a novel restriction endonuclease Hpy188I with a new
specificity (TCNGA) from H. pylori strain J188, and further
cloned the genes of this R-M system. The M gene contains the conserved
motifs of aminomethyltransferases, but the R-gene is unique. The system
is present in some but not all H. pylori strains, and DNA
analysis suggests that it was acquired by horizontal transfer.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Bacterial Strains, Growth Conditions, and Reagents--
The
bacterial strains used in this study (Table
I) are from our laboratory collection and
were cultured as described (15). Restriction enzymes and T4 DNA ligase
were obtained from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). All columns used
for protein purification were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech
(Piscataway, NJ), unless otherwise indicated. Oligonucleotides used in
this study (Table II) were synthesized
either at New England Biolabs or at the Vanderbilt University Cancer
Center DNA Core Facility using a Milligen 7500 DNA synthesizer.
DNA Techniques--
Chromosomal and plasmid DNA were prepared as
described (16). PCR1 and DNA
sequencing were performed as described (15). Computer analyses of DNA
and protein sequences were performed with the GCG programs (17, 18) and
data base similarity searches were performed at the National Center for
Biotechnology Information using the BLASTX algorithm (19, 20).
Purification of Hpy188I--
H. pylori cells were
resuspended in ice-cold buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, pH 7.5), then
sonicated until ~50 mg of protein/g of cells was released. After
centrifugation, the supernatant was applied to a 20-ml heparin Hyper-D
column (Biosepra, Marlborough, MA). The column was washed with buffer A
containing 0.05 M NaCl, and eluted with a 200-ml linear
gradient of 0.05-1.0 M NaCl. Fractions were assayed for
endonuclease activity by incubation at 37 °C for 1 h in New
England Biolabs buffer 4 (50 mM KOAc, 20 mM
Tris-OAc, 10 mM Mg(OAc)2, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, pH 7.9), using 1 µg of DNA as substrate, and
further examined by electrophoresis. The fractions containing
Hpy188I activity were pooled, diluted, and applied to a Mono
S column, which was eluted with the same NaCl gradient as the first
column. After the endonuclease assay, peak fractions of
Hpy188I were pooled, diluted, and applied to a Poly-CAT A
column (Custom LC Inc., Houston, TX). This column was eluted with a
40-ml linear gradient of 0.05 to 0.6 M NaCl. Finally, the
enzyme-containing Poly-CAT A fractions were combined, diluted, and
passed through a Mono Q column onto a heparin-TSK column (Tosohaas,
Philadelphia, PA). The heparin-TSK column was eluted with a 0.05-0.6
M linear gradient of NaCl in 60 ml. Fractions containing
Hpy188I activity were collected. The yield of the purified
Hpy188I was ~1250 units/g of cells.
Amino Acid Sequencing of Hpy188I--
Hpy188I
activity among eluted fractions from the heparin-TSK column was titered
by serial dilution. One unit of Hpy188I was defined as the
activity needed to completely digest 1 µg of phage X174 DNA at
37 °C for 1 h in New England Biolabs buffer 4. About 300 units
of Hpy188I were subjected to SDS-PAGE, and the proteins visualized by silver-staining. Based on the Hpy188I activity
in these fractions and protein migration on the gel, a protein band was
predicted to correspond to Hpy188I. An SDS-polyacrylamide gel, loaded with ~3000 units of Hpy188I, was
electroblotted as described (21), and the membrane was stained with
Coomassie Blue. The predicted band was excised and subjected to
sequential degradation using an automated peptide sequencer (ABI model
470A, Perkin-Elmer Co., Foster City, CA).
Determination of Hpy188I Specificity--
pBR322, pUC19, and
X174 DNAs were digested into well defined fragments using
Hpy188I. Double digestion reactions also were performed in
the presence of Hpy188I and a second endonuclease having a
single recognition site in the substrate DNA (PstI and AlwNI for pUC19; ClaI, NdeI, and
PstI for pBR322; and PstI, NciI, and
StuI for X174), which permitted mapping of the location
of several Hpy188I cleavage sites in these DNAs. The sizes
of the DNA fragments produced by Hpy188I digestion of the
DNAs also were entered into the program SITES (22), which predicts
recognition sequences. The locations of these potential recognition
sequences were compared with the sites mapped by double endonuclease
digestions. Then, the fragments predicted by cleavage at the putative
recognition sites were compared with the observed restriction fragments
from Hpy188I cleavage of the DNAs.
A method involving cleavage of a primed synthesis reaction (23) was
used to determine the site of Hpy188I cleavage within the
recognition sequence. Two oligonucleotides, M13q1 and M13q2 (Table II),
located ~50 bp upstream and downstream of a recognition site at
position 1353 in M13mp18, were used to perform two sets of sequencing
reactions, using M13mp18 as template. Two extension reactions using the
same combination of primer and template were carried out simultaneously
in the absence of dideoxyribonucleotide terminators. The extended DNAs
each were then digested with Hpy188I. The
Hpy188I-digested DNAs were then subjected to electrophoresis through an 8% polyacrylamide gel in parallel with the two sets of
sequencing reactions, and the gel was analyzed following autoradiography.
Cloning of Hpy188I Restriction-Modification Genes--
The
methyltransferase selection method (24) was used to clone the
Hpy188I R-M system from H. pylori strain J188. To
construct the genomic library of strain J188, 10 µg of chromosomal
DNA was partially digested with Sau3AI, mixed with 1 µg of
BamHI-digested pUC19, and ligated with T4 DNA ligase. The
ligated DNA was transformed into E. coli ER2688, and
transformants selected on ampicillin LB plates. Plasmid DNA was
prepared from the ampicillin-resistant colonies, and digested with
purified Hpy188I to destroy the plasmids not expressing the
Hpy188I methyltransferase. The digested DNA was then
re-transformed into ER2688, and selected on ampicillin plates. Plasmid
DNA from ampillicin-resistant clones, confirmed to be
Hpy188I-resistant, was sequenced to obtain the sequence of
the M gene. These clones were also assayed for the presence of
restriction endonuclease activity. Positive clones were sequenced and
the gene for the Hpy188I endonuclease was identified by
comparison with the N-terminal amino acid sequence obtained from
purified Hpy188I.
Preparation of Antibodies--
Hapten-protein conjugates were
prepared by periodate oxidation of the methylated nucleosides as
described (25). Rabbits were immunized by injecting 500 µg of the
protein conjugate, in complete Freund's adjuvant, intradermally and
subcutaneously for the primary injections, and 250 µg in incomplete
adjuvant via the subcutaneous route for each boost. The first test
bleeds were taken 1 month after the initial injection and then at
3-week intervals.
Detection of Methylated DNA--
The presence of N-6 adenine or
N-4 cytosine methylated DNA was detected using Western blotting
analysis. M.Hpy188I-methylated and control DNAs were
denatured, serially diluted, spotted onto nitrocellulose membrane, and
UV cross-linked prior to immunoblot detection. Western blotting was
performed as described (26). In general, the antisera against N-6
methyladenine or N-4 methylcytosine were diluted 1:50,000- 1:500,000
and developed using an horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody.
 |
RESULTS |
Purification and Amino Acid Sequencing of Hpy188I from H. pylori
Strain J188--
A crude extract of H. pylori strain J188
cells (8 g) was applied to a heparin Hyper-D column, and eluted with a
linear NaCl gradient. A type II activity, designated
Hpy188I, was detected in eluted fractions between 0.3 and
0.38 M NaCl, which were pooled and applied to a Mono S
column. Hpy188I eluted between 0.26 and 0.3 M
NaCl from this column, and Hpy188I positive fractions were then applied to a Poly-Cat A column. After elution, Hpy188I
activity appeared in a broad peak between 0.3 and 0.38 M
NaCl, with a trace of a second endonuclease activity. To purify
Hpy188I further, positive fractions were passed through a
Mono Q column onto a heparin-TSK column, and the Hpy188I
activity eluted between 0.38 and 0.42 M NaCl from the
heparin-TSK column (Fig. 1, A
and B). Hpy188I activity among these final
fractions was titered on X174 DNA. In total, more than 10,000 units
of Hpy188I activity were present in fractions 39-46.
Fraction 42 had the highest endonuclease activity (8 units/µl),
followed by fraction 43 (4 units/µl) (Fig. 1B). SDS-PAGE
of the relevant fractions (Fig. 1C) revealed that a protein
band of ~21 kDa was present only in lanes of fractions 42 and 43, which had the highest enzyme activity, but not other lanes with less
activity. The density of this band in the lane 42 is higher
than that in the lane 43, which is consistent with the
presence of higher enzyme activity in fraction 42. The size of this
protein is in the range typical for type II endonucleases (3). Thus, we
predicted that it was Hpy188I. N-terminal sequencing on this
protein resulted in a sequence of 27 amino acids:
XKRKXDIILKSVDDLKDXIDXKDFXYK (X, not identified).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Purification and identification of
Hpy188I from H. pylori strain
J188. Panel A, the 280 nm profile of
Hpy188I-containing fractions eluted from a heparin-TSK
column. NaCl concentrations, A280 value, and
volumes of elution buffer are indicated separately. Panel B,
endonuclease assay of Hpy188I. The eluted fractions from the
heparin-TSK column (5 µl) were used to digest X174 DNA. The
products were resolved on a 1% agarose gel. Panel
C, SDS-PAGE (8% polyacrylamide gel with 4% stacking
gel) with silver staining of fractions containing Hpy188I
activity.
|
|
Determination of the Recognition Sequence and Cleavage Site of
Hpy188I--
To determine the recognition sequence, Hpy188I was used
to digest pUC19, pBR322, or X174 DNAs (data not shown). The patterns of the well defined fragments from Hpy188I-digested DNA were
analyzed, using the SITES program (22), which indicated that these
differed from those of all known endonucleases. The sizes of digested
fragments from each substrate DNA are consistent with cleavage at TCNGA symmetric sites. Mapping by digestion with additional endonucleases also predicted Hpy188I digestion to occur at TCNGA sites.
Thus, we concluded that Hpy188I is a novel endonuclease with
the specificity TCNGA.
To determine the cleavage site of Hpy188I within its
recognition sequence, the extension products, using M13q1 and M13q2 as primers, and M13mp18 as template, were digested by Hpy188I.
The digestion of the M13q1-extension product produced a band that migrated identically with the dideoxy termination product of the unspecified nucleotide in the recognition sequence, TCNGA (N is G in
this location) (Fig. 2), indicating
cleavage between the N and the G of the recognition sequence. Digestion
of the M13q2-extension product with Hpy188I produced a band
that also co-migrated with the unspecified nucleotide of the
Hpy188I recognition sequence TCNGA (in this case, the N is
the C on the opposite strand of DNA from the G in the M13q1 reaction)
(Fig. 2). This result confirms cleavage between the N and G of the
recognition sequence on this strand of DNA as well. Thus,
Hpy188I cuts DNA symmetrically between N and G in its
recognition site (TCN GA) on both DNA strands to produce a one-base
3'-extension.

View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Identification of the
Hpy188I cleavage site. M13mp18 DNA was used as
template for DNA extension reactions and DNA sequencing reactions, with
primers M13q1 and M13q2. The DNA extension products of M13q1 and M13q2
were digested with Hpy188I, then subjected to
electrophoresis on an 8% polyacrylamide gel (their lanes are marked q1
and q2, respectively) alongside standard sequencing reactions produced
with the same primer-template combination.
|
|
Cloning and Analysis of the Hpy188I Restriction-Modification
Genes--
We next sought to clone the Hpy188I R-M genes.
Digestion of plasmid DNA (2 µg) from a Sau3AI genomic
library of strain J188, and retransformation of the digested DNA back
into E. coli resulted in 44 ampicillin-resistant
transformants. Plasmids from 3 of the 44 clones (numbers 16, 42, and
60) were confirmed to be Hpy188I-resistant, while they
remained digestible by Sau3AI and HindIII (Fig.
3). Migration of the plasmid DNAs after
incubation with Hpy188I was slower than the uncut plasmid, a
shift that may be due to Hpy188I binding to DNA. The genomic
DNA inserts in these plasmids were 3-4 kb long. The Sau3AI
and HindIII digestion patterns of the plasmids were similar,
indicating that all inserts cloned in these plasmids were from the same
genomic locus, although their sizes were slightly different.

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Analysis of
Hpy188I-resistant clones. Digestion of plasmid
DNA from three clones (16, 44, and 60) from a Sau3AI genomic
library of strain J188, with Hpy188I, Sau3AI, and
HindIII, as indicated. The digested products were resolved
on a 1% agarose gel. M represents the
-HindIII/ X174-HaeIII DNA ladder.
|
|
DNA sequence analysis showed that plasmid p#16 carried an ~3.6-kb
genomic DNA insert. This insert possessed two complete ORFs of 1299 and
513 bp, oriented in the same direction and overlapping by 41 nucleotides, and two incomplete ORFs of 555 and 566 bp, one at the 5'
and the other at the 3' end of the insert (Fig. 4). The 1299-bp ORF had regions similar
to the nine conserved motifs found in aminomethyltransferases (27),
indicating that it is the gene for M.Hpy188I,
hpy188IM. The 513-bp ORF showed no similarity to any known
gene in GenBank on either the DNA or the amino acid level. The two
partial ORFs showed strong matches to genes identified in H. pylori strain 26695. The 555-bp partial ORF at the 5' end matched
HP#1117 (omp27) that encodes an outer membrane protein, and
the 566-bp partial ORF at the 3' end was similar to HP#1118
(deoD) that encodes a purine-nucleotide phosphorylase.

View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Structure of the Hpy188I R-M
system. Schematic representation of the
hpy188IM-hpy188IR locus from H. pylori
strain J188 is as revealed from sequence analysis of Sau3AI
library clone p#16. The ORFs of omp27, hpy188IM,
hpy188IR, and deoD are each represented by
solid arrows, indicating the direction of transcription. The
thin lines between the arrows represent the
flanking regions.
|
|
hpy188IM would encode a predicted 432-amino acid product
with a molecular mass of 50.9 kDa, which is in the typical size range of DNA methyltransferases. Nine motifs identified in its product, including the (N/S/D)PP(Y/F) motif, are arranged in the order of motif
X, and I to VIII. The longest variable region is near the C-terminal,
where the target recognition domain (TRD) presumably is located (27).
The 1299-bp ORF of hpy188IM uses GTG as a translation start
site. There is a potential translation start site, ATG, 155 bp
downstream of the GTG. Expression of hpy188IM in E. coli starting from the GTG site generated a functional
methyltransferase, while expression from the downstream ATG site did
not (data not shown), indicating that the GTG site is the start codon
for hpy188IM translation.
By endonuclease assay, we found that all Hpy188I-resistant
clones demonstrated weak endonuclease activity (data not shown), suggesting that hpy188IR was also present in the inserts of
these Hpy188I-resistant plasmids. The 513-bp ORF encodes a
170-amino acid product with a molecular mass of 20.3 kDa, which matches the size of the purified Hpy188I (Fig. 1C). Its
predicted N-terminal sequence also matched the 27-amino acid sequence
obtained from the purified Hpy188I protein. Furthermore,
expression of this ORF in E. coli generated a functional
Hpy188I (data not shown), indicating that it is the gene
encoding Hpy188I.
Detection of the Bases in the Recognition Sequence Methylated by
M.Hpy188I--
DNA methyltransferases have been divided into three
distinct groups, , , and (27), based on the order of motifs
and sequences in these motifs. The order of the M.Hpy188I
motifs (X and I to VIII) and the sequences present in its motifs are
the same as or similar to those from N-6 adenine methyltransferases in
the group, indicating that M.Hpy188I is a member of the
group. Thus we hypothesized that M.Hpy188I is most
likely an N-6 adenine methyltransferase. Although no N-4 cytosine
methyltransferases have yet been found to belong to the group, we
could not rule out the possibility just on the basis of sequence analysis.
To determine whether our hypothesis is correct, Western blotting was
performed against M.Hpy188I-methylated DNA.
M.Hpy188I-methylated DNA, p#16, was prepared in E. coli DB23 which has no endogenous N-6 or N-4
methyltransferases.2 p#16
from DB23 was resistant to digestion by Hpy188I, while pUC19 from DB23 was susceptible (data not shown), as expected, indicating modification of p#16 but not pUC19 DNA. pUC19 grown in a
dam+ E. coli strain was used as a positive
control for N-6 adenine-methylated DNA, while pBamM (28, 29) from DB23
was used as a positive control for N-4 cytosine-methylated DNA. When
antibodies against N-6 adenine-methylated DNA were used as the probe
(Fig. 5A), p#16 DNA gave a
strong signal, like the positive control pUC19(N6-A) DNA. pBamM(N4-C)
and the negative control DNA, pUC19( ), gave no signal, as expected.
This result indicates that p#16 was methylated at the N-6 position of
adenine in the Hpy188I recognition sequence TCNGA. In
contrast, when antibodies against N-4 cytosine-methylated DNA were used
(Fig. 5B), only the positive control DNA pBamM(N4-C) gave a
hybridization signal. Thus, M.Hpy188I is an N-6 adenine methyltransferase.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Determination of the
M.Hpy188I-methylated residue in its recognition
sequence. Anti-N-6 methyladenine antibodies (Panel A)
and anti-N-4 methylcytosine antibodies (Panel B) were used
for Western blotting of M.Hpy188I-methylated DNA p#16.
pUC19(N6-A) and pBamM were used as positive controls for N-6
methyladenine and N-4 methylcytosine, respectively, while pUC19( )
from DB23 as negative control. The total amounts of DNA spotted on
membranes were indicated on the left of each panel.
|
|
Search for Hpy188I R-M Genes in the Complete Genomic Sequences of
H. pylori Strains 26695 and J99--
H. pylori strain 26695 was predicted to have 14 potential type II R-M systems (13). However,
none of these systems showed similarity to the Hpy188I R-M
system, indicating its absence from strain 26695. The sequences
flanking the Hpy188I R-M genes, in which part of
omp27 and deoD of strain J188 are located, match a region containing HP1177 (omp27) and HP1178
(deoD) in the genome of strain 26695 (Fig.
6) with >95% identity. The conservation of omp27 between the two strains continues for 96 bp
upstream of omp27 ORF, while the conservation of
deoD stops near the end of its ORF (Fig. 6). In 26695, the
two conserved genes are separated by a 365-bp segment, which contains
no obvious ORF. In contrast, in J188, the corresponding region is 2457 bp and includes the hpy188IM-hpy188IR genes (Fig.
6). Overall, the 365- and 2457-bp regions share little similarity. The
complete genomic sequence from a second H. pylori strain,
J99, was recently published (14). DNA analysis indicated that J99 has
no Hpy188I R-M system either. Two genes, omp27
and deoD, are also highly conserved in J99, and their
conservation ends at the same locations as those in the other two
strains (Fig. 6). Furthermore, a 372-bp region separates the two
conserved genes in J99 and shares >90% identity with the 365-bp
region of 26695, but no similarity to the 2457 bp of J188.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Comparison of the Hpy188I
R-M locus from strain J188 and the corresponding loci from strains
26695 and J99. The black solid arrows
labeled as deoD and omp27 represent the conserved
coding regions of the two genes among the three strains. The
hatched boxes represent the 96-bp conserved noncoding region
just upstream of omp27. The solid lines between
the black arrows and hatched boxes represent
unconserved regions between J188 and 26695 (and J99). The open
boxes labeled with 92 represent 92-bp direct repeats in
J188 and the open boxes labeled with 49 represent
49-bp conserved segments among J188, 26695, and J99. The
arrows indicate both the location and direction of each ORF.
"H" indicates the locations of the Hpy188I
recognition sites. The figure was not drawn to scale. The sizes of DNA
fragments are indicated on the top of each schematic
structure.
|
|
Analysis of the hpy188IM-hpy188IR locus of strain
J188 reveals 92-bp direct repeats with only 3 mismatches, which flank
the R-M genes (Fig. 6). The 92-bp repeat on the right is located at the
junction of the 2457-bp region and the conserved deoD (Fig. 6), and 79 bp of this repeat corresponds to the 3' end of the deoD ORF, a region conserved among all three strains. The
92-bp repeat on the left is located 171 bp downstream of the conserved omp27 (Fig. 6). The sequence of the 171-bp region is
completely different from those in the corresponding regions of 26695 or J99, and has no homologs elsewhere in either of the sequenced strains, suggesting that it has a different origin. The 92-bp direct
repeats are not present in the corresponding intergenic region of 26695 and J99, suggesting these repeats are related to the acquisition event
of the Hpy188I R-M system in strain J188.
There is a 49-bp segment located 4 bp downstream of the right 92-bp
repeat and 217 bp upstream of the hpy188IM ORF in strain J188 (Fig. 6). This segment shows strong similarity to segments of the
same length in strains 26695 (with 7 mismatches) or J99 (with 11 mismatches) that lie 2 or 6 bp downstream of the deoD ORF
(Fig. 6). This segment is not found elsewhere in the 2 sequenced H. pylori genomes. Thus, it is unlikely that the J188
version represents a chance similarity. This arrangement in which the Hpy188I R-M genes adjoin the 49-bp segment and
deoD suggests that a module containing the R-M system may
have integrated specifically into the region between the 49-bp segment
and the 3' end of deoD. The event may have resulted in the
92 bp duplication that is now seen. Considering the possibility of
Hpy188I involvement in DNA mobility, we checked for the
presence of its recognition site, TCNGA, in the related regions.
However, the locations found (Fig. 6) do not suggest that they were
directly involved in the integration event.
To further investigate the origin of this R-M system, the G + C content
of these regions were calculated. The G+C content of the 2457-bp
J188-specific region in strain J188 was 28.8%, while that of the
Hpy188I R-M ORFs was 29.9%. The G + C content in the 365-bp
intergenic region of strain 26695 is 32.3%, and a similar G + C
content is observed in the J99 equivalent region. In contrast, the G + C content in the flanking regions including omp27 and
deoD, was 39.5%, which matches the overall G + C
content (39%) of H. pylori (13, 14, 37). The significantly
lower G + C content of the 2457-bp J188-specific region strongly
suggests that the hpy188IM-hpy188IR locus was
introduced during the evolution of the H. pylori genome.
Study of Hpy188I Diversity Among Various H. pylori Strains--
To
further study the diversity of the Hpy188I R-M system,
chromosomal DNAs from 10 H. pylori strains, including J188
and 26695, were examined for their modification at TCNGA sites. As
expected, the DNA of J188 was resistant to Hpy188I
digestion, indicating modification at TCNGA sites, whereas DNA from
26695 was digestible, corresponding to the absence of the R-M system in
its genome (Fig. 7A). DNA from
seven other strains was digestible, but strain J166 was resistant,
suggesting that the Hpy188I R-M system is present in J166,
but not the other strains. To confirm this observation, a pair of
primers, QII ORF-F and QII ORF-R corresponding to the 5' end of
hpy188IM and the 3' end of hpy188IR,
respectively, were used to amplify the same set of DNAs (Fig.
7B). Only DNA from J188 and J166 gave PCR products with the
predicted size of 1.8 kb, whereas no PCR products were observed for the
other strains. Thus, only J188 and J166 among the strains tested have
the Hpy188I R-M system.

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Study of the diversity of
Hpy188I R-M systems among H. pylori
strains. The products of digestion or PCR were resolved on
1% agarose gels. Panel A, digestion of chromosomal DNA from
10 H. pylori strains by Hpy188I. Only strains
J166 and J188 were resistant to digestion by Hpy188I.
Panel B, PCR analysis of chromosomal DNA from the same 10 strains. Primers QII ORF-F and QII ORF-R, corresponding to the 5' and
3' ends of hpy188IM-hpy188IR, were used to
amplify the Hpy188I R-M genes, with chromosomal DNA as
template. Products were amplified only from strains J166 and
J188. Panel C, primers QII-F and QII-R, corresponding to the
conserved regions flanking the 5' and 3' ends of the
hpy188IM-hpy188IR genes, were used for PCR, with
chromosomal DNA as template.
|
|
To investigate the corresponding regions of the Hpy188IM-hpy188IR locus
among these strains, primers QII-F and QII-R, corresponding to the 5'
and 3' ends of the conserved omp27 and deoD, were
used for PCR (Fig. 7C). As expected, DNA from J188 yielded a
PCR product of the predicted size of ~3.0 kb. J166 DNA yielded a
product of the same size, indicating that both the size and location of
the Hpy188I-integrated region in J166 resembles that for
J188. DNA from 26695 yielded a PCR product that matched the expected
size of 1.0 kb. The other strains yielded PCR products of the same size
as for 26695, except for 60190 and J178 which yielded 1.4- or 1.1-kb
products, respectively. To further assess this heterogeneity, PCR
fragments from strains A101, J262, 60190, and J178 were sequenced. The
sequences of A101 and J262 shared >80% identity with that of 26695;
and those of 60190 and J178 shared >60% identity. The presence of
direct repeats (with sizes varying between 60 and 150 bp) in the J178
and 60190 sequences made their PCR products larger than those of the
rest of the strains. These data indicate that only one genotype is
present in the region between omp27 and deoD
among the strains not possessing the Hpy188I R-M system. All
ORFs present in the region are <125 bp, suggesting no functional genes. The 49-bp segment identified in strains J188, 26695, and J99 is
also present at a similar location in the intergenic region of these 4 strains.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have cloned and sequenced genes encoding the Hpy188I
R-M system, a novel type II R-M system from H. pylori strain
J188. Only two of 11 H. pylori strains examined possess this
R-M system, and its significantly lower G + C content strongly suggests
that this R-M system is a relatively recent acquisition by H. pylori. Comparison of the J188
hpy188IM-Hpy188IR gene locus and the genomic sequence of strain 26695 indicates that the Hpy188I R-M
system was introduced into a 365-bp intergenic region with a G + C
content (32%) lower than average (39%) for H. pylori. Five
regions with a significantly different G + C composition have been
found in the genome of strain 26695 (13), but this 365-bp region is not located in any of these previously identified regions. The 365-bp region is also present at the same location in J99 and other strains that do not carry the Hpy188I R-M system, indicating
conservation of this low G + C region. The Hpy188I R-M genes
are flanked by 92-bp direct repeats, a situation that resembles the
37-40-kb cag pathogenicity island (cagPAI) in
H. pylori (31), which also has a lower G + C content and is
flanked by 31-bp direct repeats. The presence of these direct repeats
further suggests that the hpy188IM-hpy188IR locus
could have integrated into the H. pylori genome during a
transposition event. A 49-bp segment, downstream of deoD, in
the region of 26695 and others, is also present in the J188 region. The
R-M system could have specifically integrated into the site between
this small segment and deoD. However, it is unclear how this
49-bp segment was preserved while the rest of the original region was
replaced by a completely different sequence.
In studies of the R-M systems of EcoO109I, AccI,
BglII, Eco47I, and others (32-36), components of
either prophages or transposons were found closely associated with
their R-M genes. In the case of Hpy188I, however, no
mobility genes can be identified immediately adjacent to its genes,
which is also true for most of the type II R-M systems predicted in the
two sequenced strains (13, 14). These data suggest that H. pylori uses a different mechanism for the horizontal transfer of
R-M systems. One possibility is that the Hpy188I R-M system
integrated into the H. pylori genome by homologous
recombination in a region of lower G + C content. Another mechanism for
horizontal transfer is exemplified by intron homing and transposition
(37, 38), where endonucleases play the key role in introducing double
strand breaks. While restriction enzymes have not yet been directly
implicated in such events, it remains possible that they could initiate
DNA insertion events. Analysis of the region between omp27
and deoD among 6 strains not possessing the
Hpy188I R-M system reveals that 3 have a TCNGA site. It is conceivable that the restriction activity of Hpy188I could
have facilitated the integration process of its R-M genes into the H. pylori genome. If this were the case, a TCNGA site could
have been located in the region between the 49-bp segment and the
deoD ORF, and might have provided the initial break point.
Hpy188I could have cleaved this site, and subsequently, its
R-M genes could have been integrated into this cleaved site. The origin of the 92-bp direct repeats of the target sequence near the 5' end of
deoD is unknown, but again is reminiscent of transposition events.
Strains J188 and J166 have the Hpy188I R-M system integrated
in the same region, suggesting that they might have arisen from the
same original strain. However, their genotypes at three other loci,
vacA (39), cagA (40-42), and iceA
(43) (Table I) are substantially different from each other, indicating
that they are not closely related. Thus, the differences at these loci
may be explained by two independent Hpy188I R-M system
integration events into this lower G + C region in two separate
strains. If this is true, the lower G + C region may be a particularly
hot site for integration. Alternatively, J188 and J166 may have arisen from the same original strain that acquired the R-M system, and has
subsequently diverged at the vacA, cagA, and
iceA loci.
The Hpy188I R-M genes cloned in this study were present in
only two of 11 H. pylori strains tested. The diversity of
this R-M system among various strains is consistent with studies on other type II R-M systems in H. pylori. These include
iceA1-hpyIM, an NlaIII-like R-M system
(15, 43) where the R gene is allelic with a non-R gene, and a
DdeI isoschizomer (44) which resulted from an integration
event. In addition, comparison of the genomic sequences of strains J99
and 26695 indicates that some major strain-specific components are R-M
genes (14). Finally, a study examining genomic differences between
H. pylori strains J166 and 26695, using a PCR-based
subtractive hybridization method, shows that seven of 18 DNA clones
specific to J166 appear to be R-M genes (45). Although we found the
Hpy188I R-M system to be present in J166, but not in 26695, this difference was not found during the previous study (45).
This study exemplifies the apparent propensity of H. pylori
to accumulate R-M systems, presumably by integrating them into inactive
positions of the genome. It is unknown, although, why this organism,
for which there are no known bacteriophages, needs so many R-M systems.
A feature of H. pylori infection is its persistent colonization in the human stomach mucosa for years or decades (10-11).
Clearly, H. pylori is well adapted to this gastric
environment and it is tempting to think that the acquisition of so many
R-M systems might be related to this unique lifestyle. Restriction enzymes and their associated methyltransferases in H. pylori
might provide a biological role that we have yet to discover.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We are grateful to Dr. Jack Benner for help
with amino acid sequencing of Hpy188I.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by a Dissertation
Enhancement Grant from the Vanderbilt Graduate School, National
Institutes of Health Grants GM56534 and DK53707, and a Vanderbilt
Cancer Center Core Grant.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequences reported in this paper have been
submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession
numbers AF202061 (the sequence of the hpy188IM-Hpy188IR locus in strain
J188), AF215914 (the sequence of the corresponding region in strain
A101), AF215915 (that in strain J262), AF215916 (that in strain J178),
and AF215917 (that in strain 60190).
To whom correspondence should be addressed: New England
Biolabs, Inc., 32 Tozer Rd., Beverly, MA 01915. Tel.: 978-927-5054; Fax: 978-921-1350; E-mail: morgan@neb.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 23, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M910303199
2
D. Byrd, S. Stickel, and R. J. Roberts,
personal communication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
ORF, open
reading frame;
R, restriction;
M, modification;
bp, base pair(s);
kb, kilobase(s).
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Luria, S. E.,
and Human, M. L.
(1952)
J. Bacteriol.
64,
557-569
|
| 2.
|
Bertani, T. A.,
and Weigle, J. J.
(1953)
J. Bacteriol.
65,
113-121
|
| 3.
|
Wilson, G. G.,
and Murray, N. E.
(1991)
Annu. Rev. Genet.
25,
585-627
|
| 4.
|
Kim, Y. C.,
Grable, J. C.,
Love, R.,
Greene, P. J.,
and Rosenberg, J. M.
(1990)
Science
249,
1307-1309
|
| 5.
|
Athanasiadis, A.,
Vlassi, M.,
Kotsifaki, D.,
Tucker, P. A.,
Wilson, K. S.,
and Kokkinidis, M.
(1994)
Struct. Biol.
1,
469-475
|
| 6.
|
Winkler, F. K.
(1992)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
2,
93-99
|
| 7.
|
Cheng, X.,
Kumar, S.,
Posfai, J.,
Pflugrath, J. W.,
and Roberts, R. J.
(1993)
Cell
74,
299-307
|
| 8.
|
Newman, M.,
Strzelecka, T.,
Dorner, L. F.,
Schildkraut, I.,
and Aggarwal, A. K.
(1995)
Science
269,
656-663
|
| 9.
|
Cheng, X.,
Balendrian, K.,
Schildkraut, I.,
and Anderson, J. E.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3927-3935
|
| 10.
|
Berg, D. E.,
and Logan, R. P. H.
(1997)
Bioessays
19,
86-90
|
| 11.
|
Goodwin, C. S.,
Armstrong, J. A.,
Chilvers, T.,
Peters, M.,
Collins, M. D.,
Sly, L.,
McConnell, W.,
and Harper, W.
(1989)
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
39,
397-405
|
| 12.
|
Blaser, M. J.,
and Parsonnet, J.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
94,
4-8
|
| 13.
|
Tomb, J. F.,
White, O.,
Kerlavage, A. R.,
Clayton, R. A.,
Sutton, G.,
Fleischmann, R. D.,
Ketchum, K. A.,
Klenk, H. P.,
Gill, S.,
Dougherty, B. A.,
Nelson, K.,
Quackenbush, J.,
Zhou, L.,
Kirkness, E. F.,
Peterson, S.,
Loftus, B.,
Richardson, D.,
Dodson, R.,
Khalak, H. G.,
Glodek, A.,
McKenney, K.,
Fitzegerald, L. M.,
Lee, N.,
Adams, M. D.,
Hickey, E. K.,
Berg, D. E.,
Gocayne, J. D.,
Utterback, T.,
Peterson, J. D.,
Kelley, J.,
Cotton, M. D.,
Weidman, J. M.,
Fujii, C.,
Bowman, C.,
Watthey, L.,
Wallin, E.,
Hayes, W. S.,
Borodovsky, M.,
Karp, P. D.,
Smith, H. O.,
Fraser, C.,
and Venter, J. C.
(1997)
Nature
388,
539-547
|
| 14.
|
Alm, R. A.,
Ling, L. L.,
Moir, D. T.,
King, B. L.,
Brown, E. D.,
Doig, P. C.,
Smith, D. R.,
Guild, B. C.,
deJonge, B. L.,
Carmel, G.,
Tummino, P. J.,
Caruso, A.,
Uria-Nickelsen, M.,
Mills, D. M.,
Ives, C.,
Gibson, R.,
Merberg, D.,
Mills, S. D.,
Jiang, Q.,
Taylor, D. E.,
Vovis, G. F.,
and Trust, T. J.
(1999)
Nature
397,
176-180
|
| 15.
|
Xu, Q.,
Peek, R. M.,
Miller, G. G.,
and Blaser, M. J.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
6807-6815
|
| 16.
|
Schleif, R. F.,
and Wensink, P. C.
(1981)
Practical Methods in Molecular Biology
, Springer-Verlag, New York
|
| 17.
|
Staden, R.
(1982)
Nucleic Acids Res.
10,
4731-4751
|
| 18.
|
Devereux, J.,
Haeberli, P.,
and Smithies, O.
(1984)
Nucleic Acids Res.
12,
387-395
|
| 19.
|
Altschul, S. F.,
Gish, W.,
Miller, W.,
Myers, E. W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
215,
403-410
|
| 20.
|
Gish, W.,
and States, D. J.
(1993)
Nat. Genet.
3,
266-272
|
| 21.
|
Waite-Rees, P. A.,
Keating, C. J.,
Moran, L. S.,
Slatko, B. E.,
Hornstra, L. J.,
and Benner, J. S.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
5207-5219
|
| 22.
|
Gingeras, T. R.,
Milazzo, J. P.,
and Roberts, R. J.
(1978)
Nucleic Acids Res.
5,
4105
|
| 23.
|
Brown, N. L.,
Hutchinson, C. A.,
and Smith, M.
(1980)
J. Mol. Biol.
140,
143-148
|
| 24.
|
Wilson, G. G.
(1988)
Gene (Amst.)
74,
281-289
|
| 25.
|
Stollar, B. D.
(1980)
Methods Enzymol.
70,
70-85
|
| 26.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fristch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 27.
|
Malone, T.,
Blumenthal, R. M.,
and Cheng, X.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
253,
618-632
|
| 28.
|
Hattman, S.,
Keisler, T.,
and Gottehrer, A.
(1978)
J. Mol. Biol.
124,
701-711
|
| 29.
|
Brooks, J. E.,
Benner, J. S.,
Heiter, D. F.,
Silber, K. R.,
Sznyter, L. A.,
Jager-Quinton, T.,
Moran, L. S.,
Slatko, B. E.,
Wilson, G. G.,
and Nwankwo, D.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
841-852
|
| 30.
| Deleted in proof
|
| 31.
|
Censini, S.,
Lange, C.,
Xiang, Z.,
Crabtree, J.,
Ghiara, P.,
Borodovsky, M.,
Rappuoli, R.,
and Covacci, A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
14648-14653
|
| 32.
|
Anton, B. P.,
Heiter, D. F.,
Benner, J. S.,
Hess, E., J.,
Greenough, L.,
Moran, L. S.,
Slatko, B. E.,
and Brooks, J. E.
(1997)
Gene (Amst.)
187,
19-27
|
| 33.
|
Stankevicius, K.,
Povilionis, P.,
Lubys, A.,
Menkevicius, S.,
and Janulaitis, A.
(1995)
Gene (Amst.)
157,
49-53
|
| 34.
|
Vaisvila, R.,
Vilkaitis, G.,
and Janulaitis, A.
(1995)
Gene (Amst.)
157,
81-84
|
| 35.
|
Brassard, S.,
Paquet, H.,
and Riym, P. H.
(1992)
Gene (Amst.)
157,
69-72
|
| 36.
|
Kita, K.,
Tsuda, J.,
Kato, T.,
Okamoto, K.,
Yanase, H.,
and Tanaka, M.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
6822-6827
|
| 37.
|
Belfort, M.,
and Roberts, R. J.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3379-3388
|
| 38.
|
Belfort, M.,
and Perlman, P. S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
30237-30240
|
| 39.
|
Cover, T. L.,
Dooley, C. P.,
and Blaser, M. J.
(1990)
Infect. Immun.
58,
603-610
|
| 40.
|
Covacci, A.,
Censini, S.,
Bugnoli, M.,
Petracca, R.,
Burroni, D.,
Macchia, G.,
Massone, A.,
Papini, E.,
Xiang, Z.,
Figura, N.,
and Rappuoli, R.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
5791-5795
|
| 41.
|
Tummuru, M. K. R.,
Cover, T. L.,
and Blaser, M. J.
(1993)
Infect. Immun.
61,
1799-1809
|
| 42.
|
Akopyants, N. S.,
Clifton, S. W.,
Kersulyte, D.,
Crabtree, J. E.,
Youree, B. E.,
Reece, C. A.,
Bukanov, N. O.,
Drazek, E. S.,
Roe, B. A.,
and Berg, D. E.
(1998)
Mol. Microbiol.
28,
37-53
|
| 43.
|
Peek, R. M.,
Thompson, S. A.,
Donahue, J. P.,
Tham, K. T.,
Atherton, J. C.,
Blaser, M. J.,
and Miller, G. G.
(1998)
Proc. Am. Assoc. Phys.
110,
531-544
|
| 44.
|
Ramakrishna, J.,
Mathee, K.,
Plaut, A. G.,
and Wright, A.
(1995)
Gastroenterology
108,
A200
|
| 45.
|
Akopyants, N. S.,
Fardkov, A.,
Diatchenko, L.,
Hill, J. E.,
Siebert, P. D.,
Lukyanov, S.,
Sverdlov, E. D.,
and Berg, D. E.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
13108-13113
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. D. Morgan, E. A. Dwinell, T. K. Bhatia, E. M. Lang, and Y. A. Luyten
The MmeI family: type II restriction-modification enzymes that employ single-strand modification for host protection
Nucleic Acids Res.,
July 3, 2009;
(2009)
gkp534v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Wirawan, K. M. Swanson, T. Kleffmann, R. W. Jack, and J. R. Tagg
Uberolysin: a novel cyclic bacteriocin produced by Streptococcus uberis
Microbiology,
May 1, 2007;
153(5):
1619 - 1630.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Godfroid, C. Delcorps, L. M. Irenge, K. Walravens, S. Marche, and J.-L. Gala
Definitive Differentiation between Single and Mixed Mycobacterial Infections in Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) by a Combination of Duplex Amplification of p34 and f57 Sequences and Hpy188I Enzymatic Restriction of Duplex Amplicons
J. Clin. Microbiol.,
September 1, 2005;
43(9):
4640 - 4648.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Ishikawa, M. Watanabe, T. Kuroita, I. Uchiyama, J. M. Bujnicki, B. Kawakami, M. Tanokura, and I. Kobayashi
Discovery of a novel restriction endonuclease by genome comparison and application of a wheat-germ-based cell-free translation assay: PabI (5'-GTA/C) from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus abyssi
Nucleic Acids Res.,
July 21, 2005;
33(13):
e112 - e112.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Xu, R. D. Morgan, R. J. Roberts, S. Y. Xu, L. J. van Doorn, J. P. Donahue, G. G. Miller, and M. J. Blaser
Functional analysis of iceA1, a CATG-recognizing restriction endonuclease gene in Helicobacter pylori
Nucleic Acids Res.,
September 1, 2002;
30(17):
3839 - 3847.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Takata, R. Aras, D. Tavakoli, T. Ando, A. Z. Olivares, and M. J. Blaser
Phenotypic and genotypic variation in methylases involved in type II restriction-modification systems in Helicobacter pylori
Nucleic Acids Res.,
June 1, 2002;
30(11):
2444 - 2452.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Naderer, J. R. Brust, D. Knowle, and R. M. Blumenthal
Mobility of a Restriction-Modification System Revealed by Its Genetic Contexts in Three Hosts
J. Bacteriol.,
May 1, 2002;
184(9):
2411 - 2419.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Osaki, D. Takamatsu, Y. Shimoji, and T. Sekizaki
Characterization of Streptococcus suis Genes Encoding Proteins Homologous to Sortase of Gram-Positive Bacteria
J. Bacteriol.,
February 15, 2002;
184(4):
971 - 982.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Sekizaki, M. Osaki, D. Takamatsu, and Y. Shimoji
Distribution of the SsuDAT1I Restriction-Modification System among Different Serotypes of Streptococcus suis
J. Bacteriol.,
September 15, 2001;
183(18):
5436 - 5440.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Vitkute, K. Stankevicius, G. Tamulaitiene, Z. Maneliene, A. Timinskas, D. E. Berg, and A. Janulaitis
Specificities of Eleven Different DNA Methyltransferases of Helicobacter pylori Strain 26695
J. Bacteriol.,
January 15, 2001;
183(2):
443 - 450.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Sekizaki, Y. Otani, M. Osaki, D. Takamatsu, and Y. Shimoji
Evidence for Horizontal Transfer of SsuDAT1I Restriction-Modification Genes to the Streptococcus suis Genome
J. Bacteriol.,
January 15, 2001;
183(2):
500 - 511.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Xu, R. D. Morgan, R. J. Roberts, and M. J. Blaser
Identification of type II restriction and modification systems in Helicobacter pylori reveals their substantial diversity among strains
PNAS,
August 15, 2000;
97(17):
9671 - 9676.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|