Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M000689200 on March 23, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 23, 17263-17268, June 9, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/23/17263    most recent
M000689200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ganju, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Groopman, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ganju, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Groopman, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

beta -Chemokine Receptor CCR5 Signals through SHP1, SHP2, and Syk*

Ramesh K. GanjuDagger , Stephanie A. Brubaker, Rebecca D. Chernock, Shalom Avraham, and Jerome E. GroopmanDagger

From the Division of Experimental Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Received for publication, January 24, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The beta -chemokine receptor CCR5 has been shown to modulate cell migration, proliferation, and immune functions and to serve as a co-receptor for the human immunodeficiency virus. We and others have shown that CCR5 activates related adhesion focal tyrosine kinase (RAFTK)/Pyk2/CAK-beta . In this study, we further characterize the signaling molecules activated by CCR5 upon binding to its cognate ligand, macrophage inflammatory protein-1beta (MIP1beta ). We observed enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of the phosphatases SHP1 and SHP2 upon MIP1beta stimulation of CCR5 L1.2 transfectants and T-cells derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Furthermore, we observed that SHP1 associated with RAFTK. However, using a dominant-negative phosphatase-binding mutant of RAFTK (RAFTKm906), we found that RAFTK does not mediate SHP1 or SHP2 phosphorylation. SHP1 and SHP2 also associated with the adaptor protein Grb2 and the Src-related kinase Syk. Pretreatment of CCR5 L1.2 transfectants or T-cells with the phosphatase inhibitor orthovanadate markedly abolished MIP1beta -induced chemotaxis. Syk was also activated upon MIP1beta stimulation of CCR5 L1.2 transfectants or T-cells and associated with RAFTK. Overexpression of a dominant-negative Src-binding mutant of RAFTK (RAFTKm402) significantly attenuated Syk activation, whereas overexpression of wild-type RAFTK enhanced Syk activity, indicating that RAFTK acts upstream of CCR5-mediated Syk activation. Taken together, these results suggest that MIP1beta stimulation mediated by CCR5 induces the formation of a signaling complex consisting of RAFTK, Syk, SHP1, and Grb2.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Chemokines and their receptors play important roles in cell migration, growth, and host inflammatory responses (1-3). These receptors also serve as co-receptors for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)1 (4-6). Recently, chemokines also have been implicated in the development of Kaposi's sarcoma via Kaposi's sarcoma herpes virus (human herpes virus (HHV-8)), which encodes for several functional homologues of certain chemokines like MIP and of alpha -chemokine receptors, including CXCR1, CXCR2, and CXCR3 (7-10).

CCR5 is a G-protein-coupled seven-transmembrane receptor that belongs to the pro-inflammatory beta -chemokine receptor family. It is a co-receptor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1 isolates (4, 11, 12). CCR5 is activated by the beta -chemokines MIP1beta , MIP1alpha , and RANTES. MIP1beta has higher specificity for CCR5 than do MIP1alpha and RANTES, which also bind to CCR1 and CCR3 (1, 3, 12). Knockout mice lacking CCR5 revealed partial defects in macrophages and also showed enhanced T-cell-dependent immune response and delayed type hypersensitivity reaction, suggesting that CCR5 may play an important role in down-regulating T-cell-dependent immune responses (13).

Despite the emerging role of CCR5 and its ligands in HIV infection and the immune response, relatively little is known about the signaling pathways mediated by this receptor. CCR5 has been shown to induce calcium signals and chemotaxis upon binding to the macrophage-tropic HIV gp160 recombinant envelope protein (14). We (15) and others (16) have also recently shown that CCR5, upon binding to its cognate ligand (MIP1beta ) or to the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein from a macrophage-tropic strain, activates a member of the focal adhesion kinase family called related adhesion focal tyrosine kinase (RAFTK; also known as Pyk2 and CAK-beta ). We further demonstrated that RAFTK associates with the cytoskeletal protein paxillin upon CCR5 activation (15).

To further elucidate MIP1beta -induced CCR5 signaling pathways, we have delineated the roles of the SH2 domain-containing cytoplasmic tyrosine phosphatase subfamily members SHP1 and SHP2 and of the Src-related kinase Syk. SHP1 (also named SHPTP1, PTPK, HC, or SHP) is predominantly expressed in hematopoietic cells, whereas SHP2 (also called SHPTP2, PTP1D, SYP, PTP2C, or SHPTP3) is expressed ubiquitously (17, 18). SHP1 acts as a negative regulator of intracellular signaling (19, 20). In contrast, SHP2 appears to play a positive role in regulating various growth factor-induced signaling pathways (21-24). SH2 domains of SHP1 and SHP2 have been shown to bind to several tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins (25-28). Mice deficient in SHP1 (motheaten or viable motheaten) suffer from several immunological, inflammatory, and hematological abnormalities (29, 30), whereas SHP2 mutant mice possess multiple defects in mesodermal patterning and die at mid-gestation (31). Furthermore, recently, it was shown that chemotactic responses to chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha were altered in mature and immature hematopoietic cells derived from motheaten mice (32).

Syk, a cytoplasmic protein-tyrosine kinase, plays an important role in the signaling pathways mediated by the B-cell antigen, Fc receptor, T-cell antigen receptor, and integrin receptor and thereby modulates cell growth and chemotaxis (33-37). Syk interacts with various tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins (38, 39). Prior analysis of RAFTK indicated that tyrosine 402 in its N-terminal domain binds to the SH2 domain of Src kinases and activates such Src kinases upon lipopolysaccharide or bradykinin treatment (40).

This study demonstrates that MIP1beta stimulation of CCR5 transfectants induces the tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP1 and SHP2 and activates Syk. This induction also results in the formation of a signaling complex consisting of RAFTK, Syk, SHP1, and Grb2. These results indicate that RAFTK acts upstream of Syk and suggest that it does not regulate the SHP1 and SHP2 phosphorylation mediated by CCR5.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Reagents and Materials-- Anti-RAFTK antibodies were generated as described previously (41). This antiserum recognized both human and murine forms of RAFTK and did not cross-react with focal adhesion kinase. Antibodies to Syk, SHP1, and SHP2 were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (4G10) was a generous gift from Dr. Brian Druker (Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR). Electrophoresis reagents and nitrocellulose membranes were obtained from Bio-Rad. The protease inhibitors leupeptin and alpha 1-antitrypsin and all other reagents were acquired from Sigma. Indo-1/AM was purchased from Molecular Probes, Inc. (Eugene, OR).

Construction of CCR5 Stable Transfectants-- CCR5 was transfected into the pre-B lymphoma cell line L1.2 as described previously (42, 43), and transfectants were selected in medium containing mycophenolic acid. FACS analysis was used to monitor the cell-surface expression of CCR5. CCR5 was expressed at a high level in these cells (42). The beta -chemokines MIP1alpha , MIP1beta , and RANTES bind with high affinity to the expressed CCR5 receptors. These cells possess properties characteristic of native CCR5, as they bind to macrophage-tropic HIV-1 gp120 in the presence of soluble human CD4 (42).

Cell Culture-- CCR5 transfectants and mutants were grown in RPMI 1640 medium (containing 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mmol/liter glutamine, 1 mmol/liter sodium pyruvate, 50 µg/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, and 55 µmol/liter beta -mercaptoethanol) supplemented with 100 nmol/liter sodium hypoxanthine, 16 nmol/liter thymidine, 2.5 µg/ml mycophenolic acid, and 125 µg/ml xanthine. CCR5 L1.2 transfectants containing RAFTK constructs were grown in mycophenolic acid medium containing 0.8 mg/liter Geneticin (G418, Life Technologies, Inc.).

RAFTK Transfectants-- Transfectants of mutants RAFTKm402 and RAFTKm906 and wild-type RAFTK (RAFTKWT) were produced by transfection of the CCR5 L1.2 cells with the RAFTKm402, RAFTKm906, or RAFTKWT construct, respectively (15). pcDNA vector without an RAFTK construct was used as a control. Mutants RAFTKm906 and RAFTKm402 were generated by replacing Tyr906 and Tyr402 with Phe, respectively, by site-directed mutagenesis. Tyr906 of RAFTK is the putative binding site for phosphatases, and Tyr402 has previously been shown to bind to Src kinases (40). Plasmids carrying RAFTKm906, RAFTKm402, RAFTKWT, or pcDNA control vector were transfected by electroporation into the CCR5 L1.2 cells using Bio-Rad electroporation equipment. The transfectants were selected in medium containing mycophenolic acid and G418. The double mutants expressed equal amounts of CCR5 as determined by FACS analysis. Several clones of double transfectants were used in the signaling studies.

Primary Lymphocyte Culture-- T-cell-enriched, monocyte-depleted cultures were generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells as described (15, 44). Briefly, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were separated by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation and two rounds of adherence to plastic. Non-adherent cells were stimulated with phytohemagglutinin (5 µg/ml) for 3 days. Cells were removed to fresh medium supplemented with recombinant human interleukin-2 (Advanced Biotechnologies, Columbia, MD). Three-week-old activated T-cells, which were found to be ~35% positive for CCR5 by FACS analysis, were used for further studies.

Stimulation of Cells-- Cells were washed twice with 1× Hanks' buffered salt solution (Sigma), resuspended at 10 × 106 cells/ml in 1× Hanks' buffered salt solution, and then starved of serum for 2 h at 37 °C. The serum-starved cells were stimulated with 200 ng/ml MIP1beta at 37 °C for various time periods. Following stimulation, cells were lysed using modified radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (50 mmol/liter Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1% Nonidet P-40, 150 mmol/liter NaCl, 1 mmol/liter phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml pepstatin, 10 mmol/liter sodium vanadate, 10 mmol/liter sodium fluoride, and 10 mmol/liter sodium pyrophosphate). Total cell lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min. Protein concentrations were determined by protein assay (Bio-Rad).

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis-- Immunoprecipitation studies were conducted as described (45). Briefly, identical amounts of protein from each time point were clarified by incubation with protein A-Sepharose CL-4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 1 h at 4 °C. Protein A-Sepharose was removed by brief centrifugation, and the supernatants were incubated with different primary antibodies as described below for each experiment for 2 h at 4 °C. Immunoprecipitation of the antibody-antigen complexes was performed by incubation at 4 °C overnight with 50 µl of protein A-Sepharose (10% suspension). Nonspecific bound proteins were removed by washing the Sepharose beads three times with modified radioimmune precipitation assay buffer and one time with phosphate-buffered saline. Immune complexes were solubilized in 30 µl of 2× Laemmli buffer, and samples were separated on 8 or 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat milk protein for 1 h and probed with primary antibody for 3 h at room temperature or at 4 °C overnight. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and the enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The densitometric scanning of films was done using a Bio-Rad Model G5-700 imaging densitometer.

Syk Kinase Assay-- The Syk kinase assay was performed by first immunoprecipitating lysates with anti-Syk antibody. The immune complexes were then washed twice with radioimmune precipitation assay buffer and twice with Syk kinase buffer (20 mM Hepes, 50 mM NaCl, 10 µM Na3VO4, 5 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM MnCl2). The complex was incubated in Syk kinase buffer and 5 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP for 20 min at 30 °C. The reaction was terminated by adding 4× SDS sample buffer and boiling the samples for 5 min at 100 °C. Proteins were then separated on 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and detected by autoradiography. Rabbit IgG was used as a negative control.

Glutathione S-Transferase Fusion Protein Binding Studies-- The RAFTK C-terminal domain (amino acids 681-1009)-glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein was produced as described (46). Briefly, the fusion protein was amplified by polymerase chain reaction and cloned into the pGEX-2T expression vector (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The GST fusion protein was produced by 1 mM isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside induction and purified by affinity chromatography on a glutathione-Sepharose column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Grb2-GST fusion proteins were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. For the binding experiments, 5 µg of GST fusion protein were mixed with 1 mg of cell lysate and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C on a rotatory shaker. GST protein (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used as a control. The complex was pre-absorbed by adding 50 µl of glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C on a rotatory shaker. The beads were centrifuged and washed three times with modified radioimmune precipitation assay buffer and once with 1× phosphate-buffered saline. The bound proteins were eluted by boiling in Laemmli sample buffer and subjected to 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot analysis.

Chemotaxis Assay-- The assay was performed in 24-well plates containing 5-µm porosity inserts (Costar Corp., Cambridge, MA) as described (45). Briefly, cells were resuspended at 6.6 × 106/ml in RPMI 1640 medium containing 2.5% bovine serum albumin. 50 ng of MIP1beta were added to the bottom wells, and 150 µl of cells (1 × 106) untreated or pretreated with different concentrations of sodium orthovanadate were loaded onto the inserts. Cells migrating to the bottom wells were collected, centrifuged, and counted. The results shown are representative of findings from three independent experiments.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

SHP1 and SHP2 Are Tyrosine-phosphorylated upon MIP1beta Stimulation-- Cytoplasmic tyrosine phosphatases have been shown to be important positive and negative regulators of signaling pathways. To characterize the role that phosphatases play in CCR5-mediated signal transduction pathways, CCR5 transfectants were stimulated with MIP1beta , and lysates were analyzed for SHP1 and SHP2 tyrosine phosphorylation. As shown in Fig. 1 (A and C, respectively), MIP1beta stimulation of CCR5 transfectants resulted in an increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP1 and SHP2. Equal amounts of SHP1 and SHP2 proteins were present in each lane (Fig. 1, A and C, lower panels). We also found that MIP1beta stimulation induced a slight increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP1 and SHP2 (Fig. 1, B and D, respectively) in activated T-cells derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. These T-cells were found to be ~35% positive for CCR5 (data not shown). The reduced SHP1 and SHP2 phosphorylation in T-cells as compared with CCR5 L1.2 cells may be due to differences in the number of CCR5 receptors on these cells and/or to differences between the cell types. In addition, RAFTK has also been shown to have lower tyrosine phosphorylation in MIP1beta -stimulated T-cells as compared with the similarly stimulated CCR5 L1.2 transfectants (15).


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP1 and SHP2 upon MIP1beta stimulation. Unstimulated (0 lanes) or stimulated CCR5 L1.2 cell lysates (A and C) and T-cells (B and D) were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-SHP1 (A and B) or anti-SHP2 (C and D) antibody or control IgG (C lanes). The immune complexes were run on SDS-polyacrylamide gel and subjected to serial immunoblotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (upper panels), followed by anti-SHP1 antibody (A and B, lower panels) or anti-SHP2 antibody (C and D, lower panels). The TCL lanes represent 30 µg of total cell lysate. Fold increase represents values calculated after densitometric scanning of gels. WB, Western blot.

SHP1 and SHP2 Associate with Various Signaling Molecules-- Tyr906 of RAFTK may act as a putative binding site for SHP proteins. Therefore, we examined the association of RAFTK with SHP1. As shown in Fig. 2A, SHP1 associated with RAFTK constitutively; this association was modestly increased upon MIP1beta stimulation. To further confirm this association, we used a GST fusion protein containing the C-terminal domain of RAFTK. As shown in Fig. 2B, SHP1 was observed to associate with this fusion protein. SHP1 also associated with Grb2 upon MIP1beta stimulation (Fig. 2C). Since SHP2 was also tyrosine-phosphorylated following MIP1beta stimulation, we studied whether it associated with the adaptor protein Grb2. As shown in Fig. 2D, SHP2 associated with Grb2, and this association increased upon chemokine stimulation.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   SHP1 associates with RAFTK and Grb2 upon MIP1beta stimulation. CCR5 L1.2 cell lysates unstimulated (0 lanes) or stimulated with MIP1beta for different time periods were immunoprecipitated (IP) with SHP1 (A), RAFTK C-terminal domain-GST fusion protein (B), or Grb2-GST (C and D). The immune complexes were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotted with RAFTK (A), SHP1 (B and C), or SHP2 (D). The C lanes represent immunoprecipitates with control IgG (A) or GST fusion protein (B-D). The TCL lanes represent 30 µg of total cell lysate. WB, Western blot.

RAFTKm906 Has No Effect on the SHP1 or SHP2 Phosphorylation Induced by MIP1beta -- Since SHP1 was shown to associate with RAFTK upon MIP1beta stimulation, we were interested in whether RAFTK modulated the MIP1beta -stimulated phosphorylation of SHP1. To address this question, we created double-transfected L1.2 cells that expressed human CCR5 and RAFTKm906, in which Tyr906 was replaced with Phe. Tyr906 of RAFTK is a putative binding site for phosphatases. As shown in Fig. 3 (A and B, respectively), there was no significant increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP1 and SHP2 in the RAFTKm906 transfectants as compared with the pcDNA transfectants. An equal amount of SHP1 and SHP2 proteins was present in all samples (Fig. 3, A and B, lower panels).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   RAFTK does not mediate SHP1 or SHP2 tyrosine phosphorylation. Stable transfectants of pcDNA control vector or the dominant-negative phosphatase-binding mutant of RAFTK (RAFTKm906) were stimulated with MIP1beta , and cell lysates were then immunoprecipitated (IP) with SHP1 (A) or SHP2 (B). The immune complexes were run on SDS-polyacrylamide gel and subjected to serial blotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (A and B, upper panels), followed by anti-SHP1 (A, lower panel) or anti-SHP2 (B, lower panel) antibody. The TCL lanes represent total cell lysates, and the C lanes represent immunoprecipitates with control IgG. Fold increase represents values calculated after densitometric scanning of gels. WB, Western blot.

Effect of Phosphatase Inhibitor on MIP1beta -induced Migration of CCR5 Cells-- Tyrosine phosphatases have been shown to play an important role in chemotaxis. To determine the potential role of phosphatases in MIP1beta -stimulated chemotaxis, we examined MIP1beta -induced migration in the presence of different concentrations of the phosphatase inhibitor orthovanadate. As shown in Fig. 4 (A and B, respectively), orthovanadate treatment attenuated the MIP1beta -induced migration of CCR5 L1.2 cells and activated T-cells in a dose-dependent manner. 100 µM orthovanadate resulted in ~85% inhibition of CCR5 L1.2 and ~70% inhibition of T-cell chemotaxis. No effect on cell survival or growth was observed under similar conditions.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effect of the phosphatase inhibitor orthovanadate on MIP1beta -induced chemotaxis. CCR5 L1.2 cells (A) or activated T-cells (B) were pretreated with 1, 10, or 100 µM orthovanadate for 30 min. Migration toward 50 ng/ml MIP1beta was measured for 8 h in the presence or absence of inhibitor as described under "Experimental Procedures." Chemotaxis of cells in the absence of orthovanadate is referred to as 100% migration.

Syk Is Phosphorylated and Activated upon MIP1beta Stimulation-- The Src-related kinase Syk has been shown to participate in various signaling pathways regulating cell growth and adhesion. To characterize the role of Syk in CCR5-mediated signal transduction pathways, CCR5 transfectants or T-cells were stimulated with MIP1beta , and the lysates were analyzed for Syk kinase activation. As shown in Fig. 5A (upper panel), MIP1beta stimulation of the CCR5 L1.2 transfectants resulted in enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of Syk. Equal amounts of Syk protein were present in each lane (Fig. 5A, lower panel). In addition, MIP1beta stimulation induced Syk-autophosphorylating activity in CCR5 L1.2 transfectants (Fig. 5B) and, to a lesser degree, in T-cells (Fig. 5C). Similar to SHP1 and SHP2 phosphorylation, Syk-autophosphorylating activity was reduced in T-cells as compared with the CCR5 L1.2 transfectants upon MIP1beta stimulation.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Activation of Syk in response to MIP1beta stimulation. CCR5 L1.2 cells (A and B) or T-cells (C) were unstimulated (0 lanes) or stimulated with 200 ng/ml MIP1beta for varying time periods. Cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated (IP) with Syk and then analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (A, upper panel). The same immunoblot was stripped and immunoblotted with anti-Syk antibody (A, lower panel). Syk immunoprecipitates were subjected to autophosphorylation kinase activity as described under "Experimental Procedures" (B and C). Fold increase represents values calculated after densitometric scanning of gels. The TCL lanes represent total cell lysates, and the C lanes represent immunoprecipitates with control IgG. WB, Western blot.

Syk Associates with RAFTK, Grb2, SHP1, and SHP2-- To further characterize the role that Syk might play in CCR5-mediated signaling, we sought to identify proteins that associate with Syk upon MIP1beta stimulation. We observed a constitutive association of Syk with RAFTK, an association that was enhanced upon MIP1beta stimulation (Fig. 6A). RAFTK has previously been shown to be phosphorylated and activated by MIP1beta (15). Furthermore, Syk was also shown to associate with the SH2 domain of Grb2. This association was enhanced upon MIP1beta stimulation (Fig. 6B). Since we observed that Syk was activated and associated with RAFTK upon MIP1beta stimulation, we subsequently studied the association of Syk with SHP1. As shown, Syk also associated with SHP1 (Fig. 7), and this association was enhanced upon MIP1beta stimulation.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Association of Syk with RAFTK and Grb2 upon MIP1beta stimulation. A, unstimulated (0 lane) or stimulated CCR5 L1.2 cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Syk antibody or control IgG (C lane) and then immunoblotted with anti-RAFTK antibody. The TCL lane represents 30 µg of total cell lysate. B, cell lysates unstimulated (0 lane) or stimulated with 200 ng/ml MIP1beta were immunoprecipitated with Grb2-GST and then immunoblotted with anti-Syk antibody. Control immunoprecipitations were done using GST protein (C lane). WB, Western blot.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   SHP1 associates with Syk. Lysates from CCR5 L1.2 cells stimulated with MIP1beta for different time periods as indicated were immunoprecipitated (IP) with SHP1 and run on SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The blots were subjected to serial blotting with Syk (upper panel), followed by blotting with SHP1 (lower panel). The C lane represents immunoprecipitates with control IgG. WB, Western blot.

Syk Stimulation by MIP1beta Is Mediated by RAFTK-- Since RAFTK associated with Syk, we wanted to see whether this association was important for Syk activation. To address this question, we created double-transfected L1.2 cells that expressed human CCR5 and RAFTKm402 (which lacks the Src-binding site) or CCR5 and RAFTKWT. Up to a 3-fold increase in Syk activation was observed in the MIP1beta -treated CCR5-RAFTKWT cells as compared with the pcDNA-transfected cells (Fig. 8A). We also observed an ~2-fold decrease in Syk activity in the CCR5 L1.2 transfectants overexpressing the dominant-negative mutant RAFTKm402 as compared with transfectants expressing the pcDNA vector (Fig. 8B). These studies suggest that RAFTK may regulate Syk kinase activation in these cells.


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Regulation of Syk kinase by RAFTK. CCR5 L1.2 cells were stably transfected with pcDNA control vector, RAFTKWT, or the dominant-negative Src-binding mutant of RAFTK (RAFTKm402). Double transfectants, pcDNA control vector, and RAFTKWT (A) or pcDNA control vector and RAFTKm402 (B) were stimulated with MIP1beta for varying time periods, and then cell lysates from unstimulated (0 lanes) or stimulated cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-Syk antibody. The immune complexes were subjected to in vitro kinase reaction. Fold increase represents values calculated after densitometric scanning of gels.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In our earlier studies using CCR5-transfected murine pre-B lymphoma L1.2 cells as a model, we have shown that MIP1beta stimulation results in activation of RAFTK/Pyk2 (15). Furthermore, HIV gp120 binding to CCR5 and chemokine stimulation have also been shown to induce RAFTK/Pyk2 phosphorylation (16, 47). In the present study, we have further characterized the role of RAFTK and investigated the possible involvement of the phosphatases SHP1 and SHP2 and the Src-related kinase Syk in signaling pathways mediated by CCR5. Cytoplasmic tyrosine phosphatases and Src-related kinases are known to modulate regulatory pathways of cell spreading, migration, and cytoskeletal organization (48-52).

MIP1beta stimulation enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of the phosphatases SHP1 and SHP2. Both of these phosphatases have been shown to participate in various receptor-mediated pathways. SHP1 has been shown to act as a negative regulator of signaling pathways, whereas SHP2 appears to function as a positive mediator (17, 18, 21-24). Recent studies of hematopoietic cells from motheaten mice indicate that SHP1 plays an important role in the regulation of the stromal cell-derived factor-1-induced signaling pathway (32). We have observed that SHP1 is associated with RAFTK. However, RAFTK does not appear to mediate the MIP1beta -stimulated phosphorylation of SHP1 or SHP2 since overexpression of a dominant-negative phosphatase-binding mutant of RAFTK had little effect on MIP1beta -stimulated SHP1 or SHP2 phosphorylation.

We also observed that chemokine stimulation resulted in the enhanced association of SHP1 and SHP2 with Syk and Grb2. In different signaling pathways, SHP1 and SHP2 are known to associate with various signaling molecules, including Vav, Grb2, SOS, and SLP-76 via their SH2 domains (53-56). In addition to their role as phosphatases, SHP1 and SHP2 may act as adaptor proteins by providing docking sites for the recruitment of downstream signaling molecules. The present study indicates that tyrosine phosphatases may play an important role in the regulation of MIP1beta -induced migration, as orthovanadate treatment markedly attenuated MIP1beta -stimulated chemotaxis. Recently, platelet-derived growth factor-induced migration was shown to be regulated by SHP2 (48).

MIP1beta stimulation also induced activation of Syk, a Src-related kinase. Syk has been shown to participate in signal transduction pathways mediated by B- and T-cell antigen receptors, the Fc receptor, various growth factor receptors, and integrin receptors (33-37). However, the G-protein-coupled m1 muscarinic receptor does not activate Syk. Tyr402 (autophosphorylation site) of RAFTK has been shown to bind to Src kinases, which results in their activation (40). In the present study, we observed that Syk associated with RAFTK and that this association was enhanced upon MIP1beta stimulation. RAFTK association with another Src-related kinase, Fyn, has been shown to play an important role in mediating T-cell receptor signal transduction (46, 57). Furthermore, RANTES has been shown to induce ZAP-70 activity and its association with focal adhesion kinase in T-cells (58). In this study, RAFTK appeared to partially mediate Syk activation, as overexpression of a Src-binding mutant of RAFTK resulted in the reduced activation of Syk, whereas overexpression of wild-type RAFTK enhanced Syk activity. Recently, Syk was shown to be upstream of RAFTK/Pyk2 phosphorylation in Fcepsilon receptor-1-induced tyrosine phosphorylation in mast cells, whereas Pyk2 phosphorylation by thrombin and the adenosine G-protein-coupled receptor was independent of RAFTK/Pyk2 in these cells (59).

We also observed that Syk associated with SHP1 and that this association was enhanced by chemokine stimulation. Tyrosine phosphatases can cause activation of Src kinases (60). SHP1 has been shown to regulate Syk activity, as overexpression of SHP1-inactive mutants in B lymphoma cell lines results in enhanced Syk kinase activity (61).

Taken together, our results provide new information regarding various downstream signaling molecules involved in CCR5-mediated signaling pathways. We have found that MIP1beta stimulation of CCR5 activates Syk and increases the tyrosine phosphorylation of the SH2-domain containing phosphatases SHP1 and SHP2. This results in the formation of a multimeric complex consisting of RAFTK, Syk, Grb2, and SHP1. RAFTK was shown to partially mediate the activation of Syk, but had no significant effect on SHP1 or SHP2 tyrosine phosphorylation. These results suggest that RAFTK differentially regulates several downstream signaling targets that are activated upon CCR5 stimulation.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Walter Newman and Lijun Wu (LeukoSite, Inc.) for providing the CCR5 L1.2 transfectants. We also thank Janet Delahanty for editing, Nancy DesRosiers and Dan Kelley for preparation of the figures, and Simone Jadusingh for typing the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants HL53745 and HL61940 (to J. E. G.) and Grant CA76950 (to R. K. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Institutes of Medicine, 4 Blackfan Circle, Suite 351, Boston, MA 02115. Tel.: 617-667-0070; E-mail: jgroopma@caregroup.harvard.edu (J. E. G.). Tel.: 617-667-0060; E-mail: rganju@caregroup.harvard.edu (R. K. G.).

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 23, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000689200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein; RANTES, regulated on activation normal T-cell expressed; RAFTK, related adhesion focal tyrosine kinase; RAFTKWT, wild-type RAFTK; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter; GST, glutathione S-transferase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Premack, B. A., and Schall, T. J. (1996) Nat. Med. 2, 1174-1178
2. Luster, A. D. (1998) N. Engl. J. Med. 338, 436-445
3. Rollins, B. J. (1997) Blood 90, 909-928
4. Littman, D. R. (1998) Cell 93, 677-680
5. Moore, J. P., Trkola, A., and Dragic, T. (1997) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9, 551-562
6. Feng, Y., Broder, C. C., Kennedy, P. E., and Berger, E. A. (1996) Science 272, 872-877
7. Nicholas, J., Ruvolo, V. R., Burns, W. H., Sandford, G., Wan, X., Ciufo, D., Hendrickson, S. B., Guo, H. G., Hayward, G. S., and Reitz, M. S. (1997) Nat. Med. 3, 287-292
8. Murphy, P. M. (1997) Nature 385, 296-297
9. Arvanitakis, L., Geras-Raaka, E., Varma, A., Gershengorn, M. C., and Cesarman, E. (1997) Nature 385, 347-350
10. Bais, C., Santomasso, B., Coso, O., Arvanitakis, L., Raaka, E. G., Gutkind, J. S., Asch, A. S., Cesarman, E., Gershengorn, M. C., and Mesri, E. A. (1998) Nature 391, 86-89
11. Choe, H., Farzan, M., Sun, Y., Sullivan, N., Rollins, B., Ponath, P. D., Wu, L., Mackay, C. R., LaRosa, G., Newman, W., Gerard, N., Gerard, C., and Sodroski, J. (1996) Cell 85, 1135-1148
12. Alkhatib, G., Combadiere, C., Broder, C. C., Feng, Y., Kennedy, P. E., Murphy, P. M., and Berger, E. A. (1996) Science 272, 1955-1958
13. Zhou, Y., Kurihara, T., Ryseck, R. P., Yang, Y., Ryan, C., Loy, J., Warr, G., and Bravo, R. (1998) J. Immunol. 160, 4018-4025
14. Weissman, D., Rabin, R. L., Arthos, J., Rubbert, A., Dybul, M., Swofford, R., Venkatesan, S., Farber, J. M., and Fauci, A. S. (1997) Nature 389, 981-985
15. Ganju, R. K., Dutt, P., Wu, L., Newman, W., Avraham, H., Avraham, S., and Groopman, J. E. (1998) Blood 91, 791-797
16. Davis, C. B., Dikic, I., Unutmaz, D., Hill, C. M., Arthos, J., Siani, M. A., Thompson, D. A., Schlessinger, J., and Littman, D. R. (1997) J. Exp. Med. 186, 1793-1798
17. Streuli, M. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 182-188
18. Neel, B. G. (1997) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9, 405-420
19. Haque, S. J., Harbor, P., Tabrizi, M., Yi, T., and Williams, B. R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 33893-33896
20. Dong, Q., Siminovitch, K. A., Fialkow, L., Fukushima, T., and Downey, G. P. (1999) J. Immunol. 162, 3220-3230
21. Frearson, J. A., and Alexander, D. R. (1998) J. Exp. Med. 187, 1417-1426
22. Nakamura, K., and Cambier, J. C. (1998) J. Immunol. 161, 684-691
23. Pazdrak, K., Adachi, T., and Alam, R. (1997) J. Exp. Med. 186, 561-568
24. Yamauchi, K., Milarski, K. L., Saltiel, A. R., and Pessin, J. E. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 664-668
25. Bone, H., Dechert, U., Jirik, F., Schrader, J. W., and Welham, M. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14470-14476
26. Yu, Z., Su, L., Hoglinger, O., Jaramillo, M. L., Banville, D., and Shen, S. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 3687-3694
27. Sagawa, K., Kimura, T., Swieter, M., and Siraganian, R. P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31086-31091
28. Ong, S. H., Lim, Y. P., Low, B. C., and Guy, G. R. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 238, 261-266
29. Shultz, L. D., Schweitzer, P. A., Rajan, T. V., Yi, T., Ihle, J. N., Matthews, R. J., Thomas, M. L., and Beier, D. R. (1993) Cell 73, 1445-1454
30. Shultz, L. D., Rajan, T. V., and Greiner, D. L. (1997) Trends Biotechnol. 15, 302-307
31. Qu, C. K., Yu, W. M., Azzarelli, B., Cooper, S., Broxmeyer, H. E., and Feng, G. S. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 6075-6082
32. Kim, C. H., Qu, C. K., Hangoc, G., Cooper, S., Anzai, N., Feng, G. S., and Broxmeyer, H. E. (1999) J. Exp. Med. 190, 681-690
33. Poole, A., Gibbins, J. M., Turner, M., van Vugt, M. J., van de Winkel, J. G., Saito, T., Tybulewicz, V. L., and Watson, S. P. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 2333-2341
34. Latour, S., Fournel, M., and Veillette, A. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 4434-4441
35. Gao, J., Zoller, K. E., Ginsberg, M. H., Brugge, J. S., and Shattil, S. J. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 6414-6425
36. Brumbaugh, K. M., Binstadt, B. A., Billadeau, D. D., Schoon, R. A., Dick, C. J., Ten, R. M., and Leibson, P. J. (1997) J. Exp. Med. 186, 1965-1974
37. Turner, M., Gulbranson-Judge, A., Quinn, M. E., Walters, A. E., MacLennan, I. C., and Tybulewicz, V. L. (1997) J. Exp. Med. 186, 2013-2021
38. Yanaga, F., Poole, A., Asselin, J., Blake, R., Schieven, G. L., Clark, E. A., Law, C. L., and Watson, S. P. (1995) Biochem. J. 311, 471-478
39. Sidorenko, S. P., Law, C. L., Chandran, K. A., and Clark, E. A. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 359-363
40. Dikic, I., Tokiwa, G., Lev, S., Courtneidge, S. A., and Schlessinger, J. (1996) Nature 383, 547-550
41. Li, J., Avraham, H., Rogers, R. A., Raja, S., and Avraham, S. (1996) Blood 88, 417-428
42. Wu, L., Gerard, N. P., Wyatt, R., Choe, H., Parolin, C., Ruffing, N., Borsetti, A., Cardoso, A. A., Desjardin, E., Newman, W., Gerard, C., and Sodroski, J. (1996) Nature 384, 179-183
43. Wu, L., Paxton, W. A., Kassam, N., Ruffing, N., Rottman, J. B., Sullivan, N., Choe, H., Sodroski, J., Newman, W., Koup, R. A., and Mackay, C. R. (1997) J. Exp. Med. 185, 1681-1691
44. Alfano, M., Schmidtmayerova, H., Amella, C. A., Pushkarsky, T., and Bukrinsky, M. (1999) J. Exp. Med. 190, 597-606
45. Ganju, R. K., Brubaker, S. A., Meyer, J., Dutt, P., Yang, Y., Qin, S., Newman, W., and Groopman, J. E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 23169-23175
46. Ganju, R. K., Hatch, W. C., Avraham, H., Ona, M. A., Druker, B., Avraham, S., and Groopman, J. E. (1997) J. Exp. Med. 185, 1055-1063
47. Dikic, I., and Schlessinger, J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 14301-14308
48. Qi, J. H., Ito, N., and Claesson-Welsh, L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 14455-14463
49. Yu, D. H., Qu, C. K., Henegariu, O., Lu, X., and Feng, G. S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 21125-21131
50. Sada, K., Minami, Y., and Yamamura, H. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 248, 827-833
51. Jugloff, L. S., and Jongstra-Bilen, J. (1997) J. Immunol. 159, 1096-1106
52. Greenberg, S., Chang, P., and Silverstein, S. C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 3897-3902
53. Songyang, Z., Shoelson, S. E., McGlade, J., Olivier, P., Pawson, T., Bustelo, X. R., Barbacid, M., Sabe, H., Hanafusa, H., Yi, T., Ren, R., Baltimore, D., Ratnofsky, S., Feldman, R. A., and Cantley, L. C. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 2777-2785
54. Veillette, A., Thibaudeau, E., and Latour, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22719-22728
55. Fujioka, Y., Matozaki, T., Noguchi, T., Iwamatsu, A., Yamao, T., Takahashi, N., Tsuda, M., Takada, T., and Kasuga, M. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6887-6899
56. Zhang, S., and Broxmeyer, H. E. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 254, 440-445
57. Qian, D., Lev, S., van Oers, N. S., Dikic, I., Schlessinger, J., and Weiss, A. (1997) J. Exp. Med. 185, 1253-1259
58. Bacon, K. B., Szabo, M. C., Yssel, H., Bolen, J. B., and Schall, T. J. (1996) J. Exp. Med. 184, 873-882
59. Okazaki, H., Zhang, J., Hamawy, M. M., and Siraganian, R. P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 32443-32447
60. Somani, A. K., Bignon, J. S., Mills, G. B., Siminovitch, K. A., and Branch, D. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 21113-21119
61. Dustin, L. B., Plas, D. R., Wong, J., Hu, Y. T., Soto, C., Chan, A. C., and Thomas, M. L. (1999) J. Immunol. 162, 2717-2724


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Cheung, V. Ravyn, L. Wang, A. Ptasznik, and R. G. Collman
Signaling Mechanism of HIV-1 gp120 and Virion-Induced IL-1{beta} Release in Primary Human Macrophages
J. Immunol., May 15, 2008; 180(10): 6675 - 6684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
T. T. Murooka, R. Rahbar, L. C. Platanias, and E. N. Fish
CCL5-mediated T-cell chemotaxis involves the initiation of mRNA translation through mTOR/4E-BP1
Blood, May 15, 2008; 111(10): 4892 - 4901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Saita, E. Kodama, M. Orita, M. Kondo, T. Miyazaki, K. Sudo, K. Kajiwara, M. Matsuoka, and Y. Shimizu
Structural Basis for the Interaction of CCR5 with a Small Molecule, Functionally Selective CCR5 Agonist.
J. Immunol., September 1, 2006; 177(5): 3116 - 3122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
B. Tomkowicz, C. Lee, V. Ravyn, R. Cheung, A. Ptasznik, and R. G. Collman
The Src kinase Lyn is required for CCR5 signaling in response to MIP-1beta and R5 HIV-1 gp120 in human macrophages
Blood, August 15, 2006; 108(4): 1145 - 1150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. H. Lee, Y. M. Kim, N. W. Kim, J. W. Kim, E. Her, B. K. Kim, J. H. Kim, S. H. Ryu, J. W. Park, D. W. Seo, et al.
Phospholipase D2 acts as an essential adaptor protein in the activation of Syk in antigen-stimulated mast cells
Blood, August 1, 2006; 108(3): 956 - 964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. J. Salmond, G. Huyer, A. Kotsoni, L. Clements, and D. R. Alexander
The src Homology 2 Domain-Containing Tyrosine Phosphatase 2 Regulates Primary T-Dependent Immune Responses and Th Cell Differentiation
J. Immunol., November 15, 2005; 175(10): 6498 - 6508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J.-C. Gevrey, B. M. Isaac, and D. Cox
Syk Is Required for Monocyte/Macrophage Chemotaxis to CX3CL1 (Fractalkine)
J. Immunol., September 15, 2005; 175(6): 3737 - 3745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
S L-F Pender, V Chance, C V Whiting, M Buckley, M Edwards, R Pettipher, and T T MacDonald
Systemic administration of the chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein 1{alpha} exacerbates inflammatory bowel disease in a mouse model
Gut, August 1, 2005; 54(8): 1114 - 1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. Riol-Blanco, N. Sanchez-Sanchez, A. Torres, A. Tejedor, S. Narumiya, A. L. Corbi, P. Sanchez-Mateos, and J. L. Rodriguez-Fernandez
The Chemokine Receptor CCR7 Activates in Dendritic Cells Two Signaling Modules That Independently Regulate Chemotaxis and Migratory Speed
J. Immunol., April 1, 2005; 174(7): 4070 - 4080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. D. Moon, C. B. Post, D. L. Durden, Q. Zhou, P. De, M. L. Harrison, and R. L. Geahlen
Molecular Basis for a Direct Interaction between the Syk Protein-tyrosine Kinase and Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase
J. Biol. Chem., January 14, 2005; 280(2): 1543 - 1551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. MacGillivray, M. T. Herrera-Abreu, C.-W. Chow, C. Shek, Q. Wang, E. Vachon, G.-S. Feng, K. A. Siminovitch, C. A. G. McCulloch, and G. P. Downey
The Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2 Regulates Interleukin-1-induced ERK Activation in Fibroblasts
J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2003; 278(29): 27190 - 27198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. Mocsai, H. Zhang, Z. Jakus, J. Kitaura, T. Kawakami, and C. A. Lowell
G-protein-coupled receptor signaling in Syk-deficient neutrophils and mast cells
Blood, May 15, 2003; 101(10): 4155 - 4163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Z. Fernandis, R. P. Cherla, R. D. Chernock, and R. K. Ganju
CXCR4/CCR5 Down-modulation and Chemotaxis Are Regulated by the Proteasome Pathway
J. Biol. Chem., May 10, 2002; 277(20): 18111 - 18117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. L. Kozak, J. M. Heard, and D. Kabat
Segregation of CD4 and CXCR4 into Distinct Lipid Microdomains in T Lymphocytes Suggests a Mechanism for Membrane Destabilization by Human Immunodeficiency Virus
J. Virol., February 15, 2002; 76(4): 1802 - 1815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
Y. Shibasaki, H. Matsubara, Y. Nozawa, Y. Mori, H. Masaki, A. Kosaki, Y. Tsutsumi, Y. Uchiyama, S. Fujiyama, A. Nose, et al.
Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Inhibits Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Transactivation by Increasing Association of SHP-1 Tyrosine Phosphatase
Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 367 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
K. J. Clemetson, J. M. Clemetson, A. E. I. Proudfoot, C. A. Power, M. Baggiolini, and T. N. C. Wells
Functional expression of CCR1, CCR3, CCR4, and CXCR4 chemokine receptors on human platelets
Blood, December 15, 2000; 96(13): 4046 - 4054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Chiarugi, M. L. Taddei, P. Cirri, D. Talini, F. Buricchi, G. Camici, G. Manao, G. Raugei, and G. Ramponi
Low Molecular Weight Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase Controls the Rate and the Strength of NIH-3T3 Cells Adhesion through Its Phosphorylation on Tyrosine 131 or 132
J. Biol. Chem., November 22, 2000; 275(48): 37619 - 37627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/23/17263    most recent
M000689200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ganju, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Groopman, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ganju, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Groopman, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement