|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M000689200 on March 23, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 23, 17263-17268, June 9, 2000
-Chemokine Receptor CCR5 Signals through SHP1, SHP2, and
Syk*
Ramesh K.
Ganju ,
Stephanie A.
Brubaker,
Rebecca D.
Chernock,
Shalom
Avraham, and
Jerome E.
Groopman
From the Division of Experimental Medicine, Hematology/Oncology,
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Received for publication, January 24, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The -chemokine receptor CCR5 has been shown to
modulate cell migration, proliferation, and immune functions and to
serve as a co-receptor for the human immunodeficiency virus. We and others have shown that CCR5 activates related adhesion focal tyrosine kinase (RAFTK)/Pyk2/CAK- . In this study, we further characterize the
signaling molecules activated by CCR5 upon binding to its cognate
ligand, macrophage inflammatory protein-1 (MIP1 ). We observed
enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of the phosphatases SHP1 and SHP2
upon MIP1 stimulation of CCR5 L1.2 transfectants and T-cells derived
from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Furthermore, we observed that
SHP1 associated with RAFTK. However, using a dominant-negative
phosphatase-binding mutant of RAFTK (RAFTKm906), we
found that RAFTK does not mediate SHP1 or SHP2 phosphorylation. SHP1
and SHP2 also associated with the adaptor protein Grb2 and the
Src-related kinase Syk. Pretreatment of CCR5 L1.2 transfectants or
T-cells with the phosphatase inhibitor orthovanadate markedly abolished
MIP1 -induced chemotaxis. Syk was also activated upon MIP1
stimulation of CCR5 L1.2 transfectants or T-cells and associated with
RAFTK. Overexpression of a dominant-negative Src-binding mutant of
RAFTK (RAFTKm402) significantly attenuated Syk activation,
whereas overexpression of wild-type RAFTK enhanced Syk activity,
indicating that RAFTK acts upstream of CCR5-mediated Syk activation.
Taken together, these results suggest that MIP1 stimulation mediated
by CCR5 induces the formation of a signaling complex consisting of
RAFTK, Syk, SHP1, and Grb2.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Chemokines and their receptors play important roles in cell
migration, growth, and host inflammatory responses (1-3). These receptors also serve as co-receptors for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)1 (4-6).
Recently, chemokines also have been implicated in the development of
Kaposi's sarcoma via Kaposi's sarcoma herpes virus (human herpes
virus (HHV-8)), which encodes for several functional homologues of
certain chemokines like MIP and of -chemokine receptors, including
CXCR1, CXCR2, and CXCR3 (7-10).
CCR5 is a G-protein-coupled seven-transmembrane receptor that belongs
to the pro-inflammatory -chemokine receptor family. It is a
co-receptor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1 isolates (4, 11, 12). CCR5 is
activated by the -chemokines MIP1 , MIP1 , and RANTES. MIP1
has higher specificity for CCR5 than do MIP1 and RANTES, which also
bind to CCR1 and CCR3 (1, 3, 12). Knockout mice lacking CCR5 revealed
partial defects in macrophages and also showed enhanced
T-cell-dependent immune response and delayed type
hypersensitivity reaction, suggesting that CCR5 may play an important
role in down-regulating T-cell-dependent immune responses
(13).
Despite the emerging role of CCR5 and its ligands in HIV infection and
the immune response, relatively little is known about the signaling
pathways mediated by this receptor. CCR5 has been shown to induce
calcium signals and chemotaxis upon binding to the macrophage-tropic
HIV gp160 recombinant envelope protein (14). We (15) and others (16)
have also recently shown that CCR5, upon binding to its cognate ligand
(MIP1 ) or to the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein from a
macrophage-tropic strain, activates a member of the focal adhesion
kinase family called related adhesion focal tyrosine kinase (RAFTK;
also known as Pyk2 and CAK- ). We further demonstrated that RAFTK
associates with the cytoskeletal protein paxillin upon CCR5 activation
(15).
To further elucidate MIP1 -induced CCR5 signaling pathways, we have
delineated the roles of the SH2 domain-containing cytoplasmic tyrosine
phosphatase subfamily members SHP1 and SHP2 and of the Src-related
kinase Syk. SHP1 (also named SHPTP1, PTPK, HC, or SHP) is predominantly
expressed in hematopoietic cells, whereas SHP2 (also called SHPTP2,
PTP1D, SYP, PTP2C, or SHPTP3) is expressed ubiquitously (17, 18). SHP1
acts as a negative regulator of intracellular signaling (19, 20). In
contrast, SHP2 appears to play a positive role in regulating various
growth factor-induced signaling pathways (21-24). SH2 domains of SHP1
and SHP2 have been shown to bind to several tyrosine-phosphorylated
proteins (25-28). Mice deficient in SHP1 (motheaten or
viable motheaten) suffer from several immunological,
inflammatory, and hematological abnormalities (29, 30), whereas SHP2
mutant mice possess multiple defects in mesodermal patterning and die
at mid-gestation (31). Furthermore, recently, it was shown that
chemotactic responses to chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1
were altered in mature and immature hematopoietic cells derived from
motheaten mice (32).
Syk, a cytoplasmic protein-tyrosine kinase, plays an important role in
the signaling pathways mediated by the B-cell antigen, Fc receptor,
T-cell antigen receptor, and integrin receptor and thereby modulates
cell growth and chemotaxis (33-37). Syk interacts with various
tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins (38, 39). Prior analysis of RAFTK
indicated that tyrosine 402 in its N-terminal domain binds to the SH2
domain of Src kinases and activates such Src kinases upon
lipopolysaccharide or bradykinin treatment (40).
This study demonstrates that MIP1 stimulation of CCR5 transfectants
induces the tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP1 and SHP2 and activates
Syk. This induction also results in the formation of a signaling
complex consisting of RAFTK, Syk, SHP1, and Grb2. These results
indicate that RAFTK acts upstream of Syk and suggest that it does not
regulate the SHP1 and SHP2 phosphorylation mediated by CCR5.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Reagents and Materials--
Anti-RAFTK antibodies were generated
as described previously (41). This antiserum recognized both human and
murine forms of RAFTK and did not cross-react with focal adhesion
kinase. Antibodies to Syk, SHP1, and SHP2 were obtained from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine
antibody (4G10) was a generous gift from Dr. Brian Druker (Oregon
Health Sciences University, Portland, OR). Electrophoresis reagents and
nitrocellulose membranes were obtained from Bio-Rad. The protease
inhibitors leupeptin and 1-antitrypsin and all other
reagents were acquired from Sigma. Indo-1/AM was purchased from
Molecular Probes, Inc. (Eugene, OR).
Construction of CCR5 Stable Transfectants--
CCR5 was
transfected into the pre-B lymphoma cell line L1.2 as described
previously (42, 43), and transfectants were selected in medium
containing mycophenolic acid. FACS analysis was used to monitor the
cell-surface expression of CCR5. CCR5 was expressed at a high level in
these cells (42). The -chemokines MIP1 , MIP1 , and RANTES bind
with high affinity to the expressed CCR5 receptors. These cells possess
properties characteristic of native CCR5, as they bind to
macrophage-tropic HIV-1 gp120 in the presence of soluble human CD4
(42).
Cell Culture--
CCR5 transfectants and mutants were grown in
RPMI 1640 medium (containing 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mmol/liter
glutamine, 1 mmol/liter sodium pyruvate, 50 µg/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, and 55 µmol/liter -mercaptoethanol)
supplemented with 100 nmol/liter sodium hypoxanthine, 16 nmol/liter
thymidine, 2.5 µg/ml mycophenolic acid, and 125 µg/ml xanthine.
CCR5 L1.2 transfectants containing RAFTK constructs were grown in
mycophenolic acid medium containing 0.8 mg/liter Geneticin (G418, Life
Technologies, Inc.).
RAFTK Transfectants--
Transfectants of mutants
RAFTKm402 and RAFTKm906 and wild-type RAFTK
(RAFTKWT) were produced by transfection of the CCR5 L1.2
cells with the RAFTKm402, RAFTKm906, or
RAFTKWT construct, respectively (15). pcDNA vector
without an RAFTK construct was used as a control. Mutants
RAFTKm906 and RAFTKm402 were generated by
replacing Tyr906 and Tyr402 with Phe,
respectively, by site-directed mutagenesis. Tyr906 of RAFTK
is the putative binding site for phosphatases, and Tyr402
has previously been shown to bind to Src kinases (40). Plasmids carrying RAFTKm906, RAFTKm402,
RAFTKWT, or pcDNA control vector were transfected by
electroporation into the CCR5 L1.2 cells using Bio-Rad electroporation
equipment. The transfectants were selected in medium containing
mycophenolic acid and G418. The double mutants expressed equal amounts
of CCR5 as determined by FACS analysis. Several clones of double
transfectants were used in the signaling studies.
Primary Lymphocyte Culture--
T-cell-enriched,
monocyte-depleted cultures were generated from peripheral blood
mononuclear cells as described (15, 44). Briefly, peripheral blood
mononuclear cells were separated by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient
centrifugation and two rounds of adherence to plastic. Non-adherent
cells were stimulated with phytohemagglutinin (5 µg/ml) for 3 days.
Cells were removed to fresh medium supplemented with recombinant human
interleukin-2 (Advanced Biotechnologies, Columbia, MD). Three-week-old
activated T-cells, which were found to be ~35% positive for CCR5 by
FACS analysis, were used for further studies.
Stimulation of Cells--
Cells were washed twice with 1×
Hanks' buffered salt solution (Sigma), resuspended at 10 × 106 cells/ml in 1× Hanks' buffered salt solution, and
then starved of serum for 2 h at 37 °C. The serum-starved cells
were stimulated with 200 ng/ml MIP1 at 37 °C for various time
periods. Following stimulation, cells were lysed using modified
radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (50 mmol/liter Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1% Nonidet P-40, 150 mmol/liter NaCl, 1 mmol/liter
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml
leupeptin, 10 µg/ml pepstatin, 10 mmol/liter sodium vanadate, 10 mmol/liter sodium fluoride, and 10 mmol/liter sodium pyrophosphate).
Total cell lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min. Protein concentrations were determined by
protein assay (Bio-Rad).
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot
Analysis--
Immunoprecipitation studies were conducted as described
(45). Briefly, identical amounts of protein from each time point were
clarified by incubation with protein A-Sepharose CL-4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 1 h at 4 °C. Protein A-Sepharose was
removed by brief centrifugation, and the supernatants were incubated
with different primary antibodies as described below for each
experiment for 2 h at 4 °C. Immunoprecipitation of the
antibody-antigen complexes was performed by incubation at 4 °C
overnight with 50 µl of protein A-Sepharose (10% suspension).
Nonspecific bound proteins were removed by washing the Sepharose beads
three times with modified radioimmune precipitation assay buffer and
one time with phosphate-buffered saline. Immune complexes were
solubilized in 30 µl of 2× Laemmli buffer, and samples were
separated on 8 or 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and then transferred to
nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat milk
protein for 1 h and probed with primary antibody for 3 h at
room temperature or at 4 °C overnight. Immunoreactive bands were
visualized using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody
and the enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL, Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech). The densitometric scanning of films was done using a Bio-Rad
Model G5-700 imaging densitometer.
Syk Kinase Assay--
The Syk kinase assay was performed by
first immunoprecipitating lysates with anti-Syk antibody. The immune
complexes were then washed twice with radioimmune precipitation assay
buffer and twice with Syk kinase buffer (20 mM Hepes, 50 mM NaCl, 10 µM
Na3VO4, 5 mM MgCl2, and
5 mM MnCl2). The complex was incubated in Syk
kinase buffer and 5 µCi of [ -32P]ATP for 20 min at
30 °C. The reaction was terminated by adding 4× SDS sample buffer
and boiling the samples for 5 min at 100 °C. Proteins were then
separated on 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and detected by
autoradiography. Rabbit IgG was used as a negative control.
Glutathione S-Transferase Fusion Protein Binding
Studies--
The RAFTK C-terminal domain (amino acids
681-1009)-glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein
was produced as described (46). Briefly, the fusion protein was
amplified by polymerase chain reaction and cloned into the pGEX-2T
expression vector (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The GST fusion protein
was produced by 1 mM isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside induction and
purified by affinity chromatography on a glutathione-Sepharose column
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the manufacturer's
recommendations. Grb2-GST fusion proteins were purchased from Santa
Cruz Biotechnology. For the binding experiments, 5 µg of GST fusion
protein were mixed with 1 mg of cell lysate and incubated for 1 h
at 4 °C on a rotatory shaker. GST protein (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
was used as a control. The complex was pre-absorbed by adding 50 µl
of glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The
samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C on a rotatory shaker. The
beads were centrifuged and washed three times with modified radioimmune
precipitation assay buffer and once with 1× phosphate-buffered saline.
The bound proteins were eluted by boiling in Laemmli sample buffer and
subjected to 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western
blot analysis.
Chemotaxis Assay--
The assay was performed in 24-well plates
containing 5-µm porosity inserts (Costar Corp., Cambridge, MA) as
described (45). Briefly, cells were resuspended at 6.6 × 106/ml in RPMI 1640 medium containing 2.5% bovine serum
albumin. 50 ng of MIP1 were added to the bottom wells, and 150 µl
of cells (1 × 106) untreated or pretreated with
different concentrations of sodium orthovanadate were loaded onto the
inserts. Cells migrating to the bottom wells were collected,
centrifuged, and counted. The results shown are representative of
findings from three independent experiments.
 |
RESULTS |
SHP1 and SHP2 Are Tyrosine-phosphorylated upon MIP1
Stimulation--
Cytoplasmic tyrosine phosphatases have been shown to
be important positive and negative regulators of signaling pathways. To
characterize the role that phosphatases play in CCR5-mediated signal
transduction pathways, CCR5 transfectants were stimulated with MIP1 ,
and lysates were analyzed for SHP1 and SHP2 tyrosine phosphorylation.
As shown in Fig. 1 (A and
C, respectively), MIP1 stimulation of CCR5 transfectants
resulted in an increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP1 and SHP2.
Equal amounts of SHP1 and SHP2 proteins were present in each lane (Fig.
1, A and C, lower panels). We also
found that MIP1 stimulation induced a slight increase in tyrosine
phosphorylation of SHP1 and SHP2 (Fig. 1, B and
D, respectively) in activated T-cells derived from
peripheral blood mononuclear cells. These T-cells were found to be
~35% positive for CCR5 (data not shown). The reduced SHP1 and SHP2
phosphorylation in T-cells as compared with CCR5 L1.2 cells may be due
to differences in the number of CCR5 receptors on these cells and/or to
differences between the cell types. In addition, RAFTK has also been
shown to have lower tyrosine phosphorylation in MIP1 -stimulated
T-cells as compared with the similarly stimulated CCR5 L1.2
transfectants (15).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP1 and SHP2
upon MIP1 stimulation. Unstimulated
(0 lanes) or stimulated CCR5 L1.2 cell lysates (A
and C) and T-cells (B and D) were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-SHP1 (A and
B) or anti-SHP2 (C and D) antibody or
control IgG (C lanes). The immune complexes were run on
SDS-polyacrylamide gel and subjected to serial immunoblotting with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (upper panels), followed by
anti-SHP1 antibody (A and B, lower
panels) or anti-SHP2 antibody (C and D,
lower panels). The TCL lanes represent
30 µg of total cell lysate. Fold increase represents
values calculated after densitometric scanning of gels. WB,
Western blot.
|
|
SHP1 and SHP2 Associate with Various Signaling
Molecules--
Tyr906 of RAFTK may act as a putative
binding site for SHP proteins. Therefore, we examined the association
of RAFTK with SHP1. As shown in Fig.
2A, SHP1 associated with RAFTK
constitutively; this association was modestly increased upon MIP1
stimulation. To further confirm this association, we used a GST fusion
protein containing the C-terminal domain of RAFTK. As shown in Fig.
2B, SHP1 was observed to associate with this fusion protein.
SHP1 also associated with Grb2 upon MIP1 stimulation (Fig.
2C). Since SHP2 was also tyrosine-phosphorylated following
MIP1 stimulation, we studied whether it associated with the adaptor
protein Grb2. As shown in Fig. 2D, SHP2 associated with
Grb2, and this association increased upon chemokine stimulation.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
SHP1 associates with RAFTK and Grb2 upon
MIP1 stimulation. CCR5 L1.2 cell lysates
unstimulated (0 lanes) or stimulated with MIP1 for
different time periods were immunoprecipitated (IP) with
SHP1 (A), RAFTK C-terminal domain-GST fusion protein
(B), or Grb2-GST (C and D). The immune
complexes were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
immunoblotted with RAFTK (A), SHP1 (B and
C), or SHP2 (D). The C lanes represent
immunoprecipitates with control IgG (A) or GST fusion
protein (B-D). The TCL lanes
represent 30 µg of total cell lysate. WB, Western
blot.
|
|
RAFTKm906 Has No Effect on the SHP1 or SHP2
Phosphorylation Induced by MIP1 --
Since SHP1 was shown to
associate with RAFTK upon MIP1 stimulation, we were interested in
whether RAFTK modulated the MIP1 -stimulated phosphorylation of SHP1.
To address this question, we created double-transfected L1.2 cells that
expressed human CCR5 and RAFTKm906, in which
Tyr906 was replaced with Phe. Tyr906 of RAFTK
is a putative binding site for phosphatases. As shown in Fig.
3 (A and B,
respectively), there was no significant increase in tyrosine
phosphorylation of SHP1 and SHP2 in the RAFTKm906
transfectants as compared with the pcDNA transfectants. An equal amount of SHP1 and SHP2 proteins was present in all samples (Fig. 3,
A and B, lower panels).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
RAFTK does not mediate SHP1 or SHP2 tyrosine
phosphorylation. Stable transfectants of pcDNA control vector
or the dominant-negative phosphatase-binding mutant of RAFTK
(RAFTKm906) were stimulated with MIP1 , and cell lysates
were then immunoprecipitated (IP) with SHP1 (A)
or SHP2 (B). The immune complexes were run on
SDS-polyacrylamide gel and subjected to serial blotting with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (A and B,
upper panels), followed by anti-SHP1
(A, lower panel) or anti-SHP2
(B, lower panel) antibody. The
TCL lanes represent total cell lysates, and the
C lanes represent immunoprecipitates with control IgG.
Fold increase represents values calculated after
densitometric scanning of gels. WB, Western blot.
|
|
Effect of Phosphatase Inhibitor on MIP1 -induced Migration of
CCR5 Cells--
Tyrosine phosphatases have been shown to play an
important role in chemotaxis. To determine the potential role of
phosphatases in MIP1 -stimulated chemotaxis, we examined
MIP1 -induced migration in the presence of different concentrations
of the phosphatase inhibitor orthovanadate. As shown in Fig.
4 (A and B,
respectively), orthovanadate treatment attenuated the MIP1 -induced
migration of CCR5 L1.2 cells and activated T-cells in a
dose-dependent manner. 100 µM orthovanadate
resulted in ~85% inhibition of CCR5 L1.2 and ~70% inhibition of
T-cell chemotaxis. No effect on cell survival or growth was observed
under similar conditions.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of the phosphatase inhibitor
orthovanadate on MIP1 -induced chemotaxis.
CCR5 L1.2 cells (A) or activated T-cells (B) were
pretreated with 1, 10, or 100 µM orthovanadate for 30 min. Migration toward 50 ng/ml MIP1 was measured for 8 h in the
presence or absence of inhibitor as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Chemotaxis of cells in the absence of orthovanadate is
referred to as 100% migration.
|
|
Syk Is Phosphorylated and Activated upon MIP1
Stimulation--
The Src-related kinase Syk has been shown to
participate in various signaling pathways regulating cell growth and
adhesion. To characterize the role of Syk in CCR5-mediated signal
transduction pathways, CCR5 transfectants or T-cells were stimulated
with MIP1 , and the lysates were analyzed for Syk kinase activation.
As shown in Fig. 5A
(upper panel), MIP1 stimulation of the CCR5 L1.2
transfectants resulted in enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of Syk.
Equal amounts of Syk protein were present in each lane (Fig.
5A, lower panel). In addition, MIP1
stimulation induced Syk-autophosphorylating activity in CCR5 L1.2
transfectants (Fig. 5B) and, to a lesser degree, in T-cells
(Fig. 5C). Similar to SHP1 and SHP2 phosphorylation, Syk-autophosphorylating activity was reduced in T-cells as compared with the CCR5 L1.2 transfectants upon MIP1 stimulation.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Activation of Syk in response to
MIP1 stimulation. CCR5 L1.2 cells
(A and B) or T-cells (C) were
unstimulated (0 lanes) or stimulated with 200 ng/ml MIP1
for varying time periods. Cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated
(IP) with Syk and then analyzed by immunoblotting with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (A, upper
panel). The same immunoblot was stripped and immunoblotted
with anti-Syk antibody (A, lower panel). Syk
immunoprecipitates were subjected to autophosphorylation kinase
activity as described under "Experimental Procedures" (B
and C). Fold increase represents values
calculated after densitometric scanning of gels. The TCL
lanes represent total cell lysates, and the C
lanes represent immunoprecipitates with control IgG.
WB, Western blot.
|
|
Syk Associates with RAFTK, Grb2, SHP1, and SHP2--
To further
characterize the role that Syk might play in CCR5-mediated signaling,
we sought to identify proteins that associate with Syk upon MIP1
stimulation. We observed a constitutive association of Syk with RAFTK,
an association that was enhanced upon MIP1 stimulation (Fig.
6A). RAFTK has previously been
shown to be phosphorylated and activated by MIP1 (15). Furthermore,
Syk was also shown to associate with the SH2 domain of Grb2. This
association was enhanced upon MIP1 stimulation (Fig. 6B).
Since we observed that Syk was activated and associated with RAFTK upon
MIP1 stimulation, we subsequently studied the association of Syk
with SHP1. As shown, Syk also associated with SHP1 (Fig.
7), and this association was enhanced
upon MIP1 stimulation.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Association of Syk with RAFTK and Grb2 upon
MIP1 stimulation. A, unstimulated
(0 lane) or stimulated CCR5 L1.2 cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Syk antibody or control
IgG (C lane) and then immunoblotted with anti-RAFTK
antibody. The TCL lane represents 30 µg of
total cell lysate. B, cell lysates unstimulated (0 lane) or stimulated with 200 ng/ml MIP1 were immunoprecipitated
with Grb2-GST and then immunoblotted with anti-Syk antibody. Control
immunoprecipitations were done using GST protein (C lane).
WB, Western blot.
|
|

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
SHP1 associates with Syk. Lysates from
CCR5 L1.2 cells stimulated with MIP1 for different time periods as
indicated were immunoprecipitated (IP) with SHP1 and run on
SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The blots were subjected to serial blotting
with Syk (upper panel), followed by blotting with
SHP1 (lower panel). The C lane
represents immunoprecipitates with control IgG. WB, Western
blot.
|
|
Syk Stimulation by MIP1 Is Mediated by RAFTK--
Since RAFTK
associated with Syk, we wanted to see whether this association was
important for Syk activation. To address this question, we created
double-transfected L1.2 cells that expressed human CCR5 and
RAFTKm402 (which lacks the Src-binding site) or CCR5 and
RAFTKWT. Up to a 3-fold increase in Syk activation was
observed in the MIP1 -treated CCR5-RAFTKWT cells as
compared with the pcDNA-transfected cells (Fig.
8A). We also observed an
~2-fold decrease in Syk activity in the CCR5 L1.2 transfectants
overexpressing the dominant-negative mutant RAFTKm402 as
compared with transfectants expressing the pcDNA vector (Fig. 8B). These studies suggest that RAFTK may regulate Syk
kinase activation in these cells.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Regulation of Syk kinase by RAFTK. CCR5
L1.2 cells were stably transfected with pcDNA control vector,
RAFTKWT, or the dominant-negative Src-binding mutant of
RAFTK (RAFTKm402). Double transfectants, pcDNA control
vector, and RAFTKWT (A) or pcDNA control
vector and RAFTKm402 (B) were stimulated with
MIP1 for varying time periods, and then cell lysates from
unstimulated (0 lanes) or stimulated cells were
immunoprecipitated with anti-Syk antibody. The immune complexes were
subjected to in vitro kinase reaction. Fold
increase represents values calculated after densitometric scanning
of gels.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In our earlier studies using CCR5-transfected murine pre-B
lymphoma L1.2 cells as a model, we have shown that MIP1 stimulation results in activation of RAFTK/Pyk2 (15). Furthermore, HIV gp120 binding to CCR5 and chemokine stimulation have also been shown to
induce RAFTK/Pyk2 phosphorylation (16, 47). In the present study, we
have further characterized the role of RAFTK and investigated the
possible involvement of the phosphatases SHP1 and SHP2 and the
Src-related kinase Syk in signaling pathways mediated by CCR5. Cytoplasmic tyrosine phosphatases and Src-related kinases are known to
modulate regulatory pathways of cell spreading, migration, and
cytoskeletal organization (48-52).
MIP1 stimulation enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of the
phosphatases SHP1 and SHP2. Both of these phosphatases have been shown
to participate in various receptor-mediated pathways. SHP1 has been
shown to act as a negative regulator of signaling pathways, whereas
SHP2 appears to function as a positive mediator (17, 18, 21-24).
Recent studies of hematopoietic cells from motheaten mice
indicate that SHP1 plays an important role in the regulation of the
stromal cell-derived factor-1-induced signaling pathway (32). We have
observed that SHP1 is associated with RAFTK. However, RAFTK does not
appear to mediate the MIP1 -stimulated phosphorylation of SHP1 or
SHP2 since overexpression of a dominant-negative phosphatase-binding mutant of RAFTK had little effect on MIP1 -stimulated SHP1 or SHP2 phosphorylation.
We also observed that chemokine stimulation resulted in the enhanced
association of SHP1 and SHP2 with Syk and Grb2. In different signaling
pathways, SHP1 and SHP2 are known to associate with various signaling
molecules, including Vav, Grb2, SOS, and SLP-76 via their SH2 domains
(53-56). In addition to their role as phosphatases, SHP1 and SHP2 may
act as adaptor proteins by providing docking sites for the recruitment
of downstream signaling molecules. The present study indicates that
tyrosine phosphatases may play an important role in the regulation of
MIP1 -induced migration, as orthovanadate treatment markedly
attenuated MIP1 -stimulated chemotaxis. Recently, platelet-derived
growth factor-induced migration was shown to be regulated by SHP2
(48).
MIP1 stimulation also induced activation of Syk, a Src-related
kinase. Syk has been shown to participate in signal transduction pathways mediated by B- and T-cell antigen receptors, the Fc receptor, various growth factor receptors, and integrin receptors (33-37). However, the G-protein-coupled m1 muscarinic receptor does not activate
Syk. Tyr402 (autophosphorylation site) of RAFTK has been
shown to bind to Src kinases, which results in their activation (40).
In the present study, we observed that Syk associated with RAFTK and that this association was enhanced upon MIP1 stimulation. RAFTK association with another Src-related kinase, Fyn, has been shown to
play an important role in mediating T-cell receptor signal transduction
(46, 57). Furthermore, RANTES has been shown to induce ZAP-70 activity
and its association with focal adhesion kinase in T-cells (58). In this
study, RAFTK appeared to partially mediate Syk activation, as
overexpression of a Src-binding mutant of RAFTK resulted in the reduced
activation of Syk, whereas overexpression of wild-type RAFTK enhanced
Syk activity. Recently, Syk was shown to be upstream of RAFTK/Pyk2
phosphorylation in Fc receptor-1-induced tyrosine phosphorylation in
mast cells, whereas Pyk2 phosphorylation by thrombin and the adenosine
G-protein-coupled receptor was independent of RAFTK/Pyk2 in these cells
(59).
We also observed that Syk associated with SHP1 and that this
association was enhanced by chemokine stimulation. Tyrosine
phosphatases can cause activation of Src kinases (60). SHP1 has been
shown to regulate Syk activity, as overexpression of SHP1-inactive
mutants in B lymphoma cell lines results in enhanced Syk kinase
activity (61).
Taken together, our results provide new information regarding various
downstream signaling molecules involved in CCR5-mediated signaling
pathways. We have found that MIP1 stimulation of CCR5 activates Syk
and increases the tyrosine phosphorylation of the SH2-domain containing
phosphatases SHP1 and SHP2. This results in the formation of a
multimeric complex consisting of RAFTK, Syk, Grb2, and SHP1. RAFTK was
shown to partially mediate the activation of Syk, but had no
significant effect on SHP1 or SHP2 tyrosine phosphorylation. These
results suggest that RAFTK differentially regulates several downstream
signaling targets that are activated upon CCR5 stimulation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Walter Newman and Lijun Wu
(LeukoSite, Inc.) for providing the CCR5 L1.2 transfectants. We also
thank Janet Delahanty for editing, Nancy DesRosiers and Dan Kelley for
preparation of the figures, and Simone Jadusingh for typing the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants HL53745 and HL61940 (to J. E. G.) and Grant CA76950 (to
R. K. G.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Beth Israel Deaconess
Medical Center, Harvard Institutes of Medicine, 4 Blackfan Circle,
Suite 351, Boston, MA 02115. Tel.: 617-667-0070; E-mail: jgroopma@caregroup.harvard.edu (J. E. G.). Tel.: 617-667-0060; E-mail: rganju@caregroup.harvard.edu (R. K. G.).
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 23, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000689200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HIV, human
immunodeficiency virus;
MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein;
RANTES, regulated on activation normal T-cell expressed;
RAFTK, related
adhesion focal tyrosine kinase;
RAFTKWT, wild-type RAFTK;
FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Premack, B. A.,
and Schall, T. J.
(1996)
Nat. Med.
2,
1174-1178
|
| 2.
|
Luster, A. D.
(1998)
N. Engl. J. Med.
338,
436-445
|
| 3.
|
Rollins, B. J.
(1997)
Blood
90,
909-928
|
| 4.
|
Littman, D. R.
(1998)
Cell
93,
677-680
|
| 5.
|
Moore, J. P.,
Trkola, A.,
and Dragic, T.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
9,
551-562
|
| 6.
|
Feng, Y.,
Broder, C. C.,
Kennedy, P. E.,
and Berger, E. A.
(1996)
Science
272,
872-877
|
| 7.
|
Nicholas, J.,
Ruvolo, V. R.,
Burns, W. H.,
Sandford, G.,
Wan, X.,
Ciufo, D.,
Hendrickson, S. B.,
Guo, H. G.,
Hayward, G. S.,
and Reitz, M. S.
(1997)
Nat. Med.
3,
287-292
|
| 8.
|
Murphy, P. M.
(1997)
Nature
385,
296-297
|
| 9.
|
Arvanitakis, L.,
Geras-Raaka, E.,
Varma, A.,
Gershengorn, M. C.,
and Cesarman, E.
(1997)
Nature
385,
347-350
|
| 10.
|
Bais, C.,
Santomasso, B.,
Coso, O.,
Arvanitakis, L.,
Raaka, E. G.,
Gutkind, J. S.,
Asch, A. S.,
Cesarman, E.,
Gershengorn, M. C.,
and Mesri, E. A.
(1998)
Nature
391,
86-89
|
| 11.
|
Choe, H.,
Farzan, M.,
Sun, Y.,
Sullivan, N.,
Rollins, B.,
Ponath, P. D.,
Wu, L.,
Mackay, C. R.,
LaRosa, G.,
Newman, W.,
Gerard, N.,
Gerard, C.,
and Sodroski, J.
(1996)
Cell
85,
1135-1148
|
| 12.
|
Alkhatib, G.,
Combadiere, C.,
Broder, C. C.,
Feng, Y.,
Kennedy, P. E.,
Murphy, P. M.,
and Berger, E. A.
(1996)
Science
272,
1955-1958
|
| 13.
|
Zhou, Y.,
Kurihara, T.,
Ryseck, R. P.,
Yang, Y.,
Ryan, C.,
Loy, J.,
Warr, G.,
and Bravo, R.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
160,
4018-4025
|
| 14.
|
Weissman, D.,
Rabin, R. L.,
Arthos, J.,
Rubbert, A.,
Dybul, M.,
Swofford, R.,
Venkatesan, S.,
Farber, J. M.,
and Fauci, A. S.
(1997)
Nature
389,
981-985
|
| 15.
|
Ganju, R. K.,
Dutt, P.,
Wu, L.,
Newman, W.,
Avraham, H.,
Avraham, S.,
and Groopman, J. E.
(1998)
Blood
91,
791-797
|
| 16.
|
Davis, C. B.,
Dikic, I.,
Unutmaz, D.,
Hill, C. M.,
Arthos, J.,
Siani, M. A.,
Thompson, D. A.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Littman, D. R.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
1793-1798
|
| 17.
|
Streuli, M.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
182-188
|
| 18.
|
Neel, B. G.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
9,
405-420
|
| 19.
|
Haque, S. J.,
Harbor, P.,
Tabrizi, M.,
Yi, T.,
and Williams, B. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
33893-33896
|
| 20.
|
Dong, Q.,
Siminovitch, K. A.,
Fialkow, L.,
Fukushima, T.,
and Downey, G. P.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
3220-3230
|
| 21.
|
Frearson, J. A.,
and Alexander, D. R.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
187,
1417-1426
|
| 22.
|
Nakamura, K.,
and Cambier, J. C.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
684-691
|
| 23.
|
Pazdrak, K.,
Adachi, T.,
and Alam, R.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
561-568
|
| 24.
|
Yamauchi, K.,
Milarski, K. L.,
Saltiel, A. R.,
and Pessin, J. E.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
664-668
|
| 25.
|
Bone, H.,
Dechert, U.,
Jirik, F.,
Schrader, J. W.,
and Welham, M. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
14470-14476
|
| 26.
|
Yu, Z.,
Su, L.,
Hoglinger, O.,
Jaramillo, M. L.,
Banville, D.,
and Shen, S. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
3687-3694
|
| 27.
|
Sagawa, K.,
Kimura, T.,
Swieter, M.,
and Siraganian, R. P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31086-31091
|
| 28.
|
Ong, S. H.,
Lim, Y. P.,
Low, B. C.,
and Guy, G. R.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
238,
261-266
|
| 29.
|
Shultz, L. D.,
Schweitzer, P. A.,
Rajan, T. V.,
Yi, T.,
Ihle, J. N.,
Matthews, R. J.,
Thomas, M. L.,
and Beier, D. R.
(1993)
Cell
73,
1445-1454
|
| 30.
|
Shultz, L. D.,
Rajan, T. V.,
and Greiner, D. L.
(1997)
Trends Biotechnol.
15,
302-307
|
| 31.
|
Qu, C. K., Yu, W. M.,
Azzarelli, B.,
Cooper, S.,
Broxmeyer, H. E.,
and Feng, G. S.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
6075-6082
|
| 32.
|
Kim, C. H.,
Qu, C. K.,
Hangoc, G.,
Cooper, S.,
Anzai, N.,
Feng, G. S.,
and Broxmeyer, H. E.
(1999)
J. Exp. Med.
190,
681-690
|
| 33.
|
Poole, A.,
Gibbins, J. M.,
Turner, M.,
van Vugt, M. J.,
van de Winkel, J. G.,
Saito, T.,
Tybulewicz, V. L.,
and Watson, S. P.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
2333-2341
|
| 34.
|
Latour, S.,
Fournel, M.,
and Veillette, A.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
4434-4441
|
| 35.
|
Gao, J.,
Zoller, K. E.,
Ginsberg, M. H.,
Brugge, J. S.,
and Shattil, S. J.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
6414-6425
|
| 36.
|
Brumbaugh, K. M.,
Binstadt, B. A.,
Billadeau, D. D.,
Schoon, R. A.,
Dick, C. J.,
Ten, R. M.,
and Leibson, P. J.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
1965-1974
|
| 37.
|
Turner, M.,
Gulbranson-Judge, A.,
Quinn, M. E.,
Walters, A. E.,
MacLennan, I. C.,
and Tybulewicz, V. L.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
2013-2021
|
| 38.
|
Yanaga, F.,
Poole, A.,
Asselin, J.,
Blake, R.,
Schieven, G. L.,
Clark, E. A.,
Law, C. L.,
and Watson, S. P.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
311,
471-478
|
| 39.
|
Sidorenko, S. P.,
Law, C. L.,
Chandran, K. A.,
and Clark, E. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
359-363
|
| 40.
|
Dikic, I.,
Tokiwa, G.,
Lev, S.,
Courtneidge, S. A.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1996)
Nature
383,
547-550
|
| 41.
|
Li, J.,
Avraham, H.,
Rogers, R. A.,
Raja, S.,
and Avraham, S.
(1996)
Blood
88,
417-428
|
| 42.
|
Wu, L.,
Gerard, N. P.,
Wyatt, R.,
Choe, H.,
Parolin, C.,
Ruffing, N.,
Borsetti, A.,
Cardoso, A. A.,
Desjardin, E.,
Newman, W.,
Gerard, C.,
and Sodroski, J.
(1996)
Nature
384,
179-183
|
| 43.
|
Wu, L.,
Paxton, W. A.,
Kassam, N.,
Ruffing, N.,
Rottman, J. B.,
Sullivan, N.,
Choe, H.,
Sodroski, J.,
Newman, W.,
Koup, R. A.,
and Mackay, C. R.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
185,
1681-1691
|
| 44.
|
Alfano, M.,
Schmidtmayerova, H.,
Amella, C. A.,
Pushkarsky, T.,
and Bukrinsky, M.
(1999)
J. Exp. Med.
190,
597-606
|
| 45.
|
Ganju, R. K.,
Brubaker, S. A.,
Meyer, J.,
Dutt, P.,
Yang, Y.,
Qin, S.,
Newman, W.,
and Groopman, J. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
23169-23175
|
| 46.
|
Ganju, R. K.,
Hatch, W. C.,
Avraham, H.,
Ona, M. A.,
Druker, B.,
Avraham, S.,
and Groopman, J. E.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
185,
1055-1063
|
| 47.
|
Dikic, I.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
14301-14308
|
| 48.
|
Qi, J. H.,
Ito, N.,
and Claesson-Welsh, L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
14455-14463
|
| 49.
|
Yu, D. H.,
Qu, C. K.,
Henegariu, O.,
Lu, X.,
and Feng, G. S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
21125-21131
|
| 50.
|
Sada, K.,
Minami, Y.,
and Yamamura, H.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
248,
827-833
|
| 51.
|
Jugloff, L. S.,
and Jongstra-Bilen, J.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
159,
1096-1106
|
| 52.
|
Greenberg, S.,
Chang, P.,
and Silverstein, S. C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3897-3902
|
| 53.
|
Songyang, Z.,
Shoelson, S. E.,
McGlade, J.,
Olivier, P.,
Pawson, T.,
Bustelo, X. R.,
Barbacid, M.,
Sabe, H.,
Hanafusa, H.,
Yi, T.,
Ren, R.,
Baltimore, D.,
Ratnofsky, S.,
Feldman, R. A.,
and Cantley, L. C.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
2777-2785
|
| 54.
|
Veillette, A.,
Thibaudeau, E.,
and Latour, S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22719-22728
|
| 55.
|
Fujioka, Y.,
Matozaki, T.,
Noguchi, T.,
Iwamatsu, A.,
Yamao, T.,
Takahashi, N.,
Tsuda, M.,
Takada, T.,
and Kasuga, M.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
6887-6899
|
| 56.
|
Zhang, S.,
and Broxmeyer, H. E.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
254,
440-445
|
| 57.
|
Qian, D.,
Lev, S.,
van Oers, N. S.,
Dikic, I.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Weiss, A.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
185,
1253-1259
|
| 58.
|
Bacon, K. B.,
Szabo, M. C.,
Yssel, H.,
Bolen, J. B.,
and Schall, T. J.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
184,
873-882
|
| 59.
|
Okazaki, H.,
Zhang, J.,
Hamawy, M. M.,
and Siraganian, R. P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
32443-32447
|
| 60.
|
Somani, A. K.,
Bignon, J. S.,
Mills, G. B.,
Siminovitch, K. A.,
and Branch, D. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21113-21119
|
| 61.
|
Dustin, L. B.,
Plas, D. R.,
Wong, J.,
Hu, Y. T.,
Soto, C.,
Chan, A. C.,
and Thomas, M. L.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
2717-2724
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Cheung, V. Ravyn, L. Wang, A. Ptasznik, and R. G. Collman
Signaling Mechanism of HIV-1 gp120 and Virion-Induced IL-1{beta} Release in Primary Human Macrophages
J. Immunol.,
May 15, 2008;
180(10):
6675 - 6684.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. T. Murooka, R. Rahbar, L. C. Platanias, and E. N. Fish
CCL5-mediated T-cell chemotaxis involves the initiation of mRNA translation through mTOR/4E-BP1
Blood,
May 15, 2008;
111(10):
4892 - 4901.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Saita, E. Kodama, M. Orita, M. Kondo, T. Miyazaki, K. Sudo, K. Kajiwara, M. Matsuoka, and Y. Shimizu
Structural Basis for the Interaction of CCR5 with a Small Molecule, Functionally Selective CCR5 Agonist.
J. Immunol.,
September 1, 2006;
177(5):
3116 - 3122.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Tomkowicz, C. Lee, V. Ravyn, R. Cheung, A. Ptasznik, and R. G. Collman
The Src kinase Lyn is required for CCR5 signaling in response to MIP-1beta and R5 HIV-1 gp120 in human macrophages
Blood,
August 15, 2006;
108(4):
1145 - 1150.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. Lee, Y. M. Kim, N. W. Kim, J. W. Kim, E. Her, B. K. Kim, J. H. Kim, S. H. Ryu, J. W. Park, D. W. Seo, et al.
Phospholipase D2 acts as an essential adaptor protein in the activation of Syk in antigen-stimulated mast cells
Blood,
August 1, 2006;
108(3):
956 - 964.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Salmond, G. Huyer, A. Kotsoni, L. Clements, and D. R. Alexander
The src Homology 2 Domain-Containing Tyrosine Phosphatase 2 Regulates Primary T-Dependent Immune Responses and Th Cell Differentiation
J. Immunol.,
November 15, 2005;
175(10):
6498 - 6508.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-C. Gevrey, B. M. Isaac, and D. Cox
Syk Is Required for Monocyte/Macrophage Chemotaxis to CX3CL1 (Fractalkine)
J. Immunol.,
September 15, 2005;
175(6):
3737 - 3745.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S L-F Pender, V Chance, C V Whiting, M Buckley, M Edwards, R Pettipher, and T T MacDonald
Systemic administration of the chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein 1{alpha} exacerbates inflammatory bowel disease in a mouse model
Gut,
August 1, 2005;
54(8):
1114 - 1120.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Riol-Blanco, N. Sanchez-Sanchez, A. Torres, A. Tejedor, S. Narumiya, A. L. Corbi, P. Sanchez-Mateos, and J. L. Rodriguez-Fernandez
The Chemokine Receptor CCR7 Activates in Dendritic Cells Two Signaling Modules That Independently Regulate Chemotaxis and Migratory Speed
J. Immunol.,
April 1, 2005;
174(7):
4070 - 4080.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. D. Moon, C. B. Post, D. L. Durden, Q. Zhou, P. De, M. L. Harrison, and R. L. Geahlen
Molecular Basis for a Direct Interaction between the Syk Protein-tyrosine Kinase and Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 14, 2005;
280(2):
1543 - 1551.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. MacGillivray, M. T. Herrera-Abreu, C.-W. Chow, C. Shek, Q. Wang, E. Vachon, G.-S. Feng, K. A. Siminovitch, C. A. G. McCulloch, and G. P. Downey
The Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2 Regulates Interleukin-1-induced ERK Activation in Fibroblasts
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 11, 2003;
278(29):
27190 - 27198.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Mocsai, H. Zhang, Z. Jakus, J. Kitaura, T. Kawakami, and C. A. Lowell
G-protein-coupled receptor signaling in Syk-deficient neutrophils and mast cells
Blood,
May 15, 2003;
101(10):
4155 - 4163.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Z. Fernandis, R. P. Cherla, R. D. Chernock, and R. K. Ganju
CXCR4/CCR5 Down-modulation and Chemotaxis Are Regulated by the Proteasome Pathway
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 10, 2002;
277(20):
18111 - 18117.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Kozak, J. M. Heard, and D. Kabat
Segregation of CD4 and CXCR4 into Distinct Lipid Microdomains in T Lymphocytes Suggests a Mechanism for Membrane Destabilization by Human Immunodeficiency Virus
J. Virol.,
February 15, 2002;
76(4):
1802 - 1815.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Shibasaki, H. Matsubara, Y. Nozawa, Y. Mori, H. Masaki, A. Kosaki, Y. Tsutsumi, Y. Uchiyama, S. Fujiyama, A. Nose, et al.
Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Inhibits Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Transactivation by Increasing Association of SHP-1 Tyrosine Phosphatase
Hypertension,
September 1, 2001;
38(3):
367 - 372.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J. Clemetson, J. M. Clemetson, A. E. I. Proudfoot, C. A. Power, M. Baggiolini, and T. N. C. Wells
Functional expression of CCR1, CCR3, CCR4, and CXCR4 chemokine receptors on human platelets
Blood,
December 15, 2000;
96(13):
4046 - 4054.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Chiarugi, M. L. Taddei, P. Cirri, D. Talini, F. Buricchi, G. Camici, G. Manao, G. Raugei, and G. Ramponi
Low Molecular Weight Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase Controls the Rate and the Strength of NIH-3T3 Cells Adhesion through Its Phosphorylation on Tyrosine 131 or 132
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 22, 2000;
275(48):
37619 - 37627.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|