![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 23, 17349-17357, June 9, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,From the Department of Immunology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Received for publication, January 7, 2000, and in revised form, March 29, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We studied steps that make up the initial and
steady-state phases of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis to understand how
activity of bovine endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) is regulated.
Stopped-flow analysis of NADPH-dependent flavin reduction
showed the rate increased from 0.13 to 86 s Nitric-oxide synthases
(NOSs)1 catalyze a stepwise
oxidation of L-arginine (Arg) to citrulline and nitric
oxide (NO) (1-3). In mammals, three NOSs are expressed that differ in
their primary sequence, post-translational modifications, cellular
location, and tissue expression (4-6), consistent with their
participating in a range of physiologic and pathologic systems. Two
NOSs (neuronal, nNOS or NOS-I; and endothelial, eNOS or NOS-III) are
constitutively expressed and participate in signal cascades by
synthesizing NO in response to Ca2+-dependent
CaM binding. A third NOS (cytokine-inducible, iNOS or NOS-II) is
primarily regulated by transcriptional mechanisms, binds CaM
irrespective of the Ca2+ concentration to be always active,
and functions as both a regulator and effector of the immune response.
Although NO synthesis activities of the NOS isoforms differ
considerably, how and why this occurs is unclear. A comparison of
published steady-state rates shows that eNOS is about four to eight
times slower than either nNOS or iNOS (7-14). Because NO synthesis is
actually the result of many steps, it is imperative to identify which
steps limit the activity of a particular NOS isoform. Work with NOS
chimeras containing swapped reductase domains has suggested heme
reduction could be responsible for the low activity of eNOS (30).
However, it seems that NOS catalysis is comprised of two parts (15,
16): an active component that includes all steps involved in NO
generation and an inactive component that includes NO binding to the
NOS heme and subsequent dissociation or oxidation of the heme-NO
complex to regenerate active enzyme. For iNOS and nNOS, evidence
suggests that their activities are significantly decreased in a number
of settings because a majority of enzyme partitions into an NO-bound
inactive form (17, 18). This also increases their
Km for O2, which has physiologic
consequences (19, 20). In nNOS, a residue that controls enzyme
partitioning between the active and NO bound forms has recently been
identified (16). In contrast, the extent by which heme-NO complex
formation may limit eNOS NO synthesis is still unknown. To address this issue, we analyzed several steps involved in NO synthesis by eNOS and
its propensity to partition between active and inactive forms during catalysis.
Materials--
NO gas was purchased from Matheson Gas Products,
Inc., and O2 gas was purchased from the Ohio Gas Company
and used without further purification.
N Enzyme Purification--
Bovine eNOS with a six-histidine tag at
its N terminus was expressed in Escherichia coli
BL21(DE3) using the pCWori expression vector and purified in the
presence of (6R)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin (H4B) by
ammonium sulfate precipitation and sequential nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid and 2',5'-ADP affinity chromatography as described previously (11). The purified enzyme was homogeneous as judged by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The eNOS was quantitated based
on its P450 heme content which was determined using an extinction
coefficient of 74 mM Electrochemical Detection of NO--
NO concentration was
monitored using an ISO-NO mark II NO meter equipped with a ISO-NOP
200 sensor (World Precision Instruments, Inc., Sarasota, FL). Applied
voltage was +865 mV. Measurements were made in a water-jacketed and
stirred 4-ml cell at 15 °C. Electrode calibration involved the
consecutive addition of 1 µl of saturated NO solution to 3 ml of
argon-deoxygenated Hepes buffer (40 mM, pH 7.4) in a
rubber-sealed cell at 15 °C. The NO solution was made in
argon-deoxygenated buffer, and its NO concentration was determined with
oxyhemoglobin. The electrode current was proportional to NO
concentration up to 10 µM, and sensitivity was typically 410 nM NO/nA at 15 °C.
Measurement of NO Concentration, Citrulline Formation, and NADPH
Oxidation during eNOS NO Synthesis--
Reactions (1.5-ml total
volume) were run in the stirred 4-ml cell at 15 °C and contained 40 mM Hepes buffer, pH 7.4, 0.2 mM NOHA or Arg,
0.3 mM dithiothreitol, 4 µM H4B, 1 mM Ca2+, 0.6 mM EDTA, 2.5 µM CaM, 0.1 M NaCl, and 1.5 µM
eNOS. NO synthesis was started by adding 50 µM NADPH. NO
concentration was monitored with the NO electrode. Concurrent
citrulline production was followed by removing 10-µl aliquots from
the reaction at various time points and quenching with diluted HCl.
Citrulline was measured after derivatization with orthopthaldialdehyde
using a fluorometric high pressure liquid chromatography detection
method as described previously (21). Concurrent NADPH oxidation was
measured at 340 nm in replica reactions that were run in cuvettes under
the same conditions except the total volume was 0.7 ml.
Measurement of NO Synthesis and NADPH Oxidation at Different
O2 Concentrations--
Concentrated eNOS was placed in
septum-sealed cuvettes and diluted with various ratios of
N2-, air-, or O2-saturated buffer solutions
that contained 40 mM BisTris propane, pH 7.4, 1 mM Arg, 15 µg CaM, 1.2 mM Ca2+,
0.9 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 5-10
µM oxyhemoglobin, and 4 µM each of FAD,
FMN, and H4B (final volume 1 ml). Final eNOS concentrations for the
NADPH oxidation and NO synthesis rate measurements were 300 and 80 nM, respectively. The initial O2 concentration in each reaction was calculated based on the solution mixing ratio and
the O2 concentration of air- or O2-saturated
buffer at 25 °C (0.26 and 1.26 mM, respectively).
Reactions were run at 25 °C and initiated by injecting 10 µl of
NADPH solution to give 100 µM final concentration. The
rate of NO synthesis was determined by monitoring the NO-mediated
conversion of oxyhemoglobin to methemoglobin at 401 nm (11), whereas
the initial rate of NADPH oxidation was determined at 340 nm in the
presence or absence of Arg and in the absence of oxyhemoglobin.
Km values for O2 were estimated from
double reciprocal plots of the data.
Optical Spectroscopy and Stopped-flow Measurements--
Optical
spectra were recorded on a Hitachi 3010 UV-visible spectrophotometer at
15 °C. Anaerobic spectra were recorded using septum-sealed quartz
cuvettes that could be attached through a quick-fit joint to a vacuum
system. eNOS samples were made anaerobic by repeated cycles of
evacuation and equilibrated with catalyst-deoxygenated nitrogen.
Cuvettes were maintained under nitrogen or NO atmosphere during
spectral measurements.
Kinetic measurements were carried out using a Hi-Tech stopped-flow
apparatus (model SF-51) equipped for anaerobic work. Rates of NO and
O2 binding to ferrous eNOS at different ligand
concentrations were obtained as described previously (22). Experiments
were carried out at 10 °C and initiated by rapidly mixing an
anaerobic buffered solution that contained 2 µM ferrous
eNOS (generated in a cuvette by titrating in an anaerobic dithionite
solution), 10 µM H4B, 1 mM dithiothreitol,
and 0.15 M NaCl with a buffered solution that contained
0.15 M NaCl and different concentrations of O2
or NO. Dithionite reduction was omitted when studying ferric eNOS. All
NO and O2 binding rates were measured in the presence or
absence of Arg. In some cases, O2 binding to ferrous eNOS
was monitored using a rapid scanning diode array detector (Hi-Tech MG-6000) designed to collect 96 complete spectra in a specific time
frame. The diode array detector was calibrated relative to five
reference absorbance wavelengths of holmium oxide filter (HY-I) at 362, 420, 446, 460, and 536 nm. Spectra were collected after rapidly mixing
anaerobic ferrous eNOS with air-equilibrated buffer at 10 °C. In all
cases, 6-10 replica scans were collected and utilized to derive mean
kinetic values. Solution compositions were as described above.
Rates of NADPH-dependent flavin and heme reduction were
measured at 10 °C under similar stopped-flow conditions as described above, except that the anaerobic ferric eNOS solution also contained 0.9 mM EDTA with or without 1.2 mM
Ca2+ and 3 µM CaM and was mixed with an
anaerobic buffered solution that contained 0.2 mM NADPH and
0.15 M NaCl. Flavin reduction was monitored at 485 nm, and
heme reduction was monitored at 400 nm. Signal-to-noise ratios
were improved by averaging 6-10 individual traces. The time
courses were fit using a nonlinear least-squares method provided
by the instrument manufacturer.
Extent and Kinetics of Flavin and Heme Reduction--
We first
characterized UV-visible transitions that occur during reduction of
eNOS flavin and heme centers by NADPH. As shown in the upper
panel of Fig. 1, an anaerobic sample
of ferric eNOS containing H4B displayed a broad Soret absorbance peak
centered near 400 nm with flavin absorbance peaks ranging from 445 to
550 nm, consistent with earlier reports (8, 9, 23). Adding NADPH in the
absence of bound CaM caused flavin reduction as judged by the
disappearance of the flavin visible absorption bands. No heme reduction
occurred as judged by our observing only a slight decrease in heme
Soret absorbance, which could be attributed to flavin reduction in this
region of the spectrum, and no change in ferric heme absorbance at 640 nm. Adding Ca2+ to promote CaM binding led to partial heme
reduction, as judged by an intermediate decrease and red shift in Soret
absorbance. Upon adding Arg to the sample, heme reduction became
complete. The lower panel of Fig. 1 shows spectra from a
similar experiment that initially contained ferric eNOS saturated with
both H4B and Arg. Under this condition, Ca2+-promoted CaM
binding led to complete heme reduction as judged by the decrease in
Soret absorbance and its shift to 414 nm. Heme reduction was blocked
when N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester replaced Arg in the experiment (data not shown), as also occurs in eNOS isolated
from mammalian cells (23). These results confirm that CaM triggers heme
reduction in H4B-bound eNOS, indicate that Arg facilitates heme
reduction, and provide wavelengths to monitor the kinetics of flavin
and heme reduction.
We studied the kinetics of flavin and heme reduction using stopped-flow
spectroscopy under anaerobic conditions at 10 °C. Based on spectra
in Fig. 1 and our previous work with nNOS (24), we followed flavin and
heme reduction at 485 and 400 nm, respectively. Reduction of flavins
was studied by rapidly mixing CaM-free or CaM-bound eNOS with a
solution containing excess NADPH. Fig. 2 shows flavin reduction in CAM-free eNOS was very slow and required about 25 s to reach completion (left panel), whereas
flavin reduction in CaM-bound eNOS was fast and reached completion in
less that 0.1 s (right panel). In both cases, the
spectral change was essentially monophasic and fit well to a single
exponential function with rate constants of 0.13 and 85 s
Replica experiments were run to monitor heme reduction in eNOS at 400 nm. In CaM-free eNOS, the spectral change at 400 nm was monophasic with
a rate of 0.15 s Oxygen Binding Kinetics--
We next characterized O2
binding to ferrous eNOS. We used rapid-scanning stopped-flow
spectroscopy to identify species that form upon mixing a prereduced,
anaerobic solution of H4B-saturated eNOS with air-equilibrated buffer.
As shown in Fig. 4, the starting spectrum
recorded after 3 ms is characteristic of ferrous eNOS, which
displays a Soret absorbance peak at 414 nm and almost no absorbance at
630 nm. This was followed by buildup of a transient species whose
spectrum was characterized by absorbance peaks at 427, 560, and a
shoulder at 600 nm, identical to the ferrous-dioxy complex of nNOS
obtained under similar temperature and buffer conditions (25, 26). This
transient species decayed to form ferric eNOS, as judged by a shift in
Soret absorbance to 396 nm and buildup of visible absorbance centered
near 630 nm. The eNOS ferrous-dioxy complex formed and decayed at
sufficiently different rates such that the kinetics of both steps could
be studied using single wavelength stopped-flow methods. We therefore
examined the rates of ferrous-dioxy formation and decay as a function
of O2 concentration. We studied H4B-bound eNOS in the
presence and absence of Arg or NOHA and monitored the change in
absorbance at 430 nm (Fig. 4). At all O2 concentration
tested, there was a monophasic increase in absorbance attributed to
buildup of the ferrous-dioxy complex, followed by a slower, essentially
monophasic decrease attributed to its conversion to ferric eNOS (data
not shown). As shown in Fig. 5, plots of
kobs versus O2
concentration were linear in all cases, with a positive intercept
indicating that the reaction is reversible and follows a one step
mechanism. The kinetic parameters for O2 binding were
estimated from the slope and y intercept of each plot and
are listed in Table I, along with the
rates of ferrous-dioxy complex decay, which were independent of
O2 concentration under each circumstance (data not
shown).
NO Binding Kinetics--
As shown in Fig.
6, adding excess NO to H4B-bound ferric
or ferrous eNOS formed stable 6-coordinate nitrosyl complexes under anaerobic conditions in the absence of Arg. The ferric-NO complex displayed a Soret absorbance peak at 440 nm and two absorbance bands
centered at 549 and 580 nm, whereas the ferrous-NO complex had a Soret
peak at 436 nm and a broad visible band centered at 580 nm. These
spectral features are essentially identical to NO complexes of iNOS,
nNOS, and eNOS (17, 18, 27). Kinetics of NO binding were studied at
10 °C in the presence or absence of Arg or NOHA. Reaction of NO
solutions of different concentration with ferric or ferrous eNOS was
monitored at 440 or 436 nm, respectively. For all six conditions
tested, plots of kobs versus NO
concentration were linear with positive intercept at the y
axis (Fig. 7), indicating that NO binding
is reversible and follows a simple one step mechanism. Kinetic
constants for NO binding estimated from these plots are listed in Table
I.
Formation of an eNOS-NO Complex During Steady-state
Catalysis--
Because iNOS and nNOS both form heme-NO complexes
during NO synthesis (17, 18), we examined if eNOS would also do so. Fig. 8, upper panel, contains
spectra of eNOS recorded prior to, during, and after NO synthesis with
Arg as the substrate. NADPH was limiting in the reaction. The spectra
clearly show that the majority of eNOS molecules contained reduced
flavins and oxidized (ferric) heme during the steady state, with very
little or no NO complex present. This is similar to the state in which
eNOS exists when it oxidized NADPH in the absence of substrate
(upper panel inset). We then examined if a heme-NO complex
would form during NO synthesis from NOHA, which for eNOS supports a
higher rate of NO synthesis compared with Arg (23). Again, spectra were
recorded prior to, during, and after NO synthesis. As shown in the
lower panel of Fig. 8, the spectrum recorded during NO synthesis from NOHA had less ferric heme character (absorbance at 400 nm) as compared with Arg and displayed a shoulder above 420 nm. As the
inset shows, the shoulder is actually a gain in absorbance
centered near 430 nm. Thus, some heme-NO complex built up during NO
synthesis from NOHA.
We next examined the kinetics of heme-NO complex formation and decay
during NO synthesis from NOHA using the stopped-flow method. The
reaction was initiated by rapid mixing an NADPH solution with a
solution of CaM-bound eNOS that contained H4B and NOHA. The upper
panel of Fig. 9 follows buildup and
decay of the heme-NO complex at 436 nm, along with concurrent NADPH
oxidation at 340 nm. Buildup of the eNOS-nitrosyl complex was
relatively slow, approached a steady state, and then decayed at a rate
of 0.01 s Relationship between Solution NO Concentration and eNOS
Activity--
We next utilized an electrode to monitor NO
concentrations during NO synthesis from Arg or NOHA to see how these
levels correlate with rates of NADPH oxidation and citrulline
formation. Experiments were carried out by immersing a NO-selective
electrode in a reaction vial that contained eNOS and all the necessary
substrates and cofactors. Aliquots were removed for citrulline analysis
at timed intervals after initiating the reaction with NADPH, and
replica experiments were run in a cuvette to monitor concurrent NADPH oxidation by eNOS under each condition. As shown in the upper panel of Fig. 10, the NO
concentration rose after initiating NO synthesis from Arg, achieved a
maximum of 61 nM after 1 min, fell as NADPH continued to be
consumed, and then fell more rapidly after all NADPH was oxidized. The
rate of NADPH consumption was approximately linear during the reaction
and increased only slightly when the NO scavenger oxyhemoglobin was
present.
When NOHA was used in place of Arg (Fig. 10, middle panel),
the NO concentration rose to a much higher level during the reaction (840 nM) and then gradually fell as in the Arg reaction.
NADPH consumption by eNOS was slowed about 3 times as the NO
concentration built up. This effect was NO-dependent,
because NADPH oxidation in a replica reaction that contained
oxyhemoglobin as an NO scavenger continued at the initial fast rate. As
shown in the lower panel of Fig. 10, there also may be a
deflection in the rate of citrulline formation from NOHA but not from Arg.
Apparent Km for O2 and Effect of NO
Synthesis--
For nNOS and iNOS, heme-NO complex formation causes a
shift in the Km for O2 to higher
values (19, 20). We therefore examined the O2 concentration
versus activity response for eNOS during NO synthesis. The
upper panel of Fig. 11 plots
enzyme activity (rate of NADPH oxidation) versus
O2 concentration when NOHA or Arg served as substrate. The
O2 response curve for NOHA was shifted to the right
relative to the Arg curve, although they both approached a similar
Vmax. Double reciprocal plots (Fig. 11,
middle panel) were linear and gave apparent
Km values for O2 of 25 µM with NOHA versus 4 µM with
Arg. Repeating the NOHA experiment in the presence of the NO scavenger
oxyhemoglobin (Fig. 11, lower panel) caused the
O2-response curve to shift back to the left. This indicates the increase in Km for O2 was
because of NO.
NO synthesis involves many steps including NADPH and substrate
binding, electron transfer between flavins and heme, O2
binding and reduction, proton transfer, bond making and breaking,
product release, and associated protein conformational changes. In
addition, enzyme-generated NO can bind to the NOS heme and influence
subsequent catalysis. Here we examined steps involved in the initial
and steady-state phases of NO synthesis to understand what regulates eNOS activity.
Flavin and Heme Reduction--
Flavin reduction differs in eNOS
compared with other NOS. In CaM-free eNOS, flavin reduction was much
slower than in nNOS (Table II). However,
it had a greater fold increase upon CaM binding such that the rate
became slightly greater than CaM-bound nNOS or iNOS. This implies that
CaM stimulates NADPH reduction of bound FAD to a greater extent in eNOS
than in nNOS. Although the mechanism is still unclear, our related work
shows that CaM binding to nNOS speeds NADPH reduction of FAD by
relieving a repressive effect of the FMN module on this "upstream"
electron transfer event (13). If a similar mechanism operates in eNOS,
then the repressive effect of its FMN module must be stronger. Recent
results with an eNOS deletion mutant (28) suggest that an
autoinhibitory loop contained in its FMN module may be involved in this
process.
Heme reduction in eNOS also differs from other NOSs. In the absence of
substrate about half of the heme was reduced when excess NADPH was
added to anaerobic, CaM-bound eNOS, whereas heme reduction was nearly
complete with substrate present. This differs from nNOS or iNOS, where
excess NADPH caused almost complete heme reduction in the presence or
absence of substrate (29). If the thermodynamics of flavin-mediated
heme reduction are less favorable in substrate-free eNOS compared with
other NOSs, this could help explain why eNOS NADPH consumption is so
slow in the absence of substrate (8, 9, 23). Heme reduction was also
much slower in eNOS than in nNOS or iNOS (Table II). Given that CaM
induced a 600-fold increase in flavin reduction rate that brought it to
a level comparable with other NOSs, it is astounding that CaM so poorly
stimulated electron transfer to the eNOS heme. CaM also is a poor
stimulator of electron transfer from the eNOS reductase domain to
external acceptors like Fe(CN)6 or cytochrome c
(8, 9, 11). Conceivably, slow heme reduction in eNOS could involve
structural elements in both its reductase and oxygenase domains.
However, poor Fe(CN)6 and cytochrome c reduction
by the CaM-bound reductase domain (11), along with the fact that a NOS
chimera comprised of an nNOS reductase and eNOS oxygenase domain had
faster NO synthesis than native eNOS (30), suggest that structural
elements responsible for slow heme reduction reside in the reductase
domain. From our present work we conclude that slow heme reduction is
not because of slow flavin reduction in eNOS, which is actually quite
fast in the presence of CaM.
Our heme reduction rates (Table II) differ considerably from those
reported by Miller et al. (31). Although both studies followed change in heme Soret absorbance, our measurements were made
anaerobically at 10 °C, whereas theirs were made aerobically under
catalytic conditions at room temperature. In their system, absorbance
change at 397 nm actually reflects the combination of flavin reduction,
heme reduction, O2 binding, and conversion to a heme-NO
complex. Taking measurements under anaerobic conditions avoids this complication.
O2 and NO Binding--
Our stopped-flow study showed
that O2 binding in eNOS is generally similar to what has
been reported for nNOS. The eNOS ferrous-dioxy intermediate had a Soret
absorbance at 427 nm and other absorbance bands that were identical to
the ferrous-dioxy intermediate of nNOS (25, 26) and
iNOS2 obtained under similar
conditions. Thus, all NOSs appear to form a ferrous-dioxy intermediate
with similar electronic
characteristics.3 Association
and dissociation of O2 to eNOS and decay of its
ferrous-dioxy complex were about three times slower than rates observed
with the nNOS oxygenase domain under identical conditions (25). This may reflect that different NOS isoforms were studied or that a differences exist between full-length and oxygenase domain proteins (26). Ferric and ferrous eNOS displayed similar NO binding kinetics, suggesting NO affinity is not strongly influenced by the reduction state of the eNOS heme. However, our stopped-flow method may
overestimate the NO dissociation rate from ferrous NOS (32). Estimated
rate constants for NO binding were similar to those observed with
ferric and ferrous iNOS oxygenase domain by stopped-flow under the same conditions (22). Because O2 and NO binding appear to be
relatively similar among the three NOS isoforms, the lower activity of
eNOS is not likely because of differences in O2 or NO binding.
Neither Arg nor NOHA strongly affected O2 or NO binding to
eNOS, as was also reported for Arg in iNOS, eNOS, and nNOS (22, 27,
32). However, the NOHA result is surprising because a recent crystal
structure of the iNOS oxygenase domain with NOHA has its
N-hydroxy group positioned above the ferric heme close enough to constrain the binding geometry of a model ferrous-dioxy complex (33). Although the same binding geometry would exist in eNOS
(34), our kinetic results imply it does not impede O2 or NO
binding to the heme.
NO Synthesis and Heme-NO Complex Formation--
We detected little
or no heme-NO complex during NO synthesis from Arg, even though a
measurable concentration of NO built up in solution. This distinguishes
eNOS from iNOS and nNOS, which both predominantly convert to a heme-NO
complex during NO synthesis under similar conditions (17, 18). In
contrast, with NOHA as substrate eNOS did partition between a heme-NO
complex and its ferric form during the steady state. Heme-NO complex
formation was associated with a greater buildup of solution NO and a
decrease in the rate of NADPH consumption. This was not seen in the Arg reaction and was prevented in the NOHA reaction by adding oxyhemoglobin as a NO scavenger. Because the deflection in NADPH oxidation occurred as the heme-NO complex formed, it likely results from eNOS molecules partitioning into the NO-bound form. Thus, under appropriate conditions eNOS behaves like iNOS and nNOS in forming an inactive heme-NO complex
during NO synthesis. That oxyhemoglobin prevented heme-NO complex
formation in eNOS shows that it is dependent on the external NO
concentration. This makes eNOS similar to iNOS
(17)4 but distinguishes it
from nNOS, whose heme-NO complex formation occurs independent of the
external NO concentration (18).
A far greater NO concentration build up during NO synthesis from NOHA
than from Arg. This is consistent with eNOS catalyzing a 3-fold faster
rate of NO synthesis from NOHA in the presence of the NO scavenger
oxyhemoglobin (8, 9, 21). The different rates may arise because the two
substrates differ in their ratio of NADPH oxidized to product formed
(21). Specifically, NOHA conversion to NO requires transfer of only one
electron (0.5 NADPH equivalent) from the reductase domain to the heme,
whereas Arg conversion to NO requires transfer of three electrons (1.5 NADPH equivalents). Given that the rate of NADPH oxidation was
approximately the same when NOHA or Arg served as substrate in the
presence of oxyhemoglobin, the difference in NADPH stoichiometry
specifies a 3-fold faster rate for NO synthesis from NOHA.
In the absence of the NO scavenger oxyhemoglobin, the initial rate of
NADPH oxidation was only maintained for the first 30-50 s in the NOHA
reaction, after which a 2-3-fold slower rate was observed. Thus, after
the rate deflection occurred eNOS synthesized NO from NOHA at a rate
that was approximately equivalent to the Arg reaction. This is
consistent with the NOHA reaction continuing almost three times longer
than the Arg reaction in Fig. 10. The "initial burst" kinetic
pattern (i.e. a fast phase of NO synthesis followed by a
slower phase) helped achieve and maintain a higher NO concentration in
the NOHA reaction. Although this explanation is consistent with the
data, pathways for NO loss also helped determine the NO concentration
achieved under each circumstance. Because superoxide dismutase was not
added to the reactions, any superoxide produced by eNOS (35) would be
expected to lower the NO concentration. Because eNOS heme reduction is
slow, uncoupled NADPH oxidation may be greater during NO synthesis from
Arg compared with NOHA, resulting in greater superoxide production and
a lower NO concentration.
Relation between Heme-NO Complex Formation and O2
Response--
Because more heme-NO complex formed with NOHA as
substrate, this provided an opportunity to test how NO complex
formation would affect eNOS activity versus O2
concentration response. Heme-NO complex formation increased the
apparent Km for O2 6-fold. This confirms our previous work with nNOS and iNOS that suggests NO complex
formation can have major impact on NOS O2 response
(18-20). When little or no heme-NO complex formed (i.e.
either with Arg as substrate or with NOHA in the presence of
oxyhemoglobin), the apparent Km values for
O2 were similar to other enzymes that contain thiolate-ligated heme (36). This suggests that O2 affinity
toward the ferrous heme primarily determines eNOS
Km for O2 when a heme-NO complex
does not form.
A Model for eNOS Catalysis--
Our results fit within a
hypothetical model for NOS catalysis (16, 19) (Scheme
I). NOS molecules can partition between two cycles during steady-state NO synthesis: an active cycle that generates NO and an inactive cycle that involves formation of a heme-NO
complex. At the start of NO synthesis all NOS molecules are active.
However, if heme-NO complex formation occurs, the ratio between NO-free
and NO-bound NOS determines activity during the steady state.
The spectrum of eNOS during NO synthesis from Arg showed that the
majority of enzyme was in a flavin-reduced, ferric form during the
steady state. This is consistent with flavin reduction being relatively
fast and identifies heme reduction as the slow step in the active
cycle. Because ferrous eNOS does not build up, O2 binding
and subsequent steps must be faster than heme reduction. With Arg as
substrate almost all of the enzyme molecules were in the active cycle
during NO synthesis. This explains why the rates of citrulline
synthesis and NADPH oxidation remained constant. In contrast, the
spectrum we collected during NO synthesis from NOHA showed some of the
eNOS molecules were present in their NO-bound form. Thus, both active
and inactive cycles were operative with slow steps being heme reduction
and NO complex decay, respectively. Such partitioning explains why
NADPH oxidation and associated citrulline synthesis from NOHA became
attenuated after an initial burst phase.
The rate of NO synthesis and degree of heme-NO complex formation may
both depend on the O2 concentration. For NO synthesis the
relevant reaction is O2 binding to ferrous heme, whereas
the level of heme-NO complex can be affected by a reaction between O2 and the ferrous heme-NO complex (as occurs for nNOS;
Ref. 19) or any O2-dependent reaction that
lowers the solution NO concentration. Our data indicate that NO binding
and dissociation from the ferric heme occur much faster in eNOS than
heme reduction. Thus, for eNOS the external NO concentration and
affinity toward the ferric heme likely determine the amount of heme-NO
complex that builds up during the steady state. Indeed, the solution NO
concentration that would be required for 50% heme-NO complex formation
as calculated from our NO binding constants is well above those
actually achieved in the reaction. Because heme-NO complex formation
shifts the eNOS apparent Km for O2
to the right, reactions limiting heme-NO complex buildup must be more
broadly related to O2 concentration than is NO synthesis
itself. This also appears to be the case for nNOS (19).
The different activities of eNOS and nNOS are best appreciated in the
context of Scheme I. For nNOS, heme-NO complex formation is intrinsic
to catalysis and causes a majority of enzyme to partition into the
NO-bound form. This slows down activity to about 10-20% of the
initial value within the first two catalytic turnovers. The slower rate
is commonly considered the Vmax activity of nNOS (about 75 NO/min at 25 °C). Multiplying by a factor of 5 minimizes the effect of enzyme partitioning and provides an estimate of nNOS
activity prior to NO complex formation (375 NO/min). For eNOS, its slow
rate of NO synthesis from Arg is not due to NO complex formation. Thus,
its steady-state activity (~15 NO/min at 25 °C) is a good estimate
of its intrinsic activity. The analysis reveals that nNOS is actually
25 times more active than eNOS, which is remarkable from a
structure-function standpoint.
Why does so little heme-NO complex build up during eNOS NO synthesis
from Arg? Our results suggest that a sufficient NO concentration is
simply not achieved. This likely reflects slow catalysis, which in turn
reflects a particularly slow electron transfer between flavins and heme
in eNOS. Perhaps this characteristic evolved to minimize NO feedback
regulation in eNOS. Do NO concentrations that support heme-NO complex
formation ever build up in tissues? This is important to consider
because of the effect on eNOS O2 response. Our electrode
results suggest that a NO level above 50 nM would be
needed. Under what circumstances this occurs is unclear. However, in
human and pig lung NO levels are apparently sufficient to support
significant iNOS heme-NO complex formation with a strong resultant
effect on that enzyme's O2 concentration-activity response
(20, 43). Because eNOS is coexpressed in human lung, it may be exposed
to the same NO level. Several mechanisms also boost eNOS activity in
cells. These include eNOS interaction with the membrane or proteins
like HSP-90 (37, 38) and phosphorylation within its reductase domain
(39, 40). How these might alter the connection between NO concentration
in tissues, NO feedback regulation, and the O2 response of
eNOS can now be explored.
1 upon
calmodulin binding, but this supported slow heme reduction in the
presence of either Arg or
N
-hydroxy-L-arginine (0.005 and
0.014 s
1, respectively, at 10 °C). O2
binding to ferrous eNOS generated a transient ferrous dioxy species
(Soret peak at 427 nm) whose formation and decay kinetics indicate it
can participate in NO synthesis. The kinetics of heme-NO complex
formation were characterized under anaerobic conditions and during the
initial phase of NO synthesis. During catalysis heme-NO complex
formation required buildup of relatively high solution NO
concentrations (>50 nM), which were easily achieved with
N
-hydroxy-L-arginine but not
with Arg as substrate. Heme-NO complex formation caused eNOS NADPH
oxidation and citrulline synthesis to decrease 3-fold and the apparent
Km for O2
to increase 6-fold. Our main conclusions are: 1) The slow steady-state
rate of NO synthesis by eNOS is primarily because of slow electron
transfer from its reductase domain to the heme, rather than heme-NO
complex formation or other aspects of catalysis. 2) eNOS forms
relatively little heme-NO complex during NO synthesis from Arg,
implying NO feedback inhibition has a minimal role. These properties
distinguish eNOS from the other NOS isoforms and provide a foundation
to better understand its role in physiology and pathology.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-Hydroxy-L-arginine was a
generous gift from Dr. Bruce King of Wake Forest University. All other
materials were obtained from Sigma or from sources reported previously
(11, 13, 16, 18).
1 cm
1 for
its dithionite-reduced, CO bound form (11).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Influence of CaM and Arg on NADPH reduction
of eNOS flavins and heme. Upper panel, representative
spectra of ferric eNOS (2 µM) in buffer containing 0.9 mM EDTA and 10 µM H4B, before (
-) and after
consecutive addition of 30 µM NADPH (- - -), 1.2 mM Ca2+ (····), and 1 mM
Arg (
·
). Lower panel, representative spectra of ferric
eNOS (2 µM) in buffer containing 0.9 mM EDTA,
10 µM H4B, and 1 mM Arg before (
-) and
after consecutive addition of 30 µM NADPH (····)
and 1.2 mM Ca2+ (- - -).
1, respectively.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Flavin reduction kinetics. An anaerobic
sample of eNOS containing H4B was rapidly mixed at 10 °C with an
anaerobic solution of 0.2 mM NADPH, and flavin reduction
was followed as an absorbance decrease at 485 nm. Left and
right traces are for CaM-free and CaM-bound eNOS,
respectively. The solid line through each trace is the line
of best fit obtained using a single exponential equation.
1, essentially identical to that observed
at 485 nm and consistent with only flavin reduction occurring in this
circumstance. In contrast, for CaM-bound eNOS that contained Arg and
H4B the absorbance change was biphasic. The first phase was attributed
to flavin reduction with a rate constant identical to that obtained at
485 nm, whereas the slow phase was attributed to heme reduction. As shown in Fig. 3, heme reduction in the
presence of Arg had a rate constant of 0.005 s
1 at
10 °C and was about three times faster (0.014 s
1) with
NOHA. The slow phase attributed to heme reduction at 400 nm was absent
when eNOS contained the heme reduction inhibitor N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (data not
shown). Adding Arg, NOHA, or N-nitro-L-arginine
methyl ester did not alter the rate of flavin reduction (data not
shown).

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Heme reduction kinetics. An anaerobic
sample of CaM-bound eNOS containing H4B and substrate was rapidly mixed
at 10 °C with an anaerobic solution of 0.2 mM NADPH, and
heme reduction was followed as an absorbance decrease at 400 nm.
Left and right traces are for enzyme that
contains 1 mM NOHA or Arg, respectively. The solid
line through each trace is the line of best fit obtained using a
single exponential equation.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Representative spectra of ferrous,
ferrous-dioxy, and ferric eNOS observed during O2 binding
experiments. An anaerobic solution of ferrous eNOS (6 µM) containing H4B was rapidly mixed at 10 °C with an
air-saturated buffer solution, and 96 spectra were collected using a
diode array detector. The solid, dotted, and
dashed lines were observed at 0.003, 0.08, and 120 s
after mixing, respectively, and represent the spectrum of ferrous,
ferrous-dioxy, and ferric eNOS. The inset magnifies these
traces in the absorbance range 450 to 700 nm.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Rate of ferrous-dioxy complex formation
versus O2 concentration and effect of
substrate. eNOS ferrous-dioxy complex formation at 10 °C was
followed at 430 nm to determine an observed rate at each indicated
O2 concentration. Experiments contained H4B-bound eNOS
either in the absence of substrate (
) or in the presence of 1 mM Arg (
) or 1 mM NOHA (
). The lines are
a least squares fit for each data set.
Kinetics of O2 and NO binding to H4B-saturated eNOS determined
by stopped-flow spectroscopy

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Spectra of eNOS NO complexes. Anaerobic
solutions of eNOS containing H4B and Arg either were or were not
reduced with dithionite prior to the addition of NO gas. The spectra
shown are ferric (
), ferric-NO (····), and ferrous-NO
(-·-) eNOS.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Rate of heme-NO complex formation
versus NO concentration and effect of substrate.
The rate of eNOS ferrous-NO (A) or ferric-NO (B)
complex formation was followed at 10 °C and at 436 and 440 nm,
respectively, at each indicated NO concentration. Experiments contained
H4B-bound eNOS either in the absence of substrate (
) or in the
presence of 1 mM NOHA (
) or 1 mM Arg (
).
The lines are a least squares fit for each data set.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Spectra of eNOS during steady-state
catalysis. The spectra show eNOS prior to (
), during (- - -),
and after (····) catalyzing NO synthesis from Arg (upper
panel) or from NOHA (lower panel). The upper
inset shows CaM-bound eNOS prior to (
) and during (- - -) NADPH
oxidation in the absence of substrate. The lower panel inset
is the difference spectrum generated by subtracting the spectrum taken
before NO synthesis from the spectrum taken during NO synthesis from
NOHA.
1 after the NADPH was consumed. The rate of
NADPH oxidation was slowed by about a factor of 2 or 3 upon buildup of
the heme-NO complex. The absorbance change at 436 nm during the first
100 s of the reaction (Fig. 9, lower panel) best fit to
a single exponential function and gave an observed rate of 0.065 s
1. This absorbance increase at 436 nm was actually
preceded by a more rapid absorbance decrease (lower panel
inset), which best fit to a single exponential function with an
apparent rate constant of 94 s
1 and can be attributed to
flavin reduction. This initial drop also explains why the trace at 436 nm in the upper panel appears not to return to its initial
level after the reaction terminated and flavins become oxidized.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Time course of heme-NO complex formation
during NO synthesis from NOHA. A sample of CaM-bound eNOS
containing H4B and NOHA was rapid mixed at 10 °C with a buffered
solution that contained a limiting amount of NADPH, and subsequent
heme-NO complex buildup and decay was followed at 436 nm. The
upper and lower panels and lower panel
inset all show the same 436-nm trace within three different time
frames. The traces in the lower panel and
inset each contain a line of best fit. In a replica
reaction, the rate of NADPH oxidation was followed at 340 nm
(upper panel).

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 10.
Solution NO concentrations, NADPH oxidation
rates, and citrulline accumulation during NO synthesis from Arg or
NOHA. Samples contained eNOS in air-saturated reaction buffer at
15 °C. NO synthesis from Arg (upper panel) or NOHA
(middle panel) was initiated by Ca2+-promoted
CaM binding, and the solution NO concentration was monitored using an
NO electrode. NADPH was the limiting reagent in the reactions. Replica
experiments were run in cuvettes to monitor NADPH oxidation rate under
each condition in the presence (····) or absence (- - -) of the
NO scavenger oxyhemoglobin. The initial absorbance increase at 340 nm
is an artifact from the instrument shutter opening after the NADPH
addition. Sample aliquots were removed at indicated times from replica
reactions and quenched immediately for citrulline measurement from the
Arg (
) and NOHA (
) (lower panel).

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 11.
Activity versus
O2 concentration with Arg or NOHA as substrate.
The upper panel plots rate of NADPH oxidation (absorbance
change at 340 nm × 103/min) observed at each
O2 concentration during NO synthesis from Arg (
) or NOHA
(
) in the absence of oxyhemoglobin. The middle panel
contains the same data plotted in double reciprocal form
(O2 concentrations are in µM), with a least
squares line of best fit through each data set. The lower
panel plots the rate of NO synthesis from NOHA (absorbance change
at 401 nm × 103/min) observed at each O2
concentration in the presence of oxyhemoglobin.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Rates of NADPH-dependent flavin and heme reduction in three
NOS

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Scheme 1.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM51491 and CA53914 (to D. J. S.) and a grant from the American Heart Association (to H. M. A.-S.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence may be addressed: Dept. of Cell Biology,
NC-10, Lerner Research Inst., Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave.,
Cleveland, OH 44195. Tel.: 216-445-5921; Fax: 216-444-9404; E-mail:
abusouh@ccf.org.
§ Current address: Dept. of Physiology, School of Medicine, Tokai University, Bohseidai, Isehara, 259-1193, Japan.
¶ To whom correspondence may be addressed: Immunology NB-3 , Lerner Research Inst., Cleveland, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195. Tel.: 216-445-6950; Fax: 216-444-9329; E-mail: stuehrd@ccf.org.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 3, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000050200
2 H. M. Abu-Soud and D. J. Stuehr, manuscript in preparation.
3
The spectral characteristics of the NOS
ferrous-dioxy complex appear to change when recorded at low temperature
(
30 °C) in the presence of ethylene glycol (41, 42).
4 Like eNOS, the level of heme-NO complex observed in iNOS is dependent on the external NO concentration.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
NOS, nitric-oxide
synthase;
nNOS, rat neuronal NO synthase;
eNOS, bovine endothelial NO
synthase;
CaM, calmodulin;
iNOS, mouse inducible NO synthase;
H4B, (6R)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-L-biopterin;
NOHA, N
-hydroxy-L-arginine;
BisTris:
2- [bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1, 3-diol;
NO, nitric oxide.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Marletta, M. A., Hurshman, A. R., and Rusche, K. M. (1998) Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2, 656-663 |
| 2. | Hemmens, B., and Mayer, B. (1997) in Methods in Molecular Biology (Titheradge, M. A., ed), Vol. 100 , pp. 1-32, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ |
| 3. | Griffith, O. W., and Stuehr, D. J. (1995) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 57, 707-736 |
| 4. | Michel, T., and Feron, O. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 100, 2146-2152 |
| 5. | Craven, S. E., and Bredt, D. S. (1998) Cell 93, 495-498 |
| 6. | MacMicking, J., Xie, Q.-W., and Nathan, C. (1997) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15, 323-350 |
| 7. | Rusche, K. M., Spiering, M. M., and Marletta, M. A. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 15503-15512 |
| 8. | Martasek, P., Liu, Q., Liu, J., Roman, L. J., Gross, S. S., Sessa, W. C., and Masters, B. S. S. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 219, 359-365 |
| 9. | List, B. M., Klosch, B., Volker, C., Gorren, A. C. F., Sessa, W. C., Werner, E. R., Kukovetz, W. R., Schmidt, K., and Mayer, B. (1997) Biochem. J. 323, 159-165 |
| 10. | Moali, C., Boucher, J. L., Sari, A. M., Stuehr, D. J., and Mansuy, D. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 10453-10460 |
| 11. | Ghosh, S., Gachhui, R., Crooks, C., Wu, C., Lisanti, M. P., and Stuehr, D. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22267-22271 |
| 12. | Roman, L. J., Sheta, E. A., Martasek, P., Gross, S. S., Liu, Q, and Masters, B. S. S. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 8428-8432 |
| 13. | Adak, S., Ghosh, S., Abu-Soud, H. M., and Stuehr, D. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 22313-22320 |
| 14. | Rodriguez-Crespo, I., Gerber, N. C., and Ortiz de Montellano, P. R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11462-11467 |
| 15. | Stuehr, D. J. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1411, 217-230 |
| 16. | Adak, S., Crooks, C., Wang, Q., Crane, B. R., Tainer, J. A., Getzoff, E. D., and Stuehr, D. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26907-26911 |
| 17. | Hurshman, A. R., and Marletta, M. A. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 5627-5634 |
| 18. | Abu-Soud, H. M., Wang, J., Rousseau, D. L., Fukuto, J., Ignarro, L. J., and Stuehr, D. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22997-23006 |
| 19. | Abu-Soud, H. M., Rousseau, D. L., and Stuehr, D. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32515-32518 |
| 20. | Dweik, R. A., Laskowski, D., Abu-Soud, H. M., Kaneko, F. T., Hutte, R., Stuehr, D. J., and Erzurum, S. C. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 660-666 |
| 21. | Presta, A. P., Siddhanta, U., Wu, C., Sennequier, N., Huang, L., Abu-Soud, H. M., Erzurum, S., and Stuehr, D. J. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 298-310 |
| 22. | Abu-Soud, H. M., Wu, C., Ghosh, D. K., and Stuehr, D. J. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 3777-3786 |
| 23. | Presta, A., Liu, J., Sessa, W. C., and Stuehr, D. J. (1997) Nitric Oxide Biol. Chem. 1, 74-87 |
| 24. | Gachhui, R., Abu-Soud, H. M., Ghosh, D. K., Presta, A., Blazing, M. A., Mayer, B., George, S. E., and Stuehr, D. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5451-5454 |
| 25. | Abu-Soud, H. M., Gachhui, R., Raushel, F. M., and Stuehr, D. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 17349-17353 |
| 26. | Sato, H., Sagami, I., Daff, S., and Shimizu, T. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 253, 845-849 |
| 27. | Negrerie, M., Berka, V., Vos, M. H., Liebl, U., Lambry, J.-C., and Martin, J.-L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 24694-24702 |
| 28. | Nishida, C. R., and Ortiz de Montellano, P. R. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 14692-14698 |
| 29. | Abu-Soud, H. M., and Stuehr, D. J. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 10769-10772 |
| 30. | Nishida, C. R., and Ortiz de Montellano, P. R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5566-5571 |
| 31. | Miller, R. T., Martasek, P., Omura, T., and Masters, B. S. S. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 265, 184-188 |
| 32. | Scheele, J. S., Bruner, E., Kharitonov, V. G., Martasek, P., Roman, L. J., Masters, B. S. S., Sharma, V. S., and Magde, D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 13105-13110 |
| 33. | Crane, B. R., Arvai, A. S., Getzoff, E. D., Ghosh, S., Stuehr, D. J., and Tainer, J. A. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 4608-4621 |
| 34. | Fischmann, T. O., Hruza, A., Da Niu, X., Fossetta, J. D., Lunn, C. A., Dolphin, E., Prongay, A. J., Paul, R., Lundell, D. J., Narula, S. K., and Weber, P. C. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 233-242 |
| 35. | Vasquez-Vivar, J., Kalyanaraman, B., Martasek, P., Hogg, N., Masters, B. S. S., Karoui, H., Tordo, P., and Pritchard, K. A., Jr. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U. S. A. 35, 9220-9225 |
| 36. | Jones, D. P., and Mason, H. S. (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 253, 4874-4880 |
| 37. | Garcia-Cardena, G., and Sessa, W. C. (1998) Nature 392, 821-824 |
| 38. | Igarashi, J, Thatte, H. S., Prabhakar, P, Golan, D. E., and Michel, T. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 12583-12588 |
| 39. | Dimmeler, S., Fleming, I., Fisslthaler, B., Hermann, C., Busse, R., and Zeiher, A. M. (1999) Nature 399, 601-605 |
| 40. | Fulton, D., Gratton, J.-P., McCabe, T. J., Fontana, J., Fujio, Y., Walsh, K., Franke, T. F., Papapetropoulos, A., and Sessa, W. C. (1999) Nature 399, 597-601 |
| 41. | Bec, N., Gorren, A. C. F., Voelker, C., Mayer, B., and Lange, R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13502-13508 |
| 42. | Ledbetter, A. P., McMillan, K., Roman, L. J., Masters, B. S. S., Dawson, J. H., and Sono, M. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 8014-8021 |
| 43. | Nelin, L. D., Thomas, C. J., and Dawson, C. A. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 271, H8-H14 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G.M. Saed, M. Zhao, M.P. Diamond, and H.M Abu-Soud Regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase in post-operative adhesions Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1605 - 1611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Bevers, B. Braam, J. A. Post, A. J. van Zonneveld, T. J. Rabelink, H. A. Koomans, M. C. Verhaar, and J. A. Joles Tetrahydrobiopterin, but Not L-Arginine, Decreases NO Synthase Uncoupling in Cells Expressing High Levels of Endothelial NO Synthase Hypertension, January 1, 2006; 47(1): 87 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cheng, R. van Haperen, M. de Waard, L. C. A. van Damme, D. Tempel, L. Hanemaaijer, G. W. A. van Cappellen, J. Bos, C. J. Slager, D. J. Duncker, et al. Shear stress affects the intracellular distribution of eNOS: direct demonstration by a novel in vivo technique Blood, December 1, 2005; 106(12): 3691 - 3698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||