|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M000966200 on April 3, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 23, 17358-17363, June 9, 2000
Expression of Oncogenic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
Family Kinases Induces Paclitaxel Resistance and Alters -Tubulin
Isotype Expression*
R. Bruce
Montgomery §,
Junitta
Guzman ,
Donald M.
O'Rourke¶, and
William L.
Stahl
From the Departments of Medicine and Oncology and
Physiology, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System,
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98108 and the
¶ Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Received for publication, February 1, 2000, and in revised form, March 30, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Oncogenic transformation confers resistance to
chemotherapy through a variety of mechanisms, including suppression of
apoptosis, increased drug metabolism, and modification of target
proteins. Oncogenic epidermal growth factor receptor family members,
including EGFRvIII and HER2, are expressed in a broad spectrum of human malignancies. Cell lines transfected with EGFRvIII and
HER2 are more resistant to paclitaxel-mediated
cytotoxicity, and tubulin polymerization induced by paclitaxel is
suppressed compared with cells expressing wild type epidermal growth
factor receptor. Because differential expression of -tubulin
isotypes has been proposed to modulate paclitaxel resistance, we
analyzed -tubulin isotypes expressed in cell lines transfected with
different oncogenes. EGFRvIII- and HER2-expressing cells demonstrated
equivalent total -tubulin protein compared with cells transfected
with wild type receptor or untransfected controls. EGFRvIII-expressing
cells demonstrated increases in class IVa (2.5-fold) and IVb (3.1-fold) mRNA, and HER2-expressing cells showed increases in class IVa (2.95-fold) mRNA. Expression of oncogenic Ha-Ras did not change class IV RNA levels significantly. Inhibition of EGFRvIII kinase activity using a mutant allele with an inactivating mutation in the
kinase domain decreased expression of class IVa by 50% and partially
reversed resistance to paclitaxel. Expression of oncogenic epidermal
growth factor receptor family members is associated with modulation of
both -tubulin isotype expression and paclitaxel resistance in cells
transformed by expression of the receptor. This effect on tubulin
expression may modulate drug resistance in human malignancies that
express these oncogenes.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
De novo or acquired resistance to chemotherapeutic
agents can be induced by increased clearance mediated by membrane
transporter proteins or by modification of molecular targets. In human
tumors, a combination of these mechanisms may be responsible for
clinical tumor progression. The taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel, which are used extensively in clinical oncology, stabilize microtubules by
binding to the -tubulin component of / -tubulin heterodimers, blocking cells in G2/M leading to cell death (1, 2).
Modification of -tubulin by mutation or differential expression of
isotypes have been proposed as mechanisms for either de novo
or acquired taxane resistance (3, 4). At least six -tubulin isotypes have been identified, constituting five evolutionarily conserved isotype classes. These differ primarily in the carboxyl-terminal 15 amino acids (5). The conservation of distinct isotype classes has
suggested that the different -tubulins contribute unique functional
properties to cell structure and function. Recent evidence suggests
that these isotype classes vary in their paclitaxel binding affinities.
Microtubules selectively enriched for isotype class III and IV
-tubulin are significantly more resistant to paclitaxel suppression
of microtubule dynamics than are microtubules composed of
unfractionated tubulin (6). Tumor cell lines rendered
paclitaxel-resistant by exposure to high concentrations of drug also
demonstrate substantial increases in class III and IV -tubulin
(7-9). Prostate carcinoma lines resistant to the tubulin-active agent
estramustine demonstrate selective increases in class III and IV
tubulin isotypes (10). Clearly, one response of tumor cells to in
vitro selection with microtubule-stabilizing agents is to increase
the proportion of taxane-resistant tubulin. Evidence for modulation of
isotype expression by paclitaxel exposure is also found in patients
treated with taxanes. Paired samples from patients with advanced
ovarian cancer that developed clinical paclitaxel resistance showed
increases in -tubulin isotype classes I (3.6-fold), III (4.4-fold),
and IVa (7.6-fold) (8).
The epidermal growth factor receptor
(EGFR1 or erbB) family of
receptor tyrosine kinases plays a role in oncogenic transformation in
tissues where it is overexpressed or coexpressed with one of its
ligands (11, 12). Transformation occurs by mutation, overexpression, and synergistic activation of different family members. Gene
amplification and overexpression of intact or wild type (wt)EGFR have
been found in a variety of epithelial and neuronal neoplasms including
squamous cell carcinomas, melanoma, and glioblastoma multiforme and
portend a poor prognosis for patients with these tumors (13-16).
Overexpression of EGFR has been associated with a relative resistance
to chemotherapy in cell lines and in patients with breast, ovarian, and
esophageal cancer (17-21). HER2 is a closely related member of the
EGFR family which is oncogenic when overexpressed in several cell
contexts as a result of transactivation of HER2 complexes (22). HER2 plays a role in oncogenesis in breast, ovarian, gastric, and lung carcinoma (23). A mutant EGFR with constitutive kinase activity has
been identified in a variety of human tumors (24). This mutant,
referred to as EGFRvIII (also EGFRm, EGFR, de2-7 EGFR), activates
signaling through multiple pathways and acts as a dominant oncogene
when overexpressed (25-29). EGFRvIII also reduces spontaneous apoptosis when transfected into glioblastoma cell lines, suggesting that it may play a significant role in protecting tumor cells from
drug-induced cytotoxicity (30). Activation of mutant EGFRvIII is
ligand-independent and recapitulates the chronic autocrine or paracrine
stimulation of EGFR in tissues that overexpress EGFR. Because of its
broad prevalence and likely clinical significance in human tumors, we
wished to determine the effects of EGFRvIII and the related oncoprotein
HER2 on chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity and potential mechanisms of
resistance to these agents. This report demonstrates that expression of
constitutively active, oncogenic EGFR and HER2 induce paclitaxel
resistance and increase class IVa and IVb -tubulin RNA. This
modulation of -tubulin isotype expression may demonstrate one
mechanism by which oncogenic transformation mediates intrinsic
resistance to paclitaxel in tumors that overexpress these oncogenes.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Antibodies to EGFRvIII were kindly provided by
Albert Wong, Kimmel Cancer Center, and were prepared as described (31).
Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents and pan- -tubulin antibody
(N357) were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Antibodies to p21 were
from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Antibody to HER2 was from Transduction Laboratories (E19420). Precast SDS-PAGE gels were from NOVEX. GeneAmp
PCR amplification kits were from Perkin-Elmer, and Taq polymerase was from Promega. Paclitaxel and -tubulin antibody were
from Sigma.
Cell Culture--
HC2 20d2/c (HC2) and CO12 20c2/b (CO12) were
generated from transfected NIH3T3 and maintained as described (27).
NIH3T3, HER2-expressing, and Ras (Val-12)-transfected NIH3T3 were
provided by Dr. Michael Lilly, University of Washington. H(T691) were
derived by transfection of HC2 cells with the HER2/neu
T691stop mutant as described previously (32, 33). All cell lines were
maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, 10% fetal calf
serum, 200 units/ml penicillin, 200 µg/ml streptomycin. HC2 and CO12
medium also contained 250 µg/ml G418, and HC2 (T691) cells were
selected and maintained in 13 mM aminopterin.
Paclitaxel Cytotoxicity Assay--
2 × 105
cells were plated on day 0, grown for 1 day, and exposed to 0-100
nM paclitaxel for 4 days. Cells were trypsinized and
assayed for viability by trypan blue staining. Triplicate flasks were
counted for each concentration.
Tubulin Polymerization Assay--
Quantitation of tubulin
polymerization was carried out essentially as described previously with
minor modifications (4). Cells were grown to confluence in
25-cm2 flasks, and monolayers were washed twice with
phosphate-buffered saline and lysed at 37 °C in the dark with 300 µl of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 1 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM EGTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin,
leupeptin, and soybean trypsin inhibitor, 5 mM aminocaproic
acid, 1 mM benzamidine, and paclitaxel (0-1 µg/ml).
Lysates were then vortexed and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 10 min.
Pellets were resuspended in 300 µl of lysis buffer. The supernatants
and pellets were mixed with equal amounts of 2× SDS sample buffer and
boiled for 5 min. 30 µl of lysate was then separated on 7.5%
SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose filters, and probed with
anti- -tubulin antibodies.
-Tubulin Isotype Analysis by RT-PCR--
The gene-specific
oligonucleotide primers for isotype classes I-IVb,
2-microglobulin, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase were exactly as published by Haber et al. (34)
(Table I). The primers for 18 S rRNA
were 5'-ATGCTCTTAGCTGAGTGTCC-3' and 5'-AACTACGACGGTATCTGATC-3'. The
primer sequences and expected product sizes are shown in
Table II. Total RNA isolated from
transfected NIH3T3 cells was treated with RNase-free DNase to remove
contaminating genomic DNA (35). Reverse transcription of 2 µg of
total RNA was performed to synthesize cDNA using specific primer
pairs. PCRs were carried out with 50 ng of cDNA, and products were
amplified for 35 cycles in a programmable thermocycler. Effective
removal of genomic DNA was verified by amplification of intron-spanning
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase primers. Isotypes classes I
and II were coamplified with 2-microglobulin to allow
normalization of products. Isotypes III, IVa, and IVb could not be
coamplified with 2-microglobulin and instead were quantified by comparing intensity of PCR products generated in the
linear range of amplification to 2-microglobulin and
18 S RNA (from parallel samples). PCR products were electrophoresed on
6% TBE gels and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Densitometric measurements were performed on negatives of the gels. The band of
interest was divided by the control band (18 S RNA,
2-microglobulin). Data for the figures were expressed as
the signal intensity ratios compared with
2-microglobulin. Because isotype III levels were consistently very low, the results were not plotted. The ratios of
18 S and 2-microglobulin products with tubulin isotypes
were within 15% of each other for the different cell lines. The assays were performed in triplicate and standard deviations determined.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Paclitaxel cytotoxicity for transfected NIH3T3 cells
NIH3T3, CO12 (wt EGFR-expressing 3T3), HER2, and HC2
(EGFRvIII-t-expressing 3T3) cells were grown for 1 day and exposed to
paclitaxel (0-100 nM) for 4 days. Cell viability was
quantitated by trypan blue staining of cells. Data were expressed as
IC50, the drug concentration that inhibits cell number by 50%
after 4 days. Average cell counts at 4 days for controls were NIH3T3,
2.3 × 106, CO12-2.51 × 106, HER2,
1.73 × 106, HC2, 2.94 × 106.
|
|
Western Analysis--
Cells were lysed in 50 mM
HEPES (pH 7.4), 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 1 mM
sodium orthovanadate, 10 µg/ml leupeptin/aprotinin/soybean trypsin
inhibitor, normalized for protein concentrations, and resolved by
SDS-PAGE on 8-16% gels. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose
and incubated with 5% nonfat dry milk for 1 h followed by
immunoblotting antibody in the same solution for 4 h. Filters were
extensively washed in TBS, 0.05% Tween 20, and bound antibodies were
detected by addition of conjugated protein A-horseradish peroxidase at
1:5000 for 1 h followed by ECL following the manufacturer's directions.
Experiments were performed at least 3 times and representative data are shown.
 |
RESULTS |
Oncogenic EGFR Expression Induces Resistance to Paclitaxel
Cytotoxicity--
HER2 and EGFRvIII undergo ligand-independent
autophosphorylation, mediating oncogenic signaling and transformation.
Growth factor receptor stimulation may circumvent drug-induced
apoptosis and cytotoxicity. As a model system that mimics these
effects, we determined the effect of EGFR expression on sensitivity to paclitaxel in transfected fibroblast cell lines. Cell lines were exposed to 0-100 nM paclitaxel, and viability was
determined after 4 days of exposure. Table I demonstrates the effect of
the different EGFR constructs on sensitivity to paclitaxel. Cells
expressing the EGFR mutant (HC2) and HER2 were 2-3-fold more resistant
to paclitaxel compared with the parental cell line. This level of resistance is modest compared with that induced by selection in tubulin-active agents (8, 10, 34), but it correlates well with other
parameters of oncogenicity associated with expression of EGFRvIII, such
growth in serum-free medium (27, 36).
Paclitaxel-induced Tubulin Polymerization Is Reduced in Cells
Expressing EGFRvIII and HER2--
The major mechanism of paclitaxel
cytotoxicity is stabilization of microtubule arrays that blocks
effective cell division and growth. Because both EGFRvIII and HER2
induce resistance to paclitaxel, we measured paclitaxel-induced
polymerization activity using a cell-free assay system. This assay
separates measurement of polymerization from cell-mediated functions
such as membrane transport (4). In the absence of paclitaxel, tubulin
is relatively evenly distributed between soluble and insoluble forms in
extracts derived from all cell lines (Fig.
1). With the addition of paclitaxel at
0.2-0.4 µg/ml, the amount of soluble tubulin decreases substantially with a proportionate increase in insoluble tubulin in extracts from
cells expressing wtEGFR. In contrast, there was no apparent increase in
tubulin polymerization in cells expressing EGFRvIII or HER2,
demonstrating diminished sensitivity to paclitaxel microtubule stabilization.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Paclitaxel effect on tubulin
polymerization. CO12, HER2, and HC2 were grown to confluence and
lysed in 400 µl in the presence and absence of paclitaxel (0-0.4
µg/ml) at room temperature in the dark. Lysates were then vortexed
and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm in a minifuge for 10 min. Pellets were
resuspended in 300 µl of lysis buffer. The supernatants
(SN) and pellets were mixed with equal amounts of sample
buffer and boiled, and 30 µl of lysate was separated on 7.5%
SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with
anti- -tubulin antibodies.
|
|
-Tubulin Isotype Expression Is Modulated by Expression of
Oncogenes--
The observed resistance to paclitaxel-induced
polymerization in cells expressing EGFRvIII could be due to changes in
total tubulin levels, to mutation in the tubulin molecule itself, or to
changes in the relative proportions of paclitaxel-sensitive -tubulin
isotypes (3, 7, 37). To distinguish among these possibilities, total
-tubulin protein was analyzed from NIH3T3 cell lines expressing
wtEGFR, EGFRvIII, Ras, and HER2. Total -tubulin levels differed no
more than 15% among the different cell lines (Fig.
2). In order to estimate the quantitative
contribution of distinct -tubulin isotypes to the total protein
levels, we performed quantitative PCR assays. Relative RNA levels for
class I-IVb were determined using RT-PCR with primers previously
described by Haber et al. (34). Tubulin isotype RNA levels
were normalized to PCR products for 2-microglobulin and
18 S RNA in each gel. Relative ratios of amplified products to each of
these standards were similar between the different cell lines. The
parental NIH3T3- and wtEGFR-expressing cells showed similar amounts of
-tubulin I-IVb with very low levels of class III (Fig.
3, data for type III not shown).
EGFRvIII-expressing cells showed a 2.5-fold increase in class IVa and a
3.1-fold increase in class IVb compared with cells expressing wtEGFR.
HER2 expression resulted in a 2.95-fold increase in IVa and 2.1-fold
increase in IVb. Ras expression induced insignificant changes compared with the parental line.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
-Tubulin expression in
transfected cell lines. 40 µg of cell lysates from NIH3T3, CO12,
HC2, Ras, and HER2 expressing 3T3 cells were separated on 10%
SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with
pan- -tubulin antibody.
|
|

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
RT-PCR quantitation of
-tubulin isotype expression. RNA from
subconfluent NIH3T3 cell lines expressing EGFRvIII (HC2), HER2, wtEGFR
(CO12), or Ras was isolated and analyzed by RT-PCR for the presence of
-tubulin isotype-specific RNA using the primer sets described in
Table I. PCR products were separated on agarose gels and visualized by
ethidium bromide staining. Quantitation by comparison with coamplified
2-microglobulin and 18 S RNA was used to generate
ratios of PCR products from samples. Isotypes classes III and IV could
not be coamplified with 2-microglobulin, and separate
reactions from samples were used for quantitation. A,
-tubulin isotype products. B, graphic representation of
PCR data, normalized to 2-microglobulin.
|
|
Expression of EGFRvIII and HER2 Does Not Affect p21Cip1
Expression--
Yu et al. (38) have recently shown that
taxane resistance of HER2-expressing cells correlates with increased
expression of p21Cip1. Suppression of p21 production
blocked resistance to taxane, suggesting that this may be a general
mechanism of taxane resistance in HER2-expressing cells. To test this
hypothesis in our experimental system, we determined levels of p21 by
immunostaining of NIH3T3 cell lysates expressing EGFR family members
and Ras proteins. As shown in Fig. 4 and
in contrast to the results of Yu et al. (38), expression of
oncogenic EGFR family members did not alter p21Cip1
expression in this specific cell type.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Quantitation of p21Cip1
expression. 40 µg of cell lysates from NIH3T3, CO12, HC2, Ras,
and HER2 expressing 3T3 cells were separated on 14% SDS-PAGE,
transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with
p21Cip1-specific antibody.
|
|
Inhibition of EGFRvIII Kinase Activity Suppresses Class IV Tubulin
Production--
EGFR signaling is not mediated exclusively by tyrosine
kinase activity since various downstream kinases may be activated
despite functional inactivation of the EGFR kinase domain (39). To
determine whether kinase activity is important to induction of taxane
resistance, HC2 cells, expressing EGFRvIII, were transfected with a
HER2/neu construct, T691stop, which contains an inactivating
mutation in the kinase domain (32, 33). This mutant HER2 construct
inhibits EGFRvIII signaling and kinase activity as a result of
dimerization of T691stop with EGFRvIII (33). The resultant doubly
transfected cells, designated H(T691), were analyzed for expression of
EGFRvIII, the 115-kDa T691 protein construct, and for effects on
EGFRvIII autophosphorylation (Fig.
5A). H(T691) cells maintained
their expression of EGFRvIII and demonstrated significant expression of
the T691 protein; however, autophosphorylation of EGFRvIII was
suppressed, reflecting decreased kinase activity. H(T691) cells were
then tested for paclitaxel sensitivity in the same fashion as was used
to generate results shown in Table I. In these assays the
ED50 for HC2 was 40 nM, whereas the
ED50 for H(T691) was 20 nM. H(T691) cells
demonstrate decreased resistance to paclitaxel and decreased expression
of the paclitaxel-resistant -tubulin class IVa (Fig. 5B),
although levels of IVb were not affected (data not shown). This
suggests that induction of tubulin isotype IVa is a direct result of
kinase activity, and induction of isotype IVb is not
kinase-dependent. The constitutive kinase activity of
EGFRvIII is responsible for induction of paclitaxel resistance and
increase in class IV tubulin expression.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effects of suppression of EGFRvIII kinase
activity on expression of -tubulin
isotypes. A, whole cell lysates of HC2, H(T691), and
HER2-expressing SKBR3 were analyzed by Western blot using
EGFRvIII-specific antibodies, followed by stripping the blots and
probing with anti-HER2 antibodies (to confirm expression of the
kinase-dead HER2/neu mutant) and antiphosphotyrosine antibodies. SKBR3
was included as a positive control for HER2 and negative control for
EGFRvIII. B, RT-PCR quantitation of -tubulin isotype IVa
from cells expressing EGFRvIII (HC2) or coexpressing EGFRvIII and the
kinase-dead T691stop mutant (H(T691). C, bar
graph representation of effects of the T691 mutant on class IVa
expression.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Resistance to antineoplastic agents can be mediated by many
different mechanisms, including differential uptake and retention of
drug controlled by membrane transporter proteins (1). The expanding use
of taxanes in clinical practice has made the ability to predict primary
or secondary resistance to these agents a potentially important aspect
to treatment planning. Although de novo resistance is
relatively rare, some malignancies will exhibit intrinsic resistance to
taxanes, and the majority of patients with advanced disease will
ultimately develop progressive disease despite continued therapy.
Overexpression of EGFR, EGFRvIII, and HER2 is found in ovarian and
breast carcinomas, tumors that are perhaps the best defined indications
for taxane therapy (1, 24). EGFR and HER2 overexpression is inversely
correlated with response to chemotherapy and prognosis, and resistance
is often accompanied by an increase in receptor expression (24,
40-42). Poor response rates could result from intrinsic drug
resistance mediated by these oncogenes.
We analyzed the effect of EGFRvIII and HER2 expression on cell
sensitivity to paclitaxel, since these oncogenes induce constitutive signals for proliferation and transformation. Both receptors confer relative resistance to paclitaxel and confer resistance to tubulin polymerization. RT-PCR assays of RNA levels suggest that expression of
EGFRvIII increases levels of class IVa and IVb 3-fold. The changes in
isotype class IV are consistent with studies previously demonstrating
an increase in type III or IV tubulin expression associated with
paclitaxel resistance (7-9). Since class III and IV tubulins are
relatively resistant to paclitaxel-induced stabilization of
microtubules, cells overexpressing these isotypes should have a
selective growth advantage. The majority of published studies have
demonstrated increases in IVa class rather than IVb, although there is
no evidence that these isotypes differ in their sensitivity to
paclitaxel (8-10). Conditional overexpression of isotype IVb in
Chinese hamster ovary cells by Blade et al. (43) did not
induce paclitaxel resistance, suggesting that IVb levels do not mediate
taxane resistance, at least in the cell system used in their study. In
our studies, the failure to suppress isotype IVb following transfection
with the T691 mutant also suggests that EGFRvIII kinase activity is not
essential for tubulin isotype IVb induction. In contrast to the studies
of Yu et al. (38), there was no evidence that
p21Cip1 expression played a role in paclitaxel resistance.
The experimental conditions of these two studies were clearly
different, involving cell lines that may have distinct protein
expression and compensatory mechanisms available in response to
oncogene activation, accounting for the disparate results (38).
Modulation of tubulin isotype expression by oncogenes is a novel
mechanism for the induction of paclitaxel resistance. Why expression of
class IV may be favored in cells expressing specific oncogenes remains
to be explored. Oncogenic Ras does not influence class IV levels,
suggesting a level of specificity for HER2 and EGFRvIII transformation.
Transcriptional regulation of -tubulin synthesis is separate from
that of -tubulin and is controlled by cellular tubulin levels,
extracellular growth factors, and expression of transcription factors
(44-46). Studies directed at this question that rely on overexpression
of specific tubulin isotypes are difficult to interpret because
overexpression of isotype class IV tubulin causes compensatory
decreases in synthesis of endogenous class IV, maintaining a constant
cellular level (44). This is presumably related to a negative feedback
control in which an amino-terminal tetrapeptide in -tubulin
transduces a signal that induces RNA degradation thus maintaining
homeostatic levels (47-49). In Drosophila, binding sites
for the transcription factors Tinman and
Engrailed have been identified within isotype-specific -tubulin sequences. Binding of these transcription factors is regulated in a stage-specific fashion, and expression proceeds in a
tissue-specific, temporally regulated manner (45, 50). In mammalian
cells, exposure to cardiac stress induces transcription of specific
-tubulin classes within cardiac myocytes, and these tubulins appear
to be intrinsically more stable, allowing hypertrophy and adaptation to
stress (51). In rat brain -tubulin isotype levels vary dramatically
depending on the stage of neuronal development, again suggesting that
expression of different isotypes has functional significance for
differentiating cells (52). Few studies are available that address
trends in isotype expression within specific tissues during tumor
development. The stimulus for modulation of -tubulin isotype
expression could be related to the relatively less differentiated
phenotype of tumor cells, an increased fraction of cells undergoing
mitosis, or EGFR-specific induction of transcription factors that
regulate -tubulin stability.
Direct evidence of the contribution of isotypes III and IVa to the
development of paclitaxel resistance has been hampered by the
compensatory cellular mechanisms noted above, and the effects of class
III and IVa overexpression have not been reported to date. More
indirect evidence for the importance of isotype expression on
paclitaxel resistance comes from the use of antisense oligonucleotides to inhibit production of specific isotypes. Antisense oligonucleotides specific to isotype class III -tubulin are capable of blocking class
III expression while reversing taxane resistance in drug-resistant lung
carcinoma cells (53). Extending these studies through transient expression of EGFR family members combined with assay of isotype expression and taxane resistance will be required to confirm the general relevance of these findings. More detailed characterization of
tumors from patients that overexpress oncogenic EGFR and correlation of
isotype expression with clinical drug resistance will be important correlates to this work.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Dr. William Schubach for careful
reading and commentary on the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Veterans Affairs Merit Review and
National Institutes of Health Grant CA60782 (to R. B. M. and W. L. S.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom reprint requests should be addressed: Oncology Division,
Veteran Affairs Puget Sound HCS (111ONC), 1660 S. Columbian Way,
Seattle, WA 98108. Tel.: 206-764-2709; Fax: 206-764-2851; E-mail:
rbmontgo@u.washington.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 3, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000966200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor, wtEGFR, wild type EGFR;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Goldspiel, B. R.
(1997)
Pharmacotherapy
17,
110-125
|
| 2.
|
Horwitz, S. B.
(1994)
Ann. Oncol.
5,
3-6
|
| 3.
|
Giannakakou, P.,
Sackett, D. L.,
Kang, Y. K.,
Zhan, Z.,
Buters, J. T.,
Fojo, T.,
and Poruchynsky, M. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17118-17125
|
| 4.
|
Minotti, A. M.,
Barlow, S. B.,
and Cabral, F.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
3987-3994
|
| 5.
|
Joshi, H. C.,
and Cleveland, D. W.
(1990)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
16,
159-163
|
| 6.
|
Derry, W. B.,
Wilson, L.,
Khan, I. A.,
Luduena, R. F.,
and Jordan, M. A.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
3554-3562
|
| 7.
|
Jaffrezou, J. P.,
Dumontet, C.,
Derry, W. B.,
Duran, G.,
Chen, G.,
Tsuchiya, E.,
Wilson, L.,
Jordan, M. A.,
and Sikic, B. I.
(1995)
Oncol. Res.
7,
517-527
|
| 8.
|
Kavallaris, M.,
Kuo, D. Y. S.,
Burkhart, C. A.,
Regl, D. L.,
Norris, M. D.,
Haber, M.,
and Horwitz, S. B.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
100,
1282-1293
|
| 9.
|
Ranganathan, S.,
Benetatos, C. A.,
Colarusso, P. J.,
Dexter, D. W.,
and Hudes, G. R.
(1998)
Br. J. Cancer
77,
562-566
|
| 10.
|
Ranganathan, S.,
Dexter, D. W.,
Benetatos, C. A.,
Chapman, A. E.,
Tew, K. D.,
and Hudes, G. R.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
2584-2589
|
| 11.
|
Khazaie, K.,
Schirrmacher, V.,
and Lichtner, R. B.
(1993)
Cancer Metastasis Rev.
12,
255-274
|
| 12.
|
Di Fiore, P. P.,
Pierce, J. H.,
Fleming, T. P.,
Hazan, R.,
Ullrich, A.,
King, C. R.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Aaronson, S. A.
(1987)
Cell
51,
1063-1070
|
| 13.
|
Hirono, Y.,
Tsugawa, K.,
Fushida, S.,
Ninomiya, I.,
Yonemura, Y.,
Miyazaki, I.,
Endou, Y.,
Tanaka, M.,
and Sasaki, T.
(1995)
Oncology
52,
182-188
|
| 14.
|
Hurtt, M. R.,
Moossy, J.,
Donovan-Peluso, M.,
and Locker, J.
(1992)
J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.
51,
84-90
|
| 15.
|
Schlegel, J.,
Merdes, A.,
Stumm, G.,
Albert, F. K.,
Forsting, M.,
Hynes, N.,
and Kiessling, M.
(1994)
Int. J. Cancer
56,
72-77
|
| 16.
|
Veale, D.,
Kerr, N.,
Gibson, G. J.,
Kelly, P. J.,
and Harris, A. L.
(1993)
Br. J. Cancer
68,
162-165
|
| 17.
|
van Dam, P. A.,
Vergote, I. B.,
Lowe, D. G.,
Watson, J. V.,
van Damme, P.,
van der Auwera, J. C.,
and Shepherd, J. H.
(1994)
J. Clin. Pathol.
47,
914-919
|
| 18.
|
Scambia, G.,
Benedetti-Panici, P.,
Ferrandina, G.,
Distefano, M.,
Salerno, G.,
Romanini, M. E.,
Fagotti, A.,
and Mancuso, S.
(1995)
Br. J. Cancer
72,
361-366
|
| 19.
|
Porter-Jordan, K.,
and Lippman, M. E.
(1994)
Hematol. Oncol. Clin. N. Am.
8,
73-100
|
| 20.
|
Long, B.,
McKibben, B. M.,
Lynch, M.,
and van den Berg, H. W.
(1992)
Br. J. Cancer
65,
865-869
|
| 21.
|
Dassonville, O.,
Formento, J. L.,
Francoual, M.,
Ramaioli, A.,
Santini, J.,
Schneider, M.,
Demard, F.,
and Milano, G.
(1993)
J. Clin. Oncol.
11,
1873-1878
|
| 22.
|
Di Fiore, P. P.,
Pierce, J. H.,
Kraus, M. H.,
Segatto, O.,
King, C. R.,
and Aaronson, S. A.
(1987)
Science
237,
178-182
|
| 23.
|
Hung, M. C.,
and Lau, Y. K.
(1999)
Semin. Oncol.
26,
51-59
|
| 24.
|
Moscatello, D. K.,
Holgado-Madruga, M.,
Godwin, A. K.,
Ramirez, G.,
Gunn, G.,
Zoltick, P. W.,
Biegel, J. A.,
Hayes, R. L.,
and Wong, A. J.
(1995)
Cancer Res.
55,
5536-5539
|
| 25.
|
Huang, H.-J. S.,
Nagane, M.,
Klingbeil, C. K.,
Lin, H.,
Nishikawa, R.,
Ji, X. D.,
Huang, C. M.,
Gill, G. N.,
Wiley, H. S.,
and Cavenee, W. K.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
2927-2935
|
| 26.
|
Moscatello, D. K.,
Holgado-Madruga, M.,
Emlet, D. R.,
Montgomery, R. B.,
and Wong, A. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
200-206
|
| 27.
|
Moscatello, D. K.,
Montgomery, R. B.,
Sundareshan, P.,
McDanel, H.,
Wong, M. Y.,
and Wong, A. J.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
85-96
|
| 28.
|
Montgomery, R. B.,
Moscatello, D. K.,
Wong, A. J.,
and Stahl, W. L.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
232,
111-116
|
| 29.
|
Montgomery, R. B.,
Moscatello, D. K.,
Wong, A. J.,
Cooper, J. A.,
and Stahl, W. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
30562-30566
|
| 30.
|
Nagane, M.,
Coufal, F.,
Lin, H.,
Bogler, O.,
Cavenee, W. K.,
and Huang, H. J.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
5079-5086
|
| 31.
|
Humphrey, P. A.,
Wong, A. J.,
Vogelstein, B.,
Zalutsky, M. R.,
Fuller, G. N.,
Archer, G. E.,
Friedman, H. S.,
Kwatra, M. M.,
Bigner, S. H.,
and Bigner, D. D.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
4207-4211
|
| 32.
|
Qian, X.,
O'Rourke, D. M.,
Zhao, H.,
and Greene, M. I.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
2149-2157
|
| 33.
|
O'Rourke, D. M.,
Nute, E. J.,
Davis, J. G.,
Wu, C.,
Lee, A.,
Murali, R.,
Zhang, H. T.,
Qian, X.,
Kao, C. C.,
and Greene, M. I.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
1197-1207
|
| 34.
|
Haber, M.,
Burkhart, C. A.,
Regl, D. L.,
Madafiglio, J.,
Norris, M. D.,
and Horwitz, S. B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
31269-31275
|
| 35.
|
Chomczynski, P.,
and Sacchi, N.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
162,
156-159
|
| 36.
|
Ekstrand, A. J.,
Longo, N.,
Hamid, M. L.,
Olson, J. J.,
Liu, L.,
Collins, V. P.,
and James, C. D.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
2313-2320
|
| 37.
|
Dumontet, C.,
Duran, G. E.,
Steger, K. A.,
Murphy, G. L.,
Sussman, H. H.,
and Sikic, B. I.
(1996)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
35,
49-58
|
| 38.
|
Yu, D.,
Jing, T.,
Liu, B.,
Yao, J.,
Tan, M.,
McDonnell, T. J.,
and Hung, M. C.
(1998)
Mol. Cell.
2,
581-591
|
| 39.
|
Wright, J. D.,
Reuter, C. W.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
12085-12093
|
| 40.
|
Fischer-Colbrie, J.,
Witt, A.,
Heinzl, H.,
Speiser, P.,
Czerwenka, K.,
Sevelda, P.,
and Zeillinger, R.
(1997)
Anticancer Res.
17,
613-619
|
| 41.
|
Klijn, J. G.,
Berns, E. M.,
and Foekens, J. A.
(1993)
Cancer Surv.
18,
165-198
|
| 42.
|
Nicholson, S.,
Sainsbury, J. R.,
Halcrow, P.,
Chambers, P.,
Farndon, J. R.,
and Harris, A. L.
(1989)
Lancet
1,
182-185
|
| 43.
|
Blade, K.,
Menick, D. R.,
and Cabral, F.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
2213-2221
|
| 44.
|
Sisodia, S. S.,
Gay, D. A.,
and Cleveland, D. W.
(1990)
New Biol.
2,
66-76
|
| 45.
|
Kremser, T.,
Gajewski, K.,
Schulz, R. A.,
and Renkawitz-Pohl, R.
(1999)
Dev. Biol.
216,
327-339
|
| 46.
|
Jinno, Y.,
Merlino, G. T.,
and Pastan, I.
(1988)
Nucleic Acids Res.
16,
4957-4966
|
| 47.
|
Yen, T. J.,
Gay, D. A.,
Pachter, J. S.,
and Cleveland, D. W.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
1224-1235
|
| 48.
|
Bachurski, C. J.,
Theodorakis, N. G.,
Coulson, R. M.,
and Cleveland, D. W.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
4076-4086
|
| 49.
|
Theodorakis, N. G.,
and Cleveland, D. W.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
791-799
|
| 50.
|
Serrano, N.,
Brock, H. W.,
and Maschat, F.
(1997)
Development
124,
2527-2536
|
| 51.
|
Narishige, T.,
Blade, K. L.,
Ishibashi, Y.,
Nagai, T.,
Hamawaki, M.,
Menick, D. R.,
Kuppuswamy, D.,
and Cooper, G., IV
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
9692-9697
|
| 52.
|
Oblinger, M. M.,
and Kost, S. A.
(1994)
Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res.
77,
45-54
|
| 53.
|
Kavallaris, M.,
Burkhart, C. A.,
and Horwitz, S. B.
(1999)
Br. J. Cancer
80,
1020-1025
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Chaudhry and E. Asselin
Resistance to chemotherapy and hormone therapy in endometrial cancer
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
June 1, 2009;
16(2):
363 - 380.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Azambuja, V. Durbecq, D. D. Rosa, M. Colozza, D. Larsimont, M. Piccart-Gebhart, and F. Cardoso
HER-2 overexpression/amplification and its interaction with taxane-based therapy in breast cancer
Ann. Onc.,
February 1, 2008;
19(2):
223 - 232.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Sok, F. M. Coppelli, S. M. Thomas, M. N. Lango, S. Xi, J. L. Hunt, M. L. Freilino, M. W. Graner, C. J. Wikstrand, D. D. Bigner, et al.
Mutant Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFRvIII) Contributes to Head and Neck Cancer Growth and Resistance to EGFR Targeting
Clin. Cancer Res.,
September 1, 2006;
12(17):
5064 - 5073.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kollmannsberger, M. Schittenhelm, F. Honecker, J. Tillner, D. Weber, K. Oechsle, L. Kanz, and C. Bokemeyer
A phase I study of the humanized monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody EMD 72000 (matuzumab) in combination with paclitaxel in patients with EGFR-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Ann. Onc.,
June 1, 2006;
17(6):
1007 - 1013.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Arai, Y. Matsumoto, Y. Nagashima, and K. Yagasaki
Regulation of Class II {beta}-Tubulin Expression by Tumor Suppressor p53 Protein in Mouse Melanoma Cells in Response to Vinca Alkaloid
Mol. Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2006;
4(4):
247 - 255.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. N. Fishman, C. R. Garrett, G. R. Simon, A. A. Chiappori, R. M. Lush, W. R. Dinwoodie, J. J. Mahany, A. M. Dellaportas, A. Cantor, A. Gollerki, et al.
Phase I Study of the Taxane BMS-188797 in Combination with Carboplatin Administered Every 3 Weeks in Patients with Solid Malignancies
Clin. Cancer Res.,
January 15, 2006;
12(2):
523 - 528.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Takenouchi, N. Kiyokawa, T. Taguchi, J. Matsui, Y. U. Katagiri, H. Okita, K. Okuda, and J. Fujimoto
Shiga toxin binding to globotriaosyl ceramide induces intracellular signals that mediate cytoskeleton remodeling in human renal carcinoma-derived cells
J. Cell Sci.,
August 1, 2004;
117(17):
3911 - 3922.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. Katsetos, A. Legido, E. Perentes, and S. J. Mork
Class III {beta}-Tubulin Isotype: A Key Cytoskeletal Protein at the Crossroads of Developmental Neurobiology and Tumor Neuropathology
J Child Neurol,
December 1, 2003;
18(12):
851 - 866.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. M. McDaid, S. Mani, H.-J. Shen, F. Muggia, D. Sonnichsen, and S. B. Horwitz
Validation of the Pharmacodynamics of BMS-247550, an Analogue of Epothilone B, during a Phase I Clinical Study
Clin. Cancer Res.,
July 1, 2002;
8(7):
2035 - 2043.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Van Poznak, L. Tan, K. S. Panageas, C. D. Arroyo, C. Hudis, L. Norton, and A. D. Seidman
Assessment of Molecular Markers of Clinical Sensitivity to Single-Agent Taxane Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 1, 2002;
20(9):
2319 - 2326.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Toppmeyer, A. D. Seidman, M. Pollak, C. Russell, K. Tkaczuk, S. Verma, B. Overmoyer, V. Garg, E. Ette, M. W. Harding, et al.
Safety and Efficacy of the Multidrug Resistance Inhibitor Incel (Biricodar; VX-710) in Combination with Paclitaxel for Advanced Breast Cancer Refractory to Paclitaxel
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2002;
8(3):
670 - 678.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Chatterjee, H. A. Pulido, S. Koul, N. Beleño, A. Perilla, H. Posso, M. Manusukhani, and V. V. V. S. Murty
Mapping the Sites of Putative Tumor Suppressor Genes at 6p25 and 6p21.3 in Cervical Carcinoma: Occurrence of Allelic Deletions in Precancerous Lesions
Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2001;
61(5):
2119 - 2123.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|