![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 23, 17647-17652, June 9, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, October 22, 1999, and in revised form, March 14, 2000
Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2), a member of
the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF- Bone morphogenetic protein-2
(BMP2),1 a member of the
transforming growth factor- One pathway involves a family of transcription factors collectively
known as Smads. Smad1, Smad5, or Smad8 are phosphorylated by activated
type I BMP2/4 receptors and are then associated with a common signaling
mediator, Smad4. The resultant heteromeric Smad complex is translocated
into the nucleus where they activate transcription (3-5). Another
pathway is mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade initiated by
TAK1 (for TGF- After initial activation of the receptors, BMP2 elicits multiple
effects ranging from cell differentiation to regulation of early
embryogenesis. Because there are tens of different cytokines present
simultaneously in vivo, it is sometimes the case that two
different signal pathways could cause the synergistic or antagonistic interplay in common target cells. We have recently reported that BMP2
and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) act in synergy on cultured fetal
neural progenitor cells to induce differentiation into astrocytes, whereas BMP2 or LIF alone do not induce astrocyte development under the
same culture conditions (10). LIF is a member of the interleukin-6
(IL-6) family of cytokines, which shares membrane glycoprotein gp130 as
a common subunit in the receptor complex (11). Ligand binding to the
receptor triggers the dimerization of gp130, activating
gp130-associated cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase in the Janus kinase family
and a downstream transcription factor, signal transducer and activator
of transcription-3 (STAT3) (11). In the case of synergistic effect
caused by BMP2 and LIF, respective downstream transcription factors
Smad1 and STAT3 form a signal-dependent complex bridged by
p300 in the nucleus, thereby exerting the synergy between BMP2 and LIF
in astrocyte differentiation (10). Moreover, another group has
demonstrated the inhibitory cross-talk between the Smad cascade and the
signal from a receptor tyrosine kinase: activation of epidermal growth
factor receptor leads to MAPK activation, which then phosphorylates
Smad1 on serine residues, thereby inhibiting Smad1 translocation into
the nucleus (12).
In the present study, we attempt to know the interaction of the signals
mediated by IL-6 and those by BMP2 in mouse hybridoma MH60 cells whose
growth is IL-6-dependent. We show here that BMP2 induces
apoptosis in MH60 cells even in the presence of proliferative signals
of IL-6. We show that phosphorylation of STAT3 and expression of its
target gene bcl-2 are not affected by BMP2, suggesting that
the cell death signaling pathway initiated by BMP2 is independent of
the survival signaling by IL-6. The studies presented here further
propose a mechanism of BMP2-induced apoptosis in MH60 cells, which
appears to be mediated by the TAK1-p38 kinase pathway. In addition, we
show that Smad6 unexpectedly blocks BMP2-induced apoptosis and suggest
a mechanism by which Smad6 prevents cell death promoted by BMP2.
Plasmids--
Wild type TAK1 cDNA was subcloned into
pEF-BOSE-FLAG vector (13) to generate pEFBOSE-FLAG-TAK1. Mammalian
expression vectors encoding HA-BMPR-IA, Myc-XIAP, and FLAG-TAB1 were
described previously (14). HA-TAK1 (wild type) and HA-KNTAK1 (K63W)
were also described previously (15). Myc-tagged and FLAG-tagged
Smad6-expressing vectors were kind gifts of Drs. Miyazono and Imamura
(16).
Cell Culture--
Mouse Hybridoma MH60 cells were cultured in
RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma) containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 ng/ml
IL-6. COS7 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium (Sigma) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. To establish
Smad6-overexpressing MH60 cell clones (MH60/Smad6), 20 µg of
FLAG-tagged Smad6 expression vector or mock vector was cotransfected
with 1 µg of pSV2-NEO using an electroporation method. Transfectants
were selected by 500 µg/ml G418, and single cell clones were obtained
by limiting dilution. Expression of Smad6 was analyzed by Western
blotting using anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma).
Cell Growth Assay--
Cells (2 × 104 cells
per well in a 96-well plate) were cultured in 100 µl of medium
containing 2 ng/ml IL-6 and various concentrations of BMP2 for 40 h. The number of viable cells was then examined by a colorimetric assay
using the WST-8 cell-counting kit (Wako).
Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction--
First
strand cDNAs were synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA using
superscript II (Life Technologies, Inc.). The respective first strand
cDNAs were then used directly for amplification of bcl-2 and G3PDH
genes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The PCR reaction was
performed using cycling conditions appropriate for each gene.
DNA Fragmentation Assay--
After the cultivation of cells in
the presence of 50 ng/ml of BMP2 for 13 or 24 h, cells (5 × 105) were lysed in a buffer containing 0.5% Triton X-100,
10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, and 10 mM EDTA. After
treatment with RNase A and proteinase K, the size of DNA was analyzed
by agarose gel electrophoresis.
Immunoblotting and Coimmunoprecipitation Analysis--
To
examine the STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation, MH60 cells were starved for
1 h without IL-6 and then treated with IL-6 together with BMP2 or
IL-6 or with BMP2 alone. After 10 min, the cells were solubilized with
Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer (0.5% Nonidet P-40, 10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml aprotinin). Lysates were
separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and
immunoblotted with anti-STAT3 antibody or anti-phosphotyrosine antibody
(4G10, Upstate). The proteins were detected by using an enhanced
chemiluminescence system (ECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
To examine the p38 activation, MH60 cells were treated with BMP2 (20 ng/ml) for 10 or 20 min after starvation as described above. The cells
were lysed with lysis buffer, and subjected to immunoblotting with p38
antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or phospho-specific p38 antibody
(New England BioLabs), respectively.
For the coimmunoprecipitation assay, COS7 cells were transfected with
expression constructs using a Trans-IT LT-1 polyamine transfection
reagent (Mirus) according to the manufacturer's protocol. After 1 day
in culture, cells were solubilized with lysis buffer. Lysates from
transfected COS7 cells or MH60 transfectants were incubated with
antibody to Myc (Genosys) or FLAG (Sigma) for 2 h, and immune
complexes were then precipitated with magnetic protein G (BioMag) for
30 min. Precipitates and, in some cases, cell lysates were subjected to
SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with anti-FLAG, anti-Myc, anti-HA
(Santa Cruz), or anti-TAK1 (Santa Cruz).
Immunofluorescence and Microscopic Observation of Apoptotic
Cells--
MH60 cells were transfected using SuperFect transfection
reagent (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cells were
fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for
10 min followed by washing with PBS. Cells were permeabilized with
0.1% Triton X-100 for 5 min, washed again, and incubated in blocking
solution (3% bovine serum albumin in PBS) at 4 °C for 2 h.
Cells were incubated with monoclonal antibody against FLAG-epitope or
polyclonal antibody against HA-epitope at 4 °C for 1 h in PBS
containing 2% bovine serum albumin. Cells were washed three times with
PBS and incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse
IgG (ImmunoResearch) or rhodamine-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Chemicon)
for an additional 1 h. After three times washing, cells were
counter-stained with Hoechst 33258. Images were obtained using
fluorescent microscopy (AX70, Olympus).
Protein Kinase Assay--
Cells were lysed in extraction buffer
(20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 12.5 mM BMP2-induced Apoptosis in MH60 Cells--
We have previously
demonstrated that BMP2 and LIF exert a synergistic effect on the
differentiation of neural progenitor cells (10). In an attempt to know
whether a similar cooperative mechanism takes place in other cell
systems, we tested the effect of BMP2 on the growth of
IL-6-dependent mouse hybridoma MH60 cells. As shown in Fig.
1, BMP2 dose-dependently
suppressed growth of MH60 cells in the presence of IL-6. To know the
mechanism of this growth suppression induced by BMP2, we first examined
whether BMP2 alters the cell cycle distribution and/or induces
apoptosis on MH60 cells cultured with IL-6. BMP2 treatment for 24 h resulted in the cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase (data
not shown) and genomic DNA fragmentation (Fig.
2A). These observations
indicate that treatment of BMP2 causes cell cycle arrest in the
G1 phase and apoptosis in MH60 cells.
Withdrawal of IL-6 for 24 h led to the apoptosis of MH60 cells
(Fig. 2A) without apparently inducing cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase (data not shown) but with decreased expression
of bcl-2 (Fig. 2B). To examine whether the BMP2
signaling interferes with the IL-6 signaling pathway at the step of
STAT3 activation, we analyzed tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3 in the
presence or absence of BMP2. Tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3, which
has been shown to be a prerequisite for STAT3 activation, was induced in MH60 cells by IL-6 stimulation, whereas it was not affected by BMP2
(Fig. 2C). STAT3 activation has been shown to be important for bcl-2 gene expression and eventually for cell survival
by IL-6 (17). These data indicate that BMP2-induced apoptosis in MH60
cells is not caused by the inhibition of STAT3 activation or its
downstream targets.
Inhibition of BMP2-induced Apoptosis by Smad6--
It has been
shown that Smad6 is a negative regulator of the Smad1, -5, and -8 signaling cascade initiated by BMP2 (16). To investigate whether Smad6
inhibits BMP2-induced apoptosis, we established stable transfectants
with a Smad6 expression vector and examined cell growth after 40 h
of BMP2 treatment. Smad6-expressing transfectants (MH60/Smad6; three
independent representative clones 4, 5, and 6) were resistant to BMP2,
whereas treatment of mock vector transfectants (MH60/control; clones 1, 2, and 3) with BMP2 resulted in significant growth suppression (Fig.
3A). In all three Smad6-expressing clones, chromosomal DNA fragmentation did not occur
after BMP2 treatment (Fig. 3B), suggesting that Smad6 blocks BMP2-induced apoptosis.
BMP2-induced Activation of p38 and TAK1 and Its Inhibition by
Smad6--
The result described above that bcl-2 gene
expression was not changed at the mRNA and protein levels (not
shown) in response to BMP2 suggested the existence of a signaling
cascade other than those involving bcl-2 regulation for the
apoptotic response of MH60 cells. We then focused on p38
stress-activated protein kinase whose activation has been suggested to
be involved in the induction of apoptosis independent of bcl-2
function, in response to various cytotoxic stresses such as UV and
x-ray radiation, heat shock, and tumor necrosis factor-
To our surprise, in the Smad6-overexpressing MH60 cells (MH60/Smad6),
which are resistant to BMP2-induced apoptosis, activation of p38 and
TAK1 did not occur after BMP2 stimulation (Fig. 4, A and
B). These results indicate that Smad6 inhibits the
activation of the TAK1-p38 pathway in BMP2 signaling.
Essential Role of TAK1 Activation in the BMP2-induced Apoptosis in
MH60 Cells--
Catalytically inactive TAK1 (TAK1/KN) is known to
inhibit the TAK1 signaling pathway (6). To determine the involvement of
TAK1 in BMP2-induced apoptosis, we transiently transfected expression
vectors encoding FLAG-tagged TAK1/KN (FLAG-TAK1/KN) or wild type
control ((FLAG-TAK1(WT)) into MH60 cells. Expression of these proteins
could be identified by immunostaining with anti-FLAG antibody. MH60
cells transfected with the above vectors were stimulated with BMP2 for
14 h, followed by staining for FLAG with the specific antibody.
The nuclei were stained with the DNA dye bisbenzimide (Hoechst 33258),
which detected apoptotic change characterized by chromatin condensation
and nuclear fragmentation. As shown in Fig.
5, no apoptotic cells were detected in
MH60 cells expressing FLAG-TAK1/KN even when treated with BMP2
(arrows in Fig. 5, A and B). Cells
expressing negligible levels of FLAG-TAK1/KN underwent the apoptotic
change (arrowheads in A and B). In
contrast, MH60 cells transfected with FLAG-TAK1 (WT) exhibited the
apoptotic change by treatment with BMP2, regardless of the expression
levels of FLAG-TAK1(WT) (arrows in C and
D, high expressing cells; arrowheads in
C and D, low expressing cells). These results
suggest that TAK1 is involved in mediating BMP2-induced apoptosis and
that its endogenous expression level is sufficient.
It has previously been shown that kinase activity of TAK1 was increased
in cells cotransfected with TAB1 vector (15). Furthermore, simultaneous
expression of TAK1 and TAB1 was able to enhance
transcription of reporter gene under the control of the promoter region
of the TGF- Interaction of Smad6 and TAK1--
As described above, Smad6
unexpectedly blocked activation of TAK1, which made us hypothesize that
Smad6 can associate with TAK1 directly. To determine the target of
Smad6 in the apoptotic pathway initiated by BMP2, we expressed these
molecules in COS7 cells and analyzed physical interaction using
coimmunoprecipitation assays. Lysates from COS7 cells expressing
Myc-tagged Smad6 and FLAG-tagged TAK1 were immunoprecipitated with
monoclonal antibody against FLAG or Myc and immunoblotted with anti-Myc
or -FLAG antibody, respectively, to detect Smad6 or TAK1. As shown in
Fig. 7A, Smad6 was
coprecipitated with TAK1 (upper panel) and TAK1 was found in
the Smad6 immunocomplex (lower panel). With a similar
experimental procedure, binding of the endogenous TAK1 to Smad6 in the
MH60/Smad6 transfectant clones was also observed (Fig.
7B).
Several recent studies have suggested that there is cross-talk
between intracellular signaling pathways of different cytokines or
growth factors. For example, epidermal growth factor and hepatocyte growth factor can antagonize the effects of BMP2 by inducing
phosphorylation of Smad1 (12). On the other hand, LIF and BMP2 can
elicit the synergistic interplay on differentiation of neural
progenitor cells (10). In the later case, respective downstream
transcription factors Smad1 and STAT3 form a complex bridged by p300 in
the nucleus in a signal-dependent manner. In MH60 hybridoma
cells, BMP2 opposes the proliferative effect of IL-6. However, our data suggest that BMP2 does not interfere with the IL-6 signal transduction pathway, partly because BMP2 does not alter phosphorylation of STAT3
and expression of bcl-2 gene induced by IL-6. Furthermore, we observed that BMP2 could induce apoptosis efficiently enough in MH60
cells regardless of the presence or absence of IL-6 (data not shown);
therefore, BMP2 did not induce apoptosis in these cells more
efficiently in the absence of IL-6. These results suggest that BMP2
promotes cell death by activating its own apoptotic pathway.
BMP2-induced apoptosis has been reported in vivo so far, for
example, in rhombomeres 3 and 5 (24) and the interdigit field of the
limb (25, 26) in developing chickens. In addition, an earlier study
demonstrated that BMP2 was capable of inducing apoptosis in cultured
mouse hybridoma HS-72 cells whose growth is independent of IL-6 (27).
Although the BMP2 signal transduction pathways and molecular nature of
their components have been studied in detail, the signaling cascade by
which BMP2 induces apoptosis both in vivo and in
vitro are not fully understood.
BMP2 is a member of the TGF- Studies on early Xenopus embryos have demonstrated that the
constitutively active form of xTAK1 or a combination of normal xTAK1
plus xTAB1 could induce not only ventral mesoderm but also cell death
(23). Therefore, it has been presumed that activation of TAK1 has a
potential to induce apoptosis in the Xenopus embryo. Here we
demonstrated that cotransfection of TAB1 and TAK1
leads to the induction of apoptosis, mimicking the effect of BMP2.
Because we have not examined whether Smad1 or Smad5 could induce
apoptosis on MH60 cells, the possibility that Smad pathway is involved
in the BMP2-induced apoptosis could not be completely excluded.
However, BMP2-induced apoptosis was completely blocked in the MH60
cells expressing the kinase-defective form of TAK1, suggesting that TAK1 is essential for BMP2-induced apoptotic signaling. Treatment with
BMP2 activates TAK1, which was accompanied by similar kinetics of p38
activation. Moriguchi et al. (7) have shown the existence of
a kinase cascade consisting of TAK1-MKK6-p38. Other previous reports
show that treatment of cells with ceramide (8), IL-1 (28), tumor
necrosis factor- Proteins Smad1, -2, -3, -5, and -8 have been shown to transduce
signals, in cooperation with Smad4, of the TGF- It has been reported that Smad6 binds to the type I receptors for the
TGF- Because the transcription of Smad6 mRNA is induced by
TGF- The molecular mechanism by which Smad6 inhibits TAK1 kinase activation
remains to be elucidated. TAK1 is known to be activated by binding with
TAB1, and it has been proposed that TAB1 binding to TAK1 induces an
activating conformational change (15). We observed that Smad6
interacted with TAK1 but led to little disruption of the TAK1·TAB1
complex (not shown), implying that Smad6 may not compete with TAB1 for
the binding to TAK1 but may block the catalytic site, or alternatively,
interaction of Smad6 with the TAK1·TAB1 complex could cause the
conformational change of TAK1 back to its inactive form again.
Our present study and others (27) show BMP2-induced apoptosis in
the mouse hybridomas that were derived from plasmacytomas, the tumors
of terminally differentiated B lineage cells. We are in the process of
testing the effect of BMP2 on human-equivalent tumors, i.e.
multiple myeloma. It is of much interest to note that (i) growth of
myelomas are often IL-6-dependent; (ii) myeloma cells
produce IL-6, IL-6 receptor (IL-6R), and soluble IL-6R (35); and (iii)
patients with multiple myeloma often exhibit osteoporosis, presumably
because of promotion of osteoclast development by IL-6 and soluble
IL-6R produced by myeloma cells. BMP2 is known to play an important
role in inducing the bone formation. In the bone marrow, BMP2 produced
by osteoblasts is suggested to be stored in a latent form bound to bone
matrix as in the case of TGF- We thank Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
for providing recombinant human BMP2, K. Matsumoto and J. Ninomiya-Tsuji for the anti-TAK1 antibody and for encouraging
discussion, M. Hagiwara for recombinant MKK6 protein, K. Yasukawa for
IL-6, H. Ichijo for helpful discussion, and Y. Nakamura for secretarial assistance.
*
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid from the
Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture; the Human Frontier
Science Program; the Kowa Life Science Foundation; the Ouchi Foundation
for Intractable Diseases; and the Cell Fate Modulation Research Unit.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 23, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M908622199
The abbreviations used are:
BMP, bone
morphogenetic protein;
TGF-
BMP2-induced Apoptosis Is Mediated by Activation of the TAK1-p38
Kinase Pathway That Is Negatively Regulated by Smad6*
§,
,
, and
Department of Molecular Cell Biology,
Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University,
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0062, Japan, the § Gene Search
Program, Chugai Research Institute for Molecular Medicine, Inc.,
Niihari, Ibaraki 300-4101, Japan, and the ¶ Division of
Morphogenesis, Department of Developmental Biology, National
Institute for Basic Biology, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
) superfamily, regulates a
variety of cell fates and functions. At present, the molecular
mechanism by which BMP2 induces apoptosis has not been fully
elucidated. Here we propose a BMP2 signaling pathway that mediates
apoptosis in mouse hybridoma MH60 cells whose growth is interleukin-6
(IL-6)-dependent. BMP2 dose-dependently induces
apoptosis in MH60 cells even in the presence of IL-6. BMP2 has no
inhibitory effect on the IL-6-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of
STAT3, and the bcl-2 gene expression which is known to be
regulated by STAT3, suggesting that BMP2-induced apoptosis is not
attributed to alteration of the IL-6-mediated bcl-2
pathway. We demonstrate that BMP2 induces activation of TGF-
-activated kinase (TAK1) and subsequent phosphorylation of p38
stress-activated protein kinase. In addition, forced expression of
kinase-negative TAK1 in MH60 cells blocks BMP2-induced apoptosis. These
results indicate that BMP2-induced apoptosis is mediated through the
TAK1-p38 pathway in MH60 cells. We also show that MH60-derived
transfectants expressing Smad6 are resistant to the apoptotic signal of
BMP2. Interestingly, this ectopic expression of Smad6 blocks
BMP2-induced TAK1 activation and p38 phosphorylation. Moreover, Smad6
can directly bind to TAK1. These findings suggest that Smad6 is likely
to function as a negative regulator of the TAK1 pathway in the BMP2
signaling, in addition to the previously reported Smad pathway.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(TGF-
) superfamily, signals through
the heterotetrameric complex of type I and type II serine-threonine kinase receptors (1, 2). Downstream of the receptor complex, at least
two distinct intracellular pathways have been suggested for mediating
inductive signals from the cell membrane to the nucleus.
-activated kinase-1) (6). TAK1 was originally
identified as a member of MAPK kinase kinase (MAPKKK) activated in
response to TGF-
and BMP4 (6). More recently, it has been reported
that TAK1 functions as a mediator of the MKK6-p38 pathway and the
MKK7-JNK pathway (7-9). However, a regulatory mechanism of the signal
transduction pathway mediated by TAK1 remains to be clarified.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-glycerophosphate, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM EGTA, 10 mM NaF, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM
Na3VO4, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 20 µg/ml aprotinin) containing 0.5% Triton X-100. Endogenous TAK1 was precipitated using rabbit polyclonal antibody against TAK1-C-terminal peptide (8). Immunocomplexes were recovered with protein A-Sepharose and washed three times with washing buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2) then twice with kinase buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2).
Immunoprecipitates were resuspended in kinase buffer containing 1 µg
of the specific substrate his-MKK6. The kinase reaction was initiated
by addition of 5 µCi of [
-32P]ATP (NEN Life Science
Products). After 2 min of incubation at 30 °C, reactions were
terminated by adding SDS sample buffer followed by boiling for 5 min.
Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE, dried, and visualized by autoradiography.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
BMP2 suppressed the growth of MH60 hybridoma
cells. Cells were cultured with IL-6 (2 ng/ml) in the presence or
absence of various concentrations of BMP2 for 40 h. Number of
viable cells were monitored using WST-8 cell counting kit.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
BMP2 induced apoptosis in MH60 hybridomas but
did not interfere with the IL-6 signal transduction pathway. MH60
cells were incubated with IL-6 (2 ng/ml) or BMP2 (50 ng/ml) in a
combination as indicated above the figure. A, DNA purified
after 24-h culture was analyzed for fragmentation in an agarose gel.
B, total RNA prepared after 15-h culture was used for
reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis with primers specific for
bcl-2 and G3PDH. C, lysates prepared
from cells stimulated with cytokines for 15 min were subjected to
antiphosphotyrosine or anti-STAT3 immunoblotting.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Ectopic expression of Smad6 prevented
BMP2-induced apoptosis. A, Smad6-expressing
transfectants (MH60/Smad6; clones 4, 5, and 6) and mock transfectants
(MH60/control; clones 1, 2, and 3) were cultured in the presence of
IL-6 with various concentrations of BMP2 for 40 h. Number of
viable cells was measured as described in Fig. 1. Each value was
divided by that obtained from cells without BMP2. B, MH60 or
MH60/Smad6 (clone 5) were cultured with IL-6 in the presence or absence
of BMP2 (50 ng/ml) for the times indicated, and then fragmentation of
DNA was analyzed.
stimulation
(18-22). We thus examined whether treatment of MH60 cells with BMP2
leads to activation of p38. As shown in Fig.
4A, the level of the activated
form of p38, which can be detected by phospho-p38-specific antibody,
increased within 5 min after treatment with BMP2. Because it is known
that p38 lies downstream of the TAK1-MKK6 pathway (7), we next examined the activation of TAK1 kinase by immunocomplex kinase assay using a
recombinant his-MKK6 protein as a substrate. Fig. 4B shows
that treatment of MH60 cells with BMP2 significantly enhanced the
protein kinase activity of TAK1, which coincided with p38 activation
(Fig. 4A). These results indicate that BMP2 activates the
TAK1-p38 pathway in MH60 cells.

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
BMP2 stimulated activation of the TAK1-p38
cascade, which was blocked by Smad6. A, MH60 cells or
MH60/Smad6 cells were treated with BMP2 (50 ng/ml) for the indicated
time periods. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with
phospho-specific p38 antibody to detect the active form of p38
(upper panel) and subsequently with p38 antibody to analyze
the level of endogenous p38 (lower panel). B,
MH60 cells or MH60/Smad6 cells were treated with or without BMP2 for
the indicated time periods. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with
or without anti-TAK1 antibody. Protein kinase assay was then performed
as described under "Experimental Procedures" with his-MKK6 as a
substrate. The phosphorylated proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and
visualized by autoradiography. The immunoprecipitates were also
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and subsequent immunoblotting with
anti-TAK1.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Expression of the catalytically inactive TAK1
prevented BMP2-induced apoptosis. MH60 cells were transfected with
vectors encoding kinase-negative TAK1 (A and B)
or FLAG-tagged wild type TAK1 (C and D). 24 h after transfection, cells were further cultured with BMP2 for 14 h. Cells expressing these proteins were detected by immunostaining with
anti-FLAG antibody (A and C). Changes of the
chromatin structure in the same transfected cells were monitored by
Hoechst dye staining (B and D). Overexpression of
the kinase-negative TAK1 prevented apoptosis induced by BMP2
(arrow in A and B), whereas normal
MH60 cells (triangles), or cells overexpressing wild type
TAK1 (arrow in C and D) show apoptotic
morphology by treatment of BMP2.
-inducible PAI-1 gene even in the absence of
TGF-
(15). In addition, coinjection of TAK1 and
TAB1 mRNA into dorsal blastomeres caused ventralization
of the Xenopus embryos, mimicking the effect of BMP2 and
BMP4 (23). To investigate the effect of simultaneous expression of
TAK1 and TAB1 in MH60 cells, we cotransfected
both expression vectors into MH60 cells. As shown in Fig.
6, MH60 cells expressing both
TAK1 and TAB1 genes exhibited clear apoptotic change even in the absence of BMP2, whereas cells expressing
TAK1 or TAB1 alone or neither of the two
exhibited no apoptotic change. These observations indicate that
activated TAK1 is involved in induction of apoptosis in MH60 cells and
mimics BMP2 effect.

View larger version (8K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Simultaneous expression of TAK1 and TAB1
induced apoptosis, mimicking the effect of BMP2. MH60 cells were
cotransfected with HA-tagged TAK1 and FLAG-tagged TAB1 expression
vectors. After 45 h, expression of TAK1 was detected with anti-HA
antibody and rhodamine-conjugated secondary antibody (red)
(A), and expression of TAB1 was detected with anti-FLAG
antibody and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody
(green) (B). Nuclear morphology was determined by
staining with Hoechst dye (C). Only the MH60 cells
expressing both TAK1 and TAB1 genes showed
apoptotic morphology.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Smad6 and TAK1 interacted in
vivo. A, Myc-tagged Smad6 was expressed together with
FLAG-tagged TAK1 in COS7 cells. Cell extracts were subjected to
immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-FLAG or anti-Myc
antibody. Precipitates or lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and
analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Myc antibody to detect Smad6
(upper panel) or anti-FLAG to detect TAK1 (lower
panel). B, MH60/Smad6 transfectants and parental cells
were lysed with lysis buffer and subjected to immunoprecipitation with
anti-FLAG antibody to pull down Smad6. The precipitates were subjected
to SDS-PAGE and subsequent immunoblotting with anti-TAK1 antibody to
detect Smad6-TAK1 interaction.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
superfamily of cytokines whose signals
have been suggested to be transduced from receptor serine/threonine kinases to the nucleus via at least two different signaling pathways involving transcription factors Smads and MAPKKK family kinase TAK1.
TAK1 was originally identified as a TGF-
-responsive MAPKKK (6). No
member of the TGF-
superfamily other than TGF-
and BMP4 have been
reported so far to directly activate TAK1 (6). It was later shown that
injection of Xenopus TAK1 (xTAK1) and its activator xTAB1 with bcl-2 in early embryos
caused ventralization, mimicking the effect of BMP2 and BMP4 in
Xenopus and implying that TAK1 participates in the BMP2 and
BMP4 signaling pathway (15). In the present study, we show the first
evidence that BMP2 could activate TAK1.
(9), and TGF-
(29) results in activation of the
TAK1-JNK cascade. JNK and p38, collectively known as stress-activated
protein kinases, are involved in apoptosis, probably by inducing
expression of a Fas ligand (30). Taken together, we conclude that
BMP2-induced apoptosis is most likely mediated by the TAK1-p38 signal cascade.
superfamily, which
is independent of the TAK1-MAPK cascade (3-5). Smad6, one of the two
known inhibitory Smad species (Smad6 and Smad7), blocks the Smad
pathway by associating with type I receptors to inhibit Smad1 and Smad2
phosphorylation (16) or by sequestration of phosphorylated Smad1 from
Smad4 (31). Interestingly, an overexpression of Smad6 blocks
BMP2-induced apoptosis in MH60 cells. In a similar approach, Ishisaki
et al. (27) have previously shown that an overexpression of
Smad6 suppressed BMP2-induced apoptosis in mouse B cell hybridoma HS-72
cells. They showed that Smad6 blocked BMP2-induced phosphorylation of
Smad1/Smad5 in HS-72 cells, as has been demonstrated by other groups.
However, because their studies did not explain how BMP2 could trigger
apoptosis, it was not clear how Smad6 could prevent BMP2-induced
apoptosis. Here we clearly show that BMP2-induced apoptosis is
dependent on the TAK1-p38 cascade in MH60 cells and that Smad6 prevents
the activation of TAK1-p38 cascade induced by BMP2. Therefore, Smad6 is
likely to function as a negative regulator of the TAK1 pathway in the
apoptotic signaling of BMP2, in addition to the previously known
negative regulatory function in the Smad pathway.
superfamily cytokines and inhibits the Smad signaling pathway
(16). It is important to note that our results show that Smad6
physically interacts with TAK1. This was confirmed in a COS7 cell
expression system and also in MH60/Smad6 transfectant clones, in the
latter of which endogenous TAK1 was found to bind to Smad6. This
suggests that Smad6 directly blocks the TAK1 activity by physical
interaction. X-chromosome-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP)
is a cytoplasmic molecule that is suggested to interact with BMP type I
receptor (BMPR-I) and is involved in linking the BMP2-stimulated
receptor to TAK1 (14). The possibility that association of Smad6 with
BMPR-I releases XIAP from BMPR-I and thereby unlinks the receptor to
TAK1 dose not appear to be true, because association of BMPR-I with
XIAP was not disrupted by binding of Smad6 to BMPR-I in COS7 cells
(data not shown). Taken together with the previous finding that Smad6
is a negative regulator of the Smad signaling, our finding of the
potential for Smad6 to also inhibit the TAK1-p38 pathway indicates that Smad6 serves as a general inhibitor of TGF-
superfamily cytokines.
superfamily cytokines (32), Smad6 may completely block the
signaling by the TGF-
superfamily in an autoregulatory
negative-feedback manner. Recently, involvement of TAK1 in the signal
transduction of cytokines outside the TGF-
superfamily has been
suggested, for instance in the NF-
B-inducing kinase-I
B kinase
cascade in the IL-1 signaling pathway (28) and in the NF-
B essential
modulator like kinase MAPK-like cascade in the Wnt signaling pathway
(33, 34). Therefore, our finding suggests that antagonistic cross-talk exists between BMP2 and other cytokines such as IL-1 and Wnt.
(36, 37). When bone resorption is
initiated by osteoclasts, BMP2 is released from the deposit in the
calcified bone matrix, and thereafter it stimulates the differentiation
of osteoblasts. In addition, osteoclasts activated by IL-6 and soluble
IL-6R, which are produced by myelomas, may be growth-inhibited by the released BMP2. Because the bone marrow provides an important
hematopoietic microenvironment, bone formation and hematopoiesis are
closely related there. For instance, Kajkenova et al. (38)
has previously shown that myeloid progenitors and IL-6 production were
significantly increased in the bone marrow of
osteoblastogenesis-defective mouse. Taken together, BMP2 might act as a
regulatory factor for maintaining a balance between bone formation and
hematopoiesis in the bone marrow.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular
Cell Biology, Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental
University, 2-3-10 Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 101-0062, Japan.
Tel./Fax: 81-3-5280-8062; E-mail: tagamcb@mri.tmd.ac.jp.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
, transforming growth factor-
;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
TAK1, TGF-
activated kinase-1;
MAPKKK, MAPK kinase kinase;
MKK6, MAPK kinase 6;
MKK7, MAPK kinase7;
JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase;
LIF, leukemia inhibitory factor;
IL-6, interleukin-6;
STAT3, signal transducer and activator of
transcription-3;
TAB1, TAK1 binding protein-1;
KN, kinase-negative;
XIAP, X chromosome-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein;
BMPR-I, BMP
type I receptor;
HA, hemagglutinin;
IL-6R, IL-6 receptor;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Massague, J.,
and Weis-Garcia, F.
(1996)
Cancer Surv.
27,
41-64
2.
ten Dijke, P.,
Miyazono, K.,
and Heldin, C. H.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
139-145
3.
Heldin, C. H.,
Miyazono, K.,
and ten Dijke, P.
(1997)
Nature
390,
465-471
4.
Derynck, R.,
Zhang, Y.,
and Feng, X. H.
(1998)
Cell
95,
737-740
5.
Massague, J.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
753-791
6.
Yamaguchi, K.,
Shirakabe, K.,
Shibuya, H.,
Irie, K.,
Oishi, I.,
Ueno, N.,
Taniguchi, T.,
Nishida, E.,
and Matsumoto, K.
(1995)
Science
270,
2008-2011
7.
Moriguchi, T.,
Kuroyanagi, N.,
Yamaguchi, K.,
Gotoh, Y.,
Irie, K.,
Kano, T.,
Shirakabe, K.,
Muro, Y.,
Shibuya, H.,
Matsumoto, K.,
Nishida, E.,
and Hagiwara, M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
13675-13679
8.
Shirakabe, K.,
Yamaguchi, K.,
Shibuya, H.,
Irie, K.,
Matsuda, S.,
Moriguchi, T.,
Gotoh, Y.,
Matsumoto, K.,
and Nishida, E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
8141-8144
9.
Yao, Z.,
Zhou, G.,
Wang, X. S.,
Brown, A.,
Diener, K.,
Gan, H.,
and Tan, T. H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2118-2125
10.
Nakashima, K.,
Yanagisawa, M.,
Arakawa, H.,
Kimura, N.,
Hisatsune, T.,
Kawabata, M.,
Miyazono, K.,
and Taga, T.
(1999)
Science
284,
479-482
11.
Taga, T.,
and Kishimoto, T.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
15,
797-819
12.
Kretzschmar, M.,
Doody, J.,
and Massague, J.
(1997)
Nature
389,
618-622
13.
Nakashima, K.,
Narazaki, M.,
and Taga, T.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
403,
79-82
14.
Yamaguchi, K.,
Nagai, S.,
Ninomiya-Tsuji, J.,
Nishita, M.,
Tamai, K.,
Irie, K.,
Ueno, N.,
Nishida, E.,
Shibuya, H.,
and Matsumoto, K.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
179-187
15.
Shibuya, H.,
Yamaguchi, K.,
Shirakabe, K.,
Tonegawa, A.,
Gotoh, Y.,
Ueno, N.,
Irie, K.,
Nishida, E.,
and Matsumoto, K.
(1996)
Science
272,
1179-1182
16.
Imamura, T.,
Takase, M.,
Nishihara, A.,
Oeda, E.,
Hanai, J.,
Kawabata, M.,
and Miyazono, K.
(1997)
Nature
389,
622-626
17.
Fukada, T.,
Hibi, M.,
Yamanaka, Y.,
Takahashi-Tezuka, M.,
Fujitani, Y.,
Yamaguchi, T.,
Nakajima, K.,
and Hirano, T.
(1996)
Immunity
5,
449-460
18.
Xia, Z.,
Dickens, M.,
Raingeaud, J.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1995)
Science
270,
1326-1331
19.
Butterfield, L.,
Storey, B.,
Maas, L.,
and Heasley, L. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
10110-10116
20.
Verheij, M.,
Bose, R.,
Lin, X. H.,
Yao, B.,
Jarvis, W. D.,
Grant, S.,
Birrer, M. J.,
Szabo, E.,
Zon, L. I.,
Kyriakis, J. M.,
Haimovitz-Friedman, A.,
Fuks, Z.,
and Kolesnick, R. N.
(1996)
Nature
380,
75-79
21.
Zanke, B. W.,
Boudreau, K.,
Rubie, E.,
Winnett, E.,
Tibbles, L. A.,
Zon, L.,
Kyriakis, J.,
Liu, F. F.,
and Woodgett, J. R.
(1996)
Curr. Biol.
6,
606-613
22.
Raingeaud, J.,
Gupta, S.,
Rogers, J. S.,
Dickens, M.,
Han, J.,
Ulevitch, R. J.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7420-7426
23.
Shibuya, H.,
Iwata, H.,
Masuyama, N.,
Gotoh, Y.,
Yamaguchi, K.,
Irie, K.,
Matsumoto, K.,
Nishida, E.,
and Ueno, N.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1019-1028
24.
Graham, A.,
Francis-West, P.,
Brickell, P.,
and Lumsden, A.
(1994)
Nature
372,
684-686
25.
Yokouchi, Y.,
Sakiyama, J.,
Kameda, T.,
Iba, H.,
Suzuki, A.,
Ueno, N.,
and Kuroiwa, A.
(1996)
Development
122,
3725-3734
26.
Zou, H.,
and Niswander, L.
(1996)
Science
272,
738-741
27.
Ishisaki, A.,
Yamato, K.,
Hashimoto, S.,
Nakao, A.,
Tamaki, K.,
Nonaka, K.,
ten Dijke, P.,
Sugino, H.,
and Nishihara, T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
13637-13642
28.
Ninomiya-Tsuji, J.,
Kishimoto, K.,
Hiyama, A.,
Inoue, J.,
Cao, Z.,
and Matsumoto, K.
(1999)
Nature
398,
252-256
29.
Zhou, G.,
Lee, S. C.,
Yao, Z.,
and Tan, T. H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
13133-13138
30.
Le-Niculescu, H.,
Bonfoco, E.,
Kasuya, Y.,
Claret, F. X.,
Green, D. R.,
and Karin, M.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
751-763
31.
Hata, A.,
Lagna, G.,
Massague, J.,
and Hemmati-Brivanlou, A.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
186-197
32.
Takase, M.,
Imamura, T.,
Sampath, T. K.,
Takeda, K.,
Ichijo, H.,
Miyazono, K.,
and Kawabata, M.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
244,
26-29
33.
Meneghini, M. D.,
Ishitani, T.,
Carter, J. C.,
Hisamoto, N.,
Ninomiya-Tsuji, J.,
Thorpe, C. J.,
Hamill, D. R.,
Matsumoto, K.,
and Bowerman, B.
(1999)
Nature
399,
793-797
34.
Ishitani, T.,
Ninomiya-Tsuji, J.,
Nagai, S.,
Nishita, M.,
Meneghini, M.,
Barker, N.,
Waterman, M.,
Bowerman, B.,
Clevers, H.,
Shibuya, H.,
and Matsumoto, K.
(1999)
Nature
399,
798-802
35.
Treson, S. P.,
and Anderson, K. C.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Hematol.
5,
42-48
36.
Mostov, K.,
and Werb, Z.
(1997)
Science
276,
219-220
37.
Suzawa, M.,
Takeuchi, Y.,
Fukumoto, S.,
Kato, S.,
Ueno, N.,
Miyazono, K.,
Matsumoto, T.,
and Fujita, T.
(1999)
Endocrinology
140,
2125-2133
38.
Kajkenova, O.,
Lecka-Czernik, B.,
Gubrij, I.,
Hauser, S. P.,
Takahashi, K.,
Parfitt, A. M.,
Jilka, R. L.,
Manolagas, S. C.,
and Lipschitz, D. A.
(1997)
J. Bone. Miner. Res.
12,
1772-1779
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Khan, M. S. Nelson, C. Pan, P. M. Gaffney, and P. Gupta Endogenous heparan sulfate and heparin modulate bone morphogenetic protein-4 signaling and activity Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): C1387 - C1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Yu, D. Y. Deng, H. Beppu, C. C. Hong, C. Lai, S. A. Hoyng, N. Kawai, and K. D. Bloch Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) Type II Receptor Is Required for BMP-mediated Growth Arrest and Differentiation in Pulmonary Artery Smooth Muscle Cells J. Biol. Chem., February 15, 2008; 283(7): 3877 - 3888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Haynes, C. Gutierrez, J.-C. Aycinena, P. A. Tsonis, and K. Del Rio-Tsonis BMP signaling mediates stem/progenitor cell-induced retina regeneration PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20380 - 20385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Wordinger and A. F. Clark Bone Morphogenetic Proteins and Their Receptors in the Eye Experimental Biology and Medicine, September 1, 2007; 232(8): 979 - 992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Lu, L. Tian, Y. Han, M. Vogelbaum, and G. R. Stark Dose-dependent cross-talk between the transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin-1 signaling pathways PNAS, March 13, 2007; 104(11): 4365 - 4370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. B Lee, V. Khivansara, M. M Santos, P. Lamba, T. Yuen, S. C Sealfon, and D. J Bernard Bone morphogenetic protein 2 and activin A synergistically stimulate follicle-stimulating hormone {beta} subunit transcription J. Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2007; 38(2): 315 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ferrari, G. Pintucci, G. Seghezzi, K. Hyman, A. C. Galloway, and P. Mignatti VEGF, a prosurvival factor, acts in concert with TGF-beta1 to induce endothelial cell apoptosis PNAS, November 14, 2006; 103(46): 17260 - 17265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hirao, N. Tamai, N. Tsumaki, H. Yoshikawa, and A. Myoui Oxygen Tension Regulates Chondrocyte Differentiation and Function during Endochondral Ossification J. Biol. Chem., October 13, 2006; 281(41): 31079 - 31092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zihni, C. Mitsopoulos, I. A. Tavares, A. J. Ridley, and J. D. H. Morris Prostate-derived Sterile 20-like Kinase 2 (PSK2) Regulates Apoptotic Morphology via C-Jun N-terminal Kinase and Rho Kinase-1 J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7317 - 7323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Jadlowiec, X. Zhang, J. Li, P. G. Campbell, and C. Sfeir Extracellular Matrix-mediated Signaling by Dentin Phosphophoryn Involves Activation of the Smad Pathway Independent of Bone Morphogenetic Protein J. Biol. Chem., March 3, 2006; 281(9): 5341 - 5347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Kendall, C. Battelli, S. Irwin, J. G. Mitchell, C. A. Glackin, and J. M. Verdi NRAGE Mediates p38 Activation and Neural Progenitor Apoptosis via the Bone Morphogenetic Protein Signaling Cascade Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2005; 25(17): 7711 - 7724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hoffmann, O. Preobrazhenska, C. Wodarczyk, Y. Medler, A. Winkel, S. Shahab, D. Huylebroeck, G. Gross, and K. Verschueren Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}-activated Kinase-1 (TAK1), a MAP3K, Interacts with Smad Proteins and Interferes with Osteogenesis in Murine Mesenchymal Progenitors J. Biol. Chem., July 22, 2005; 280(29): 27271 - 27283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Yu, H. Beppu, N. Kawai, E. Li, and K. D. Bloch Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) Type II Receptor Deletion Reveals BMP Ligand-specific Gain of Signaling in Pulmonary Artery Smooth Muscle Cells J. Biol. Chem., July 1, 2005; 280(26): 24443 - 24450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. Jeffery, P. D. Upton, R. C. Trembath, and N. W. Morrell BMP4 inhibits proliferation and promotes myocyte differentiation of lung fibroblasts via Smad1 and JNK pathways Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): L370 - L378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Brederlau, R. Faigle, M. Elmi, A. Zarebski, S. Sjoberg, M. Fujii, K. Miyazono, and K. Funa The Bone Morphogenetic Protein Type Ib Receptor Is a Major Mediator of Glial Differentiation and Cell Survival in Adult Hippocampal Progenitor Cell Culture Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2004; 15(8): 3863 - 3875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Qi, T.-G. Li, J. Hao, J. Hu, J. Wang, H. Simmons, S. Miura, Y. Mishina, and G.-Q. Zhao BMP4 supports self-renewal of embryonic stem cells by inhibiting mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways PN |