![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 23, 17677-17682, June 9, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, December 27, 1999, and in revised form, March 20, 2000
The fidelity of Schizosaccharomyces
pombe DNA polymerase The enzymes principally responsible for catalyzing procaryotic and
eucaryotic DNA replication share many common elements. Eucaryotic DNA
polymerases Extensive studies on the fidelity properties of core DNA polymerases
have been reported over the past 3 decades focusing on biochemical and
kinetic analysis of deoxynucleotide insertion specificity and the
reduction in pol-generated errors by proofreading exonucleases
(15-18), whereas there are but a paucity of experiments reporting on
the fidelity properties of the more biologically relevant pol HE
systems. Previous experiments employing pol HE systems have attempted
to probe the fidelity of leading versus lagging strand
synthesis using mutational reporter sequences (e.g. lacZ) (19, 20) and to visualize synthesis past DNA damage sites using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (21, 22). We have
recently generalized a gel kinetic assay originally designed to measure
polymerase fidelity in the absence of proofreading (23, 24), enabling
fidelity measurements to be made at arbitrary p/t DNA sites in the
presence of proofreading and pol accessory proteins (25-27).
There are a variety of questions regarding the fidelity properties of
holoenzymes that can be investigated systematically using gel kinetic
methodology. Recently, measurements on the fidelity of calf thymus pol
Materials
Proteins cloned S. pombe pol DNA Substrates--
The p/t DNA was made up of a synthetic
100-mer template annealed to complementary 30- or 35-mer primers or to
a 35-mer primer containing a single noncomplementary base at its
3'-end. The 30-mer primer was annealed at the middle of the template
leaving equal length (35 nt) ssDNA overhangs on each side. The matched
35-mer primer was annealed to the template leaving 35 nt of ssDNA at the 3'-end of the template and 30 nt of ssDNA at 5'-end. The mismatched 35-mer primer was identical to the matched 35-mer except that the
nucleotide at the 3'-end contained an A in place of C. All oligomers
were synthesized on an Applied Biosystems 392 DNA/RNA synthesizer
(Perkin-Elmer) and gel-purified. The 100-mer was synthesized as two
half-length oligomers and then ligated together.
The sequences for the 30-mer primer/100-mer template were as follows:
where G is the target site where misincorporation
frequencies were measured.
The sequences for the matched 35-mer primer/100-mer template were as
follows:
The sequences of the mismatched 35-mer primer/100-mer template differed
only in that A replaced C at the primer-3'-end.
Nucleotides--
dNTP substrates were purchased from Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech. [ Methods
The primer was 5'-end-labeled with 32P using T4
polynucleotide kinase in enzyme reaction buffer at 37 °C for 60 min.
p/t DNA was annealed in enzyme reaction buffer using a ratio of 1 primer to 1.2 templates by heating to 90 °C and gradually cooling to room temperature. The concentration of p/t DNA after annealing was 100 nM (primer termini).
Assay for 3'-Exonuclease Activity of S. pombe pol Processive Synthesis on 30/100-Mer p/t DNA--
p/t DNA was
preincubated at 37 °C with different combinations of ATP and
accessory proteins PCNA, RFC, and SSB in enzyme reaction buffer (16 µl) containing glycerol (4%) for 1 min. Following preincubation of
enzyme reaction buffer (4 µl) containing glycerol (4%), the four
dNTPs and pol Gel Kinetic Fidelity Analysis--
A gel fidelity assay was used
to determine the kinetics of incorporation of each of the four dNTPs
opposite the target site (26, 31). Primer extension reactions for pol
Primer extension reactions for pol
Integrated polyacrylamide gel band intensities were measured on a
PhosphorImager using ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). The nucleotide incorporation efficiency opposite the
target site was obtained by measuring
IT
A plot of the relative incorporation rate,
IT pol A 30/100-mer p/t DNA Serves as a "Minimal" Substrate Supporting
Processive Synthesis by S. pombe pol
A time course showing extension of a 32P-labeled primer is
arranged in seven groups of lanes to test the effects of PCNA, RFC, and
SSB on pol
The apparent stimulation of the RFC-dependent reaction by
SSB (compare Fig. 1, groups 4 and 5) was caused
most likely by the inhibition of a 3'-exonuclease contaminant present
in our purified preparation of RFC. This adventitious 3'-exonuclease
appeared to digest the primer extension products causing a uniform
reduction in the gel band intensities in group 4 bands relative to
either groups 5 or 2, while maintaining similar processivity patterns for these three groups.
The assays shown in Fig. 1 were performed in the presence of ATP (1 mM) required for RFC-mediated loading of PCNA onto p/t DNA
(12, 35-37). Further characterization of the effects of PCNA and RFC
on pol S. pombe pol
Base substitution fidelity measurements were performed using pol
pol
Each of these misincorporations was, however, readily detected for the
pol
It is important to emphasize that the inability to detect G·G and
A·G misincorporations in the absence of PCNA, RFC, and SSB does not
imply that the 4-subunit pol S. pombe pol
The S. pombe pol
The extremely low nuclease/polymerase ratio suggests that
3'-exonuclease of the pol pol Processive Synthesis by pol
Synthesis by pol Fidelity of S. pombe pol
The higher nucleotide misincorporation rates for pol
The apparent "absence" of effective proofreading for S. pombe pol
The absence of a next-nucleotide effect is consistent with our
observation that pol
In an earlier in vitro study, Kunkel and co-workers (42)
were also unable to demonstrate a proofreading contribution to accuracy
when using calf thymus pol *
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants GM21422 (to M. F. G.), GM38559 (to J. H.), and GM38839 (to M. O'D.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biological
Sciences, SHS Rm. 172, University of Southern California, University
Park, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1340. Tel.: 213-740-5190; Fax:
213-740-8631; E-mail: mgoodman@mizar.usc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 23, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M910278199
2
In the fidelity comparison for G·G
misincorporations, the template used for E. coli pol III HE
contains the base A in place of C immediately downstream from the
target G site because pol III HE can incorporate dGMP
opposite the downstream C by a primer-template slippage mechanism
called "dNTP-stabilized" misalignment (26). In contrast,
S. pombe pol The abbreviations used are:
pol, DNA polymerase;
HE, holoenzyme comprised of DNA polymerase + processivity subunits,
proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) sliding clamp, and replication factor C (RFC) clamp loading complex for S. pombe, and
Fidelity of Eucaryotic DNA Polymerase
Holoenzyme from
Schizosaccharomyces pombe*
,
, and
**
Department of Biological Sciences and
Chemistry, Hedco Molecular Biology Laboratories, University of
Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-1340, ¶ Rockefeller University and Howard Hughes Medical Institute,
New York, New York 10021, and § Program in Molecular
Biology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,
New York, New York 10021
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
was measured in the presence or absence
of its processivity subunits, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)
sliding clamp and replication factor C (RFC) clamp-loading complex,
using a synthetic 30-mer primer/100-mer template. Synthesis by pol
alone was distributive. Processive synthesis occurred in the presence
of PCNA, RFC, and Escherichia coli single strand
DNA-binding protein (SSB) and required the presence of ATP.
"Passive" self-loading of PCNA onto DNA takes place in the absence
of RFC, in an ATP-independent reaction, which was strongly inhibited by
SSB. The nucleotide substitution error rate for pol
holoenzyme (HE)
(pol
+ PCNA + RFC) was 4.6 × 10
4 for T·G
mispairs, 5.3 × 10
5 for G·G mispairs, and
4.5 × 10
6 for A·G mispairs. The T·G
misincorporation frequency for pol
without the accessory proteins
was unchanged. The fidelity of pol
HE was between 1 and 2 orders of
magnitude lower than that measured for the E. coli pol III
HE at the same template position. This relatively low fidelity was
caused by inefficient proofreading by the S. pombe
polymerase-associated proofreading exonuclease. The S. pombe 3'-exonuclease activity was also extremely inefficient in
excising primer-3'-terminal mismatches in the absence of dNTP substrates and in hydrolyzing single-stranded DNA. A comparison of pol
HE with E. coli pol III
HE (lacking the proofreading exonuclease subunit) showed that both holoenzymes exhibit similar error
rates for each mispair.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and
have the ability to proofread replication
errors using pol1-associated
3'
5'-exonuclease activity (1, 2), a property shared with
Escherichia coli pols I-III (3). Each of these enzymes
copies DNA with extremely low processivity, typically adding less than
30 nt before dissociating. There are closely analogous groups of
eucaryotic and procaryotic polymerase accessory proteins that interact
with the non-processive core pols, forming highly processive polymerase
holoenzymes. E. coli pol III HE and pol II HE bind to the
dimeric sliding clamp (4-6), whereas eucaryotic pol
HE and pol
HE bind to the PCNA trimeric sliding clamp (7). The processivity
clamps are loaded on and off the DNA by clamp loading complexes,
complex in E. coli (8-11) and RFC in eucaryotic cells (7,
12-14).
were made in the presence and absence of PCNA at normal (28) and
abasic (29) template sites. In this paper, we report on the base
substitution error rate of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe pol
HE and core for comparison with data with the E. coli pol III HE-catalyzed error rates (26) determined in the same sequence context.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, PCNA, and RFC were
purified as described (30). The enzyme reaction buffer contained 40 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.8, 170 µg/ml bovine serum albumin,
0.5 mM dithiothreitol, and 7 mM
MgCl2. Bacteriophage T4 polynucleotide kinase was purchased from United States Biochemical Corp. or Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. T4
DNA ligase was purchased from Promega. E. coli single strand DNA-binding protein and bovine serum albumin were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
SEQUENCE 1

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
SEQUENCE 2
-32P]ATP (4500 Ci/mmol) was
purchased from ICN Radiochemicals.
--
10
nM either matched or mismatched 35/100-mer DNA were
incubated at 37 °C with 10 µg/ml (0.2 unit/µl) S. pombe pol
in reaction buffer in the presence and absence of
all 4 dNTPs (0.5 mM each if present) in separate reactions
containing 20 µl. One unit of pol
supports the incorporation of 1 nmol of dTMP under the conditions specified above. The 35-mer primers
were 5'-end-32P-labeled. The mismatched 35-mer primer (10 nM) was used as single-stranded DNA substrate and incubated
at 37 °C with 10 µg/ml (0.2 unit/µl) S. pombe pol
in reaction buffer (20 µl). Aliquots (4 µl) were removed from each
reaction and quenched by mixing with 10 µl of 20 mM EDTA,
95% formamide at different time points. Reaction products were
separated on a 12% denaturing polyacrylamide gel run for 2 h at
2,000 V. The amount of primer extension catalyzed by pol
(gel bands
above the primer band) or degradation catalyzed by pol
3'-exonuclease activity (gel bands below the primer band) was measured
as percentage of total gel band intensity in each lane using a
PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
were added to initiate the reaction. Aliquots (4 µl) were removed at different times and mixed with formamide/EDTA (10 µl) to quench the reaction. Final substrate concentrations in the
reactions were p/t DNA (10 nM), pol
(0.5 µg/ml), dATP (0.5 mM), dCTP (0.5 mM), dGTP (0.5 mM), dTTP (0.5 mM), ATP, and the accessory
proteins, if present as follows: ATP (1 mM), RFC (54 µg/ml), (PCNA)3 (90 nM), SSB (320 nM). Aliquots (4 µl) were removed from each reaction at
different times and quenched by mixing with formamide/EDTA (10 µl).
in the absence of processivity accessory proteins were performed as
follows. p/t DNA and the dNTP to be incorporated opposite the target
were first mixed together in the reaction buffer. A mixture of S. pombe pol
and the running-start nt (dATP) in the same reaction
buffer was then added to initiate the reaction. Reactions were run for 5 min to measure the incorporation of dCMP opposite G and for 20 min to
measure the misincorporation of dTMP opposite G. The assay conditions
for correct incorporation satisfied single-completed hit conditions,
whereby most of the p/t DNA molecules that undergo extension encounter
a polymerase only once (27, 31). However, multiple hit conditions were
required to detect dTMP·G misincorporations for pol
in the
absence of the processivity factors, and the minor modifications
required to analyze properly multiple encounter kinetics were made as
described in Ref. 27. The final concentrations were 1 mM
dATP, 10 nM p/t DNA, 1.0 µg/ml S. pombe pol
, and dNTP concentrations as indicated in the figures. Control
reactions were run for 5 min using just the running-start dATP to
verify that misincorporation of the running-start nt opposite the
target G site did not occur.
in the presence of processivity
accessory proteins were performed as follows. Solution A contained 33 nM p/t DNA, 150 µg/ml RFC, 270 nM
(PCNA)3, 1 µM SSB, 2 mM ATP, and
4% glycerol in enzyme reaction buffer. Solution B consisted of the
enzyme reaction buffer containing various concentrations of the dNTP to
be incorporated opposite target site. Solution C contained 0.5 µg/ml
pol
, running start dATP (188 µM), and 4% glycerol in
the enzyme reaction buffer. The reaction was performed as follows:
solution A (3 µl) was mixed with solution B (3 µl) and incubated at
37 °C for 1 min to allow RFC to load PCNA onto the DNA; then
solution C (4 µl) was added to the mixture of A + B to initiate the
primer extension reaction. The final concentrations in the 10-µl
reaction mixture were 10 nM p/t DNA, 0.2 µg/ml pol
,
75 µM dATP, 45 µg/ml RFC, 80 nM
(PCNA)3, 300 nM SSB, 0.6 mM ATP,
and various concentrations of dNTP for incorporation opposite the
target site. Control reactions were run with the running-start dATP
only to ensure that it did not misincorporate opposite G. The reactions, run at 37 °C for 2 min for both correct incorporation and misincorporations opposite G, approximately satisfied
single-completed hit conditions, in which about 20% of the primers
were extended, so that no further corrections were required in the
kinetic analysis. Reactions were quenched by addition of formamide/EDTA
(20 µl) to the reaction mixture. The samples were heated to 100 °C
for 6 min, placed on ice for 3 min, and then loaded on a 16%
polyacrylamide denaturing gel. The gel was run at 2000 V for 4 h
to separate reaction products.
/IT
1,
where IT
is the integrated gel band
intensities of primers extended to the target site and beyond, and
IT
1 is the integrated gel band
intensity of primers extended to the site just prior to the target site
(26, 31).
/IT
1
as a function of the dNTP substrate concentration, results in a
rectangular hyperbola whose slope in the initial linear region is the
apparent Vmax/Km. Apparent
Km and relative Vmax values
were obtained using a least squares fit to a rectangular hyperbola. The
relative Vmax value is equal to the maximum
value of
IT
/IT
1.
In reactions where misincorporation opposite the target site was
relatively inefficient, a plot
IT
/IT
1
versus dNTP concentration showed little or no curvature, and
apparent Vmax/Km values were
obtained by a least squares fit of the data to a straight line.
Apparent Vmax/Km values that
were obtained under multiple-completed hit conditions were corrected to
single-completed hit conditions as described in Ref. 27, but these
corrections were essentially negligible. The misincorporation
efficiency, finc, which is the inverse of the
fidelity, is given by the ratio shown in Equation 1,
where the subscripts W and R refer to wrong and right
incorporations, respectively. Measurement errors for
Vmax/Km are ± 30% and
for finc are ± 40% (1 S.D.).
(Eq. 1)
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, thought to be one of the principal eucaryotic replication
polymerases (32), forms a processive holoenzyme complex in the presence
of the trimeric PCNA sliding clamp and RFC, which is responsible for
loading PCNA onto DNA (7). Eucaryotic pol
is analogous to E. coli pol III core which uses both the
sliding clamp and the
clamp loading
complex to form the highly processive pol III HE. In
this study, we have measured the fidelity of S. pombe pol
HE in the same sequence context that was used previously to study
the fidelity of E. coli pol III HE (26). Although similar in
some respects, the biochemical properties of the E. coli and S. pombe pol holoenzymes revealed several unanticipated
differences, particularly with respect to the contribution of
proofreading to fidelity.
HE--
We chose to measure
the fidelity of S. pombe pol
HE when copying a synthetic
100-mer DNA template. The advantage of using relatively short synthetic
oligonucleotide minimal p/t DNA is that pol fidelity can be measured at
arbitrary template target sites in defined sequence contexts that can
be easily varied. However, before such a system can be used, it is
necessary to show that it recapitulates the properties observed with
much longer biological substrates, e.g. SV40 DNA (33).
processivity (Fig. 1). pol
copied the synthetic 100-mer DNA template in a completely
distributive manner in the absence of PCNA (Fig. 1, groups 1 and 3). A marked stimulation in pol
processivity
occurred in the presence of PCNA, PCNA + RFC, or PCNA + RFC + SSB (Fig.
1, group 2, group 4, and group 5, respectively).
The observation that PCNA stimulated pol
synthesis in the absence
of RFC suggests that the processivity clamp can load onto the short DNA
by itself and stabilize the pol
-p/t DNA complex. Threading of PCNA
onto linear DNA in the absence of RFC has been reported previously for
Saccharomyces cerevisiae PCNA (34). We observed that SSB
strongly inhibited synthesis by pol
in the presence of PCNA (Fig.
1, group 6), but processive synthesis was restored by the
addition of RFC (Fig. 1, group 5), clearly demonstrating
that RFC was active in the assay.

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Effects of PCNA, RFC, SSB on DNA synthesis by
S. pombe pol
on a 30-mer
primer/100-mer template. Primer extension reactions were run with
pol
, 4 dNTPs, and indicated (±) proteins and ATP on a 30/100-mer
DNA. Four lanes in each group represent reaction products of 4 time
points of 3, 8, 18, and 40 min. The left-hand lane,
designated as 0, contained the band corresponding to the
unextended 32P-labeled primer. Final concentrations in the
reactions were p/t DNA (10 nM), pol
(0.5 µg/ml), dATP
(0.5 mM), dCTP (0.5 mM), dGTP (0.5 mM), dTTP (0.5 mM); and the accessory proteins
and ATP, if present, were as follows: ATP (1.0 mM), RFC (54 µg/ml), (PCNA)3 (90 nM), and SSB (320 nM).
synthesis was carried out by performing similar primer
elongation experiments in the absence of ATP. We found that processive
synthesis observed in the presence of PCNA (Fig. 1, group 2)
was retained in the absence of ATP (data not shown), whereas ATP must
be present to observe processive synthesis in presence of PCNA, RFC,
and SSB (Fig. 1, groups 5 and 7). We conclude the
following: (i) ATP is required for loading of PCNA onto DNA by RFC but
that PCNA can also "thread" itself onto short linear p/t DNA in the
absence of RFC, in a "passive" reaction not requiring ATP; (ii) SSB
significantly inhibits the ATP-independent passive loading reaction but
does not affect loading of PCNA by RFC.
Base Substitution Fidelity--
The nucleotide
misincorporation value, finc, which is the
reciprocal of the fidelity, was determined using a gel kinetic assay suitable for measuring fidelity in the presence of proofreading and
polymerase processivity proteins (27, 31). The assay measured the
relative rates of incorporating either a right (R) or wrong (W)
nucleotide opposite a template target site base. Integrated gel band
intensities corresponding to primers extended opposite a template
target site and beyond were compared with extended primers terminating
1 base before the target site and were plotted as a function of dRTP
and dWTP substrate concentrations to determine Vmax/Km values, in accordance
with Equation 1 (27, 31) (see "Experimental Procedures").
alone (Fig. 2) and pol
HE,
i.e. pol
+ PCNA, RFC, and SSB (Fig.
3). A 32P-labeled primer was
extended by incorporation of four running-start As prior to reaching
the template target site G where fidelity was measured. A
sketch of the p/t DNA sequence is shown at the top of Fig.
2.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Fidelity of S. pombe
pol
. Primer extension reactions
were carried out with dATP (1 mM), p/t DNA (10 nM), S. pombe pol
(1.0 µg/ml), and various
concentrations of dCTP or dTTP. Reactions with dCTP and dTTP were
incubated for 5 and 20 min, respectively. A running-start dATP (1 mM) control reaction was run for 5 min, in the absence of a
target dNTP substrate. The unextended 32P-labeled primer
band is shown at the left-hand side of the gel. A sketch of
the p/t DNA is shown at the top of the figure. Gel band
intensities were measured using a PhosphorImager, and their ratio
IT
/IT
1
was plotted versus dNTP concentration. The misincorporation
efficiency finc was computed using Equation 1
(see "Experimental Procedures"). The template sequence
corresponding to individual primer extension bands is indicated at the
right-hand side of the gel.

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Fidelity of S. pombe
pol
HE. Primer extension reactions
were carried out with dATP (75 µM), p/t DNA (10 nM), S. pombe pol
(0.2 µg/ml), RFC (45 µg/ml), (PCNA)3 (80 nM), SSB (300 nM), ATP (0.6 mM), and various concentrations
of dNTP for incorporation opposite the target site. All reactions were
run for 2 min. A running-start dATP (75 µM) control
reaction was incubated for 2 min, in the absence of a target dNTP
substrate. The unextended 32P-labeled primer band is shown
at the left-hand side of the gel. A sketch of the p/t DNA is
shown at the top of the figure. Gel band intensities were
measured using a PhosphorImager and their ratio
IT
/IT
1
was plotted versus dNTP concentration. The misincorporation
efficiency finc was computed using Equation 1
(see "Experimental Procedures"). The template sequence
corresponding to individual primer extension bands is indicated at the
right-hand side of the gel. The dNTP concentration values
have been rounded to two significant figures.
incorporated four running-start As and then C opposite the
target G in a thoroughly distributive manner in the absence of the processivity proteins (Fig. 2, dCTP
lanes). The appearance of faint primer extension bands
corresponding to misincorporation of T opposite G allowed us to compute
a T·G misincorporation ratio of 5.6 × 10
4 (Fig.
2, dTTP lanes). G·G and A·G misincorporations were not detectable (data not shown).
HE (Fig. 3), which synthesized DNA processively (compare Figs.
3 and 2). Note the presence of the high intensity primer extension
bands terminating opposite the target site G and continuing
further downstream (Fig. 3). The T·G error rate of 4.6 × 10
4 was similar to that for pol
alone, suggesting
that the processivity proteins have essentially no effect on the
fidelity for this mispair. The error rates for G·G and A·G mispairs
were 5.3 × 10
5 and 4.5 × 10
6, respectively.
core has higher fidelity than pol
HE. Rather, the absence of target site misincorporation bands for the
case of pol
alone was caused by the distributive nature of the
enzyme. The residence time on the p/t DNA was simply too short to allow
pol
to catalyze the most difficult misincorporation events during a
single pol-p/t DNA encounter. The data indicated that the apparent
Km values for incorporation of C opposite G were 72 µM for pol
and 1.6 µM for pol
HE
(Figs. 2 and 3). The Km values for misincorporation
of T opposite G were ~6900 µM for pol
and only 370 µM for pol
HE (Figs. 2 and 3). The observation that
the apparent Km values were much higher for both
right (C·G) and wrong (T·G) incorporations for pol
alone is
consistent with reduced processivity. Thus, a much higher concentration
of dNTPs is required to attain one-half Vmax when the pol
-p/tDNA dissociation occurs rapidly, as is the case for
a highly distributive synthesis. Because finc
(Equation 1) is expressed as the ratio of
Vmax/Km for wrong
versus right incorporations, the sensitivity of the gel
kinetic assay is reduced in proportion to the reduction in
(Vmax/Km)R for
pol
in the absence of processivity factors. Thus, the assay is
roughly 100-fold more sensitive for pol
HE, enabling detection of
misincorporation ratios on the order of about 10
6 to
10
7.
-associated 3'
5'-Exonuclease Activity Is a
Weak Proofreader--
We measured 3'
5' proofreading exonuclease
activity for the 4-subunit pol
core under synthesizing and
non-synthesizing conditions on p/t DNA, using either matched or
mismatched primer-3'-ends (Fig.
4A). Excision of the
primer-3'-end containing an A·G mismatched base pair occurred more
rapidly than removal of a C·G correctly matched pair both in the
presence and absence of dNTP substrates. However, the pol
exonuclease activity appeared extremely weak. Removal of a terminal
A·G mismatch was detectable in a 3-min incubation in either the
presence or absence of dNTP substrates (Fig. 4A), whereas in
the presence of dNTPs, a low level of incorporation of a next correct
dGMP·C onto an A·G mismatched base pair was observed in a 7-min
incubation.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
3'
5'-exonuclease activity of S. pombe pol
. A, 10 nM each of matched (left) and mismatched
(right) 35/100-mer DNA were incubated at 37 °C with
S. pombe pol
(10 µg/ml), for the times indicated, in
reaction buffer in the presence or absence of 4 dNTPs. The lane
designated as 0 contains the unextended primer.
B, 35-mer primer ssDNA (10 nM) was incubated at
37 °C with S. pombe pol
(10 µg/ml) in the absence
of dNTP substrates. The left-hand lane designated as
0 contains the band corresponding to the unextended
32P-labeled primer.
exonuclease-to-polymerase ratio, is
about 1 to 30. That is, the rate of extending a correct dCMP·G
terminus is roughly 30 times greater than the rate of removal of a
dAMP·G mismatched terminus in the absence of dNTP substrates. Indeed, the excision of dAMP from a terminal A·G mispair was remarkably inefficient with greater than 90% of the input p/t DNA remaining following a 40-min reaction. In contrast, degradation of ssDNA occurred
more rapidly than p/t DNA (Fig. 4B). The degradation reaction appeared to be distributive, showing removal of about 6 nt
during a 6-min reaction.
may not be effective in eliminating nucleotide substitution errors. We tested this supposition by measuring
finc (dTMP·G) for pol
HE at different
concentrations of the next correct dGTP substrate. We found no
measurable change in the T·G misincorporation ratios
(finc = 4.6 × 10
4) for pol
, when varying dGTP concentrations between 0 and 160 µM (data not shown). Since a decrease in fidelity with
increasing next correct dNTP concentration is a well established
hallmark of proofreading (38, 39), the absence of a dependence of
fidelity on dNTP concentration implies that the 3'-exonuclease of pol
may not be effective in eliminating polymerase-catalyzed base substitution errors.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
is believed to be the primary replicative enzyme in
eucaryotic cells responsible for carrying out processive DNA synthesis in the presence of PCNA, RFC, and RPA (32). Despite the importance of
this enzyme, little is known regarding its fidelity properties in
vitro and in vivo. In this paper, we have used a gel
kinetic assay (24, 26, 31) to measure fidelity at an arbitrary
template G site using the pol
HE purified from S. pombe (30).
Using a Synthetic p/t DNA
Oligomer--
It is convenient to synthesize relatively short DNA
templates to investigate DNA polymerase fidelity using defined sequence contexts. However, prior to performing a fidelity analysis using S. pombe pol
HE on a 30/100-mer p/t DNA, it was
necessary to demonstrate that the PCNA sliding clamp stimulated pol
processivity, dependent on the presence of RFC and ATP, since the
presence of ATP is required for loading of PCNA onto DNA by the RFC
clamp loading complex (12, 35-37). This requirement is potentially important because PCNA can also diffuse onto linear but not circular DNA in the absence of RFC and ATP (34).
alone was distributive on the 30/100-mer p/t DNA
with the addition of about 6 nt following a 3-min reaction and
increasing to just 7 nt at 8, 18, and 40 min (Fig. 1, group 1). The enzyme remained active during the 40-min time course as shown by the increased primer extension band intensities at the later
time points. In contrast, synthesis by the pol
HE was much more
processive, with the addition of 35 nt to reach the end of the template
strand well within the first time point taken at 3 min (Fig. 1,
group 5). Processive synthesis does not occur in the absence
of either PCNA or ATP (Fig. 1, groups 3 and 7, respectively). One can also clearly observe the PCNA-independent passive clamp loading reaction, with full-length synthesis also occurring in less than 3 min (Fig. 1, group 2). However, it
is important to note that the passive clamp loading reaction failed to
occur in the presence of SSB (Fig. 1, group 7), ensuring
that our fidelity measurements made with pol
HE in the presence of SSB, required PCNA, RFC, and ATP to carry out processive primer elongation. Experiments in which RPA (human or S. pombe RPA)
was substituted for E. coli SSB showed no significant
differences in either the rates or fidelity of DNA synthesis (data not
shown). Therefore, a specific requirement for eucaryotic SSB has not
been demonstrated in our in vitro model system and remains
an open question requiring further investigation.
HE--
Nucleotide misincorporation
values for S. pombe pol
were found to be
finc = 4.6 × 10
4 (T·G),
5.3 × 10
5 (G·G), and 4.5 × 10
6 (A·G) (Fig. 3 and Table
I). The pol
HE error rates can be compared with values obtained with E. coli pol III HE
and proofreading-defective E. coli pol III
HE
(26) containing the
sliding clamp (analogous to PCNA),
clamp
loading complex (analogous to RFC), and SSB in the same p/t DNA
sequence context (Table I). The fidelity of pol
HE is considerably
lower than pol III HE for each mispair. The reduction in fidelity
compared with pol III HE is 82-fold (T·G), 76-fold
(G·G),2 and 11-fold
(A·G).
Comparison of misincorporation efficiencies for DNA polymerase
holoenzymes
HE, E. coli pol III HE, and E. coli pol
III
HE. E. coli pol III
HE is devoid of proofreading
exonuclease activity. The p/t DNA sequence is shown at the top of Fig.
2.
HE appear to
be attributable almost entirely to a severely compromised ability to
proofread insertion errors made by the polymerase catalytic subunit.
Indeed, a comparison of finc for pol III
HE
(containing the
polymerase subunit in the absence of the
proofreading and
subunits) shows that the nucleotide
misinsertion rates for pol
and pol III are essentially
the same (Table I). The reduction in fidelity for pol
HE compared
with pol III
HE is only 2.6- and 1.5-fold for T·G and G·G
mispairs, respectively, whereas pol
HE may be slightly (1.2-fold)
more accurate in forming A·G mispairs. These small differences are
not statistically significant.
in the in vitro experiments is quite
puzzling. By using the same assay and p/t DNA sequence to measure
E. coli pol III fidelity, we observed an 8-fold reduction in
fidelity as proofreading of mispaired A·G termini were reduced in the
presence of high concentrations of a next-correct "rescue" dNTP
(26). The "next nucleotide" reduction in fidelity is a well
established hallmark of a proofreading polymerase (38, 39) and confirms
that the gel kinetic assay can be used to analyze the effects of
proofreading on fidelity. We observed no significant differences in pol
HE fidelity using a wide concentration range of next-nucleotide
dNTP (data not shown), and we concluded, therefore, that S. pombe pol
is unable to effect a significant reduction in
polymerase insertion errors. The p/t DNA sequence, requiring
incorporation of four As prior to reaching the target G
site, was chosen to maximize proofreading, i.e. "all
things being equal" proofreading is most effective in removing
misinserted nucleotides adjacent to relatively unstable DNA regions
(40, 41). This latter point serves to emphasize the inability of pol
to carry out effective error correction.
has an extremely weak associated
3'-exonuclease activity (Fig. 4). This activity barely degraded p/t DNA
containing mismatched primer 3'-ends in the absence of dNTP substrates
(Fig. 4A), and although it was able to degrade the
single-stranded 35-mer primer somewhat more effectively (Fig.
4B), its activity was far lower than that observed using
either E. coli pol III core or HE (data not shown). The pol
-catalyzed DNA degradation rate was essentially unchanged in the
presence of PCNA (data not shown). A small increase in the rate of DNA
hydrolysis was, however, observed in the presence of PCNA + RFC, which
can be attributed to a low level of nuclease contamination in our most
highly purified RFC fraction (data not shown).
to copy a lacZ
reporter gene sequence in the absence of processivity subunits, although pol
proofreading was readily apparent using the same gap filling assay.
Although we are unaware of any in vivo mutational data for
proofreading-deficient S. pombe mutants, there are such data in S. cerevisiae showing that proofreading for pols
and
can substantially reduce base substitution errors (43, 44). In view
of this dichotomy, it seems reasonable to speculate that associated
exonuclease activity of pol
may be masked in vitro. In
this regard, it is interesting to note that the S. pombe and S. cerevisiae pol
s differ in their subunit structure. In
S. cerevisiae, this complex has been shown to be a dimer of
the three-subunit complex (Mr 125,000, 58,000, and 55,000 (45, 46)) whereas the S. pombe pol
has been
shown to be a dimer of the four-subunit complex
(Mr 125,000, 55,000, 54,000, and 22,000 (30)).
Whether the unique 22-kDa subunit found in S. pombe pol
,
the product of the non-essential cdm1+ gene (47)
affects the proofreading function of the S. pombe pol
in vitro, remains to be explored. In addition, perhaps some other protein cofactor may be required to stimulate proofreading. As
indicated here, the gel fidelity assay might prove useful as a means to
identify and purify proofreading stimulatory factors from cell lysates.
On the other hand, the presence of an alternative excision repair
pathway in S. pombe that has been shown to excise mispaired
bases (48), in addition to damaged DNA bases, raises the possibility
that this repair pathway might compensate for a lack of effective
proofreading by pol
.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Professor of the American Cancer Society.
HE misincorporates dGMP
directly opposite G when C is located at the
5'-side of the target.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
sliding clamp and
clamp loading complex for
E. coli;
SSB, E. coli single strand DNA-binding
protein;
RPA, replication protein A, eucaryotic single strand
DNA-binding protein;
p/t DNA, primer-template DNA;
nt, nucleotide;
ssDNA, single-stranded DNA.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Lee, M. Y.,
Tan, C. K.,
So, A. G.,
and Downey, K. M.
(1980)
Biochemistry
19,
2096-2101
2.
Bambara, R. A.,
Murante, R. S.,
and Henricksen, L. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4647-4650
3.
Kornberg, A.,
and Baker, T. A.
(1992)
DNA Replication
, 2nd Ed.
, p. 167, W. H. Freeman & Co., New York
4.
Stukenberg, P. T.,
Studwell-Vaughan, P. S.,
and O'Donnell, M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
11328-11334
5.
Kelman, Z.,
and O'Donnell, M.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
64,
171-200
6.
Bonner, C. A.,
Stukenberg, P. T.,
Rajagopalan, M.,
Eritja, R.,
O'Donnell, M.,
McEntee, K.,
Echols, H.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
11431-11438
7.
Waga, S.,
and Stillman, B.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
721-751
8.
Maki, S.,
and Kornberg, A.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
6555-6560
9.
Bloom, L. B.,
Turner, J.,
Kelman, Z.,
Beechem, J. M.,
O'Donnell, M.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
30699-30708
10.
Hingorani, M. M.,
and O'Donnell, M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24550-24563
11.
Bertram, J. G.,
Bloom, L. B.,
Turner, J.,
O'Donnell, M.,
Beecham, J. M.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24564-24574
12.
Podust, L. M.,
Podust, V. N.,
Sogo, J. M.,
and Hubscher, U.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
3072-3081
13.
Podust, V. N.,
Tiwari, N.,
Stephan, S.,
and Fanning, E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31992-31999
14.
Yao, N.,
Turner, J.,
Kelman, Z.,
Stukenberg, P. T.,
Dean, F.,
Shechter, D.,
Pan, Z.-Q.,
Hurwitz, J.,
and O'Donnell, M.
(1996)
Genes Cells
1,
101-113
15.
Echols, H.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1991)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
60,
477-511
16.
Johnson, K. A.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
62,
685-713
17.
Goodman, M. F.,
Creighton, S.,
Bloom, L. B.,
and Petruska, J.
(1993)
Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.
28,
83-126
18.
Goodman, M. F.,
and Fygenson, D. K.
(1997)
Genetics
148,
1475-1482
19.
Veaute, X.,
and Fuchs, R. P. P.
(1993)
Science
261,
598-600
20.
Fijalkowska, I. J.,
Jonczyk, P.,
Tkaczyk, M. M.,
Bialoskorska, M.,
and Schaaper, R. M.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
10020-10025
21.
Cordeiro-Stone, M.,
Zaritskaya, L. S.,
Price, L. K.,
and Kaufmann, W. K.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13945-13954
22.
Veaute, X.,
and Sarasin, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15351-15357
23.
Randall, S. K.,
Eritja, R.,
Kaplan, B. E.,
Petruska, J.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
6864-6870
24.
Boosalis, M. S.,
Petruska, J.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
14689-14696
25.
Creighton, S.,
Bloom, L. B.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
262,
232-256
26.
Bloom, L. B.,
Chen, X.,
Kuchnir Fygenson, D.,
Turner, J.,
O'Donnell, M.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27919-27930
27.
Fygenson, D. K.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27931-27935
28.
Mozzherin, D. Ju.,
McConnell, M.,
Jasko, M. V.,
Krayevsky, A. A.,
Tan, C.-K.,
Downey, K. M.,
and Fisher, P. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31711-31717
29.
Mozzherin, D. J.,
Shibutani, S.,
Tan, C.-K.,
Downey, K. M.,
and Fisher, P. A.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
6126-6131
30.
Zuo, S.,
Gibbs, E.,
Kelman, Z.,
Wang, T. S.-F.,
O'Donnell, M.,
MacNeill, S. A.,
and Hurwitz, J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
11244-11249
31.
Creighton, S.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
4759-4774
32.
Burgers, P. M. J.
(1998)
Chromosoma (Berl.)
107,
218-227
33.
Chalberg, M. D.,
and Kelly, T. J.
(1989)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
58,
671-717
34.
Burgers, P. M. J.,
and Yoder, B. L.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
19923-19926
35.
Tsurimoto, T.,
and Stillman, B.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
1950-1960
36.
Lee, S.-H.,
and Hurwitz, J.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
5672-5676
37.
Burgers, P. M. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
22698-22706
38.
Clayton, L. K.,
Goodman, M. F.,
Branscomb, E. W.,
and Galas, D. J.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
1902-1912
39.
Fersht, A. R.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
4946-4950
40.
Bessman, M. J.,
and Reha-Krantz, L. J.
(1977)
J. Mol. Biol.
116,
115-123
41.
Petruska, J.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
7533-7539
42.
Thomas, D. C.,
Roberts, J. D.,
Sabatino, R. D.,
Myers, T. W.,
Tan, C.-K.,
Downey, K. M.,
So, A. G.,
Bambara, R. A.,
and Kunkel, T. A.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
11751-11759
43.
Simon, M.,
Giot, L.,
and Faye, G.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
2165-2170
44.
Morrison, A.,
and Sugino, A.
(1994)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
242,
289-296
45.
Burgers, P. M. J.,
and Gerik, K. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
19756-19762
46.
Gerik, K. J.,
Li, X.,
Pautz, A.,
and Burgers, P. M. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
19747-19755
47.
Reynolds, N.,
Watt, A.,
Fantes, P. A.,
and MacNeill, S. A.
(1998)
Curr. Genet.
34,
250-258
48.
Alleva, J. L.,
Zuo, S.,
Hurwitz, J.,
and Doetsch, P. W.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
2659-2666
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Jaszczur, K. Flis, J. Rudzka, J. Kraszewska, M. E. Budd, P. Polaczek, J. L. Campbell, P. Jonczyk, and I. J. Fijalkowska Dpb2p, a Noncatalytic Subunit of DNA Polymerase {varepsilon}, Contributes to the Fidelity of DNA Replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, February 1, 2008; 178(2): 633 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Larijani and A. Martin Single-Stranded DNA Structure and Positional Context of the Target Cytidine Determine the Enzymatic Efficiency of AID Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2007; 27(23): 8038 - 8048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Fortune, Y. I. Pavlov, C. M. Welch, E. Johansson, P. M. J. Burgers, and T. A. Kunkel Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA Polymerase {delta}: HIGH FIDELITY FOR BASE SUBSTITUTIONS BUT LOWER FIDELITY FOR SINGLE- AND MULTI-BASE DELETIONS J. Biol. Chem., August 19, 2005; 280(33): 29980 - 29987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bebenek, G. T. Carver, F. A. Kadyrov, G. E. Kissling, and J. W. Drake Processivity Clamp gp45 and ssDNA-Binding-Protein gp32 Modulate the Fidelity of Bacteriophage RB69 DNA Polymerase in a Sequence-Specific Manner, Sometimes Enhancing and Sometimes Compromising Accuracy Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 1815 - 1824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Shimizu, K. Hashimoto, J. M. Kirchner, W. Nakai, H. Nishikawa, M. A. Resnick, and A. Sugino Fidelity of DNA Polymerase epsilon Holoenzyme from Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae J. Biol. Chem., September 27, 2002; 277(40): 37422 - 37429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kanuri, I. G. Minko, L. V. Nechev, T. M. Harris, C. M. Harris, and R. S. Lloyd Error Prone Translesion Synthesis Past gamma -Hydroxypropano Deoxyguanosine, the Primary Acrolein-derived Adduct in Mammalian Cells J. Biol. Chem., May 17, 2002; 277(21): 18257 - 18265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||