JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M000751200 on April 3, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 23, 17900-17908, June 9, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/23/17900    most recent
M000751200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Higashio, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kohno, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Higashio, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kohno, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Sfb2p, a Yeast Protein Related to Sec24p, Can Function as a Constituent of COPII Coats Required for Vesicle Budding from the Endoplasmic Reticulum*

Hironori HigashioDagger , Yukio KimataDagger §, Toshio KiriyamaDagger , Aiko Hirata, and Kenji KohnoDagger §||

From the Dagger  Research and Education Center for Genetic Information, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara 630-0101, Japan, the  Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, the University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan, and § CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Tokyo 101-0062, Japan

Received for publication, January 27, 2000, and in revised form, March 24, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The COPII coat is required for vesicle budding from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and consists of two heterodimeric subcomplexes, Sec23p/Sec24p, Sec13p/Sec31p, and a small GTPase, Sar1p. We characterized a yeast mutant, anu1 (abnormal nuclear morphology) exhibiting proliferated ER as well as abnormal nuclear morphology at the restrictive temperature. Based on the finding that ANU1 is identical to SEC24, we confirmed a temperature-sensitive protein transport from the ER to the Golgi in anu1-1/sec24-20 cells. Overexpression of SFB2, a SEC24 homologue with 56% identity, partially suppressed not only the mutant phenotype of sec24-20 cells but also rescued the SEC24-disrupted cells. Moreover, the yeast two-hybrid assay revealed that Sfb2p, similarly to Sec24p, interacted with Sec23p. In SEC24-disrupted cells rescued by overexpression of SFB2, some cargo proteins were still retained in the ER, while most of the protein transport was restored. Together, these findings strongly suggest that Sfb2p functions as the component of COPII coats in place of Sec24p, and raise the possibility that each member of the SEC24 family of proteins participates directly and/or indirectly in cargo-recognition events with its own cargo specificity at forming ER-derived vesicles.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In eukaryotic cells, protein transport along the secretory pathway is mediated by vesicle budding from a donor membrane and by specifically fusing the formed vesicle to an acceptor organelle. Vesicle budding is driven by the recruitment of specific coat proteins to a donor membrane (1, 2). The COPII coat, that is required for the vesicle budding from endoplasmic reticulum (ER),1 consists of heterodimeric protein complexes, Sec23p/Sec24p, Sec13p/Sec31p, and a small GTPase Sar1p. COPII-coated vesicle formation begins with recruitment of Sar1p to the ER membrane where Sar1p-GDP is converted to Sar1p-GTP by a specific guanine nucleotide exchanging factor, Sec12p. Subsequently, Sec23p/Sec24p binds a membrane-bound Sar1p-GTP to form Sar1p-Sec23p/Sec24p prebudding complex. Finally, Sec13p/Sec31p binds the prebudding complexes to cross-link them, resulting in vesicle budding (3-6). An additional protein, Sec16p, is also required for COPII-coated vesicle budding. Sec16p is a peripheral membrane protein tightly associated with the ER, and can bind COPII coat components, Sec23p, Sec24p, and Sec31p via its distinct domains. Thus Sec16p is considered to serve as a scaffold to recruit and/or assemble COPII coat components (5).

In addition to secretory and membrane proteins (cargo proteins), vesicle machinery proteins, such as v-SNAREs (vesicle targeting proteins) and cargo receptors are also specifically concentrated into COPII-coated vesicles (7-11). Cargo receptors are membrane proteins cycling between the ER and Golgi that interact with specific cargo molecules and facilitate their uptake into transport vesicles (12). For instance, several yeast proteins belonging to the p24 family are known to be involved in the transport of a subset of cargo proteins (9, 10, 13, 14). At least eight members of the yeast p24 family have been identified as putative cargo receptors, i.e. EMP24, ERV25, and ERP1-ERP6, all encoding type I integral membrane proteins (9, 10, 14). Genetic and biochemical studies revealed that Emp24p, Erv25p, Erp1p, and Erp2p function in a heteromeric complex (10, 14), and are responsible for the efficient and selective export of invertase and/or Gas1p out of the ER (9, 10, 13, 14). However, clear cut evidence for a direct interaction between these cargo proteins and p24 heteromeric complexes has not been observed yet.

Several lines of evidence strongly suggest that selective export from the ER and COPII-coated vesicle formation should be coupled. Matsuoka et al. (15) demonstrated that v-SNAREs but not ER resident proteins are concentrated in synthetic COPII-coated vesicles in a reconstituted liposome budding assay. It was also demonstrated in both yeast and mammals that some membrane cargo and vesicle machinery proteins, such as v-SNAREs, Emp24p, and vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein (VSV-G), specifically interact with Sar1p-Sec23p/Sec24p prebudding complex (16-18).

Although Sec24p has binding domains for Sec23p, Sec31p, and Sec16p (19-21) and a zinc finger-like domain essential for its function (21), the precise role of Sec24p itself in vesicle formation and cargo selection remains to be elucidated. The Saccharomyces genome data base (22) shows that there are two additional genes related to SEC24, designated SFB2 (YNL049c; 56% identity) and SFB3 (YHR098c; 23% identity). While neither SFB2 nor SFB3 is essential for growth (23), the zinc finger-like domain is conserved among the SEC24 family of proteins. Recently, SFB3 was identified as LST1, the gene exhibiting synthetic lethal interactions with SEC13 and all of other COPII genes. Lst1p has an ability to bind Sec23p, and chromosomal deletion of LST1 specifically inhibits export of the plasma membrane proton-ATPase (Pma1p) from the ER. Thus Lst1p is considered to be a specialized form of the COPII subunit required for efficient packaging of Pma1p into COPII-coated vesicles (24). On the other hand, very little is known about the role of SFB2. Analysis of SFB2 function may provide us with further information about the roles of the SEC24 family of proteins in vesicle formation and/or cargo selection.

We have obtained four temperature-sensitive mutants, designated anu (abnormal nuclear morphology), that exhibited abnormal nuclear morphology at the restrictive temperature. All four genes designated ANU1-ANU4 were identical to SEC24, SEC28, SEC13, and SEC18, respectively, genes involved in vesicle transport between the ER and Golgi (25). anu1-1/sec24-20 mutant cells are severely defective in vesicle transport from the ER to the Golgi at the restrictive temperature, resulting in accumulation of both nascent proteins and membranes in the ER. We examined whether the overexpression of SEC24 homologues suppresses sec24-20 phenotypes. Here we report that only the overexpression of SFB2 suppresses defective phenotypes of both sec24-20 and Delta sec24 mutants. Moreover, Sfb2p has an ability to bind Sec23p, suggesting that Sfb2p may participate in both COPII-coated vesicle formation and cargo selection events in concert with other constituents of COPII-coated vesicles. We also report the difference between Sec24p and Sfb2p in their cargo specificity. Studies on Sfb2p (this study) and Lst1p (24) suggest that the ER-to-Golgi protein transport is mediated by vesicles with heterogeneous COPII coats.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plasmid Construction-- pAN1 is a YCp50-based plasmid harboring a 8.0-kilobase pair Sau3AI yeast genomic DNA fragment containing SEC24 (ANU1), which was screened from a YCp50-based (CEN vector; URA3) yeast genomic library (26). A 2.9-kilobase pair SnaBI genomic fragment containing SEC24 was subcloned into the SmaI site of pRS314 (27) to produce pAN11. pAN12 was generated as follows: sec24-20 (anu1-1) gene was cloned from TKC3 strain by plasmid gap repair method (28) using pAN1. The resultant sec24 plasmid was digested with SnaBI, and a 2.9-kilobase pair genomic fragment containing sec24-20 was subcloned into the SmaI site of pRS314 to produce pAN12. Plasmids pSF1, pSF2, and pSF11 were generated as follows: the SFB2 gene was obtained by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of chromosomal DNA isolated from Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain FY23 (generous gifts from Dr. F. Winston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) using oligonucleotides, SFB2-5 (5'- AGAGAGAGGATCCGTAGTTTGTCCAAGCACTGCCCAT-3') and SFB2-3 (5'-AGAGAGAGAAGCTTTTAGAGGCAAACTTGTATCTTATGTCAAAGC-3'), which correspond to nucleotides, -285 to -262, and nucleotides 2980 to 2950, respectively. SFB2-5 and SFB2-3 contain a BamHI and a HindIII site, respectively, allowing for insertion into BamHI and HindIII endonuclease sites of pRS426 and pRS424 (29) to produce pSF1 and pSF11, respectively. The SFB3 gene was also obtained by PCR using SFB3-5 (5'-AGAGAGAGGATCCCTGCTCAGTGAGTGACATCGGCAA-3') and SFB3-3 (5'-AGAGAGAGCTCGAGCTCTGCCTGCGTTTCACATACTGC-3'), which correspond to nucleotides -844 to -821, and 3144 to 3121, respectively.

SFB3-5 and SFB3-3 contain a BamHI and a XhoI site, respectively, allowing for insertion into BamHI/XhoI sites of pRS426 to produce pSF2. pCZY1 is a 2-µm based plasmid containing KAR2UPRE (unfolded protein response element of KAR2)-CYC1 promoter-LacZ fusion gene and URA3 selectable marker, kindly provided by K. Mori (30). pUPR3 was generated as follows: a XhoI-EcoRI fragment of pCZY1 containing UPRE-CYC1-LacZ was inserted into XhoI/EcoRI sites of pRS316 (27), and a synthetic 52-base pair oligonucleotide encoding 2×UPRE was inserted into its XhoI site of the resultant plasmid to obtain pUPR3 containing 3UPRE-CYC1-LacZ.

The plasmids for yeast two-hybrid assay, pGAD-SEC24, pGAD-sec24-20, pGAD-SFB2, and pGBD-SEC23 were generated as follows: open reading frames of SEC24, sec24-20, SFB2, and SEC23 were obtained by PCR amplification of chromosomal DNA using following primer sets: TH24-5 corresponding to nucleotides 0 to 21 of SEC24, and TH24-3 (5'-AGAGAGAGCTCGAGAGCCTTATTTGCTAATTCTGGCTTTCATG-3') corresponding to nucleotides 2784 to 2756, TH2-5 corresponding to nucleotides 0 to 30 of SFB2, and TH2-3 (5'-AGAGAGAGCTCGAGTTATCTGTTGATACTAGTCTTCATACTCTGT-3') corresponding to nucleotides 2631 to 2600, and TH23-5 corresponding to nucleotides 0 to 26 of SEC23, and TH23-3 (5'- AGAGAGAGCTCGAGCTCCTATGCCTGACCAGAGACGGCTA-3') corresponding to nucleotides 2310 to 2284, respectively. PCR fragments containing SEC24, sec24-20, and SFB2 were digested by XhoI and then cloned into SmaI/SalI sites of pGAD-C1 to produce pGAD-SEC24, pGAD-sec24-20, and pGAD-SFB2, respectively. Similarly, the PCR fragment containing SEC23 was digested and cloned into pGBD-C1 to produce pGBD-SEC23.

Strains, Media, and Growth Conditions-- Yeast strains were grown in rich (YPD) or synthetic dextrose (SD) media, and standard genetic manipulations were performed as described previously (32). For some experiments, cells were grown in synthetic complete (SC) media (32) buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer or adjusted to pH 4.0 with HCl. The Escherichia coli strain DH5alpha (33) was used for manipulation of recombinant DNA and was grown in LB media (1% NaCl, 1% peptone, and 0.5% yeast extract) containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin. All yeast strains used in this study were listed in Table I, and yeast strains except for PJ69-4A were derived from FY strains (generous gifts from Dr. F. Winston). Diploid strain DFY24 was sporulated to obtain a KFY1 strain. To obtain YKH1 (Delta sfb2) and YKH2 (Delta sfb3) strains from TKO1, gene deletions were performed by PCR amplification of the URA3 gene with oligonucleotides that encoded 45 base pairs of the gene-specific sequences near each end of the open reading frames according to the method of Baudin et al. (34). The diploid strain DFY24 replaced one of its SEC24 genes with the LEU2 gene, as described above, was transformed with pAN1 (SEC24, URA3, CEN), and then sporulated to obtain a YKH3 (Delta sec24) strain. Strains YKH4 and YKH6 were obtained from the experiment represented in Fig. 4 (see figure legend of Fig. 4).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Yeast strains used in this study

Electron and Immunofluorescence Microscopy-- Electron microscopic analysis was performed as follows: preparation of a thin section of yeast cells was carried out by the freeze-substituted fixation method as described previously (35), except that Reichart KF80 was used to freeze the cells. Thin sections were viewed on a JEOL100CX electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at 80 kV. For Kar2p staining, cells were fixed by direct addition of formaldehyde to the culture to a final concentration of 3.7% and incubated at room temperature for 2 h. Fixed cells were washed with potassium phosphate buffer (0.1 M potassium phosphate, pH 6.5) and converted into spheroplasts by incubation with 50 µg/ml zymolyase-100T (Seikagaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan) in 1.2 M sorbitol, 0.1 M potassium phosphate, pH 6.5, and 0.2% beta -mercaptoethanol at 30 °C for 1-2 h. Immunofluorescence was performed essentially as described previously (36). The rabbit anti-yeast Kar2p antiserum prepared as described previously (37) was used as the primary antibody and rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Cappel Research Products, ICN, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was used as the secondary antibody. DNA was stained with 1 µg/ml 4,6-diamino-2-phenylindole for 3 min at room temperature before mounting. Preparations were viewed on a Axiophot fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

beta -Galactosidase Assay-- Assays of beta -galactosidase activity in yeast extracts were carried out as described previously (38). beta -Galactosidase activity was expressed as units defined as (A420 × 1000)/(A600 × t × v), where A420 is the absorbance at 420 nm of the reaction mixture, after t minutes, A600 the turbidity of the culture at the time of harvest, t the number of minutes for which the reaction mixture was incubated, and v the volume of the sample in milliliters. The values are averages of four independent yeast transformants, and error bars are presented (Figs. 2C and 5E).

Pulse-Chase Experiments-- Pulse-chase experiments were performed as described previously (39) with the following modifications. Cells were grown exponentially in SC, pH 4.0, lacking methionine and cysteine. For invertase transport assay, cells were transferred to SC, pH 4.0, media containing 0.1% glucose and incubated for 30 min to induce the expression of invertase before pulse labeling. Immunoprecipitations were performed using anti-carboxypeptidase Y (CPY) antibody (Rockland Immunochemicals, Inc., Gilbertsville, PA), anti-invertase antibody (kindly provided by Dr. K. Mihara, Kyushu University, Japan), and anti-Gas1p antibody (kindly provided by Dr. H. Riezman, University of Basel, Switzerland) at 1:500 dilution. Proteins were dissolved in Laemmli sample buffer containing 0.1 M dithiothreitol, incubated at 95 °C for 3 min, and then subjected to SDS-PAGE (8%). Assays for general secretion competence were performed as described (40) with the following modifications. Before labeling, cells were grown exponentially in SC, pH 4.0 or 7.0, lacking methionine and cysteine. Cells were pulse-labeled with 4 MBq/ml [35S]methionine + cysteine, at 5 A600/ml in SC, pH 4.0 or 7.0, media containing 100 µg/ml alpha 2-macroglobulin and 250 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, and then chased for 45 min by adding excess amounts of unlabeled methionine and cysteine (final concentrations of 1 and 0.8 mM, respectively). Proteins equivalent to 0.25 A600 were loaded on SDS-PAGE (8%), and autoradiographed with a BioImage BAS2000 analyzer (Fuji Photo Film, Tokyo, Japan).

Yeast Two-hybrid System-- The interaction between Sec23p and Sfb2p, Sec24p, or sec24-20 gene product was tested by the yeast two-hybrid method as described (31). Open reading frames of SFB2, SEC24, anu1, and SEC23 were cloned into vectors pGAD-C1 and pGBD-C1 in-frame with the GAL4 activation or binding domain as described under "Plasmid Construction."

RNA Preparation and Northern Analysis-- Cells were grown exponentially in SC, pH 4.0, medium and then harvested by centrifugation, washed, frozen by liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C. Total RNA of cells was isolated by hot phenol extraction (41). RNA was quantified by absorbance at 260 nm and the integrity of the RNA was confirmed by ethidium bromide staining of RNA in agarose gels. For Northern blotting, 5 or 10 µg of each RNA sample was subjected to electrophoresis in 1.0% formaldehyde/agarose gel, followed by transferring onto a nylon membrane (Hybond N+, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and hybridization analysis as described (42). Probes used for hybridization were the open reading frames of SEC24 and SFB2, obtained by PCR amplification of chromosomal DNA using the primer sets TH24-5 and TH24-3 and TH2-5 and TH2-3, respectively. Probes were labeled by Random primer labeling kit (TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan). The probed membranes were autoradiographed and analyzed with a BioImage BAS2000 analyzer.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Accumulation and Severe Extention of the ER in anu1-1/sec24-20 Mutants-- In our previous study on nuclear morphology, we obtained four mutants, anu1-anu4, exhibiting abnormal nuclear morphology at the restrictive temperature (25). Unexpectedly, ANU1 was identical to SEC24, which is known to be involved in the early secretory pathway rather than the construction of nuclei (25). Electron microscopic analysis revealed that anu1-1/sec24-20 cells cultured at the restrictive temperature of 37 °C for 2 h contained morphologically aberrant and apparently fragmented nuclei (Fig. 1B, D, and E). Accumulated membranes having appearances like an extension of the ER because of their continuity with the outer nuclear membrane were also observed in sec24-20 cells (Fig. 1, B and D). In addition, irregular invagination of the ER was often observed in sec24-20 cells cultured at the restrictive temperature (Fig. 1C). These results suggested that some abnormalities of the ER led to the aberrant nuclear morphology in sec24-20 cells.


View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Electron micrographs of wild-type and anu1-1/sec24-20 cells. Wild-type (TKO1; A) and anu1-1/sec24-20 (TKC3; B-E) cells were grown at 23 °C to early logarithmic phase in YPD followed by 2 h incubation at 37 °C, and subjected to ultrathin sectioning and subsequent electron microscopic analysis. The large arrow in C indicates irregular invagination of ER. The arrowhead in A indicates a spindle pole body. The boxed region of the cell in D is enlarged in E. er (with small arrows), ER; N, nucleus; Nu, nucleoli; V, vacuole; mt (with small arrows), nuclear microtubules.

Abnormal Phenotype in the ER at the Restrictive Temperature-- sec24-20 cells barely grew at 30 °C, and died at 37 °C (Fig. 2A). To identify some other abnormalities related to the ER in sec24-20 cells, we investigated the distribution of Kar2p/BiP, a well characterized ER resident chaperone, by indirect immunofluorescence microscopic analysis. Contrary to wild-type cells, punctate staining of Kar2p was observed in 90-95, 60-70, and <5% of sec24-20 cells incubated at 37, 30, and 23 °C, respectively (Fig. 2B). The Kar2p distributions in sec24-20 cells resembled those termed BiP bodies (43) observed in various mutants defective in the transport between ER and Golgi. Since the unfolded protein response (UPR) activates transcription of ER resident chaperones in response to the accumulation of un- or mal-folded proteins in the lumen of the ER accompanied by the blockade of ER-to-Golgi vesicle transport (44-48), we next investigated whether the UPR was activated in sec24-20 cells. To assess the activation of the UPR, beta -galactosidase activity was determined in wild-type, sec24-20, and sec18 (anu4) cells containing a UPRE (UPR element of KAR2)-CYC1 promoter-LacZ reporter plasmid (pCZY1). LacZ expression from pCZY1 was under the control of UPRE, the 22-base pair cis-acting element necessary and sufficient for transcriptional induction of Kar2p by the UPR (30, 38). At the semipermissive temperature of 30 °C, but not at 23 °C, beta -galactosidase activity of sec24-20 and sec18 cells was 3-4-fold higher than that of wild-type cells, indicating that the UPR was activated in these two mutants (Fig. 2C).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   sec24-20 cells show temperature-sensitive growth and ER chaperone-related defects. A, 10-fold serial dilution (starting from A600 of 0.01) of wild-type and sec24-20 cells containing 2 µ-based plasmids, pSF1 (SFB2), pSF2 (SFB3), or control vector (pRS426), were spotted on SC, pH 4.0, plates and incubated at 23 °C for 3 days, or at 30 and 37 °C for 2 days. B, wild-type and sec24-20 cells were grown exponentially at 23 °C in SD followed by 3 h incubation at the indicated temperatures. Immunofluorescent microscopic analysis was performed with anti-Kar2p antibody. C, beta -galactosidase activities of wild-type, sec24-20, and sec18 (TKA33; anu4) cells containing a UPRE-CYC1 promoter-LacZ reporter plasmid (pCZY1). The growth conditions were as in B.

To further confirm secretory defects in sec24-20 cells, we first compared the general profiles of protein secreted in the media of sec24-20 cells with that of wild-type cells by a pulse-chase experiment. In contrast to wild-type cells, a temperature-sensitive secretion was observed in sec24-20 cells (Fig. 3A). In sec24-20 cells, some proteins appeared to be secreted in more reduced kinetics than other proteins at 30 °C (Fig. 3A, lane 6, arrows), whereas the overall secretion was almost blocked at 37 °C. We further investigated whether sec24-20 cells had ER-to-Golgi vesicle transport defects by a transport assay of CPY. CPY is detected in the ER as the p1 form (67 kDa), further modified to the p2 form (69 kDa) in the Golgi, and then processed proteolytically to the mature form (m; 61 kDa) in the vacuole (49). Unlike wild-type cells, sec24-20 cells exhibited a temperature-sensitive maturation of CPY to accumulate the p1 form even after the 60-min chase at 37 °C (Fig. 3B). Thus, sec24-20 cells are defective in ER-to-Golgi vesicle transport at the restrictive temperature causing the activation of the UPR.


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Protein transport defect in sec24-20 cells and its partial suppression by overexpression of SFB2. Wild-type and sec24-20 cells containing plasmids, pAN1 (SEC24; CEN), pSF1 (SFB2; 2µ), or control vector (pRS426), were incubated at the indicated temperature for 30 min, and subjected to the following assays. A, assay for general secretion competence. Cultures were pulse-labeled with [35S]Met + Cys for 10 min and chased for 45 min. Cells and media were separated by centrifugation, and proteins secreted into media were resolved by SDS-PAGE (8%). B, CPY transport assay. Cultures were pulse-labeled as in A, and chased for the indicated times. CPY was recovered by immunoprecipitation, and resolved by SDS-PAGE (8%). The positions of ER-modified (p1), Golgi-modified (p2), and mature (m) forms of CPY are indicated.

Suppression of sec24-20 Phenotypes by the Overexpression of a SEC24 Homologue, SFB2-- The Saccharomyces genome data base contains two genes related to SEC24, SFB2 (56% identity) and SFB3 (23% identity) (22). We therefore investigated whether the overexpression of either gene suppressed growth and/or vesicular transport defects of sec24-20 mutant. As shown in Fig. 2A, the overexpression of SFB2 suppressed the growth retardation of sec24-20 cells at 30 °C, but not the growth inhibition at 37 °C. On the contrary, the overexpression of SFB3 did not affect the growth of sec24-20 cells (Fig. 2A). In addition, at 30 °C but not at 37 °C, the overexpression of SFB2 also restored the secretion competence of sec24-20 cells to the same extent as that of sec24-20 cells complemented with a SEC24 plasmid (pAN1; URA3, CEN) (Fig. 3A). Consistent with this observation, the overexpression of SFB2 similarly improved the maturation rate of CPY in sec24-20 cells (Fig. 3B). These results indicated that both growth and ER-to-Golgi vesicle transport defects of sec24-20 cells were partially suppressed by the overexpression of SFB2.

Suppression of the Chromosomal Deletion of SEC24 by Overexpression of SFB2-- To investigate whether the overexpression of SFB2 suppresses the lethality derived from a sec24 null mutation, we constructed a yeast strain (YKH3) harboring a null allele at the SEC24 chromosomal locus that was rescued by the SEC24 plasmid (pAN1; URA3, CEN). The Delta sec24 strain was transformed with each of the following plasmids, SFB2 (pSF11; TRP1, 2 µ), SEC24 (pAN11; TRP1, CEN), or sec24-20 (pAN12; TRP1, CEN). The clones obtained by selection on SD (+5-fluoroorotic acid) plates, where only the Delta sec24 cells that lose the SEC24 plasmid (pAN1, URA3) can grow, were examined. Interestingly, the Delta sec24 cells containing a -based SFB2 plasmid (pSF11) grew well on the SD (+5-fluoroorotic acid) plates as well as those containing either SEC24 (pAN11) or sec24 (pAN12) plasmid (Fig. 4A), indicating that overexpression of SFB2 suppressed the lethality caused by the absence of SEC24. Furthermore, we examined the growth of the resultant Delta sec24 cells rescued by pAN11 (SEC24,CEN), designated as Delta sec24(SEC24,CEN) (YKH4) and those rescued by pSF11(SFB2,), designated as Delta sec24(SFB2,) (YKH6) under various culturing conditions. As shown in Fig. 4B, Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells grew on SC, pH 4.0, as well as on SD (pH 4.5, approximately) plates, but not on SC, pH 7.0, plate at any culturing temperature. They also exhibited a weak growth retardation at 23 and 37 °C on SC, pH 4.0, plate, that was strengthened by culturing on YPD (pH 6.2, approximately) plate (Fig. 4B). These results suggested that Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells had both pH- and temperature-dependent (low and high temperature-sensitive) growth phenotypes. In addition, determination of doubling time of the growth of Delta sec24 cells cultured in SC, pH 4.0, revealed that Delta sec24(SEC24,CEN) cells grew as fast as wild-type (TKO1) cells (3.4 h at 23 °C, and 2.1 h at 30 °C) and that Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells grew faster than sec24-20 cells containing the SFB2 plasmid (sec24-20(SFB2,) cells) at 30 °C but not at 23 °C (doubling time; 2.6 versus 3.2 h at 30 °C, 6.2 versus 4.6 h at 23 °C).


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   The lethality caused by chromosomal deletion of SEC24 is conditionally suppressed by overexpression of SFB2. A, each of the following plasmids, pSF11(SFB2,TRP1,), pAN11(SEC24,TRP1,CEN), pAN12(sec24-20,TRP1,CEN), and control vector (pRS424), was introduced into strain YKH3, a Delta sec24 mutant being rescued by pAN1(SEC24,URA3,CEN), and the resulting clones were replica-plated onto SD (± 5-fluoroorotic acid (FOA)) plates and incubated at 23 °C for 4 days. We designated Delta sec24 cells rescued by pAN11 and those rescued by pSF11, Delta sec24(SEC24,CEN) (YKH4) and Delta sec24(SFB2,) (YKH6), respectively. B, 10-fold serial dilutions (starting from A600 of 0.1) of Delta sec24(SEC24,CEN) and Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells were spotted on the indicated plates and incubated at 23 °C for 3 days, or at 30 and 37 °C for 2 days. pH of the YPD is 6.2, approximately.

Cargo-specific ER-to-Golgi Protein Transport Defects in Delta sec24(SFB2,2µ) Cells-- To analyze the protein transport of Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells, we first performed the assay for general secretion competence. As shown in Fig. 5A, the secretion profile of Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells was almost indistinguishable from that of Delta sec24(SEC24,CEN) cells, suggesting that the overexpression of SFB2 recovered almost all of the protein transport. However, at 23 and 37 °C, the protein band indicated by the arrowhead (Fig. 5A, lanes 2 and 6) was more apparent in Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells than Delta sec24(SEC24,CEN) cells. Subsequently, the ER to Golgi protein transport of Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells was examined by the CPY transport assay. The maturation of CPY was greatly retarded in Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells cultured at 23 °C (Fig. 5B), indicating that Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells were cold-sensitive for the ER-to-Golgi transport of CPY. We further analyzed the ER-to-Golgi protein transport of Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells by an invertase transport assay. Invertase is detected in the ER as several core-glycosylated forms (core; 79-83 kDa) that upon arrival to Golgi are further modified to generate heterogeneous hyperglycosylated mature forms (mature; 100-150 kDa), and then secreted into the periplasmic space (50-52). As shown in Fig. 5C, comparing to Delta sec24(SEC24,CEN) cells, core-glycosylated ER forms remained in Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells even after the 45-min chase at any culturing temperature, suggesting that Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells were originally defective in the efficient ER-to-Golgi transport of invertase. Moreover, no obvious mature form of invertase in the medium was observed in Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells, confirming that a hyperglycosylation of invertase was defective in these cells (data not shown). Such maturation defects of invertase have been observed in Delta EMP24 mutant cells (9). To clarify ER-to-Golgi protein transport defects as seen in the transport of invertase in Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells, we analyzed the transport of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored plasma membrane protein Gas1p. Gas1p is synthesized in the ER as a 105-kDa glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored precursor that carries N- and O-linked oligosaccharides, and upon arrival to the Golgi, outer chain glycosylation residues are added, generating the 125-kDa mature form (53, 54). As shown in Fig. 5D, compared to Delta sec24(SEC24,CEN) cells, maturation of Gas1p was greatly retarded in Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells at any culturing temperature, indicating that efficient ER-to-Golgi transport of Gas1p was impaired in Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells. Taken together, despite restoration of almost all protein transport, Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells still have some cargo-specific ER-to-Golgi protein transport defects. Since the UPR was activated in response to the accumulation of un- or mal-folded proteins in the lumen of the ER associated by the reduced ER-to-Golgi protein transport (Fig. 2C), beta -galactosidase activity of Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells harboring the reporter plasmid was determined to assess the UPR activation. beta -Galactosidase activity of Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells was approximately 2.5-fold higher than that of Delta sec24(SEC24,CEN) cells at both 23 and 30 °C, indicating that the UPR was activated in Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells (Fig. 5E).


View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Protein transport and UPR in Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells. Delta sec24(SEC24,CEN) and Delta sec24(SFB2,) (see the figure legend of Fig. 4A) cells were preincubated in SC, pH 4.0, at the indicated temperatures for 3 h, and subjected to the following assays. A, assay for general secretion competence. Cultures were pulse-labeled with [35S]Met + Cys for 10 min and chased for 45 min. Cells and media were separated by centrifugation, and proteins secreted into media were resolved by SDS-PAGE (8%). B, CPY transport assay. Cultures were pulse-labeled as in A, and chased for the indicated times. CPY was recovered by immunoprecipitation, and resolved by SDS-PAGE (8%). C, invertase transport assay. Cultures were shifted to SC, pH 4.0, containing 0.1% glucose to induce the expression of invertase, pulse-labeled with [35S]Met + Cys for 6 min, and chased for the indicated times. Invertase was recovered by immunoprecipitation, and resolved by SDS-PAGE (8%). The approximate positions of ER-modified (core), Golgi-modified mature (mature) forms of invertase are indicated. D, Gas1p transport assay. Cultures were pulse labeled as in A, and chased for the indicated times. Gas1p was recovered by immunoprecipitation, and resolved by SDS-PAGE (8%). The positions of ER-modified precursor (105 kDa) and mature (125 kDa) forms of Gas1p are indicated. E, beta -galactosidase activities of these cells containing a UPRE-CYC1 promoter-LacZ reporter plasmid (pUPR3) incubated in SC, pH 4.0, at the indicated temperatures for 3 h are presented.

Two-hybrid Interaction between SFB2 and SEC23-- Sec24p was first identified as a complex with Sec23p (55). Because of the similarity to Sec24p, Sfb2p is supposed to bind Sec23p and act as a component of COPII coat. To investigate whether Sfb2p interacts with Sec23p by the yeast two-hybrid assay, SEC23 and each of SFB2, SEC24, and sec24-20 were fused to the GAL4-DNA binding domain (pGBD-SEC23) and to the GAL4-activation domain (pGAD-SFB2, pGAD-SEC24, pGAD-sec24-20), respectively. Each pGAD-plasmid was co-transformed with pGBD-SEC23 into host strain PJ69-4A, and the resultant clones were replica-plated onto SD plate lacking histidine and adenine (Fig. 6) or subjected to beta -galactosidase assay (Table II). When the fusion proteins interact in host cells, reporter genes HIS3, ADE2, and LacZ are activated in GAL-promoter dependent manner, resulting in the disappearance of both histidine and adenine auxotrophies and in the elevated levels of beta -galactosidase. As shown in Fig. 6, cells coexpressing the SFB2- and SEC23-fusions grew on SD (-His, -Ade) as well as those coexpressing the SEC24- and SEC23-fusions or the sec24-20- and SEC23-fusions. Consistent with this observation, beta -galactosidase activity of these cells was considerably higher than that of others (Table II). These results suggested that Sfb2p and sec24-20 gene product could bind to Sec23p as well as Sec24p.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Two-hybrid interaction between SFB2 and SEC23. Either pGBD-SEC23 or control plasmid (pGBD-C1) was co-transformed with pGAD-SFB2, pGAD-SEC24, pGAD-sec24-20, or control plasmid (pGAD-C1), into host strain PJ69-4A. The resulting clones containing each plasmid combinations were replica-plated onto SD (-His, -Ade) and control SD (+His, +Ade) plate, and incubated at 30 °C for 4 days.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Two-hybrid interaction between SFB2 and SEC23
Cells were grown exponentially at 30 °C for 3 h in SC.

Effect of sfb2 Disruption on Growth or Protein Transport-- Another SEC24 homologue, SFB3, was identified as LST1 (lethal with sec-thirteen). LST1 disrupted cells (Delta lst1) were defective in export of plasma-membrane proton-ATPase (Pma1p) from the ER, and thereby their growth was sensitive to an acidic environment at high culturing temperature (24). We knocked out two SEC24 homologues, SFB2 and SFB3, to evaluate the growth of the resultant null mutants. Unlike Delta sfb3 (YKH2) cells, Delta sfb2 (YKH1) cells could grow as well as the wild-type cells at any culturing temperature or pH of media (Fig. 7A). When the general secretion competence of Delta sfb2 cells was examined, all of the secretion profiles at 37 °C (Fig. 7B, lanes 9-12) were dramatically different from those presented in Fig. 3A because of culturing cells in SC, pH 7.0, a neutral medium suitable for Delta sfb3 cells. The secretion profile of Delta sfb2 cells, however, was indistinguishable from that of wild-type or Delta sfb3 cells at any culturing temperature (Fig. 7B). This was consistent with the observation (23) that chromosomal deletion of SEC24 homologues did not affect the transport of either CPY or invertase. Finally, to obtain the information about the expression of SFB2, Northern blot analyses were carried out with total RNA isolated from wild-type cells. To examine the transcriptional level of SFB2 in comparison to that of SEC24, the RNA blots were hybridized with SFB2 and SEC24 probes of comparable specific activity and were exposed for the same period of time. As shown in Fig. 7C, the transcription level of SFB2 is much lower (approximately 1/8, at any culturing temperature) than that of SEC24, consistent with the fact that chromosomal deletion of SEC24 is lethal (note the expression level of SFB2 that compensates the chromosomal deletion of SEC24).


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Delta sfb2 phenotypes and SFB2 expression in wild-type cells. A, 10-fold serial dilutions (starting from A600 of 0.01) of wild-type, Delta sfb2(YKH1), and Delta sfb3(YKH2) cells were spotted on SC, pH 4.0 or 7.0, plates and incubated at 37 °C for 2 days, pH 4.0, or 3 days, pH 7.0. B, assay for general secretion competence. Wild-type, Delta sfb2, Delta sfb3, and sec24-20 cells were preincubated in SC, pH 7.0, at the indicated temperature for 30 min, pulse-labeled with [35S]Met + Cys for 10 min and chased for 45 min. Cells and media were separated by centrifugation, and proteins secreted into media were resolved by SDS-PAGE (8%). C, Northern analysis of SEC24 and SFB2. A membrane blotted with the two indicated sets of total RNA was devided in two, and hybridized to 32P-labeled probes specific for SEC24 and SFB2, respectively. Specific activity of each probe was quantified, and 1.0 × 106 cpm equivalents were used for hybridization. The lower panel shows the ethidium bromide staining of the gel. Control strains (Delta sec24(SFB2,) and Delta sfb2) were grown at 30 °C, and harvested for total RNA isolation.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this study, we describe some phenotypes of a temperature-sensitive mutant anu1-1, previously screened for abnormal nuclear morphology (25), and the partial suppression of anu1 phenotypes by overexpression of the SEC24 homologue, SFB2. At the restrictive temperature, anu1 cells exhibited the proliferated ER and the punctate distribution of Kar2p. Consistent with the fact that ANU1 is identical to SEC24 (25), anu1-1/sec24-20 cells exhibited the temperature-sensitive ER-to-Golgi vesicle transport. Both temperature-sensitive growth and transport were partially restored by overexpression of SFB2. Moreover, the overexpression of SFB2 suppressed the lethality derived from the chromosomal deletion of SEC24, depending on culturing conditions. The resultant Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells exhibited some cargo-specific ER to Golgi transport defects, while their secretion competence appeared to be recovered to the same extent as that of wild-type cells. A yeast two-hybrid assay revealed that like Sec24p, Sfb2p could bind Sec23p.

The abnormal nuclear morphology of sec24-20 cells (Fig. 1) has also been observed in various mutants defective in vesicular transport between the ER and the Golgi such as sec28/anu2, sec13/anu3, sec18/anu4, sar1, sec12, sec16, and uso1 (25, 56).2 Transport defects between the ER and the Golgi are considered to trigger a proliferation of ER, perturbing the nuclear structure because of the continuity of the nucleus with the ER (25). Consistent with the retardation of the ER to Golgi protein transport (Fig. 3), the BiP body-like distribution of Kar2p and the activation of the UPR were also observed in sec24-20 cells at 30 °C (Fig. 2, B and C). Since the UPR was also activated in sec18 cells (Fig. 2C), the activation of the UPR in sec24-20 cells is considered to represent the accumulation of proteins in the ER owing to the reduced ER-to-Golgi vesicle transport. On the other hand, the punctate distribution of Kar2p in sec24-20 cells is probably identical to the BiP body, the site where secretory proteins accumulate when ER to Golgi vesicle transport is blocked (43). It is thought that BiP may escort secretory proteins to keep them transport-competent until the transport between the ER and Golgi is resumed (43).

The precise role of Sec24p itself in vesicle formation and cargo selection yet remains unclear. The suppression of the Delta sec24 mutation by overexpression of SFB2 (Figs. 4 and 5) in addition to the two-hybrid interaction between Sfb2p with Sec23p (Fig. 6 and Table II), strongly suggest that Sfb2p can replace Sec24p in the COPII-coated vesicle formation and in the transport of most proteins. This is supported by the difference in the growth rate between Delta sec24(SFB2,) and sec24-20(SFB2,) cells. sec24-20(SFB2,) cells grew slower than Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells at 30 °C, but faster at 23 °C (see "Results"). Moreover, the overexpression of SFB2 could rescue the growth defect of Delta sec24 cells but not that of sec24-20 cells at 37 °C (Figs. 2A and 4B). Like Sec24p, Sfb2p and the sec24-20 gene product can bind Sec23p (Fig. 6 and Table II). Taken together, these results suggest that Sfb2p competes with the functionally impaired sec24-20 gene product for the binding to Sec23p in sec24-20(SFB2,) cells at high culturing temperature.

The secretion assay in Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells revealed that most of the protein transport appeared to be recovered to the same extent as that of Delta sec24(SEC24,CEN) cells (Fig. 5A). This implies that vesicle machinery proteins such as v-SNAREs, are packaged or at least included in the ER-derived vesicles of Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells. On the other hand, transport assays of several cargo proteins revealed that not all of the secretory proteins were efficiently exported from the ER in Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells (Fig. 5, B-D). In particular, Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells exhibited markedly slow transport kinetics of invertase and Gas1p at any culturing temperature (Fig. 5, C and D), suggesting that Sec24p, rather than Sfb2p, is indirectly responsible for concentrating them into ER-derived vesicles. It is known that the efficient ER to Golgi transport of invertase and Gas1p requires p24 proteins, the putative cargo receptor expected to serve as an adaptor linking the vesicle-forming machinery to soluble cargo recruitment (9, 10, 12-14). In the study using ER-derived microsomes and purified COPII components, Emp24p, a member of the p24 family, was found to associate with the Sar1p-Sec23p/Sec24p prebudding complex, suggesting that the prebudding complex is responsible for sorting Emp24p into COPII-coated vesicles (17). According to this observation, p24 proteins appear to interact efficiently with the Sar1p-Sec23p/Sec24p rather than the Sar1p-Sec23p/Sfb2p complex, emerging the difference between Delta sec24(SEC24,CEN) and Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells in the kinetics of invertase and Gas1p transport. Alternatively, a reduced packaging of machinery proteins required for the Golgi to ER retrograde vesicle transport (such as Golgi to ER v-SNAREs) into ER-derived vesicles of Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells may retard the retrieval of p24 proteins from the Golgi to the ER, resulting in the reduced kinetics of invertase and Gas1p transport. On the other hand, the cold-sensitive transport of CPY in Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells (Fig. 5B) suggests that COPII-like-coated vesicles including Sfb2p are cold-sensitive in the selection and/or the concentration of CPY. Since the UPR was activated in Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells at both 23 and 30 °C (Fig. 5E), some other cargo proteins such as invertase and Gas1p might be retained in the ER independently of culturing temperature. The conditional growth of Delta sec24(SFB2,) cells may be due to the temperature-dependent and/or -independent ER retention of proteins affecting the cell growth, such as those required for the growth under neutral conditions.

The fact that some cargo proteins (such as invertase and Gas1p) require Sec24p but not Sfb2p for their efficient export from the ER suggests that Sec24p itself is responsible for the cargo recognition. Another Sec24p homologue, Lst1p, is involved in the export of restricted cargo proteins (only Pma1p is known) from the ER (24). Based on Delta sfb2 phenotypes and the transcriptional level of SFB2 in wild-type cells (Fig. 7), Sfb2p may be involved in the efficient transport of specific cargo molecules like Lst1p rather than the efficient transport of many cargo proteins required for their growth like Sec24p. Hence, each of the SEC24 family of proteins may function as a component of COPII coats and serve its own cargo selectivity.

We could not find the unique role of Sfb2p in the cargo selection, but demonstrated that in the ER-to-Golgi vesicle transport Sfb2p could function as the component of COPII coats. The identification of Sfb2p (this study) and Lst1p (24) as the component of COPII coats suggests that the coats of ER-derived vesicles may be heterogeneous. We are interested in whether one ER-derived vesicle contains one member of the SEC24 family of proteins, or alternatively plural members of the family act together as the components of coats. If all members of the SEC24 family of proteins participate in the cargo selection event in concert with Sec23p, Sar1p, and others, the composition of the SEC24 family of proteins in the cell may affect that of cargo proteins transported by ER-derived vesicles. Further experiments are required to elucidate the roles of Sec24p and Sfb2p in cargo selection.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank members of the Kohno laboratory for valuable discussion; K. Mihara (Kyushu University) and H. Riezman (University of Basel) for antibodies; E. Craig (University of Wisconsin) for two-hybrid system; R. Ando and K. Maekawa for excellent technical assistance; and I. Farcasanu for critical reading of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grant-in-aid 11153216 for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan, a Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from The Japan Science Society, and by the Sapporo Bioscience Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Research and Education Center for Genetic Information, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara 630-0101, Japan. Tel.: 81-743-72-5640; Fax: 81-743-72-5649; E-mail: kkouno@bs.aist-nara.ac.jp.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 3, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000751200

2 A. Hirata, unpublished observations.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ER, endoplasmic reticulum; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CPY, carboxypeptidase Y; SNARE, soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein attachment protein receptor; v, vesicular; COPII, coat protein complex II; BiP, immunoglobulin heavy chain-binding protein; UPR, unfolded protein response; UPRE, unfolded protein response element; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Schekman, R., and Orci, L. (1996) Science 271, 1526-1533
2. Rothman, J. E., and Wieland, F. T. (1996) Science 272, 227-234
3. Kuehn, M. J., and Schekman, R. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 477-483
4. Barlowe, C. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1404, 67-76
5. Kaiser, C., and Ferro-Novick, S. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 477-482
6. Springer, S., Spang, A., and Schekman, R. (1999) Cell 97, 145-148
7. Rexach, M. F., Latterich, M., and Schekman, R. W. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 1133-1148
8. Bednarek, S. Y., Ravazzola, M., Hosobuchi, M., Amherdt, M., Perrelet, A., Schekman, R., and Orci, L. (1995) Cell 83, 1183-1196
9. Schimmoller, F., Singer-Kruger, B., Schroder, S., Kruger, U., Barlowe, C., and Riezman, H. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 1329-1339
10. Belden, W. J., and Barlowe, C. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 26939-26946
11. Powers, J., and Barlowe, C. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 1209-1222
12. Herrmann, J. M., Malkus, P., and Schekman, R. (1999) Trends Cell Biol. 9, 5-7
13. Elrod-Erickson, M. J., and Kaiser, C. A. (1996) Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 1043-1058
14. Marzioch, M., Henthorn, D. C., Herrmann, J. M., Wilson, R., Thomas, D. Y., Bergeron, J. J., Solari, R. C., and Rowley, A. (1999) Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 1923-1938
15. Matsuoka, K., Morimitsu, Y., Uchida, K., and Schekman, R. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 703-708
16. Springer, S., and Schekman, R. (1998) Science 281, 698-700
17. Kuehn, M. J., Herrmann, J. M., and Schekman, R. (1998) Nature 391, 187-190
18. Aridor, M., Weissman, J., Bannykh, S., Nuoffer, C., and Balch, W. E. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 141, 61-70
19. Gimeno, R. E., Espenshade, P., and Kaiser, C. A. (1996) Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 1815-1823
20. Shaywitz, D. A., Espenshade, P. J., Gimeno, R. E., and Kaiser, C. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25413-25416
21. Peng, R., Grabowski, R., De Antoni, A., and Gallwitz, D. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 3751-3756
22. Cherry, J. M., Ball, C., Weng, S., Juvik, G., Schmidt, R., Adler, C., Dunn, B., Dwight, S., Riles, L., Mortimer, R. K., and Botstein, D. (1997) Saccharomyces Genome Database, http://genome-www.stanford.edu/Saccharomyces/
23. Pagano, A., Letourneur, F., Garcia-Estefania, D., Carpentier, J. L., Orci, L., and Paccaud, J. P. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 7833-7840
24. Roberg, K. J., Crotwell, M., Espenshade, P., Gimeno, R., and Kaiser, C. A. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 145, 659-672
25. Kimata, Y., Lim, C. R., Kiriyama, T., Nara, A., Hirata, A., and Kohno, K. (1999) Cell Struct. Funct. 24, 197-208
26. Rose, M. D., Novick, P., Thomas, J. H., Botstein, D., and Fink, G. R. (1987) Gene (Amst.) 60, 237-243
27. Sikorski, R. S., and Hieter, P. (1989) Genetics 122, 19-27
28. Orr-Weaver, T. L., and Szostak, J. W. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 4417-4421
29. Christianson, T. W., Sikorski, R. S., Dante, M., Shero, J. H., and Hieter, P. (1992) Gene (Amst.) 110, 119-122
30. Mori, K., Sant, A., Kohno, K., Normington, K., Gething, M. J., and Sambrook, J. F. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 2583-2593
31. James, P., Halladay, J., and Craig, E. A. (1996) Genetics 144, 1425-1436
32. Kaiser, C., Michaelis, S., and Mitchell, A. (1994) Methods in Yeast Genetics , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
33. Woodcock, D. M., Crowther, P. J., Doherty, J., Jefferson, S., DeCruz, E., Noyer-Weidner, M., Smith, S. S., Michael, M. Z., and Graham, M. W. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 3469-3478
34. Baudin, A., Ozier-Kalogeropoulos, O., Denouel, A., Lacroute, F., and Cullin, C. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 3329-3330
35. Sun, G. H., Hirata, A., Ohya, Y., and Anraku, Y. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 119, 1625-1639
36. Kilmartin, J. V., and Adams, A. E. (1984) J. Cell Biol. 98, 922-933
37. Tokunaga, M., Kawamura, A., and Kohno, K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 17553-17559
38. Kohno, K., Normington, K., Sambrook, J., Gething, M. J., and Mori, K. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 877-890
39. Nakamura, N., Yamazaki, S., Sato, K., Nakano, A., Sakaguchi, M., and Mihara, K. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3493-3503
40. Gaynor, E. C., and Emr, S. D. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 136, 789-802
41. Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (eds) (1995) Current Protocol in Molecular Biology , John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York
42. Apone, L. M., Virbasius, C. M., Reese, J. C., and Green, M. R. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 2368-2380
43. Nishikawa, S., Hirata, A., and Nakano, A. (1994) Mol. Biol. Cell 5, 1129-1143
44. Kaufman, R. J. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 1211-1233
45. Chapman, R., Sidrauski, C., and Walter, P. (1998) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 14, 459-485
46. Normington, K., Kohno, K., Kozutsumi, Y., Gething, M. J., and Sambrook, J. (1989) Cell 57, 1223-1236
47. Rose, M. D., Misra, L. M., and Vogel, J. P. (1989) Cell 57, 1211-1221
48. Liu, E. S., Ou, J. H., and Lee, A. S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 7128-7133
49. Stevens, T., Esmon, B., and Schekman, R. (1982) Cell 30, 439-448
50. Esmon, B., Novick, P., and Schekman, R. (1981) Cell 25, 451-460
51. Esmon, B., Esmon, P. C., and Schekman, R. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 10322-10327
52. Esmon, P. C., Esmon, B. E., Schauer, I. E., Taylor, A., and Schekman, R. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 4387-4394
53. Conzelmann, A., Riezman, H., Desponds, C., and Bron, C. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 2233-2240
54. Nuoffer, C., Jeno, P., Conzelmann, A., and Riezman, H. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 27-37
55. Hicke, L., Yoshihisa, T., and Schekman, R. (1992) Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 667-676
56. Nakajima, H., Hirata, A., Ogawa, Y., Yonehara, T., Yoda, K., and Yamasaki, M. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 113, 245-260


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?