Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M000751200 on April 3, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 23, 17900-17908, June 9, 2000
Sfb2p, a Yeast Protein Related to Sec24p, Can Function as a
Constituent of COPII Coats Required for Vesicle Budding from the
Endoplasmic Reticulum*
Hironori
Higashio
,
Yukio
Kimata
§,
Toshio
Kiriyama
,
Aiko
Hirata¶, and
Kenji
Kohno
§
From the
Research and Education Center for Genetic
Information, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama,
Ikoma, Nara 630-0101, Japan, the ¶ Institute of Molecular and
Cellular Biosciences, the University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku,
Tokyo 113-0032, Japan, and § CREST, Japan Science and
Technology Corporation, Tokyo 101-0062, Japan
Received for publication, January 27, 2000, and in revised form, March 24, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The COPII coat is required for vesicle budding
from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and consists of two heterodimeric
subcomplexes, Sec23p/Sec24p, Sec13p/Sec31p, and a small GTPase, Sar1p.
We characterized a yeast mutant, anu1 (abnormal
nuclear morphology) exhibiting proliferated ER as well as
abnormal nuclear morphology at the restrictive temperature. Based on
the finding that ANU1 is identical to SEC24, we
confirmed a temperature-sensitive protein transport from the ER to the
Golgi in anu1-1/sec24-20 cells. Overexpression of
SFB2, a SEC24 homologue with 56% identity,
partially suppressed not only the mutant phenotype of
sec24-20 cells but also rescued the
SEC24-disrupted cells. Moreover, the yeast two-hybrid assay revealed that Sfb2p, similarly to Sec24p, interacted with Sec23p. In
SEC24-disrupted cells rescued by overexpression of
SFB2, some cargo proteins were still retained in the ER,
while most of the protein transport was restored. Together, these
findings strongly suggest that Sfb2p functions as the component of
COPII coats in place of Sec24p, and raise the possibility that each
member of the SEC24 family of proteins participates
directly and/or indirectly in cargo-recognition events with its own
cargo specificity at forming ER-derived vesicles.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In eukaryotic cells, protein transport along the secretory pathway
is mediated by vesicle budding from a donor membrane and by
specifically fusing the formed vesicle to an acceptor organelle. Vesicle budding is driven by the recruitment of specific coat proteins
to a donor membrane (1, 2). The COPII coat, that is required for the
vesicle budding from endoplasmic reticulum (ER),1 consists
of heterodimeric protein complexes,
Sec23p/Sec24p, Sec13p/Sec31p, and a small
GTPase Sar1p. COPII-coated vesicle formation begins with recruitment of
Sar1p to the ER membrane where Sar1p-GDP is converted to Sar1p-GTP by a
specific guanine nucleotide exchanging factor, Sec12p. Subsequently,
Sec23p/Sec24p binds a membrane-bound Sar1p-GTP to form
Sar1p-Sec23p/Sec24p prebudding complex. Finally, Sec13p/Sec31p binds
the prebudding complexes to cross-link them, resulting in vesicle
budding (3-6). An additional protein, Sec16p, is also required for
COPII-coated vesicle budding. Sec16p is a peripheral membrane protein
tightly associated with the ER, and can bind COPII coat components,
Sec23p, Sec24p, and Sec31p via its distinct domains. Thus Sec16p is
considered to serve as a scaffold to recruit and/or assemble COPII coat
components (5).
In addition to secretory and membrane proteins (cargo proteins),
vesicle machinery proteins, such as v-SNAREs (vesicle targeting proteins) and cargo receptors are also specifically concentrated into
COPII-coated vesicles (7-11). Cargo receptors are membrane proteins
cycling between the ER and Golgi that interact with specific cargo
molecules and facilitate their uptake into transport vesicles (12). For
instance, several yeast proteins belonging to the p24 family are known
to be involved in the transport of a subset of cargo proteins (9, 10,
13, 14). At least eight members of the yeast p24 family have been
identified as putative cargo receptors, i.e.
EMP24, ERV25, and
ERP1-ERP6, all encoding type I integral membrane
proteins (9, 10, 14). Genetic and biochemical studies revealed that
Emp24p, Erv25p, Erp1p, and Erp2p function in a heteromeric complex (10,
14), and are responsible for the efficient and selective export of
invertase and/or Gas1p out of the ER (9, 10, 13, 14). However, clear
cut evidence for a direct interaction between these cargo proteins and
p24 heteromeric complexes has not been observed yet.
Several lines of evidence strongly suggest that selective export from
the ER and COPII-coated vesicle formation should be coupled. Matsuoka
et al. (15) demonstrated that v-SNAREs but not ER resident
proteins are concentrated in synthetic COPII-coated vesicles in a
reconstituted liposome budding assay. It was also demonstrated in both
yeast and mammals that some membrane cargo and vesicle machinery
proteins, such as v-SNAREs, Emp24p, and vesicular stomatitis virus
glycoprotein (VSV-G), specifically interact with Sar1p-Sec23p/Sec24p
prebudding complex (16-18).
Although Sec24p has binding domains for Sec23p, Sec31p, and Sec16p
(19-21) and a zinc finger-like domain essential for its function (21),
the precise role of Sec24p itself in vesicle formation and cargo
selection remains to be elucidated. The Saccharomyces genome data base (22) shows that there are two additional genes related to SEC24, designated SFB2 (YNL049c; 56%
identity) and SFB3 (YHR098c; 23% identity). While neither
SFB2 nor SFB3 is essential for growth (23), the
zinc finger-like domain is conserved among the SEC24 family
of proteins. Recently, SFB3 was identified as LST1, the gene exhibiting synthetic lethal interactions with
SEC13 and all of other COPII genes. Lst1p has an ability to
bind Sec23p, and chromosomal deletion of LST1 specifically
inhibits export of the plasma membrane proton-ATPase (Pma1p) from the
ER. Thus Lst1p is considered to be a specialized form of the COPII
subunit required for efficient packaging of Pma1p into COPII-coated
vesicles (24). On the other hand, very little is known about the role of SFB2. Analysis of SFB2 function may provide us
with further information about the roles of the SEC24 family
of proteins in vesicle formation and/or cargo selection.
We have obtained four temperature-sensitive mutants, designated
anu (abnormal nuclear morphology),
that exhibited abnormal nuclear morphology at the restrictive
temperature. All four genes designated ANU1-ANU4 were
identical to SEC24, SEC28, SEC13, and SEC18, respectively, genes involved in vesicle transport
between the ER and Golgi (25). anu1-1/sec24-20 mutant cells
are severely defective in vesicle transport from the ER to the Golgi at
the restrictive temperature, resulting in accumulation of both nascent proteins and membranes in the ER. We examined whether the
overexpression of SEC24 homologues suppresses
sec24-20 phenotypes. Here we report that only the
overexpression of SFB2 suppresses defective phenotypes of
both sec24-20 and
sec24 mutants. Moreover,
Sfb2p has an ability to bind Sec23p, suggesting that Sfb2p may
participate in both COPII-coated vesicle formation and cargo selection
events in concert with other constituents of COPII-coated vesicles. We
also report the difference between Sec24p and Sfb2p in their cargo
specificity. Studies on Sfb2p (this study) and Lst1p (24) suggest that
the ER-to-Golgi protein transport is mediated by vesicles with
heterogeneous COPII coats.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmid Construction--
pAN1 is a YCp50-based plasmid
harboring a 8.0-kilobase pair Sau3AI yeast genomic DNA
fragment containing SEC24 (ANU1), which was
screened from a YCp50-based (CEN vector; URA3)
yeast genomic library (26). A 2.9-kilobase pair SnaBI
genomic fragment containing SEC24 was subcloned into the
SmaI site of pRS314 (27) to produce pAN11. pAN12 was
generated as follows: sec24-20 (anu1-1) gene was
cloned from TKC3 strain by plasmid gap repair method (28) using pAN1.
The resultant sec24 plasmid was digested with
SnaBI, and a 2.9-kilobase pair genomic fragment containing
sec24-20 was subcloned into the SmaI site of
pRS314 to produce pAN12. Plasmids pSF1, pSF2, and pSF11 were generated
as follows: the SFB2 gene was obtained by polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) amplification of chromosomal DNA isolated from
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain FY23 (generous gifts from
Dr. F. Winston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) using
oligonucleotides, SFB2-5 (5'-
AGAGAGAGGATCCGTAGTTTGTCCAAGCACTGCCCAT-3') and SFB2-3
(5'-AGAGAGAGAAGCTTTTAGAGGCAAACTTGTATCTTATGTCAAAGC-3'), which correspond
to nucleotides,
285 to
262, and nucleotides 2980 to 2950, respectively. SFB2-5 and SFB2-3 contain a BamHI and a
HindIII site, respectively, allowing for insertion
into BamHI and HindIII endonuclease sites of
pRS426 and pRS424 (29) to produce pSF1 and pSF11, respectively. The
SFB3 gene was also obtained by PCR using SFB3-5
(5'-AGAGAGAGGATCCCTGCTCAGTGAGTGACATCGGCAA-3') and SFB3-3
(5'-AGAGAGAGCTCGAGCTCTGCCTGCGTTTCACATACTGC-3'), which correspond to nucleotides
844 to
821, and 3144 to 3121, respectively.
SFB3-5 and SFB3-3 contain a BamHI and a XhoI
site, respectively, allowing for insertion into
BamHI/XhoI sites of pRS426 to produce pSF2. pCZY1
is a 2-µm based plasmid containing KAR2UPRE (unfolded
protein response element of KAR2)-CYC1
promoter-LacZ fusion gene and URA3 selectable marker,
kindly provided by K. Mori (30). pUPR3 was generated as follows: a
XhoI-EcoRI fragment of pCZY1 containing
UPRE-CYC1-LacZ was inserted into
XhoI/EcoRI sites of pRS316 (27), and a synthetic
52-base pair oligonucleotide encoding 2×UPRE was inserted into its
XhoI site of the resultant plasmid to obtain pUPR3
containing 3UPRE-CYC1-LacZ.
The plasmids for yeast two-hybrid assay, pGAD-SEC24, pGAD-sec24-20,
pGAD-SFB2, and pGBD-SEC23 were generated as follows: open reading
frames of SEC24, sec24-20, SFB2, and
SEC23 were obtained by PCR amplification of chromosomal DNA
using following primer sets: TH24-5 corresponding to nucleotides 0 to
21 of SEC24, and TH24-3
(5'-AGAGAGAGCTCGAGAGCCTTATTTGCTAATTCTGGCTTTCATG-3')
corresponding to nucleotides 2784 to 2756, TH2-5 corresponding to
nucleotides 0 to 30 of SFB2, and TH2-3
(5'-AGAGAGAGCTCGAGTTATCTGTTGATACTAGTCTTCATACTCTGT-3') corresponding to
nucleotides 2631 to 2600, and TH23-5 corresponding to nucleotides 0 to
26 of SEC23, and TH23-3 (5'-
AGAGAGAGCTCGAGCTCCTATGCCTGACCAGAGACGGCTA-3') corresponding to
nucleotides 2310 to 2284, respectively. PCR fragments containing
SEC24, sec24-20, and SFB2 were
digested by XhoI and then cloned into
SmaI/SalI sites of pGAD-C1 to produce pGAD-SEC24, pGAD-sec24-20, and pGAD-SFB2, respectively. Similarly, the PCR fragment
containing SEC23 was digested and cloned into pGBD-C1 to
produce pGBD-SEC23.
Strains, Media, and Growth Conditions--
Yeast strains were
grown in rich (YPD) or synthetic dextrose (SD) media, and standard
genetic manipulations were performed as described previously (32). For
some experiments, cells were grown in synthetic complete (SC) media
(32) buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.1 M potassium phosphate
buffer or adjusted to pH 4.0 with HCl. The Escherichia coli
strain DH5
(33) was used for manipulation of recombinant DNA and was
grown in LB media (1% NaCl, 1% peptone, and 0.5% yeast extract)
containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin. All yeast strains used in this study
were listed in Table I, and yeast strains
except for PJ69-4A were derived from FY strains (generous gifts from
Dr. F. Winston). Diploid strain DFY24 was sporulated to obtain a KFY1
strain. To obtain YKH1 (
sfb2) and YKH2
(
sfb3) strains from TKO1, gene deletions were performed
by PCR amplification of the URA3 gene with oligonucleotides
that encoded 45 base pairs of the gene-specific sequences near each end
of the open reading frames according to the method of Baudin et
al. (34). The diploid strain DFY24 replaced one of its
SEC24 genes with the LEU2 gene, as described
above, was transformed with pAN1 (SEC24, URA3,
CEN), and then sporulated to obtain a YKH3
(
sec24) strain. Strains YKH4 and YKH6 were obtained from
the experiment represented in Fig. 4 (see figure legend of Fig. 4).
Electron and Immunofluorescence Microscopy--
Electron
microscopic analysis was performed as follows: preparation of a thin
section of yeast cells was carried out by the freeze-substituted
fixation method as described previously (35), except that Reichart KF80
was used to freeze the cells. Thin sections were viewed on a JEOL100CX
electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at 80 kV. For Kar2p staining,
cells were fixed by direct addition of formaldehyde to the culture to a
final concentration of 3.7% and incubated at room temperature for
2 h. Fixed cells were washed with potassium phosphate buffer (0.1 M potassium phosphate, pH 6.5) and converted into
spheroplasts by incubation with 50 µg/ml zymolyase-100T (Seikagaku
Corp., Tokyo, Japan) in 1.2 M sorbitol, 0.1 M
potassium phosphate, pH 6.5, and 0.2%
-mercaptoethanol at 30 °C
for 1-2 h. Immunofluorescence was performed essentially as described
previously (36). The rabbit anti-yeast Kar2p antiserum prepared as
described previously (37) was used as the primary antibody and
rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Cappel Research
Products, ICN, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was used as the secondary antibody.
DNA was stained with 1 µg/ml 4,6-diamino-2-phenylindole for 3 min at
room temperature before mounting. Preparations were viewed on a
Axiophot fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
-Galactosidase Assay--
Assays of
-galactosidase
activity in yeast extracts were carried out as described previously
(38).
-Galactosidase activity was expressed as units defined as
(A420 × 1000)/(A600 × t × v), where A420
is the absorbance at 420 nm of the reaction mixture, after t
minutes, A600 the turbidity of the culture at
the time of harvest, t the number of minutes for which the
reaction mixture was incubated, and v the volume of the
sample in milliliters. The values are averages of four independent
yeast transformants, and error bars are presented (Figs.
2C and 5E).
Pulse-Chase Experiments--
Pulse-chase experiments were
performed as described previously (39) with the following
modifications. Cells were grown exponentially in SC, pH 4.0, lacking
methionine and cysteine. For invertase transport assay, cells were
transferred to SC, pH 4.0, media containing 0.1% glucose and incubated
for 30 min to induce the expression of invertase before pulse labeling.
Immunoprecipitations were performed using anti-carboxypeptidase Y (CPY)
antibody (Rockland Immunochemicals, Inc., Gilbertsville, PA),
anti-invertase antibody (kindly provided by Dr. K. Mihara, Kyushu
University, Japan), and anti-Gas1p antibody (kindly provided by
Dr. H. Riezman, University of Basel, Switzerland) at 1:500 dilution.
Proteins were dissolved in Laemmli sample buffer containing 0.1 M dithiothreitol, incubated at 95 °C for 3 min, and then
subjected to SDS-PAGE (8%). Assays for general secretion competence
were performed as described (40) with the following modifications.
Before labeling, cells were grown exponentially in SC, pH 4.0 or 7.0, lacking methionine and cysteine. Cells were pulse-labeled with 4 MBq/ml
[35S]methionine + cysteine, at 5 A600/ml in SC, pH 4.0 or 7.0, media containing
100 µg/ml
2-macroglobulin and 250 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, and then chased for 45 min by adding excess amounts of unlabeled methionine and cysteine (final concentrations of 1 and 0.8 mM, respectively). Proteins equivalent to 0.25 A600 were loaded on SDS-PAGE (8%), and
autoradiographed with a BioImage BAS2000 analyzer (Fuji Photo Film,
Tokyo, Japan).
Yeast Two-hybrid System--
The interaction between Sec23p and
Sfb2p, Sec24p, or sec24-20 gene product was tested by
the yeast two-hybrid method as described (31). Open reading frames of
SFB2, SEC24, anu1, and
SEC23 were cloned into vectors pGAD-C1 and pGBD-C1 in-frame
with the GAL4 activation or binding domain as described
under "Plasmid Construction."
RNA Preparation and Northern Analysis--
Cells were grown
exponentially in SC, pH 4.0, medium and then harvested by
centrifugation, washed, frozen by liquid nitrogen and stored at
80 °C. Total RNA of cells was isolated by hot phenol extraction
(41). RNA was quantified by absorbance at 260 nm and the integrity of
the RNA was confirmed by ethidium bromide staining of RNA in agarose
gels. For Northern blotting, 5 or 10 µg of each RNA sample was
subjected to electrophoresis in 1.0% formaldehyde/agarose gel,
followed by transferring onto a nylon membrane (Hybond N+,
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and hybridization analysis as described (42). Probes used for hybridization were the open reading frames of
SEC24 and SFB2, obtained by PCR amplification of
chromosomal DNA using the primer sets TH24-5 and TH24-3 and TH2-5 and
TH2-3, respectively. Probes were labeled by Random primer labeling kit (TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan). The probed membranes were autoradiographed and
analyzed with a BioImage BAS2000 analyzer.
 |
RESULTS |
Accumulation and Severe Extention of the ER in anu1-1/sec24-20
Mutants--
In our previous study on nuclear morphology, we obtained
four mutants, anu1-anu4, exhibiting abnormal nuclear
morphology at the restrictive temperature (25). Unexpectedly,
ANU1 was identical to SEC24, which is known to be
involved in the early secretory pathway rather than the construction of
nuclei (25). Electron microscopic analysis revealed that
anu1-1/sec24-20 cells cultured at the restrictive
temperature of 37 °C for 2 h contained morphologically aberrant
and apparently fragmented nuclei (Fig.
1B, D, and
E). Accumulated membranes having appearances like an
extension of the ER because of their continuity with the outer nuclear
membrane were also observed in sec24-20 cells (Fig. 1,
B and D). In addition, irregular invagination of
the ER was often observed in sec24-20 cells cultured at the
restrictive temperature (Fig. 1C). These results suggested
that some abnormalities of the ER led to the aberrant nuclear
morphology in sec24-20 cells.

View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Electron micrographs of wild-type and
anu1-1/sec24-20 cells. Wild-type (TKO1;
A) and anu1-1/sec24-20 (TKC3; B-E)
cells were grown at 23 °C to early logarithmic phase in YPD followed
by 2 h incubation at 37 °C, and subjected to ultrathin
sectioning and subsequent electron microscopic analysis. The
large arrow in C indicates irregular invagination
of ER. The arrowhead in A indicates a spindle
pole body. The boxed region of the cell in D is
enlarged in E. er (with small arrows),
ER; N, nucleus; Nu, nucleoli; V,
vacuole; mt (with small arrows), nuclear
microtubules.
|
|
Abnormal Phenotype in the ER at the Restrictive
Temperature--
sec24-20 cells barely grew at 30 °C,
and died at 37 °C (Fig.
2A). To identify some other
abnormalities related to the ER in sec24-20 cells, we
investigated the distribution of Kar2p/BiP, a well characterized ER
resident chaperone, by indirect immunofluorescence microscopic
analysis. Contrary to wild-type cells, punctate staining of Kar2p was
observed in 90-95, 60-70, and <5% of sec24-20 cells incubated at 37, 30, and 23 °C, respectively (Fig. 2B).
The Kar2p distributions in sec24-20 cells resembled those
termed BiP bodies (43) observed in various mutants defective in the
transport between ER and Golgi. Since the unfolded protein response
(UPR) activates transcription of ER resident chaperones in response to
the accumulation of un- or mal-folded proteins in the lumen of the ER
accompanied by the blockade of ER-to-Golgi vesicle transport (44-48),
we next investigated whether the UPR was activated in sec24-20 cells. To assess the activation of the UPR,
-galactosidase activity was determined in wild-type,
sec24-20, and sec18 (anu4) cells
containing a UPRE (UPR element of KAR2)-CYC1
promoter-LacZ reporter plasmid (pCZY1). LacZ expression
from pCZY1 was under the control of UPRE, the 22-base pair cis-acting
element necessary and sufficient for transcriptional induction of Kar2p
by the UPR (30, 38). At the semipermissive temperature of 30 °C, but not at 23 °C,
-galactosidase activity of sec24-20 and
sec18 cells was 3-4-fold higher than that of wild-type
cells, indicating that the UPR was activated in these two mutants (Fig.
2C).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
sec24-20 cells show
temperature-sensitive growth and ER chaperone-related defects.
A, 10-fold serial dilution (starting from
A600 of 0.01) of wild-type and
sec24-20 cells containing 2 µ-based plasmids,
pSF1 (SFB2), pSF2 (SFB3), or control vector
(pRS426), were spotted on SC, pH 4.0, plates and incubated at 23 °C
for 3 days, or at 30 and 37 °C for 2 days. B, wild-type
and sec24-20 cells were grown exponentially at 23 °C in
SD followed by 3 h incubation at the indicated temperatures.
Immunofluorescent microscopic analysis was performed with anti-Kar2p
antibody. C, -galactosidase activities of wild-type,
sec24-20, and sec18 (TKA33; anu4)
cells containing a UPRE-CYC1 promoter-LacZ
reporter plasmid (pCZY1). The growth conditions were as in
B.
|
|
To further confirm secretory defects in sec24-20 cells, we
first compared the general profiles of protein secreted in the media of
sec24-20 cells with that of wild-type cells by a pulse-chase experiment. In contrast to wild-type cells, a temperature-sensitive secretion was observed in sec24-20 cells (Fig.
3A). In sec24-20 cells, some proteins appeared to be secreted in more reduced kinetics than other proteins at 30 °C (Fig. 3A, lane 6,
arrows), whereas the overall secretion was almost blocked at
37 °C. We further investigated whether sec24-20 cells had
ER-to-Golgi vesicle transport defects by a transport assay of CPY. CPY
is detected in the ER as the p1 form (67 kDa), further modified to the
p2 form (69 kDa) in the Golgi, and then processed proteolytically
to the mature form (m; 61 kDa) in the vacuole (49). Unlike wild-type
cells, sec24-20 cells exhibited a temperature-sensitive
maturation of CPY to accumulate the p1 form even after the 60-min chase
at 37 °C (Fig. 3B). Thus, sec24-20 cells are
defective in ER-to-Golgi vesicle transport at the restrictive
temperature causing the activation of the UPR.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Protein transport defect in
sec24-20 cells and its partial suppression by
overexpression of SFB2. Wild-type and
sec24-20 cells containing plasmids, pAN1 (SEC24;
CEN), pSF1 (SFB2; 2µ), or control vector
(pRS426), were incubated at the indicated temperature for 30 min, and
subjected to the following assays. A, assay for general
secretion competence. Cultures were pulse-labeled with
[35S]Met + Cys for 10 min and chased for 45 min. Cells
and media were separated by centrifugation, and proteins secreted into
media were resolved by SDS-PAGE (8%). B, CPY transport
assay. Cultures were pulse-labeled as in A, and chased for
the indicated times. CPY was recovered by immunoprecipitation, and
resolved by SDS-PAGE (8%). The positions of ER-modified (p1),
Golgi-modified (p2), and mature (m) forms of CPY are indicated.
|
|
Suppression of sec24-20 Phenotypes by the Overexpression of a SEC24
Homologue, SFB2--
The Saccharomyces genome data base
contains two genes related to SEC24, SFB2 (56%
identity) and SFB3 (23% identity) (22). We therefore
investigated whether the overexpression of either gene suppressed
growth and/or vesicular transport defects of sec24-20 mutant. As shown in Fig. 2A, the overexpression of
SFB2 suppressed the growth retardation of
sec24-20 cells at 30 °C, but not the growth inhibition at
37 °C. On the contrary, the overexpression of SFB3 did
not affect the growth of sec24-20 cells (Fig.
2A). In addition, at 30 °C but not at 37 °C, the
overexpression of SFB2 also restored the secretion
competence of sec24-20 cells to the same extent as that of
sec24-20 cells complemented with a SEC24 plasmid
(pAN1; URA3, CEN) (Fig. 3A).
Consistent with this observation, the overexpression of SFB2
similarly improved the maturation rate of CPY in sec24-20
cells (Fig. 3B). These results indicated that both growth
and ER-to-Golgi vesicle transport defects of sec24-20 cells
were partially suppressed by the overexpression of SFB2.
Suppression of the Chromosomal Deletion of SEC24 by Overexpression
of SFB2--
To investigate whether the overexpression of
SFB2 suppresses the lethality derived from a
sec24 null mutation, we constructed a yeast strain (YKH3)
harboring a null allele at the SEC24 chromosomal locus that
was rescued by the SEC24 plasmid (pAN1; URA3,
CEN). The
sec24 strain was transformed with
each of the following plasmids, SFB2 (pSF11;
TRP1, 2 µ), SEC24 (pAN11;
TRP1, CEN), or sec24-20 (pAN12;
TRP1, CEN). The clones obtained by selection on SD
(+5-fluoroorotic acid) plates, where only the
sec24 cells
that lose the SEC24 plasmid (pAN1, URA3) can
grow, were examined. Interestingly, the
sec24 cells
containing a 2µ-based SFB2 plasmid (pSF11) grew
well on the SD (+5-fluoroorotic acid) plates as well as those
containing either SEC24 (pAN11) or sec24 (pAN12)
plasmid (Fig. 4A), indicating that overexpression of SFB2 suppressed the lethality caused
by the absence of SEC24. Furthermore, we examined the growth
of the resultant
sec24 cells rescued by pAN11
(SEC24,CEN), designated as
sec24(SEC24,CEN) (YKH4) and those
rescued by pSF11(SFB2,2µ), designated as
sec24(SFB2,2µ) (YKH6) under
various culturing conditions. As shown in Fig. 4B,
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells grew on SC,
pH 4.0, as well as on SD (pH 4.5, approximately) plates, but not on SC, pH 7.0, plate at any culturing temperature. They also exhibited a weak
growth retardation at 23 and 37 °C on SC, pH 4.0, plate, that was
strengthened by culturing on YPD (pH 6.2, approximately) plate (Fig.
4B). These results suggested that
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells had both pH-
and temperature-dependent (low and high
temperature-sensitive) growth phenotypes. In addition, determination of
doubling time of the growth of
sec24 cells cultured in
SC, pH 4.0, revealed that
sec24(SEC24,CEN) cells grew as fast
as wild-type (TKO1) cells (3.4 h at 23 °C, and 2.1 h at
30 °C) and that
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells grew faster than sec24-20 cells containing the
SFB2 plasmid (sec24-20(SFB2,2µ) cells) at
30 °C but not at 23 °C (doubling time; 2.6 versus
3.2 h at 30 °C, 6.2 versus 4.6 h at
23 °C).

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The lethality caused by chromosomal deletion
of SEC24 is conditionally suppressed by overexpression
of SFB2. A, each of the following plasmids,
pSF11(SFB2,TRP1,2µ),
pAN11(SEC24,TRP1,CEN),
pAN12(sec24-20,TRP1,CEN), and control
vector (pRS424), was introduced into strain YKH3, a sec24
mutant being rescued by
pAN1(SEC24,URA3,CEN), and the
resulting clones were replica-plated onto SD (± 5-fluoroorotic acid
(FOA)) plates and incubated at 23 °C for 4 days. We
designated sec24 cells rescued by pAN11 and those rescued
by pSF11, sec24(SEC24,CEN) (YKH4)
and sec24(SFB2,2µ) (YKH6),
respectively. B, 10-fold serial dilutions (starting
from A600 of 0.1) of
sec24(SEC24,CEN) and
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells were spotted
on the indicated plates and incubated at 23 °C for 3 days, or at 30 and 37 °C for 2 days. pH of the YPD is 6.2, approximately.
|
|
Cargo-specific ER-to-Golgi Protein Transport Defects in
sec24(SFB2,2µ) Cells--
To analyze the protein transport of
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells, we first
performed the assay for general secretion competence. As shown in Fig.
5A, the secretion profile of
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells was almost
indistinguishable from that of
sec24(SEC24,CEN) cells, suggesting
that the overexpression of SFB2 recovered almost all of the
protein transport. However, at 23 and 37 °C, the protein band
indicated by the arrowhead (Fig. 5A, lanes 2 and
6) was more apparent in
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells than
sec24(SEC24,CEN) cells. Subsequently, the ER to Golgi protein transport of
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells was examined
by the CPY transport assay. The maturation of CPY was greatly retarded
in
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells cultured at 23 °C (Fig. 5B), indicating that
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells were cold-sensitive for the ER-to-Golgi transport of CPY. We further analyzed the ER-to-Golgi protein transport of
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells by an
invertase transport assay. Invertase is detected in the ER as several
core-glycosylated forms (core; 79-83 kDa) that upon arrival to Golgi
are further modified to generate heterogeneous hyperglycosylated mature
forms (mature; 100-150 kDa), and then secreted into the periplasmic
space (50-52). As shown in Fig. 5C, comparing to
sec24(SEC24,CEN) cells,
core-glycosylated ER forms remained in
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells even after
the 45-min chase at any culturing temperature, suggesting that
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells were
originally defective in the efficient ER-to-Golgi transport of
invertase. Moreover, no obvious mature form of invertase in the medium
was observed in
sec24(SFB2,2µ)
cells, confirming that a hyperglycosylation of invertase was defective
in these cells (data not shown). Such maturation defects of invertase
have been observed in
EMP24 mutant cells (9). To clarify
ER-to-Golgi protein transport defects as seen in the transport of
invertase in
sec24(SFB2,2µ)
cells, we analyzed the transport of the
glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored plasma membrane protein Gas1p.
Gas1p is synthesized in the ER as a 105-kDa
glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored precursor that carries
N- and O-linked oligosaccharides, and upon
arrival to the Golgi, outer chain glycosylation residues are added,
generating the 125-kDa mature form (53, 54). As shown in Fig.
5D, compared to
sec24(SEC24,CEN) cells, maturation
of Gas1p was greatly retarded in
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells at any
culturing temperature, indicating that efficient ER-to-Golgi transport
of Gas1p was impaired in
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells. Taken
together, despite restoration of almost all protein transport,
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells still have some cargo-specific ER-to-Golgi protein transport defects. Since the
UPR was activated in response to the accumulation of un- or mal-folded
proteins in the lumen of the ER associated by the reduced ER-to-Golgi
protein transport (Fig. 2C),
-galactosidase activity of
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells harboring
the reporter plasmid was determined to assess the UPR activation.
-Galactosidase activity of
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells was
approximately 2.5-fold higher than that of
sec24(SEC24,CEN) cells at both 23 and 30 °C, indicating that the UPR was activated in
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells (Fig.
5E).

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Protein transport and UPR in
sec24(SFB2,2µ)
cells. sec24(SEC24,CEN) and
sec24(SFB2,2µ) (see the figure
legend of Fig. 4A) cells were preincubated in SC, pH 4.0, at
the indicated temperatures for 3 h, and subjected to the following
assays. A, assay for general secretion competence. Cultures
were pulse-labeled with [35S]Met + Cys for 10 min and
chased for 45 min. Cells and media were separated by centrifugation,
and proteins secreted into media were resolved by SDS-PAGE (8%).
B, CPY transport assay. Cultures were pulse-labeled as in
A, and chased for the indicated times. CPY was recovered by
immunoprecipitation, and resolved by SDS-PAGE (8%). C,
invertase transport assay. Cultures were shifted to SC, pH 4.0, containing 0.1% glucose to induce the expression of invertase,
pulse-labeled with [35S]Met + Cys for 6 min, and chased
for the indicated times. Invertase was recovered by
immunoprecipitation, and resolved by SDS-PAGE (8%). The approximate
positions of ER-modified (core), Golgi-modified mature (mature) forms
of invertase are indicated. D, Gas1p transport assay.
Cultures were pulse labeled as in A, and chased for the
indicated times. Gas1p was recovered by immunoprecipitation, and
resolved by SDS-PAGE (8%). The positions of ER-modified precursor (105 kDa) and mature (125 kDa) forms of Gas1p are indicated. E,
-galactosidase activities of these cells containing a
UPRE-CYC1 promoter-LacZ reporter plasmid (pUPR3)
incubated in SC, pH 4.0, at the indicated temperatures for 3 h are
presented.
|
|
Two-hybrid Interaction between SFB2 and SEC23--
Sec24p was
first identified as a complex with Sec23p (55). Because of the
similarity to Sec24p, Sfb2p is supposed to bind Sec23p and act as a
component of COPII coat. To investigate whether Sfb2p interacts with
Sec23p by the yeast two-hybrid assay, SEC23 and each of
SFB2, SEC24, and sec24-20 were fused
to the GAL4-DNA binding domain (pGBD-SEC23) and to the
GAL4-activation domain (pGAD-SFB2, pGAD-SEC24,
pGAD-sec24-20), respectively. Each pGAD-plasmid was co-transformed with
pGBD-SEC23 into host strain PJ69-4A, and the resultant
clones were replica-plated onto SD plate
lacking histidine and adenine (Fig. 6) or subjected to
-galactosidase assay (Table II). When
the fusion proteins interact in host cells, reporter genes
HIS3, ADE2, and LacZ are activated in
GAL-promoter dependent manner, resulting in the
disappearance of both histidine and adenine auxotrophies and in the
elevated levels of
-galactosidase. As shown in Fig. 6, cells
coexpressing the SFB2- and SEC23-fusions grew on
SD (-His, -Ade) as well as those coexpressing the SEC24- and
SEC23-fusions or the sec24-20- and
SEC23-fusions. Consistent with this observation,
-galactosidase activity of these cells was considerably higher than
that of others (Table II). These results suggested that Sfb2p and
sec24-20 gene product could bind to Sec23p as well as
Sec24p.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Two-hybrid interaction between
SFB2 and SEC23. Either
pGBD-SEC23 or control plasmid (pGBD-C1) was co-transformed with
pGAD-SFB2, pGAD-SEC24, pGAD-sec24-20, or control plasmid (pGAD-C1),
into host strain PJ69-4A. The resulting clones containing each plasmid
combinations were replica-plated onto SD ( His, Ade) and control SD
(+His, +Ade) plate, and incubated at 30 °C for 4 days.
|
|
Effect of sfb2 Disruption on Growth or Protein
Transport--
Another SEC24 homologue, SFB3,
was identified as LST1 (lethal with
sec-thirteen). LST1 disrupted cells
(
lst1) were defective in export of plasma-membrane
proton-ATPase (Pma1p) from the ER, and thereby their growth was
sensitive to an acidic environment at high culturing temperature (24).
We knocked out two SEC24 homologues, SFB2 and
SFB3, to evaluate the growth of the resultant null mutants.
Unlike
sfb3 (YKH2) cells,
sfb2 (YKH1) cells
could grow as well as the wild-type cells at any culturing temperature or pH of media (Fig. 7A). When
the general secretion competence of
sfb2 cells was
examined, all of the secretion profiles at 37 °C (Fig.
7B, lanes 9-12) were dramatically different from
those presented in Fig. 3A because of culturing cells in SC,
pH 7.0, a neutral medium suitable for
sfb3 cells. The
secretion profile of
sfb2 cells, however, was
indistinguishable from that of wild-type or
sfb3 cells at
any culturing temperature (Fig. 7B). This was consistent
with the observation (23) that chromosomal deletion of SEC24
homologues did not affect the transport of either CPY or invertase.
Finally, to obtain the information about the expression of
SFB2, Northern blot analyses were carried out with total RNA isolated from wild-type cells. To examine the transcriptional level of
SFB2 in comparison to that of SEC24, the RNA
blots were hybridized with SFB2 and SEC24 probes
of comparable specific activity and were exposed for the same period of
time. As shown in Fig. 7C, the transcription level of
SFB2 is much lower (approximately 1/8, at any culturing
temperature) than that of SEC24, consistent with the fact
that chromosomal deletion of SEC24 is lethal (note the
expression level of SFB2 that compensates the chromosomal deletion of SEC24).

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
sfb2 phenotypes and
SFB2 expression in wild-type cells. A,
10-fold serial dilutions (starting from A600 of
0.01) of wild-type, sfb2(YKH1), and
sfb3(YKH2) cells were spotted on SC, pH 4.0 or 7.0, plates and incubated at 37 °C for 2 days, pH 4.0, or 3 days, pH 7.0. B, assay for general secretion competence. Wild-type,
sfb2, sfb3, and sec24-20 cells
were preincubated in SC, pH 7.0, at the indicated temperature for 30 min, pulse-labeled with [35S]Met + Cys for 10 min and
chased for 45 min. Cells and media were separated by centrifugation,
and proteins secreted into media were resolved by SDS-PAGE (8%).
C, Northern analysis of SEC24 and
SFB2. A membrane blotted with the two indicated sets of
total RNA was devided in two, and hybridized to 32P-labeled
probes specific for SEC24 and SFB2, respectively.
Specific activity of each probe was quantified, and 1.0 × 106 cpm equivalents were used for hybridization. The
lower panel shows the ethidium bromide staining of the gel.
Control strains ( sec24(SFB2,2µ)
and sfb2) were grown at 30 °C, and harvested for total
RNA isolation.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we describe some phenotypes of a
temperature-sensitive mutant anu1-1, previously screened for
abnormal nuclear morphology (25), and the partial suppression of
anu1 phenotypes by overexpression of the SEC24
homologue, SFB2. At the restrictive temperature,
anu1 cells exhibited the proliferated ER and the punctate
distribution of Kar2p. Consistent with the fact that ANU1 is
identical to SEC24 (25), anu1-1/sec24-20 cells
exhibited the temperature-sensitive ER-to-Golgi vesicle transport. Both temperature-sensitive growth and transport were partially restored by
overexpression of SFB2. Moreover, the overexpression of
SFB2 suppressed the lethality derived from the chromosomal
deletion of SEC24, depending on culturing conditions. The
resultant
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells
exhibited some cargo-specific ER to Golgi transport defects, while
their secretion competence appeared to be recovered to the same extent
as that of wild-type cells. A yeast two-hybrid assay revealed that like
Sec24p, Sfb2p could bind Sec23p.
The abnormal nuclear morphology of sec24-20 cells (Fig. 1)
has also been observed in various mutants defective in vesicular transport between the ER and the Golgi such as sec28/anu2,
sec13/anu3, sec18/anu4, sar1,
sec12, sec16, and uso1 (25,
56).2 Transport defects
between the ER and the Golgi are considered to trigger a proliferation
of ER, perturbing the nuclear structure because of the continuity of
the nucleus with the ER (25). Consistent with the retardation of the ER
to Golgi protein transport (Fig. 3), the BiP body-like distribution of
Kar2p and the activation of the UPR were also observed in
sec24-20 cells at 30 °C (Fig. 2, B and
C). Since the UPR was also activated in sec18
cells (Fig. 2C), the activation of the UPR in
sec24-20 cells is considered to represent the accumulation
of proteins in the ER owing to the reduced ER-to-Golgi vesicle
transport. On the other hand, the punctate distribution of Kar2p in
sec24-20 cells is probably identical to the BiP body, the
site where secretory proteins accumulate when ER to Golgi vesicle
transport is blocked (43). It is thought that BiP may escort secretory
proteins to keep them transport-competent until the transport between
the ER and Golgi is resumed (43).
The precise role of Sec24p itself in vesicle formation and cargo
selection yet remains unclear. The suppression of the
sec24 mutation by overexpression of SFB2
(Figs. 4 and 5) in addition to the two-hybrid interaction between Sfb2p
with Sec23p (Fig. 6 and Table II), strongly suggest that Sfb2p can
replace Sec24p in the COPII-coated vesicle formation and in the
transport of most proteins. This is supported by the difference in the
growth rate between
sec24(SFB2,2µ) and
sec24-20(SFB2,2µ) cells.
sec24-20(SFB2,2µ) cells grew slower
than
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells at
30 °C, but faster at 23 °C (see "Results"). Moreover, the
overexpression of SFB2 could rescue the growth defect
of
sec24 cells but not that of sec24-20 cells
at 37 °C (Figs. 2A and 4B). Like Sec24p, Sfb2p and the sec24-20 gene product can bind Sec23p (Fig. 6 and
Table II). Taken together, these results suggest that Sfb2p competes with the functionally impaired sec24-20 gene product
for the binding to Sec23p in
sec24-20(SFB2,2µ) cells at high
culturing temperature.
The secretion assay in
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells revealed
that most of the protein transport appeared to be recovered to the same extent as that of
sec24(SEC24,CEN)
cells (Fig. 5A). This implies that vesicle machinery
proteins such as v-SNAREs, are packaged or at least included in the
ER-derived vesicles of
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells. On the
other hand, transport assays of several cargo proteins revealed
that not all of the secretory proteins were efficiently exported from
the ER in
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells
(Fig. 5, B-D). In particular,
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells exhibited
markedly slow transport kinetics of invertase and Gas1p at any
culturing temperature (Fig. 5, C and D),
suggesting that Sec24p, rather than Sfb2p, is indirectly responsible
for concentrating them into ER-derived vesicles. It is known that the
efficient ER to Golgi transport of invertase and Gas1p requires p24
proteins, the putative cargo receptor expected to serve as an adaptor
linking the vesicle-forming machinery to soluble cargo recruitment (9,
10, 12-14). In the study using ER-derived microsomes and purified
COPII components, Emp24p, a member of the p24 family, was found to
associate with the Sar1p-Sec23p/Sec24p prebudding complex, suggesting
that the prebudding complex is responsible for sorting Emp24p into
COPII-coated vesicles (17). According to this observation, p24 proteins
appear to interact efficiently with the Sar1p-Sec23p/Sec24p rather than
the Sar1p-Sec23p/Sfb2p complex, emerging the difference between
sec24(SEC24,CEN) and
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells in the
kinetics of invertase and Gas1p transport. Alternatively, a reduced
packaging of machinery proteins required for the Golgi to ER retrograde
vesicle transport (such as Golgi to ER v-SNAREs) into ER-derived
vesicles of
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells may retard the retrieval of p24 proteins from the Golgi to the ER,
resulting in the reduced kinetics of invertase and Gas1p transport. On
the other hand, the cold-sensitive transport of CPY in
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells (Fig.
5B) suggests that COPII-like-coated vesicles including Sfb2p
are cold-sensitive in the selection and/or the concentration of CPY.
Since the UPR was activated in
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells at both 23 and 30 °C (Fig. 5E), some other cargo proteins such as invertase and Gas1p might be retained in the ER independently of
culturing temperature. The conditional growth of
sec24(SFB2,2µ) cells may be due
to the temperature-dependent and/or -independent ER
retention of proteins affecting the cell growth, such as those required
for the growth under neutral conditions.
The fact that some cargo proteins (such as invertase and Gas1p) require
Sec24p but not Sfb2p for their efficient export from the ER suggests
that Sec24p itself is responsible for the cargo recognition. Another
Sec24p homologue, Lst1p, is involved in the export of restricted cargo
proteins (only Pma1p is known) from the ER (24). Based on
sfb2 phenotypes and the transcriptional level of
SFB2 in wild-type cells (Fig. 7), Sfb2p may be involved in
the efficient transport of specific cargo molecules like Lst1p rather
than the efficient transport of many cargo proteins required for their
growth like Sec24p. Hence, each of the SEC24 family of
proteins may function as a component of COPII coats and serve its own
cargo selectivity.
We could not find the unique role of Sfb2p in the cargo selection, but
demonstrated that in the ER-to-Golgi vesicle transport Sfb2p could
function as the component of COPII coats. The identification of Sfb2p
(this study) and Lst1p (24) as the component of COPII coats suggests
that the coats of ER-derived vesicles may be heterogeneous. We are
interested in whether one ER-derived vesicle contains one member of the
SEC24 family of proteins, or alternatively plural members of
the family act together as the components of coats. If all members of
the SEC24 family of proteins participate in the cargo
selection event in concert with Sec23p, Sar1p, and others, the
composition of the SEC24 family of proteins in the cell may affect that of cargo proteins transported by ER-derived vesicles. Further experiments are required to elucidate the roles of Sec24p and
Sfb2p in cargo selection.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank members of the Kohno laboratory for
valuable discussion; K. Mihara (Kyushu University) and H. Riezman
(University of Basel) for antibodies; E. Craig (University of
Wisconsin) for two-hybrid system; R. Ando and K. Maekawa for excellent
technical assistance; and I. Farcasanu for critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grant-in-aid 11153216 for
Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan, a Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from The Japan Science Society, and by the Sapporo Bioscience Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Research and
Education Center for Genetic Information, Nara Institute of Science and
Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara 630-0101, Japan. Tel.:
81-743-72-5640; Fax: 81-743-72-5649; E-mail:
kkouno@bs.aist-nara.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 3, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000751200
2
A. Hirata, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ER, endoplasmic
reticulum;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
CPY, carboxypeptidase Y;
SNARE, soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein
attachment protein receptor;
v, vesicular;
COPII, coat protein complex
II;
BiP, immunoglobulin heavy chain-binding protein;
UPR, unfolded
protein response;
UPRE, unfolded protein response element;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Schekman, R.,
and Orci, L.
(1996)
Science
271,
1526-1533
|
| 2.
|
Rothman, J. E.,
and Wieland, F. T.
(1996)
Science
272,
227-234
|
| 3.
|
Kuehn, M. J.,
and Schekman, R.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
477-483
|
| 4.
|
Barlowe, C.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1404,
67-76
|
| 5.
|
Kaiser, C.,
and Ferro-Novick, S.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10,
477-482
|
| 6.
|
Springer, S.,
Spang, A.,
and Schekman, R.
(1999)
Cell
97,
145-148
|
| 7.
|
Rexach, M. F.,
Latterich, M.,
and Schekman, R. W.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
126,
1133-1148
|
| 8.
|
Bednarek, S. Y.,
Ravazzola, M.,
Hosobuchi, M.,
Amherdt, M.,
Perrelet, A.,
Schekman, R.,
and Orci, L.
(1995)
Cell
83,
1183-1196
|
| 9.
|
Schimmoller, F.,
Singer-Kruger, B.,
Schroder, S.,
Kruger, U.,
Barlowe, C.,
and Riezman, H.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
1329-1339
|
| 10.
|
Belden, W. J.,
and Barlowe, C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
26939-26946
|
| 11.
|
Powers, J.,
and Barlowe, C.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
1209-1222
|
| 12.
|
Herrmann, J. M.,
Malkus, P.,
and Schekman, R.
(1999)
Trends Cell Biol.
9,
5-7
|
| 13.
|
Elrod-Erickson, M. J.,
and Kaiser, C. A.
(1996)
Mol. Biol. Cell
7,
1043-1058
|
| 14.
|
Marzioch, M.,
Henthorn, D. C.,
Herrmann, J. M.,
Wilson, R.,
Thomas, D. Y.,
Bergeron, J. J.,
Solari, R. C.,
and Rowley, A.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
1923-1938
|
| 15.
|
Matsuoka, K.,
Morimitsu, Y.,
Uchida, K.,
and Schekman, R.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
2,
703-708
|
| 16.
|
Springer, S.,
and Schekman, R.
(1998)
Science
281,
698-700
|
| 17.
|
Kuehn, M. J.,
Herrmann, J. M.,
and Schekman, R.
(1998)
Nature
391,
187-190
|
| 18.
|
Aridor, M.,
Weissman, J.,
Bannykh, S.,
Nuoffer, C.,
and Balch, W. E.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
61-70
|
| 19.
|
Gimeno, R. E.,
Espenshade, P.,
and Kaiser, C. A.
(1996)
Mol. Biol. Cell
7,
1815-1823
|
| 20.
|
Shaywitz, D. A.,
Espenshade, P. J.,
Gimeno, R. E.,
and Kaiser, C. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
25413-25416
|
| 21.
|
Peng, R.,
Grabowski, R.,
De Antoni, A.,
and Gallwitz, D.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3751-3756
|
| 22.
| Cherry, J. M., Ball, C., Weng, S., Juvik, G., Schmidt, R., Adler,
C., Dunn, B., Dwight, S., Riles, L., Mortimer, R. K., and
Botstein, D. (1997) Saccharomyces Genome
Database, http://genome-www.stanford.edu/Saccharomyces/
|
| 23.
|
Pagano, A.,
Letourneur, F.,
Garcia-Estefania, D.,
Carpentier, J. L.,
Orci, L.,
and Paccaud, J. P.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
7833-7840
|
| 24.
|
Roberg, K. J.,
Crotwell, M.,
Espenshade, P.,
Gimeno, R.,
and Kaiser, C. A.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
659-672
|
| 25.
|
Kimata, Y.,
Lim, C. R.,
Kiriyama, T.,
Nara, A.,
Hirata, A.,
and Kohno, K.
(1999)
Cell Struct. Funct.
24,
197-208
|
| 26.
|
Rose, M. D.,
Novick, P.,
Thomas, J. H.,
Botstein, D.,
and Fink, G. R.
(1987)
Gene (Amst.)
60,
237-243
|
| 27.
|
Sikorski, R. S.,
and Hieter, P.
(1989)
Genetics
122,
19-27
|
| 28.
|
Orr-Weaver, T. L.,
and Szostak, J. W.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
4417-4421
|
| 29.
|
Christianson, T. W.,
Sikorski, R. S.,
Dante, M.,
Shero, J. H.,
and Hieter, P.
(1992)
Gene (Amst.)
110,
119-122
|
| 30.
|
Mori, K.,
Sant, A.,
Kohno, K.,
Normington, K.,
Gething, M. J.,
and Sambrook, J. F.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
2583-2593
|
| 31.
|
James, P.,
Halladay, J.,
and Craig, E. A.
(1996)
Genetics
144,
1425-1436
|
| 32.
|
Kaiser, C.,
Michaelis, S.,
and Mitchell, A.
(1994)
Methods in Yeast Genetics
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 33.
|
Woodcock, D. M.,
Crowther, P. J.,
Doherty, J.,
Jefferson, S.,
DeCruz, E.,
Noyer-Weidner, M.,
Smith, S. S.,
Michael, M. Z.,
and Graham, M. W.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
3469-3478
|
| 34.
|
Baudin, A.,
Ozier-Kalogeropoulos, O.,
Denouel, A.,
Lacroute, F.,
and Cullin, C.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
3329-3330
|
| 35.
|
Sun, G. H.,
Hirata, A.,
Ohya, Y.,
and Anraku, Y.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
119,
1625-1639
|
| 36.
|
Kilmartin, J. V.,
and Adams, A. E.
(1984)
J. Cell Biol.
98,
922-933
|
| 37.
|
Tokunaga, M.,
Kawamura, A.,
and Kohno, K.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
17553-17559
|
| 38.
|
Kohno, K.,
Normington, K.,
Sambrook, J.,
Gething, M. J.,
and Mori, K.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
877-890
|
| 39.
|
Nakamura, N.,
Yamazaki, S.,
Sato, K.,
Nakano, A.,
Sakaguchi, M.,
and Mihara, K.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
3493-3503
|
| 40.
|
Gaynor, E. C.,
and Emr, S. D.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
789-802
|
| 41.
|
Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K.
(eds)
(1995)
Current Protocol in Molecular Biology
, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York
|
| 42.
|
Apone, L. M.,
Virbasius, C. M.,
Reese, J. C.,
and Green, M. R.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
2368-2380
|
| 43.
|
Nishikawa, S.,
Hirata, A.,
and Nakano, A.
(1994)
Mol. Biol. Cell
5,
1129-1143
|
| 44.
|
Kaufman, R. J.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
1211-1233
|
| 45.
|
Chapman, R.,
Sidrauski, C.,
and Walter, P.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
14,
459-485
|
| 46.
|
Normington, K.,
Kohno, K.,
Kozutsumi, Y.,
Gething, M. J.,
and Sambrook, J.
(1989)
Cell
57,
1223-1236
|
| 47.
|
Rose, M. D.,
Misra, L. M.,
and Vogel, J. P.
(1989)
Cell
57,
1211-1221
|
| 48.
|
Liu, E. S.,
Ou, J. H.,
and Lee, A. S.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
7128-7133
|
| 49.
|
Stevens, T.,
Esmon, B.,
and Schekman, R.
(1982)
Cell
30,
439-448
|
| 50.
|
Esmon, B.,
Novick, P.,
and Schekman, R.
(1981)
Cell
25,
451-460
|
| 51.
|
Esmon, B.,
Esmon, P. C.,
and Schekman, R.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
10322-10327
|
| 52.
|
Esmon, P. C.,
Esmon, B. E.,
Schauer, I. E.,
Taylor, A.,
and Schekman, R.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
4387-4394
|
| 53.
|
Conzelmann, A.,
Riezman, H.,
Desponds, C.,
and Bron, C.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
2233-2240
|
| 54.
|
Nuoffer, C.,
Jeno, P.,
Conzelmann, A.,
and Riezman, H.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
27-37
|
| 55.
|
Hicke, L.,
Yoshihisa, T.,
and Schekman, R.
(1992)
Mol. Biol. Cell
3,
667-676
|
| 56.
|
Nakajima, H.,
Hirata, A.,
Ogawa, Y.,
Yonehara, T.,
Yoda, K.,
and Yamasaki, M.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
113,
245-260
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?