JBC Focus on PI3-Kinase with Echelon

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M000650200 on April 5, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 24, 17968-17973, June 16, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/24/17968    most recent
M000650200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bäumer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Deppenmeier, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bäumer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Deppenmeier, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The F420H2 Dehydrogenase from Methanosarcina mazei Is a Redox-driven Proton Pump Closely Related to NADH Dehydrogenases*

Sebastian BäumerDagger , Tina IdeDagger , Carsten Jacobi§, Andre Johann§, Gerhard GottschalkDagger §, and Uwe DeppenmeierDagger

From the Dagger  Abteilung Allgemeine Mikrobiologie and § Göttingen Genomics Laboratory, Institut für Mikrobiologie und Genetik, Georg-August-Universität, Grisebachstrasse 8, 37077 Göttingen, Germany

Received for publication, January 28, 2000, and in revised form, March 20, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The F420H2 dehydrogenase is part of the energy conserving electron transport system of the methanogenic archaeon Methanosarcina mazei Gö1. Here it is shown that cofactor F420H2-dependent reduction of 2-hydroxyphenazine as catalyzed by the membrane-bound enzyme is coupled to proton translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane, exhibiting a stoichiometry of 0.9 H+ translocated per two electrons transferred. The electrochemical proton gradient thereby generated was shown to drive ATP synthesis from ADP + Pi. The gene cluster encoding the F420H2 dehydrogenase of M. mazei Gö1 comprises 12 genes that are referred to as fpoA, B, C, D, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, and O. Analysis of the deduced amino acid sequences revealed that the enzyme is closely related to proton translocating NADH dehydrogenases of respiratory chains from bacteria (NDH-1) and eukarya (complex I). Like the NADH-dependent enzymes, the F420H2 dehydrogenase is composed of three subcomplexes. The gene products FpoA, H, J, K, L, M, and N are highly hydrophobic and are homologous to subunits that form the membrane integral module of NDH-1. FpoB, C, D, and I have their counterparts in the amphipathic membrane-associated module of NDH-1. Homologues to the hydrophilic NADH-oxidizing input module are not present in M. mazei Gö1. Instead, the gene product FpoF may be responsible for F420H2 oxidation and may function as the electron input part. Thus, the F420H2 dehydrogenase from M. mazei Gö1 resembles eukaryotic and bacterial proton translocating NADH dehydrogenases in many ways. The enzyme from the methanogenic archaeon functions as a NDH-1/complex I homologue and is equipped with an alternative electron input unit for the oxidation of reduced cofactor F420 and a modified output module adopted to the reduction of methanophenazine.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Methanosarcina mazei strain Gö1 is a strictly anaerobic methanogenic archaeon that converts a limited number of simple substrates (H2 + CO2, methanol, methylamines, and acetate) to methane. 2-methylthioethanesulfonate is the central intermediate in all methanogenic pathways and is reductively demethylated to methane catalyzed by the 2-methylthioethanesulfonate reductase. The two electrons required for the reduction are derived from 7-mercaptoheptanoylthreonine phosphate, resulting in the formation of a heterodisulfide (CoB-S-S-CoM)1 of 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate (HS-CoM) and 7-mercaptoheptanoylthreonine phosphate (HS-CoB) (1). An energy-conserving step in the metabolism of methanogens is the reduction of CoB-S-S-CoM with either molecular hydrogen or reduced coenzyme F420. In recent years, the membrane-bound electron transfer of M. mazei Gö1 has been analyzed in detail, resulting in the discovery of two proton translocating systems referred to as H2:heterodisulfide oxidoreductase and F420H2:heterodisulfide oxidoreductase, respectively (2).

During growth on methylated substrates, part of the methyl groups of the substrates is oxidized to CO2, and reducing equivalents are transferred to F420. The reduced cofactor (F420H2) is reoxidized by the above-mentioned membrane-bound electron transport system consisting of an F420H2 dehydrogenase and a heterodisulfide reductase. The transfer of electrons between the enzymes is most likely mediated by methanophenazine, a hydrophobic cofactor that has been isolated from the cytoplasmic membrane of M. mazei Gö1. The overall process has been shown to be competent in driving proton translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane (3). The resulting electrochemical proton gradient is the driving force for ATP synthesis from ADP + Pi catalyzed by an A1A0-type ATP synthase (2, 4).

The F420H2 dehydrogenase with a molecular mass of 115 kDa has been purified from M. mazei Gö1 and contains iron-sulfur clusters and FAD (5). The isolated enzyme is very similar to the corresponding protein from Methanolobus tindarius (6) and is composed of five different subunits with molecular masses of 40, 37, 22, 20, and 17 kDa. A F420H2 dehydrogenase has also been purified form the sulfate-reducing archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus (7).

In this report the gene locus encoding the F420H2 dehydrogenase on the M. mazei genome is described. Furthermore, it is shown that the corresponding enzyme is a novel proton pump contributing to the generation of the electrochemical proton gradient in the methanogenic organism.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Assay Conditions-- Washed inverted vesicles of M. mazei Gö1 (DSM 3647) were prepared according to Ide et al. (8). Proton translocation, electron transport, and ATP synthesis were monitored as described previously (8). The isolation and reduction of F420 as well as the synthesis of 2-OH-phenazine was performed according to Abken et al. (9).

Determination of N-terminal Amino Acid Sequences-- The F420H2 dehydrogenase was purified as described previously (5). The subunits were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Pall GmbH, Dreieich, Germany). N-terminal sequences were determined by Dr. B. Schmidt (Zentrum Biochemie, University of Göttingen) on an Applied Biosystems Procise Sequencer.

Cloning and Sequencing of the fpo Gene-- The complete genomic sequence of M. mazei Gö1 was determined by a whole genome shotgun approach. More than 18,000 clones carrying inserts of approximately 2.5 kilobases in length from small insert libraries representative of the whole genome were sequenced from both ends usind LICOR IL 4200 and ABI PRISM 377 DNA sequencers. The generated sequence readings were assembled into contigs with the Prap software implemented in the STADEN software package.

Computer Analysis-- Protein sequence analysis was performed with the following internet servers: PredictProtein server; SignalP V1.1 World Wide Web Prediction Server, Center for Biological Sequence Analysis; and PSORT Prediction server.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Proton Translocation Activity of the F420H2 Dehydrogenase-- It was shown that electron transport from F420H2 to CoM-S-CoB as catalyzed by washed inverted vesicles from M. mazei Gö1 is coupled to proton translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane (3). With the identification of methanophenazine as an electron carrier in the membrane the redox-driven proton translocation could be analyzed in more detail. It became evident that the key enzymes of the membrane-bound electron transfer systems were able to interact with 2-OH-phenazine, which is a water-soluble homologue of methanophenazine (9). Reducing equivalents from F420H2 were transferred to 2-OH-phenazine by the membrane-bound F420H2 dehydrogenase. Furthermore, the heterodisulfide reductase present in the cytoplasmic membrane was able to use reduced 2-OH-phenazine as electron donor for the reduction of CoB-S-S-CoM (10).

Taking advantage of 2-OH-phenazine as electron acceptor, it became evident that the F420H2 dehydrogenase is directly involved in the generation of an electrochemical proton gradient (Fig. 1). Concentrated vesicles were diluted with a sucrose/thiocyanate solution containing 200 nmol of F420H2 and were pulsed with 2-OH-phenazine under an atmosphere of molecular nitrogen. In the course of electron transport from F420H2 to 2-OH-phenazine a rapid alkalinization of the medium occurred that was due to proton movement into the lumen of the inverted vesicles. Thiocyanate was used as a permeant charge-compensating cation required to exchange for the ejected protons, thus maintaining the electroneutrality across the membrane. After consumption of F420H2, the energy conserving electron transport stopped leading to a decay of the generated Delta µH+ by passive diffusion of protons from the lumen of the inverted vesicles to the medium. This is indicated in the second reaction phase where a reacidification took place until the base line was reached again. After calibration of the instrument response with NaOH as an internal standard the extent of reversible alkalinization was used to calculate the H+/2e- ratio. As evident from Fig. 1 (inset), the extent of H+ ejection was dependent on the amount of 2-OH-phenazine added. From the linear part of the reaction curve (0-7 nmol of 2-OH-phenazine/assay) a stoichiometry of 0.9 ± 0.2 H+/2e- was determined. Proton translocation was not observed when 2-OH-phenazine was replaced by ethanol or when F420 instead of F420H2 was added, indicating that proton transfer was specifically coupled to the F420H2-dependent 2-OH-phenazine reduction. In the presence of the protonophore SF 6847 the generation of a pH gradient was abolished, and a reversible alkalinization was prevented (Fig. 1).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Redox-driven proton uptake by washed inverted vesicles from M. mazei Gö1. Proton translocation was monitored in a glass vessel connected to a sensitive pH electrode as described previously (8). After gassing with N2, the vessel was filled with 3 ml of 40 mM KSCN solution containing 0.5 M sucrose, 1 mg/ml resazurin, 10 mM dithioerythritol, and 200 nmol F420H2, followed by the addition of 50-80 µl of washed vesicles (1-1.4 mg protein/assay). The assay was continuously stirred, and the pH was adjusted to 6.8-6.9. The reaction was started by the addition of 20 nmol of 2-OH-phenazine (20 mM stock solution in ethanol) After finishing the experiments the pH changes were calibrated with a NaOH standard solution. SF 6847 was added to a final concentration of 15 nmol/mg protein where indicated.

Coupling of Electron Transport and ATP Synthesis-- When the electron transfer from F420H2 to 2-OH-phenazine was analyzed the initial velocity of substrate conversion was 0.42 ± 0.03 µmol × min-1 × mg protein-1 (Table I). After 1 min, the rate slowly decreased because of the depletion of reduced F420. The reaction was coupled to the phosphorylation of ADP as indicated by a rapid increase of the ATP content upon start of the reaction (Fig. 2). The initial rate of ATP synthesis was 0.11 ± 0.03 µmol × min-1 × mg protein-1 resulting in an ATP/2e- stoichiometry of about 0.26 within the first minute of the reaction. In the absence of ADP, 2-OH-phenazine reduction slowed down to 0.3 ± 0.02 unit/mg protein (Table I), and ATP synthesis was not possible (Fig. 2). The ATP synthase inhibitor DCCD led to a strong inhibition of phosphorylation of ADP and resulted in a slight decrease of the electron transport rate (0.32 ± 0.04 unit/mg protein). SF 6847 abolished ATP synthesis (Fig. 2) because of the decay of Delta µH+. Inhibition of electron transfer in the presence of DCCD or in the absence of ADP was relieved by the addition of SF 6847 (Table I). The results of the experiments outlined are clearly in accordance with the chemiosmotic coupling mechanism of ATP synthesis. Furthermore, the effect of SF 6847, DCCD, and ADP on the rate of electron transport resembles the phenomenon of respiratory control. The low control ratio is explained by the fact that about 50% of the vesicles were uncoupled and catalyzed electron transfer without generating an electrochemical proton gradient (2).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Effect of ADP, DCCD, and SF 6847 on electron transfer rates from F420H2 to 2-OH-phenazine
The conditions were the same as those described in the legend to Fig. 2. Each value represents an average of at least 10 determinations.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   ATP synthesis in the course of F420H2-dependent 2-OH-phenazine reduction. ATP synthesis was analyzed in 1.5-ml glass cuvettes filled with 0.8 ml of 40 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7, containing 20 mM MgSO4, 0.5 M sucrose, 10 mM dithioerythritol, and 1 mg/ml resazurin under an atmosphere of molecular nitrogen. After addition of F420H2 (64 µM) and 2-OH-phenazine (125 µM), the reaction was started by the injection of washed vesicles (19 µg of protein). The concentrations of ADP, SF 6847, and DCCD were 0.16 mM, 25 µM, and 250 nmol/mg protein, respectively. black-square, + ADP; triangle , F420H2 omitted; black-triangle, + ADP + SF 6847; , ADP omitted; open circle , + ADP + DCCD. 2-OH-phenazine, DCCD, and SF 6847 were added as ethanolic solutions. The controls received ethanol only. To determine the ATP concentration 1-2-µl aliquots were withdrawn with a syringe and analyzed using the luciferin/luciferase assay as described previously (3).

Structure of the fpo Operon Coding for the F420H2 Dehydrogenase from M. mazei Gö1-- The entire genome of M. mazei Gö1 is currently sequenced in the Genomic Laboratory Göttingen. In the course of the sequencing process the data were checked for the presence of regions coding for the known N-terminal amino acid sequences obtained from five subunits of the purified enzyme. Finally, one DNA fragment was identified that codes for the 40-, 22-, 20-, and 16-kDa subunits of the purified F420H2 dehydrogenase (Fig. 3). The proposed name for the gene locus is fpo for F420H2:phenazine oxidoreductase. The fragment comprises 12 genes that were designated fpoA, B, C, D, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, and O. Each gene is preceded by at least one putative ribosome binding site starting with the initiation codon ATG or GTG (fpoL) and is terminated by the stop codons TAA or TGA. Other putative open reading frames could not be identified in the direct neighborhood of the flanking genes fpoA and fpoO, respectively. Upstream of fpoA is an AT-rich region, which contains potential archaeal consensus promoter sequences (Fig. 4A). At the opposite boundary a stem loop was found downstream of fpoO (Fig. 4B), followed by a T-rich region. The RNA duplex stability is -51 kJ/mol (11). Furthermore, two different repeats of a 9-bp sequence and a 10-bp sequence (TAAAGTGGCT and CTTTATTTT) were identified in this region (Fig. 4B). These structures are similar to transcriptional termination sites of polypeptide-encoding genes from other archaea (12). All 12 structural genes are organized so compactly in the cluster that there is almost no intergenic space for promoter or terminator-like sequences. Therefore, the genes fpoA-O may represent one operon. Evidence for this assumption came from Northern blot analysis. A single 11-kilobase signal was obtained when RNA from methanol-grown cells was hybridized with a specific probe (not shown). The size of the transcript is in full accordance with the length of the predicted fpo genes.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Organization of the fpo gene cluster from M. mazei Gö1 compared with the nuo operon from E. coli. The sizes of the boxes are proprotional to the lengths of the genes. Homologous genes are marked by broken lines. Subunits of the purified core enzyme of the F420H2 dehydrogenase are indicated by black arrows. The genes are shaded according to the function of the encoded polypeptides (see text). , membrane-associated module; , membrane-integrale module; , input module; , unknown function.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Putative promoter (A) and terminator sequences (B) upstream and downstream of the fpo gene cluster. A, conserved base pairs are underlined. B, the stop codon of fpoO is boxed. Stem loop structures are marked by open arrows indicating the length and the orientation of the stems. Tandem repeats are underlined.

The deduced N-terminal amino acid sequences from fpoB, C, D, and I were identical to the N termini of four subunits of the purified F420H2 dehydrogenase. The fifth subunit is encoded by the fpoF gene, which will be described below. Because the gene products of the remaining fpo genes were not found in the homogeneous protein preparation, it is most likely that only a subcomplex of the F420H2 dehydrogenase was purified and that the other subunits were lost during purification. However, the core enzyme composed of FpoB, C, D, F, and I showed catalytic activity with F420H2 as electron donor and several artificial dyes as electron acceptors (10).

The deduced primary sequences of all predicted F420H2 dehydrogenase subunits from M. mazei Gö1 were compared with those of other organisms. Eleven polypeptides showed significant homologies to NADH:plastoquinone oxidoreductases from cyanobacteria or chloroplasts and to NADH:UQ oxidoreductases from mitochondria and bacteria (complex I, NDH-1). Alignments of the fpo gene products A-N indicated similarities of 42-71% and identities of 37-60% to the corresponding subunits of the above-mentioned enzyme complexes (Table II). With the exception of nqo6 from Thermus thermophilus (13) and of nuoI from Pyrococcus abyssi (14), highest scores were obtained for gene products of higher plants and algae. On the other hand the fpo genes are arranged in the same order as bacterial NDH-1 genes. This fact prompted us to number the genes according to the nomenclature of the nuo operon from Escherichia coli (Fig. 3).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Homologies of deduced amino acid sequences of fpo genes from M. mazei Göl to corresponding gene products of NADH dehydrogenases from other organisms

Hydropathy plots revealed that the deduced polypeptides from fpoA, H, J, K, L, M, and N are membrane-integral components. The largest subunits are predicted to contain 14 (FpoM, N) to 16 (FpoL) transmembrane helices, and the smaller peptides FpoJ and FpoH are predicted to contain 2 and 8 membrane-spanning helices. Computer programs (PSORT Prediction/SignalP-Server) revealed that FpoA and FpoK may contain N-terminal signal peptides with cleavage sites at amino acid positions 38 and 23, respectively. If this prediction is correct, each of the processed polypeptides would comprise two transmembrane helices. In summary, the membrane integral part of the F420H2 dehydrogenase complex showed high similarities to the corresponding module of bacterial NDH-1 with respect to composition and homology of the amino acid sequences. In the bacterial nuo/nqo operons known so far the genes encoding hydrophobic subunits are clustered at the 3' end of the operon with the exception of nuoA/nqo7, which is located at the very beginning of the operon. The same organization is given in the fpo gene cluster from M. mazei Gö1. It is important to note that the hydrophobic subunits of bacterial NDH-1 and of the F420H2 dehydrogenase have their counterparts in mitochondrially encoded complex I subunits from Eukarya (15).

Secondary structure prediction classifies the gene products FpoB, FpoC, FpoD, and FpoI as nonmembrane proteins. This is in agreement with the cellular localization of the homologous polypeptides from bacterial NDH-1 of Nuo BCDI from E. coli (16) and eukaryotic complex I of PSST, 30k, 49k, TYKY from bovine heart (17). These subunits comprise a module that connects the membrane-integral subcomplex to the NADH-oxidizing device (Fig. 3). It is most likely that FpoB, C, D, and I have a similar function in the F420H2 dehydrogenase. In subunit FpoB and FpoI, binding motifs for up to three tetranuclear iron-sulfur centers are present that are invariably conserved in the bacterial and eukaryotic equivalents (Table III). It has been suggested that these prosthetic groups mediate electron transport between the subcomplexes and play an important role in energy conversion of NDH-1 and complex I (18).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Binding motifs in the deduced amino acid sequences of the fpo genes

The amino acid sequence derived from the open reading frame designated fpoO contains motifs for the binding of one [Fe2-S2] cluster (Table III). The corresponding polypeptide has no counterpart in NDH-1 or complex I and shows no homologies to any known protein. This hydrophilic polypeptide was not copurified with the core enzyme, and its function is unknown.

NADH is oxidized by the hydrophilic NADH dehydrogenase fragment of NDH-1 or complex I, which is composed of NuoF, G, and H (E. coli) or the 24-, 51-, and 75-kDa subunits (bovine heart) (16, 17). Genes encoding these subunits are not present in the fpo gene cluster or anywhere else on the M. mazei chromosome, indicating that the input module is different and adjusted to the oxidation of F420H2 as electron donor of the F420H2 dehydrogenase. A suitable candidate for this function is the 37-kDa subunit of the purified core enzyme. The N-terminal sequence of this polypeptide was not found in the deduced amino acid sequences of the fpo gene cluster. However, a gene coding for the fifth subunit (37 kDa) of the purified enzyme was identified at a different location on the chromosome and was referred to as fpoF (F for F420). The deduced amino acid sequences shows motifs for two [Fe4-S4] clusters. It is homologous to the beta  subunit of F420-reducing hydrogenases and to subunits of the F420H2 dehydrogenase from M. tindarius (FfdB; Ref. 19) and A. fulgidus (AF1833; Ref. 20). In the latter organism the fpoF homologue gene AF1833 is part of the operon encoding the F420H2 dehydrogenase. Recently, the gene was overexpressed in E. coli, and the corresponding polypeptide was purified to homogeneity. The subunit contained nonheme iron, acid-labile sulfur, and FAD and was able to oxidize F420H2 when the artificial electron acceptor methylviologen was added.2 Because AF1833 and FpoF are structurally equivalent and FpoF is part of the purified F420H2 dehydrogenase from M. mazei Gö1, it may function as electron input device of the enzyme.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Energetics of the F420H2 Dehydrogenase-- F420 is the central cytoplasmic electron carrier in the methanogen M. mazei Gö1. The cofactor is involved in the process of methanogenesis from H2 + CO2 and from methylated compounds such as methanol and methylamines. In the methylotrophic pathway of methane formation (21) three out of four methyl-groups are reduced to methane. The remaining methyl-moiety is oxidatized to CO2, and the resulting reducing equivalents are transferred to F420. The membrane-bound F420H2 dehydrogenase catalyzes the reoxidation of F420H2 and most likely transfers the electrons to the novel membrane-integral cofactor methanophenazine, which is a linear sesterterpenic ether of 2-OH-phenazine (2). Previous studies indicate that the protein is part of the membrane-bound F420H2:heterodisulfide oxidoreductase, which is one of the major energy conserving systems of M. mazei Gö1 (3). It was found that the electron transport from F420H2 to the heterodisulfide (CoM-S-S-CoB) is coupled to the transfer of 3-4 protons across the cytoplasmic membrane. Using 2-OH-phenazine as a water-soluble precursor of methanophenazine, it became evident that the overall electron transfer can be divided into two partial reactions catalyzed by the F420H2 dehydrogenase and the heterodisulfide reductase, respectively.
<UP>F<SUB>420</SUB>H<SUB>2</SUB></UP>+2-<UP>OH-phenazine → F<SUB>420</SUB></UP>+<UP>dihydro-2-OH-phenazine</UP>(&Dgr;G′=<UP>−20.2 kJ/mol</UP>)

<UP>dihydro-2-OH-phenazine</UP>+<UP>CoM-S-S-CoB → 2-OH-phenazine</UP>+<UP>HS-CoM</UP>+<UP>HS-CoB</UP>(&Dgr;G<SUP>0</SUP>=<UP>−10.6 kJ/mol</UP>)

<UP><SC>Reactions 1 and 2</SC></UP>
Very recently, it was shown that the dihydrophenazine-dependent heterodisulfide reduction (Reaction 2) is coupled to proton translocation exhibiting a stoichiometry of 2H+/2e- (8). The experiments in this publication show that in the first partial reaction catalyzed by the F420H2 dehydrogenase, a maximum of 0.9 ± 0.2 protons/two electrons were translocated. Taking into account that about 50% of the vesicles are uncoupled (2), a H+/2e- ratio of about 2.0 could be considered. Then the H+/2e- stoichiometries of the partial reactions would add up to 4 and support the value of 3-4 H+/2e- translocated in the overall electron transport from F420H2 to heterodisulfide (3). In summary, the data clearly indicate that the F420H2 dehydrogenase is a redox-driven proton pump showing a maximal energetic efficiency of about 2 H+ translocated per 2e- transported.

Comparison of F420H2 Dehydrogenase and Proton Translocating NADH Dehydrogenases-- The F420H2 dehydrogenase from M. mazei Gö1 resembles eukaryotic complex I and bacterial NDH-1 in many ways: 1) The membrane-bound, flavin and iron-sulfur containing enzymes are characterized by a complex subunit composition. 2) The electron donors F420H2 and NADH are both reversible hydride donors with comparable mid-point potentials. 3) Both enzymes take advantage of small hydrophobic nonproteinous electron acceptors namely quinones in case of the NADH dehydrogenase and methanophenazine in case of F420H2 dehydrogenase. The electron acceptors are highly hydrophobic and can diffuse within the cytoplasmic membrane. Several experimental data indicate that semiquinone radicals are produced in the course of the NADH dehydrogenase reaction (22). The same could be true for methanophenazine because the direct precursor 2-OH-phenazine is also reduced in two 1e- transfer reactions forming a semiphenazine radical as an intermediate in solution (23). 4) It was shown that mitochondrial and bacterial NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductases as well as the F420H2 dehydrogenase are inhibited by diphenyleneiodonium chloride (24, 25). 5) The redox-reaction catalyzed by the proteins is coupled to proton translocation.

It is shown in this publication that the physiological characteristics of the F420H2 dehydrogenase are supported by genetic data. The deduced primary sequences of the M. mazei Gö1 F420H2 dehydrogenase subunits were compared with those of other organisms and with those of some phylogenetically related enzymes. For 11 proteins encoded by fpoA to fpoN related counterparts exist in bacterial NDH-1 and mitochondrial complex I. The organization of the genes resembles operons encoding the proton-translocating NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductases (Ndh/Nqo) from several bacteria such as E. coli, T. thermophilus, and Rhodobacter capsulatus (13, 26, 27). The bacterial enzyme is composed of 13 or 14 different subunits (28) that form the following modules (nomenclature according to E. coli) 1) The hydrophilic NADH dehydrogenase fragment composed of NuoE, F, and G catalyzes the oxidation of NADH. 2) NuoA, H, J, K, L, M, and N form the membrane-integral module and are involved in quinone reduction and proton-translocation. 3) NuoB, C, D, and I connect the above-mentioned subunits and catalyze electron transfer from module 1 to module 3 (29).

The detailed reaction mechanism of the enzyme is unknown. Several intrinsic redox components were detected that are involved in NADH-dependent quinone reduction (18). The NuoE, F, and G module contains most of the redox-active prosthetic groups (16). One noncovalently bound FMN and at least five EPR detectable iron-sulfur clusters form a long electron transfer chain guiding electron transfer from NADH to the [Fe4-S4] cluster N2 that is part of the amphipathic connecting fragment NuoB, C, D, and I. It is still a matter of debate whether this cluster is bound to NuoB or NuoI. However, it is well established that reduced N2 successively injects single electrons into the membraneous subcomplex, thereby activating a serial array of quinones that are directly involved in H+ translocation (30).

The native structure of the F420H2 dehydrogenase is still unknown. However, the primary sequence informations, operon structure, and the homology to bacterial NDH-1 allow composition of a tentative model (Fig. 5). The gene product FpoF forms the input module that oxidizes F420H2 by hydride transfer. FAD present in this subunit catalyzes a two-electron/one-electron switch to reduce the [Fe4-S4] clusters. It is still an open question whether the gene product of fpoO is also part of the input module. This polypeptide is predicted to be hydrophilic and probably contains [Fe2-S2]-clusters. On the other hand this polypeptide was not copurified with the core enzyme, indicating that it is not essential for catalytic activity. From the F420H2-oxidizing device the electrons are then channeled to the amphipathic connecting fragment composed of FpoB, C, D, and I, which is highly homologous to the corresponding module of NDH-1. Because all iron-sulfur signatures are conserved in FpoB and FpoI, it is reasonable to assume that a FeS-cluster comparable with N2 is present in one of these subunits. In analogy to NDH-1 and complex I cluster N2 should transfer electrons to the membrane integral module composed of FpoA, H, J, K, L, M, and N. In spite of the fact that the composition of the membraneous part of the F420H2 dehydrogenase and NDH-1 is identical, the further electron transport pathway of the F420H2-dependent enzyme is difficult to predict because methanogenic archaea do not contain quinones. Therefore, the reaction mechanism of the F420H2 dehydrogenase must be different at this point and must involve the electron carrier methanophenazine. The mid-point potential of 2-OH -phenazine, which is a potential precursor of methanophenazine, was determined to be -255 mV (23). With the assumption that the redox potential of methanophenazine is similar, the change of free energy (Delta Go') coupled to the F420H2-dependent methanophenazine reduction is only -20.2 kJ/mol compared with a Delta Go' of -80.9 kJ/mol for the NADH-dependent reduction of ubiquinone. These thermodynamic facts are reflected by the coupling efficiencies of the enzymes because the maximal H+/2e- ratio of the F420H2 dehydrogenase is 1.8, in contrast to NDH-1/complex I, which translocates four or even more protons across the membrane per reaction cycle (30).


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Tentative models of the F420H2 dehydrogenase and the NADH dehydrogenase 1 from E. coli. Proton translocating activity is indicated by broken arrows. UQ, ubiquinone 10; MPhen, methanophenazine. Functionally homologous subcomplexes are indicated by equal shading. , membrane-integral module; , membrane-associated module; , input module; , unknown function.

Despite the aforementioned differences, the F420H2 dehydrogenase represents a NDH-1 homologue in the methanogenic archaeon M. mazei Gö1, which is equipped with an alternative input device and a modified proton translocating machinery. Further analysis of the enzyme may contribute to the understanding also of the reaction mechanism of NADH dehydrogenases.

Interestingly, fpo-like gene clusters were not detected in the methanogenic archaea Methanococcus jannaschii (31) and Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum (32), indicating that a F420H2 dehydrogenase is absent in these organisms. This fact is in accordance with the finding that the electron transport chains from obligate hydrogenotrophic methanogens of the orders Methanobacteriales and Methanococcoles are different from those of methylotrophic methanogens belonging to the order Methanosarcinales. (2)

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grant De 488/4-2 of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bonn-Bad Godesberg), by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft priority program "Structure of functional modules from energy-transducing complexes in prokaryotes" Grant De 488/6-1, and by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Culture of the state Lower Saxony.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF228525 and AF228526.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: 49-551-393793; E-mail: udeppen@gwdg.de.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 5, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000650200

2 H. Brüggemann and U. Deppenmeier, unpublished results.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: CoB-S-S-CoM, heterodisulfide of HS-CoM and HS-CoB; HS-CoM, 2-mercaptoethansulfonate; HS-CoB, 7-mercaptoheptanoylthreoninephosphate; F420, (N-L-lactyl-gamma -L-glutamyl)-L-glutamic acid phosphodiester of 7,8 didemethyl-8-hydroxy-5-deazariboflavin-5'-phosphate; F420H2, reduced F420; DCCD, N,N'-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide; SF 6847, 3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-benzylidenemalononitrile; 2-OH-phenazine, 2-hydroxyphenazine; contig, group of overlapping clones.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Thauer, R. (1998) Microbiology 144, 2377-2406
2. Deppenmeier, U., Lienard, T., and Gottschalk, G. (1999) FEBS Lett. 457, 291-297
3. Deppenmeier, U., Blaut, M., Mahlmann, A., and Gottschalk, G. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 9449-9453
4. Müller, V., Ruppert, C., and Lemker, T. (1999) J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 31, 15-27
5. Abken, H. J., and Deppenmeier, U. (1997) FEMS Lett. 154, 231-237
6. Haase, P., Deppenmeier, U., Blaut, M., and Gottschalk, G. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 203, 527-531
7. Kunow, K., Linder, D., Stetter, K. O., and Thauer, R. K. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 223, 503-511
8. Ide, T., Bäumer, S., and Deppenmeier, U. (1999) J. Bacteriol. 181, 4076-4080
9. Abken, H. J., Tietze, M., Brodersen, J., Bäumer, S., Beifuss, U., and Deppenmeier, U. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180, 2027-2032
10. Bäumer, S., Murakami, E., Brodersen, J., Gottschalk, G., Ragsdale, S. W., and Deppenmeier, U. (1998) FEBS Lett. 428, 295-298
11. Freier, S. M., Kierzek, R., Jaeger, J. A., Sugimoto, N., Caruthers, M. H., Neilson, T., and Turner, D. H. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 9373-9377
12. Brown, J. W., Daniels, C. J., and Reeve, J. N. (1989) CRC Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 287-338
13. Yano, T., Chu, S. S., Sled, V. D., Ohnishi, T., and Yagi, T. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 4201-4211
14. Heilig, R. (1999) Pyrococcus abyssi genome sequence, Genoscope , Centre National de Sequencage, BP (191) 91006 EVRY cedex, France
15. Finel, M. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1364, 112-121
16. Friedrich, T. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1364, 134-146
17. Walker, J. E., Skehel, J. M., and Buchanan, S. K. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 260, 14-34
18. Ohnishi, T. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1364, 186-206
19. Westenberg, D. J., Braune, A., Ruppert, C., Müller, V., Herzberg, C., Gottschalk, G., and Blaut, M. (1999) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 170, 389-398
20. Klenk, H. P., Clayton, R. A., Tomb, J. F., White, O., Nelson, K. A., Dodson, R. J., Gwinn, M., Hickey, E. K., Peterson, J. D., Richardson, D. L., Kerlavage, A. R., Graham, D. E., Kyrpides, N. C., Fleischmann, R. D., Quackenbusch, J., Lee, N. H., Sutton, G. G., Gill, S., Kirkness, E. F., Dougherty, B. A., McKenny, K., Adams, M. D., Loftus, B., and Venter, J. C. (1997) Nature 390, 364-370
21. Deppenmeier, U., Müller, V., and Gottschalk, G. (1996) Arch. Microbiol. 165, 149-163
22. Ohnishi, T., Sled, V. D., Yano, T., Yagi, T., Burbaev, D. S., and Viogradov, A. D. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1365, 301-308
23. Mann, S. (1970) Arch. Mikrobiol. 71, 304-318
24. Brodersen, J., Bäumer, S., Abken, H. J., Gottschalk, G., and Deppenmeier, U. (1999) Eur. J. Biochem. 259, 218-224
25. Majander, A., Finel, M., and Wikström, M. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21037-21042
26. Weidener, U., Geier, S., Ptock, A., Friedrich, T., Leif, H., and Weiss, H. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 233, 109-122
27. Dupuis, A., Chevallet, M., Darrouzet, E., Duborjal, H., Lunardi, J., and Issartel, J. P. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1364, 147-165
28. Yagi, T., Yano, T., Di Bernardo, S., and Matsuno-Yagi, A. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1364, 125-133
29. Friedrich, T., and Weiss, H. J. (1997) Theor. Biol. 187, 529-540
30. Dutton, P. L, Moser, C. C., Sled, V., Daldal, F., and Ohnishi, T. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1364, 245-257
31. Bult, C., White, J. O., Olsen, G. J., Zhou, L., Fleischmann, R. D., Sutton, G. G. J., Blake, A., FitzGerald, L. M., Clayton, R. A., Gocayne, J. D., Kerlavage, A. R., Dougherty, B. A., Tomb, J.-F., Adams, M. D., Reich, C. I., Overbeek, R., Kirkness, E. F., Weinstock, K. G., Merrick, J. M., Glodek, A., Scott, J. L., Geoghagen, N. S. M., Weidman, J. F., Fuhrmann, J. L., Nguyen, D., Utterback, T. R., Kelley, J. M., Peterson, J. D., Sadow, P. W., Hanna, M. C., Cotton, M. D., Roberts, K. M., Hurst, M. A., Kaine, B. P., Borodovsky, M., Klenk, H.-P., Fraser, C. M., Smith, H. O., Woese, C. R., and Venter, J. C. (1996) Science 273, 1058-1073
32. Smith, D. R., Doucette-Stamm, L. A., Deloughery, C., Lee, H., Dubois, J., Aldrege, T., Bashirzahdeh, R., Blakely, D., Cook, R., Gilbert, K., Harrison, D., Hoang, L., Keagle, P., Lumm, W., Pothier, B., Qiu, D., Spadafora, R., Vicaire, R., Wang, Y., Wierzbowski, J., Gibson, R., Jiwani, N., Caruso, A., Bush, D., Safer, H., Patwell, D., Prabhakar, S., McDougall, S., Shimer, G., Goyal, A., Pietrokovski, S., Church, G. M., Daniels, C. J., Mao, J., Rice, P., Nölling, J., and Reeve, J. N. (1997) J. Bacteriol. 179, 7135-7155


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
E. F. Johnson and B. Mukhopadhyay
Coenzyme F420-Dependent Sulfite Reductase-Enabled Sulfite Detoxification and Use of Sulfite as a Sole Sulfur Source by Methanococcus maripaludis
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 1, 2008; 74(11): 3591 - 3595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. F. Johnson and B. Mukhopadhyay
A New Type of Sulfite Reductase, a Novel Coenzyme F420-dependent Enzyme, from the Methanarchaeon Methanocaldococcus jannaschii
J. Biol. Chem., November 18, 2005; 280(46): 38776 - 38786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. Seshadri, L. Adrian, D. E. Fouts, J. A. Eisen, A. M. Phillippy, B. A. Methe, N. L. Ward, W. C. Nelson, R. T. Deboy, H. M. Khouri, et al.
Genome Sequence of the PCE-Dechlorinating Bacterium Dehalococcoides ethenogenes
Science, January 7, 2005; 307(5706): 105 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Prommeenate, A. M. Lennon, C. Markert, M. Hippler, and P. J. Nixon
Subunit Composition of NDH-1 Complexes of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803: IDENTIFICATION OF TWO NEW ndh GENE PRODUCTS WITH NUCLEAR-ENCODED HOMOLOGUES IN THE CHLOROPLAST Ndh COMPLEX
J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 2004; 279(27): 28165 - 28173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Klunker, B. Haas, A. Hirtreiter, L. Figueiredo, D. J. Naylor, G. Pfeifer, V. Muller, U. Deppenmeier, G. Gottschalk, F. U. Hartl, et al.
Coexistence of Group I and Group II Chaperonins in the Archaeon Methanosarcina mazei
J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2003; 278(35): 33256 - 33267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/24/17968    most recent
M000650200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bäumer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Deppenmeier, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bäumer, S.
Right arrow Articles by Deppenmeier, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.