![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 24, 17968-17973, June 16, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, January 28, 2000, and in revised form, March 20, 2000
The F420H2 dehydrogenase
is part of the energy conserving electron transport system of the
methanogenic archaeon Methanosarcina mazei Gö1. Here
it is shown that cofactor
F420H2-dependent reduction of
2-hydroxyphenazine as catalyzed by the membrane-bound enzyme is coupled
to proton translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane, exhibiting a
stoichiometry of 0.9 H+ translocated per two electrons
transferred. The electrochemical proton gradient thereby generated was
shown to drive ATP synthesis from ADP + Pi. The gene
cluster encoding the F420H2 dehydrogenase of
M. mazei Gö1 comprises 12 genes that are referred to
as fpoA, B, C, D,
H, I, J, K,
L, M, N, and O.
Analysis of the deduced amino acid sequences revealed that the enzyme
is closely related to proton translocating NADH dehydrogenases of
respiratory chains from bacteria (NDH-1) and eukarya (complex I). Like
the NADH-dependent enzymes, the
F420H2 dehydrogenase is composed of three
subcomplexes. The gene products FpoA, H, J, K, L, M, and N are highly
hydrophobic and are homologous to subunits that form the membrane
integral module of NDH-1. FpoB, C, D, and I have their counterparts in the amphipathic membrane-associated module of NDH-1. Homologues to the
hydrophilic NADH-oxidizing input module are not present in M. mazei Gö1. Instead, the gene product FpoF may be
responsible for F420H2 oxidation and may
function as the electron input part. Thus, the
F420H2 dehydrogenase from M. mazei
Gö1 resembles eukaryotic and bacterial proton translocating NADH
dehydrogenases in many ways. The enzyme from the methanogenic archaeon
functions as a NDH-1/complex I homologue and is equipped with an
alternative electron input unit for the oxidation of reduced cofactor
F420 and a modified output module adopted to the reduction
of methanophenazine.
Methanosarcina mazei strain Gö1 is a strictly
anaerobic methanogenic archaeon that converts a limited number of
simple substrates (H2 + CO2, methanol,
methylamines, and acetate) to methane. 2-methylthioethanesulfonate is
the central intermediate in all methanogenic pathways and is reductively demethylated to methane catalyzed by the
2-methylthioethanesulfonate reductase. The two electrons required for
the reduction are derived from 7-mercaptoheptanoylthreonine phosphate,
resulting in the formation of a heterodisulfide
(CoB-S-S-CoM)1 of
2-mercaptoethanesulfonate (HS-CoM) and 7-mercaptoheptanoylthreonine phosphate (HS-CoB) (1). An energy-conserving step in the metabolism of
methanogens is the reduction of CoB-S-S-CoM with either molecular hydrogen or reduced coenzyme F420. In recent years, the
membrane-bound electron transfer of M. mazei Gö1 has
been analyzed in detail, resulting in the discovery of two proton
translocating systems referred to as H2:heterodisulfide
oxidoreductase and F420H2:heterodisulfide oxidoreductase, respectively (2).
During growth on methylated substrates, part of the methyl groups of
the substrates is oxidized to CO2, and reducing equivalents are transferred to F420. The reduced cofactor
(F420H2) is reoxidized by the above-mentioned
membrane-bound electron transport system consisting of an
F420H2 dehydrogenase and a heterodisulfide
reductase. The transfer of electrons between the enzymes is most likely
mediated by methanophenazine, a hydrophobic cofactor that has been
isolated from the cytoplasmic membrane of M. mazei
Gö1. The overall process has been shown to be competent in
driving proton translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane (3). The
resulting electrochemical proton gradient is the driving force for ATP
synthesis from ADP + Pi catalyzed by an
A1A0-type ATP synthase (2, 4).
The F420H2 dehydrogenase with a molecular mass
of 115 kDa has been purified from M. mazei Gö1 and
contains iron-sulfur clusters and FAD (5). The isolated enzyme is very
similar to the corresponding protein from Methanolobus
tindarius (6) and is composed of five different subunits with
molecular masses of 40, 37, 22, 20, and 17 kDa. A
F420H2 dehydrogenase has also been purified
form the sulfate-reducing archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus
(7).
In this report the gene locus encoding the
F420H2 dehydrogenase on the M. mazei
genome is described. Furthermore, it is shown that the corresponding
enzyme is a novel proton pump contributing to the generation of the
electrochemical proton gradient in the methanogenic organism.
Assay Conditions--
Washed inverted vesicles of M. mazei Gö1 (DSM 3647) were prepared according to Ide et
al. (8). Proton translocation, electron transport, and ATP
synthesis were monitored as described previously (8). The isolation and
reduction of F420 as well as the synthesis of
2-OH-phenazine was performed according to Abken et al. (9).
Determination of N-terminal Amino Acid Sequences--
The
F420H2 dehydrogenase was purified as described
previously (5). The subunits were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Pall GmbH, Dreieich, Germany). N-terminal sequences were
determined by Dr. B. Schmidt (Zentrum Biochemie, University of
Göttingen) on an Applied Biosystems Procise Sequencer.
Cloning and Sequencing of the fpo Gene--
The complete genomic
sequence of M. mazei Gö1 was determined by a whole
genome shotgun approach. More than 18,000 clones carrying inserts of
approximately 2.5 kilobases in length from small insert libraries
representative of the whole genome were sequenced from both ends usind
LICOR IL 4200 and ABI PRISM 377 DNA sequencers. The generated sequence
readings were assembled into contigs with the Prap software implemented
in the STADEN software package.
Computer Analysis--
Protein sequence analysis was performed
with the following internet servers: PredictProtein server; SignalP
V1.1 World Wide Web Prediction Server, Center for Biological Sequence
Analysis; and PSORT Prediction server.
Proton Translocation Activity of the F420H2
Dehydrogenase--
It was shown that electron transport from
F420H2 to CoM-S-CoB as catalyzed by washed
inverted vesicles from M. mazei Gö1 is coupled to
proton translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane (3). With the
identification of methanophenazine as an electron carrier in the
membrane the redox-driven proton translocation could be analyzed in
more detail. It became evident that the key enzymes of the
membrane-bound electron transfer systems were able to interact with
2-OH-phenazine, which is a water-soluble homologue of methanophenazine
(9). Reducing equivalents from F420H2 were transferred to 2-OH-phenazine by the membrane-bound
F420H2 dehydrogenase. Furthermore, the
heterodisulfide reductase present in the cytoplasmic membrane was able
to use reduced 2-OH-phenazine as electron donor for the reduction of
CoB-S-S-CoM (10).
Taking advantage of 2-OH-phenazine as electron acceptor, it became
evident that the F420H2 dehydrogenase is
directly involved in the generation of an electrochemical proton
gradient (Fig. 1). Concentrated vesicles
were diluted with a sucrose/thiocyanate solution containing 200 nmol of
F420H2 and were pulsed with 2-OH-phenazine under an atmosphere of molecular nitrogen. In the course of electron transport from F420H2 to 2-OH-phenazine a rapid
alkalinization of the medium occurred that was due to proton movement
into the lumen of the inverted vesicles. Thiocyanate was used as a
permeant charge-compensating cation required to exchange for the
ejected protons, thus maintaining the electroneutrality across the
membrane. After consumption of F420H2, the
energy conserving electron transport stopped leading to a decay of the
generated Coupling of Electron Transport and ATP Synthesis--
When the
electron transfer from F420H2 to 2-OH-phenazine
was analyzed the initial velocity of substrate conversion was 0.42 ± 0.03 µmol × min Structure of the fpo Operon Coding for the
F420H2 Dehydrogenase from M. mazei
Gö1--
The entire genome of M. mazei Gö1 is
currently sequenced in the Genomic Laboratory Göttingen. In the
course of the sequencing process the data were checked for the presence
of regions coding for the known N-terminal amino acid sequences
obtained from five subunits of the purified enzyme. Finally, one DNA
fragment was identified that codes for the 40-, 22-, 20-, and 16-kDa
subunits of the purified F420H2 dehydrogenase
(Fig. 3). The proposed name for the gene
locus is fpo for
F420H2:phenazine
oxidoreductase. The fragment comprises 12 genes that were
designated fpoA, B, C, D,
H, I, J, K, L,
M, N, and O. Each gene is preceded by
at least one putative ribosome binding site starting with the
initiation codon ATG or GTG (fpoL) and is terminated by the
stop codons TAA or TGA. Other putative open reading frames could not be
identified in the direct neighborhood of the flanking genes
fpoA and fpoO, respectively. Upstream of
fpoA is an AT-rich region, which contains potential archaeal
consensus promoter sequences (Fig.
4A). At the opposite boundary
a stem loop was found downstream of fpoO (Fig.
4B), followed by a T-rich region. The RNA duplex stability is
The deduced N-terminal amino acid sequences from fpoB,
C, D, and I were identical to the N
termini of four subunits of the purified F420H2
dehydrogenase. The fifth subunit is encoded by the fpoF
gene, which will be described below. Because the gene products of the
remaining fpo genes were not found in the homogeneous protein preparation, it is most likely that only a subcomplex of the
F420H2 dehydrogenase was purified and that the
other subunits were lost during purification. However, the core enzyme
composed of FpoB, C, D, F, and I showed catalytic activity with
F420H2 as electron donor and several artificial
dyes as electron acceptors (10).
The deduced primary sequences of all predicted
F420H2 dehydrogenase subunits from M. mazei Gö1 were compared with those of other organisms.
Eleven polypeptides showed significant homologies to NADH:plastoquinone
oxidoreductases from cyanobacteria or chloroplasts and to NADH:UQ
oxidoreductases from mitochondria and bacteria (complex I, NDH-1).
Alignments of the fpo gene products A-N indicated similarities of 42-71% and identities of 37-60% to the
corresponding subunits of the above-mentioned enzyme complexes (Table
II). With the exception of
nqo6 from Thermus thermophilus (13) and of nuoI from Pyrococcus abyssi (14), highest scores
were obtained for gene products of higher plants and algae. On the
other hand the fpo genes are arranged in the same order as
bacterial NDH-1 genes. This fact prompted us to number the genes
according to the nomenclature of the nuo operon from
Escherichia coli (Fig. 3).
Hydropathy plots revealed that the deduced polypeptides from
fpoA, H, J, K,
L, M, and N are membrane-integral
components. The largest subunits are predicted to contain 14 (FpoM, N)
to 16 (FpoL) transmembrane helices, and the smaller peptides FpoJ and
FpoH are predicted to contain 2 and 8 membrane-spanning helices. Computer programs (PSORT Prediction/SignalP-Server) revealed that FpoA
and FpoK may contain N-terminal signal peptides with cleavage sites at
amino acid positions 38 and 23, respectively. If this prediction is
correct, each of the processed polypeptides would comprise two
transmembrane helices. In summary, the membrane integral part of the
F420H2 dehydrogenase complex showed high
similarities to the corresponding module of bacterial NDH-1 with
respect to composition and homology of the amino acid sequences. In the
bacterial nuo/nqo operons known so far the genes encoding
hydrophobic subunits are clustered at the 3' end of the operon with the
exception of nuoA/nqo7, which is located at the very
beginning of the operon. The same organization is given in the
fpo gene cluster from M. mazei Gö1. It is
important to note that the hydrophobic subunits of bacterial NDH-1 and
of the F420H2 dehydrogenase have their counterparts in mitochondrially encoded complex I subunits from Eukarya (15).
Secondary structure prediction classifies the gene products FpoB, FpoC,
FpoD, and FpoI as nonmembrane proteins. This is in agreement with the
cellular localization of the homologous polypeptides from bacterial
NDH-1 of Nuo BCDI from E. coli (16) and eukaryotic complex I
of PSST, 30k, 49k, TYKY from bovine heart (17). These subunits comprise
a module that connects the membrane-integral subcomplex to the
NADH-oxidizing device (Fig. 3). It is most likely that FpoB, C, D, and
I have a similar function in the F420H2
dehydrogenase. In subunit FpoB and FpoI, binding motifs for up to three
tetranuclear iron-sulfur centers are present that are invariably
conserved in the bacterial and eukaryotic equivalents (Table
III). It has been suggested that these
prosthetic groups mediate electron transport between the subcomplexes
and play an important role in energy conversion of NDH-1 and complex I
(18).
The amino acid sequence derived from the open reading frame designated
fpoO contains motifs for the binding of one [Fe2-S2] cluster (Table III). The corresponding polypeptide has no counterpart in NDH-1 or complex I and shows no homologies to any known protein. This hydrophilic polypeptide was not copurified with the core enzyme,
and its function is unknown.
NADH is oxidized by the hydrophilic NADH dehydrogenase fragment of
NDH-1 or complex I, which is composed of NuoF, G, and H (E. coli) or the 24-, 51-, and 75-kDa subunits (bovine heart) (16,
17). Genes encoding these subunits are not present in the
fpo gene cluster or anywhere else on the M. mazei
chromosome, indicating that the input module is different and adjusted
to the oxidation of F420H2 as electron donor of
the F420H2 dehydrogenase. A suitable candidate
for this function is the 37-kDa subunit of the purified core enzyme.
The N-terminal sequence of this polypeptide was not found in the
deduced amino acid sequences of the fpo gene cluster.
However, a gene coding for the fifth subunit (37 kDa) of the purified
enzyme was identified at a different location on the chromosome and was
referred to as fpoF (F for F420). The deduced
amino acid sequences shows motifs for two [Fe4-S4] clusters. It is
homologous to the Energetics of the F420H2
Dehydrogenase--
F420 is the central cytoplasmic
electron carrier in the methanogen M. mazei Gö1. The
cofactor is involved in the process of methanogenesis from
H2 + CO2 and from methylated compounds such as
methanol and methylamines. In the methylotrophic pathway of methane
formation (21) three out of four methyl-groups are reduced to methane.
The remaining methyl-moiety is oxidatized to CO2, and the
resulting reducing equivalents are transferred to F420. The
membrane-bound F420H2 dehydrogenase catalyzes
the reoxidation of F420H2 and most likely
transfers the electrons to the novel membrane-integral cofactor
methanophenazine, which is a linear sesterterpenic ether of
2-OH-phenazine (2). Previous studies indicate that the protein is part
of the membrane-bound F420H2:heterodisulfide
oxidoreductase, which is one of the major energy conserving systems of
M. mazei Gö1 (3). It was found that the electron
transport from F420H2 to the heterodisulfide (CoM-S-S-CoB) is coupled to the transfer of 3-4 protons across the
cytoplasmic membrane. Using 2-OH-phenazine as a water-soluble precursor
of methanophenazine, it became evident that the overall electron
transfer can be divided into two partial reactions catalyzed by the
F420H2 dehydrogenase and the heterodisulfide
reductase, respectively.
Comparison of F420H2 Dehydrogenase and
Proton Translocating NADH Dehydrogenases--
The
F420H2 dehydrogenase from M. mazei
Gö1 resembles eukaryotic complex I and bacterial NDH-1 in many
ways: 1) The membrane-bound, flavin and iron-sulfur containing enzymes
are characterized by a complex subunit composition. 2) The electron
donors F420H2 and NADH are both reversible
hydride donors with comparable mid-point potentials. 3) Both enzymes
take advantage of small hydrophobic nonproteinous electron acceptors
namely quinones in case of the NADH dehydrogenase and methanophenazine
in case of F420H2 dehydrogenase. The electron
acceptors are highly hydrophobic and can diffuse within the cytoplasmic
membrane. Several experimental data indicate that semiquinone radicals
are produced in the course of the NADH dehydrogenase reaction (22). The
same could be true for methanophenazine because the direct precursor
2-OH-phenazine is also reduced in two 1e
It is shown in this publication that the physiological characteristics
of the F420H2 dehydrogenase are supported by
genetic data. The deduced primary sequences of the M. mazei
Gö1 F420H2 dehydrogenase subunits were
compared with those of other organisms and with those of some
phylogenetically related enzymes. For 11 proteins encoded by
fpoA to fpoN related counterparts exist in bacterial NDH-1 and mitochondrial complex I. The organization of the
genes resembles operons encoding the proton-translocating NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductases (Ndh/Nqo) from several bacteria such as
E. coli, T. thermophilus, and Rhodobacter
capsulatus (13, 26, 27). The bacterial enzyme is composed of 13 or
14 different subunits (28) that form the following modules
(nomenclature according to E. coli) 1) The hydrophilic NADH
dehydrogenase fragment composed of NuoE, F, and G catalyzes the
oxidation of NADH. 2) NuoA, H, J, K, L, M, and N form the
membrane-integral module and are involved in quinone reduction and
proton-translocation. 3) NuoB, C, D, and I connect the above-mentioned
subunits and catalyze electron transfer from module 1 to module 3 (29).
The detailed reaction mechanism of the enzyme is unknown. Several
intrinsic redox components were detected that are involved in
NADH-dependent quinone reduction (18). The NuoE, F, and G module contains most of the redox-active prosthetic groups (16). One
noncovalently bound FMN and at least five EPR detectable iron-sulfur clusters form a long electron transfer chain guiding electron transfer
from NADH to the [Fe4-S4] cluster N2 that is part of the amphipathic
connecting fragment NuoB, C, D, and I. It is still a matter of debate
whether this cluster is bound to NuoB or NuoI. However, it is well
established that reduced N2 successively injects single electrons into
the membraneous subcomplex, thereby activating a serial array of
quinones that are directly involved in H+ translocation
(30).
The native structure of the F420H2
dehydrogenase is still unknown. However, the primary sequence
informations, operon structure, and the homology to bacterial NDH-1
allow composition of a tentative model (Fig.
5). The gene product FpoF forms the input
module that oxidizes F420H2 by hydride
transfer. FAD present in this subunit catalyzes a
two-electron/one-electron switch to reduce the [Fe4-S4] clusters. It
is still an open question whether the gene product of fpoO
is also part of the input module. This polypeptide is predicted to be
hydrophilic and probably contains [Fe2-S2]-clusters. On the other
hand this polypeptide was not copurified with the core enzyme,
indicating that it is not essential for catalytic activity. From the
F420H2-oxidizing device the electrons are then channeled to the amphipathic connecting fragment composed of FpoB, C,
D, and I, which is highly homologous to the corresponding module of
NDH-1. Because all iron-sulfur signatures are conserved in FpoB and
FpoI, it is reasonable to assume that a FeS-cluster comparable with N2
is present in one of these subunits. In analogy to NDH-1 and complex I
cluster N2 should transfer electrons to the membrane integral module
composed of FpoA, H, J, K, L, M, and N. In spite of the fact that the
composition of the membraneous part of the F420H2 dehydrogenase and NDH-1 is identical,
the further electron transport pathway of the
F420H2-dependent enzyme is
difficult to predict because methanogenic archaea do not contain
quinones. Therefore, the reaction mechanism of the
F420H2 dehydrogenase must be different at this
point and must involve the electron carrier methanophenazine. The
mid-point potential of 2-OH -phenazine, which is a potential precursor
of methanophenazine, was determined to be
Despite the aforementioned differences, the
F420H2 dehydrogenase represents a NDH-1
homologue in the methanogenic archaeon M. mazei Gö1,
which is equipped with an alternative input device and a modified
proton translocating machinery. Further analysis of the enzyme may
contribute to the understanding also of the reaction mechanism of NADH dehydrogenases.
Interestingly, fpo-like gene clusters were not detected in
the methanogenic archaea Methanococcus jannaschii (31) and
Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum (32), indicating that a
F420H2 dehydrogenase is absent in these
organisms. This fact is in accordance with the finding that the
electron transport chains from obligate hydrogenotrophic methanogens of
the orders Methanobacteriales and Methanococcoles are different from
those of methylotrophic methanogens belonging to the order
Methanosarcinales. (2)
*
This work was supported by Grant De 488/4-2 of the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bonn-Bad Godesberg), by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft priority program "Structure of functional
modules from energy-transducing complexes in prokaryotes" Grant De
488/6-1, and by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Culture of the
state Lower Saxony.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF228525 and AF228526.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax:
49-551-393793; E-mail: udeppen@gwdg.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 5, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000650200
2
H. Brüggemann and U. Deppenmeier,
unpublished results.
The abbreviations used are:
CoB-S-S-CoM, heterodisulfide of HS-CoM and HS-CoB;
HS-CoM, 2-mercaptoethansulfonate;
HS-CoB, 7-mercaptoheptanoylthreoninephosphate;
F420, (N-L-lactyl-
The F420H2 Dehydrogenase from
Methanosarcina mazei Is a Redox-driven Proton Pump
Closely Related to NADH Dehydrogenases*
,
,
§, and
¶
Abteilung Allgemeine Mikrobiologie and
§ Göttingen Genomics Laboratory, Institut für
Mikrobiologie und Genetik, Georg-August-Universität,
Grisebachstrasse 8, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
µH+ by passive diffusion of
protons from the lumen of the inverted vesicles to the medium. This is
indicated in the second reaction phase where a reacidification took
place until the base line was reached again. After calibration of the
instrument response with NaOH as an internal standard the extent of
reversible alkalinization was used to calculate the
H+/2e
ratio. As evident from Fig. 1
(inset), the extent of H+ ejection was dependent
on the amount of 2-OH-phenazine added. From the linear part of the
reaction curve (0-7 nmol of 2-OH-phenazine/assay) a stoichiometry of
0.9 ± 0.2 H+/2e
was determined. Proton
translocation was not observed when 2-OH-phenazine was replaced by
ethanol or when F420 instead of
F420H2 was added, indicating that proton
transfer was specifically coupled to the F420H2-dependent 2-OH-phenazine
reduction. In the presence of the protonophore SF 6847 the generation
of a pH gradient was abolished, and a reversible alkalinization was
prevented (Fig. 1).

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Redox-driven proton uptake by washed inverted
vesicles from M. mazei Gö1. Proton
translocation was monitored in a glass vessel connected to a sensitive
pH electrode as described previously (8). After gassing with
N2, the vessel was filled with 3 ml of 40 mM
KSCN solution containing 0.5 M sucrose, 1 mg/ml resazurin,
10 mM dithioerythritol, and 200 nmol
F420H2, followed by the addition of 50-80 µl
of washed vesicles (1-1.4 mg protein/assay). The assay was
continuously stirred, and the pH was adjusted to 6.8-6.9. The reaction
was started by the addition of 20 nmol of 2-OH-phenazine (20 mM stock solution in ethanol) After finishing the
experiments the pH changes were calibrated with a NaOH standard
solution. SF 6847 was added to a final concentration of 15 nmol/mg
protein where indicated.
1 × mg protein
1
(Table I). After 1 min, the rate slowly
decreased because of the depletion of reduced F420. The
reaction was coupled to the phosphorylation of ADP as indicated by a
rapid increase of the ATP content upon start of the reaction (Fig.
2). The initial rate of ATP synthesis was
0.11 ± 0.03 µmol × min
1 × mg
protein
1 resulting in an ATP/2e
stoichiometry of about 0.26 within the first minute of the reaction. In
the absence of ADP, 2-OH-phenazine reduction slowed down to 0.3 ± 0.02 unit/mg protein (Table I), and ATP synthesis was not possible
(Fig. 2). The ATP synthase inhibitor DCCD led to a strong inhibition of
phosphorylation of ADP and resulted in a slight decrease of the
electron transport rate (0.32 ± 0.04 unit/mg protein). SF 6847 abolished ATP synthesis (Fig. 2) because of the decay of
µH+. Inhibition of electron transfer in
the presence of DCCD or in the absence of ADP was relieved by the
addition of SF 6847 (Table I). The results of the experiments outlined
are clearly in accordance with the chemiosmotic coupling mechanism of
ATP synthesis. Furthermore, the effect of SF 6847, DCCD, and ADP on the
rate of electron transport resembles the phenomenon of respiratory
control. The low control ratio is explained by the fact that about 50%
of the vesicles were uncoupled and catalyzed electron transfer without
generating an electrochemical proton gradient (2).
Effect of ADP, DCCD, and SF 6847 on electron transfer rates from
F420H2 to 2-OH-phenazine

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
ATP synthesis in the course of
F420H2-dependent 2-OH-phenazine
reduction. ATP synthesis was analyzed in 1.5-ml glass cuvettes
filled with 0.8 ml of 40 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7, containing 20 mM MgSO4, 0.5 M
sucrose, 10 mM dithioerythritol, and 1 mg/ml resazurin
under an atmosphere of molecular nitrogen. After addition of
F420H2 (64 µM) and 2-OH-phenazine
(125 µM), the reaction was started by the injection of
washed vesicles (19 µg of protein). The concentrations of ADP, SF
6847, and DCCD were 0.16 mM, 25 µM, and 250 nmol/mg protein, respectively.
, + ADP;
,
F420H2 omitted;
, + ADP + SF 6847;
, ADP
omitted;
, + ADP + DCCD. 2-OH-phenazine, DCCD, and SF 6847 were
added as ethanolic solutions. The controls received ethanol only. To
determine the ATP concentration 1-2-µl aliquots were withdrawn with
a syringe and analyzed using the luciferin/luciferase assay as
described previously (3).
51 kJ/mol (11). Furthermore, two different repeats of a 9-bp
sequence and a 10-bp sequence (TAAAGTGGCT and CTTTATTTT) were
identified in this region (Fig. 4B). These structures are similar to transcriptional termination sites of polypeptide-encoding genes from other archaea (12). All 12 structural genes are organized so
compactly in the cluster that there is almost no intergenic space for
promoter or terminator-like sequences. Therefore, the genes
fpoA-O may represent one operon. Evidence for this
assumption came from Northern blot analysis. A single 11-kilobase
signal was obtained when RNA from methanol-grown cells was hybridized with a specific probe (not shown). The size of the transcript is in
full accordance with the length of the predicted fpo
genes.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Organization of the fpo gene
cluster from M. mazei Gö1 compared with the
nuo operon from E. coli. The
sizes of the boxes are proprotional to the lengths of the genes.
Homologous genes are marked by broken lines. Subunits of the
purified core enzyme of the F420H2
dehydrogenase are indicated by black arrows. The genes are
shaded according to the function of the encoded polypeptides
(see text).
, membrane-associated module;
, membrane-integrale
module;
, input module;
, unknown function.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Putative promoter (A) and
terminator sequences (B) upstream and downstream of
the fpo gene cluster. A, conserved
base pairs are underlined. B, the stop codon of
fpoO is boxed. Stem loop structures are marked by open
arrows indicating the length and the orientation of the stems.
Tandem repeats are underlined.
Homologies of deduced amino acid sequences of fpo genes from M. mazei
Göl to corresponding gene products of NADH dehydrogenases from
other organisms
Binding motifs in the deduced amino acid sequences of the fpo genes
subunit of F420-reducing hydrogenases and to subunits of the F420H2 dehydrogenase
from M. tindarius (FfdB; Ref. 19) and A. fulgidus
(AF1833; Ref. 20). In the latter organism the fpoF homologue
gene AF1833 is part of the operon encoding the
F420H2 dehydrogenase. Recently, the gene was overexpressed in E. coli, and the corresponding polypeptide
was purified to homogeneity. The subunit contained nonheme iron,
acid-labile sulfur, and FAD and was able to oxidize
F420H2 when the artificial electron acceptor
methylviologen was added.2
Because AF1833 and FpoF are structurally equivalent and FpoF is part of
the purified F420H2 dehydrogenase from M. mazei Gö1, it may function as electron input device of the enzyme.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Very recently, it was shown that the
dihydrophenazine-dependent heterodisulfide reduction
(Reaction 2) is coupled to proton translocation exhibiting a
stoichiometry of 2H+/2e
(8). The experiments
in this publication show that in the first partial reaction catalyzed
by the F420H2 dehydrogenase, a maximum of
0.9 ± 0.2 protons/two electrons were translocated. Taking into
account that about 50% of the vesicles are uncoupled (2), a
H+/2e
ratio of about 2.0 could be considered.
Then the H+/2e
stoichiometries of the partial
reactions would add up to 4 and support the value of 3-4
H+/2e
translocated in the overall electron
transport from F420H2 to heterodisulfide (3).
In summary, the data clearly indicate that the
F420H2 dehydrogenase is a redox-driven proton
pump showing a maximal energetic efficiency of about 2 H+
translocated per 2e
transported.
transfer
reactions forming a semiphenazine radical as an intermediate in
solution (23). 4) It was shown that mitochondrial and bacterial NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductases as well as the
F420H2 dehydrogenase are inhibited by
diphenyleneiodonium chloride (24, 25). 5) The redox-reaction
catalyzed by the proteins is coupled to proton translocation.
255 mV (23). With the
assumption that the redox potential of methanophenazine is similar, the
change of free energy (
Go') coupled to the
F420H2-dependent methanophenazine
reduction is only
20.2 kJ/mol compared with a
Go' of
80.9 kJ/mol for the
NADH-dependent reduction of ubiquinone. These thermodynamic
facts are reflected by the coupling efficiencies of the enzymes because
the maximal H+/2e
ratio of the
F420H2 dehydrogenase is 1.8, in contrast to
NDH-1/complex I, which translocates four or even more protons across
the membrane per reaction cycle (30).

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Tentative models of the
F420H2 dehydrogenase and the NADH dehydrogenase
1 from E. coli. Proton translocating activity is
indicated by broken arrows. UQ, ubiquinone 10;
MPhen, methanophenazine. Functionally homologous
subcomplexes are indicated by equal shading.
, membrane-integral
module;
, membrane-associated module;
, input module;
,
unknown function.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
-L-glutamyl)-L-glutamic
acid phosphodiester of 7,8 didemethyl-8-hydroxy-5-deazariboflavin-5'-phosphate;
F420H2, reduced F420;
DCCD, N,N'-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide;
SF 6847, 3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-benzylidenemalononitrile;
2-OH-phenazine, 2-hydroxyphenazine;
contig, group of overlapping
clones.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Thauer, R.
(1998)
Microbiology
144,
2377-2406
2.
Deppenmeier, U.,
Lienard, T.,
and Gottschalk, G.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
457,
291-297
3.
Deppenmeier, U.,
Blaut, M.,
Mahlmann, A.,
and Gottschalk, G.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
9449-9453
4.
Müller, V.,
Ruppert, C.,
and Lemker, T.
(1999)
J. Bioenerg. Biomembr.
31,
15-27
5.
Abken, H. J.,
and Deppenmeier, U.
(1997)
FEMS Lett.
154,
231-237
6.
Haase, P.,
Deppenmeier, U.,
Blaut, M.,
and Gottschalk, G.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
203,
527-531
7.
Kunow, K.,
Linder, D.,
Stetter, K. O.,
and Thauer, R. K.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
223,
503-511
8.
Ide, T.,
Bäumer, S.,
and Deppenmeier, U.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
4076-4080
9.
Abken, H. J.,
Tietze, M.,
Brodersen, J.,
Bäumer, S.,
Beifuss, U.,
and Deppenmeier, U.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
2027-2032
10.
Bäumer, S.,
Murakami, E.,
Brodersen, J.,
Gottschalk, G.,
Ragsdale, S. W.,
and Deppenmeier, U.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
428,
295-298
11.
Freier, S. M.,
Kierzek, R.,
Jaeger, J. A.,
Sugimoto, N.,
Caruthers, M. H.,
Neilson, T.,
and Turner, D. H.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
9373-9377
12.
Brown, J. W.,
Daniels, C. J.,
and Reeve, J. N.
(1989)
CRC Crit. Rev. Microbiol.
16,
287-338
13.
Yano, T.,
Chu, S. S.,
Sled, V. D.,
Ohnishi, T.,
and Yagi, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4201-4211
14.
Heilig, R.
(1999)
Pyrococcus abyssi genome sequence, Genoscope
, Centre National de Sequencage, BP (191) 91006 EVRY cedex, France
15.
Finel, M.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1364,
112-121
16.
Friedrich, T.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1364,
134-146
17.
Walker, J. E.,
Skehel, J. M.,
and Buchanan, S. K.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
260,
14-34
18.
Ohnishi, T.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1364,
186-206
19.
Westenberg, D. J.,
Braune, A.,
Ruppert, C.,
Müller, V.,
Herzberg, C.,
Gottschalk, G.,
and Blaut, M.
(1999)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
170,
389-398
20.
Klenk, H. P.,
Clayton, R. A.,
Tomb, J. F.,
White, O.,
Nelson, K. A.,
Dodson, R. J.,
Gwinn, M.,
Hickey, E. K.,
Peterson, J. D.,
Richardson, D. L.,
Kerlavage, A. R.,
Graham, D. E.,
Kyrpides, N. C.,
Fleischmann, R. D.,
Quackenbusch, J.,
Lee, N. H.,
Sutton, G. G.,
Gill, S.,
Kirkness, E. F.,
Dougherty, B. A.,
McKenny, K.,
Adams, M. D.,
Loftus, B.,
and Venter, J. C.
(1997)
Nature
390,
364-370
21.
Deppenmeier, U.,
Müller, V.,
and Gottschalk, G.
(1996)
Arch. Microbiol.
165,
149-163
22.
Ohnishi, T.,
Sled, V. D.,
Yano, T.,
Yagi, T.,
Burbaev, D. S.,
and Viogradov, A. D.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1365,
301-308
23.
Mann, S.
(1970)
Arch. Mikrobiol.
71,
304-318
24.
Brodersen, J.,
Bäumer, S.,
Abken, H. J.,
Gottschalk, G.,
and Deppenmeier, U.
(1999)
Eur. J. Biochem.
259,
218-224
25.
Majander, A.,
Finel, M.,
and Wikström, M. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
21037-21042
26.
Weidener, U.,
Geier, S.,
Ptock, A.,
Friedrich, T.,
Leif, H.,
and Weiss, H.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
233,
109-122
27.
Dupuis, A.,
Chevallet, M.,
Darrouzet, E.,
Duborjal, H.,
Lunardi, J.,
and Issartel, J. P.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1364,
147-165
28.
Yagi, T.,
Yano, T.,
Di Bernardo, S.,
and Matsuno-Yagi, A.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1364,
125-133
29.
Friedrich, T.,
and Weiss, H. J.
(1997)
Theor. Biol.
187,
529-540
30.
Dutton, P. L,
Moser, C. C.,
Sled, V.,
Daldal, F.,
and Ohnishi, T.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1364,
245-257
31.
Bult, C.,
White, J. O.,
Olsen, G. J.,
Zhou, L.,
Fleischmann, R. D.,
Sutton, G. G. J.,
Blake, A.,
FitzGerald, L. M.,
Clayton, R. A.,
Gocayne, J. D.,
Kerlavage, A. R.,
Dougherty, B. A.,
Tomb, J.-F.,
Adams, M. D.,
Reich, C. I.,
Overbeek, R.,
Kirkness, E. F.,
Weinstock, K. G.,
Merrick, J. M.,
Glodek, A.,
Scott, J. L.,
Geoghagen, N. S. M.,
Weidman, J. F.,
Fuhrmann, J. L.,
Nguyen, D.,
Utterback, T. R.,
Kelley, J. M.,
Peterson, J. D.,
Sadow, P. W.,
Hanna, M. C.,
Cotton, M. D.,
Roberts, K. M.,
Hurst, M. A.,
Kaine, B. P.,
Borodovsky, M.,
Klenk, H.-P.,
Fraser, C. M.,
Smith, H. O.,
Woese, C. R.,
and Venter, J. C.
(1996)
Science
273,
1058-1073
32.
Smith, D. R.,
Doucette-Stamm, L. A.,
Deloughery, C.,
Lee, H.,
Dubois, J.,
Aldrege, T.,
Bashirzahdeh, R.,
Blakely, D.,
Cook, R.,
Gilbert, K.,
Harrison, D.,
Hoang, L.,
Keagle, P.,
Lumm, W.,
Pothier, B.,
Qiu, D.,
Spadafora, R.,
Vicaire, R.,
Wang, Y.,
Wierzbowski, J.,
Gibson, R.,
Jiwani, N.,
Caruso, A.,
Bush, D.,
Safer, H.,
Patwell, D.,
Prabhakar, S.,
McDougall, S.,
Shimer, G.,
Goyal, A.,
Pietrokovski, S.,
Church, G. M.,
Daniels, C. J.,
Mao, J.,
Rice, P.,
Nölling, J.,
and Reeve, J. N.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
7135-7155
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. F. Johnson and B. Mukhopadhyay Coenzyme F420-Dependent Sulfite Reductase-Enabled Sulfite Detoxification and Use of Sulfite as a Sole Sulfur Source by Methanococcus maripaludis Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 1, 2008; 74(11): 3591 - 3595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. F. Johnson and B. Mukhopadhyay A New Type of Sulfite Reductase, a Novel Coenzyme F420-dependent Enzyme, from the Methanarchaeon Methanocaldococcus jannaschii J. Biol. Chem., November 18, 2005; 280(46): 38776 - 38786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Seshadri, L. Adrian, D. E. Fouts, J. A. Eisen, A. M. Phillippy, B. A. Methe, N. L. Ward, W. C. Nelson, R. T. Deboy, H. M. Khouri, et al. Genome Sequence of the PCE-Dechlorinating Bacterium Dehalococcoides ethenogenes Science, January 7, 2005; 307(5706): 105 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Prommeenate, A. M. Lennon, C. Markert, M. Hippler, and P. J. Nixon Subunit Composition of NDH-1 Complexes of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803: IDENTIFICATION OF TWO NEW ndh GENE PRODUCTS WITH NUCLEAR-ENCODED HOMOLOGUES IN THE CHLOROPLAST Ndh COMPLEX J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 2004; 279(27): 28165 - 28173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Klunker, B. Haas, A. Hirtreiter, L. Figueiredo, D. J. Naylor, G. Pfeifer, V. Muller, U. Deppenmeier, G. Gottschalk, F. U. Hartl, et al. Coexistence of Group I and Group II Chaperonins in the Archaeon Methanosarcina mazei J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2003; 278(35): 33256 - 33267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |