HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 24, 18138-18144, June 16, 2000

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 275/24/18138    most recent M000379200v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Terry, C. F. Articles by Green, F. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Terry, C. F. Articles by Green, F. R. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Cooperative Influence of Genetic Polymorphisms on Interleukin 6 Transcriptional Regulation^*

Catherine F. Terry, Valerie Loukaci^§, and Fiona R. Green^¶

From the  Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom and ^§ INSERM SC7, 17 rue du Fer a Moulin, 75005 Paris, France

Received for publication, January 19, 2000, and in revised form, March 20, 2000

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Interleukin 6 (IL6) plays key roles in hematopoiesis, immune, and acute phase responses. Dysregulated IL6 expression is implicated in diseases such as atherosclerosis and arthritis. We have examined the functional effect of four polymorphisms in the IL6 promoter (597GA, 572GC, 373A_nT_n, 174GC) by identifying the naturally occurring haplotypes and comparing their effects on reporter gene expression. The results indicate different transcriptional regulation in the ECV304 cell line compared with the HeLa cell line, suggesting cell type-specific regulation of IL6 expression. The haplotypes showed functional differences in the ECV304 cell line; transcription was higher from the GG9/11G haplotype and lower from the AG8/12G allele. The differences suggest that more than one of the polymorphic sites is functional; the base differences at distinct polymorphic sites do not act independently of one another, and one polymorphism influences the functional effect of variation at other polymorphic sites. These results show that genetic polymorphisms in the promoter influence IL6 transcription not by a simple additive mechanism but rather through complex interactions determined by the haplotype.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

IL6,¹ a multifunctional cytokine with a central role in host defense (1-3), has diverse functions including stimulation of the hepatic acute phase response to infection and injury (4), differentiation and/or activation of macrophages and T cells, growth and terminal differentiation of B cells, support of multipotential colony formation by hematopoietic stem cells, and neural differentiation. IL6 is not constitutively expressed but is highly inducible and is produced in response to a number of inflammatory stimuli such as IL1, platelet-derived growth factor, tumor necrosis factor  (TNF), bacterial products such as endotoxin, and viral infection. Glucocortocoids produced as part of the inflammatory response act to enhance some IL6 effects, such as acute phase protein synthesis, but down-regulate IL6 expression, providing a negative feedback pathway on the inflammatory response in vivo. Many cell types produce IL6 in response to noxious stimuli, including monocytes/macrophages (5), fibroblasts (6), endothelial cells (7), adipocytes (8), T cells (9), and mast cells (10).

IL6 is an essential mediator of the acute phase response. In IL6 knockout mice, the T cell-dependent antibody response is dramatically compromised in response to localized infection and tissue damage, with impairment of the response to certain viral infections; macrophage stimulation was also deficient (11-13). IL6-deficient mice also show 20-40% reduced numbers of thymocytes and peripheral T cells, suggesting the involvement of IL6 in T cell proliferation.

Dysregulated IL6 production is implicated in the pathology of several disease processes. Constitutively high levels of IL6 in transgenic murine B cell lineages results in fatal plasmacytosis (14) and has been implicated in human multiple myeloma (15-17) and Kaposi's sarcoma (18). Increased IL6 levels are also a feature of diseases such as systemic onset juvenile chronic arthritis (19), rheumatoid arthritis (20), osteoporosis (21, 22), and psoriasis (23). The symptoms of cardiac myxoma (24) and Castleman's disease (25) are the consequence of systemic overexpression of IL6, which induces polyclonal B cell activation and leads to hypergammaglobulinaemia and autoantibody production. IL6 is the key regulator of the acute phase protein, fibrinogen, which is an important risk factor for atherothrombotic disease and is implicated in thrombus and plaque formation. IL6 mRNA is present in atherosclerotic arteries at a 10-40-fold higher level than in non-atherosclerotic vessels (26). These results suggest the involvement of IL6 in the development of human atherosclerosis. Many of the pleiotropic effects of IL6, such as its ability to stimulate differentiation of monocytes to macrophages (27), may be relevant to the growth of the atherosclerotic plaque.

Circulating levels of IL6 are largely regulated at the level of expression, due to the rapid plasma clearance of this cytokine (28). The transcription of this molecule is tightly regulated by the transcription factors NFIL6, NFB, Fos/Jun, CRBP, and the glucocorticoid receptor. Experiments in HeLa cells showed the region 180 to 123 in the promoter to be crucial for transcription induction with viruses, second messengers, and cytokines such as IL1, TNF, platelet-derived growth factor, and epidermal growth factor (29, 30). Activation of the IL6 promoter involves synergism between the transcription factor NFIL6 (158 to 145), and the transcription NFB (73 to 64) (31, 32) (Fig. 1). Potent repression of IL6 expression by steroid hormones such as glucocorticoids and estrogen does not appear to involve high affinity binding of the estrogen receptor or the glucocorticoid receptor to IL6 DNA (33-35). Rather, the estrogen receptor and glucocorticoid receptor ligand complexes interact directly with the transcription factors NFIL6 and NFB, inhibiting DNA binding and thus repressing transcription (36). Thus, IL6 transcription is regulated by co-ordination among factors binding at distinct sites in the promoter.

Polymorphisms in the promoter region of the IL6 gene may result in inter-individual variation in transcription and expression. Genetic variants could therefore influence an individual's susceptibility to a diverse range of diseases. There are precedents for this; for example, the TNF 308TNF2 allele is associated with elevated risk of cerebral malaria (37). It has been shown that a polymorphism in the 5' flanking region of the IL6 gene at position 174 (GC) appears to affect IL6 transcription, and the presence of the C allele may be associated with systemic onset juvenile chronic arthritis (19). Understanding the influence of genetic variation on the control of IL6 expression may provide insight into inter-individual variation in disease risk and underlying pathogenesis.

Polymorphisms do not exist in isolation, and it may be the combination of base changes at several sites, i.e. the haplotype, that influences function. We describe here two point substitutions in the 5' region of the IL6 promoter at position 572 (GC), and position 597 (GA) and study the effect of the previously described 373 AT run polymorphism and the 174 (GC) point substitution. The position of these polymorphic sites relative to transcription factor binding sites is illustrated in Fig. 1. We aimed to identify the common promoter haplotypes present in a population, and assess the functional consequences of these haplotypes on transcriptional control, in response to activating and inhibitory stimuli in different cell types.

	EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Direct Haplotyping-- Double-ended allele-specific PCR primers were used in combination to allow direct haplotype determination in a group of 182 unrelated individuals from a family study on hypertension (38). These allelic PCR products were sequenced to haplotype for the A_nT_n run in a small group of 39 healthy controls. PCR primers for detection of the single nucleotide polymorphisms are listed in Table I.

Haplotyping PCR Conditions-- Haplotype-specific PCRs were carried out as described (39, 40) at a final volume of 13 µl in 96-well plates. Control primers were used in each reaction to avoid false negative interpretation. A total of 5 µl of primer mix with 3 ng/µl control primers 63 and 64 and 10 ng/µl allele-specific primers was overlaid with 10 µl of mineral oil. 8 µl of PCR mix was added. The final concentration of reaction components were as follows: 200 µM each dNTP, 2 mM MgCl₂, 67 mM Tris base (pH 8.8), 16.6 mM ammonium sulfate, 0.01% Tween 20, with 40 ng of genomic DNA and 0.2 units of Taq polymerase (Bioline, London, United Kingdom (UK)). The PCR conditions were 95 °C for 1 min; 5 cycles of 95 °C for 35 s, 70 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 35 s; 21 cycles of 95 °C for 25 s, 65 °C for 50 s, and 72 °C for 40 s; followed by 4 cycles of 95 °C for 35 s, 55 °C for 60 s and 72 °C for 90 s. The entire PCR reaction with 10 µl of loading dye was run on a 1% agarose gel in 0.5× TBE at 200 V for 20 min. The various combinations of allele-specific primers and the haplotypes they amplify are shown in Table II.

Automated sequencing of the allele-specific PCR products was carried out by the Department of Biochemistry (University of Oxford, Oxford, UK), using the primer 5'-GCTGCGATGGAGTCAGAG-3'.

Screening for Coding Region Polymorphisms-- PCR and sequencing of the five exons and intron 1 of the IL6 gene in 20 individuals were carried out using the primer pairs shown in Table III. The PCR reagents for the 40-µl reaction volume were: 67 mM Tris base (pH 8.8), 16.6 mM ammonium sulfate, 0.01% Tween 20, 200 nM dNTPs (Advanced Biotechnologies, Epsom, UK), 5% W1 (Life Technologies, Inc., Paisley, UK), 2 mM MgCl, 1 unit of Taq polymerase (Bioline) and 200 ng of each primer (MWG, Milton Keynes, UK). 200 ng of genomic DNA was added for each reaction. The PCR reaction conditions were as described for haplotyping. DNA sequencing was carried out using Thermo Sequenase DNA polymerase with the 3'-[-³³P]dNTP internal label, cycle sequencing protocol detailed by the manufacturer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, UK).

Reporter Gene Constructs-- Both allelic forms (174G and 174C) of the IL6 promoter region, 221 to +13, were cloned into the pCAT-basic vector (Promega, Southampton, UK). The primer pair LH3 and RH1 (Table III; Fig. 1) was used to PCR genomic DNA. The resulting Eco47III-digested (5') and XhoI-digested (3') fragment was directly cloned into the SmaI-XhoI sites of pCAT-basic, upstream of the CAT gene.

Seven different haplotypes of the IL6 promoter region 641 to +13 containing all four polymorphic sites were cloned into the pGL3-basic luciferase vector (Promega). Primers RH1 and LH1 (Table III; Fig. 1) containing a MluI site were used to PCR genomic DNA from individuals with different haplotypes of the IL6 promoter. The resultant MluI-XhoI fragments were cloned into the MluI-XhoI sites of the pGL3-basic luciferase vector. Sequencing of all clones for the multiple cloning sites and the entire cloned IL6 promoter region was carried out to ensure that the only variation between clones was at the desired polymorphic sites.

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1.   A schematic representation of the 5'-flanking region of the IL6 gene, identifying the four polymorphic sites, transcription factor binding sites, primer binding sites, and restriction enzyme cutting sites used for cloning. Location numbers are relative to the major transcription site.

Cell Lines and Cell Culture-- The human derived epithelial-like cell line HeLa (ATCC, CCL-2) was chosen as much of the previous analysis of the IL6 promoter had been performed in this cell line. The ECV304 cell line was chosen as it was reported to show some properties of endothelial cells; more recently, it has been suggested that it is epithelial in origin. The rationale for choosing an endothelial-like cell line was because such cells are known to produce IL6 in the atherosclerotic plaque, which may be important in the development of the disease. Haplotype-specific control of IL6 expression was compared in these two cell lines of different origin to investigate potential cell type-specific control of gene expression.

Cell lines were cultured in Eagle's minimal essential medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) for HeLa cells or M199 (Sigma, Poole, UK), for ECV304.7 cells, supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (PAA, Teddington, UK), 2 mM L-glutamine (PAA), 45 µg/ml penicillin, 45 µg/ml streptomycin, 90 µg/ml kanamycin. All cells were cultured at 37 °C in 5% CO₂.

Transient Transfections and Reporter Gene Assays-- Plasmid DNA was prepared using a Qiagen endotoxin-free Maxi Prep-500 kit. Two separate preparations of each clone were used, and, for two out of seven clones studied, two separately cloned constructs were used. HeLa and ECV304 cells were transfected during the log phase of their growth using a calcium phosphate co-precipitation method. 1 × 10⁶ HeLa cells were seeded into 9-cm Petri dishes, or 1.9 × 10⁵ ECV304 cells were seeded into six-well plates and incubated for 24 h. HeLa cells were transfected using 125 mM CaCl₂, 140 mM NaCl, 25 mM Hepes free acid, 0.74 mM disodium hydrogen phosphate (pH 7.06) with 10 µg of each reporter gene construct and either 10 µg of construct expressing -galactosidase under the control of the CMV promoter (kind gift of D. Greaves, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford) if CAT was the reporter gene, or 0.2 µg of pRL-TK Renilla luciferase vector (Promega) if the reporter gene was firefly luciferase. ECV304 were transfected with one third of the above amounts of DNA. Negative control experiments included mock transfections with no DNA and with the -galactosidase or pRL-TK vectors alone. Positive control experiments were carried out using the pCAT3-control vector or the pGL3-control luciferase vector and either the CMV-Gal vector or the pRL-TK vector. The positive and negative control experiments ensured that maximum reporter gene expression was not reached during the experiment and that background levels were negligible.

16 h after the addition of calcium phosphate co-precipitate, the plates were washed with phosphate-buffered saline, fresh medium applied and incubated for 24 h untreated, treated with interleukin-1 (2.5 ng/ml) only, or treated with IL1 and dexamethasone (3.92 µg/ml) (Sigma). Cell lysates of the transfected cells were prepared and assayed for -galactosidase using the chromogenic substrate o-nitrophenyl--D-galactopyranoside (Sigma). CAT was assayed using a standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in microtiter plates (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Lewes, UK). Quantitation of luminescence from firefly luciferase was achieved with luciferase assay Reagent II (Promega). Quenching of the firefly luciferase and concomitant activation of Renilla luciferase was accomplished by adding Stop & Glo^® reagent (Promega). Luminescence was measured in a luminometer (Lucy, Anthos, UK). IL1 was titrated from 0.005 to 10 ng/ml, and a stimulation time course was carried out from 1 to 24 h for both HeLa and ECV304 cell lines. The conditions used above gave a maximal response in these experiments. Dexamethasone concentration was based upon published data (33). All experiments were performed at least twice, with each transfection in duplicate, using two separate DNA preparations. CAT expression was normalized against -galactosidase activity and firefly luciferase was normalized against Renilla luciferase activity to account for variation in transfection efficiency.

Statistical Analysis-- The t test (allowing for unequal variance) was used to compare experimental ratios between individual clones and between different treatments. Owing to the large number of comparisons, significance was considered to be at the 0.005 level. Results are shown as mean ± 95% confidence interval.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Haplotype Frequency for Point Substitutions (174GC, 572GC, 597GA)

The haplotypes for the three point substitutions in the promoter region of the IL6 gene, for 182 unrelated individuals, are shown in Table IV.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table IV Haplotype frequencies for 3-point substitutions of the IL6 promoter in 182 control individuals Haplotypes are indicated in the order: 597GA, 572GC, 174GC.

Complete Haplotype Frequencies

We assessed the complete haplotypes for all four promoter polymorphisms in 39 healthy controls (Table V). The 8A/12T allele was shown to be associated with the 597A allele and the 174C allele in all but one case. The 597G and 174G alleles showed more diversity in the associated A_nT_n alleles, with 9A/11T, 10A/10T, 10A/11T, and an allele with a deletion of the G residue adjacent to the upstream end of the A_nT_n run identified. The rare 572C allele (0.052) was always associated with the 597G, 174G and 10A/10T alleles. The four most common haplotypes were: 597A 572G 8A/12T 174C; 597G 572G 10A/11T 174G; 597G 572G 9A/11T 174G; 597G 572G 10A/10T 174G.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table V Frequency for complete IL6 haplotypes in 39 control individuals Haplotypes are indicated in the order: 597GA, 572GC, 373AnTn, 174GC. ^ indicates a G nucleotide deletion adjacent to the AnTn run.

Screening of Intron 1 and the 5 Exons

Screening of intron 1 and the 5 exons of the IL6 gene in 20 unrelated individuals revealed no genetic variation, although we consistently observed variations from the published sequence (GenBank^TM accession no. Y00081): an additional T residue at position 584, two additional G residues at position +117, AAGG insert at +154, C substituted for an A at +158, CG instead of GC at +165 and +166, an additional C residue at +204, T instead of an A at positions +431 and +506, a C inserted at +465, a C deleted from position +471, a TGC insert at position +478 and a +CC insert at position +490.

Functional Studies

211+13 Constructs (Figs. 2 and 3) Transfection of the 221+13 construct into HeLa cells resulted in both alleles showing a significant induction in the presence of IL1 (p < 0.0000002); 174G showed a 9.2 (±0.61)-fold induction, and the 174C allele showed a 12.2 (±1.79)-fold induction after 24 h (Fig. 2). There was no significant difference between the two alleles at any of the time points studied (Fig. 3). Both alleles showed a significant reduction in expression when treated with IL1 and dexamethasone compared with IL1 alone (Fig. 2). Dexamethasone did not reduce IL1 induction of the IL6 promoter to untreated levels (174G allele = 3.47 ± 0.57, 174C allele = 5.03 ± 1.15). In contrast to HeLa cells, ECV304 cells showed no IL1 induction of transcription with these shorter constructs (Fig. 2).

View larger version (26K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2.   Effect of the 211 to +13 region of the IL6 promoter on CAT expression in HeLa cells (panel A) and in ECV304 cells (panel B) for the two alleles at the 174 position. CAT activity was corrected for transfection efficiency by co-transfection with a CMV -galactosidase construct. The values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of the -fold increase compared with the untreated 174G clone. Cells were incubated for 24 h in the absence of IL1, in the presence of IL1, or in the presence of IL1 and dexamethasone.

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3.   IL1 stimulation time course for the effect of the 211 to +13 region of the IL6 promoter on CAT expression in HeLa cells for the 174G and G alleles. CAT activity was corrected for transfection efficiency by co-transfection with a CMV -galactosidase construct. The values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of the -fold increase compared with the untreated 174G clone. Cells were incubated for the specified time in the presence of IL1.

641+13 Constructs (Fig. 4 and Table VI)

HeLa Cell Line-- All haplotypes tested in the 641+13 constructs showed a significant (p < 0.0003) approximate 6-fold increase (5.4 ± 0.64 to 7.0 ± 1.09) in transcription on IL1 stimulation in HeLa cells. Dexamethasone did not reduce expression for the AG8/12G haplotype, whereas all other haplotypes resulted in a significant reduction in expression (p < 0.005). The haplotypes GG9/11C and GG10/10G showed no difference between transcription levels in the untreated state compared with the IL1- and dexamethasone-treated state, whereas haplotypes GG9/11G, AG8/12C and AG8/12G did not show complete damping down of IL1 induction (p < 0.005) at the dexamethasone concentration used.

View larger version (34K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4.   Effect of the 641 to +13 region of the IL6 promoter on luciferase expression in HeLa cells (panel A), and in ECV304 cells (panel B) for seven common haplotypes. Firefly luciferase activity was corrected for transfection efficiency by co-transfection with a Renilla luciferase construct. The values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of the -fold increase compared with the untreated AG8/12G clone. Cells were incubated for 24 h in the absence of IL1, in the presence of IL1, or in the presence of IL1 and dexamethasone.

There was no significant difference among the individual +641+13 clones in the untreated state, when treated with IL1 alone or in the presence of IL1 and dexamethasone, in the HeLa cell line.

ECV304 Cell Line-- In the ECV304 cell line, all 641+13 constructs showed a significant stimulation of expression with IL1. Dexamethasone significantly reduced IL1-stimulated expression for all haplotypes. Dexamethasone reduced expression to a level not significantly different from unstimulated expression levels, with the exception of the AG8/12C construct, which showed significantly higher expression in the untreated state compared with the dexamethasone-inhibited state (p < 0.005) but the absolute difference was small (0.52- versus 1.18-fold).

In the ECV304 cells, there were significant differences between certain long clones. In the untreated state, the haplotype AG8/12C showed significantly higher expression than all other clones (p < 0.005), but, again, the absolute difference was small (1.51 versus 1.23 to 0.83). When stimulated with IL1, the GG9/11G clone showed significantly higher expression (5.02 ± 0.60-fold induction) than all other clones (1.9 ± 0.23 to 3.0 ± 0.52) (p < 0.005). The AG8/12G haplotype showed significantly lower IL1-stimulated expression than the clone differing only at the 174 site, AG8/12C (p < 0.0005), as well as the GG9/11G clone (p < 0.00005), the GG10/11G clone (p < 0.0006), and the GG10/10G clone (p < 0.00005), but was not significantly different from the GC10/10G clone.

In the presence of dexamethasone, there were also significant differences between haplotypes, with the GG10/11G haplotype (0.77 ± 0.02) showing significantly lower expression (greater repression) than the GG9/11G (1.27 ± 0.09) (p < 0.0001), GC10/10G (1.01 ± 0.24) (p < 0.0009) and AG8/12C (1.18 ± 0.03) (p < 0.0002) haplotypes, but absolute differences were small.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Our findings indicate the essential role of upstream elements for IL1 induction in the ECV304 cell line compared with the region required for IL1-induced transcription in the HeLa cell line. Our results suggest that regulation of IL6 transcription is cell type-specific, which may be of physiological relevance when considering different disease processes. The other important finding is the functional effect of IL6 promoter haplotype on expression levels. The study of a single polymorphism in isolation will not reveal the overall functional effect of the polymorphism in combination with other functional polymorphisms.

In the HeLa cell line, both 174 allelic constructs showed strong induction upon IL1 treatment (11-fold) in contrast to published data (19) on a longer fragment (550 to +61), which showed that the 174C allele in combination with 8A/12T resulted in a complete lack of transcriptional induction by IL1. The difference in these observations could be explained by the presence of a 174C allele-specific repressor between +13 and +61 or between 211 and 550. Our studies with clones containing the fragment 641 to +13 showed the AG8/12G haplotype to result in significantly lower expression than the AG8/12C haplotype, again contrary to the published results (19), suggesting that any repression of the 174C allele must be the result of the presence of the more downstream region, +13 to +61, in the clones described by Fishman et al. The possibility of this allelic repression is difficult to explain in the light of the absence of additional polymorphisms in this region.

In the ECV304 cell line, there is no clear and simple relationship between one polymorphism and the differences observed in transcription levels from the longer constructs. The increased expression levels from the AG8/12C clone under basal conditions are statistically significant, but, considering the actual effects on transcription levels (the -fold differences were minimal), the physiological relevance of this remains uncertain. The same conclusion should also be applied to the differences observed in the ECV304 cell line when examining the damping down of IL6 transcription in response to dexamethasone. The 10A/11T-containing haplotype shows significantly greater inhibition of transcription than the 9A/11T, and the AG8/12C and GC10/10G haplotypes at the dexamethasone dose used. Although these experimental differences were found to be statistically significant, the physiological importance of these findings is questionable when the relative differences are so small.

Our results show that the relationship between IL6 expression and the 174 polymorphism is not as simple as might be expected; the A_nT_n allele has an influence on expression when comparing the GG9/11G clone and the GG10/11G clone, the GG9/11G haplotype resulting in significantly higher expression than the GG10/11G haplotype, but the increased expression from this one clone is not the consequence of the 9A/11T allele alone as similarly high expression is not seen from the GG9/11C allele. The higher expression is not the result of the 174G allele, as the other 174G haplotypes do not produce the same effect, and the same follows for the 597G allele and the 572G allele. The difference is the result of the combination of alleles for the different polymorphisms, i.e. the haplotype. This same conclusion is drawn for the low expressing haplotype AG8/12G; the low expression is not the result of the 597A allele or the 8A/12T allele, as the other clone containing these two alleles (AG8/12C) shows significantly higher expression. The 174G allele is not the cause alone either, as the same lower transcription is not observed for the other 174G-containing clones. The conclusion is that the different polymorphisms have an influence on transcription but the polymorphisms are not functioning individually. The effect of one polymorphism synergizes with the effect of another, so the difference caused by one variant is not easy to determine. One explanation is that the differences are the result of specific combinations of the A_nT_n run and the 174 polymorphism, but a complete explanation awaits analysis of potential transcription factor binding and/or interactions.

The variation observed in the ECV304 cell line between the clones in the stimulated state may be important physiologically. Owing to the short half-life of IL6 in vivo, the consequence of the strikingly increased induction with IL1 of the GG9/11G haplotype would be increased levels of IL6 locally, and probably not a prolonged acute phase response under normal regulator conditions because the haplotype responds to the down-regulation of expression (e.g. by dexamethasone) in the same way as the other haplotypes. The AG8/12G haplotype resulting in significantly lower levels of expression with IL1 stimulation could also be of physiological importance.

It is also important to consider the reasons for the differential expression of short and long constructs in the ECV304 cells compared with HeLa cells. It may be that transcription from the IL6 promoter reaches a maximum level in HeLa cells, with transcription factors becoming limiting and masking any potential variation between clones. Expression levels in ECV304 are lower for both long and short constructs. From the study of a positive control, it was clear that production of the reporter gene itself was not the limiting factor. Second, the cell type-specific differences may be the results of differential expression of essential transcription factors in the two cell lines or underlying differences in transcriptional control.

When considering these results in the context of potential population-based studies, the overall effect on level if only the 174GC polymorphism is considered would be that the C allele would show lower expression than the G allele, because the 174G-containing haplotypes with lowest expression levels only account for approximately 5% of the population. This would explain the findings of Fishman et al. (19) that the C allele was associated with significantly lower levels of plasma IL6 levels in a population of healthy subjects, but if future studies show this low expressing AG8/12G haplotype or, indeed, the high expressing GG9/11G haplotype to affect disease susceptibility, genotyping of the 174GC polymorphism alone would be inadequate.

The overall conclusion of this study is that differences in IL6 promoter haplotype may have an important role in determining levels of transcription for the IL6 gene. The transcriptional control of this gene is complex, and subtle variations in the promoter influence regulation of this system. The observation that base changes at adjacent polymorphic sites are not independent suggests that there may be interaction between the transcriptional machinery at the separate sites. The function of one variation is determined by the effect of other alleles at distinct polymorphic sites, and the effect of altering the DNA sequence in two separate regions does not have the simple combined effect of the alterations individually. A run of A and T nucleotides will result in variation in helical structure with consequent bending in the DNA; it is possible that variation in such bending as the result of different sequences of A_nT_n run could influence the binding of transcription factors in the region and/or the interaction of transcription factors that may bind at sites flanking the putative region of curvature. The difference in transcription factor binding as the result of this structural change would then be compounded by the effects of other variations. This study underlines the importance of studying the transcriptional control region as a whole when considering the functional effects of natural variants, and shows the importance of understanding the function of genetic variants prior to embarking on population-based association studies.

	ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank C. Julier and B. Keavney for providing Hypertension Oxford Family DNAs and K. Channon, F. Cambien, and J. W. B. Senaratne for critically reading this manuscript.

	FOOTNOTES

^* This work was supported by the Medical Research Council and British Heart Foundation Grant SF/95024.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

^¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Current address: BHF Molecular Cardiology Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom. Fax: 44-1865-287664; E-mail: fionag@well.ox.ac.uk.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 22, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000379200

	ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: IL, interleukin; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; CMV, cytomegalovirus; TNF, tumor necrosis factor .

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. C. Reyes-Gibby, B. El Osta, M. R. Spitz, H. Parsons, R. Kurzrock, X. Wu, S. Shete, and E. Bruera The Influence of Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} -308 G/A and IL-6 -174 G/C on Pain and Analgesia Response in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Supportive Care Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2008; 17(11): 3262 - 3267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. K. Pedersen and M. A. Febbraio Muscle as an Endocrine Organ: Focus on Muscle-Derived Interleukin-6 Physiol Rev, October 1, 2008; 88(4): 1379 - 1406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Shen, D. K. Arnett, P. Perez-Martinez, L. D. Parnell, C.-Q. Lai, J. M. Peacock, J. E. Hixson, M. Y. Tsai, R. J. Straka, P. N. Hopkins, et al. The effect of IL6-174C/G polymorphism on postprandial triglyceride metabolism in the GOLDN study,boxs J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1839 - 1845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Oberbach, S. Lehmann, K. Kirsch, J. Krist, M. Sonnabend, A. Linke, A. Tonjes, M. Stumvoll, M. Bluher, and P. Kovacs Long-term exercise training decreases interleukin-6 (IL-6) serum levels in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance: effect of the -174G/C variant in IL-6 gene Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2008; 159(2): 129 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Fornage, Y. A. Chiang, E. S. O'Meara, B. M. Psaty, A. P. Reiner, D. S. Siscovick, R. P. Tracy, and W.T. Longstreth Jr Biomarkers of Inflammation and MRI-Defined Small Vessel Disease of the Brain: The Cardiovascular Health Study Stroke, July 1, 2008; 39(7): 1952 - 1959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R. Velez, S. J. Fortunato, S. M. Williams, and R. Menon Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and receptor (IL6-R) gene haplotypes associate with amniotic fluid protein concentrations in preterm birth Hum. Mol. Genet., June 1, 2008; 17(11): 1619 - 1630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Wilkening, B. Tavelin, F. Canzian, K. Enquist, R. Palmqvist, A. Altieri, G. Hallmans, K. Hemminki, P. Lenner, and A. Forsti Interleukin promoter polymorphisms and prognosis in colorectal cancer Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2008; 29(6): 1202 - 1206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Sauter, A. Rosenberger, L. Beckmann, S. Kropp, K. Mittelstrass, M. Timofeeva, G. Wolke, A. Steinwachs, D. Scheiner, E. Meese, et al. Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1) Is Associated with Early-Onset Lung Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1127 - 1135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. P. Smith, F. D'Aiuto, J. Palmen, J. A. Cooper, J. Samuel, S. Thompson, J. Sanders, N. Donos, L. Nibali, D. Brull, et al. Association of Serum Interleukin-6 Concentration with a Functional IL6 -6331T>C Polymorphism Clin. Chem., May 1, 2008; 54(5): 841 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W.-C. Liao, J.-T. Lin, C.-Y. Wu, S.-P. Huang, M.-T. Lin, A. S.-H. Wu, Y.-J. Huang, and M.-S. Wu Serum Interleukin-6 Level but not Genotype Predicts Survival after Resection in Stages II and III Gastric Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2008; 14(2): 428 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. C. Reyes-Gibby, M. Spitz, X. Wu, K. Merriman, C. Etzel, E. Bruera, R. Kurzrock, and S. Shete Cytokine Genes and Pain Severity in Lung Cancer: Exploring the Influence of TNF-{alpha}-308 G/A IL6-174G/C and IL8-251T/A Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2007; 16(12): 2745 - 2751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. Tso, J. G. Merino, and S. Warach Interleukin-6 174G/C Polymorphism and Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 3070 - 3075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]