![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 24, 18271-18278, June 16, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, February 16, 2000, and in revised form, March 29, 2000
Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential
enrichment (SELEX) is a powerful method for the identification of small
oligonucleotides that bind with high affinity and specificity to target
proteins. Such DNAs/RNAs are a new class of potential chemotherapeutics that could block the enzymatic activity of pathologically relevant proteins. We have conducted a detailed biochemical study of the interaction of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) with a SELEX-derived pseudoknot RNA aptamer. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy of site-directed spin-labeled RT mutants revealed that this aptamer was selected for
binding to the "closed" conformation of the enzyme. Kinetic analysis showed that the RNA inhibitor bound to HIV RT in a two-step process, with association rates similar to those described for model
DNA/DNA and DNA/RNA substrates. However, the dissociation of the
pseudoknot RNA from RT was dramatically slower than observed for model
substrates. Equilibrium binding studies revealed an extraordinarily low
Kd, of about 25 pM, for the
enzyme-aptamer interaction, presumably a consequence of the slow
off-rates. Additionally, this pseudoknot aptamer is highly specific for
HIV-1 RT, with the closely related HIV-2 enzyme showing a binding
affinity close to 4 orders of magnitude lower.
HIV1 reverse
transcriptase (RT), a key enzyme of the retroviral life cycle,
catalyzes the conversion of the single stranded genomic viral RNA into
double stranded proviral DNA, which in turn is integrated into the host
genome. The enzyme consists of an asymmetric heterodimer of two
subunits, p66 and p51, possessing RNA- and DNA-dependent
DNA polymerase and RNase H activities. The small subunit, p51, is
derived from p66 by proteolytic cleavage of the C-terminal domain.
Several x-ray structures of RT have been determined showing structural
changes of the enzyme depending on whether the protein is bound to
inhibitors, bound to substrates, or unliganded (for a recent review,
see Ref. 1). The overall fold of the p66 subunit has been compared with
a right hand, consisting of subdomains termed fingers, palm, thumb,
connection, and RNase H.
RT is one of the main targets in the fight against AIDS. Drugs
currently in use include nucleoside inhibitors, such as AZT, 3TC, ddI,
ddC, d4T, as well as non-nucleoside inhibitors, such as nevirapine,
delavirdine, and efavirenz, all of which target RT (for a review, see
Ref. 2). However, severe side effects and the rapid emergence of drug
resistant mutants compromise the efficacy of these drugs. Recently,
significant progress has been achieved by applying multidrug
combination therapy (for a review, see Ref. 3). In this therapy, at
least two drugs against RT and one against the retroviral protease are
taken simultaneously. Nevertheless, the underlying problems of this
kind of chemotherapeutic treatment remain the same, urgently calling
for alternative strategies to deal with viral infections such as AIDS.
Many different strategies have been discussed without, so far, leading
to a genuine alternative to the currently used anti-AIDS drugs.
However, one promising alternative approach could be the application of
nucleic acid aptamers derived using in vitro selection. Aptamers bind with high affinity as well as specificity to their target
proteins, often eliminating enzymatic activity (for a review, see Ref.
4). Tuerk and Gold (5) have used SELEX to identify RNA aptamers against
the HIV-1 RT. The analysis of the isolated aptamers revealed a
consensus sequence that resulted in the formation of an RNA pseudoknot
(6). The interactions between SELEX RNA pseudoknots and HIV-1 RT have
been analyzed in some detail using biochemical studies and chemical
modification (7, 8).
Pseudoknots are defined as loop regions base pairing with complementary
sequences, outside the loop, in the same RNA molecule (9, 10). The
pseudoknot fold is a widespread structural motif found in all kinds of
RNA, including coding and noncoding regions of cellular mRNAs,
viral RNAs, ribosomal RNAs, and small nuclear RNAs. Although not all of
the functions of this RNA secondary structure motif are fully
understood, pseudoknots play an important role in ribosomal
frameshifting, in transcriptional read-through, as internal ribosomal
entry sites, and as translational enhancers, and they are key
components of ribozymes (11) and cis-acting elements important for the
initiation of viral replication (for a review, see Ref. 12). Several
NMR studies and one high resolution x-ray study of pseudoknots have
been reported (13-19).
The x-ray structure of HIV-1 RT complexed with an RNA pseudoknot
inhibitor has been solved recently (see Fig.
1) (20). This is the first example of an
x-ray structure of such an pseudoknot aptamer bound to its target
protein. The RNA ligand binding surface lies within the nucleic acid
cleft of the enzyme, between the polymerase and RNaseH active sites,
and partially overlapping the binding surface of duplex DNA substrates.
The pseudoknot is kinked by 60° from the co-axial stacking of stems 1 and 2, thus optimizing the extensive contacts between the RNA inhibitor
and both subunits of the heterodimeric enzyme. The protein-RNA
interaction stabilizes the "closed" conformation of the enzyme, in
which the fingers and thumb domains of the large subunit are in close
contact. Further, we suggested that the SELEX procedure appears to have identified an RNA molecule whose uncomplexed solution structure is very
similar to its structure when bound to RT and which binds to the
unliganded conformation of RT.
Here we present the first detailed biochemical study of the this
enzyme-inhibitor interaction. Using electron paramagnetic resonance
(EPR) spectroscopy of site-directed spin-labeled RT mutants, we show
that the relative positions of the fingers and thumb domains of the
large subunit are virtually indistinguishable whether or not RNA is
bound. This proves, for the first time, that RT in solution can adopt
the closed conformation seen in the x-ray structure by Rodgers et
al. (21) and might be an important feature of selecting for tight
binding ligands. An analysis of the binding equilibrium of the
protein-inhibitor complex revealed astonishingly tight binding, with a
Kd in the low picomolar range, about 2-3 orders of
magnitude lower than the Kd of about 5 nM reported earlier by Tuerk et al. (6). To our knowledge, this is the first report of a SELEX-derived RNA ligand showing such a tight binding for a known nucleic acid binding target protein.
Mutagenesis of Reverse Transcriptase--
To label RT with
either spin labels or fluorophors in a site-directed manner, the
naturally occurring cysteines had to be replaced by serines, and
cysteines had to be introduced at the desired positions. In a first
step, the mutant RT
p66C38S/C280S/p51C280S was
generated. The cysteine at position 38 in the small subunit is not
solvent-accessible and consequently does not interfere with
site-directed labeling.2 In a
second step, cysteines at certain positions were introduced as
described below.
Mutant RT was prepared by site-directed mutagenesis using polymerase
chain reaction (22). The mutations were introduced into the plasmids
pRT166 (23) and p6HRT51 (24). The plasmids thus generated
were transformed into Escherichia coli M15/pDMI.1 (25),
resulting in expression systems for mutated p66 and mutated His-tagged p51.
Protein Purification--
Recombinant heterodimeric wild type
HIV-1, HIV-2, and equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV) RT were
expressed in E. coli and purified as described before (23,
26, 27). Enzyme concentrations were routinely determined using an
extinction coefficient at 280 nm of 260,450 (HIV-1 RT), 238,150 (HIV-2
RT), and 223,180 M
Mutant RTs were purified according to a protocol described previously
(28). Co-homogenization of E. coli cells expressing p66 or
p51 led to reconstruction of heterodimeric p66/p51 RT. Analysis of the
mutant proteins by a standard RT assay (see below) showed
indistinguishable polymerase activity as compared with the wild type enzyme.
Labeling of RT Mutants--
Spin labeling of the introduced
cysteine residues at positions 24 and 287 in p66 was achieved by
the following procedure. In order to reduce any disulfide
bonds, 2 µl of 1 M DTT was added to 200 µl of a 44 µM solution of mutant RT
(p66W24C/C38S/C280S/K287C/p51C280S) in
Buffer A. After 30 min at 4 °C, a 2-fold excess of 18/36-mer DNA/DNA
p/t was added to the solution. The resulting RT-p/t complex was
separated from excess DTT using a Sephadex G25 gel filtration column
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The eluted complex was collected in a
tube containing 2 µl of 100 µM
(1-oxyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrroline-3-methyl)methane-thiosulfonate (Toronto Research Chemicals, Inc.) in Me2SO. After 16 h at 4 °C, excess spin label and bound p/t were removed by purifying
the enzyme over a Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid-Sepharose
column (Qiagen). The bound protein was washed extensively with a buffer
containing 1 M NaCl and eluted with 0.3 M
imidazole. Subsequently, the protein solution was concentrated, and
buffer was changed (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 25 mM NaCl, 6 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol)
using centrifugal filters (Millipore). Finally, samples were
shock-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at
The labeling of the HIV-1 RT mutant
(p66C38S/C280S/p51C280S/K281C) used for the
fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments at position p51281C with the fluorophor Alexa488 was
performed according to the instructions given by the manufacturer
(Molecular Probes). Equilibrium as well as kinetic measurements of
DNA/DNA p/t binding to this fluorescently labeled RT gave similar
values to those obtained for the wild type protein (data not shown).
RNA Preparation--
The 33-nucleotide pseudoknot RNA (sequence,
5'-GGGAGAUUCCGUUUUCAGUCGGGAAAAACUGAA) was prepared in a standard 10-ml
T7 reaction mixture for in vitro transcription and purified
by gel electrophoresis as described previously (20, 29). The RNA was
refolded at a concentration of 200-300 µM at 65 °C
for 5 min followed by slow cooling to room temperature in 20 mM cacodylate buffer, pH 6.5, 25 mM NaCl, and 5 mM MgCl2. 5'-End labeling of the RNA with T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs) was performed as described previously (30). Dephosphorylation of the in vitro
transcribed RNA prior to end labeling was carried out according to
standard procedures (31). The fluorescent-labeled
5'-hexachlorofluorescein (HEX) pseudoknot RNA was synthesized and high
pressure liquid chromatography-purified as described previously (32).
HEX phosphoramidite was obtained form Glen Research (Sterling, VA).
This chemically synthesized RNA consists of 28 residues missing the
last 5 nucleotides at the 5'-end. Final purity was > 97% as
assessed by high pressure liquid chromatography.
Buffer--
Protein-RNA interactions were routinely analyzed at
25 °C in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, and 10 mM
MgCl2 (standard buffer). Additionally, some of the
experiments were also performed in a buffer containing 200 mM KOAc, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.7, and 10 mM DTT (6). EPR measurements were performed in a buffer
containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, 12 mM NaCl,
and 5% glycerol.
Polymerase Activity Determination--
RNA-dependent
DNA polymerase activity on poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18
substrates was measured by a standard assay described previously (33,
34) with 2.8 nM RT for 10 min at 37 °C in a buffer
containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 80 mM KCl, 5 mM DTT, 6 mM MgCl2 and 0.05% (v/v)
Triton X-100.
Filter Binding Assay--
Protein and 5'-32P-labeled
RNA were mixed in standard buffer and incubated at 25 °C for 10 min.
An aliquot of this mixture was filtered under suction through a prewet
(standard buffer) nitro-cellulose filter (Schleicher & Schuell BA85)
and rinsed with 4 ml of standard buffer. Radioactivity retained on the
filters was measured by scintillation counting.
Fluorescence Equilibrium Measurements of RT-RNA Binding--
The
affinity of the different RTs for the pseudoknot RNA was measured both
by displacing a fluorescently labeled 18/36-mer DNA/DNA p/t bound to RT
and by titrating increasing amounts of RT with 5'-HEX-labeled RNA.
The fluorescently labeled DNA-primer was synthesized by coupling the
phosphoroamidite dye 6-carboxyfluorescein, a fluorescein derivative,
directly to the 5'-end of the oligodeoxynucleotide during DNA synthesis
according to the recommendation of the manufacturer (Applied
Biosystems). The titrations were performed using an SLM AB2
spectrofluorometer. To monitor the fluorescence change upon displacing
the labeled p/t from RT, the samples were excited at 492 nm, and the
emission intensity was measured at 516 nm. These competitive titrations
were evaluated using the program Scientist (MicroMath), which allows
the user to define the system under investigation as a series of
parallel equations defining (in this case) each discrete equilibrium,
the relationship between the total and free concentrations of the
components, and the way in which the observable signal is generated.
The Kd of the 18/36-mer DNA/DNA p/t was determined
independently (30, 35) and kept constant during the fit
procedure (primer sequence, 5'-TCCCTGTTCGGGCGCCAC-3'; template
sequence, 5'-TGTGGAAAATCTCATGCAGTGGCGCCCGAACAGGGA-3').
To monitor the fluorescence change upon binding of RT to the
5'-HEX-labeled pseudoknot RNA, the samples were excited at 538 nm, and
the emission intensity was measured at 556 nm. Data were fitted to a
quadratic equation analogous to the one given by Müller et
al. (36) using the program Grafit (Erithacus Software). Values for
the dissociation constant (Kd), the amplitude of the
fluorescence change, and the RNA concentration were allowed to vary
during the fit procedure.
Rapid Kinetics of RT-RNA Interaction--
Experiments on the
kinetics of the association of HIV-1 RT with the pseudoknot RNA were
performed using a stopped flow apparatus (High Tech Scientific,
Salisbury, United Kingdom). 25 nM
Alexa488-labeled HIV-1 RT (final concentration) was rapidly
mixed with increasing 5'-HEX-labeled pseudoknot RNA concentrations
(50-300 nM). Collection and analysis of the data was done
as described previously (27, 30). Excitation of the
Alexa488-labeled protein was at 435 nm and detection of the
donor quenching due to fluorescence resonance energy transfer to the
HEX-fluorophor was through a bandpass filter (520 nm). Data were fitted
using a double exponential equation. The rate of the first phase
(k+1) is dependent on the concentration of RT
and corresponds to the formation of the collision complex. The rate of
the second phase (k+2) is largely
concentration-independent and arises from a conformational change of
the RT-RNA complex after formation of the collision complex.
EPR Measurements--
Continuous wave EPR experiments were
performed using home made X-band EPR spectrometers equipped with a
dielectric resonator (Bruker) or with an H103 cavity (AEG).
The magnetic field was measured with a B-NM 12 B-field meter (Bruker).
Spin-labeled RT samples were loaded into EPR quartz capillaries (50 µl for low temperature measurements, otherwise 5 µl) at a final RT
concentration of 100-200 µM. Spectra were recorded with
a modulation amplitude of 1.5 G, and the microwave power was adjusted
to between 0.2 and 0.6 mW. A modified Oxford ESR 9 variable temperature
accessory allowed stabilization of the sample temperature between 80 and 330 K. The whole apparatus was controlled by a personal computer, which also performed 12 bit analog-to-digital data acquisition. EPR
powder spectra simulations were performed according to the method
described by Steinhoff et al. (37).
The spin-spin interaction between two spin labels attached to a protein
is composed of static dipolar interaction, modulation of the dipolar
interaction by the residual motion of the spin label side chains, and
exchange interaction. For temperatures below 200 K, the residual motion
of the nitroxide side chain is strongly restricted, and the static
dipolar interaction leads to considerable broadening of the spectrum if
the interspin distance does not exceed 25 Å. A detailed line shape
analysis allows determination of absolute values of the interspin
distance in the range of about 10 to 25 Å (37-40). For certain cases
the modulation of the dipolar interaction due to the motion of the spin
labels allows an estimation of the interresidue distances at room
temperature (41). Exchange interaction was found to contribute
significantly to the line broadening for distances of less than 10 Å,
because partial overlap of the nitrogen pi-orbitals of the two
interacting nitroxides is required (42, 43).
Affinity of HIV-1 RT for the Pseudoknot RNA by Equilibrium
Binding--
Binding measurements to determine the
Kd of the RT-RNA complex were performed using three
different approaches. Fig. 2A
shows a displacement titration using a fluorescently labeled DNA/DNA
p/t, for which the affinity has previously been determined (35). When
this p/t binds to RT, its fluorescence is quenched. A complex was
formed between RT and the p/t, and increasing amounts of pseudoknot RNA
were added. The fluorescence increase observed upon displacement
of the fluorescent p/t into solution was measured, as shown in
Fig. 2A. A Kd of 25 pM was
calculated from a least squares fit of the data to a model describing
both equilibria (see under "Experimental Procedures").
Fig. 2B shows titration of increasing amounts of HIV-1 RT
with a 5'-HEX-labeled pseudoknot RNA. Data were fitted to a quadratic equation yielding a Kd of 24 pM. These
results indicate that the chemically synthesized RNA, labeled with a
fluorophor on the 5'-end (see under "Experimental Procedures"),
shows a similar affinity for RT to the in vitro transcribed
RNA used in Fig. 2A.
However, in Fig. 2, A and B, the concentration of
the substrates is 2-3 orders of magnitude higher than the determined
Kd value, and therefore the Kd
values derived show a rather large error, being in the same range as
the fitted value. Due to the limiting fluorescence signal of the
probes, it was not possible to reduce the substrate concentrations
below 1 nM. To overcome the drawbacks of fluorescence-based
measurements, radioactive labeling was used, allowing for the use of
substrate concentrations in the pM range. Fig.
2C shows a filter binding assay in which 5'-32P-labeled pseudoknot RNA was titrated with increasing
amounts of RT. However, upon dilution of the RNA from the stock
solution (which had a concentration in the micromolar range) to the
working solution in the low picomolar range, about 90% of the RNA was lost, probably due to molecules irreversibly absorbing to the Eppendorf
tube. Several attempts to minimize this problem were only partially
successful. However, as the RNA is highly labeled, it was possible to
correct for these losses. Fitting of the experimental data, shown in
Fig. 2C, to a quadratic equation yielded a
Kd of about 40 pM, in good agreement
with the fluorescence-based approaches. However, this
Kd is dependent on the assumption that dilute
solutions of RT do not result in absorption to the Eppendorf tube, as
seen with the RNA. If such absorption (which cannot easily be corrected
for) takes place, the effective protein concentration would be reduced,
leading to a lower Kd value than determined.
Therefore the figure of 40 pM should be regarded as an
upper estimate.
Measurements were performed routinely in standard buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM
DTT, and 10 mM MgCl2) with refolded pseudoknot
RNA. Performing the experiments in the buffer used to select the
pseudoknot (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.7, 200 mM KOAc, and 10 mM DTT) and carry out previous experiments
(6), with RNA that was not folded, gave similar results.
Kinetics of RT-RNA Association--
Stopped flow experiments were
performed to analyze the association of RT with RNA. Binding of RT to
the 5'-HEX-labeled pseudoknot RNA results in quenching of the
fluorescence signal of about 6% (see Fig. 2B). This rather
small signal change was, however, not sufficient to obtain reasonable
data in stopped flow experiments. We therefore used fluorescence
resonance energy transfer to enhance the signal. The
Alexa488-fluorophor (absorption and emission maxima of 493 and 520 nm, respectively) covalently linked to a cysteine at position
281 in the small subunit of the heterodimeric enzyme was used as donor
and the HEX-fluorophor (absorption and emission maxima of 538 and 555 nm, respectively) on the 5'-end of the RNA as acceptor. From the x-ray
structure of the protein-RNA complex, it could be predicted that the
two fluorophors are about 20 Å apart (see Fig. 1). Upon binding of the
RNA to the protein, a quenching of the donor fluorescence of about 20%
could be observed. Independent measurements demonstrated that the
Alexa488-labeled enzyme had comparable behavior to wild
type RT with respect to enzymatic activities, substrate binding, and
affinity for the pseudoknot (data not shown).
Fig. 3A shows a typical
stopped flow experiment. The data obtained could be fitted best to an
equation with two exponential terms. The fast first phase was dependent
on the RT concentration, whereas the slower phase was not. In Fig.
3B, the dependence of the first phase of pseudoknot binding
(observed pseudo-first-order rate constant) on RT concentration is
shown. The rate constants k+1 and
k Analysis of the RT-RNA Dissociation--
Attempts to measure the
dissociation rate of the protein-RNA complex using stopped flow did not
result in an appreciable signal change over the maximal useful time
range of the instrument, indicating that this process might be too slow
to be measured by this approach. Thus, the filter binding assay was
applied to determine the dissociation rate of the complex. 25 nM RT was complexed with 20 nM
32P-labeled RNA and then mixed with 2 µM of
unlabeled pseudoknot. Analyses of the amount of radioactive pseudoknot
that remained bound at different times (Fig.
4) gave data that fitted to a single exponential, yielding an observed dissociation rate of 0.0002 s Binding of RT to the Pseudoknot RNA by Kinetic
Measurements--
The results outlined above show that the binding of
the pseudoknot RNA to HIV-1 RT can be best described as a two-step
process. Scheme 1 summarizes the results
obtained form the different kinetic experiments. RT and pseudoknot RNA
initially form a collision complex with a second order rate constant of
5 × 108 M Affinity of HIV-2 and EIAV RT for the Pseudoknot--
To
investigate the specificity of the interaction of the pseudoknot with
HIV-1, RT binding studies were carried out with the closely related RTs
of HIV-2 and EIAV. Fig. 5 shows the
effect of adding increasing amounts of these RTs to the 5'-HEX-labeled pseudoknot. Fitting the experimental data to a quadratic equation yielded Kd values of 85 and 118 nM for
the HIV-2 and EIAV complexes, respectively. Interestingly, the signal
change upon binding of these RTs to the fluorescently labeled RNA is much larger than for HIV-1 RT. In both cases, the fluorescence signal
was quenched by about 50%, compared with about 6% in the case of
HIV-1 RT. To ensure that the fluorophor is not interfering with binding
to the HIV-2 and EIAV RT, we analyzed the interaction by performing
displacement titrations using a fluorescently labeled DNA/DNA p/t as
described above. These experiments gave essentially the same
Kd values (data not shown).
Effect of the RNA on Polymerase Activity of Different RTs--
To
further illustrate the exceptional specificity of the pseudoknot RNA
for the HIV-1 enzyme we performed standard RT assays using
poly(rA)/oligo(dT) as substrate. The reactions were started with
preincubated RT-RNA complexes. Fig. 6
shows the effect of the pseudoknot RNA on the polymerase activity of
HIV-1, HIV-2 and EIAV RT. At pseudoknot concentrations at which the
HIV-1 enzyme is fully inhibited with respect to the polymerase
activity, there is only a minor effect on HIV-2 and EIAV RT, as would
be predicted from the different Kd values evaluated
above. The difference in the observed Ki values
(defined as the pseudoknot concentration that inhibited polymerase
activity by 50%) is given by a factor of about 3.5 × 104.
EPR Measurements--
Site-directed spin labeling has emerged as a
powerful technique for exploring the structure and dynamics of both
soluble and membrane proteins (for a recent review, see Ref. 46). We
have applied this method to determine in solution the relative
positions of the fingers and thumb domains of the p66 subunit of RT,
both as an unliganded apo-enzyme and in the presence of bound nucleic acids, and have compared these data with data obtained from x-ray analysis (for a review, see Ref. 1). RT was mutagenized to introduce
two unique cysteines in the p66 subunit. Subsequent reaction with a
thiol specific nitroxide resulted in an RT variant carrying two spin
labels, one at the tip of the fingers and the second in the thumb
domain (amino acids 24 and 287, respectively; see Fig. 1). EPR
spectroscopy was used to determine the distance between these spin labels.
The EPR spectra of spin-labeled RT liganded to either a DNA/DNA p/t
(18/36-mer) or the pseudoknot RNA were measured at 170 K in frozen
solution to exclude dynamic effects and motional averaging of the
dipolar broadening. Room temperature measurements (293 K) were
performed to characterize the mobility of the spin label side chains
and to study spin-spin interaction at a more physiological temperature.
The EPR spectra were normalized to represent the same number of spins.
The results, shown in Fig. 7, reveal
considerable line broadening for the RT bound to RNA compared with the
enzyme bound to DNA. Powder spectra simulations were performed to
determine absolute values for the interspin distances (37). The
experimental spectra are generally composed of species with different
relative nitroxide orientations and interspin distances because of the flexibility of the spin label side chains and the variety of
conformational substates of the proteins in frozen solution. A fitting
of simulated EPR spectra to the experimental data with the assumption
of a Gaussian interspin distance distribution yields an average
interspin distance, d, and the distance distribution width,
At room temperature, the spin label side chain motion occurs in the
nanosecond time range, and the nitroxide mobility and the flexibility
of the protein backbone are directly reflected in the EPR absorption
line shape. The small apparent hyperfine splitting visible in the
spectrum of the DNA-bound RT indicates high mobility of the nitroxide
side chains. This spectral shape is typical for nitroxide side chains
bound to flexible loop regions as revealed by the comparison with
spectra of
1-oxyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrroline-3-methyl)methane-thiosulfonate bound to the E-F cytoplasmic loop of bacteriorhodopsin (48). The lack
of any additional spectral component of considerable amplitude reveals
that the dynamics of both nitroxide side chains must be very similar.
In the RNA-bound species of RT, the apparent hyperfine splitting is
only slightly increased, indicating only minor changes in the tertiary
interaction of the nitroxides compared with the DNA-bound structure.
However, the line width is substantially increased, which must be due
to spin-spin interaction. The spectrum of the RNA-bound RT can be fit
reasonably well by the convolution of a Lorentzian function with the
spectrum of the DNA-bound species. The nonbroadened contribution to the
spectrum is most probably due to a small fraction of singly labeled
species, which amounts to less than 10%. The broadening appears to be
homogeneous across the spectrum, and the line width at half height,
At room temperature, the spectrum of the substrate free RT is nearly
indistinguishable from that of the RNA-bound species. Because the
spectral shape of this mutant is determined by the spin-spin
interaction, this result is strong evidence that the finger-thumb
distance of the main fraction of the free RT is identical to that of
the RNA-bound structure.
Comparing the x-ray structure of the pseudoknot RNA-RT complex
(20) with that of RT bound to a DNA/DNA p/t (49, 50), reveals that the
RNA makes more extensive contacts with the enzyme than the natural
substrate does. The DNA duplex contacts mainly the p66 subunit of the
RT heterodimer, showing interactions close to the polymerase active
site (fingers and thumb domain) and the RNaseH active site. The
inhibitory RNA also shows interactions with these regions of the
enzyme. Additionally, there are extensive interactions with the small
(p51) subunit. The RNA, therefore, sits snugly in the nucleic acid
binding cleft, in contrast to DNA/DNA duplexes, which appear to
"float" above this cleft. For the complex of RT with a DNA duplex,
a Kd of about 2 nM has previously been
determined (35). On the basis of the available structural information,
which indicates less extensive interactions of DNA/DNA as compared with
the RNA inhibitor, we performed a detailed biochemical examination of
the RT-pseudoknot RNA interaction. In particular, we suspected that the
binding might be considerably stronger than what has been published by others (6).
Equilibrium binding experiments using fluorescently as well as
radioactively labeled RNA yielded Kd values of about 25 pM for the enzyme inhibitor complex. As described above
(see under "Results"), binding studies in the low picomolar range
are technically problematic due to experimental limitations that are difficult to overcome. We therefore regard the value of 25 pM as an upper limit, meaning that the interaction could be
even tighter. Interestingly, we observed similar binding affinities regardless of the salt concentration of the buffer (50-200
mM). Additionally, refolding of the RNA in a buffer
containing MgCl2 using a standard protocol was not
necessary to obtain tight binding. The only difference seen was in the
time required for the fluorescence signal to become stable in titration
experiments when the RNA was not refolded, indicating that the proper
folding might be induced and stabilized upon interacting of the
pseudoknot with RT. However, it is not know whether Mg2+ is
important for the folding of this RNA in the absence of the enzyme.
The kinetic analysis of the RT-pseudoknot interaction revealed that
binding occurs in two steps, previously shown for DNA/DNA or DNA/RNA
binding to the enzyme (45). The observed on-rates for complex formation
are in the same range as for the nucleic acid duplex substrates,
whereas the off-rates are much slower explaining the extraordinarily
tight binding. Calculating the Kd of the complex
using the kinetic constants given in Scheme 1 gives a value of 0.8 pM, about 30 times lower than what has been determined via
the equilibrium binding experiments. This obvious discrepancy could be
explained by either the k An important aspect concerning the pseudoknot RNA aptamer is the
specificity of the interaction with HIV-1 RT. This is interesting not
only in terms of the selectivity index of this inhibitor but also with
respect to the potential of the SELEX method to select for highly
specific ligands. Binding studies with HIV-2 and EIAV RTs yielded
Kd values of 85 and 118 nM,
respectively. This dramatic reduction in affinity in comparison to
HIV-1 RT was an especially surprising finding because the HIV-2 RT used in this study shows 60% identity and 13% homology to the HIV-1 enzyme. On the basis of this result, we propose that in addition to the
overall fold of the pseudoknot, there must be site-specific interactions between protein and RNA that are responsible for the tight
binding to HIV-1 RT, because it is likely that the HIV-2 enzyme adopts
a comparable structure and therefore should be capable of forming
similar overall interactions. This could be an explanation for the
sequence conservation seen in stem 1 among the minimal Tuerk-type
pseudoknots (8). Unfortunately, the resolution of the x-ray structure
of the RT-RNA complex (about 4.8 Å) is not sufficient to clearly
identify such interactions.
The conformation of RT observed in the x-ray structure of the RNA
complex resembles the closed conformation, in which fingers and thumb
of p66 are in close contact, also seen in the structure of the
unliganded enzyme (21, 51). This conformation is stabilized by the RNA
through extensive electrostatic interactions with several basic
residues in helix I of the p66 thumb and in the p66 fingers domain.
From the crystal structure described by Rodgers et al. (21),
it cannot be deduced whether RT adopts this closed conformation in
solution because it cannot be ruled out that this structure is induced
and/or stabilized by crystal packing. Consequently, there is no clear
answer to the question of whether the pseudoknot RNA was selected
against the closed conformation of RT, as recently proposed (20), or
alternatively whether the protein-RNA interaction has induced a closure
of the thumb domain relative to the fingers domain. To address these
questions, we performed EPR measurements, analyzing the interspin
distances of spin labels attached to the tip of the fingers and thumb
domain in p66. The solution structure at 293 K of RT complexed with the
RNA pseudoknot shows a distance of 13 Å between the spin labels at
positions Cys-24 and Cys-287 in the large subunit. This value is in
excellent agreement with the distance of 12 Å between C Typically, RNA aptamers selected for tight binding to protein targets
show binding constants in the low nanomolar to micromolar range (52).
Occasionally tighter binding, with Kd values of
100-500 pM, is reported. However, to our knowledge, an RNA aptamer with a binding constant of We thank Karin Vogel-Bachmayr and Martina
Wischnewski for excellent technical assistance, Manfred Souquet for
purifying the EIAV RT, Paul Rothwell for purifying the
Alexa488-labeled HIV-1 RT, Joachim Jäger for
providing Fig. 1, and Jochen Reinstein and Birgitta
Wöhrl for fruitful discussions.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Supported by a United Kingdom Medical Research Council Senior
Research Leave fellowship. Part of this work was carried out while this
author was on sabbatical in Dortmund. A CIBA Fellowship Trust award
contributed toward the cost of this sabbatical.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 4, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001309200
2
O. Kensch, unpublished data.
The abbreviations used are:
HIV, human
immunodeficiency virus;
EIAV, equine infectious anemia virus;
RT, reverse transcriptase;
SELEX, systematic evolution of ligands by
exponential enrichment;
EPR, electron paramagnetic resonance;
p/t, primer/template;
HEX, hexachlorofluorescein;
DTT, dithiothreitol.
HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase-Pseudoknot RNA Aptamer Interaction
Has a Binding Affinity in the Low Picomolar Range Coupled with High
Specificity*
,
,
, and
Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare
Physiologie, Abteilung Physikalische Biochemie,
Otto-Hahn-Straße 11, 44227 Dortmund, Germany and the
§ School of Biochemistry and Genetics, University of
Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (88K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Structure of the HIV-1 RT pseudoknot RNA
complex. The p66 subunit is shown in blue, the p51
subunit in gray, and the RNA in red. Surface
residues <5 Å away form the RNA aptamer are shown in
orange. The positions of the two spin labels used for the
EPR measurements at the tip of the fingers and thumb domain of the p66
subunit are indicated.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1
cm
1 (EIAV RT). The purified RTs were free of
nuclease contamination.
80 °C. The labeled
cysteine/RT ratio, estimated from double integration of the EPR spectra
and absorption measurements of protein (280 nm), was found to be > 90%. Analysis of the spin-labeled protein by a standard RT assay
(see below) shows polymerase activity that was indistinguishable from
that of wild type enzyme.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Equilibrium titrations of HIV-1 RT and
pseudoknot RNA. A, displacement titration of
fluorescent p/t bound to HIV-1 RT with pseudoknot RNA. A complex of
carboxyfluorescein-labeled 18/36-mer DNA/DNA (25 nM) and RT
(40 nM) was titrated with increasing amounts of competitor.
The curve shows the best fit by least-square fitting to the
model describing the two binding equilibria from which a dissociation
constant of 25 ± 17 pM for the pseudoknot was
obtained (see under "Experimental Procedures"). The sequence of the
DNA/DNA p/t is given under "Experimental Procedures." B,
titration of 5'-HEX-labeled pseudoknot RNA (3 nM) with
increasing amounts of HIV-1 RT. The curve shows the best fit
to a quadratic equation describing the binding of the RNA to a single
site in the heterodimeric enzyme. The fit gives a value of 24 ± 39 pM for the Kd. C, filter
binding assay of radiolabeled RNA with RT. 8 pM
5'-32P-labeled pseudoknot RNA was titrated with increasing
amounts of RT. The curve shows the best fit to a quadratic
equation yielding a Kd of 40 ± 6 pM.
1 are given by the slope of the line and the
intercept with the y axis, respectively (44). For the first step in pseudoknot binding values for k+1 and
k
1 of 5.6 × 108
M
1 s
1
and 10 s
1 were obtained, in the same range as
those observed previously for DNA/DNA and DNA/RNA binding (45).

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Kinetics of the binding of 5'-HEX-labeled
pseudoknot RNA to a Alexa488-labeled HIV-1 RT (amino acid
281 in p51). A, a typical stopped flow result is shown.
A 25 nM sample of RT was rapidly mixed with 250 nM RNA. Excitation was at 435 nm, and the donor emission
was detected via a bandpass filter (520 nm). Fitting of the
experimental data to a double exponential equation gave rates of
151 ± 6 and 4.9 ± 0.4 s
1.
B, dependence of the pseudo-first-order rate constant of
pseudoknot binding on the RNA concentration. A constant concentration
of fluorescently labeled RT (25 nM) was mixed with
increasing amounts of 5'-HEX-labeled pseudoknot.
k+1 and k
1 were
determined by the slope of the linear fit and the intercept of the line
with the y axis and yielded values of 5.6 ± 0.4 × 108 M
1
s
1 and 10 ± 8 s
1, respectively.
1. Essentially the same rate constant was
determined using the 5'-HEX-labeled pseudoknot in a fluorescence
spectrofluorometer (data not shown).

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Analysis of the dissociation of the
protein-RNA complex using a filter binding assay. 25 nM HIV-1 RT was preincubated with 20 nM
5'-32P-labeled pseudoknot RNA and then mixed with 2 µM unlabeled pseudoknot RNA. Aliquots were analyzed at
different time points by spotting onto a nitro-cellulose filter,
rinsing with 4 ml of binding buffer, and scintillation counting. The
curve shows the best fit to a single exponential equation
yielding a off-rate of 0.0002 s
1.
1
s
1 followed by a slower,
concentration-independent isomerization with a rate constant of about 5 s
1. The rate constants determined for the
reverse reaction are 0.0002 and 10 s
1. The
latter was indirectly derived from the y axis intercept of a
linear fit of RNA concentration versus observed
pseudo-first-order rate and therefore is subject to a rather large
error (see Fig. 3B). Efforts to observe
k
1 directly by performing double mixing
stopped flow experiments did not yield interpretable data (data not
shown). A Kd of about 0.8 pM can be
calculated from these rate constants, about 30 times lower than
determined using equilibrium measurements.

View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
Scheme 1.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Binding of the pseudoknot RNA to HIV-2 and
EIAV RT. 5'-HEX-labeled pseudoknot RNA (7 nM) was
titrated with increasing amounts of HIV-2 (A) and EIAV
(B) RT. The curves show the best fit to a quadratic equation
yielding Kd values of 85 ± 4 and 118 ± 4 nM for the HIV-2 and EIAV enzymes, respectively.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Standard RT assay with different RTs in the
presence of pseudoknot RNA. RNA-dependent DNA
polymerase activity on poly(rA)/oligo(dT)12-18 substrates
(approximately 1.2 µM with respect to the free 3'-ends)
was measured for 10 min at 37 °C. 2.8 nM HIV-1
(circles), HIV-2 (squares), and EIAV
(hexagons) RT were preincubated with increasing amounts of
pseudoknot RNA. The reaction was initiated by the addition of the
RT-RNA complexes to the assay mixture.
, which also accounts for small amounts of singly spin-labeled
proteins. The parameters that describe the EPR spectrum in the absence
of any spin-spin interaction were fixed according to the values
obtained from the fitting of simulated powder spectra to the
experimental data of spin-labeled proteins in a similar environment
(47). The respective values are given in the legend to Fig. 7. The
experimental and simulated spectra with interspin distances >21 Å for
the DNA-bound species and 13 Å for the RNA-bound structure agree well
(Fig. 7).

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
EPR spectra of the spin-labeled RT double
mutant p66W24C_R1,K287C_R1 (R1 = (1-oxyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrroline-3-methyl)methane-thiosulfonate;
see under "Experimental Procedures"). A, spectra of
RT + DNA/DNA (thick trace) and RT + pseudoknot RNA were
recorded at 170 K and normalized to constant spin number. The
dotted traces show fits of dipolar broadened powder spectra
with interspin distances of >21 Å (RT + DNA/DNA) and 13Å (RT + pseudoknot RNA). Parameters taken from spectra of noninteracting spin
labels and kept fixed during the fitting procedure were as follows:
gxx = 2.0089, gyy = 2.0065, gzz = 2.0026, Axx = 5.4 G, Ayy = 4.9 G, Azz = 36.5 G, and a field-independent line shape function composed of a
superposition of 53% Lorentzian and 47% Gaussian of 4.8 and 4.1 G
width, respectively. B. room temperature spectra of the RT
double mutant with bound DNA/DNA or pseudoknot RNA (heavy
traces) and without substrate (light trace) normalized
to constant spin number. The dashed trace shows the
convolution of the of the spectrum of the DNA/DNA-bound RT with a
Lorentzian broadening function of line width,
DH = 6 G, which gives the best fit to the dipolar broadened spectral fraction
of the pseudoknot RNA-bound RT.
DH, of the Lorentzian provides a quantitative measure of the
spin-spin interaction (41). The best fit is obtained with
DH = 6 G, which yields an interspin distance of 12.5 Å according to the empirical calibration given by Mchaourab et
al. (41). Due to the high flexibility of the nitroxides and
because we do not distinguish between exchange and dipolar interaction,
this value has to be regarded as an estimate of the average interspin
distance. Additionally, as the line width depends on
r
6, the average is weighted in
favor of molecules with smaller interspin distances. With this in mind,
the estimated distance value agrees well with that determined from the
low temperature experiment.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1 value not being
entirely correct, because it was determined indirectly, by the
determined equilibrium Kd being too high for
technical reasons, as described above, or by a combination of both.
Nevertheless, the two Kd values are in reasonable
agreement when the limitations of the techniques used are considered.
from Trp-24
and Lys-287 found in the crystal structure of the RT-pseudoknot complex
(20). Furthermore, the EPR spectra of unliganded and
pseudoknot-complexed RT are virtually indistinguishable, clearly
showing for the first time that RT adopts the closed conformation in
solution at room temperature. Thus, the pseudoknot RNA appears to have
been selected against this structure, indicating that neither the RNA
nor the protein undergoes significant conformational change upon
complex formation, which would further account for the extraordinarily low Kd for this interaction.
25 pM has not been
described so far. This aptamer shows binding at least 100-fold tighter
than that of the natural substrate, exceptional specificity, and a broad working range concerning buffer conditions, making it an encouraging drug candidate for the treatment of HIV infections. Experiments are in progress to evaluate the inhibitory potential of
this pseudoknot RNA in cell tissue culture.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
49-231-133-2364; Fax: 49-231-133-2398; E-mail:
tobias.restle@mpi-dortmund. mpg.de.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Jäger, J.,
and Pata, J. D.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
9,
21-28
2.
De-Clercq, E.
(1999)
I/Farmaco
54,
26-45
3.
Vandamme, A. M.,
Van Laethem, K.,
and De-Clercq, E.
(1999)
Drugs
57,
337-361
4.
Gold, L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13581-13584
5.
Tuerk, C.,
and Gold, L.
(1990)
Science
249,
505-510
6.
Tuerk, C.,
Macdougal, S.,
and Gold, L.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
6988-6992
7.
Green, L.,
Waugh, S.,
Binkley, J. P.,
Hostomska, Z.,
Hostomsky, Z.,
and Tuerk, C.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
247,
60-68
8.
Burke, D. H.,
Scates, L.,
Andrews, K.,
and Gold, L.
(1996)
J. Mol. Biol.
264,
650-666
9.
Rietveld, K.,
Van Poelgeest, R.,
Pleij, C. W.,
Van Boom, J. H.,
and Bosch, L.
(1982)
Nucleic Acids Res.
10,
1929-1946
10.
Studnicka, G. M.,
Rahn, G. M.,
Cummings, I. W.,
and Salser, W. A.
(1978)
Nucleic Acids Res.
5,
3365-3387
11.
Ferre-D'Amare, A. R.,
Zhou, K. H.,
and Doudna, J. A.
(1998)
Nature
395,
567-574
12.
Deiman, B. A. L. M.,
and Pleij, C. W. A.
(1997)
Semin. Virol.
8,
166-175
13.
Puglisi, J. D.,
Wyatt, J. R.,
and Tinoco, I. J.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
214,
437-453
14.
Shen, L. X.,
and Tinoco, I.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
247,
963-978
15.
Du, Z. H.,
Giedroc, D. P.,
and Hoffman, D. W.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
4187-4198
16.
Du, Z. H.,
Holland, J. A.,
Hansen, M. R.,
Giedroc, D. P.,
and Hoffman, D. W.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
270,
464-470
17.
Kang, H. S.,
and Tinoco, I.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
1943-1949
18.
Kolk, M. H.,
Vandergraaf, M.,
Wijmenga, S. S.,
Pleij, C. W. A.,
Heus, H. A.,
and Hilbers, C. W.
(1998)
Science
280,
434-438
19.
Su, L.,
Chen, L. Q.,
Egli, M.,
Berger, J. M.,
and Rich, A.
(1999)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
6,
285-292
20.
Jäger, J.,
Restle, T.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
4535-4542
21.
Rodgers, D. W.,
Gamblin, S. J.,
Harris, B. A.,
Ray, S.,
Culp, J. S.,
Hellmig, B.,
Woolf, D. J.,
Debouck, C.,
and Harrison, S. C.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
1222-1226
22.
Ho, S. N.,
Hunt, H. D.,
Horton, R. M.,
Pullen, J. K.,
and Pease, L. R.
(1989)
Gene
77,
51-59
23.
Müller, B.,
Restle, T.,
Weiss, S.,
Gautel, M.,
Sczakiel, G.,
and Goody, R. S.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
13975-13978
24.
Le Grice, S. F.,
Naas, T.,
Wohlgensinger, B.,
and Schatz, O.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
3905-3911
25.
Certa, U.,
Bannwarth, W.,
Stüber, D.,
Gentz, R.,
Lanzer, M.,
Legrice, S. F. J.,
Gulliot, F.,
Wendler, I.,
Hunsmann, G.,
Bujard, H.,
and Mous, J.
(1986)
EMBO J.
5,
3051-3056
26.
Müller, B.,
Restle, T.,
Kühnel, H.,
and Goody, R. S.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
14709-14713
27.
Souquet, M.,
Restle, T.,
Krebs, R.,
Legrice, S. F. J.,
Goody, R. S.,
and Wöhrl, B. M.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
12144-12152
28.
Wöhrl, B. M.,
Krebs, R.,
Thrall, S. H.,
Le Grice, S. F. J.,
Scheidig, A. J.,
and Goody, R. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17581-17587
29.
Thrall, S. H.,
Krebs, R.,
Wöhrl, B. W.,
Cellai, L.,
Goody, R. S.,
and Restle, T.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
13349-13358
30.
Krebs, R.,
Immendorfer, U.,
Thrall, S. H.,
Wöhrl, B. M.,
and Goody, R. S.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
10292-10300
31.
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1994)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
32.
McGregor, A.,
Murray, J. B.,
Adams, C. J.,
Stockley, P. C.,
and Connolly, B. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2255-2262
33.
Restle, T.,
Müller, B.,
and Goody, R. S.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
8986-8988
34.
Jacques, P. S.,
Wöhrl, B. M.,
Ottmann, M.,
Darlix, J. L.,
and Le Grice, S. F. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
26472-26478
35.
Divita, G.,
Müller, B.,
Immendörfer, U.,
Gautel, M.,
Rittinger, K.,
Restle, T.,
and Goody, R. S.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
7966-7971
36.
Müller, B.,
Restle, T.,
Reinstein, J.,
and Goody, R. S.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
3709-3715
37.
Steinhoff, H. J.,
Radzwill, N.,
Thevis, W.,
Lenz, V.,
Brandenburg, D.,
Antson, A.,
Dodson, G.,
and Wollmer, A.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
73,
3287-3298
38.
Steinhoff, H. J.,
Dombrowsky, O.,
Karim, C.,
and Schneiderhahn, C.
(1991)
Eur. Biophys. J.
20,
293-303
39.
Rabenstein, M. D.,
and Shin, Y. K.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
8239-8243
40.
Thorgeirsson, T. E.,
Xiao, W. Z.,
Brown, L. S.,
Needleman, R.,
Lanyi, J. K.,
and Shin, Y. K.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
273,
951-957
41.
Mchaourab, H. S.,
Oh, K. J.,
Fang, C. J.,
and Hubbell, W. L.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
307-316
42.
Closs, G. L.,
Forbes, M. D. E.,
and Piotrowiak, P.
(1992)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
114,
3285-3294
43.
Fiori, W. R.,
and Millhauser, G. L.
(1995)
Biopolymers
37,
243-250
44.
Rittinger, K.,
Divita, G.,
and Goody, R. S.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
8046-8049
45.
Wöhrl, B. M.,
Krebs, R.,
Goody, R. S.,
and Restle, T.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
292,
333-344
46.
Hubbell, W. L.,
Gross, A.,
Langen, R.,
and Lietzow, M. A.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
8,
649-656
47.
Tiebel, B.,
Radzwill, N.,
Aung-Hilbrich, L. M.,
Helbl, V.,
Steinhoff, H. J.,
and Hillen, W.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
290,
229-240
48.
Pfeiffer, M.,
Rink, T.,
Gerwert, K.,
Oesterhelt, D.,
and Steinhoff, H. J.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
287,
163-171
49.
Jacobo-Molina, A.,
Ding, J.,
Nanni, R. G.,
Clark, A. D.,
Lu, X.,
Tantillo, C.,
Williams, R. L.,
Kamer, G.,
Ferris, A. L.,
Clark, P.,
Hizi, A.,
Hughes, S. H.,
and Arnold, E.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
6320-6324
50.
Huang, H.,
Chopra, R.,
Verdine, G. L.,
and Harrison, S. C.
(1998)
Science
282,
1669-1675
51.
Hsiou, Y.,
Ding, J.,
Das, K.,
Clark, A. D., Jr.,
Hughes, S. H.,
and Arnold, E.
(1996)
Structure
4,
853-860
52.
Patel, D. J.,
Suri, A. K.,
Jiang, F.,
Jiang, L.,
Kumar, P. F.,
and Nonin, S.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
272,
645-664
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Kissel, D. M. Held, R. W. Hardy, and D. H. Burke Active site binding and sequence requirements for inhibition of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase by the RT1 family of single-stranded DNA aptamers Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2007; 35(15): 5039 - 5050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Held, J. D. Kissel, S. J. Thacker, D. Michalowski, D. Saran, J. Ji, R. W. Hardy, J. J. Rossi, and D. H. Burke Cross-Clade Inhibition of Recombinant Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1), HIV-2, and Simian Immunodeficiency Virus SIVcpz Reverse Transcriptases by RNA Pseudoknot Aptamers J. Virol., May 15, 2007; 81(10): 5375 - 5384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Veldhoen, S. D. Laufer, A. Trampe, and T. Restle Cellular delivery of small interfering RNA by a non-covalently attached cell-penetrating peptide: quantitative analysis of uptake and biological effect Nucleic Acids Res., December 2, 2006; 34(22): 6561 - 6573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mescalchin, W. Wunsche, S. D. Laufer, D. Grohmann, T. Restle, and G. Sczakiel Specific binding of a hexanucleotide to HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: a novel class of bioactive molecules Nucleic Acids Res., November 14, 2006; 34(19): 5631 - 5637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|