|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M906304199 on March 28, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 24, 18432-18440, June 16, 2000
Glucocorticoids Suppress Tumor Necrosis Factor- Expression by
Human Monocytic THP-1 Cells by Suppressing Transactivation through
Adjacent NF- B and c-Jun-Activating Transcription Factor-2
Binding Sites in the Promoter*
James H.
Steer ,
Karen M.
Kroeger§,
Lawrence J.
Abraham§, and
David A.
Joyce ¶
From the Departments of Pharmacology and
§ Biochemistry, University of Western Australia,
Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia 6907
Received for publication, August 5, 1999, and in revised form, March 6, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Glucocorticoid drugs suppress tumor necrosis
factor- (TNF- ) synthesis by activated monocyte/macrophages,
contributing to an anti-inflammatory action in vivo. In
lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated human monocytic THP-1 cells,
glucocorticoids acted primarily on the TNF- promoter to suppress a
burst of transcriptional activity that occurred between 90 min and
3 h after LPS exposure. LPS increased nuclear c-Jun/ATF-2,
NF- B1/Rel-A, and Rel-A/C-Rel transcription factor
complexes, which bound specifically to oligonucleotide sequences from
the 106 to 88 base pair (bp) region of the promoter. The
glucocorticoid, dexamethasone, suppressed nuclear binding activity of
these complexes prior to and during the critical phase of TNF-
transcription. Site-directed mutagenesis in TNF- promoter-luciferase reporter constructs showed that the adjacent c-Jun/ATF-2 ( 106 to 99
bp) and NF- B ( 97 to 88 bp) binding sites each contributed to the
LPS-stimulated expression. Mutating both sites largely prevented
dexamethasone from suppressing TNF- promoter-luciferase reporters.
LPS exposure also increased nuclear Egr-1 and PU.1 abundance. The
Egr-1/Sp1 ( 172 to 161 bp) binding sites and the PU.1-binding Ets
site ( 116 to 110 bp) each contributed to the LPS-stimulated
expression but not to glucocorticoid response. Dexamethasone suppressed
the abundance of the c-Fos/c-Jun complex in THP-1 cell nuclei, but
there was no direct evidence for c-Fos/c-Jun transactivation through
sites in the 172 to 52 bp region. Small contributions to
glucocorticoid response were attributable to promoter sequences outside
the 172 to 88 bp region and to sequences in the TNF-
3'-untranslated region. We conclude that glucocorticoids suppress
LPS-stimulated secretion of TNF- from human monocytic cells largely
through antagonizing transactivation by c-Jun/ATF-2 and NF- B
complexes at binding sites in the 106 to 88 bp region of the
TNF- promoter.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The glucocorticoids are prototypic anti-inflammatory drugs, with
wide ranging effects on inflammatory cells and tissues. Cells of the
monocyte/macrophage lineage release numerous proinflammatory cytokines,
including tumor necrosis factor
(TNF- )1 (1), and are
important therapeutic targets for glucocorticoids. Glucocorticoids
suppress the release of secreted TNF- from human monocyte/macrophages in vivo (2) and reduce expression of
cell surface TNF- (3). TNF- is essential for normal inflammatory and immune function but also contributes to the pathogenesis of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, such as endotoxic shock, rheumatoid arthritis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and multiple sclerosis (4-8). Clinically, suppressing TNF- activity ameliorates rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease (4, 7). Glucocorticoid drugs suppress inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis, ulcerative colitis, and multiple sclerosis.
Monocytic cells release TNF- in response to many stimuli, including
the Gram-negative bacterial endotoxin, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (9,
10), TNF- itself (11), phorbol esters (12), superantigens (13, 14)
and viral agents (15). Regulation is both transcriptional and
post-transcriptional, depending on the stimulus, cell type, and
possibly differentiation (16-19). Sequences in the proximal 172 base
pairs (bp) and in the 627 to 487 bp region of the TNF- promoter
(Fig. 1), at least, contribute to transcriptional control in monocytic
cells (9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 19, 20). Each of these stimuli modifies
transcription factors interaction with the 116 to 88 bp region.
This region includes putative cAMP-response element/activating
transcription factor (CRE/ATF), NF- B, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein
(C/EBP), and Ets binding sites (9, 10, 12-15, 21). There is an
activator protein-1 (AP-1)-like site at 65 to 59 bp (20), an
AP-2-like site at 36 to 28 bp (22), and an Egr-1 binding site at
172 to 161 bp, which is functional in LPS-stimulated THP-1 cells (23). Factors binding to the CRE/ATF site ( 106 to 99 bp) and the
NF- B site ( 97 to 88 bp) site co-operate functionally in both
monocytic and lymphocytic cells (9, 24). There is also evidence for
cooperativity between the CRE/ATF site and the immediately upstream
Ets-like site at 116 to 110 bp (25). LPS, the stimulus used in
these studies, activates monocyte/macrophage cells through Toll-like
receptors 2 and 4, binding in association with the glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored surface glycoprotein, CD14
(26-28).
Glucocorticoids have pleiotropic actions on cytokine expression by
monocyte/macrophages, suppressing gene transcription (29), reducing
mRNA stability (30), or reducing mRNA translational efficiency
(31). In LPS-stimulated human THP-1 monocytic cells, glucocorticoids
suppress TNF- promoter activity (18). In murine RAW macrophages,
glucocorticoids also suppress TNF- transcription and, more
importantly, inhibit translation of TNF- mRNA (31). The effect
on translation is at least partially mediated through suppression of
Jun N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase activity (16).
Like the 3'-UTR of murine TNF- , the 3'-UTR of human TNF- includes
an AU-rich region, which indicates potential for regulation through
mRNA stability or translational efficiency (32).
In this study, we identify transcriptional suppression as the main
mechanism for glucocorticoid suppression of TNF- expression in THP-1
monocytic cells. Transcriptional suppression is largely due to
diminished transactivation through sites in the 106 to 88 bp region
of the promoter and is associated with reduced binding activity of
transcription factor complexes containing NF- B factors and
c-Jun/ATF-2.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture--
The human promonocytic cell line, THP-1, and
the murine macrophage cell line, RAW264.7, were obtained from ATCC.
Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (THP-1) or Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium (RAW264.7) with 10% low endotoxin fetal
bovine serum (CSL, Melbourne, Australia), penicillin, and gentamicin. Fetal bovine serum was charcoal-stripped to remove endogenous glucocorticoids (33). All media and additives were checked for endotoxin contamination using the Limulus amebocyte lysate test (BioWhittaker Inc., Walkersville, MD) and rejected if endotoxin concentration exceeded 0.1 unit/ml. All glassware was baked prior to
use, and all plasticware was new.
Construction of Luciferase Fusion Plasmids--
The TNF-
promoter fragment 993 to +110 (which includes the 5'-UTR) and the
TNF- 3'-UTR +1957 to +2792 fragment were amplified from genomic DNA,
as described previously (34). The promoter fragment was cloned into the
SacI and HindIII restriction sites located
upstream of the luciferase gene in the pGL2-Basic plasmid (Promega) to
create the TNF-Luc-SV40 reporter gene construct. The 3'-UTR
in this construct is SV40-derived and includes the SV40 polyadenylation
signal. The 3'-UTR of TNF- was cloned into this construct to replace
the SV40 3'-UTR after digestion at the PflMI and
BamHI sites, creating TNF-Luc-TNF. The same
procedure was used to clone the TNF- 3'-UTR into pGL2-Promoter. The
resulting construct includes the SV40 early promoter and is designated
SV40-Luc-TNF. There is a consensus NF- B site downstream
of the 3'-UTR in the mouse and human genomes (35), which was not
included in these reporters. The pGL2-Promoter vector
(SV40-Luc-SV40) itself also served as a control.
Site-directed mutagenesis was used to alter putative binding sites in
the promoter region of TNF-Luc-SV40 and
TNF-Luc-TNF, using the QuikChangeTM site-directed
mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) and appropriate oligonucleotide sequences
(Fig. 1). Mutated sequences were confirmed by restriction digestion of
the mutated site. DNA was prepared for transfection using the
EndoFreeTM Plasmid Maxi Kit (Qiagen).
The 3 B-Luc-SV40 reporter, which contains three
Ig NF- B sites from the interferon- gene (36) upstream of the
luciferase coding region of the pGL2-basic plasmid, was kindly provided
by Dr. D. Baltimore.
Transient Transfection of THP-1 Cells--
Plasmids were diluted
to 100 ng·µl 1 in endotoxin-free water,
and 5 µl was mixed with 4 µl of 50 µg/µl DEAE-dextran (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). This was mixed with 250 µl of HEPES-buffered RPMI
medium (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, without antibiotics) and left at room temperature for 30 min. Prior to transfection, 1.2 × 107 THP-1 cells were washed in RPMI/HEPES, pelleted, and
then resuspended in 750 µl of RPMI/HEPES. The cells and
DEAE-dextran-plasmid mixture were mixed in a well of a 24-well plate
(Costar). After a 30-min incubation at 37 °C in a 5%
CO2 atmosphere, cells were washed twice in RPMI/HEPES and
resuspended in RPMI with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin, and
streptomycin. Transfected cells were distributed into remaining wells
of the 24-well plate at 2 × 105 cells/well and rested
overnight before experimentation. For each comparison between
constructs, equivalent transfectional efficiency was confirmed by
co-transfecting the Renilla luciferase vector, pRL-TK
(Promega), with each in parallel experiments.
Transfected cell cultures were then stimulated in triplicate with 1 µg·ml 1 lipopolysaccharide
(Escherichia coli, serotype 026-B6; Sigma). Glucocorticoid-treated cultures were exposed to 1 µM
dexamethasone (Dex; Sigma) from 30 min before LPS addition. Similar
triplicate cultures without LPS or Dex served as controls. Firefly
luciferase expression was measured at times up to 24 h after LPS
exposure, using the Promega Luciferase Assay System. When
Renilla luciferase expression was also to be measured, the
Promega Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System was used.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) and Supershift
EMSA--
THP-1 cells were exposed to LPS, with or without Dex, as
above for up to 6 h. Unexposed cells served as controls. Nuclear extracts were prepared from 2.5 × 107 cells using the
method of Li et al. (37, 38). For EMSA, nuclear proteins (4 µg) were preincubated for 10 min at room temperature with 0.5 µg of
poly(dI-dC) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in a binding buffer (4%
Ficoll, 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM KCl, 0.05%
IGEPALCA-630) to give a final reaction volume of 10 µl. Appropriate
specific antibodies (1 µg; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa
Cruz, CA) were included in the mixture for supershift EMSA. The
oligonucleotide probe, which had been labeled with
[ -32P]dCTP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using Klenow
fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I (Promega) was then
added. Probes derived from sequences of the TNF- promoter are shown
in Fig. 1. Consensus binding sequences
for CRE, AP-1, NF- B, Ets/PEA3, and C/EBP were derived from
somatostatin promoter (39), collagenase promoter (40), TNF-
3'-enhancer (35), polyoma enhancer (41), and interleukin-6 promoter
(42), respectively. The PU.1 consensus probe was designed to
incorporate optimal binding sequences for this protein (43). The
sequences were as follows: CRE, 5'-gcagatgacgtcatgggt-3'; AP-1, 5'-gaagcatgagtcagacacg-3'; NF- B,
5'-gggcatgggaatttccaactc-3'; Ets/PEA3,
5'-gcgagcaggaagttcgacg-3'; C/EBP,
5'-tcgagacattgcacaatctg-3'; PU-1,
5'-gcataaaggggaagttgtag-3'. Boldface lettering indicates the
core sequences. When present, unlabeled oligonucleotide probes were at
100-fold molar excess, unless otherwise indicated. Thirty minutes after
the addition of probe, samples were loaded onto a 4% polyacrylamide
gel, containing 0.25 × Tris-Borate-EDTA buffer, which had been
pre-run for 2 h in the same buffer. They were then separated at
150 V for 90 min. Gels were then exposed to Cronex x-ray film, using a
single intensifying screen. Films were not preflashed. Retarded bands
were quantitated using a Molecular Dynamics ImageQuant densitometer in
"wide line" integration mode with film background subtraction.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
TNF- promoter
regions 177 to 156 bp, 121 to 67 bp, and 71 to 52 bp.
Putative binding sites for Egr-1, Sp1, CRE/ATF, NF- B, and Ets
factors are shown. C/EBP factor binding has been localized to sequences
within the 100 to 74 region (shaded). The 65 to 59
sequence resembles an AP-1 binding site. The arrows indicate
the mutations created in reporter constructs. Oligonucleotide probes
used for EMSA are shown below the sequences. Some probes
included an additional 5' guanosine nucleotide (g) to allow
infill labeling.
|
|
TNF- Assay--
TNF- in supernatant was assayed by
sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, as described previously
(44, 45).
Statistical Analysis--
Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. Suppression of luciferase activity and TNF- by Dex is expressed
as a percentage of the LPS-induced increment. Statistical analyses were
made using two-way analysis of variance.
 |
RESULTS |
Luciferase Expression Parallels TNF- Release in THP-1 Cells
Transfected with TNF-Luc-TNF--
In order to confirm that the
reporter constructs responded comparably to the endogenous TNF-
gene, TNF- release and luciferase activity were measured
simultaneously in TNF-Luc-TNF-transfected cells during
exposure to LPS and Dex. THP-1 cells were transfected, rested
overnight, and exposed to LPS with or without Dex. In the absence of
LPS stimulation, luciferase activity was initially low and increased
only marginally between 12 and 24 h (Fig.
2a). Secreted TNF-
concentrations were also close to the limit of assay detection (32 pg·ml 1) throughout this time (Fig.
2b). Peak expression of luciferase and peak concentration of
secreted TNF- coincided at 3 h after LPS stimulation (Fig. 2,
a and b). Dex suppressed both from 2 to 12 h. At 3 h, luciferase activity was suppressed 35% and TNF- was
suppressed 47% by Dex. Luciferase activity had returned almost to the
level of unstimulated cells at 24 h, but the Dex-induced suppression of supernatant TNF- activity remained. Dex did not influence either TNF- secretion or luciferase activity in the absence of LPS stimulation (results not shown). The
TNF-Luc-TNF construct, transfected into THP-1 cells,
therefore responds to LPS and Dex like the endogenous TNF- gene.
Neither LPS nor Dex affected cell numbers or viability in this or
subsequent experiments.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
a, luciferase activity (mean ± S.E.) in THP-1 cells transfected with the TNF-Luc-TNF
reporter construct over 24 h following exposure to LPS ( ), LPS
plus Dex ( ), or neither ( ). b, TNF- secretion
(mean ± S.E.) by the same transfected THP-1 cells, exposed to
LPS, LPS plus Dex, or neither. Results are from single experiments,
performed in triplicate.
|
|
Glucocorticoids Suppress Activity of TNF- Promoter Reporter
Constructs--
Previous work has shown that glucocorticoids suppress
both TNF- gene transcription and TNF- mRNA translation in the
murine RAW264.7 macrophage line (16, 31). Sequences in the 3'-UTR mediate the effect on translational efficiency (32). We therefore expressed reporters that incorporated the TNF- promoter, the TNF-
3'-UTR, or both in THP-1 cells and measured suppression of LPS-induced
luciferase activity by Dex. Initially, SV40-Luc-TNF (which
incorporates the 3'-UTR of the TNF- gene) was compared with
SV40-Luc-SV40 (which incorporates the SV40-derived 3'-UTR). SV40-Luc-SV40 does not respond to LPS or Dex in THP-1 cells
(Fig. 3a).
SV40-Luc-TNF, which expresses at approximately one-tenth of
the level of SV40-Luc-SV40, was induced by LPS (to a maximum of 1.56-fold at 6 h), but the response was unaffected by Dex (Fig. 3b). Because the murine TNF- 3'-UTR confers Dex
responsiveness in the murine RAW264.7 cell line, we performed the same
experiments with RAW264.7 cells. In these cells, Dex suppressed
LPS-stimulated activity of SV40-Luc-TNF by 39% at 6 h
after exposure (Fig. 3c). This confirms the relatively
greater importance of the TNF- 3'-UTR in Dex response of RAW264.7
cells. LPS itself was a more potent inducer in RAW264.7 cells, causing
an 18-fold increase in SV40-Luc-TNF expression and a 3-fold
increase in expression of the control vector,
SV40-Luc-SV40.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
THP-1 cells and murine RAW macrophage cells
were transfected with luciferase reporter constructs, rested overnight,
and then incubated for up to 12 h with LPS ( ), LPS plus Dex
( ), or neither ( ). Results in panels
a, b, d, and e are
means ± S.E. of representative experiments performed in
triplicate. a and b, reporter constructs that
incorporate the SV40 early promoter and either SV40 3'-UTR sequences
(SV40-Luc-SV40) or the TNF- 3'-UTR
(SV40-Luc-TNF) did not respond to Dex after transient
transfection into THP-1 cells. c, the SV40 promoter
construct that incorporates the TNF- 3'-UTR
(SV40-Luc-TNF) is more responsive to Dex than the control
vector (SV40-Luc-SV40) after transfection into murine
RAW264.7 macrophage cells. Cells were exposed to LPS (filled
bars), LPS and Dex (hatched bars), or
neither (open bars) for 6 h. Results are
means ± S.E. from one of two experiments, each performed in
triplicate. d and e, Dex suppressed the
LPS-induced activity of reporter constructs that incorporate the
TNF- promoter and adjacent 5'-UTR ( 993 to +110 bp) in THP-1 cells.
Suppression was seen for both TNF-Luc-SV40 and
TNF-Luc-TNF.
|
|
We then examined the role of the TNF- promoter in glucocorticoid
response of LPS-stimulated THP-1 cells, using the
TNF-Luc-SV40 and TNF-Luc-TNF reporters. These
included the TNF- promoter in the place of the SV40 promoter. Dex
suppressed activity from 4 h (TNF-Luc-SV40) or 2 h
(TNF-Luc-TNF). Dex suppressed the peak LPS-induced
luciferase activity by 31% in TNF-Luc-SV40-transfected cells and 38% in TNF-Luc-TNF-transfected cells (Fig. 3,
d and e). In separate experiments, Dex
consistently produced slightly greater suppression of
TNF-Luc-TNF than TNF-Luc-SV40 (52% maximum suppression compared with 41%, p = 0.003, data from
eight independent experiments), implying that the TNF- 3'-UTR also
contributed to Dex response in these TNF- promoter reporters,
although it had no measurable effect in the SV40 promoter vectors in
THP-1 cells (Fig. 3b). Dex did not alter the activity in
either construct in the absence of LPS stimulation (results not shown).
TNF-Luc-TNF exhibited lower absolute expression than
TNF-Luc-SV40 but greater inducibility with LPS (Fig. 3,
d and e), similar to the distinction that had
been observed between SV40-Luc-SV40 and
SV40-Luc-TNF (Fig. 3, a and b).
From these experiments, we concluded that promoter sequences were
essential for glucocorticoid suppression of TNF- in LPS-stimulated THP-1 cells and that there was also a small effect mediated through sequences in the TNF- 3'-UTR.
We then timed the onset and duration of these promoter-mediated effects
of LPS and Dex. THP-1 cells were transiently transfected with
TNF-Luc-SV40 and exposed to LPS, with or without Dex, as described under "Experimental Procedures." Actinomycin D (AcD; 2 µg·ml 1) was added at 90 min, 2 or 3 h after LPS. In the absence of AcD, the effects of LPS and Dex on
luciferase activity were apparent at 2 h and were maximal at
6 h (Fig. 4a). Added at
90 min, AcD completely prevented both the LPS and Dex effects (Fig.
4b). Added at 3 h, it failed to prevent either (compare
Fig. 4, a and d). Adding AcD at 2 h
partially prevented the actions of both LPS and Dex (Fig.
4c). We concluded that LPS induced a burst of transcription from the TNF- promoter-luciferase reporter construct between 90 min
and 3 h after exposure and that Dex suppressed this. This is
consistent with the timing of maximal effects of LPS and Dex on TNF-
protein secretion at 3 h (Fig. 2). Later experiments examined
control of the TNF- promoter before and during this brief phase of
transcription.

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
a, luciferase activity (mean ± S.E.) in THP-1 cells transfected with the TNF-Luc-SV40
reporter construct over 8 h following exposure to LPS ( ), LPS
plus Dex ( ), Dex alone ( ), or neither ( ). b,
c, and d, AcD (2 µg·ml 1) was added to cultures at the
times indicated by the arrows. Added at 90 min after LPS/Dex
exposure, AcD prevents LPS-induced luciferase activity (b).
When the addition of AcD is delayed for 3 h after the addition of
LPS (with or without Dex), however, both LPS and Dex effects on
luciferase activity are observed in their entirety (d).
Adding AcD at 2 h has an intermediate effect (c).
|
|
Glucocorticoids Suppress LPS-induced TNF- Promoter Binding
Activity and Transactivation by NF- B--
A series of functional
transcription factor binding sites exists in the 177 to 59 bp
region of the TNF- promoter, with binding sequences for NF- B
factors, Ets, AP-1, CRE/ATF, NF-AT, C/EBP, Egr-1, and Sp.1 (Fig. 1). We
went on to investigate whether glucocorticoids altered transcription
factor binding at these sites in LPS-stimulated THP-1 cells and whether
these sequences also mediated the suppression of TNF- promoter
activity by glucocorticoids.
A putative NF- B-binding site exists at 97 to 88 bp in the
TNF- promoter (Fig. 1). Nuclear extracts from LPS-stimulated THP-1
cells contained four protein complexes that retarded a NF- B consensus probe. Supershift analysis identified
NF- B1/Rel-A complex, Rel-A/C-Rel complex,
NF- B1/NF- B1 homodimer, and a further,
slowly migrating Rel-A-containing complex (Fig.
5a). Only the slowly migrating
complex was detected in unstimulated cells. Each of the
Rel-A-containing complexes increased within 1 h of LPS stimulation and peaked at 2 or 4 h (Fig. 5b). The
NF- B1 homodimer peaked later than the Rel-A complexes,
at 4-6 h. Rel-A/C-Rel had largely disappeared by 6 h, while the
other complexes remained readily detectable. Nuclei of Dex-treated
cells contained less binding activity for each of the complexes from 1 to 4 h after LPS stimulation. (Fig. 5b). Dex therefore
suppressed the nuclear abundance of NF- B-containing complexes before
and during the critical period for TNF- promoter-driven transcription, between 90 min and 3 h after LPS exposure (Fig. 4).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
a, at 2 h after LPS exposure, THP-1
cell nuclei contained four protein complexes that retarded a NF- B
consensus probe. Supershift analysis with specific antibodies to
NF- B1, Rel-A, and C-Rel identified the
NF- B1/Rel-A complex, Rel-A/C-Rel complex,
NF- B1/NF- B1 complex, and a further
Rel-A-containing complex (arrow). The asterisks
designate supershifted bands. The anti-C-Rel antibody antagonized C-Rel
complex binding but did not generate a supershifted band. b,
THP-1 cells were exposed to LPS, with or without Dex for 6 h.
Nuclear extracts were made at the indicated times and analyzed by EMSA
with the NF- B consensus probe. NF- B1/Rel-A,
Rel-A/C-Rel, NF- B1 homodimer, and the further
Rel-A-containing complex (arrow) each increased after LPS
stimulation but with differing time courses. Dex diminished the binding
of each complex between 1 and 4 h after LPS stimulation.
c, NF- B factors in nuclear extracts from LPS-stimulated
THP-1 cells bound to an oligonucleotide probe corresponding to bases
100 to 84 of the TNF- promoter. The cells were exposed to LPS
for 2 h. NF- B factors were identified by supershift EMSA with
specific antibodies to NF- B1, Rel-A, and C-Rel.
Complexes are designated by arrows, and supershifted bands
are indicated by asterisks. d, luciferase
activity (mean ± S.E.) in THP-1 cells transfected with the
NF- B reporter construct, 3× B-Luc-SV40, over 8 h
following exposure to LPS ( ), LPS plus Dex ( ), or neither ( ).
Dex alone did not alter expression.
|
|
An oligonucleotide probe corresponding to bases 100 to 84 of the
TNF- promoter, which includes the putative NF- B-binding site
(Fig. 1), also bound NF- B1/Rel-A, Rel-A/C-Rel,
NF- B1 homodimer, and the slower migrating,
Rel-A-containing complex (Fig. 5c).
NF- B transactivating activity, as measured by the NF- B reporter
construct, 3× B-Luc-SV40,
corresponded with changes in nuclear NF- B DNA binding activity. This
vector was transfected into THP-1 cells, as for the TNF- reporter
constructs. LPS exposure increased expression to a maximum of 94-fold
at 6 h (Fig. 5d). Dex suppressed the maximum response
by 36%. The timing of the
3× B-Luc-SV40 response closely
reflected the response of TNF-Luc-SV40 (compare Figs. 4a and 5d).
The functional importance of suppressed NF- B factor binding in Dex
response of TNF- was shown in gene transfer experiments using
TNF- promoter reporter constructs (TNF-Luc-SV40 and
TNF-Luc-TNF) that incorporated nonbinding mutations of the
NF- B site (Fig. 1). The mutants were shown to be binding-defective
by competition EMSA against wild-type oligonucleotides (Fig.
6a). Constructs were
transiently transfected into THP-1 cells, and the cells were then
exposed to LPS, with or without Dex. The mutants still responded to
LPS, although significantly less than the wild-type promoter constructs
(p < 0.05 in each case; Fig. 6b). Both
mutant constructs exhibited impaired responsiveness to Dex in
LPS-stimulated THP-1 cells. Whereas Dex maximally suppressed
LPS-induced activity of TNF-Luc-SV40 by 40%, the mutation
in the NF- B site limited suppression to 20.3% (p < 0.01; n = 6; Fig. 6b). Likewise, mutating
the NF- B sites in TNF-Luc-TNF reduced maximal Dex
suppression from 53.8 to 37.7% (p < 0.01;
n = 5, Fig. 6b).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
a, an oligonucleotide probe
corresponding to the 121 to 83 bp region of the TNF- promoter
bound NF- B factors. A 50-fold excess of an oligonucleotide
corresponding to the same region but incorporating mutations in the
NF- B site (mNF- B), failed to compete with
the NF- B binding (lane 3). The wild-type probe
itself competed efficiently under the same conditions (lane
2). The slowly migrating band is c-Jun/ATF-2 (see
"Results" and Fig. 8b). The wild-type and NF- B mutant
probes compete for it with comparable affinity. b, mutants
of TNF-Luc-SV40 and TNF-Luc-TNF that incorporate
the nonbinding NF- B mutation (mNF- B) are
less induced by LPS (*, p < 0.05 in each case) and
less suppressed by Dex (**, p < 0.01 in each case)
than the respective parent vectors (WT). Luciferase activity
was measured at the time of peak induction, 6 h after LPS exposure
in the case of TNF-Luc-SV40 and 4 h after exposure in
the case of TNF-Luc-TNF. Results are means ± S.E. of
six (TNF-Luc-SV40) and five (TNF-Luc-TNF)
experiments, each performed in triplicate, and are expressed as -fold
induction over unstimulated cells. Filled bars,
LPS-stimulated; hatched bars, LPS-stimulated and
Dex-exposed.
|
|
From these experiments, we concluded that the NF- B-binding site at
97 to 88 bp of the TNF- promoter contributed to glucocorticoid response and that glucocorticoids diminished NF- B factor binding to
the site.
Glucocorticoids Suppress LPS-induced TNF- Promoter Binding
Activity and Transactivation by c-Jun/ATF-2--
A putative
CRE/ATF-binding site exists at 106 to 99 bp in the TNF- promoter
(Fig. 1). Nuclear extracts from both unstimulated and LPS-stimulated
THP-1 cells contained three protein complexes that retarded a consensus
CRE/ATF probe. Specific antibodies to c-Jun and ATF-2 individually
produced supershifted bands in gel shift analysis of THP-1 cell
extracts made at 2 h after LPS exposure (Fig.
7a, lanes
2 and 3; supershifted bands are designated with asterisks). Together, the two antibodies also reduced
binding of the slowest migrating band (lane 5). A
specific antibody to CREB1 supershifted the bands of rapid
and intermediate mobility (lane 6).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
a, at 2 h after LPS exposure, THP-1
cell nuclei contained three protein complexes that retarded a CRE/ATF
consensus probe (lanes 1 and 4). The
intermediate and rapidly migrating bands appear confluent at the
exposures required for supershift analysis (compare with b
and d). Specific antibodies to c-Jun and ATF-2 each produced
supershifted bands in supershift analysis (lanes
2 and 3). Together, the two antibodies also
diminished binding to the slowly migrating band (arrow,
lane 5). A specific antibody to CREB1
produced two supershifted bands, accompanied by the partial
disappearance of the bands of intermediate and rapid mobility
(arrow, lane 6). The
asterisks designate supershifted bands. No supershifts were
seen with an antibody that had broad specificity against c-Fos, Fos-B,
Fra-1, and Fra-2 (lane 7). b, THP-1
cells were exposed to LPS, with or without Dex, for 6 h. Nuclear
extracts were made at the indicated times and analyzed by EMSA with the
CRE/ATF consensus probe. The c-Jun/ATF-2 and
CREB1-containing complexes (arrow) both
increased after LPS stimulation. Dex diminished the binding of each.
c, nuclear extracts from LPS-stimulated THP-1 cells
contained two complexes that bound to an oligonucleotide probe
corresponding to bases 110 to 94 of the TNF- promoter. The cells
were exposed to LPS for 2 h. Supershift analysis was performed, as
for a. Specific antibodies to c-Jun (lane
2), ATF-2 (lane 3), and c-Jun and
ATF-2 together (lane 5) yielded a similar result
as when used with the consensus CRE/ATF probe. However, the rapidly
migrating complex (which appeared as a single band, arrow)
was not supershifted by a specific antibody against CREB1
(lane 6) but was displaced by an antibody with
specificity toward Fos/Fra factors (lane 7).
Complexes are designated by arrows, and supershifted bands
are indicated by asterisks. d, a 100-fold excess
of an oligonucleotide corresponding to the 110 to 94 bp region of
the TNF- promoter competed for the c-Jun/ATF-2 complex binding to
the consensus CRE/ATF probe but failed to compete for the
CREB1-containing complexes. Under the same conditions, the
consensus CRE/ATF probe competed efficiently for all complexes.
|
|
LPS increased nuclear abundance of c-Jun/ATF-2 and the
CREB1 complexes from 1 h after exposure (Fig.
7b). Dex reduced the abundance of c-Jun/ATF-2 from 1 to
6 h and reduced the CREB1 complexes from 1 to at least
4 h (Fig. 7b).
An oligonucleotide probe corresponding to bases 110 to 94 bp of the
TNF- promoter, including the putative CRE/ATF site, also bound the
c-Jun/ATF-2 complex (Fig. 7c, lanes 2,
3, and 5) but did not bind the CREB1
complexes (lane 6) or displace CREB1 complexes from the CRE/ATF consensus probe (Fig. 7d). It
bound a distinct rapidly migrating complex that was subject to binding competition from an antibody of broad specificity to c-Fos, Fos-B, Fra-1, and Fra-2 (Fig. 7c, lane 7).
The same antibody failed to displace the CREB1 complexes
from the CRE/ATF consensus probe (Fig. 7b, lane
7).
TNF- promoter oligonucleotide probes that included the NF- B site
as well as the c-Jun/ATF-2-binding site (e.g. the 108 to
85 bp probe) did not bind either the CREB1-containing
complexes or the Fos/Fra-containing complexes (Fig.
8a and results not shown).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
a, an oligonucleotide probe
corresponding to the 108 to 85 bp region of the TNF- promoter
bound three protein complexes in nuclear extracts prepared from THP-1
cells at 2 h after LPS stimulation. A consensus NF- B probe
(lane 3) and an oligonucleotide comprising the
100 to 84 bp region (which includes the NF- B site;
lane 2) efficiently compete for the intermediate
and rapidly migrating complexes (which contain NF- B factors), while
a consensus CRE/ATF probe (lane 5) and an
oligonucleotide comprising the 110 to 94 bp region (lane
4) compete efficiently for c-Jun/ATF-2 binding. The probe
did not bind CREB1 or Fos/Fra-containing complexes.
b, in the absence of an oligonucleotide competitor, an
oligonucleotide probe corresponding to bases 121 to 83 of the
TNF- promoter bound c-Jun/ATF-2, Rel-A/C-Rel, and
NF- B1/Rel-A complexes (lane 1). At
a 50-fold molar excess, the same probe, unlabeled ( 121 to 83),
competed for binding to all factors (lane 2).
When this probe included mutations in the CRE/ATF site
(mCRE/ATF), it failed to compete for c-Jun/ATF-2
(lane 3). Mutating both the NF- B site and
CRE/ATF site (mNF- B + mCRE/ATF) impaired
competition for both NF- B factors and c-Jun/ATF-2 (lane
4). c, mutants of TNF-Luc-SV40 and
TNF-Luc-TNF that incorporate the nonbinding CRE/ATF
(mCRE) mutation were less induced by LPS (*,
p < 0.05 in each case) and less suppressed by Dex (**,
p < 0.01 in each case) than the respective parent
vectors (WT). Luciferase activity was measured at the time
of peak induction, 6 h after LPS exposure in the case of
TNF-Luc-SV40 and 4 h after exposure in the case of
TNF-Luc-TNF. Results are means ± S.E. of six
(TNF-Luc-SV40) and five (TNF-Luc-TNF)
experiments, each performed in triplicate. Filled
bars, LPS-stimulated; hatched bars,
LPS-stimulated and Dex-exposed.
|
|
The functional importance of suppressed c-Jun/ATF-2 binding in Dex
response was shown in gene transfer experiments using TNF- promoter
reporter constructs (TNF-Luc-SV40 and
TNF-Luc-TNF) that incorporated nonbinding mutations of the
c-Jun/ATF-2 site (Fig. 1; Fig. 8b). Transiently transfected
mutant reporters still responded to LPS although significantly less
than the wild-type promoter constructs (p < 0.05 in
each case; Fig. 8c). Both mutant constructs were less
responsive to Dex than the wild-type controls. Dex suppressed the
c-Jun/ATF-2 site mutant of TNF-Luc-SV40 by 22.8%, compared with 40% for the wild-type control at 6 h (p < 0.01; n = 6; Fig. 8c). Similarly,
mutating the c-Jun/ATF-2 site in TNF-Luc-TNF reduced maximal
Dex suppression from 53.8 to 32.2% at 4 h (p < 0.01; n = 5, Fig. 8c).
We concluded that the c-Jun/ATF-2-binding site at 106 to 99 bp of
the TNF- promoter contributed to glucocorticoid response and that
glucocorticoids diminished c-Jun/ATF-2 factor binding to the site.
The NF- B and CRE/ATF Sites Cooperatively Mediate Glucocorticoid
Response--
The NF- B and c-Jun/ATF-2 sites are adjacent in the
TNF- promoter, raising the possibility that they interact in respect to factor binding and transactivation. To investigate interactions in
Dex response, we examined transcription factor binding to the 108 to
85 bp oligonucleotide probe that incorporated both sites and
performed gene transfer studies with TNF- promoter reporters that
had mutations in both sites. The probe bound three prominent nuclear
protein complexes from LPS-stimulated THP-1 cells. Competition studies
with consensus sequences and the shorter probes from the TNF-
promoter confirmed that these were c-Jun/ATF-2, Rel-A/C-Rel, and
NF- B1/Rel-A (Fig. 8a). Binding activity for
each of these increased between 1 and 4 h after LPS exposure (Fig.
9, a and b). Dex
suppressed binding of each complex at each time. At 6 h, the
effect of LPS had diminished, and the effect of Dex had disappeared.
The LPS and Dex-induced changes in nuclear transcription factor
abundance therefore occurred before and during the critical period of
TNF- promoter-driven transcription (compare Fig. 9b with
Fig. 4)

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
a, nuclear extracts of THP-1 cells
contained increased amounts of c-Jun/ATF-2, Rel-A/C-Rel, and
NF- B1/Rel-A after LPS exposure, shown by increased
binding to the 108 to 85 bp oligonucleotide probe. The time courses
are similar to those for binding to the respective consensus probes
(Figs. 5b and 7b). Dex antagonized the
LPS-induced increases in all three complexes. b,
densitometric measurement of c-Jun/ATF-2, Rel-A/C-Rel, and
NF- B1/Rel-A binding activities in a. The
changes occur before and during the critical period for TNF-
promoter-driven transcription (compare with Fig. 4). c,
mutants of TNF-Luc-SV40 and TNF-Luc-TNF that
incorporate the nonbinding mutations of both the NF- B and CRE/ATF
site were less induced by LPS (*, p < 0.05 in each
case) and less suppressed by Dex (**, p < 0.01 in each
case) than the respective parent vectors. Luciferase activity was
measured in THP-1 cells at the time of peak induction. Results are
means ± S.E. of 12 (TNF-Luc-SV40) and seven
(TNF-Luc-TNF) experiments, each performed in triplicate.
Filled bars, LPS-stimulated; hatched
bars, LPS-stimulated and Dex-exposed.
|
|
We investigated functional interactions between the NF- B and
c-Jun/ATF-2 sites by transiently transfecting TNF-Luc-SV40
and TNF-Luc-TNF constructs that incorporated nonbinding
mutations in both the NF- B and c-Jun/ATF-2 sites (Fig.
8b). As with the single mutants, they were less responsive
to LPS than wild-type promoter constructs (Fig. 9c). Dex
response was more impaired in the double mutants than in single mutants
of either TNF-Luc-SV40 or TNF-Luc-TNF. When both
sites were mutated in TNF-Luc-SV40, Dex suppressed LPS
response by no more than 17.7% (p < 0.01;
n = 12; Fig. 9c). Dex suppressed the LPS
response of TNF-Luc-TNF by no more than 27.6%
(p < 0.01; n = 7, Fig. 9c)
when both sites were mutated.
From these experiments, we concluded that juxtaposition of the NF- B
and c-Jun/ATF-2 binding sites conferred binding selectivity on the
region and that the two sites behaved cooperatively in respect to
glucocorticoid response.
Glucocorticoids Do Not Affect C/EBP Binding to the 121 to 67 bp
Region of the TNF- Promoter in THP-1 Cell Nuclear Extracts--
A
consensus C/EBP probe bound three protein complexes specifically in
EMSA of nuclear extracts from LPS-stimulated cells. A broad specificity
antibody against C/EBP , C/EBP , C/EBP , and C/EBP
supershifted one of these bands, confirming the presence of at least
one C/EBP factor in THP-1 cell nuclei (results not shown). Dex did not
consistently alter the abundance of any of the three complexes that
bound the consensus probe.
The 100 to 74 bp region of the TNF- promoter can bind
overexpressed C/EBP (12) and C/EBP factors in nuclear extracts of
other cell types (46). However, neither supershift EMSA with the
anti-C/EBP antibody nor competition EMSA with the consensus probe
revealed evidence that C/EBP factors in nuclei of LPS-stimulated THP-1
cells bound this region (result not shown).
The sequences that determine C/EBP binding to the 100 to 74 region
remain incompletely defined, but they overlap with the NF- B binding
region (12, 46, 47). We were therefore unable to prepare mutants that
we were confident had specific deficits in C/EBP factor binding.
Consequently, we cannot exclude the possibility that Dex modifies C/EBP
transactivation at this region of the TNF- promoter.
Glucocorticoids Do Not Affect Transactivation through PU.1-binding
and Egr-1/Sp1 Sites in the 172 to 110 Region of the TNF-
Promoter or through an AP-1-like Site at 65 to 59 bp--
The
116 to 110 bp sequence of the TNF- promoter has been shown to
bind Ets factors (25) and the 172 to 161 bp sequence includes
overlapping Egr-1 and Sp1 sites (9). Both regions are functional (9,
25). EMSA and supershift analysis with oligonucleotide probes based on
these regions showed that LPS increased nuclear levels of Egr-1 and the
Ets factor PU.1 (results not shown). Dex slightly and transiently
suppressed PU.1 but did not alter the abundance of Egr-1.
Mutations that impair PU.1 binding at the Ets site (25) or binding to
the Egr-1 site reduced the LPS responsiveness of
TNF-Luc-SV40 and TNF-Luc-TNF in THP-1 cells
(p < 0.05, n = 6 for the Ets site mutant and n = 5 for the Egr-1 site mutant). None of
the mutants exhibited impaired Dex response (p > 0.05 in each case; results not shown). We concluded that interactions of
PU.1 with the Ets site and Egr-1 with the Egr-1 site contribute to LPS
response in THP-1 cells but that glucocorticoids did not impair
transcriptional activation through either site.
An AP-1-like sequence is present at bases 65 to 59 in the TNF-
promoter. Nuclear extracts from THP-1 cells contained a complex of
c-Jun in association with c-Fos and other Fos/Fra factors, identified
by supershift analysis with specific antibodies and a consensus AP-1
probe. The nuclear abundance of the complex increased with LPS
stimulation and was suppressed by Dex (results not shown). However, the
complex did not bind to a probe corresponding to the 71 to 52 bp
region, which incorporates the putative AP-1 site. At a 100-fold molar
excess, this probe also failed to compete with the consensus probe for
binding to the c-Jun/Fos/Fra complex (results not shown). When this
site in TNF-Luc-SV40 was mutated to destroy potential for
AP-1 binding, neither LPS nor Dex response was impaired
(p > 0.05 in each case, n = 5; results
not shown). It was concluded that the 65 to 59 bp region of the
TNF- promoter did not bind AP-1 factors and was not relevant to LPS
or Dex response in THP-1 cells.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Dex suppressed transcription of TNF- in promonocytic THP-1
cells by preventing transactivation at NF- B and CRE/ATF sites between 106 and 88 bp of the promoter between 90 min and 3 h after LPS exposure. This corresponded chronologically with reduced nuclear DNA binding activity of NF- B1/Rel-A, Rel-A/C-Rel
and c-Jun/ATF-2 complexes. The NF- B and CRE/ATF sites contributed independently but additively to glucocorticoid response. Sequence in
the TNF- 3'-UTR contributed to glucocorticoid response in THP-1
cells, but to a lesser extent than in murine RAW264.7 macrophage cells.
Glucocorticoids can suppress NF- B-transactivation through direct
physical association of ligand-activated glucocorticoid receptors with
Rel-A (48, 49) and, in some cell types, by enhancing expression of
I- B (50-52). Physical association with Rel-A prevents DNA
binding and transactivation by Rel-A-containing complexes (48), while
I- B maintains NF- B1 and Rel-A in an inactive
cytoplasmic complex (53). Glucocorticoid treatment also diminishes
nuclear DNA binding activity of NF- B1 and
C-Rel-containing complexes in COS cells that overexpress both
glucocorticoid receptor and the NF- B subunits (49), but these
phenomena may not be directly relevant to glucocorticoid suppression of
NF- B transactivation (54).
Unstimulated THP-1 cells express ATF-2 homodimer (10), c-Jun/ATF-2,
c-Fos/c-Jun, and at least one other complex of c-Jun with another
Fos/Fra family member. LPS exposure increased the nuclear DNA-binding
activity of c-Jun/ATF-2 and c-Fos/c-Jun, at least, and Dex partially
prevented the increases. An intact c-Jun/ATF-2 binding sequence at
106 to 99 bp was required for full LPS and Dex responses. In
context, this site did not bind the c-Jun/Fos/Fra complex(es) from
THP-1 cell nuclei, although the isolated short sequence from 110 to
94 bp did bind.
Glucocorticoids potentially suppress transactivation by
c-Jun-containing complexes through preventing c-Jun activation by mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways (55-57), by direct physical interaction between ligand-activated glucocorticoid receptor and the
c-Jun containing complex (58-60), or through reducing de
novo synthesis of c-Jun (61, 62). Glucocorticoids suppress
activity of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophage cells (56). Jun N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase activates both c-Jun and ATF-2
through amino-terminal phosphorylation (55-57). Direct physical interaction of glucocorticoid receptor with c-Jun underlies
glucocorticoid inhibition of c-Fos/c-Jun (AP-1) transactivating
function and may contribute to glucocorticoid inhibition of c-Jun/ATF-2
transactivation (58-60). De novo synthesis of c-Jun itself
is subject to transcriptional regulation by c-Jun/ATF-2 (62), providing
an opportunity for glucocorticoids to modulate c-Jun levels by
interfering with this feedback. LPS stimulates the de novo
synthesis of c-Jun (61).
Simultaneous mutations in the c-Jun/ATF-2-binding and NF- B-binding
regions maximally suppressed glucocorticoid response. The c-Jun/ATF-2
and NF- B sites in the TNF- promoter act synergistically in
response to LPS stimulation. Synergism depends on the proximity of the
sites and is most apparent when they are linked to a minimal heterologous promoter (9). Proximate, cooperating c-Jun/ATF-2 and
NF- B sites are also present in the promoters of the E-selectin and
interferon- genes. The sites are separated by a greater distance than in the TNF- promoter. Binding of high mobility group I(Y) family proteins to the regions in the E-selectin and interferon- promoters alters the DNA conformation and facilitates factor binding and transcriptional activation (63, 64). We have not investigated the
role of the high mobility group proteins in LPS or glucocorticoid response of TNF- .
TNF- promoter mutants that did not bind NF- B factors or
c-Jun/ATF-2 still showed some response to glucocorticoid, indicating additional effects that were independent of these two sites. There are
six other NF- B-like sites in the 993 bases of the TNF- promoter upstream of the transcription start site. The sites between 627 and
589 bp are functional in Mono Mac 6 human monocytic cells (19), while
others appear nonfunctional (9, 65, 66) or have not been tested. The
functional sites may contribute to the residual glucocorticoid action.
C/EBP factors were present in nuclear extracts of unstimulated THP-1
cells. The 100 to 74 bp region of the TNF- promoter region has
been shown previously to bind C/EBP and C/EBP in nuclear extracts
of Mono Mac 6 monocytic cells and to bind recombinant C/EBP factors
(12, 46). Functional studies with overexpressed full-length C/EBP
(47) and a dominant negative C/EBP mutant (12) indicate that the
interaction is important for full transactivation of TNF- . However,
we were not able to demonstrate a role for C/EBP factors in
glucocorticoid response of LPS-stimulated THP-1 cells. C/EBP
synergizes with other LPS-regulated transcription factors, including
NF- B, c-Jun and glucocorticoid receptor (47, 67, 68). It therefore
may have a permissive role in glucocorticoid response of TNF- in
monocytic cells, which our experiments did not reveal.
The TNF- 3'-UTR strongly influenced basal expression and contributed
to LPS response of luciferase reporter constructs in THP-1 cells.
Although the TNF- 3'-UTR did not mediate glucocorticoid response in
SV40 promoter reporter constructs, TNF- promoter reporter constructs
that incorporated the TNF- 3'-UTR were more responsive to
glucocorticoid than constructs that incorporated the SV40 3'-UTR. The
effect was small but was consistent across all of the TNF- promoter
constructs and mutants that were used in this study. Sequences in the
3'-UTR were substantially more important to TNF- glucocorticoid
response in murine macrophage RAW264.7 cells than in THP-1 cells. In
RAW264.7 cells, glucocorticoids also inhibit translation by inhibiting
activation of Jun N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase,
which is necessary for efficient translation of TNF- mRNA (29,
56).
In summary, therefore, glucocorticoids act to reduce TNF- secretion
by THP-1 cells largely through suppressing TNF- gene transcription.
Suppression is mediated through reduced binding of
Rel-A/NF- B1, Rel-A/C-Rel, c-Jun/ATF-2, and possibly
other complexes to binding sites between 106 and 88 bp of the
promoter. Smaller, additional effects on transcription are unrelated to these sites. There is evidence for a small effect mediated through the
3'-UTR, but it is much less important than in RAW264.7 cells.
Glucocorticoids suppress the stimulus-dependent expression
of many proinflammatory proteins by macrophages, including TNF- . Most macrophage stimuli are subject to glucocorticoid modulation. Glucocorticoids exhibit such breadth of action because they interact with a range of regulatory pathways and because the pathways employed by different macrophage stimuli overlap. This diversity seems to offer
many opportunities for development of drugs with glucocorticoid-like anti-inflammatory action, but also means that drugs that emulate only
one aspect of glucocorticoid action are unlikely to exhibit full
clinical anti-inflammatory efficacy. Drugs that act against discrete
glucocorticoid-sensitive processes may find application in inflammatory
or immune diseases that are particularly dependent on that pathway.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We are grateful for the technical assistance
of Robin Quick.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
These studies were supported by the Arthritis Foundation of
Australia and by the National Health and Medical Research Council of
Australia.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western
Australia, 6907. Tel.: 618 9346 2569; Fax: 618 9346 3469; E-mail:
djoyce@receptor.pharm.uwa.edu.au.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 28, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M906304199
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TNF, tumor necrosis
factor;
AcD, actinomycin D;
ATF, activating transcription factor;
AP-1, activator protein-1;
C/EBP, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein;
CRE, cAMP-response element;
CREB, CRE-binding protein;
EMSA, electrophoretic
mobility shift assay;
LPS, lipopolysaccharide;
UTR, untranslated
region;
bp, base pair(s);
Dex, dexamethasone.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Grell, M.,
Douni, E.,
Wajant, H.,
Löhden, M.,
Clauss, M.,
Maxeiner, B.,
Georgopoulos, S.,
Lesslauer, W.,
Kollias, G.,
Pfizenmaier, K.,
and Scheurich, P.
(1995)
Cell
83,
793-802
|
| 2.
|
Steer, J. H.,
Vuong, Q.,
and Joyce, D. A.
(1997)
Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.
43,
383-389
|
| 3.
|
Solomon, K. A.,
Covington, M. B.,
DeCicco, C. P.,
and Newton, R. C.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
159,
4524-4531
|
| 4.
|
Feldmann, M.,
Brennan, F. M.,
Elliott, M.,
Katsikis, P.,
and Maini, R. N.
(1994)
Circ. Shock
43,
179-184
|
| 5.
|
Strieter, R. M.,
Kunkel, S. L.,
and Bone, R. C.
(1993)
Crit. Care Med.
21,
S447-S463
|
| 6.
|
Raine, C. S.
(1995)
Nat. Med.
1,
211-214
|
| 7.
|
Targan, S. R.,
Hanauer, S. B.,
van Deventer, S. J.,
Mayer, L.,
Present, D. H.,
Braakman, T,
DeWoody, K. L.,
Schaible, T. F.,
and Rutgeerts, P. J.
(1997)
N. Engl. J. Med.
337,
1029-1035
|
| 8.
|
Brynskov, J.,
Nielsen, O. H.,
Ahnfelt-Ronne, I.,
and Bendtzen, K.
(1994)
Digestive Dis.
12,
290-304
|
| 9.
|
Yao, J.,
Mackman, N.,
Edgington, T. S.,
and Fan, S.-T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17795-17801
|
| 10.
|
Newell, C. L.,
Deisseroth, A. B.,
and Lopez-Berestein, G.
(1994)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
56,
27-35
|
| 11.
|
Leitman, D. C.,
Ribeiro, R. C.,
Mackow, E. R.,
Baxter, J. D.,
and West, B. L.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
9343-9346
|
| 12.
|
Pope, R. M.,
Leutz, A.,
and Ness, S. A.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
94,
1449-1455
|
| 13.
|
Trede, N. S.,
Tsytsykova, A. V.,
Chatila, T.,
Goldfeld, A. E.,
and Geha, R. S.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
155,
902-908
|
| 14.
|
Trede, N. S.,
Castigli, E.,
Geha, R. S.,
and Chatila, T.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
150,
5604-5613
|
| 15.
|
Geist, L. J.,
Hopkins, H. A.,
Dai, L. Y.,
He, B.,
Monick, M. M.,
and Hunninghake, G. W.
(1997)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
16,
31-37
|
| 16.
|
Swantek, J. L.,
Cobb, M. H.,
and Geppert, T. D.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
6274-6282
|
| 17.
|
Raabe, T.,
Bukrinsky, M.,
and Currie, R. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
974-980
|
| 18.
|
Joyce, D. A.,
Steer, J. H.,
and Abraham, L. J.
(1997)
Inflammation Res.
46,
447-451
|
| 19.
|
Udalova, I. A.,
Knight, J. C.,
Vidal, V.,
Nedospasov, S. A.,
and Kwiatkowski, D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
21178-21186
|
| 20.
|
Rhoades, K. L.,
Golub, S. H.,
and Economou, J. S.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
22102-22107
|
| 21.
|
Kramer, B.,
Marchleidt, T.,
Wiegmann, K.,
and Kronke, M.
(1995)
J. Inflammation
45,
183-192
|
| 22.
|
Rhoades, K. L.,
Cai, S.,
Golub, S. H.,
and Economou, J. S.
(1995)
Cell Immunol.
161,
125-131
|
| 23.
|
Tsai, E. Y.,
Yie, J.,
Thanos, D.,
and Goldfeld, A. E.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5232-5244
|
| 24.
|
Tsai, E. Y.,
Jain, J.,
Pesavento, P. A.,
Rao, A.,
and Goldfeld, A. E.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
459-467
|
| 25.
|
Kramer, B.,
Wiegmann, K.,
and Kronke, M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
6577-6583
|
| 26.
|
Poltorak, A.,
He, X.,
Smirnova, I.,
Liu, M. Y.,
Huffel, C. V.,
Du, X.,
Birdwell, D.,
Alejos, E.,
Silva, M.,
Galanos, C.,
Freudenberg, M.,
Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P.,
Layton, B.,
and Beutler, B.
(1998)
Science
282,
2085-2088
|
| 27.
|
Yang, R. B.,
Mark, M. R.,
Gray, A.,
Huang, A.,
Xie, M. H.,
Zhang, M.,
Goddard, A.,
Wood, W. I.,
Gurney, A. L.,
and Godowski, P. J.
(1998)
Nature
395,
284-288
|
| 28.
|
Pugin, J.,
Heumann, I. D.,
Tomasz, A.,
Kravchenko, V. V.,
Akamatsu, Y.,
Nishijima, M.,
Glauser, M. P.,
Tobias, P. S.,
and Ulevitch, R. J.
(1994)
Immunity
1,
509-516
|
| 29.
|
Han, J.,
Huez, G.,
and Beutler, B.
(1991)
J. Immunol.
146,
1843-1848
|
| 30.
|
Amano, Y.,
Lee, S. W.,
and Allison, A. C.
(1993)
Mol. Pharmacol.
43,
176-182
|
| 31.
|
Han, J.,
Thompson, P.,
and Beutler, B.
(1990)
J. Exp. Med.
172,
391-394
|
| 32.
|
Han, J.,
and Beutler, B.
(1990)
Eur. Cytokine Netw.
1,
71-75
|
| 33.
|
Eckert, R. L.,
and Katzenellenbogen, B. S.
(1982)
Cancer Res.
42,
139-144
|
| 34.
|
Kroeger, K. M.,
Carville, K. S.,
and Abraham, L. J.
(1997)
Mol. Immunol.
34,
391-399
|
| 35.
|
Kuprash, D. V.,
Udalova, I. A.,
Turetskaya, R. L.,
Rice, N. R.,
and Nedospasov, S. A.
(1995)
Oncogene
11,
97-106
|
| 36.
|
Akama, K. T.,
Albanese, C.,
Pestell, R. G.,
and Van Eldik, L. J.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
5795-5800
|
| 37.
|
Joyce, D.,
Bouzahzah, B.,
Fu, M.,
Albanese, C.,
D'Amico, M.,
Steer, J.,
Klein, J. U.,
Lee, R. J.,
Segall, J. E.,
Westwick, J. K.,
Der, C. J.,
and Pestell, R. G.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25245-25249
|
| 38.
|
Li, Y. C.,
Ross, J.,
Scheppler, J. A.,
and Franza, B. R., Jr.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
1883-1893
|
| 39.
|
Montminy, M. R.,
Sevarino, K. A.,
Wagner, J. A.,
Mandel, G.,
and Goodman, R. H.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
6682-6686
|
| 40.
|
Angel, P.,
Imagawa, M.,
Chiu, R.,
Stein, B.,
Imbra, R. J.,
Rahmsdorf, H. J.,
Jonat, C,
Herrlich, P.,
and Karin, M.
(1987)
Cell
49,
729-739
|
| 41.
|
Wasylyk, B.,
Wasylyk, C.,
Flores, P.,
Begue, A.,
Leprince, D.,
and Stehelin, D.
(1990)
Nature
346,
191-193
|
| 42.
|
Akira, S.,
Isshiki, H.,
Sugita, T.,
Tanabe, O.,
Kinoshita, S.,
Nishio, Y.,
Nakajima, T.,
Hirano, T.,
and Kishimoto, T.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
1897-1906
|
| 43.
|
Kominato, Y.,
Galson, D. L.,
Waterman, W. R.,
Webb, A. C.,
and Auron, P. E.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
58-68
|
| 44.
|
Joyce, D. A.,
Steer, J. H.,
and Kloda, A.
(1996)
J. Interferon Cytokine Res.
16,
513-519
|
| 45.
|
Meager, A.,
Parti, S.,
Leung, H.,
Peil, E.,
and Mahon, B.
(1987)
Hybridoma
6,
305-311
|
| 46.
|
Wedel, A.,
Sulski, G.,
and Ziegler-Heitbrock, H. W.
(1996)
Cytokine
8,
335-341
|
| 47.
|
Zagariya, A.,
Mungre, S.,
Lovis, R.,
Birrer, M.,
Ness, S.,
Thimmapaya, B.,
and Pope, R.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
2815-2824
|
| 48.
|
Ray, A.,
and Prefontaine, K. E.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
752-756
|
| 49.
|
Scheinman, R. I.,
Gualberto, A.,
Jewell, C. M.,
Cidlowski, J. A.,
and Baldwin, A. S., Jr.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
943-953
|
| 50.
|
Auphan, N.,
DiDonato, J. A.,
Rosette, C.,
Helmberg, A.,
and Karin, M.
(1995)
Science
270,
286-290
|
| 51.
|
Scheinman, R. I.,
Cogswell, P. C.,
Lofquist, A. K.,
and Baldwin, A. S.
(1995)
Science
270,
283-286
|
| 52.
|
Unlap, M. T.,
and Jope, R. S.
(1997)
Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res.
45,
83-89
|
| 53.
|
Verma, I. M.,
Stevenson, J. K.,
Schwarz, E. M.,
Van Antwerp, D.,
and Miyamoto, S.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
2723-2735
|
| 54.
|
McKay, L. I.,
and Cidlowski, J. A.
(1998)
Mol. Endocrinol.
12,
45-56
|
| 55.
|
Morooka, H.,
Bonventre, J. V.,
Pombo, C. M.,
Kyriakis, J. M.,
and Force, T.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
30084-30092
|
| 56.
|
Andersson, O.,
Bronnegard, M.,
Sonnenfeld, T.,
Schmekel, B.,
Lund, J.,
Ripe, E.,
and Gustafsson, J. A.
(1991)
Chest
99,
1336-1341
|
| 57.
|
Smeal, T.,
Hibi, M.,
and Karin, M.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
6006-6010
|
| 58.
|
Jonat, C.,
Rahmsdorf, H. J.,
Park, K. K.,
Cato, A. C.,
Gebel, S.,
Ponta, H.,
and Herrlich, P.
(1990)
Cell
62,
1189-1204
|
| 59.
|
Yang-Yen, H. F.,
Chambard, J. C.,
Sun, Y. L.,
Smeal, T.,
Schmidt, T. J.,
Drouin, J.,
and Karin, M.
(1990)
Cell
62,
1205-1215
|
| 60.
|
Schule, R.,
Rangarajan, P.,
Kliewer, S.,
Ransone, L. J.,
Bolado, J.,
Yang, N.,
Verma, I. M.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1990)
Cell
62,
1217-1226
|
| 61.
|
Bertani, A.,
Polentarutti, N.,
Sica, A.,
Rambaldi, A.,
Mantovani, A.,
and Colotta, F.
(1989)
Blood
74,
1811-1816
|
| 62.
|
van Dam, H.,
Duyndam, M.,
Rottier, R.,
Bosch, A.,
de Vries-Smits, L.,
Herrlich, P,
Zantema, A.,
Angel, P.,
and van der Eb, A. J.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
479-487
|
| 63.
|
Lewis, H.,
Kaszubska, W.,
DeLamarter, J. F.,
and Whelan, J.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
5701-5709
|
| 64.
|
Whitley, M. Z.,
Thanos, D.,
Read, M. A.,
Maniatis, T.,
and Collins, T.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
6464-6475
|
| 65.
|
Jongeneel, C. V.
(1992)
in
Tumor Necrosis Factors: The Molecules and Their Emerging Role in Medicine
(Beutler, B., ed)
, pp. 539-559, Raven Press, New York
|
| 66.
|
Goldfeld, A. E.,
Doyle, C.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
9769-9773
|
| 67.
|
Stein, B.,
Cogswell, P. C.,
and Baldwin, A. S., Jr.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
3964-3974
|
| 68.
|
Nishio, Y.,
Isshiki, H.,
Kishimoto, T.,
and Akira, S.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
1854-1862
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Cheng, N. J. Pavlos, C. Wang, J. W.-Y. Tan, J. M. Lin, J. Cornish, M.-H. Zheng, and J. Xu
Mutations within the TNF-Like Core Domain of RANKL Impair Osteoclast Differentiation and Activation
Mol. Endocrinol.,
January 1, 2009;
23(1):
35 - 46.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. Preusch, M. Rattazzi, C. Albrecht, U. Merle, J. Tuckermann, G. Schutz, E. Blessing, G. Zoppellaro, P. Pauletto, R. Krempien, et al.
Critical Role of Macrophages in Glucocorticoid Driven Vascular Calcification in a Mouse-Model of Atherosclerosis
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
December 1, 2008;
28(12):
2158 - 2164.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P.-H. Park, H. Huang, M. R. McMullen, P. Mandal, L. Sun, and L. E. Nagy
Suppression of Lipopolysaccharide-stimulated Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Production by Adiponectin Is Mediated by Transcriptional and Post-transcriptional Mechanisms
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 3, 2008;
283(40):
26850 - 26858.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Zhang, M. A. Park, C. Mitchell, H. Hamed, M. Rahmani, A. P. Martin, D. T. Curiel, A. Yacoub, M. Graf, R. Lee, et al.
Vorinostat and Sorafenib Synergistically Kill Tumor Cells via FLIP Suppression and CD95 Activation
Clin. Cancer Res.,
September 1, 2008;
14(17):
5385 - 5399.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Skinner, K. M. Deleault, R. Fecteau, and S. A. Brooks
Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase Regulation of Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} mRNA Nucleocytoplasmic Transport Requires TAP-NxT1 Binding and the AU-rich Element
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 8, 2008;
283(6):
3191 - 3199.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W. Hammon
Extracorporeal Circulation: The Response of Humoral and Cellular Elements of Blood to Extracorporeal Circulation
Card. Surg. Adult,
January 1, 2008;
3(2008):
370 - 389.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. V. Ustyugova, L. L. Frost, K. VanDyke, K. M. Brundage, R. Schafer, and J. B. Barnett
3,4-Dichloropropionaniline Suppresses Normal Macrophage Function
Toxicol. Sci.,
June 1, 2007;
97(2):
364 - 374.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. Tsytsykova, J. V. Falvo, M. Schmidt-Supprian, G. Courtois, D. Thanos, and A. E. Goldfeld
Post-induction, Stimulus-specific Regulation of Tumor Necrosis Factor mRNA Expression
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 20, 2007;
282(16):
11629 - 11638.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. T. Sawyer, A. P. Fontenot, T. A. Barnes, C. E. Parsons, B. C. Tooker, L. A. Maier, M. M. Gillespie, E. B. Gottschall, L. Silveira, J. Hagman, et al.
Beryllium-Induced TNF-{alpha} Production Is Transcription-Dependent in Chronic Beryllium Disease
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.,
February 1, 2007;
36(2):
191 - 200.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Mahlknecht, J. Will, A. Varin, D. Hoelzer, and G. Herbein
Histone Deacetylase 3, a Class I Histone Deacetylase, Suppresses MAPK11-Mediated Activating Transcription Factor-2 Activation and Represses TNF Gene Expression
J. Immunol.,
September 15, 2004;
173(6):
3979 - 3990.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. V. Reddy, G. Bhattacharjee, G. Schabbauer, A. Hollis, K. Kempf, M. Tencati, M. O'Connell, M. Guha, and N. Mackman
Dexamethasone enhances LPS induction of tissue factor expression in human monocytic cells by increasing tissue factor mRNA stability
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
July 1, 2004;
76(1):
145 - 151.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Staniforth, S.-Y. Wang, L.-F. Shyur, and N.-S. Yang
Shikonins, Phytocompounds from Lithospermum erythrorhizon, Inhibit the Transcriptional Activation of Human Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} Promoter in Vivo
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 13, 2004;
279(7):
5877 - 5885.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Ma, K. Gee, W. Lim, K. Chambers, J. B. Angel, M. Kozlowski, and A. Kumar
Dexamethasone Inhibits IL-12p40 Production in Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated Human Monocytic Cells by Down-Regulating the Activity of c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase, the Activation Protein-1, and NF-{kappa}B Transcription Factors
J. Immunol.,
January 1, 2004;
172(1):
318 - 330.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. H. Zhu and E. L. Schwartz
Expression of the Angiogenic Factor Thymidine Phosphorylase in THP-1 Monocytes: Induction by Autocrine Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} and Inhibition by Aspirin
Mol. Pharmacol.,
November 1, 2003;
64(5):
1251 - 1258.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. McMullen, E. Cocuzzi, M. Hatzoglou, and L. E. Nagy
Chronic Ethanol Exposure Increases the Binding of HuR to the TNF{alpha} 3'-Untranslated Region in Macrophages
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 3, 2003;
278(40):
38333 - 38341.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Lagoumintzis, M. Christofidou, G. Dimitracopoulos, and F. Paliogianni
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Slime Glycolipoprotein Is a Potent Stimulant of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Gene Expression and Activation of Transcription Activators Nuclear Factor {kappa}B and Activator Protein 1 in Human Monocytes
Infect. Immun.,
August 1, 2003;
71(8):
4614 - 4622.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Stoecklin, M. Lu, B. Rattenbacher, and C. Moroni
A Constitutive Decay Element Promotes Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha mRNA Degradation via an AU-Rich Element-Independent Pathway
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
May 15, 2003;
23(10):
3506 - 3515.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Berrebi, S. Bruscoli, N. Cohen, A. Foussat, G. Migliorati, L. Bouchet-Delbos, M.-C. Maillot, A. Portier, J. Couderc, P. Galanaud, et al.
Synthesis of glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ) by macrophages: an anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive mechanism shared by glucocorticoids and IL-10
Blood,
January 15, 2003;
101(2):
729 - 738.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Menasche and L. H. Edmunds Jr.
Extracorporeal Circulation: The Inflammatory Response
Card. Surg. Adult,
January 1, 2003;
2(2003):
349 - 360.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Frost, G. J. Nystrom, and C. H. Lang
Lipopolysaccharide regulates proinflammatory cytokine expression in mouse myoblasts and skeletal muscle
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
September 1, 2002;
283(3):
R698 - R709.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Paparella, T.M. Yau, and E. Young
Cardiopulmonary bypass induced inflammation: pathophysiology and treatment. An update
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
February 1, 2002;
21(2):
232 - 244.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Y. Almawi and O. K. Melemedjian
Molecular mechanisms of glucocorticoid antiproliferative effects: antagonism of transcription factor activity by glucocorticoid receptor
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
January 1, 2002;
71(1):
9 - 15.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Xu, R. Dziarski, Q. Wang, K. Swartz, K. M. Sakamoto, and D. Gupta
Bacterial Peptidoglycan-Induced tnf-{alpha} Transcription Is Mediated Through the Transcription Factors Egr-1, Elk-1, and NF-{kappa}B
J. Immunol.,
December 15, 2001;
167(12):
6975 - 6982.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Heiss, C. Herhaus, K. Klimo, H. Bartsch, and C. Gerhauser
Nuclear Factor kappa B Is a Molecular Target for Sulforaphane-mediated Anti-inflammatory Mechanisms
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 17, 2001;
276(34):
32008 - 32015.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|