|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 24, 18534-18540, June 16, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, February 24, 2000
Big mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase
(BMK1), a member of the mammalian MAP kinase family, is activated by
growth factors. The activation of BMK1 is required for growth
factor-induced cell proliferation and cell cycle progression. We have
previously shown that BMK1 regulates c-jun gene expression
through direct phosphorylation and activation of transcription factor
MEF2C. MEF2C belongs to the myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) protein
family, a four-membered family of transcription factors denoted MEF2A,
-2B, -2C, and -2D. Here, we demonstrate that, in addition to MEF2C,
BMK1 phosphorylates and activates MEF2A and MEF2D but not MEF2B. The
blocking of BMK1 signaling inhibits the epidermal growth
factor-dependent activation of these three MEF2
transcription factors. The sites phosphorylated by activated BMK1 were
mapped to Ser-355, Thr-312, and Thr-319 of MEF2A and Ser-179 of MEF2D
both in vitro and in vivo. Site-directed mutagenesis reveals that the phosphorylation of these sites in MEF2A
and MEF2D are necessary for the induction of MEF2A and 2D transactivating activity by either BMK1 or by epidermal growth factor.
Taken together, these data demonstrate that, upon growth factor
induction, BMK1 directly phosphorylates and activates three members of
the MEF2 family of transcription factors thereby inducing MEF2-dependent gene expression.
Mitogen-activated protein
(MAP)1 kinase signal
transduction pathways constitute one of the major mechanisms by which
extracellular stimuli are converted into specific nuclear responses
(1-3). These pathways are considerably evolutionarily conserved, as
they have been identified in a diverse group of organisms ranging from Saccharomyces cerevisiae to humans (2, 4). In mammalian cells, four families of MAP kinases have been identified, including the
extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK1/2), c-Jun N-terminal kinase, p38 kinase, and big MAP kinase 1 (BMK1/ERK5). Each
MAP kinase family is regulated by a distinct signal transduction mechanism that influences specific cellular functions, including cell
growth, cell differentiation, programmed cell death, neoplastic transformation, and certain stress-related responses (1, 5-7).
An ever growing number of nuclear targets for the different MAP kinase
cascades are being identified and, in most cases, it appears that a
specific transcription factor acts as a target for one or a limited
subset of MAP kinases (8). For example, MAP kinases have been shown to
regulate the activity of c-Jun, CHOP10, c-Myc, ternary complex factor,
and MEF2 transcription factors (9-13). MEF2 transcription factors bind
as homodimers and heterodimers to MEF2 sites found within the promoters
of numerous genes, including muscle-specific genes and the
proto-oncogene c-jun (14, 15). Interestingly, these four
MEF2 proteins exhibit amino acid sequence similarity within their DNA
binding and transactivating domains (16).
BMK1, a newer member of the MAP kinase family, was cloned by us and
others using distinct approaches (17, 37). We have previously
demonstrated that BMK1 is activated by growth factors, oxidative
stress, and hyperosmolarity and that BMK1 activity is required for
growth factor-induced cell cycle progression through S phase (18-20).
Transcription factor MEF2C is a direct substrate for BMK1, and its
phosphorylation by BMK1 is involved in serum-induced proto-oncogene
c-jun expression via the MEF2 site found within c-jun
promoter (18). However, the effect of the BMK1 signaling pathway on
other MEF2 family members has not yet been explored. In this study, we
have investigated the regulation of MEF2A, -2B, and -2D proteins by
BMK1. We found that, in addition to MEF2C, BMK1 can specifically
phosphorylate and activate MEF2A and -2D but not -2B. The BMK1
phosphorylation sites within MEF2A and MEF2D were subsequently
identified both in vivo and in vitro and shown to
be critical for both BMK1 and growth factor-mediated activation of
these transcription factors.
Reagents and Cell Culture--
HeLa cells and Chinese hamster
ovarian (CHO-K1) cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium (Sigma) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mM glutamine, 50 units/ml penicillin, 50 mg/ml
streptomycin, and 1% nonessential amino acids (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). NIH-3T3 cells were maintained in the same
medium but with 10% FCS. RAW264 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma) containing 10% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, 50 units/ml penicillin, 50 mg/ml streptomycin, and 1% nonessential amino acids.
MEF2 Constructs--
Expression plasmid GAL4-MEF2A(wt) was
constructed by fusing the GAL4 DNA binding domain (GAL4(BD)) with the
transactivation domain of human MEF2A (amino acids 87-507).
GAL4-MEF2B, -MEF2C, and -MEF2D were constructed by fusing GAL4(BD)
separately with mouse MEF2B (amino acids 87-349), human MEF2C (amino
acids 87-442), and mouse MEF2D1b (amino acids 87-506) as described
previously (13, 18, 21). Plasmids carrying point mutations such as MEF2A(S355A), MEF2A(T312A/T319A), MEF2A(S355A, T312A/T319A),
MEF2D(S179A), and MEF2D(S430A) were generated as described elsewhere
(18, 21). The His-tagged full length MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, MEF2D, MEF2A(S355A), MEF2A(T312A/T319A), MEF2A(S355A, T312A/T319A),
MEF2D(S179A), and MEF2D(S430A) were individually cloned into the
bacterial expression vector pETM1 as described elsewhere (18, 21).
Preparation of Recombinant Proteins--
Escherichia
coli BL21(DE3) was transformed with the vector pETM1 with
individual cDNAs encoding MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, MEF2D, MEF2A(S355A), MEF2A(T312A/T319A), MEF2A(S355A, T312A/T319A),
MEF2D(S179A), and MEF2D(S430A). The transformed bacteria were
grown at 37 °C in L broth until the A600
reached 0.5, at which time
isopropyl-D-thiogalactopyranoside at a final concentration
of 1 mM was added for 5 h. Cells were collected by
centrifugation at 8,000 × g for 10 min, and the
bacterial pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of buffer A (30 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 20 mM
Tris-HCl, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) for every 100 ml of original bacterial culture. The cell suspension was sonicated,
and cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 30 min. Recombinant proteins were then purified from
the cleared lysate by using a Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid purification system (Qiagen). GST c-jun was purchased from Calbiochem.
Protein Kinase Assays--
In vitro kinase assays
were carried out at 37 °C for 60 min, using 0.1 µg of recombinant
kinase, 1 µg of kinase substrate, 250 µM ATP, and 10 µCi of [ Phosphoamino Acid Analysis and Phosphopeptide Mapping--
These
experiments were performed as described previously (18). In brief,
recombinant proteins were phosphorylated in vitro by BMK1 as
described above. Phosphorylated MEF2A and MEF2D proteins were separated
by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, visualized by
autoradiography, and excised. Eluted proteins were digested with
trypsin, and the resulting tryptic peptides were analyzed by thin-layer
electrophoresis followed by thin-layer chromatography. In some cases,
phosphopeptides were recovered from thin-layer chromatography plates
and then analyzed for phosphoamino acid content as described elsewhere
(18). Phosphopeptides were visualized and quantitated using a
PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). To detect in
vivo phosphorylation site(s) in MEF2A and -2D, HeLa cells
expressing GAL4-MEF2A and GAL4-MEF2D proteins were labeled with
32Pi for 3 h followed by treatment with or
without 50 nM epidermal growth factor (EGF) for 20 min.
These MEF2A or -2D proteins were recovered from the cell lysate (from
5 × 106 cells) by immunoprecipitation using 50 µg
of anti-GAL4 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and the resulting
immunoprecipitates were then subjected to peptide mapping analysis as
described above.
Reporter Gene Assays--
The GAL4-responsive reporter plasmid
pG5E1bLuc contains five GAL4 binding sites upstream of a minimal
promoter driving a luciferase gene. Plasmids encoding a
luciferase gene driven by the wild-type c-Jun promoter
(pJluc), or a c-Jun promoter with a mutated MEF2 site (pJSXluc), were
kindly provided by Dr. R. Prywes (22, 23). The reporter plasmid
pG5E1bLuc was cotransfected into cells along with a construct encoding
the GAL4(BD) fused to MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, MEF2D, MEF2A(S355A),
MEF2A(T312A/T319A), MEF2A(S355A, T312A/T319A), MEF2D(S179A), or
MEF2D(S430A). In some experiments, the expression vector encoding
MKK6b(E), MEK1(E), or MEK5(D) was also included in the
transfection mixtures as indicated in the figure legends.
Cells were grown on 35-mm-diameter multiwell plates (Nunc, Naperville,
IL) and transiently transfected with 1 µg of total plasmid DNA, using
Lipofectamine Plus reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.). A
MEF2A and MEF2D Are Downstream Targets for BMK1--
We have
previously shown that the transcription factor MEF2C is phosphorylated
and activated by BMK1 in response to serum (18). Because MEF2 family
members share amino acid sequence similarity within the DNA binding and
transactivating domains, we speculated that other MEF2 family members
may be substrates of BMK1. Using recombinant MEF2A, -2B, -2C, and -2D
as substrates in in vitro protein kinase assays, we found
that BMK1 phosphorylated MEF2A, -2C, and -2D but did not phosphorylate
MEF2B (Fig. 1). We next investigated the
ability of BMK1 to regulate the transactivating activity of these
transcription factors in a trans-reporter assay as described previously
for MEF2C (18). First, expression vectors encoding MEF2A, -2B, and -2D
as fusion proteins containing the GAL4 DNA binding domain (GAL4(BD))
were constructed. These fusion proteins were cotransfected with a
GAL4-driven luciferase reporter gene to measure the
transactivating activity of each transcription factor. In this system,
activated BMK1 enhanced the transactivating activity of MEF2A, -2C, and
-2D but not MEF2B in a variety of cell types (Fig.
2). Taken together, these results
indicate that BMK1 phosphorylates and activates all MEF2 family members
with the exception of MEF2B.
EGF Activates MEF2A and MEF2D via BMK1--
We previously
demonstrated that BMK1 is strongly activated by EGF and that this event
leads directly to activation of MEF2C (18, 20). Therefore, we
investigated whether MEF2A and MEF2D were also be activated by EGF
through BMK1. Using the GAL4 trans-reporter assay, we found that EGF
enhanced the transactivating activity of MEF2A, -2C, and -2D about
3-fold but had no effect on the activity of MEF2B (Fig.
3a). To ascertain the role of
BMK1 pathway in EGF-mediated MEF2A and -2D activation, we expressed
enzyme-dead forms of the MAP kinases BMK1 (BMK1(AEF)), ERK2
(ERK2(AEF)), or p38 (p38(APF)) in the trans-reporter assay. The
activation of MEF2A and MEF2D by EGF was only inhibited by the
enzyme-dead form of BMK1 but not by enzyme-dead forms of ERK2 or p38
MAP kinases (Fig. 3). These results suggest that the EGF-induced
activation of MEF2A and MEF2D is specifically mediated by BMK1.
Identification of BMK1-mediated Phosphorylation Sites in
MEF2A--
We have previously demonstrated that BMK1 regulates the
activity of MEF2C by phosphorylating a specific amino acid residue within the transactivating domain of this transcription factor (18). To
identify the specific amino acids within MEF2A and MEF2D that are
phosphorylated by BMK1, we performed tryptic phosphopeptide mapping on
MEF proteins incubated with BMK1 in an in vitro protein kinase assay. This analysis on MEF2A revealed one BMK1-phosphorylated peptide (Fig. 4a). Subsequent
phosphoamino acid analysis revealed that this phosphopeptide consisted
of both phosphoserine and phoshothreonine (Fig. 4b). The
relative radioactivity between phosphoserine and phosphothreonine was
approximately 1:2.2 in this phosphopeptide. After examining the amino
acid sequence of MEF2A, only one tryptic peptide contained both Ser-Pro
and Thr-Pro amino acid sequences (consensus phosphorylation sites for
MAP kinases) at a ratio of 1:2. This peptide comprises amino acids
301-403 of MEF2A and contains one Ser-Pro (Ser-355) and two Thr-Pro
(Thr-312 and Thr-319) sites. Interestingly, others have shown that
threonines 312/319 as well as serine 355 of MEF2A are phosphorylated by
the MAP kinase p38 after stimulation of cells using stress-related
agonists. To confirm that these are the sites in MEF2A phosphorylated
by BMK1 in vitro, mutant forms of MEF2A were constructed
with serine 355 and/or threonines 312 and 319 converted to alanines.
These mutant forms of MEF2A, denoted MEF2A(S355A), MEF2A (T312A,
T319A), and MEF2A(S355A/T312A, T319A), were utilized as substrates in
an in vitro kinase reaction containing BMK1 followed by
tryptic peptide mapping. A single radioactive peptide was observed
using MEF2A(S355A) or MEF2A(T312A, T319A) as a substrate. As expected,
no radioactive tryptic peptide was detected using MEF2A(S355A/T312A,
T319A) as a substrate (Fig. 4c). These results indicate that
in vitro BMK1 phosphorylates MEF2A at Thr-312, Thr-319, and
Ser-355.
To investigate whether these sites in MEF2A are phosphorylated in cells
following EGF stimulation, GAL4-MEF2A was expressed in HeLa cells
labeled with [32P]orthrophosphate and, after treating the
cells with 5 ng/ml EGF, GAF-MEF2A protein was immunoprecipitated from
the cell lysate. One phosphopeptide (Fig. 4d) was detected
following tryptic peptide mapping of immunoprecipitated GAL4-MEF2A.
Phosphoamino acid analysis revealed that the phosphopeptide contained
both phosphoserine and phosphothreonine (Fig. 4e) with a
ratio of radiolabeling of about 1:2. To confirm that the
phosphorylation of MEF2A obtained in vivo and in
vitro is identical, we mixed equal counts of these phosphopeptides
followed by two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping. The identical
migration of the two phosphopeptides confirms that cellular MEF2A is
phosphorylated at amino acids Thr-312, Thr-319, and Ser-355 upon
stimulation with EGF (Fig. 4f).
We next examined the role of these phosphorylation sites in regulating
MEF2A activity as a result of either BMK1 activation or EGF induction.
Mutation of Thr-312, Thr-319, and Ser-355 to alanine in GAL4-MEF2A
significantly reduced the BMK1- and EGF-mediated activation of MEF2A
(Fig. 5, a and b).
Moreover, the BMK1- or EGF-induced transactivation of MEF2A was
completely abrogated by mutating all three phosphorylation sites of
MEF2A (Fig. 5, a and b). These results indicate
that BMK1 or EGF mediates transactivation of MEF2A through all three of
the phosphorylation sites identified by phosphopeptide mapping.
Identification of Phosphorylation Sites in MEF2D Catalyzed by
BMK1--
Similar to the analyses performed on MEF2A, the sites of
MEF2D phosphorylated by activated BMK1 were determined. Tryptic peptide mapping of recombinant MEF2D, which had been phosphorylated by BMK1 in
an in vitro protein kinase assay, revealed two
phosphopeptides with equal radioactive intensity (Fig.
6a). Both phosphopeptides contained only phosphoserine as indicated by phosphoamino acid analysis
(Fig. 6b). The RF and
Mr values of these phosphopeptides are 0.45 and
18.9 × 10
To determine the sites phosphorylated in MEF2D in cells activated by
EGF, GAL4-MEF2D-expressing HeLa cells were labeled with 32P
and these cells were subsequently treated with 5 ng/ml EGF. Tryptic
peptide mapping of immunoprecipitated GAL4-MEF2D revealed only one
phosphopeptide (Fig. 6d) containing phosphoserine (Fig. 6e). Tryptic peptide mapping of a mixed sample containing
equal counts of in vitro and in vivo
phosphorylated MEF2D revealed a 2:1 ratio between phosphopeptide 1 and
phosphopeptide 2 (Fig. 6f). These results identify
phosphopeptide 1 as the phosphoryated tryptic peptide, and S179 as the
site phosphorylated in MEF2D upon EGF treatment of cells.
We next examined the role of these two phosphorylation sites in
regulating MEF2D activity in response to BMK1 activation or EGF
stimulation. Mutation of S179 to alanine in GAL4-MEF2D alone completely
abolished the BMK1- and EGF-mediated activation of MEF2D (Fig.
7, a and b). In
contrast, BMK1- or EGF-induced MEF2D activity was not affected by
mutating S430 to alanine (Fig. 7, a and b). These
results indicated that only S179 is involved in regulating MEF2D
activity in response to BMK1 and EGF.
Phosphorylation of MEF2A and MEF2D Is Required for MEF2-mediated
c-jun Induction--
The MEF2 site in the c-jun promoter is important
for the activation of c-jun expression in response to various agonists,
including EGF (18, 22, 24, 25). It has been shown that MEF2 proteins are involved in serum-induced expression of c-jun through binding of a
MEF2 site within the c-jun promoter (18, 22, 23). However, the
mechanism by which MEF2A and MEF2D regulate the activity of c-jun has
not yet been thoroughly explored. The activation of BMK1 in cells was
found to activate the expression of a reporter gene driven by the c-jun
promoter (Fig. 8a). In
contrast, this BMK1-dependent induction of c-jun was
abolished using a reporter gene driven by a c-jun promoter containing a
deletion of the MEF2 binding site (Fig. 8c). To determine
the contribution of the previously identified MEF2A or MEF2D
phosphorylation sites to c-jun expression, the mutants MEF2A
(S355A/T312A, T319A) or MEF2D(S179A) were expressed in this reporter
assay. The expression of either MEF mutant blocked BMK1-mediated c-jun
induction. This effect was specific for the MEF mutations, because
expression of wild type MEF2A or MEF2D had no effect on
BMK1-dependent c-jun induction (Fig. 8b). These data indicate that BMK1 regulates c-jun expression through
phosphorylation of specific sites in MEF2A and MEF2D.
Previous studies have implicated MEF2 proteins in EGF-induced c-jun
expression (24), however the signaling pathway leading to MEF2
activation remains largely unknown. The elimination of the MEF2 site in
the c-jun promoter resulted in a 50% reduction in the EGF-mediated
activation of a reporter gene (compare Figs. 9a and 9b). To
determine whether phosphorylation of MEF2A or MEF2D by BMK1 is involved
in EGF-dependent c-jun induction, MEF2A(S355A/T312A, T319A) or MEF2D(S179A) was expressed in this reporter assay. The expression of either MEF mutant resulted in a 50% decrease in EGF-mediated c-jun induction (Fig. 9a). This decrease was
similar to that observed using the MEF2-deleted c-jun promoter (Fig.
9b) indicating that expression of mutant MEF2A or MEF2D
eliminated the contribution of any MEF to EGF-induced c-jun expression.
In contrast, expression of wild type MEF2A or MEF2D had no effect on
EGF-dependent c-jun induction (Fig. 9c).
Together, these results suggest that BMK1-mediated phosphorylation of
MEF2A and MEF2D makes a significant contribution to EGF-induced c-jun
expression.
The MEF2 family members, along with certain specific splice
variants, were originally described as muscle-specific DNA binding proteins that recognize MEF2 motifs found within the promoters of many
muscle-specific genes (14, 26). Recently, however, several groups have
reported MEF2 binding activity and MEF2 proteins in a wide variety of
cell types where these proteins appear to play an important role in
growth factor- and stress stimulus-induced early gene responses (13,
18, 22). These findings suggest that the expression and function of
MEF2 transcription factors is broader than originally thought. All four
MEF2 family members can bind MEF2 promoter elements as either
homodimers or a combination of heterodimers. Our laboratory has
previously determined that BMK1 can modulate MEF2C activity induced by
growth factors (18, 20). Herein, the effect of BMK1 on other MEF2
family members was investigated, and we found that, in addition to
MEF2C, the transcriptional activity of MEF2A and -2D is also directly
up-regulated by BMK1-catalyzed phosphorylation. Nonetheless, the
biological consequence of BMK1-mediated activation of MEF2 proteins in
various cell types and tissues is still largely unknown and needs to be explored.
MEF2A, -2C, and -2D in MEF2 family share amino acid sequence similarity
within their transactivating domains, and, in this paper, we have
demonstrated that their activity can be modulated by the
phosphorylation of these domains by BMK1. Interestingly, our findings,
combined with our previous report (18), suggest that the MEF2 sites
phosphorylated by BMK1 are not conserved with respect to each other
(Fig. 10). These results indicate that
the general structural similarity among MEF2 proteins may only
contribute to their initial recognition/interaction with BMK1 but that
the actual site phosphorylated by BMK1 is determined by other factors. One possibility is that different cellular cofactors orient the kinase
domain of BMK1 with different phosphorylation sites of these three MEF
proteins. Another possibility is that the more subtle variations in the
amino acid sequences of each of the MEFs contribute to the precise site
phosphorylated by BMK1.
The MAP kinase p38 has also been shown to regulate the activity of
MEF2A and MEF2C (13, 21, 27). In this regard, a conserved p38-docking
domain was found in both MEF2A and MEF2C. In comparison, the docking
domain of MEF2D is significantly different and has been considered
inaccessible by p38 (27). We have shown that BMK1 can interact with all
three of the aforementioned MEF proteins Thus, the recognition and
interaction of BMK1 with MEF family members may to be less stringent
than that of p38. The other possibility is that BMK1 recognizes domains
in these MEFs distinct from that utilized by p38. Moreover, BMK1 has
been shown to physically interact with amino acids found within the DNA
binding domain of MEF2A and MEF2C (28). However, the functional
consequences or existence of this association in MEF2D have not yet
been explored. It appears unlikely that this function of p38 acts in
concert with BMK1 in the induction of c-jun expression, as the agonists
for p38 are largely activators of stress and inflammation and are not
mitogenic in nature (13, 29, 30).
In collaboration with B. C. Berk's laboratory, we have previously
shown BMK1 is strongly activated by oxidative stress in smooth muscle
cells and by shear stress in endothelial cells (19, 31, 32).
Interestingly, MEF2 proteins are expressed in these cell types where
they have been shown to be involved in vascular development (33, 34).
Thus, a possible role for BMK1 in endothelial cell organization and
smooth muscle cell differentiation warrants investigation. In addition,
because these MEF2 proteins are critical in regulating muscle-specific
gene expression, it is worthy to determine if BMK1-mediated signaling
is involved in the MEF2-dependent differentiation or
proliferation of muscle cells during development.
The proto-oncogene c-jun is an immediate early gene
expressed in quiescent cells in response to mitogens such as growth
factors. The induction of c-jun expression, mediated by mitogens or by signals from G protein-coupled receptors, requires ATF1 (AP-1 like) and
MEF2 sites in the promoter of this gene (24, 35). Here, we demonstrate
that a MEF2 promoter element is required for the BMK1-mediated
activation of c-jun expression as deletion of this element completely
abrogates this effect (Fig. 8a). The induction of c-jun
expression appears to be essential for cell proliferation as
microinjection of a deactivating anti-c-jun antibody has been shown to
abrogate serum-induced cell cycle progression (36). In addition,
previous studies in our laboratory have established that BMK1 activity
is required for mitogen-induced cell proliferation and cell cycle
progression (20). Taken together, these results indicate that the
requirement for BMK1 in mitogen-induced cell cycle progression may be
due to its ability to activate MEF transcription factors and thereby
induce c-jun expression. As the ras/rac/MEKK1 signal transduction
pathway has also been implicated in EGF-induced c-jun expression (24),
it will be interesting to determine if this pathway, along with that
provided by BMK1, mediates synergistic effects on c-jun activation.
*
This work was supported by Grant GM53214 from the National
Institutes of Health; by grants from the American Heart Association, the Naito Memorial Foundation, the Uehara Memorial Foundation; and by
Research Grants from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture,
Japan. This publication was made possible by funds received from the
Cancer Research Fund, under Interagency Agreement 97-12013 (University
of California contract 98-00924V) with the Department of Health
Services, Cancer Research Program.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Immunology,
The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla,
CA 92037. Tel.: 858-784-8539; Fax: 858-784-8239; E-mail
jdlee@scripps.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 12, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001573200
The abbreviations used are:
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase;
BMK1, big
mitogen-activated protein kinase 1;
MEK, MAP kinase/ERK kinase;
MKK, MAP kinase kinase;
MEKK, MAP kinase kinase kinase/ERK kinase kinase;
SAPK, stress-activated protein kinase;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
MBP, myelin basic protein;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
MEF, myocyte enhancer factor;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
GAL4(BD), GAL4 DNA
binding domain.
Big Mitogen-activated Kinase Regulates Multiple Members of the
MEF2 Protein Family*
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
Department of Microbiology and Immunology,
Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi 480-1195, Japan; the
§ Department of Pathology II, Linking University, SE 581 85 Linking, Sweden; the ¶ Department of Immunology, The Scripps
Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037; and the
R.
W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, San Diego, California
92121
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP in 20 µl of kinase reaction
buffer as described previously (18). Reactions were terminated by the
addition of Laemmli sample buffer. Reaction products were resolved by
sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE). 32Pi-Labeled proteins were
visualized by autoradiography.
-galactosidase expression plasmid (pCMV-
-gal;
CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) was used to determine the
transfection efficiency in each transfection. The total amount of DNA
for each transfection was kept constant by using the empty vector
pcDNA3. After 24 h, the medium was changed to serum-free
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 2 mM
glutamine and nonessential amino acids; 24 h after transfection,
cell extracts were prepared and the activities of
-galactosidase and
luciferase were measured as described previously (18).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
BMK1 phosphorylates MEF2A, -2C, and -2D.
a, equal amounts of recombinant MEF2A, -2B, -2C, -2D, MBP,
and c-jun (1-93) were used as substrates for BMK1 in an in
vitro protein kinase assay as described. The phosphorylation of
these substrates by BMK1 was detected by SDS-PAGE followed by using a
PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics). b, Coomassie Blue
staining of MEF2s, MBP, and c-jun (1-93) proteins used in the protein
kinase assay.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
BMK1 simulates the transcriptional activity
of MEF2A and MEF2D. a, HeLa; b, Chinese
hamster ovary; c, 293; or d, PC12 cells were
cotransfected with the reporter plasmid pG5ElbLuc (0.2 µg) and a
plasmid encoding a given MEF2 isoform fused with GAL4(DB) as indicated.
Additionally, control vector pcDNA3 (0.4 µg) or expression
plasmids encoding MEK5(D) (0.2 µg) along with BMK1 (0.2 µg) were
included in each transfection as indicated at the bottom of
each panel. Cell extracts were prepared 48 h following
transfection. The luciferase activities were normalized against cells
transfected with pG5ElbLuc and GAL4 reporter plasmid alone, whose value
was taken as 1.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
BMK1 mediates EGF-induced activation of MEF2A
and -2D. a, HeLa cells were transfected with the
reporter plasmid pG5ElbLuc (0.4 µg) along with either no MEF plasmid
(Mock) or plasmids encoding GAL4/MEF2A, -2B, -2C, or -2D
(0.4 µg) as indicated. 24 h after transfection, the cells were
transferred into serum-free media for an additional 24 h. Then 5 ng/ml EGF was added and the cells were incubated for an additional
6 h. Relative luciferase activities were normalized to
non-EGF-treated mock cells whose activity was taken as 1. b,
HeLa cells were transfected with the reporter plasmid pG5ElbLuc (0.3 µg) and GAL4/MEF2A (0.3 µg) along with various amounts of plasmids
encoding the inactive MAP kinases BMK1(AEF), ERK(AEF), or p38(AGF) (0, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 µg) as indicated. The total amount of transfected
DNA was adjusted to 1.0 µg through the addition of empty vector
pcDNA3. Cells were then incubated, treated with EGF, and then
assayed as described above. Relative luciferase activities were
normalized to cells transfected with pG5ElbLuc and GAL4/MEF2A whose
value was taken as 100%. c, same as b, except
that GAL4/MEF2D was used in place of GAL4/MEF2A.

View larger version (92K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
BMK1 phosphorylates MEF2A at
amino acids Ser-355, Thr-312, and Thr-319. a,
phosphopeptide map of MEF2A phosphorylated by BMK1 in vitro
as described under "Experimental Procedures." b,
phosphoamino acid analysis of the phosphorylated peptide from
a. c, phosphopeptide mapping of MEF2A,
MEF2A(S355A), MEF2A(T312A/T319A), and MEF2A(S355A/T312A, T319A),
which have been phosphorylated by BMK1 in vitro as
indicated. d, HeLa cells expressing wild-type GAL4/MEF2A
were starved in serum-free media for 24 h and then
metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate
for 3 h. The cells were then stimulated with 5 ng/ml EGF for 30 min. GAL4 MEF2A protein was immunoprecipitated from the cell lysate
using the anti-GAL4 DNA-binding domain monoclonal antibody RK5C1
followed by phosphopeptide mapping. e, phosphoamino acid
analysis of the phosphorylated peptide from d. f,
phosphopeptide map of a mixture of equal counts of in vitro
(a) and in vivo labeled MEF2A
(d).

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
BMK1 phosphorylation sites in MEF2A are
required for both EGF and BMK1-mediated MEF2A activation. HeLa
cells were transfected with plasmids pG5ElbLuc (0.2 µg) along with
empty vector pcDNA3 (Mock) or individual plasmids (0.2 µg) encoding MEF2A, MEF2A(S355A), MEF2A(T312A, T319A), or
MEF2A(S355A/T312A, T319A) as indicated. a, plasmids encoding
BMK1 and MEK5(D) were included as indicated. b, EGF was
used, as indicated, to stimulate the cells as described in legend of
Fig. 3. All luciferase activities were normalized to unstimulated mock
cells whose value was taken as 1.
4 for peptide 1 and 0.32 and 26.7 × 10
4 for peptide 2, respectively. Sequence analysis
reveals that there are 10 predicted tryptic peptides containing Ser-Pro
in the transactivating domain of MEF2D. Among them, only two
phosphopeptides; one phosphorylated at Ser-179 and the other
phosphorylated at both Ser-355 and Ser-404, would produce similar
RF and Mr values observed for
peptide 1. To distinguish among these possibilities, we individually
mutated each of these serines to alanine and phosphorylated the
resulting proteins in vitro with BMK1 followed by tryptic
peptide mapping. We found that phosphopeptide 1 was absent in the
tryptic peptide map of the MEF2D(S179A) mutant (Fig. 6c) but
not in the tryptic peptide map on the other mutants (data not shown).
Two putative phosphopeptides; one phosphorylated at Ser-430 and the
another phosphorylated at both Ser-436 and Ser-457, would produce
similar RF and Mr values
observed for peptide 2 (Fig. 6a). These three serines in
MEF2D were individually mutated to alanine, and these mutant forms of
MEF2D, denoted MEF2D(S430A) and MEF2D (S436A/S457A), were utilized as
substrates in an in vitro kinase reaction containing BMK1
followed by tryptic peptide mapping. We found that phosphopeptide 2 was
present in the tryptic peptide map of mutant MEF2D(S436A/S457A) but was
absent using the mutant MEF2D(S430A) mutant (Fig. 6c). These
results indicate that S430 is the site phosphorylated in MEF2D by BMK1
in vitro.

View larger version (70K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
BMK1 phosphorylates MEF2D at Ser-179.
a, phosphopeptide map of MEF2D that was phosphorylated by
BMK1 in vitro. b, phosphoamino acid analysis of the
phosphorylated peptides from a. c, phosphopeptide
mapping of MEF2D, MEF2D(S179A), and MEF2D(S430A) that have been
phosphorylated by BMK1 in vitro. d, HeLa cells expressing
wild-type GAL4/MEF2D were starved in serum-free media for 24 h,
metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate for 3 h, and then stimulated with EGF for 30 min. GAL4/MEF2D protein was
immunoprecipitated from the cell lysate using the anti-GAL4 DNA binding
domain monoclonal antibody RK5C1 followed by phosphopeptide mapping.
e, phosphoamino acid analysis of the phosphorylated peptide
from d. f, phosphopeptide map of a mixture of
equal counts of in vitro (a) and in
vivo labeled MEF2D (d).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
The BMK1 phosphorylation site in MEF2A is
required for both EGF and BMK1-mediated MEF2D activation. HeLa
cells were transfected with plasmids pG5ElbLuc (0.2 µg) along with
empty vector pcDNA3 (Mock) or individual plasmids (0.2 µg) encoding MEF2D, MEF2D(S179A), or MEF2D(S430A) as indicated.
a, plasmids encoding BMK1 and MEK5(D) were included as
indicated. b, EGF was used, as indicated, to stimulate cells
as described in the legend of Fig. 3. All luciferase activities were
normalized to unstimulated mock-transfected cells whose value was taken
as 1.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
BMK1 mediates c-jun induction by
phosphorylation of MEF2A and MEF2D. HeLa cells were transfected
with the reporter plasmid pJLuc (0.2 µg) along with empty vector
pcDNA3 (Mock) or individual expression plasmids (0.2 µg) encoding MEF2A (Awt), MEF2A(S355A/T312A, T319A)
(Amut), MEF2D (Dwt), or MEF2D(S179A)
(Dmut) as indicated. Plasmids encoding BMK1 and
MEK5(D) were included as indicated. In c and d,
the reporter plasmid pJXLuc was used instead of pJLuc. All luciferase
activities were normalized against unstimulated mock cells whose value
was taken as 1.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
EGF-dependent c-jun induction
requires BMK1-mediated phosphorylation of MEF2A and MEF2D. HeLa
cells were transfected with the reporter plasmid pJLuc (0.2 µg) along
with empty vector pcDNA3 (Mock) or individual plasmids
(0.2 µg) encoding MEF2A (Awt), MEF2A(S355A/T312A, T319A)
(Amut), MEF2D (Dwt), or MEF2D(S179A)
(Dmut) as indicated. EGF was used, as indicated, to
stimulate the cells as described in the legend of Fig. 3. In
c and d, the reporter plasmid pJXLuc was used
instead of pJLuc. All luciferase activities were normalized against
unstimulated mock cells whose value was taken as 1.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 10.
Sequence comparison of members of the MEF2
group of transcription factors in the regions phosphorylated by
BMK1. The Pileup program (Wisconsin Genetics Group, Madison, WI)
was used for sequence alignment. Gaps introduced into the sequence to
optimize alignment are indicated by a hyphen. The
numbers indicate the starting and ending amino acid residues
of each MEF2 protein shown. Amino acid residues phosphorylated by BMK1
are indicated by asterisks.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Cobb, M. H.
(1999)
Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.
71,
479-500
2.
Widmann, C.,
Gibson, S.,
Jarpe, M. B.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1999)
Physiol. Rev.
79,
143-180
3.
Davis, R. J.
(1995)
Mol. Reprod. Dev.
42,
459-467
4.
Whitmarsh, A. J.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1998)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
23,
481-485
5.
Stronach, B. E.,
and Perrimon, N.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
6172-6182
6.
Ichijo, H.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
6087-6093
7.
Thomson, S.,
Mahadevan, L. C.,
and Clayton, A. L.
(1999)
Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.
10,
205-214
8.
Treisman, R.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
205-215
9.
Gupta, S.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
353,
281-285
10.
Gupta, S.,
Campbell, D.,
Derijard, B.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1995)
Science
267,
389-393
11.
Wang, X.-Z.,
and Ron, D.
(1996)
Science
272,
1347-1349
12.
Janknecht, R.,
Ernst, W. H.,
Pingoud, V.,
and Nordheim, A.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
5097-5104
13.
Han, J.,
Jiang, Y.,
Li, Z.,
Kravchenko, V. V.,
and Ulevitch, R. T.
(1997)
Nature
386,
296-299
14.
Martin, J. F.,
Miano, J. M.,
Hustad, C. M.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
and Olson, E. N.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
1647-1656
15.
Black, B. L.,
and Olson, E. N.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
14,
167-196
16.
Olson, E. N.,
Perry, M.,
and Schulz, R. A.
(1995)
Dev. Biol.
172,
2-14
17.
Lee, J.-D.,
Ulevitch, R. J.,
and Han, J.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
213,
715-724
18.
Kato, Y.,
Kravchenko, V. V.,
Tapping, R. I.,
Han, J.,
Ulevitch, R. J.,
and Lee, J.-D.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
7054-7066
19.
Abe, J. I.,
Kushuhara, M.,
Ulevitch, R. J.,
Berk, B. C.,
and Lee, J.-D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16586-16590
20.
Kato, Y.,
Tapping, R. I.,
Huang, S.,
Watson, M. H.,
Ulevitch, R. J.,
and Lee, J.-D.
(1998)
Nature
395,
713-716
21.
Zhao, M.,
New, L.,
Kravchenko, V. V.,
Kato, Y.,
Gram, H.,
di Padova, F.,
Olson, E. N.,
Ulevitch, R. J.,
and Han, J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
21-30
22.
Han, T.-H.,
and Prywes, R.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
2907-2915
23.
Han, T.-H.,
Lamph, W. W.,
and Prywes, R.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
4472-4477
24.
Clarke, N.,
Arenzana, N.,
Hai, T.,
Minden, A.,
and Prywes, R.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
1065-1073
25.
Coso, O. A.,
Montaner, S.,
Fromm, C.,
Lacal, J. C.,
Prywes, R.,
Teramoto, H.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20691-20697
26.
Yu, Y. T.,
Breitbart, R. E.,
Smoot, L. B.,
Lee, Y.,
Mahdavi, V.,
and Nadal-Ginard, B.
(1992)
Genes Dev.
6,
1783-1798
27.
Yang, S. H.,
Galanis, A.,
and Sharrocks, A. D.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
4028-4038
28.
Yang, C. C.,
Ornatsky, O. I.,
McDermott, J. C.,
Cruz, T. F.,
and Prody, C. A.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
4771-4777
29.
Raingeaud, J.,
Gupta, S.,
Rogers, J. S.,
Dickens, M.,
Han, J.,
Ulevitch, R. J.,
and David, R. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7420-7426
30.
Han, J.,
Lee, J.-D.,
Bibbs, L.,
and Ulevitch, R. J.
(1994)
Science
265,
808-811
31.
Abe, J. I.,
Takahashi, M.,
Ishida, M.,
Lee, J.-D.,
and Berk, B. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20389-20394
32.
Yan, C.,
Takahashi, M.,
Okuda, M.,
Lee, J.-D.,
and Berk, B. C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
143-150
33.
Lin, Q.,
Lu, J.,
Yanagisawa, H.,
Webb, R.,
Lyons, G. E.,
Richardson, J. A.,
and Olson, E. N.
(1998)
Development
125,
4565-4574
34.
Bi, W.,
Drake, C. J.,
and Schwarz, J. J.
(1999)
Dev. Biol.
211,
255-267
35.
Coso, O. A.,
Teramoto, H.,
Simonds, W. F.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3963-3966
36.
Kovary, K.,
and Bravo, R.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
4466-4472
37.
Zhou, G.,
Bao, Z. Q.,
and Dixon, J. E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
12665-12669
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Schramp, O. Ying, T. Y. Kim, and G. S. Martin ERK5 promotes Src-induced podosome formation by limiting Rho activation J. Cell Biol., October 22, 2008; 181(7): 1195 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Ramachandran, G. Yu, S. Li, B. Zhu, and T. Gulick Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2A Is Transcriptionally Autoregulated J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2008; 283(16): 10318 - 10329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. W. Groenendijk, K. Van der Heiden, B. P. Hierck, and R. E. Poelmann The Role of Shear Stress on ET-1, KLF2, and NOS-3 Expression in the Developing Cardiovascular System of Chicken Embryos in a Venous Ligation Model Physiology, December 1, 2007; 22(6): 380 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Satoh, J. Ohnishi, A. Sato, M. Takeyama, S.-i. Iemura, T. Natsume, and H. Shibuya Nemo-Like Kinase-Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2A Signaling Regulates Anterior Formation in Xenopus Development Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2007; 27(21): 7623 - 7630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B. Atkins and M. K. Jain Role of Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors in Endothelial Biology Circ. Res., June 22, 2007; 100(12): 1686 - 1695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Ostrander, A. R. Daniel, K. Lofgren, C. G. Kleer, and C. A. Lange Breast Tumor Kinase (Protein Tyrosine Kinase 6) Regulates Heregulin-Induced Activation of ERK5 and p38 MAP Kinases in Breast Cancer Cells Cancer Res., May 1, 2007; 67(9): 4199 - 4209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Yan, B. Ding, T. Shishido, C.-H. Woo, S. Itoh, K.-I. Jeon, W. Liu, H. Xu, C. McClain, C. A. Molina, et al. Activation of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 5 Reduces Cardiac Apoptosis and Dysfunction via Inhibition of a Phosphodiesterase 3A/Inducible cAMP Early Repressor Feedback Loop Circ. Res., March 2, 2007; 100(4): 510 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gregoire, L. Xiao, J. Nie, X. Zhang, M. Xu, J. Li, J. Wong, E. Seto, and X.-J. Yang Histone Deacetylase 3 Interacts with and Deacetylates Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2 Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2007; 27(4): 1280 - 1295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-h. Feng and S. C. Kenney Valproic Acid Enhances the Efficacy of Chemotherapy in EBV-Positive Tumors by Increasing Lytic Viral Gene Expression. Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 66(17): 8762 - 8769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Abbasi, J.-D. Lee, B. Su, X. Chen, J. L. Alcon, J. Yang, R. E. Kellems, and Y. Xia Protein Kinase-mediated Regulation of Calcineurin through the Phosphorylation of Modulatory Calcineurin-interacting Protein 1 J. Biol. Chem., March 24, 2006; 281(12): 7717 - 7726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gregoire, A. M. Tremblay, L. Xiao, Q. Yang, K. Ma, J. Nie, Z. Mao, Z. Wu, V. Giguere, and X.-J. Yang Control of MEF2 Transcriptional Activity by Coordinated Phosphorylation and Sumoylation J. Biol. Chem., February 17, 2006; 281(7): 4423 - 4433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Seyfried, X. Wang, G. Kharebava, and C. Tournier A Novel Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Docking Site in the N Terminus of MEK5{alpha} Organizes the Components of the Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 5 Signaling Pathway Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2005; 25(22): 9820 - 9828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Sohn, D. Li, L. K. Lee, and A. Winoto Transcriptional Regulation of Tissue-Specific Genes by the ERK5 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2005; 25(19): 8553 - 8566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Zhu, B. Ramachandran, and T. Gulick Alternative Pre-mRNA Splicing Governs Expression of a Conserved Acidic Transactivation Domain in Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2 Factors of Striated Muscle and Brain J. Biol. Chem., August 5, 2005; 280(31): 28749 - 28760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Carvajal-Vergara, S. Tabera, J. C. Montero, A. Esparis-Ogando, R. Lopez-Perez, G. Mateo, N. Gutierrez, M. Parmo-Cabanas, J. Teixido, J. F. San Miguel, et al. Multifunctional role of Erk5 in multiple myeloma Blood, June 1, 2005; 105(11): 4492 - 4499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|