![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 24, 18602-18610, June 16, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
,
, and
§¶
From the
Division of Hematology-Oncology and
the Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles and the
§ Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Keck
School of Medicine, University of Southern California,
Los Angeles, California 90027
Received for publication, February 17, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The balance between matrix metalloproteinases
(MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs) is a key determinant in
the homeostasis of the extracellular matrix. We have identified two
cis-acting elements involved in the transcriptional regulation of
TIMP-2. The first is an inverted CCAAT box located at position Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases
(TIMPs)1 are natural
inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), a family of proteases that degrade proteins of the extracellular matrix (ECM) (1). These
inhibitors play an important role in the control of the homeostasis of
the ECM under conditions that are associated with intense connective
tissue remodeling such as implantation, embryogenesis, organogenesis,
wound repair, arthritis, and cancer invasion (2, 3). Four members of
the TIMP family, designated TIMP-1 to TIMP-4, have been identified so
far in many species including human (4-8). These inhibitors differ in
many aspects such as tissue-specific expression, solubility, and
regulation but share a common antiprotease function because of their
ability to form stable enzyme-inhibitor complexes with all members of
the MMP family. The balance between MMPs and TIMPs is a key element
that controls the turnover of the ECM and is itself under the influence
of a large variety of growth factors and cytokines that
transcriptionally regulate MMP and TIMP expression. Whereas some of
these factors such as transforming growth factor The molecular basis for the transcriptional regulation of MMP and TIMP
expression has been investigated, and several cis-acting elements in
the promoter of many MMPs and TIMPs responsible for transcription
control have been identified. In particular, a PEA-3 motif and an AP-1
motif located in close proximity in the promoter of many MMPs and TIMPs
have been shown to mediate their enhanced expression by phorbol esters
and serum factors (15), and a transforming growth factor In our laboratory we have previously isolated and characterized
the human TIMP-2 gene and partially characterized its promoter (17).
This promoter has many features classically observed in housekeeping
genes including a typical CpG island and several Sp1 motifs, suggesting
that in contrast to TIMP-1 or TIMP-3, which respond to a large variety
of cytokines and growth factors, TIMP-2 functions predominantly in
providing a basal level of inhibitory activity. We demonstrate here
that TIMP-2 is transcriptionally up-regulated by cAMP in a manner that
specifically alters the MMP/TIMP balance in favor of the TIMP. Moreover
we show that up-regulation of TIMP-2 by cAMP involves a cooperative
action between NF-Y and Sp1.
Cell Culture--
Human breast epithelial cancer cells MDAMB,
human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells, and murine NIH3T3 cells were cultured
in minimum Eagle's medium (MDAMB, HT1080) or Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium (NIH3T3) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and
supplemented with 200 µg/ml penicillin and streptomycin.
Plasmids and Mutagenesis--
The full-length 2243 base pairs
(pTIMP2-2.3K) and 276 base pairs (pTIMP2-276) TIMP-2 promoters cloned
into the firefly luciferase reporter vector pGL-2 (Promega, Madison,
WI) have been previously described (17). Both plasmids served as a
template for deletion and site-directed mutagenesis studies in the
TIMP-2 promoter. Mutational deletions were performed by PCR cloning,
using a PCR core kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA), 10 ng of DNA template,
and 10 pmol of sense and antisense primers. The sequence of the
sense primer for TIMP2-187 is
5'-GCGGGTCGCCCCGGGCAGGTGGTGC-3', for TIMP2-131 5'-GCGCGGCCCGGGGGGAGGCGCGGGC-3', for TIMP2-112
5'-GGCGCGGGCCCGGGGGGAGGAGGGGGC-3', for TIMP2-100
5'-GGGGGAGGCCCGGGCTGCTGGGAG-3', for pTIMP2-86
5'-AGGGGGCTGCTGCCCGGGCCCAGA-3', for pTIMP2-73,
5'-GGGAGCGCCCAGACCCGGGATTGGCC-3', and for pTIMP2-63 5'-GCCTGCATTGCCCGGGAGCCACCGGG-3'. The number in these
plasmids indicates the number of bases located upstream of the
transcription initiation site. The sequence of the antisense primer
used for the generation of all the deletion mutants is
5'-CCATCCTCTAGAGGATAGAATGGCG-3'. All sense primers contain
an SmaI site (underlined), and the antisense primer contains
a XbaI site (underlined). The PCR reactions consisted of 39 cycles, and each cycle included a denaturation step at 94 °C for 1 min, a primer annealing step at 68 °C for 1.5 min, and an extension
step at 72 °C for 2 min. The PCR-generated fragments were separated
by agarose gel electrophoresis, extracted using the Qiagen gel
extraction kit (Qiagen), and inserted and amplified into T-Vectors
(Promega). These vectors were digested with SmaI and
XbaI, and the digested fragments containing the promoter
were ligated back in the pGL-2 vector (Promega) linearized with
SmaI and XbaI. Site-directed mutations within
plasmid pTIMP2-86 were generated by PCR with the above-mentioned
conditions using mutated sense primers. The sequence of the sense
primer for pTIMP2-86M1 is
5'-AGGGGGCTGCTGCCCGGGCCCAGAGCCTGCA(C)TTGGCCGCC-3'; for
pTIMP2-86M2, 5'-CTGCCCGGGCCCAGAGCCTGCGAGCCTGCA(T)TTG(A)GCCGCC-3';
and for pTIMP2-86M5, 5'-CTGCCCGGGCCCAGAGCCTGCG
AGCCTGCA(C)T(C)T(C)G(C)G(C)CCGCC-3', where the nucleotide replacing the constitutive nucleotide (underlined) is shown in parentheses. Site-directed mutagenesis within plasmid pTIMP2-2.3K were performed with QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene®, La Jolla, CA). The sequence of the
mutagenic primers for pTIMP2-NF-Ymt are
5'-CTGCCCGGGCCCAGAGCCTGCT(A)TTA(G)GCCGCCAGCCACCGGG-3'
(sense primer) and
5'-CCCGGTGGCGGCT(C)AAA(T)GCAGGCTCTGGGCCCGGGCAG-3' (antisense primer) and for pTIMP2-Sp1mt are
5'-GGGCGGAGGGGGAT(G)T(G)AGGGGGCTGC (sense
primer) and
5'-GCAGCCCCCTA(C)A(C)TCCCCCTCCGCCC-3'
(antisense primer). The plasmid pTIMP2-Sp1mt was used as a
template for constructing pTIMP2-Sp1/NF-Ymt. The mutagenic primers used
for this construct are the same as those for pTIMP2-NF-Ymt. The PCR
reaction consisted of 16 cycles, and each cycle included a denaturation
step at 95 °C for 1 min, a primer annealing step at 55 °C for 1 min, and an extension step at 68 °C for 18 min. The methylated,
nonmutated parental DNA templates were digested with DpnI at
37 °C for 2 h. The presence of these mutations was verified by
sequence analysis.
Analysis of the TIMP-2 Promoter Activity--
Cells were
transiently transfected by lipofection using the DOTAP
(N-[1-(2,3-dioleoyloxy)propyl]-N,N,N-trimethylammonium
salts) liposomal transfection kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
To normalize the data for transfection efficiency, the pRL-SV40
(Promega), which contains the Renilla luciferase reporter
cDNA under the transcriptional control of the SV40 promoter, was
co-transfected with each test plasmid. Cells were transfected at 80%
confluency 24 h after being plated into 6-well tissue culture
clusters. Four µg of test plasmid was mixed with 10 ng of pRL-SV40
and 20 µl of DOTAP liposomal transfection reagent, and the mixture
was added to the cells in the presence of 4 ml of culture medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. When indicated, cultures
were treated with dibutyryl cyclic AMP (Bt2cAMP, Sigma)
15 h after transfection. The cells were further maintained for
48 h before being washed and lysed in the presence of 100 µl of
lysis buffer (Dual-LuciferaseTM reporter assay system,
Promega). The activity of firefly luciferase (test plasmid) and
Renilla luciferase (control plasmid) was measured in 20-µl
aliquots of cell lysate using the Dual-LuciferaseTM
reporter assay system and a Lumat LB950 luminometer (Berthold, Germany). Transfection experiments were done in triplicate dishes and
repeated at least three times. When indicated, stably transfected clones were obtained by co-transfecting cells with 8 µg of Psf/Neo plasmid (a gift of Dr. W. E. Laug, Children's Hospital Los
Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) and selecting cells against G-418 (600 µg/ml).
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay--
Nuclear extracts
from MDAMB cells were prepared according to the method of Dignam
et al. (18). The sense sequences of the DNA probes generated
from hTIMP-2 are the following. The wild type probe containing NF-Y
binding site is GCGCCCAGAGCCTGCATTGGCCGCCAGCCA, and its mutant probe is
GCGCCCAGAGCCTGCT(A)TTA(G)GCCGCCAGCCA; the wild
type probe containing the Sp1 binding site is
GGGGGAGGAGGGGGCTGCTGGGAGC, and its mutant probe is
GGGGGAT(G)T(G)AGGGGGCTGCTGGGAGC. Synthetic double-stranded DNA probes were labeled with [ Northern Blot--
Total RNA was isolated from MDAMB cells using
the method of Chomczynski and Sacchi (19). The cells were lysed in
Trizol® (Life Technologies, Inc.) and centrifuged at 2,000 rpm to remove nuclei. The RNA in the supernatant was precipitated in
isopropanol, washed in 75% ethanol, and resuspended in diethyl
pyrocarbonate-treated water. Twenty µg of RNA for each lane was
electrophoresed on a 1% formaldehyde agarose gel and blotted onto
Zeta-probe membranes (Bio-Rad). Blots were sequentially hybridized with
32P-labeled cDNA probes for 16 h at 65 °C in
0.5 M
NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4 (pH
7.2), 7% SDS, 1% bovine serum albumin, 1 mM EDTA, and
15.4% formamide. Human TIMP-2 cDNA was available in our
laboratory, and the human rRNA 28 S cDNA (control) was purchased
from Ambion Inc. (Austin, TX). After hybridization, the blots were
washed 2 times in 40 mM
NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4 (pH
7.2), 1 mM EDTA, and 1% SDS at 65 °C before to
autoradiography at Western Blot--
Western blot analysis was performed according
to the method of Burnette (20) using a rabbit polyclonal antibody
against human TIMP-2. Immune complexes were detected by enhanced
chemiluminescence with luminol (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using a
goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase as
a secondary antibody.
TIMP and MMP Analysis in Culture Medium--
Analysis of MMP
expression in serum-free culture medium of cell lines was performed
using SDS-polyacrylamide gel zymography as described previously (21).
When needed, samples were concentrated by ultrafiltration using
Microcon filters (Amicon, Beverly, MA; molecular weight cutoff,
10,000). In these gels, a clear zone indicated the presence of a
protein with gelatinolytic activity. Similar gels were used to detect
the presence of TIMP with the exception that
p-aminophenylmercuric acetate (Sigma)-activated crude
gelatinase from cultured rabbit fibroblasts was incorporated into the
gelatin-polyacrylamide mixture before polymerization. In these
conditions, the presence of a stained zone of undigested gelatin
indicated the presence of an inhibitor of gelatinases.
Invasion and Migration Assays--
For invasion assays we used
transwells (Corning Inc., Corning, NY) in which the 8-µm pore
filter of the upper chamber had been precoated with 100 ng of
Matrigel® (Becton Dickinson Labware, Bedford, MA). After
drying overnight at room temperature, 100 µl of serum free medium was
added to keep the filter wet for 2 h at room temperature. The
upper chamber, to which 50,000 cells suspended in 200 µl of serum
free medium were added, was then inserted into a well containing 500 µl of medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. After 36 h at 37 °C in the presence or absence of Bt2cAMP, the
cells in the upper chamber were fixed and stained with
Diff-Quik® Stain Set (Dade International Inc., Miami, FL).
The cells on the upper side of the filter were gently eliminated with a
Q-tip before the filters were removed and mounted on glass slides. The cells attached to the lower side of the filter were counted under a
microscope using a 20× objective. For migration assays we used similar
experimental conditions, but the upper side of the filters in the
transwells was not coated with Matrigel®.
An Inverted CCAAT Box in the Human TIMP-2 Promoter Is Responsible
for Basal Activity--
We had previously shown that the basal TIMP-2
promoter was located within 276 nucleotides upstream of the
transcription initiation site (17). To further locate element(s)
responsible for basal expression in this promoter, we created a series
of deletion mutants by PCR cloning of the pTIMP2-276 plasmid. These
constructs were transiently transfected into MDAMB cells and tested for
luciferase activity. The data (Fig. 1)
indicated an almost complete loss of basal activity when a segment of
the promoter located between positions The Transcription Factor NF-Y Binds to the Inverted CCAAT Box
in the TIMP-2 Promoter--
We used electrophoretic mobility shift
assays (EMSA) to identify in MDAMB cells nuclear protein(s) binding to
the inverted CCAAT motif (Fig. 3). In a
first set of experiments, nuclear extracts from MDAMB cells were
incubated in the presence of a 30-mer radiolabeled double-stranded
oligonucleotide probe corresponding to the TIMP-2 promoter region
extending from position Transcriptional Up-regulation of TIMP-2 by cAMP--
The CCAAT
motif is a bidirectional cis-acting element present in many eukaryotic
promoters (22, 25, 26). This motif has been recently reported to
mediate the response of several genes that are up-regulated by an
increase in cAMP (27-29). CAMP-mediated regulation of these genes
however differs from the rapid (within minutes) cAMP response seen in
genes that contain the typical cAMP-responsive elements (CREs) by a
delayed (within hours) response to changes in cAMP (30). In view of a
previous report indicating that cAMP up-regulates TIMP-2 expression in
HT1080 cells (16), we explored the possibility that the inverted CCAAT
motif in the TIMP-2 promoter is involved in cAMP response. We first
examined the effect of an increase in cAMP concentration on TIMP-2
expression in MDAMB cells by testing the effect of Bt2cAMP
treatment on TIMP-2 mRNA and protein expression. The data (Fig.
4A) indicated a
dose-dependent increase in TIMP-2 mRNA and TIMP-2
protein expression upon treatment of these cells with 2 and 10 mM Bt2cAMP. To determine whether the increase
in TIMP-2 mRNA represents a net increase in transcriptional activity or a change in RNA stability, we performed similar experiments in the presence of the transcriptional inhibitor
5,6-dichlorobenzimidazole riboside (DBR), which was added to the
culture medium 40 h after exposure to Bt2cAMP. The
data (Fig. 4B) revealed a similar decay of the 3.8- and
1.7-kb TIMP-2 mRNAs in the presence or absence of
Bt2cAMP. These observations indicate that cAMP up-regulates TIMP-2 expression at a transcriptional level by affecting de
novo RNA synthesis rather than RNA stability. We next conducted a
time course analysis of TIMP-2 mRNA expression on
Bt2cAMP-treated MDAMB cells to evaluate the timing of the
response of TIMP-2 to an increase in cAMP. The data (Fig.
5A) indicated a progressive
increase in mRNA expression starting 5 h after treatment and
lasting beyond 48 h. There was therefore a 5-h delay between
Bt2cAMP treatment and transcriptional up-regulation of
TIMP-2, suggesting the presence of an intermediate regulatory
mechanism. We therefore examined whether transcriptional up-regulation
of TIMP-2 required de novo protein synthesis by testing the
effect of cycloheximide on endogenous TIMP-2 mRNA expression in
Bt2cAMP-treated MDAMB cells. The data (Fig. 5B)
revealed that cycloheximide at a concentration of 2.5 µM
inhibited the up-regulation of TIMP-2 mRNA induced by
Bt2cAMP by 94% and 100% (3.8-kb and 1.7-kb mRNA,
respectively). These observations and the absence of a typical CRE
motif in the TIMP-2 promoter (17) are consistent with the concept that
the up-regulation of TIMP-2 by cAMP involves a CRE-independent
mechanism recently described for several cAMP-responsive genes such as
the fatty acid synthase gene or the cystic fibrosis transmembrane
conductance regulator gene (28, 29). Typically, these genes have
delayed response to cAMP mediated by NF-Y binding to the inverted
CCAAT box.
NF-Y and Sp1 Cooperate in cAMP-dependent Up-regulation
of the TIMP-2 Promoter--
We therefore determined whether the
276-nucleotide-long TIMP-2 promoter, which contains the inverted CCAAT
motif, could mediate a cAMP response. MDAMB cells were transfected with
the plasmid pTIMP2-276, and stably transfected cells were selected in
the presence of G-418. These cells were tested for the effect of
Bt2cAMP on luciferase expression. These experiments (Fig.
6) indicated that Bt2cAMP
stimulated the expression of luciferase in a dose-dependent manner at concentrations ranging between 0.05 mM and 10 mM with a 2-fold increase in luciferase expression achieved
in the presence of 0.5 mM Bt2cAMP
(inset) and a 4-fold increase in the presence of 10 mM Bt2cAMP. To further localize the
cAMP-responsive element in this segment of the promoter, we tested the
effect of Bt2cAMP on MDAMB cells transiently transfected
with TIMP-2 promoter deletion mutants. These experiments indicated a
partial loss of cAMP response between the pTIMP2-112 and the
pTIMP2-100 construct and a complete loss of cAMP response between the
pTIMP2-73 and the pTIMP2-63 construct (Fig.
7A), suggesting the
possibility of a cooperative effect between two transcription factors.
Whereas the sequence located between position Bt2cAMP Treatment of MDAMB Cells Inhibits
Invasion in Vitro--
To determine whether the up-regulation of
TIMP-2 expression by cAMP in MDAMB cells was affecting the balance
between MMPs and TIMPs and the invasive potential of these cells, we
examined the effect of Bt2cAMP treatment on the expression
of MMP-2 and MMP-9 and TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 and on the ability of these
cells to invade a Matrigel®-coated filter. The data
indicated that the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in these cells was
unaffected by Bt2cAMP, whereas both TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 were
up-regulated (Fig. 9A). This
change in the MMPs/TIMPs ratio in favor of the TIMPs was associated
with a marked inhibition of cell invasion through
Matrigel®. In the presence of 2 mM and 10 mM of Bt2cAMP, a 43% and 50% inhibition of
invasion was observed, respectively. Consistent with a specific effect
on the MMP/TIMP balance and ECM degradation, Bt2cAMP had no
effect on cell migration when the filters were not coated with
Matrigel® (Fig. 9B).
In this manuscript we describe a novel transcriptional regulatory
mechanism that controls TIMP-2 expression. We demonstrate that TIMP-2
belongs to a family of genes that have a delayed response to cAMP
treatment and that this response involves the cooperative action of two
transcription factors, NF-Y and Sp1.
cAMP-regulated genes have been classified in two categories: immediate
responsive genes whose expression is increased by cAMP within minutes
and unconventional responsive genes whose expression is delayed within
hours after an increase in intracellular cAMP and requires a
stimulation of cAMP analogs at a millimolar concentration range. The
former category includes a large variety of genes controlled by
hormones and growth factors (30, 32). The rapid up-regulation of these
genes involves activation of protein kinase A followed by the release
and subsequent nuclear localization of its catalytic subunit. This
catalytic subunit phosphorylates a family of activators that bind to
CRE motifs including the transcription factors CRE-binding protein,
CREM, and ATF-1 (33). In the case of unconventional responsive genes,
the signaling pathways are not as well understood, but the observation
that the increase in gene transcription begins only after a delay of
several hours indicates that the response does require de
novo protein synthesis (34). Our data clearly indicate that TIMP-2
belongs to the second category of cAMP-responsive genes because
up-regulation of mRNA expression was observed more than 5 h
after treatment with Bt2cAMP, and the response was
abolished in the presence of cycloheximide. The absence of any CRE
consensus or variants thereof in the segment of the promoter that
responds to cAMP is also consistent with this conclusion (17). As an alternative for an indirect effect of cAMP on de novo RNA
transcription was the possibility that cAMP may affect TIMP-2 mRNA
stability. Our experiment performed in the presence of a
transcriptional inhibitor, DBR, eliminated this possibility because we
observed an absence of effect of Bt2cAMP on decay of TIMP-2
mRNAs. The observation that the 3.8- and 1.7-kb TIMP-2 mRNA
species responded similarly to cycloheximide and DBR is consistent with
our published data indicating that they differ by the positions of the
polyadenylation signals and share the same transcription initiation
site (17).
We demonstrate that the inverted CCAAT motif located at position
The mechanism by which cAMP increases the transcriptional
activity through NF-Y has remained unknown. It is conceivable that cAMP
might transcriptionally up-regulate NF-Y or increase its binding
affinity to DNA. By Western blot analysis and EMSA we have not observed
a change in protein expression or DNA binding affinity upon cAMP
treatment (data now shown). It is also possible that cAMP increases the
expression or the binding affinity of other proteins interacting with
NF-Y. Several co-activator proteins such as p300, GCN5, P/CAF, and the
high mobility group protein HMG-I(Y) have been reported to bind to
different NF-Y subunits (39-41), and it is plausible that cAMP may
activate the TIMP-2 promoter by enhancing the recruitment of p300 by
NF-Y. The acetyltransferase activity of p300 could modify NF-Y and
TFIIE and enable NF-Y to make more active contacts with other
transcription factors. Acetylation of TFIIE and TFIIF might also
facilitate their function within chromatin (42, 43). As an alternative,
post-transcriptional modification of NF-YA such as phosphorylation
could be influenced by cAMP and affect DNA binding and transcriptional
activity. These possibilities are currently investigated in our laboratory.
Our study also shows that Sp1 binding to a GAGGAGGGGG ( Finally, it is noteworthy to point out that in contrast to most
regulatory agents that regulate simultaneously MMP and TIMP expression,
cAMP up-regulates the expression of TIMP-2 and TIMP-1 without affecting
the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9. Thus, cAMP alters the balance
between MMPs and TIMPs in favor of the TIMPs and inhibits ECM
degradation and cell invasion.
In summary, we demonstrate that two ubiquitously expressed
transcription factors, NF-Y and Sp1, cooperate in the transcription of
the human TIMP-2 gene and its up-regulation by cAMP in a manner that
alters the MMP-TIMP balance in favor of the inhibitor. These observations suggest that alteration of ECM homeostasis must be considered in the pharmacological manipulation of cAMP.
73 to
69 in the TIMP-2 promoter that binds the transcription factor NF-Y.
The second is a GAGGAGGGGG motif located at position
107 to
98,
that binds the transcription factors Sp1 and Sp3. NF-Y and Sp1
cooperate for the basal transcription activity of the promoter. We then
determined that TIMP-2 is transcriptionally up-regulated by cAMP
analogs. Up-regulation of TIMP-2 by dibutyryl cAMP is a delayed
response that requires de novo protein synthesis and does
not affect RNA stability. The NF-Y and the Sp1 binding site are both
involved in cAMP-dependent up-regulation of TIMP-2. Whereas
NF-Y is essential for cAMP mediated regulation, Sp1 alone is not
sufficient but enhances the activity of NF-Y. Dibutyryl cAMP has no
effect on the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 and switches the MMP-TIMP
balance in favor of the inhibitor.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
have a coordinated
effect that decreases ECM degradation by up-regulating TIMP and
down-regulating MMP expression (9, 10), other factors such as
interleukin-1, interleukin-6, or oncostatin M have a much less
predictable effect on the ECM because they simultaneously up- or
down-regulate MMP and TIMP expression (11-14).
inhibitory
element involved in the down-regulation of MMP-3 by transforming growth
factor-
1 has been identified (9). Signaling pathways involved in MMP
and TIMP regulation have only recently begun to be explored. The
mitogen-activated protein kinase and JACK/STAT (signal transducers and
activators of transcription) pathways have been implicated in the
regulation of MMP-1 expression by oncostatin M (13). TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 are up-regulated by 8-bromo-cAMP in HT1080 cells, but the signaling pathway involved has not been entirely defined (16).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
32P]ATP
using the T4 polynucleotide kinase. Six µg of the nuclear extracts
were mixed with these radiolabeled DNA probes (20,000 cpm) in the
presence of 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.8), containing 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 9% glycerol,
0.5 µg/ml leupeptin, 0.7 µg/ml pepstatin, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM spermidine, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 15 min before being loaded and electrophoresed in a 4% polyacrylamide gel under constant voltage (150 volts) in 0.4×
TBE buffer (36 mM Tris borate (pH 8.0) and 0.8 mM EDTA). When indicated, non-radiolabeled (cold)
double-stranded nucleotides or monoclonal antibodies against NF-YA
(Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) and against Sp1, Sp2, Sp3, and Sp4 (Santa
Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) were pre-incubated with the nuclear
extracts for 15 min at room temperature before the addition of the
radiolabeled probes. After electrophoresis, the gels were dried and
autoradiographed at
80 °C.
80 °C.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
63 and
73 was deleted,
whereas deletions of DNA segments located up-stream of position
73
had no significant effect on basal activity. This 10-nucleotide-long
DNA fragment (ATTGGCCGCC) appears essential for transcription activity
and is located 39 nucleotide upstream of the TATA box. It contains an
inverted CCAAT motif (ATTGG) between position
73 and
69. Evidence
that the ATTGG motif is responsible for basal promoter activity was
then obtained by directed site mutagenesis. These experiments (Fig. 2) indicated a progressive loss of
activity as the number of mutations in the motif increased from one
(GTTGG) to two (TTTAG) and five (CCCCC) nucleotides. Thus the data demonstrate that the
inverted CCAAT box is an essential motif in maintaining the basal
expression of the TIMP-2 promoter.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Deletion mutation analysis of the human
TIMP-2 promoter. A series of deletion mutations (left
panel) in the human TIMP-2 promoter was performed by PCR as
indicated under "Experimental Procedures." The position of the
ATTGG motif (inverted CCAAT box) in the promoter is
underlined, and the number for each construct
corresponds to the number of nucleotides upstream of the transcription
initiation site (+1). Each construct (4 µg) was transiently
co-transfected into MDAMB cells with a pRL-SV40 plasmid (10 ng)
containing a Renilla luciferase (LUC) reporter
gene. After 63 h, the activities of cellular firefly and
Renilla luciferases were individually measured, and the
ratio of firefly over Renilla luciferase activities
(FFL/RL) was calculated. The data (right panel)
represent the mean (+S.D.) of two separate experiments performed each
in triplicate.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Direct site mutagenesis of the inverted CCAAT
box. Point mutations on the ATTGG (inverted CCAAT) motif were
performed by PCR cloning as indicated under "Experimental
Procedures" (left panel). The activity of these mutants
driving a firefly luciferase (LUC) reporter gene was
determined in transient transfection assays in MDAMB cells
co-transfected with the pRL-SV40 plasmid. The data (right
panel) represent the mean (+S.D.) firefly
luciferase/Renilla luciferase (FFL/RL) ratio of
three separate samples. The data shown are representative of three
similar experiments.
89 to
59 and containing the ATTGG motif.
These experiments demonstrated the presence of 2 shifted radioactive
bands (Fig. 3, left panel). The specificity of the upper
band was demonstrated in the presence of increased amounts of a
non-radiolabeled (cold) double-stranded oligonucleotide. To determine
that the binding involved the inverted CCAAT box, we used a two-point
mutation in the ATTGG motif (TTTAG) and
demonstrated an absence of competition in the presence of this
non-radiolabeled mutated oligonucleotide. NF-Y proteins have been
identified as the major proteins binding to the inverted CCAAT motif
(22, 23). The NF-Y complex is composed of three subunits (A, B, and C)
of transcription factors. The subunit A is the subunit interacting with
DNA, and subunits B and C form a binary complex that interacts with
subunit A to promote DNA binding (23, 24). To determine whether NF-Y
binds to the inverted CCAAT motif of the TIMP-2 promoter, we performed
a second set of EMSA in the presence of an anti-NF-YA monoclonal
antibody (Chemicon, Temecula, CA). The data (Fig. 3, right
panel) showed the presence of a super-shift in the presence of the
antibody at the level of the upper band, which was not observed in the
presence of nonspecific murine IgG. The data indicate that the NF-Y
complex binds to the inverted CCAAT box in the TIMP-2 promoter and
controls basal expression.

View larger version (75K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Analysis of CCAAT-binding protein by
electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Electrophoretic mobility
shift assays were performed as indicated under "Experimental
Procedures" in the presence of nuclear extracts from MDAMB cells (6 µg) incubated with a 32P-labeled double-stranded
synthetic oligonucleotide corresponding to the
59 to
89 sequence of
the TIMP-2 promoter which contains the ATTGG motif. Left
panel, increased amounts (25, 50, and 250 molar excess) of
unlabeled double-stranded oligonucleotide (Wild cold oligo)
or mutated (TTTAG) (Mutant cold
oligo) were added as competitors, as indicated on the top. The
specific shift is indicated by the arrow on the left.
Right panel, an anti-NF-YA monoclonal antibody (1 µg and 2 µg) was added to the reaction mixture before the addition of the
radiolabeled oligonucleotide. The addition of the anti-NF-YA antibody
and not of nonspecific murine IgG created a super-shift of the NF-Y/DNA
complex as indicated by the arrow on the right.

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Effect of Bt2cAMP treatment on
TIMP-2 expression in MDAMB cells. A, cells were treated
with Bt2cAMP at 37 °C for 48 h in serum-free medium
at indicated concentrations. Upper panel: Western blot
analysis of TIMP-2 secreted in the medium. Middle and
lower panels, Northern blot analysis of TIMP-2 mRNA and
28 S rRNA. B, MDAMB cells were treated with or without
Bt2cAMP (dbcAMP, 10 mM) for 40 h, DBR (72 µM) was then added to the culture medium, and
total RNA was collected at the indicated time after DBR treatment.
Top, Northern blot analysis with TIMP-2 and 28 S rRNA
cDNA probes. Bottom, the signal intensity in the
autoradiography (top panel) was determined by scanning
densitometry using the SigmaGelTM analysis software, and the amount of
TIMP-2 mRNA for each time point was normalized for the amount of 28 S rRNA present. The data represent the ratio TIMP-2 mRNA/28 S rRNA
for the 3.8-kb and 1.7-kb TIMP-2 mRNA over time. The ratio at time
0 h was arbitrary determined as 100%. No decay curve for the
1.2-kb mRNA could be obtained because of the low amount of mRNA
detected on the Northern blot in the presence of
Bt2cAMP.

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Time course analysis of TIMP-2 mRNA
expression in Bt2cAMP-treated MDAMB cells and
effect of cycloheximide. A, MDAMB cells were incubated
with 10 mM Bt2cAMP (dbcAMP) at
37 °C for various lengths of time. At indicated times, the cells
were collected, and the total RNA was isolated. Top, TIMP-2
mRNA and 28 S rRNA expression was analyzed by Northern blot.
Bottom, the signal intensity in the autoradiography was
determined by scanning densitometry, and the amount of TIMP-2 mRNA
at each time point was normalized for the amount of 28 S rRNA detected.
The data represent the ratio TIMP-2/28S rRNA over time, for the 3.8- and 1.7-kb mRNAs. The signal of the 1.2-kb mRNA was too weak to
generate meaningful data. B, MDAMB cells were treated with
10 mM Bt2cAMP in the absence or presence of 2.5 µM of cycloheximide (CHX) at 37 °C for
48 h. Top, analysis of TIMP-2 and 28 S rRNA expression
by Northern blot. Bottom, analysis of signal intensity by
scanning densitometry of the Northern blot. The data represent the
ratio TIMP-2 mRNA/28 S rRNA treated over untreated with cAMP for
each experimental condition (with and without cycloheximide).
73 and
63 contains
the NF-Y binding ATTGG motif, the sequence located between position
112 and
100 contains a GAGGAGGGGG motif with high homology to a Sp1
binding site (31). Site-directed mutagenesis studies of these two DNA motifs indicated that mutation of the ATTGG motif completely abolished cAMP response (Fig. 7B), whereas mutation in the GAGGAGGGGG
motif only partially inhibited the response. Consistently, mutations at
both sites also abolished cAMP response. Similar data were obtained
with a human fibrosarcoma cell line (HT1080) and murine NIH3T3 cells,
indicating that this cAMP-dependent regulatory pathway is
common among different cell types and species (data not shown). Using
EMSA, we then demonstrated that the GAGGAGGGGG motif binds two members
of the Sp1 family of transcription factors (Fig.
8). These experiments indicated the
presence of three specific mobility shifts of the promoter fragment
containing the GAGGAGGGGG motif in the presence of MDAMB nuclear
extracts. These specific complexes could be super-shifted with
antibodies against Sp1 and Sp3 but not against Sp2 or Sp4. Thus the
data identified NF-Y and Sp1 as key transcriptional factors involved in
cAMP response.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effect of Bt2cAMP on TIMP-2
promoter activity. MDAMB cells stably transfected with plasmid
pTIMP-276 were incubated with the indicated concentrations of
Bt2cAMP (dbcAMP) at 37 °C for 48 h. The
cellular firefly luciferase activity in cell lysate was then measured
by luminometry, and the values obtained were normalized for the amount
of proteins present in each sample. The data represent the mean (+S.D.)
of triplicate samples. Inset, details of the data for
concentrations of cAMP ranging from 0 to 1.5 mM.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Effect of deletion and site-directed
mutagenesis of the human TIMP-2 promoter on Bt2cAMP
response. Deletion mutations in the human TIMP-2 promoter
(panel A) and the site-directed mutations within the
pTIMP2-2.3K promoter (panel B) were performed as indicated
under "Experimental Procedures." The NF-Y binding motif (ATTGG) and
a sequence with high homology to a Sp1 binding motif (GAGGAGGGGG) are
shown on the left side of panel B. The mutated
oligonucleotides are underlined. Each construct (4 µg) was
transiently co-transfected into MDAMB cells with the pRL-SV40 plasmid
(10 ng). The cells were treated with or without Bt2cAMP
(dbcAMP) 15 h after transfection and lysed 63 h
after transfection for determination of luciferase activity. The values
(right of panels A and B) represent
the mean (+S.D.) firefly luciferase/Renilla luciferase
(FFL/RL) ratios of a minimum of triplicate samples.

View larger version (83K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Analysis of Sp1-binding proteins by
electrophoretic mobility shift assay. EMSA was performed in the
presence of nuclear extracts (6 µg) from MDAMB cells incubated with a
32P-labeled double-stranded synthetic oligonucleotide
corresponding to the
87 to
111 sequence of the TIMP-2 promoter and
containing the GAGGAGGGGG motif. When indicated, an unlabeled (cold)
wild type and mutated (GATTAGGGGG) double-stranded
oligonucleotide (25 molar excess) was added to the reaction mixture as
a competitor. To identify the specific DNA-binding proteins, monoclonal
antibodies (1 µg) against Sp1, Sp2, Sp3, Sp4, or murine IgG (1 µg)
were added to the reaction before the addition of the radiolabeled DNA
probe. The specific DNA-protein complexes are indicated on the left,
and the super-shifted complexes generated in the presence of antibodies
are shown on the right.

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Effect of Bt2cAMP on MMP and TIMP
expression and on MDAMB cells invasion and migration. Panel
A, gelatin zymographic analysis for MMPs (upper panel)
and TIMPs (lower panel). MDAMB cells were treated with the
indicated concentrations of Bt2cAMP for 48 h at
37 °C in serum-free medium. The medium was then collected and
analyzed for gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) and TIMP (TIMP-1 and TIMP-2)
expression by gelatin polyacrylamide zymography as indicated under
"Experimental Procedures." The positions of MMP-9, MMP-2, TIMP-1,
and TIMP-2 are indicated by arrows on the left. Panel
B, MDAMB cells were treated with indicated concentrations of
Bt2cAMP and transferred into the upper chamber of a
transwell. The data represent the mean number of cells (+S.D.) that
migrated to the lower side of the filter from triplicate samples.
Top figure, filters precoated with Matrigel®
(invasion). Bottom figure, filters not coated with
Matrigel® (migration).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
73 to
69 in the TIMP-2 promoter is not only responsible for basal
activity but is also involved in the delayed response to cAMP. Although
this element was initially believed to contribute only to basal
transcription (26, 35, 36), it has been implicated in the cAMP response
of several genes such as the fatty acid synthase gene (28), the
tryptophan hydroxylase gene (27, 34), the cystic fibrosis transmembrane
regulator gene (29), and the hexokinase II gene (26). Our mutation
analysis indicates that in the case of TIMP-2 this element does both,
mediating cAMP-dependent up-regulation and maintaining
basal expression. By EMSA we demonstrate that NF-Y binds to the
inverted CCAAT box of the TIMP-2 promoter. NF-Y is a ubiquitous
transcription factor complex consisting of three subunits (A, B, and C)
that has been implicated in the basal expression of several ECM-related
genes such as fibronectin and interstitial collagen I (25, 26, 37).
Regulation of TIMP-2 expression by this factor may therefore be part of
a broader regulatory process that controls the expression of several
genes affecting the composition and homeostasis of the ECM.
Interestingly, a CCAAT motif is present in the murine TIMP-1 promoter
(38). It is therefore conceivable that this motif is similarly involved
in the cAMP response of TIMP-1, since our data in MDAMB cells indicate
an increase in both TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 expression by
Bt2cAMP.
107/
98)
motif in the TIMP-2 promoter is involved in basal activity and cAMP
up-regulation. That Sp1 can compensate for NF-Y activity is
demonstrated by the fact that whereas mutations of the inverted CCAAT
motif suppress basal promoter activity in the absence of the Sp1
binding motif (Fig. 1), they have no effect in the presence of the Sp1
binding motif (Fig. 7B). That Sp1 cooperates with NF-Y for
cAMP response is shown by the observation that mutation of the Sp1
binding motif alone decreases (but does not suppress) the cAMP response
by 50% (Fig. 7). Cooperation between NF-Y and Sp1 has been
demonstrated in the regulation of several genes including the major
histocombatibility complex class II-associated invariant chain (44),
the p27KIP1 gene (45), the hamster thymidine kinase gene
(46), and the rat fatty acid synthase gene (47). The promoters of these
genes all have in common one or several Sp1 binding sites located in close proximity (20 to 30 nucleotides) with an inverted CCAAT motif.
Cooperation between these two transcription factors is involved in the
insulin response of the fatty acid synthase gene, the vitamin D3
response of the p27KIP1 promoter, and the serum response of
the thymidine kinase promoter. The molecular mechanism responsible for
this cooperative activity has been recently partially elucidated by the
demonstration of the cooperative DNA binding of NF-YA and Sp1 and the
presence of specific protein-protein interaction domains in NF-YA and
Sp1 (47, 48). In the human TIMP-2 promoter, there is a Sp1 binding site
located 34 nucleotides upstream of the NF-Y binding site, and our
mutational analysis indicates that although Sp1 alone does not mediate
cAMP response, it synergizes the activity of NF-Y upon cAMP
stimulation. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of such
cooperation between Sp1 and NF-Y in mediating cAMP response.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We thank J. Rosenberg for typing the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant CA 42919 (to Y. D. C.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Hematology-Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, MS #54, 4650 Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90027. E-mail: declerck@hsc.usc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 11, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001389200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: TIMP, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; ECM, extracellular matrix; Bt2cAMP, dibutyryl cyclic AMP; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assays; CRE, cyclic AMP-responsive element; DBR, 5,6-dichlorobenzimidazole riboside; kb, kilobase(s).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Birkedal-Hansen, H., Moore, W. G., Bodden, M. K., Windsor, L. J., Birkedal Hansen, B., DeCarlo, A., and Engler, J. A. (1993) Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 4, 197-250 |
| 2. | Birkedal-Hansen, H. (1995) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 728-735 |
| 3. | Werb, Z. (1997) Cell 91, 439-442 |
| 4. | Docherty, A. J., Lyons, A., Smith, B. J., Wright, E. M., Stephens, P. E., Harris, T. J., Murphy, G., and Reynolds, J. J. (1985) Nature 318, 66-69 |
| 5. | Boone, T. C., Johnson, M. J., DeClerck, Y. A., and Langley, K. E. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 2800-2804 |
| 6. | Stetler-Stevenson, W. G., Krutzsch, H. C., and Liotta, L. A. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 17374-17378 |
| 7. | Uria, J. A., Ferrando, A. A., Velasco, G., Freije, J. M., and Lopez Otin, C. (1994) Cancer Res. 54, 2091-2094 |
| 8. | Greene, J., Wang, M., Liu, Y. E., Raymond, L. A., Rosen, C., and Shi, Y. E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 30375-30380 |
| 9. | Kerr, L. D., Miller, D. B., and Matrisian, L. M. (1990) Cell 61, 267-278 |
| 10. | Campbell, C. E., Flenniken, A. M., Skup, D., and Williams, B. R. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7199-7206 |
| 11. | Bugno, M., Graeve, L., Gatsios, P., Koj, A., Heinrich, P. C., Travis, J., and Kordula, T. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 5041-5047 |
| 12. | Murphy, G., Reynolds, J. J., and Werb, Z. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 3079-3083 |
| 13. | Korzus, E., Nagase, H., Rydell, R., and Travis, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 1188-1196 |
| 14. | Alexander, J. P., Samples, J. R., and Acott, T. S. (1998) Curr. Eye Res. 17, 276-285 |
| 15. | Benbow, U., and Brinckerhoff, C. E. (1997) Matrix Biol. 15, 519-526 |
| 16. | Tanaka, K., Iwamoto, Y., Ito, Y., Ishibashi, T., Nakabeppu, Y., Sekiguchi, M., and Sugioka, Y. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 2927-2935 |
| 17. | Hammani, K., Blakis, A., Morsette, D., Bowcock, A. M., Schmutte, C., Henriet, P., and DeClerck, Y. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 25498-25505 |
| 18. | Dignam, J. D., Lebovitz, R. M., and Roeder, R. G. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 1475-1489 |
| 19. | Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-159 |
| 20. | Burnette, W. N. (1981) Anal. Biochem. 112, 195-203 |
| 21. | Lim, Y. T., Sugiura, Y., Laug, W. E., Sun, B., Garcia, A., and DeClerck, Y. A. (1996) J. Cell. Physiol. 167, 333-340 |
| 22. | Dorn, A., Bollekens, J., Staub, A., Benoist, C., and Mathis, D. (1987) Cell 50, 863-872 |
| 23. | Mantovani, R. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 1135-1143 |
| 24. | Sinha, S., Maity, S. N., Lu, J., and de Crombrugghe, B. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 1624-1628 |
| 25. | Karsenty, G., and de Crombrugghe, B. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 9934-9942 |
| 26. | Maity, S. N., Golumbek, P. T., Karsenty, G., and de Crombrugghe, B. (1988) Science 241, 582-585 |
| 27. | Reed, G. E., Kirchner, J. E., and Carr, L. G. (1995) Brain Res. 682, 1-12 |
| 28. | Roder, K., Wolf, S. S., Beck, K. F., Sickinger, S., and Schweizer, M. (1997) Gene 184, 21-26 |
| 29. | Pittman, N., Shue, G., LeLeiko, N. S., and Walsh, M. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 28848-28857 |
| 30. | Daniel, P. B., Walker, W. H., and Habener, J. F. (1998) Annu. Rev. Nutr. 18, 353-383 |
| 31. | Jones, K. A., Kadonaga, J. T., Luciw, P. A., and Tjian, R. (1986) Science 232, 755-759 |
| 32. | Sassone Corsi, P. (1995) Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 11, 355-377 |
| 33. | Lalli, E., and Sassone-Corsi, P. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 17359-17362 |
| 34. | Boularand, S., Darmon, M. C., Ravassard, P., and Mallet, J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 3757-3764 |
| 35. | Osawa, H., Robey, R. B., Printz, R. L., and Granner, D. K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17296-17303 |
| 36. | Alonso, C. R., Pesce, C. G., and Kornblihtt, A. R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 22271-22279 |
| 37. | Karsenty, G., Golumbek, P., and de Crombrugghe, B. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 13909-13915 |
| 38. | Clark, I. M., Rowan, A. D., Edwards, D. R., Bech-Hansen, T., Manin, D. A., Bahr, M. J., and Cawston, T. E. (1997) Biochem. J. 324, 611-617 |
| 39. | Faniello, M. C., Bevilacqua, M. A., Condorelli, G., de Crombrugghe, B., Maity, S. N., Avvedimento, V. E., Cimino, F., and Costanzo, F. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 7623-7626 |
| 40. | Currie, R. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 30880-30888 |
| 41. | Currie, R. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1430-1434 |
| 42. | Imhof, A., Yang, X. J., Ogryzko, V. V., Nakatani, Y., Wolffe, A. P., and Ge, H. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 689-692 |
| 43. | Li, Q., Herrler, M., Landsberger, N., Kaludov, N., Ogryzko, V. V., Nakatani, Y., and Wolffe, A. P. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 6300-6315 |
| 44. | Wright, K. L., Moore, T. L., Vilen, B. J., Brown, A. M., and Ting, J. P.-Y. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 20978-20986 |
| 45. | Inoue, T., Kamiyama, J., and Sakai, T. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 32309-32317 |
| 46. | Sorensen, P., and Wintersberger, E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 30943-30949 |
| 47. | Roder, K., Wolf, S. S., Beck, K.-F., and Schweizer, M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 21616-21624 |
| 48. | Roder, K., Wolf, S. S., Larkin, K. J., and Schweizer, M. (1999) Gene 234, 61-69 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Elliot, P. Catanuto, W. Stetler-Stevenson, and S. W. Cousins Retinal Pigment Epithelium Protection from Oxidant-Mediated Loss of MMP-2 Activation Requires Both MMP-14 and TIMP-2. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2006; 47(4): 1696 - 1702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Yu, X. Zhu, W. Pi, J. Ling, L. Ko, Y. Takeda, and D. Tuan The Long Terminal Repeat (LTR) of ERV-9 Human Endogenous Retrovirus Binds to NF-Y in the Assembly of an Active LTR Enhancer Complex NF-Y/MZF1/GATA-2 J. Biol. Chem., October 21, 2005; 280(42): 35184 - 35194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Schermuly, H. Yilmaz, H. A. Ghofrani, K. Woyda, S. Pullamsetti, A. Schulz, T. Gessler, R. Dumitrascu, N. Weissmann, F. Grimminger, et al. Inhaled Iloprost Reverses Vascular Remodeling in Chronic Experimental Pulmonary Hypertension Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2005; 172(3): 358 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Testa, G. Donati, P. Yan, F. Romani, T. H.-M. Huang, M. A. Vigano, and R. Mantovani Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) on Chip Experiments Uncover a Widespread Distribution of NF-Y Binding CCAAT Sites Outside of Core Promoters J. Biol. Chem., April 8, 2005; 280(14): 13606 - 13615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. G. Munshi, Y. I. Wu, S. Mukhopadhyay, A. J. Ottaviano, A. Sassano, J. E. Koblinski, L. C. Platanias, and M. S. Stack Differential Regulation of Membrane Type 1-Matrix Metalloproteinase Activity by ERK 1/2- and p38 MAPK-modulated Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases 2 Expression Controls Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1-induced Pericellular Collagenolysis J. Biol. Chem., September 10, 2004; 279(37): 39042 - 39050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Schermuly, K. P. Kreisselmeier, H. A. Ghofrani, A. Samidurai, S. Pullamsetti, N. Weissmann, C. Schudt, L. Ermert, W. Seeger, and F. Grimminger Antiremodeling Effects of Iloprost and the Dual-Selective Phosphodiesterase 3/4 Inhibitor Tolafentrine in Chronic Experimental Pulmonary Hypertension Circ. Res., April 30, 2004; 94(8): 1101 - 1108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Goodall, C. Wellbrock, T. J. Dexter, K. Roberts, R. Marais, and C. R. Goding The Brn-2 Transcription Factor Links Activated BRAF to Melanoma Proliferation Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2004; 24(7): 2923 - 2931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zhao, K. Venkatasubbarao, S. Li, and J. W. Freeman Requirement of a Specific Sp1 Site for Histone Deacetylase-mediated Repression of Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Type II Receptor Expression in Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells Cancer Res., May 15, 2003; 63(10): 2624 - 2630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ngwenya and S. Safe Cell Context-Dependent Differences in the Induction of E2F-1 Gene Expression by 17{beta}-Estradiol in MCF-7 and ZR-75 Cells Endocrinology, May 1, 2003; 144(5): 1675 - 1685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||