![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 25, 18611-18614, June 23, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, March 16, 2000, and in revised form, April 5, 2000
The Atx1 metallochaperone protein is a
cytoplasmic Cu(I) receptor that functions in intracellular copper
trafficking pathways in plants, microbes, and humans. A key
physiological partner of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Atx1
is Ccc2, a cation transporting P-type ATPase located in secretory
vesicles. Here, we show that Atx1 donates its metal ion cargo to the
first N-terminal Atx1-like domain of Ccc2 in a direct and reversible
manner. The thermodynamic gradient for metal transfer is shallow
(Kexchange = 1.4 ± 0.2), establishing that
vectorial delivery of copper by Atx1 is not based on a higher copper
affinity of the target domain. Instead, Atx1 allows rapid metal
transfer to its partner. This equilibrium is unaffected by a 50-fold
excess of the Cu(I) competitor, glutathione, indicating that Atx1 also
protects Cu(I) from nonspecific reactions. Mechanistically, we propose
that a low activation barrier for transfer between partners results
from complementary electrostatic forces that ultimately orient the
metal-binding loops of Atx1 and Ccc2 for formation of copper-bridged
intermediates. These thermodynamic and kinetic considerations suggest
that copper trafficking proteins overcome the extraordinary copper
chelation capacity of the eukaryotic cytoplasm by catalyzing the rate
of copper transfer between physiological partners. In this sense,
metallochaperones work like enzymes, carefully tailoring energetic
barriers along specific reaction pathways but not others.
Copper is an essential cofactor in hydrolytic, electron transfer,
and oxygen utilization enzymes and is also crucial for high affinity
iron uptake in yeast (1, 2). Copper uptake in eukaryotes is mediated by
the CTR plasma membrane proteins (3-6). Once inside the cell, a
portion of the copper is delivered to P-type ATPases, which pump this
metal ion into vesicles for ultimate incorporation into multicopper
oxidases. In yeast the P-type ATPase is Ccc2 (7-9) and the
multicopper oxidase is Fet3 (10). Until recently, copper was thought to
be delivered to target proteins as glutathione complexes;
however, the Atx1 metallochaperone protein, a cytosolic Cu(I) receptor,
is required downstream of CTR1 and upstream of Ccc2 and related ATPases
(11, 12).
Copper chaperone proteins are soluble, intracellular receptors that
bind and deliver copper to specific partner proteins (12). Initially
identified as antioxidant and biosynthetic pathway proteins, the yeast
metallochaperone Atx1 and the copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase
(CCS)1 have since been shown
to be Cu(I) receptors that interact with specific vesicular and
cytoplasmic targets, respectively (12-15).
Copper-trafficking pathway proteins including homologues of CTR1 (5),
Atx1 (16), Cox17 (17), Ccc2 (18-22), and Fet3 (2, 23) are highly
conserved from yeast to humans. Complementation studies demonstrate
that human Atx1 (HAH1) functions in place of yeast Atx1 (24), and the
Wilson's and Menkes' disease proteins, homologues of Ccc2, function
in place of Ccc2 to deliver copper to Fet3 (25-27).
Recent structural studies provide insights into the intracellular
chemistry of copper transfer (28). Crystallographic studies of Atx1
indicate that the metal-binding motif is housed in a surface-exposed loop, with the cysteines located in the first loop and the first Cytoplasmic free Cu(I) is notably unavailable to the high affinity
copper enzymes such as SOD1 (superoxide dismutase) (14). In fact, the
results are consistent with the presence of a vast excess of specific
and nonspecific copper chelation sites relative to the total number of
copper atoms per cell. Furthermore, copper exchange rates are generally
thought to be slow because of the strength of the Cu(I) ligand bonds
(33). These considerations raise the dilemma of how a copper
trafficking protein can bind its cargo tightly enough to prevent loss
to inappropriate binding sites and yet allow facile release at specific
destinations. To address these issues, the energetics of copper
transfer between Atx1 and Ccc2 were probed using a direct assay of
metal occupancy.
Cloning and Isolation of Ccc2a and Atx1--
The gene encoding
the 72-residue N-terminal Atx1-like domain of Ccc2, Ccc2a, was cloned
into pET11d (Novagen) and resequenced. The resultant plasmid,
pDLHV021, was transformed into Escherichia coli
strain BL21(DE3) and induced with 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio-
The concentration of a Ccc2a stock solution was determined by
hydrolysis (Harvard Microchem) giving Preparation of Protein Samples for Metal Transfer--
Frozen
protein stocks were treated with excess DTT, washed, and exchanged into
the metal insertion buffer immediately prior to loading with copper.
Cu(I)-Atx1 and Cu(I)-Ccc2a were prepared in an N2
atmosphere chamber (Vacuum Atmospheres) at 12 °C by adding 1 equivalent of [Cu(I)-(CH3CN)4]PF6
in CH3CN to a solution of apoprotein in 50 mM
Tris/MES, pH 8, with stirring. Unbound metal was removed by washing
with at least 3 volumes of buffer in an ultrafiltration device.
The metal to protein stoichiometries for Atx1 and Ccc2a are typically
~1, even when the proteins are incubated with excess Cu(I) in the
presence of glutathione (GSH) or DTT. The protein samples used for
metal transfer were: Cu(I)-Atx1, 760 µM, Cu/protein ratio
1.0; Cu(I)-Atx1, 2000 µM, Cu/protein ratio 0.94;
Cu(I)-Ccc2a, 1890 µM, Cu/protein ratio 0.62;
apoAtx1, 770 µM; apoCcc2a, 520 µM; apoCcc2a, 2030 µM. Metal
concentration was determined by ICP-AES. All samples were stored at
4 °C or Metal Transfer Assay--
Metal ion transfer experiments were
performed by combining Cu(I)-Atx1 or Cu-Ccc2a with apoCcc2a
or apoAtx1 in an inert atmosphere maintained at 18 °C at
pH 6 in 20 mM MES/Na or at pH 7.2 in 4 mM
NaPi. After incubation, the mixture was separated using the same buffer (pH 6 or pH 7.2 as indicated) with a linear gradient (0-0.5 M NaCl) on a Bio-Scale Q2 (Biologic) or a RESOURCE
Q (1 ml, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Column fractions were analyzed for protein and metal content by the Bradford assay (34) and ICP-AES,
respectively. Control experiments indicate routine protein recovery
rates of more than 95%.
Determination of Equilibrium Constant--
The equilibrium
expressions for Cu(I) exchange are shown in Equations 1 and 2.
This in vitro assay of Cu(I) transfer from the
metallochaperone Atx1 to its physiological partner, Ccc2, provides a
direct test of copper trafficking function. When CuAtx1 is incubated with apoCcc2a, the metal partitions between the two proteins
(Fig. 1). Control experiments demonstrate
that Atx1 is not retained on the Q2 strong anion column (Fig.
1b), whereas Ccc2a binds strongly.
These experiments also provide a quantitative insight into the
thermodynamics and kinetics of metal transfer. To test the equilibrium
assumption, the reverse reaction of CuCcc2a with apoAtx1 was
conducted. As shown in Table I, CuCcc2a
can transfer metal to apoAtx1. The reverse reaction gives
the same product distribution as the forward reaction, establishing
that the system reaches equilibrium in the time frame of the
experiments. Furthermore, the product distribution was independent of
the incubation time, indicating that copper exchange is complete even
at the shortest possible incubation times (1 min).
ACCELERATED PUBLICATION
Energetics of Copper Trafficking between the Atx1
Metallochaperone and the Intracellular Copper Transporter,
Ccc2*
§ and
¶
Department of Chemistry and the
¶ Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Cell Biology,
Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3113
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-helix (29). This fold is conserved in other eukaryotic
copper-trafficking proteins including Menkes' ATPase domain 4, MNK4
(30), and the CCS metallochaperone domain I (31). The two N-terminal
domains of Ccc2 are predicted to possess this same





-fold, albeit with multiple negatively charged
surface residues like MNK4, its human counterpart. In contrast, Atx1
possesses multiple positively charged lysines on its surface (29).
Mutation of conserved lysines on the surface of Atx1 greatly reduces
the copper-dependent interaction of Atx1 and Ccc2 in
vivo (12, 32).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-D-galactopyranoside in M9 supplemented
with cas-amino acids. The protein was extracted from the cell pellet by
freeze-thaw extraction in 20 mM MES/Na, 1 mM
EDTA, 10 mM DTT. After batch treatment with CM-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), filtrate was loaded onto a DEAE-Sepharose CL-6B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) column, pre-equilibrated with 20 mM MES/Na, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT,
pH 6.0 and eluted with a linear NaCl gradient. Ccc2a-containing
fractions were combined, concentrated, and loaded onto a Superdex 75 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) column and eluted with 20 mM
MES/Na, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM DTT. Approximately 3 mg of pure protein was obtained per liter of culture. Electrospray mass
spectroscopy revealed a mass of 7882.1 daltons, consistent with the
processing of the N-terminal Met in the expression strain. The cloning
procedure introduced an Ala after the N-terminal Met; therefore, the
recombinant protein begins with Ala at position 1 and ends with Ser at
position 72.
= 2750 M
1 cm
1 (at 280 nm) in 20 mM MES/Na, pH 6. The hydrolysis results indicate that the
Bradford method (34) using IgG as a standard underestimates the
concentration of Ccc2 that can be accounted for if multiplication factor of 2.9 is applied to the IgG-based value. Atx1 was purified as
described previously (12), and the concentration was determined as
described for Ccc2a. Total amino acid hydrolysis (Harvard Microchem,
= 4950 M
1 cm
1 in 50 mM Tris/MES, pH 8) data indicate that the Bradford assay (34) using IgG standards leads to an overestimate of the concentration of Atx1. In this case, a multiplication factor of 0.54 was applied to
the IgG standard curve.
20 °C in an N2 atmosphere prior to use.
(Eq. 1)
Using expressions for [Atx1]eq and
[Ccc2a]eq,
(Eq. 2)
(Eq. 3)
(Eq. 4)
(Eq. 5)
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Copper transfer assay between CuAtx1 and
Ccc2a. Protein (
,
) and metal ion (
,- - -) concentrations
of fractions from strong anion exchange chromatography. Controls
demonstrate that Ccc2a strongly binds and elutes from the column in
fractions 24-26 (20 mM MES/Na, pH 6, ~0.35 M
NaCl) (a), whereas CuAtx1 does not bind to the column and
elutes in fractions 5-7 (20 mM MES/Na, pH 6)
(b). c, metal ion transfer assay between CuAtx1
and Ccc2a demonstrates that Cu(I) is transferred to Ccc2a.
The copper exchange constant (Kexchange) was
obtained from a linear least squares fit of the data in Table I to the
modified form of the equilibrium expression shown in Equation 5. Total moles of loaded and recovered copper were routinely found in the 90%+
range, and runs with less than 86% recovery were not used. The
linear least squares fit of the data (corresponding to experiments 1-14) over a range of protein concentrations supports the equilibrium assumption implicit in Equation 5
(Fig. 2), revealing a slope (Kexchange) = 1.4 and standard deviation
sm = 0.1 (correlation coefficient, r,
of 0.95). Data for both the forward and reverse reactions fit equally
well, further indicating that the system is at equilibrium. The
averages of the Kexchange values at pH 6.0, 1.5(
= 0.2), and at pH 7.2, 1.2(
= 0.3), are the same
within experimental error indicating no effect of pH in this range
(Fig. 2).
|
To determine whether copper competitors can interfere with the transfer
or remove the copper ion from these proteins, we conducted the metal
transfer experiment in the presence of a physiologically relevant Cu(I)
binding agent, GSH. GSH avidly binds Cu(I) to form Cu(GSH)2
with a stability constant of
2 = 1038.8
(35). The addition of physiological levels of GSH (1-5 mM) does not effect the final equilibrium position (Table I, experiments 15-17). The copper transfer reaction is unaffected by the presence of
even a 50-fold molar excess of GSH over the Cu(I) concentration (experiment 17, Table I), indicating that low molecular weight thiols
do not participate in this equilibrium. We also tested whether Cu-Atx1
could transfer copper to another copper-binding protein by incubating
190 µM CuAtx1 anaerobically with 167 µM bovine serum albumin at pH 6 for 5 min. No copper is transferred from
Cu-Atx1 to bovine serum albumin in four separate determinations. Thus,
the strong Cu(I) thiolate bonds in Atx1 not only protect Cu(I) from
disproportionation and air oxidation (12) but may also prevent loss of
the metal ion to adventitious binding sites within the cell.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
When the copper-bound form of the chaperone is directly incubated with apoCcc2a, Cu(I) equilibrates between the two proteins, and it does so rapidly. A stepwise mechanism for direct and rapid metal transfer is proposed. In the first step, CuAtx1 docks apoCcc2a. A specific orientation between CuAtx1 and apoCcc2a could poise the Cu(I) center for nucleophilic attack by thiol from the adjacent protein, forming a Cu(S-Cys)3 intermediate. In the next step, the copper rapidly partitions between the two metal-binding sites within the protein-protein complex via the formation and decay of two- and three-coordinate copper thiolate intermediates. In the final step, the complex dissociates to provide apoAtx1 and Cu-Ccc2a.
Thermodynamic versus Kinetic Control of Copper
Trafficking--
The metal exchange results shown herein demonstrate
that the thermodynamic gradient for copper transfer between this copper chaperone and its target domains is ~0.2 kcal/mol and is thus quite
shallow (Kexchange = 1.4 ± 0.2). Thus, the
thermodynamics of vectorial copper delivery from the copper chaperone
to targets involves small differences in the Cu(I) binding constants of
each protein or domain. If the subsequent Cu(I) transfer step to
another site in Ccc2, such as the CXC motif (36), is rapid,
then each of the copper transfer steps in Fig. 3
would be coupled with the driving force
ultimately being provided by ATP hydrolysis.
|
Because the initial Cu(I) transfer between Atx1 and Ccc2 proceeds rapidly to equilibrium, this step in the cellular trafficking pathway is best considered to be under thermodynamic control. However, the recently established boundary conditions, which indicate an extraordinarily limited cytosolic free copper concentration, need to be considered as the copper chaperone hypothesis is extended. Rae et al. (14) have shown that intracellular free copper concentration is negligible and further suggested that the cytoplasm has a significant overcapacity for copper chelation. This leads to the dilemma of how the copper chaperone can retain Cu(I) in the face of a significant thermodynamic sink if the reaction is under thermodynamic control. Our current data suggest a solution. Copper transfer from chaperone to target is not driven by thermodynamics of the copper-binding sites in these proteins. Rather, Atx1 appears to function as an enzyme; it lowers the kinetic barrier for copper transfer along specific reaction coordinates. In this model, Atx1 catalyzes equilibration of copper between yet to be identified copper donor sites and specific targets such as Ccc2. ATP hydrolysis then drives the compartmentalization of the cytosolic copper available to Atx1. Finally, Atx1 may prevent adventitious copper release by deterring ligand exchange reactions with non-partner proteins, although additional transfer reactions with the latter are required to test this proposal.
Partner Specificity of the Atx1/Ccc2 Reaction-- Given the rapid transfer, we anticipate that a low activation barrier results when the metal-loaded chaperone adopts a preferred orientation with respect to the metal-binding site in the acceptor. In this model, specific intermolecular forces guide the docking interactions and position the metal binding loop in the Cu-donor protein proximal to the unoccupied metal loop in the partner domain. Based on our modeling of both of the ~72-residue N-terminal metal-binding domains of Ccc2 utilizing the coordinates of the NMR structure of Menkes' domain 4 (30), we propose that electrostatic complementation between surfaces on the donor (29, 32) and acceptor proteins will play an important role in achieving the orientation favored for facile metal transfer. The electrostatic properties of the second N-terminal copper-binding domain suggest that it may also serve as a docking site for Atx1. This possibility could increase the likelihood of an encounter between the metallochaperone and its target in vivo and may increase the overall efficiency of copper transport. Once Cu(I) is transferred to either domain of Ccc2, ATP hydrolysis then provides conformational changes that displace the Cu(I) into a vesicle, which is thermodynamically distinct from the cytosol.
As shown by Camakaris and colleagues (37), Cu(I) ions are actively transported through the membrane in an ATP-dependent manner by the Menkes' disease protein, the human homologue of Ccc2. The requirement for active transport is consistent with a vesicular compartment in which the availability of copper (i.e. [Cu(I)]free) is significantly higher than in the cytosol (Fig. 3). This leads to a further extension of the metallochaperone hypothesis; active transport is required to maintain the gradient of high copper inside the vesicle and low copper in the cytosol. If this is the case, then another copper chaperone may not be required to insert copper into Fet3 within the vesicle; the apo-enzyme could acquire copper by diffusion and collision. A recent report showing that the GEF1 chloride/proton antiporter co-localizes with Fet3 and is required for Fet3 activity (38) raises the interesting possibility that elevated chloride concentrations within these vesicles lead to formation of copper(I) chloride complexes, which can stabilize Cu(I) against disproportionation. This observation is consistent with a compartment that contains elevated levels of free Cu(I) relative to the cytosol.
The facile and reversible nature of the Cu trafficking pathway raises
the possibility that the Ccc2-containing secretory vesicles can also
serve as a source of copper for cytosolic enzymes. The reverse
reaction, copper egress from the vesicle into the cytosol and into
Atx1, is allowed by the chemistry, but it remains to be seen whether it
is part of the physiology of copper trafficking.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank R. Pufahl, V. Culotta, J. Widom, A. Rosenzweig, and members of the O'Halloran laboratory for helpful discussions.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported National Institutes of Health Grant GM54111 (to T. V. O.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ Supported by Molecular Toxicology Training Program Postdoctoral Fellowship 5T32ES07284 and by a Gramm Travel Fellowship Award from the Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Chemistry, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL
60208. Tel.: 847-491-5060; Fax: 847-491-7713; E-mail:
t-ohalloran@nwu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 7, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000172200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: CCS, copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase; DTT, dithiothreitol; GSH, glutathione; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid..
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Askwith, C., and Kaplan, J. (1998) Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 135-138 |
| 2. | Kaplan, J., and O'Halloran, T. V. (1996) Science 271, 1510-1512 |
| 3. | Dancis, A., Yuan, D. S., Haile, D., Askwith, C., Eide, D., Moehle, C., Kaplan, J., and Klausner, R. D. (1994) Cell 76, 393-402 |
| 4. | Dancis, A., Haile, D., Yuan, D. S., and Klausner, R. D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25660-25667 |
| 5. | Zhou, B., and Gitschier, J. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 7481-7486 |
| 6. | Pena, M. M., Lee, J., and Thiele, D. J. (1999) J. Nutr. 129, 1251-1260 |
| 7. | Fu, D., Beeler, T. J., and Dunn, T. M. (1995) Yeast 11, 283-292 |
| 8. | Yuan, D. S., Stearman, R., Dancis, A., Dunn, T., Beeler, T., and Klausner, R. D. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 2632-2636 |
| 9. | Yuan, D. S., Dancis, A., and Klausner, R. D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25787-25793 |
| 10. | Askwith, C., Eide, D., Van Ho, A., P. S., B., Li, L., Davis-Kaplan, S., Sipe, D. M., and Kaplan, J. (1994) Cell 76, 403-410 |
| 11. | Lin, S.-J., Pufahl, R. A., Dancis, A., O'Halloran, T. V., and Culotta, V. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9215-9220 |
| 12. | Pufahl, R. A., Singer, C. P., Peariso, K. L., Lin, S.-J., Schmidt, P., Fahrni, C., Culotta, V. C., Penner-Hahn, J. E., and O'Halloran, T. V. (1997) Science 278, 853-856 |
| 13. | Culotta, V. C., Klomp, L. W. J., Strain, J., Casareno, R. L. B., Krems, B., and Gitlin, J. D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 23469-23472 |
| 14. | Rae, T. D., Schmidt, P. J., Pufahl, R. A., Culotta, V. C., and O'Halloran, T. V. (1999) Science 284, 805-808 |
| 15. | Schmidt, P. J., Ramos-Gomez, M., and Culotta, V. C. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 36952-36956 |
| 16. | Klomp, L. W. J., Lin, S.-J., Yuan, D. S., Klausner, R. D., Culotta, V. C., and Gitlin, J. D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9221-9226 |
| 17. | Amaravadi, R., Glerum, D. M., and Tzagoloff, A. (1997) Hum. Genet. 99, 329-333 |
| 18. | Vulpe, C., Levinson, B., Whitney, S., Packman, S., and Gitschier, J. (1993) Nat. Genet. 3, 7-13 |
| 19. | Bull, P. C., Thomas, G. R., Rommens, J. M., Forbes, J. R., and Cox, D. W. (1993) Nat. Genet. 5, 327-337 |
| 20. | Tanzi, R. E., Petrukhin, K., Chernov, I., Pellequer, J. L., Wasco, W., Ross, B., Romano, D. M., Parano, E., Pavone, L., Brzustowicz, L. M., Devoto, M., Peppercorn, J., Bush, A. I., Sternlieb, I., Pirastu, M., Gusella, J. F., Evgrafov, O., Penchaszadeh, G. K., Honig, B., Edelman, I. S., Soares, M. B., Scheinberg, I. H., and Gilliam, T. C. (1993) Nat. Genet. 5, 344-350 |
| 21. | Mercer, J. F., Livingston, J., Hall, B., Paynter, J. A., Begy, C., Chandrasekharappa, S., Lockhart, P., Grimes, A., Bhave, M., Siemieniak, D., and Glover, T. W. (1993) Nat. Genet. 3, 20-25 |
| 22. | Chelly, J., Tumer, Z., Tonnesen, T., Petterson, A., Ishikawa-Brush, Y., Tommerup, N., Horn, N., and Monaco, A. P. (1993) Nat. Genet. 3, 14-19 |
| 23. | Vulpe, C. D., Kuo, Y. M., Murphy, T. L., Cowley, L., Askwith, C., Libina, N., Gitschier, J., and Anderson, G. J. (1999) Nat. Genet. 21, 195-199 |
| 24. | Hung, I., Casareno, R. L. B., Labesse, G., Matthews, F. S., and Gitlin, J. D. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1749-1754 |
| 25. | Hung, I., Suzuki, M., Yamaguchi, Y., Yuan, D. S., Klausner, R. D., and Gitlin, J. D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 21461-21466 |
| 26. | Forbes, J. R., Hsi, G., and Cox, D. W. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274 (18), 12408-12413 |
| 27. | Larin, D., Mekios, C., Das, K., Ross, B., Yang, A. S., and Gilliam, T. C. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274 (40), 28497-28504 |
| 28. | Rosenzweig, A. C., and O'Halloran, T. V. (2000) Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 4, 140-147 |
| 29. | Rosenzweig, A. C., Huffman, D. L., Hou, M. Y., Wernimont, A. K., Pufahl, R. A., and O'Halloran, T. V. (1999) Structure 7, 605-617 |
| 30. | Gitschier, J., Moffat, B., Reilly, D., Wood, W. I., and Fairbrother, W. J. (1998) Nat. Struct. Biol. 5, 47-54 |
| 31. | Lamb, A. L., Wernimont, A. K., Pufahl, R. A., Culotta, V. C., O'Halloran, T. V., and Rosenzweig, A. C. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 724-729 |
| 32. | Portnoy, M. E., Rosenzweig, A. C., Rae, T., Huffman, D. L., O'Halloran, T. V., and Culotta, V. C. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 15041-15045 |
| 33. | Frausto da Silva, J. J. R., and Williams, R. J. P. (1991) The Biological Chemistry of the Elements , p. 396, Clarendon, Oxford |
| 34. | Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 |
| 35. | Osterberg, R., Ligaarden, R., and Persson, D. (1979) J. Inorg. Biochem. 10, 341-355 |
| 36. | Solioz, M., and Vulpe, C. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 237-241 |
| 37. | Voskoboinik, I., Strausak, D., Greenough, M., Brooks, H., Petris, M., Smith, S., Mercer, J. F., and Camakaris, J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 22008-22012 |
| 38. | Davis-Kaplan, S. R., Askwith, C. C., Bengtzen, A. C., Radisky, D., and Kaplan, J. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 13641-13645 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Peter, J. Laliberte, J. Beaudoin, and S. Labbe Copper Distributed by Atx1 Is Available to Copper Amine Oxidase 1 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe Eukaryot. Cell, October 1, 2008; 7(10): 1781 - 1794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Hussain, J. S. Olson, and P. Wittung-Stafshede Conserved residues modulate copper release in human copper chaperone Atox1 PNAS, August 12, 2008; 105(32): 11158 - 11163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gonzalez-Guerrero and J. M. Arguello Mechanism of Cu+-transporting ATPases: Soluble Cu+ chaperones directly transfer Cu+ to transmembrane transport sites PNAS, April 22, 2008; 105(16): 5992 - 5997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Ward, E. A. Hoye, and A. M. Talaat The Global Responses of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to Physiological Levels of Copper J. Bacteriol., April 15, 2008; 190(8): 2939 - 2946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Banci, I. Bertini, S. Ciofi-Baffoni, A. Janicka, M. Martinelli, H. Kozlowski, and P. Palumaa A Structural-Dynamical Characterization of Human Cox17 J. Biol. Chem., March 21, 2008; 283(12): 7912 - 7920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ayala-Castro, A. Saini, and F. W. Outten Fe-S Cluster Assembly Pathways in Bacteria Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2008; 72(1): 110 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Sazinsky, B. LeMoine, M. Orofino, R. Davydov, K. Z. Bencze, T. L. Stemmler, B. M. Hoffman, J. M. Arguello, and A. C. Rosenzweig Characterization and Structure of a Zn2+ and [2Fe-2S]-containing Copper Chaperone from Archaeoglobus fulgidus J. Biol. Chem., August 31, 2007; 282(35): 25950 - 25959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Yatsunyk and A. C. Rosenzweig Cu(I) Binding and Transfer by the N Terminus of the Wilson Disease Protein J. Biol. Chem., March 23, 2007; 282(12): 8622 - 8631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Cobine, F. Pierrel, M. L. Bestwick, and D. R. Winge Mitochondrial Matrix Copper Complex Used in Metallation of Cytochrome Oxidase and Superoxide Dismutase J. Biol. Chem., December 1, 2006; 281(48): 36552 - 36559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Eren, D. C. Kennedy, M. J. Maroney, and J. M. Arguello A Novel Regulatory Metal Binding Domain Is Present in the C Terminus of Arabidopsis Zn2+-ATPase HMA2 J. Biol. Chem., November 10, 2006; 281(45): 33881 - 33891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Banci, I. Bertini, F. Cantini, N. DellaMalva, T. Herrmann, A. Rosato, and K. Wuthrich Solution Structure and Intermolecular Interactions of the Third Metal-binding Domain of ATP7A, the Menkes Disease Protein J. Biol. Chem., September 29, 2006; 281(39): 29141 - 29147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Achila, L. Banci, I. Bertini, J. Bunce, S. Ciofi-Baffoni, and D. L. Huffman Structure of human Wilson protein domains 5 and 6 and their interplay with domain 4 and the copper chaperone HAH1 in copper uptake PNAS, April 11, 2006; 103(15): 5729 - 5734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-C. Horng, P. A. Cobine, A. B. Maxfield, H. S. Carr, and D. R. Winge Specific Copper Transfer from the Cox17 Metallochaperone to Both Sco1 and Cox11 in the Assembly of Yeast Cytochrome c Oxidase J. Biol. Chem., August 20, 2004; 279(34): 35334 - 35340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Banci, I. Bertini, F. Cantini, S. Ciofi-Baffoni, L. Gonnelli, and S. Mangani Solution Structure of Cox11, a Novel Type of {beta}-Immunoglobulin-like Fold Involved in CuB Site Formation of Cytochrome c Oxidase J. Biol. Chem., August 13, 2004; 279(33): 34833 - 34839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Banci, I. Bertini, S. Ciofi-Baffoni, X.-C. Su, G. P. M. Borrelly, and N. J. Robinson Solution Structures of a Cyanobacterial Metallochaperone: INSIGHT INTO AN ATYPICAL COPPER-BINDING MOTIF J. Biol. Chem., June 25, 2004; 279(26): 27502 - 27510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yoon and J. A. Cowan Frataxin-mediated Iron Delivery to Ferrochelatase in the Final Step of Heme Biosynthesis J. Biol. Chem., June 18, 2004; 279(25): 25943 - 25946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Cobine, L. D. Ojeda, K. M. Rigby, and D. R. Winge Yeast Contain a Non-proteinaceous Pool of Copper in the Mitochondrial Matrix J. Biol. Chem., April 2, 2004; 279(14): 14447 - 14455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Wernimont, L. A. Yatsunyk, and A. C. Rosenzweig Binding of Copper(I) by the Wilson Disease Protein and Its Copper Chaperone J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 2004; 279(13): 12269 - 12276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Maxfield, D. N. Heaton, and D. R. Winge Cox17 Is Functional When Tethered to the Mitochondrial Inner Membrane J. Biol. Chem., February 13, 2004; 279(7): 5072 - 5080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mana-Capelli, A. K. Mandal, and J. M. Arguello Archaeoglobus fulgidus CopB Is a Thermophilic Cu2+-ATPase: FUNCTIONAL ROLE OF ITS HISTIDINE-RICH N-TERMINAL METAL BINDING DOMAIN J. Biol. Chem., October 17, 2003; 278(42): 40534 - 40541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Park, O. Gakh, H. A. O'Neill, A. Mangravita, H. Nichol, G. C. Ferreira, and G. Isaya Yeast Frataxin Sequentially Chaperones and Stores Iron by Coupling Protein Assembly with Iron Oxidation J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 31340 - 31351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Uldschmid, R. Dombi, and K. Marbach Identification and functional expression of ctaA, a P-type ATPase gene involved in copper trafficking in Trametes versicolor Microbiology, August 1, 2003; 149(8): 2039 - 2048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Strausak, M. K. Howie, S. D. Firth, A. Schlicksupp, R. Pipkorn, G. Multhaup, and J. F. B. Mercer Kinetic Analysis of the Interaction of the Copper Chaperone Atox1 with the Metal Binding Sites of the Menkes Protein J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2003; 278(23): 20821 - 20827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Finney and T. V. O'Halloran Transition Metal Speciation in the Cell: Insights from the Chemistry of Metal Ion Receptors Science, May 9, 2003; 300(5621): 931 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. R. Bury, P. A. Walker, and C. N. Glover Nutritive metal uptake in teleost fish J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2003; 206(1): 11 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Walker, R. Tsivkovskii, and S. Lutsenko Metallochaperone Atox1 Transfers Copper to the NH2-terminal Domain of the Wilson's Disease Protein and Regulates Its Catalytic Activity J. Biol. Chem., July 26, 2002; 277(31): 27953 - 27959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |